20080141 Ver 1_Application_20080117

a~,s >TNFo
.3~ m ~
P r.
w..~+n..es`'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART1ViENT OF 'TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F_ EASLEY
GOVERNOR
January 2, 2008
U_S. Anriy Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
ATTENTION: Mr_ Andrew Williams
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYND~ TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subj ect: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13, 14, and Section 401 Water Quality
Certification for replacement of Bridge No. 95 over Big Beaver Island Creek and Bridge Nv.
67 over Little Beaver Island Creek on US 311 in Rockingham County, Division 7. State
Project No. 8.1512001, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-311(14), TIP No. B-4252; WBS
Element No. 33594.1.1
Please see the enclosed Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), permit drawings, Rapanos forms,
Ecosystem Enhancement (EEP) letter, and roadway design plans for the subject project_
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to replace the 37-foot Bridge No. 67
and the 41-foot Bridge No. 95 with 100-foot long, 54-foot wide, one span steel plate girder bridges in
both locations. The new bridges will be constructed approximately 25 feet north of the existing
alignment and will span both creeks. The intersection of SR 1 138 and US 31 1 will be moved west
approximately 500 feet. One 80-foot long, 66-inch pipe, will be used to replace a 55-foot long, four by
five foot, box culvert under SR 1 138. This will enhance drainage and reduce flooding across SR 1138.
US 31 1 will be widened to three lanes from Bridge No. 95 to the relocated intersection with SR 1138.
An onsite detour will be provided using the existing structures and staged-construction_ A Categorical
Exclusion Document was signed on January 5, 2006 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies
are available upon request.
The Purpose of this project is to:
1 . Improve safety and traffic operations through the intersections of US 31 1, SR 1 169, and. SR 1 1 38.
2. Replace functionally obsolete bridges and inadequate structures_
MAILING AUfl RESS: LOCATION:
NC ~EPARTME NT OF TRANSPORTATION TELEPHONE: [phone] HS4 272$ CAPITAL BLVD.
PROJECT ~EVELOPME NT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: 9'19-7'15-550"1 SUITE 240
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27604
RALEIGH NC 27fi99-1598 WEBSITE= WVI/W.NC~OT_ORG

IMPACT TO WATERS OF THE L7NITED STATES
General Description: The project is located. in the Roanoke River basin (Sub-basin 03-02-02, Hydrologic
Unit 03010103). The jurisdictional resources in the project area are three perennial streams (Big Beaver
Island Creek, Little Beaver Island Creek, and UT to Big Beaver Island Creek)_ The Division of Water
Quality stream index number for Little Beaver Island Creek is 22-29-1 and for Big Seaver Island Creek is
22-29 both streams are classified as Class C_
Big Beaver Island Creek is approximately 24 feet wide and has an average depth of 12-24 inches. The
substrate is composed of gravel and sand_ Little Beaver Island Creek is approximately 24 feet wide and
has an average depth of six to 24 inches_ The substrate is composed of sand, gravel, and cobble_ During
the April 2004 site visit flow in both streams was moderate and water clarity was clear_ UT to Big
Beaver Island Creek is approximately five feet wide and has an average depth of six to 12 inches_ The
substrate is composed of sand and. gravel. During the July 2006 field visit flow was low_
No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), WS-I, or WS-II Waters occur
within 1.O mile of the prof ect study area_ Big Beaver Island Creek, Little Beaver Island Creek, and UT to
Big Beaver Island Creek are not listed on the Final 2006 303(d) list for North Carolina impaired waters
nor are any streams within 1 .0 miles of the prof ect (NCDENR-DWQ, 2006).
Permanent Impacts: UT to Big Beaver lsland Creek will have 222 feet of permanent stream impacts due
to fill. These impacts will be caused by channel realignment and the replacement of a 4 x 5 foot box
culvert with a 66-inch reinforced concrete pipe. This will enhance drainage, reduce erosion, and flooding
across SR 1 138_ In addition, Big Beaver Island Creek and Little Beaver Island Creek will each have 20
feet of impacts (40 feet in total) due to rip rap placement along the stream bank from lateral base ditches
for stabilization. The project will not impact any wetlands.
Temporar5r Impacts: UT to Big Beaver Island Creek will have 14 feet of temporary surface water impacts
due to the placement of a 66-inch reinforced concrete pipe and removal of the 4 x 5 foot box culvert_
There will be no temporary wetland. impacts associated with this prof ect_
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 67 was constructed in 1940 and has a reinforced concrete deck on I-
beams and reinforced abutments. Overall length is 37 feet long and it has a clear deck width of 26 feet.
Bridge No_ 95 was constructed in 1940 and has a reinforced concrete deck on I-beams with cover plates
and reinforced concrete abutments. Overall length is 41 feet and it has a clear deck width of 26 feet.
Both bridges are approximately 1 8 feet above the creek bed.
Bridge No. 95 and No_ 67 will be removed without dropping components into Waters of the United
States_ All guidelines for bridge demolition and removal will be followed_ NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters and for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed_
Utilitv Impacts: There will be no jurisdictional resource impacts associated with utility relocation_
FEDERAT.LY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered
(PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1 973, as amended_ The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists 2
federally-protected species, as of May 16, 2007 for Rockingham County. The species under federal
protection are listed in Table 1 .
2

Table 1 _ Federally Protected Snecies for Rockingham Countv
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Habitat Present Biological
Conclusion
James Pleurobema Endangered No No Effect.
s in mussel collina
Smooth F.chinacea Endangered No No Effect
coneflower lczevigata
Yleurobem~a collina (James spinymussel)
Since Big Beaver Island Creek and Little Beaver Island Creek are within the Dan River Basin a mussel
screening was conducted on April 22, 2004 by NCDOT biologists_ The Big Beaver Island Creek and
Little Beaver Island Creek crossing at LTS 3 i 1 contained runs, riffles, and pools behind snags with normal
and unconsolidated substrate compactness_ .The substrate above and below the bridge on US 31 1 consists
of sand, silt, cobble and gravel with medium current_ Surveys were conducted by wading using a
batiscope 100 meters upstream from project crossing and 100 meters past the confluence of Big Beaver
Island Creek and Little Beaver Island Creek. No freshwater mussels were found in 4.5 man-hours of
survey time_ There were Asian clams present in both streams that were surveyed_ The North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNI=IP) documents no occurrences of James spinymussel within five miles
of the project area_ This project will have no effect on James spinymussel.
Echincacea Iczevigata (Smooth coneflower)
Suitable habitat for smooth coneflower may exist within the project area_ The approximately 10 acres of
woodlands have open understories and a high. proportion of maintained edge habitat_ The NCNHP does
not record any occurrences of smooth coneflower within five miles of the prof ect area_ Detailed surveys
for smooth coneflower were conducted on August 18, 2004, July 25, 2006, and July 31, 2007_ No
specimens of smooth coneflower were found_ This project will have no effect on this species.
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION and MITIGATION
Avoidance and Minimization:
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and
minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining,
unavoidable jurisdictional impacts_ Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and NEPA
compliance stages; minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
According to the Clean Water Act (CWA) §404(b)(1) guidelines, NCDOT must avoid, minimize, and
mitigate, in sequential order, impacts to waters of the US_ The following is a list of the project's
jurisdictional stream avoidance/minimization activities proposed or completed by NCDOT:
Avoidance/Minimization
• The new bridges will be 63 and 59 feet longer than the existing bridges, increasing the floodplain
under the bridges_
• The proposed project will completely span Big Beaver Island and Little Beaver Island Creeks,
allowing for pre-project stream flows to maintain the current water quality, aquatic habitat, and flow
regime_
• "Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through
implementation of stringent erosion control schedule and use of Best Management Practices (BMPs)_
• Use of preformed scour holes

Mitigation:
Unavoidable, permanent impacts to 222 feet of j urisdictional stream will be offset by compensatory
mitigation provided by the EEP program. An acceptance letter dated November 14, 2007 from EEP is
attached_ Mitigation is not proposed for the 40 feet of impacts for bank stabilization because there will
be no adverse effects to the stream nor will the project incur loss of Waters of the United States.
MORATOR7L7M
In an email dated December 11, 2007, Travis Wilson, Wildlife Resources Cornrnission, rescinded a
previously requested sunfish moratorium. Therefore, no moratoria are required for this prof ect.
SCHEDUI_.E
The prof ect calls for a letting of June 1 7, 2008 (review date of May 6, 2008) with a date of availability of
July 29, 2008_ It is expected that the contractor will choose to start construction in July 2008.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that impacts from construction of culvert replacement and channel
realignment be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 and bank stabilization be authorized
under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 13.
Section 401 Permit. NCDOT will adhere to all conditions of the General Water Quality Certifications
(WQC) 3689 and 3704. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Div_ of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
is required. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .OSOO(a) and 15A NCAC 2B .0200 we are
providing five copies of this application to the NCDWQ for their review and approval.
Thank you for your time and assistance with this project_ A copy of this permit application will be
posted on the NCDOT website at httn.//www_ncdot_or~/doh/yreconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html_ Please
contact James Pflaum, at (919) 71 5-7217 or j rpflaum@dot_state.nc.us if you have any questions or need
any additional information.
Sincere ,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph_D
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
w/attachment Mr. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (5 Copies) Mr_ Jerry Parker, Division 7 Environmental Officer
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC Mr_ Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Progra.rm~ng and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P_E., Highway Design
w/o attachment (see permits website for attachments) Mr. Stephen Kirby, PDEA
Dr_ David Chang, P_E., Hydraulics Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E_, Structure Design Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1 _ Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit Q Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Q Section 1 O Permit Q Isolated Wetland Permit $-om DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification Q Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2_ Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 13, 14
3_ If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: Q
4_ If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5_ if your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: Q
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Greg J. Thorpe, Ph.D_, Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center. Ralei~h_ NC 27699
Telephone Number: 919-733-3141 Fax Number: 91 9-715-5507.
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant_)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Updated 1 1 / 1 /2005
Page5ofl3

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties_ Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate LJSGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan. drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1 _ Name of project: realignment and replacement of bridge No. 95 over Big Beaver Island
Creek and Bride No_ 67 over Little Beaver Island Creek on US 31 1
2_ T.I_P_ Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4252
3 _ Property Identification Number (Tax PiN):
4_ Location
County: Rockingham Nearest Town: Madison
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc_): US 31 1 crossint; Big
Beaver Island and Little Beaver Island Creek
5_ Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): °N °W
6_ Property size (acres): Project Study Area is apt~roximately 41.4 acres_
7_ Name of nearest receiving body of water: Dan River
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins_ The
River Basin map is available at http:/fh2o_enr_statf:_nc_usfadminlmaps/_)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Rural crossroads with business and residential development_
Updated 1 1 / 1 /2005
Pagefiofl3

1 O_ Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of bride No. 67 and 95 with 54-foot wide (three lanes) bridges and
reali~nanent of US 311 and SR 1 138 intersection. Heavy duty excavation equipment will be
used such as trucks. dozers. cranes and other various equipment necessary for roadway
construction.
7 1 . Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Improve safety and efficiency of overall traffic
operations.
IV_ Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.1_P_ project, along with.
construction schedules.
V_ Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application_
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project_ Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e_g_, culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary_ All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan_ All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems_
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate_
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion_ If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below_ If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
upadtea ~ i i i izons
Pale 7 crF 13

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Fill 222 feet of perennial stream.
Bank stabilization for 20 feet of Big Beaver Island Creek and 20 feet for Little Beaver Island
Creek.
2. Indi vidual I y list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact 'Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceaus, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yeslno) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres)

"Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3_ List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property- < _001 acres
4_ Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts- Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e_g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc-), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. if stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included- To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560_
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma )
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(Linear feet Area of
Impact
(acres
Site 1 L Beaver Island Bank Stabilization Perennial 24 feet 20 X0.01
Site 2 B Beaver Island Bank Stabilization Perennial 24 feet 20 X0.01
Site 3 UT Permanent Fill Perennial 2-3 feet 222 OA1
Site 3 UT Temporary Fill Perennial 2-3 feet 14 <0.01

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 276 0.02
Updated l 1 /1 /2005
Page 8 of 13

5 _ Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, floading, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma )
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.02
Wetland Impact (acres): O
Open Water Impact (acres): O
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres O.02
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 276
7_ Isolated. Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ~ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the- proposed impact (acres or linear feet)- Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE_
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application~
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): Q uplands ~ stream Q wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., darn/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc-):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e. g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:-
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be usefizl to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project- The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
trout pond,
lJpdated 1 I / I /2005
Page 9 of 13

site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Aiso discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed_ If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts_ New bridges will be
approximately 60 feet longer than existing bridges, increasing floodplain size under the bridges_
Both bridges will completely span Big Beaver Island and Little Beaver Island Creeks_
Temporary construction impacts from sedimentation and erosion will be minimized through
stringent erosion control measures and Best Management Practices (see cover letter)_
VIII_ Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H _0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams _
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 1 5, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed_
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be- attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version _) _
1 . Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan_ The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e_g_, deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction_ Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed_
Updated 1 I / I /2005
Page 10 of 13

2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:llivwuF.nceep.net/pageslinlietrreplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 222.0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): O
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): O
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitiga#ion requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): O
IX_ Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1 _ Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local] funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No Q
2_ If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current threshoids for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No
3_ If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No Q
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1 _ Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neese), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes Q No
Updated 1 1 /1 /20Q5
Page 11 of 13

2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact. to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation. by applying the
buffer multi liers_
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(sduare feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
~'otal
Zone 1 extends out 30 feet peipendicu[ar from the mp of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 2() feet from the edge of Zone 1 .
3_ If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e_,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund)_ Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B _0242 or _0244, or _0260_
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
XII_ Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated fram the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (i SA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Suffer Rules?
Yes Q No
is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ~ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes Q No
Updated 1 1 / 1 /2005
Page 12 of 13

If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http_//1~2o_enr-_state_nc.usir~cwetlands. if no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV_ Other Circumstances (Opti©nal).
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits_ However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e_g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control)_

App'~icant/A~ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided)
Updated 1 I / [ /2005
Page 13 of 13

` t _ -, ~--
~cos~s-t~rn
~e _ ~ ~ k
~~ _:
PROGRAM
November 14, 2007
Mr_ Andy Williams
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Lear 1vI*-- V~Tilliams_ - -- ~-
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter.
5-4252, Replace Bridge Numbers 95 and 67 on US 3 1 1 over Big and
Little Beaver Island Creeks, Rockingham County; Roanoke River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 0301 O 103); Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enha_=cement Program
(EEP) will provide the stream mitigation for the unavoidable impact assoc:aced with the above
relorenced project_ As indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation request dated October 29, 2007, the
stream mitigation from EEP is required For approximately 222 feet of warm stream i~npact_
Stream rn itigation associated with this project will be provided in accordance with
Section X of the Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of Agreement between the N. C_
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the N. C. Department of Transportation, and
the tJ. S_ Army Corps of Engineers fully executed on March 8, 2007 (Tri-Party MOA). EEP
commits to implement sufficient 444 warm stream credits to offset the impacts associated with
this project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is permitted. If the above
referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
I Iarmon at 919-71 5 -1929.
sincerely, Q~ /'
Willr m D_ Gilmore, P_E. U
EEP Director
cc_ Mr. Gregory J_ Thorpe, Ph.D_, NCDOT-PDEA
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4252
_. r .-, _
~'~''
:. _ - r 1
- NC~EIr•-IR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, t552 1"lai! Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27599-1652 / 919-715-0475 / www_nceep_net

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION h'OKM
U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be complcte:d by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMA'T'ION
A. REPORT COMPLET[ON DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish/borough: Rockingham City: Madison
Center coordinates of site {let/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.382825° N, Long. -79.980531 ° E.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Nance of nearest waterbody: Big Beaver Island Creek, Little Beaver Island Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Big and Little Beaver Island Creeks
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03010103
Check if map/diagram of review area. and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/arc available upon request.
Q Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc-..) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different 3D form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
~[ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION 77: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A_ RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION~
There Pink List "ntzvi,gable waters of the U_S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction {as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may he susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B_ CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION~
There Al<`+~ "waters of the LT. S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) -jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Requzrecs!j
I_ Waters of the U_S_
a. Indicate presence of waters of U_S. in review area (check aTl that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that Clow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that 17ow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments ofjurisdictional waters
isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identity (estimate) sire of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: 1600 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: ll~bll~~~ Oll~`yV1bI
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): _
2_ Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
Potentialty jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to he not jurisdictional.
Explain: _
' Boxes chee;ked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section [il below.
For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
<a_g., typically 3 tnonths)_
' Supporting docutncntation is presented in Section 111_I'.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TN Ws
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TN Ws. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA.1 and Section IILD.1_ only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA_1 and 2
and Section III_D_1_; otherwise, see Section III_B below_
1. TNW
Identify TNW= Little and Big Beaver Island Creeks.
Summarize rationale supporting determination: Both large perennial streams that directly connect with the Dan River less than 1
mile downstream.
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TR[BUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND 1TS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapairos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TN Ws where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i. e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e_g., typically 3
months)_ A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional_ ]f the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III_D_2. if the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial Row,
skip to Section III_D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a signifcant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law_
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW_ If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IIl.B.l for
the tributary, Section Ill_B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below_
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: I~i~Ic LSE
Drainage area: )I'`aael<z,I:i~[
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
Tributary flows directly into TNW.
-_ _ --
0Tributary t7ows through Il'~'ie1~~.jst( tributaries before entering TNW.
__ _ _ __ ._
Project waters are ~'ie>c L-a~t river miles from TNW_
Project waters are Ft¢Ir ~~pst~ river miles from RPW.
. ~„
Project waters are I'Iele-lip` aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1t'iclci~f aerial (straight) miles from RPW_
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain= _
Identify flow route to TNWS:
a Note that the lnstnactional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in fhe acid
West.
` Flow route can ba described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW_

Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ~ Natural
Q Artificial (Wren-made). Explain:
~ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: 11~c14tl~,is#_
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
~ Silts ~ Sands Q Concrete
~ Cobbles ~ Gravel Q Muck
Q Bedrock ~ Vegetation. Type./% cover:
Q Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e. g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
__
Tributary geometry: Yte1; List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
__
Tributary provides for: I~c1K.lEis
_._
Estimate average number of flew events in review area year: #3'#~Iz ~iFSt
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
....-.. _...._.......
Surface flew is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
Q Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
~ Bcd and banks
OHWM~ (check all indicators that apply):
Q clear, natural line impressed on the bank
Q changes in the character of soil
© shelving
© vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
~ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
sediment deposition
water staining
Q other (list):
~ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explairi:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to detenn
High Tide Line indicated by:
Q oil or scum line along shore objects
Q fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
0 physical markings/characteristics
tide] gauges
Q other (list):
Q the presence of litter and debris
Q destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Q the presence of wrack line
Q sediment sorting
Q scour
© multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
Q survey to available datum;
Q physical markings;
Q vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
`'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHW1V1 does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e. g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e. g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'ibid_

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
Q Riparian corridor_ Characteristics (type, average width):
~ Wetland lringe_ Characteristics: _
Q Habitat for:
Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
Q Fish/spawn areas_ Explain findings:
Q Other environmentally-sensitive species_ Explain findings:
~ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-'FNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Ganes-al Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries_ Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: 1~-~`]~c ~,tk,'~1~. Explain: _
Surface flow is: i?'1~~.f+~t
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ~~il~#. Explain findings:
Q Dye (or other) test perforrrsed:
(c) Wetland Adiacenev Determination with Non-TNW:
Q Directly abutting
Not directly abutting
Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
Q Ecological connection. Explain:
~ Separated by benn/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands arc ~~~ river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ~,°'~ aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: P-i°a sf.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the ll~i~t )C.l~ floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterise wetland system (c. g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all thaE apply):
Q Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
Q Vegetation type percent cover. Explain:
© Habitat for:
Q Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
© Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
© Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
© Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: _
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any).
Ali wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: P~#c Dist
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/NI Size (in acres) Dircctiv abuts? (Y/N) Size Cin acresl
Sumrrsarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: _
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis wiL assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW_ For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstan#ial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW_
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e_g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus_
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or t7ood waters reaching a TN W'?
• Does the: tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwcbs'?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW`?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III_D: _
2_ Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TN Ws. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.I7:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but tha# do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IILD:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUI3JEC`I' WA"TERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands_ Chcclc all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width {ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands a-djaeant to 7`NWs: acres.
2_ RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
'I'ributarles of'I`NWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional_ Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (c.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
~ '' Other non-wetland waters: acres.
identify type(s) of waters:
3_ Non-RPWs$ that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
Watcrbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
'TNW is jurisdictional_ Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres_
Identify type(s) of waters:
4_ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section ilI_D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: _
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area.: acres.
5_ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
[ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW arc _jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC_
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs_
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they arc adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created fi-om "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)a°
__ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
- from which fsh or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or v-ould be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
KSee Footnote # 3.
e To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section S1I. D_6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
'O Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts wil! elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistenE with the process describ¢d in the Corps/EPA Memor¢ndum Regarding CWA Act ./urisdiction FoLlo wing Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check al] that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: _
Wetlands: acres_
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLV).
Q, If po#ential wetlands were: assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
} Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
~ Prior to the San 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MSR)_
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: _
Other. (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i_e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other rron-wetland waters: acres_ List type of aquatic resourcc_
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet t}ic "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres_
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres_
SECTION IVc DATA SOURCES_
A_ SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
~ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Q Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
CJ.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
~ L1SGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 1 2 digit HUC maps.
U_S. Geological Survey map(s)_ Cite scale Sc quad name:
[~ USDA Natural Kesources Conservation Service Soil Survey_ Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/F[RM maps:
~' 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ~ Aerial (Name 8z Date): _
or Q Other (Name 8~ Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: _
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B_ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JDc

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers
"Phis form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATF_ FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OINF[CE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: B-4252
State:NC County/parish/borough: Rockingham City_ Madison
Center coordinates of site (iat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 3[.379406° N, Long. -79.980531 ° ~.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Lithe Beaver Island Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows. Little Beaver Island Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Codc (HUC): 030I0103
Check if map/diagram of review area. and/or potential jurisdictional areas islarc available upon request.
Q Check if other sites (e. g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc_..) are associated witl-r this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION Il: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DE"TERMINATION OF JURISDICTION_
There Are "rzavigcrble waters of the U. S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (Rl[A) jurisdiction (as de#ined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review
area_ [RequireclJ
Waters subject to the ebh and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain
B_ CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTiON_
"There Alr`~ "waters of the U. S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area_ [RequireclJ
I. Waters of the U.S.
a_ Indicate presence of waters of U_S_ in review area (check all that apply):
TN Ws, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TN Ws
Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that #low directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
~], Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that #low directly or indirectly into TNWs
~] Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments ofjurisdictional waters
~' Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: 650 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: <_01 acres.
__ _
c_ Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based nn. 1987' I~ielisteatia~u M$loual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
[,~ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional_
Explain: _
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate seLtions in Section ill below.
~ For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year-round or has continuous now at ]east "seasonally"
(c_g., typically 3 months).
a Supporting documentation is presented in Section IlLF.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYS[S
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA_1 and Section III_D_1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections Iii_A_1 and 2
and Section 1ILD.I_; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2_ Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANV):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met_
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i_e_ tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e_g_, typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional: if the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, sltip to Section IIl_D.2_ If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILD.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the exestence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands_ This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IH.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III_B_2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section 111.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a signitlcant nexus exists is determined in Section 1[LC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(ij General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 147579.574
Drainage area: 242 1 5 ~tci-~s
Average annual rainfall: 46.9 inches
Average annual snowfall: 9. 1 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
© Tributary flows through Picl~ lC tributaries before entering TNW_
Project waters are ~. ~cs~Y;~ss~ river miles from TNW.
Project waters era ~i~3,~ri~~ river miles from RPW.
Project waters are ~L~t aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are l@"# 8>x aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: _
identify flow route to TNWS: Flows from nearby pied into Little Bcavcr Island Creek.
Tributary stream order, if ktrown: 1 .
< Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the grid
West
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e. g., tributary a, which #lows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW_

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that app[y):
Tributary is: ®Natural
Q Artificial (man-made). Explain:
© Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of hank (estimate):
Average width: S.Q feet
Average depth: ] feet
Average side slopes: 31[_ .
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
© Silts ®Sands Q Concrete
~ Cobbles ®Gravel ~ Muck
Q Bedrock Q Vegetation. Type/% cover:
~ Other_ Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g_, highly eroding, sloughing banks. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: MQandcring
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 5-10
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal"7f1c-w,
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 2O (or greater)
Describe flow regime: Yerennial_
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: iltseret~_ Characteristics:
Subsurface flew: l~nline(1Wt1. Explain findings:
Q Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
~ OHWM~ (check all indicators that apply):
Q clear, natural line impressed on the bank
Q changes in the character of soil
shelving
Q vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Q leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Q sediment deposition
© water staining
~ other (list):
Q Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
Q' High Tide Line indicated by:
oil or scum line along shore objects
Q fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
physical markings/characteristics
Q tidal gauges
Q other Qist):
® the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® the presence of wrack line
® sediment sorting
Q scour
Q multiple observed or predicted flow events
© abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
~ survey to available datum;
Q physical markings;
vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types_
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (c.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily tilm; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc_)_
Explain: water color is clear__
Identify specific pollutants, if known: _
°A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (c_g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the watcrbody's flow
regime {e.g_, Row over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators oi~ Row above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characterlstics_ Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
Q Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
Habitat for:
~ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
Q Fish/spawn arcas. Explain findings:
Q Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
Q Aquatic/wildlife diversity_ Explain findings:
2_ Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland sire: acres
Wetland type_ Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: ~~L Explain:
Surface flow is: P'f€ L:ist
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: E.L7~_ Explain findings:
Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacencv Determination with Non-TNW:
Q Directly abutting
~ Not directly abutting
Q Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
~ Ecological connection_ Explain:
Separated by berm/harrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationshi~l to TNW
Project wetlands are `€~,.' river miles from TNW_
Project waters are ~ t aerial (straight) miles fi"om TNW.
Flow is from: lE"'ist.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the i}ice #..,#`$t floodplain_
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e. g_, water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
ldcntify specific pollutants, if known:
(ill) Biological Characterlstics_ Wetland supports (check all that apply):
Riparian buffer_ Characteristics (type, average width):
Q Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
Q Habitat for:
~ Fede-rally Listed species. Explain findings:
Q Fish/spawn arcas_ Explain findings:
~ Other environmentally-sensitive species_ Explain findings:
Q Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: l~'#~'Ic his?(
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis_

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/Nl Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N7 Size (in acresl
Summarize overall hiological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW_ For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands_ It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specitic threshold of distance (e_g_ between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW)_ Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative oi" significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the 72apanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook_ Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce: the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combinatiun with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and Mows directly or indirectly into TN Ws. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section il[.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs_ Explain findings ofpresenec or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section Ili_D: _
3_ Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. F_xplain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III_D: _
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
I . TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
~] TN Ws: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres_
~' Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TN Ws where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional_ I'rovidc data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Provides consistent year round flow from pond.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e. g., typically three months each year) arc
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB_ Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (it).
_ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs_
Waterbody that is not a TN W or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (1't).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4_ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into "I'N Ws.
~_ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: _
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally-" Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section ll1.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: _
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs_
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for j urisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6_ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs_
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7_ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a genera] rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
.,~ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (sae E below).
E. 1SOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT' INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):1O
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
xSee Footnote # 3.
s To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section IILD.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
ro Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this cat gory, Corps Districts will el¢vat¢ the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process d¢scribed in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction FoLLowing Rapanos_

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Q'' Uther non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: _
Q Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
[~ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
~] Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
Q Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area. would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Sird Rule" (MBR)_
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: _
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i_e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e_, rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft)_
Q Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres_
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: _
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant_
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
~ Office does not cancur with data sheets/delineation report_
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
[~ U_S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
Q USGS NHD data.
Q USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s)_ Cite scale 8L quad name:
USDA Natura] Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey_ Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s): _
FEMA/F[RM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Gcodcctic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ~ Aerial (Name 8L Date):
or ~ Other (Name 8r. Date):
Q', Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter _
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Q Other information {please specify):
B_ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT :ID:

Pernsit i3rawit~g
Sheet 1 of ~~
a
0
o Q,
N Q

1°~1~~
m o ~ ~ ~ SfIEET 8 / lb /
~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROCgEI~TGHA 7Vf COUNTY
PROJECT:3359~I11 (B-~252I
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREEg AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREEg
ON US 311.

o a
N Q
m a
' Y 2. F /~/
-~ as
aan ~z
~--~ .- ~
" _~_ \' `` ~~ MADISON -pz
ti 8~--~ ~
'~~ 11s2
`'Im
,,
'\ _ ; ~ 11ss 1ss
~ rQ
't ~ 1169 ;~ 1151 2,77
~~a r~
1171 7170 \ - ~ I 1152 x Mu
_ c
I SV~~ ~ r
~ 1170 ~ aii Acad 3~8 L
a ~ a,. 1145
~ ~ Y 1148
1794 1138 ~'~ ptN ,~~- ~ ~
s p~
i ~.
OpN _ j 1145
-4N ~
__- ~ ~
` 1145
~'~ i~ /,
____, ~~
\ ~~ 1 145 / ,
} ~a~ 1138 _ _ /~ ~~
c
a
0
m
t
t
m
3
E
a
V
_T
N
CV
Q
m N ~u{/~_
m 6 _ V ~®~
m DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RO(;ga~7GH A M COUNTY
.~ PROTECT:33.S9~.L1 (B~~25~
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREEg A1~TD
G L f BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER LSLAATD CREEg
ON US 31.1
a SFIEET 8 / 16 / 07

a
o~
~,
a
SUMMARY OF AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS

TRACT NO. PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS SITE NO.
HUGH D. FALLIN III 8c 503 WESTVIEW DR. I
LYNDA G. FALLIN MADISON, NC 27025
7~ GAYLE N. BROWN 249 ISLAND DRIVE 1
MADISON, NC 27025
THOMAS V. & 411 W DECATUR STREET 1
CAROLYN M. CARDWELL MADISON, NC 27025
J.B.M. SALES 8c 1007 W ACADEMY STREET
O
RENTALS, INC.
MADISON, NC 27025 I. 2
BELLWOOD VILLAGE INC_ 5143 N CHURCH STREET
IO
8c BLANCHE W. BELL
GF2EENSBORO. NC 27455 2
143 SARDIS CHURCH ROAD
11 CATHY C. TUCKER, TRUSTEE
MADISON, NC 27025 2
O NEW VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC. 710 CHIEF MARTIN STREET 3
MADISON, NC 27025
15 JOYGE B. WALL 1165 W. ACADEMY STREET 3
MADISON, NC 27025
16 CHANDLER CONCRETE/ PO BOX 131 3
PIEDMONT BURLINGTON, NC

Permit Drawing ~
Sheet 3 of
~C~®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RpCgITTGH.e- M COUNTY
PROJECT: Zi3.S94.L1 1B-4252
BRIDC'E 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREEg AND
G L' BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREEg
oN vs au
SF~ET 8 / 16 / 07

~~~~~1~~~ ~~' ~s~' ~~
~JL~ WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
~~
~--M! L BB~~ WETLAND ~ ~ PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES FILL IN

W E T L A N D PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED
DENOTES PERMANENT LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG
SURFACE WATER IMPACT STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
o a
00
m o
DENOTES PERMANENT
SURFACE WATER IMPACT
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACT
• # ~ +~ DENOTES MECHANIZED
•#«"`.~" +M CLEARING
~ ~ FLOW DIRECTION
TB TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
C PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
8c ABOVE
F PROP
LIMIT OF FILL
.

PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
NG
NATURAL GROUND
PL PROPERTY LINE

-TDE- TEMP_ DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- P D E PERMANENT D R A I N A G E
EASEMENT
-EAg EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-Epg EXIST_ ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
`~ WATER SURFACE
X ~[x X % LIVE STAKES

BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
~~- ROOT WAD
RIP RAP
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
LEVEL SPREADER CLS)
~ GRASS SWALE
Perrr~ii i~rawir-g
Sheet ~# of ~
N~~® JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROC$INGH A M G`OZ.TNTy
PROJECT: 335941..1 ~B-4252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAI~TD CREEg AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREEg
ON US 311
8/16/
SHEET

NC DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTA`UON
Perennial & Intermittent Total - Mitigation Aeq'd; DIVI5[ON OF HIGHWAYS
Intermittent Total -Not Requiring Mitigation:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
Permit pf8MN11~ WBS - 33594.1.1 IB-42521
Sheet ,~.o~
ATN Aevaed ~d,~as r /25/2007
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS

Site
No.

Station
(FromlTo)

Structure
Size I Type
Permanent
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Nand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
.impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1 •L- 27+45 to 27+61 LT Single-Span Bridge -100 ft --- •-- --- --- --- < 0.01 --- 20 --- ---
2 •L- 31+4D fo 31+57 AT Single-Span Bridge -1 DO ft --- --- --- •-- --- < D.01 ••• 20 --- ---
3 •Y-15+22 to 16+49 66"RCP --• --- •-• -•- --- 0.01 <0.01 222 14 •--

~.

~:

.i

TOTALS: 0.02 < 0.01 262 14

~
r.
x
- - 5+l3D0
15 (a'11
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL A
lSHT. 2-D)
vw
V A4
O
o~n~ K
CUT/FILL TRANSISTION
CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
EST.ITONS
I EST.S SY FF

END SHOULDER
BERM GUTTER
O
3 -Y- STA. 10+85 LT & RT.
~ ~; ~ F•~ SITE 1
PERMANENT SURFACE
\ WATER IMPACT
RIPRAP C EMBANKMENT
SEE DETAIL D (SHT. 2-D)
~(
\
6
`Te PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
SEE DETAIL E (SHT.2-D)
NIp10.FAIJ.N III
LYIOA 0.FALLN ~ CLASS II RIPRAP
~ \ PTO SHOULDER
T
YP
)
LATERAL BASE DITCH .
. fT
L
C(
~ \~~ ~
SEE
DETAIL
SHT. Z-D) •~
~nE wo a ~ a KO ~
ri0Il8
~~
r
i \
~ u
111
-
UT/FILL TRANSITION
CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
ESL (TONS
I EST.S SY Ff
~ I I
I
I
I I
I
II I y
~
15'CSP W/ELBOWS, RODS
AND LUG CONNECTORS
BI1,L~NJ.AiB NC. R
FORMED SCOUR HOLE
DETAIL E ISHT. 2-D)
Permit t)rawin~
Sheet , ~ of ~ ,
15' CSP W/ELBOWS,
RODS AND LUG
CONNECTORS
CLASS II RIPRAP
UP TO SHOULDE~
PT. ITYP.)
`~ ~ (
~ `~, : a
11 ~ I ~ F
N ~ ~~ rvc 1 ,~1
~~ ~ ~,
. ~ _- _. - ,. -. 2d FSi F ~ ~ • i .... 10'VC
a •;
N~ ~ g
~ - __
J W _~,. ~ ~ ~ ,..
--_- fr- -- ---- -- T
W ~ ------ -_- --- s +xt ~± _ _ i - - -_
Z -~ ~ ~- msns v. - _~ wn.T c ~ c wn~ c ~ ~ / /i - ~ I i y`'
J W s6t. /j, STRUCTU E~ wn ~; // ~ Erasr
_ ~ -EY- POT 10+00.00 = _E%cnvAT 1
~ -L- POC 26+32.03 ,25.86'RT. I `~ ~ /i WW -
- END OULDER ..., _J
!( BERM GUTTER
60 LF TAIL DITCH W/PSRM STRUCTURE f + \ ~i~ I STRUCT E GRADEATO(
4' BASE W/2:1 SIDES E%CAVATION STA. +64 RT. 'j~
I EST.DDE = 105 CY ~ (I END SHOULDER E%CAVAT N
SEE DETAIL F (SHT. 2-0) REMOVE 24'CMP !I BER GUTTER ~ B57
~ STA 30+35 RT. t2 RIP P 0 EMBANKME T
DECK DRAWS ARE ~ Q1;CAVATED TO ELIMINATE SEE DETAIL D (SHT. -0)
d NOT REOUNiED CUT DITCH
~- STRUCTURE DECK DR INS ARE
~" T 56 IpE, E%CAVATION NOTRE IRED -
11~ ~ REMOVE 15' ACP /
40 LF TAIL DITCH J
2' BASE W/2:1 SIDES
EST.DDE = 24 CY
SEE DETAIL C iSHT, 2-D)
5 -EY- p0 ,2f~~32
IEr YIS10N F810r9F,NC '^
40 LF TAIL DITCH W/PSRM
2'BASE W/2:IS1DE5
EST.DDE = 24 CY ~
SEE DETAIL F ISHT.2-DI - ~
FYI II
'°~c /
100 0 ~xss~8 ~
/ //
50 100 ~~ +
SCALE: 1R= 100' HORIZ. ~ ~ ,
1- Pr 86+7~~0 / ? -L-
7FIOINS YO YN k ~~
REMOVE ]5' RCP
d~
9
4~
~~
~~ PL~iN VIEW
~ SITES 1 ~ 2
~~
n da

U
S1LLE3 R

~i

O
O
`0
~ M
Q~
N
-_- I Z
•~
__ W
- W Vf
J W
V ~

d
PERMANENT SURFACE r GLI
WATER IMPACT a
-_ ~ NCD®T
--~~
_~ ~_
LEGEND
® DENOTES PERMANENT
SURFACE WATER IMPACT
DIVISION OF ffiOHWAYS
ROCLIIdOHAM QOiINTY
PROIHCI':3569~1116-~
BRIDOS 9d OVBR BI(i BBAVBR
LSLAND CR$SL AND
RRIDCD2 ~ ovsR L1117.6
BBAVSR ISLAND CRBEL
ON IIS Ell
8/ ~/M
CIAT
EngiIleerR
am W&OH, N.G Tlf06
REFERENCE N0.
1252
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
00 NOT U9E Po CON9TRUCfION
NAD 83%g5
~~ ~
COAS MANIN BYAD
-SITE 2
TOE PROTECTI
SEE DETAIL H
(SHT. 2-DI
Is'
RCP ~ esr
err
a u of a w /ol
STOIAI SYSTEM fLOws L__
AWAY FRON -L-
k ~~
18 11

• ~ s " ~,'~,~',,, '~ ~ RO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. FROIER REFERENCE NG. SXEET N0.
- - ~ "; a
Consulting E
i 8-4252 5

1 ng
neers
a¢ erneoe of e,mtf, hm w.Mnrs.naneoe
Ise,l wises 0.AV SHEET N0.

I5 (a'I-J
` 0.0ALIWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER HYUAAWCS
ENGINEER
SPECIAL CUT D1TCH
SFE DETAIL A
fSHT. 2-D)
PR
ELIMIN
Y
PLANS

~A9 a
~ ~
~„
~
c
~
~ ., I
CUT/FILL TRANSITION
y~ CLASS 'B' RIPRAP
ESi
ITONS Perms ~

7 -
arLa K raln+

,J
J

~

I

~
.
EST.S SY FF

C GRID
NAD 83/g5 ~~~

~@t '~" p( ~~
..,~.,,
CUT/FILL TRANSISTION ~
CL0.5S 'B' RIPRAP
EST.ITONS I
EST.S SY FF ~ ~ I I
I I I

~ END SHOULDER
BYR STA.?OEBS LT & RT. I
I i
I
~
ID
3 BE11E
N6 t
~~
,IAGI A. ~ DA P.OLLON
\
SITE 1
PERMANENT SURFACE
WATER IMPACT
I ~ II
II ~ I
I
I ~
/
RIPRAP R EMBANKMENT
\ SEE DETAIL D fSHT. 2-DI ~ i I I I I 10 ~/~~~
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE ~~
0 \n SEE DETAIL E fSHT. 2-D) I l i ~ „
A? ~
LYIOA 0.FAL111~ \ CLASS IIRIPRAP DOSS MARTM 9YRD ~E„
~~ \ TO SHOULDER I PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
T (TYP 1 IS' CSP W/ELBOWS, R005 SEE DETAIL EfSHT. 2-DI
LATERAL BASE DITCH ~y, I AND LUG CONNECTORS
W/CL0.3S 'B' RIPRAP ~ IS' CSP W/ELBOWS,
SEE DETAIL C fSHT. 2-Df \~ ~ I I RODS AND LUG
~~// CONNECTORS
~~,•'~ 6r N o CLASS II RIPRA!' SITE 2
N F° UP TO SHDULDER
PT.(TYP.> TOE PROTECTION ~
~ `a ~ SEE DETAR. H - A
n
( HT
~ P .2-DI
-= 15, F
F
N ,~~ ~ - __ -- "_' -- -- _ G
M ~ ~'--` F F
.. B,~ ~-.
Q ~ i..
~~ ,' ~ ~ w ~
I W ~ --------
W 2Gi o -----
$ ~i ~ h
W (n ~----___ 5172 ~ _- ---- - i 13' 15'
_ R5 ///'-T -iE- -- I Z
Z ~~ r ~- o¢s1,M M whT \ C tl~ ~ C ~ Q / % ~ / i 7" - - - C - ..'
J W sE2 F STRUC E - - w2 / ;//,0 ca+c
= N fY- P07 IQ+00.00 = / _EXCavAT ~ ~ /., T 9'mT IsLAro Qw/u ~- I =
L- POC 26+32.03 , 25.86' RT. ~ I 1 ~ -
H '- ~ END OULDER F -- /! V~ REMOV 5'RCP IsuxR ISLAHR ~~ ?W
STRUCTURE BERM GUTTER ~_ !, ~~~ ~' --- (~ es7 ~ ~ W
60 LF TAIL DITCH W/PSRM ` I STA. +64 RT. o GRADE TO D N
4'BASE W/2d SIDES y~ ~ .EXCAVATION END SHOULDER + ~ ~'~ I STRUCTU E = V!
EST. DOE = 105 CY Iir - I BER GUTTER 't EXCAYAT N ~T
SEE DETAIL F ISHT. 2-D) REMOVE 24 CMP ~ STA 30+35 RT. _ y ~~ F"
DECK DRAINS ARE ~ EXCAVATED TO ELIMWATE ~ / WP C EMBANKME T _ r
'~ ~: NOT REOUIREO I CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL D ISHT. -D) I O 0 D D 0 0
F - `~ STRUCTURE OECKOR INS ARE / I
- - TOp Q_ EXCAVATION NOT AE IRED 01 q d 01 q M -
c ~ I ~ STORM SYSTEM FIOMS
m ~ REMOVE IS' RCP ~ Awar FRON -L- ~-~_
m kb ~ / ~
y ~~ rl ~TI7.. '~ ~ > '{~ ~ ~'~• ~ 98 24' RCP e~ 1~ ~QI
' 40 LF TAIL DITCH ~ / - ~' -~pMO%~
E 2'BASE IY/2:ISigE3 ~ ~ / ~~Q~~ ~- ~. O
a EST. ODE - 24 CY 8 I8
~ SEE DETAIL G ISHT.2-DI 12
r 711dN5 Y. YN IL
~ O -£Y- pC /2tj1~2 ~ ~ J SALES 4 RBIT MC ¢ d
~ q$qN ~pryp~ ~ ~ REMOVE 15' RCP o
~' mo ~ d
40 LF TAIL DITCH W/PSAM ~ ~ PERMANENT SURFACE • GLI
a 2'BASE W/2:ISIDES
E6T. DoE = 24 cY ~ ~ WATER IMPACT a
SEE DETAIL F (SHT.2-D> ~ d
/ ~
' NCD®T
N ~ \ ~~ ~_
E Fy, I ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ DIVISION OF ffi(iHWAY3
a A~~,,Fx ~l , ~ Roc~IC>~at covrrrr
/ rlto~acraa~w.I
loo o SS28 ~ PLt~N VIEW _LEGEND '~~~ ~° ~,~
~ SITES 1 & 2 ~ L°~D ~` `'~
/~ DENOTES PERMANENT aRmoB 6~ ovsR LTITLS
50 100 / ~ i~ ~~ '~ ~ ®SURFACE WATER IMPACT saAVSR ISLAND cRaB><
= SCALE: I'= 100' HORIZ. ~ , A~, ~ I ~ .,N ,~ ~
,,...~

~ax+s
,~
m
v
m
v
E
a
T
r
rv
a
a
3
v
U
D
4
N
V
\ 9,\\
\ ~ ~~\ ~`~
\~.. ~~~,
PERMANENT SURFACE ~
WATER IMPACT ~'
t
H@DAS
i
~ 15 '~D
:~,;D.s,
~YGE B. wALL
r SPECIAL CUT DRCH LATERAL N' DITCH
SEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL L ISHT.2-DI
ISHT.2-0)
CLASS `B' RIP AAP
EST.2 TONS
~, EST. S SY FF
~ ~"
•• '
~
•.
~
\~ LS
CSP W/ELBOWS, R005
AND LUG CONNECTORS
~
••
3 ~
\~/n \ \ Fi
/., r~~~
1 ~'\~R ~
~~,
WETLAND POCKET-~ SPECIAL CUT DITCH
cAass AFFIL SEE DETAB. A
LSHT. 2-D>
16
Y~tTRAI.
SEE SHEET 10 -PLAN
VIEW ENLARGEMENT
TEMPORARY SURFACE
WATER IMPACT
Z9~
C7~
~~
t>7 ~
9d
s „~,
iIP RAP
FF
~' aP w/aei
AND LLM COM
-Boo
i~

as,
.~' . ~
xe~s E S
~ ,,,,., f i ~ i
;,kJ / ,~ / ~ ~`~
~// s ~
4
14 / '•
~~
ROADNAY CUT DRCH ~ / O 9
- w/PSRM ~ a~
550 SY FF /
SEE DETAIL K
O (SHT.2-D) ~ k
.~D / /i o0
1~ / ~ ~
CMV \ I / / ~ OS/DS y

elf' ~ /
i ~~~
/,---F- ~ , ~r n~
t `~ *pure~~v i
~~ SED:~NT
.~ s
~Fp S 9dSiN `
RS~' ~ I
~ahi RDADWA CUT DITCH` ~
~ SEESDEtAIL' ISHT.2-D)
~tl \ -Y4- PT /2f5Q75
c.,~r
ivGTER S"v3a6E
EdS':hl i4N (5D
-G/
~~~1~1 ~~~ W9'
100 0
50 100
SCALE:I°= 100' HORIZ.
~~~~ aD
~ ~\

s
8,
~` .~ C
RENOYE EXIST.
' ~ ~ •~
~P"
4'x 5
RCBC

BURY 66' PIPE i:..
NIATURAL STREAM BED p 1
l
/
~
r
v~v ~j
~~ Y ~ aB 1
1
p
r
CLASS 'N RIP RAP
ON BA Y
EST. 48 TONS
EST. 89 SY FF RIP RAP o
E]ABANKMEn
5 ETAR
22 LF CHANNEL MPROVEM
4' BASE W/2d SIDES
0.45% MAX SLOPE
EST. ooE = oo DY
SEE DETAIL I (SHT. 2-D)
160 LF TAILDITCH -
4'BASE W/2:ISIDES
4.T5% MAX SLOPE
FST. DOE = 95 CY
SEE DETAIL G ISHT.2-01
CLASS 'B' RN RAP-
E5T.5 TONS
EST. 14 SY FF
T5 LF CHANR~L IMPROVEMENT
2' BASE N/2:IS~ES A
CLASS TRIP RAP
6.6Y. MAX, SLOPE
EST.DDE = 25 CY
EST. 65 TONS
EST.IOB SY FF
SEE DffCH DETAIL M LSHT.2-I
_.

17
KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C,
Consulting Engineers
]OU BCMIID U0., BUfIU 20f PN81G&N.G~I606
(9191 &51fA66

/ /~
~/
/~
ROADNAY CUT DITCH
M/PSRM
530 SY FF
SEE DETAI. K fS11T.2-0)
.
~ ~~~~ ~
~ v~
LEGEND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
DENOTES PERMANENT
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
SEE DETAL A`LSHi.2-0)

11ECI REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0.
8-4252 7
PM' SHEET N0.
DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PR~EL~IMIND RYSTPLANS
Perm$ l3~awinfl
Sheet 1 ~ I~
---"~
GLI
d . ~~® JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROC%INGHAM COUNTY
PROJECT:3359911 8-4252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREE% AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREE%
ON US 311
10/16/Oi

__.
-.'-;= _
" "~A; `3~~• '' ~' ~ !"~` ~ . } ~ SPECIAL T DITCH
/q ~''- ~'~"a \~. ~ .,~ I SEE DETAI~ A
/ \~, ~
\ ~ ~ ~~
! ~
,` `1 ~\ \ ~~ ~\ .
r
~` '~- ~ ~`541~ ~ ~ r ~~ 1 ~\
WETLAND POCKET '\~` '~ "`" .-
~ SP~CIAe CUT DIT.pI -- --
o~O4 txtASS ADE~ SEE%DETAL'A"
-ISWTJ2-.~
~~--
-~'- Pr 13'-.
16
SEE SHEET 10 -PLAN
VIEW ENLARGEMENT
PERMANENT SURFACE ~
WATER IMPACT ~'
L
15 °~'°
w~: ~r
.sras~
~Y~ Ilr NALL
LATERAL 'V'DITCH
SEE DETAIL L ISHT.2-D)
CLA55 'B' RIP RAP
EST.2 TONS
EST.S SY FF
6'CSP W/ELBOWS4AOD5
AND LUC CONNEC ORS
J ,? ~! ~
...
92
Q~
~c~
~_~
9~
s
1
'1 +
~ Cn~~~ •\
T5 LF CHANNEL hIPROVEMENT ~ ~ I r ! h
2' BASE W/2HSIDES A , ~'~
CLASS IPoP RAP \, ''
6.62 NAX. SLOPE ~ ~ ~ '.
EST. DDE = 25 CY , 1 ~ l ! ~ ~~
E5T.65 TONS ~ ~, : ~
EST.IDB SY FF r yy V ~
SEE DITCH DETAIL M ISHT.2-D , `; >~ l ~ \y
v t ~1\\ ~,, ~4~ ~ ..
~ ~~ E~ OE D, J fSµT 2 ~I \~ ~ ` \ ~ ~ "\\ `^- ^^,~l`.
:,2 TCNS 11 ~
\ _ {
`? 4'~~n ; t 1 '~ ~ >?~ .h ^~ ' _~OADM'AY_Cl(P D~~~l~1.
~~` ~} I ` 'l ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ \ 4`"~ `,SEE ~L1K1 / ° "
"3'.
~t 1.9~TI~EL9 At ,
1'
-,~- -'. -a. ~, ~ ~
., ~ ~ F
i
, ~l ,
Y9

AEMOYE EX6T.
4' x 5' RCBC

~r F
/
•
~ gip, '"
~
~
`~,f \
P BINi?`6 'PIPE -'' F ~ ~ ~
NATURAL ST BEB /
t j ~ ;~ I;{, \\\
l
~ 1~ 1 ~fl~lll ~~\\
~~~
~~
f ~~ ,
~ ~4 c
,.v~~~r
~-
OCLASA 'P RIP RYP

E5T.4B TONS
EST. 89 SY FF

•

IP_AAP_g._ s'

} ~~'~.
t /'.
1
TEMPORARY SURFACE
WATER IMPACT
m
v,
m
m
E
a
r
N
N
a
v
Y
0
3
v
100 0
50 100
SCALE:I"= 100' HORIZ.
SEE DETAIL ILSHr.z-m
I60 LF TALDRCH
4'BASE N/2H SIDES
4.T5X MAX SLOPE
EST. DDE = 95 CY
SEE DETAIL G (SHT.2-D)
CLASS 'B' RP RAP
EST,S TONS
EST. 14 SY FF
¶~-
~JLs~1V 9' ~~ WI'
~~ ll ll's uD
`~,
~~, ~
/' ` I
~~~~'~~~ ,I 1'}I~,
\~~~~ 1'\`\\i';~i~l ~
`,~
~ ~ 7~ ~ ~\' TENPM}¢R`I~iP
` `t , SEOktl f \
p,_~ ~ V~ ~~ j 1~ 3a54 '1~~
~ '. ~ 142 ~Y~F~ . ~
`~SE~ DE`[AI ' LSHT.2-D)
--~.`t~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ , A ~~ ~IA~.~~' ~ fMG
~. \ ~~q~\\\` •, ~~r \ `, ~S.DESAA.\~THT.2-0)
r ~~ ` \
\\\ \
<~ .`~ \ ` VAVA~~A
Fa*EE szoaAaE ~~zgg - ~ ~ ~ i \
9ASIN O! liSFJ~ ~`~ ~! ~ \
'xAiE'r ST ~°~~F l~ '_~~.;~ ,. \ \ y \ \\•~\~~y`~, -~f ~~y rpVl~ IeT'Tw~fpJV~ ~
~ 1 ~ /
r~ / ~i~ .r'~~~.~ ~ ,~ ~
~b°° ~ ~1 \ ~ \ t ` ~ ~ ~~ ~~ : A ~
6~~,
4
KO & AS50CIATES, P.G.
Consulting Engineers
1aa sauus na, earls zoz sxitzca, n.c zrcoe
qe 1919) 9546066
"... "" t
~'
~,
N0. I SHEET N0.
RM' SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUDCS
ENGINEER ENGINEE0.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
W NOT U9E FO CONSTRUCTION
'
J
Rr~~
i
~r
/ l~
~
l
~~r r ~ ~~
~\, ~ "--~ ~ ~ / ~
~ `\ ~ / .~ ` / ~ S
.%o fs \
.l ~ i /
~ ~ ~ 'L tJr~
~
~`~~~
'
/ O
~
~
~,
. ~ .' """' ~
~ DO
LEGEND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
DENOTES PERMANENT
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
/ /
f \ /~ 0
~ \\, ~ sp'a`s"rii5 ~"
~ /
--"S''/~
.% ~%/ I'
/ ~ 1
go~brfA cur blrcH '
~a ~' ~
SEE,DET K ~SHT.2-D1
Permit Drawing
Sheek a of ~
GLI
~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROC%INGHAM COUNTY
PROJECT: 33594.1.1 O1--0252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREE% AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LPfTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREE%
ON US 311
10/ 16/ 0'

xn R n.ecnr.InTF~S, P,G.
:ers
;N.G 21606
PROJECT REFERENCE N0.
e-s~2
R/y~' SHEE7 N0.
oaownY oesicN
ENGINEER
PRELIMIN R
OO NOT U56 PO L
SHEEP N0.
HYDRAUULS
ENGINEER
Permit Drawing
Sheet { n of ~~
;o
GLI
50
50
SCALE
1~~~®~
DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS
ROC%INGHAM COUNTY
PROJECT:3359411 (B-9252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
LSLAND CREE% AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREE%
ON US 311

PER ANENT
WA ER I,„
f%' '
,.... J ~ ;
~ / y /~~/
-/,,:~
1 '~/"~ '~
~ i.~'~ .
\. .''%%
~ ~\~ >
~~ti ~~~ ~
m
u
a
a,
A
e
Y
v
3
E
a
T
r
N
v
M
N
3
v
~.
aA,7
J'`\ ~ ~ .
~~~~ ~
` / _ `~
`~ .,,, ~
\~
~~
---585--`~ ~ln
I ~~
f~ ~, -------J
REMOVE EXIST. ~
4' x 5' RCBC i
\\ ~/
\`', -'
~~~°~,
50 0
50 50
SCALE:I°= 50' HORIZ.

'a,
~,~
a KO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. PR°B~"~2"`E "°. S"~ "°.
`~ ` , Consulting Engineers wW sHEEr No.
~\ ~,'~ 1ov SNAIID D0., 61111E 'M]BALtIGft N.G YIfi06 ROADWAY GESIGN HYDRAWCS
1 i~ 19191 &51{U66
~ ~~ '~ ENGINEER ENGINEER
~ \ ~~,` \ \
~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ PRELIMIN Y PLANS
14+2911 ~ ~ .
~ Do xo7• oee ao caxsrnvcr[ox
,~~~ 1~~ ~V` ~~ ~
,~ -< - - ~~ ~ r 1I~. ~~ ,1,`,-Y~~. ~~ ~~
~.,,.,; ~~, 10/
,~~, 4 s ~
'`'~ ~' ~ ~ ' j ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ mit Ora irg
;",~,-i,~' ~ \ ~l~r li 1 ' ,~ ~ ~1 ; ~ ~, '~ ~, ~ Sheet 1 ~ w
.~"` ~ ~ ~ I ~ v!1 ~
r
,. :.ri a~ ~ ~ art ~ \f ~?, ~. '~~. ~ ~, ~~'~
1 ~1
,~~''' A ~ Q (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,, ~ ,__ ~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~~ J~
~./-~ ~
h ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,., -~' - -~
~' \ I '~~~ ,• 7 ~ -- ~ I i
~t ~ ~ - ~~~ T~ i
y . \ ~ ,~ 1 ~ ,, /I ~ ,, ~ ~I 1, ~ ~, 1
i f n , 1~- ~' ; ~' i~ 1 . ;~ 1 i
~i'' ~~ ~ ,
,,~ \, A~\~ ~~ A~~~
.~,~
,,~ ,~-
I~ ~ ~ 1'~ lg~,~„ ~. ~ ~
F , t ~' I
r i,
r
r , t r~i ,
,~
t ~
f 1,
t 1~ ~~
1
t 1 1 ~ ; ,;.
~ ~ tt ~%~''r.'°'%
~1 I~~•
~~ ;,~
t
TEMPORARY
SURFACE
WATER IMPACT
~.
~-„ - ~
';r ti, ~ i r `~, ~
-~;
4 1 I
. / 11
~ ~
I ' t~ ~ 4
't
~ I ~ ~~ ~~ ~
~ ~ `3
f ~ ~~ `
1~ ~ ~ 4 1 ~ ,
I ~~~

r
0
~\ ~*~\ ~ f\ ~..
1. A\\V ~ ~ 8 `~\ ~ it ~ ~t ~„
~~: ,
4 i ~ ~ ~\ 1 ~
Jl ~'~ ~
\~ ~ `~
~, 1 ~/'~' ~ \ .~A~~~ ~ ,
~,~.,~,, ,-"~.~~r ~.~~~.
r,
_~ ,
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~A ~
~~~~
LEGEND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
DENOTES PERMANENT
® SURFACE WATER IMPACT
GLI
~~~®°~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROC%INGHAM COUNTY
PROJECT:33594.1.1 (B-4252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREE% AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREE%
ON US bll

c
m
N
0
~i
i
U
t
N
N
cv
a
n
i
0
3
N
0
w
o~
o.
QETAIL A oETai~ c DETAIL D
SPECIAL CUT DITCH LATERAL BASE DITCH RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
(Not to soo14 I Noi to SpdN I Rot h soaW
_ Fl~
A~ --~ °s D B"r~' Ea ~
'ibr D
Foerlo Yln D=1Ft. V,
MID. D= I Ft. No>L d• L5 Ft. Fat. _ Tau
SHEET RDWY STATION -S7ATION SIDE •eheD B b <6.0' B= 2 Ft.
M 5 Ft. Type of Lhur• Clue IR¢ROp
Type of LMer-- daee B Alp-R<p
d -L- 12+50 TO 13+00 RT. SHEET 0.DWY STATION SIDE TONS
d -L- 12+SD TO 13+OD LT. SNEET RDWY STATION -STATION SIDE
4 -L- 13+SD TO 14+03 RT. 5 -l- 27+41 LT. EST. 10
d -L- 13+SD TO 14+03 LT. 5 -1- 25+50 70 27+41 LT. 5 -L- 31+78 RT. EST.30
4 -L- 15+50 TO 16+10 RT. 7 -Y- 16+20 RT. E5T.10
4 -Y- 25+00 70 26+23 RT.
4 -DR1- 10+35 TO 11+75 LT.
5 -YI- 14+50 TO 15+00 LT.
fi -L- 36+25 i0 37+50 LT.
6 -L- 41+00 TO 41+50 LT.
1 -Y- 13+00 TO 13+50 LT.
7 -Y- 13+00 TO 13+50 RT.
7 -Y4- 11+13 TO 13+00 LT.
STa I~ DITCH
D
Len D• IFr.
NmL ~ l5 Ft.
Nhn R Y <tA' & Ft.
Type M LRrr• PEMI
SHEEP RDWY STATION EIRE B
5 -If 25+91 RT. 1
5 -L- 26+32 Ri. 4
CHAN~EMENT
INOF iD SoaN
D
FFhr FdNi YID, k Ft.
Yax. d• 4 Ft.
B= Ft.
type of LBtore Cleve IAlp~iop
T RDWY STATION SIDE D
SHE
7
B
-Y- 16+10 RT. 4' 4'
DETAIL L
urERaL ~ DITCH
ENpt to sear
1 - S~loppe
D
Mh D= I Ft.
SHEET RDWY STATION -STATION SIDE
7 -Y- 15+00 TO 16+OD LT.
FAL~ S~ 91J1MP '
fNOi to Scole) _
iraffla FIavH
lpS 20:1 .~2.D
01
~-E- eto
5 = Dltoh Slope ~ Proposed Dltch
EHEEi 0.DWY STATION EIDE
4 -Y- 26+10 LT.
7 -Y- 16+99 LT.
STANDAADRCH
I N•t to SaWel
D
Lents Ft.
B• Ft.
SHEEP RDWY STATION SIDE 0 B
5 -l- 26+03 RL 1' Y
7 -Y- 16+06 TO 11+13 -Y4- RT. 1' 4'
LaTFAAOE LABASE DITCH
f Net tp SodN
D ~- Skoe
LOn ~ I Ft.
~ 2 Ft.
b• 5 Ft.
SHFET RDWY STATION -STATION SIDE
7 -Y- 16+00 TO 16+50 LT.
C~IFM
E Net to SapW
~D
FRhr Fdrl Rlln 0= L5 Ft.
Mmu d= 2 Ft.
B= 2 Ft.
Type of LMer= Gaee Iflry~-Aap
SHEEP ROWY STATION SIDE
7 -Y- 16+OD LT.
TOE P~ N
1 x•t to Saol•1
SHEEF RDWY STATION -STATION SIDE
5, 6 -L- 35+00 TO 36+50 LT.
YS1JS~ l
ROADWAY CUT DRCH
I Not to SodJ
xana ~~
D
a
Ymc ~ IFt.
Type of Llner- PSAY
SHEEP RDWY STATION -STATION SIDE
7 -Y- IB+00 TO 22+00 0.T.
7 -Y- I6+99 70 22+00 LT.
7 -Y4- 10+50 TO 11+73 LT.
FA~~P o
I NOt to Ecael
T~rafflc Flowh
:l 2'
-- ~ cl
~E- eto.
s=mt~h snipe p Propo6ee Dlt~h
SHEET RDWY 5IATION -STATION SIOE
5 -L- 25+DO LT.
7 -Y- 14+SD LT.
PREFORMED SCOUR HO
DETAIL E LE
,
,,
~ NIII ICII•tlQwLL
~ __
,
-
`^
A
1
~bne"+eM B• S Ft.
ter aen1E D= 2 Fi
^= 1 Ft
d• IFt.
$EFTgN A-A
~~+
Rew F4"' a
Leene~ 1119 N~
F 1Hek MM Flhr FdH• r~~
SHEET RDWY STATION SIDE
5 -L- 2B+4i LT.
5 -L- 30+40 LT.
5 -YI- 10+30 RT.
KO ~ ASSOCIATES, P,C,
Consulting Engineers
IOll 9CNdGB NF.6(RIE '~61 RALF]GN, N.CTifi06
PROTECT REFERENCE E10. SHEET N0.
8-4252 2-D
Rho SHEET N0.
OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAl1LICE
ENGINEER ENGINEER

PRELIMIN RY PLANS
W NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
Permit Drawing
Sheet ! ~ of 1 ~
~~.~
GLI
~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ROC%INGHAM COUNTY
PROdECT:33594.1.1 (B-4252)
BRIDGE 95 OVER BIG BEAVER
ISLAND CREE% AND
BRIDGE 67 OVER LITTLE
BEAVER ISLAND CREE%
ON US 311

/16/2007 Gina i4a

N
W
~
1
I

N
~+.
~
~
.
! 577

1
1 N
BE DIT RT.
/ BE DIT LT. +
N
U1 1
ELE
.623. I
~
N
~

CH L N
~ I • -
DI
CN R ~
EqN TCN T. ~ .

+ .~
~
r W
EV.
21.79
~
2.46
j
~ _ ~
N
~ ,y^ ~ ~ ELE 1620. 3 PVC ST f'3+ ~ STA. 350

TA
+50 r ~ ~
~'
.

I t ~~

~~ ~~~
~

EV.

6 7
STA.
V
4+08
N
_
~~
y ~ , ~~ ~ ~~~~ }~
~~~ ~ ~ q
~Eg$$i v
N
V r17 U !5 ~° ~~~~ ~~ ~
~ ~~~~''~ m 2
~ D DI L ~ Q ~~~ ~ g p~ ~~~~~ T~ 6 6 1 ~

~
iO~ ~ 8~
~ y
~ ~~~'-I~~~~~ ~
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
Amy
BE
DIT
RT
N
~ + ~o (v
ar°~~~~LS~YI a

~
~~
~ EL .615 90
t~
~l ~i
~til
r
a DIT RT
.
~ ~
N
~O
h ~,
~ V
W
c ,` ~

~~
~ E

7 ao

w f
~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
Q
~~ ~~~

w
N ~
~
g
N
• ~ ~ ~~~~i~~~in
~ ~~
~~$
~~~
~ D
' p
p
p
~ '-I~~
'~1~
~~ N
i
N
N
O

W
W

'
~
s N
W
A
r ~~
N
N
L1y 1
~ ' r.Y

~
~ ~ 4
~
~ C
r c~
J ~
~ F
1

A?

ST

35

~

'b
~
i f

~

~
~
4 ~.. ~ C G~ Z ~
1~ z ~~. am ~ ~
H r C
Cd
~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~
~ ~ ~

® ' I ~ ~

~ ~ N
~ ~ xx~ ~ o
7tl ~ ~ C,C ~~ ~ `fi r" ~~
~
0
V ~ ~ r y o

ics\dgn\Permrts\Surf ace Water\64252_hyd_prm_pf l_sheets.dgn
c ai "•
EV. 6.67
~A~'
N
is ~
V
OD
~O
N
O
N

N
N

N
W

QQg~ ~
2
~
~ $ ~~ ~ rn
~

~ ~~~~
~o
a
~ ~~~~~~~~~
Q~`~ ~. g ggy
~~ .81
~t:~~'i ~6 -
6S

S

o~
y~ .~
~~,
z,.~ o~~z
r c ~ ~ ~ ~ °
V~l ~ ~ `O ~
~~E°~~
~~
r
'
~
~~`'';w~'~C
t+
T
0
V
W
tr
W
O~
W
V
~~~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~~~~ ~ ~~
~ °
~ ~~~~~~~~~ a W
~~~ y ~a ,~
O
~ N
n. W
A~
~! r~
~
S i' ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ Z
z
a
~
a ,~
~r ~~

O n
A C
z~ ~

tp
=
N
~

r- -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
I
I
I
I ~
I ~
s
I ~
I ~
I ~
t
I N
I N
I ~
~ ,e
-,~
"' of
~i~c
I - a`
~i:
0 0.
~ N 3L
~ ~ ~~
~ 0-
~ a~4
p~F
N lF
RM~ R11
1
MO1M
.R
~Q }A b~ p~
e~~ ni
~
M n,
A/
T`~~
R~'R lMItA 1~AMFlR. M%LRRN
33594,1.1 BRSTP~114 P.E.
33594,1.1 BRSTP-311 4 RAV 6 UtiliHe~

PAVEMENT SCHEDULE

~1 PROP. APPROX. 11¢" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE CDUASE, TYPE 88,6B,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 788 LBB. PEA 80. YD.

EP pBDp, APPROX. b14" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE CDUASE, TYPE 826,OB,

AT AN AYEAAOE RATE OF 827 LBB. PER 60, YD.

CQ PADP. APPROX. 9" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE CDUASE, TYPE BB.bB,
AT AN AVEAADE RATE OF 188 LBB, PEA 80. Y0. IN EACH DF TWD
LAYEAB,

E3 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE CDUASE, TYPE B46,OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 714 LBB. PEA BD. YD. PER 1" DEPTH, TO
BE PLACED IN LAYEAB NOT LE88 THAN 3" IN DEPTX OA GREATER
THAN 61+1" 1N DEPTH.

C3 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 88,68,
AT AN AVERASE HATE OF 11E LBB• PER 90. YD. PER 1i' DEPTH. TO
8E PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO E%CEED 2" [N DEPTH.
~
PROP. R" h00AE0ATE BABE COURSE.
D1 PROP. APPROX. 21Q" ASPHALT CONCRETE ]NTERNEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I1B•DR, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 28b LBB. PEA 8D. Y0. j EARTH RATEAIAL.

D2 PROP. 4AA, DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE CDUASE,
TYPE I7B.OR, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 174 LBB. PEA 80. YD. PEA 1"
DEPTH, TO EE PLACED IN LAYEAB NOT LE88 THAN R19" IH DEPTH OA
u
E%I8TIN0 PAVERENT.
DREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
E1 PROP. APPRO%. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE 816, OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 468 LBB. PER 80. YD. W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOTE: PAVEBENT EOOE BLDPE6 ARE 1:1 UNLESS BROWN OTHERWISE.
TRANSITION FROM EXISTIN
~ STA,14+75,00 TO 13 H
USE TYPICAL SECTION NC
-4- STA,13+26,00 TO 25
-lr STA. 35+45,00 TO 41
TRANSmON FROM T.S. N0.1 i0 EXISTING
STA. 41+00.00 TO 41+50,00
USE TYPICAL SECTION NC
-~ dr STA. 25+25.00 TO 4!
r -lr STA. 28+43,00 ~APPRC
-1r• STA.34+35.50 ~APPRO
~Q~
i°
4 -I.
ARIB ~ F%ISTING
4~
~RO & ASSOCIATES, P,C. M10JE~rEEEaa'cE"D' axEEr,
Coaeul' E B-4252 2
Gag ag1a00l1 ROADWAY DlSIGN PAVEMlNT DElI
~ ~ m'°m ~ W~'~~' ENGIN®, ENGINEER
D~ Ib,IM
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
DD NOT V5S FO CONSTRUCItON
6UMI _.._._, Q DDi11N6
~ 8~ i , ~~~
u
Y
MIN NIN.
DetoilShowlnp Method OfWedpinp
S"
MIN.
' ADD S' WRN GUARDRAIL
"' FOR NARROW WIDENING LESS THAN 4', USE RASE COURSE IN UEU OF REEERA{EDIATE COURSE
'AGO D'wnTH GUARDRAIL

PAVEMENT SCHEDULE

C1 PROP. APPROX. 114" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE BA,BB,
AT AH AYEMGE RATE OF 188 LBB, PEA Bq. YD.
EE PROP. APPROX, 814" ASPHALT CDNCRETE BABE CDUABE, TYPE B48.OB,
AT AN AYEMGE RATE OF 827 LBB. PEA BD. YD.

CQ PADP. APPROX. B" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE BA.eB,
AT AN AYERAGE RATE OF 188 LBB. PER 00. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYEAB.

E3 PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CDNCRETE BABE CDUABE, TYPE B48.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBB. PEA BD. YD. PER 1' DEPTH, TD
BE PLACED IN LAYEAB NOT LESS THAN 8" IN DEPTH OA GREATER
THAN 614" 1N DEPTH.

C3 PROP VAA~ DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 80.88,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBB. PEA BD. YD. PER 1~ DEPTH. TO
~
PROP. B° AGSAEGATE 8A8E COURSE.
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 4" IH DEPTN.
D1 PAOP~ APPROX. 414" ABPNAL7 CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I1 A.OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE DF 488 LBB. PER 80. YD. T EARTH MATERIAL.
PADP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,

DZ TYPE ItA,OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 111 LBB. PER Sq. 'N. PER 1"
DEPTN, TD BE PLACED IN LAYEAB NDT LE88 THAN 414" IN DEPTH OR EXISTING PAVEMENT.
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.

E1 PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE B48.OB,
AT AN AVERADE RATE OF 468 LBB. PER Bq. YD.
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAYEMENi
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE BLOPEE AAE 1:1 UNLE86 BHDWN OTHERWISE.
TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO i.S. N0.3
-Y- STA. i3+15.00 TO 13+65.00
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.3
-Y- STA. 13+65,00 TO 15+75.00
4 -Y-
~AO ~ ASSOCIATES, P,C,
Consulting Engtneare
mm ^sM.7In.MmN ~u~e,e,crna
511AM' C BORINe
~ _~ ~
~ i ~
u
D° sy~"
AMN. MN.
DehilSlbwinp MMhod OfWedpinp
'ADD O' VIRH GUARDRAIL
• ADD s' YlITH GUARDRAIL
a I USE TYPICAL SECTION NC
-Y- STA. 15+75.00 TO 2!
~ -r-
s•
MIN.
OU NUT U58 FUI CDNSTRUCItON

PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C1 PROP. APPROX. 1YQ" ASPHALT CONCRETE 6UAFACE COURSE, TYPE SG.SB,
AT AN AVEAADE RATE OF iBB LB6~ PEA BD. YD.
E2 PROP. APPROX. bl"e" ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE B26.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 0E7 LBB. PEA 80~ YD.

CQ PROP. APPROX. 8° A8PHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE BS.dB,
AT AN AVERADE RATE OF i8S LBB, PEA B0. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYERS.

E3 PROP. YAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE B76.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBB. PEA SG, YD. PEA 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IH LAYERS NOT LE88 THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 6ti4" 1N DEPTH.

~3 PROP. VAR. DEFTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 8S•bB,
AT AN AVENGE RATE OF 112 LBB. PEA 8D. YD. PER 11' DEPTH, TO
~
PROP, S° AGGREGATE BABE COURSE.
SE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED E" IN DEPTH.
D1 PROP. APPAOx, 2Y4° ASPHALT CONCRETE INTEANEOIATE COURSE,
TYPE I18,OB, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF eBd LSB. PER BO. YD. T EARTH LUTER]AL.

DE PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTEANEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I1S,OB, AT AH AYERAGE RATE DF 114 LBB. PEA BG. YD. PEA 1"
DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LEBB THAN 46¢" IN DEPTH OR
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
Et PROP, APPROX~ 4" ABPxuT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE Be6.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 4bB LBS~ PER 8O. Y0. µl VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS BROWN OTHERWISE.
7.7
USE TYPICAL SEC110N N0.5
-YI- STA. 10+18.00 TO U+75.00
TRANSITION FROM T,S. N0.5 TO E1O5TING
-n- sTA.1a+T5.oo ro 1s+oo,oo
7,•!
~ Y4-
4' ti' ~ ts' _ . _ 4'
OSIGINAL
G0.0UNp
USE TYPICAL SEC110N N0. b
m -Ya- STA,10+63.00 TO 11+50,00
a
~~
N
~ -L-
~RO & ASSOCIATES, P,C, Nt01~ EEiFIBICE ND IHEEf N0.
B-4252 2-8
Consulting Englnoan ~ ~~~ DN RAV~6 D~eBGN
mH E61EM
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
DO NOT U58 FO OONSTROCf1ON
4 tug ~ epEnNo
O
E.1 3
i
i ~
u
AYH. eM1~N," ~n B'
odTGnsnG,~Ho MestGa orwedalNo ~".
•,wD s'wrGi cuARDw~IL
" FO0. NARROW WIDENING IBS THAN 4', USE BASE COURSE IN UEU OF INTERMEDIATE COURSE
Di eih" ~ 812' D1 T
T El Ei
7;~
GRADE TO nic UNE vA1LYN
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 5 MGR
-Yl- (SR 1169)
,{;t
b ~'r
GRADE TO THIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0. b
Y4- (SR 1138)
4;1
ORIGINAL 1
OMGINAL 1
~O

PAVEMENT SCHEDULE

~1 PROP. APPROX. 114" ABPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE CDUABE, TYPE 8e,6B,
AT AN AVERAGE AATE OF 10B LBB. PER BO. YD.
E2 p6gp, APPAO%, 614" ABPHALT CONCRETE BABE CDURBE, TYPE B26•DB,
AT AN AYERAOE RATE OF e4T LBB. PER 8D. YD.

CQ PROP. APPROX. 9" ABPHALT CDNCAETE BUAFACE CDUABE, TYPE 8B.6B,
AT AN AVERAGE AATE OF 16B LBB. PEA Bq. YD. IN EACH OF TWO

LAYERB.

E3 PROP. VAA. OEPTN ABPHALT CDNCAETE BABE CDUABE, TYPE B4B.OB,
AT AN AYEAAOE AATE OF 114 LBB. PER 80. YD. PER 1" OEPTX. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERB NOT LE88 TNAN 3' IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 614" IN DEPTH.
PROP. VAA. OEPTN ABPHALT CONCRETE BUAFACE CDURBE TYPE 8B•6B,
~3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBB. PEA 8q. Y0. PER 1I' DEPTH. TO ~ pAOP. B" AGGREGATE BABE CDUABE.
BE PLACED IN LAYERB NOT TO EXCEED 4" !N DEPTH.
D1 PROP. APPROX. 414" ABPHALT CONCRETE INTEANEDIATE COURSE,
TYPE I1 B•OB, AT AN AVERAGE AATE OF 486 LBB. PER 8q. YD. T EARTH MATERIAL.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ABPIULT CONCRETE INTERNEpIATE CDUABE,
DP TYPE I1B.OB, AT AN AYEAAOE AATE DF 111 IBS. PEA"Bq. YD. PER 1"
DEPTH, TO BE PLACED LN LAYERS NOT LEBA TXAN 414 IN DEPTH OR u E%IBTING PAVENEHT.
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.

E1 PAOP• APPRO%. 4" ABPHALT CONCRETE BABE CDURBE, TYPE B26.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 468 LBB• PER SG. VD.
W VARIABLE DEPTN ABPHALT PAVEMENT
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES AAE 1:1 UNLESS KNOWN OTNERWIBE•
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.7
Y4- STA. 11+50,OD TO 12+b0,00
TRANSRION FROM T,S. N0.7 TO E]a5T1NG
Y4- STA. 12+60.00 TO 13+OD.00
ORIGINAL
GROUND
8' _ _ 4' _ "
4i -Y4-
~KO & ASSOCL4TES, P;C,
Coaeultag Engiaoere
as1 iu1a1
4 wEVer @ eaEna
C1 ~
E9 Hr 7
i h `
i ~ O ~
u
'~ 414" ~n
RUN. MIN. MN. ,y
Detail Showing Method Of Wedging "'"'
4'
7n ~ TnJ/
T E1 U ~ T
CAADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 7
Y4- (SR 1138
~ -DR1-
_ 4' _ ~ . 11' _ 11' _ .. 4'
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0.8
-0Ri- STA,10+15.10 TO 11+95.68
m
a
d
ORIGINAL
GROUND
?'/
A:1
~B
GRADE TO TNIS UNE
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 8
-DRI-
4:T
4d
m xar uss
ORIGINAL
ORIGINAL

KQ ~ ASSOCIAT
m oaeu dag Ea
mn u~un ex,aas am eus
~~
-L-
PI Sfo 12+1252 P/ $to 20+1526 PI Slo 24+2&46
p = 7'58'!8A'(LT) p ~ 3'37'27.5'lLTI p ~ 3'37'275'lRT)
D = f 52' 428' D = r08' 453' 0 = 042'53'
L = 42435' L = 316.28' L =5016,05'
T =21252' T = 158J9' T = 253Jr
R = 3,050.00' R = 5A00.00' R = 8A70A0'
SE = OA3 SE = DA2 SE = NC
NA0 83195
1
/ I
m 8976~4z' w AkIE ~
99.51'
O I ~
JAGK A. & IDA P. DIUDN ~ BL-4 10+20.73 PINC
DB 745 Pc 4G7
OB A69 PG 790 ~ BYA-44 5+00.00 POT
-L- POT 16+49.31, 31.08' RT.=
-Y- POT 26+37.67,10.02' LT.
BEGIN PROJECT 8-4252
+ ~
N 85'49'47TE JAMES D. HODGES W -L- POT IB+(IJS ~ O
& LINDA HDDGES -Y- POT 26+69x38
OB 317 PG 444 JACK A, & IDA P. DILLON
-(- PT 14+24,35 GB 1137 PG 1103
o" BfGix J00'rAPER ~ ~ -L- PC 18+5TOI
-L- PC ~+Op,00 -1- Iz+rS.oo Lr a Rr sP WL CUT grcH -L- PRC 21+7335
SE DETAIL A (SHT.2 I
SPECIAL CUT TCN Ex0 3aTTaPER
{'',~ SEE DETAIL A SHT.2-01 _L_ r5+75.00 Er & Rr
a +50
w rseao EST~3 0 SIPRAP ~ w
~'l ~ ~ ry EST, 10 SY FF p ~p
~~`I a...@@@' N ~`
Q - 9x P 4N
x Q 50' ~
8
N5 ~ COLLAR AND END '
18'RCP,BLF~ ~
+ woaos [ Q
~_~~---------
~~ Q
U
x
,n,, Q
~~
'
f 235 ~ X wooos
, ~ ~,
2
EIPW o
,,nn,,
6'VL ExrstxV4 Ww 7- RiW ICI 2.5'Riw GY C
't
- ~` ~ N
EIP j 70/EM EPA ~ 0.30'PR
~-~~ _ --~. ~ YF
LE
~ J
15
-
F -.--
.. -
~ ~ -
~- R~ _,
_
aiw
'~rsnn
~
O A41ROR A?
x-
-~~- 5 P~ - ss
~
C ` ~ __ \ ~ ~ /
E
G
~ rra,-_
rz. RC Fes-`" _- / r-~~~ - -_ ~
-w-
_ - ~~
P - -
-L-
o _ _ Z
--- - - ---r.o -- sL -- _ - -
~
0
-
-~~
.l EwSi;M ~M 6"$rL7N- -~ _ 6 .-"- 1- W ~
t
u P= . . ~. - .....
_ ~

1 /W y~
H~IJ, L~S~
24'BSr ..........
--- -_
--
W
v.~n..1- - ---'--6---- ---
I r 2or iLr L - -- - ----- - -- - --- -
-~----
2.54 ax ~
~ V TO R/WE STONE well BK EMISi
I~I ~ ~ Rsp +75 sror~ we L o owMN R
Q ~ 4I~,Q Er. RM' >
I I ~ ~ ~ ~ DI~T'AtiTADtSH 2-q Q ~ ~ I I ' ~
Im IN SPEfi(~L DITCH ~ ~
I I +75 Q I Iml SEE T L~ tSHT.2•Dr _~_ I FS-I ~. 1 1 +7
JDAN K,GRDGAN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2;.1 ~ ~~ Iu
,,nn,, 1\ \~
DB 525 PG 305 111!
DB 719 PG 3l7 BEGlN r50'rAPER I
DB 1046 Pc zel ; -1- 13+50 RT +2~5 E D ! T ER ~ 4 +.~ ~1 4 IP' r a
PB4 PG 37
25 (-Y-J -1 5 WANOA G. GRIM I P
DB 714 PG 109
BL-3 5+00.00 POT = ~ ~.EK -~ Dale i Pe li°o ~ ~ `Y
sPEau cur aTCH
-L- POC 11+30.64, 1.42' RT. SEE DETAIL A cSHi.2-D7 I I I /
wo Os
REMOVE Hw N <~ I swwo I , /
COLLAR AND E%TEND ~ ^ F V
v
IB' RCP, K LF o A ~ I~ w I r R=37
N ~
Z h Q`~ I+r -1 I a s
LEON W. & JDYGE B. WALL ~ ~ ~ I m ~ ~ I E ~~~
DB 927 PG 2408 I ~, ~ I
S 69'22'04• E J ~
2-~
` - - - -

' _
- " ---
6
$TL IHPI ~ ~ N
~eiw wtir ~ ~ Z {Ll
- _ ~ ~ W
~ ' ~ - - - -- - -- TIE TO E%ISTNG = {
/1

+J5f-L-1
5f-

+57,~
nPEe uic DITCH
+7J35 ~
r~ Er. RiW
E'
0~ CLASS re' RPRAP ~ 09/05
- EST.3 TONS
EST. 10 SY FF BL-5 14+37.95 PINC =
+ X__ _
___ +~-Y-r _________--
- - -
47
96' RT
-L- POC 20+65
20
- 7
r55 ,
.
.
.
E ~, /
SPECIAL CUT gTCH /
_ W SEE DETAIL A ISHT.2-0I /
-
- - - - -DRI- POT n+98~ , /
/
-ORI-
END 240'rMER Pl$10 ~+9483
-r- zs+~,DG u & Rr O p = 78' SD' 16.7' (LT!
SPECIAL CUT DITCH D - l~4'35'29B
w SEE DETAIL A fSHT. 2-DI NEW VISIDN FELLOWSHIP, INC L ~ ~~
_~1_ ~ 11+2253 DB 1063 PG 1492 T ~ 4U0'
/ PA 47 PG IB R a ~~'
/
+Op-Y-1
H5 2
~
P
ao ~i -Y- PDT 24+0000 = I R= a ~ ~
-DRI- POT 10+00,00 _ I r -DRI- PC 10+53J3
~- I
~"~ J
i "~3,e N 895o're• GRADE TO gtAIN
0 292.54' ~_ _=.61' \ E I
m ~
~ + -r-1
HOLE IN ~ W 7d
m' CONG -MATCHLINE- _y_ U
a
SEE SHEET Np ~23+00
88 126
138 US 311 196
2 40
IP To
42
az
SR 1138
2003 ADT
2025 ADT
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES lIN HUNORED51
Ho.
LEGEND
Q PAVED BHOULDER
® APPROACH BLAB
FOR -L- PROFIE.SEE SHEET N0.8
FOR -Y- PROFLE.SEE $II:ET N0.9
FOR -YI• PROFLE, SEE SIEET ND. 10
FOR -OR I- PAOfIE.SEE SIEET N0. 10
FOR giCN DETAIS.SEE SHEET N0.2•I

nPE B-n §I nPE B-n HAROLD R. & ~ _ri_/ ~~ RALPH E. McCRACKEN & I a KO & ASSOCIATES P C, YAOIECT RERiRENCE NO. 8HEk7 ND.
b ~ x x b h RaerN T• MEAL ~ CHRISTINE MoGRAGYEN END CONSTRUCTION ~ ~ B-4252 5
-Yl- POT /5+1900 DB 799 PG le Ex, ~ B 1237 Pc 1271 Coaeuldn En eete
m N PA T Pr. AA ~^ +047A"-YT-9 P6 7 PG -YI- STkI5+~.00 , I® em4oewl4a ~ amu~T~•a,Atcned RhY SHEET NO•
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m I Ex. N B2'29'41' E ~ ~~
ROADWAY DEIGN HYDRWUd
5 e2`ir26•w v x as.P+' m ENOCVEER ?!WNlH
a ~ ~ a 15 (-Yl-) 169.96' _y/ o I e oN ~ ro
SPECIAL CUT DITCH f9 I I I ~ ~ +C46ra'-YI-!
' b a x x b a SEE DETAIL e I A aN ~ P'~tBT.rI~`T1hRT~ ~~~k~~~
nPE a-n nPE B-n BYI-17 5+00.00 POT = csHT. 2-DI I I l uu xgi;ualt Rna eai~~avicewH
~ I ` END 2CD'TAPER /f
x GuARawL AxcxoRS -YI- POT 14+57.34,19.05' LT. ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~-~
PAVEMENT -BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH wAAW ~ = I I -n- 14+7sm v & Rr
I
-L- el I ~ - „- 7YPE BX A,I nPf B-n t ~
PI Sio 24+25,46 P/ SiC 34+63,88 p~ .L
0 = 3'37'275'(RT) Q = 257'S12'IRT) ~I UT/FILL TRM4SITION p
D = 042'583" D = 042'583' ~ II ~LL pLass •B•RIPRAP o _~ • ~ o
_- L =50505' L = 413.89' I ] ~W" it EsT•'TOns "o N ~ "o SR 1169
EST.S SY FF ~ o ~ N
a T= 253lM T=20699' I I C GRID
f R= 8,000.00 R= 8,000.00 GanE N. DROwN I I~ I I ~ b a ,~ t o NAp 83/qg 32
DB 1270 PG IGSB 48
SE = NC SE = NC I I nPE a-n nPE B-n
cuTrFlu TRarvslsTlpN ~ '^ III I ~ , GuaRDRaL aR~CtgRs
- CLA55 'B' AIPRAP
ESLITONS ~ II 1 ~ PAVEMENT -BRIDGE RELATIONSHIP SKETCH 22 I ~~
j EST.5 SY FF I I 3..2„/// 16
b~;3 BYI-16 9+27.66 PNC = - J I I ~
?2gssµ ~ -L- POT 29+12.66, 29.50' LT. = ENp sHauLDER ~ ~' ~ o O I 126 us 3D iw
N -YI- POT 10+29.73, 25.24' LT. BERN CUTTER I 1 M Ady 3
BEG/x 2~'TAPfR IY 196 180
-YI- STA. H1+85 LT 6 RT. N .
3 -YI 12+i5DD Li & R! BELLWOOD VILLAGE. INC. & n ry
END APPROACH SLAB : ~ I I G AU-35D ELANCHE w. BELL 2003 ADT
JACK A. & IDA P. DILLON III ~ +5p OB 1094 PG 1809 2025 ADT
OB 1137 PG 1103 -L' STA.2B+4314 o X I-
II" I I I BEGIN .dPPROACH $LA8 /N PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES (IN HUNDREDS)
s ~ \ RIPRdP w EMBANKMENT END 8R)DGE ~ I1 ml ~ -L- STA30+87.35 ~
r g SsrO SEE DETAIL D ISHT.2-DI -L- STA28+l90O ~~- = II ~~ I / ~
7g5 625• ~ 1 ( --~
ws. a PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE sNAU caowTN ~~ ~
~ O I I vI I VEGETATIW4 LT I
cant SEE DETAIL E ISHT.2-DT
HUGH D. PRELIM III& 6EIDT5 .~ OPEN C4TASS ~ ; A~ I BEGIN BRIDGE q DODB 6M5R GIN30BZ RD
EIP LYNDA G.FALLIN ~~ ~ ASS RRIPRAP A m i : PREFORMED SCOUT HOLE
j OB 755 PG B60 \ ~" U ~ TO SHD DEA I 15' CSP L ,RODS- STA3l+u50 SEE DETdR E ISHT.2-DI ~
'' 16.3a'2s N. v PT. YPd dN0 LUG ONNEC ORS ~
Z :. LATERAL BASE DITCH ~ 6 .94' Sb• ~ -L-1 BEGIN 3CO'TA°fR
w/CLe55 'B' PoPRAP w °°a -n-1 I I +Op-n-1 + IS' CSP w/ELBOwS.
Q ~ SEE DETAIL C ESHT. 2-D) o~, F,,,O, 50' I Sp• RODS erro LI1O _L- 33+WN LT & Ri END 3~'T4PER
pp ,..\/}S 9.~p eq , -L-I I +OQ'-YI- / COMIECTORS -L- 36+OOG0 LT & Ri
~' rO +5D s ~-' 5' ~F-~. 7 -L-1 CLASS II RIPRdP ~
++o fiO +Li7 d'Ap ~0 5 ~ g 6.O' ~ UP TO SHOLIDER ~
M 6ry s, :~'- 'sT EL uG ° PL ITYP.T
C _ ~ C EEX A0551 ' ; TOE PROTECTION
M~
Q I s ~ z ~$ GI ,o BY SEE DETAI H
~ G M m x' T P PIPE= 5 ISHT.2-DT
IIIII{MI 55.
w +, ~ o ~' F/ ~ F on~
i ~ ~ ~.. °0D- _._ _ _- .~ -~ tY ~~, .. a :.- .. w a ~~ k F 1~, F . - _ -_. worms-_ ~ __ _ F
` ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. 2CI FS-II F ~ .. s Z ~ _ I e.4E, b
_...- .a'
Ir ~ .__.... --_-_- .. .. .. . ~ - - -
N To Ew Xelsr~ Aiw _ M
1 z -- -- _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ duo
XLr, --------- -------~-
C J W ..-....._....- _. ....... ...... .. .. _..-..._.._~.._....-. --- _ ~._ ., - H O
IY ~ ........_. .. -.---- -- -..-...-_... _-_... _ .. ~ ... ...- ............. ... _......
W ~ I / rro.6T ~+ a nB.9s // 3p a 1Y TY Z
0- L ~ 12~W ----~- r Z c coNC e DAnT 1-- P E°NNrs c ~ _,~'---f-zst~=~"- o.css 36'- - J~
EXISTN6 AIM _ w 'a BENTS ~~\ s= - ~ ~ a - ~ ~ TYPICAL < - 1 ALT _ - 2PVC - - - -
W _
,.1 W 4b} • 'S1 d ((~ TYPICALI $TRUCTU NB BAARICA BLOW oFF W'LT ~ ~ ~ PUMP . CoNC ~ R-5 W
T ~/y~h~ } 7N Y _ ® _ L. ~ ~_I ~~T std ISLeryo . Q wrLr I '_'
y, H -EY- PDT ID+OOOD = /'I ~ ~ f~{x ,~(. + ~ .. Eels xc wow 6''STL I ~E~ ~~o e`oNC- coNC ~nsrn L[I N
rn I s .. + - O28'EIP o ISLeNO Z
~ U -L- PQC 25+3203 ,2586'RT. ~* ~ `~,+ ~' y WW T rw IsLAIm W
/ I + END OLDER WE . /W
p ~ ~ u I E 's/ ~. ~4`6 BEAM GUTTER Ex R W $ ~ - REMOVI~ 5' igC~ BsT a ~ es/ ~ ~ W
60 LF TAR DITCH r/p M i RUCT E 10' 22 ~. 02"x' ST0. +64 RT, oos ~ °o GRdpE TO N ~ _ ~
a BN SIGN ~ 9. S , ~" + ° STA CTU E BN VACUNS
6 ~ 4'BaSE w/2dSI0ES I CAVA pN n y. ~. s2, a "'"a,3 EPD sH0UL0ER + fOLp a~ ' I E%C VeT IrrPlcau -' arr
o EST. DDE =105 CY \ ~I
C ~ SEE DETAL F ISHT. -DI I MOVE 24' CMP ,Ex R/W '0 ~, BER GUTTER ILYI' ~ I I gyT Of ~ ~ 0
I ~~ ti "~ STe 30+35 RT. pRldp w EMB Ku T
TENPOAAAr ~ p I 1 t : ~ y ~ ~ : op ExCavaTED TO ELR.GNATE EE DET IL D 1 HT, -W '~ IseXrwn
seoaslNNT ~ t75 ~ f ~ ~.W3s. 1c•sTEEL Arc CUT DITCH W o o B o G N ° = Bus
+70 ~ 4 +~. EEA wosslNC STRUCTURE 140• P ' a m 01 BI m m
~,~ +75Ex• RnY ~ 1 EA: R/W' " ~c ~ 4 ~'+ `^. . E PP PIPE= E%CAVATION yy~ {/^r~ '^ "' b-BA7 IBNI
HORSE PASTURE '~ 4.31 ~' y 4 Q 15 STORM SYSTEM FLON$
~ 39 1 I A0, IMO EVIDENT FENCEI 1 ISF BI15 0°
1V1~~ 4 ) PI °a' LAA WASH
1 135" it® BL-7 25+48.28 R C = ! Awar FABN -L-
BL-6 19+53.98 PING = REN YE 15'RCP TrcNL
t
~ ~A, I 1 ('~~L(r ~ \ BYI-47 12+02.49 . OT = A ~ 11 C ~,' ~ wr359w
r
BY-46 5+00.00 POT = ~ -L- POT 31+77.14, .2 RT kl` lrr'~ Jaer M. muoN
-L- POC 25+82.28, 46.12' RT, ~' I ~ - ~ 25+7940 _ ~ -L- POT 29+3816 = ~ D ., ~ DD 974 PG 1600
~ 40 LF TAIL DITCH ~ ~ ~ : / ° POT 10+0000 -L- PC 32+ 18
2'BASE w/2:ISl)ES \yy- -
Q SEE DE~TaL G (SHT. 2-DI I I Exx, RAV j O ~ ., '~ d~ ., O ~~
\ I 1 : +55., THOMAS V.& CAROLYN M.
- aT ,EY~ pC / I I R2µ. CARDWELL J 2 ~~ ,D.M. SALES & PENTdLS.I EIP N ez•s6'4aE EIP ~p
O 2+7/,32 I y OB 725 PG 144 `o, OBPB BS PG 290 ~ 145.97 aN
NEW VI519N FELLOWSHIP, INC I ~ VE 15' CP / ~\ 4~, ~' ~/ ~aa
DB 1063 PG 1492 / 'h
PB 47 PG 18 / ac+m
I +~ BL-1 29+44.14 PINC
40 LF TAL DITCN w/PSRN I I '~ ~' ~ D " ~ma
m z•BASE w/zdslDES ,~ 1 I . +~ +yp BEGIN BRIDG \\ ~ END BRICGE 'GPS B4252-I' _ ;y ~~
~ EST, DDE = 24 CY = W /I I fx R/W -L- STA27 9.00 -L- POC 35+74.63, 38.90' RT. o
N SEE DETaL F l5HT.2-D9 ~_~ ~ 1 I : Ex,R - Y
m ° ~ ~, -L sra32+IL50 a
r ~Q~ / _p, y ~ m a
a. _ _.wQ rl BEGIN APPROACH SLAB__:._ _ _ :--- >'~s- -`_" sae•32sr•rv - - -
z --
N
- - n ._ _- - - ~A'~$S P 7 J - ~,-6Y-13 -8+61. -P-INC- -- -- - ~D-APPRDACff SCAB - _ -- - - S'a' _ ~7~~~ _
__ _
"'~ +y3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~= 18'39'165'(RT) ~= 420917'(RT)
/i• R_~ ®APPROACH SLAB
8q 1 x 5r / D = 1008'270' D = 3'57'052'
"_ ~ l '~ "` ~ A L = 18396' L = 11000
"q / / Rnr f T = 9280' T = 5503' FOR •L- PROFRE,SEE SHEET N0.8
`~ + ~ ~// " 1 ` R =55500 R = 1,450.00' FOR -Y I- PROFLE.SEE SHEET N0.10
a! // / /..iv.4. 1 ~ FOR DITCN DEidD.i SEE SNEET N0.2-D

rn
m
a
a
a>zo
~0~
~~
_C_
P! Sto 34+6388 PI SYo 39+2224
p =2'57'512' (RTl p = 7'IY 401(LT)
D • 442'583' D = I25'56B
L • 4!389' L =50227'
T -20699' T = 251.46'
R -800200' R • 4,00000'
SE • NC SE - 002
NC GRID
NAB 83195
J
J R
~.

O
P7
N
O
W
Zy
w
Iy

11
CORI$ MARTIN GYRO
F OB 675 PG 962
peeaoxo
4 TOE PROTECTION
~. SEE DETa1L H cSHT.2-q
+5p
~gp 75'
~'•~, 15 SPECIAL CUT DITCH
~ SEE DETAL A tSHT.2-q
\ ~ ~"
/ / woOaS
- i.t ~ ~~
NSP_ _ 't
END PROJECT 8-4252
-L- P T . 41 +54.1
N 79'07' 268' E
SPECIAL GUT gTCN
SEE DETmL A ISNT.2-D)
woaos

7 I
74' ~
BITS
~m
~o
0
EIP
_ _ ----
~- ~ esrLmpl - `_ ~ ~~_wi~i~ R--3r
I g
.y/ ~ E ~ J BSf ~E~15nNG PiM - 4~'I
IY -PAP FUEL cane Ex RM
- g.~awPS
~~ Is BLK aic rcEao
I 4O~~2L BUS i1Nx 1 +4
PAr S~ k / 1 I _ BUS MGL Ex.
N~~ II Ez RitY ~~,~/ ~~~Q Q f~ l Q Q
~3 ~I~= ~ ~ a° 14
Ib~.
9-U/G FUEL TANKS
II , H - JOHN K. LEryIS
Q SIZE UNK pg IlUB PG Igl
RET~11N W 1`w m PB 5 PG 29
GAS TOIVN, INC.
Og 8 4 PG 944
PB 5 PG 29
o N 7g'll'30r -
N 81'53'94' E X2.85'
171.72'
I~
1 I
I
6A%LE
P,(
NP. 4581' tBPO ) x_ ~ .. _~. ~. ~ ~ - _ _ - ~~ f
K 16'81- - - ~~
S:
- ~~~~~J ' ~J~ oss - . - B'VC
-~ - - -~~ EIP
~_ 'N ~ -. - ~~ 6'STLIHPI
_ ~~ 15'RCP - w/LT AAL
~ ~s / F' B J c ->•. - - CONC 21.6I' EIP
PL/NiER ~ W7LT SO EIP
vn R=5O' _~' ~ISSnc an EI {~
II EIP ' ~ I ~ Q
* I 4TC0 /(C f
Ea, RM I corvc `- ~
i _ ~ ~ ~ ~~o
m rXa CNL I&V2 8F0
J JIMMY ft. WI IAMS ~ ~
egl
~~~ I ~~~ Ex. Rm I---~- oa iea P aoo ¢;,
PB 5 P 29 s x ~ aoNc
~m ~~'w 14 I-2 STOAY o I pECA 48'CHL h
gK AP18 i( pLAN H. & CYNTHIA N.
~~ ~ ~ JONN K. LEWIS ~ COLEMAN
~~ ~~ 90 IIOg PG 167 pg 852 PG V2a7
PB 5 PG 29 pg g PG 68
I aQ ~ N 10'SC'4a'E~
40A0'
o _ _;
g N 79'll'30~ ~h
y N i9'1170'E ~tl flQ
~I 70.35' ~
1
BL-z sr+l~.aa rul I
'GPS 64252-2'
-L- POT 43+50.09, 23.06' RT.
No,
TT N0.

LEGEND
r~ PAVED 6HOULDEq
® APPNOACH BLAB
FOR -L• PROFLE,SEE SHEET N0.9
FOR giLN DETALS.SEE SIEET N0.2•D

a`
\
C
W
ep
N9
0~2~~5.6 FROM eY ~D `?
~ °oe P/ /O O 1
z -Y- POT 10+00.00 0GD3a a~; •?z•
E,a/
woods
\ woaos
ti~ ~,.
rOS\\ a ~~ "'•" SPECIAL CUT DITCH
\\ ,y ~ s ~ °j SEE DETaII a
~N ISHi.2-DI
\~ ~
~~ 'Ra\ ' t\ ~ +t5
\ s~ _ it
~\Eq \\\
woo \\ ~ ~\ • ~
° \`~\Y
BY-10 26+34.88 POT / ~ ~~~ ~ e°
-Y- POT 11+49.90, 28.11' RT. (,~ ( '~ ~~ > +
9 ( 9rMc
2~ R.
s4 FTt Ec
-r- PC N+59Jr +~
, ~
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
DPEN cRass dREn SEE DETAL A
tSHT.2•Dl ?S• 4D'
ro~~~R
-Y- PT 13+65A1 /
a R~ ~ A$$~~lA1~S, p,C, na B4252 No aH ~ ND.
-Y- Consulting Enginoore
PI S10 12+62.36 PI S10 16+89J•16 , m Atao ®,wms m wwaaaFCCOreos ow aHaar No.
p = f~'34,6'lRTI p =54'56'2/J'lLTJ ~weNi aeADWAY OnION NYDKAUUa
2 2 1 ?4dNlBl B4GINlQ
D = 034' 22b" D = 1127' 33.0' 90~'
L =205.30 L =479.44'
T = 102b5' T = 25995' ~'~9f ~ETw~iTN.~E~ ,~~
R = IO,OQ7.00 x R =500.00' 0
ROCK CROSS vaNES '" ~ ~ "~ ~~~'~ ° ~~
SE = OA40 w/ STEP POOLS 0 T.5' N S s ; _...... -- _ .:................_........
SPACING FROM HEADWALL O
x DESIGN EXCEPTION REOilIREO EST. 5O TONS FOOTER/HEADER ROCKS ~ BEGIN 24D'7APER ' N.
EST,100 SY F ~ ~ -y- ~t76D7 LT & R7 F ~
EST. 25 TDNS 5T STONE ~ q
EST. 35 CY DDE
SEE OETaL SHEET 2•D m
~ °~'
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION N 75 LF CHANNEL INPAOVENENT / 9s~;, .- ~~
r 2'BASE w/2:ISIDES (~
-Y- POC STal3+r5.00 `c 6.6% Nex.SLOPE ~ ~ ~~`~
N 5059' 20.3' E ~ EST. DDE = 25 CY woaos V
SEE DITCH DETAIL I ISHT.2•DI
15 wr~~r Apo L eASE DITCH ~ d',s~
Ysisio5~ ~ ~ o ~ E DETAL J tSHT.2•DI m> ! / ~ ~ . ~ 1
JOYCE 8. WALL s ~mm i ~o
CLASS 'B' TUP RAP xf
OB 1046 PG 278 EST.2 TONS ~i~ ~ ~
-Y- PC 14+29/1 ~
LATERAL 'V' DITCH ~ t° EST.5 SY FF
SEE DETAIL L (SHT. 2-D) ' °P'oa -Y- POC 0+63,95 ' ~ ROADWAY CUT DITCH fp// y~7
CLASS Ti'PoP RAP ~ o~,g ~ -Y4- PDT ~+OO.QO ~oy'w 550 SMFF ~ ~~ = s 3r ~
EST.2 TONS oq3 9' O SEE DETAIL K ~ aA
EST. S SY FF / / e ° ,y~9 5 t5HT.2.01 ~ ~ k
i' CSP w/ELBOWS, RODS ~~' ~ ~NEw VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC 'C ~ ~ ~ ~
AND LUG CONNECTORS Aga / woaos
d8~w 08PB 4T PG 11892
.,~ ( ~, -Y- PT 19+08.55 / ~ ~
~a5a ~~ / ~` ~ ~ ~ ~
Q. h rt`6 10 dPEe U/C
~ ~ ~ +T7 +1 aP 15'CSR w/ELBOwS.ROD ~,OB55 / GBios
. Aflh LUG CONNECTO
~ Aso s ~ ( BDD / ~
2 w° z~z~ ( +~ 0~ ~
'S tit + (/ ~ ~
~. ~ ~~ fN ~ ~ ~ D ~ /
N ~ ~ ~ ~~
i
~ o ~' r ~~ ~ E ~ ar
X71
A `\
• ~ ~ ROapwaY CUT DITCH
araoP^'~a '+'~ ~~ ~4; w/PSRN BYA-15 9+78.52 PINC
53o sr FF -Y- POT 21+63.15, 51.78' RT.
SEE DETaI K t5HT.2-Dl
~ , ~!~ ~ BYA-I4 12+64.76 PINC
N 4 5, -Y- POC 18+82.45, 80.35' RT.
- f- ~ . ~ ` R=5 -Y4- PC +6695 -Y4-
~~ + Y- TEMPOAdRY 1t1
'~y,,~ ' O5f-Y-) SEDIMENT PI $IV 11+6183
`F"B"mod I Ea r6695r 4_IgdslR ~ p = 35'06'105'!LT)
D -19'05'549'
~+A 9p ROADWA GUT DITCH J L - !8360'
° w/RSRN' ~,~~ T =9469'
42 SY FF . R . ~,~'
\\ SEE DETNC tSHT.2-01 $E ~ 0.040
~ i~• • A 4y
~' woods O
.~~ o•
+ZD
Er, RN
16 AEUOVE EIOST.
'
s ~ pc
R=PO
4' x 5' RCBC
CENTRAL CONCRETE COMPANY
~
B ~
~
~
OB 894 PG I7OB ~lY
EpT$
I' BELDw (
10' \
\
NATURAL STREAK BED / ( 75
ea
F
/
f:
(
°
+00
~ ~
~ Ex.
(Ex. RM' ~

CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
ON BANKS ONLY
EST. 48 TONS

EST. 89 SY FF PoP RAP 0
ENBaNKMENT
SEE DETaII D
22 LF CHANNEL MPROVEMENT tSHT.2-DI
4' BASE w/2H SR)ES
0.45% NAx SLOPE
EST, DDE = IW CY
SEE DETAIL IISHT.2•DI
160 Lf iAILDITCH
4' BaSE w/2tl SIDES
9.75% NA% SLOPE
EST.DDE : 95 CY
m
m
m
Q
U
N
N
v
>°
~a
~~
~ a " aa.
a p YY~s; °'/
wi ~
SEE DETAIL G tSHT.2-DI 1
CLASS '8' RIP RAP
EST.S TONS
EST. 14 SY FF
BY-II 20+06.53 PINC =
BYA-4114+75.22 POT =
-Y- POC 17+16.97,142,28' RT,
-Y4- POC 11+31.69, 57,91' RT,
-EY-
P~ STa 20+7233 Pr srn r9+00JO Pr sro n+6834
p = 1532'433"(RTJ p = 250'S8A'(RTJ p = 612'05!lRTJ
D = 8'52' S9A' D - !4'52' 55.3' D =6'44'26.4
L = 05.OD' L = n000' L = 920Q'
T = 88A4' T = 86.4Y T =46.04'
R = 645.A7' R =385,00' R = 850A0'
i-~ ~ 4p
V I NEW VISION FELLOWSHIP, INC
<r V ~ ~ ~ SPECIeL CUT ITCH BB 1063 PG 1492
'\ \ r SEE DETAL A HL2-DI END CONSTRUCTION PB 47 PG IB
sBt-r+-( \ \ \\ ast-rsa -Y4- STAI3+OOA0
'; RiIY ~ \ 40'
WdiER STORAGE \ ~\ ,2pr_Y4_(
BdSIN fIN NSE~ \ \ \\
k \
397! \-\
/~\ ~\\~ Ex,R/W x"
wdrEadsinRdG oA9~ (F9 v'~~gS` ~vv -Y4- POT 14+69.80 =
'6 % \
(NOT IN uSEI ~ ` -EY- P7 21+5929
E . R/W a w ~. \\ `~\
r m~3s~ \
~ wN~ A ~ ~\
R \ ~
e Q }
17 ~~ ~~`~ ~~ ~
TOWN OF MADISON " °~ ~° ~ ~~~
DB 663 PG 638 AF"sm ~~ \
~ s°s, ~ \
fF9 k JS~~ ~ \ ° \\
NOTE NO Sl1E rvORI( wdS PERFORMED t A ° y °i \
INSOE DF PL~Ni dREd .a~gye~ \y~Qyp~~~ ~T~~ ~ SvECEidT~ONH
v (~~/ \ \ dN0 SLeiiEREO TREES
r + ~\
~g ~~ ~ \ ~,
~ /~° +~ \ \
~+ ~\~. ~\
BY-12 14+40.76 PINC
P N

~
1
I ~
;
LEGEND
PAVED SNDULDEH
® APPROACH 8LAB

FOR -r• PROFLE,SEE SNEEi N0. 9
FOR -r4 FROFF•E,SEE SHEET N0. 10
FOR DRCN DETALS.SEE SHEET N0.2•D

~ FROKT REFlRlNCE N0, !HEFT N0.
B-4252 9
woAnwav onwN NroRwur.7
ENGINln lNG7~R

PRfiLIMIN RY PLANS
0o xar use coNSraucnoe

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
PIPE HYDRAULIC Dara
S(0. B+OJ -Y-
p7NNA0E A4EA A74 AC
OE$A7N FNEOJEAp' • p,5 YNS
OE$7fY77 pSCNANGE • 85.00 CF S
OES7:v 1w EIfNATgN 576.Q P7
7:0 YEN! pSCNAROE • 7j0 CF S
1 770 YEN! MV ElfYATlQY •57775 F7
a'ERfOPPpG F7tf0UE7CY 500+ YN5
0.'EN70PP+NC pSCxNGE 28+ CF S
OvERTOWWNG ElfVATpN • 58?DO F i

~ PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA
y sra ~+u -r-
m p7AN1A0E AREA 0,~ AC
PESM,N FREOOENGY 25 YNS
0.`SIGY p5GlNd^sf 550 CFS
a pE5lON MY EIEVN AAY &J1J FI'
/00 YEAR pSCHN77E • 450 CFS
~ ro0 rfAR nN ElEVa7A)N - N322 FT
N OvERfOPWAG fRfOUENCY ° 500+ rq5
~ OvEafOPwNG pSCNNEGE • l8 CFS
c OvEN70PflN0 ElEVaigN 6wL0 FT
n
rig
ti~
0
oa
rv
~
U~
~~
d 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

~
fROJlCT !?lRENCF N0. RH@! N0.
8-4252 10
~ ROADWAY CESION FfiOlAUIlC3
ENGINEER FNGMFER

PRELIMIN RY PLANS
DO Ndf US8 CONSfRUCf10N

10 11 12 13 14 15

N
m PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA
sra u+i5 -ra-

a A
56'~
OESNBV FREp/EMY •
rR5
-~ OESK,W O'SCRAaCE • 1500 CFS
CESM,h' hW EIfVATpx •57981 f7
N p0 YEAiI GSCHAAf,E J900 CFS
N KJ0 rEAa NN EJEV~UJOx 5JR7~5J FT
° OVERTOPPdIG FREOUExp • 1~ YRS
~~ OVfRFOPPbMi p5CHA90E • 5V ~ CFS
Mo 0.'fRfOPPIxG f(EYA7gR • 58U2 fT

o~
oq
a~
~~
~q
Qo
o~ 10 11 12 13 14 10 11