20080147 Ver 1_Application_20080118

d.,a A/Nf o~
~~
~ ••; .,~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART'1V~NT OF T`RANSPORTATIO
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
January 9, 2008
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Attention: Mr. Brian Wrenn
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
h , r~
`f ~:~
o~,~°~
`~ ~~
V
p ~~~q~F ~ ~ U~ J, ~/~
Sr~AR~~
~.,~<i~y
9
N ~y
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
X80147
Subject: Application for Neuse Riparian Buffer Authorization, for the proposed
replacement of Bridge 17 on SR 1131 over Turkey Creek in Nash County.
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1131 (6), WBS No. 33555.1.1, TIP No. B-4209.
Please find enclosed the buffer drawings, Pre-Construction Notification form (PCN), and
half-size plan sheets for the above referenced project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion
(PCE) was completed for this project on February 6, 2006, and distributed shortly thereafter.
Additional copies are available upon request. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace existing Bridge No. 17 on SR 1131 over
Turkey Creek in Nash County. The project involves replacement of the existing five span,
86-foot bridge structure with a two span, 105-foot bridge at approximately the same location
and roadway elevation as the existing structure. Impacts will consist of <0.01 acre of
permanent surface water impacts to Turkey Creek and 5,763 ft2 of impacts to riparian buffer.
Traffic will be detoured off-site along surrounding roads during construction.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: The project is located in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit
03020203, subbasin 03-04-07). A best usage classification of "C NSW" has been assigned to
Turkey Creek [DWQ Index # 27-86-3-(1)]. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water
Supplies (WS-I: undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds),
nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
Turkey Creek is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River, or as a National
Wild and Scenic River. Additionally, Turkey Creek is not listed on the Fina12006 303(d) list
of impaired waters due to sedimentation for the Neuse River Basin, nor does it drain into any
Section 303(d) waters within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILbbNGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBS/TE: WNhV.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Permanent Impacts: Surface waters will be impacted by the proposed project. Construction
of the proposed project will result in permanent impacts of 30 ft due to one interior bent on
drilled piers.
Temporarypacts: There will be no temporary impacts to wetlands or surface waters due to
this project.
Utili~ Impacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of utilities
in the project area. An existing overhead Embarq telephone line is in conflict with the
proposed project. Wetland impacts due to the relocation of this line will be avoided by using
directional bore techniques.
Bridge Demolition:
The existing superstructure consists of a five-span bridge with a concrete surface on timber
joists. The existing substructure consists of timber piles with timber caps. Best Management
Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed to prevent any temporary fill
from entering Waters of the United States.
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the regulations pertaining to the
buffer rules apply. There will be a total of 5,763 ft2 of impacts to riparian buffers. This
includes 2,675 ft2 (2,584 ft2 in Zone 1 and 91 ftZ in Zone 2) due to the bridge crossing.
According to the buffer rules, bridges are allowable. Ina dition, 3,088 ft2 (1', m one 1
and 1,622 ft2 in Zone 2) of impacts will occur from approach fill and mechanized ec~anng
activities due to road crossings. This Road Crossing activity i als owable because impacts are
less than the 150-foot/0.3 acre threshold, for which mitigation is required. Uses designated as
allowable may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no practical
alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this rule.
Federally Protected Species
As of November 5, 2007 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed four federally
protected species for Nash County. The bald eagle, however, was removed from the
Endangered Species List on August 8, 2007. The three remaining species are listed in Table 1.
The biological conclusion for red-cockaded woodpecker remains valid. The biological
conclusions for dwarf wedgemussel and Tar River spinymussel have been updated from
"Unresolved" in the NRTR (2001) to "May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect"
following surveys on August 27, 2007. Concurrence from USFWS was received on October
15, 2007.
Table 1. Federally urotected species of Nash County

Common Name
Scientific Name Federal
Stahis
Habitat Biological ,
Conclusion
Red-cockaded wood ecker Picoides borealis E No No Effect
Dwarf wed emussel Alasmidonta heterodon E Yes MANLAA
Tar Rivers in ussel Elli do steinstansana E Yes MANLAA
NCDOT TIP 8-4209 Page 1 of 4

Bald Eagle
The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) was delisted from the Endangered Species Act as
of August 8, 2007. However, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act. A survey conducted on September 5, 2007 found no suitable habitat within 660 ft of the
project area. No nests or eagles were observed during the survey.
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within the
project study area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed to
incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize
jurisdictional impacts. Minimization measures incorporated as part of the project design
included:
• Use of an off-site detour during construction
• Construction of a 19-foot longer bridge
• The new structure will reduce the number of interior bents from four to one
• Measures used to minimize impacts to the buffer zone include using the existing
alignment
• Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be utilized during demolition of the
existing bridge and construction of the new bridge
Mitigation
Due to the limited amount of impacts to jurisdictional surface waters, and because impacts to
riparian buffers have not exceeded the threshold requiring compensatory mitigation, NCDOT
is not proposing mitigation for this project.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: Per conversation with William Wescott of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers on November 19, 2007, a Section 404 permit is not required.
Section 401 Certification: A written 401 General Certification is not being requested since a
404 permit is not required..
Neuse River Basin Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water
Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Neuse Riparian Buffer
Authorization.
A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.doh.dot. state.nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit.html
NCDOT TIP B-4209 Page 3 of 4

Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Veronica Barnes at
[e-mail] or [phone] if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Sincerel ,
~,
(~,~ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
fi'' Environmental Management Director, PDEA
cc:
W/attachment
Mr. Rob Ridings, NCDWQ (4 Copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF
W/o attachment (see website for attachments)
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Richard E. Greene , P.E. Division 4 Engineer
Mr. Jamie Guerrero, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Natalie Lockhart, PDEA Engineer
NCDOT TIP B-4109 Page 4 of 4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
2 0 0 8 0 1 4 7
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(1t any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: N/A
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^ N/A
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^ N/A
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for fuxther details), check here: ^ N/A
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:~919) 733-9794
E-mail Address: vabarnes(a~dot.state nc us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bride No. 17 on SR 1131 over Turkey Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4209
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Nash Nearest Town: Middlesex
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From US 264 take the
exit to NC 231 North. Travel north approximately 2 7 miles and turn right onto SR 1131
~Bryant St.). Bridge #17 is the onl~ge on that street
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.833625 °N -78.166150 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Buckhorn Resevior
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is mostly forested The surrounding area is
dedicated mostly to agriculture and low density housing-
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing superstructure consists of a 5-span bridge with a concrete surface on timber
foists. The existing substructure consists of timber piles with timber caps. The project
involves replacing the old bridge on the existing_ location with a new two span bridge
approximately 106 feet long. Traffic will be detoured off-site during construction. Standard
NCDOT construction equipment will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The current bridge has a sufficiency rating of 35
out of 100 and a structure apprasial of 4 out of 9. It is therefore considered structurally
deficient by the Federal Hi way Administration standards and rehabilitation is not feasible
due to the brid eg 's age and condition.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. A jurisdictional determination was issued by the USACE for this project
on December 10, 2007 under Action Id. 200703606.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed permanent or
temporary impacts to wetlands. There are 30 square feet ofproposed permanent impacts to
streams. Impacts to riparian buffer tota15,763 square feet.
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
Set)aratelV 11St lmt)aCtS Clue tci tenth ctntCfi~rP anal flnnrlino
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number T e of Im act
yp p
(e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Neazest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Flood lain Stream acres
( )
(es no (lineaz feet
N/A 0.0
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.05 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify
temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or
culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls,
rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation
is proposed, plans and profiles showing the lineaz footprint for both the original and relocated
streams must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by
43.560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (lineaz feet acres
1 Turkey Creek Interior Bent Perennial 49.0 0 <0.01
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 <0.01
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds,
Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not
limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6.
List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the roiect:
Stream Im act (acres : <0.01
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.00
en Water Im act (acres): 0.0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) <0.01
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Page 4 of 8

Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. NCDOT has minimized
impacts to the fullest extent possible. The number of bents in the water is being reduced from
four for the existing bridge to one for the new bridge. In compliance with 15A NCAC
02B.0104(m) we have incorporated the use of BMP's in the design of the project Traffic will be
detoured off-site during construction.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 lineaz feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USAGE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 5 of 8

aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0.0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0.0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
Page 6 of 8

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Meuse )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 4,050 3 (2 for Catawba) 0.0
2 1,713 1.5 0.0
Total 5,763 0.0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian ,Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. N/A
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 7 of 8

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
X1V. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The proiect is a relatively small bride in a residential area There will be no new road created
and no additional lanes added, therefore it is unlikely to attract development
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A.
' ~ `'d
Ap~ilica~/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

\Ts" I
-., ,
;.
~~~

VICII~TI~~
~.~1~
NCI)®'T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NASH COUNTY
PROJBCT: b3555.11 (B-~S09)
BRIDGE N017 OVER
TURgEY CREEg ON
SR llbl
SHEET OF 9/ 19 / 07 ~
Buffer Dr~n-ing -
Sheet ,~_ of

~~
~ ~
~ ~
C,1
N~
-Q+.
-1
BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABL E MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT

SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE
TYPE STATION
~ FROM/TO ROAD
CROSSING
BRIDGE PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ftZ) ZONE 2
(ftz) TOTAL
(ftZ) ZONE 1
(ftZ) ZONE 2
(ftZ) TOTAL
(ftZ) ZONE 1
(ft2) ZONE 2
(ft2)
1 Bride STA. 17+47.5 -L- X 2584.0 91.0 2675.0
2 52.5' X 1466.0 1622.0 3088.0
21"CORED SLAB

TOTAL: 4050.0 1713.0 5763.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LINEAR IMPACTS -BRIDGE 92 FT.
ROAD CROSSING 143 FT.

~I
N'i
~I
~~
V

ti
H
SR 1131
MI
~~
OI
UI
v
0
v
TURKEY CREEK
gee ~~~ i-d ror ~arvennanai ~ymaws
1152 1151 ,
150
L
11~ ~
ti 145 1197
~Y 115 8~N 141
i18~ 1162

, 1138
1150 BEGIN
PROJECT ~~
` 11 5 1134 1166

4'+w
nea \
~ -
115e
112a l

1187
1 ~ 11 1 ,
9 ''
® 1191
~ -
END
~ PROJECT
i ~ 1130 1182
1121 r ~~
~ - ~ „~
115e ~
1126 1~ 1159 1100
VlCINIT'I' tYL4P
i--~--ti--f asmsrrs ns~qux
. ~ Pi~,gNK~'N c
~~N1Y
U' R L ]I¶Il~f,'J~I'L( ~l~/Jp uA ~-Y LL 1 \ ~ 1 V 8 I~YnT1 ~{~~i Ii~~1Y 1$~1(~~1(~~ ~1/~J{yUy Y ` ~ 1 ~1 .~. ~w o
1V JL V a~~®~ ®~ Y1~V'LL1 ii L~ d ~ R~41i[l9 1R~IrLR igV1Of
3 @5;:,1,1 @B~11 P,E,
---- - - - ---- ---- - ------ -
NASH CaU11~TY -
LOCATION: BRIDGE_11t0.17 OVER TURFY CREEK ON SR_1131
----------------------------------------
TYPE OF WORIL GRADING .PAVING .DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE,..
AND GUARDRAIL
-L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4209
4
END BRIDGE
sra oar o~+ .oooo
BEGIN BRIDGE
STA. 16+95.00
P
v
w
4-
7
L
N
P
STA. 21 +00.00
-L- END TIP PROJECT B-4209
TO BAILEY
NEUSE RIVER BUFFER PERMIT
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN F)fITA PROJECT LENGTH
1 Aor ~Oo~ = a3Q
ADT 2028 = .]5Q
PLANS DHY = ]Q % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4209 0.113 MI
5 5 1 0 D ~ % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4209 0.020 MI
T = ~ % ' TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 8-4209 = 0.133 MI
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) V = ¢Q MPH
TTST 19~ + DUAL 2~6
Prepmed !n tM 0(fla dr
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Dtnfi Bti~ Dr., 9rtrtlM NC, 2701!
IAM l7dIlIDl1lD ~ECC7C/f7tdY!
RIGHT OF 1PAY J11T& BRENDA MOORE. P.E.
JUNE 15.2007 ~'"~`
IJ3T17NG 17ATB: THAD F DUNCAN. P.E.
JUNE 17.2008 °~ ~""°1°R
EYDR,lULfC3 J;1PGII~SR
ROADWAY DBSiGx
S11fG1111861q
I~
INCOMPLETE PLANS
no um oa roa aiv ecoumrm
PRELIMINARY PLANS
m~~~~o~
J)MSION OF ffiCd~TWAY3
sTAZJI oJ- xoJtrJ;< cAllotnvA
Y
a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------e~~tu'~ti^ng---------
Sh~:e: of

~ A
1
y
O
G ~ ~
~ ~
m
~

~+~ ~
~ m
N N
1
e~m~t~\64209_hyd_prm_buf.dgn I °°----------°°---°-----°_________________________________
~~
a R
o g
~ ~
m m
9
D y
17 fl
ti ~
N N
N N
~$
N r
~~~~~oD~
~uuuaua~
~~~~Qi'~i'41~w r
~w~N~ '
~~

N
rn
~~
/,
~~
0
.~ ~~
lK ~ ~k/
~~/
(`~F
V
~1
NQ~
Z
~/.
~ ~~~
N
C
A

~..
\~~ ~ I I ~
~ ~~ ..
.~
\~
a
~~
^
I
~.
~~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ ~ $
. ~ ~ ~ ~~a~
/ ~e
/ /
-/ / .~
/ /
/ /
/ /
~ / w
~ ~"'~ ~>
~ ~~ N~ ~'
1 ~~ /
I _a ~ b~
L'~~~
• O~O~
~s~~~.
rr /
~ ' ~T.~
~I .
I ( a
~\ N
1
1 '.
j
~"
µ~W .
~~. a Q
N
• ~ ~ O
. /
' ~ K K ~ k k
\ ~ ~ ~ K k M
I~~y.~x~1t
1 .K k1tM
f~k~~~
,t~~K
i ~. ,« µ
~ M
r
J~
$a
~~.;~
w
i
/~
~~

/5
GV
~~p83

B10NN11 ea1®I
I I
I I I
1
I I
I I
I 1
I I PREL MIN RY PLANS
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
F, ATIE~S I ~ i
rt ~
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I ~ 2
1 I O
I 1
I 1
I I
1 I ~~ ~ '~,
I 1 FF N EiP ,~~9•
s \ prx OF 10.90N ~
I an OF r150N ,~J
I I
1 I
I 1
I I NYM9,07
I i, KATIE STgE 4 Z /
I. Iwaas \ SdrtA M. STONE ~,.s, /~_I(/
1 1 \~ ~ ~"~~, aM1 al xxxxx
\\ h~~, ~f 4N xxxx Yxxxs / I,
/ }, Y
? ~ I ~t~~by °r~ / ti~ ^-- _ Y t x x x x y ~` A~9~'h : F. ^AYIE STONE
\\ TI J ... ', k x x * x x . ~ SON'+A ~.ST01E
.. \ y - x
~""T~ ~~ \ ~~ __ 1 _..~~w QlIJNF11 IRIA~ p 1
~. V ....... __ ~./ 1\
-:
I I .. ~ v-._~ _ x A 01 \
_ ~
..._
I I \ _
(' ~~
. _ w '
-
I I \\ \\
/y~ O „ .
1 I .. .. ~~ .._::_,
` - My~. ~
.,..+wr
__
_._ _... _ r _ _
I ~ = 'MOODS. _ ~
1 / -
-y_ _ .. .._. ~...
I I 'w .-,._. .. .. ,.. .. .. ~
N t
I 1 ~ ~ __ _-_ __
-: _ ~~
-- +. ~.
pn OF 85011 _.,._._..,.u-.; ~ ` ! ?, n y
-._-
-.._
__ >- ,
I I = _- n l=E Is _ _ "~
I I - x ~_ - I
1 1
I 1 yq'1 ANOAEN [E BIIIAND. ET UK
I I
I 1 5
1
I 1 n
1 I !..
I 1 ._
~I~ O
': ': SITE 1 --~~
1
I I
v
SKBT~CH OP BRIDGE 1N R&LATIONSHIP TO PAVBMBNT
TYPE 8-77 5.5' TYPE 8-77
II` 22` ll`
ll` ll'
f'I
TYPE B-77 55' TYPE ~n
ALLOVABLE IMPACTS ZONE I
® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
-~-
PI SYa 13+8217
o = rca~2rsr~rl
D = 3'49'!IA'
C = ~22,5J'
r = Z12b7'
R = 1,500,00'
AO = Z00'
SE= A8
SBG: SHOULDER BERM Gl1RER
FOR -lr PROFILE SEE SHEEP 5
FOR STRULTURE SEE SHEETS 51-SX
Butter Drawing
Sheet ~ of ~

0
N
`~
V
O
e~
~1

See Sheet 1-A For Index of Shxfs
See Sheet 1-8 For ConvenllonolSymbols
1162 ~ ;
16
111
11 ,
` ~ 11~j
116 8dner~ 111

•
• ~
160 BEGIN
PROJECT
.
~ ~ 1191 1188

11e4 \
nos
124 f

i~
1129 „ , ~
'' 1181
1108
END
/ PROJECT
11 ~ 119Q 11~

1127 / ~'
~
1 J17
112e ~
n26
- 11za nne
1~q
VICINITY MAP
•--~--~--t-t au~srra nsmr~
t0 R~
~N ~aUNTM
~~C~~CIE ®F N®I$T~I C~I$®]LIN~ R'~ '~'"°'~°°°'° ~`
.C. B-y4209 1
I~IVI~I®N ®F HICFItiV~~~ ~.~- ...,~-
33555,1.1 BRZ_11916 P.E.
39555.2.1 BRZ-11916 ROW llTl
11~ASH COU,II~TY
LOCATION: BRIDGE N0.17 OVER TURI~EI' CREEK OK SR 1131
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRA121lAG1y STRUCTURE,
AND GUARDRAIL
sTa la+oo.o0 4
-L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B.4209
END BRIDGE
STA. 1 008
SR 1131
TURKEY CREfK
0
V
c 'f •
D
L /~ ~
N V
T
V
L
0
N
Q
D~
N.~iN
~ oe~
~~
o~~
0 oz
O 3~
NaN
~~ o
a o~
w w
in~w
~~
N Ltli
BEGIN BRIDGE
STA. 16+95.00
/STA. 21 +00.00
-L- END TIP PROJECT B-4204
TO BAILEY
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
GRAPI~C SCALES
50 15 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 50 1
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 10 10
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTA
ADT 2008 = 430
ADT 2028 = 750
DHV = 10 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4209 0.113 Ahl
D = 60 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4209 = 0.020 MI
T = 3 % e TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4209 0.133 MI
V = 60 MPH
' TTST 196 + DUAL 2%
Prepped In tht Offfce de
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
lose a~,a star m., aerel~l Nc, s~11o
siee rreem~uo ~cmraao~
lr!1GET OA WAY 11!18 BRENDA MOORE P.E.
JUNE 15r 2007 "~ A°0~
L81T1NG 11418 THAD F. DUNCAN. P.E.
JUNE 17.2008 mar
XYDILIULfCd ETSGIIr(88R
ROADWAY DESICr51
SNGIIIO~R
M
a0
0
I'Z
INCOMPLETE PLANS
0o xm oa vaq ci..oovmna.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
m xor ~ roe cacarocrxm
JuYlSION OF B1GHR'AYd
S?ATJi OF NORTH CAROLIIVA
e
ea

N
. ~
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
(FINAL PAYENENT DESIGN)
C1 PROP. APPROX. 11i;" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 8F8.5A,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 197.8 LBB. PER SQ. YD.
PROP. APPROX. 21~" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE BFS.BA,
C2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 197.6 LBB. PER SO. YD. IN EACH OF TWD
LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE BFS.SA,
R
C3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LSB. PER 80. YD. PER 1
DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 114" IN DEPTH.
Ei PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 828.OB,
AT AN AYERAOE RATE OF 468 188. PER S0. YD.
EZ PROP. APPROX. 6)~" ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE 825.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 827 LBS. PER 8D. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BABE COURSE, TYPE B28.OB,
E3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1° DEPTH. TO
"
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LE86 THAN 9
IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 63*4" IN DEPTH.
EXIBTINS PAVEMENT.
T EARTH MATERIAL.
W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAYEYENT (9EE STANDARD KEDGING DETAIL
TNI$ SHEET.)
VAR. S
SE! X-
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLES6 SHOWN OTHERWISE, VAR. Si
SEE X-
~ suAYEr
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 1
TYPICAL BRIDGE DETAIL N0. 1
-L- STA. 16+95.00 TO STA. 15+00.00
nm~ecr ~eesce ra. I war -a.
IR. SLOPE
!! X-SECT.
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0. 1
-Ir STA.14+00.00 TO -~ STA.14+50.00 TAPER RUNA EXIST.
~ SG.14±50A0 TO ~ STA.16+50.00
-4. SA 10+50.00 TO a. Sfi120+50.00
tb0.00 TO ~ STA.21+00.00 TAP9l TO EX151:
IR. SLOPE
iE X-SECT.
USE TYPICAL SECTION N0. 2
-L- STA.16+50,00 TO -Ir AA.16+95.00 (BK3. BRIDGEI
-L- STA.1S+00,00 (END BRIDGE TO ~- STA.1S+50.00
TYPICAL SECTION N0. 1

i i
,~
,~-
J

~ `
` `
V
V

a a
C
n, ~ C
n,
c

V
~$~ti~opv
q d g q q q
~j O
W~~~~~~*
,~~~
~tqw
y

~ ~
fA
0 C
~^ iii
m
m
m

N
A
~s~~ ~,~
Z F^~.
~r
~ ~
~o a ~,
3
i
~I~ .5
eti r /
~
•
~
' ~~ ,i
~
C
~
\ p
1~ ~~~
f/
\
a ~~
Y
.
~~ ~ .p
t
M " "' ~
~
~

'
lq~
/
~~~ ;pi W
1

n ~~
' ~
~a
~. s
g~ ~
H

6
r
~~
~~~ O
aya!
~*
a
~~ µlkµlF
~~ ~kM K'w

" 1114

A
a
8
'V
NAp 83
S ~~ ~
~~~y ~~~
7r
~~
~r
y ~

+'