HomeMy WebLinkAbout19970959 Ver 1_Complete File_19971209State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary p E H N FR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 9, 1997
Beaufort County
WQC 401 Project #970959
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Jeffrey Furness
PCS Phosphate Co. Inc.
PO Box 48
Aurora, NC 27806
Dear Mr. Furness:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill material in 4,900 of
waters for the purpose of constructing a stable shoreline with ripmp at PCS barge slip area near Aurora, as
you described in your application dated November 5, 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non - Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as d:-scribed in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow th'- conditions
listed in the attached certification.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 -7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919 - 733 -1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mey
Central 1~iles
John Parker; DCM
Sincerely,
,'
r. P.E.
970959.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919 - 733 -1786 FAX # 733 -9959
An Equal Opportunity Aff irmative Action Employer • 50% recycled /10% post consumer paper
T,FHNR Fax: 9l li`;:ii'11> I)Pr, 4 'ui 11:n1 P. 03/04
I � i',l.+�nning Drewclt
, fDTVTfgTtIN'.17rr Tl►iV71iA1TH"Ta MA17A ptoT
t , 11414/6* OrPKTT ArPLlrATIOH REVIEW
Ndho rao rscT� R NQ suPlumMORI MOVIE/-
WTS�f.Altll1' TJIYIk,�t► i`AdvN I/olt pYi'34. TRACc m
IdRAlf[197f P$RIfT0'. COII!lfY=
Ptb1119c, i�As,t 1:. L�,
pRC�,nu�i .?ryr>R� �; �;,arP 1 r>a[oui ms: (jk4ujls
R F1t0lt 'MAf f' DATE rpnH GnA: or:l a Y/17
O3+YIk vaico T1A9IIa a r 77'2f' C)"""
4 s j,.4•11 1t,tADJAC!' T WATXH 'BODY. rGv}� %.,r
S �
(7.A99. ✓'•ts i. 7L�• !l'11{YAk 11Vt1ISX Nf �,( `; �_ J�
0
N INP CT, 7�1 WL TYPE
v i Wf'. STSI1� WL ACR EST:
TI WL sumSt
NTT]FA MT7D >1TTON TYPE:
lkTt±Ul!bN 'SIZ19 _ F AA4'iii� .^.T[RR'I' ATTAEIIRD7
Hk4t11NMKNnAPJOfy�4 MtilUl 1:i}:IIRI,it1N11 DKNX "Ohl)
BT,ORMWq4�I'F i PLAN PEQ':), IF YES, PATE AYYHOVk;r): '-'r-
Ppjtd LIISCRIPT UNI t r,
WAI RH C11TAI I PY Ckl . • .(4Q1)
Ti Y�S .TYPRt.�
CiWAfrR D�RP,N�AL j
i ,:TYPE I OF. DTAPORAT, .PRFiF�,,FI)! '
i<X13TJ:N0. P1?0POSE11, Sr:PTTG TANK hTC. )
to r ��r
DITS, COUNTY)
IN BY DEM,.,IS STTF AVATLATITY AND PERMIT ISSUANCE ]PROBABLE;
i ?YA'I'RN /kR1l'f ANB 1fT1 T: �, � "
ARKA:iQTr. FILLr WA'.I'RRt I (h' WICI'LAND:
IN F)TIh ELTMINA'1TNG A 41GN1b1CAN� IJSLt7
—'AHPA tiU ''BI< URET1t:FDl ')
I5
1).4 X'llbJrWI;4C'TYviT.Y FYI'RCTRi, TO CAITSR A SIGNIFICANT 1,04.9 OF
' "� T�If f11TNG1L'}
T° ;TOIL DI,51105AL' ADEQUATFLY ADDRESSEDI
A17F THE: FOTF.(iWYNC ADKOUAT'ELY ADDRESSED? .
F,WA(F DT.SP0SAL; pMj'RTNA .4RRVT.i'•F9:
F1(YCFTI IN BABINt C1,0SUR11 of EHFLTFISHINC WATT!RSt
i
1i
Wa{!U. - ctTr>tTl I'l -ko9; Lf-09 MIPL�t Offtcog; l.U,!: W+ighingtnn uffice.
I' TO RP, PFRMTTTFD ' BY:
OEM, DHS, COUNTY) .
IP B bEM, IS SI'I'1:. AYA,C1*DI.L AND ri IMIT 135UANCE rRODABT,r;:
WAf117t F.}{� .
AREA TOb' fill! WA''1'tTN -' - WFTI ANTI; ' 6)
:I,'1rJLi I:LININATING A SIGNIFICANT IT.-,r,?
.AREA n5 RF DRHDGED.:i't iir"-
I'S DRIGDGING..AGI'TVYTY FXPFCTRD TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS OP'
R�S'OTTRCE7
f3 9�07L YLl1'O:tAL ATYEQUAlL+LY "DIt1vD8rD?
At+r TTII),. tOLLOWIN.G ADFg1TA -NITY AbDRESSET17
SFNA'GR 1S1'SPOSALt MARINA SrttvTCFSt
I
tIXYGRIV TN RAi4IN: C1tY.iUR1E nF sllrJ.T7TSJTPTR WATERS;
t?[" WRRcJ ; TRM Fiolrl C)7`Ptrvz; Mr. Wnnhingtnn O:rflce
. `lie
1.
2
3.
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
APPLICANT'S NAME: PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Beaufort County, off NC 306 at the company's barge slip area
near the Town of Aurora
Photo Index - 1995: 98 -1027, L14 1989: 1012, R4 1984: 68 -1389, P12 RECEIVED
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,664,000 Y: 603,000 Bath LR
NOV U5 1997a
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA & Dredge and Fill
g FNVIRONMFNTALSCIEryCES
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 23 October 1997
Was Applicant Present - Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 23 October 1997
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A)
Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B)
AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area, Estuarine Waters
(C)
Water Dependent: Yes
(D)
Intended Use: Shoreline stabilization
(E)
Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F)
Type of Structures: Existing - Riprap
Planned - Riprap
(G)
Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 10' maximum
Source - DCM staff observation
7
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non - Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Open Water
[AREA]
DREDGED FILLED
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±4,900 sq. ft. or 0.11 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SB Open: No
9"70`59
±4,900 sq. ft.
OTHER
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to stabilize 2,300 feet of shoreline with riprap.
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INC.
Beaufort County
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. has extensive land holdings in Beaufort County. The
application for permits which are being considered at this time is an area of shoreline on the east
side of the existing barge slip and along the north and east sides of an existing dike disposal area.
The project terminates near the mouth of the Lee Creek plant discharge. The dike disposal was
historically used for spoil placement when hydraulic dredging occurred within the barge slip. The
area has not been used for spoil placement since the early 1980's. Various upland and wetland
vegetation have volunteered within the basin. The dominate vegetation atop the dikes is Fesque
grass. Considerable amounts of Golden Rod and Dog Fennel are also located on the dikes. The
only wetland vegetation on or at the outside toe of the dike is an area of Phragmites W- which is
growing along the dike adjacent to the barge slip. Partial attempts have been made for many
years to stabilize the dike with riprap; however, these attempts have been futile which is obvious
by ongoing erosion to the dikes. Hurricanes Bertha and Fran during 1996 also caused significant
erosion into the dikes. Also, the remains of the previous placed riprap are scattered an are no
longer of any benefit.
The applicant is proposing to stabilize the outer slope of the dike disposal area. This will
be accomplished by sloping the existing eroded dike, add fill as required, and place riprap on the
newly created slope. The total length of shoreline to be stabilized is 2,300 feet. Along this
distance of shoreline the riprap will average ±3' landward of the NWL, however the riprap will be
placed a maximum distance of 10' beyond the NWL. Where the Phragmites ,'.L is present near the
barge slip, the riprap will be placed landward of it so as not to fill any wetland vegetation. Along
much of the shoreline, the riprap will be placed atop the remnants of the existing riprap.
ENYMONMENTAL IMPACT
The project as proposed should have a minimal environmental impact. No wetland
vegetation will be excavated and/or filled. The project should result in the stabilization of the
eroded dike and should result in a permanent solution to stabilize the dikes for many years.
A total of ±4,900 sq. ft. of open water area will be filled by the placement of the riprap
David Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 28 October 1997
Form DCM -MP -1
APPLICA'110N
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name PCS Phoc-phate Cote U Tnrr
Address P.O. Box 48
City Aurora
State NC
Zip 27806 Day Phone (919) 322-4111
Fax (919) 322 -4444
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
c. Project name (if any) _Barge S1 i P S ni 1 g ni kP
NOTE. Pernat will be issued in name of landowner(s), and /or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County
Beaufort
b. City, town, community or landmark
Ai irr -rq
c. Street address or secondary road number
Highway 306 North
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes _y No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Pamlico River
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and /or filling activities.
Chnrol ino atn}; l ; nnt���
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Private
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. The 3M=nG is to Gtahi l i e
the miter sloue of a drech-e spoil
disposal area dike that is being eroded
by the Pamlico River. A backhoe will slope
the existing eroded dike face and
excavate the toe, drznp trucks umii add
rii i as required, and riprap wiu t)e
11 is L-alied.
Form DCM -MP -1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract NIA
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above M1-1W or
NWL R,ngea fi-= Q tr% 7n -F—t
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sands and sandv loatns
e. Vegetation on tract Fescue grass, wax myrtle,
l,v
sierling, and willow
f. Man -made features now on tract _hjai, -mrlP
dredge soils dike
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
_X Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
TAT / A
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cenificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes _; No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? Yes _ x No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
m. Describe exi ti g wastewater treatment facilities.
NI
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
�i irfana -" mnff f n Paml i rn P, i Vor
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Wells and purchased bottled water
S. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross- sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Form DCM -MP -1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Dr. Eugene Pate, Jr.
Address lyll- Hampton M., Kinston,NC 28501
Phone (919) 5 ?'i -g55n
Name Mc Ar,nia 0_n=linn Rniri
Address 2962 Rit Pui, .wmg Tcl and Gr 90/1 5
Phone (803) ,5 737
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions container) in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow -up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
Name r� w;1 1; �„ r. � „tt
Address 1218 Kenn; t rn, T1r- �}�AY� PCt nn application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
, SC 29407
Phone (803) 556 -8216
i"ir. Thomas Bess (919 This is the
• A list of p evioi °s t150r FW” i4gssue��i= 683 '9 day of �c�u , 19 9'1 .
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, Print Name EFL R Cy C • l W it,JEss
permittee, and issuing dates.
G.P. 12264, Texasgulf, 2/9/94 Signature C tN+^^M� QCS PIWs
Lando Authorized Agk
G.P. 017188, PCS Phosphate. 2/18/97
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP -2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP -3
Upland Development
DCM MP-4
Structures Information
DCM MP -5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment In the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Form DCM -MP-2
EXCAVA'1'10N
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -I. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Revised 03/95
Average F ud
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
If yes, where?
Form DCM -MP -2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead X Riprap
b. Length 2,300 feet
c. Average distance waterw�arrd�of MHW or NWL
-`i fPPt �i fp�t la Mid 72;id A-F ba-A
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
0 fPP1-
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
5 -10 feet in places
(Source of information)
f. T e oftbulkhead or riprap material 18" Class 2
gipani. e riprap
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap 850 cu.yds.
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material Granite rivrav
i. Source of fill material Offs ite rock quarry
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
Revised 03/95
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? _I.arF r,-�?' &#one
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe. dtup-InIcl,.
c. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes y_ No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Appikant or Projea Name
stn4
/ 0 /� /91
Date
PROPOSED SHORELINE PROTECTION
FOR
PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY
y sEAe
5365.
FRTM.G�
........✓
APRIL 16, 1997
RMC NO: 97058
Revised July 15, 1997
Revised August 12, 1997
PAMLICO RIVER
IPRAP, TOP 0 10.0' ELEV. W
u �� BARGE SUP LANDING
2
�1
)—all
M.S.L W.L
PCS
PLANT SITE
FILTER FABRIC
306
TYPICAL SECTION N.T.S. N
�o
_ R VICINITY MAP
PaM
00 U
o°
1
W W
I 11000
g.�
cQ
o'
8
h 8
h~
8
IS.00
0 �7
12.00 `A
1µ
tTE A I
• 11.00 25+00 ,
• 1a� -
76.00
a ITEM III
j 21 +00
r
aO 27.50 ------- --------
to 6i00 1I __
�\ N 10000
1+00
---� ITEM II 4 IT IV
6+10
_1-7 1
NOT IN
CONTRACT +`00 o ��. SHEET 1 of
_ PROPOSED
SHORELINE PROTECTION
1+00
0.0o L
4 , 4 .. .� CD /� RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA H
o�-
DATE: FEB. 24, 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB 010. ---L7058 — ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
$ SCALE: _1" = 300__ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
REVISED 7- 15 -97, 8 -12 -97
I--
W.L. +0.7FT.
IM
CONSTRUCTION
EXCAVATION \
- - 14'
6'
d-
`� 0
Ire
t\IC"UI RIPR�P
STATION 5 +70
ul
sa
x
v
FILTER FABRIC
0
26'
r�
0
Q
O
w(1-1
CD
o ►�
w O
SHEET __9 _ of _35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELME PROTECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA n
DATE: _FEB- 24; 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. _ 9705 __ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: I" - 10* NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA `
8' -F t
4' --
r� �n Qo
cn ri (1) o-)
NEW RIPRAr
CONSTRUCTION 7
FXCAVATinr\l
W.L. +0.71`T.
r iL 1 crc r iADrul ,
25'
FILL
In
0)
35'
SHEET 1-0- of 35
� o
O
Ll-
O
w
0
w
0
STATION 6 +10 CROSS SECTION
U
SHORELINE PROTECTION
OG NNY M.MI� n
a
(i 1
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
PATE; FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. a
JOB NO. ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: 1 = 10 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
12'
r`
O
-- 12' — —g' -
-- -- 2'
Ln
O O
rq cD
NEW RIPRAP
CONSTRUCT10k
EXCAVATION \
W.L. + 0.7FT.
STATION
SIM
r' ILICR r- ABRIC
0
i
N
SHEET 11 of 35
7 +00 CROSS SECTION
U
SHORELINE PROTECTION
Xa-
h
a
V �
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997
-- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. a
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
SCALE: --L ° 10 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA u
CONSTRUCTI(
EXCAVATION
W.L_ + 0.7FT.
STATION
2 2' s— 8' - - 19'
0
`D o
o �
NIP-W PIPPAP
F IL I CF\ F h1D1111.
0
0
SHEET -1-2- o f - -35
8 +00 CROSS SECTION
U
SHORELINE PROTECTION
a
v �
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997
-- - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. �
JOB NO. ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS a
21 SCALE: 1" = 10' NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
r`
O
W L + 0.7FT.
1 B'
O N
rri
STATION
9 +00
CON ;TF
EXC%w�
15'
26'
6°
FILL\
a
ox.
3MC
— -
13 o f
SHEET _ - - --
GROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
a
lkwawt ""'w `
NORTH CAROLINA
BEAUFORT CO.
21CHLANDS TOWNSHIP
CHILES, P.E. o
DATE-. -F£B; 24; 1997 ROBERT M.
CONSULTANTS P
58 ENGINEERS AND °
JOB N0. __ 1970791— __ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE:
- 3q'
j\IF1A/ PIPPAP
CONSTRUCTIC
EXCAVATION
W. L. + 0.7F
24'
-- 6
CD rrl
Ln O-)
FILL
F IL_ I I- r-\ r r-,BRIC
N
23' , 5' --
0
Q
O rn�
CD d
LL-
O
w
C�
w
SHEET 1 4 o f 35
0 - - - -- - - - --
STATION 10 +00 n CROSS SECTION
U
SHORELINE PROTECTION
Ul
p O—
4,17 �MM� M�yr n
V u
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA N
DATE: FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. a
JOB N0. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: 1 - 10 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA u
r
0
0
� o
PIKE
r
I
,4- - -
g-T pTIQN 11 +00
0
U
0
5
cRass Se CT OT4
HpREL� pROT
S P
NORTW CAROl1N%` '
BEAVFORT GO. IL�S♦ Q,E•' o
R` SANDS TOWS"tiP
2 ROgE � M' C
FEB. 4. 1997 GQNSULTANTS v
Op7E: ENGINEERS AND
NOR rn CAR0�INA
97058 NEy1 BERN.
JOB N0.
o SCALE:
33' _
f 2'
O 0
O �p O
NEW RIPRAP
CONSTRUCTION
EXCAVATION/
LW l__ + 0.7F-
FILTER FABRIC
STATION 12 +00
21'
0
- - 15' ----- 18'
M �
DIKE
SHEET 16 of 35
CROSS SECTION
U
SHORELINE PROTECTION
o.
C)
V
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: — FEB. 24 1997
- -- , -97 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. _ 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: i e i C NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
42' _ _- 7' _ = 18' 15'
3 --
N I� Ln t�
O � 00 r`
NIFFW RIPPAP
r IL_ I try FABRIC
SHEET 17 of 35
0
DIKE
STATION 13+00 SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
s=
o_
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA it
DATE: _FEB. 24. 1997 '
— - - - - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
RIB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
SCALE: I = 10' NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA °
CONSTRUCT'S "'
EXCAVATI(
W.L. + 0.
.27' -- -- -15' _
� N
r N �
O
NEW RIPRAP
\ FILTER FABRIC
STATION 14 +00
EXIST. RIPRAP
0
5' 15' -
00 t\
DIKE
SHEET -j-@- of __35
CROSS SECTION
n SHORELINE PROTECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
r
DIJE; -FE-" 24_ 2-991 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS a
g SCALE: — " = 10' _ NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA
i
+0
6' 16' _ - 8' = _
50'
I� co 00 N
O I") Ln N co
CONSTRUCTION
EXC 8,VATION
NEW RIPRAP
FILL
,X�
F IL I E-R F /ADINI
STATION 15+00
EXIST. RIPRAP
DIKE
SHEET 19 of 35
0
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
< O
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997
-- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB N0. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
SCALE: i - 10 NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA V
CONSTRUCTI(
EXCAVATION
W. L. + 0.7FT.
EJ
25'
v- 6' i
(D
N
O CD
O U-01 - _ B
F IL_ I GFC F f1Df-\ll.
STATION 15+50
16' _ - 10' - 4' -13'
In
I I- CD CD
T T T T
=XIST. RIPRAP
DIKE
SHEET 20 of 35
0
n CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
�O-
y
U i
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA 1V°
DATE: -FEB. 24, 1997
— - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: 1" = 10 NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA U
CON
EXC
W -L
+ 0.7 r- T.
2 4'
o
� o
o
r--
NEW RIPRAP
rlL ILH rABRIC
STATION 16 +00
ST. RIPRAP
0
1
gx
d
U
25'
8' 3' _ . 6' _
00 00
N cD
r" r
r
DIKE
SHEET _ r?1 _ of 35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP��w ^
BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
)ATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES P.E.
10B NO. 97058
ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
CALF: 1" = 10' NEW BERN, NORTH
CAROLINA °
W. L. + 0.7FT.
0
C(:)NSTR�
E} CAVA1
STATION
21' _ - 14' 4' --- g' - i - -15' _
5'
It o
r c° o co r-
F1r-1A/ PIPPAF
DIKE
FABRIC
SHEET _ 22_ of __35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
MJM .... a
DS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA !�
EB. 24, 1997
- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
97058 ENGMEERS AND CONSULTANTS
v
1" = 10' NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
0
CONSTRUCTION
EXCAVATION \
W.L. + 0.7FT.
31'
Klr`%Al F)IF)D A E) riI I
9' 12' —
3'
0 0
Ln
DIKE
� IL I LIB 1 !'�LJI .Iv
0
EXIST. RIPRAP
SHEET _ 23_ of __35
STATION 17 +50 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
n
DATE: _FEB. 24, 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
r
,JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
V
° SCALE: I" = lo' NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA
O
CONSTRUC
EXCAVATIC
W.L. + 0.7FT.
2 4' _ - 10'- 3' ---12' --
2'
O O
O N
co
FMm
r IL_ i LI"N r haRl� o
DIKE
mum
SHEET 24 Of 35
STATION 18 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
y
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
n
DATE: FEB. 24 +1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
O-
°
SCALE: 1' = 10 NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA u
NEW RIPRAP
W.L. + 0.7FT
15' 8' 7' --- 12'
5'
cD
o o r`
FILL — DIKE
FILTER FABRIC
STATION 19 +00
0
J. RIPRAP
SHEET _ 2S_ Of _-35-
CROSS SECTION
SHORED PROTECTION
U
MW M�PM P
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO_ NORTH CAROLINA
n
DATE; -FEB� 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. __ 87058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS a
U
SCALE: _ I__= 10' J NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
W.L. -
19' = 7' S' — 13' -
f g -�
N O
O
CD 06 r- t\
In
Nf- W RIPR .� P rii
F IL_ I try r HCSKiI
STATION 20 +00
�n
v
�o
2
DIKE
SHEET 26 of 35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
a
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA R
DATE: _FEB. 24. 1997
- - - - - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _? 10 _ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA o
NEW R
W_L. + 0.7FT
14' - 10' - - 7'- 13' -
4' �-
O O N O)
cfl CO f'- ►�
r IL I r-m r f-�DrCik-
O
DIKE
SHEET _ 27_ of __35
STATION 21 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
y O-
��rr MwMM r
� P
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA �
n
DATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
U
° SCALE: — i °�10___ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTRI
EXCAW
W. L. + C
22'
3
cD O N
r r cD DO I-�
0 In —
F IL I Cr\ F r�L7r�1�
0
�P
15' ---
DIKE
N
t\
SHEET _ 28 _ of __35
STATION 22 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
50
a
v RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA .��.
DATE. FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. — 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
U
o _ SCALE: _ 1° 1C _ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
13' - - 18' 5' = 17'
6
o
co co CD
FILL DIKE
NEW RIPRAP \ /-
CONSTRUCTION
EXCAVATION
W.L. + 0.7FT. A
EXIST. RIPRAP
FILTER FABRIC
0
SHEET 29 of 35
STATION 23 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA 7C
DATE: FEB. 24. 1997
--- - - - - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E,
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: -_i:-= 10 __ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
NEW
W. L. + 0.7
20' = 5' 1-10'— 20'
--- -- 2'
00 N In
N In t\ co �
DIKE
EXIST. RIPRAP SHEET _ 30_ of __3S
o
FILTER FABRIC
STATION 24 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
sa
MAW MIME O
a �
o RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA ie
n
DATE'. _FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: - I'__ 10 _ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTF
EXCAVP
W. L. +
18' _ - 11 ' 14' - - 15'
3'
(� O N 00 V-) co
O Lo co cD
F IL I CCC r AbNi(-
STATION 24 +50
DIKE
T. RIPRAP
0 SHEET _ 31 _ Of _-35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
a o-
a
°
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO_ NORTH CAROLINA
DATE; FEB. 24, 1997
- - -- - -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. 2
JOB N0. __g7058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS °
SCALE: _ 1!° IQ - -- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA u
CONS
EXCA\
W.L. + C
g' = = 18'
N
O N
niCli DIDD AD
21' — = 16'—
KIST. RIPRAP
N O
cfl co
DIKE
SHEET _ 32 _ of __35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
"... j,
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO_ NORTH CAROLINA b
DATE; _FEB. 24. 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. 97058 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
U
SCALE: 1 - 10 _ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA u
47'
6' -a-- = 15'
-- 4 --
Ln rq rn
o r 00 r--� r;
NEW RIPRAP
CONSTRUCTION
EXCAVATION
W.L. - +- 0.7FT.
r IL I LK r ABRIC
0
DIKE
EXIST. RIPRAP
SHEET 33 of 35
STATION 26 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
a
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA A
DATE: _FEB. 24. 1997
- -- -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E_ �
JOB NO. --L725-8— ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: — I -__ 10' __ NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA o
CONSTRU(
EXCAVATI
W.L. +
21' — 6' 5' = 14'
0o d- 00
r CV (D f
O M co
FILL ` DIKE
f IL.ICIN I nUi\i\., °
SHEET _..q4_ of __35
STATION 27 +00 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. __ 97d58 __ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
v
21 SCALE: 1 _ - 10 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
CONSTI
EXCAV,
W.L. +
r
27' - -
o �
13' - 3' 15'
2'
F11 I DIKE
r- I L_ I t rc r H o rc I—
O
SHEET _35_ of --35-
STATION 27 +50 CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
U
o RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _FEB. 24_ 1997 ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. a
JOB N0. _ 97058 _ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
U
E!j SCALE: _ 1 10 NEW BERN. NORTH CAROLINA
NEW F
W.L. + 1.4 F1
i
9.0' ---- 14.6' _ _
00
d r-
Q0
STATION 28 +50
20.7' i
DIKE
0
r;
SHEET 35-1 of --- 35
CROSS SECTION
SHORELINE PROTECTION
u RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT CO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _AUG. 07,_1997
- -- -- ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E. o
JOB NO. __ 97058 — ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS o
U
ej SCALE: _ 1 _= 10 NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 19,1997
Mr. Jeffrey C. Furness
PCS Phosphate
P. O. Box 48
Aurora, North Carolina 27806
Dear Mr. Furness:
Subject: Whitehurst Creek Mitigation Plan
Beaufort County
LT
. W
�EHNR
Thank you for your February 10, 1997 mitigation plan for the relocated
Whitehurst Creek. I apologize for the tardy review. The Division of Water
Quality offers the following comments:
1) The figures do not define the upper and lower floodplains. This is
important since the planting scheme relies on these zones.
2) Benthic macroinvertebrate sampling should include the number of
specimens rather than presence/ absence. Also, please list all species of
Cricotopus since they may indicate a presence of toxic substances.
3) Please remove river birch from the list of trees to be planted. Like
sweet gum, river birch will invade the site. We also request that
swamp blackgum be planted instead of blackgum.
4) No more than 20% of any one species should be planted in order to
produce a diverse stand.
5) The tree success criteria should include a statement that no more than
20% of any one species be present at the end of the third growing
season. If this condition is not met, additional plantings may be
necessary.
6) The location and number of transects should be predetermined and
shown on a figure.
Environmental Sciences Branch • 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone 919 - 733 -9960 FAX # 733 -9959
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 500/a recycl"l0% post consumer paper
7) The figures did not identify the location of the groundwater
monitoring wells. The wells should have continuous recorders, or
there should be daily (except weekend and holiday) monitoring for the
first and last 30 days of the growing season.
8) Site monitoring should be five years and not three. This is consistent
with all plans submitted to us over the last several years.
9) Figure 5 shows herbaceous plants. There is no mention of the species
or density in the write -up.
10) There should be a discussion on the instream habitat (pre and post).
What efforts will occur to ensure that the substrate and amount of
woody debris will be approximately the same following the relocation?
11) The sentences on page 3 and 4 that start with, "Standing water within
12 ..." should have the "within 12 inches of the surface" portion
removed.
DWQ believes that the success criteria should be as follows:
hydrology - wetland restoration sites that are inundated or saturated to the
surface for a consecutive number of days greater than 12.5
percent of any growing season under normal conditions. This
monitoring will occur for 5 years as in comment 8 above.
vegetation - At the end of the third year, there will be at least 320 trees /acre.
At least six species of planted hardwood trees will be present
with no more than 20% for any species at the end of the third
year.
Please submit a revised plan based on the comments. Should you have
any questions, please contact Mr. Eric Galamb, Ms. Karen Lynch, or me at
733 -1786.
Sincerely,
1 6
L�D
j6hn R. Dorn VBic l ogical Supervisor
cc: Eric Galamb
Ron Ferrell
Karen Lynch
Deborah Sawyer, WaRO
Central Files
JRD /gh
whc
PCS
Phosphate VAURORA DIVISION
P.O. BOX 48, AURORA, NC 27806
February 10, 1997
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Dept. of UHNR
4401 Rcedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27626 -0535
Dcar Mr. Dorney:
B
FM�,Ro ,� 199
A modification to the 401 Water Quality Certification for Whitehurst Creek was issued by the
Division of Water Quality on December 12, 1996. A stipulation of the modification was that a
final mitigation plan for all wetland and stream mitigation must be submitted within two months.
Unclosed please find two copies of the mitigation plan. The plan consists of a narrative portion
and a set of five large drawings. The narrative describes the tree planting specifications,
monitoring plans and success criteria, and the drawings (labeled figures 1 -5) show the plans for
different parts of the project.
If you have any questions on this plan, please call me at 919/322 -8249. When you indicate your
approval of this plan, it will be submitted to the Division of Land Resources for incorporation
into the reclamation portion of our mining permit.
Sincerely,
)ffrey C. Furness
JCP /rc
Fnclosures
PC: Tracey Davis - DLR, Raleigh (w /o encl)
W. A. Schimming (w /encl)
1'. J. Moffett (w /cncl)
1). J. Millman (w /encl)
S. R. Phillips /12 -01- 004 -26 (w /cncl)
13. W. Bolick - C7,R (w /cncl)
00 -14 -000 (w /o encl)
Mitigation Plan for the
Whitehurst Creek Channel
Beaufort County, North Carolina
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
February 1997
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On April 24, 1992 PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. (PCS Phosphate)
submitted an application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) to impact a portion of the
channelized drainage of Whitehurst Creek. Approval of the 401 was issued
on June 30, 1992, and a mitigation channel was constructed. A
modification to the 401, to relocate a portion of the mitigation channel, was
requested on December 15, 1994 and approved on May 30, 1995. A second
modification was requested on May 28, 1996, which involved leaving the
current Whitehurst Creek mitigation channel in place, construction of a new
channel through reclaimed land, and a change in the date for the whole
channel system to be tied together and complete. This request was approved
by DWQ and resulted in the issuance of a modified 401 on December 12,
1996. This 401 Certification required that a mitigation plan for Whitehurst
Creek be submitted to DWQ for approval within two months of the date of
the modification approval.
This document is the proposed mitigation plan as specified in the 401
Certification conditions. The Whitehurst Creek mitigation project consists
of three distinct but integrated areas, shown in the large drawing labeled
Figure 1. The first is the 10 -foot wide stream channel itself, which consists �o OY_
of an east prong, (Figure 2), which was completed in August 1995, and a 0 , tk-k-
west prong (Figures 3 and 4). The second is the flat floodplain areas
adjacent to the west prong and at the confluence of the east and west prongs
i,
(Figures 3 and 4). Third is a headwater area located at the extreme upperoQ(
prong ( g (Figure 5 �
��.
end of the east Fi ) �' �-
2.0 STREAM CHANNEL MONITORING
2.1 Water Quality. The parameters to be monitored include dissolved
oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity, fluoride and total phosphorus.
Water quality monitoring has been done on a monthly basis in the east
prong for several years. Monitoring water quality in the west prong will
begin one month after it is tied -in to lower Whitehurst Creek, which must be
done by June 4, 2003. Samples will be collected from two locations in each
prong, one near the upper ends and one nearer the lower ends.
1
l
2.2 Fish. Fish sampling will be conducted during winter (February) and
summer (July) using a backpack electroshocker at an upstream and a
downstream location in each prong. This sampling is presently occurring in
the eastern prong, and will begin in the western prong following tie -in.
Samples will be taken over two 600 -foot segments at each site, with
upstream and downstream blocknets used when needed. Fish collected will
be identified, measured, and either kept as vouchers or released. Voucher
specimens will be preserved in 10 percent formalin and transferred to 95
percent denatured ethanol after 48 hours. The created stream channels will
be considered successful when there is no greater than 25 percent reduction
in the total number of species found before mining.
2.3 Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Qualitative macro invertebrate sampling
will be conducted during winter and summer at an upstream and a
downstream location in each prong. Nine standing sweep net samples will
be taken at each site for each seasonal survey. These samples will be hand -
sorted in the field and all macro invertebrates collected preserved in 10
percent formalin. Additional macro invertebrates will be collected from log
washes and rubs as well as by incidental captures made during visual
searches. All specimens will be transferred to 95 percent denatured ethanol
in the lab. Macro invertebrates will be identified to lowest reasonable taxa
within each group. Taxa identification for specimens collected in the
surveys will rely primarily on Brigham et al (1982), and will be based on
the level of effort established by DWQ during their sampling of Whitehurst
Creek in February 1992. The created stream channels will be considered
successful when there is no greater than 25 percent reduction in the total
number of genera (or species where identification is feasible) found before
mining. Monitoring will continue until this success criterion is met or until _U
the DWQ concurs that the benthic macro invertebrate co munity hasro�
successfully recolonized, whichever is sooner. w`^ 'M�`r;n
3.0 BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD WETLAND MONITORING s Peur�' ccv
The monitoring of the floodplain wetland that will be created adjacent
to the stream channel will be based on the Compensatory Hardwood
Mitigation Guidelines published by the Wilmington District of the U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
6
I , ITa?,C.c�
a�
00'c046 1/5 5
3.1 Planting Specifications. Hardwood trees will be planted at a density
of at least 400 trees per acre. The initial planting goal is 20 percent \v
containerized and 80 percent bare root seedlings, but may be modified
depending on ability to install the larger trees. Tree species on the lowest
•'�
floodplain areas may include bald cypress, green ash, water tupelo and
overcup oak. Tree species on the higher floodplain areas will include, but
not be limited to, willow oak l,a�.uu'�el oak, swamp chestnut oak, water oak,
cherrybark oak, fi anct�bl�ckgum. Trees will be planted in the west
prong floodplain�uar y 1998, and in the floodplain area at the
confluence of the east and west prongs by February 2003.
3.2 Tree Monitoring and Success Criteria. Tree success will be
monitored with tree transects scattered throughout the floodplain area.
Success is measured by tree survival and species composition. Average tree
density will be at least 320 planted trees /acre at the end of the third growing
season. At least six species of planted hardwood trees will be present at the
end of the third growing season (with bald cypress considered hardwood).
3.3 Hvdrolovv Monitoring and Success Criteria. The hydrology of the
'^V bottomland hardwood floodplain areas will be monitored with 24 -inch wells
spaced within the floodplain and checked periodically throughout the
0 or �I growing season. On most areas, the hydrology should meet or exceed the
level of 12.5 percent of the growing season as specified in the Corps of
1 V16 Engineers Compensator Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines. Wetland
restoration sites that are inundated or saturated to the surface for a
consecutive number of days greater than 12.5 percent of any one growing
season under normal c nditions are hydrologically successful. Portions of
this site which after t years of monitoring are inundated or saturated to
the surface between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season in most years
will be considered successful on a case by case basis. Standing water within-
12--;-,n, _ mace will be considered a positive indicator of wetland
hydrology.
4.0 HEADWATER AREA
The monitoring of the headwater area that will be developed at the
upper end of the east prong will be based on the Compensator Hardwood
Mitigation Guidelines published by the Wilmington District of the U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
3
1�41V- -e
�OA
�A
tv
r4
4.1 Planting Specifications. Bare root hardwood tree seedlings will be
planted at a density of at least 400 trees per acre. Tree species may include
bald cypress, green ash, water tupelo, overcup oak, willow oak, water oak,
laurel oak, swamp chestnut oak, cherrybark oak,�lackgum, and rid 'rch.
Trees will be planted in February 1998..
4.2 Tree Monitoring and Success Criteria. Tree success will be
monitored with tree transects scattered throughout the headwater area.
Success is measured by tree survival and species composition. Average tree
density will be at least 320 planted trees per acre at the end of the third
growing season. At least six species of planted hardwood trees will be
present at the end of the third growing season (with bald cypress considered
a hardwood).
4.3 Hydrology Monitoring and Success Criteria. The hydrology of the
headwater area will be monitored with 24 -inch wells checked periodically
throughout the growing season. The hydrology of the bottomland hardwood
floodplain areas will be monitored with 24 -inch wells spaced within the
floodplain and checked periodically throughout the growing season. On
most areas, the hydrology should meet or exceed the level of 12.5 percent of
the growing season as specified in the Corps of Engineers Compensatory
Hardwood Mitigation Guidelines. Wetland restoration sites that are
inundated or saturated to the surface for a consecutive number of days
greater than 12.5 percent of any one growing season under normal
conditions are hydrologically successful. Portions of this site which after
<e years of monitoring are inundated or saturated to the surface between
and 12.5 percent of the growing season in most years will be considered
successful on a case by case basis. Standing water within 1-2 e
.-surface will be considered a positive indicator of wetland hydrology.
5.0 REPORTS
An annual monitoring report will be submitted to DWQ by April 1 of
the following year. Upon meeting the stated success criteria, the wetland
areas within the scope of the Whitehurst Creek project would be expected to
count as mitigation credits for future wetland impacts.
4
6.0 LITERATURE CITED
Brigham, A.R., W. U. Brigham, and A Gnilka, eds. 1982. Aquatic insects
and oligochaetes of North and South Carolina. Midwest Aquatic
Enterprises, Mahomet, Illinois. 837 pp.
5
C 11
ml,
G
C
n
i
�l
ice/ l
I � `
I �
14 I'I
l'
i
FLOAREA AIN
- -- - -•
All
SPOIL
IN
AI
- - - -- -- — - -- —
l
R
- — -T
-a
% .
HEADWATER
/ f ►': �' l
AREA
lo- lol
loll
r%
I
If
\ \ \ I f1
hf ` SE Al
-
REVISED \ \ I I) I I I c
Q <aeaaasap'a•
\
REVISED 01- 30 -97: ADDED 5 ACRE HEADWATER AREA.
\ � \ REVISED 01- 06 -97: ADDED 0.4 ACRE FLOOD PLAIN AREA.
LEGEND �\ � � \ � -y OVERALL PLAN Figure I
\ \ of
• -- PERMIT LINE \ - WHITEHURST CREEK RESTORATION
-al'a ��. TREES
a for
— ' PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
d
Phosphate AURORA D I V I S I O N
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP ROBERT BE:AUF ?RT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _08_
23_96 _ M. CHILES, t'.E
JOB NO.. _ 96074 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _1"—,=-300'--- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
a
M
I
0
3
a
�r
'I
E
i
I
f
I
ice/ l
I � `
I �
14 I'I
l'
i
FLOAREA AIN
- -- - -•
All
SPOIL
IN
AI
- - - -- -- — - -- —
l
R
- — -T
-a
% .
HEADWATER
/ f ►': �' l
AREA
lo- lol
loll
r%
I
If
\ \ \ I f1
hf ` SE Al
-
REVISED \ \ I I) I I I c
Q <aeaaasap'a•
\
REVISED 01- 30 -97: ADDED 5 ACRE HEADWATER AREA.
\ � \ REVISED 01- 06 -97: ADDED 0.4 ACRE FLOOD PLAIN AREA.
LEGEND �\ � � \ � -y OVERALL PLAN Figure I
\ \ of
• -- PERMIT LINE \ - WHITEHURST CREEK RESTORATION
-al'a ��. TREES
a for
— ' PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
d
Phosphate AURORA D I V I S I O N
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP ROBERT BE:AUF ?RT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _08_
23_96 _ M. CHILES, t'.E
JOB NO.. _ 96074 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _1"—,=-300'--- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
a
M
I
0
3
a
1�
U
t--
D
z
(� W
Q
O W
a0 —'
U
O W J a- W
W I_
- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -
- ROAD -._ ... - - - - - - _. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING _
�- - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - -_ _..- -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - ROAD- - -
�+ 67.2' -I- 101.4'
SECTION :B —B
? " = 30'
v J
,.�.. •.. 1Y.,?�' -. `jam•'. /// 1
_C .. ,.. . .. ,- rt f:: r ��, � �, (: .� ,F-• .4i+i. �r..:.,�.re�.- ..+... �3r►. -. - w..- .:��_�+l�i;r.�,,.;__ '?"�►' � / // 111
A.
. . . . . .............. .. ....
i f
/
,►•
/1r
1 /
ro
PLAN VIEW
w
1" _ 300'
F ROAD -- - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - _ - - _ -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -. - - -- - -- -- _ _ . - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - ---
-
- - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- HEADWATER AREA
SECTION A —A
1 " = 30,
HEAD+MATf_? `t ` j 11 1
AFEA 1 t
i
III
l I II
Il II�.._•1
III II
III �
111 !I Q
z
U
O
aL
_ EXISTING,
ROAD
POND
5,
c
i
3t
a
0
+bc yv3'Siyptl
eec +` vA�J Shp'
• + 4p
� by
SEAL
5365.
REVISED 02- 04 -97: GENERAL UPDATE,
r�.
SHEET 2 of 2
Figure 2
WHITEHURST CREED
LEGE�JD
EAST PRONG and HLAI)WATER AREA
---- --- PERMIT LINE
CROSS SECTIONS
_ TREES
r�
rn
PROPOSED CONTOURS
v
.9
�CS
kN��k.,
Phosphate
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PR'O_IE =C;'1 BOUNDARY;►
AURORA DIVISION
--I,� FLOW DIRECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFOR'T COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _ 08-14 R O B E L\ �i M. . C ��{ I L E J, P. E:.
JOB NO. `)6074_ -M ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _ AS SHOWN NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
5,
c
i
3t
a
0
V
a
4 ! ACre
FL E"LAiN
AP
i
f � 1
i
ii
i
'1
i
1
i ^MAt, OATS, SORGHUFERABLE GRASS THE SOJL UNTIL IN SUCH A
Or ANNU L
INCLUDES: NATIVE MANNER
F. SHOULO A LESPEOEZA. ANNUAL PLANTS BECOME
BE PLANTED L RYE GRASS, RYE,
CONDITIONS P AT A
,\ AREA S ( SUCH AS AFTER s DENSITY Y OF 400 TREE
S WITHIN BALD 7R S PER
tHE F CYPRESS TREES AC.'R
LOOP PLAIN AREA.) SHOULD ORE 7OLERANTE WITH A GOAL
A. E PLANT - OF PLOOQIh'G
20% BALLED on ED AT THE LOWEST
���Yyvv,ikrvayr *.
"•• 80% BARER d BURLAPPED ��.4 H CARC;
.... OOt SEEDL INGS %
a
. ��
v CYPRESS p`'`t =-,S r► c- S.
GREEN ASH
`"�.." ••r.,� ~_
P p R
0,
I L L �£4Sfh Ol-
�:
�t5r
f 3 !V 6
O N TUPELO GUM W W 06-47: OA ADOfA04 ACRE r0G p
SWAMP CHES tNU f OAK OVERCUP OAK REL OAK AF EA
WATER P� E
CE �
OAK ..,Aa;0Al.
BK G IRCH ,j T 1LAC EET
CHERRY AL
:t :
\
BA RK of
BARK F19� r� ;
l
1 E of ure 4 1�
�t jam'
co
for -E,5'TORA,PIa
N
PCs
RICE:,' ".-,- --.PtG
LANDS
DATE; SI iIP E�EA i AURORA 01 V
UROR
IF�)Rr CC(f�.1TY t510N
X48 N0. 9 Cf74 R NORTH CAROI.!Nq .
ENGINEERS S, C
AND COtdS TAN
NE'W REl;?N UL , T
.,. NORTH CAROLINA S ¢,
I
,
J iA
W
1 o: cr
W
V Z
ELEV. t.fl't —
ELEV t Ot
50' 1L10.0, 50'
1.5'
TYPICAL SECTION A
1" — 20'
Pc-
i
t• � � 1
1
1�
VEGETATION IN THE FORM OF GRASS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED IN SUCH A MANNER
THAT SMALL GRAINS WILL STABILIZE THE SOIL UNTIL NATIVE PLANTS BECOME
REESTABLISHED. PREFERABLE GRASS INCLUDES: ANNUAL RYE GRASS, RYE,
WHEAT, OATS, SORGHUM, or ANNUAL LESPEDEZA.
TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 400 TREES PER ACRE WITH A GOAT_
OF 320 TREES PER ACRE AFTER 5 YEARS. TREES MORE TOLERANT OF FLOODING
CONDITIONS (SUCH AS BALD CYPRESS) SHOULD 6E PLANTED AT THE LOWEST
AREAS WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN ,AREA.
20% BALLED and BURLAPPED
80% BARE ROOT SEEDLINGS
LOWER FLOOD PLAIN SPECIES )JPPJLR FLQQD PLAIN SPECIES
CYPRESS WILLOW OAK
GREEN ASH LAUREL OAK
TUPELO GUM SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
OVERCUP OAK 'WATER OAK
RIVER BIRCH �. +� CAR "•.
BLACK GUM .�o� �S�a
CHERRY BARK OAK
SEAT~
r
5565
REVISED 01- 30 -07: MODIFIED NOTES. a� .
SHEE r ,lm of R?
PHASE I PLAN Figure 3
= of
W WHITEHURST CREED RESTORATION
Q g- for
.�
PCs
x Phosphate AURORA DIVISION
a
° PICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT C'OI{NTY NORTH CAROLINA
V
DATE: _c_ 14_96_._ ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. _ 950_4___ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCAR E: _ 1__= 100' -- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
Y
rl
M
cl
C�
a
cl
r
r
VEGETATION IN THE FORM OF GRASS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED IN SUCH A MANNER
THAT SMALL GRAINS WILL STABILIZE THE SOIL UNTIL NATIVE PLANTS BECOME
REESTABLISHED. PREFERABLE GRASS INCLUDES: ANNUAL RYE GRASS, RYE,
WHEAT, OATS, SORGHUM, or ANNUAL LESPEDEZA.
TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 400 TREES PER ACRE WITH A GOAT_
OF 320 TREES PER ACRE AFTER 5 YEARS. TREES MORE TOLERANT OF FLOODING
CONDITIONS (SUCH AS BALD CYPRESS) SHOULD 6E PLANTED AT THE LOWEST
AREAS WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN ,AREA.
20% BALLED and BURLAPPED
80% BARE ROOT SEEDLINGS
LOWER FLOOD PLAIN SPECIES )JPPJLR FLQQD PLAIN SPECIES
CYPRESS WILLOW OAK
GREEN ASH LAUREL OAK
TUPELO GUM SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
OVERCUP OAK 'WATER OAK
RIVER BIRCH �. +� CAR "•.
BLACK GUM .�o� �S�a
CHERRY BARK OAK
SEAT~
r
5565
REVISED 01- 30 -07: MODIFIED NOTES. a� .
SHEE r ,lm of R?
PHASE I PLAN Figure 3
= of
W WHITEHURST CREED RESTORATION
Q g- for
.�
PCs
x Phosphate AURORA DIVISION
a
° PICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT C'OI{NTY NORTH CAROLINA
V
DATE: _c_ 14_96_._ ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. _ 950_4___ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCAR E: _ 1__= 100' -- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
Y
rl
M
cl
C�
a
cl
5
3
77TE
-- --------------- -- -------
12
12
• N,
01, C,
z
POND
A
CULVERT tk
/-48"
t;
A�A
011"
75.
N —160+00
.................................... . ......... ............................... . ....... .............. .... . .......................... . ......•..... .... ......... . ..... ............ .................. .............................. ..... ... \ .. ................................
�h
ok,
/-GEOWEB ROCK
ILLWAY
Sp
------- 15
x 13.0
CV, .0
GEOWEB ROCK
SPILLWAY A
01,
- --------- - -
e-000
0
rum"
zz/- lll, jr-GE Wl ROCK
'LLW Y
A
I
L E G E- N D
011, HERBACEOUS PLANTS
ifln-1 • , 6 --�, , HARDWOOD "FREES
ag
>
PERMIT LINE
TREES
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
CARO'O,
S E A VL\��
FR
. M,
WHITEHURST
HEADWA"FER
for
SHEET I of 2
CREEK Figure 5
AREA
PCs
Phosphatel AURORA DIVISION
X RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT T Y NORTH -/ rOUNA
DATE- -- 08__3 =96 --
JOE; NO. 96074
SCALF:
ROBERT M. CAILES, P-E
ENGINEERS AND CONISULTANTS
NEW NORTH CAROLINA
ct
C 11
ml,
G
C
n
i
�l
ice/ l
I � `
I �
14 I'I
l'
i
FLOAREA AIN
- -- - -•
All
SPOIL
IN
AI
- - - -- -- — - -- —
l
R
- — -T
-a
% .
HEADWATER
/ f ►': �' l
AREA
lo- lol
loll
r%
I
If
\ \ \ I f1
hf ` SE Al
-
REVISED \ \ I I) I I I c
Q <aeaaasap'a•
\
REVISED 01- 30 -97: ADDED 5 ACRE HEADWATER AREA.
\ � \ REVISED 01- 06 -97: ADDED 0.4 ACRE FLOOD PLAIN AREA.
LEGEND �\ � � \ � -y OVERALL PLAN Figure I
\ \ of
• -- PERMIT LINE \ - WHITEHURST CREEK RESTORATION
-al'a ��. TREES
a for
— ' PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
d
Phosphate AURORA D I V I S I O N
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP ROBERT BE:AUF ?RT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _08_
23_96 _ M. CHILES, t'.E
JOB NO.. _ 96074 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _1"—,=-300'--- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
a
M
I
0
3
a
�r
'I
E
i
I
f
I
ice/ l
I � `
I �
14 I'I
l'
i
FLOAREA AIN
- -- - -•
All
SPOIL
IN
AI
- - - -- -- — - -- —
l
R
- — -T
-a
% .
HEADWATER
/ f ►': �' l
AREA
lo- lol
loll
r%
I
If
\ \ \ I f1
hf ` SE Al
-
REVISED \ \ I I) I I I c
Q <aeaaasap'a•
\
REVISED 01- 30 -97: ADDED 5 ACRE HEADWATER AREA.
\ � \ REVISED 01- 06 -97: ADDED 0.4 ACRE FLOOD PLAIN AREA.
LEGEND �\ � � \ � -y OVERALL PLAN Figure I
\ \ of
• -- PERMIT LINE \ - WHITEHURST CREEK RESTORATION
-al'a ��. TREES
a for
— ' PROPOSED CONTOURS
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
d
Phosphate AURORA D I V I S I O N
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP ROBERT BE:AUF ?RT COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _08_
23_96 _ M. CHILES, t'.E
JOB NO.. _ 96074 ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _1"—,=-300'--- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
a
M
I
0
3
a
1�
U
t--
D
z
(� W
Q
O W
a0 —'
U
O W J a- W
W I_
- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -
- ROAD -._ ... - - - - - - _. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING _
�- - -- - - -- -- -- -- -- - - -_ _..- -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - ROAD- - -
�+ 67.2' -I- 101.4'
SECTION :B —B
? " = 30'
v J
,.�.. •.. 1Y.,?�' -. `jam•'. /// 1
_C .. ,.. . .. ,- rt f:: r ��, � �, (: .� ,F-• .4i+i. �r..:.,�.re�.- ..+... �3r►. -. - w..- .:��_�+l�i;r.�,,.;__ '?"�►' � / // 111
A.
. . . . . .............. .. ....
i f
/
,►•
/1r
1 /
ro
PLAN VIEW
w
1" _ 300'
F ROAD -- - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - _ - - _ -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -. - - -- - -- -- _ _ . - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - ---
-
- - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- HEADWATER AREA
SECTION A —A
1 " = 30,
HEAD+MATf_? `t ` j 11 1
AFEA 1 t
i
III
l I II
Il II�.._•1
III II
III �
111 !I Q
z
U
O
aL
_ EXISTING,
ROAD
POND
5,
c
i
3t
a
0
+bc yv3'Siyptl
eec +` vA�J Shp'
• + 4p
� by
SEAL
5365.
REVISED 02- 04 -97: GENERAL UPDATE,
r�.
SHEET 2 of 2
Figure 2
WHITEHURST CREED
LEGE�JD
EAST PRONG and HLAI)WATER AREA
---- --- PERMIT LINE
CROSS SECTIONS
_ TREES
r�
rn
PROPOSED CONTOURS
v
.9
�CS
kN��k.,
Phosphate
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PR'O_IE =C;'1 BOUNDARY;►
AURORA DIVISION
--I,� FLOW DIRECTION
RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFOR'T COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: _ 08-14 R O B E L\ �i M. . C ��{ I L E J, P. E:.
JOB NO. `)6074_ -M ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCALE: _ AS SHOWN NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
5,
c
i
3t
a
0
V
a
4 ! ACre
FL E"LAiN
AP
i
f � 1
i
ii
i
'1
i
1
i ^MAt, OATS, SORGHUFERABLE GRASS THE SOJL UNTIL IN SUCH A
Or ANNU L
INCLUDES: NATIVE MANNER
F. SHOULO A LESPEOEZA. ANNUAL PLANTS BECOME
BE PLANTED L RYE GRASS, RYE,
CONDITIONS P AT A
,\ AREA S ( SUCH AS AFTER s DENSITY Y OF 400 TREE
S WITHIN BALD 7R S PER
tHE F CYPRESS TREES AC.'R
LOOP PLAIN AREA.) SHOULD ORE 7OLERANTE WITH A GOAL
A. E PLANT - OF PLOOQIh'G
20% BALLED on ED AT THE LOWEST
���Yyvv,ikrvayr *.
"•• 80% BARER d BURLAPPED ��.4 H CARC;
.... OOt SEEDL INGS %
a
. ��
v CYPRESS p`'`t =-,S r► c- S.
GREEN ASH
`"�.." ••r.,� ~_
P p R
0,
I L L �£4Sfh Ol-
�:
�t5r
f 3 !V 6
O N TUPELO GUM W W 06-47: OA ADOfA04 ACRE r0G p
SWAMP CHES tNU f OAK OVERCUP OAK REL OAK AF EA
WATER P� E
CE �
OAK ..,Aa;0Al.
BK G IRCH ,j T 1LAC EET
CHERRY AL
:t :
\
BA RK of
BARK F19� r� ;
l
1 E of ure 4 1�
�t jam'
co
for -E,5'TORA,PIa
N
PCs
RICE:,' ".-,- --.PtG
LANDS
DATE; SI iIP E�EA i AURORA 01 V
UROR
IF�)Rr CC(f�.1TY t510N
X48 N0. 9 Cf74 R NORTH CAROI.!Nq .
ENGINEERS S, C
AND COtdS TAN
NE'W REl;?N UL , T
.,. NORTH CAROLINA S ¢,
I
,
J iA
W
1 o: cr
W
V Z
ELEV. t.fl't —
ELEV t Ot
50' 1L10.0, 50'
1.5'
TYPICAL SECTION A
1" — 20'
Pc-
i
t• � � 1
1
1�
VEGETATION IN THE FORM OF GRASS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED IN SUCH A MANNER
THAT SMALL GRAINS WILL STABILIZE THE SOIL UNTIL NATIVE PLANTS BECOME
REESTABLISHED. PREFERABLE GRASS INCLUDES: ANNUAL RYE GRASS, RYE,
WHEAT, OATS, SORGHUM, or ANNUAL LESPEDEZA.
TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 400 TREES PER ACRE WITH A GOAT_
OF 320 TREES PER ACRE AFTER 5 YEARS. TREES MORE TOLERANT OF FLOODING
CONDITIONS (SUCH AS BALD CYPRESS) SHOULD 6E PLANTED AT THE LOWEST
AREAS WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN ,AREA.
20% BALLED and BURLAPPED
80% BARE ROOT SEEDLINGS
LOWER FLOOD PLAIN SPECIES )JPPJLR FLQQD PLAIN SPECIES
CYPRESS WILLOW OAK
GREEN ASH LAUREL OAK
TUPELO GUM SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
OVERCUP OAK 'WATER OAK
RIVER BIRCH �. +� CAR "•.
BLACK GUM .�o� �S�a
CHERRY BARK OAK
SEAT~
r
5565
REVISED 01- 30 -07: MODIFIED NOTES. a� .
SHEE r ,lm of R?
PHASE I PLAN Figure 3
= of
W WHITEHURST CREED RESTORATION
Q g- for
.�
PCs
x Phosphate AURORA DIVISION
a
° PICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT C'OI{NTY NORTH CAROLINA
V
DATE: _c_ 14_96_._ ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. _ 950_4___ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCAR E: _ 1__= 100' -- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
Y
rl
M
cl
C�
a
cl
r
r
VEGETATION IN THE FORM OF GRASS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED IN SUCH A MANNER
THAT SMALL GRAINS WILL STABILIZE THE SOIL UNTIL NATIVE PLANTS BECOME
REESTABLISHED. PREFERABLE GRASS INCLUDES: ANNUAL RYE GRASS, RYE,
WHEAT, OATS, SORGHUM, or ANNUAL LESPEDEZA.
TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 400 TREES PER ACRE WITH A GOAT_
OF 320 TREES PER ACRE AFTER 5 YEARS. TREES MORE TOLERANT OF FLOODING
CONDITIONS (SUCH AS BALD CYPRESS) SHOULD 6E PLANTED AT THE LOWEST
AREAS WITHIN THE FLOOD PLAIN ,AREA.
20% BALLED and BURLAPPED
80% BARE ROOT SEEDLINGS
LOWER FLOOD PLAIN SPECIES )JPPJLR FLQQD PLAIN SPECIES
CYPRESS WILLOW OAK
GREEN ASH LAUREL OAK
TUPELO GUM SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK
OVERCUP OAK 'WATER OAK
RIVER BIRCH �. +� CAR "•.
BLACK GUM .�o� �S�a
CHERRY BARK OAK
SEAT~
r
5565
REVISED 01- 30 -07: MODIFIED NOTES. a� .
SHEE r ,lm of R?
PHASE I PLAN Figure 3
= of
W WHITEHURST CREED RESTORATION
Q g- for
.�
PCs
x Phosphate AURORA DIVISION
a
° PICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT C'OI{NTY NORTH CAROLINA
V
DATE: _c_ 14_96_._ ROBERT M. CHILES, P.E.
JOB NO. _ 950_4___ ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
SCAR E: _ 1__= 100' -- NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
Y
rl
M
cl
C�
a
cl
5
3
77TE
-- --------------- -- -------
12
12
• N,
01, C,
z
POND
A
CULVERT tk
/-48"
t;
A�A
011"
75.
N —160+00
.................................... . ......... ............................... . ....... .............. .... . .......................... . ......•..... .... ......... . ..... ............ .................. .............................. ..... ... \ .. ................................
�h
ok,
/-GEOWEB ROCK
ILLWAY
Sp
------- 15
x 13.0
CV, .0
GEOWEB ROCK
SPILLWAY A
01,
- --------- - -
e-000
0
rum"
zz/- lll, jr-GE Wl ROCK
'LLW Y
A
I
L E G E- N D
011, HERBACEOUS PLANTS
ifln-1 • , 6 --�, , HARDWOOD "FREES
ag
>
PERMIT LINE
TREES
ROAD (APPROXIMATE PROJECT BOUNDARY)
FLOW DIRECTION
CARO'O,
S E A VL\��
FR
. M,
WHITEHURST
HEADWA"FER
for
SHEET I of 2
CREEK Figure 5
AREA
PCs
Phosphatel AURORA DIVISION
X RICHLANDS TOWNSHIP BEAUFORT T Y NORTH -/ rOUNA
DATE- -- 08__3 =96 --
JOE; NO. 96074
SCALF:
ROBERT M. CAILES, P-E
ENGINEERS AND CONISULTANTS
NEW NORTH CAROLINA
ct