MVPCorrespondence

MVP
SOUTHGATE
November 28, 2018
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ)
1611 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1611
625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700 1 Pittsburgh, PA 15222
833-MV-SOUTH I [e-mail]
www.m vpsouthgate.com
kill @ 110 �Vjll 2
nFr. d 3 2018

Mountain 833- Energy ©rive Canonsburg, ga 15317
e.com
T 833-MV-SOUTH I [e-mail]
Valley www.mvpsouthgate.com
PIPELINE uc
November21, 2018
SUBJECT: MVP Southgate: Docket Number CP19-14-000
Dear Stakeholder,
As a valued stakeholder and community member, this letter is to inform you that on November 6, 2018,
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, filed a formal application with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) requesting authorization to construct an interstate natural gas pipeline and related
facilities, Known as the MVP Southgate project.
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, will construct and own the proposed MVP Southgate. EQM Midstream
Partners will operate the pipeline and own the largest interest in the joint venture. As an interstate
transmission pipeline, the MVP Southgate will be subject to regulation by the FERC.
The proposed MVP Southgate project includes:
Construction and operation of approximately 73 miles of 24- and 16-inch diameter pipeline and
related facilities
One proposed compressor station, generating approximately 28,915 nominal horsepower of
compression, with an identified location in Pittsylvania County, Virginia
Commencing in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, the proposed pipeline will extend from the
Mountain Valley Pipeline, traverse south and west into Rockingham County, North Carolina,
and continue south and east into Alamance County, where it will end at an existing
interconnect facility used by PSNC Energy.
As proposed, the MVP Southgate is a new pipeline designed to transport natural gas from the prolific
Appalachian Basin region to growing markets in southern Virginia and central North Carolina. The
purpose of the project is to provide timely, cost-effective, clean -burning natural gas access to meet the
growing demand for use by residential and commercial customers of PSNC Energy, a local distribution
company, while contributing positive economic benefits and helping to secure America's energy
independence.
The MVP Southgate project team made nearly 200 route adjustments in order to mitigate concerns that
were raised during the pre -filing process. The preferred route identified in the application encompasses
these various revisions, which include the protection of streams, wetlands, and cultural resources, as
well as the avoidance or modification of the route in several sensitive areas.
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, proposes to begin construction activities in the first quarter of 2020, with
full in-service commencing in the fourth quarter of 2020. Construction dates, however, are subject to
change depending on a variety of factors, including receipt of the FERC Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity.
Landowners may be contacted by Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, to request a pipeline easement
and/or other land rights necessary for construction. Every effort will be made to reach a negotiated
settlement for the required easements. Compensation for easements is based on current fair market
value for the property. Landowners will also be reimbursed fairly for crop loss and any other damages
to their property that may occur.
Mountain Valley's goal is to negotiate a fair and equitable settlement that considers the needs of the
landowner and the project. If an agreement cannot be reached, and upon a finding that the project is

needed to serve the public and a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity is issued, section
7(h) of the Natural Gas Act authorizes Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, to secure the necessary rights
through eminent domain. If the use of eminent domain is necessary, a court will determine
compensation that may be different than the amount offered by Mountain Valley. Subsequent to the
filing of a complaint or petition in state or federal court, the court will determine the process as to how it
will determine compensation.
As a landowner or interested stakeholder, it is important that you have access to information regarding
the FERC review process and the proposed project. Enclosed with this letter are:
• An overview of the MVP Southgate project
• The FERC "Notice of Application" for the MVP Southgate project
• FERC pamphlet entitled An Interstate Natural Gas Facility on My Land? What Do I Need To
Know?
• A copy of information from the FERC website entitled How to Intervene
• A map illustrating the proposed route and general location of the project
All public filings to the FERC related to the MVP Southgate project can be accessed online at
www.mvasouthgate.com. The full application, as filed with the FERC, is available for viewing at the
FERC website, www.ferc.gov. Additionally, a complete copy of the application, as filed with the FERC,
has been made available for viewing at the following locations:
May Memorial Library
342 S. Spring Street
Burlington, NC 27215
Reidsville Public Library
204 W Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Eden Public Library
598 S. Pierce St.
Eden, NC 27188
Pittsylvania County Public Library
24 Military Drive
Chatham, VA 24531
The FERC has assigned docket number CP19-14-000 to the MVP Southgate project, and this docket
number should be referenced in all project -related communications to Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC,
or the FERC. individual requests to intervene in this project are due by December 10, 2018.
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, is dedicated to the safe, responsible, and environmentally conscious
construction of the MVP Southgate pipeline. We want community members to understand the natural
gas transportation process and feel confident in knowing that we are committed to the safety of our
communities —from the construction phase to the 24/7 monitoring of in-service operations.
Please contact us with any questions or comments by calling 1 -833-MV-SOUTH, or emailing
mailamvpsouthaate.com, and visit our website at www.mvpsouthgate.com.
Sincerely,
'4�r
Kevin Wagner
Regional Land Director
MVP Southgate Project
Mountain Valley
PIPELINE uc

Project Overview
As proposed, the MVP Southgate project is a natural gas
pipeline system that spans approximately 73 miles from
southern Virginia to central North Carolina — and as an
interstate pipeline will be regulated by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). Mountain Valley Pipeline,
LLC, will construct and own the proposed MVP Southgate.
EQM Midstream Partners will operate the pipeline and
own the largest interest in the joint venture.
MVP Southgate will tie into the Mountain Valley Pipeline
near Chatham, Virginia, and transport supplies of
Marcellus and Utica natural gas to delivery points in
Rockingham and Alamance counties in North Carolina for
distribution to PSNC Energy's residential and commercial
customers. The project is proposed to terminate at an
existing interconnect facility in Alamance County. As
stated in the formal application, Mountain Valley has
secured a firm commitment from PSNC Energy for 300,000
dekatherms (300 million cubic feet) per day and continues
to engage in discussion with other potential customers.
The project's proposed route passes through a portion
of the Southern Virginia Mega Site at Berry Hill, which is
one of the largest business parks on the East Coast. As
an open -access pipeline, the proposed pipeline also may
provide additional access to other new and existing end
users in proximity to the route.
The pipeline will be governed by the federal Natural
Gas Act, which requires a Certificate of Convenience
and Necessity from the FERC before construction can
commence. As currently planned, the pipeline will be
24 inches in diameter for the first 31 miles, and 16 inches
in diameter for the remaining 42 miles. The project will
require approximately 50 feet of permanent easement,
with up to an additional 50 feet of temporary easement
during construction (for a total of up to 100 feet during
construction). As proposed, the project will require one
compressor station, with a proposed location on land
owned by Mountain Valley near Chatham, Virginia.
Project Timeline
On April 11, 2018, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, announced
the MVP Southgate project.
In May 2018, Mountain Valley requested — and received —
permission to enter the FERC's pre -filing process. Through
the next six months, the MVP Southgate project team
engaged stakeholders; participated in extensive outreach
efforts; performed important fieldwork; and conducted
detailed engineering and construction analyses.
On Nov. 6, 2018, Mountain Valley filed a formal application
with the FERC for approval to construct, own, and operate
the MVP Southgate. The application requesting the
FERC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
was received and the MVP Southgate project was issued
Docket Number CP19-14.
The regulatory process allows for robust public
participation, and the MVP Southgate team is eager
to work with all stakeholders to inform development of
the proposed project. Pending approval of a Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity, construction is
targeted to start in the first quarter of 2020. The project
is targeted for completion and an in-service date in the
fourth quarter of 2020.
Designing the Route
Engineering aspects have included surveying and
evaluating various routes to help determine a proposed
route with the least overall impact to landowners, cultural
November 2018

and historic resources, and the environment. During the
pre -filing review, which began in May 2018, the MVP
Southgate team started to conduct environmental surveys
hosted open houses, and participated in FERC scoping
meetings, as part of a comprehensive effort to encourage
open discussion with community members, landowners,
tribes and public agencies.
The proposed MVP Southgate route has been carefully
designed to utilize existing gas and electric transmission
corridors where possible, resulting in a proposed route
that is 54 percent co -located with those existing corridors.
The proposed route also has been designed to avoid
sensitive or protected areas where feasible, limit surface
disturbance, address environmental justice concerns
and minimize the overall environmental footprint. As part
of the MVP Southgate project team's commitment to
communities, the project team considered a wide range
of alternatives and variations to the proposed route, and
made 191 route adjustments in response to feedback
collected during the pre -filing process. These adjustments
are reflected in the current route, as proposed in the
Nov. 6, 2018 filing.
Counties along the proposed MVP Southgate route include:
Virginia: Pittsylvania
North Carolina: Rockingham, Alamance
Health, Safety, and Enviroment
The MVP Southgate project team respects the concerns
and opinions of community members; we value each
landowner's property; and we value the safety of our
employees, contractors, and every person that lives in
these communities. We want to work with everyone in
the communities along the proposed route to make sure
we're building this pipeline safely and responsibly, and
that we're doing so in a way that has minimal impacts
on their land and their daily lives while providing the
affordable, clean -burning fuel needed to heat homes and
fuel commercial operations.
According to the National Transportation Safety Board
and the U.S. Department of Transportation, natural gas
pipelines have the best safety record of any energy
delivery system in the United States. More than 20,000
miles of natural gas pipeline currently operate in Virginia,
and more than 30,000 miles operate in North Carolina,
according to the American Gas Association.
Mountain Valley takes tremendous precautions to ensure
the long-term safety of our pipelines — and once the
pipeline is completed and in operation, we will utilize
sophisticated technology to monitor the pipeline, in real
time, 24-hours-a-day and 7-days-a-week.
Mountain Valley believes safety is Priority No. 1. We have
a steadfast commitment to environmental protection and
will conduct our business operations in a sustainable and
environmentally responsible manner at all times.
Economic Benefits for Our Communities
The proposed MVP Southgate is designed to carry short-
term economic benefits associated with construction
activity, and long-term economic benefits associated
with the increased supply of an affordable, cleaner -
burning fuel that is preferred by many employers. As a
result, the project has earned the support of the Virginia
and North Carolina chambers of commerce, the North
Carolina Economic Development Association and other
organizations.
Direct Spending: With an estimated capital expense
of $468 million, the MVP Southgate project team
anticipates spending $68 million directly in Virginia,
and $113 million directly in North Carolina
Labor & Employment: During peak employment, the
MVP Southgate project team is expected to support
570 jobs in Virginia and 1,130jobs in North Carolina,
including direct, indirect and induced jobs
Tax Revenues: A significant source of state and local
tax revenues will be generated during the construction
phase, with approximately $4.1 million generated in
Virginia, and $6.3 million generated in North Carolina
Ad Valorem Taxes. Once the MVP Southgate project
is operational, localities along the route will continue
to receive tax revenues — generating an estimated $1.2
million in Virginia, and $3.4 million in North Carolina
November 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
(November 19, 2018)
Docket No. CP19-14-000
PF 18-4-000
Take notice that on November 6, 2018, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Mountain
Valley), 625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 2000, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222, filed in
Docket No. CP19-14-000 an application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) and Parts 157 and 284 of the Commission's regulations for authorization to
construct, own and operate its Southgate Project located in Virginia and North Carolina.
Specifically, Mountain Valley proposes to construct: (i) approximately 73 miles of new
24-inch and 16-inch-diameter pipeline, (ii) the 28,915 horsepower Lambert Compressor
Station in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, and (iii) associated valves, piping, pig launching
and receiving facilities, and appurtenant facilities. The proposed Southgate Project
facilities commence near the City of Chatham, in Pittsylvania County, Virginia and
terminate at a delivery point with Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc.
(PSNC) near the City of Graham in Alamance County, North Carolina. The Project is
designed to create 375,000 dekatherms per day (Dth/d). Mountain Valley estimates the
cost of the Southgate Project to be $468,459,509. Mountain Valley requests a separate
rate zone and initial recourse rates for the Southgate Project facilities, all as more fully set
forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection.
Commission staff has determined that this project qualifies as a Major
Infrastructure Project pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding Implementing One
Federal Decision Under Executive Order 13807 (MOU) signed on April 10, 2018. Major
Infrastructure Projects are defined as projects for which multiple authorizations by
Federal agencies will be required and the lead Federal agency has determined that it will
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
The filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room
or may be viewed on the Commission's website web at http://www.ferc.pov using the
"eLibrary" link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupporte,ferc.gov or call toll -free, [phone] or TYY, [phone].

Docket No. CP19-14-000
PF 18-4-000 - 2 -
Any questions regarding this application should be directed to William Lavarco,
NextEra Energy, Inc., 801 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 220, Washington, DC 20004, by
telephone at [phone], or by email at William.Lavarco&nee.com.
On May 15, 2018, the Commission staff granted Mountain Valley's request to
utilize the Pre -Filing Process and assigned Docket No. PF 184-000 to staff activities
involved in tlie Southgate Project. Now, as of the filing of the November 6, 2018
application, the Pre -Filing Process for this project has ended. From this time forward,
this proceeding will be conducted in Docket No. CP 19-14-000, as noted in the caption of
this Notice.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (IS CFR 157.9), within 90
days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either: complete its environmental impact
statement (EIS) and place it into the Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this
proceeding; or issue a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other milestones,
the anticipated date for the Commission staff s issuance of the final EIS for this proposal.
The filing of the final EIS in the Commission's public record for this proceeding or the
issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal
and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days of the date of
issuance of the Commission staffs FEIS.
There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of this
project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the
proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date stated below, file with
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC
20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under
the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service
list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 3 copies
of filings made with the Commission and must provide a copy to the applicant and to
every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court
review of Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the
Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of
or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not
serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules require that

Docket No. CP 19-14-000
PF 18-4-000 -3-
persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only
to the party or parties directly involved in the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project
should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the
Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the Commission's
environmental mailing list and will be notified of any meetings associated with the
Commission's environmental review process. Environmental commentors will not be
required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's
final order.
As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in Docket No. CP16-
4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice concerning out -of -time motions to
intervene in any new Natural Gas Act section 3 or section 7 proceeding.' Persons
desiring to become a party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely
manner. If seeking to intervene out -of -time, the movant is required to "show good cause
why the time limitation should be waived," and should provide justification by reference
to factors set forth in Rule 214(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.2
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the "eFiling" link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
Comment Date: 5:00 pm Eastern Time on December 10, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
` Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L. C., 162 FERC 161,167 at ¶50 (2018).
2 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).

FERC
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervene
Motions to Intervene
Individuals have the option to intervene in Commission proceedings.
Intervenors becomes participants in a proceeding and have the right to
request rehearing of Commission orders and seek relief of final agency
actions in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal. All motions to intervene
should be submitted to the Commission pursuant to 18 C.F.R. §
385.214 The Commission expects parties to intervene in a timely
manner based on the reasonably foreseeable issues arising from the
applicant's filing and the Commission's notice of filing.
Motions to intervene must be served on the applicant. Any subsequent
submissions by an intervenor must be served on the applicant and all
other parties to the proceeding. Contact information for parties can be
downloaded from the service list at the eService link on FERC Online.
Service can be via email with a link to the document.
Intervention is not applicable in two instances:
• Intervention is not permitted during Pre -Filing Activity (PF and PT
Dockets) because there is no application officially before the
Commission. Comments may be filed during the Pre -Filing phase.
• Intervention is not necessary for persons submitting comments in a
rulemaking, administrative, or policy proceeding (RM, AD, and PL
Dockets). Commenters in these dockets are considered parties with
the same rights as intervenors in application- related dockets. There
are no service requirements for comments filed in RM, AD, or PL
dockets.
Motion to Intervene Out of Time
A key purpose of the intervention deadline is to determine, early on,
who the interested parties are and what information and arguments
they can bring to bear. Interested parties are not entitled to hold back
awaiting the outcome of the proceeding, or to intervene when events
take a turn not to their liking.
The Commission's regulations dealing with motions for late intervention
state that, in acting on such a motion, the decisional authority may
consider:
• Whether the movants had good cause for not filing timely;
• Any disruption of the proceeding that might result from permitting
intervention;
• Whether the movant's interest is adequately represented by other
parties; and
Whether any prejudice to, or additional burden on, existing parties
might result from permitting intervention.
Late intervention at the early stages of a proceeding generally does not
disrupt the proceeding or prejudice the interest of any party. The
Commission is therefore more liberal in granting late intervention at the
early stages of a proceeding. A petitioner for late intervention, however,
bears a higher burden to show good cause for late intervention after the
issuance of a final order in a proceeding and generally it is Commission
policy to deny late intervention at the rehearing stage, even when the
movant claims that the decision established a broad policy of general
application.
CONTACT
FERC Online Support
Email:
ferconhnesupp©[e-mail]
QUICK LINKS
FAQs: Active Participation/Intervention in
FERC Cases
18 C.F.R. 385.214 EQ

How to file for intervener status
The Commission encourages electronic submission of motions to
intervene via the eFiling link on the Commission's website. There are
document attachment and document -less options for both timely and
out -of -time motions to intervene. All contacts that are to be added to
the Service List for the applicable docket must have a validated
eRegistration account and their email addresses must be added online
in order for their contact information to appear on the service list. The
contact's email address will be included as part of the service list
information to facilitate electronic service by parties and the
Commission.
Persons unable to file electronically should send an original and three
copies of the motion to intervene by overnight services to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary
Nathaniel 1. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20426
Receipt of mail sent via the US Postal Service may be subject to
irradiation and significant delays.
Updated: July 9, 2014

Roanoke
eeAl8dft A avista
H. North Sho
Mal r
Rocky M4Sli Z n S r
oan It.
Gretna
Fer►um 'Museville
Sydnorsville m"'RRsylvanla
4
�i
Rondo Chatham
3
''
Lambert minoas '
Compressor Halifax
Bassett Ho Station
glIKkberry Collin svil
River Birch Wolf Trap
e South Boston
Witt tv APO s;
t"Ms
Sh/ 4r
018 Horse Pasture IMP
zto Henry _ Turbeville (�!
etrlc p811ville Pndponw ad �isin?.
Uanvllle
Hill �
' a
nce ad
Eden m
» Purley
r
Ruffin' ti
diireHe
Lea Mayodan Yanceyville Ro>f�
` N`�/�Rock1 Caswell Leesburg
�i
r r Reidsvil Locust Hill
Y Hightowers
Bushy Fork
• � Mount Tirtah
as Stony Creek s'
Stokesdale
Monticello
fir Summerfield ` Pleasant Grove Quail Roost
Oak Ridge s "� Cedar Grove i ti
N
I
�DlSyUI �,
,ersvil
i
McLeansville Gibso* villc Burlington Me ne orange
uo
Hillsborough
V Graham 4
MVP Southgate Proposed Route ,« rh&m n
(November 2018) Melville
plamsncc Blac is
L Proposed Compressor Station Rock Creek
Saxapahaw Yt
—� MVP Southgate Proposed Route Chapel Hill 14
Mountain Valley Pipeline ��_,
Mande
i ' R�
--- ftke
East Tennessee Cbarham 1�
Crutchfield Fearrington '
Crossroads

T SOUTHGATE
MVP Southgate's formal filing with the FERC
Our project newsletter to stakeholders
We are pleased to provide you with the
second newsletter for the MVP Southgate
project. As part of our effort to maintain
communication with stakeholders, we plan
to issue this newsletter approximately
3-4 times per year. The newsletter will
provide an update on where we are in the
regulatory process, what stakeholders
should expect in terms of next steps, and
other relevant information on our project
and t� Po
JAN 0 3 2019
On November 6, 2018, the MVP Southgate project team filed an official application with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Through the certificate
application filing, the FERC is being asked to certify the public convenience and necessity of the MVP
Southgate project. The commission, together with cooperating agencies, will conduct a detailed review and
evaluation of a broad number of subjects, including public safety; water resources; air quality; wildlife, soils, and
vegetation; protected species; cultural and historic resources; sound levels; alternatives; and economic benefits.
The certificate application is a collection of information gathered before and during the FERC pre -filing
process. This comprehensive set of documentation includes extensive research from environmental, geological,
and economic studies conducted by the MVP Southgate project team and outside experts, as well as
intelligence gathered during discussions with landowners along the route, local elected officials and others.
As part of the application, the MVP Southgate project team filed updated Resource Reports and a proposed
route map that incorporated input from agencies, landowners and other stakeholders, as well as information
from surveys and engineering analysis, gathered during the pre -filing process. These documents are available
at mvpsouthgate.com.
With the application filed, what's next?
Now that the MVP Southgate team has filed its formal application, the project must undergo a lengthy and
extensive regulatory review process before construction can begin. Meanwhile, TRC Engineers Inc. will continue
to perform survey activities in order to inform the project's design and permitting. The FERC will review the
project's submitted application and will prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DE15), which we
anticipate being issued in the spring of 2019. After the DEIS is issued, the FERC will hold public comment
meetings on the statement, after which they will assess the comments and begin drafting a Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS). The current project schedule is targeting fall of 2019 for issuance of the FEIS. After
additional review of the FEIS, the FERC makes a decision whether the MVP Southgate project can proceed
with construction by issuing an order and granting certification. The project is targeted for construction to
begin in the first quarter of 2020, with a completion date targeted for the fourth quarter of 2020.

Tell me more about recent changes
to the project...
The MVP Southgate project's formal application removed
one compressor station that had previously been planned
for Rockingham County, North Carolina, and modified the
diameter of the pipe. As currently proposed, the pipeline
will require one compressor station on land owned by
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, near the project's starting
point in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. The project will
include 24-inch diameter steel pipe for approximately the
first 31 miles into Rockingham County, and 16-inch diameter
steel pipe for approximately the remaining 42 miles to the
project's termination point in Alamance County.
The MVP Southgate project team considered a wide
range of alternatives and variations to the proposed route,
and made 191 route adjustments in response to feedback
collected during the pre -filing process. The proposed route
identified in the application encompasses these various
revisions, which include the protection of streams, wetlands,
and cultural resources, as well as the avoidance of, or
minimization of impacts to, several sensitive areas. This
includes the reduction in the temporary right-of-way width
from 100 feet to 75 feet at wetland and waterbody crossings,
and a proposal to cross Cascade Creek, Wolf Island
Creek, and Deep Creek via conventional bore based on
recommendations from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Safety tips for
winter travel
Safety is a top priority for the MVP Southgate
team, and as winter sets in, we want to help keep
our communities safe as they prepare for seasonal
travel. Road trips during the holidays and routine
daily commutes can become hazardous when the
temperatures turn colder and the snow begins
to fly. Checking the forecast before heading out
on the road can be vital to ensuring safe travels;
make sure to observe current conditions and
anticipate quick changes in the weather.
Our commitment to safe, responsible
construction and operation
Pipelines are recognized by the U.S. Department of
Transportation as the safest means to move natural gas.
In fact, few may realize that more than 20,000 miles of
natural gas pipeline currently operate in Virginia, and
more than 30,000 miles of natural gas pipeline currently
operate in North Carolina. These pipelines pass through
rural, suburban and urban areas in these states.
The MVP Southgate project will connect with existing
pipeline systems in Rockingham and Alamance counties in
North Carolina. The project team takes its environmental
and public safety responsibilities very seriously and is
dedicated to meeting or exceeding state and federal
requirements. During construction at many smaller
waterbodies along the route, we anticipate using
the same type of crossing method commonly used in
construction of sewer and drinking water lines.
At other, larger waterbodies, including the Dan River, we
anticipate using horizontal directional drilling, a labor -
and time -intensive process that involves drilling beneath
the riverbed, thereby avoiding any direct impact to the
waterbody. This involves the use of lubricating mud and
additives that meet the same standards and specifications
of additives used to drill drinking water wells.
Safety check your
car before leaving
Always perform a quick safety check on
your car before leaving your driveway.
Examine tire pressure, test the
brakes, and make sure the heater is
working properly.
If snow has fallen, make sure to
brush the snow off your car and
defrost your windows before
driving to ensure maximum
visibility.

A project designed to meet public need for clean, affordable natural gas
The MVP Southgate project's primary objective is to serve customers of PSNC Energy, a local distribution company in
North Carolina. The company, which recently opted not to have an affiliate ownership stake in the project, is the anchor
shipper on the proposed pipeline. The project is designed to strengthen the reliability of natural gas service in central
North Carolina. Additionally, other markets along the project area will have the ability to access the MVP Southgate
project, which in turn could attract manufacturing opportunities to the area. Having a safe, reliable source of natural gas
is important to secure industry growth and stimulate job creation and spending throughout the region.
"Over the past decade, PSNC Energy has added more than 100,000 new natural gas customers," said Rusty Harris,
president and chief operating officer of PSNC Energy. "We are committed to ensuring the highest levels of service to
the homes and businesses that rely on natural gas for heating, cooking and other uses, and the MVP Southgate project
offers the most efficient and cost-effective way to enhance reliability and provide the diversity of supply needed to meet
our customers' needs."
WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING...
During the past six months, there has been a lot of talk about the MVP Southgate project in Virginia and North
Carolina. Many landowners, community members, and elected officials have expressed both concerns and
support for the pipeline through personal meetings, phone calls, emails, and letters to the editor in various
publications. In the natural gas industry, the negative stories are often the ones we hear the most, while the
positive stories fall by the wayside.
The proposed pipeline will bring economic benefits to Virginia and North Carolina, and to communities located
along the route. Here are some comments from supporters of the project that you may not have heard:
"The NC Chamber supports the MVP Southgate project because it will improve access to affordable natural
gas and help strengthen North Carolina's reputation as a leading place in the world to do business. Many
employers rely on natural gas to fuel their operations and the construction of the MVP Southgate project will
bolster efforts to attract and retain businesses in North Carolina." — Gary Salamido, chief operating officer
and acting president of the NC Chamber
"The proposed MVP Southgate pipeline would increase the region's supply of affordable, reliable and domestic
natural gas and provide the fuel needed to meet North Carolinians' current and future energy demands."
— Mark Pope, president of the North Carolina Economic Development Association
"Time and again we hear from manufacturers and other large companies that the availability of natural
gas is a critical component in the site selection process. The Southern Virginia Mega Site at Berry Hill is
the commonwealth's biggest business park, and the MVP Southgate project's proximity to that site offers
tremendous long-term economic development opportunities. The Virginia Chamber fully supports the project
and the potential benefits its construction and operation could bring." — Barry Du Val, president of the Virginia
Chamber of Commerce
"The MVP Southgate project is important to the region and to the commonwealth. The efforts undertaken by
the project team reflect a commitment to build the proposed pipeline in a safe and respectful manner, and
Virginia FREE supports it." — Chris Saxman, executive director of Virginia FREE
www.mvpsouthgate.corr

14r4rq MVP
SOUTHGATE
Tiv1vr
SOEJTHGAI F
Happy
Your feedback is important to us
In order to access project filings and provide Contact the MVP Southgate project team
comments, please visit the FERC website at:
www.mvpsouthgate.com
https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/docket_search.asp » Call us toll -free: 833-MV-SOUTH
Reference the docket number: CP19-14 » Send us an email: mailCa)mvpsouthgate.com

A40
0 0
owe"
I
•I
_
m
�
1
1/
m
r I
m
m
11
I
• ,I"
I
f I •
i
' C¢
N N0 CD
.+�•CD
d SU N (D
rC
-_
O
� o P
-
"
•, •� /
.•
a
(3) N—
cn cn w
//
OD
�.
� rt
cn
•'•
: • �
�
1 '
s �
O O M
� � 41
r'—Jr
L
' J
�•j
(D (D 3 3
O O Cl)
"•
i • / /
w `�
E E (D a
C>(0
/ /
I
—0) 00
cncnOD0
/
-n - rn
•'`•
t/........
I
1 t,••
175
ar.
�� •'� //------------
✓.
I�
� r•
f�)
i
i
0
nn
s l l
O V):
cn ; c r
C
r
v
A � m
3
co
�.
,"►
Z (D
v
n
(A
R 6
�
_(�?
N
m m i20 c)
0 0 0
O
070 C
J
'N'N
'
to
�Si1.<.a
°-'
000
Cncn
0C)
O
nn
n c
cn
MQC7
p
O O
�'
O O
O tD
O
lD (D
pj (�
f� 'LS
"O
C
�' O
'D
0
o z
CD (D.
O.
C
(D
(D ?
fD O
O N
(D
'-' .N+ Vt
v N N O
a •�.
ID
CL
N O I
0 ti t 1 11
N
N
in
00 (n
S X
M X
`�
C O
-o 'Y -p
O c
2"'
O
O
o m,3n
`�
(DD (DD
(D cD
7 �.
(D cn
71 C
(D
C
C .-•
A 7 -6
�.
O
to
3
;
w
O
`t
(D N (D
O
ca.
N
C
sv
3
_ M
ro
s
a
o
Q
3t �
i
o t
rn
O
� ,
�
�%
� ,
I
o
n n I O
• •
Q1 ID
� \ V
La
=
cn!
- N
N
n O D
0 n
(nn
(n
i H
v
7 (D
fD
cn3CC
(D (D
ai 0
N
-'!
I
C-
N'
C x
C/) x
CD x
? W
fQ
C
(D
(p
6a
n o
O C_ Q
CDd
Q
=
A
i3t
(D
N
nk
7Q

o
m
s9p
0-0
n
.
----------_
r ,
• •
r
-,-- ---
o-- - - -- -- ----------------
l- 1
1
I C
LJ
n
N N
(n (D 3 M3
%
na.�
1\
0 0
vn�=ww
\
CD (D (�
••.•
..�ll�
-` O
••.• 1
0
'
V'V60
J /
PiPi �
1�
\
111
�
•♦ � \ -
°Ca
3
� v c
�
O
CID -T
0)
c
Ul n
g
$�
M CD
w Zm
rt
'
C-) d
CD
.G
u
m
N
(R
N
ro
=fD
s
a
R
•N'N
cuo
Cncn
no
0
CAD
D
c
(n
r"
O �O 2
00
D
K
CD
3
(U (D
ryD
A
<
'D
OO 6
cn
O
n
N
CL..♦
A1 (n
3(D
(D O
O
N
^" N
NN C,
yUl
Q-
�n
co
3(X
XIn`d
!}7
•C
D
O
O —C
a)a
N
^
(D CD
(Dn
N Cn
�
i
o6(:n
yO
xid'<
o,
D<
N
n
�•
n 7
a
z=i, c
N
S
CD
CD
m 3 ; v �
IIf—IjI
k AL
i
N
N
D
W*0 :0D
(n>
(n
O
7
7
O �.
C
17
E y
m
:3
(D
(D
N 0 o
m m o
o
!Z
N
c
O
7
J
y
m
sv
aD
al
m
I
m
Q
n_
a"'
m Q
C')
n
a
fl.
(D
�•
?
(D
N
I
V � I
C3'

\
mrL
>(a
eE0
�
CD
« C) \
g=r
\
]�
O
E
�
g
§�
#
DDO
�V�/]
I
10011
11
00
1$
0
2
N
N
c c\
m
0 c
2
1.)
�>
J
c m
3 0=
o*
0=
On
>�(D
§°
E%
a E
q_ 3
t
9
g;
a) R=
7=
e R
n
CD
\
§ 0
(D-
.
*§
7
2 \
/
2
( \
\
& a
\
0
M
\ /
2
�
E /
71
R
\ a
0
/ 0
e \
\
2
o J
Q a,
m q\
2
>
a
\a
\
g\
f
ka
o
f
/
2
$
)
2
7�
a;
E
I
±
2
±
=
a
g
e
o
E
o
/
/
. 0
E
;
G $
)
/ /
CL
(a
Cl)$
} /
2
J
(D
\
9 | \
/ƒ ?> e g
}2 § }0 =
7 CD/ e k
\ / \ k
A Q) \ ;
o \ / g

f�
0
�
fw
@-[/
0
oCD
.
§ 2�on/
- 7o
°
!C
k 7[
J
=�
=rD
7
2 /(
a
!'%F :
`
U§/\±///tco>
CD\
mE)_=
\
IDCL
\��\
2 2
CD\
m \
/ \
®
m
p�
\
§
2
g
§
3
E
/ 0
0
0
0
,$
°
2
c«�/\0
/�I
/0
}]�\
§W0L
0(n
CL
§00
a/"®
\G\k
$
0
Co
R
«
_
%
_
m
O
\�
0
o
k��
n
01-0CD
I
I
I
;
::
/
\
\ o
7 2
/
\
/
/
J
f ƒ
/
\
f
\ \
E
k
\
)
}_
CD)
>
/§
/�(
OL
\
m
0
_
°
\
2
\
�
�
�
�

|�
o
ƒ/
r
i \ �
■
7
/
\ 72
'4
2
0 o
)
==
t $f
/
§/_
CL
Ill
O
C
�
�
0
!�
m
e
0
q o
0
�E|/f2E
| §{/OE
;G(§
E M-
; jo fi
o rn
§ )
§i4§\;
/ kl /
»
E
I
}
/0
D00
¢
°
0
? 2
� ?
/
2
? �
/�
` 2
0
\ /
$
2
2
g
G
�5 .a=o�
MO
._�
'
2 2
J 2
=�
m
/
,m
&70
/
CL
» G
E »
f)
& a
f,
o
. ;
- (
�
ul
o
E a
&
_
rL
�
2
\
§
\
-
mJ
GQ
E
s&G�
\
E /
®
3
\�
$a
0
M \
J
0
\
/
SS
AID
I
)
$
0.2
CL
c
J
£
m
c
§ 0,
ID
;.
/ /
\
\
J
/
z ,
m
m)
CL©
�
/'
$ )
e
§
; 7
a k
f
/ /
/
/
/ /
/
ƒ
& E
g
/
(
a
CD\
/
\ ■
$ �
�
�
�

(� li
o
}n
(D w
D
N
m
O r
m 3
°i
0
pp�
Ch
Oy (D
7
V i O
J Z'o
rh
8
0 S
m
O Dg
Q
�5
N
5
^O
L
S,1}
z fD
71:C
/ - Ro
3
m,
oa
a
BD
O�
�
N'
ED p
Co (n
ci 0
-O
c (n
O
O
S
00
D
K
CD
m m
O (D
O
(D ID
N ID
CD
fl7 'O
C
cp 0
"a
•D
0 0
O
N
m 3
3 c
CD
°
m°
v,
an
d
o
a
w
o
[n
7
v c
3
m'
O
o
m o
o'
��
cD N
`<
(D cD
7 �.
CDcn
7 O
D°
N
N
O 7
N
'O•
OA
(!!
N
3
T. fl1
o
ni
7C
v
m
O
(D
(D
3•
o'
a �
n
a
7
(D3
O
cm
Q
O
G1
l�f
1
N N
O O
C)
Q D
�Q
�D
'O
(nD
•O
I N
O
7 7
O
(D-
O (D
p�
m
NCD CD
j
�,
7 0
`°
m o
a
a
7
(n
CD
O.
CD

f�
o
CD 2
>■m
c
{
[\§�ZJ�
9
k $(
(
\�
ZO
O
c
�
�
m
§�
/,z
' t
/
0
E§E\/2
?\ƒ$�
`®=nEo»om
¥
¥
§ »
§
2
'
)
% [ \
2 \ 2
}
~
m
7.
ƒ /
E e
/ o_
m-
,§
§
o
\
/ k
/
/ \
\
/
7 \
cn
\ \
J
�)
��
��FD
°(D
}dam
W°
¥
/
a
g
_
2
¢ o
/ / / « CD
ka0CD
-o CL
R a G
/mow
� _
�o
n
w/a
|S
2
/
/ ƒ
2 }
/
/
\
\
7 J
D
/
®
\
/
R
§
0
\ 0
\ /
J
2
\.
mz
n
/ \
/
}
/ }
/_
ƒ
E
CD
\
�
°
/
\ on
�
�
N
�
�
■

IV
f�
0
ma
>$§
=Eor
k2§t
e R M °
LSD
q2:f /
2$
CL
=
O
�
�
�
�
§�
R
»
q�
§
ƒ%
9
/0
0oil
¢
I
°
2
�/
�
� �
q
� �
=a
n
�
,m
� /
Q
D
2
\§f�
13
o
2
§\
a
o&
a
m
a
e
S
\\7/
�����\ƒ1�\mE
\(D
®
0
%'
$�
_
2
)
j
0
$
a
C
®E
w
N N
° q
o=>
\ 9
§
f
/ /
ƒ
� {
CL
�
�
| \
/ 2
/ >
® ƒ
@ f
/
e
d
Gf
3 _
\
Cl)
$q
\ I
/
}
/
\
m
$ E
/
N
,
a

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
a a a v v a v a c
N N D
D D No i D a
Z
O
O
v
Z n
q a'
2 2 9
D ➢ � d
O O
0 3
m
sr
ao a
m
w
'm
m
y� N
o
Z Z Z
o O
O
2 =
O O
_ p O
a o o 0 0 o o o o N
O _
+ c
2 2
� o
3 d
d o
n �
" o
T
n
c
3
P
C
a m
o O n O n a o a s
00 oG
O.
N
Q N N T V Ls
<' n
N
O
N
W m ^ N
00
A ]�
d d
O C
b_ d
N 2
� N
ry C
a �
0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 1p
V V d
d
T �
O N
� L
a
N p O p O O O O C ry
� w
r R
� N
O C
O �
P O 6 0 0 O O O 2
T �
a y
A �
w o o O p b
d ry
m
N
A 2
T j
A
O A
� d
V O
O �
T 7
m
O
O 0 0 0 ip pp A
iD 0 O T N C
c
w oo n
N
O
A
C
m o N V T a
w

V m pi A W
w
D .D.
O1 m oe Zn F e m me m m
m N N O ti. p m
rn tD m
N
O
7
i
Z m
D
D D � n
Z a
'm io
w O
m
ao
'm
m
y� N
O �
N
zzz � IT
m O
= O
_ p O
9 o 0 0 0 0 O O O N
w
C
� .0..
_ ry
3 d
a o
n �
o
T
m
H m rn a+ m in c
3
c
0
v
A
b ry
O D 0 0 0 O O D y
ao Oo > >
m a
N
m
N d o o� o 0 o w an d
s
0
v w m N A O
v c
m a,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u
� m
m c
� 9 d
V V �
d
T A
n
O C
3
N
W C
3 ,r
� N
j C
d
O C
r A
v`0
� v
V p �
d �
N
IA
A �
W a
T s
m
N
n
p m
3
n
w �
r 5
m
O 0 0 0 �p pp N N
� N a
T y
Sl
C
A
N f+ N
T O N T W
W 00 f�
N
A
C
T �

r
n,
Q
rm
z
0
m
Z
m
D
m
n
m
m
O
x
O p
cn O
z cn
O m
r a
z
D
�
m
X
m
O
<
m
O
cn
N
O
D
z
m
m
C� r
O z
z m
m
0
z
x
cn
r-
m
O
m
z
i
IQ
m
X
1
m
m
acn
O
�
m
m
D
z
m
z
D
D
m
X
m
O
v
O
�
m
v
D
C-
m
m
D
m
m
m
Z
o
0
O
O
a
C)
_
n
�
m
�
cco
�
rt
o
n
m
m
v
Tl
Z
m
r
-
-
m
T(D
�,
mmx
D
o) cn
D
a'
� m
—�
O
C`
m
z