20021682 Ver 1_Purlear Creek - Initial Monitoring Report Abstract_20050708

Purlear Creek
Stream Restoration Proj ect
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
August 2004
OO Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2004
� � '��
C � �
.l�
Monitoring Report
r`� r�'�A�V�
�����vf h
,�,�;, ,�oo �
����'
�`4' �JQ.��'�0
`� ° �
�`� J`' `�`�
� �-��
`�,�.: � 5�
, J��,o �,o
���

2004 Purlear Creek Restoration Initial Monitoring Report
Abstract
Purlear Creek was restored through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) - formerly Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). The goal of the project is to
transform the pre-existing altered stream corridor to a more stable and biologically active
form through the following objectives:
1.) Restore 11,500-linear feet of Purlear Creek through geomorphic modification of
dimension, pattern, and profile adjustments; and cattle exclusion
2.) Establish a riparian zone surrounding restored sections of Purlear Creek
3.) Improve the habitat within the channel and the riparian zone.
This is the baseline monitoring report for Purlear Creek.
Table 1: Background Information
Pro'ect Name Purlear Creek
Designer's Name Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box 33068, Raleigh, NC, 27636
[phone]
Contractor's Name L-J Inc.
Pro'ect Count Wilkes
Directions to Project Site The project is located west of Wilkesboro in Wilkes County. From
Winston Salem, take Business 40 to US 421 West toward
Wilkesboro. Continue west through Wilkesboro. From the point
where Business 421 joins US 421, travel approx. 2.6 mi to the
intersection with NC-16. Turn right onto NC-16 and travel north
for approx. 2.9 mi to the intersection with SR-1304 (Boone Trail).
Turn left onto SR-1304 and drive approx. 2.8 mi to the intersection
with SR-1346 (Purlear Road). Turn right onto SR-1346 and drive
north approx 0.7 mi to the intersection with SR 1317 (New Hope
Rd). Turn left onto SR-1317 and drive west / northwest approx 0.9
mi to the intersection with SR-1349 Rd (C.C. Hayes Rd). Turn
right onto SR-1349. The middle of the project reach lies at the
bottom of valley. Please note that this is a private residence and
ernussion is re uested rior to enterin the site.
Draina e Area 1.3 - 2.6 mi2 (Main Reach) 0.1 — 0.8 miZ (Tributaries)
USGS H dro Unit 03040101 (U er Yadkin)
NCDWQ Subbasin 03-07-01
Project Length 11,SOO linear feet (Restoration)
Restoration Approach 11,500-feet of cattle exclusion
Date of Com letion November 2003
Monitorin Dates March 2004
T:\pn\Ol 179501 I\rtpnitoring\year9\purlear_creek_monitoring_reporty0_abstract.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley ���, .e �ne

Results and Discussion
Based on field observations and measurements, Purlear Creek appears to be performing
in close accordance to project goals. The channel geometry elements of dimension,
pattern, and profile closely approximate design specifications.
Over the course of construction, the watershed experienced above average rainfall and a
bankfull flooding event. In spite of the active flooding event, the channel has maintained
its form and integrity. Almost all the structures have maintained their form and function
with the exception of a failed cross vane located at design station 104+50 (Upper Mid
Tributary). Bed elevation drops at some structures are greater than typical drops but fall
within structural tolerances. Steeper drops have been accommodated by tiering typical
cross vanes to form a structure known as an A-vane.
The time of investigation occurred closely behind initial plantings. The investigator
observed that the vegetation had been planted properly. The success of the planting will
be determined during future monitoring efforts.
Photos
The following are photographs of typical sections and areas of concern throughout the project.
�
�
�
�
- T:\pn\011795011\rrronitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_reporty0_abstract.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley C�� �N°m,�.,ar,n�
-
-

�
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
r�
l�,c�nystem
Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
Initial Monitoring Report
March 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................................2
1.1 Goals and Objective .....................................................................................................................2
1.2 Project Location ...........................................................................................................................2
1.3 Project Description .......................................................................................................................2
2.0 YEAR 2004 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................2
2.1 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................2
2.1.1 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................3
2.2 Geomorphology ...........................................................................................................................3
2.2.1 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................3
TABLES
Table 1: Summary of Channel Conditions ....................................................................................................6
PHOTOS
Photo1 - Typical Riffle ..........................................................................
Photo2 - Typical Pool ............................................................................
Photo 3: Structure Failure — Station 104+50 ..........................................
Photo 4: Bed Elevation Drop ..................................................................
Photo 5: A-Vane Structure .....................................................................
Figure 1 — As-Built Conditions
Appendix A — Monitoring Methods
Appendix B — Monitoring Results
FIGURES
APPENDICIES
...................................................3
...................................................3
...................................................4
...................................................4
...................................................4

�
�
- r►� Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
�,���s�,5t���� Initial Monitoring Report
� _ March 2004
�
� 1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
�
- The Purlear Creek Restoration project lies within the C.C. Hayes Property in Wilkes County, North
- Carolina located south of Rendezvous Mountain; immediately north of New Hope Road (SR-1317); and
both east and west of C.C. Hayes Road (SR-1349). At the downstream terminus, the stream drains a 2.6
� square mile watershed. Project construction was completed in November 2003 and the as-built survey
- was completed March 2004. The riparian buffer was planted in the winter of 2004. The mitigation effort
included a combined Priority I and II Restoration (Rosgen 1997) of 11,SOO linear feet of stream.
�
�
�
�
�
1.1 Goals and Objective
The goal of the project is to transform the pre-existing altered stream corridor to a more stable and
biologically active form through the following objectives:
1.) Restore 11,500-linear feet of Purlear Creek through geomorphic modification of dimension,
- pattern, and profile adjustments; cattle exclusion, and controlled crossing
- 2.) Establish a riparian zone surrounding restored sections of Purlear Creek
3.) Improve the habitat within the channel and the riparian zone.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
-
-
1.2 Project Location
The project is located west of Wilkesboro in Wilkes County. From Winston Salem, take Business 40 to
US 421 West toward Wilkesboro. Continue west through Wilkesboro. From the point where Business
421 joins US 421, travel approx. 2.6 mi to the intersection with NC-16. Turn right onto NC-16 and travel
north for approx. 2.9 mi to the intersection with SR-1304 (Boone Trail). Turn left onto SR-1304 and
drive approx. 2.8 mi to the intersection with SR-1346 (Purlear Road). Turn right onto SR-1346 and drive
north approx 0.7 mi to the intersection with SR 1317 (New Hope Rd). Turn left onto SR-1317 and drive
west / northwest approx 0.9 mi to the intersection with SR-1349 Rd (C.C. Hayes Rd). Turn right onto
SR-1349. The middle of the project reach lies at the bottom of valley. Please note that this is a private
residence and permission is requested prior to entering the site.
1.3 Project Description
Purlear Creek was restored using a Priority I and II (Rosgen 1997) protocol that modified channel
dimension, pattern, and profile and established a riparian zone adjacent to the creek. In-stream structures
including log and rock cross vanes; and rock j-hooks were installed a maintain channel profile. Root
wads and vegetation were added to maintain channel pattern. Fencing was installed to maintain easement
boundaries. Stabilized fords and crossing were installed to allow animals and farm equipment to cross the
stream.
2.0 YEAR 2004 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
2.1 Vegetation
On March 10`h, 2004, the investigators assessed rectangular plots measuring 4 x 25 meters for bare root
seedlings, live stakes, and ground cover. Survey methodology is described in Appendix A and results are
shown in Appendix B and discussed below.
T:\pn\011795011\nwnitoring\yeaz0\purlear_creek_monitoring_reporty0_body.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
C�►� �„„�

�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
-
-
.
�
.
-
r� Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
I�� osystem : Initial Monitoring Report
... March 2004
Due to the dormant season, the investigator could not readily identify the species of herbaceous
vegetation, live stakes, or bare root seedlings. Most of the herbaceous cover had died back and was not
evident. The investigator performed a stem count of live stakes and bare roots without identifcation of
the plant species.
2.1.1 Results and Discussion
The species composition of the plots could not be determined due to the dormant season. A count of live
stakes and bare roots confirmed that the riparian buffer had been planted according to design
specifications.
2.2 Geomorphology
On March 10°i, 2004, the investigators performed a geomorphic survey of the project reach that are
identified in Appendix B. The geomorphic survey for each area included the following:
• Pool and Riffle Cross Section
• Stream Profile
• Modified Wolman Pebble Count
Figure 1 shows site conditions observed during the initial monitoring assessment. Survey methodology is
described in Appendix A and results are shown in Appendix B and discussed below.
2.2.1 Results and Discussion
The measured values for channel dimension, pattern, and profile from the monitoring survey accord with
design specifications. Table 1— Summary of Channel Conditions provides survey details.
Overall the channel profile and banks appeared stable. The investigator did not observe head cuts or
similar indicators of channel degradation.
Photo 1 - Typical Rifile
T�.\pn\01179501 I\rtronitoring\yeaN\purlear_creek_monironng_repony0_body.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
Photo 2 - Typical Pool
CCI1 w �K

r�
I��cosyste�n
Purlear Creek - Wilkes County, North Carolina
Initial Monitoring Report
March 2004
Almost all structures appeared to be functioning properly with the exception of a structure located at
design station 104+50 (Upper - Middle Tributary). Bed elevation drops at some structures are greater
than typical drops but fall within structural tolerances. Steeper drops have been accommodated by tiering
typical cross vanes to form a structure known as an A-vane.
,
� �E�� �_``��'#����
a '
.+,•� - - ,, °'r,' �
. . . n,- .
+', �` � w, .r..., .' ��..� t _
•� �� �'�'� � .
. _��;,'� �.�� "! � .'� Yi� � � .
�
�' �74 ^� • �° �, ` � ,y� � .
i ;�c } _ Yu '^c....,
� ; a� . _� �,_ ;_
r ' ` "��
;,r ,, _ �•.a
. ��
'i } v�1Y � . � .0 A,�.
"� ..�.�: - ' �'tl'�' ._. �c.
ta� � `" .«i�v.w .'AI.��� cfs� �
� ,
� � tr. .�� � �'y� ;'X
, ��
��%'� � �. ;a+ �'� ��'ct�i.
��►.� z�-� �'► • , � , ,��"` 3 ��:#(�:.
Photo 4- Bed Elevation Drop
.�-. ��,,._ , . �.. ,� � ,
��w� . � ,
�� �. „'1 - . �� .!: �'i � _.
7'`c,i. 9 ,?`L rY+sn f> > u�. " w r' � .� �...
: •:d$ 3 � '�`�� �"8�� �r '
F. � � '�..sY �Y', .'I � . 1 'A �'" .F
'itii� �y�'4 'h _ ia �'. :.n . - 't/ , br.',
�r. e _.;�ec�r . - . 'a' T .. ..
�� ., . . . .. .
�
� F�s� , . ��� +�'.. a:�':v.;6 + ��. �' F .
v�P X'" a >� �Wy
�.�1 � � 1 q� ��,�
'. a' j?` � y ���,,,�� .
+.
• '�� �;,��
�, y � `� `i� ���
� '*,� � . . . �v'p�4�
r�y., �j %' � ": u � _ � �� �ii
HT'.$� �«4`iy �f�^` ,� . ry Y.
-� :a- ± � 6+i i -�t \,.�. �.
�{ny� ,i j�' ��� f� i'`.. i'%C � ,� ' `�
"C,4i�'t ��T� .'_ 9'� �� '� b ,.�' . "
�i'�`� �M'!! 'p i. :.. _'� � � .'.'� . .�c�".: .
Photo 3- Structure Failure:Station 104+50
t �;�
�. � � ,
� _
\ , �; ��� ���
� �
_.� . `
.. . fi ' . �,�:,
� � �t ,. �-'�`..�`�,��"0���'�'
�,?. ` ��'' ,�.�..._" '.��,� ; z Mro��`'��
,:V�' T . Yi h}y� . y ��,f, _ ,�4 �� ..�.�j _'s. d�' �.t�
� }.,y���y�,w„<�. y�' 'r'"�`
Y'�." +� tF"`' �.''�-i-�'t'y s J; ''
} �. •
,�;__ ����;� „�'
�"� r-"` �r` x��y,,. �.-�,} r�a. .
4. .:��i�vi"r�._.'t� ar�:•"�3" _. �.-,:lc�f►
Photo 5 - A-Vane Structure
T:\pn\011795011\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitonng_reporty0_body.doc Prepazed by Andrew Kiley ��n .+� k
4

0
cd
U
�
o �
z°
� �O
U o N
� �
� o �
3 ��
N �
�
U
c�d
N
�
a
)�r
� '•�._'
^ � �
. 7
� pp v� t� N '�..^' � vl l� CC O
� in M,--� � 'y! N l� oo ; t� O�
Q � � Q � �
� �O � p 7 �O O� �
�1 a � a O�o`� �o°�° �
� N
� � � � M cV c�1 � ' p� � 7 p � � O
� 'n I I I I �`oMM � �
� A M M ,� � � � n �� ^^ fV
.b o � Q �
� v� �. 8 �
� � • o 0
y � ^o, E��,�o E o�
�' N N .--� �Y! N � � �p � .-.
� �
N vi CQ ^ 'D
o A „� �� � �� a�
7 M l� �,
a w �� w�A M o o �
Oi� �-- N
y a
W Q p A 7 p y N d�
'y I N r � � N °rn° � 'y � � I
A N ,',�,�^.i A �+ ° , oNo
� � v
0
�� �n�n 8`��00 � � o^�
� M N,� �.j 'k M G1 vl C� ��1 ,_,
d� = � Q� � u
o '�� p o�noo �o°o
� o CQ o 0.�� a� c�
a �, � w �,o-- ,aN �
� S = � N�� Q= � �' M N a O
a/ M � V� I I I � ��"�NM �� �t� M
N 6� v� 00 cn � �� N y•� O
.� � A N ~� N � Q�
.�
� Y 8 E
�G � _ _
� qq � N M O Q� � o�o 00 O � O N�
.� y ,�, N �^' N M A O ^
�1 Q a� � 'r` '�'" iG G� •� � � �
�� W '�n '►�• Ca �O O i
a F A E �� M a"�" a
r, oo ° o 00 �o c� � �
00 O C O
•y M o0 � •,^n
A N '��NM Aa ° �
� �
� ? �
� ap p N�O E 0 �O 1� L i O� N
� d' � .--� fV �ie cV � � � p '� •-•
Q ^ � Q .^"' a�>i
0 '� '� � 7 r oo °
O � �O � � � y �
O l� Q ^ � d � ~
� � � � V N � d' � O � � N �O M O
�I t� 'v, I I I I �o °O N CC • ^' M rn
f�l � � N oo m � [ '—' vi � ' p ^'
.p p Q N ^ N � Q�
C� 'y"
� � _ E E
� � �A c��i ^�°• E`�°o�oo°`; E oo,v
•� �� N N.—� �� --� N N �O O N r ^
� Q �, Q � � � � �,
� , o 00 �o .+
� � � �i O � �
a A 8 Q� ° Q o"'
�
•� � 00 '_' � � r 00 O1 �Vi Q � � 1
AN O^ N N A a � O �
� �
i.
� � � O i
�+
u � � � i' � a�'i o '�
a�
a \
.0 ci] A� a� � L° o
,a o O a, � E
�o L ��� �� � r`� � o �O�
.., u 3�� 3�� �.� o � .. y�..
� '� ti' O'O G� 6pi � C Ow �r � L� a�'.+
y �7.y c7�.� �7.y y7.� y 'O �� � a� o� '� +�' H G� V� � V1
.�r Y� X 1 '�i �
A^'� c� L e� ai c0 � � cd 67 � �`�" O O � � 00 � L� GLi
mdaaoaa, a �xm a ai�ao. v� vb � F�nm
Y
��
�
u
�
aN
.n
�
�
a`

�
O
�
U
�
o �
z°
�
� �o
o •�
U � N
� � �
,� O �c�dI
3 � �y -/-'
'�
�
i ��
���
�:
U
�
N
�
Ll,
)��
� w
� � �
� � "" rn r`? ^ � � .-. y"s a, t�
� M N.-. N 'y� ,� 00 [� y 7 O�
� Q � � Q � 6�i
-L,-� o '= o = � �
0
�° �? p°, �oo, �a
� � N N.� O Q� �� Q O N '
� O 'n I I I I ���N 0�-1 ����O
l� a � � o � � Q y �
,! p v+, q cu r; ,� � Q�.
f�+ O
1••� � N
� y .� � � �
,� � � . o �
7 f� [� .--� N '�^" '_' '�7 M O
�C A � O 00 r; N � Vl v1 •Q N o0
� y �� �-r
Q cd � � �o
C "�"
� � 7 �D -� .a:
� a �� a���; �
AE �--� M
� o � a o � ^ Q °�
� o
�
O �'� � 'n � � � vl N N �'n N� � �
� A M �^ ~ A W O O
�
� G �
� �� � �rnv �o.-. y p^
a �? N NoN �,���� � �M
a Q ^�� Q ^ �
� o
� '= o =��
" a a� aaa��-, ��
�a � c
Y� O � M M O Q' E � G Q 'a �
� O+ C N N^ M q � 7 O
� ' y I I I I ��� N C G �� �� o�o
� N a� ^ ° '_' �°• � `i, �
'.",�, p � A `� _" � Q �
� o
� v �
dV�� � E E
� = N oo�, ���_ s ��
b�� a, �, N � •,� _ �„ �„ •q �, �
� � � � �
A a'd °� ,,.�—M °�'
I w •� w��i� �
� � o ,,, A E �� „ �" � r' N a
� ^ ° r"
00 O
�
Q �v�i ^ vl � I •'�" v� N N �v� Q i� i I
a A r., �-- A� o 0
.� � v
�
'� �o ^ � r, E � � �n
A? � �n o .� u� -- �
." Q � � Q : �
� '� � � > °
� O � O i� �� y�
r
� o a" v, oo � o, Q E � E a" Q a c�
.., ° Q � c�oo � � � � , , �o �
i.i � '� I I I i fA . ,-, o
[ I A .� �n � �O C vi �
G% C. M �O O O "�"' Q�
� O
,�-.
'� V❑] ^
� �
� bA •7 =
� ��� � V N N P. � O N
I �� �i M O� O O 'y� l� N N •C --+ V
� � � 'O
� Q a> Q p,� Gi • G�
�« . � � `� � �+
�., m w pq o c
� y � � �
� a o A a �„ � �" Q a.
00 �n v�D � o0 o cV p � p
Qcv �o 0 0 'o �O '-' A� ° v
�
�.
p� eua > a�+
++
o �� c i d � o v
a� � � � � ° \°
� � A °' '� y �� '- _
� p A �, � 8
� o � � � � 3v� � „�, o �; o � � �
•.. � 3��
y �' t' O'C G% a�i � C Ow �r C� L� y�'„
� Y Y Y X � ��� � v 7� �"'� �'�" y 6% V� � V1
�+ C
""' �� epe e[a c�d � � e�a a� J.�i ��.. ��., o o � � o�o � i� a�"i
A ca�oac�ca a �aca a 'a�'aa,a, v� �v�o � Hv�x
�
O
�
b
O
J
�
�
J
0
c�
�
�
�
�
�
.�
cd
=-�
Y
#�
u
v
�
�e
a`
a
�
�
�
0
rn
�
a

r; Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
I�;cosy�tem Initial Monitoring Report
March 2004
References
Rosgen, D. L. (199'n. A Geomorhnic Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Management of Landscapes
Disturbed by Channel Incision.
T�\pn\Ol 179501 I\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_reporty0_body.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley [�� ti�w
7

�
� 1. : " , �
a . � �.
- w 1= • '� � f�,' � y �,.�; '- �" �
� ,., ,
� � -• • � � � �` �,
� - � �.
y �
�
- � ` ,� . ' �
. ,
� . �t-
. < � ���� : '�
• .� .
. . _ �
,
�..
• . > �' +�
Upper - Middle
- � �', �� Tributary � �. ' � �
� '�,.�.' `Y 'j � � ��+ •
�
� . • � � a
� � � .�
� ��
� fi� ' Upper Main p ,� �., , `' � _
'� Reach 'c; �R��,� �. � �
- = Tr � ���: 1� ,
� '�►,�;;; «r : f`.
- '.�
� � " • � t' • ►
��, + �' �y ���. � , 4k ' ��'
- f '� 1 l `'��� �1 ,r �,� �
, , ��
• • , t` ' . �
� � �� '` ` , y ��
- � �• `•..���� �: � �
: � � � � ,, �,
•�
- '. 1 4 i N'^ ; M ��' l., R
?► t� � �
- �`• ,�• �w• ���1 � � , a '�
�" ; ) ��" . . �
- . ' � �' �
�`�� � � �•�,��,, Middle Main ;. � ,
- � Reach w � s
� �� .' � ,�
• ' ' � �
�'� . . � ;
• �r�.� - _ � �,,--�� � � �
• • �i�,. �t► �, � � • n � . ���`
- '�;, ,`� " ;�t, .+,�� �► � ` �.
• ��._�. ,. � �•
. As-Built Center Line
� ;'As-Built In-Stream Sturctures
- � � • Functional
- � Lower M
Stressed �' Reach
� �
• Failing
� As-Built Easement f . �►
• � W �l
�. O .r
� �`_� --r� ♦
�
-
� Title As-Built Conditions
Prepazed For:
� � `" Project Initial Monitrying Report
Wilkes Coun North Carolina
- �' � Date Project Number
• I ,COSyStelll
, w,,., �M 8/ 14/04 011795011
�
- T�.\pn\0] 179501 l�rrronitoring\year0\purlear_creek_conditions_mapy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
�
:•� .
� ,�
�
�• ,..5�
r x;�, �.•.•'�
�� .
i �
. ! � �
�
� � �
I
Lower - Middle �
Tributary
(Lower Section)
�
,,
.` `, �
,. �•�.Ne
�;' ` .
. � �
• �
ain ���
-- ��
- ��-'�' .
�� � '
. ; `� �
� � �
1 � ' �
Figure
1
C�� �11A��Y4h

Appendix A — Monitoring Methods
Purlear Creek
Stream Restoration Proj ect
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
August 2004
�OKimley-Hom and Associates, [nc. 2004

�
�
•
�
�
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
r�
l�;cosystcm
1. Introduction
Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
Mitigation Monitoring Methods
March 2004
The purpose of this document (Mitigation Moraitoring Methods) is to outline the procedure used
to assess the success of the Purlear Creek restoration effort. The stream has been constructed to
be stable and provide improved biological habitat. Refer to the Purlear Creek Restoration
Executive Summary of Restoration Plan (Executive Surnmary) (Kimley-Horn and Associates
2002) for details concerning the restoration effort. The monitoring methods described in Section
2 have been developed to allow for the assessment of restoration goals. Monitoring success
criteria are taken from the Executive Summary (Kimley-Horn and Associates 2002) and Section
11 of the Stream Mitigation Guidelines of Apri12003 (McLendon, Fox et al. 2003).
2. Success Criteria
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile, and
sinuosity do not deviate significantly from stable channel geometry. It is expected that there will
be minimal changes in the designed/constructed (Kimley-Horn and Associates 2003) cross
sections, profile andlor substrate composition. Changes that may occur during the monitoring
period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a more unstable
condition (down-cutting, deposition, erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in
stability (settling; vegetative changes; coarsening of bed material).
� Channel stability should be verified using surveys of the established cross-sections, longitudinal
- profiles, and pattern. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
- degradation, bank erosion; success of riparian vegetation; and effectiveness of in-stream
structures and erosion control measures. Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of
� developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. To be deemed
- successful, photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks
over time.
�
- The success of vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts. A stem count over 260 trees
• per acre at the end of the monitoring period will be considered successful. The restored buffer
should mimic the function of upstream and downstream ecological function. Photos taken at
� established photo points should indicate maturation of riparian vegetation community.
� 3. Schedule
•
- Monitoring will be performed annually for five years beginning in autumn 2004 and ending in
- 2008. Monitoring reports will be completed immediately following the monitoring effort. The
monitoring methods outlined in this section should be followed during the monitoring effort.
- Each monitoring report should have the same format as the initial monitoring report.
�
•
�
�
�
�
�
�
-
-
4. Monitoring Methods
The following is a discussion of the methodologies used in the monitoring effort. This section
will facilitate follow-up monitoring efforts and enable replication of the monitoring effort. The
geomorphology of the stream should be assessed using Rosgen morphological variables (Rosgen
1996). The results of the monitoring survey are shown in Appendix B of the initial monitoring
report.
T�\pn\O1179501I\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_methoiisy0.doc Preparcd by Andrew Kiley ��� ���

�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
�� Mitigation Monitoring Methods
L;cosystem March 2004
To maintain consistency during the monitoring period, physical bench marks — rebar pins
surrounded by white PVC piping - depicting cross-sections and vegetation plots were set up in the
project area. The location of the bench marks are shown in the pattern view panel of the
longitudinal profile survey results sheet located in Appendix B of initial monitoring report.
Channel Morphology
Longitudinal Profile
Six longitudinal profles were surveyed. Profile stationing should be based on changes of bed
features and include in-stream stabilization structures (structures). Each station should include a
thalwag and water surface elevation. Bankfull elevations should be taken at stations with clear
bankfull indicators. Structures should be noted to facilitate comparison of the profile with data
from previous years.
Cross Section
Both a riffle and pool cross section was surveyed within each longitudinal profile (12 cross
sections total). At least 20 measurements are recommended to accurately portray channel cross-
sections. Measure all significant breaks of slope that occurs across the channel. Outside the
channel, measure important features including the active floodplain, bankfull elevations, and
stream terraces. Attempts should be made to match the stations of previous year's survey.
Modified Wolman Pebble Count
� Pebble counts were performed within each longitudinal profile. Each pebble count consisted of a
- number of samples taken from each the riffle and pool features relative to proportion of each
. feature within the longitudinal profile. For example, in a reach where the distribution was 50%
riffle and 50% pools, 50 samples each were counted for both riffles and pools. Pool/riffle counts
� were performed near the cross-sections taken for that area. Within each riffle and pool feature,
- the pebble count is further divided between bed and bank materials relative to the proportion of
channel surface area. For example: if the total of 100 pebbles are measured for the reach and
� riffles account for 50 percent of the facet features and the bed accounts for 50 percent of channel
- surface area of the riffles, then 25 pebbles should be sampled from the bed of the riffles.
� Vegetation
�
- A belted transect measuring 4 meters by 25 meters was setup within each longitudinal profile.
The plots assessed the number of bare root seedlings and live stakes. Within each plot, a subplot
� measuring 1 meter by 1 meter was used to estimate herbaceous cover. Plant species were not
- identified during the initial survey because the vegetation was dormant and difficult to identify.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
-
-
Reference Photographs
Photographs were taken of each cross section and vegetation plot. Photographs should be
centered on the feature — either vegetation plot or cross-section — and include both bench marks —
rebar pins surrounded by white PVC piping. The approximate location and orientation of the
photograph site are shown in the pattern view panel of the longitudinal profile survey results
sheet found in Appendix B of initial monitoring report.
T:\pn\011795011\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitonng_methodsy0.doc PreparedbyAndrewKiley �����5�

r�
l�;c os}ntem
Purlear Creek — Wilkes County, North Carolina
Mitigation Monitoring Methods
March 2004
References
Kimley-Horn and Associates, I. (2002). Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project: Wilkes County, NC -
Executive Summary of Restoration Plan. Raleigh, NC.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, I. (2003). Purlear Creek Restoration Plan and Construction Drawings.
Raleigh, NC.
McLendon, S., B. Fox, et al. (2003). Stream Mitigation Guidelines, United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Wilmington District; United States Environmental Protecrion Agency; North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission; North Carolina Department of Natrual Resources - Division of Water Quality.
Rosgen, D. L. (1996). A�plied river morpholo�v. Pagosa Springs, Colo., Wildland Hydrology.
T-\pn\011795011\monitoring\yea�0\purlear_creek_monitonngmethodsy0.doc PreparedbyAndrewKiley ������

Appendix B — Monitoring Results
Purlear Creek
Stream Restoration Proj ect
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
August 2004
OO Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 2004

�
- Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
�
� Vllinter �004 �
� Pool w-�� Riffle w-Q4 ' �
� 13� � � � t
^ � �
� -�� ! �
� �H
- ''-'' 130 _ �� - .� _ � I �_---i--- --- � �l.
� _� � ���_ � 1 �
T T
- � IL� �~ � -
; - As-Bwlt Cmta L'me
. � � � _ r- - � � � - o� ����oo�o�
�
- � �� I �� � � ~' _ T �� •.�. .:MOnilOnngLODUBIUd'me1Ro61e
� _ � � _ _ As-Huih In-Strwm Smrctures
7 � } ._„ � FuncYqral
• � - Stressed
� � � I I � Faiinp
- _ � - hbnimring 6oss SaAion
- Pool
-- Riffie
� - Mouibriog Photo PoiuLs
_ a Poo�
� 1 � � a � oo �oa �ao �oa �oa �oo �oa ��ao �ao � aaa � R�e
� Stati a n � ft)
�� Vegeta6on
- 1.
Benchmark Lon itudinal Surve Data
5tation Channel �'�'ater Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel �'�'atcr gankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel �'�'ater Bankfull Top of Bank Feature
• Surface Surface Surface
0 128.33 282 124.33 603 122.89
� 1 128.7 291 124.57 617 120.47
- 3 130.55 292 121.56 618 120.28
68 127.86 128.7 293 124 624 118.6`
- 83 127.62 298 127.93 625 119.6
84 128.63 324 124 645 119.11 119.58 123.94
� 85 128.6 337 120.95 123.92 665 118.68 119.07
• 91 130.02 350 123.5 668 118.08 118.61
101 133.18 386 123.06 671 121.84
� 102 124.92 391 125.98 683 117.8? 118.41
105 127.21 398 127.68 689 121.13
� 117 124.48 405 122.53 122.97 693 121.8
- 129 126.52 417 121.98 699 116.94 117.75
144 126 429 122.34 723 116.91 117.47
� 164 122.96 444 122.59 122.89 746 117.08 120.49
167 125.76 469 126.16 750 116.87 117.08
� 170 122.24 471 125.92 754 117.1 119.88
- 171 125.29 478 121.67 122.08 781 116.37 117.08
172 125 506 121.25 121.77 799 116.75 120.3
� 186 122.06 125.28 517 127.55 811 116.01 116.79
- 209 129.74 526 121.56 Continued on Next Pa e
210 122.02 125.24 538 12138 124.08 Profile Summar
- 225 121.62 545 121.36 121.31 Bankfull Slo e o.ols Riffle Slo e o.os
233 122.15 125.15 550 119.29 121.33 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
� 242 127.73 567 119.61 121.08 Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin t i9
� 251 127.94 571 125.07 Pool Len th 58 Low Bank Hei h __
266 121.42 582 120.66 Max Riffle De th 3•6 Max Run De th
- 4 2 x P 5.3 --
- Title Longitudinal Profile
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project PCOjeCt # 0 1 1 795008
- �� Project Wilkes County, NC Figure la
� l�,cusystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
� .,...... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach 1- Desi n Station 007+00
�
-
- T�.\pn\011795011�nwniroring\year0\purlear_creek_moniroring_results�(l.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
C�/1 ���

Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
Vl�inter Z004
��� Paol w-�i4 Riffle w-a�
.-. , I I
� �` �-�, I �
`-` 13Q -` - - CH
� ' � w.r �� 4 � ; y � I �?.. L.
� � i +J T � � —
��� ~ 7 �
� � ; - As-Built Crnta L'me
� � As-Buitt Faxmmt
� �� y_ ' Q MonLL«ing vcgewlon Pla
A'}jy I �. 7 � - ` �j��c �imewing fungiNd'mel Profile
A 1 I L U - � * w- V Y L7 At-Buih Io-SVam Swrcnua
� w ~ � � � Fund'qnal
- ����
W • Faiirg
I I _ n��n� aoss s��
11� - -� --��
-- RifAe
MOOIODM1fIg Pb010 PoIOLS
110 � � I � � � � --� T B KF Poo�
0 140 200 3Q0 4Q0 500 6Q0 T00 800 900 �aao a
�) Riffle
Stati o n( ft} � �����
Benchmark Lon itudinal Surve Data
Station Channel H'ater ganldull Top of Hank Feature Station Channel �'�'ater Bankfull Top ot Bank Feature Station Channel �'ater Banld'ull Top of Bank Feature
Surface Surface Surface
820 115.25 116.77
824 120.79
826 119.6
832 115.42
846 119.02
854 115.81 116.27
876 115.53
892 119.11
902 114.7
910 115.14 115.43 _
911 120.9
913 113.69 114.77 .
Profile Summar
Bankfull Slo e o.ots Rif�le Slo e o.05
Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin t i 9
Pool Len th 58 Low Bank Hei h --
Max Rif�le De th 3�6 Max Run De th --
s.3 h --
Title Longitudinal Profile
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration I'roject Project # O1 1795008
Project Wilkes County, NC Figure Ib
r�
1'',ccxystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
•�-•- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach 1- Desi n Station 007+00
T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc PreparedbyAndrewKiley [���� �.�

�
�
• Surve Data Cross Section - Riffle
•Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
� o � 20.22
- 6.22 119.82
] 2.17 118.42
• 13.05 117.52
14.24 117.64
• 14.24 117.8
• 21.97 I 17.5
26.25 117.87
• 27.39 I18.57
• 32.94 1 19.64 Ooround Points �Banww� �ndicatars �water surtace Points
39.72 12�.69 Nbkf - 20.7 Dbkf - 1.1 R6kf = 22.# _-. � ,�_�
• 39.88 120.79 i23.7 - ,�;
- ;�,. �� -.
i ,� Y� f' ��
- _ - � �. , l � �,
• �\ � .. ��� ' i " , �i � � � .
- 121.5 - ' 1�+��,/ � �'"'�
� \ /i` _ "�� f�:
� .�'H. �1 �. i�-�-.
� iiM1
. , � �
�--
� �
, �
� C � + , � `
n,
� �� � � �. �
. -
I 1}-' �i ' �".
� j 119.2 .�y.trL,_ � ',�� .� -? �>' � .
� � '�" �'p� ` . .. . � �
- w . ' �_.' � e .� � � �- �. - �,'_ .-
- - _ _ . . . � ,� . , _ - '�--R?�•�•+. ., ti"
�'" -i.�a-.t��
.r ..� -. .�• - '. ��,p .-��
- . S �.I r��� �j'�' ' 1� ��,(, y� ir Y,a� Y y.
116.9 � '"y • . _. . .. - �''� � .. �.�[ :.
.ry �� - .�aJ �%f"�`� T� �q .
� ,,: -A-- - � � �c� s�
' f=
- 'k .�s,y. '�+ , _
_
-
• 174.6 � -Z �� - . . , ..-
� _ �;� w� _' !�.
� - � .��-- ' ^ .�- "� .
R• a
� iy. �
-�;_�,-�,�
. - .. .... '. ti',. t k.y�+'� -�'�I
- -5.5 OA 5.5 10.9 i6A 21.8 27.3 32.7 382 13.6 19.1 54.5 ��•� - � � � �� ��.
- -' .c�l-'��' ' " - _� � . . ' . . .. . ,_.Q .
Horizontal Distance (R)
�
� Summa Data
• Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 22•4
- Bankfull Width 20��
Bankfull Mean De th � • �
� Bankfull Max De th t.6
� Width/De th Ratio � 9� 1
Entrenchment Rario 1.9
� Classification B
- Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # O1 1795008
• Project Wilkes County, NC
r� Figure 2
� 1',cY�system Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
• .. ..... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach 1- Desi Station 007+00
• T:\pn\01179501 I�monitormg\year0\purlear_aeek_monitoring_resuhsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley ��n .e��'a".o�...�
�

Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 135.71
10.83 135.22
17. l 9 132.02
22.05 130.42
26.65 I 30.34
31.04 128.62
33.84 I27.48
36.89 127.27
39.23 127.01
41.78 127.18 Ovround Points an�un �ndicarors
�B �1Yater Surtace Points
49.51 �ig.$3 Ybkf - 89J Dbkf � 1.2 qOMF ��M.2 � \ , i' H°
56.34 129.01 r .� ;� � �� � 1 ; a ��}� � (.�
145
k l�`� 1� i v: q_ �', r,.
68.15 129.62 ��.� j �� � �^ ` z��
74.44 't � t , -? t. ?. ,
I31.5 �' �,� � ,.'� � , ti,
81.02 133.28 � �, ` \ • "` , ,. �. ,
� �y
� f S. - j
92.34 134.99 . T, F ' J ,_. ?��, ', r 1 � ' �'ri`,.k'' `Y � *•
-� � � \,-+l .� f -t J� � f� SL � � �-.'���'•/•
;� � � - f e .�� -- �
, � ti t, �i ' .,;/ . rj�. r'a ' 1 �'�, �: 't'.:, ,
140 �/' >, 1 i 1 r��.t�' ..
� _
�. i . �
�
C
O
� 135 �
W . � � iY �+.}� W.yM,'dt �, �; � . . .
�� . . .�.� _... . - r-J' sA_-: . l��Yisu . � � 1�h .
" . .w.;..H.. '^- �- � ..f . .. ...�'�. .
. _ .. ,/�' ��►� - : � -
130 ^ �` .. .. " , .' _ � � .�... _ .0 r. � �Y"��� _ �.�..- � �
`w ` a F"�
. = c �i z . , �+
, . _ ` ` �� ^ "�"s���� -
• •
. _ _ ;. � : „
.
-
_
_ . . .. - , ...
- _ _ _, y: _
' {, � ' �: - - �•�`
.
��'� . •. ,� �:. � � , �.� ., s -:
•�S� K .�
iz5 ! �c,.� -.. �. •i r �""�' ' _ - ,
}- ^£ - �;v - , _ , rF�, � �� .� c�� fin .�yl� �•� ( �y �.
`��7s,.� �.wrs_ .�ylh �' .. y�, .,q..,:..��-.y,� �
3� �,., (�i- � . . ' . .'°� x`'� _ "Y .( Y4� "'.. .: ? S �. ��i - Y
L ' _a� � c^.'+y � y�¢. ���, t � '°� ' �y
1�-- � 4 �c „ v . .� Kn ��+ ,�F e \'Y x �. ,�� �w, „�r e.�'d ,, -� - - /
i
`i �`.�'K3l.;�r fw r � ,�, ' _ �.5; y .r j � A�-�i .t�: � t-r. ��;�. ..
120 � r ''�` � e� . ` M��� �:: �� ,,.
D 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 700 ��t -�'� � �� �����,� � � � .. . _ - � �l~
�y : ' . c ,s�_;t4" -i
{1wM i°� ''C'f 11�./ (� � d�'
�i'. ..ai. . . ��}:l�l,:.: 1 . .. 1P . ��` � .. . . . . � � .-.. -
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 48.20
Bankfull Width 39.7
Bankfull Mean De th t.2
Bankfull Max De th 2.6
Width/De th Ratio 32.78
Entrenchment Ratio t .5
Classification -
Title Cross Secrion
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration 1'roject ProjeCt # O1 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 3
r�
I',cx�system Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
,•�.•.- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach l- Desi n Station 007+00
T:\pn\0117950i I�rranitoring\year0�purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by An.irew Kiley [�n ���

�
�
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Riftie
Materials Plot biaterials Size Range (mm) Aggregate Bed Bank
Pebbles Item% Cum°/. Pebbles Item% Cum% Pebbles Item% Cum%
SilUClay 0 0.062 11 11.00 11.00 0 0.00 0.00 11 45.83 45.83
ioa
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 3 3.00 14.00 1 1.32 1.32 2 8.33 54.17
Fine Sand 0.13 025 2 2.00 16.00 1 1.32 2.63 1 4.17 58.33
eo Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 16.00 0 0.00 2.63 0 0.00 58.33
�Rm�avn�re�aoo4�vc� CoarSeSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 16.00 0 0.00 2.63 0 0.00 58.33
ao Very Coarse Sand 1 2 2 2.00 18.00 0 0.00 2.63 2 8.33 66.67
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 0 0.00 18.00 0 0.00 2.63 0 0.00 66.67
�o Fine Gravel 4 6 2 2.00 20.00 0 0.00 2.63 2 8.33 75.00
= Fine Gravel 6 8 3 3.00 23.00 3 3.95 6.58 0 0.00 75.00
LL
Medium Gravel 8 11 5 5.00 28.00 3 3.95 10.53 2 8.33 83.33
u eo
Medium Gravel 11 16 9 9.00 37.00 9 11.84 22.37 0 0.00 83.33
4
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 18 18.00 55.00 15 19.74 42.11 3 12.50 95.83
so Rim�eaavnma�zoo��ac� Co2rseGravel 22 32 16 16.00 71.00 15 19.74 61.84 1 4.17 100.00
VeryCoarseGravel 32 45 16 16.00 87.00 16 2t.05 82.89 0 0.00 100.00
.o VeryCoarseGravel 45 64 8 8.00 95.00 8 10.53 93.42 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 5 5.00 100.00 5 6.58 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o MediumCobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�a
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
iR�m�eaokm�re�zooac�c� SmailBOUlder 362 512 0 0.00 700.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 MediumBoulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ooi ai i io mo iooa i0000
Totals too �s 24
Particle Size (mm) DI6 (rtvn) D35 (mm) D50 (rtvn) D84 (rtvn) D95 (mm) So SiIU Clay % Sand % Gavel % Cobble % Boulder % 6ed-rock
Aggregate Summary a zs is.o 2o.a az e 6a i i � �� s o 0
Moditied Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Aggregate Bed Bank
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item °/, Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 38 30.89 30.89 37 42.53 42.53 1 2.78 2.78
,00
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 1 0.81 31.71 0 0.00 42.53 1 2.78 5.56
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 0 0.00 31.71 0 0.00 42.53 0 0.00 5.56
9p Medium Sand 025 0.5 0 0.00 31.71 0 0.00 42.53 0 0.00 5.56
/vooinnma�zooa�vc� CoarseSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 31.71 0 0.00 42.53 0 0.00 5.56
eo Very Coarse Sand 1 2 1 0.81 32.52 0 0.00 42.53 1 2.78 8.33
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 1 0.81 33.33 0 0.00 42.53 1 2.78 11.11
�o Fine Gravel 4 6 1 0.81 34.15 0 0.00 42.53 1 2.78 13.69
c Fine Gravel 6 8 5 4.07 3821 2 2.30 44.83 3 8.33 2222
LL
� MediumGravel 8 11 6 4.88 43.09 2 2.30 47.13 4 11.11 33.33
� eo
w
Medium Gravel 11 16 9 7.32 50.41 3 3.45 50.57 6 16.67 50.00
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 9 7.32 57.72 3 3.45 54.02 6 16.67 66.67
5o aao�saew�manno� �c� Coarse Gravel 22 32 18 14.63 72.36 9 10.34 64.37 9 25.00 91.67
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 19 15.45 87.80 17 19.54 83.91 2 5.56 97.22
.o Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 7 5.69 93.50 6 6.90 90.80 1 2.78 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 3 2.44 95.93 3 3.45 94.25 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 5 4.07 100.00 5 5.75 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ao
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
/POaFBenkWln�erZOD<(PC) Srroll Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ooi oi i io ioa +oao �ooaa
TO18�5 123 87 36
Pattiele Size (mm) D76 (rmn) D35 (nmi) D50 (rtan) D84 (mm) D95 (rzrtn) % Sild Clay % Sand % Crcavel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.03 6.2 15.7 41.8 80.1 30.9 1.6 61.0 6.5 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # O1 1795008
Project W�ikes County, NC Fi ure 4
r� g
I';a�system Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
.... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach 1- Desi n Station 007+00
-
- T:\pn\011795011\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
� ��, .dNwaemc u4
I �

Modified Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Reach Rifile Pool
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
� oa
SilUClay 0 0.062 49 21.97 21.97 �� 11.00 11.00 38 30.89 30.89
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 4 1.79 23.77 3 3.00 14.00 1 0.81 31.71
Fine Sand 0.13 025 2 0.90 24.66 2 2.00 16.00 0 0.00 31.71
B0 �ledium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 24.66 0 0.00 16.00 0 0.00 31.71
I /a.arnHnme�aoo��PC� (:oarseSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 24.66 0 0.00 16.00 0 0.00 31.71
i
eo � Very Coarse Sand 1 2 3 1.35 26.01 2 2.00 18.00 1 0.81 32.52
IVery Fine Gravet 2 4 1 0.45 26.46 0 0.00 18.00 1 0.81 33.33
�o Fine Grevel 4 6 3 1.35 27.80 Z 2.00 20.00 1 0.8t 34.15
LL i Fine Grevel 6 8 8 3.59 31.39 3 3.00 23.00 5 4.07 38.21
i
`u ao Medium Gravel 8 11 11 4.93 36.32 5 5.00 28.00 6 4.88 43.09
u � Medium Gravel 11 16 18 8.07 44.39 9 9.00 37.00 9 7.32 50.41
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 27 12.11 56.50 1g 18.00 55.00 9 7.32 57.72
so � rooivnme�zoo�c�c� CoarseGravel 22 32 34 1525 71.75 16 16.00 71.00 18 14.63 72.36
i
Ve�� Coarse Gravel 32 45 35 15.70 87.44 16 16.00 87.00 19 15.45 87.80
'0 � Vep Coarse Gravel 45 64 15 673 94.17 8 8.00 95.00 7 5.69 93.50
� Small Cobble 64 90 8 3.59 97J6 5 5.00 100.00 3 2.44 95.93
�o Medium Cobble 90 128 5 224 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 5 4.07 100.00
iLarge Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
zo
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Srtall Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
iR�mavn�ia��oa�ac� SmallBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
'� Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
L3rge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Verv Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o.m o+ i io ioo i000 maoo
Totals 223 100 123
Particle Size (mm) Aggrv gate Summary D16 (rmn) D35 (rmn) D50 (rmm) D84 (rtrtn) D95 (frnn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rcek
0.05 IOA 19.1 421 70.0 22A 4.0 681 5.8 0 0
Representarve Photos
S� � f ��: , -�,f �t2 ,J '
w. _� _
,,. � r «� .. 4 � �
Y .r•'� .�.r�.y� r- 'A� �' ,e . $�A 1�' Il . �'�, _
�, .� �y-�' .'�- vr� , ,� � t�.., E6 , F� ? ��
�° ` .' ,�''V y t�`.1 t y� ' �� .
�S"` !+�et L� ,i�5y� �`� ;,�i �'` - :�,Z �Y' y` � �-.�-`.
atr4'y r k . � � -� s l�� �� �� - � r +'� _
� ��r'�;�,�i �R•'+ttij�'��`�. � �'�.��'" .: °. � ,( �
:'TM'� � a:'- a3, �,. ,i�' �,� � ���,�'���� �r���� ,� � '"��' V 'Qi+�,�_ �x
��� �` 4 � '� h � r } { 1�� t _f;�� - .
. . 'J�. 1 . F� .�� � �`k7- � '��,,���� - � 1ir
^'Y"`F- . ��::R'�� 1' ,t�,4!�i��+`�'' -1� �r . K�„
�. � �' . . , � �C� � :� 7`�„ r -
�:: � � '�"' � ,y `� � � ' � � �� ' _ . _
1 I
Z
..i+ - ,-JY�
1 '
&fi
� ;� ��5..y.
�y �•
r
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Froject Project # 011795008
�� Project Wilkes County, NC Figure 5
]�,��5�� t�� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
-�� March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach I- Desi n Station 007+00
'I:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_crcek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc Repared by Andrew Kiley ��� ���irc.

�
�
Ve etation Transect Data Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 100 m2
Live Stakes'
ScientiTic Name Common Name Count Sam le ScientiTic Name Common Name Count Sam le
Betula nigra River birch Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya cordiformis Bittemut hickory Quercus michauxii Swamp chesfiut oak
Carya ovnta Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Ce(tis laevigata Sugarberty Quercus phel(os Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumardii Shumard oak
Fraxinus pennsylvnnica Green ash Salix nigra Black willow
Nyssn sylvatica Blackgum Tilia heterophyl[a White basswood
Carpinus cnroliniann Ironwood % �� � '
. � :t, �1
�� , � � � � ,,� .. . ' � i r�' � e'''; '`� � �,�.
Estimated Live Stake Plantings -- Initial Live Stake Monitoring Requirements -- Total Live Stakes Observed 36 �,
. i
� � � � � �r'''�, � - `,. .
Bare Roots • i
_ - -., �
Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam �e Scientific Name Common Name Count 5am le � ,:��3'`� � ���; � ��'� �
Acer jloridanum Southern sugar maple Le:�cothoe axillnris Doghobble �` _ � � +�_ � . i ~ ' � ?�: _ - r ♦° '` �'�y '-, ' .
1 4i' �� .�1 ; / . �'F . � 1 +c � .
Aesculus sylvatica Painted buckeye Lindera benzoin Spicebush ;� " 1 � � '' ' � �j 1 • � ' �` l
�� 1 ��, t � yr; � � '�. t , ' r �� . � � � ,. .
Alnus serrulata Tag alder Lyonia ligustrina Male-berry a, � ; �� � '� n \ �•' ��, �
k,
Amelnnchier arborea Serviceberry Magnolia tripetala Umbrella tree t �. ' �' , �, '` � ! � ;� ^' ,
Aronia arbutifolin Red chokeberry Morus rubra Red mulbeiry �"� i �� fi t � �,` �'�' +'
A s i m i n a t r i l o b a C o m m o n p a w p a w Ph ysocar pus o puli folius Ninebark ' ��, r �
� . �� ,� r � . ��;
CalycanthusJloridus Sweet-shrub Rhododendron Wildazalea , y , ._ _ '' ��' �}���, J�.�''. Y _ a � ; .� "
eric! menoirles • i '' � � - � � " ' ` "� .'
� ' ! t � . �...�f d �" ..�v � �: st: A-.
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Rhododendron viscosum Swamp azalea � . " _ - - '' -' + - �"�` _ ts.-- :�
�: '� ,.�� ,;•.. , �. .:-
Cornus a[ternifolia Alternate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose .' '"- . _ ,
� - . . -A
� Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Salix sericen Silky willow s"- "`k`, - ° " „� '° '
� -'. _., . . 'F-�.� .« , : . . . .. s4:-;`, � '�ISar.�'`�
Corylus americana Hazel-nut Staphylen trifolia Bladdemut �.�,�yI� - " " - ��$�- .s-e -� �- �
+..�'?�'1[ b{ ...we� 2 . � - . . .. ! -� : _' Y '+" o - �� .c r '`'� ��n�,,'* i
Hamnmelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewartia mnlaco�tendron Silky camellia � � � �.�, a • . �" "� , - ^ � �.:�- � -_ v ;
Hibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow m locos tinctoria Sweet leaf ' `� � � ,: �. �f �.^� � -'* '' `��'�-.+'�`" ' - � � " '
Sl' p �i� � .�r- .. � . . � •,;-�.... , � . . :�, - -
, . -�.,. � � . - R..:' -
� Y - 't+� �,: f +
� ,
.
_ . .,._ _ ..,r.� . . . . . .. .k1 . -•.
_ r q -
/lex decidun Deciduous holly Viburnum cassinoides Withe rod �.�` ����y �°"' ;��'" �=r :.:,: - .' . ��^+ � w�;��,jr';-`�"�ir� - __ � ��r-:� p `
Ilex vertici!latn Win[er berry Viburnum dentatum Southern arrow-wood ,� � - ,,, '"�.,;;h 4" : �y, 'W�, ' .rr -� "_ . �
� � , c + : �xr, ' !+t
Itea virginica Virginia willow Xanthorhizn simplicissimn Yellow-root ��.� � ti "�` �"" •w �. ,.� Y'"s `� 4 �"' : • �.l �,"� �^
r i ti�,�., " Y� ��,}���,�,''�", �� i�, x" � ,�a �"�x � - - ~�1 � _
, ��'- . � "���. � - �
> `��, iis� `�'- � � � +, , � .,.:� ^+�.��3'� s .�, � -
Estimated Bare Root Plantings -- Initial Bare Root Monitoring Requirements — Total Bare Roots Observed 7 . �r ��- s � ; �" f .- - , , . .�v,�� '� � �. _�
� * - �s .,�,'�"c , .k x - > " -
Total Estimated Plantings -- Year 3 Monitoring Requirements 8 Total Plants Observed 43 � �4� = � , '�z ': �`-:�� �r
�. -,�c,�"�i �-.d,� ,�a � .. . : -....z�. `".r'r" ':e�- �`�,.. .
Ground Cover " " �F �,y�,,. �� � : �< ' -�.��o;�. : '',��+�'� • -
.: �
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name , �r� r'�t�.,,� 6„ ��""���, ,� � �''�'' ' `� �:�� '� �� i � .' -
,-�``; � :k �- :�.�. `��� ��r �
� 'k:�� «?" ,� �.•�: "� �^�'a,�iv�. � s - � '�. �a v. +.�� .� � ? �� .�J
;tf� F`.�Y J ����•'�' �. {- � . ;' 4 � . ��j..• . G����,�.� - .��
k� y � � T C
��i�lF�, - t 4 �;, �` � r�,t4 1 F �s � a;�r, ""�1�'-��r "���a ,�
�' }fi��
� "'� 'e� - �� � � � ,y ;�, „� ,� ' z� ,,,( �: �� =`+�y�. �r � � ��i•�.2�'� an`.{
,°�' . ��.slJp aR�.t.� - � I � y �: r � y . , "n � i w- � r `+e , `a��. �� �,a.�.
'�'� � F r4..•`- 4° '.:e �. _ ��_�. a �.� .�5,. t'ft ' � "�P
�A,.,
Percent Cover --
Recruitment
Scientific Name Common Name 5cientific Name Common Name
� Count 2
� Notes
� Identification of species not possible due to season - winter - of initial assessment
- Title Vegetation
• Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # O1 1795008
• Project W�lkes County, NC Figure 6
�� Surve Date Surve Weather Field Team Location
� I�,cosystem Y Y
_... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Main Reach 1- Desi n Station 007+00
�
• T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
�on .�.�.�

Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
V1�i nter �004
110 Pool w-a�+ Riffle w-a4
� i i
'� ���� � I I I GH
� �o� � _ � - _
�� - � � �`
4 � =..=, �.� � �=�.=
��' I lJ lJ T��' � ti� 4_
T 7 - At-ewl[ Cmta L'me
C �� As-BuiltFis�at
� # Q Monaoring Vegdatia Pld
� � � �
� * 4 �SmM1Oriog Ivngihdinal Profilc
�/�� � � I I � � � �- - As-Buih Io-Slreem SWrcNres
Vj ~ � Functqnal
W � � � - �. ����
� ry # B KF- L • FaNirg
V Moniariog aoss sxtion
- - Pbol
-- RifAe
Mmibring Phao Poiou
$� � + ��F-� a ��
o � ao �oo �oa aoo �oo soa �oa s��o
�, Riffle �
l !
Stati o n( ft} � �����
�
Benchmark Lon itudi*�.al Surve Data
Station Channel �'�'ater Bankfull Top of Uank Feature Statioo Channel �'�'atcr BanFdull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel �'t'ater Bankfull Top of Bank Feature
SurCace Surface Surfece
0 102.74 102.8 189 98.52 408 100.43
1 99.83 190 99.6 413 96.42 96.81
12 99.98 101.76 196 98.08 99.6 424 96.5 96.6
14 101.76 202 103.14 425 96.1
15 100.61 105.87 207 98.46 99.6 426 94.22
23 101.31 101.73 216 99.24 99.57 428 93.76
32 106.13 240 99.05 99.27 433 96.02
65 104.76 244 103.03 434 95.27
67 100.58 101.22 260 98.63 99.24 442 100.62
78 105.57 _ 272 102 443 95.31
79 101.16 277 98.94 99.06 449 95.68 95.97
83 99.5 101.16 278 98.02 458 9539 95.8
93 100.56 101.15 279 94.95 463 93.83 95.79
98 101.1 284 94.77 470 94.76 95.76
99 100.81 292 96.65 98.03 475 95.25 95.71
121 104.17 301 97.5 98.02 480 100.43
124 100.05 100.6 309 101.4 492 94.89 95.26
126 105.64 317 97.14 97.73 502 100.72
150 100.02 323 93.42 509 94.55 95.07
151 100.58 324 97.73 525 94.44
152 99.8 327 94.14 97.73 100.16 Continued on Next Page
153 98.13 329 97.24 Pr fi Summar
157 97.7 99.79 332 94.36 Bankfull Slo e o.014 Riffle Slo e o.02
160 104.74 348 96.98 97.27 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
163 99.78 358 100.93 Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin >>2
164 99.32 375 96.81 97.1 Pool Len th -- Low Bank Hei h --
173 98.95 99.78 384 99.7 Max Riffle De th 4�7 Max Run De th --
8.2 --
Title Longitudinal Profile
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration I'roject ProjeCt # 011795008
Project W;�kes County, NC Figure 7a
r�
1�cYnystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
•--�- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
T:\pn\Ol 1795011�monitoring\year0\pudear_aeek_monitoring_resuhsy0.doc Preparcd by Andrew Kiley ��� ��M+�^ M

�
�
Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
�11�i nte r � 0 04 `� -
� � � Pooi w-o� Riffle w-a�
� � �
� ���� � � � � - �H
��--� � �� -� �.� _
� �=�..,�- ��
� �- �_
�ao - �°��=��' -
- As-Boilt Catv L'me
�� ' `� - � ` 4 �� As-BuiltFas�mt
� � � �' O n�onitaiuq veg�azioo e�ot
� �� I I � * 4 +�_ L -
� _ 1 �vtonitoriqg Longitud'mal Rofile
As-Buih Io-Stream Swrctures
� Functional
9resse�
W �� I I � - � = BI�F-L
• Fanitg
Mooibring C�oss Sa�w
- Fbol
-- Rilfle
Mooibriqg Phao Poinls
$� o � oa �o� �ao �oa �aa soo �oo $oa } e�F-� a �°�
� RiHle �
Stati a n� ft� � �����
Benchmark Lon itudinal Surve Data
Station Channel �'�'ater Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel �'ater ganld'ull Top of Bank Feature Station Chan�el �'atcr ganldull Top of Bank Feature
SurCace Surface Surface
526 94.97 722 91.94 92.44 95.43 95.06
I 542 99.83
' . 546 94.19 94.74
562 94.15 94.72
566 97.48
571 94.49
572 94.62
- 573 93.98
574 91.89
- 577 92.03
578 93.97
� 588 93.56 93.96
• 614 93.19 93.55
625 97.92
629 96.75
- 632 92.63 93.24
637 92.07 93.24
- 644 92.89 93.23
650 96.57
� 666 92.7 93.23
• 677 92.83 92.85
679 90.42 92.85 Pr tile Summa
- 685 90.34 Bankfull Slo e o.o1a Riffle Slo e o.02
686 92.63 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
� 692 91.58 ('�lide Slo e -- Pool S acin t i2
- 693 92.57 Pool Len th -- Low Bank Hei h -_
695 95.52 Max Riffle De th 4�7 Max Run De th
• 2 s.2 --
- Title Longitudinal Profile
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
• Project W��kes County, NC
Figure 7b
�� Surve Date Surve Weather Field Team Location
� 1{�ccnystcm Y Y
. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
�
�
- T�\pn\011795011\moniroring\year0\purleaz_creek_rtaniroring_resultsy0.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
c_n .��. �.

Surve Data Cross Section - Riftle
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot — Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo — Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 0 IO1.38
0.49 0 IOLl9
9.31 0 99.5
13.64 0 98.65
17.73 0 97.99
18.26 0 97.63
19.97 0 97.4 LEW
24.11 0 96.99
27.43 0 97.44 REW
29.14 0 97.85
OOround Points �BanlUull Intlicators �Water Surface Points
32.94 0 98.4 YbkF � 29.9 DDkf - 1 Rbkf - 23_4
38.17 0 99.1 �� o �.. .• ��
,�
,.
� `3 .
} � '' .�y
., -- ;
ios � ` � c '� � _
`�
��.
' � . ,.' �
� �;„. �;� ; , -� ' � ,
o - � , �µ; '�'
� 100
> �
N
W
z -.. �
� __ �
., T y � ,�yyY �I . .
.:� -n�e� �� ' 1� ..�``*, �_ � t� , ,
.. ' t��` .• `�y" � ��.c�'" � ' ;'� .,r� .^"K� � -� �.; �
95- . ''� �. 3 .��.np... �a'
� t � ;�,�'.�°�+Lt I � -`
r( pY �.� .
� �iZ � 4y, .s�.{ �,. a,� -
� \7� ♦ - � � i �,C �
. y
.!- � - . . . Z ='
_ . . _ - .+:
' ' _ - . ._
'.
- � � . �' -�' _ �a. � .. . �„`
9O. ':. �x���. _ . , p, ." .
; � 7 _ _
- . . - ��' � .�'q'`� j � 't'� � _ � ���b _ .o,� .
-a � .'.i°���."'� R.s 'i- ., �.
`y .t ��� ��.
`i
L' _ .
85 ' �.y •
0 10 20 30 �0 50 60 70 80 90 100 � - - ,�
� � - � � — - - - - .. — _' �c;�;..
Horizontal Distance (R)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 23.4
Bankfull Width 239
Bankfull Mean De th �.o
Bankfull Max De th �.9
Width/De th Ratio 24
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6
Classification B
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
�� Project W��kes County, NC Figure 8
l�;cosys,t�� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
•••'�- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
T:\pn\01179501 IUnonitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley ��n a'+�'"�"
� .ni�ax�

�
Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot — Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo — Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 0 106.41
5.28 0 103.73
12.47 0 102.73
]7.3 0 101.42
19.25 0 100.66
22.95 0 100.88
27.49 0 99.89
30.03 0 99.66
32.2 0 100.19
3436 0 101.19 OOround Points �ean�uu �ndicators �water Sunace Points
3436 � 101.19 Ybkf � 21.1 Dbkf � 1.5 ROkf - 31.3 � 4 '�f+: F"` "
35.1 0 102.05 E3KF ��s l'� ,j%� � �:�� . � ��� � '�� � "
39.34 0 103.23 � .� -
`S<1' � �� � f v�
39.61 0 103.2
.� �'I 1 S ''�C�''~,�"7� '7
S C '1\ .�r .� \, �� �N� y. # .
.. "' � I
.. �
��� .. . . . ... . ..� .
;_ " -- ' � � . f .�i
�o. . a �
i , �'
� ; �' � /, '� � •
� •",;� �i.`t
O �c;- ( r / v
��] 105 �'a���i�"�
N �
w ♦ .
, -°--.-.._ � . i . _.i,_ � -� �'.}
I ' - _-
- � .. _ �w. _ 3� �. ..yt V_ ;�.i►,��.
�VM
ioo
� 1...�s - -
!'.- "' *•� �� l . - � � . . ` � . �+� . R .'. _ ' _ _
�- .�I , . _ _ �:�, 4uY``�`+�yy a �.. ��� � f�• i�� . � 4�-'� � . � .
_ .. _ c,�e,a '."�`'., f s .'� '.t s�.
�
,� � ��� � � � .
��:
�. j4 '..� . ��
' �
- , c.+� �,. ?r.�:. � , . ,� •_ - -
95 rt _ � •y���y • �T � _ . ,:�.�" ��'w"'y.r' . `_ �� -
�r, x
* , . _ w--� i. ;�;•� �;?,�� �;. � � ' ,
� `"�. W'''�.�:'�� - �j t`, x�,� Y
� �.� 't : x =.�
_ - �� '� ;
- � ._�: ,.� � -
so � - ; l'_ `t �,
o �0 20 30 40 5o so ro eo so too '- "'"�*
I - _�'�`t , .,�,t..',
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area � 3t.3
Bankfull Width 21.�
Bankfull Mean De th � �s
Bankfull Max De th Z.s
Width/De th Ratio ►4
� Entrenchment Ratio � �9
Classification B
• Title Cross Section
- Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project W��kes County, NC
- �� Figure 9
- 1'�cosystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
,.,..... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Daa Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
�
- T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\yeaz0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resuluy0.doc
-
Prepared by Avdrew Kiley
��n ti��k

Modi6ed Wolman Pebble Count - Riffle
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item •/. Cum •/.
�oo SilUClay 0 0.062 11 12.64 12.64 p 0.00 0.00 11 31.43 31.43
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 0 0.00 12.64 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 31.43
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 7 8.05 20.69 0 0.00 0.00 7 20.00 51.43
eo PAedium Sand 0.25 0.5 6 6.90 27.59 0 0.00 0.00 6 17.14 68.57
�aime�nma�am<�PC> CoarseSand 0.5 1 4 4.60 32.18 1 1.92 1.92 3 8.57 77.14
eo Veiy Coarse Sand 1 2 6 6.90 39.08 4 7.69 9.62 2 5.71 82.86
Ve�y Fine Gravel 2 4 3 3.45 42.53 3 5.77 15.38 0 p,00 g2,g6
d
ro Fine Gravel 4 6 4 4.60 47.13 4 7.69 23.08 0 0.00 82.86
� Fine Gravel 6 8 4 4.60 51.72 4 7.69 30.77 0 0.00 82.86
LL
`u eo Medium Gravet 8 11 6 6.90 58.62 6 11.54 42.31 0 0.00 82.86
;, Nedium Gravel 11 16 10 11.49 70.11 7 13.46 55.77 3 8.57 91.43
a Goarse Gravel 16 22 10 11.49 61.61 8 15.38 71.15 2 5.71 97.14
5o R�me eeamma�soo� cnc� Coarse Gtavel 22 32 5 575 87.36 4 7.69 78.85 1 2.86 100.00
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 4 4.60 91.95 4 7.69 86.54 0 0.00 100.00
'0 Verv Coarse Gravel 45 64 4 4.60 96.55 4 7.69 94.23 0 0.00 100.00
:imall Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 96.55 0 0.00 9423 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 2 2.30 98.85 2 3.85 98.08 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 1 1.15 100.00 1 1.92 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ao
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦a;m�e,oww�ma,zoacac> SmallBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
io
Madium Bouider 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ooi oi i io iuo iooa ioaoo
Totals 87 52 as
Particle Size (mm) D16 (rmn) D35 (�mn) D50 (mm) D84 (mm) D95 (rtrtn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
02 1.4 7.1 26.5 57.6 12.6 26.4 57.5 3.5 0 0
ModiCed Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
Vtaterials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
ioo
SilUClay 0 0.062 23 23.00 23.00 4 5.71 5.71 19 63.33 63.33
� �_' V�ry Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 2 2.00 25.00 2 2.86 8.57 0 0.00 63.33
�� Fine Sand 0.13 025 13 13.00 38.00 12 17.14 25.71 1 3.33 66.67
90 I P,fedium Sand 025 0.5 8 8.00 46.00 8 11.43 37.14 0 0.00 66.67
I�
iPOO�w��re,�oo��c> (:oarSeSand 0.5 1 8 8.00 54.00 7 10.00 47.14 1 3.33 70.00
eo Veiy Coarse Sand 1 2 8 8.00 62.00 8 11.43 58.57 0 0.00 70.00
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 4 4.00 66.00 3 4.29 62.86 1 3.33 73.33
`m
,o Fine Gravel 4 6 2 2.00 68.00 2 2.86 65.71 0 0.00 73.33
` Fine Gravel 6 8 5 5.00 73.00 3 429 70.00 2 6.67 80.00
LL
`u sa Madium Gravel 8 11 6 6.00 79.00 4 5.71 75.71 2 6.67 86.67
� ' M°dium Gravel 11 16 4 4.00 83.00 2 2.86 78.57 2 6.67 93.33
a I
I C�arse Gravel 16 22 8 8.00 91.00 8 11.43 90.00 0 0.00 93.33
5o vomeaoxmme�zow�vc� C�rseGrevel 22 32 3 3.00 94.00 2 2.86 92.86 1 3.33 96.67
I
i
Ver} Coarse Gravel 32 45 5 5.00 99.00 5 7.14 100.00 0 0.00 96.67
'0 Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 1 1.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 1 3.33 100.00
i Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ao i Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
i Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ia
� Ver� Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦ aooFeearame� �oo� �ac� S�roll Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�� MediumBouider 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
� Large Bouider 1024 2046 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Ver� Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om ai i io +oo t000 i0000
TO[81S 100 70 3p
Partitle Size (mm) Dl6 (rmn) D35 (rtvn) D50 (�mn) D84 (rmn) D95 (mm) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary o.oa o.zz o.�s i6.a 34.6 zs 39 3s o 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Froject Projeet # 011795008
�` Project W��kes County, NC Figure 10
��� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
••-••- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
T:\pn\011795011�moniroring\year0\purlear_crcek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared byAntrew Kiley ��� ���i�

�
�
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Reach RifFle Pool
Pebbles [tem% Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbks Item•/. Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 34 18.18 18.18 11 72.64 12.64 23 23.00 23.00
,00 Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 2 1.07 19.25 0 0.00 12.64 2 2.00 25.00
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 20 10.70 29.95 7 8.05 20.69 13 13.00 38.00
eo Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 14 7.49 37.43 6 6.90 27.59 8 8.00 46.00
�Reac�Wln�e�]00�(PC) CoarSeSand 0.5 1 12 6.42 43.85 4 4.60 32.18 8 8.00 54.00
ao Very Coarse Sand 1 2 14 7.49 51.34 6 6.90 39.08 S 8.00 62.00
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 7 3.74 55.08 3 3.45 42.53 4 4.00 66.00
io
Fine Gravel 4 6 6 3.21 5829 4 4.60 47.13 2 2.00 68.00
c Fine Gravel 6 8 9 4.81 63.10 4 4.60 51.72 5 5.00 73.00
iL
� Medium Gravel 8 11 12 6.42 69.52 6 6.90 58.62 6 6.00 79.00
� so
u
Medium Gravel 11 16 14 7.49 77.01 10 11.49 70.11 4 4.00 83.00
� Coarse Gravel 16 22 18 9.63 86.63 10 11.49 81.61 8 8.00 91.00
5o aimewimenawcPC� CoarSCGtavel 22 32 8 428 90.91 5 575 87.36 3 3.00 94.00
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 9 4.81 95.72 4 4.60 91.95 5 5.00 99.00
.o Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 5 2.67 98.40 4 4.60 96.55 1 1.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 98.40 0 0.00 96.55 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 2 1.07 99.47 2 2.30 98.85 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 1 0.53 100.00 1 1.15 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
20 Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦aooiw�me�7oo��ac� Srr�IlBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o
Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o.ai ai i ia �oo ioaa i000n
Totals 1e7 e� ioo
Particle Size (mm) DI6 (rrnn) D35 (mm) D50 (rtvn) D84 (rtvn) D95 (mm) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.05 0.4 1.8 20.6 43.1 182 332 47.1 1.6 0 0
Representative Photos
� , • � ;• , �(
� � �,� ;�
, i �
� � ` ° , �., � _ ..y
� 4 �
'� ..�� .. .: �f� «' � 1 ' � r' 1? i ` � 'i� �` JI I, �
:e, ,� {"�� ;�� ,� � N �...�i� �� ;
�" , "
r'!\ �" ij. . � y� / . . �� 1 4�J �
� ` � � � A . , . �cy,�� w, �`ti � �. , ; ' 4
� � � . ; �
� rF�,� �` r� .� � � G� '� - ,
' ��cy'`C�,. i*'} � .. .I. ,=e � -� 'n� �� �` ��Y -E
1_� i ' �1°,j� ��'•� y�� .t � � ,�
�/ Y ; `T ` M � �Y ' i ' � h � ! ' ` ' � � �
, �Y � . . �1� i 1 S 1 • � .
'� � ,�'`. ,�, � , �, r � `� , E
� ',, i � 4� , S �
• ^ ,�* `'u ,. �' •� �;+' �'�� �� . .� � , / a���
��A�1� . , �� �.. �tr��. , , ' , . .
� �� "°Y j ' 1 # . �„ � Y
� ' • � i . ', � ' , . � 1... ' _ ' _ ., r . . . .. .. .. .
• r ��� `1� ��, j 't`., �
.
:'�� � �` , ia r 4 , �'� r
• i'� � , � 11
� F _ �__ a,� � . .� � 1� , � ` . '�'�► - �f �,
� :.b! . . _ .. wi'� �� ''�i - . _ - _
- Title Pebble Counts
• Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
- Project W��kes County, NC Fi ure 11
r� g
• ];��e11� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
.... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
�
�
� T:\pn\011795011\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc
�
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
[ �n .,a.�.aomr. w�

Ve etation Transect Data Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 1�0 m2
Live Stakes'
Scientific Name Common Name Count San°�e Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le
Betula nigra River birch Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya cordiformis Bitternut hickory Quercus michauxii Swamp chesmut oak
Caryn ovata Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Celtis laevigala Sugarberry Quercus phellos Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumardii Shumard oak
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash Salix nigra E31ack willow
Nyssa sylvntica E3lackgum Tilia heterophylln White basswood
Carpinus cnroliniann Ironwood
Estimated I,ive Stake Plantings -- Initial Live Stake Monitoring Requirements -- Total Live Stakes Observed 42
Bare Roots' A.
1
Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le ,. � �l .=,. ,�
Acer,Jlori�lanum Southern sugar maple Leucothoe axillaris Doghobble "�; �' '�.� ' i , �}
, i t
Aesculus sylvatica Painted buckeye Lindera benzorn Spicebush ��;'',` �
}. A�'
Alnus serrulnta Tag alder Lyonrn ligustrina Male-berry ,,;, :
� � , : � ,��� .
Amelanchier arborea Serviceberry Magnolia tripetnln Umbrella tree ti��
,�
Aronia arbutifolia Red chokeberry Morus rubra Red mulberry "h � L " �'
Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Physocarpus opu[ifolius Ninebark
Cnlycanthus�loridus Sweet-shrub Rhododendron W��d azalea
ericl menoides
Cephalnnthus occi�tentalis Buttonbush Rhododendron viscosum Swamp azalea -
Cornus niternifolia Alternate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose -
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Salix sericea Silky willow = ` ^ ' - � - '�' `` _ - _
� - - . ., '°..'`,�,�-�.:;,-; - -' -- ' ,.r..,.. .
Corylus nmericann Hazel-nut Staphylea trifolin Bladdernut - -- ' -'' ' ' "��s ,`�., .. ' _ '
Hamnmelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewartia malacodendron Silky camellia w_ -;-�'�a-� `' - e,,,;"
Nibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow Symplocos tinctoria Sweet leaf '..�, r,�- ,., ^.. .,�. � -
Ilex �lecidun Deciduous holly Viburnum cassinoides Withe-rod � � - '� ti. �,,_ ,
Ae,r verticillnta Winter berry Viburnum dentatum Southem arrow-wood �{" � ~�""' �� •� -
/tea virginica Virginia willow Xanthorhiza simp/icissimn Yellow-root , a < �� . -- :. ' , - i �' ' ' I "j ,.,
�.', .'��; - .i . . • .. i. � ,
�.. ,i� , -i��. � .
Estimated Bare Root Plantings -- Initial Bare Root Monitoring Requirements - Total I3are Roots Observed 15 • ' � . • � , �'`� 'F''--t'�i�, `. '� ,.,y ,: .y , , ,-,�,y
.. A . .. ,,�, M,, _
Total Estimated Plantings - Year 3 Monitoring Requirements S Total Plants Observed 57 5 � � " ' ' " "' ° � "' ' ^ ` - '' ' " " "" " '� �� '� � � �
Ground Cover
Scientifc Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Nar�e
Percent Cover -
Recruitment
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Narie
Count --
Notes
� Identification of species not possible due to season - winter - of initial assessment
Title Vegetation
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 12
r�
1',rnsystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
--� March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Middle Main Reach 4- Station 023+00
T�.\pn\01179501 I\monitoring\yeaA\pudear_crcek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Ardrew Kiley ��n ��k

�
�
- Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
� �}
� V1�1 nter �004
� ��o Pooi w-a� Riffle w-��
�� I I
� r`' �� `�-�_��
� �- ��-I� I �H
, '�--�' 98 ' M1 � _ .� ;
- � �
� �
� �7 - ` -�, _ � � -
� � � - _ � - � � �
$$ � s � I -ws-ewuCanQ�mo
��� I � � As-Bwlt Pas�ml
� �� L � z
� _ � ' -� - I � _ ~ - ~ Q Maniloring Vegt18[ion PIM
• � n i_� �� it���vfonitoring Longitud'mal Profiie
�7 ` � o as-suin io-sneam smai�res
� Func[ional
- �j � � _ � L �*..,� Sreued
w �`, 1 • Failirg
- �y� I MOnibnng do55 $x[ion
za
- aooi
• � � ' -- RrfFle
Mooimring Phdo Points
$� . ��F � a��
• a �oo �oa �oo aoo �oo �ao �oo
• � Riffle
Distanc� along thalweg f ft) �, ����
• �-�
•
- Benchmark Lon itudic�al Surve Data
Station Channel �'ater Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel �'�'ater Banld'ull Top of Bank Feature Station Chan�nei �'�'ater Banld'ull Top of Bank Feature
- Surface Surface Surface
0 94.66 357 95.2
� 1 97.92 385 93.89 95.2
. 21 99.67 394 94.57 95.18
29 96.83 97.89 404 96.89
• 54 97.2 415 93.5 95.1
91 97.38 97.83 436 93.58 95.08
� 98 93.65 438 96.77
- 102 96.8 454 93.31 95.04
137 98.4 474 94.64 94.98
� 141 95.74 96.8 475 96.02
184 96.25 96.8 484 91.15 93.32
� 188 98.55 506 92.91 93.28
- 199 93.76 507 94.65
210 98.48 521 92.48 93.23
� 225 96.21 96.77 551 92.33 93.17
• 250 96.7 571 92.61 93.16
251 9638 605 92.52 93.14
- 267 96.6
272 93.71
� 284 97.4
- 285 9538 96.3
303 94.28 96.3 Pr file S mm r
- 314 95.48 Bankfull Slo e o.008 Rif�1e Slo e o� �
322 95.36 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
� 323 96.28 Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin 19�
- 349 95.96 96.26 Pool Len th 72 Low Bank Hei h __
353 97.53 Max Riffle De th
� •9 Max Run De th
- 5.6 --
- Title Longitudinal Profile
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
- �� Project Wilkes County, NC Figure 13
- ]��yStE��� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
- ..._.. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Main Reach 6- Station 051+00
I• T:\pn\O1179501I\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc
-
I
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
G� u,+ev+w�
�. ��a.iamc

Surve Data Cross Section - Riffle
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 98.21
6.53 98.28
15.71 97.8
23.9 97.52
25.72 96.74
28.73 94.22
30.37 94.67
33.66 93.99
36.94 94.78
39.43 95.14 REW
QOrountl Points �BanlQull Intlicators �Water Surtace Points
40.0g 97.45 YbkF = 25.5 DbkF - 1.1 Rbkf = 29 ' �� � ��« . � �:r ,
42.82 98.21 �05- � �,• �.y � ! i,1 \. � , :
43.4 98.38 - ` _ .r , �,i ,'� }� � �
46.86 98.35 - �
�� � �
, i' .
53.14 98A1 � - ; `� ��� � � -
� � � �`� a
ioo "� � :i �:,, � r1�
�`
. '` „
� � �,
t i. '
r
�� I ,;�
i
� ' �j� � �� �''�'�t'� ��� �� � l ��'i '
_ . .. . .. Y;r.�' : ��'°� . . � i
O ' . �_�.
N
� 95 . .J, s, ,'��. . j � . . \
w '; � � ; i .; -
� � - �. _ _ - -
r•',.,,.. .4.,�.,,w,,,,�c„l►.r,� � ,.� r+l ��cc
=�'9Y �' � �
y;q,• � �,s� a
�: _
"'t _ � . . . * .
90 F- ' '�� �.K�Ry, a..A�,'`�' r��.' - ._ � : ,p � .,� ' -�i'" " .�
.s . - � K:`i'fu�� .�K .r �.r}'� - . ..� ..` . v... � � ` o
- � � � s..
�'z' �''
� �,�i:, � �`.r - ` .� -�' .� '�c� �
, �r#�' -�,� ,�.^�,. � � �
� .. , ,�., '� :' .�:
tic�r:x- � . •� _�. ".
��. r . - _ .- .,. . .:- .
. ayJ�e_" .� �` f_�� r 9 a ���ti� `
.P�' }�`
85- °� � .!{. r:• �,;. �' .ar
_ �."'�.. ?F�e
� �'k.. .�:i;.�:z=.�.
? . .. ' �:'""'-w
� _ . ♦ . - � ;a;�, I
. -� �•�-�.::r,4_ ��'
_ - _ v
80
0 10 20 30 !0 50 60 70 60 90 700
Horizontal Distance (R)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 29
Bankfull Width 2s.s
Bankfull Mean De th 1. �
Bankfull Max De th 1.9
Width/De th Ratio 22.3
Entrenchment Ratio 2•4
Classification C
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # O1 1795008
Project W�Ikes County, NC Figure 14
��� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
',..... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Main Reach 6- Station 051+00
T�.\pn\011795011�monitoring\yeaA\pudeer_crak_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Acdrew Kiley [�n ,�i"�u.,iR.

�
Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 96.2
1.24 96.03 LEP
4.2 95.53
792 95.16
11.26 94.72
14.83 94.95 E3KF
17J2 93.11 LEW
19.41 92.62
22.58 92.82
26.94 92.48 Ooround Points �Bankruu �ndicators �watar surrace Points
3�.%$ 93.08 REW il�kf - 35 Dbkf � 1 .7 pAkf � SB.2 �` . ..c ._ � . .
36.51 94.07 110 . j� +
44.8 94.7 \ � .. � %"
�
51.59 95.19 '
57.91 95.48 .
58.17 95.53 REP �'
60.64 95.6 { -
� � ��, � � � �� - �'
,oe � � . � � ,,�,�1, �� .��� � � - .,,� �
� ';� 9 ! � 1,� �"��� �
� �r �..�f. � � � � ' �� � �
� ' !'y ' i,r� �,: I�',
c ' , , , � � i �
o L:y. L�-I ��_.. .."��� �� ��-;
'� �I� r�
� ioo �� ..�,
w -;•F-�- � , j a , _. _ .��,.. � � ��, -
�� f - .�� -'.�� � � -
- --�.. _ _ `i� . � - -
, �_� ,.�,t
_ - � � ',''3s,._ `-:�;�;.
' 95
i
i
•1/
�, ,
i. -..>�i._..- �:
90 i "; � t . ^�r.p, 'F3` �", '" . .-c-f '" 4
q � � .' I 1
,.� n :r. rr`j^s� �'� e '` '
.;S � if�Ii �. � �A 1
�,_+ "�M k� .,'i�'� { ��r�� � ' , , arl.,i'% y f ..�� �� � .. I . _ � '_
+� k -. � . ' J � r �;, �. � �. � �
B5
D 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Horizontal Distance (R)
Summar Data
Bankfull Cross Secrional Area 5s.z
Bankfull Width 3s.o
Bankfull Mean De th 1•7
Bankfull Max De th 4.2
Width/De th Ratio 21
Entrenchment Ratio � •s
Classification --
- Title Cross Section
� Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Pr'ojeCt # 011795008
- Project W�Ikes County, NC
r� Figure 15
- I��cosystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
......,. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Main Reach 6- Station 051+00
�
- T�\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resullsy0.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
c_n.���.

ModiCed Wolman Pebble Count - Riffle
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Aggregate Bed Bank
Pebbles Item •/. Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles ltem % Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 5 4.72 4.72 0 0.00 0.00 5 12.50 12.50
10° - 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 0 0.00 4.72
Fine Sand 0.13 025 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
eo Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
/RIIIIeWlnterl001(PC) CoarSeSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
eo Ver,� Coarse Sand 1 2 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 7 6.60 11.32 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 12.50
io
Fine Gravel 4 6 9 8.49 19.81 4 6.06 6.06 7 17.50 30.00
c Fine Gravel 6 8 12 11.32 31.13 10 15.15 2121 5 12.50 42.50
IL
� Medium Gravei 6 11 12 11.32 42.45 5 7.58 28.79 2 5.00 47.50
� 80
Medium Gravel 11 16 19 17.92 60.38 15 22.73 51.52 7 17.50 65.00
° Coarse Gravel 16 22 14 13.21 73.58 � � 16.67 68.18 4 10.00 75.00
so - e�m� eeavnma«ooa mc� CoarSe Gravel 22 32 17 16.04 89.62 � 1 16.67 84.85 3 7.50 82.50
VeryCoarseGravel 32 45 6 5.66 9528 5 �.58 92.42 6 15.00 97.50
�o VeryCoarseGravel 45 64 5 4.72 100.00 5 7.58 100.00 1 2.50 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
30 - MediumCobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�� Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00
0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
/RMIe�BanMWlnter]00�(PC) Srr�IlBouldet 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
am o, , ,o ,oa ,000 ,oaoo
Totals tos 66 ao
Partiele Size (mm) D16 (rtvn) D35 (mm) D50 (mm) D84 (rtvn) D9S (mm) % Silb Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
4.9 9.1 13.3 28J 44.4 4J 0 953 0 0 0
Modi�ed Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
P✓iaterials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SiIVCIay 0 0.062 30 53.57 53.57 19 43.18 43.18 11 91.67 91.67
ioo V.;ry Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 2 3.57 57.14 2 4.55 47.73 0 0.00 91.67
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 2 3.57 60.71 2 4.55 5227 0 0.00 91.67
eo �� kedium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 60.71 0 0.00 52.27 0 0.00 91.67
�aooivama�zoo�tvc� CoarseSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 60.71 0 0.00 5227 0 0.00 91.67
eo Ver� Coarse Sand 1 2 0 0.00 60.71 0 0.00 52.27 0 0.00 91.67
c Ve�y Fine Gravel 2 4 2 3.57 64.29 2 4.55 56.82 0 0.00 91.67
�o
fine Gravel 4 6 0 0.00 64.29 0 0.00 56.82 0 0.00 91.67
c i Fine Gravel 6 8 1 1.79 66.07 1 227 59.09 0 0.00 91.67
LL
c I Medium Gravel 8 11 8 14.29 80.36 8 18.18 77.27 0 0.00 91.67
� eo
d
� Medium Gravel 11 16 6 10.71 91.07 5 11.36 88.64 1 8.33 100.00
a Cuarse Gravel 16 22 3 5.36 96.43 3 6.82 95.45 0 0.00 100.00
so - �
eooFeeammer2ow(pcJ CoarSeGtavel 22 32 2 3.57 100.00 2 4.55 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I Very Coarse Gravei 32 45 0 0.00 t 00.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o � Very Coarse Gravet 45 64 0 0.00 t00.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
� �mall Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o i Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Verr Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
/POO48ankWlnter1001(PC) Srtrall Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 MediumBOUlder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I 4�rge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om oi i io tno to0o ia000
Totals s6 aa iz
Partiele Size (mm) D16 (rmn) D35 (rrnn) D50 (rtvn) D84 (rtvn) D95 (mm) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.02 0.04 0.06 12.9 20.8 53.6 7..1 393 0 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration I'roject Project # 0 1 1 795008
Project W��kes County, NC
�� Figure 16
F,anystcm Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
..-... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Main Reach 6- Station 051+00
T:\p�\OI ll95011�rtionitoring\year0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
���ik.

�
�
Moditied Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Reach RifFle Pool
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 35 21.60 21.60 5 4.72 4.72 30 53.57 53.57
� oa
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 2 1.23 22.84 0 0.00 4.72 2 3.57 57.14
Fine Sand 0.13 025 2 1.23 24.07 0 0.00 4.72 2 3.57 60.71
eo I�tedium Sand 025 0.5 0 0.00 24.07 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 60.71
�rtearnwn�mnao��aq CoarSeSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 24.07 0 0.00 4J2 0 0.00 60.71
ea Very Coarse Sand 1 2 0 0.00 24.07 0 0.00 4.72 0 0.00 60.71
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 9 5.56 29.63 7 6.60 11.32 2 3.57 64.29
,a Fine Gravel 4 6 9 5.56 35.19 9 8.49 19.81 0 0.00 6429
d
s Fine Gravel 6 8 13 8.02 4321 12 11.32 31.13 1 1.79 66.07
�
c Medium Gravel 8 11 20 12.35 55.56 12 11.32 42.45 8 14.29 80.36
U 60
v Medium Grave� 11 16 25 15.43 70.99 19 17.92 60.38 6 10.71 91.07
� Coarse Gravel 16 22 17 10.49 81.48 14 13.21 73.58 3 5.36 96.43
so rooimma�aoo�cvc� Co2r5eGravel 22 32 19 11.73 9321 17 16.04 89.62 2 3.57 100.00
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 6 3.70 96.91 6 5.66 95.28 0 0.00 100.00
�o Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 5 3.09 100.00 5 4.72 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
za
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦R�mew�re,sowcvc� Srtall Boulde� 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om oi i ia �oo iooa ioauo
Totals w6 56
Paititla Size (mm) Dl6 (rton) D35 (nm�) D50 (rtvn) D84 (mm) D95 (rmn) ". o SiIU Clay % Ssnd % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
Representative Photos
�C�y �'� ��� -
�r �..�,yw •,;:� �'" . ._ __
I `. •� �" ''�'3 l4K,�.° `'k✓ °u'.. 14 . . ... '
�egy �
� » ' ;1 %/��,�. � , _ -
N r� �
� ��6 ..
f ..{ if• h'++l"2:��1 f� ' J T' � _ i , _ ,�l . -�..�
%v' .�¢'.. . . y'�" � 'I
. ¢*e( � ' ` F � w �
�' p� J- ' : ,n
, f �: p '°r �: . ✓ `� '�'Y�!�+ -,
�e a,�
a /
r.. 1it _ -. �-e^`�+�1-.�e+�'-�.� 9
.., �.-. .,` -�+�+'v _�
"�4i��, .. . . '..� �v,'�
� �7���. � � �� ' ?
� ���' - _�'' �„ .� �'�' � ` d
_ '.,'- '�*�`- � - .
�„ � ' � a�"� `
- _ = - .� .�
_ �"�-- ; �- � � .
- � _ !�,_ - :�- _.
:� h, ,
� � - - � �,. -^�� �
- :s� : '� ��.
:<¢,• - ..�: i
� �` _ `".+-�. _ �;"
n.
it� � e.- - _ - - ' --' __i��r=
_ ,�M1�^ _ _ '���'_- _ ' ..,�,,y�_
- w,o...,:" - � •� - � _' �'
i �►
yk� �� ti'x,
• -
� Title Pebble Counts
- Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Pr'ojeCt # Ol 1795008
Project W�Ikes County, NC Fi ure 17
� �, g
I',cx�syste�u Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
� ...... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Main Reach 6- Station 051+00
�
�
• T�\pn\01179SOII�monitoring\year0\purleaz_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc
I -
Repared by Andrew Kiley
con.���

Ve etation Transect Data Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 100 m2
Live Stakes'
Scientific Name Common Name Count % or Scientific Name Common Name Count %�f
Sam le Sam le
Betula nigra River birch Plalanus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya cordiformis Bitternut hickory Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut oak
Carya ovata Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Quercus phellos Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumardii Shumard oak
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash Snlix nigrn Black willow
Nyssa sylvntica Blackgum Tilia heterophylla White basswood
a'
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood , �' t
/ i \ Y4 !' '�q � L I� il � �� { ..'( �`Y� \ , %- ,� ,� /r r,j. .:,
j !
Estimated Live Stake Plantings — Initiai Live Stake Monitoring Requirements -- Total Live Stakes Observed 36 ,:,� 1;�ql N� �� �� i l� �� �� ;;�.� i �;� ��
Bare Roots� � � ��� � ��r� � ,���i �� �, � � y �;j�',, , I � ��� ' ,�'i r'�. � �,
%or , ; ,, ' .-_' '', ' ` 1 • ' � � : �f •
Scientific Name Common Name Count %of Scientific Name Common Name Count `! �' ;�" � r��. • J,-�+ 'I / �
Sam le Sam le / � t ���� y � I � � � % � �� ; ', �� I _
Acer,/loridanum Southern sugar maple Leucothoe nxillaris Doghobble � J �� � � < \
� � � �� � �i � I J �y ;'' � ' �� 1�;
Aesculus sylvalica Painted buckeye Lindera benzoin Spicebush �:� '' i� F � •
��, t��� �j� � �
Alnus serrulntn Tag alder Lyonia liguslrina Male-berry . �
i � , �'' ;� :i .
Ame/anchier ar6orea Serviceberry Magnolia tripetala Umbrella tree ,� 1�' � �� ' �! i , � i
Aronia arbutifolia Red chokeberry Morus ru6ra Red mulberry i�'• T��t � � ' i �
Asimina trilobn Common pawpaw Physocarpus opulrfolius Ninebark � ' � I'4 r �� _
Rho�lortendron — , r �
!
Calycanthus floridus Sweet-shrub ericl menoides W>>d azalea , - � ' '� + . ,� • ;,. -
Cephalanthus occidentalis E3uttonbush Rhodo�len�lron viscosum Swamp azalea � I. '�
: i f _t
Cornus alternifolia Altemate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose ' -� ' � �_ _
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Salix sericea Silky willow ..
Corylus americana Hazel-nut Staphylea trifolia Bladdemut i ., � ,- ���;
Hnmamelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewartia malacodendron Silky camellia P�-r `� �� . � ,:` .-. ' a +=`, r�r� �� `�"' — ..'
_��k ' � : ' ��7.;:
Hibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow Symplocos tinctoria Sweet leaf `5��1;:'��'?, "�`� r :,, r,; w� �, n,v
Ilex decidun Deciduous holly Viburnum cassinoides Withe-rod i ^ '_ �,� � -�'p�£ �
�i � ,;�'A��' Uc..*.� .�; � ; .�.Y�► � y�. '�`�"�,
� _ p ,�;z+� 'S� �zy `
/!ex vertici!latn Winter berry Viburnum dentatum Sou[hern arrow-wood �'; `��"-�y u� r T* fir -±�— �. ;!, a����"�`"+-}�'p, r� : �
ltea virginica Virginia willow Xanthorhiza simplicissima Yellow-root " 4��'- '�,e�;,�t .� w�� _, �� � s[. ;�II�^` �
�,n^�.y�te ; TP-��r �:tt�b.0 ..i� .��,`�"','o'!Y"i"'�i�,�.r;> ^R.hs�'�ti:�`" rt; -
7 - .... ; . .
Estimated Bare Root Plantings — Initial Bare Root ��lonitoring Requirements — Total Bare Roots Observed 16 "`� .,, ` �,,�"' '�y � n., .
Total Estimated Plantings — Year 3 Monitorin; Requirements 8 Total Plants Observed 52 Mp ��"",.. � ""' ' � p �
•i '^' . t� y G:'�.Ri�'s y'�i�' � ..:r ' �'O ' ^ ^�� �r
Ground Cover . `i • ' t ,r .��, y r y'a:'* ,� �� , ' * , , ��
"'J� .r )^���* e�� �� ` ;� � � _�a,r' .
Scientific Name Common Name Scienti�c Name Common Nanie ""� r� '�'°"' r& a:� � �
' rrq .: � J l�*,��,r�,.�M- i�� ,�������a� "�,� �3� ��
� ��� , -`�4,. ,�-�..
� `d.. i.. .�'t�'Y`., • `"'�a-. �:.� t,.,. � .l ��... -a �,' ,�.a�, �4 . .y w';; .jF•'�- � -i�"K► �.r�� .iir
Y �
f � � � '
.s+s 4.' � +d � .-d" .r R5- • � �. �} .'• e'-� .v �"i ;:: y,� ;�.� , . "" ' � f _ �- �', ` .
j` _k :2 �. .. � � .. � i'.b�� `f�F�� � �,� �,�:;'S` 'A �1r�; { '�'� 'M.�
��s �` , �," ��y'/ .lp, `. a dgail�rtf� � �!R ,,.wtL�����__'Sc,���;y
f+ . �i0 .� � •�b { �' . � � � �C
Percent Cover 82 � , � �f ��uA��Mi���? ��i+°_;n.�.yr,�,,%'+?�Mrv� �`,� F�i'!� ro� Y Y! �'a�y...�''Fa e! r ����se: ._, � �^�'���,itA�� +r��ti��
Recruitment
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Count --
Notes
� Identification of species not possible due to season — winter - of initial assessment
Title Vegetation
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration 1'roject Project # O1 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 18
]��� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
�,�::. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F Anl Kile ; lan W��i; 1an Clint�n; NCSU Lowcr Mzin Reach �- Stati�n �51+00
T:\pn\Ol 179501 I�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_nx>nitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepazed by Ardrew Kiley ��n +�rs��.ur

�
� Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
�
• 1�/inter 20Q4
� 1�� Riffle w-a� Pooi w-a�
� � ,� -���,__� � I �
� �...r 1 � � I � � � - I � --�---� --- � C H
• i 122 _ I � �ti�,_i . L`
Q`' - - - �
- 121 � �- � _ -AS-BuiltCauaL'me
�-+ �
� � , ,�-8���� ��
• iii 120 I I �` - -� _ � ~ ' � . � _ _ p �,n� ��� �«
�A� 1 19 �` � � _ �j,� M�,��«�� ��Nam� r+oei�
• _ � J As-Buih Io-Stream SmrcNres
V,/ I I � Functional
• W 118 � � _ � s,�um
117 I I � Faiirg
- Maoibring Qoss Sation
- Pool
116 --R�fle
�;b� �«o ���
� 115 � �I�CF a ��
- 0 100 200 300
� Riffle
• Stati o n( ft} � ���h00
• �
��,
� Benchmark LOri itudinal Surve Data
Water Water Water
Station Chan�el Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Feature
� 0 122.22
- 1 122.38
24 122.23
- 72 123.43
74 121.8 121.96
� 76 119.27 120.94
- 93 120.79 120.94
106 ] 20.71 120.89
- 125 122.13
128 120.63 120.76
� 174 120.59 121.97
- 175 120.43
176 118.54
� 187 119.09
188 119.14
� 216 119.07 119.075 120.12
- 217 117.56 118.83
225 118.36 118.76
� 228 118.62 118.75
- 243 118.59 120.31
244 118.67
- 249 118.41 Profile Summar
261 11834 Bankfull Slo e o�o�g Riffle Slo e --
� 265 118.22 118.51 119.39 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
- Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin 71
Pool Len th � 3 Low Bank Hei h
- Max Rif�le De th -- Max Run De th --
M x a.l --
� Title Longitudinal Profile
- Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # 011795008
Project W�Ikes County, NC Fi ure 19
� �' g
l�;cotiystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
� •.. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tributar 2- Station 103+00
�
�
- T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resul[s�9.doc
I -
Repared by Andrew Kiley
CCC1 „�,� �

Surve Data Cross Section - Riffle
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 0 124.29
8.73 0 124.06
12.03 0 123.94
16.87 0 123.58
19.99 0 123.39 BKF
26.63 0 121.95
28.05 0 122.47
31.26 0 122.78
34.45 0 123.3 BKF
37.55 0 123.73 �Orountl Points �BanIQW� Intlicators �Water Surtace Paints
42.� 0 124.01 YbkF - 9.# Dbkf �.4 Rbkf - 3.7
48.53 0 124.03 t 35 � ^ ~ � - " - -
, , ,, . .
66.34 0 124.53 � � { �
l, - , � u� ���',���:
;s'� � � �� , _ - _
. - -� ii:
�,�,:.
,ao � 1 �
c - ' i �• !' �ti y Sr°�- . _. �;��
�'� �--" �-c.,,.�//: . � �\ ' ..�! t'1 � •.� .a+�� ✓'�.
� � , � , _\'+;,�'. 1 j � 1 � 7 �. . I� . `� .
C � �/ ` `ie'fi - - i � � ��� � " ' / � � i.
O _ � f �� t. : }. '` °d
j 725 _ . � � � �. �+�.,ee'� _
W b "���.J. . � . �' -
�.. . .� � .1 _ - . . - . I ' � I �. ; :e
_ , ' �SS..j` . .. / " . �'p h �. ' ; � . _.' , , _ I
... cµ . . '.♦ � � � .. . . .. ' ".�.�,.
�� Y � �
720- ba.4'+.1 '�,'�' - r ���f�rn '. i• � �.�� �i�� ' .� ...�'e�.'{'� * 1 .r -. � �', . � .. � `,R: p .t
-rS:,k � '.� " �iikl�h� '�i+ � y,,;: - vr �x�{�����} �.� �r � z • -:� '•' a z�.,�`�
���x' 4-�tr� ai' '. �_"�,-". y n.�� �`E4,� . _ ..,o +Mr,,:T � : t'�'r� _.t'�:c,
`��� a �.
r. .�tnl � - �a . �.., .:�f"� `�' . .� ,,,+e1a �S � � °'.�-.x�.A^a- .1!x;.=`,
, .; ♦ w
�� . ° �1' .?�3" � r' ` ' ° r . � . �1ra�j,',^r°c y t4- .
k k .`. � �Y ,��
�i�� a�. �`:E ^� � � . ,- . �. } ` :, � i �s
115 s �,�ry�:.r., . ._ , �4"� .�Cti:� e�r� .
;k-? �,� ` .:� .'.. ,,1�L,�, �,;;"i?. we..'
r.., t ,'yyy °'-'v
:` � , � f
k . � � �� �'�h ,
.
- : �:..
'� �":'k s t �a'�� �`��� ti���
�^ _ ` i.. .. , ti "�.` ��'��'�',
.
#� � {,� r - '" ` � ; -� : • m , :�, * a$'�`', Q
,'-;^. .. ,.. �"�°�` : ,�, . ,,,g � �:, � ,� " -z
, , �y
� �.:, ., � o� � ''' - , + �� `"'
110 . ,�. �.. � `y-= i , �.+�. ?*- t. j... � ,� �,��' � � ., .
o io zo ao �o eo so �o so so �oo , x'+ts'�` '+��' , ,'`"; � �- �'s�°� � . ���,t� � *i
,. ;,� '#�, � d�� `�i! '� `c'= , _ , �r � , f' ' �. . 4. ;
�:.� .
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 3.7
Bankfull Width 9.a
Bankfull Mean De th o.4
Bankfull Max De th o.9
Width/De th Ratio Z4
Entrenchment Ratio Z•6
Classification �
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration I'roject Project # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 20
�� Surve Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
F,cc�s�sten� Y
....,_.. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tributa 2- Station ]03+00
T:\pn\01179501 I\monitoring\year0�purlear_creek_rtanitoring_rcsultsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley
�� .n�m..iK
�
�
�
-
-

�
• Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
� Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
- Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 o t22.�� o
- 2.06 0 122.77 2.06
- 2.77 0 122.76 2.77
10.93 0 122.52 10.93
12.22 0 122.52 12.22
- 14.32 0 122.54 14.32
15.34 0 122.25 1534
- 17.78 0 122.13 17.78
23.11 0 121.77 23.11
- 26.1 0 121.44 26.1 OOround Points �ean�uuu mdicators �Water Surtace Points
30.97 � i2�.%4 30.97 YbkF - 13.7 DDkf �.6 flbkf - 7.6
32.36 0 120.5 32.36 135 ��
- 33 0 120.82 33 �{'
- 33.38 0 121.28 33.38 ,
35.27 0 121.82 35.27 � � r
�'--- ' "�1 V. � � ' � '
- 37.I6 0 122.3 37.I6 , 11�! �..,
i
- 41.03 0 122.23 41.03 � � � - ' • ,
130
54.07 0 122.58 54.07 ' -
- A7.�, � ,� a,:�Y, i ,; i
_. l , .�. ; .,
- b{ r -i lr
� �' ; I'.
c t
O
� 125
> °
W ��. � - �
_ �-._ . , ,� , .
- W � . _ '�!.. .,. _ ...-1.. ..,.. _
- a��; � .. Y � .:! f i ��'W'�,-'+, g.� : _ �
� . � �y -i k���'4� �'4� z.:� ,��:T• ,�M1r"J �.'�, ,. yay` ♦�,,, � �- - F
- �zo �� k Y � � '.`" � . '+�.� .�'� �,�` ;" :��. �'a,� �,�s.�t �
� � .r � ; ,���� - � ,,
- _; a '� � �� �: �r5 ,� � �.������,��'
t M1� .r., s��~ A' _�..� � ti ��'wA.., �� . "� � ,�t�. "''"'F.��S'^'T.y
� i� � � . �� r, ,� � t -,,,
� ^ �
- ,t ii� � �� � .� " . 1 7<'..�. i '�
�r fkt- �'Y.�C K.s�i.... � . ,
- �� +i Y 9 lT � f� I t) . _ . f �.. s �.
. .� { ,..i. 1 .� � , � . f ..\ ,y1' �C r .
+,y .- � h Y c v.�, ♦. y r
i '� � ��� � �^ �}` � � . i•...�' �. '..+►. ' u- � 1
• 115 �;,P�' ^� . : _ v� :�. _ •.,� ' � .
i w y •'� =,ry-s
� _-' y i �
� -, �� ,� .��=rw.�.��� � "� �r-.� -��,;, l�i;
� -. .
- l.,i . _ � { *.e-`ia'��. ,_.j �,,, �,a�,ry t'� I �� �� • s'Y•_� . ��; �_ y� �y.�,�iY
' Y�4+ti+� F . . _ 9F '
� �� � � �ti°� .ti � f' �' .
� , ti . a_' + x -- y+'"a, r ��t _ + r � f � . , _ `'� `+i . a.
„x� - .r.;�t �y, i,' �� . � �,J�s •+�. � f� / �:� �� ,,
- .� . ���"�y^ ,$•�, �`r'•+'✓ S,v�'.,i � `r^ R�`+� :� r,crau+.•, t � e �., ;- �. _ c,
ts � r _.}i"� �a���N �Y.tix.�.'�F1u'l�F,�.��� � _.�t�� ;� � .. . �` .�.�Syy� � �
- 110 yY ^� '� 'r� � � ' �.,�+ ` y , ,� -�h � ��' ° �,.+ : ��� �".' �,y �
.. � r�� 4`", e .R � . � :
- 0 10 20 30 !0 50 6� 70 BO 90 100 L _ � `� '� ��� � � ��. � �.'� ��� .; �y,��;�xx� ' , ..
_ s n�' , r.a .a'y y�� ._e ,' r_
/.. ��<, -r.`�rM'z�9 rb "� ':�'-�� !�'i��. ��ijW.�.,: �._
.Y _ 4.6r.�L.�i�.V�1�Q��. .n�A�� `e�s'�k'0 _
- Horizontal Distance (R)
�
- Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 7.6
� Bankfull Width � 3. �
- Bankfull Mean De th .6
Bankfull Max De th i.3
� Width/De th Ratio 23
- Entrenchment Ratio 4•�
- Classification --
TiNe Cross Section
� Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 21
• r�
- 1'�cosystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tribut 2- Station 103+00
�
- T:\pn\01179501 i�monitonng\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resWtsyO.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
CC/1 �.�

Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Riffle
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbies Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum •/. Pebbles Item % Cum •/.
Riffle Winter 2004 siivCiay o z3 z� 5a.00 sa.00 a 20.00 20.0o zs �s.s� �s.s�
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 3 6.00 60.00 0 0.00 20.00 3 10.00 86.67
,00
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 1 2.00 62.00 0 0.00 20.00 1 3.33 90.00
Medium Sand 025 0.5 0 0.00 62.00 0 0.00 20.00 0 0.00 90.00
ao Coarse Sand 0.5 1 3 6.00 68.00 3 15.00 35.00 0 0.00 90.00
/a�mevrmb�aoa��vc� VeryCoarseSand 1 2 4 8.00 76.00 2 10.00 45.00 2 6.67 96.67
eo Very Fine Gravel 2 4 2 4.00 80.00 2 10.00 55.00 0 0.00 96.67
Fine Gravel 4 6 3 6.00 86.00 3 15.00 70.00 0 0.00 96.67
;, ,o �ine Gravel 6 8 4 8.00 94.00 4 20.00 90.00 0 0.00 96.67
ii Medium Gravel 8 11 2 4.00 98.00 2 10.00 100.00 0 0.00 96.67
� fia Medium Grave� 11 16 0 0.00 96.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 96.67
:+ Coarse Gravel 16 22 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 96.67
a
Cnarse Gravel 22 32 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 96.67
5o aime-eea w�mer �oo� �PC�
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 1 2.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 1 3.33 100.00
Very Coarse Grevel 45 64 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�� Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
'o Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�� Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦ R�me-eanx �^n�ie� zoo< �vc�
Small Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
,o MediumBoulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
l.;irge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om oi � io ioo moo +oaoo '(`Ota�S 50 20 30
Partitle Size (mmj D16 (rmn) D35 (mm) D50 (rrvn) D84 (rmn) D95 (nmi) % Sild Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
OA2 0.04 0.06 5.13 8.83 54 22 24 0 0 0
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materia;s Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
Iviaterials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Ifem % Cum °/. Pebbles Item % Cum %
Pool Winter 2004 Silt/Clay 0 0.062 19 38.00 38.00 4 11.43 11.43 15 100.00 100.00
Ve:ry Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 3 6.00 44.00 3 8.57 20.00 0 0.00 100.00
10° Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 4 8.00 52.00 4 11.43 31.43 0 0.00 100.00
Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 � 0.00 52.00 0 0.00 31.43 0 0.00 100.00
9� i C;oarseSand 0.5 1 �5 30.00 82.00 15 42.86 74.29 0 0.00 100.00
ivoo�m���aoo�cPC� VeryCoarseSand 1 2 3 6.00 88.00 3 8.57 82.86 0 0.00 100.00
eo Vey Fine Gravel 2 4 3 6.00 94.00 3 8.57 91.43 0 0.00 100.00
-ine Gravel 4 6 2 4.00 98.00 2 5.71 97.14 0 0.00 100.00
� ,o =ine Gravel 6 8 � 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 97.14 0 0.00 100.00
ii Madium Grevel 8 11 � 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 97.14 0 0.00 100.00
� fio M�dium Grevel 11 16 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 97.14 0 0.00 100.00
� C�arse Gravel 16 22 � 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 97.14 0 0.00 100.00
Coarse Gravel 22 32 � 2.00 100.00 1 2.86 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
so , eooFeeew�ma�aoo� �c7
j Ve� Coarse Gravel 32 45 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o i Ve� Coarse Gravel 45 64 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
M�:dium Cobble 90 128 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I Ver� Large Cobble 180 256 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
zo
�mall Boulder 256 362 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�eooFSa�km�mrzoo�eac� �rteill BOUlder 362 512 � 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
io
Mrdium Boulder 512 1024 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 10 . 0
I
L3rge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° i Ven� Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
am o� i io vo �uoo iaaoa
Totals so 3s t s
Par6tle Size (mm) Dt 6(tmn) D35 (mm) D50 (rtvn) D84 (rtvn) D95 (rtvn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.03 0.06 03 13 4.4 38 SO I2 0 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project Wilkes County, NC Figure 22
�� Surve Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
I�;cosystem Y
•,.- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tributa 2- Station 103+00
T: \pn\Ol I"79501 I�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Ar.drew Kiley
��n ,�a�.aiM

�
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Reach RifOe Pool
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 46 46.00 46.00 27 54.00 54.00 19 38.00 38.00
10° Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 6 6.00 52.00 3 6.00 60.00 3 6.00 44.00
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 5 5.00 57.00 1 2.00 62.00 4 8.00 52.00
� Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 57.00 0 0.00 62.00 0 0.00 52.00
�aa.�nw�m.,aowmc� CoareeSand 0.5 1 18 18.00 75.00 3 6.00 68.00 15 30.00 82_00
� Very Coarse Sand 1 2 7 7.00 82.00 4 8.00 76.00 3 6.00 88.00
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 5 5.00 87.00 2 4.00 80.00 3 6.00 94.00
�o Fine Gravel 4 6 5 5.00 92.00 3 6.00 86.00 2 4.00 98.00
c Fine Gravel 6 8 4 4.00 96.00 4 8.00 94.00 0 0.00 98.00
�
� Medium Gravel 8 11 2 2.00 98.00 2 4.00 98.00 0 0.00 98.00
� BO
u Medium Gravel 11 16 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 98.00
� Coarse Gravei 16 22 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 98.00 0 0.00 98.00
zo e�memma�zoo��vc> Coa�seGravel 22 32 1 1.00 99.00 0 0.00 98.00 1 2.00 100.00
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 1 1.00 100.00 1 2.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3a Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 160 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
=o Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
/PaolWinle��00�(PC) Srt�llBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10
Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
L2rge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
am o.i � +o iaa iaoa m000
Totals �oo so so
Particla Siza (mm) DI6 (rtrtn) D35 (rtan) D50 (=rnn) D84 (mm) D95 (mm) °6 SiIU Clay % Sand % Cnavel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.02 0.05 0.1 2.8 7.4 46 36 18 0 0 0
Representative Photos
� ��'+�' �' _.' X_ _ .. 3 �r tfa� �. 74���',�«J4."�*h,i . .'4 ." +i�("�ja'�!.�' ��.A:
'"- ` � 1.. ✓✓ � � � �p ti� �y;,. .� .,����k'i.� ; .�,�+ �3.� `Tt � 9�i�'•�'� ��
, ,�, t ;�,��.s��.�.� ;�`�,�.� �,�,:��,,, ,_���„� , �
�'�'�'' . �1 -. � � . r : � � r: _�._ ,:; �
t` , + > � 4 �r- :. "'� .�1� q k� �.� ?�� �r ����.�
� � � � r�f . .< . � .• � r a �;� �._e•. � �� r .Yr �.���.`^'�%'}_SJ�. k � i��. �' � �� ✓ � . ..
� . ,{� � S\
� � r t � "� f� ` e t,�' �; ..�.^ti]� '+. (rt a d ;.. ,:, s�lfi�„� .� ,
�`�� �f. � . .a+ � ) � � � A , �'r ��'� Z,�'��1� �'�( �' "��,� ��.`bA��.1$�':... .� .��,.�r
<<� i.; ; �� _;t � �� . F `' . ,� • � �. .;��Y � '��tr`.� -��O �; i��� ��^� s� ;f��+. � . ' 1;' e .�c� � y .. ' � �`;' ,� ��� �'�f, �it ..����.^,
�FaI _ � . � ..fiuF t' �� � � - � i "``�v -. " }'.�+ ry �'�. �yp'� ��.1,� � �`�' �
.
,
u� ' ,h� ns� ,�! ji .
�(�' r-; _" ��r �j/Y ``� , I � 4, .. �: .1V'� a�'�.. '� r ��.ir w i��,� !�� ��' �,;��, �r���_�,
� � �... �Z: ,. t , � `l,, n,,.4� ti-h. w , t � t . � � � . .� y "� .� � r i �, +�:
^4y 4 . 1 . _ C . . ,,,;w! vSA.. �S'� �i � 'cd �'... q `�- f _�+4 � i�
� .��' ,� `\ �,i' n,iM��•. �. ��� •-� � �
.�� jr � � ...1�,�'. � - t , . � �`� vi. y�. , " °�' .a,qP ,_+?���i,.,�����-i - '"►, �►1!t�Y .
: �' � � � �*r �+�, �� r_� ' -: ,T .-. `i` '� . � � . 1j�.a . : ��� '��;''�� .
'r� r ' <, : 1 .� ` `�^' � �. L � . .� `. � ,�,.,� ����..
�.. �„ar,X�.� ` _ , � � �t � � ��� � � `�y� � ����, � r � � '��' �
� �i 1re�+`�i ° �� �L � , � ` w4.J ,.+ 1 w „In :!� � r � fQ�-� . � '�lr����yry�'� 1 1 � ,.
� ii * . C A J aC O ,ij''= `�` . _i' � ^ ` �` "'C� � �t� �l. ., �F �.' �p ��!r� ._ �•�<� pyp,� �.Al:( Y�, . r�,:
," �F 9 ' � . �1� '� .n..t ,-. .� t�, � �'.i t - �m'y�� �, •.�; .
�� � � � �p^°� "' � _ `y �% � �� � ,,��' � i -� t, �°",+
�1•;.� . j�'� � , h ��' .. . _ . �,� D �"'1h J�. �1 ,. ,,.�'., � � �i..
;��� f,i E � . :. ��. . -, r, , ,� 4 :�'•� :� , .1; �� � �
� �, �=�o � '��:� ,,; ,1 '� � ^� :�, t �, , , ,::;� � >.
� �jr�i, a �,1 a � �, k �'°�,�,'� �y { �� Y � � _ �
c. �+� � '.a � .[� A � .r �,��+�! � �. � , 4� t. � �'. , Y Y�,�' Y,, .. � ' � �����
.���\� � .�. � _ � �. '�� , � � +� , � �.
# �„r t :.. K �w. I ? , . w j �, ..�`��
et�G" � � , "4 . � ( !�i �
/
�' � �:; � , - ' �c `Yr • li � � ",
` .'r '. � t. , • `- �. _. � �-:•�'�..- .�_ - � .
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Projeet # 011795008
Project W��kes County, NC Fi ure 23
r� g
: I',cosystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tribut 2- Station 103+00
�
�
- T:\pn\011795011\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc
-
Prepared by Mdrew Kiley
��� qrt�aw�
� w.w�u..u�

Ve etation Transect Data
Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 100 m2
Live Stakes'
Scientific Name Common Name Count % or Scientific Name Common Name Count % of
Sam le Sam le
Betula nigra River birch Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya corttiformis E3i[temut hickory Quercus michatc.rii Swamp chestnut oak
Caryn ovata Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Quercus phellos Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumardii Shumard oak
Frazinus pennsylvanica Green ash Salix nigra Black willow
Nyssn sylvatica E3lackgum Tilia heterophylla White basswood
C.nrpinus caroliniana Ironwood
Estimated Live Stake Plantings — Initial Livc Stake Monitoring Requirements — Total Live Stakes Observed 37
Bare Roots' � �_ ,,
� f
Scientific Name Common Name Count % of Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le �.,j �,�� �' !''4•�'' +`
i �?i�
Sam le ,, � s
Acer floridanum Southern sugar maple Leucothoe nxillaris Doghobble / "'�'
Aesculus sylvatica Painted buckeye Lindera benzoin Spicebush �� � -
Alnus serrulata Tag alder Lyonia ligustrina Male-berry �~ -
r: ==^� ,; �..
Amelanchier arborea Serviceberry Magnolia tripetala Umbrella tree �. �^
Aronra nrbutifolia Red chokeberry Morus rubra Red mulberry �
Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark , 1i
CalycanthusJloridus Sweet-shrub Rhododendron Wildazalea ��`
eric! menoides
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Rhododendron viscosum Swamp azalea
Cornus alternifolia Altemate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose - _ _
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Snlix sericea Silky willow � � � ���,��
`r`���_��
C,orylus americana Hazel-nut Staphylea trifolia E3laddernut i- • �- „-�_ • - _� __ . -- ' t _--` - .-- - .i " � , � �
Hamamelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewartia malacodendron Silky camellia � "+' '� = _ . _ -. -
-_"2S� ai.:�� . .. ,�� _ 'f: .n�._ r'rw""Y"z+tr�.�..-� �* �i-.--:�� •- ;
�
Hibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow Symplocos tinctoria Sweet leaf .-i�� y`��,:.r��'�i�x '-=.4'� :.,�n,��
� . ���"' ' l • �
/!ex decidua Deciduous holly Viburnum cassinoides Withe-rod r "'' '. - , ~'� � _'�'�- � = t- � = •' �;.r- �'' "
- ,_` "' ', - � , - . i_ .,�
/lex verticillatn Winter berry Yiburnum dentatum Southem arrow-wood � , � �t � -'� , � : 1
� r„ � <-01�F 4 .r � . tl � �
Iten virginica Virginia willow Xanthorhizn simplicrssima Yellow-root � r�.x- � � �, -ti�; k�- ,� :_
�
R R+�'�'Z� � � +? � r x : � � �bklx -.�.� A"' .
,_ �y� . f. . . ��,y lR , ° r
'Tt,"�f���:,�:M�to-' f;•; � 9,M�� -. Y� '�' ��, '4 .1 .; .TV7 . s �' : �t� �Y
Estimated Bare Root Plantings -- Initial Bare Root Monitoring Requirements — Total Bare Roots Observed 24 'c:�� `� � � ��
� .
p .7 � Y�'e�4;��l��_ � :.---
Total Estimated Plantings -- Year 3 Monitoring Requirements 8 Total Plants Observed 61 '�''' yr A ,a` l , y� ,� s�a.�.�, r y _��
' v� � �Si���''= ,ct ."�' b �E � ���c=,f - � ..
Ground Cover � � — �.:
Scientific Hame Common Hame Scientific Name Common Name 2� ��'�""•n►�" ' k,.. � x` ;; -'�'��`�
s r . ��`�",��
' _ �'Y S °`'Y. r` -
t � �,-.. � �a�
i. � •�A�,
� � � ,�..� � � � ' � ' �
: FM1 y+��'ir�4�, T _ �,4�'� �� . _ t " •1tM
.' � _ - fi . � , . .
` .�, tii _' y' � ^?�V 1. ��' �a
Percent Cover 10 4�,��M�t� v r ����'�a"' � `"� '�
, - � �_ TYii+-�"' . ' ,Ac � ti. �r.c � . ....•,+iis.lillT. ,. . � �?�i�9t��'"i�l'�.:Ly. j'.- �
Recruitment
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Count
Notes
� Identification of species not possible due to season — winter - of initial assessment
Title Vegetation
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration f'roject ProjeCt # Ol 1795008
Project �y��kes County, NC Figure 24
�� Surve Date Surve Weather Field Team Location
l�,c��sysrem Y 3'
•,�.-�- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU U er Middle Tributa 2- Station 103+00
T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0�purlear_crcek_monitoring_resultsy0.dce Preparcd by Audrew Kilry ��� .d� �

�
� Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
�
� �lVi nt e r 2004 � �
- Riffle w-a� Pooi w-o�
•
---, ' I I �
• � -�-�{ ; �H
� �. ,,,� � �
• � -�-�_ �
- o _.�-��_� ��
� � � - ,�-Bw�� �Q �m�
� � As-Built Fas�mt
- � ~ - �� _ I - - Q Manuoring Vegetatim Plot
�7 � - �� �Mnrtwin6 [uogiwd'mal Aofilc
• �1' � � _ ~ ~ ~ � As-Buih Io-Sveam Smrctures
Y� I � Functional
W � �ress�
- q � • Faiirg
I I Monibriog Qoss Sation
- ' ' Pool
-- RNfie
Mmibring Photn Points
• � - a�F a ��
� G 1CU JDC� 3CC+ 1C1G �4G qCrG �GG � R�rne
����� V � � �� � Vegetaaon
• lJ
�
- Benchmark Lon itudinal Surve Data
Water Water Water
Station Channel Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel Surface Bankfull Top o( Bank Feature Station Chaonel Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Featurc
� 0 98.18 101.25 351 94.4 641 90.85 91.17
• 34 99.13 364 94.46 647 88.14
35 99.44 372 94.61 649 90.13
- 70 98.77 373 93.13 660 89.87 90.11
71 99.1 388 94.37
'i � 78 97.91 403 94.34 94.54
- 90 100.35 409 90.6
94 98.91 98.99 412 93.57
- 95 96.68 432 93.4
97 98.22 452 93.03 9334
� 126 97.76 98.12 456 94.84
- 127 99.45 478 92.84
133 97.83 98.09 489 94.1
- 134 99.64 493 92.84 93.15
184 97.61 97.71 498 92.4
� 185 96.42 499 90.2
- 186 95.82 517 9232
202 96.41 525 91.65 92.34
� 203 96.1 543 91.57
220 95.96 566 92.1 92.24
� 227 95.83 571 89.4
- 239 97.69 572 91.53 Profile Summar
240 95.53 96.32 584 91.25 Bankfull Slo e o.ois Riffle Slo e o.os
� 266 96.25 96.36 97.38 585 91.52 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
- 317 94.86 608 90.93 Glide Slo e ~ Pool S acin 13 �
331 94.4 613 91.29 Pool Len th �o Low Bank Hei h
� �6 Max Run De th
• 332 96.47 614 90.27 Max Rif�le De th --
h 4.4 --
� Title Longitudinal Profile
• Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project Wi�kes County, NC Fi ure 25
� �' g
j�;�Y������� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
� ..-..- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tribut - U er Section 3- Station 200+00
�
�
- T:\pn\011795011Uranitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.dce PreparedbyAnclrewKiley [�n,,,e�i,.,�,.�„,m�
-

Surve Data Cross Section - Riffle
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot — Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo — Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 101.49
4.86 l O l .24
15.35 99.33
20.63 98.37
23.83 97.87 LEW
26.68 97.72
31.04 97.82
32.37 97.99 REW
35.13 98.88
36.92 99.39 BKF �vround Points �ean�un inoicators �Water surtace Points
4�.4$ 99.35 ypgp - pg DDkF - 1 Rbkf - 19.2 .
4336 100.3 115 � _
, � .,,
46.42 l OL23 V`"`''
48.04 101.2 ` � ``�j✓ /'
y _ ��
; -
,, •'_ � %;i f
,u , ;�,,t ��°_ .,,: ,�
>>0 4;, - ,
,�. , ,
� . °l _
� �i ,�..
c
°— — � '1 = 2
j �
j 105 �'
w 1 _ -� - �
- - - ��r
_�� 1'k .
' n��: . M . � - � . �,r«
{, �,�x�.F:;,, 4 :�7'!�`�+ ^�,T .'t4 .? •.r -...,
�'ria. ` .�F�^ v�ri� i � . - , � ' .. r. .
' � '�!' - :A 1 � � _� 4 -w .� �..r�� �:x;� . .
700 �*,/�� - . - - . -
e � 1-
� . i
.i
► '
r
: ` . ,�. �
d �
95 .� �, �,,, �J� I
a. � -'� ..,.�.
°z 1
- �;�`.
�
� I w
�'• —
r•
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -
�s.=
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 19.2
Bankfull Width 20
Bankfull Mean De th � •o
Bankfull Max De th t.s
Width/De th Ratio ZI
Entrenchment Ratio 1 �g
Classification B
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 26
�� Surve Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
L��system Y
....•- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa — U er Section 3- Station 200+00
T:\pn\01179501I�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Preparcd by Aidrew Kiley G�n ��
� .d�.o�u:e�.

�
Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 99.13
8 98.23
15.45 97.54
20.17 95.78
24.21 94.2
25.06 93.87
26.91 93.6
30.17 93.8 BKF
32.04 93.1
33.19 9235 LEW poround Points �BanlAUll Indicators �Water Surtace Points
34.57 91.$$ Ybkf - 27.7 Dbkf -.9 RGkF - 2�
37 92.19 ��o
38.79 92.35 REW
41.96 92J9 '�,��;; ,,
46.43 93.41 - ar'-. ' j �
49.48 93.58 �'� '
52.92 93.96 �
105
58.88 94.54 -'
67.88 95.4 '
77.04 96.I8 � _ r:
82.08 96.59 �
;,
o �= . . �.�� 'i ' ,� � • ��
' �� �
:- ,
j t0o I 1 �.� � . . ... _ ' t , �i I . -
w �, "" -- ��'' -,.� -- •'%�' .Y« � � r � ._ _ '
_ . . , �,;.1-c' . . . I - ._. _�v=wJ:w �:
'
< � 1- �•ti.'- •� y-� �!
.
` � L a.4
95 + :tir �al ����4 - . _ - � . .r Y� - -
� s�rr�� .�a
,.� ;�7� {, =y
'� -
.,
> -
�. :.�,....
.
' .�w'�. r _ _,
+�,. -
.�- •�'� <
.
._
�� }�^ � ��,'�y o- .. C .
a� .�.�t
r d ^
90
� � i i.: �
. 4' � a�4 '.�.`r - '
.. _ .-iy.j�.. ,r � - -
- �t- . :`s� t�� � �'��
.�r+�,,., .. °<M-+�
�•� � t"': V�i _� .
B5
0 10 20 30 10 50 60 70 80 90 100
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summar Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area z4
Bankfull Width z7.7
Bankfull Mean De th o.9
Bankfull Max De th 2.4
Width/De th Ratio 32
Entrenchment Rario 2•2
Classification --
Title Cross Section
- Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # 0 1 1 795008
Project W;�kes County, NC Fi ure 27
�� Surve Date Surve Weather Field Team g Location
� l��Y»ytce»> y y
•. �•.• March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tribut - U er Section 3- Station 200+00
�
- 'I:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\pwlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc
•
Prepared by Amlrew Kiley
��n �r�
� .�ewoou�.r�.

Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Riffle
Materials Plot �9aterials Size Range (mm) Aggregate Bed Bank
Pebbles Item % Cum% Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item% Cum %
Riffle Winter 2004 SiiuCiay o o.os2 � tz.o� tz.o� o o.00 o.o0 7 31.82 3�.e2
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 1 1.72 13.79 0 0.00 0.00 1 4.55 36.36
10° Fine Sand 0.13 025 0 0.00 13.79 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 36.36
Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 13.79 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 36.36
eo Coarse Sand 0.5 1 0 0.00 13.79 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 36.36
�a�mavnma,aoo��c� VeryCo2rseSand 1 2 0 0.00 1379 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 36.36
ea Very Fine Gravel 2 4 0 0.00 13.79 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 36.36
Fine Gravei 4 6 5 8.62 22.41 3 8.33 8.33 2 9.09 45.45
� �o Fine Gravel 6 8 5 8.62 31.03 5 13.89 22.22 0 0.00 45.45
i� Medium Gravel 8 11 8 13.79 44.83 6 16.67 38.89 2 9.09 54.55
� fio _ Metlium Gravel 11 16 17 29.31 74.14 11 30.56 69.44 6 27.27 81.82
u Cuarse Gravel 16 22 5 8.62 82.76 4 11.11 80.56 1 4.55 86.36
a
Coarse Gravel 22 32 4 6.90 89.66 3 8.33 88.89 1 4.55 90.91
sa n�ma-eaa vame� zaa� cvc�
VeryCoarse Gravel 32 45 5 8.62 98.28 3 8.33 97.22 2 9.09 100.00
VeryCoarseGravel 45 64 1 1.72 100.00 1 2.78 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
.o
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
MediumCobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
'o L:�rge Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�0 Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
/RMIe�BankWln1er700�(PC) Sm2118oulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
+� Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o.oi o.i i io ioo moo i000a
TotalS 58 36 22
Partide Siza (mm) Dl6 (rmn) D35 (nvn) D50 (rtvn) D84 (rmn) D95 (rtvn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggre;ate Summary
4.4 9.0 12. I 24.3 40.1 12.1 1 J 862 0 0 0
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
P,laterials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SiIUCIay 0 0.062 6 10.53 10.53 0 0.00 0.00 6 16.22 1622
,00 VEry Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 1 1.75 1228 0 0.00 0.00 1 2.70 18.92
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 6 10.53 22.81 1 5.00 5.00 5 13.51 32.43
yo tiedium Sand 025 0.5 1 1.75 24.56 0 0.00 5.00 1 2.70 35.14
/rwivn�renoo��rc� GoarseSand 0.5 1 4 7A2 31.58 7 5.00 10.00 3 8.11 4324
80 Ver� Coarse Sand 1 2 6 10.53 42.11 5 25.00 35.00 1 2.70 45.95
Ve�y Fine Gravel 2 4 2 3.51 45.61 1 5.00 40.00 1 2.70 48.65
i=ine Grevel 4 6 5 8.77 54.39 2 10.00 50.00 3 8.11 56.76
ra
°1 i�ine Gravel 6 8 4 7.02 61.40 2 10.00 60.00 2 5.41 62.16
c
LL
M;dium Gravel 8 11 9 15.79 77.19 4 20.00 80.00 5 13.51 75.68
� b0
M•:dium Gravel 11 16 4 7.02 84.21 0 0.00 80.00 4 10.81 86.49
`u
°� C�arseGravel 16 22 3 526 89.47 0 0.00 80.00 3 8.11 94.59
5o vom-eeawm�e�aoo�cvc� C�2rseGravel 22 32 4 7.02 96.49 2 10.00 90.00 2 5.41 100.00
( Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 2 3.51 100.00 2 10.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�a Ve� Coarse Gravel 45 64 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
; £mall Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
� Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Ver� Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�� S�nall Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I /POOLBenkMlnter100�(PC) $rrallBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10
Mr.dium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Ven� Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om oi i io wo moa ia000
TOlB�S 57 20 37
Partiele Siza (mm) Dl6 (rrvn) D35 (rmn) D50 (`mn) D84 (rmn) D95 (mm) % SiW Clay ° o Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Bouldtt % Bed-rock
Aggrcgate Summary
01 13 4.9 15.9 30 10.5 31.6 57.9 0 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # 011795008
Project W�Ikes County, NC
�� Figure 28
1';crnystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
•-•- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa - U er Section 3- Station 200+00
Pr ared b Andrew Kiley ��n .���ma
T\pn\011795011�monitoring\yeaz0\pudear_creek_moniroring_resultsy0.doc eP Y

�
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Reach RifFle Pool
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles [tem % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
i oa
SilUClay 0 0.062 � 3 ���� � 1•� 7 12.07 12.07 6 10.53 10.53
Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 Z 1.74 13.04 � �.72 13.79 1 1.75 1228
. Fine Sand 0.13 025 6 522 1826 0 0.00 13.79 6 10.53 22.81
90
MediumSand 0.25 0.5 � 0�87 19�3 0 0.00 13.79 1 1.75 24.56
/aa��nrnmenoo��rq Co2rseSand 0.5 1 4 3.48 22.61
0 0.00 13.79 4 7.02 31.58
80 Very Coarse Sand 1 2 6 5.22 27.83 0 0.00 13.79 6 10.53 42.11
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 Z 1•�4 29.5� p 0.00 13.79 2 3.51 45.61
v
�o Fine Gravel 4 6 10 8.70 3826 5 8.62 22.41 5 8.77 54.39
� Fine Gravel 6 8 9 7.83 46.09 5 8.62 31.03 4 7.02 61.40
u ea Medium Gravel 8 11 17 14.78 60.87 g 13.79 44.83 9 15.79 77.19
; MediumGravei 11 16 2� 18.26 79.13 �7 29.31 74.14 4 7.02 8421
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 8 6.96 86.09 5 8.62 82.76 3 5.26 89.47
50 R�marame�zoo�tac� CparseGravel 22 32 8 s�� 93�� 4 6.90 89.66 4 7.02 96.49
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 7 6.09 99.13 5 8.62 98.28 2 3.51 100.00
�� VeryCoarseGravel 45 64 1 0.87 100.00 � �.72 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
20 Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦aooiw�ma�sooec�c> SrrallBoulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
io
Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Ven� Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
o.o, o., i io mo �000 ,0000
TOi81S 115 58 57
Partitle Size (mm) D16 (rmn) D35 (mm) D50 (rtan) D84 (nm�) D95 (mm) % SiIU Clay % Sand °o Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
� 01 5.1 89 20.6 36.2 113 16.5 721 0 0 0
Representative Photos
'f,
J
r: :'� . ,�..,..
� by;� ..t ' P� �d�.' �. 'i" ..1.
�� �''� ��. � h,
_ Tu`; - '� t ti
ry ^ S +� .
G .
.. _ ' �-. ��'r.' - .
.7��.t:. �" .. � ti' � -�� �.�b
.c `<:_
_• , �"'� �� ',�►"
- _ ..s 5�.�.•'-`/-
� . •
- +` L� ` s-- -+�--
� . ' -
) � h,, � �
��_ _ . ��h ... . .���r±c' � . 'i �(� . .�• �
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project W��kes County, NC
r� Figure 29
I�.a�system Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
•..,.. March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa - U er Section 3- Station 200+00
�
�
• T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc
.
Prepared by Mdrew Kiley
�
C �/1.��, k

Ve etation Transect Data
Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 100 m2
Live Stakes'
Scientific Name Common Name Count % of Scientific Name Common Name Count % of
Sam le Sam le
Betula nigra River birch Plalnnus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya cordijormis Bittemut hickory Quercus michauxii Swamp chesMut oak
Cnrya ovata Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Quercus phellos Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumnrdii Shumard oak
Fraxinus pennsylvanicn Green ash Salix nigra Black willow
Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum Tilia heterophylln White basswood
Carpinus caroliniann Ironwood
Estimated Live Stake Plantings - Initial Live Stake Monitoring Requirements - Total Live Stakes Observed 33
Bare Rootsl
Scientific Name Common Name Count % of Scientific Name Common Name Count % of
Sam le Sam le
} ,.
Acer floridanum Southem sugar maple Leucothoe axillaris Doghobble _
Aesculus sylvatica Painted buckeye Lindera benzoin Spicebush t_ _ _ •�: �
Alnus sern�lata Tag alder Lyonia Jigustrina Male-berry � � �, `'- " � � � `'`{" `"' " � � -�•..- '" ':
�,
Amelnnchier arboren Serviceberry Magnolia lripetaln Umbrella tree _ � � x a �. s' i° r •� "' �;;
Aronia arbutifolia Red chokeberry Morus rubra Red mulberry '- ' - �1
Asimina tri[oba Common pawpaw Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark , - " ��'-.�... � , • - "w � - -
CalycanthusJloridus Sweet-shrub Rhododendron Wildazalea : ,� � -� • ° - .
eric! menoides "� •-; .�,.� " � „- � � � i.. . ' - ' ^. - . -' ,. - -
Cephalnnthus occidentalis E3uttonbush Rhododendron viscosum Swamp azalea ,���� t .., �.. '„Y ` � � • � � ' ` _ , - � � '� � � '�. �`�
Cornus alternifolia Altemate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose . _ •�,� � ' .. ' � - � ti_
. �� ;
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Salix sericea Silky willow � `�" � t � --�s _ ��, ' " ,�yl. ;,,.. , : � .-� c�;'
Ti .. � �
Corylus nmericana Hazel-nut Staphylea trifolia Bladdemut �t����i � �F� :�'�' t!"�`x '�. ,e.� � ,� ���. �► �� 7?�`�
Hamamelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewartin ma[acodendron Silky camellia �� �;• ,Lr�� = � �,' � � ' �, ,�3s ;'.,,,��+ -'• '�_,{ �;�� �
Hibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow Symplocos tincloria Sweet leaf � . � �'� y''�,+„� " , ��� � � '� ' � "�'�
!L � . : � . .wn. 7 ��. � � 1 t .4 �f' �i r� n J � .
Ilex decidua Deciduous holly Viburnum cnssinoi�les Withe-rod ,-� '' _ •� * .�tiy�fjt�l►- ' b� � ,� =•,1�.�' � _�'
�' � .� S�r'° � ,
/!ex verticillata Winter berry Viburnum dentatum Southern arrow-wood ; ,. �������.L • �,; , 'L � '. "<�
Xanthorhizn sim licissima Yellow-root .n ' -' `''�' :'��` � ;'�► '
Ilea virginica Virginia willow P ' '�ra -. -:�i �►'�` < << � r #- �. ,� ,.-
afa � • > > �"' .► f 'r� _ ��, ��; - } �—
±:. ., : ,,.,,, � -s'�= �. ` � . . . �., �� �tc ,�� �I _ -
Estimated Bare Root Plantings -- Initial Bare Root Monitoring Requirements - Total Bare Roots Observed 13 '_� 'ici�.' � , �� » "� .
i� � � - �
,�-'� : n �.. ;. ' � -�.t ,� � �
Total Estimated Plantings - Year 3 Monitoring Requirements 8 Total Plants Observed 46 ,�'F" d "- ���� � � ����t `� "`— =�
Ground Cover �' � -.�� `���' y� �. . ;.� ,� _ ��� •t,, �� . ���,�� .
�� esY't's?� • .. .. `Ii � _ � �
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name .x-- ' " � -�- � •
,:"i�� �'�)' �'A '� •L e� .: - •'* �„�{
- •�s �'�I ,' �� ya�� � ti�' . ��. • '. P. �' . 1 � - �
�� 7�- �` f � � � �.
• � �'���#�-.s�. .�.'�'_ � ��r . � . ar''"i'f: "!�"`�h _ � "�t � ..
� S < L.� �y✓f111 � �, �iir �' ' ..,t _ � .. � . - , ` w� . .�� ..��e � � � �o
-1., r.��v�, `. �y�� �'t':�"� .`A_ A '���•� �y ��L,^a- .
f� i'.f +.�'�6 � '� � � , � ^r i.� � ..�`-'�.ti+'
Percent Cover -- T �^+�t-f �`� � v:� � • �
f� . ._ � x�L� '� l����E�_• . 1�4 . � �.,'1�
R r i ment
ec u t
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Count
Notes
' Identification of species not possible due to season - winter - of initial assessment
Title Vegetation
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC Figure 30
]� t�� Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
�w>>-' March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa - U er Section 3- Station 200+00
T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\yea,0\purlear_creek_rtanitoring_resultsy0.doc PreparedbyAndrewKiley ��n.�p'�"a �.�i�iz.

�
� Lon itudinal Plot Pattern View
� �
� �IClt�f ���� �
a ��Q Rooi w-�� Riffle w-a�
� � ��-���_� I I
• � =-�- -� I I • �H
� �
• - - ������-
� _ ���-�--._��I
� � J I �_ i As-Bwlt Cmta L'me
� � �� _ � _ � _ L M1 ^_ As-BuiltFaSmmt
� � - � _ _ �� Q Monitoriog VegGa[ion Pla
- - - Moudoring Langitud'mel Rofile
As-Buih Io-Stream Smrctures
W � Functbnal
� Stressetl
� � ' ♦ Failirg
I I Moniaoring Qow Sation
- ' Pbol
-- Riffle
Moniroring Phow Points
• �� T � �F a ��
o � oo �oo �ao �oa �oa � R�e
�.
• �t�ti o n � ft � � V�°�"°°
• ��� �
• Benchmark Lon itudinal Surve Data
Water Water Water
Station Channel gurtace Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel Surfsce Bankfull Top of Bank Feature Station Channel Surface Bankfull Top of Bank Feature
� 0 98.23 247 95.6
� 15 98.37 98.58 248 95.28
18 94.43 97.74 254 94.76
�- 38 97.52 255 92.49
39 97.64 265 94.46 94.75
� 59 97.28 97.6 285 94.21 94.67
- 77 97.2 97.56 286 96.7
97 97.51 300 93.83
• 98 98.56 320 94.28 94.6
99 97.2 96.7 334 94.41 94.475
� 101 94.62 337 92.97
. 114 96.32 96.68 352 94.1
117 98.04 355 96.06
� 128 95.18 98.17 364 95.91
131 96.64 365 94.07 94.41
� 153 96.64 398 93.41
, 171 96.63 405 93.07
172 96.38 420 93.61
� 174 94.25 442 93.47 93.8
- 176 9639 96.59
178 93.98
• 190 95.39 95.82 Protile Summar
191 95.23 Bankfull Slo e o.o t Riffle Slo e --
� 204 95.81 Run Slo e -- Pool Slo e --
• 205 95.47 Glide Slo e -- Pool S acin 9�
214 95.2 95.78 97.53 Pool Len th 49 Low Bank Hei h
- 222 94.86 95.75 Max Rif�le De th 2�5 Max Run De th --
4.6 --
� Title Longitudinal Profile
• Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project W�Ikes County, NC
• r� Figure 31
I�,msyste�u Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
� .•. •-• March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tribut - Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
-
-
• T:\pn\OI1795011\monitoring\year0\pudear_creek_rrwnitoring_resultsy0.doc
-
Prepared by Andrew Kiley
��� a,eraa�
� .ier,.muu�+c.

Surve Data Cross Section - Riffle
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 o too.26
4.25 0 100.16
12.59 0 98.07
17.47 0 97.29
17.56 0 97.17
22.97 0 96.22
27.68 0 95.45
33.41 0 94.72 LEW
35.43 0 94.39
37.28 0 94.22 Ooround Po�nts �eanktu�� �ndicators �vater surtace Points
39.57 0 93.8 Ybkf - 18.7 DDkf - 1.1 Ilbkf - 20.7
41.48 0 94.66 REW 110
42.29 0 95.42
43.88 0 96.36 E3KF • - -� 5 - Y : : �.,i--,�; � ,�nc� . ,T,.F
.�,
44.01 0 96.39 "�
47.3 0 96.48 ��`
�
51.57 0 97.63
105
56.05 0 98.96 '
�
58.4 0 99.44 � �
�
� ��
c i
0
@ ioo
>
w
w
��esc... _�.,r,;,��..�.-S - r
L
95 . ,� r
- r'
_' ...4��Yy _..
� . .
� �
9�'
r
�
85
0 10 20 30 10 50 60 70 80 9D 700
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summar Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area zo.7
Bankfull Width ►8.7
Bankfull Mean De th � . ►
Bankfull Max De th 2.z
Width/De th Ratio ►�.o
Entrenchment Rario 2•2
Classification B
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration }'roject ProjeCt # Ol 1795008
Project W��kes County, NC
�� Figure 32
I'�Y��ntem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
�• .•-• March ]0, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tribut - Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
T: \pn\Ol 179501 I\nwnitoring\year0\purlear_creek_moniroring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Andrew Kiley ��n .e�i,eo+a �

�
Surve Data Cross Section - Pool
Benchmark Elevation Cross Section Plot - Lookin Downstream Cross Section Photo - Lookin Downstream
Station Foreshot Elevation Feature
0 0 9s.zz
8.27 0 98.06
12.67 0 97.09
16.04 0 96.06
20.07 0 96.02 BKF
22.6 0 94.37
23.91 0 94.08 LEW
26.61 0 93.76
31.88 0 94.12 REW
34.88 0 94.48 OOround Points �ean�ou�� �ndicators �'vater surtace Points
45.1� 0 95.44 Ybkf - 29.1 D�kF - 1.2 IIbkF - 85.1
55. I 9 0 96.53 ��°
64.95 0 97.9 �'�._�, �
74.98 0 98.9
M _�
105
�
C
O
� 100 �-� !
N �,
W
.
95 ..4� - , _ .._��.1`ii�ik� _
_ :F ;i.i ._, �"��,d;�.'_.'i . i
I 1 � '
_ �
i'�
so - -
85
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 700
Horizontal Distance (ft)
Summa Data
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 35.1
Bankfull Width 29.t
Bankfull Mean De th ►•2
Bankfull Max De th z•1
Width/De th Ratio 24•2
Entrenchment Ratio 2•�
Classification --
Title Cross Section
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # 011795008
Project W;�kes County, NC Fi ure 33
r� g
l��cosystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
••,.-... March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa - Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
�
• T:\pn\011795011�monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc
.
Prepared by Ardrew Kiley
��� �r�
� w��

Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Riftle
Materials Plot Aggre ate Bed Bank
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item% Cum % Pebbles Item°/. Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 8 8.00 8.00 8 8.00 8.00 8 20.00 20.00
��� Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 0 0.00 8.00 0 0.00 8.00 0 0.00 20.00
Fine Sand 0.13 025 3 3.00 11.00 3 3.00 11.00 2 5.00 25.00
eo Medium Sand 025 0.5 0 0.00 11.00 0 0.00 11.00 0 0.00 25.00
/RilAaWinler]00�(PC) CoarSeSand 0.5 1 0 0.00 11.00 0 0.00 11.00 0 0.00 25.00
eo Very Coarse Sand 1 2 2 2.00 13.00 2 2.00 13.00 2 5.00 30.00
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 0 0.00 13.00 0 0.00 13.00 0 0.00 30.00
Fine Gravel 4 6 1 1.00 14.00 1 1.00 14.00 1 2.50 32.50
io
� Ffne Gravel 6 6 4 4.00 18.00 4 4.00 18.00 2 5.00 37.50
� M�dium Gravel 8 11 10 10.00 28.00 10 10.00 28.00 5 12.50 50.00
� 80
Medium Gravel 11 16 15 15.00 43.00 15 15.00 43.00 7 17.50 67.50
`u
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 18 18.00 61.00 18 18.00 61.00 3 7.50 75.00
so a�m�eeammanoo� �rc� COarse Gr2ve1 22 32 19 19.00 60.00 19 19.00 80.00 3 7.50 82.50
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 17 17.00 97.00 17 17.00 97.00 5 12.50 95.00
�o Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 2 2.00 99.00 2 2.00 99.00 2 5.00 100.00
Small Cobbte 64 90 1 1.00 100.00 1 1.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
30 Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
z0 Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦a�m�ea�xmme�zoo�cvc� Sm211 Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Lnrge Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om ai i �a ioo iaaa �0000
Totals too so ao
Partiele Size (mm) D16 (rtun) D35 (rtvn) D50 (mm) D84 (rtvn) D95 (trvn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
6.9 13.5 18.6 35.1 43.5 8 5 66 1 0 0
Modified Wolman Pebble Count - Pool
Materials Plot Aggregate Bed Bank
Materials Size Range (mm)
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SilUCley 0 0.062 6 12.00 12.00 0 0.00 0.00 6 20.00 20.00
10° Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 12 24.00 36.00 0 0.00 0.00 12 40.00 60.00
I Fine Sand 0.13 025 0 0.00 36.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 60.00
90 4 bedium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 O.OD 36.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 60.00
� /POOiwm�e�aoo�cac� CoarSeSand 0.5 1 21 42.00 78.00 20 100.00 100.00 1 3.33 63.33
so Ver� Coarse Sand 1 2 0 0.00 78.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 63.33
� Veiy Fine Gravet 2 4 0 0.00 76.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 63.33
,o
Fine Gravel 4 6 0 0.00 78.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 63.33
c Fine Gravel 6 S 1 2.00 80.00 0 0.00 100.00 1 3.33 66.67
LL
� M:dium Gravel 8 11 4 8.00 88.00 0 0.00 100.00 4 13.33 80.00
V80
� i Medium Gravel 11 16 4 8.00 96.00 0 0.00 100.00 4 13.33 93.33
a CoarseGravel 16 22 2 4.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 2 6.67 100.00
so P004BankVN�Ie�l00�(PC) Cuar5eGr2vel 22 32 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
t
i Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o Ve� Coarse Gravel 45 64 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
8mall Cobble 64 90 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
3o Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
i
Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Z� Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
I ♦eooFeaaw�ma�aowcec� Srrell Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
10 Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
i Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
� Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
om o, , ,o +�a ,000 ,00ao
Totals so zo so
Partele Size (mm) D16 (mm) D35 (mm) D50 (rtvn) D84 (mm) D95 (mm) % Silt/ Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
o.o� o.i o.� 9.� is.a i2 � zz o 0 0
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project ProjeCt # 011795008
Project �r,lkes County, NC
�� Figure 34
I''.crnystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
�•�-��- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa - Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
T�.\pn\01179501 IMonitoring\ycar0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Ardrew Kiley �Cn ��k

�
Moditied Wolman Pebble Count - All Facets
Materials Plot Materials Size Range (mm) Reach Rifile Pool
Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum % Pebbles Item % Cum %
SilUClay 0 0.062 14 9.33 9.33 8 8.00 8.00 6 12.00 12.00
1°0 Very Fine Sand 0.062 0.13 12 8.00 17.33 0 0.00 8.00 12 24.00 36.00
Fine Sand 0.13 0.25 3 2.00 19.33 3 3.00 11.00 0 0.00 36.00
90 Medium Sand 0.25 0.5 0 0.00 19.33 0 0.00 11.00 0 0.00 36.00
/aearnmma�zmi�ac� Co2r5eSand 0.5 1 21 14.00 33.33 0 0.00 11.00 21 42.00 78.00
eo Very Coarse Sand 1 2 2 1.33 34.67 2 2.00 13.00 0 0.00 78.00
Very Fine Gravel 2 4 0 0.00 34.67 0 0.00 13.00 0 0.00 78.00
,o Fine Gravel 4 6 1 0.67 35.33 1 1.00 14.00 0 0.00 78.00
s Fine Gravet 6 8 5 3.33 38.67 4 4.00 16.00 1 2.00 80.00
LL
c Medium Gravel 8 11 14 9.33 48.00 10 10.00 28.00 4 8.00 88.00
� 60
� Medium Gravel 11 16 19 12.67 60.67 15 15.00 43.00 4 8.00 96.00
a Coarse Gravel 16 22 20 13.33 74.00 18 18.00 61.00 2 4.00 100.00
5o PooiNnrne�:oa�c�c� CoerseGravel 22 32 19 12.67 86.67 19 19.00 80.00 0 0.00 100.00
Very Coarse Gravel 32 45 17 11.33 98.00 17 17.00 97.00 0 0.00 100.00
ao Very Coarse Gravel 45 64 2 1.33 99.33 2 2.00 99.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Cobble 64 90 1 0.67 100.00 1 1.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
ao Medium Cobble 90 128 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Cobble 128 180 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
�o Very Large Cobble 180 256 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Small Boulder 256 362 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
♦a�mawima�zoacPC� Srrell Boulder 362 512 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
io
Medium Boulder 512 1024 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
Large Boulder 1024 2048 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
° Very Large Boulder 2048 4096 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00 0 0.00 100.00
a.ui a.i i io ioo iauo iaoaa
Totals �50 �o0 50
Partitle Sita (mm) DI6 (rmn) D35 (mm) D50 (rtan) D84 (rtvn) D95 (rtrtn) % SiIU Clay % Sand % Gravel % Cobble % Boulder % Bed-rock
Aggregate Summary
0.1 4.9 12..0 30.0 41.6 9.3 253 64J OJ 0 0
Representative Photos
Title Pebble Counts
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration Project Project # 011795008
Project W��kes County, NC Fi ure 35
]�,��,�t�� Surve Date g
y Survey Weather Field Team Location
�-�•- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tribut - Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
�
�
- T:\pn\01 V9501 I\monitoring\year0\purlear_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc
•
Prepazed by Andrew Kiley
c�n .�,�,.�

Ve etation Transect Data Transect Photo
Plot Dimension Width 4 m Len th 25 m Area 100 m2
Live Stakes'
Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le
Betula nigra River birch P!alnnus occidentalis Sycamore
Carya cortlijormis Bitternut hickory Quercus michauxir Swamp chestnut oak
Carya ovatn Shagbark hickory Quercus nigra Water oak
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry Quercus phellos Willow oak
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon Quercus shumardii Shumard oak
FrtLrinus pennsylvanica Green ash Salix nigra Black willow
Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum Tilia heterophy![a White basswood
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood
Estimated Live Stake Piantings -- Initial Live Stakc Monitoring Requirements — Total Live Stakes Observed 47
Bare Roots'
Scientific Name Common Name Count $8m �e Scientific Name Common Name Count Sam le
AcerJloridanum Southern sugar maple Leucothoe axillaris Doghobble
Aescu/us sylvatica Painted buckeye Lindera benzoin Spicebush
Alnus serrulnta Tag alder Lyonia ligustrina Male-berry
Amelanchier arborea Serviceberry Magnolia tripetala Umbrella tree
Aronia arbutifolin Red chokeberry Morus rubra Red mulberry
Asimina triloba Common pawpaw Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark
Calycanthus floridus Sweet-shrub Rho�loden�lron Wild azalea
eric! menoides
Cephnlnnthus occidentalis Buttonbush Rhododen�lron viscosum Swamp azalea
Cornus a[ternifolia Altemate leaf dogwood Rosa palustris Swamp rose
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood Salix sericea Silky willow
Corylus americana Hazel-nut Staphylea trifolia Bladdemut
Hamamelis virginiana Witch-hazel Stewnrtia malacodendron Silky camellia
Hibiscus moscheutos Marsh mallow Symplocos tinctoria Sweet leaf
/lex decidua Deciduous holly Viburnum cassinoides Withe-rod
/lex verticillata Winter betty Viburnum dentatum Southem arrow-wood
Itea virginica Virginia willow Xanthorhiza simplicissima Yellow-root
Estimated Bare Root Plantings — Initial Bare Root Monitoring Requirements -- Total Bare Roots Observed 13
Total Estimated Plantings -- Year 3 Monitoring Requirements 8 Total Plants Observed 60
Ground Cover
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Percent Cover
Recruitment
Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Count
Notes
� Identification of species not possible due to season — winter - of initial assessment
Title Vegetation
Prepared For: Purlear Creek Stream Restoration I'roject ProjeCt # O1 1795008
Project W;�kes County, NC
�� Figure 36
I;cc�ystem Survey Date Survey Weather Field Team Location
�� -��- March 10, 2004 Overcast 30 F And Kile ; Dan Wood; Dan Clinton; NCSU Lower Middle Tributa — Lower Section 5- Station 214+00
T:\pn\OI 179501 l�monitoring\year0\purleaz_creek_monitoring_resultsy0.doc Prepared by Ardrew Kiley �=n ���