RE_ flagging_fencing

Wanucha, Dave
From:Euliss, Amy
Sent:Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:18 AM
To:Wyrick, Scott D; McLaughlin, Zachery R
Cc:Tucker, Mezak; Marciniak, Katherine J; Guy, Jeremy M; Sawicki (Gannett Fleming),
Jeremy P; Suggs, Phillip H; Smith, Thomas A; Alsmeyer, Eric C CIV USARMY CESAW
(USA); Wanucha, Dave
Subject:RE: flagging/fencing
Attachments:U-2579AA environmental precon meeting attendees.pdf
Scott and Zach,

Kat and I discussed the highly visible fencing/flagging this morning. Let’s carry on with business as usual regarding our
use of safety fencing ahead of clearing. Within our wetlands, if we need to differentiate between the type of clearing
(i.e mechanized vs. hand clearing), we should utilize the boundary flagging as detailed in the contract special
provisions. The use of safety fencing meets the conditions in the 404 and 401 permits, and the Division feels that it is
more protective.

If we get further clarification from Roadside Environmental in the future, we might have to adjust. Please communicate
this with Smith Rowe and Flatiron. I have also included the sign in sheet from our environmental preconstruction
meeting for your (and their) records.

Copying the Jeremy’s since I discussed with them after our meeting.

Amy
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 2:18 PM
To: Wyrick, Scott D <[e-mail]>
Cc: McLaughlin, Zachery R <[e-mail]>
Subject: flagging/fencing

I’ve attached the safety fence special provision and the exert regarding it from the EC manual. The exert from the EC
manual is contradictory. We can discuss over the phone. I discussed with Thomas and he is going to discuss with his
folks next week. I’ll follow up with you after I hear back from him.

Amy Euliss
Division 9 PDEA Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation

336 747 7802 office
[e-mail]

375 Silas Creek Parkway
Winston Salem, NC 27127-7167

1

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
2