20071648 Ver 1_Application_20070926

~s~°~
-~
~.2
.Q wr ~~
C<cJ"
~~/~
~r ? !%~,
s, y~~ ~y, ,~/J
,;.
'f~~-7)c'~.
`• ~',a
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 24, 2007
Mr. Steve Lund 0 716 4 8
US Army Corp of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR 1868(Withers Road), Catawba County
Dear Mr. Lund:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace a double 60-foot, 78" pipe
on SR 1868 (Withers Road) in Catawba County with a double 60-foot, 96" CMP with inlet and
outlet headwalls and associated riprap for structure stabilization. The existing pipe is slightly
perched; however, the bedrock located in the project area will prevent pipe burial below the
existing streambed elevation. NCDOT proposes to place the new pipe on the same grade as the
existing pipe and construct a short rock ladder at the outlet of the main flow pipe to provide some
stream connectivity. Due to the existing site conditions, NCDOT requests a waiver from the
Regional Condition 2(b)(e) permit depth specification, for the construction of this project.
Temporary cofferdams and bypass pumping will be used for stream management during
construction. Upon project completion, the area impacted by the temporary cofferdams will be
returned to pre-project conditions and seeded and stabilized. The total scope of the work will
result in 10 feet of permanent impacts to an unnamed tributary to Allen Creek, which is classified
as WS-IV HQW waters by the Division of Water Quality.
The project is located approximately '/z mile from a critical watershed area; however, SR 1868 is
not a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the
hazardous spill basin checklist.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Catawba County (USFWS listed dated May 10, 2007) include the
dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan~ora) and the Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).

1
i
SR 1868, Withers Road
Page 2
September 24, 2007
Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location
approximately 2.2 miles southeast of the proposed project area. The heartleaf is usually found on
dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in
boggy areas near springheads. There did not appeaz to be suitable habitat within the proposed
project azea and no species were observed. Natural Heritage Program records document the
nearest Bald eagle location and the nearest large body of water is approximately 17 miles north of
the proposed project area, on Lake Hickory. Bald eagles typically nest in tall, living trees neaz
open water. There does not appear to be any suitable habitat in the surrounding azea and no bald
eagles were observed during the site visit. NCDOT is recommending a finding of "no effect" for
T&E species and historical structures.
I have enclosed apre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned activities, and
location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150460-55120005-12B.201811-3855
• TIP #: NA
• Project Category: $200.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank
you for your time and consideration to this matter
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: ~ /
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: John Hennessy, DWQ, Transportation Permitting Unit
Polly Lespinasse, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office

OffSce USe Only: Form Version March OS
2 0 0 7 1 6 4 8
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particulaz item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW #14 (WQC#3627)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Cazolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder, N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon(a),dot.state.nc.us
Page I of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Pipe Replacement, SR 1868 (Withers Road)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 12B.201811
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Catawba Nearest Town: Maiden
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Take Business 321 east
from Maiden, turn left onto SR 1855 then left onto SR 1868 and proceed to site
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°34'20"°N 81°11'04"°W
6. Property size (acres): < 0.10 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Allen Creek, WS-IV HQW (from source to
a 0.7 mile upstream of Maiden Water Supply Intake)
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:!;'h?o.enr.state.nc.us%a~imin!In~~ps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing Conditions-Pipe on paved secondary road
General Land Use- Rural.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
Replacement of a deteriorating double 60-foot 78" CMP with a double 60-foot 96"CMP
with inlet and outlet headwalls and associated riprap for structure stabilization Typical heavy
equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.) will be used for the construction of this project
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace
a deteriorating_pipe for the safety of the travelling_public
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated at this site
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts from riprap stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Page 3 of 8

Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
T e of Im act
yp p Type of Wetland

(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Flood lain
P
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage_ multinly lenuth X width then r1;.rir1P t,~, az sin

Stream Im act
P - --o- - - - ~ -----, ----
Average -- - - - --, - -,~

Number
Stream
N
T e of Im act
~ P
Perennial or
Stream Width Impact

Length Area of

Im
act
(indicate on map) ame Intermittent? Before (linear feet) p
(acres)
1 m act
1 UT to Allen
Creek Riprap Stabilization Perennial 7 feet 10 feet .0017
Temporary
~~
1 Cofferdams/Bypass 20 feet 0.0032
Piping
* 10 feet *,0017 acre

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) permanent ermanent
P
20 feet .0032 acre
temporary temporary
impacts impacts
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredQin~, flooding, draina~e_ bulkheads_ etc_
Open Water Impact
Site Number _ _
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) v
T e of Im act
~ P Type of Waterbody
lake, and estu
( P > ary, sound, bay, Area of

Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project
Stream Impact (acres): Permanent 0.0017
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0017
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Permanent 10 feet
Page 4 of 8

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation NO POND IMPACTS
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Inlet and outlet headwalls
utilized to minimize increase in pipe length. Minimal amount of riprap used for structure
stabilization.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 5 of 8

aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http:/;'h?o.enr.state.nc.us!nc~~~etlands;sU-m~~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Any mitigation required will be provided by the Ecosystem Enhancement prog am per the
Memorandum of Agreement between NCDOT, USACE and NCDENR
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http: %'h?o.enr.state.nc.us;'« rp%inde~.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Page 6 of 8

X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
No increase in impervious surface is proposed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater is generated from the project.
Page 7 of 8

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact neazby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
httn:'-h?c}.enr.state.nc.us'nc«etlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The Wipe replacement will not result in additional development of the surrounding azea
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~`~
-~y-£!
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

SR 1868, Withers Road, Catawba County
.:w
a_.
,. ~r--
~ F, .
. ?~ r
:?.~..:
Outlet
Downstream

~~~w:
~: -~,:
r ~. :~, :.
'. .
;,~.
a.
~;~
Y ~ ~ r ~y+
~ ,~;y
L :~ '~'
74 ~
`K' _
Inlet
U pstrea m

-
\ \
a ~ /
\ ~
ej 2099
~ ~' \ 1883
4 ~ ,O 1877
/'
its '~b \
8 I
,m
2094 g d f'
~
/
v
~ - -
2095 i 2066 ~+
e ~
~ ~
j 1
`

2012
'
~ DulOn
'
' ~~
~ _
- ~ - -
~o 1810

- b
,~
~ ,
~ i
m
'
~ 1882 I' ( ~ i ~ 1915

~ \ 1880
2093
~/ o\ 9 ~ t,
1938
~r
pp
2011
H ~
_ \ ~ I
~
2718 a i0
Pro~laence

I 1 ~
1
L r-
1 _
s
~- ~ Roaa
Cn L d,
1e
- ~
I
9 2734
2719
1897
~ /
\
'
u+ - ~
O u~
Ir L~ ~ -
\ .. 1810
l
~~ 1882
I ~ -f` ~
1 8 ,~~
881
~ ~
-I ~
\ ~
II u ~ _ -„
'>- ~_ I; ~ 1880 '
~ ( '
- mod.
°_ _ I:
I -
i
1892 ~
,
d
\ l~ ,5
a~u
` I
.~
1878 b
l
I _
r i
a~
~
~
~, 1892
// '
~ ~o ~ i
~ ~~ 1 2631
2610 ~a
, ! - .
_d_.
i
:
.
J
2010 ~
27_^,5 '~
/ - - 'z ~
~ ~
+ ~ - -
1880
~
a _ - - -
- -a-
- -
°~.- d -
\ 2610 8
~ ~;
a ~ _ - -aa- - - - , _ - _ '
~

\ m
N I

I 1
u Nate /
I
I
ChOpel _
7
\ ~
"~ / , II $
I
1879 1 I 1810 I ~I - CI ~.<-

~ 1884 ~
~ t
~
~ /
2119 ~; I ~ ~ ..
~
2118 t+el ~ ° ~ ~`".G..r I ~ \ ~--.. ~ f ` ~

~~ ~~ ~ ~
~ - - ~ )1 ~`~ -" =-
~~ 1875
~ .,
- ~ __
! FoOory ~
"
~ ~ / /
~ ~ ~ 1992
1874

'~ 4 v
~~I
~ -~ ~I ~
/
m
,i m
Nnr
y v
NalOen ) 1874 ~
N
n ' Cn ~
/
~ .
r '~ ~
N1gn
~c
207 ~ 1873 I
Ia -
1872
2692 _
,~ 1
I
s N 1992
3
y ~ ~ I -
,` b = i I 2609 +o
` 2608 .
/ L 1867
4
/
' ~ 2893
/
1~
~
/ 2007 S Mpiden
~- Elem i
N sin / ~
\ ~
/ I
I ~~ p~. - ~ r I
' _ _ _ T _ _
a
,872 ~ ° ~ ~ ~~ _ ~~ :~ ~'
~ ~ _.
~~ west
sine cSi
~ W
ry; "
~~ ~ / \ a I ~~ - I
i
Ch ,t, ~
/ = ~ ' T ~ T ~ = 8 ~ ~,,
1
- / V
2003 r d / 5
1868
1870
\. 5 r t ! „
, ~ 1810
1'
\ d [n a ~
MAIDEN ~x+ A p
` &~ $`
>~ POP. 3,018 s 1855
++
2005 ~ - - _
rat -~
~ ~ _. ~
S \ a~
Jiver _ ~ ~ ~ 0
a or
Cn a
zoos ~ -
- - - - ~~ J ~ +
J
r
1
b I

I 2002 -!

° ~, Na~aerl
~
Ln 1855 18E7
2709

- !

- - ! ~ ~
2000 1 zs
Naiaen
ChOGeI '~~i I ~
r
I ~ - `
/l 1 ~ ~ 0
;
~ i
1869
/
/ ~
~ /
`
2695 1e 2696
^y ~~. 2708
~
zooa ~ ~ ~ n
2082 ~ /2050 I; / z+
~ 1 1855
2113 !~ 'P 2697
~ ~ ~
'~ ?` / ~ 2003
'! ! ' l 2786 2770
r
V ro ~;/
/J ~/
R~ - 2111 f/f
- i

, I ~
aii
1003
- -
- - - - - _
- -" 1869
L
_ 2781
COUNT Y - - -_ -
-
J - ----'--
~ ------
i _

•

e; S

1
~ ~ _ r ~ tee
! y

~ ~ _
/

-

P ..
~
.
~ ~
r
~ __ .
_
i

•
~ ~ ~
_ _
- ,
Fllt~rat~r,r~ - R ~
_
~ -
~
.. ~ Punt ~•
~° -•'- ~ - T~ S
- : -~ ~,
;
.. _
^- ~ _
'
~ 33 SAL f -
- (': J

, '
(~ _ 4 tit -~ {
~ (
-
~
~ _.
~F f (
-
.~
P i

r ~ _ ~ k' !
,
~ -~
. , .
y- ,,

~
_ ..
i. ~ f}

~ ~~ Fi
Y • a~; / i ~
~ i i - .-r'
- -.
- r ~ . .
• _ _
'
F s
,-
,~

~,; ~~i
.
;, ~ .,, ~ f r ,

:

Pipe Replacement

! -
~~
~~ ~
1~ ~ i. - ,
f
- _ - F j~ •
ri ~ . ~ }
- ..
~ -
- ,""
- F
_
- .
~ r f

•~ , F .

..
~ ..

c ~ ~ ^

- . _, -.
t• y.
- -- ~~
~`~ _
- ._ _ • • .-
~+. • R- ~ c
s' ,~-_ ~
• ~ . . i :~
n m t r,
^ '
Name: MAIDEN Location: 035° 34' 20.81" N 081 ° 11' 04.91" W
Date: 9/18/2007 Caption: SR 1868, Withers Road, Pipe Replacement, UT to Allen Creek,
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet WS-II HQW, Catawba River Basin
icy ~sse,

i ~ ~ ,"SUE .
n
~ ~ ~~
L~ i
'~,
i ~ ~ ~~~
/ ,%
/ - ~ _
~ ' -i ~ ~ ~,
~ ~ a iiti a ~
~~ - j ' ~ ~~/ ~~ rv
// / ~ ~y D
%/
~ ~~
,~~ _,, ~
;;
'~ ~ / _
~~~ _,
j ~ ~~
~o ' ~~ _ ~~, ~ ~r~ __ .~
~ ~ ~ ~ JI ~~ ;~~~
~~~ ; / ~ ~ 11
u J~ ~ /
~,i ~o ~~
~ ~ ,- a°~ ~~ ~I
%~ i~ ';_ ~
;; r '~ ~ ~
~, %%
~'_ / I
;~,
--=_ _
~_~_ ~;
a
a`~
ad
a
N
Z
rn
n
/~;
,;
~.
is
;'
;;
~R
a
~~,

~-

g£s
D , L 1'
.ri: `
~a
tv4:
~ - ~:

~,.-
:.
N
0
Z
m
N
o~g <~: ~
~N.
~~~s~~.

LINA - SHEET NUMBER 51 (Joins sheet 42) 5~
e
_,., k, . :y ~r;K i, t W MHE2 E CY rs,
y ~~t #,- HwC2 c~' ~ ~~> ~~~ ~ - Cm82 a,,, ~
Y. ~ f
~Cw . cv ~ Hw ~.. - ~;t cmp ~., ~~ r ~~
~ ~'
~ ~ ~ ~ rt y rW
..' ~ ~ +'"
KCn .1 v j2~~ ', V ~'~
~ ' 1 ~ ~4
N ' I !, .. ~
~ ~ b~ .., • C2 1N w 4 ,~;, n
1 ,~HsB2 _ r~~~ t/ 4. r. e c
. c
... ..
_ ; ,. c
,r ~ I ~ '- MgC2' ~
:. ~ •~~ ~
~, r •.
~~
E
.., 2
,~ •
i
• d" _ ' ~ Mg 2
-~ .. "' ~.r",,,7 ~ - ~° - MgB2
' C2 ~# ~t
_ _ . 'tr -«, ' , ~, to
.._ ~ -~ - _ n~. F ,~
? p -. . Hs92~ •r*,s.'w ~ r .f{ HsB~~~, , r ~'~ ~ • v g8Y As Mg
Y,, ''` w ~ t ~ ~ ~'. ? + 3 '" ,~BB~, ~ ,~.. sue' c3 ~r. _
~ ~ ~ M . f ,~ S ; T " e . ~ ` MgC2
~;
_ i r
~ r Y 'fem. ~ .. . t- ' Cv A "r
_ y' ~MHC2 ..ate. y _ ~ 321 `~ f ° r,M
•',4, -CmC2, HS62 ~a '+'.. t r ^ •~ ' , • ~,. h.
3sB2 • C2 'k.: •` MgB2 °,~. ~.
' AsB ~_klw ~ - g ~
~g, .,-
R
w 9~ ~ ~ r 3 2 MHE °
MgC2
C2 tr ' ~ .: o~ HsB2 s ,t+. nE3 ,{l
~ ,, ~-~ CnE3 ; ~y.' _ ,, MgB2
.~1Pj~1P: CmC2 ~ Cn ~ ~'(~
. ~`: CmB2 C2 ~~ - r] ~
j~ ~~z __ _
k ~ ~ • CnC2 • r
'• ~ ,_
`{. y ~ ~ ~ 1, MgC2
MgB2 C2 .. .. 4
Cn vc Qy 82 i CmB2 CnC2
~ '~` c.~ , gC2 ,,
~.
"~
C -
4K
e
I L~ ~~•.~
C r ~ 4i ~~ M ~.~ gB2-s~,.• ~. m
~i
t , _ ~e g CnE2^ ~~ ~ - , M _ _,,MgB2 I ~ ~ Y..,a,.
,` . ~'` *'~ • * ~ -het ~ ~"^ ~
a, ~+, ~ ~•
t ~ -,
;~, ~ .
.
,.
_. ,' ,
r ..
' Ate', 7 ., ~''.. ~ Z' ~~ . -
.~. ~ ate. ~ /~ f t • i ~~ ~~ ~~1~~' ~ "~1 1' ~ ~ 'v _ ~ ~ _'~` ~ ,~ ~~ #` ~ ~ t 'T,, ~• , a
~~ °4`,. ~ _N p ~~ ~ ~ 1 350000 FEET

T 7 0 m x
C: Jve i
7 m O m O w n m 3~ n~ 0
f w u - J ~~ j
+o ~ a m.~{ tiT,aw m~'v~ d !' ~ i
O W (D ~ ~- cr j 3 ~ i ~ ~ m N• ~ ~ O
~ U O O ~ 7 m W O o~ m p
3+o m '°cno a3 0~0 703-+.
r p 7 ~ m ~ iv ~, n 7 N- O -h
a v o m a J o ~~ m o
~m ~ ~; mp ~ /{m
0 0 ~ N m \ O O X
aaD O 1 m € ~ (1 J~ m j~1 ~ N
ii~~`` ~, •7 ~_
~~ m ~ C D J n -+ _~ p ~ ~ Q m 7
C n ~ C y +O m m ~ m s~
~~t a ~ p °a- ~ m
~ ~ v, m + ~ O. £ o .,~ + ~
`~mam_ ~ ca ~m m Q E ~ n
U1 p ~~ ~ ~ f~ :l
S
~ ~ ~` // / , r \ 1
~ % 1~~ o .
~ v ~ r~ ~~
ggg~ "' ii
I c._-. I
~ ~ ,,, ~ ~ o a• v a
~ m m ~
:~ ~ :~
~ ~~•~~~
f /r ~ m,o x"~Q ip i
o m p o m
a .-. -~' ~ ~ ~ ~ 'J
t
O [~ ~ T T m 1 Q
~~~ i
( ~ m Qo~%oo~ f
f 1' \ ~ O~ 7 U m o m- (
r ~ n m~~ n
nu;~ .o ~ °~~~E
~- ~- pC~ ~°£3~7 i
7~, ~31,a
3 m °~~ m a~ i
+C ~ O b0 D £ c'~~ m
O 7 A ~ 3 0 .? ~,
7 p n A Q N m 3
so ~_ ~~ o+~ mcn
f mm ~ Q=' gym{ ~_ ~
7 Q r ~N m p 7
6 ~ T.
f l'-t Q AO N ~ Q
m~ a x~ pm
m cr ~ + v
i
j Q ] m O
f i F~ ~ p ~~ f
2
11 ~ ~
~ .j G
O
f ~ ~ O ~ ~ f
Z a n _
N 3
0
o m
'~ ? ~ _
~~ ~ O n rp
f~ ~+±NI
~ E ~ ~ ~
~r „ J
I~ ~~m~l f
~ °~ <~ ~

N ~
a Q~ ~
ao 0
N 0 0
a C+ 0
Oo
n ~ ~ o
N
N 1
CI uy O
O O N 1
D ~ 7
u o
_ ~ (7 ~
~ t C_
O O N
N + 1 ~
- _ +
u
N u ~ O
O O 7
~~S
T ~ ~ ~
~
a~ ~ m ~
~ N - v
N 1 :[7 Q. 0
Z
o ~' ~ ~D ~
7 O ~
Z ~
a n
m
7
N ~

@ 1 1

+ J
~ ~+

O
O
C[1 N
~ 7 ~-
~ ~
~ E N 0
.T ~

v O

~
n

~
~ n m m
V% U p~
-- - ~ r
UU 7 U '+~ ~S ~
C< < o ~ O O O
+~ ~ S 7 E 7 n
~, -h O
7 +
0
0 o c
f € -a
i ~ n Ln fT
lT~ (T CT v x
~ O N N
~
T
aD ~D ~D tD 7
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
n n} n n~
~, ~,
~~
~~
_<
Om
~ ~
N ~~
Q
~J , ,
O O
n ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ^„ s C~ s
`
~ ~
a co
~ ~
'~i
D ~
m
o ~ ~
~;
v
~
~ X
a
a~~~
7{~
a ~ n , o
$
J- m N N p 3
X
~ ; ; N
. ~
D p' O N '~ a
7
n ~
~
~
3 a
" O ~_
'fi p O cD
_ 7
7
m
N ~ ~
< ~
_
cu
+ ^' 9
~ ~9.9-

m -~
~ \~q
cD ~ ~ ~.v-
n
9
~' ~

~ -
c
~ \j.

m
a
N
J
~in ~ m ~''
a
u; yS
O ~ N { N \O
.~ ~ w rv
~ 9~
~ O ~ ~
O ~ /~
D ~L
O ~p
~~ ~ ~
f
~ ~ ,
m ! ~
o

~ o -- -~
O FO\\
i

~p

'
~

v r m ~ 1
o a
a v~ \

N ~
~ fJ n
D
O ~~ f
\ I I
~

~ (n
cb
a

,,,, ~
O
C) _
D
W :T v
W {-~\
a n I
~
~
~
a ~~
~
~~
1 r,
w c
\'
D 1
.I ~~~,
~ 1~~.

N l~
~v\s ~~'
\\
~
O
a ~,
~
\•
cD cD
~~ ~~ ~1

O p N
N
a w
\~,

~
a 1
`~
I
.9
.: W ~1
~ ~ .n ~
~~ a o~

+ #
7 ~
~ ~
O ~
7 0
m ~
iTi
~a
~~
<o
~~
.~ ~;
~o
O s
~ ~
~~
3rn
~U
mp
x
~ Q
~ n
~D Q
T C1
,~ a

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section lV of the 1D Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish borough: Catawba City: Maiden
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35 34 20 ° N, Long. 81 11 04° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Allen Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Clark Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUG): 03-08-35
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
^ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9/20/07
® Field Determination. Date(s): 9/6/07
SECTION Il: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required)
^ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
^ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: .
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required)
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
^ TNWs, including territorial seas
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^^ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
^ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
^ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 110 linear feet: 7 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by mean (average) high waters.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
^ Potentiallyjurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section HI.A.1 and Section III.D.1, only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND 1TS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanoshave been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody~ is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. It the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.I for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and oftsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick List
Drainage area: Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
^ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
^ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into T'N W.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Pick List.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
^ Silts ^ Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riflle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick List
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review arealyear: Pick List
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
^ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank ^
^ changes in the character of soil ^
^ shelving ^
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ^
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ^
^ sediment deposition ^
^ water staining ^
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to detetm
^ High Tide Line indicated by: ^
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
`A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OH WM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply)•
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

for each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N1 Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acre
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial eRect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to cant' pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TN W?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IIf.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
^ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
^ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TN Ws where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: .
^ Tributaries of TN W where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., t}~pically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: .

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 110 linear feet 7 width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
^ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
^ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
^ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
^ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
^ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATES WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
^ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
^ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
^ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
^ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
^ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
"See Footnote # 3.
~ To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 111.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described io the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Ad Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
^ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
^ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
^ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review azea, these azeas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
^ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
^ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
^ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
^ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
^ Lakes/ponds: acres.
^ Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
^ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delincation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
^ Corps navigable waters' study:
^ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:l :24,000, Maiden .
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Catawba County Soil Survey.
^ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
^ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
^ Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
^ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: .
^ Applicable/supporting case law:
^ Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
^ Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 1 ~ County: C'atawha Project ID:
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: Pipe Replacement
Route: SR 1868 (Withers Road) Stream: Unnamed tributary to Allen
Creek, WS-II Watershed, HQW
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r
WSI r
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban r r
Arterial Rural r r
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? r
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
*One of the unnamed tributaries is not a blue line on USGS