Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19970722 Ver 1_Emails_20011008J. Re comments (Randleman Resei voir) Subject: Re: comments (Randleman Reservoir) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:23:53 -0400 From: Steven Kroeger <steve kroeger @ncmall net> To: Jeff Jurek <jeffjurek @ncmall.net> CC: Jennifer Frye <Jennifer.Frye @ncmatl.net >, Peter Colwell <Peter.Colwell @ncmatl.net> Jeff -- Thanks for your comments. I would like to have the copies of the plans back, since they are the only ones I had (I can stop by and get them). I had hoped the water authority would have provided a set for you, and in the future this will be the case. The three plans you reviewed are only a few developed for this pr03ect -- more are expected. Jeff Jurek wrote: > Steve, I have gone over the three mitigation plans for Randleman > reservoir; Edgar, Bob, and Sophia Branches. One thing I notice is that > they are basically the same. Below are comments for all three: > 1) These projects are being done for mitigation .itself, not to produce a > good restoration pro3ect. All three address incised streams, which need > to be restored (there are no pictures; there needs to be). We suggest > they redo the plans to restore streams naturally and then monitor to see > how much wetlands they get. > 2) There are too many structures involved in all three plans. This is a > long -term maintenance nightmare. The structures are being over -used to > get as much wetland as possible, instead of a more natural approach. > 3) Chewacla Soils -this is creation, not restoration. These systems were > terrace systems with wetlands sporadically found in the bottomlands. > They are creating a swamp, not a bottomland hardwood. > 4) The success criteria for hydrology being proposed is not acceptable > (5 -12.59 of growing season). This denotes that there is wetland > hydrology, not that there is the proper hydrology They need to find > references, monitor these references, and then restore these systems to > match the reference systems. They need to take into account overbank > flooding (duration and frequency). They do not address the replacement > function very well in any of these plans. Steve Kroeger <steve.kroeger @ncmatl.net> NC Division of Water Quality Wetlands Unit 1 of 1 10/11/2001 1 55 PM