20030512 Ver 1_Monitoring Report - Closeout_20140619

CLOSEOUT REPORT
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site
EEP Project #241
USACE 404 (Action ID #SAW- 200320335)
DWQ 401 Cert # 021792
Project Type: Stream Restoration
Table Ia. Project Setting and Classifications
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site
County
Alamance
General Location
Eli Whitney
Basin
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region
Central Piedmont
USGS Hydro, Unit
03030002050020
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03 -06 -04 (Mary's
Creek)
Wetland Classification
N/A
Trout Water
No
Thermal Regime
Warm
Project Performers:
Source Agency
WRP
Provider
Stantec
Designer
Stantec
Monitoring Firm(s)
The Catena Group;
Ward Consulting
En ineers
Supplemental Planting
(2013)
Harp
Property Interest Holder
EEP
�3 ,V �i�
R@90MEN
JUN 1 9 2014
Table Ib. Project Activities and Timeline
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site
Milestone
Month/Year
Instituted
Aril 2003
Restoration Plan
Aril 2003
Permitted
May 2003
Final Design (90% )
October 2005
Construction
March 2006
Planting
March 2006
As -Built Survey
June 2006
Year 1 Monitoring
March 2007
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2008
Year 3 Monitoring
March 2010
Year 4 Monitoring
March 2011
Year 5 Monitoring
March 2012
Supplemental Planting
November 2013
Invasives Treatment
May 2013; August
2013; continues
through 2014
Beaver Management
October 2011;
November 2012;
September 2013,
December 2013

MARCH 2014
1.0 PROJECT SETTING AND BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Mary's Creek site is an NCEEP stream restoration project that drains 1.8 square mile's along
a portion of two unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Mary's Creek in Alamance County, North
Carolina.'The site is located approximately 12 miles (mi),south of the town of Graham and lies in
the Cape Fear River Basin within North Carolina,Division of Water Quality sub -basin 03- 06 -04.
Land use in the vicinity of the site consists of a mix of cattle, pasture, hay fields, and forested
areas. The project is protected by a 7.1 acre (ac) permanent conservation easement. The banks of
- both�reaches werte rseverely eroded and unstable with little or no riparian buffer prior to
"restorations Cattlelhad unlimited access to the stream channels, and as many as 3'0 crossings were
observed within the project reaches.
Priority 2 stream restoration was carried out on both reaches ,resulting in restored C type
chanri °A`_: Cattle were excluded from each of the newly planted riparian areas. The streambanks,
flbbdflain, and the upland areas within the conservation easement were all planted with
vegetation to stabilize the channel and provide shading, food, and habitat as well as a vegetated
buffer to treat surrounding overland flows. In November 2013, supplemental planting with 310
one - gallon trees was conducted to address areas of low planted stem densities within the
conservation easement. The,buffers as ,a whole are well vegetated and, all vegetation plots have
greater than 320 stems /acre. Invasive exotics plants have also been an issue with Tree of heaven
(Ailanthus altissima) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) being the dominant,species of
concern. Herbicidal treatments were conducted in May 2013, August 20f3, and will continue,
through the, end of 2014. Throughout the monitoring period beaver dams were constructed in, the
lower portion of the main, as recently as December 2013. NCEEP has been actively managing
beavers at the site since October 2011. Overall the site is stable and well vegetated.
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives, of the - restoration project are as follows:
Goals: Objectives:
• Improve water quality • Improve aquatic habitat with the use
• Provide wildlife habitat of natural material stabilization
• Reduce erosion and sedimentation structures and a riparian buffer
• Reduce nutrient loading to the • Exclude cattle from the stream
stream • Provide wildlife habitat through the
• Enhance floodplain access and creation of a riparian zone
function
3.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA AND PROJECT PERFORMANCE
Explicit success criteria were not specified in the mitigation plan, but some criteria were
specified in the monitoring baseline document. That document indicates stream reach success is
measured based on whether the channel geomorphology stays within the natural variability of the
dimensionless ratios of the reference reaches and that there is no observed channel evolution.
Put.another way, this means that the channel exhibits little change or "variation that, characterizes
stability. The ,stated vegetation success. criterion is 260 stems per acre at "year 5.

Table 2. Success Criteria and Project Performance
Ma T 's Creek Stream Restoration Site
Feature
Success Criteria
Success is measured with minimal changes to the permanent cross - sections,
demonstrating system stability. Monitoring is conducted annually for a
period of five years. Other than some aggradation at the very top of the
tributary, the project has exhibited stream stability. The cross sections have
Stream
either demonstrated little change or adjustments that indicate stability such a
narrowing and deposition on banks and floodplain making natural levees and
lateral berms. The one area ofaggradation occurred earlier in the projects
history andohas not developed further. No bank erosion accompanied the
development of this feature. The 2011 MY5 report indicated no bank
erosion of concern.
Average of 260 stems /acre,, as indicated by permanent vegetation, plots after
5 years of monitoring. The project vegetation plots well exceed the
Vegetation
criterion. There were 6 -10 native woody stems per plot, 19 site wide. Some
areas subject to fescue competition were supplemented in.2013 and the site
was subject to a significant infestation of Chinese privet, which was treated
in 2013 and will ,be treated again in.2014.
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

Tahle 3. Project Assets:
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site
Stream Reach
Restoration
Level
Watershed
Area (mil)
Existing,
Linear
Footage*
Mitigation`
Linear
Footage*
Credit
Ratio
Stream
Mitigation
Units
UT to Mary's Creek
(Main Charmei)
R
127
1,663
1,575
1.1
1575
UT to Mary's Creek
(Tributary)
R
0521
360
507
1.1
507
Totalsi
1.211
2,023
2,09'21
2,082
* Footage,exludes crossings and breaks in easement
I
I
1
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

2
1
3
Vegetation Plot Origins
J Vegetation Plots
• Stream Stations
11111111 Cross Section Pins
- - -- Cross Sections
Rootwads
r °ss s
Structures
eye
Current/Reoccuring Beaver Dam
s`
Stream (2043.54 It Restoration)
Drainage Features (Relic Channel)
- Wetland (within old channel)
Culverted Crossing
Stream Beyond Conservation Easement
Dixon Property
2013 Supplemental Planting
2006 Planted 50' Buffer (4 4 ac)
Conservation Easement
The
Mary's Creek Stream
Restoration Site
Date:
March 2014
Figure
Scale
Cateno
0 50 100 Feet
Group
Project Asset Map
' '
b No.:
Alantance County, North Carolina
4132

11
` -. '�/ �..►.,�.,, �ti ` I' �•� -./ -mil ��r s4 ' � `� � '. ...
Q,
4 'tit _ s - ,� • h °cC
r ff
r'.
.S E
gam.:
t`
r %� � _ � - �•' 4� �- � ! 1fWkrsheoi� 6s4a+emiksl
The
Coteno
Mary's Creek Stream
Restoration Site
Date: March 2014
Figure
o� ,,000 Fit
Group
Watershed and Site Location
Map
t t
2
a No-
Alamence County. North Carolina
4132

b
GaB2
ObC2
r�
^
4�
r
N
-.
AcC
g
R
r Tributary.
GaB2
4
Main Chan I
Hd62
GaB2 =Planted 50' Buffer (4 4 ac)
lll�l MY
4 Thalweg
Conservation
Easement
LC
Soil Type
ObC2
AaB
• >. AcC3
}� e
GaB2
Gac
,GaC2
0 GDC3
GbD3
- -. .....:,.:.
O HcB2
rf!/ GaC2 9s HdB2
HdC2
s
HdD2
Lc
f TaC
Ld
} i
J Obc2
GaB2
TaC
The
Figure
Mary's Creek Stream
Date:
March 2014
Scale
0 62.5 125 Feet
Restoration Site
Group
P
MRCS Soils Map
I
b No.
Alamance County, North Carolina
1
4132
-1

L
Mary's Creek Stream
Restoration Site
Site Maintenance Map
Alamance County, North Carolina
March 2014
0 50 100 Feet
� t
ob No
4132
Figure
4

0
N
U
l
iQ
Nd
1
r�
Q
Ul
0
O
N
l�
�i
N
N
U
S
�
o
O
,
h
E�
.r
.r
�
y4r
Ya:
°E
4�t
L6
I
Y
o
A"
Ulg
{{4
Y
{miv,
MkI
Itfm'
a � F
F�
V'
n
.(jaa� uapuap
0
N
U
l
iQ
Nd
1
r�
Q
Ul
0
O
N
l�
�i
N
N
U
S
�
o
O
,
h
E�
.r
.r
�
°E
L6
Y
Ulg
{{4
MkI
Itfm'
F�
V'
n
Li
-
4i+i1
vmi�t3
0
N
U
l
iQ
Nd
1
r�
Q
Ul
0
O
N
l�
�i
N
N
U
S
�
h
E�
.r
.r
�
Ulg
{{4
Itfm'
0
N
U
l
iQ
Nd
1
r�
Q
Ul
0
O
N
l�
�i
N
N
U

N
U
0
I
i
O
0.
O
y
O
0
0
0
C
Q
d
i
V
o
�
N
rma
a
Jr
0
O
9
° �
N
y
Q X
LO
0
f ,
pN
,
t
N
N n
o '
' d
o
N
mI�
m
0
e *.
o
Q
N
N
0
+tL-04 +tZ
aS ' °
.
°
o 0
6
sa wea
5�
S
,5
N
>
>
o
J
o
0 p
0
N
h
N
O p
p
+
� 0
O
r.
O
Ib
m
O
�
b
R•
.o
FLL
F
L
cn
ti
Q
�
A
o
O
O
�
d
O
a�
c_
o.
q
LL
m
lood
o
1
ti0 +g t e1S
uonoeS ss
o 6
•
b
tQ
° 0 v
0
o
L g
LL
•
v
Y m
b
z9+2 L
food
£B +Zt
uogoagss
°
° O' o
}
N
LL Y
d
m
o
0
O N ° 0 b N
O O Co O
Ln u� a v a v
(1001) UORRA013
N
U
0
I
i
O
0.
O
y
O
0
0
0
C
Q
d
i
V
O
a�
o.
N
U
0
I
i
O
0.
O
y
O
0
0
0
C
Q
d
i
V

*.
O
0
N ,f1
O O
} }
U- LL
Y Y
m m
x
N
.
"
N u7
O O
O
•
O
�
• i
1
1 �
11
�
Lo
°
Z'�N
��
C
Y
+
•',
'
m
cn
Y m O
d OO
.-
• I •••
•
o
U «
0
of M o
'9108 L6 +L L els
Zl uol)oeS ssaz)
LL
x
x
o °
L
X
,
o
Y
m
5
0
lood ZO +LL e1S
Li UOIPRSssIC)
,. .
o 0
iE
LL
m
.
.
.
o
0
0
o 0 0 o o o O O
,n Ln Lo N In u] N u)
(1001) u01;ena13

I
I
An
CWR
in
C3
cm
5
71'
I'm
ON Ni
In
ca
fD
6,
6n
o
M
N
cq
ic
1$
In
'11A
O
4�,
n
zs
cm
I
m
Eu
n
-s
:rn
en
I
-
In
Ln
p
N
cn
6
1A
Ln
01
'
111,
rt
U,
r4
q
w
-Z�
,
im
-
,
7-
2
$'
A
In
1
Ln
n4
in
'n
Ln
r-
i c
IQ
A
L
C3
ki
00
ID
ui
C3
It
I=
ai
Z
7.
WA
1
11'.
'n
C3
co
'm
m
III,
i.,
Ln
<
In
'r!
�
L,n
r,
P,
*
",
-4
h0
�f7
. fq
>-
f-,
,,
�II
,
I
'M
C3
-4
Q
�4
eq
CI
'In
rq,
I
M
47�YdO
a
-4
8,
t.
A
m
rN
,4
r�
.�
fV
N
'z
_
Z,Z
Z
-}
im
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Ln
77
0
1 1 �-
��
fj
zz
Ln
Zi
;,
Ln
LA
Im,
0
w
ca
qF
111
rn
4
C4
;CD
ul
on
m
&n
m
-A
Ln
-
-20
rn
ss
1`0
10
_4
O
Yq
Ln
in
:T!
10
l71
to
N
"
5.,
%10
P
Q
tr;
r-n
fq
cn
Lf)
cq
'A
N
0
=4
S
en
O
m
'"
C�
LIS
ro
0
r:j
11
oi
'o
12
2
m
Ur-
J: �
1 m
A4
In
04
41
Q
"
'o
N
w
m
P.,
in
E
tj
sm
L"
E
S
c
k-1.1
:fir
3
'CIA,
c
c
I
1
15
JC
m
in
w
:20!-
tE
-2
LL
c
log
13
E
co
0i
41
Q
E
t-A
LA
-0
r
�z
?2
M
MC
0
.r-
1 .-
78
Va
kr
In
0
,iu
a- 45
dr) jg M,
E
M
ID
15E
I
I
It
ti
O
O
O
ce
O
O
O
9 1 ho
CWR
in
',q
cm
5
71'
ON Ni
M
N
cq
ic
1$
O
zs
I"Ln
m
Eu
n
-s
:rn
en
I
-
p
N
cn
6
1A
Ln
N,
-Z�
z
z
7-
z
In
IQ
A
L
WN
r,
pp
IN
Z
WA
co
'm
m
III,
i.,
Go
<
�
h0
�f7
In
'In
rq,
I
M
47�YdO
a
U1
8,
t.
Z,Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
77
0
1 1 �-
��
1,�,q
2
zz
Zi
;,
z1zzzz
Im
10
;CD
ul
on
m
m
LM
10
CID
-Z
in
:T!
Nh
5.,
P
tr;
r-n
fq
cq
=4
S
en
O
m
-0
ro
0
r:j
q
oi
N
m
P.,
in
L"
S
S
3
c
c
I
1
15
JC
04
tE
E
0
0i
41
Q
E
t-A
LA
-0
�z
?2
M
0
.r-
1 .-
78
kr
In
0
E
M
ID
El
'I
Ij
It
ti
O
O
O
ce
O
O
O
9 1 ho

Mary's Creek EP #341
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
Late 2005T -uly 2006
Late 2005/Early 2006
Visual duiine
construction
NIA
September 18, 2008
September 7, 2008
Wrack lines
_NIA
July 24, 2009
_Un-.=e (June 6, 2009)
Crest Gauge
N/A
June 15, 2010
May 17, 2010 (3 3' ram
'event)
Wrack hneslCrestGauge
NA
August 30 2011
unknown
Wrack Imes
N/A
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

2003 Stream Restoration Plan.Planting Plan Species List
Zone 1�: St_reambank
Shrubs
Trees
Silky dogwood (Corpus amonum)
—
Tag alder'(Alrtus,serrulata)
— _
Virginia willow (Itea wr inica
1'6%
Silky (Salk sericea)
Celtis'laevigata
Buttonbush (Ce halanthus occtdentahs)
16%
Zone 2: Flood lain Forest
Shrubs
Trees
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
River birch (Betula nt a)
Red chokebe (Aroma arbutt,olia)
Green,ash (Fraxinus ennsylvanica)
Doghobble (Leucothoe axillartes)
Americansycamore (Platanus occtdentahs)
Inkberry (Ilex labra)'
Willowloak `(Quercus hellos)
Male -be (L onia ligustrina)
Overcu oak (Quercus 1 rata)
Zone 3: Upland Forest
Shrubs
Trees
Wmterbe (Ilex verticillata )
American elm Ulmus americana
Hi hbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum
American holly (Ilex o aca
Rhododendron (Rhododendron spp )
White oak (Quercus alba
Beau be Calltcar a amertcana
Chestnut oak, , uercus rinus
Table.5. Vegetation Species Planted
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
Scientific Name,
Common
I Name
Percent by
I Species
Total Number
1 gallort
Supplemental Planting (l, gallon containers) (January 2013)
Betula mgrs
River Birch
1'6%
50
Celtis'laevigata
Sugar Berry
16%
50
Fraxinus
pennsy &anica
Green Ash
13%
40
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
13%
40
Nyssa btflora
Swamp
Black um
13%
40
Quercus palustris
Pin Oak
13%
40
Quercus shumardn
Shumard Oak
16%
50
Total
—
100%
310
Table 6. Vegetation History: Stems /Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site
Plot
Number*
MY -00
2006'
MY -01
2007
MY -02 (2008)
MY -03 (2009)
MY -04 (2010)
MY -05 (2011)
Planted
Planted _
Planted
Total
Planted_
Total
Planted
Total
Planted
Total
VP1
_
8541
—
7972
3642
—
2509
_ VP2
__
_
1093
—
1133_
—
1862'
—
1335
VP3
i6-
769
—
566
—
1052-
1'174
VP4 **
728
809
323
1174
121
5787
121
2347
121
2954
VP5 * **
1052
931
—
6801
—
5,666
—
4573
202
6495
* -Plots 1 -3 were established during MY -a2
** - Originally Tributary Plot
* ** - Onginally Main Channel Plot

Y
v
u
_i
ti
E
A
2
v
o'
d`
r
m
m
r°v
O
N
N
N
y
d
D
C
d
m
o
N
O
ti
N
0
0
m
o
r
o
m
o
�
o
N
v
A
M
a
o
c
d
o
0
0
r
K1
rl rl
N Q
m
n H
of
N l0
V1 H
1'11 H
N
ei ry
n
m
ID
l0
•'1
O
A
N
�
�
O
C
d
O
O
O
O
d
r
m
l0
V
ti N
to
N
In
N
O
O�
>
111
O
C
d
o
0
0
>
in
o
m
•� n
'+
N
W
J
O
0
O
N
cT
O
n
o
a
d
o
0
0
0
c
0
c
d
o
0
0
V
6
r
N
M lm
�
ti
N
O
a
-
N
i
n
N
W
�
O
�
O
C
d
o
0
0
00
a
�
o
O
N
W
�
O
D
C
d
o
0
0
W
C N C W
CL
J
r
d
N N
r r
N
Ul
GJ
d
V V Q
E 0<?
a a
a a
a
a
a
« N d' a
'^
r
V1 Vf
Vf Vf
r
r V1
r r
r r
VI r
r
N F-
r r
� r
a
E
C
o
a
Z
N
E
v
E
o
w
a
E
o
E
a
Z
c
c
o
a
� r
v
D
E
O
w
E E
E
m
m u
o
o
A
d
c
D
w
—
c
v v
u
E
`v
>
E
n
N
io
�o ��
E E
ono
°
m t
a
B¢
a a
a
v v
3 i
E
m
m
'c
D
n
N
T
C
T>
N
L
T N
A
C
G
w
o
E
m
c u
'oo
a
E
�
E
0
o. m
E
O
N
m
.a
'Y
c
ro
n
,.�.
v
'c
a'
c�
E
y o
o
V
a w
,c a
c io
`J-
'-`
E
E E
Q
Q u
u
5
LL 3
J
a a
a a-M
-'
7 7

EEP RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The stream assessment found the stream to be, generally stable, with no ,si'gnificant changes over the
course of the - monitoring period., Other than one dislodged rock on the, structure at the very, bottom of the.
projeci; the monitored cross - sections and in stream structures on both the main stem and tributary are all
stable and bank erosion is minimal. A large'beaver dam was removed in 2011 with subsequent removals
in 2012 and 2013. The primary infe "stations of invasives�have been successfully treated, with one, more
contracted treatment in 2015. The stream_ has met the success criterion -of at least, two bankfull events
occurring in separate years. The fifth year of monitoring found the majority of the project to be
functioning as designed.
EEP,recommends regulatory closure as proposed
CONTINGENCIES
It is recommended that this site be,closed out without contingencies
Mary's Creek "Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

Pre - Construction Photos
(From Restoration Plan, April 2003)
V*w d Sc Sao.: %; =Ak 6006h m,
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

MY05 Photos
(January 2012)
Main Channel Cross Section #1 Looking Downstream
Main Channel Cross Section #3 Looking Downstream
Tributary Channel Cross Section #1 Looking Downstream
Main Channel Cross Section #2 Looking Downstream
Main Channel Cross Section #4 Looking Downstream
Tributary Channel Cross Section #2 Looking
Downstream
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

Appendix, A
Watershed, Planning Summary
The Mary's Creek project site is not located within a designated watershed,planning area.
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

Appendix B
Land' Ownership and Protection
The site protection instrument forthis mitigation project includes the following
document(s), available at the specified County Register of Deeds office:
Project
Name
Grantor
Name
County
Property Rights
Deed/Page
Plat /Page
Total
Acres
Mary's
Creek
Sigrid N.
McCain
`Trust
Randolph
Conservation
Easement
1974/313
101/57
13.26
This property will be transferred to the NCDENR Stewardship for fong °term
management.
Mary's Creek ^Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

Appendix C
Permits
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014
. 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200320626 County: Alamance
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Authorized
Owner NC Wetlands Restoration Program Agent NA
Attn: Chem Smith
Address 1619 Mail Service Center Address
Raleigh NC 27699 -1619
Telephone Number 336 - 733 -5208 Telephone Number
Size and Location of Property (waterbodv Hiehway name /number, town etc.). The project (Mary's
Creek Stream Restoration) is located east of Dixon Lamb Road, north of East Greensboro — Chapel Hill
Road, in Alamance County, North Carolina. The site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Description of Activity: This permit authorizes stream channel excavation and relocation, the placement
of fill material (stream diversion plugs), and the installation of in- stream structures (e.g., coir fiber rolls,
log and rock vanes, root wads, riprap, etc.) associated with the construction of the Mary's Creek Stream
Restoration Project. Impacts to existing waters of the U.S. authorized by this permit total 2,103 linear feet
of stream channel. See attached special conditions.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number
27 Nationwide Permit Number
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permitter to a stop work order, a restoration order, and /or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General Permit or Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals /permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Todd Tuewell at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 26
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Authorization Date July 17, 2003 Expiration Date July 17, 2005
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF:
{`�
1 1 E �.J�� ti
JU! 22 2903
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report — March 2014

F -VJATF h.
\O�� 9PG Michael F Easley
dovemor 44
Cl) r William G Ross, Jr, Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan Klimek: PE ;t
Division of Water Qualdy A
May 20, 2003
Mr. Ron,Fer ell
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619VSC
Raleigh, NC'27699 -1619
Subject Stream FiestorationlEnhancement
Unnamed Tnbuta'nes to Marys Creek,
Alamance�County, NC
DWQ #030512
Dear Mr: Ferrell:
This,Office i`s'in receipt of the revlsed`plans,for the stream restoration and 3enhancement, project of
approzimately:2084 feet'of unnamed tributaries to,Marys Creek in the Cape Fea- r'River Basin submitted tolthis
Office on Apnl 2,4,/2003 with revisions received May 12, 2003 DWQ Staff reviewed the plans and dete' fined
'that stream restoration, and/or enhancement would be,achieved
The, stream impacts associated with the project may proceedawfthout`wntten approval,from the Division. Please,
be advised that seven copiesof a complete,,formal application,and a $475.00 fee is required for prolects
intended'for compensatory mitigation credit (see General Certification No. 3399 „issued Maich 2003).,Any
request for,mitigation credit shalk%addressedvnder,separate cover.
If you haverany questions,regarding this matter, please contact Mr Tod6SLJohn at,(919) 733 -9584.
Sincerely,
John
Wetlands Unif Supervisor
cc, Mr Todd St. John, Wetlands Unit`
Chem Smith, WRP
Winston -Salem F egional,Office
File
RECEIVED.
MAY 22, 2003
NC WETLANDS
RESTORATION
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mal service CenGr,IRaleigh,,NC 27699 -1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd , Raleigh, NC'27604 -2260 (Location)'
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Closeout Report— March 2014

r�I
V
A
W
E-
W
A
I
A
A
IWI�
FBI
Q
Y
d W N
U LL c
w w O
z�ao
N U O
N
E
m
z
v _
m
o
0. c
D
C-
Ul m
m?m O
p1 a `m R
'=w? m
w Ix U
N
M
N
in
O
cu
a�
U
T)
n
a
snjoydsoyd ON
*Aluo
lueNlnN jeun8
u011eNesead
ysiew lelse0o
luawa3ueyu3
ysiew lelseoo
uopewo
Ils.leyy lelseoo
uollejolsaa
ysjew lelse00
uolle"asaM
ueljedlJuON
luawaoueyu3
ueliedlJuON
uolleaj
ueuedljuON
uoRejolsoN
ueliedlJuON
CD
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
O
W
CD
O
O
N
N
N
`
¢
E
n
cv m
m
Z
U
N
_ m
Y
m
N
d' O
N
2
co 0
Q
0-
Q
cu
a
�
a�
z
E
z
a-
m
rn
00
_o
C
N
O
p
O
N
V
Lo
W
N
y
¢
O
O
_
N
a
y
w
U
m
U
U
C
(n
V
v
m
C
m
CO
N
m
?1
v
E
M
M
OI
O
O
y
_
ao
m
w
E
O
Q)
CD
0
O
C
0
01
U
V
u
f6
U
m
m UJ
a�
o
m
m w
m
m
rn
rn
m
Y
rn
rn
rn
'rn
o
a
E
E
m
m z
w
m
m
v
O
N
N
M
a
N
f0
N
CD
Q1
J
4
a�
D
CL
W
W
E
0
c
O
cu
E
0
c