19970544 Ver 1_Complete File_19970801

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
' LT.NWA'
T4
100"% 00-AM00
r
�EHNR
August 1, 1997
Carteret County
DWQ Project # 970544
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDMONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Randall Ramsey
P.O. Box 280
Marshallberg, NC 28553
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to dredge
4,200 square feet of water and 6115,355 square feet of water for the purpose of removing existing docks
-and building new ones at Jarrett Bay Boatworks at Jarrett Bay Boatworks, as you described in your
application dated 13 May 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number 3112. In addition, you should get any other federal, state
or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non - Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in
the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except
as modified below. If you change your protect, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a
new application. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed
below. A permanent seweage pumpout facility shall be installed and maintained throughout the life of the
marina and signs shall be installed to indicate its location. The applicant shall contact the Carteret County
Health Dept. concerning the existing septic tank's suitability for this site.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 -7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919 - 733 -1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
John Parker, DCM
970544.1tr
Division of Water Quality - Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919 - 733 -1786 FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycledl10% post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
To: Interested Citizens
From: John Dorn
Division of W ter Quali
LT.WYWA
A&14
- - �J
sm
�EHNR
August 6, 1997
Re: Water Quality Certification
Randall Ramsey project
Jarrett Bay Boatworks/Marshallberg Harbor
DWQ #970544, COE #199707653
Carteret County
Thank you for your recent letter concerning Mr. Ramsey's project to remove piers and
pilings, place riprap for shoreline stabilization and install piers and moorings to establish
commercial dockage within the Marshallberg Harbor of Refuge in Carteret County.
After careful consideration of your comments and our rules, DWQ issued a 401 Water
Quality Certification for this project on 1 August 1997 (see attached). An important
condition was added to the Certification to require a properly designed and maintained
sewage pumpout facility at the site.
Many of the comments we received related to public access in the Marshallberg
Harbor. The Certification decision made by the Division of Water Quality relates to water
quality and aquatic life issues. Issues related to public access of water are beyond the
scope of the Water Quality certification and are more properly the regulatory interest of the
N.C. Division of Coastal Management. I will send copies of all comments we have
received to Mr. John Parker of the N.C. Division of Coastal Management for his review.
Thank you for your interest in water quality. Please call me at 919 - 733 -1786 if you
have any questions.
cc: Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
970544.dcm
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NO 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aff irmative Action Employer • 50% recycled /10% post consumer paper

July 26, 1997 RECEI VED
Mr. John Dorney Al J-1 1991
N.C. Division of Environmental Mang. EM'�oNMFNTA�sciFivcFs
P.O. Box 27687 ', �•.,,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 -7687
Mr. Dorney:
I am writing in regards to Mr. Randy Ramsey's / Jarrett Bay Boat Works
application for a major permit in the Marshallberg harbor. As a life -time member of this
community, I would like to state my complete and total support of this project. In my
opinion, the clean up and organization of the harbor is long over due. I applaud Mr.
Ramsey's efforts, dreams, and aspirations. He is trying to improve a business situation, but
has tried very hard to accommodate the local community in this process. Many people in
our community have long wished for someone to take the interest and have the resources
to take such action. The community and environment can benefit greatly.
Mr. Ramsey's proposal would be a drastic improvement for local commercial
fishermen, community members, visitors, and any one coming into the area, in that the
harbor would be meeting government regulations for safety, providing safe dockage
facilities, including electricity, water, and maintenance to these facilities. All of these
would be a great improvement and asset.
Mr. Ramsey has endeavored to work with the local community and has met with
much resistance from some individuals who have used and abused this facility for years.
One can simply come and observe to understand the impact some of the local forces have
had on this area. Change is often resisted when individuals think they will have to give up
something they have been accustom to having at the expense of others. Many of us
would love to see this area be cleaned up and be made a safe environment for all those
concerned. I would like to thank Mr. Ramsey, as the landowner, for taking the initiative
and wanting to improve the area. This area has been ignored and monopolized by a few
for far too long.
Thank you for the opportunity to address this matter. I hope Mr. Ramsey's
proposal is considered carefully and all due haste is made in bringing it to fruition for the
good of all those involved.
Sincerely,
Ken J. D ✓avis
cc: Mr. Jeff Richter
Dept. of the Army
Wilmington District
Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402 -1890

As a resident of Carteret
opposed to the Marshallberg
being turned over to private
used for commercial profit.
County, I am
refuge harbor
individuals to be
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and. maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Personal Comments:
Signature_
Address
Z K"-0- c-/
^ys'pj�Nc�S

As a resident of Carteret
opposed to the Marshallberg
being turned over to private
used for commercial profit.
County, I - am
refuge harbor
individuals to be
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Personal Comments:�W
igh'atur�e_'
Address
t
F,G
o4
s

r
July 25, 1997
Mr. John Dorney
N.C. Division of Environmental Mang.
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 -7687
Dear Mr. Dorney:
FC
scFti1
Fs
I am writing this letter in regards to the application for a major permit project in
the Marshallberg harbor by Mr. Randy Ramsey. I would like to state my complete and
total support of this project. In my opinion, the proposals which Mr. Ramsey has applied
for would be a great improvement to the harbor facilities at Marshallberg. The community
would benefit greatly, from the stand point of the harbor being cleaned up, the shoreline
being made stable, new slips being created, better organization of existing area, water
quality being improved and monitored more closely, and overall appearance and
functionality of the harbor. Mr. Ramsey's vision of the harbor area is one that, if taken to
completion, would instill a sense of pride in the harbor. Visitors to the area would see a
neat and well maintained harbor facility, instead of the area in its present condition, with
years of accumulation of trash, including items abounding along the shore such as old
appliances, discarded commercial fishing equipment, engines, tires, broken pilings, etc.,
etc. From appearance only, immediate results would be realized, and drastic improvement
over its present state would make the harbor a place which one could take friends and
visitors to with pride instead of embarrassment, which is now the case. It is well past due
for the ram - shackle, run down, and unsafe docks which now exist in the harbor, most of
which were illegally built over the years, be cleaned out and put back in proper fashion by
the property owner of the land adjoining the harbor project, that owner in this case being
Mr. Ramsey.
Mr. Ramsey's proposal would have immediate benefits to the local fishermen and
others now moored in the harbor, in that more and better organized slips would be
created. The outcry of locals claiming being "run out" of the harbor is simply not founded,
since Mr. Ramsey has stated privately and publicly that those who will be co- operative
with his plans and vision for the harbor will be offered docks and slips at a very
reasonable cost. This proposal would enable local mariners to remain in the facility very
much like they are now, except with a clean, safe, well thought out and well maintained
facility. Basically these folks have taken a "free ride" in the harbor for years, having
absolutely no responsibility or accountability for the state of conditions around the
harbor. Further, many of these folks have overstepped the bounds of common decency
and courtesy, until they have reached a state of running amuck around the harbor, and
turning the entire area into an eyesore for the community with their ever increasing levels
of trash and pollution. It is well past time for control of this area to be put back in proper
place, that being the property owner, in this case being Mr. Ramsey. It is fortunate that
the property owner, who may utilize this property in any manner he sees fit, has such
noble and good intentions for the use of his property. He is certainly going out of his way

to make accommodations and a fine facility available to local community members, many
of whom are completely unappreciative of his efforts, and in fact are operating continually
to generate ill -will and uncooperative spirits among the community. It is a shame that
such narrow - minded and ignorant attitudes are allowed to have such a negative impact on
a part of our community which has the potential to be such a great and positive asset.
Mr. Ramsey's business, Jarrett Bay Boat Works, employs approximately 40 to 50
people and is responsible for generating millions of dollars of income in the local area each
year. This business needs the improvements to the harbor in order to perpetuate growth
and success. Mr. Ramsey's proposal enables the needs of this vital business to be met, as
well as the needs of the community. The pollution and trash problems will be resolved.
The environment will be greatly improved, both in an environmental sense and in a social
sense. It is well past time that a project of this nature be implemented in the harbor.
I will close by again simply restating my complete and total support of the proposals
made by Mr. Ramsey in his application, and say God -speed in making his proposals come
to completion as soon as possible. Your attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Gary T. Davis
Marshallberg, NC 28553
[phone]
[phone]
cc: Mr. Jeff Richter
Dept. of the Army
Wilmington District
Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Raleigh, N.C. 28402 -1890

Attention: John Dorney
N. C. Division of Environmental Management F®
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687 Ftir 9j
gysc /�Nc�s
To whom it may concern,
I am a permanent resident, and full time charter boat operator who
has lived in Carteret County since 1980. In the past eight years I have had
many business dealings with Randy Ramsey s. I
find them to be very professional and honest in their practices.
In a ten year period they have grown from half a dozen people in a
fallen down shed to a premier custom boat builder on the east coast of
the United States. Now employing sixty people directly, and numerous
subcontractors in eastern Carteret County. This has taken a tremendous
amount of foresight and fortitude to last through some hard times in the
boating industry.
What they now propose for the Marshallberg Harbor is a continuation
of this foresight, and an undertaking of a project that the county has not
had the courage to assume. The current arrangement in the harbor is
squatter's rights with no long term or short term responsibility for property
management or environmental responsibility. The U.S. Coast Guard has
told Jarrett Bay this is their land and they are to be held accountable.
Jarrett Bay and the other property owners seem to have no control
over their deeded property in the current state of confusion. Therefore, I
see nothing but good to come from this new plan for Marshallberg
Harbor.
Sincerely,
Cap ain Dew Forbes
Calcutta Fishing

Elbert W. Pittman
P.O. Box 182
Rgik N t: 9R�9d
WY w1w, i V.W LL*Yr i
(919) 729 -9781
[e-mail]
NC Division of Enviromental Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 -7687
Mr. John Domey,
",,, oU� 0
F X991
N
�NTA``SC��NcFs
This letter Is In response to public comments for Improvements in Marshaliberg Harbor
of Refuge made by Randall Ramsey,Jarrett Bay Boatworks.
Deny any and all permits. Reason, displacement of mariners who have historically
moored vessels.
Thank you,
eml"4 Ur. PwAn4 m,
Elbert W. Man

4
As a resident of Carteret County, I am
opposed to the Marshallberg refuge harbor
being turned over to private individuals to be
used for commercial profit.
To ensure the public access for future.
generations, it is my request that Carteret
Y
County restore and maintain this refuge =harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkens Is
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Personal Comments:
J/U.� u� ✓ ,�., �ta�"- ern/ u� `� �m-�a�J
Signaturc_e....�J
Address
oti��2T91 '�q
of
s

)C�l
JVA
PA'
En\ji roornea4n-1 ManoTe Glck-uceS4--er, I JC
yo. c x-r sh-alUtce-cs ------- - --- --
1s
\cL
14 c e-
-TV

199, .
"1VVIRovvh,-,
---------- - -- ------
ly
CLJ
L6- 4 c -C I -
k A
. ......... 6CLAIJ -C4 -

ti
r -.,

As a resident of Marshallberg, I am opposed
to the refuge harbor being turned over to
private individuals to be used for commercial
profit.
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Persona( Comments:
Signature iyj'a1��- ,c - - - -_
Address
RFcF��'F
�M�yTgc 9t

As a resident of Carteret County, I am
opposed to the Marshallberg refuge harbor
being turned over to private individuals to be
used for commercial profit.
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County .restore an.d maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Personal Comments: CQ'C�- �(��u� - VO
.9uen c, 40 c ktf de c eaM. cf be dze�c�ecL
Signature —�Ik*,Li�—1 _�Q.-Svw'—
Address �51_I� �� �g�___
I �
Fiy��RoNM� ,' 99

��14Rfl�MF_NiA:in- a
,-n, C'. "]Wt� I
9,o, 26Y IV( R7
alL ) `n. c . A �4 // - 24 k7
edj- a&6 &&T
E�O-aj-y- fyvr - vay�
of+Lcj XK
*ne 60-f-
em eel �i
3 �" 1 41" v-
SX-
J,�) )Au� ZAVI-e- ICU C
.1iY1 ovrs-�
SaLv
B .Q -
°�S

or
1
As a resident of Marshallberg, I am opposed
to the refuge harbor being turned over to
private individuals to be used for commercial
profit.
To ensure
generations, it
County restore
as the harbors
were protected
communities.
he public access for future
is my request that Carteret
and maintain this refuge harbor
at Atlantic and Harkers Island
for the residents of those
Personal Comrnents J�+ v,(t el LA CA Siwne, c
Dj I e-i- (k., PGbi I c, hcwbol D-� 40 tars
5 sbo�.od r�o-1- be, cA. i
�CL►'s1 c,I 1 bug hc-vbw � P �41Et*-� �01 b ss �n -�rKAA
J ? 4- c s Goa -) ty-IG ?
9�' � -��n-h cJ h�► -leis . �. � +Se c9 I �. io h�Y� Ctc� � �.cl
i�►�5� C.c�icler �1� ri h-�- �-F = PAP
5 .� U� - L+s� �G' 6,
Signature_ �.rrls1 --
Address 13.L.,6h
t
JUL 18 1997
ALITY
I ION

.l t
As a resident of Carteret County, I am
opposed to the Marshallberg refuge harbor
being turned over to private individuals to be
used for commercial profit.
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Signature_�6/ �— ----------_
Address %4T
,ue �PslG
JUL 18 1997
CITY

As a resident of Carteret County, I am
opposed to -the Marshallberg refuge harbor
being turned over to private individuals to be
used for commercial profit.
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities. �u /°) q,
Personal Comments: ftt6tm 's
�L u ��0
Signature _____
Address 3 _L.. C12
���
F � o
JUL 18 1991
._a tY
S�� I ION

As
a resident of
Marshallberg,
I am opposed
to the
refuge harbor
being turned
over to
private
individuals to
be used for
commercial
profit.
To ensure the public access for future
generations, it is my request that Carteret
County restore and maintain this refuge harbor
as the harbors at- Atlantic and Harkers Island
were protected for the residents of those
communities.
Personal Comments:
..1 Fr C SrRo�rG v 7—#AT T,y,' Conr�V�v►TY wie,� Ae a T 4
pgO PEA y SE,e VA5 0 a Y A Al -7-^/ o, W 1 I/A o ►2 i4 COt�ePORA7'10 N
p g 7-A ► f4 I n! C- 6CP M T A 0 4-/ A R 4e 4',2
ro Q / T �S F ► Mt4 N r f A L GA i N _ T�qLF A/•9, it BOtle C. AM F /C'c014
L- d C A L 1-Y fld NA TLf A
Tom ✓S a SEe✓Ic
TfFl� C�rr24F
C O /mot ,m c/ti ► T / .
D� TNLr.
1
�.SV 1Li/- �2SN.4c.c.,rFR� t2�,
MA,eS14.4L L Z �ss3

`a.
To: John Dorney
Environmental Sciences Branch
DIVISION OF QUALITY
CAMA MAJOR PERMIT '' Y•► R /I
• ► : • �� M : 01 'r• s ►11 • ulul ►II : Y •
REVIEWER: GREGS
ACTING WQ SUPERVISOR: SHIVER
DATE: July 18, 1997
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKIN[�
PERMIT YR: 96 PERMIT NO.: 970544 COUNTYi Carteret
PROJECT NAME: Randall Ramsey (Jarrett Bay Boat works)
PROJECT TYPE: Marina / Riprap PERMIT TYPE: CAMA
COE #: N/A DOT #: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: June 17, 1997
REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030504
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: The Straits
CLASS: SA STREAM INDEX #: 21- 35 -1 -12
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed
WL IMPACT: N/A WL TYPE: N/A
WL REQUESTED: N/A WL ACR EST: N/A
WL SCORE: N/A
MITIGATION: N/A MITIGATION TYPE: N/A
MITIGATION SIZE: N/A RATING SHEET ATTACHED ?: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D:
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to remove existing docks and construct new ones to
accommodate 24 boats. Also proposed is the placement of approximately 700' riprap along the shoreline of
his property.
WATER OITALITV CF.RT_ (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #3112 for CAMA Major Permits.
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: Existing Septic Tank
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FIIJ-
AREA OF FILL - WATER: 5,355 sq. ft. WETLAND: N/A
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? No
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? No
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? Yes

970544.Jul
Page Two
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: No MARINA SERVICES: N/A
OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A
(ATTACH A MARINA USE ATTAINABILITY EVAL.)
RF.0 OMMF.NT)Fi) C ONDMONS OR PERMIT RF_4TRTCT INS! That the project be done
in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate construction area to exceed
25 NTU.
It is recommended that a permanent sewage pumpout facility be installed and maintained
through out the life of the marina and that signs be posted indicating the location of the pumpout
facility. The applicant should contact the Carteret County Health Department concerning the
suitability of the existing septic tank system for the proposed type of operation and if additional
capacity will be needed for the addition of the pumpout facility.
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM-
John Parker

I rr -
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402 -1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199707653
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
June 25, 1997
9'7 05'7 0
,p
< VGA
Enclosed is the application of Mr. Randall Ramsey, Jarrett Bay Boatworks,
for Department of the Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to remove piers and pilings, place rip rap material for
shoreline protection and install piers and mooring piles establishing
commercial dockage within the Marshallberg Harbor of Refuge, The Straits,
Marshallberg, Carteret County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter
verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification by Section
325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification
has been obtained or waived.
According to our administrative regulations, 60 days is reasonable for
State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by August 25, 1997, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Jeff Richter, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
Cl Vord Wi fordner
Chief, South Section
Regulatory Branch
Enclosure

-2-
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -7687
Mr. Charles Jones, District Manager
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division of
Coastal Management
Hestron Plaza Two
151 -B Highway 24
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

° `C\ v 3
1 t
RECE WED
J
• )N OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT JUN 1) 1991
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
QG11IAT09Y R1iMi`3+
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Randall Ramsey (Jarrett Bay Boatworks)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: at the end of SR 1347 and adjacent to the Marshallberg Harbor and
the Straits, in the community of Marshallberg, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1995: 41- 499,L -14
1989: 154- 3,J -14
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2745000 Y: 362500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D &F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 5 -20 -97
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - June 4, 1997
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret
Land Classification From LUP - Community & Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW,PTA,ES
© Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Commercial .
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Septic Tank
Planned -
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Boat Manufacturing Facility, boat yard & docks
Planned - Docking facility
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: Minimal
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
RTT T 'Pn OTHRR
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non - Vegetated Wetlands
±4,200 sq.ft.
±5,355 sq.ft.
±16,620 sq.ft.
Shallow water bottom areas
(Footprint of dock
& mooring areas)
m Other (Highground)
±4,400 sq.ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ± 11,755 sq.ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Closed
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to remove existing docks and build new ones in
their place to accommodate 24 boats.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
RANDALL RAMSEY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DE ION: The applicant's property is a t 4.15 acre tract(s) of
land located at the end of SR 1347 in the community of Marshallberg. The majority of
the property is bordered on the south by the Straits and surrounds the head of the
Marshallberg Harbor. The majority of the high ground property has been developed into
a commercial boat yard and boat building facility known as Jarrett's Bay Boat Works.
The applicant primarily builds large charter boats and yachts in the +50' range and was
previously located in Williston before outgrowing that facility in 1991. The applicant
has received both CAMA major and minor Permits over the past 6 years authorizing the
development of this facility. One of the permits, LAMA Major Permit No. 150 -91,
authorized the excavation of a boat basin and the construction of four boat slips in the
Straits and the installation of a travel lift in the Marshallberg Harbor. Marshallberg
Harbor was excavated in the 1950's by the Federal government and today remains a
federally authorized project. The harbor connects to Sleepy Creek near its intersection
with the Straits. Historically, the residents of Marshallberg and nearby communities
have constructed and maintained docking facilities in the harbor. For the most part, the
boats mooring in this area are commercial fishing boats ranging from skiffs to ± 40'
vessels. It is estimated that ± 60 boats moor in the harbor. The shoreline of the harbor
is partially stabilized with bulkheads, riprap and various amounts of trash and debris.
There are some areas which are vegetated with varying amounts of coastal and 404
wetlands. While there is some signs of bank erosion, most has occurred gradually over
the years. The harbor is fairly deep (6 to 8' mean low water) and, is classified as SA
waters. The harbor is closed to the harvesting of shellfish.
The applicant is proposing to develop the shoreline area of his property which is adjacent
to the Marshallberg Harbor into a commercial docking /marina facility. The existing
docks used by area watermen will first be removed and riprap will be placed along the
shoreline bank. The total length of shoreline to be riprap is f 700` and the Riprap will
extend 6' beyond the mean high water line expect in the location of an existing ±165
linear foot bulkhead at the head of the basin. Here, the riprap will extend +13' below
the mean high water line. The shoreline area is proposed to be excavated and sloped in
order to provide a proper angle for the riprap placement. The applicant has indicated
that ±350 of silty material would be excavated below the mean high water line to
facilitate the riprap placement. The marina development will include the placement of
12 finger piers and one larger dock (with adjacent mooring pilings) into the harbor in
order to accommodate 24 boats. The finger piers will be 4' in width and will vary in
length from t 12 to 40'. The waterward extensions of the finger piers and mooring into
the harbor will range from ± 24 to 40' in length. Fourteen of the spaces will be 20'
wide while the remaining 10 slips will be 15' wide. At the head of the basin and
adjacent to SR 1347, a 70' long x 4' wide dock is also proposed. The applicant has
indicated that parking for the marina facility will be located in an area adjacent to SR
1347 and on an existing rock parking area within the Boatworks' compound. Presently,
an unimproved portion of the area along SR 1347 is presently used for parking while

the remainder is vegetated with grass, vines and bushes. A portion of the area will have
to be filled in order to make it usable for a parking. The 11 new spaces along the road
are not proposed to be improved with rock or gravel. The new parking area will be
located within the Estuarine Shoreline AEC and would occupy an area of ±2,200 sq.ft.
It is anticipated that the total land disturbance (filling and grading) associated with the
parking area would be ± 4,400 sq.ft.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the excavation of
approx. 4,200 sq.ft. of intertidal and shallow water habitat area with t 350 cu.yds. of
silty material being removed. The placement of the riprap will result in the filling of f
5,355 sq.ft. of shallow water bottom area with the placement of f 518 cu.yds of broken
concrete material below the mean high water line. The removal of the existing boat
docks will displace a number of individuals who have historically moored their boats in
the harbor. A recent site inspection of the harbor revealed 32 boats /mooring areas
within the project area which would be eliminated. The 24 slip marina will extend into
a federally authorized harbor and the US Army Corps of Engineers will need to
determine what impacts will occur to the federal project. The majority of the marina
slips will be wide enough (20') to allow for large boats to use the facility. It can be
anticipated that these boats will have "heads" but there is no pump -out facility proposed
or available in the immediate area. New parking areas will be provided along the road
right of way and will be unimproved. It is not known if stormwater approval will be
required by the Division of Water Quality. Since receiving the permit application, a
number of individuals in the Marshallberg community have expressed concerns and
opinions over the project involving such things as the public ownership of the harbor,
validity of easements and deeds and the prescriptive use rights of the area by the public.
Further evaluations and investigations of these issues will need to be undertaken before a
permit decision is made.
Prepared By: Charles Jones
Date: June 13, 1997

Form DCM -MP -1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name Randall Ramsey
Address P. 0. Bog 280
City Marshallberg . State NC
Zip 28553 Day Phone
Fax 919 - 729 -1442
b. Authorized Agent:
919 - 729 -1661
Name Jack P. Huddle, P.E.
Address P. 0. Drawer 1578
City New Bern
Zip 28563 Day Phone
Fax 919 - 633 -1370
State NC
919 - 633 -2424
c. Project name (if any) Proposed harbor
improvement
NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of imudowner(s), mid /or
project name.
Randall Ramsey
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Carteret
Revised 03/95
REC:E:, VJ�o
JUIN 1 ? 1997
b. City, town, community or landA%Q1 Q 1 J)pV jgW,1 � J, ,,u
Marshallberg, N. C.
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1347
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes x No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) The Straits
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and /or filling activities.
Add new rip —rap bulkhead, finger piers,
and mooring piles.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Commercial
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Clean up existing shore
line, removed old piers and piling.
Rip —rap the existing shoreline and
construct new finger piers and mooring
piles.

N
Form DCM -MP -1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 4.15 Acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 6.5'
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sandy with stone surface
e. Vegetation on tract Grass
f. Man-made features now on tract Travelift
basin, construction buildings, mooring
piles and docks.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
g Conservation Transitional
Developed g Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Unzoned
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes No
(Attach zoning conpliance cerrificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes z No
Are there wetlands on the site? Yes g No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach docwnentatton, if available)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Septic Tank
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
Surface Runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
WP11
5. ADDITIONAL FNFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy or the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross- sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

Form DCM -MP -1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Stephen Warner
Address Hadnot Creek Farm
Phone Cape Carteret, N. C. 2858
Name Kenny Wayne Willis
Address 9002 -302 SE # 4
Phone Issaquah, WA 98027
Name
Address
Phone
Myron Harris
P. 0. Bog 93
Marshallberg, N. C. 28553
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
April 17, 1991
CAMA Minor Development 023 -91
December 20, 1991
N.C. Dept. of Euviro., Health & Natural
Resources 150 -91
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow -up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided. in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 13th day of May , 19__.97.
Print Name Jack P. Huddle
Signature G'
weer or Awhorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
g DCM MP -2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP -3
Upland Development
DCM MP-4
_Structures Information
DCM MP -5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
.7

Form DCM -MP -2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
D— —A mine
Average- Fund
Eiasting Project
Length Width Depth Depth
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 350 CY
b. Type of material to be excavated Silty Sand
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes x No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 0
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area ou site
b. Dimensions of disposal area Material to be
used in constructing slope.
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes x No
If yes, where?

4)
Form DCNi -'1T -2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes x No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes x No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. 'Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead x Riprap
b. Length 700 LF
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
6T±
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
6v±
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Not noticeable
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Broken
concrete 25# to 200#
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap 518 CY
(2) Bulkhead backfill 0
h. Type of fill material Broken concrete
rip —rap
i. Source of fill material Broken concrete from
runway repair at Cherry Point MCAS
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes x No
Revised 03/95
R
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water 0
(2) Dimensions of fill area 0
(3) Purpose of fill 0
Will fill material be placed in
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area _
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
coastal wetlands
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Placement of felt
over excavated soils at the time of
fine grading slope
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe
c. Will wetlands be crassed in transporting_ equipment
to project site? Yes x No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Date
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
00 01
�._
13, 1997

Form DCM -MP -3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and /or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 27 each boat slips
b. Number of lots or parcels 1 parcel
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) No residential
JUN 0 4 1997
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
L Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Existing facilities
Have the facilities described
received state or local approval?
(Attach appropriate documentation)
in Item i. above
Yes
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
including roads, ditches, etc. loo LF of sanitary wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent,
shore % 12' = 933 SY "wash down" and residential discharges).
No change in run -off
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
No paved surfaces
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and /or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular, driveways or parking. N/A
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Well
m. Will water be impounded? Yes x No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
Jack P. Huddle, P.E., Agent
Applicant or Project Name
Sig
June 2, 1997
Date

Form DCM -MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
this proposed project.
a. Dock(s) and /or Pier(s)
(1)
x Commercial _Community _ Private
(2)
Number 1
(3)
Length 72' '
(4)
Width 4'
(5)
Finger Piers x Yes No
(i) Number 12
(ii) Length 14'
(iii) Width 4'
(6)
Platform(s) Yes x No
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
(7)
Number of slips proposed 24
(8)
Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
property lines Join
(9)
Width of water body 1801±
(10)
Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL NWL at 7' ±
b. Boathouse
(including covered lifts) N/A
(1)
Commercial Private
(2)
Length
(3)
Width r
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
Revised 03/95
e. Mooring buoys N/A
(1) _ Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number
(3) Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
(4) Width of water body
(5) Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
shoreline
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(1) x Commercial _Community _ Private
(2) Number 50
(3) Length 24' — 30'
(4) Width 8" to 12"
g. Other (Give complete description)
Improvement to existing harbor
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
S'
MAY 13, 1997
Date

Form DCM -MP -6
MARINA
DEVELOPMENT
(Required for the mooring of more than 10 vessels)
Attach this form x Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
)they sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
rroposed project.
1. MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
�. Check below the type of marina proposed.
x Commercial Public Residential
Will the marina be open to the general public?
Yes x No
If there is residential development associated with
the marina, how many units or lots are planned and
how many are currently developed?
N/A
Check all of the types of services to be provided.
X Full service, including travel lift and /or rail
Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
X Dockage ( "wet slips") only
Number of slips 20
None Dry storage
Number of boats
None Boat ramps)
Other (describe)
Check below the proposed type of siting.
Land cut and access channel
Open water with dredging for basin and /or
channel
Open water, no dredging required
X Other (describe). Upgrade existing
harbor
Describe the typical boats to be served (for example,
open runabout, charter boats, sail boats, mixed
types). Charter boats and commercial
_fishing boats
g. Typical boat length 30 — 40
h. Maximum boat length 60'
i. Are any floating structures planned? No
If so, describe
2. MARINA OPERATIONS
a. Check each of the following sanitary: facilities that
will be included in the proposed project.
1 Office toilets
N/A Toilets for patrons
Number
Location
N/A Showers
N/A Boat holding tank pumpout
Type and location
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all
sanitary wastewater. Septic Tank
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and
trash disposal. Contract Dump
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats
be controlled? N/A
e. Give the location and number of "No Sewage
Discharge" signs proposed. N/A

9.
Form DCM -MP -6
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for
containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint,
sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
N/A
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be
disposed of ? N/A
h. Give the number of channel m4rkers and "No
Wake" signs proposed. N/A
i. Give the location of fuel - handling facilities, and
describe the safety measures planned to protect area
water quality. N/A
j. Describe design measures that promote boat basin
flushing or circulation and that reduce water quality
impacts. Tide Action
k. What will be the marina policy on overnight and
live -board dockage? None Allowed
1. Is the proposed marina located near any shellfish
leases? Yes x No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder.
m. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina,
what types of services are currently provided?
Mooring
n. How many slips are now available? 20 +
Revised 03195
o. Is the marina proposed within a primary or
secondary nursery area? Yes x No
p. Is the marina proposed within an area open to
shellfish harvesting? Yes x No
q. Give the location and number N/A
"Pumpout
Available" signs proposed.
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
AGENT
MAY 13, 1997
Signature
Datk'

AREA DIAGRAM
page l of t
Show all surrounding buildings and roads within 1500 feet of the equipment covered by this application. Attach a site diagram identify
ing each emission source locationfsl. Droaerty boundaries and building (structure) dimensions (height, width, and length).
NO
INSTRUCTIONS CODE DESCRIPTION
1. Indicate location and type of building by the use of small (1) Sh'o,17
numbered circles with the decription below. (2) GL41911 1101VS,4=
2. Show roads as lines representing the road edges. Indicate (3) RCS
street names and highway numbers. (4)
(5)
3. Show wooded or cleared area by approximate boundary (6)
lines and the words "woods ", "cleared ", "cornfield ", etc. (7)
(8)
(g)
(10)
Example:
(1) Church
(2) Residence

I/.
0
z
�z
o a
s A
r
� O
a
X66
/T
S
�f�of- 'os.�� �Yi9�P,�3o/p /MPRai��F�rT
R fiit/O,gLG R,9M S EY
S MAY /997
0
\4
3
n
p
t A�
a
R-
N

0
41C.,
p ...
y
iS'' ¢o
Ckk
IN'
ti
y�Q N 6 r`1f o E
LIZ. -
f� / e
tips

Lr
�w
o
r'
NJ
a TN
N� C
o
w�
� N
a
o �
sz.o32 E
PR�Pos�O'. Ciocy,y,c�F

Al c ocT TJ'p� 2
NoN - Wo 1/E.r/ rffl3, .
NdTts ' SL df?E �A.�r!fC T'a
oTToA,'l - (G to S
4
n3

..." n�ov,

JUN 0 4 1997
o a
.A6C
.2
-30

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 -1890
Action ID No. 199707653 June 26, 1997
PUBLIC NOTICE
MR. RANDALL RAMSEY, JARRETT BAY BOATWORKS, Post Office Box 280,
Marshallberg, North Carolina 28553, has applied for a Department of the Army
(DA) permit TO REMOVE PIERS AND PILINGS, PLACE RIP RAP MATERIAL FOR SHORELINE
PROTECTION AND INSTALL PIERS AND MOORING PILES ESTABLISHING COMMERCIAL DOCKAGE
WITHIN THE MARSHALLBERG HARBOR OF REFUGE, THE STRAITS, MARSHALLBERG, Carteret
County, North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during a site visit by a representative
of the Corps of Engineers. Plans submitted with the application show the
proposed removal of docks and pilings, displacing mariners who have
historically moored vessels, and the placement of riprap material along
approximately 700 linear feet of shoreline. The riprap material is to extend
six (6) feet waterward of the mean high water (MHW) elevation contour except
adjacent to an existing 165- foot -long bulkhead at the head of the harbor. The
riprap is to extend thirteen (13) feet waterward of MHW in front of the
bulkhead. Excavation of silt below MHW, approximately 350 cubic yards, is to
be accomplished to slope the shoreline for placement of the rip rap. All
excavated material is to be placed and retained on high ground. Proposed
dockage includes twelve (12) finger piers and one large dock with adjacent
pilings to provide commercial slips for twenty -four (24) vessels. The finger
piers are to be four feet in width and between twelve (12) and forty (40) feet
long. Fourteen (14) of the slips are to be twenty (20) feet wide and ten (10)
of the slips are to be fifteen (15) feet wide. At the head of the harbor, a
70- foot -long, 4- foot -wide dock is proposed. The applicant states that the
purpose of the work is to improve the harbor and provide commercial dockage
for charter and commercial fishing boats. Plans showing the work are included
with this public notice.
The applicant has determined that the proposed work is consistent with
the North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Plan and has submitted this
determination to the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) for
their review and concurrence. This proposal shall be reviewed for the
applicability of other actions by North Carolina agencies such as:
a. The issuance of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
( NCDEM) .
b. The issuance of a permit to dredge and /or fill under North Carolina
General Statute 113 -229 by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
(NCDCM) .

f
4
c. The issuance of a permit under the North Carolina Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA) by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
(NCDCM) or their delegates.
d. The issuance of an easement to fill or otherwise occupy State -owned
submerged land under North Carolina General Statute 143 - 341(4), 146 -6, 146 -11,
and 146 -12 by the North Carolina Department of Administration (NCDA) and the
North Carolina .Council . -of- State _
e. The approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land
Quality Section, North Carolina Division of Land Resources (NCDLR), pursuant
to the State Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NC G.S. 113 A -50-
66) .
The requested Department of the Army (DA) permit will be denied if any
required State or local authorization and /or certification is denied. No DA
permit will be issued until a State coordinated viewpoint is received and
reviewed by this agency. Recipients of this notice are encouraged to furnish
comments on factors of concern represented by the above agencies directly to
the respective agency, with a copy furnished to the Corps of Engineers.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 10 of the River
and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment
period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider
this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this site is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for
inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register is the
extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is
otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown
archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or
destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that
the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973.
The decision, whether to issue a permit, will be based on an evaluation
of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed
activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the
probable impacts that the proposed activity may have on the public interest
requires a careful weighing of all those factors that become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits that may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its foreseeable detriments. The decision
whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will
be allowed to occur, are therefore decided by the outcome of the general
2

I
balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both
protection and use of important resources. All factors that may be relevant
to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects of it.
Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental
concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards
and flood plain values (according to Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and
conservation, water.. quality ,_energy..needs,..safety, food-and fiber production,
mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the
needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of
dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be
denied if the discharge that would be authorized would not comply with the
Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the
preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit
will be granted unless the District Engineer decides that it would be contrary
to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested
parties to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any
comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to decide
whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To
make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species,
historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the
other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the
preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and /or an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Comments are also used to decide the need for a public hearing and to decide
the public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA)
permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (NCDEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDEM considers whether the proposed
activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water
Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army
(DA) permit serves as application to the NCDEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), Salisbury Street,
Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons wanting to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), Post Office Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -7687, on or before July 21, 1997, Attention:
Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Jeff Richter, until 4:15 p.m.,
3

AREA DIAGRAM
page 1 of l
Show all surrounding buildings and roads within 1500 feet of the equipment covered by this application. Attach a site diagram identify-
:14 a... 1, emission entorep Inr2tinnW orooerty boundaries and building (structure) dimensions (height, width, and length).
140
INSTRUCTIONS CODE DESCRIPTION
1. Indicate location and type of building by the use of small
numbered circles with the decription below.
2. Show roads as lines representing the road edges. Indicate
street names and highway numbers.
3. Show wooded or cleared area by approximate boundary
lines and the words "woods ", "cleared ", "cornfield ", etc.
(2) GL/iM h�ov; t`
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
'54EEr l OF-
Example:
(1) Church
(2) Residence

}
H
W
z � o
INI
pfRC4 � n
r
�G>
c �
a
� O
X66/ cn
cf >►� a� JIG`` ��
C
S
PfZOFOS.EA �1i9.P,B�/P /MPR�Y€�IF.rT � S I-�E -�T Z OF 8
f�ilit/OAL< fIAMSEy
S AIA1- 1997
0
N

Th
N �P
ja-
lb
w
�
a
Z.S
n
0-
j
_1
_ V
- ti
0 s
!Y P, _ rho
-
- .vs -'�a 52; N
�-
.___ .:_.. -- •E)rIST /��. -- aaG%?r�GE' - -- - - - -- - - - - --
-
°moo- -- _ __.. __ .. �, _
- - -... - - - - -- ....... _..
F{RyO� <c
i�ft Al

S c•s-8 W
b1
y Q
Cl) e o
0
Z Z
o
Q � y
qtr _ _ _ - •� d ..1... - - Sc/ ,
2
• a
it
0
SLR .. �jt.GY�•. -. .._
Pfd �PoSr-o.. lOPc�j�GE ..
S it % 9 5 7 ��-�

T:
_..... - r'aS -�
:. FOR
Now -woVIO / /54/0,

.t
N
:v JUN 0 4 1997
�— / ;
..... .... .
x..
e � p
l�
/ / //1% %f' E V l
o�
�- _.
dG
,`� L 511EET 7 B

I RFGF /V��
DNISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT `��' 2 4 19
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 9J
9FNTA� Sc�FN��S
I. APPLICANT' S NAME: Randall Ramsey (Jarrett Bay Boatworks)
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: at the end of SR 1347 and adjacent to the Marshallberg Harbor and
the Straits, in the community of Marshallberg, Carteret County
Photo Index - 1995: 41- 499,L -14
1989: 154- 3,J -14
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2745000 Y: 362500
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D &F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 5 -20 -97
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - June 4, 1997
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Carteret
Land Classification From LUP - Community & Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW,PTA,ES
° Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Commercial
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - Septic Tank
Planned -
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Boat Manufacturing Facility, boat yard & docks
Planned - Docking facility
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: Minimal
Source - Personal observation
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FIT .T .FT) OTTURR
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
(B) Non - Vegetated Wetlands
±4,200 sq.ft.
±5,355 sq.ft.
±16,620 sq.ft.
Shallow water bottom areas
(Footprint of dock
& mooring areas)
° Other (Highground)
±4,400 sq.ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ± 11,755 sq.ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA Open: Closed
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to remove existing docks and build new ones in
their place to accommodate 24 boats.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
RANDALL RAMSEY
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a ± 4.15 acre tract(s) of
land located at the end of SR 1347 in the community of Marshallberg. The majority of
the property is bordered on the south by the Straits and surrounds the head of the
Marshallberg Harbor. The majority of the high ground property has been developed into
a commercial boat yard and boat building facility known as Jarrett's Bay Boat Works.
The applicant primarily builds large charter boats and yachts in the +50' range and was
previously located in Williston before outgrowing that facility in 1991. The applicant
has received both CAMA major and minor Permits over the past 6 years authorizing the
development of this facility. One of the permits, CAMA Major Permit No. 150 -91,
authorized the excavation of a boat basin and the construction of four boat slips in the
Straits and the installation of a travel lift in the Marshallberg Harbor. Marshallberg
Harbor was excavated in the 1950's by the Federal government and today remains a
federally authorized project. The harbor connects to Sleepy Creek near its intersection
with the Straits. Historically, the residents of Marshallberg and nearby communities
have constructed and maintained docking facilities in the harbor. For the most part, the
boats mooring in this area are commercial fishing boats ranging from skiffs to + 40'
vessels. It is estimated that ± 60 boats moor in the harbor. The shoreline of the harbor
is partially stabilized with bulkheads, riprap and various amounts of trash and debris.
There are some areas which are vegetated with varying amounts of coastal and 404
wetlands. While there is some signs of bank erosion, most has occurred gradually over
the years. The harbor is fairly deep (6 to 8' mean low water) and is classified as SA
waters. The harbor is closed to the harvesting of shellfish.
The applicant is proposing to develop the shoreline area of his property which is adjacent
to the Marshallberg Harbor into a commercial docking /marina facility. The existing
docks used by area watermen will first be removed and riprap will be placed along the
shoreline bank. The total length of shoreline to be riprap is ± 700` and the Riprap will
extend 6' beyond the mean high water line expect in the location of an existing ±165
linear foot bulkhead at the head of the basin. Here, the riprap will extend ±13' below
the mean high water line. The shoreline area is proposed to be excavated and sloped in
order to provide a proper angle for the riprap placement. The applicant has indicated
that ±350 of silty 'material would be excavated below the mean high water line to
facilitate the riprap placement. The marina development will include the placement of
12 finger piers and one larger dock (with adjacent mooring pilings) into the harbor in
order to accommodate 24 boats. The finger piers will be 4' in width and will vary in
length from ± 12 to 40'. The waterward extensions of the finger piers and mooring into
the harbor will range from ± 24 to 40' in length. Fourteen of the spaces will be 20'
wide while the remaining 10 slips will be 15' wide. At the head of the basin and
adjacent to SR 1347, a 70' long x 4' wide dock is also proposed. The applicant has
indicated that parking for the marina facility will be located in an area adjacent to SR
1347 and on an existing rock parking area within the Boatworks' compound. Presently,
an unimproved portion of the area along SR 1347 is presently used for parking while

the remainder is vegetated with grass, vines and bushes. A portion of the area will have
to be filled in order to make it usable for a parking. The 11 new spaces along the road
are not proposed to be improved with rock or gravel. The new parking area will be
located within the Estuarine Shoreline AEC and would occupy an area of ±2,200 sq.ft.
It is anticipated that the total land disturbance (filling and grading) associated with the
parking area would be ± 4,400 sq.ft.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The project as proposed will result in the excavation of
approx. 4,200 sq.ft. of intertidal and shallow water habitat area with ± 350 cu.yds. of
silty material being removed. The placement of the riprap will result in the filling of ±
5,355 sq.ft. of shallow water bottom area with the placement of ± 518 cu.yds of broken
concrete material below the mean high water line. The removal of the existing boat
docks will displace a number of individuals who have historically moored their boats in
the harbor. A recent site inspection of the harbor revealed 32 boats /mooring areas
within the project area which would be eliminated. The 24 slip marina will extend into
a federally authorized harbor and the US Army Corps of Engineers will need to
determine what impacts will occur to the federal project. The majority of the marina
slips will be wide enough (20') to allow for large boats to use the facility. It can be
anticipated that these boats will have "heads" but there is no pump -out facility proposed
or available in the immediate area. New parking areas will be provided along the road
right of way and will, be unimproved. It is not known if stormwater approval will be
required by the Division of Water Quality. Since receiving the permit application, a
number of individuals in the Marshallberg community have expressed concerns and
opinions over the project involving such things as the public ownership of the harbor,
validity of easements and deeds and the prescriptive use rights of the area by the public.
Further evaluations and investigations of these issues will need to be undertaken before a
permit decision is made.
Prepared By: Charles Jones
Date: June 13, 1997

I/
Form DCM -MP -1
APPLICATION
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name Randall Ramsey
Address P. 0. Bog 280
City Marshallberg
(To be completed by all applicants)
State NC
Zip 28553 Day Phone [phone]
Fax 919 - 729 -1442
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Jack P. Huddle, P.E.
Address P. 0. Drawer 1578
City New Bern
State NC
Zip 28563 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Proposed harbor
improvement
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowmer(s), mid /or
project name.
Randall Ramsey
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Carteret
Revised 03/95
b. City, town, community or landmark
Marshallberg, N. C.
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1347
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes x No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) The Straits
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and /or filling activities.
Add new rip —rap bulkhead,.finger piers,
and mooring piles.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
uSe? Commercial
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Clean up existing shore
line, removed old piers and piling.
Rip —rap the existing shoreline and
construct new finger piers and mooring
piles.

4
Form DCM -MP -1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract 4.15 Acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 6.5'
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sandy with stone surface
e. Vegetation on tract
Grass
f. Man-made features now on tract Travelift
basin, construction buildings, mooring
piles and docks.
g. What is the CAMA
classification of the site?
x Conservation
Developed
Rural
Land Use Plan land
(Consult the local land use plan.)
Transitional
X Community
Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Unzoned
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j-
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom?.
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? Yes x No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
Revised 03195
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Septic Tank
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
Surface Runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
WP11
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross - sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue -line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

3.
Form DCM -MP -1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Stephen Warner
Address Hadnot Creek Farm
Phone Cape Carteret, N. C. 28584
Name Kenny Wayne Willis
Address 9002 -302 SE # 4
Phone Issaquah, WA 98027
Name
Address
Phone
Myron Harris
P. 0. Bog 93
Marshallberg, N. C. 28553
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
Appril 17, 1991
= Minor Development 023 -91
December 20, 1991
N.C. Dept. of Enviro., Health & Natural
Resources 150 -91
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow -up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided. in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 13th day of May , 19"27.
Print Name Jack P. Huddle
Signature G�
weer or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
g DCM MP -2
Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP -3
Upland Development
DCM MP-4
Structures Information
DCM MP -5
Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6
Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.

Form DCM -MP -2 i
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Revised 03/95
Average Final
Eisting Project
Length Width Depth Depth.
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 350 CY
b. Type of material to be excavated Silty Sand
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes x No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 0-•
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area on site
b. Dimensions of disposal area Material to be
used in constructing slope.
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
g Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes x No
If yes, where?
.a ✓:_'mss::...
. ^.'aa:`•.,�f.�c'�
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards 350 CY
b. Type of material to be excavated Silty Sand
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes x No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 0-•
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area on site
b. Dimensions of disposal area Material to be
used in constructing slope.
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
g Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes x No
If yes, where?

S,
Form DCM -M -2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes x No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes x No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. "Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead x Riprap
b. Length
700 LF
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
61±
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water 0
(2) Dimensions of fill area 0
(3) Purpose of fill 0
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
6'±
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
Not noticeable
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Broken
concrete 25# to 200#
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap 518 CY
(2) Bulkhead backfill 0
h. Type of fill material Broken concrete
rip —rap
i. Source of fill material Broken concrete from
runway repair at Cherry Point MCAS
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes x No
Revised 03/95
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Placement of felt
over excavated soils at the time of
fine grading slope
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Backhoe
c. Will wetlands be cr3ssed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes x No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
AGENT
S'
May 13, 1997
Date

`G
Form DCM -MP -3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and /or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed 27 each boat slips
b. Number of lots or parcels
1 parcel
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) No residential
JUN 041997
..-�
- - - - - - - --- -- - ---- T...'. .
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
Existing facilitles
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above
received state or local approval? yes
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
including roads, ditches, etc. loo I..F of sanitary wastewater, industrial /commercial effluent,
shore % 12' = 933 SY "wash down" and residential discharges).
No change in run —off
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes x No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone,
asphalt, or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
No paved surfaces
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and /or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. N/A
Revised 43/95
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source
(e.g. well, community, public system, etc.)
Well
m. Will water be impounded? Yes x No
If yes, how many acres?
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when
was the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
Jack P. Huddle, P.E., Agent
Applicant or Project Name
Sig
June 2, 1997
Date

V.
Form DCM -MP4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
e. Mooring buoys N/A
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
(1)
_ Commercial _Community Private
other sections of the Joint Application which relate to
(2)
_
Number
this proposed project.
(3)
Description of buoy
(Color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
a. Dock(s) and /or Pier(s)
(1) x Commercial
_Community —Private
(2) Number 1
(3) Length 72'
(4)
Width of water body
(4) Width 4'
(5)
Distance buoy(s) to be placed beyond
(5) Finger Piers x Yes No
shoreline
(ij Number 12
(ii) Length 14'
f. Mooring structure (boatlift, mooring pilings, etc.)
(iii) Width 4'
(1)
g Commercial _Community _, Private
(6) Platform(s) Yes x No
(2)
Number 50
(i) Number
(3)
Length 24' – 30'
(ii) Length
(4)
Width 8" to 12"
(iii) Width
(7) Number of slips proposed 24
g. Other (Give complete description)
(8) Proximity of structure to adjacent riparian
Improvement to existing harbor
property lines Join
(9) Width of water body 1801±
(10) Water depth at waterward end of pier at
MLW or NWL NWL at 7't
b. Boathouse (including covered lifts) N/A
(1) Commercial Private
(2) Length
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
(3) Width r
ENT
c. Groin (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
S.
(1) Number
(2) Length(s)
MAY 13, 1997
Date
d. Breakwater (e.g. wood, sheetpile, etc.) N/A
(1) Length
(2) Average distance from MHW, NWL or
wetlands
(3) Maximum distance beyond MHW, NWL or
wetlands
Revised X3/95

Form DCM -MP-6
MARINA
DEVELOPMENT
(Required for the mooring of more than 10 vessels)
Attach this form .o Joint Application for CAMA Major
g.
Typical boat length 30 — 40
Permit, Form DCM -MP -1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
h.
Maximum boat length 60'
proposed project.
i.
Are any floating structures planned? No
If so, describe
1. MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. Check below the type of marina proposed.
x Commercial Public Residential
b. Will the marina be open to the general public?
2.
MARINA OPERATIONS
Yes x No
a.
Check each of the following sanitary: facilities that
c. If there is residential development associated with
will be included in the proposed project.
the marina, how many units, or lots are planned and
1 Office toilets
how many are currently developed?
N/A Toilets for patrons
- N/A
Number
Location
N/A Showers
d. Check all of the types of services to be provided.
N/A Boat holding tank pumpout
x Full service, including travel lift and /or rail
Type and location
Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
X Dockage ( "wet slips ") only
Number of slips 20 _
b.
Describe treatment type and disposal location for all
None Dry storage
sanitary wastewater. Septic Tank
Number of boats
None Boat ramp(s)
Other (describe)
e. Check below the proposed type of siting.
c.
Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and
trash disposal. Contract Dump
Land cut and access channel
Open water with dredging for basin and /or
channel
Open water, no dredging required
d.
How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats
X Other (describe). Upgrade existing
be controlled? N/A
harbor
f. Describe the typical boats to be served (for example,
open runabout, charter boats, sail boats, mixed
types). charter boats and commercial
e.
Give the location and number of "No Sewage
fishinc boats
Discharge" signs proposed. N/A
Revised 03195

9.
Form DCM -MP -6
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for
containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint,
sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
N/A
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be
disposed of ? N/A
h. Give the number of channel markers and "No
Wake" signs proposed. N/A
L Give the location of fuel - handling facilities, and
describe the safety measures planned to protect area
water quality. N/A
j. Describe design measures that promote boat basin
flushing or circulation and that reduce water quality
impacts. Tide Action
k. What will be the marina policy on overnight and
live -board dockage? None Allowed
1. Is the proposed marina located near any shellfish
leases? Yes x No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder.
m. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina,
what types of services are currently provided?
Mooring
n. How many slips are now available? 20 +
Revised 03/95
o. Is the marina proposed within a primary or
secondary nursery area? Yes x No
p. Is the marina proposed within an area open to
shellfish harvesting? Yes x No
q. Give the location and number of "Pumpout
Available" signs proposed. N/A
JACK P. HUDDLE, P.E.
AGENT
MAY 13, 1997 _
Signature /
nati-' '

AREA DIAGRAM
page 1 of t
Show all surrounding buildings and roads within 1500 feet of the equipment covered by this application. Attach a site diagram identify -
ing each emission source location(s). property boundaries and building (structure) dimensions (height. width, and length).
U0
INSTRUCTIONS CODE DESCRIPTION
1. Indicate location and type of building by the use of small (1) (jOi1T Sh'oP
numbered circles with the decription below.
2. Show roads as lines representing the road edges. Indicate (3)
street names and highway numbers. (4)
(5)
3. Show wooded or cleared area by approximate boundary (6)
lines and the words "woods ", "cleared ", "cornfield ", etc. (7)
(8)
(g)
(10)
Example:
(1) Church
(2) Residence

3 �
Z a
e a
� a
� 6p
-l? 0-91-
RR�-
X6.6
�S
xr
i
• � ns
Rilivogl.G flA.�1sEY
S" i►'!AY i 9 9 7
v
pb
n
0
sue*
N

hti -o
` �I R•i
3
a
U e e
Z.s a
i V c,, D �.
Ci
o-
N s
r
h' Scud �-a'E Al ¢ 22 � 5
,x'4-:3

w J
o
• - - � –+ � � — .voRTH
`)
wo �
o
a�
O _ y
. Q •
'QS S
Pf{ AoSEI�'....

- i w
.v JUN 0 4 1997 _