20110931 Ver 1_Maps_20120214

Oct 3I Oh5( ( a
I i •
•
• kr '. ad
WE
:,A14:.%.-::,:. Seasonal RPW
•�. ' "`� .:::': <;:: ::.,.:.-.:,.:5 Stream Q I
• ,:::,t •.': ::' ,; `,-';�:: `,1 - 1 (DWQ Stream Rating=21.5)
:• WE-Wet
M . IE1 - `a' . •: Jurisdictional RPW
100 200 .
`
i. Feet :
••••::::.•:::-•:--•:-.:::-.,.:/ ., loill,4C..
•, U�
} Mitigation Site Location ;;.,U ; `"
Jurisdictional RPW i.. Flagged Wetland Boundary
- / _--- r..,,.1r_ ■ (to assist in field verification)
•
e
r r_• •` ,
i " ;�
/:. .. ' (
W F- •.. • !,!',-...,....lt
0 500 1,000 Feet ; _
`x:;14 „,
Legend - ,'.; `~ ,�'
''=ear
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
ate” WF3
Project Area ,.
WF-Wet �r - .
Existing Streams =�. :;::
New Streams ;WF-Line ',,,.11. ..
:•k%. •'.., :.4: ..•... ••.r
.
-- •,� NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) _ '? I 100 200' ••
• Flagged Wetland Locations , WE-Up * -1 •, I I I U •.1..
Feet
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
c,,a Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
Date Project Number Figure
'� +,a TM/ February 14, 2012 011700062 5A

NCDWQ Stream Data Forms

North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Stream SA
Date 12/15/2011 Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Latitude 34 758000 N
Piney Green Road JD Update
Evaluator A s (KHA) County Onslow Longitude 77 331500 W
J Hartshorn n (KHA)
Total Points 21 5 Stream D a ircle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Jacksonville
Epheme I Intermittent erennial e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
A Geomorphology Subtotal = 9 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool ripple
pool sequence 0 1 2 3 0
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5 Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 1
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9 Grade control 0 0 5 1 1 5 1
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 t 1 5 1
11 Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 6 5
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 0 5 0 1
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 5 1 1 5 0 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water tables No=0 Yes=3 3
C Biology Subtotal = 6
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 ,
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20 Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
23 Crayfish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
25 Algae 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW =0 75 OBL= 1 5 Other= 0 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Stream SA is a weak intermittent channel that crosses
Piney Green Road and flows towards Little Northeast Creek

North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Stream SB
Date 12/15/2011 Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Latitude 34 766500 N
P ney Green Road JD Update
A Reusche(KHA)
Evaluator J Hartshorn(KHA) County Onslow Longitude 77 345500 W
Total Points 11 5 tream rmination (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Jacksonville
Ephemeral termittent Perennial e g Quad Name
if 2 19 or perennial if a 30
A Geomorphology Subtotal = 5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 0
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool ripple 0 1 2 3 0
pool sequence —
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 0
5 Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0 ,
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9 Grade control 0 0 5 1 1 5 1
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 _ 1 5 1
11 Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 0 ,
°artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 0 5
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 0 5 0 0 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
17 Soil based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 0
C Biology Subtotal= 6
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20 Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
23 Crayfish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
25 Algae 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW =0 75 OBL= 1 5 Other=0 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Stream SB is a stormwater system with poor hydrology
It is a very straight ditch with steep banks

North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Stream SC
Date 12/15/2011 Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Latitude 34 768800 N
Piney Green Road JD Update
A Reusche(KHA)
Evaluator J Hartshorn (KHA) County Onslow Longitude 77 351200 W
Total Points 24 5 Stream De : `Ina io rcle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Jacksonville
Ephemer.l I Intermittent ',-rennial e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
A Geomorphology Subtotal = 12 _ Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
la Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 0
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool ripple
pool sequence 0 1 2 3 1
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5 Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 1
9 Grade control 0 0 5 _ 1 1 5 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 _ 1 1 5 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 0
°artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 6 5 _
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 2
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 0 5 0 1
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 5 1 1 5 0 5
17 Soil based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
C Biology Subtotal = 6
18 Fibrous roots in streambed _ 3 2 1 0 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20 Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
23 Crayfish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
25 Algae 0 0 5 1 _ 1 5 0
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW =0 75 OBL= 1 5 Other=0 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Stream SC is deeply incised and very straight It is approx
6 deep at BKF and 6 8 wide at BKF Flow was pooled to 6 deep
with dry areas interspersed between pools

North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form Version 4 11
Stream SD
Date 12/15/2011 Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Latitude 34 775500 N
Piney Green Road JD Update
Evaluator A s (KHA) County Onslow Longitude 77 365300 W
J Hartshorn n (KHA)
Total Points 23 Stream De Inatio rcle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Jacksonville
Ephemer I Intermittent rennial e g Quad Name
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
A Geomorphology Subtotal = 8 5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 1
3 In channel structure ex riffle pool step pool ripple
pool sequence 0 1 2 3 0
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1
5 Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 2
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 0
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3 0
9 Grade control 0 0 5 1 1 5 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 1 5 1
11 Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3 _ 0
°artificial ditches are not rated see discussions in manual
B Hydrology Subtotal = 8 5
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 3
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 0
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 0 5 0 1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debris 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 5 1 1 5 1
17 Soil based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3 3
C Biology Subtotal = 6
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3
20 Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
23 Crayfish 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
25 Algae 0 0 5 1 1 5 0
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW =0 75 OBL= 1 5 Other= 0 _ 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes Stream SD has poor sinuosity with good base flow

USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche,J.Hartshorn,C,Evenliouse(KHA)
3 Date of evaluation 12/15/2012 4 Time of evaluation 2 pm
5 Name of stream SA 6 River basin White Oak
7 Approximate drainage area 20 acres 8 Stream order 1st
9 Length of reach evaluated 100ft 10 County Onslow
11 Site coordinates(if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name(if any)
—Latitude(ex 34 872312) 34 758000 Longitude(ex —77 556611) 77 331500
Method location determined(circle) IGPS Topo Sheet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s)location) North of
Piney Green Road,east of Race Track Road
14 Proposed channel work(if any)Road widening
15 Recent weather conditions No rain in last 48 hours
16 Site conditions at time of visit Cool(60 degrees)and sunny
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _X Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply WatL,rshed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?YES INO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map?YES INO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey9 YES IMO
21 Estimated watershed land use 60%Residential 40%Commercial %Industrial %Agricultural
%Forested %Cleared/Logged %Other()
22 Bankfull width 5 23 Bank height(from bed to top of bank) 4
24 Channel slope down center of stream _X_Flat(0 to 2%) Gentle(2 to 4°/) Moderate(4 to 10%) Steep(>10%)
25 Channel sinuosity Straight X_Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation stream classification etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the charactenstics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review(e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score(from reverse) 36 Comments _SA rated out on NCDWQ form as low, intermittent
channel Channel flows southwest towards Piney Green Road
Evaluator's Signature � (�q,,,vi,it.&_ Date at (SI(I
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement.Form subject to change—version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

SA
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
Eco region Point Range _ - -
Characteristics Score
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream
1 0 5 0 4 0 5 3
(no flow or saturation=0 strong flow=max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0 6 0 5 0 5 3
(extensive alteration=0 no alteration=max points)
3 Riparian zone 0 6 0 4 0 5 1
(no buffer—0,contiguous wide buffer=max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 5 0 4 0 4 3
(extensive discharges=0 no discharges=max points)
5 Groundwater discharge 0 3 0 4 0 4 2
(no discharge=0 springs seeps,wetlands,etc =max points)
- 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 4 0 4 0 2 1
(no floodplam=0,extensive floodplam=max points)
,, Entrenchment/floodplain access 0 5 0 4 0 2 1
— 44 (deeply entrenched=0,frequent flooding=max points) -- — — — —
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 6 0 4 0 2 0
(no wetlands=0 large adjacent wetlands=max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0 5 0 4 0 3 1
(extensive channelization=0 natural meander=max points)
10 Sediment input 0 5 0 4 0 4 3
(extensive deposition=0 little or no sediment=max points)
11
Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0 4 0 5 NA
(fine,homogenous=0 large diverse,sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 0 4 0 5 3
} (deeply incised=0 stable bed&banks=max points)
13 Presence of major bank failures 0 5 0 5 0 5 3
(severe erosion=0 no erosion stable banks=max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 3 0 4 0 5 2
(no visible roots=0 dense roots throughout=max points)
m l5 Impact by agriculture livestock,or timber production 0 5 0 4 0 5 5
(substantial impact=0 no evidence—max points)
Presence of riffle pool/npple pool complexes
16 (no nffles/npples or pools=0 well developed=max points) 0 3 0 5 0 6 0
F
d l� Habitat complexity 0 6 0 6 0 6 2
(little or no habitat—0 frequent varied habitats=max points)
P� 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0 5 0 5 0 5 3
GQ; (no shading vegetation=0,continuous canopy=max po nts)
Substrate embeddedness
19 NA 0 4 0 4 NA
(deeply embedded=0,loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0 4 0 5 0 5 0
>+ (no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
G7 21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
O (no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
O22 Presence of fish 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
■r (no evidence=0 common,numerous types=max points) _
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0 6 0 5 0 5 0
(no evidence—0 abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE(also enter on first page) 36
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche,J,Hartshorn,C,Evenhouse(KHA)
3 Date of evaluation 12/15/2012 4 Time of evaluation 11am
5 Name of stream SC 6 River basin White Oak
7 Approximate drainage area 20 acres 8 Stream order_1st
9 Length of reach evaluated 100ft 10 County Onslow
11 Site coordinates(if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name(if any)
Latitude(ex 34872i12) 34 768800 Longitude(ex -77 5566111 77 351200
Method location determined(circle) GPS Topo Sheet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s)location)_Northwest
of Piney Green School adjacent to power substation
14 Proposed channel work(if any) Road widening
15 Recent weather conditions No rain in last 48 hours
16 Site conditions at time of visit Cool(60 degrees)and sunny
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I IV))
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?YES[I\1O If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map?IYES NO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?YES NO
21 Estimated watershed land use %Residential %Commercial %Industrial %Agricultural
_30_%Forested %Cleared/Logged _70_%Other(School grounds parking lots)
22 Bankfull width_6 21 Bank height(from bed to top of bank)_6 8
24 Channel slope down center of stream X Flat(0 to 2%) Gentle(2 to 4%) Moderate(4 to 10%) Steep(>10%)
25 Channel sinuosity _X Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain vegetation, stream classification, etc Every charactenstic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation if a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score(from reverse) 37 Comments Stream SC is deeply incised and very straight It
is approximately 6 deep at bankfull and 6 8 wide at bankfull Flow was pooled to 6 deep with dry areas interspersed between
pools
Evaluator's Signature £ `h (t4.-1.441,A-A- Date 1 S-/(I
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement Form subject to change—version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876 8441 x 26

Sc
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
# Characteristics Eco region Point Range Score
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream 0 5 0 4 0 5 3
(no flow or saturation=0,strong flow=max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0 6 0 5 0 5 I \
(extensive alteration=0 no alteration=max points)
3 Riparian zone
(no buffer=0 contiguous wide buffer=max points) 0 6 0 4 0 5 4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4 (extensive discharges=0 no discharges=max points) 0 5 0 4 0 4 2
„4 Groundwater discharge
U5 (no discharge=0 springs seeps wetlands etc =max points) 0 3 0 4 0 4 3
6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0 4 0 4 0 2 2
(no floodplain=0,extensive floodplam=max points)
x Entrenchment/floodplain access
a+ ' (deeply entrenched=0 frequent flooding=max points) 0 5 0 4 0 2 1
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 6 0 4 0 2 3
(no wetlands=0 large adjacent wetlands=max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0 5 0 4 0 0
(extensive channehzation=0 natural meander=max points)
10 Sediment input 0 5 0 4 0 4 2
(extensive deposition=0 little or no sediment=max points)
11 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0 4 0 5 NA*
(fine,homogenous=0,large,diverse sizes=max points)
12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0 5 0 4 0 5 1
(deeply incised=0 stable bed&banks—max points)
F"
" 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 5 0 5 0 5 1
a (severe erosion=0 no erosion stable banks=max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 3 0 4 0 5 2
(no visible roots=0 dense oots throughout=max points)
cn 15 Impact by agriculture livestock,or timber production 0 5 0 4 0 5 5
(substantial impact=0 no evidence=max points)
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
F 16 (no nffles/npples or pools=0 well developed=max points) 0 3 0 5 0 6 1
Q Habitat complexity
t 17 (little or no habitat=0 frequent,vaned habitats=max points) 0 6 0 6 0 6 2
Fq 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0 5 0 5 0 5 4
= (no shad ng v get t on=0 ontinuo s anopy=max points)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA 0 4 0 4 NA
(deeply embedded=0 loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see paee 4) 0 4 0 5 0 5 0
(no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
V 21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
0 (no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
Presence of fish 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
0 22 (no evidence=0 common numerous types—max points)
0: 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0 6 0 5 0 5 0
(no evidence—0,abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE(also enter on first page) 37
*These charactenstics are not assessed rn coastal streams

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following mformation for the stream reach under assessment
1 Applicant s name NCDOT 2 Evaluator s name A Reusche,J,Hartshorn,C.Evenhouse(KHA)
3 Date of evaluation 12/15/2012 4 Time of evaluation 4 pm
5 Name of stream SD 6 River basin White Oak
7 Approximate drainage area 20 acres 8 Stream order_1st
9 Length of reach evaluated 100ft 10 County Onslow
11 Site coordmates(if known) prefer in decimal degrees 12 Subdivision name(if any)
Latitude(ex 34 872312) 34 775500 Longitude(ex -77 556611) 77 365300
Method location determined(circle) GPSJ Topo Sheet Ortho(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13 Location of reach under evaluation(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s)location) East of
Country Club Road
14 Proposed channel work(if any) Road widening
15 Recent weather conditions No rain in last 48 hours
16 Site conditions at time of visit Cool(60 degrees)and sunny
17 Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I IV)
18 Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?YES INO If yes estimate the water surface area
19 Does channel appear on USGS quad map?YES INO 20 Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?YES INOI
21 Estimated watershed land use 70 0/Residential %Commercial %Industrial %Agricultural
30 /o Forested %CIeared/Logged %Other()
22 Bankfull width 5 23 Bank height(from bed to top of bank) 4
24 Channel slope down center of stream X_Flat(0 to 2%) Gentle(2 to 4/o) Moderate(4 to 10%) Steep(>10%)
25 Channel sinuosity XStraight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2) Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location terrain,vegetation,stream classification etc Every charactenstic must be scored using the same ecoregion Assign points to
each charactenstic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the charactcnstics
identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review(e g the stream flows from a pasture into a forest) the stream
may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity and a separate form used to evaluate each reach The total score
assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100 with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality
Total Score(from reverse) 47 Comments _Stream SD has poor sinuosity,with good base flow
Evaluator s Signature C i t.c Date I_( ( ) (f
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering
the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality The total score
resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or
requirement Form subject to change—version 06/03 To Comment please call 919 876-8441 x 26

SD
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
m # �� m X Eco-reion Ponit Range
Characteristics Score
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1 Presence of flow/persistent pools in stream 0 5 0 4 0 5 5
(no flow or saturation=0,strong flow=max points)
2 Evidence of past human alteration 0 6 0 5 0 5 4
(extensive alteration=0 no alteration=max points)
3 Ripanan zone 0 6 0 4 0 5 3
(no buffer=0 contiguous wide buffer=max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 5 0 4 0 4 3
(extensive discharges=0 no discharges=max points)
5 Groundnaterdischarge 0 a 0 4 0 4 2
V (no discharge=0 springs seeps,wetlands,etc =max points)
N.r 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain
to (no floodplain=0 extensive floodplain=max points) 0 4 0 4 0 2 3
_7 Entrenchment/floodplain access 0 5 0 4 0 2 3
P
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 6 0 4 0 2 0
(no wetlands=0 large adjacent wetlands=max points)
9 Channel sinuosity 0 5 0 4 0 3 2
(extensive channelization=0 natural meandir=max points)
10
Sediment input 0 5 0 4 0 4 2
(extensive deposition=0 little or no sediment=max points)
I 1 Size&diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0 4 0 5 NA
(fine,homogenous=0,large,diverse sizes=max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12 0 5 0 4 0 5 4
,> (deeply incised=0 stable bed&banks=max points)
H'• 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 5 0 5 0 5 4
(severe erosion=0 no erosion stable banks=max points)
14 Root depth and density on banks 0 3 0 4 0 5 3
E (no visible roots=0 dense roots throughout=max points)
rn 15 Impact by agriculture livestock,or timber production 0 5 0 4 0 5 5
(sub tantial impact—0 no evidence=max points)
Presence of riffle pool/ripple pool complexes
16 (no nifies/ripples or pools=0 well developed=max points) 0 3 0 5 0 6 0
Q 17 Habitat complexity 0 6 0 6 0 6 2
(little or no habitat=0,frequent,vaned habitats=max points)
1 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0 5 0 5 0 5 2
(no h din,v g t non=0 nunu us anopy=max po nt)
19 Substrate embeddedness NA 0 4 0 4 NA
(deeply embedded=0,loose structure=max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates(see page 4) 0 4 0 5 0 5 0
,„ (no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
C7 21 Presence of amphibians 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
O (no evidence—0 common nu nerous types=max points)
O 22 Presence of fish 0 4 0 4 0 4 0
(no evidence=0 common numerous types=max points)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0 6 0 5 0 5 0
(no evidence=0,abundant evidence=max points)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE(also enter on first page) 47
*These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

SOIL \ Sampling Point WH WET1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 6 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam 70% UCS
6 12 10YR 3/2 70 10YR 5/6 30 C M sandy loam
12 24 10YR 5/3 60 10YR 5/6 40 PL M clay loam
,
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
® Histosol(Al) MINN Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) / Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 1-1 Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) —I Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes 0 No 1-1
Remarks
Soils are moist throughout profile but at 24 a compacted clay layer comes in The auger
could not penetrate this layer making analysis impossible The upper 24 had signs of
hydrology Given the rainfall data for the area it is likely with these soils that precipitation and
surface flow after precipitation heavily influence hydrology in the wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WH WET1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size Status Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC 2 (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant 3
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species p
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC 75�o (NB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50/0 of total cover 20/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size
FAC species x 3=
1 n/a FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50/
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50 A of total cover 20 A,of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 And opogong/omc a/us 30/ Y FACW be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Sohdago spp 30/ Y FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Caret spp 15/ Y FAC
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
75/ =Total Cover
50/o of total cover 37 5/ 20/o of total cover 15/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation ❑
50%of total cover 20%of total cover Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland WH is adjacent to Piney Green Road and appears to have been maintained in the past
Currently it is dominated by herbaceous vegetation but there is a clear tree line to the east where
historic maintenance stopped out of the project boundary The area receives hydrologic input
from surface flow off Piney Green Road but given the herbaceous presence it is likely that this
area is not periodically inundated or flooded
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WH WET1
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshoi n C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Crenulation Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 735699 N Long 77 323700 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes I Nol I
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology ,naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes_ I No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
Wetland WH is a headwater system in a topographic crenulation Recent rainfall data for the
area is 0 0 in last 96 hours
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ✓ Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Tnm Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ®Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ✓ FAC Neutral Test(05)
Water Stained Leaves(89) `Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches) I�
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No I I
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
Wetland WH is a headwater system in a crenulation This area likely receives hydrologic input
from surface water drainage off Piney Green Road Soils were marginal with no saturation or
water table within the upper 24
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WH UP 1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators p)
ling
Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) 0/ Color(moist) / Type' Loci_ Texture Remarks
0 3 10YR 3/1 100 loam
3 16 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam UCS present
16 24 10YR 3/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
Histosol(Al) 1— Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) - Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) — 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
MEOW_ Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) —. Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ■ Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 1-1 Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes g No 171
Remarks
Soils at this data point are not indicative of wetland hydrology through the upper 24 Beyond
24 soil is heavily compacted and unable to effectively remove from ground for observation
with auger Some mottling was observed beginning at 16
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WH UP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) /o Cover Soecies7 Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata ' (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC �o (NB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50/o of total cover 20/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) FAC species x 3=
1 //u FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =F3/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50/o
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
=Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 20/ of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Fcstuca spp 90/ Y NI be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 -_ Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
90/ =Total Cover
50°/ of total cover 45/ 20/ of total cover 18/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 /a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophybc
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 20%of total cover Presents Yes El No IN
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Data point WH UP 1 is in a maintained and mowed yard There is no canopy or sapling or shrub
layer due to regular mowing Dominant vegetation present is fescue
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/county Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WH UP 1
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Crenulatton Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 735801 N Long 77 323699 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year' Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil, or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed') Are Normal Circumstances present') Yes ✓ No L
Are Vegetation Sod. i or Hydrology, naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present'? Yes _ No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Presents Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
Data point WH UP 1 is in a maintained yard with no hydrologic indicators present The point is
directly adjacent to Piney Green Road and is approximately 1 2 higher in elevation than wetland
data point WH WET 1 The point is approximately 15 feet from data point
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
—Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(61) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
_Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Presents Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches) I�I
Saturation Present/ Yes No .✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitonng well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There were no hydrologic indicators observed at the data point
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WG WET)
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(mast) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 10 10YR 2/1 100 loam
10 12 10YR 3/1 100 loam
12 18 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M loam
18 26 10YR 4/1 70 10YR 4/6 30 C M sandy clay loam
I
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?
® Histosol(Al) Pdyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) — 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
_ Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ,— Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si)(LRR 0 S) Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No El
Remarks
Soils are very moist in wetland WG and are very dark Saturation begins at 18
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0
1

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WG-WET1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) /o Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC 2 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across Al Strata 2 (B)
4
— Percent of Dominant Species 00%
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC (NB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species _ x 1 =
50 i6 of total cover _ 20/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ) FAC species x 3=
1 Lrgusoum valence 80/ Y FAC FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3 Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 V 2 Dominance Test is>50/
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
80/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50 A of total cover 40/ 20%of total cover 16/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8
Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/ of total cover 20°/ of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 S n/ax otundrfolra 10/ Y FAC
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
El 50% 10/ =Total Cover Vegetation
of total cover 5/ 20%of total cover 2/
Present? Yes El No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland WG is overrun by privet Green briar has become well established within the privet
population The herbaceous layer is non existent likely due to the dense shade created by the
privet thicket
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
4Tre a Stratum (Plot size 20 ) / Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 3
1 d Ltrtodendion tuliptfeta 25/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 I Fagus grandt/oha 20/ Y FACU
I t Total Number of Dominant
3 Ace:ruhrum 10/ N FAC Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4 Nyssa sylvattca 5/ N FAC
5 /leropacn 5/ N FAC Percent of Dominant Species 50%
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (NB)
6 Cat ptnus carohnzana 5/ N FAC
7 Ptnu tcada 2/ N FAC Prevalence Index worksheet
Total / Cover of Multiply by
it 8
72/ =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
0 FACW species
15 x 2= 30
i i 50 A of total cover 36/ 20/o of total cover 14 4/
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) FAC species 52 x 3= 156
1 Arundtnartagtgantea 10/ Y FACW FACU species 30 x 4= 1220 0
2 Fagusgtand�foha 10/ Y FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3 Castatteadentata 5/ Y Ni Column Totals 97 (A) 306 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50/
8 N 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
25/ =Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50 A of total cover 12 5/ 20/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tat
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/o of total cover 20/o of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20 )
1 Berchenua scandens 5/ Y FACW
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 2 5/ 20°/ of total cover 1/ Present? Yes 171 No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC UP 1 is dominated by canopy level trees Pine trees are present along wetland edge but are
infrequent (1 2 individuals)
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WC UP2
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) slight hillslope Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 773399 N Long 77 360603 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name Mk Muckalee loam NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol J
Are Vegetation Sod, or Hydrology .naturally problematic" (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present" Yes ✓, No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present" Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No_ i
Wetland Hydrology Present" Yes No ✓
Remarks
Data point WC UP2 is in an area adjacent to stream channel on a levee There is no apparent
hydrology within the upper 12 or at the surface The area is a potentially marginal but lacks
surface indicators and hydrology
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(813) —,Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns(810)
_Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Tnm Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(81) ` _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _Dry Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(84) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
aIron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(08)(LRR T U)
Field Observations _
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Saturation Present" Yes_ No ✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There are no hydrologic indicators within the upper 36 at point WC UP2 There is no moisture
present in the soil profile
i
3
k
i
t*I
tG Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0
t

0 Z uoisJan—uoi6ad wield le;seooi no pue oguel;y sJaaw6u3 10 sdJo3'CwJy Snl
0 pains
st pup ( z Jo sgpdap) aaupils moiaq 4snf isioul st Itos z I iaddn alp gSnoiq weal ipues
a IU silos 4uaaanO paq.znistp puu JaAO pauJn4 uaaq Outnuu Jo aauaptna smogs osiu itos a.znu>?aj
@Si ut>?sp ap>?w u st waasAs pu>?ITam amlua pup pa.za1Ie a.z>? HM pu2P M LIT silos aciZ
s)Jewaa
oN SOA L;ueseJd poS 3UPAH (Segall)yldao
ack
(pe#uesgo;i)JeAel aniloulsea
(n 1 S d all)(LS)aoe;ms Tea
(Q£9L o£9L 1161 71.e11 J)(0Zd)silos Aweol;y6us snolewouy — (gs)xu;eNl paddu;5
(1/6P1 v i i)(6Ld)silos uieldpoold iuowpaid (95)xopaa Agues
(9091. 'OS I.`ddllN)(9H)opm paonpa2l (4s)xu;elN Wee e Apues
of;ewaIgoJd m pagmisip ssalun (Lci v2111.(11)(Lad)ouyo0 Bllaa (S o 21211)(LS)leJauIW A>loniN Agues
;uasaKd aq;snw A6oloJpAy puellam (n 1 d 2211)(£1.j)0oepn5 ougwfl (NOSE H21ilN)(9I.V)xopael auiwd iseoa
pue uoge;a6an oiycydoJpAy;o sJoleoipuje (1 d o tall)(Z1 d)sasselnl asaue6uew uoil — (Z Ly)aoepns 31Jea>loiyl
(ESL VN1 w)(L I )0u400 palaldaa e (L 1.v)aoei ns)1Jea mola9 palaldaa 7
(s)Iaewaa w uieldx3)Ja410 In flail(olj)Pen (1 d 2111)(6y)>pm wo L
(Z ljl)aoeins)080 molle4S Aran (gj)suoissaJdaa xopa2l (fl ll1)(8t')aneroid rim —
(ZJ1)leuale4 wand Pali (1.j)aoepns>Pea palaldaa (n 1 d all)(Lv)IeJauly ArnNJ wa g
(9£91.1/2111A1) (9j)aoeyns)IJea xopaa (fl 1 d all)(9`d)saipoe owe6J0 —
(OZj)silos Awed ;461.18 snolewouy (Ed)xuleij palaldaa 7 (sv)sJeAel pal;i;e1;S
(1 S d 21211)(6Ld)slIoS uleldPoold luowpaid (Zj)xuleyd paAalJ Aweol (4y)aP4lns ua6oJpAH —
(9 v09 L b Ml W eels;no)(9H)oivan paonPa2a _ (0 M2111(ld)leJawL)(Norm Aweol (£y)ogsIH>loele
(S Nal)(Old)Nonv wo Z (n 1 S M211)(6s)aoeyns Tea w41 (Zb')uopadid3 ogsIH
(01211)(6d)Noni wo L (n 1 s 11211)(95)aoe;ins molag anleNApd (;y)IosolsiH
EsIloS oupAH ogewalgoud io;sJoleolPul (Pelou eswueglo ssalun sMll Ile of eigeogddy) sloleolPul PaS ouPAH3
xu;ew=IAI 6uiuil amd=ld uoi;eoolz sweJI pues pwlseNl=sW xu;eiN paonpa2i=W2i uoilaidaa=a uogew;uaouoa=a adkj
pues Aweol W 3 017 P/9 2IA01. 09 Z/9 2JA01. 91. Z l '
saiaydsozlyp pazlplxp weol Apues 001. Z/£ ?:1A01. Z1. 9
weol Apues W 0 OP 9/9 2JA01. 09 Z/9 HAW. 9 Z
weol i—p s 001. 1./C HA0 4 Z 0
sNieweej am;xal 7301 % (;scow)Joioo gsiow)J0103 sayow
sam;eaj xopaa xu;eW y;daa)
(sio;eolpul;o eouesge ey;WJ(}uoo Jo io;eolpul eq;;uewnoop 04 pepeeu y;dap ow 04 egposeo) uol;dliosea mom
d
.LIM IM lwod 6ugdwes BIOS

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ) ° Cove Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Lrnodcnd,on tuhp�fc a 25/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC 3 (A)
2 Fagus grand:Jolra 20/ Y FACU
Aces rubrum 10/ N FAC Total Number of Dominant 6
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4 Nyssa svlvatrca 5/ N FAC
5 Ilex opaca 5/ N FAC Percent of Dominant Species 50%
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (NB)
6 Cal punts carohnzana 5/ N FAC
7 Pmus tcada 2/ N FAC Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
72/ =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50,6 of total cover 36/ 20/o of total cover 14 4/ FACW species t 5 x 2= 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) FAC species 52 x 3= 156
1 Arundmarru g:gantea 10/ Y FACW
FACU species �0 x 4= t 20
0
2 Fagus g andifolra 10/ Y FACU UPL species x 5= 0
3 Castanea dentata 5/ Y NI Column Totals 97 (A) 306 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50/o
8 N 3 Prevalence Index is<_3 0'
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover 12 5/ 20/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/o of total cover 20 Al of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20 )
1 Berchemia scandens 5/ Y FACW
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 2 5/ 20%of total cover 1/
Present? Yes ❑ No 0
emarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
C UP 1 is dominated by canopy level trees Pine trees are present along wetland edge but are
infrequent (1 2 individuals)
USIArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0
IVc
110
1

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Protect/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/1 1
Applicant/owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WG WETI
Investigator(s) A Reusche I Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) depressional bowl Local relief(concave convex none) Concave Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 737801 N Long 77 325500 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name BaB Baymeade fine sand NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes I No! l
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ,✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
Wetland WG is a linear headwater wetland system The wetland is adjacent to a stream and is strongly dominated
by privet The area has been disturbed historically by refuse dumping The wetland begins approximately at the
corridor limit and indicators increase and become stronger as distance into the wetland increases Recent rainfall
data for the area is 0 0 in last 96 hours
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88)
inHigh Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(615)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(610)
Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) Moss Tnm Lines(816)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ✓ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tdied Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _FAC Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present'? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches) 18 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes o No El
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
Wetland WG is a depressional bowl that is adjacent to a stream feature The main surface within
the wetland is approximately 1 2 below surrounding upland surface Hydrology may be
impacted by historical dumping of household refuse and scrap metal Crayfish burrows are
present along perimeter of wetland Soil is very wet within interior of wetland but is not fully
saturated until 18 Hydrology may be impacted by historic dumping in the wetland of
household debris and scrap metal Area likely floods from stream and water is then trapped
behind dumped debris
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhlzospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(A1) c Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1- 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) 1— Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 1- 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR 5)
® Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) c Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 1—... Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type �
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 17 I No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WGUP 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) / Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5
That Are OBL FACW or FAC "'s (NB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 _„ Total°/ Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50/o of total cover 20/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
FAC species x 3=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size FACU species _ 4=
1 n/a
2 UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50%o
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
80/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 40/ 20/ of total cover 16/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Fcstuca spp 90/ Y NI be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
90/ =Total Cover
50/o of total cover 45/ 20/ of total cover 18/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50/o of total cover 20/o of total cover Present? Yes 171 No 0
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
The vegetation community is dominated by fescue and maintained lawn
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
1-1 Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) —1 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U)
■ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) .— Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Mari(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(M LRA 151)
® Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) —. Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) —. Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes INI No 17
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WF WET2
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 6 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam_ UCS
6 18 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam
I ,
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) indicators for Problematic Hydre Soils3
Histosol(Al) — Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
s 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) — Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soli Present? Yes 151 No
Remarks
The soil in wetland WF at point WF WET2 are glistening at 18 Data point location is just
inside tree line at the edge of the easement There are pockets of standing water on the ground
surface to depths of 3 Soils below 18 are heavily compacted and difficult to analyze
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
Onches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils?
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) —. 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) — 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
®
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(M LRA 151)
® Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Presents Yes Igil No g
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WF WET2
Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Jacksonville NC
Investigator(s) R
gator(s) ( ) Section Township Range
Flood lam none (%) 1
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) P Local relief(concave convex none) Slope( )
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 749100 N Long 77 329002 W Datum NAD1983
II Soil Map Unit Name BaB Baymeade fine sand NWI classification PF01/4Cd
I Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ Sod. or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol l
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sot Presents Yes ✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ _ No '
Remarks
Wetland WF is a floodplain wetland system adjacent to Piney Green Road Datapoint WF WET2 was taken in maintained
powerline easement adjacent to roadway Wetland indicators in this area are marginal This area receives hydrologic input
fi om roadway and there are pocketed areas of standing water near the treehne at the edge of the easement Ground elevation
increases closer to roadway Recent rainfall data for the area is 0 0 in last 96 hours (Station KNCA New River MCAS)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required.check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(86)
_Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) v Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ✓ Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(81) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ®Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
✓Drift Deposits(83) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Iron Deposits(85) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
_Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Presents Yes — No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
r
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 1 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes egi No El
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
Wetland WF is a floodplain wetland system adjoining to Northeast Creek The creek likely floods
on a regular basis as evidenced by wrack lines near creek Frequency and intensity of wrack
lines increases as distance from the creek is decreased This portion of wetland WF is
characteristic of a roadside drainage swale
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0
I

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / TYDe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soli indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Souls3
Histosol(Al) o Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
—
Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0)
.-- Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) �. Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
—
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(AS)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) ,_ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -- Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 1508)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soli Present? Yes 0 No g
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WF WET1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 6
1 Nlssasilvatrca 40/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 Lrnadcnd,on sh,acrJlua 20/ Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species °
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC v"�0 (NB)
6
7 Prevalence index worksheet
8 Total 0/ Cover of Multiply by
60/ =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50 A of total cover 30/ 20%of total cover 12/ FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 )
FAC species x 3=
1 Persea 1 orbon, 30/ Y FACW FACU species x 4=
2 L,gust,um smense 30/ Y FAC UPL species x 5=
3 Jwupe,usvug,n,ana 20/ Y FACU Column Totals (A) U (B)
4 Arundmarra grgantea 10/ N FACW 0
Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50/a
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
90/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/o of total cover 45/ 20/ of total cover 18/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Ca,cr spp 20/ Y FAC be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
20/ =Total Cover
50/o of total cover 10/ 20/o of total cover 4/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 )
1 Vitrs,otundrfolra 10/ Y FAC
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
10/ =Total Cover Vegetation El 50%of total cover 5/ 20%of total cover 2/ Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Datapoint WF WET 1 was taken approximately 30 from the wetland boundary directly in the
center of the southern portion of the wetland This portion of wetland WF is a low lying valley
between Piney Green Road and an upland ridge to the east
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Pant WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol(A1) a Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
■
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) 1—, Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) I—. Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) ` Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1151 No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

(
SOIL Sampling Point WF UP 1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Tvae' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 14 10YR 2/1 100 sand
14 24 10YR 4/1 100 sand Streaking is present
24 36 10YR 5/2 100 sand Streaking continues
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) indicators for Problematic Hydnc Solis?
Histosol(Al) —. Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) .— Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR 5)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U)
— Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) -- Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P 1) ,^ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
MSC Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
—
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ® Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) - Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
® Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes 151 No g
Remarks
At depths of 24 the sand is showing evidence of streaking The water table is at 36 with
evidence of a seasonal high water table at approximately 24 No organic material is present in
profile no other indicators of hydric soils
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(mast) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils'
Histosol(Al) — Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) — Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Sod Presents Yes 0 No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County sampling Date 12/1 5/1 1
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WF UP1
Investigator(s) A Reusche I Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) slight hillslope Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Let 34 747398 N Long 77 329399 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (if no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol 1.
Are Vegetation Sod, or Hydrology ,naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects,important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Presents Yes ✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
Data point WF UP1 was taken approximately 5 feet from wetland boundary and approximately 2 higher elevation
on the hillslope There has not been any recent i ainfall and the defined hillslope topographic feature does not
show signs of recent hydrologic surface flow There are mature hardwoods present throughout the upland area
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reamed)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) ®Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) ,e Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) —Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(82) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(83) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(05)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present", Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 36
Saturation Present? Yes _ No ✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes El No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitonng well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There are no hydrologic indicators within the upper 36 There is no water table or evidence of
a seasonal high water table and soils are dry throughout the profile There are no drainage
patterns down the hillslope
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?
_ Histosol(Al) ,-1 Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) — 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
— Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) —
2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) / Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
— Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 1— Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) 1.— Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) — Reduced Vedic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes 171 I No 11
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WE WET1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ) o Cove Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 7
1 Alnus scrrulata 30/ Y FACW That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 Cal punts atoluaana 20/ Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Nyssa sylvatrca 20/ Y FAC Species Across All Strata 8 (B)
4 Juniper us virginiana 20/ Y FACU
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC $$�o (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence index worksheet
8 Total%Cover of Multiply by
90/ =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%o of total cover 45/ 20/ of total cover 18/ FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ) FAC species x 3=
1 Cat punts catolneana 20/ 1 Y FAC FACU species x 4=
2 A/nus serrulata 20/ Y FACW+ UPL species x 5=
3 Ligustrum smense 10/ Y FAC Column Totals (A) (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50/o
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
50/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50 A of total cover 25/ 20/o of total cover 10/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50 A of total cover 20/o of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30
1 Yitrs,otundrfolta 10/ Y FAC
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
10/ =Total Cover Vegetation ❑
50%of total cover 5/ 20°/ of total cover 2/ Presents Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
The areas adjacent to wetland WE are developed The canopy coverage is very dense even with
deciduous trees having lost the majority of their leaves this late into the year The heavy canopy
coverage explains the lack of herbaceous vegetation The wetland is a floodplain system and
cypress knees are present throughout wetland indicating inundation for long portions of the
year
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators p)
ling
Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) °/ Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
Histosol(Al) = Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) _ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
— Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) 1—. Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vedic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
—
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) - Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
—, Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) —, Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) — Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) —. Reduced Vedic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes 151 No
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WE UP 1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 14 2 5Y 5/2 100 loam
14 24 2 5Y 5/3 85 7 5YR 5/8 15 loam sandier with depth
1
1
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) ` 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) 1— Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) . 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR 5)
Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) / Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
VIII
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
® 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) ^ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —. Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) -1 Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Presents Yes n_ No 0
Remarks
The soils in this upland area are very dry and compacted The soils are friable when removed
from auger There is slight streaking present at 14 The area and adjacent wetland is rarely
inundated given the proximity to Piney Green Road with flow coming from across Piney Green
This upland area does not appear to receive flooding due to the abandoned road bed/fill The
soils become sandier with depth and transition from a loam to sandy loam beyond 24
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) , / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(Al) — Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) —. Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
■
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Matenal(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 1—, Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Mart(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
® Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
- Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) —. Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soli Present? Yes 1151 No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
I Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/1 1
IApplicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WE UPI
1 Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Floodplain Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 759700 N Long 77 339302 W Datum NAD1983
i
Soil Map Unit Name CrC Craven fine sandy loam NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol I.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic'? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No . Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes . _ No within a Wetland? Yes No,
Wetland Hydrology Present'? Yes No N
Remarks
Data point WE UP 1 is adjacent to a roadside drainage ditch approximately 5 deep The soils present at
datapoint are not indicative of wetland hydrology There are very little hydrologic indicators and the vegetation
is marginally wet The area is between an abandoned road bed a built up parcel fill and Piney Green Road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
—Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Tnm Lines(616)
_ Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(83) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) Other(Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations _
Surface Water Present? Yes No 0 Depth(inches)
Water Table Present'? Yes No IS Depth(inches)
Saturation Present? Yes , No is Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 11 No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
The seasonal high water table appears to be between 14 18 but there is no evidence of the
water table at time of observation in the upper 24 The seasonal estimation is based on
proximity to roadside ditch
1 US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region–Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils?
Histosol(A1) a Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) - Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) —, Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ® Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) .-- Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
-1 Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1536)
— 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) WWI Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
® Thick Dark Surface(Al2) - Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) a Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ® Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) —I Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No g
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WD WET1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Acc ub um 60/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC 5 (A)
2 Lrg,rdambar 0,a i/lua 20/ Y FAC+
Total Number of Dominant 5
3 Species Across Al Strata (B)
4
5 Percent e '00%
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (NB)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
80/ =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50 k of total cover 40/ 20/ of total cover 16/ FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 )
FAC species x 3=
1 _Pe sea horboma 20/ Y FACW FACU species x 4=
2 Ligushum srnense 10/ Y FAC UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50%
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
30/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50%of total cover 15/ 200/ of total cover 6/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/o of total cover 20/ of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 Bigmuma capreolata 5/ Y FAC
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/
=Total Cover Vegetation El 50%of total cover 2 5/ 20%of total cover 1/ Presents Yes 0 No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
The vegetation in wetland WD is heavily buttressed and the leaves are water stained Red
maples are frequent and dominant throughout the wetland There is no herbaceous layer
present which indicates recent or sustained flooding
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) /o Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) —, Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) - Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vedic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) -- Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
RIM Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
—
— Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
® 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) r Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ® Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) ^ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes 0 No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WD UP 1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) _ Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 16 10YR 2/2 100 loamy sand UCS 100/
16 30 10YR 2/2 100 sandy loam
{ 'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
Histosol(A1) —, Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) =MI Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
SS= Black Histic(A3) - Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
1-1 Stratified Layers(A5) 1—.. Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1536)
1-1 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
■
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present/ Yes_a No NI
Remarks
The soils at point WD UP 1 do not have any hydrologic indicators The soils are friable when
removed from auger and very dry There is no glistening or indicators of moisture through the
upper 30
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum, (Plot size 20 ) /°Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 3
1 L:riodendion tuhpJe,a 25/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 Fagus grandi/oha 20/ Y FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Ace,rubrum 10/ N FAC Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4 Nyrsa svlvatrca 5/ N FAC
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 Ilex opaca 5/ N FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC 50�o (A/B)
6 Cam pmus carohnrana 5/ N FAC
7 Pmu teada 2/ N FAC Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
72/ =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = o
50 A of total cover 36/ 20/ of total cover 14 4/ FACW species t 5 x 2= 30
FAC species x 3= 156
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) p ewes
1 Arundurarm grgantea 10/ Y FACW FACU species 90 x 4= 120
2 Fagus g,andfolra 10/ Y FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3 Castanea dentata 5/ Y Ni Column Totals 97 (A) 306 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50°/
8 N 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/°of total cover 12 5/ 20°/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50°/ of total cover 20/ of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20 )
1 B 1 m a andens 5/ Y FACW
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 2 5/ 20%of total cover 1/
Present? Yes El No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC UP 1 is dominated by canopy level trees Pine trees are present along wetland edge but are
infrequent (1 2 individuals)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TTP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WD UP 1
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) flat land Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 769401 N Long 77 351303 W Datum NAD 1983
1 Soil Map Unit Name GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam NWI classification UPL
Are climatic!hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod, or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed', Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol I
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology _naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
—
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No I within a Wetland? Yes I No. ,
Remarks
Data point WD UP1 is upslope approximately 50 feet from point WD WET1 and approximately 2 higher elevation
above WD The trees in the upland area do not have the significant buttressing found in the wetland populations
and there is a much stronger presence of bays The soils in this upland area are significantly different from those
in the wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(88)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) —Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(816)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) —Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) �Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Saturation Present? Yes _ No ✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 11 No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitonng well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There are no wetland hydrology indicators within the upper 36 There is also no identifiable
source of hydrologic input in the upland area There is a significant berm between WD UP 1 and
WD WET 1 which prevents any hydrologic flow from the wetland into the upland area
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc7 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydre Soils'
Histosol(A1) 1•••11 Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) —
2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside NILRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
—
_ Stratified Layers(A5) / Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
® 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
_ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Mari(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) = Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ri
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC WET2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) /o Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC 5 (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant 6
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC $3'o (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover 20%of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 )
FAC species x 3=
1 Salts nrgrn 10/ Y OBL FACU species x 4=
2 Junrpe us r guaanc 10/ Y FACU UPL species x 5=
3 Mot ellacerrfeta 10/ Y FAC+ Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
30/ =Total Cover Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 15/ 20/ of total cover 3/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 20 ) 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Juncus effusus 40/ Y FACW be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Andr pug nghmeratuc 20/ Y FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Ttpha lat folic 20/ Y OBL
4 Poltgonrr r hid oprper 5/ N OBL Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 Ca erspp 5/ N FAC height
6 Suhdago spp 5/ N FACU Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
95/ =Total Cover
50/ of total cover 47 5/ 20/ of total cover 19/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation El 50%of total cover 20%of total cover Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC WET2 has shrubs on the outskirts of the wetland area This area is in a maintained utility
easement corridor but has not been recently mowed The wetland vegetation in the easement is
mostly in the herbaceous layer At the edges of the wetland and near the treehne at the edge of
the utility easement there are drainage patterns from road runoff flowing to Northeast Creek
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(Al) -- Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) r... 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
® 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) d Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) —I Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
— Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(If observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No El
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WC WET1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) /o Color(moist) / Type' Loc? Texture Remarks
0 4 10YR 3/1 100 loam Mucky
4 18 2 5Y 6/3 60 10YR 5/6 40 C/D M/PL loamy sand Oxidized rhizospheres
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?
Histosol(Al) — Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2)
— Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Mel Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) — Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) ` Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) NNW Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No g
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WC at WC WET 1 have a moist organic surface indicating inundation at
some point throughout the year Water is present in soil at depths of 12 Soils begin with a
loam layer with organic content then transitions to a loamy sand Soil is difficult to observe
below 18 due to saturation however it was noted that clay content appeared to increase as
the depth of the hole reached 18
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(mast) / Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(A1) 1—, Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) ` 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)—
®, Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside NILRA 150A B)
—
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
WM
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) — Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 151 No 11
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TiP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JO Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WC WET1
A Reusche 1 Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Investigator(s) p Ran s) g
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Floodplain Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) I%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 774399 N Long 77 362396 W Datum NAD1983
Soil Map Unit Name CrC Craven fine sandy loam NWI classification PFO 1 C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod. or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ NoJ
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic' (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects,important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
Wetland WC is out of the maintained corridor along Piney Green Road and is a floodplain wetland for Northeast Creek
Cypress trees and giant cane are established within floodplain The floodplain is not frequently inundated as evidenced
by low cypress knees and likely receives significant surface water input Dark stained and low lying depressions are
fi equent throughout wetland area Recent rainfall data is 0 0 in last 96 hours (Station KNCA New River MCAS)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ✓ Drainage Patterns(B10)
✓Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Tnm Lines(816)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(84) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
_ Iron Deposits(85) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
✓ Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 12 I�I
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No I I
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
The soil at WC WET 1 is very moist almost to the point of saturation and the water table is at
12 deep The sandy soil is moist and while retrieving the soil core with the auger the dug hole
continued to fill with water to 12 There are many low lying depressions and pockets with
significant dark staining and water stained leaves Frequent cypress knees are present as well
but judging by the low height of the cypress knees this area is not frequently inundated and
when it is inundated it is to a shallow depth
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 nodendion tuhprfc,a 25/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC 3
G, (A)
2 Fagusgrand,folea 20/ Y FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Ace,rubrum 10/ N FAC Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4 Nyssa svlvattca 5/ N FAC
5 Ilex opaca 5/ N FAC Percent of Dominant Species 50%
That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A/B)
6 Car prnus carohnrana 5/ N FAC
7 P,nus teada 2/ N FAC Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
72/ =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50%of total cover 36/ 20/o of total cover 14 4/ FACW species 15 x 2= 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) FAC species 52 x 3= 156
1 Arundmarragrgantea 10/ V FACW FACU species 30 x 4= 120
2 Fagus g,andfoha 10/ Y FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3 Castanea dentata 5/ Y Ni Column Totals 97 (A) 306 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50%
8 N 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 125/ 20/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 "/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8
Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/o of total cover 20%of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20 )
1 Be,chemea scandens 5/ Y FACW
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 2 5/ 20°/ of total cover 1/
Present? Yes ❑ No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC UP 1 is dominated by canopy level trees Pine trees are present along wetland edge but are
infrequent (1 2 individuals)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 20 ) /o Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Que cusp onus 25/ Y UPL That Are OBL FACW or FAC 5 (A)
2 Que cu lau fol a 20/ Y FACW
Total Number of Dominant
3 Ace,rubrum 15/ Y FAC Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC $3�o (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
60/ =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover 30/ 20/ of total cover 12/ FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) FAC species x 3=
1 Magnolia v,rg,mana 10/ Y FACW+ FACU species x 4=
2 vaccmeum rorynbosum 10/ Y FACW UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50/
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
20/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50°/ of total cover 10/ 20/ of total cover 4/
Herb Stratum (Plot size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50°/ of total cover 20°/ of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20
1 Lonice aJapon a 5/ Y FAC
2 e
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation 171 50/ of total cover 2 5/ 20%of total cover 1/ Presents Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC UP2 is dominated by canopy level trees including oaks and red maples A sparse shrub layer
is present in the understory The herbaceous layer is absent due to the heavy canopy coverage
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
_ Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) .- 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
=SP Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
MOM
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) - Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) .— Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
— Sandy Redox(S5) ,— Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No__
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist Just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WC UPI
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 4 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam UCS 15 20%
4 18 10YR 4!3 sand
i 18 24 10YR 5/1 60 10YR 4/6 40 RM M loamy sand mottling present
24 36 10YR 5/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 RM M sand mottling present
I
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 'Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
® Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
_ Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 02•I Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
MM.® Stratified Layers(A5) ^ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) _ Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
= Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) — Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 1508)
_ Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes g No 1-71
I
Remarks ) )
Seasonal high water table is approximately 18 deep based on mottling in the soil profile
/
I
1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WC UP 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Straturrl (Plot size 20 ) %Cover Soecies? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 L,r,odend,on tulip fet a 25/ Y FAC That Are OBL FACW or FAC 3 (A)
2 Fagus grand:folia 20/ Y FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3 Aces ruhrum 10/ N FAC Species Across All Strata 6 (B)
4 Nyssa svlvaaca 5/ N FAC
5 Ilex opaca 5/ N FAC Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW or FAC 50% (NB)
6 Cal pines carolmiana 5/ N FAC
7 Punts teada 2/ N FAC Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
72/ =Total Cover OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50 A of total cover 36/ 20%of total cover 14 4/ FACW species 15 x 2= 30
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 20 ) FAC species 52 x 3= 156
1 Arurtdinartagzgantea 10/ V FACW FACU species 30 x 4= 120
2 Fagus grandfolta 10/ Y FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
3 Castaneadentata 5/ Y Ni Column Totals 97 (A) 306 (8)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50%
8 N 3 Prevalence Index is s3 0'
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50 A,of total cover 12 5/ 20°/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 n/a be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8
Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
=Total Cover
50/°of total cover 20/0 of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 20 )
1 Berchemra scandens 5/ Y FACW
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
5/ =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 2 5/ 20°/ of total cover 1/
Present? Yes El No 0
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
WC UP 1 is dominated by canopy level trees Pine trees are present along wetland edge but are
infrequent (1 2 individuals)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WC UP 1
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) slight hillslope Local relief(concave convex none) none Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 774501 N Long 77 362701 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name CrC Craven fine sandy loam NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 7 No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ Nol I
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology ,naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓. is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
` within a Wetland? Yes_ No, 1 ,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
Data point WC UP 1 was taken on an upslope approximately 20 laterally from wetland edge
and approximately 1 2 higher in elevation Geomorphic variation is heavy compared to uniform
surfaces in the wetland Seasonal high water table is around 18
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Pnmary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) a Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
—Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(810)
®Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
`Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(85) Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ FAC Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(B9) Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations _
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches) 24 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1-1 , No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
The soils in WC UP 1 are dry through the upper 24 There is a strong presence of uncoated
sand grains in the upper 4 Below 24 soils are moist and saturated There are no indicators of
wetland hydrology through the upland area above wetland WC
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) k Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 2 10YR 3/1 100 sandy loam
2 6 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam
6 12 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam Oxidized rhizospheres
12 18 10YR 5/2 60 10YR 5/4 40 C M loamy sand
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(Al) o Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) ✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
✓ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
® Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
® Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
■ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) a Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydnc Soil Present' Yes o No_1
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WB are altered and entire wetland system is a man made drainage
feature Soil also shows evidence of having been turned over and disturbed Current soils are a
sandy loam through the upper 12 Soil is moist just below surface (depths of 2 ) and is
saturated at 10
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WB WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % over Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 nth That Are OBL FACW or FAC 4 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC 57% (NB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50/ of total cover 20/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 10 ) FAC species x 3=
1 Pv us calle yana 10/ Y Ni FACU species x 4=
2 Junzperus vzrgmzana 10/ Y FACU UPL species x 5=
3 Mot ellace zfera 10/ Y FAC+ Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
4 Clethra alnzfoha 10/ Y FACW Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50°/
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
40/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 20/ 20/ of total cover 8/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 10 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Juncus effuses 20/ Y FACW be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Solzdago spp 20/ Y FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Andropogon glomcratzzs 20/ Y FACW+
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 Rosa mult}fioza 5/ N uPL more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
65/ =Total Cover
50/ of total cover 32 5/ 20/ of total cover 13/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 'la
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation El 50%of total cover 20°/ of total cover Presents Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland WB has vegetative zonation occurring The lower portion of the wetland has more
shrubs and a light herbaceous layer Away from the interior of the wetland in the portions not as
wet the needle rush golden rod and multiflora rose is much more dense The side slopes of this
depressional area are much steeper than wetland WA
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 1 2/1 5/1 1
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WB WET
Investigator(s) A Reusche I Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Roadside depressional bowl Local relief(concave convex none) Concave Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 786800 N Long 77 378899 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro Urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydro! is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil, 1 or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes I No J
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
WB WET is in a topographic crease and is directly adjacent to US 17(N Marine Blvd) It is a linear system approximately 15 feet wide and
receives hydrologic input from drainage off US 17 Wetland WB is formed at the base of steep toe slopes from US 17 Piney Green Road and the
historic construction access road The data point was taken approximately 30 feet fi om not theastern boundary in center of ti etland depression
the area has been disturbed but does not have evidence of mowing Ihere is no evidence of recent rainfall arid wetland appears to be suiface
water dnven Actual rainfall data is 0 0 in last 96 hours
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(86)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) ✓ Drainage Patterns(810)
_Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
Water Marks(81) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _ Dry Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(82) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
•Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
II Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
0 Water Stained Leaves(B9) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches) I
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I 1 No El •
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
Hydrologic input consists of surface water flow to the wetland from US 17 and Piney Green
Road feeds wetland WB to a lesser extent The area does not appear to have received rainfall
recently but soil is saturated at depths of 10 with moisture present after upper 2 The wetland
is a low point next to US 17 and has a braided drainage pattern running through the lowest
point in the wetland The bottom of wetland WB is located in a roadside ditch approximately 5
feet lower than the adjacent road surface of US 17 There is an upland ridge between WA and
WB that was built up as a construction access road or staging area
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WB UP1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 6 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam 10% UCS
6 14 10YR 5/4 100 loamy sand
14 18 10YR 6/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL sandy clay loam
18 22 10YR 3/2 sandy loam w/gravel content
i
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
_ Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Bela'Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) — 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
_ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) _ 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR 5)
Black Histic(A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) — Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) _ Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
_ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Matenal(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) — Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) o Depleted Ochnc(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) _ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
= Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes,g No is
Remarks
Soils are disturbed with mixed matrix throughout the profile There are no hydric soil
indicators within the upper 22 Below 22 is gravel fill that is unable to be analyzed with
auger
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WB UP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species O
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across Al Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC "�0 (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50 A of total cover 20 A of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) FAC species x 3=
1 lila FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50%
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is 53 01
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50 A■of total cover 12 5/ 20/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 20 ) 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Festuca spp 80/ Y NI be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Centella erecta 10/ N FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Preudognaphalum obtur ifilmm 10/ N NI
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 , more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—Al woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
100/ =Total Cover
50/o of total cover 50/ 20/o of total cover 20/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 20%of total cover Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
The vegetation in WB UP 1 is regularly mowed preventing any canopy sapling or shrub layer
There is a small amount of needle rush along lowest end of upland at wetland boundary The
search radius is limited to 20 due to limited natural area (US 17 and Piney Green Road)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TTP #U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WB UP 1
Investigator(s) A Reusche 1 Hai tshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Roadside dept essional bowl Local relief(concave convex none) Concave Slope(%)
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 786800 N Long 77 378601 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro Urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil, I or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes I No J
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No. ✓ ,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
Data point WB UP 1 is at the edge of a filled area adjacent to US 17 Piney Green Road and a relic construction
access road are also creating boundaries around WB UP 1 There has not been any recent rainfall in the area The
disturbed area upslope of the wetland is primarily herbaceous vegetation but this area is maintained regularly
through mowing
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(813) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _ Moss Tnm Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry Season Water Table(C2) r
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) =NM Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(02)
Iron Deposits(B5) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) FAC Neutral Test(05)
Water Stained Leaves(69) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present'? Yes _,. No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes El No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There are not any wetland hydrology indicators and there is no evidence of saturation or
seasonal high water table in upper 22 This area is the head of a stormwater swale that
receives runoff from Piney Green Road and US 17 Data point is located approximately 5 from
toe of slope
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WA WET
Profile Description (Descnbe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) / Color(moist) / Tvoe' Loc1 Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2 100 clay sandy loam
2-10 10YR 3/1 100 loamy sand
10-20 10YR 3/1 70 10YR 5/6 30 C M sandy loam
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matnx MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
Histosol(Al) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
WM
Histic Epipedon(A2) Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
— Black Histic(A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) —
Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —, Loamy Gleyed Matnx(F2) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
Stratified Layers(A5) — Depleted Matrix(F3) _Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) _ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 153B)
—
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) _ Red Parent Matenal(TF2)
—
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) 1— Redox Depressions(F8) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) — Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) v Delta Ochnc(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) — Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
✓ Stripped Matrix(S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed)
Type ❑
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
Remarks
The soils in Wetland WA are altered The wetland is a drainage feature associated with Piney
Green Road or adjacent commercial development and is not natural Evidence of streaking in
the soil begins at depths of 2 The soil is very moist throughout the profile
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WA WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) / Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC 3 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 5 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC 60% (AB)
` 6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total 0/ Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50/ of total cover 20°/ of total cover FACW species x 2=
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
FAC species x 3=
1 %lore//a certfera 20/ Y FAC+ FACU species x 4=
2 Pyrus callerjana 5/ Y Ni UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A=
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 Y 2 Dominance Test is>50/
8 _ 3 Prevalence Index is<3 0'
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/o of total cover 12 5/ 20%of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 20 ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Juncos effusus 20/ Y FACW be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Soltdago spp 20/ Y FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 And,opogon glomet ants 20/ Y FACW
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 Festucaspp 15/ N NI more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 Centella erecta 10/ N FACW height
6 Coy eopszs spp 10/ N FAC
Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 Carexspp 5/ N FAC than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8 Herb—All herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
100/ =Total Cover
50/ of total cover 50/ 20/ of total cover 20/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1 n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation El 50/ of total cover 20/ of total cover Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland WA has a dense herbaceous vegetative community There is sparse shrub coverage
located along wetland boundaries As elevation increases upslope away from the wetland
grasses such as fescue become more prevalent and signs of mowing and maintenance are
present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/15/11
Applicant/Owner Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WA WET
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Roadside depressional bowl Local relief(concave convex none) Concave Slope(%) 1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Let 34 786900 N Long 77 378700 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro Urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ Soil ✓ or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology ,naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes I. No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes No,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No_
Remarks
WA WET is in a topographic crease It is a linear system approximately 10 feet wide and receives hydrologic input
from drainage off Piney Green Road Data point was taken near point WA2 approximately 10 feet from upland point
and 18 inches lower in elevation Area has been disturbed and is maintained No evidence of recent rainfall Wetland
appears to be surface water driven Actual rainfall data is 0 0 in last 96 hours (Station KNCA New River MCAS)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two requiredl
P rimary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(A1) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _ Drainage Patterns(810)
✓Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Moss Tnm Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(81) ✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) Dry Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(83) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) ✓ Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) _ FAC Neutral Test(05)
Water Stained Leaves(89) _Sphagnum moss(08)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth(inches) 18
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No _ Depth(inches) 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 151 No El
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aenal photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
The hydrologic input to the wetland consists of surface water flow from Piney Green Road This
area does not appear to have received rainfall recently but soil is saturated at depths of 10 with
moisture present after upper 2 The wetland is a low point in the area with the main wetland
elevation approximately 4 feet below the road surface of Piney Green Road and adjacent gas
station parking lot There is an upland ridge between WA and WB that was built up as a
construction access road or staging area
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point WA UP1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) 0/ Color(moist) / Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
1 0 6 10YR 3/2 90 sandy loam 10% UCS
6 14 10YR 5/4 100 loamy sand
14 18 10YR 6/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C PL M sandy clay loam
18 22 10YR 3/2 sandy loam w/gravel content
1
'Type C=Concentration D=Depletion RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydnc Soil indicators (Applicable to all LRRs unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils3
,e Histosol(Al) = Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S T U) 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon(A2) — Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S T U) 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
12¢2a. Black Histic(A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR 0) Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P S T)
® Stratified Layers(A5) Depleted Matrix(F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P T U) — Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P T U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Red Parent Material(TF2)
Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) - Redox Depressions(F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P T) _ Marl(F10)(LRR U) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) - Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Iron Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR 0 P T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) Umbnc Surface(F13)(LRR P T U) wetland hydrology must be present
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR 0 S) _ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matnx(S4) _ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A 150B)
Sandy Redox(S5) .— Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx(S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A 153C 153D)
— Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P S T U)
Restrictive Layer Of observed)
Type
Depth(inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes_EL No 0
Remarks
Soils are disturbed with mixed matrix throughout the profile There are no hydric soil
indicators within the upper 22 Below 22 is gravel fill that is unable to be analyzed with
auger
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0
r

VEGETATION(Four Strata)—Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point WA UP I
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) ° Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 n/a That Are OBL FACW or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant 1
3 Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species o
5 That Are OBL FACW or FAC "'0 (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total / Cover of Multiply by
=Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50 A of total cover 20%of total cover FACW species x 2=
Saplincl/Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) FAC species x 3=
1 71/a FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
3
Column Totals 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Prevalence Index =B/A= 0
5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6 N 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 N 2 Dominance Test is>50 A
8 3 Prevalence Index is 53 0'
25/ =Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
50/ of total cover 12 5/ 20°/ of total cover 5/
Herb Stratum (Plot size 20 )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Festuca spp 80/ Y NI be present unless disturbed or problematic
2 Centella erecta 10/ N FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3 Pseudognaphalium obturifolntm 10/ N NI
Tree—Woody plants excluding vines 3 in (7 6 cm)or
4 more in diameter at breast height(DBH) regardless of
5 height
6 Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants excluding vines less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m)tall
8
Herb—Al herbaceous(non woody)plants regardless
9 of size and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10 Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11 height
12
100/ =Total Cover
50/ of total cover 50/ 20/ of total cover 20/
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 n/a
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover 20%of total cover Present? Yes El No 0
Remarks (If observed list morphological adaptations below)
The vegetation in WA UP 1 is regularly mowed preventing any canopy sapling or shrub layer
There is a small amount of needle rush along lowest end of upland at wetland boundary The
search radius is limited to 20 due to limited natural area (BP Gas Station and roadways)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site TIP#U 3810 Piney Green Road JD Update City/County Jacksonville Onslow County Sampling Date 12/1 5/1 1
Applicant/Owner North Carolina Department of Transportation State NC Sampling Point WA UP 1
Investigator(s) A Reusche J Hartshorn C Evenhouse (KHA) Section Township Range Jacksonville NC
Landform(hillslope terrace etc) Roadside depressional bowl Local relief(concave convex none) Concave Slope(%) 1/o
Subregion(LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 786800 N Long 77 378601 W Datum NAD1983
Sod Map Unit Name GpB Goldsboro Urban land complex NWI classification UPL
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year/ Yes ✓ No (If no explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ Sod. 1 or Hydrology ,significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances present? Yes I No l
Are Vegetation Soil_ or Hydrology _naturally problematic/ (If needed explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc
—
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present/ Yes No a Is the Sampled Area /
Hydric Soil Presents Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No 0
Remarks
Data point WA UP 1 is at the edge of a filled area adjacent to parking for BP Gas Station Piney Green Road and
US 17 are also creating boundaries around WA UP 1 Thei e has not been any recent rainfall in the area The
disturbed area upslope of the wetland is primarily herbaceous vegetation but this area is maintained regularly
through mowing
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required,check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks(86)
Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(B13) —Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
High Water Table(A2) _Marl Deposits(B15)(LRR U) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Moss Tnm Lines(B16)
Water Marks(B1) _Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) _Dry Season Water Table(C2)
Sediment Deposits(B2) ,_Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Drift Deposits(B3) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery(C9)
- Algal Mat or Crust(B4) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(85) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Shallow Aquitard(D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) FAC Neutral Test(D5)
Water Stained Leaves(89) _Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present/ Yes No 0 Depth(inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No 11511 Depth(inches) El Saturation Present/ Yes No Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge monitoring well aerial photos previous inspections) if available
Remarks
There are not any wetland hydrology indicators and there is no evidence of saturation or
seasonal high water table in upper 22 This area is the head of a stormwater swale that
receives runoff from Piney Green Road Data point is located approximately 5 from toe of slope
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2 0

USACE Wetland Data Forms
(Field evaluation conducted on 12/15/2011)

or❑Other(Name&Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑0 Applicable/supporting case law
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature
❑ Other information(please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD
I
I

• Tributaries of TNW where tnbutaries have continuous flow seasonally' (e g typically three months each year)are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section I1I B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
® Tributary waters 496 4 linear feet 10 width(ft)
01 Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
3 Non RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs
▪ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area(check all that apply)
❑i Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
E Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
®i Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section iII D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetlands within the corridor that are directly abutting a RPW are located directly
adjacent to the channel or the channel flows through the wetland system
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Stream C was determined to be Seasonal RPW within the project corridor One wetland area is located
east of the channel This wetland is within the same natural valley as Stream C and flows directly to Stream C through a
culver under Piney Green Road
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 19 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
01 Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111 C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 18 acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
01 Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑1 Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(1-6) or
Q Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below)
E ISOLATED(INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE]WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
$See Footnote#3
To complete the analysis refer to the kcy in Section III D(of the instructional Guidebook

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports(check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics(type average width) WG has a wide npanan corridor(approximately 200 feet) WH
is in a cleared and maintained residential area
❑ Wetland fringe Charactenstics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(1) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 18 acres
Wetland type Explain Headwater system
Wetland quality Explain Wetland is in a cleared and maintained area Wetland is confined by a culvert under Piney
Green Road
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Intermittent flow Explain
Surface flow is Discrete
Charactenstics
Subsurface flow Unknown Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
®Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
® Separated by berm/bamer Explain WH is connected through a culvert underneath Piney Green Road to
downstream waters
(d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW
Project wetlands are II 2 river miles from TNW
Project waters are p(or 1 sse aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Flow is from Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 50 100 year floodplain
(u) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize wetland system(e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain Water quality is assumed to be fair based on surrounding land use consisting of residential
development at the review area Piney Green Road is a heavily traveled road
Identify specific pollutants if known
(III)Biological Characteristics Wetland supports(check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics(type average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tnbutary(if any)
All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis 2
Approximately(0 19)acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
01 which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industnes in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
1 ❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
Di Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
❑ Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WE1 LANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Di If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑I Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
❑ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors(le presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irnlated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(0 e nvers streams) linear feet width(ft)
0 Lakes/ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard,where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e nvers streams) linear feet width(ft)
01 Lakes/ponds acres
❑i Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑i Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and,where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
®i Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑1 Corps navigable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
®i U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale&quad name Kellum Jacksonville North Camp Lejeune(1 24 000)
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
■
❑i State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑i Photographs ❑ Aerial(Name&Date)
°Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

SECTION 111 CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section IIi A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tnbutanes of TNWs where the tnbutanes are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial)flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section 111 B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
C
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 20 acres
Drainage area 30 acres
Average annual rainfall 48 inches
Average annual snowfall 3 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
®Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entenng TNW
Project waters are �7 22 river miles from TNW
Project waters are pl(or less)river miles from RPW
Project waters are 1 2 a erial(straight)miles from TNW
Project waters are it(or less)aerial(straight)miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5 Tributary flows to Motts Creek then to Northeast Creek
Tributary stream order if known 1st
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the arid
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9(Y/N) Size(in acres) Directly abuts9(Y/N) Size(in acres)
WG 0 01 Yes
WH 0 18 No
I
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed Wetlands are functioning as filters and
improving downstream water quality by retaining water(ground and overland)and allowing the pollutants to settle prior to the
water flowing downstream
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary Itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance(e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
( outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of signific-int nexus below based on the tnbutary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE(CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑TNWs linear feet width(ft) Or acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
El Tributaries of TNWs where tributanes typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Streams in the corridor that were determined to flow year round exhibited strong geomorphological
characteristics flowing water of depths greater than 6 and large wrack lines or debris piles

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports(check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics(type average width) WG has a wide npanan corridor(approximately 200 feet) WH
is in a cleared and maintained residential area
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 18 acres
Wetland type Explain Headwater system
Wetland quality Explain Wetland is in a cleared and maintained area Wetland is confined by a culvert under Piney
Green Road
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Intermittent flow Explain
Surface flow is Discr t
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Unknown Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑Directly abutting
®Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
® Separated by berm/bamer Explain WH is connected through a culvert underneath Piney Green Road to
downstream waters
(d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW
Project wetlands are iF 2 river miles from TNW
Project waters are it (or less),aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Flow is from Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the'50 100 years floodplain
(u) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize wetland system(e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain Water quality is assumed to be fair based on surrounding land use consisting of residential
development at the review area Piney Green Road is a heavily traveled road
Identify specific pollutants if known
(iii)Biological Characteristics Wetland supports(check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics(type average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary Of any)
All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis 2
Approximately(0 19)acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

(b) General Tributary Characteristics(check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial(man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank(estimate)
Average width 5 feet
Average depth 5 feet
Average side slopes 2
Primary tributary substrate composition(check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands ❑Concrete
® Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/°/ cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability[e g highly eroding sloughing,banks] Explain
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Explain Run/riffle/pool complexes are well established
Tributary geometry Relatively straight
Tributary gradient(approximate average slope) I /
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 20(or greater)
Describe flow regime Perennial
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Confined Characteristics
Subsurface flow Unknown Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
Tributary has(check all that apply)
El Bed and banks
OHWM6(check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank ® the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil ® destruction of terrestrial vegetation
® shelving ® the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent ® sediment sorting
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away ® scour
® sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other(list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑physical markings
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
El other(list)
(III) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary(e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc)
Explain Water quality is assumed to be fair based on surrounding land use consisting of residential development at the
review area Piney Green Road is a heavily traveled road
Identify specific pollutants if known
A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever Jurisdiction(e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime(c g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7lbid

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section IIi A 1 and Section iII D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
l TNW
identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summanze rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tnbutaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial)flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both if the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 20 ac s
Drainage area 30 acres
Average annual rainfall 48 inches
Average annual snowfall 3 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑Tributary flows directly into TNW
®Tributary flows through 2 tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 1 2 river miles from TNW
Project waters are +1(or less)river miles from RPW
Project waters are l 2 aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Project waters are 1(or less)aerial(straight)miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5 Tributary flows to Motts Creek then to Northeast Creek
Tributary stream order if known 1st
Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the arid
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Drainage Area 4
(Wetlands WG WH)
(Streams 8 10)
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA I ION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
1
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Onslow County City Jacksonville
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degee decimal format) Lat 34 7235 N Long 77 3202 LWj
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Motts Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water(TNW)Into which the aquatic resource flows Little Northeast Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC) 03030001
®1 Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential junsdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites(e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc )are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑, Office(Desk)Determination Date
❑ Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are nd navigable waters of the U S within Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 329)in the
review area [Required]
❑i Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are waters of the U S within Clean Water Act(CWA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 328)in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S ''
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area(check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including terntonal seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs)that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated(interstate or intrastate)waters including isolated wetlands
b identify(estimate)size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 496 4 linear feet 10 width(ft)and/or 0 11 acres
Wetlands 0 19 acres
c Limits(boundaries)of jurisdiction based on '1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM(if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands(check if applicable)3
❑J Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not junsdictional
Explain
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropi late sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at le'ist seasonally
(c g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section IiI F

D Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑I Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
❑, Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
DI Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
▪ Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors(i e presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e rivers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
DI Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
DI Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑I Non wetland waters(i e rivers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
DI Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
DI Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale&quad name Kellum Jacksonville North Camp Lejeune(1 24 000)
DI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑i FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0' Photographs ❑Aerial(Name&Date)
or❑ Other(Name&Date)
DI Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable/supporting case law
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature
O Other information(please specify)
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section Ill C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area(Lheck all that apply)
❑1 Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Zr Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section Ill D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetland(WF)within the corridor that are directly abutting a RPW are located directly
adjacent to the channel or the channel flows through the wetland system
❑' Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributanes typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111 B and rationale in Section Ill D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Stream C was determined to be Seasonal RPW within the project corridor One wetland area is located
east of the channel This wetland is within the same naturil valley as Stream C and flows directly to Stream C through a
culver under Piney Green Road
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 38 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have i significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section Ill C
Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters'
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Di Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
❑I Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(I 6) or
01 Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below)
E ISOLATED INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATES WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 1U
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
01 from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
01 which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
01 Interstate isolated waters Explain
8Sce Footnote#3
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts9(Y/N) Size(in acres) Directly abuts'(Y/N) Size(in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A sigmficant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance(e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting,spawning or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs9
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section 111 D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE(CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
®nII TNWs Little Northeast Creek linear feet 3 15width(ft) Or 0 14acres
J Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
DI Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial
Eli Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year)are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IIi B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports(check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics(type average width) No riparian corridor Areas along stream is clear and
maintained
❑ Wetland fringe Characteristics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(I) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explam
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Pick List Explain
Surface flow is Pick List
Charactenstics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barner Explain
(d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick List
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplam
(u) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize wetland system(e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(►n)Biological Characteristics Wetland supports(check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics(type average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary Of any)
All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis Pick List
Approximately( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

Tributary stream order if known 1st
(b) General Tributary Characteristics(check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial(man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank(estimate)
Average width 5 feet
Average depth 3 feet
Average side slopes 2 1
Primary tributary substrate composition(check all that apply)
® Silts ❑ Sands ❑Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑Vegetation Type/°/ cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability[e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Explain Run/riffle/pool complexes are weak in the seasonal RPWs due to
disturbance and land cleanng in the nearby vicinity
Tributary geometry Relatively straight
Tributary gradient(approximate average slope) 2%
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 2 5
Describe flow regime Intermittent
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Confined Characteristics Stream SA is small intemittent stream that crosses Piney Green Road
through a culvert and flows south to Little Northeast Creek
Subsurface flow Unknown' Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
Tributary has(check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
®OHWM6(check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ® the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent ® sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other(list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explvn
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑physical markings
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other(list)
(iii) Chemical Charactenstics
Charactenze tributary(e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc)
Explain The watershed for Streams SA are primarily urban with residential and commercial uses Both streams have a
marginal forested ripanan buffer Water was observed to be clear
Identify specific pollutants if known
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever Jurisdiction(c g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime(c g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culveit) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7Ibid

SECTION HI CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
� The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A l and Section III D I only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D I otherwise see Section III B below
I TNW
Identify TNW Little Northeast Creek
Summanze rationale supporting determination Little Northeast Creek is subject to the ebb and flow of tidal waters The system is
approximately 20 feet wide as it crosses the corridor and flows to approximately 30 river miles to the Atlantic Ocean
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summanze rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial)flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both if the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section 111 C below
I Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 20 acres
Drainage area 25 racres
Average annual rainfall 48 inches
Average annual snowfall 3 inches
(n) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
®Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 1 2,river miles from TNW
Project waters are 1 (or less)river miles from RPW
Project waters are 1 2,ae it al(straight)miles from TNW
Project waters are 4(or less)aerial(straight)miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5 Stream SA flows south to Little Northeast Creek
Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the arid
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying c g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Drainage Area 3
(Wetland WF)
(Streams SA Stream 7)
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Onslow County City Jacksonville
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 34 748 N Long 77 3293 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Little Northeast Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water(TNW)Into which the aquatic resource flows Little Northeast Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC) 03030001
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites(e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc )are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office(Desk)Determination Date
❑I Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are navigable xaters of the U S within Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 329)in the review
area [Required]
® Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are xaters of the US within Clean Water Act(CWA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 328)in the review area [Requi ed]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area(check all that apply) i
• TNWs including temtonal seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Z Relatively permanent waters (RPWs)that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of Junsdictional waters
❑ Isolated(interstate or intrastate)waters including isolated wetlands
b identify(estimate)size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 454 linear feet 20 width(ft)and/or 0 15 acres
Wetlands 1 9 acres
c Limits(boundaries)of jurisdiction based on 11987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM(if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands(check if applicable)3
0 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
i Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD
I
1
1
I
11

O Interstate isolated waters Explain
❑ Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
0 Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
O Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑I If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
O Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
O 1 Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area,where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors(i e presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e rivers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑i Lakes/ponds acres
❑i Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard,where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e avers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
O Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
0 Corps navigable waters study
O U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale&quad name Kellum Jacksonville North Camp Lejeune(1 24 000)
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑l State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑1 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑ Aerial(Name&Date)
or❑ Other(Name&Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable/supporting case law
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature
❑ Other information(please specify)
,

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
3 Non RPWs8 that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs
❑� Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly Into TNWs
®I Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
• Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section Ill D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetlands within the corridor that are directly abutting a RPW are located directly
adjacent to the channel or the channel flows through the wetland system
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111 B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Stream C was determined to be Seasonal RPW within the project corridor One wetland area is located
east of the channel This wetland is within the same natural valley as Stream C and flows directly to Stream C through a
culver under Piney Green Road
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 38 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑f Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
O Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑I Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
DI Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(1-6) or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below)
E ISOLATED[INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE'WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DES1 RUCI ION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
❑l which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑j which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
"Sec Footnote#3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section HI D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
o Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos
{

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts (Y/N) Size(in acres) Directly abuts?(Y/N) Size(in acres)
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A sigmficant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations,a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not limited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance(e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tnbutary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or reanng young for species that are present in the TNW9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs9
Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW9
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section Ill D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE(CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
❑TNWs linear feet width(ft) Or acres
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributanes typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tnbutary is perennial Stream 6 in the corridor that were determined to flow year round exhibited strong geomorphological
characteristics flowing water of depths greater than 6 and large wrack lines or debris piles
❑J Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e b typically three months each year)are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports(check all that apply)
❑ Riparian corridor Charactenstics(type average width)
❑ Wetland fringe Charactenstics
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non i NW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explain
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Pick List Explain
Surface flow is Pick List
Charactenstics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explvn
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain
(d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick L sr t river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Flow is from Pick List
approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain
(u) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize wetland system(e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
(iii)Biological Characteristics Wetland supports(check all that apply)
❑ Riparian buffer Characteristics(type average width)
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover Explain
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary(if any)
All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis Pick List
Approximately( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

(b) General Tributary Characteristics(check all that apply)
Tributary is ❑Natural
❑ Artificial(man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank(estimate)
Average width feet
Average depth feet
Average side slopes Pick List
Primary tributary substrate composition(check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/°/ cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability[e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/raffle/pool complexes Explain
Tributary geometry Pick List
Tributary gradient(approximate average slope) %
(c) How
Tributary provides for Pick L
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year Pick List
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Pick List Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findinls
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
Tributary has(check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWMf(check all indicators that apply)
❑ clear natural line impressed on the bank ❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down bent or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other(list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑physical markings
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other(list)
(iii) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize tnbutary(e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc)
Explain
Identify specific pollutants if known
A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever Jurisdiction(c g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime(e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
7Ibid

SECTION 111 CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections 111 A 1 and 2
and Section Ill D 1 otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial)flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water even
though a sigmficant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section HI B 1 for
the tributary Section HI B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size acres
Drainage area acres
Average annual rainfall inches
Average annual snowfall inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑ Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List river miles from RPW
Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Project waters are Pick List aerial(straight)miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5
Tributary stream order if known 1st
Note that the instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying c g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Drainage Area 2
(Wetland WE)
(Stream 6)
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Onslow County City Jacksonville
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 34 7602 N Long 77 3395 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Northeast Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water(TNW)Into which the aquatic resource flows Little Northeast Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC) 03030001
❑ Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites(e b offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc )are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office(Desk)Determination Date
❑ Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are no navigable waters of the U S within Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 329)in the
review area [Required]
❑i Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are xaters of the U S within Clean Water Act(CWA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 328)in the review area [Requu ed]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area(check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including temtonal seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs)that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated(interstate or intrastate)waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify(estimate)size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 335 linear feet 6 width(ft)and/or 0 0 5 acres
Wetlands 0 38 acres
c Limits(boundaries)of jurisdiction based on 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM(if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands(check if applicable)3
0 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tnbutaiy that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section iiI F

B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD
r

❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industnes in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain
Di Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
❑ Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
O Wetlands acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area these areas did not meet the critena in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
O Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate(or foreign)commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
Q' Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Junsdiction is the MBR
factors(i e presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
Judgment(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e avers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
❑ Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ Non wetland waters(i e rivers streams) linear feet width(ft)
❑ Lakes/ponds acres
1211 Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
❑ Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD(check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested appropnately reference sources below)
® Maps plans plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters study
❑1 U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale&quad name Kellum Jacksonville North and Camp Lejeune(1 24 000)
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation
❑ National wetlands Inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑Aerial(Name&Date)
or❑ Other(Name&Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable/supporting case law
❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature
❑, Other information(please specify)

including continuity of bed and bank sinuosity and substrate sorting In addition soil based evidence of a high water table
was observed
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters in the review area(check all that apply)
® Tributary waters Streams 1 4 SC &SD=668 86 linear feet 2 10 width(ft)
U Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
3 Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
O Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is junsdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional waters within the review area(check all that apply)
❑i Tributary waters linear feet width(ft)
❑ Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s)of waters
4 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into 1 NWs
®l Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are junsdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tnbutary is perennial in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Wetlands within the corridor that are directly abutting a RPW are located directly
adjacent to the channel or the channel flows through the wetland system
01 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributanes typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 1 18 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 32acres
6 Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑J Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section 111 C
Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above(1 6) or
D Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce(see E below)
E ISOLATED[INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATES WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
8Sce Footnote#3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section iII D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

For each wetland specify the following
Directly abuts"(Y/N) Size(in acres) Directly abuts"(Y/N) Size(in acres)
WA 0 028 No
WB 0 079 No
WC 1 18 Yes
WD 0 2 No
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed Wetlands within the project area are
functioning as filters to reduce chemical pollution from entering the associated streams improving overall water quality
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tnbutary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical physical and biological integrity
of a TNW For each of the following situations,a significant nexus exists if the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands,has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include but are not hmited to the volume duration and frequency of the flow
of water in the tnbutary and its proximity to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine sigmficant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance(e g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland hes within or
outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook Factors to consider include for example
• Does the tnbutary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW"
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning or reanng young for species that are present in the TNW"
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs"
Does the tnbutary in combination with its adjacent wetlands(if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological integrity of the TNW"
Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Significant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
2 Significant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section IIi D
3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D
D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJEC I'WATERS/WETLANDS ARE(CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
D TNWs linear feet width(ft) Or acres
O Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
2 RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Streams in the corridor that were determined to flow year round exhibited strong geomorphological
characteristics flowing water of depths greater than 6 and large wrack lines or debris piles
®I Tributaries of TNW where tnbutanes have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year)are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally Streams SC and SD were determined to flow at least seasonally due to the strong geomorphological characteristics

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports(check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics(type average width) The average npanan width for Streams SC and SD was
observed to be 50 feet from edge of bank
El Wetland fringe Characteristics
El Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics
(a)_ General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 0 32 acres
Wetland type Explain Ripanan WA WB and WD are headwater systems
Wetland quality Explain WA and WB hwe been disturbed by grading and fill associated with surrouding
commercial development US 17 and Piney Green Road
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non TNW
Flow is Perennial flow, Explain
Surface flow is Discrete and confined
Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non TNW
E l Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
El Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
® Ecological connection Explain WA and WB flow to an unnamed tributary that flows to Northeast Creek
® Separated by benn/barner Explain WD flows directly to Northeast Creek through a culvert that passes under
Piney Green Road.
(d) Proximity(Relationship)to TNW
Project wetlands are J1 2 river miles from TNW
Project waters are 1 (or 1 sse)aerial(straight)miles from TNW
Flow is from Wetland to navigable waters
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 100 500 year floodplain
(ii) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize wetland system(e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc) Explain Water is clear water quality is expected to be fair considering the wetlands position in a
generally developed landscape Land use is commercia and residential
Identify specific pollutants if known
(iii)Biological Characteristics Wetland supports(check all that apply)
® Ripanan buffer Characteristics(type average width)WD has a riparian buffer of apporimately 200 feet
® Vegetation type/percent cover Explain WA and WB are dominated by early successional herbaceous vegetation
resulting from disturbance and continious mowing WD has well established vegetative stratums and a wide nparian buffer
❑ Habitat for
El Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
El Aquatic/wildlife diversity Explain findings
3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary(if any)
All wetland(s)being considered in the cumulative analysis 4
Approximately( 1 5)'tcres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

Identify specific pollutants if known

Tributary stream order if known 1st
(b) General Tributary Characteristics(check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial(man made) Explain
❑ Manipulated (man altered) Explain
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank(estimate)
Average width 2 6 feet
Average depth 3 6 feet
Average side slopes 2 1
Primary tributary substrate composition(check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands ❑Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/%cover
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability[e g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Exphin Run/riffle/pool complexes are weak in the seasonal RPWs due to
disturbance and land clearing in the nearby vicinity
Tributary geometry Relatively straight
Tributary gradient(approximate average slope) 1 /o
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Seasonal flow:
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 2 5
Describe flow regime Intermittent
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is ;Confined Characteristics Stream SC is deeply incised and very straight It is approximately 6 deep and
6 wide at bankfull Stream SD has poor sinuousity with good base flow
Subsurface flow Unknown Explain findings
❑ Dye(or other)test performed
Tributary has(check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
®OHWM6(check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank ® the presence of litter and debris
® changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ® the presence of wrack line
vegetation matted down bent or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ scour
❑ sediment deposition ❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining ❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other(list) —
El Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction(check all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits(foreshore) ❑physical markings
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other(list)
(iii) Chemical Charactenstics
Characterize tributary(e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed charactenstics etc)
Explain The watershed for Streams SC and SD are primarily urban with residential and commercial uses Both streams
have a marginal forested ripanan buffer Water was observed to be clear
A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever Jurisdiction(c g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody s flow
regime(c g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
I 7lbid
fI

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sections iiI A 1 and 2
and Section III D I otherwise see Section III B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2 Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY(THAT IS NOT A TNW)AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS(IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are relatively permanent
waters (RPWs) i e tributaries that typically flow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally(e g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
(perennial)flow skip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
skip to Section III D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial(and its adjacent wetlands if any)and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law
if the waterbody4 is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines for
analytical purposes the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary Section HI B 2 for any onsite wetlands and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
1 Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly Into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 2500a rc es
Drainage area 2500 racrd
Average annual rainfall 48 inches
Average annual snowfall 3 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relationship with TNW
®Tributary flows directly into TNW
❑Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are 2 5 river miles from TNW
Project waters are it (or less)river miles from RPW
Project waters are l 2 aennal(straight)miles from TNW
Project waters are I (or less)aerial(straight)miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNW5 The relevant reach is Northeast Creek which includes upstream tnbutanes Streams SC and
SD
°Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and in the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

Drainage Area 1
(Wetlands A B C D)
(Streams 1 4 SC SD)
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U S Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form instructional Guidebook
SECTION I BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION(JD)
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER
C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County/parish/borough Onslow County City Jacksonville
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 34 77550 N Long 77 36530 W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Northeast Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water(TNW)Into which the aquatic resource flows Northeast Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC) 03030001
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential junsdictional areas is/are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites(e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc )are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
❑ Office(Desk)Determination Date
❑i Field Determination Date(s)
SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are no navigable waters of the U S within Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)junsdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 329)in the
review area [Required]
❑I Waters`subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
01 Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There Are staters of the U S within Clean Water Act(CWA)jurisdiction(as defined by 33 CFR part 328)in the review area [Requu ed]
1 Waters of the U S
a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area(check all that apply) i
❑ TNWs including terntonal seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters (RPWs)that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
®i Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wethinds adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated(interstate or intrastate)waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify(estimate)size of waters of the U S in the review area
Non wetland waters 668 86 linear feet 2 10 width(ft)and/or 0 7 acres
Wetlands 1 5 acres
c Limits(boundaries)of jurisdiction based on 11987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM(if known)
2 Non regulated waters/wetlands(check if applicable)3
❑i Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not junsdictional
Explain
1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section i11 below
For purposes of this form an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(c g typically 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section iII F

Rapanos Jurisdictional Determination Forms
,

, R' VII- 41/4711 il
' S t' ,. �. '
r
4
�y d r WE2 WE
!1-`,i.
,- �r A Seasonal RPW
• • .. ..' `.. - ' r Stream A•1It ' „ ',: -z It (DWQ Stream Rating=21.5)
: WE-Wet:r,-\5.•;,,: e.. {(•' ' F ., ` '
1 _y
;Ut:`. -:' WE1' l' ;�;;.
I
Jurisdictional W ,�� � , �
1 100 200 ,'d 7� A � . & �, ' F'y! - 1 • *r.., �� r"' ' `* -A 1.
i I 1 1404 - WE-Up �K ;� .�•L Feet : i,4` f \ * ''s r 'A n' -5 ��
' �.��'r..y . .lam `'. ..„: 6 '4 � .∎ r - 1 r-.
.` ;':•....•
... '`: - ::` * 1. ; 4 S :4.e
! k`'•` .`: k *C •..
' 'sue ', i4,.-i
:at(�':;."':•::••'`• '4-':,;:'7•...:.tt•. j.,e•^ 'k 1 ,fit a..
Mitigation Site Location J� .` `'
-; 4�,9,7.
41 Jurisdictional RPW - t �' Flagged Wetland Boundary
� y ;; - . ,,:r . �� -' (to assist in field verification)
y'
R 1.. . ::5. we.••WF•
i 0 500 1,000 Feet
Legend
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations �, + = I
` v„ F3 < y ,�, ,
J Project Area ,! ,/� :r.`
Existing Streams v WF Wet-----:,;.--.'.;. :'.::*.s.''',-"'-"-.; ii
WF-Line ice, .. ::;,k'.
New Streams ,2'• '`/ r•: ;:';'
t NCDOT Mapped Wetlands KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) • ` : i ` " r� ``
PP ( ) ':*- :::., '. -0 100 200'
• Flagged Wetland Locations WF-Up .':'.:,; .- I I I .lrr;; :.. '.
•:;6r•,u :' .. Feet
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
,'0"'" Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
�,fN a� ^'� Date Project Number Figure
Februa 14, 2012 011700062 5B

f
I I - Y'
1 N
\ L I
rip ),.,-1/) °k
M /, r� II, ` ,
i Stream 1 / ' - .=a ,<"
WA / x,i (Perennial RPW) ,' \;
/ �1 A
a∎-; 1:' SD 1.
(Seasonal RPW) sr
`' ►�s� •_� �` (per
DRAINAGE AREA 1 _`�*.` WD se \ �'' j; = 1,
.;..:.-4. ''k .,;, ,_ ` (Ephemeral- �•, _
Stream 4 �` Drainage Ditch) ..:4,_.._ _ _ _ _._;-.�,--
(Perennial RPW) , _ �%. /- !
w . 1
(Seasonal RPW) Al• `•:• SA
(Seasonal RPW) '- `
"`�- DRAINAGE AREA 2/ N,......... /�
DRAINAGE AREA 3
- Stream 6 V _--
(Perennial RPW) /� -
/ Stream 7 - -,
v4• .i :w1: ,El-, / (TNW) Stream 8 tl`
(Perennial RPW)
L4, t
`t
0 0.5 1 _ s - DRAINAGE AREA 4
1 I ' - WG
Miles � :�: r eta Midway Fa:k
<1 7 '..m.,.. : WH/ ` `� "'� Stream 10
;� - Leend ;� 11
,�- g .� '� t�;.1,.`'�� -'` 1...., 1 .1. (Perennial RPW)
`.r ~\
Project Area - li ' ' `
gip
> Existing Streams ~ > 1 ^r, ,,, , "i!-i , •
..f..
.:a Existing Wetlands :fir- _, 7 '�11:.: -, ;....ro : E .' ••
aDrainage Area Boundary - • ,te..'.
\''' ...----..._-ar: . SW 3/' , : .... .F- .,-.);:-.:,) , ., : ':-,-s--*2 • ---.. `.-,...n—1 ,...-:1"" '''',....4.141r 2
Title Drainage Area Map - (Rapanos Form Key)
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
dwn
1 `N Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
• Jurisdictional Determination Update
=., Date Project Number Figure
�
January 16, 2011 011700062 8

'.t trey each _ ;:
A. : .- .
�r e.stt\ �„ , . t ', '. t'
1 1111 .. 41P.
iq.
ti►• w
f •\
tt �h 10‘7`. I 1
ti { ..
aki■S, 'Y ,$" 'air ''-: Pl, `' ..
1
L 1,
... ..„ ,....1,..-: " ...--- \ , -- p.•;;,. .". , . .. ---..•.-,.. :\ - /
4,
Ike.
. 1,
•1•
,
: ^ al `r �
2 �l � r
yr a
,; \ 't" x .' 6 \ %h p ` 1�';,. ' ` \
7. -4... j`y . , ..... ` j 1 •
j' ,•C mil 1, ice•
.r
tl n •� ' ! Pond q� _ �J
s T ?•nom i
- _- SAG, . °+." -e ; r '`!'$ + •R�",S�: /'~
yy<. ems" m� t
„ilk-L.4 z i tr• f `t 11 r Stream 9 Pond 3.
71 Stream 1 - UT1 Northeast Creek V- , �;p� y .;
j Stream 2- UT2 Northeast Creek _ _ t \� - r•N_ ,a 11
Stream 3- UT3 Northeast Creek - - ' -h. , - "= v. '•Stream 4- Northeast Creek �"` ¢ ' ' N cs •.' 4 fp
Stream 5- UT4 Northeast Creek � • 1 .mot''•
Stream 6- Poplar Creek f',� / '0
Stream 7- Little Northeast Creek '
' Stream 11 %I,
t, Stream 8- UT1 Mott Creek .
Stream 9- UT2 Mott Creek ;k `1 `� "� r
Stream 10 Mott Creek
t Stream 11 UT3 Mott Creek _ ir'-T - ��,
-- , w
L' ..1 pr1\pn\011 0 3 60911workspace1fig5res\slrearns.mxd '! ?' 1.y ti'i`.
2003 Aerial LEGEND
N
(z.)US Geological Survey .)Project Study Area GPS Surveyed Streams wG E
Existing Piney Green Road Intermittent(Unimportant) CVs
NCDWQ Mapped Streams —Perennial Stream(important)
-0111— Flow Direction o Ponds —•Perennial(Unimportant) 0 750 1.500 3,000 4,500 Feet
=Ditch
(�,- �" NORTH CAROLINA Figure 2
o,
DEPARTMENT Streams and Ponds
("'±•.-.,,I OF TRANSPORTATION U-3810 SR 1406(Piney Green Road)
Jacksonville,Onslow County

2005 Jurisdictional Features Mapping

r -
'---,;,;%....
lam' ( q - - y.�, _ "-_..
, . i ' p ,-,.. --- -, -.7
` 048 Acres^`
- \" \. i,1, ,, �`1
xs, /
1111 #
P5= t 4- +1:' j. ` ,\. :per 9 L ;� _■
.. `fir. 1. _`' -,'-- ' � r •'44, ' `
s`• ''- !, Wetland 3 : _
- `.J 1 30 Acres F . j ,� f.■e 4). i
p ,..4, \ , \--, ,:ii-- '''rL* .6. --
-\ -- , , . R. -.
_ .... 4440..., , . :„. ...-- , ..,._ -,r .\ ,.•
t , i—lc.' , ice' ry
rr
A __„ lir 4., ,- .4
- "....„, t.,,iir!!lor
. .' -' 1.S, .',IS — . •
r,,....,
So,
�+,a ;. 1y. .� —. � Wetland 5 ji r h
. .• ��� �142r26 Acres
y� 1• '- Y 4'
■
y a` '�!.`+f. ',�. T 'f.•- i ' u�„ tea:•- :. *r, l'111'tr,i
e�: . ` Wetland
k,�t'�®�, �"kt's �i► - • - r Acres w •- 4 �it
Itef Yf �r ` 1 ot ' •-- ,, ,0'''' 4 ..., -4t.st =20
- r,
���., �* `, ay Wetland?
0 Acr �•
sa
eS r
In t
nd 10
fy 4- y �I �t 0.,19 Acres
r Wetland.8� I
fri - .t - , 0---K -0.15713 j �I�1 !.
!''�- ,.fir. x 4P^rt ,[. -. , � , _ .s::
f• •:''' y+ Wetlang 9
7 T Acres
414 - -j----
Alk
May 2005 !—i
2003 Aerial N
US Geological Survey LEGEND W+E
C:3 Project Study Area
Existing Piney Green Road S
®Wetlands 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 Feet
I
40 NORTH CAROLINA Figure 4
DEPARTMENT Wetlands
' or U-3810 SR 1406(Piney Green Road)
TRANSPORTATION
Jacksonville,Onslow County
a

N V

KdiuTn.: ,..
N
•
W. (,.• •f
. - r; _.
i .Y .
WB ..
Stream 1 - •-_ ..
WA �, (Perennial RPW) ,'' ` ' . '
``• .I • :� SD
��,• �. ` (Seasonal RPW) ,°
- .'-
DRAINAGE AREA 1 a:...;,-..:.,
,` we ®•
1 7 . .•o;,, WD SB - i
\ .'‘...7.%---•,.. ..
... - (Ephemeral- a' �
�� ..- '` Stream 4 � ti Drainage Ditch) ..4:—.._ _ _ _ ' _ .,1._ - '
' ,;. ' ■ - (Perennial RPW) . • •
r: 4 ` i ,.�
� t'° SC
WE 1 .
0-4 (Seasonal RPW) t: SA
+ (Seasonal RPW)
./.... DRAINAGE AREA 2/,• /) °' _ -
DRAINAGE AREA 3
tr :,'...';` ;;.•: Stream 6
. c.N.T!w i — —
�,� , ' _ (Perennial RPW) .
/7- --) / Stream 7
•14W;.`.}:::.•,...,. (TNW) Stream 8
. . .. .. JACKSONYILI�
�4. :,•,-- _ 1 �\ (Perennial RPW)
I
t'.: j 24
0 0.5 1 _ -t-'t .% /4�.
> <``, ��' _ w� DRAINAGE AREA 4
r . ,�•� rte:-4: 1
Miles �_ '.i.,.'.',.,4tru yictwxr> ��,
y. 411�111: ,J ,�1 _
tau W H
�, ti .. Stream 10
Legend ^� w Fl co` (Perennial RPW)
Project Area t -
Existing Streams - L� "
/ 4 . - '.-X
,,i, Existing Wetlands x' . , ,E. .,.a . - . .
Drainage Area Boundary r' 4 -
we .
.,ice -,,...\-‘ z, ,> __`' �� .
r ... '
Title Drainage Area Map - (Rapanos Form Key)
Prepared For: TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
„.'°"\ Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
%
,. ems,, Date Project Number Figure
January 16, 2011 011700062 8

\ ' \ ,50 WAS]VE
7,—r--\ bFNJR PIMLICO
T .1ONFS
• 0 DUPt.IN j CRn
. * 101
�' _ 25
4\— I C RTFRFT
S.-OWo
IIP" \ Ca--
ra ) ;� -5 _
4� / az� PFN LR / E
.y' ....
•�•
r 4.
-t f' 0 5 10 20 30 Miles
~ NE '0 ,R . I
,/ ` l`Sand
•
el•,,
fi' l'..7 /, \ , --.
Airport *►/ S GraeV
1 In .., .
Ai f 4. 12 >,
,r4..., a Carnm-.3,____ ii 1177_4,.,,,.-1:7.‘.--..—
\Whit. 9 . _.* - ' 4.
4/
r" - i„ . . \4 L'ff 0. - r 4,„14.
iff. - i , IAA. ' _ - N,
/ 4 .1.i if , .
per , , Alx,-‘44.4,44. ,
..., .
04
\lb, pieopi...../6_ _, ,, , ..
qr , _.- -- - • -
A... tr..!t.__ _ - ,
''s;-rzBws,,,s-aim),oa..rxt-=......, ,___, ... .k.,, Nk
ko- - .:._0, -- *
r i -
--
Pr° O �� � L.,/
di " 4
_ ,
iria-T.. ,..46,0400,11
sv4 -\ ‘ vAtp '
0* , ,:4--
1190
5 , t �T 7
#
- Psroi.• t e �
Paradise •
Piney `
Point Tor ' Green r it ,\•`���` l �_ •
• .L\prllpnl 0110360911 workspace lfigures\srte_locai5on.mxd ■c-11 Wm i 1
Y" — • ``∎ '` , -
USGS Quad Maps N
(Jacksonville North, Kellum, LEGEND W--E
Jacksonville South, Camp =Project Study Area s
Lejeune, NC) Existing Piney Green Road
0 0.2 04 0.8 12 Mlles
Figure 1
r NORTH CAROLINA
• DEPARTMENT Site Location
OF U-3810 SR 1406(Piney Green Road)
6,.„f TRANSPORTATION
Jacksonville.Onslow County
I

F (C
N
WB '.
, ._
A
WA'''
/ ti.
` SD
b
She fn: Sheet 2
, WD -
Elevation _° ,,, WE $ ee T.
DEM =' �}.
-‘ r
Value it , , i 1
IN 100 Feet ,�,
85 Feet
�, WF
7 , +r
0 Feet ),.,
,e
60 Feet WS + WF
50 Feet
40 Feet - .1
30 Feet
20 Feet
10 Feet .°'. . t. i r
-5 Feet � �;-�' � 11 ' et �,
-20 Feet `-'M ...
0 2,500 5,000 Feet
Legend
Project Area
Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
• Flagged Wetland Locations
- Existing Streams
- New Streams •
lc_-__' NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006)
Title LiDar Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
•�" 4,, Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
�`'° December 19, 2011 011700062 INDEX A

1
. ,..
„,_ 9,,
,- , Di,
, .
..
WB -
h+!.—
' c ,_, \
.A.,,. ._... .,VVA 1 _ . --,,e-,„ -,1 _,AIL :
a a
} i' SD s .R
..? ..,-fp.‘„,,..- u ‘ = Sheet 2 =y , "'1 t,. . y
%-.k:-.,.,-.
.k - we ,
wD
s {� ., r' Nc :fit l4 ,' —
. r� :
: . A� . _ wE Sheet3
•.. .. - ' of 9*f 'fir
y
i3j. Y • -
r
WG Sheet 4
WH
y ,
0 2,500 5,000 Feet �- ' ,, .<`
� r '
ifp — . .,
Project Area . . _
Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
---
• Flagged Wetland Locations
- Existing Streams +11.
- New Streams
Pr:::'':= NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006)
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
--Nt. Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
s Date Project Number Figure
December 19, 2011 011700062 INDEX B

NI
W . , - ' -
XII _ WA1
- WA-Wet �.
arav_" -- WA-Up I
VV ., {'
- __________ 0Reduced Wetland
/_`" _ ...._ _ Area _=
......
X ' 0 25 50
F l
eet
I. -
4
Elevation 0 Jurisdictional RPW ' -
1.
T
DEM
Value
- 100 Feet Seasonal RPW .
85 Feet Stream D _ , �f,
a DWQ Stream Rating=23
70 Feet 0 500 1,000 Feet -
- 60 Feet +�
Fp- 50 Feet '�
40 Feet Legend '`•
30 Feet j Project Area
20 Feet • Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
10 Feet • Flagged Wetland Locations
ail -5 Feet Existing Streams
-20 Feet New Streams
'....::-Z NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006)
Title LiDar Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
December20, 2011 011700062 1A

\ ) -.
` �-.`k ` ,
q , `� '1- WA 1
,_ f WB-Wet
• /s .. is WA-Wet ••
s . .
- A- p
R W6 ,"/.. .r i'
Reduced Wetland I
- -?..t.-0..
. '., ,?f .` Area -- •••••'"�• �'
# ' ' WA'l �. ''� 0 25 50 N� I
:_ ti
;, g �. Feet I
••rte -.-7-_ . }� ,\..
,a0L,.. : ..... , , ...,...71.t.„ -, '-0. '41,, * k' ..
likt,,44.,,., - :.4( :■••-* _ ft"- - ,
t �± w�. a {., ` •;. .. - - i'7# t 1
'i� - _, 7":.
la.,''k:\.''-- i A, Ir'r ... . ,
•' Jurisdictional RPW . '1. - * ' ` , '
_ it r _ t i. ��• 4i'' .,�a.,j,,i �1Y ' _ '•�
s ' ilk l - t. i -1
+Ts'} ' - it .-• °' =. w 1,..w4 y, ; ''� 1•.,.."".. . ,, - � D a� ..
r-,. r ' . - . Seasonal RP .TM R
�-- Stream D 4. ._` -,A
�} ! �' - DWQ Stream Rating=23 . , - ,-
0 500 1,000 Feet
Le 9 end `
.,,
Project Area -c•
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations .
• Flagged Wetland Locations irlitil4t---- 4 Itir, .
Existing Streams
New Streams
•:.,:it-: NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) :4.4
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP#U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
• Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
°• Jurisdictional Determination Update
• Date Project Number Figure
'h._ December 22, 2011 011700062 1B

i
WC-UP DP1
WC2
�` WC-WET
�' DP2 .-*
Seasonal RPW .•.:. ,'•, '� WC-WET _ 4�.
Stream D • '°1; WC .;'.•f`. •',
(DWQ Stream Rating=23) <' .w,
Jurisdictional RPW ::
I, },k:: WC4 0 150 30�' 1
I
L ..1 Feet
Lio _.
„,
. iik ._
„.
iir ,
Seasonal RPW WD-UP WD-WET
Stream C te, \
(DWQ Stream Rating=24.5) . 1 WD
.11)11,111' - .‘ 4-
1 150 300
I I I
Feet
Elevation
DEM
Value
I.- 100 Feet
85 Feet - , i
! Non-Jurisdictional Man-made Ditch
I
70 Feet 0 500 1,000 Feet (DWQ Stream Rating=11)
N 60 Feet -- •
50 Feet Legend
--- 40 Feet _ /
30 Feet Project Area
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
20 Feet
mai • Flagged Wetland Locations
MT 10 Feet
Existing Streams
-5 Feet 1 New Streams
-20 Feet
r--;....,::,;j NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006)
Title LiDar Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For. TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
.."'� Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
4Jurisdictional Determination U•date
a? Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 2A

.....txv ...,.,Ap.
St. WC UP DP1
1
, .._. , ,
‘,4,___.5-.- -I.. ,
II( . . .,l'A,ARk�;' __ :•• . WC-WET
.iii •
` �', DP2 .�.'
•••,* �.WC-WET .
Seasonal RPW .: ': , ... �, ,Y4: '•;'•
Stream D WC �:' . DP1 .• .,.
(DWQ Stream Rating=23) u ;,.:
lu } • � .�•' � \•'\'. •`�.`• .;; tip. .•
1 ' It1 --•:• ,* •. DP2 ti:: ~
'Jurisdictional RPW _ } - • W 0 150 306 .
It Feet
r ,„ WD-WET ' Ts o-
Seasonal RPW s I • WD-UP 6'{
Stream C
WD
(DWQ Stream Rating=24.5) `
4 WD1
si � _y Ar k
41..,...' . i 150 30
I I I
„ fry '.
•y"t ,,R. 'N. % +"7' " 6 . 'A!1 ... s. t ! - Feet
l Aipe r ` q 4
0 500 1,000 Feet •-.1 ` ' Non-Jurisdictional Man-made Ditch
t - (DWQ Stream Rating=11) •
Legend
(- 4
Project Area
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations .,."_. ' .F
w
• Flagged Wetland Locations
Existing Streams
New Streams `
-•= NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006)
,t• - - .S - .,
Title 2010 Aerial Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP#U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
"� Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
`• Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 2B

r
ad- '
.
�
1 WE
WE2 , WE
4.
4.14:: ::::::,.: Seasonal RPW
*:`': # (DWQ Stream Rating=21)
'� •.•;•:1-
;;..: .WE=Wet •-,��:��_,�`;?: �.l
`' ,�e,•1 WE1 `•~� Jurisdictional RPW
• 100 201 . ' ..lt 1,:-- -- , ,`
"I I I WE-Up : .
f. Feet _- ., •. : • 4 `
•. . ,. . . 4001410677.
Elevation
DEM , .
. . ..,y..
. ■ ` ..
Value '',./{ ::v s- .,,
100 Feet '*:;>.. �; , .;
85 Feet WF. '
70 Feet -_ ..'''
i ;` �l/
60 Feet ,..::::,:v4..\•";,,...:.4'.:� ,
50 Feet ::. .:: .
I '
40 Feet , , Jurisdictional RPW
30 Feet , ' . j;
At- 20 Feet ;':: „� , Flagged Wetland Boundary
10 Feet :; •, :; '.� ,','
(to assist in field verification) •
-5 Feet :,...4:..:,... .,:...;,•,..,.., ',
-20 Feet _ . '
•
0 500 1 .000 Feet i - .:: ' -
Legend --�
Project Area WF3
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations '..•• ,
WF-Wet ,_ ,,,.,,, ,,_1'z'-.:;:..,...',,
• Flagged Wetland Locations F-Line ''WF2 +-.0!-A• -
Existing Streams o, c '
New Streams 100 200
WF-Up •..• I I I
r „i,1 NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006) Feet
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
r •'�,,� Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 3A

'NWE II
V
_ WE2 £ WE , �; rr
/,.' "' _) '''` Seasonal RPW
1 ..:`,--,•; •:114-,:',-;',11,..:.-.,-.---::.:.: ' Stream A
.,.,��," .� (DWQ Stream Rating=21) .
WE-Wet 44.: . : a . 1
. 4" �:? � I �:. .. Jurisdictional RPW
100 20 �: ® � • ,► i .
,I I I •"" WE-Up .L .. . ,j, ` 'be ;;'. .•i Feet -r , } .,`� ), ,f'. •_ -, 4 , ` ' '
7 :~•' ',: e� o .+: r a », f 4
' : r : ..;.*:;7: j I ... . % . '.
th,�; , i #7,-` .''.a - .r'r.•
, „, ,...Z.. ,0 0
1(104 .
12. fi�` „ ' '
• ^ A :y + r``� �
�:�
...;r., _ . >' Jurisdictional RPW ` ,-4
-.44. !• _ fit• A4*. ".1, / ..� - _ ..•
.44,1,
,� *. , 1 - " Flagged Wetland Boundary
`t �_ a- , :. (to assist in field verification)...s:::, .::::. :
. ;aft— 4 ::.*,..-4..,,... _ . t.: ,1 ••• , , . . ;T... . .......„\ '....*:-.......4/4 , „lie:•11,e. • .11E7
0 500 1,000 Feet >fi • ,
ter- • ` Y.` ti:
Legend ^+ ..'':`. .,o P.
Project Area ', j "
: WF3
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations r_
• Flagged Wetland Locations WFLine,4 "'�" - .. .0(4., -
Existing Streams vI° Vii;
43 100 200
New Streams i ;,:y `.;
rr� NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006 Feet
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
#^ Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number FigB re
December 22, 2011 011700062 3

ti
74K-7---viligEtr531R 1 1■11 '
- N
1 \\_______
- - t j
,U 40 80. I
WH Jurisdictional RPW
.1
Feet oi I
—`
WH-UP
Glib
N.
•
0 30 60 ..
/ = __
I Feet
Jurisdictional RPW
.
Elevation -
, DEM
Value
— 100 Feet
0 500 1,000 Feet 85 Feet
70 Feet
60 Feet
Legend 50 Feet
Project Area 40 Feet
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations - 30 Feet
• Flagged Wetland Locations
20 Feet
- Existing Streams - 10 Feet
ii- New Streams -5 Feet
,122,:-:7.. NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USAGE Verified 2006) -20 Feet
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP# U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 4A

1
-+
I_: r f I* . ;,.,, ... .,. .
• ..... ...•, ,a, .. .., „
. ,,,,,,,,,,,, . . ..„, .._ ,,WG-WET ,,
WG-WET �>
_
'
! hWG2 rc Y_. ' . r \
*'=:WG` ' p —f `t.,ea ' �1 j
4,
°"
4o a�` 0' , ` ,., 'IWH,` Jurisdictional RPW
Feet ' ,
O' ." .''' 44--''' \
( ,
/ ± 44) `.
WH-UP ;!► , �!�
, i ,,,a,"1"7:t4 -,,. ' . ' ' ., ' . kk.! 11‘...41• : ',..
:' .- .WH=WET , i 'lip. '. 4 'y
WH2 r s. A
., -irviwi. 1 % 0
30 611 .1� t, , � '
Feet 1 +.
Jurisdictional RPW
0 500 1,000 Feet -o 4 ,..,'.. � i_-:=t �`� .
Legend F'/ i
Project Area
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations Y 3
• Flagged Wetland Locations �^ .._ rr*4
- Existing Streams `'°• #
- New Streams "'
. NCDOT Mapped Wetlands KHA Delineated 2005(USAGE Verified 2006) �:;� •°
f''� -.
�1
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features
Prepared For TIP#U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
"�, Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
`` Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
'''°- December 20, 2011 011700062 4B

∎� Kimley-Horn
and Associates,Inc.
•
16, 2012 Raleigh,Box 33068
January Raleigh,North Carolina
27636-3068
Mr. Brad Shaver
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Request for an Updated Jurisdictional Determination
TIP#U-3810
SR 1406 (Piney Green Road) Widening from NC 24 to US 17
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Shaver:
On behalf of our client, the N.C. Department of Transportation(NCDOT),
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) requests an Updated
Jurisdictional Determination for the proposed—6.6 mile widening of SR
1406 (Piney Green Road) (TIP# U-3810) located in Jacksonville, Onslow
County,NC. The project study corridor includes approximately 185 acres,
situated in the White Oak River Basin(HUC 03030001). Land use along
the corridor includes commercial, residential, and undeveloped, forested
areas.
The project was previously delineated by KHA in 2005 in conjunction
with the preparation of a Natural Resources Technical Memorandum
(NRTR) and Environmental Assessment(EA). The original study area
consisted of a 1,331 acre project corridor ranging from—1,000 feet wide
(500 feet on each side of Piney Green Road) to—4,600 feet wide in the
vicinity of Little Northeast Creek. A copy of the 2005 delineated and
USACE approved wetland and stream mapping is included for your
review. USACE representative Dave Timpy conducted a field verification
of the jurisdictional areas on March 15, 2006.
Now that an alternative has been selected and design nearing completion,
the project study corridor has been greatly reduced to the existing and
proposed right-of-ways as shown on the attached LiDAR and aerial (2010)
•
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]

1
mapping. This updated Jurisdictional Determination request is only for
the jurisdictional features within this revised project corridor.
KHA re-evaluated each of the previously delineated wetland and stream
areas to determine if any changes have occurred to the jurisdictional limits
of each feature. Field reconnaissance was completed on December 15,
2011. The wetland verification was conducted in accordance with the
1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the
Regional Supplement to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region. Perennial streams were not re-
evaluated from the 2005 delineation. Intermittent/ephemeral streams were
re-evaluated, particularly if the feature was located in a topographic swale
shown on the LiDAR elevation mapping. The re-evaluated tributary
features were evaluated based on the presence of an ordinary high water
mark and landscape position. Updated N.C. Division of Water Quality
Stream Classification forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment
forms were completed for these re-evaluated features. In summary,based
on our recent field reconnaissance, eight wetlands (4.7 acres)and seven
streams (2,208 linear feet) were identified within the amended project
corridor.
For the most part,there were no substantial changes to the original
delineation; however KHA did make the following
modifications/additions:
Wetlands A and B (WA, WB)—these are small marginal wetlands
adjacent to the intersection of Piney Green Road and Highway 17 that
were not included in the 2005 delineation but were subsequently
delineated on a private property and have been added for field review.
(Note: KHA revised the delineation boundary as shown on attached
figures 1 A and 1B)
Stream D (SD)—this feature was not included on the original delineation
but was re-evaluated based on the LiDAR signature as a potential swale
and scored a 23 on the DWQ rating form(figure lA and 1B)
Stream B (SB)—this feature was re-evaluated based on the LiDAR
signature as a potential swale but was confirmed to be a non-
jurisdictional man-made ditch(scored 11 on DWQ form) (Figure 2A and
2B)
Stream A(SA)—this feature was not included on the original delineation
but was re-evaluated based on the LiDAR signature as a potential swale
and scored a 21 on the DWQ rating form(figure 3A and 3B).

To assist in your evaluation of the project, the following attachments are
included in this submittal:
• Figures
o Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
o Figures 2A/2B—6A/6B - Updated Jurisdictional Features
Mapping(LiDar and 2010 Aerial mapping)
o Figure 7—USGS Topographic Map
o Figure 8 - Drainage Area Map (Rapanos Form Key)
• Data Forms (2011 re-evaluation)
o Rapanos Jurisdictional Determination Forms
o USACE Wetland Data Forms
o NCDWQ Stream Data Forms
o USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms
• 2005 Jurisdictional Features Mapping
If there is any additional information you need to assist in the processing
of this Updated Jurisdictional Determination, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
&6(.."
Beth Reed, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
Cc: David Wainwright,NCDWQ
Chris Manley, NCDOT -NES

Figures

Tr \ r
4) .„.....,...\, aMumPhrey Rd �T______
\1. P Welera Rtl �> I
iillip'4,W ~\ �c =a �eQ W�(�� E
a
VO N Parker R iil N1/00 CI
la N....,, ML�MIKe
a e i\ q I .,,,. . °B Or
"' Oa 0 Ightp, ` chi i)
t pR „,„ ,
O e
G.” v
OQ 'I
c 1
/' �� V arollna Dr
G. \<
Dtyb Fd O FQ` m e,�' Old 30 RA
,,uy 0
L F
y br Qibre• way,
ill 1 I. Q,e
o \ en<n, cP
Q O e\•o
�N Dr � C.
Hoi / By p
• e o ka'B°ryr,e p
- j
Carria.e Dr \ • if'.yob
n/ / 1 / Iy �Q' n9 Rd
// �o de f r i oeron 6
r Rd i o ::Dr \\
�r
v �. le • ein Loop C°sip�,� ^ e
trot?.
I pr �
h. Weo'9'''o ~_OP glialliki obOr C Zbr S5 O` / `off
Brynn Mart'•• 9
o c: y`1r v oa Flrelh�� Ln fifc
13 lsx-Ln ��' _ France° �4, G\ C
� ..w Rd Ll.r �r ,• IP Z Rhnlers'IT lI ��
br m �e 6/
- O Qee on Or
O'
LI
G y r r� Irl y... f
Qe \
s∎QR y r ay ,
Q .I o op ti �
y\d
Q D r -'. p a \
gg Rd
\_f i me .- 1 sen
= tl <h
e Fd d
Adke
3 - :r. F^ 4
Ra �".nw %s
)4.,,_ gpre si, r
1 4. 1 fl* e \ ,I 1.6 it,
- N s o g 5\
ti
Shady St
s Viext s
Legend
0 0.25 0.5 pivd Brewster nWd I, G■
Project Area I I I '� �+ i
Miles i
Title Vicinity Map
TIP#U-3810-SR 1406(Piney Green Road)
Prepared For Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
4 ‘i Jurisdictional Determination Update
� � Date Project Number Figure
January 12 2012 011700062 1
1

F
N
WB
, . .
.WA
. , l*Iir ,.
SD
V
F i g f .. u re 4A -
P g
we OD
SB
•
,'A I i I g
Fig a .
Elevation " - ..E' �
SA•
Value �► ` y
100 Feet
85 Feet ¢ f�,
mFM il 70 Feet itik 41NF �
. EIA
60 Feet , !:.:..>.._.-,•
50 Feet
40 Feet il 110 I V -
30 Feet `' - °,1, ..
20 Feet �e
10 Feet
-5 Feet 24 r re
-20 Feet �-"
0 2,500 5,000 Feet
Legend '
Project Area
Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
N44..."'"alw--._ :
I
• Flagged Wetland Locations
Existing Streams
New Streams -
k.1'`:.'._ NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USAGE Verified 2006)
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810 - SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
--,, Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
` Jurisdictional Determination U•date
11,1
Date Project Number Figure
December 19, 2011 011700062 Figure 2A- INDEX A

s ? '^ - _ - - 9 - r
WA �F ;,
• a r -- a
\II* '''' - ''4 -' - :D' • Fleur B Figure 4B - 4 ,' a,. ,
;� z �`� _ `WD. `: ` ' ` �. ''' . W C
..t S B 'r' •
., 1 ' S
j
Figure 5B
'*,;$,„ *lir, '"•!—".1., — A
y,. '413 'IVY � • 1 /(i \" .Y-. ;kJ'
.k4 WF ii',- ,, �
. ,. ....,,, , „ig.40„..4.-. 4' --4, ' - -
'J, y '', i. WF
tt3 ` r�- .:.r �.s - Vii,..
. vipio Ar.,-.. 0 . ..',.*:'
LZ,j�E I
WG Figure 6B
WH
0 2,500 5,000 Feet -1-.,.,....,...--,..,� 1' " ,
s, , X
Legend M
I Project Area `; I�
Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations ,,,i y.- , 1
• Flagged Wetland Locations \_ ''i- , . r. 1
y ,
- Existing Streams
r_ .
- New Streams `��j�� '
r:::-..,:2.7 NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006)
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
December 19 2011 011700062 Fieure 2B - INDEX B

N
A5-.73 am .
ri _.WA-Up
III
Reduced Wetland
5--:,-_-,-,( si :E
Reduced
25 50
I I I
gig ,. Feet
IIElevation
Value
100 Feet
85 Feet
70 Feet
0 11111 60 Feet i
50 Feet ._
40 Feet -
30 Feet
20 Feet al Jurisdictional RPW
0 Lissi 10 Feet
-5 Feet
-20 Feet
Seasonal RPW SD
Stream D . _ a
0 500 1,000 Feet 41 DWQ Stream Rating=23
- ili
Legend
i Project Area
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
• Flagged Wetland Locations
Existing Streams
New Streams
t'..: ::= NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006) ' 'R
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
°"N Project Widening from NC 24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
''' December 22, 2011 011700062

—
i 4". ,_ : ilt!ifth. --47M111
. `11 r -,,,.,_ .44: t
-•tX . , _ -- ‘1,-1•• ' ' •Ar '''.
Apetto .
A? ' ....,;.•;?0,„,. .. _, .. , vi.
,.
, -r-
. ,,, i;o0" , ,„.,,.1 •••-- I Not
, ' .... ,,,,;/,. .• ..,Atip,,,, WA1
-
.4*--
• s;k„ ., ,,, '
-4 -
.,,,,_.. ...,
,
• - . .- - • .. WA-Wet ' '- II, "'..,
/
•:-..1* 7:* ' WAAJp
....-
. 1
11110`' #fie:=.
- I
4 , 1167 7.NII■
Reduced Wetland
. iia
- • ,,..- 1
..,‘. ,.
WA _ .. •- - --- .1....=..-
' AU „L.-
...,
• e " 0 25 50•;s
/
• '.,,.. ,,, ."' - s ,'... Feet .0 1
-"Th `, .,'": - --4
, ..., ‘1,..._
,-
•i - .ii • ,\ - 44. -- , .
. ., ,.'..) .. . ,'''. 3! . t ' - -, ;1`.._ .. —:,(--,e:-..,,,. -t...- - , "-• . .' --, .-1,, 1 ..: A .1-.
-••■ ' '4, .`.11s. Oct: ''''--,,,eN ' ' '-'" A it4A. .,,, ,,_'7 ' „ , - - ' • . . ,,, -
ire -. i •• • tzt• ,. - •••\ :,-T, .'"tr, --:''-- = • - --r-- - ' - ".w._.‘:---• - - - ik- '
- -
‘,,,.., , w.„ , v.> 40:0562.,-€: 4-. ..._-,.•„. -, • . - . :,.....,.., . _ ...st. •,t,:i4e: ..4._ % =
•
- ,-, . .•14— ..-.3/. _7. -•--0 '7.. . c- .1k, ' ,t --' '
,, ' . .-t- ' ) 4 - Atir . , -:, , - • . „ ,- - ,1.,
0". *-
, .4,z. ' .t.. - . - c •,....-. --,Ls .4r b. - •.. 4,....- - • ' ' '
•- ..-- lilt
"4-11• '''
0 - ,, -•t• t % -. 1r '- • - • \ • • - -
..:- 4..
--- . ---. Vt• -, • N,1470,,. '
1 4— t - • ._ . -.'16 . '1,,.
. , '44.„
0 .:. , -.... . - -- - -,. : t.- VIllVt"qfr .- .,
ik ...% N- --41, .. _, Jr- ' kait,'.• \. - ' - . 0._ Jt., •
.-..7' • --: 4:' - " ,
- A. . ., • , ',V, Al,„:t '', ' e. • - '- t, . .6',':_-
.i ., Jurisdictional RPW ' k--- • -*',....7, 4 i . t.. i .
-I" -440,:. :4' NI 414, *... _. 1,,, .f lb, ‘,... "..... . •.,
''' r er ' 7:,' .%.,• --%.14011,4* . ‘.. *Ir, ., .
, .
,* A-,-..,f-',;„ -VIII.: -- '-": . 1 _: 1r:,. ' It - _ '-'•'• • n.
.,._
, , SD .la
- 1 , - ''''-. - , + Seasonal RPW
--...")
_ ..
SptreamstD
ream Rating=23
0 500 1000 Feet ' - _ - - . k It-,. ,
■•■■•••■ . '• • ' I `It; ..."... ...—. , •■.,._
..11■.. . ' 'AL ' • 1.:ly, z
.'::*'i"%*' • t.--e
Legend ,...4., • e• • .,. ‘,..
t.., !,, _.., , ,:,,,, . .4),•
Project Area : '4., 'A
.-
-___. Nt-
16,.....
a at
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations .•.'•-.*V Aft '
• Flagged Wetland Locations L-- ... .03.1t 5•
\ — Existing Streams A ' .
.
'+
New Streams
.
. • •
NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006) . la.,. ' „ eftti _ v_
4 *
. ,.....- ' •N
. .
Title 2010 Aerial Photograph and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
*
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date
Project Number Figure
December 22 2011
011700062
B
4

+�► F
WC-UP DP1
. WC-WET
DP2
Seasonal RPW
04091/00.- W ;
Stream D fi WC . P x . •f(DWQ Stream Rating=23) �' ` y x�
.i._ ,tiir•:' DP2 ;; ,•
Jurisdictional RPW =-' -..
WC4 r0 150 300
V . • �+.''''' I Feet
Elevation -
Value i
i . 100 Feet it
__.._.. WD-WET-
85 Feet . _ , WDUP
� 70Feet - ED
N. 60 Feet WD1 co-
mg 50 Feet
— 40 Feet
30 Feet 150 300
% I i 1
20 Feet / _ Feet
10 Feet Seasonal RPW 2i
'tY -5 Feet Stream C
-20 Feet (DWQ Stream Rating=24.5)
All
0 500 1,000 Feet Non-Jurisdictional Man-made Ditch 0
I � Stream SB
,.: (DWQ Stream Rating=11.5)
Legend Ili
Project Area =
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
• Flagged Wetland Locations
- Existing Streams
- New Streams
k ':': _ NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USACE Verified 2006)
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For. TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
t °, Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
• Jurisdictional Determination Update
gif Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 4A
J

' ' :.‘ ''.. ..''‘.' ' ' 4,46.,' ,.`
' ,. ' -
pill ` +< T WC-UP DP1
WC2
•.i `7`ti:
`.� WC-WET
Y, %:
� :#` y..WC-WET '.` ;.' •.�
Seasonal RPW :t.l ::, . ;,.... .. .
Stream D , WC 4..:e )r :�,y4 t ,WC1
(DWQ Stream Rating=23) . ' `. � ''
2 WC UP• s ` .v,.
Jurisdictional RPW '.F ° ' - '`::`:I ., WC4\ i 0 150 300 .
{, "� Feet
- f 4<- # :;" = •
' . WD-WET
� ,! 3. r ; , ,
t . Iiik:WD „....,......„....,,,..........,. Ittp., , r , 1
4. 1111111,WD1-...,
. -,-.... Ark ,.# ,-r_ .4.4ki ., * ix,joi
Seasonal RPW - ' - ,
s= 111.. � 150 30
Stream C . . * s
(DWQ Stream Rating=24.5) �0 -° ;: ',‘ Feet v
„ilkst
—•
t, rte.
-* f t ; i l l. 4ir:
Ili =-.4. '''': a;iiik•• ';,,
$ w,
• Non-Jurisdictional Man-made Ditch
0 500 1,000 Feet . ..,
, rt. , A Stream SB
' , (DWQ Stream Rating=11.5)
Legend ..� `'
- L
Project Area , •
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations ,•f
• Flagged Wetland Locations 1_"_
- Existing Streams ;
- New Streams 14"■:
•;:..- NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) gr . _�` N`N'
..7.'
Title 2010 Aerial Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
f`" st Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
;\ q Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062 4B

` ,���f4 WE
�� WE2 WE"
:, It s- ;•�;, �k Seasonal RPW
, '`:•i4: ,M1• . ., ^`4 Stream A
. '• • x'., �:::::.,,y.:44
DWQ Stream Rating=21.5)
WE-Wett - :• '?::,-:•:: . .
•::: :.....4.. ..` -;; WE1 Jurisdictional RPW
y.
100 200 `
I 1 WE-Up
Feet
Elevation ':, . '.. :*;', .;
Value 7-.
100 Feet ::: .•:-. .;.: :..;.. •..s,
•
Eli 85 Feet :Y 4:s7.',
70 Feet : ': . '� :• II•
60 Feet
a_ 50 Feet -, .`�.,.�.•
- 40 Feet '' _*..:: ':,:.•..:
- 30 Feet `L ;;; : `:; / Jurisdictional RPW
20 Feet :,�:: �,
10 Feet .. Flagged Wetland Boundary•
-5 Feet '` (to assist in field verification)
-20 Feet ' ..' _ �r '..: ' ; ` ..:44.„.--.:1-,vow„_
.....- H.— "' .. *.:''''',,i,.:`'''''1„.:.'-, "*,:::-.',_.:'`f;''.. :7..:;,..4::.:11‘p".',,A7
0 500 1,000 Fee t Amikk_
•.::::: ` --� _ K Z, -•r, 1 ` .
— :::Legend
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations
WF3
Project Area r
Existing Streams WF-Wet `w `'
WF-Line '�,
Streams , ' ~ti =•
` DOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005 (USAGE Verified 2006) ' � 100 200`'-.•,,': '.:;;•`tip•. ..• ged Wetland Locations WF-Up ;: .'4,. I I I tit' '
• ti '' ' Feet ,v-
i
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For: TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
4ipt, Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
.1 ,
Jurisdictional Determination U•date
Date Project Number Figure
°'°^°'." December 22, 2011 011700062 5A

I
�
•� �iEs .WE g
i -,
4 T
WE2 O a .. •j r , _,
, 'am "IF 414,4:-t,. r •• ilik
�•
,.' '"'- , Seasonal RPW
:. .,ti . `, ti. 1
Stream A
�. ��-` `• ' ,'' `,, (DWQ Stream Rating=21.5)
I1 ,
. ,'..�,.WE-Wet \•,;t 4•.:*`' :
`�`
4-(*
: ` : d WE1 "`
i IM Jurisdictional RPW ,1„,i
#
• 100 201 �r' ° '._ • 't--+-,• 1' '-
I I I 1.` ;tL`` t `` Vi A
WE-Up p c ai , ,.
Feet _ —A�
g e lYr { .a•a / q�i,, H4.. a_ to E.
{ v 'z$ 1.i• - € -i
... .,.
.4
...,...„,,,,..,: „. ..„...,.:::„. ..........„ ..„........:.......,..:,..:,„.
.4,..:,„, ,,.:,,,."
1.4.. ........;..c:'
�
, _... ..„. .....,::.. ...... . , N . Le, .7':' • --
R` :4 -. , :''. •s '0n - ,fir �
t ' ," ' .0, '., .‘:'44'..:::::.'k'.. : 's.•
-' Jurisdictional RPW
x ,
1. �, _ . . : • Flagged Wetland Boundary
•� . _: • •.,,_ - (to assist in field verification)
' t :. ,: 1st..
;1 ; , -'4
,,: ` i - .,• 1 ,
-'a • v`' a =-..--.....2-1, .`•""•. r„ .•r/. ?U1:.`•.` ,,
0 500 1,000 Feet .•
� � - , - •,t,•.- ,yam •1' • ,
wan x 4, . .. /• r :•,•
I
Ili Legend ` '' 1%747 ''!S`` ..
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations Yap a. •
I � Project Area WF3
Existing Streams "WF-Wet .`4,;',...%.'• P
WF-Line �•.
New Streams '..•'':`
r;.,-f„..:. i NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) - •• 100 200, ••:-�•�''`• -
• Flagged Wetland Locations WF-Up ' '...ti•.; ' I I I .••••
.,;.5•.,. c.',•.:: Feet '.
Se1, • .- '''',._3... '_ _--:-....._ __-_ - _
Title 2010 Aerial Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810- SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
a�
„.....,,,s` Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination U.date
Date Project Number Figure
'' °. December 22, 2011 011700062 5B

moor oaf ' 4
f jQ
40 80. Jurisdictional RPW
Feet
WH-UP
N.
Vale
0 25 50
F1_1_1
Jurisdictional RPW
Elevation
Value
100 Feet
0 500 1,000 Feet 1 85 Feet
70 Feet
60 Feet
Legend 50 Feet
--- 40 Feet
Project Area 30 Feet
• Wetland/Upland Data Point Locations 20 Feet
• Flagged Wetland Locations 10 Feet
Existing Streams
-5 Feet
New Streams -20 Feet
NCDOT Mapped Wetlands-KHA Delineated 2005(USACE Verified 2006) .-
Title LiDAR Elevation Mapping and Jurisdictional Features Map
Prepared For TIP# U-3810-SR 1406 (Piney Green Road)
Project Widening from NC-24 to US-17
Jurisdictional Determination Update
Date Project Number Figure
December 20, 2011 011700062

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Natural Environment Unit
Raleigh, North Carolina
On-site Mitigation Plan for
SR 1406 (Piney Green Road) from NC 24 to US 17
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina
T I P Number U-3810
WBS No 35801 1 1
DRkFF
January 19, 2011
1 0 BASELINE INFORMATION
The project is located within USGS Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03030001, and NC Division of
Water Quality(NCDWQ) sub basin 03 05 02 of the White Oak River Basin and is situated is
within the southeastern portion of the Coastal Plain physiographic province The project is
located immediately east of SR 1406 Piney Green Road in Jacksonville, Onslow County on
land that is entirely owned by the North Carolina Department of Transportation Adjacent land
uses are mainly residential with scattered commercial zones fragmented forests and large
nvenne forest systems on both sides of Piney Green Road
The project includes three jurisdictional features Little Northeast Creek a 303(d) listed tributary
of Northeast Creek an unnamed tributary to Little Northeast Creek and the adjacent Cypress
Gum Swamp community located within the floodplain of Little Northeast Creek Little
Northeast Creek has been assigned Stream Index Number 19 16 2 with a classification of C,
NSW and the Cypress Gum Swamp community(Wetland#5 in the NRTR) has a NCDWQ
rating of 93
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will perform on site mitigation
within this project area for unavoidable jurisdictional impacts associated with Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) U 3810 the widening of SR 1406, Piney Green Road from NC 24
to US 17 The project will serve as on site mitigation through the restoration of 0 38 acres of
riverine wetland enhancement of 387 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Little Northeast
Creek and preservation of 7 87 acres of riverine wetlands on parcel 209 which can be found on
plan sheets 19 & 20 for TIP U 3810
The U 3810 Natural Resources Technical Report dated January 2006 provides further details
concerning existing roadway and project study area conditions

2 0 SITE SELECTION
TIP U 3810 will involve the widening of SR 1406 Piney Green Road immediately adjacent to
the mitigation site which has been purchased as part of the Right of Way(ROW) for the
widening project The mitigation area occurs east of approximate roadway L Sta 222+68 to
233+71 50 Within this area NCDOT will restore 0 38 acres of riverine wetlands via site
excavation and grading preserve 7 87 acres of cypress gum swamp and enhance 387 linear feet
of an unnamed tributary to Little Northeast Creek via stream bank reforestation (see attached
Appendix A)
3 0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The mitigation area is located within the NCDOT Right of Way for the U 3810 project It will
be managed to prohibit all uses inconsistent with its use as mitigation property, including any
activity that would materially alter the biological integrity or functionality of the site consistent
with the mitigation plan
The site will be placed on the NEU mitigation geo database It will be monitored visually for
three years with annual inspection reports provided to the agencies After closeout, the site will
placed in the NCDOT Stewardship Program for long term management and protection
4 0 OBJECTIVES
The goal of the project is to restore 0 38 acres and preserve 7 87 acres of riverine wetlands as
well as enhance 387 linear feet of an unnamed tnbutary to Little Northeast Creek to mitigate for
impacts associated with TIP U 3810 The functional restoration of the wetland area will be
accomplished via site excavation and grading The 0 38 acre restoration area consists of two
areas 0 24 acres that will be reforested to match the existing species composition of the adjacent
Cypress Gum Swamp preservation and 0 14 acres that will be within a DUE (Dual Utility
Easement) that will consist of both overhead power lines and a sewer line Due to the sewer line
NCDOT is unable to replant this area with neither native wetland trees nor shrubs but anticipates
natural re vegetation with herbaceous wetland species due to the excavation and grading of the
area to match the existing adjacent reference wetland elevation The stream enhancement will be
performed via stream bank reforestation along 387 linear feet of an unnamed tnbutary to Little
Northeast Creek that is currently maintained via mowing This area is 0 79 acres with a mean
buffer width of 81 feet Lastly, no work will be performed within the preservation area
5 0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
The mitigation area will be constructed in conjunction with the construction of TIP U 3810
Construction activities involve site excavation and grading as well as native vegetation planting
The Natural Environment Unit shall be contacted to provide construction assistance to ensure
that the mitigation areas are constructed appropriately
1
1

Native Vegetation Planting
Following the successful completion of site grading and stabilization, a reforestation plan for the
0 24 acre wetland restoration area and the 0 79 acres of stream bank reforestation will include the
planting of bare root tree species commonly found in Cypress Gum Swamps of the Blackwater
subtype These areas will be planted with a mixture of Swamp tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica var
biflora), Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) Water tupelo
(Nyssa aquatic) and Tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) (see attached reforestation plan)
Native wetland seed and mulch will be applied on all disturbed areas within the mitigation area
for stabilization purposes according to guidance and standard procedures of NCDOT s Roadside
Environmental Unit An as built report will be submitted within 60 days of completion of the
project
6 0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The mitigation areas have been purchased fee simple protected in perpetuity and added to the
NEU mitigation geo database
NEU will be contacted during construction to provide oversight and ensure that the site is graded
to match the existing adjacent, reference wetland elevation
Upon successful completion of construction the following monitoring strategies are proposed for
the mitigation site NCDOT will document monitoring activities on the site in an annual report
distributed to the regulatory agencies
7 0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Hydrologic monitoring
No specific hydrological monitoring is proposed for the wetland restoration area The target
elevation is based on the reference wetland areas and will be verified during construction
Constructing the site at the adjacent wetland elevation will ensure the hydrology in the restored
l area is similar to the hydrology in the reference area
Vegetation success criteria
NCDOT shall monitor the wetland restoration and stream enhancement areas by visual
observation and photo points for seedling survival and aerial cover of vegetation NCDOT shall
monitor the site for a minimum of three years or until the site is deemed successful Monitoring
will be initiated upon completion of the site planting
1
■

8 0 OTHER INFORMATION
The Cypress Gum Swamp community associated with U 3810 (Wetland#5) adjacent to Little Northeast
Creek is a Riverme Swamp Forest based on NCWAM field assessment methodology and is labeled as
such in Appendix A The target NCWAM wetland type for the 0 24 acre wetland restoration area is also
a Riverme Swamp Forest whereas the 0 14 acre wetland restoration area located within the DUE is a
targeted to become a Non tidal Freshwater Marsh For further information on these wetlands please see
the NC Wetland Assessment Method User Manual (Version 4 1 October 2010)
9 0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Per the NCDOT plans and 401/404 permit application for U 3810 NCDOT proposes to restore
0 38 acres of riverine wetlands via site excavation/grading and subsequent native reforestation to
mitigate for permanent impacts associated with the TIP at a 1 1 ratio to enhance 387 linear feet
of an unnamed tributary to Little Northeast Creek via stream bank reforestation at a 5 1 ratio and
to preserve 7 87 acres of nverine wetlands at a ratio of 10 1 An as built report will be submitted
within 60 days of completion of the project to verify actual wetland acreage constructed and
buffer acreage planted The success of the mitigation area and determination of total credits will
I be based upon successful completion and closeout of the monitoring period
9 1 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
NCDOT proposes immediate full release of the proposed credits for the 0 38 acres of riverine
wetland restoration the 387 linear feet of enhancement to an unnamed tributary to Little
Northeast Creek and the 7 87 acres of riverine wetland preservation as on site mitigation for
unavoidable impacts associated with U 3810 at the respective credit ratios of 1 1, 5 1 and 10 1
10 0 GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREA
The proposed Geographic Service Area(GSA) for the mitigation area is composed of the 8 digit
Hydrologic Cataloging Unit (HUC) 03030001 The 0 38 acres of riverine wetlands will be used
on site at a 1 I ratio the 387 linear feet of stream enhancement will be used at a 5 1 ratio and
the 7 87 acres will be used on site at a 10 1 ratio to offset unavoidable junsdictional impacts
Any remaining acreage or linear feet will be available for use within the White Oak River Basin
(
HUC 303001 once the mitigation site has completed the monitoring period and been closed out
■
11 0 MAINTENANCE PLAN
1

1
The site will be held by NCDOT and placed on the NEU mitigation geodatabase Once
monitoring is completed and the site is closed out it will be placed in the NCDOT Stewardship
Program for long term maintenance and protection
If an appropriate third party recipient is identified in the future then the transfer of the property
will include a conservation easement or other measure to protect the natural features and
mitigation value of the site in perpetuity
12 0 LONG TERM ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The site will be managed by the NCDOT according to the mitigation plan In the event that
unforeseen issues arise that affect the management of the site, any remediation will be addressed
by NCDOT in coordination with the Interagency Review Team
i
1
13 0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
The site will be managed by NCDOT with its own distinct cost center number within the
INCDOT budgeting and financial tracking system Therefore, all accounting for revenues
contract encumbrances fund transfers and expenses will be performed and reported independent
from other capital budget or operating budget accounting
I
I
1

Wainwright, David
From Cox Marissa R
Sent Tuesday January 24 2012 2 27 PM
To Shaver Brad E SAW (Brad E Shaver @usace army mil) Wainwright David
Cc Griffin Randy W Manley Chris Allen Pete Mathis Stonewall D
Subject U 3810 M tigation &field meeting tomorrow
Good Afternoon Brad & David
Neither Randy nor myself can attend the meeting tomorrow on U 3810 However we have asked Chris to include a field
visit to the proposed on site mitigation area for your review Very recently we were informed that NCDOT ROW had to
purchase the entire property on which we are proposing a small on site wetland restoration that you are familiar with
and was discussed in the last merger meeting We have decided to include that area in our mitigation package for both
wetland preservation and stream enhancement
Brad
It is my understanding that you suggested that I stay consistent with the on site mitigation that was approved in the R
2633 permit I agree that the sites are somewhat comparable since they both have a wetland restoration area with an
utility easement However I was also informed that preservation credit would only be considered if a threat could be
demonstrated R 2633 also had a preservation component at a 10 1 ratio but I will provide some additional information
regarding the preservation area in this email as well
Here is what the permit for R 2633 stated concerning mitigation
Natural EuvirotarEteut Unit
The Department must implement the "Stream and Wetland Rest
Branch at NC87/MVtaco Road Breuisvvick County" dated Septcrrmb
with the application package received October 19, 2010 for R-2(
the restoration site should be field confirmed by the USACE Wt.
prior to release of construction equipment so that any field level
completed The on-site mitigation consists of 2 95 acres of wetly
linear feet of stream preservation, 0.63 acres of wetland restorati
stream restoration In total this is the equivalent of 0 925 acres o
mitigation credits and 123 linear feet of stream restoration credi'
The applicant shall continue to pursue on-site mitigation opporti
finalized for It-2633 B
Based on this we received a 10 1 ratio for wetland preservation and a 1 1 ratio for restoration—including the portion
that was within the new/widened power line easement So from a consistency standpoint I think you will see via the
mitigation plan (which will be provided tomorrow)that I am being consistent on ratios for this project
However there are other differences within the two utility easements that we may want to consider/discuss
• On R 2633 there were jurisdictional wetlands within the existing power line My argument was that if this
easement area was moved/widened we would still have the same type of jurisdictional wetlands On U 3810
there is not an existing utility easement with jurisdictional wetlands to compare with However the design for
the road took into consideration the mitigation area specifically with regard to the use of equalizer pipes prior to
1

•
knowing about the new DUE Therefore the area will be graded to the adjacent reference wetland elevation
whether for mitigation or not
• On R 2633 we agreed to plant shrub species instead of trees in the restored wetland area within the utility
easement because it was overhead power lines With U 3810 the new utility easement is a DUE that will have
both overhead power lines as well as a sewer line Therefore it will be pointless to plant either wetland tree or
shrub species because they will not be able to remain in the sewer line easement However we feel that if we
g ade the area back to its natural u etland elevation that herbaceous wetland species will naturally e vegetate
that area
It seemed during the 4c meeting that you were fine with NCDOT leaving the easement area within the mitigation area
for restoration credit but asked that the areas be designated separately which I have done in the mitigation plan If
based on the above comparison/differences you see a need for different ratios for the 2 restoration areas please let me
know so that we can discuss/adjust prior to the permit application
As for the preservation portion of this mitigation site
• NCDOT has purchased the entire Parcel 209 which contains 7 87 acres of Wetland #5 (NRTR) I have included this
in the mitigation plan at a 10 1 ratio (which is consistent with R 2633)
• These 7 87 acres are adjacent&within the floodplain of Little Northeast Creek which is designated within the
project study area to its confluence with Northeast Creek as 303(d)due to low dissolved oxygen levels
• Wetland #5 also has a NCDWQ rating of 93 according to the NRTR
• As for an imminent threat if we do not use this portion of parcel 209 for mitigation and protect it it will most
likely be sold by the Department at some time in the future It is my understanding that NCDOT is not in the
business of holding on to residual properties especially in these economic times With direct access off Piney
Green Road and a few cleared acres of uplands(the house & buildings have already been removed by NCDOT) I
would think this is possibly an appealing location for development
That s all I got Please let me know if there is any additional information any of you may want/need regarding the
mitigation areas esp after ya II meet tomorrow I would like to have the final mitigation package ready for Chris asap
in case the baby decides to come a week or two early
Please feel free to forward to anyone else that needs to be included in this discussion
Thanks for your time on this matter
Marissa
Manssa Rodman Cox
PDEA—Natural Environment Section
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Delivery
Century Center B
1020 Birch Ridge Drive
Raleigh NC 27610
Mail
1598 MSC
Raleigh NC 27699 1598
Please note that my email address has changed from mrodman @ncdot gov to mrcox @ncdot gov
2

` r
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N C Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties
,
i
1
3 f

.,,..M •
-CI

. •
` '`#. t i;
• •�r1. .'+1 t`� 'fir .. ,i-. . . sp = y 3:.
,yam
_ y•4 �. ,. - •
..R� ±
-.....4 II I 00 -•
. . t +
- y• 12 (: ;�'
`l+•. - �t~ .s `- **4' fs r t . ^` -e_ o,,, • 8 irl
1 : : ' om P t e -♦ * , ,r 1,' �....k r i..„.. - 'n
� r i 1 �y s t II %:L..f •,, f , r ,._ ' sm -i ,-. " ,, -i4 1`� te * Y .- 1
� \.I
r s Y �_a _ • ` I gi 111 i- ' '' r " .� rf .": - ij h * t ' :`� - :►r1 • ` y � I(�. 'P'"' . —.,--4" F y • ` A tl,' 14T :;
< +. - " ;.-'.k "s _ t _� , I» io•
.. , _ , _ _, ir„ . :12.44, 3,,,...4w- jp-- -,. . :;......4i 1.1 i i'....;. . iii; ...,c,„7-4,-„,' ..-;,y,
••F. Lf -r`tom, a •-.y Y. { 1:.��, rl � ' r 1lo^• 4"...V
C y f fir. �� ..„..,,,... ,,,,. , ..... , ?1®� it W w ''I- 009 ,.•+� � BSI-• ; ; 1z
� J i
igMIN I, }11 1� ® 1#A. �■Ml''�y r �+� .►f 1* +` - i.e .. - A•.4, t -_ rs: t • -52
g. f r • IIIIr∎ �. " T t` r ,r •A r8f' s s+s� 'f- ,/ "• '' • hill? _ t:;r+ .fir I 4. .="j•••••2 J•�Q� y;�40IC- ,mot rx ' `,.
W ‘ _ ;': X ,rte ,• w' ,,`� y, •• 4 V` : ▪ — _
f
rcg
' - _ . - i
v •
„ 1 F if • ¶J11 /
,c�- �l , ::*?:
...
t . , a ill .._ w1'.c -
- _
A 2.- k ,.tear g ima I III 4,#" ' ; to-*- \ C x +* 1 :. ' '-'. 1-.4„....,.. tilt t Y,. + ti s + "'.
,04,;,. f! 1t: tV� A ate, *, . _�` -7 - IIji ). 1 ''4J _. i
' ,1g
I •- `- .., *
'� • , ' a p o I1b.44 -404„. 1!�" Z a1 k tV,r' P . < � 4 w r .4,1t _
1 •
i s
lit
LD
I,
,, .., 4 .., , . . .4,..4.,,, ,,, 4 _ ,, t -joi , .**N. ,* •' 7. - .. . 1pild 4 I E.,
, .--v sa* -
. : 44, .• -- ,-.. . , 4 , '', 4: - ,r -11. . -.., - As., -a,-,* .. . H-I I- r 1r *.
At, w
oil
•F `
f '� `� •-,.... - . �` 1k ,�'6 .- r & ' '
1 I _I� /
- •:.. _ ',./1-.:-_ '', - X111.' ,�' 1'
_ ry� ryIEZ�I"I I 1,4•
.1, a \"' y SA�rlA� r Ib�� I�1 _ ._
1--- - , r'•: r r t r ri. Ti� 1 Ili \I
II►,
�• 1
,1000
\ \%1 \\ \,
1 1
'-:.-7,,, .11"'--.1. ; 1 : ,41?Irtt;r*1•:"N'-'t-444;\'\,*- '41' '- ''" ,4*.w. ' si.:1k--,,..A4‘''' .. -'. -*1- 44'' '--- %., - ',CIA. 1 .,. :...- • -" .. ; tilit % ''',
4
,t. • .4„.., ,. . A ' . ,. . . . Alb t,.. v
1F
'` i
,
a` %1 of ' •-•�y , 7
-
, _ ,,
o; . F +w ° •- � _ + --
, -__. ),,... .S e .10_, ..-',. -; . ----,Ar, 2. ....* ... c.',.. ..! 11...- ..: , _ , ,5, (.• ...„- . 4. , -. 4fis 24- ‘411,0411
Al
Ark \ _ sio
�* i _, s :F So -mt, t - 1�j ; s' J L �• 1.
---'-'`-1 .1 ,-
'•"' � 1 `.. �, ',+' „b+ _ :�,�..,�r _,..,i1• - _- k "• i' g.3-fZ'd\bud‘i .44--itt,
4, ' 311 ":".,„. . -4011i6001) ': •. •°. -sr----' „ v •1/4i bf''''"' 2 ._ 44, ..,,,...„....:,,,,,t,'"4.4‘:_s!,
if
' - ,
� • .EF �. rF�, e" •t

Z
I
.. ?g w
a 3W . •
Q (,,
o $ o cc a i
_ Q i' ..
z o
_ { O N i - 1
,� og H r i
O
1
i : 9 c , , 1
4 O z
z y �..;��_!
I
w a > W
ix cc M
2 O w W I i�
v) U IIP' �
M cc a = I IJ�is ..°11*‘:', b
U/) z o
�Z W N N w C3nO� �w
F-- cc w Z 3na�
a co - a
� � N o o a o a
E- w o cc
r
cn CC a a I s
a N VI CC l
o ° z z 1 O 1L�±c4�Z -VIS --1-
j..�j s Z W W W _. `
Z v> +1'2' J /1
te �° 1 ..�'�
c 1' +
. .
IBM
• , Ma
.■■ r6
■■■■.■■■■
y ■■■■■■�%■■■14
TO\ ■■■■■■■■■■■I
`4\ , :-, ........ s,
• EEEE: i�lllfln�r_\
1
• , ■■■■■■■
■ , . ,
• _, ,,, .......
.......
■■■■■■7 `� p I •S
■■■■■■■■ i-.. -',_,1,1''''l
Ij :.f O , ■■■■■■■■�00 ■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■
<■■.■■■■
�'' U...... "■■■■■■■ • I 1,,'■■■■■■■ t� \k ,,- ■■■■■■ry i. ■■■■■■ F,i;i' n■■■■■ k: o Egml�` MIME/■■I r
.. - 11111111, Z
W WS Si' W
/U 0
a
/ 0 w
1411
■
° I -1-
r 1 a ZZ "V1S
Ca
z ,1 II Y1' -_ _
J
y
N • 0
/- _,
i
W Py 7° ,
v.).:- .2....),,,:,,
,.:•:
...... ._00r■ , \11111\\. \'1,'
- — .._/ .c. \trtc,"\"si\°' \\ , , \'\--.,
c
\...i.
'01' \
8t d
o
tss
- \
O

N z
7
H a
N
0
i r_,"'qi".
i E-
1 i
i i I CA
ii
m U') E.
U v` .5 .5 S .5 O o
g d z d r ,.
gU tt co csp Go cc 0 -
� i M I I , it a
I I
CD tt
N N .-I i-i .-1 d
- 0 ogw a Z
A A
W a O ° A
•
o t N o O 0, 0 O c
" e
A H _ i 1gm x W
, z
CA o E a II : H C r)C On
a o° � hh
,
, g g 2 g d 1
w
z x
w
cn
z rn z Wa o � qpo u 0 ,i ,:: -
it wcc...,„ 1
0 ti b O © O O O O
In In N N N N N E &,,,,,,,, g ,T.,
4 1 ,,,4 ci) I . 1 g
9 ...., . _. Ir.
. . El
d d g M
w6N 4 r.
w d
0
❑ ❑ ❑
a -non-a-im
.1 II s=,la�1 =
Q#II�II*u= -Liiii 1 1 m
H n 'ii l��l=' 141=111 4n a s
1 u=11r��au=
ainfRl�' d-1111 8
A 'I�ID ° ui*R�l-
g 41M1— II�II=11�Ib .�_
SIC
— qut�l— 'k
IIIVII 11=A x 1 AI1P11. "i 3n n AIT z }
CD y
wi���� a; allal�Ilal 1°
J 1-u ll�u !mu �,', 8 w
AII�I1*11=1R ° ° .1IUd11y1 q
11_1 u=lm , »1.4110
U au: P A11=n=11011:
•
4nananan: 5 8 �ian�ll�1� �, (� b a .0 E 3
11-11011=11= N sai n=n ,p 1s11%8 a
ilf p��p Raw �q men l vg �`�_i_� 852o go
q U�I% I � 5. u�i11�1� 1 wo $$ �r�& �. o o zs e
A 411_11411011• an4nau
f _ = aftnaq=nn @@ 11=n*11V,t.
[� _ �r 1111 6° a0 111 Xbm
W �-111 111 PEI AiTt iT 1. '6li
` uml �u�. a auan�u,u s
rr11 'ftl .11 a ll=ll 11=Il-- a
V
4 .
1 5 , o
W - a
0
II
n l\
sr /‘',/ a,/ -2 3
L.I.Z.<
a St
w �p` W a w
o
w
•
E-1 a ,,, u fl a°w L2 L■J
C/) l3 ° a °1 z a m

li
iN3 � t■
Z
�...„egG.ww .. �. ... _ r 0 i'
f1 0
o I° i ! x a x FI Ff
0 1 1 g m CO as as oa [Q�,� r
0.
S G F .k
0 I - - - -
ar I I I I z
G jf.
z oar
r
H . 4 fi a
O O a xhfl h�l F w U� z
i
g g
cin sc, g
tt
0
1 5.-) :2 i N = ,,
,,,,,
. ,;,,,,
,.,, 0 a ,...,
cn
O J r
8 v O z g^ � ” e OL!
il
GH
a'
1:1
. . . , ,
. 11 . 4 .,/ c:1 4 -1 111
III
i 1 1 0
tr
awn 1► N N N N N
r CA
VI 1
i.
❑ 11
f
A!,
1
11=Iy A-- ° Aa==1xA=
all=1111=11
�Ilanan=milt Vg
Il
ttan. u
u=nA11,O11 S =u-Il�lt
it iin=n=ua
•
A anrir pu=n-n=m
411011-11=11: 9 .-Au=11j:z s,
O as nV IVIL II N u�m
x -i!-n
1 c,...1
11411#11_.11 m ara'4∎�V a 0i
e, r
4 1 [h'.-- f�
AM ,
a _
p
U aural illy l: �1=Ilan=11: „°.�'
umu=a=ii f
X11=11011=11: a
nan0nglla n=nan�n�
44 ;M
COWAN 011-=4. 110111:11 10 1 �i�
11=1 U � ii=i11�11� r(
A 111: IlAllAllall:
111 V
- =nAn4 --. . Ir nine 1 O
Obi n1-m; n�n: hip .C5 au=moan: u .
1111-11-11 ri il-umldn� ill
ci M 0 ��
:6' a. ; ;41/.4'2 1.s°gill ' 1 11a11a11a11e 11 . 11=11�11A1 Ili
1.
I
cl 1.71,1 gi'-iii ,',11
ii W H 411=11011011: 11011=11=11: Is ' x II
11=II�IIQ� 11=11011=11= 4 d
c A O an-unau: 11x11=11x11:
_ = u-ilau*n* ¶ u�gana a
O = r- awn: 11x11!
C4 ..4110110 all I, _
-8011011-11: RIId11'�: = rN
11=11=11 110 '3 4 _
r'',, gananan: a uallall: s ...
n-n naua .a li n4naln a �,
1 ,, ..4 g
,:
,„
'..... , ...
i„.
,. ,
1�1 X11 1! ice" • Ni
i�l 111 ® v
f—i 1=110i e� t5 •L
p
ir
Vi
ig
•` 5� 38! i 0a .�{..s-‘. . if V
e OHO ^� ?GO�Oh 4 Q gyp* y�4`.G. It 21
IA u t 111 N }i
i � � u
.esssMQrmioncrac emon.asss!M,!!N✓me.J!lfrriverreza 1m%mYVVvame!65Nanna!Miff.iumi MNM reitim,1!XNrfN.iovan"dCrM!R!!nett.-e5tIG55: nrma viw oM'M!I!tt..^Y.R!RX!!N!ommi!!P.!!r!!Cmoom!vr:rt wrkt!age,!R!M.....•R0!t!i mE!Gri[J.!!ip6.M1M1.r!ItlrvYtvvommeo a!d,rn.!44r!Ye44MM!raptn...!i!He!tt!rEGG!,!!att!ocommerr!igrem oe uoommor6660osAmMbums6fr6pfiC/✓fVSMfhMMMRFMM!tIti, 7--1 A
• C
its I

;t M`1 `. ' y ..y, .,w 4 4 i r '1:e A;;, :-.A Ni x:" r +<<h +d:r" i
w�� .G: ''..4:'''-'''' fi 4L 4•a JrA s Ie F' t- {ari� rPd''r
p,�'�wtrl^M1 F ,,.wti'� i � �t ." � "'�.1`�R ,� ' �,P�.,, ..A"'� C"��'r wF r t� .',1'`,,:'4 n ,�;F•�y�',w , Y 13 � g ✓ ,:",i.'4'..., 2 ?9+ ,� 4.4��Fy L „,,',„-:,:,41.,,..L. ��, `i `.;r �-
J''9' 21 ✓ ..- co'4�.' M Gy ( J 1,",,,,,”.0{ R VX '&„ ',iY x `t
as w ' - .err 4'4,'s r a'.�ys�� Y n::,• r s+' 43.14,:,,,�9'4. '`, ,M r z sr se.. ,r ' -Ie', '
1 4„\ \ ,, O• s CY r ...1,„, 1 ,, fi' ' 'r`- .5 (,,v4,lyr ',r' '' 'R,° ,le
O :L :'rT 1• 1,�' .i,, 't ''' 1. an ,y1Y y s ?Kj p
NYc�'''y, rTC y. .w �\ �'S � � I E a''l 6 rt r �N,a�+ r��+.xn�;,r"�6.�p �yw� "'''1iGG A1,�4� ¢X� �' 4""�i � .., "�RF�V;��
S i,,,, ,4'fi'. 1 1 '' °r+ .y 0i �`,F,,_� to ,'^�' f '`tom ' ,„N
� wV 4 _ , :rte J � �d '.>a AIX�F r Y\••vn" � w�:� i+.. ` .� _ : '4`...*..',,,'.''
.,.� ,Y 4'. ,i
� t
;7, ,,., 'Y,,,,,, fW y may* M.R ae v -,,, w , ----, ! wq- m
to ..,:, 3' w. 'S.^w'r` +,":''Y'''''.'n t t� ,r :r. � ,. -,i.. p ..'�.. i . m
,a �*•; � 4 �t �s ,�+�' 'r , 8 a 4 ��^' m � :,.::: '',gyp `''
.y 44 Y
6,:>,,,,,:, ��y : ' i r wi -. '
..Oyi, r ,.P m. D i y , •" o'*
,
a'
.w
r
M 1, 4.fy ..ii-$:. , -4-,,,. ' ' e. . . '
J ,. k / w4. a,,,,T,"y ,�•+t + : n:¢0'.R
�' -,`, .r✓ ,P: r* tl� 0^` :', d , i 9.,. 'W9,�iy.," a�-„ '.' /1q 4r
mi Y i O , , ^"iiA i rTa d a 5 r _:
C$` r "� C o ^'1•°�1 ""'4„ W.447.r 3 'f r.-g ','c,a{r A �yw W, rnM ,r °w"'ri
« .�, '' v°0.
Kfa/ a''''1. ' h i• * t 4 IM'
V
y ' 3 " . a l'`Q 1 a Olt'
'
' 1 M ,,-1 ;,,,„ Y.", `9, a w 4F. nK ' p .+ ,fi O., � ,,k M ry ti
,t a . , ' .4..
or/ � ri u 4` � • 4 x g ' ri .n ;,n ". a " 4 + r ,1 x - 4 � F �.r t M� _ Y"`:W w4 r:a ,r 1I -,. Y + �` 'k f -. /r ¢ ��,J ] {Yr a g ; �9y ,cN3r3 f a m,:w k;-5 a 5.Kt R 4:
I , A. r
Yk �t aYr A-0- . 4F_t ..le a , ; d 7r _ n
—
'.+ .. LV"i * $„ a.'�1 r
.p F �." y,. m; L 1 W Pb __} y'P
cn
y
rrl
r'
--C-) (,./ a
d4 �- gym^ aia '., / ' °'-''
r
'I Y CO z CD
0 0 rw r ,(
I c / W
ar
o
•,� 'ter X71 yt
z
o
s • m ai L` M \-- _z' Mk iar -m " , /� ,
i.
.. e� sld7 i•� r'i-.. ',+ a .,fir ) j '9„ S 044; tt� P , �f�,,,w1 �S ra a 3 , 'h ;T__:___________
_ .Z7
'''-
a a ;4 i I," LJ a j / l/ • v ' O
f"'
yk b r= 7 m `s Z
M
,. x v w / // �.' .,t ¢ � D
.. .. .. ro i,.a ,'.
/� �.. ` ■ \ —_ y /.. \..i 2
rn
rn
— .
o
3 - i /
m O i / ? C
u9 , c
o /v 1
co
ll ,
' (,,, ------- -•N ''' gK ?) -1,:/- \\ ' NN
el
^' m Mk m i m 3
m
- T
_
/ ,\:--1:
ter\ rt / £fir ' J, (` O(::•?''-''''''''
' t
j) O i i I' -. 1,
f ,� x M
k
d
m
} ,
0 ^7 1
c _. / o \
\--,/
E
1111116111fr° co
x C/-\--& \ \,,__,); ‘;
Dji/ 's�4\
/h Sp jjj
/ Q O
Q - / n
07 Or ( ,----1
/
■� /r /% -T
,...._.f j;-
m _ ,,
> . ,,,. / , 8
Lc- (\...,.....,.., _./
3 W m
w m m o I m

SHEET NUMBER 42
5
tl O? i 4 s� Pt
�\ ',1W .,K \�* by < 0a0
~ +w f f Lf r a� 'MaO
r; � Ku6. —On � 1 � On
q r }
KuB Alu \ �b \ \ /
s
Ku6 h,.. ? K u6
'I. /K u8- +...__------\ � i
�Ln Ku6,Ks$ \
y S'
•
,--"1,-/ .- - \ ----- -' "' ' '''''''=-",:aU--.'i - r-•:- ,."'-,'-''.( '', _ :-.- ;$ -' . ':." ,l':,',
`336 KuR Mti ''0.'4' '''n -. '34 '.<,
p.-
e KUB-
,-"7.',:.,:: .- -:. :.:,-. r r.r..'' • -lir.. ..... :.. , . .t . ,„,„.., . ... ,,.
. . .. ., .. .,,
,,,,,,.....„.... „...„ ,. ,.. , . .„. . ..,..A.,, ,--, , .:-: ffi
....
y^� u v ,Y ,x,,,:.,•;.,:;••• d
'•`R ^mid :40:4:. i. \
��B rr
Ku8 ri
\ ) 7 Mr K_
4 1 s� i J
tV'
fCu . n f l f
Mu , b, a Mu
i---------3 •Ku8 Mu o
M
Ku8 q M "7 :
4' y 1
i,_, .. ,
..
. . ,
, _ .....,..:1:(4.3 \ .._ ..,,,- c.,:-____ _
. .,..„.. \._. _ ,,,, ,.,,,-i.,_ a Ln
_ KuC3 n ' y y 5337'30"
Ct- — °1
1 2 MILES
3 1
I
■
2 KILOMETERS