20030512 Ver 1_Mitigation Report_20110518

i
0
rf yam}, /�/ Sa taa �- — .•`�y, ^r.
,Iii � A; ` � ,' . _ ° •
'
'R 1. �*y.•.y y y�• x
^M ..
nr
ft
t�, Tf(

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary ..................................................................... ............................... I
II. Methodology ................................................................................. ..............................3
A. Vegetation Methodologies .................................................... ............................... 3
B. Stream Methodologies ........................................................... ............................... 3
III. References .................................................................................. ..............................3
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables ........ ............................... 4
Figure1. Vicinity Map ........................................................................ ............................... 5
Table la and b. Project Components and Summations ...................... ............................... 6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ................................ ............................... 7
Table 3. Project Contact Table ............................................................ ............................... 7
Table 4. Project Attribute Table .......................................................... ............................... 8
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data ............................................. ............................... 9
Figure 2.
Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) ............................ ...............................
10
Table 5.
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table .... ...............................
16
Table 6.
Vegetation Condition Assessment ...................................... ...............................
18
Photo 1.
XS -1- Downstream View .................................................... ...............................
19
Photo 2.
XS -2 Downstream View ..................................................... ...............................
19
Photo 3.
XS -3 Downstream View ..................................................... ...............................
19
Photo 4.
XS -4 Downstream View ..................................................... ...............................
19
Photo 5.
XS -T1 Downstream View .................................................. ...............................
19
Photo 6.
XS -T2- Downstream View .................................................. ...............................
19
Photo 7.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 ............................................. ...............................
20
Photo 8.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 ............................................. ...............................
20
Photo 9.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 ............................................. ...............................
21
Photo 10.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 ........................................... ...............................
21
Photo 11.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 ........................................... ...............................
22
AppendixC. Vegetation Assessment Data .................................... ............................... 23
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ......... ............................... 24
Table 8. Vegetation Metadata Table ................................................. ............................... 25
Table 9. Stem Count Total Planted by Plot and Species ................... ............................... 26
AppendixD. Stream Assessment Data .......................................... ............................... 27
Figure3. Cross - Section 1 .................................................................. ............................... 28
Figure4. Cross - Section 2 .................................................................. ............................... 29
Figure5. Cross - Section 3 .................................................................. ............................... 30
Figure 6A and B. Longitudinal Profile — Main channel and Tributary ........................... 34
Figure 7. Pebble Count Plots — Cross - Section 2 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241) ................ 36
Figure 8. Pebble Count Plots — Cross - Section 4 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241) ................ 36
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group March2011

Figure 9. Pebble Count Plots — Cross- Section2 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241) ................. 37
Table 10a and b. Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables ................ ............................... 38
Table 11 a. Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table .... ............................... 40
Table 11 b. Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table .... ............................... 41
Appendix D. Stream Assessment Data .......................................... ............................... 43
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events ......................... .............................44
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 241
The Catena Group
it
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March2011

I. Executive Summary
The Mary's Creek (EEP #241) stream restoration project consists of 2,082 linear feet of
stream restoration with just over 7.3 acres of buffer restoration. The project is in
Alamance County north of Siler City, north of Greensboro Chapel Hill Road (SR 1005)
and east of Lindley Mill Road (SR 1003) (Figure 1). Site construction and plantings were
completed in March of 2006. The goals and objectives for Mary's Creek (EEP 4241)
stream restoration are:
• Improving water quality
• Providing wildlife habitat through the creation of a riparian zone
• Improving aquatic habitat with the use of natural material stabilization structures
and a riparian buffer
• Excluding cattle from the stream
• Reducing nutrient loads from entering the stream through a filtration buffer
• Increasing the streams access to its floodplain
• Reducing erosion and sedimentation
Level II of the CVS -EEP protocol was administered for Monitoring Year (MY) -04,
which includes planted woody stems and natural woody stems. Three vegetation
monitoring plots (1, 2, and 3) were added in MY -02 to the original two established during
baseline data collection. Planted stems could not be distinguished from natural stems
during the MY -02 vegetation data collection, therefore all stems were recorded as natural,
except for three black willow livestakes located within Plot 4. Including all five
monitoring plots, there are 2695stems /acre including natural and planted stems. The
success criterion for planted woody species is 320 stems /acre after MY -03. A mortality
rate of ten percent will be allowed after MY -04 (288 stems /acre), with another ten
percent allowed after MY -05 (260 stems /acre). An accurate number of planted stems
/acre could not be determined since the planted stems could not be distinguished from
natural stems.
Invasive exotics and areas of low stem densities are the only notable vegetation problems
areas for MY -04. Tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense) have reached levels of concern as well two areas of low stem densities and are
depicted in the Current Conditions Plan View (Appendix B). Other invasive exotics
observed within the conservation easement include tall fescue (Schedonurus
arundinaceus), Gill over the ground (Glechoma hederacea), Johnson grass (Sorghum
halapense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium
vimineum), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). According to the NC Native Plant
Society, all of these species, with the exception of tall fescue, Johnson grass, and gill over
the ground, are classified as "Rank 1 ", which is defined as exotic plant species that have
invasive characteristics and spread readily into native plant communities, displacing
native vegetation. Johnson grass and gill over the ground are classified as "Rank 2"
which is exotic plant species that display some invasive characteristics, but do not appear
to present as great a threat as Rank I species. Although these species have been given
these ranks, the functionality of the project is not expected to be impaired significantly by
these species. Tree of Heaven, Chinese privet, and multiflora rose are considered a
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 1 March 2011

species of "High Concern" according to EEP's invasive plant ranking list. Tall fescue,
Johnson grass, and Japanese stiltgrass are species of "Low /Moderate Concern ". The
conservation easement contains tall fescue that resided within the seedbank pre -
construction and is still the dominant grass in the adjacent cattle fields. For additional
information relating to vegetation, see Appendix C.
Overall, the banks are stable and well vegetated along all project stream reaches. The
majority of the structures are also functioning properly with little evidence of needed
repairs with the exception of the two end structures on Mary's Creek that were noted as
degraded in MY -02. Previously reported problems with the structure at station 19 +75
continues to exhibit signs of piping, but has not degraded further as compared to MY -03.
The piping of the structure at 20 +95 reported in MY -03 has appeared to have stabilized
and is not exhibiting signs of degraded structural integrity. Rills were observed along the
fence line of the stream crossing of Mary's Creek which is outside of the EEP
conservation easement. However during a second site visit it was noted that the
landowner had filled in the rills. The steep roadway slope at the crossing makes the
crossing approach susceptible to erosion. Erosion has slowed on the upstream face of
the crossing from previous monitoring year; this area will continue to be observed due to
its lack of armoring.
Changes from MY -03 to MY -04 in the main channel are minimal. Riffle and pool
stability and performance are comparable to MY -03. The riffle substrate has fined
slightly placing the distribution closer to the MY -02 samples. The bedrock outcrop at
station 24 +50 is still causing minor backwater effects upstream more than 200 feet. The
bed of the main channel remains stable with no significant aggradation or degradation.
This is also reflected in a comparison of the cross sectional data between MY -03 and
MY -04. The structures at stations 25 +25 and 26 +00 that exhibited problems in MY -02
and MY -03 have failed and boulders have dislodged and moved slightly downstream.
These two structure failures are not causing stream integrity problems. The vane arms
are still intact, and are successfully providing bank protection. The bedrock directly
upstream is preventing any downcutting of the stream. The erosion at the upstream
culvert crossing face has slowed and some additional vegetation growth was observed.
The tributary also exhibited minor changes from MY -03 to MY -04. The reach is stable
and the banks and channel are heavily vegetated. Some of the structures are difficult to
locate due to the heavy vegetation and sediment present in the reach, however no issues
were observed. The greatest change since MY -03 is the presence of two obstructions,
located at stations 12 +80 and 13 +90, consisting of accumulated washed debris in the
channel. The obstructions are causing backwater effects that extend to the top of the
reach. The particle size distribution for the tributary has transitioned to a finer particle
bed material from MY -03 due to the backwater. The longitudinal profile and cross
sections for MY -04 show no significant changes from the previous monitoring year.
Summary information /data related to the occurrences of items such as beaver or
encroachment, and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements, can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
the mitigation plan and restoration plan documents available on EEPs website. All raw
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 2 March 2011

data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon
request.
II. Methodology
Methodologies follow the current EEP monitoring report template, Version 1.3 1115110,
and the version 4.2 of the CVS -EEP protocol for recording vegetation (Lee et al 2008).
Photos were taken with a digital camera. A Trimble Geo XT handheld unit with sub -
meter accuracy was used to locate stream and vegetation problem areas.
A. Vegetation Methodologies
Level II of the EEP /CVS protocol Version 4.2, which includes natural stems, was used to
collect data for MY -04 for five vegetation monitoring plots. Data collected for these
plots are in Appendix C.
B. Stream Methodologies
Stream profile and cross - sections were surveyed using total station equipment and
methods. The survey data was plotted using AutoCAD Civil3D. The longitudinal profile
was generated using the MY -02 alignment. Cross sectional data was extracted based on a
linear alignment between the end pins. Pattern parameters were calculated by measuring
the plotted dimensions of the MY -04 surveyed thalweg. Profile parameters were
determined through analysis of a Microsoft Excel generated plot of the profile based on
the aforementioned baseline alignment.
III. References
Lee, Michael T. Peet, Robert K. Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008).
CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2.
Weakley, Alan (2007). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding
Areas. http: // www.herbarium.unc.edu /flora.htm.
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 3 March 2011

Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 241
The Catena Group
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011

/r.
N
r
Al
1
87
4at� 4+ o
3 m
m �
pb� n
HarttM,'or7
Rd Mary's Creek Conservation Easement
a b /fin <'�`�n Rd
Dixon Lamb Ln
e
e'
ro
4 N
White a gj
a
0
.�11 '
Coro Ct�
Site Directions: From Raleigh, head south on US 1 to US 64.
Take US 64 west to Pittsboro and exit onto NC 87. Head North
onto NC 87 and turn left on East Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd
(SR 1005). Go approximatley 2.5 miles to turn right onto Lindley Mill
Rd (SR 1003). Turn right onto Dixon Lamb Ln (SR 2336) and go
to the end of the road. UT to Mary's is located within the fenced
conservation easement within the cattle pasture.
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Site Figure
&*%0CL= Site Location Map r'
Alamance County, North Carolina Date
March USGS 7 5- Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map M
EEP Protect No. 241 arcrt 2011
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number: 241
The Catena Group
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011

Table la and b. Project Components and Summations
Table La. Project Components
Mar 's Creek (EEP #241
Project
Riparian
Wetland Ac
Non -
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Footage
BMP
Riverine
Non-
Riverine
Restoration
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
or
Stationing
Buffer
BMP r
Comment
or Reach
Feet /Acres
Level
Acreage
Acres
Elements
ID
Enhancement II
Mary's
1750
R
P2
16321f
10 +00-
6.1
Instream Structure and
Creek
Preservation
26 +31.8
Vegetated Buffers
HQ Preservation
CF =4505
If
0
0
UT to
Totals
2082
0
10+00—
0
0
Instream Structure and
Mary's
360
R
P2
4501f
14 +50
1'2
Vegetated Buffers
Creek
I = BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention
Pond; FS = Filter Strip; Grassed Swale = S; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; O = Other
CF = Cattle Fencing; WS = Watering System; CH = Livestock Housing
Table lb. Component Summations
Table Lb. Component Summations
Mary's Creek (EEP #241
Restoration
Level
Stream
(if)
Riparian
Wetland Ac
Non -
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Riverine
Non-
Riverine
Restoration
2082
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
0
0
Totals
2082
0
0
0
0
Count
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 6 March 2011

Table 2. Proiect Activitv and Renorting History
Mary's Creek (EEP #241
Activity or Reporting
Scheduled
Completion
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
Date
Restoration Plan
N/A
-
Aril 2003
Final Design-90%
N/A
N/A
October 2005
Construction
N/A
N/A
March 2006
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
N/A
March 2006
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area
N/A
N/A
March 2006
Bare -Root and Livestake planting
N/A
N/A
March 2006
Mitigation Plan/As -built Year 0 Monitoring-baseline)
N/A
May 2006
June 2006
Year 1 Monitoring
N/A
February 2007
March 2007
Year 2 Monitoring
N/A
July 2008
December 2008
Year 3 Monitoring
N/A
November 2009
March 2010
Year 4 Monitoring
N/A
January 2011
March 2011
Table 3. Proiect Contact Table
Project Contact Table
Mar 's Creek (EEP 9241
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
Designer
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
David Bidelspach - (919) 851 -6866
Shamrock Environmental Corp.
Construction Contractor
6101 Corporate Park Drive
Browns Summit, North Carolina 27699
Bill Wright - (800) 881 -1098
Seal Brothers Contracting, LLC
Planting Contractor POC
P.O. Box 86
Dobson, North Carolina 27017
Brian Seal
Shamrock Environmental Corp.
Seeding Contractor POC
6101 Corporate Park Drive
Browns Summit, North Carolina 27699
Bill Wright - (800) 881 -1098
Seed Mix Sources
contact Shamrock Environmental Corp.
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Hills Nursery Co., Inc.
(931) 668 -4364
Monitoring Performers
Ward Consulting Engineers
Stream Monitoring
8368 Six Forks Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27613 -5083
The Catena Group
Vegetation Monitoring
410 -B Millstone Dr.
Hillsborough, NC 27278
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number 241
The Catena Group
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Project County
Alamance
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030002050020
NCDWQ Subbasin for the Project
Mary's Creek
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Watershed Restoration Plan for the Cape Fear River Basin 2001
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm water
% of Project easement fenced or demarcated
100% fenced beyond the 50 ft easement buffer
Beaver activity observed during the design phase?
Unknown
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Reach 1 (Main)
Reach 2 (Trib)
Drainage Area
815acres
330 acres
Stream Order
3rd
1st
Restored Length
1632
450
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type (Rural, Urban, Developing, etc.)
Rural
Rural
Watershed LUL Distribution:
Residential
10 %*
5 %*
Ag — Row Crop
25 %*
25 %*
Ag — Livestock
20 %*
35 %*
Forested
45 %*
35 %*
Watershed Impervious cover ( %)
<5%
<5%
NCDWQ AU/Index Number
16 -26
16 -26
NCDWQ Classification
C, NSW
C, NSW
303d listed?
Downstream of the site, Mary's Creek was listed on the 2002 list,
but removed from the 2006 list
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
U I U
Total acreage of easement
7.3 acres
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
7.3 acres
Total Planted Acreage as Part of the Restoration
7.3 acres
Rosgen Classification of Pre - Existing
C4/F4
C4
Rosgen Classification of As -built
C
C
Valley Type
VIII
VIII
Valley Slope
0.0096 ft/ft
0.0096ft/ft
Valley Side Slope Range
0.1076 - 0.3285 ft/ft
0.1076 - 0.3285 ft/ft
Valley Toe Slope Range
0.0 11 1-0.0285ft/ft
0.0111- 0.0285ft/ft
Cowardin Classification
Stream (R3UB1)
Stream (R3UBI)
Trout Waters designation
No
No
Species of Concern, Endangered, etc.
No
No
Dominant Soil Series Type
Series
Herndon
Herndon
Depth
U
U
Clay %
U
U
K
U
U
T
U
U
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group g March 2011

Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number: 241
The Catena Group
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011

> ::3 W
U N T
N V,
d `y/
00 � a a E LL
a
0 0
w
?:
4 m
a m o d 3 3 3 c o- N 4 o g E
o to w v U d u A m m o �n E E a `m a
m w E N r ,2 m y t H N m O�LL
c >" N 0 cr in u U) i m> a a y c> LL
LO
0
0
z
o a
U w
Z
ca
0
F--
0 3
U
�a
o N
c
ca o
o zo
:• d
a) E
02 z°
U2
N A- m N O
o
y & A U
L c
n
�`- E
_m
€ h N a
d �n ca
�a
U
Y �
N
N
U
N
C pAp N N p
0, N
T 01 01 J
H N ul M M N I I
r m M m m M
CA
O N O ,-
m N m
N�p
X m m m M m
H V l7
UN., o
ti N M O Ut
0 0 d S 0 0 0 0
d d

a�
LL
O LL
co
0
t
m
O �
O
V
z
N O <
a` r.
Q.
O w
3
_d
N
M
ca
O y
cc _
m
T O
z .o
E c
CE
O -
_z
E U m r
cD C o' '
� o
m
� o
i
-�C `- E
W Um
a) Q
L a
U ar
>, a
CD
c
O
U
_ 1
O
C a
ay. 3
O
!-V C7

a� M
_ W
o �
T
n c
vt ♦
ae < w E
O
✓, a O '^ �, c E
� c c w w w o � y� d cy w
_ _ y
o W v o v m v '� • A_ O v, E E a• LL
C E> m U¢ in U m i :t 6 G J° V `
0
N °
Z
C. u�
oa
R N
a
O w
w
d
C
U) M
ca
O y
O
Z o
O � ♦ n
C E c
t m
02 z°
E "r
(d ♦� m 0
0
L� d m
L
LL' v ♦ ♦ "♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ♦� -ld (a
LL
♦" ♦ ♦ /. " N
♦♦♦4 �•♦6a '"♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦♦'♦ C
♦a *a�i" s�' ' ' ♦O♦idO� Oi ♦ ♦♦ ♦i ♦♦ ♦e0 ♦i "o♦ ♦ ♦O ♦ ♦♦ o ♦� +re♦ ♦� ♦♦♦ � ♦ ♦�a♦ `di °i0♦ �
cc a
O
Vl�

o
Y
Y
Y o v E
H = A H Y U H 3 3 3 = A O
c 0 t/l d p U Y Y O N J d a LL
_A E
N 4 O W O Y Y Y = A T Q 3 Y `Jo u
tp U g q
l oA�
N o
2
o q�
o �
a` C°
a
o w
c
Ca
o N
A
o =
zo
°�m4
a� car
� o =Z
0
b (D o
m u U) ►�.
Y y Y 1 W E
LL LL � Q
U d
cn a
� LL •.�i'�� %i a •t' %! .� � •o O
.. #�. 44R-m♦ V
♦. t4 ❖t�.•�t.• •�..�.•�.•.tA4'► '?At�f• - A•tAg4
.4 ♦.•♦ ♦♦ •or ss. ♦ohs
c¢
0
F V U�

.•. a L
ai�j►•ai i � D>
� • •i9
. ❖a a•.
as aa• o �
♦ z
••: aa:• d old .n m
s�
LL
•i•a Oi N a
CL
as ••i• d o W
3 •!d
d
N ':t— r—
V/ Cc
C: n.
O y
O
L �
Z o
O
W u
0) r E c
z
IT s
Um
O
c E
A^♦` 1
'Em
q
W V Q
L
U ar
L •-
ca O
U O C
p
s'o U
LL LL
i
L
i
m c
rn w v a E
c i E �p
Q O N O W d d d m N C_ )
U ,
n C L Q Q^
N q d N 3 3 3 O N q N O O V
q o E E a A
E N v E w r m y t t N E Z
°o 1cp
in U 2 V1 U U) f i i 12 :V d Q J J 0 u
.r w -

v CD
C? W
c N L
LL
O E
a j s E N w
c d
oE E 1
E m '° W N_ r r r 3 p d t - N E t LL
q o 3 0 N
C E> N 0 z° N u N i m> a<
J I III 10U am�
o
z
t2 o a
a N
a
o w
1
� 3
d
in m
Ca
O
:- y
c
Lo
4
O
O ao
fA y U
N = E
cc +• �,
a
m
oU'nA
:':•'i' cn lQ
•. ••
H
•
♦. ♦.
Gem —
• • d
i�'igi�• Q �
♦ d
0
c a
u �
0
V l7
3 enl�d
N

_u
R
F"
C
u
y
u
Q
R
O
L
O
R
u
L
r+
R
7
R
C N
•C@ M
C �
L
v
d �
H �
F"-
C
d
rJ
J �
z°
w
o �
a
c
O
O
V
O
O �
N
y
A~ y
E L
C
�a
7
� U O
W V
� z F
a c T o
°3
0)
m
@
a �
c
o
L N
@ 00 0
0 :°.
LL N ;
� T
C O
a)
0
Y
Z to
p� a
E c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Oo
<n
Oo
°'
O)
o°
Ib
M
(D
Ui •t C
O1
m
t`
fl-
r
N
N
0 a a
@
o 0 m
LO
0
LO
LO
co
Cl)
N
LO
C LOLL
O d N
� � C
E�
d
Z N
c
�
—
@@ O
M
o
~
1�
r
r
r
r
O 1�1l!jj
~ O Q
N
N
N
N
N
�-
z
a
E
N
N
N
O
N
N
LO
Z N
d N
@
2•
L
a
✓i
o
N
E
of
C
AI
C
N
O~
C m
O
N
N
OJ
R U
a)
R'
'O
O
3 E
vl
(0
y
a
O
>
J
U
C
E
A M1
j
p
L
E
Q
N
a
E m
$
°
d
C
J a
v
m N
'V
N
N
N
m
c
N_ _
D m
m
'O
c
A
m
a
E
y `� N
un
m
rn
C
N
m
C W
o c
O O
d
x a
b L
m
U
N
N
C
E
N
E
E
O
N
c N m
D
C
J
C
OI
C
O
Lm a
U
L
d
c }
o
E
c
I
' v
°'D
a
m
°
7
w
°3
c
'3
o
] o
m
]
m
Eo
a
c
.w ~OI M1
`o
m
m
o
a
E co
O°
cmi
m
, �°
N
Ja
N
D°
IV
coi
m Z
m
M
w
j
C
a
m m
0 0
U
U
7
Ol
Y m GI
O
'2
W
C
L�
3
D
u)
N g
C 0
.Op
t
01 C
N
V
N—
J
L
E
?i
3
° N
N
] N
J
N
O
m
O V
E o
d
,
W
W
y
m
m
Y o
c
Y m m
c a m
x
c
_
m
m
c m a
o c
N
N J
N
a
M m
CO m m
M
2
U)
CJ
2
N
m m m
y
d m d
O
�
- C
J
'0 c
C
O
,a
U
O
c
O
C
m
m
C
0
o
C
C
o+
O
C
O
u
y
U) J
rn
c
c
"
o
a
w
a
M1
m
c
c
o
m
0
d@
C V
C
U M1
ci
m
a
C°
m
m
u
m
3
N
—
M1
"
9
�+
L
'S
a
Y
L!
A .0
f a
/
M1
U fA
N
al U
V
N
M
N
N
M
<
v
p
C
m N
6 d
C
O C y
m
'ter
Y
m
3
c
U U
C4
ri cn
J �
z°
w
o �
a
c
O
O
V
O
O �
N
y
A~ y
E L
C
�a
7
� U O
W V
� z F

3
.Q Q
C W
L
Q1
d
J
O y
d7 V G7
R d N
o m �
a 5 T •O—
a }c
o
0
0
0
.N
°o m
w �
to
rn c
L N f0
fd
Q
O
O
LL .R.
C_ O
L t N C t0
E D p y
O
J
Z :� y
N >
�a
C
C
0
0
0
0
0
(D
Lfl
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(n O
LO
co
M
m
m
00
V
co
co
N
o d y
R
O (D y
C m R
O C 0
O
LL
O C> N
� � C
�y�
N
o
7 d
Z �
C
y
Ln
LO
LO
Ln
z
�a
L c �
y m a
E c
LO
CL R
_
o
c
nl
o
? y
o
o
m
N C
S O
❑
m
�
w
v
`o
o
4
m E
3
d
O)
m
N
d
H
O
N
C7
E
N
m
j
o
$
O
c E
d
N rn
m
u
°�
d a
c
❑
m
a
m
`m
1
c w
5
o
fE m
0
=
g��
a�
m
C
a
_
�'
E
E
VI
m s
.- v a
N L
m
O
d
C
J
o
C
a°
x o_
Of
.0
3
O(v .O
O
m
N N
C m
= J
°
�
`° c_
❑
0 3
m
y
d
o J o
me
o
f0 o
o
'�
E
m
°o
N
3
e
c
o
v
c o
E$
•.�
a
o
v
a
c
.� ~OI
NN
5
T
$=
m
W
C
C
n c
C
N d
> O
o
c�
U
2
w
rte,
O°
.0
O m
❑
E
C
.a
C
C=
J=
O)
N
Y
3
U
m
L E
a�i
a�i
Lg
Y N
c H a
d
=
d
o
o- d
C1 N
E
(�
c°
m m`
w
J=
J
a c
c°
o
N
❑
d
O
❑
N
J y
Y O
_
Y d d
C d
Y
C
U
2
U
2
Y d m
C d
N
N
O C N
C�
C
N
N n
N
CO m
M m m
m
co
V)
CO m
d CO
_
_
o
O
_
V c
o
a
o
v
m
y
U
=
0
c
a
a
A
c
o
0
U
m
a
a
J
N
v
a
Y
m
o
V)
7
N
O
A
U V%
U
V
N
M
N
N
M
V
V
d N
C O
Y
Q
=
L
O c y tm
L f6
v
m
A
in
7
c
W
i U U
r
ri m
,.a �
Q w
z°
r
°a.
Ar
op
c
0
v
R
c
0
O N
y ..
e�
.o c
h a �'•
W m
W U
�z �

E
h
Q
O
C
U
C
O
N
tu
bA
,cc
m
I^ V
W Q
D
_ d
� C
� A
H a
� a)
�
Q C
0
C)
0
O)
f}
a Q
M
M
� d
� d
C
C �
v
O
U
Q
O N
U
d O
Cl)
E Z.
E O
z a
C
O
a o
r
~
V
)n
U
U �
o
0
T
°
O
a y
N
m
R m
@
_
a
� �
o
p
_
a N
co
Z
LL
V)
a
tQ6
C
H
oo
0
0
O
co
�
(0
�
z
t
Ul
�
Q
N
J
J
c9
O
0
O
N
d
m
Q
m
Q
N
a
0
U
U
l0)
U
O
O
Ln
O
a)
T
m
U
m
ate,
c6
O
w
a)
N
Q
>
N
E
d
Q
n
d
%
T
M
0
>O
N
m
d
o
�
w
C
y
U
E
G
Q
Y
N
�
3
y
�
o
J
Cl)
d
a
IC
v
Q
C
Q)
E
Q
N
A
W
C N
Q cr,
a
� d
C
o
v
9 d
Q
U
Q N
C
O
fl
O
V
)n
7
Z a
> O
°
a v
i
U d
a
p
_
a N
lL
(n
o
LL
V)
a
tQ6
C
H
oo
0
co
�
c
�
z
t
c
h
E
?
�
Q
�
Q
J
J
C
O
0
O
N
d
m
Q
m
Q
c
a
0
U
U
l0)
U
d
O
Ln
O
m
U
m
ate,
m
IT
O
Q
>
Q
>
d
>
c
>
c
d
%
N
M
C .0 �U, U jq () m uj L
« a
C « U L "O L 'p 0 - O L
m N C 0 0 N p N L p) N
U N H O N E U 7 /a 0 Y
N a) L TU °- O C la 'n a) a N
Y Y
C, a) a =
_ a > m T a) C)
U1 La) mOU 5m>
7 t/)
L
C a) C m a)
y m m m.4 E.E m a
�a a
m O m m o m 0
� o
C C 'N O
3Ea N)i° Jpo
-C z o o`ooa.a
O C Il C "O N J N N
O co — C N C m m
C 'O m a) U N O
'C E a) -0 " O
m N nma o-amU E
a m
O a
p N E J N
m N m U 5
c E
L2 '0, `oo�aL
E U N m
°–' ° c2E a�mo o�
-0 E �T ° m ° m
m O.cmLCn�.0). 3�
O p C --9 5 N Y N 2° m
u m $Ea 0- --r - _- 0a)Na)
m m E�°pom
U O H C C v) O m O
a)
0 N C
—
p _
L Cm
U C >YOp«CII
0 ° 0 N
C m j H U� E T N C E
2 a �`m a� p a m° o f
3 m a��o)m c_oi
m a)0 >a)Ln$ Oa)
m
m aia)�mmZ �m0 CL,? V a m«
a m U m >> o
C a) O
ca o
o E' �Em? w>m°
N a) T 'N
N
a L
O) m O '0 `) N m T ,
m O N m T C r C
7 C
m a Z
U_ 0) �•
0
m m �j `m ° a) V! N S N N
E Y o
>
O) C E O C O) O a) l! N_ O E U a)
N E c � aL 4� 4' E � a�
_ _ a
T m m t5 0 m
a) mE
c
x
p— m> U
_
N
rn d) O O n U U !n m C «
J > N r G
C O a) . o 0 .ID OI C ° a)
f0 a) M 7
E 0 a N 0) o .r
a) «_m °� «C Tm D7n1«)
m � m U ° U 0 a.' ° 1 cE
C € N C> m iA C ._
mNm �a m
m am rnaN . 0 NN ) N CL m N
m a)N °0m(D -5>' m
C ° m O L N m
E m M `) N E 0 a) 7 E O a)
C V) N
mt
m N c O L
a) O
�m -o E ooH — ° °-
E
°r c>,° Na @tmm° cc
m o ° a m 0 E 0Lu E "' dL
m a ° " E o � _
c2it "aEi (OD
o �~ O Fa) o `� Z aci m.LU. E
c m 7 o 0 o
`m a
m c m c m L 5 a
N lA L a) N a1 Y N N N O C
> N a)
Em m° a rn.�U °a Em mu - m e cu O O m N C
U —
r n C N nN C L �
9 7 G U y
T m_ E — J O .SO m C
aa
0 M°
06-0
U ° n
m p m
O E
o m C ) n m O O m m @ 0 « _ Taa)
m
me 7 aL O U a )m '" ,Em
Pom
m 0 o E C y L O
6
°
0 o`p apr�a°o.Eo >m
C E E C (a O« O) C' C« W
a) N L U 7 N U L Y r a 0« a
m O�
o) L (Cu 7 al 0-62 .0 m C LS « O U
° L 'o-3 G nL >` 0 n s y r N
> N «
m m C T 00 U r N m a7 L N C N
m m () a) ° '-
a) ° E m o E m c p T m L .4 m
NC, C L >,, N N N CI 7 U
C m a) « N N L_ __ '6 Z a m
E E�ESSJ2mg
C O CD
« OU m o f N N>0 a) 0 0 2 1 E Z' C
°)ai o Uo m`moama « -.,2 mo
Cm wo �maEm0m aUi.u3
w m
u 0 a u � n o.:°. E E a m .o M o
v
m ra) v,0D- M.ETano`
a�
z�
C �
LL U
W
C
O
0
9
O
m_
� N
u
o: y
E °
m E
� a
V O`
O m
y W iC
W U
z H

Stream Station Photos
Photo 1. XS -1- Downstream View
Photo 2. XS-2 Downstream View
Photo 3. XS -3 Downstream View
Photo 4. XS-4 Downstream View
Photo 5. XS-T1 Downstream View
Photo 6. XS-T2- Downstream View
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 19 March 2011

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Photo 7. Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Photo 8. Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 20 March 2011

Photo 9. Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Photo 10. Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report -FINAL
WEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 21 March 2011

Photo 11. Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report -FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 22 March 2011

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 23 March 2011

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Mary's Creek (EEP #241
Veg Plot ID
Veg Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
VP 1
N/A
0 %*
VP2
N/A
VP3
N/A
VP4
No
VP5
N/A
* Tract mean not met for Plot 4 (121 planted stems/acre), the only
plot with confirmed planted stems.
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 24 March 2011

Table 8. Veizetation Metadata Table
database name
cvs -ee -ent ool- v2.2.7.mdb
database location
11/5/2010 13:54
computer name
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS
DOCUMENT ------- - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a
summary of project (s) and project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for
each ear. This excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for
each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and
all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live
stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all
plots.
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by e for each plot.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species
(planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY --- --____-___ ---------- ___ ------
Project Code
241
project Name
Mary's Creek (EEP #241
Description
2096 if of stream restoration; no wetlands
River Basin
Cape Fear
len h ft
2096
stream-to-edge width ft
areas m
Required Plots calculated
Sampled Plots
5
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 25 March 2011

`a
;n
C v
a `
O N
a _
a �
9 C
`a d
a E
m
_ Z
o t
F �
c a`
U
d ~
N
a o
Z y
a se
K
i•
eN
d�
x � O
a =
�U s
� z r-
h
N
O
M
M N
O
N
N O
M l0
H
N
F
T
d
T
a
m
M
N
NO
�
d'
a
N
c
m
m
.y
o0
N
d
01
N
N
Y
N
Q
�
d
v
^'
O
F-
N .r
,r
N
01 N
d
d VI
.-� •�
M
0
N
M r1
M
m
N
01
�D
N
�
O
m
m
N N
m
N
_
N
M
M
ti
�
d
^'
tD
rl
ti
M
M M
M
N
W m
J 1
-
M
N
M
M
�
>
o
N o
0
o
n
�
N
a
o
W
y�
d
O
O
O
.y 00 1
n
N
Q
a
�
O
®
°
N
�
a
°
O
o
W
J
i
N
N
T
N
�0
N N
N
l0
O
N
o
M
p>
O
N O
O
•+
i
O
N
O
0
0
c
v
d
�
U
N
m
�
a
N
a
�
>
o
N o
0
a
0
N
O
O
O
W
y�
1
N
ut H
r N
N
N
m
dN
O
N O
O
O
m
ti
O
d
�
N
W
N
d
O
O
O
6
d
d W 0 U
T
d
Ol v
d d
W
v
N d
pJ
U a
y
G
v
v
v J
L
J J
L L
J J
L L
J v
L
v J`
L
v
L d
J v
L
v v
v
J J
L L
J v
L
J
L v
d v
N N L E
�
H
H N
Vf N
N VI
VI H
H N
V1 H
N H
H H
N V1
VI H
N F
H F-
VI d
E
v
N
v
E
a
E
v
m
2
c
E
v
=
o
E
;
"
t
v
q
c
E
E
E
v
u r
v
E
a v
3 a
«
u
o v
3
>-
a E
'a
':
c
E E
a c
L
v
ai
v v
0
v v
l0
l0 N
c U
a
O 0
N
C C
N 00
> O
U U
3
0
ww
v
m
Y E
y c
•°-'
` v
m
is
E
a
r
3
a
E
_�
v
v r
v¢
u° uJi
_ o
m
in v
v
_° v>i
a a
E a
u° a,
3
c
m
�
O
�
c
m
C
m
10
c
v
72
u
v
A
E
>
o
C
-
2
J
J
>
-
c
(0
> L
c
f0
N i`
m
N
E`
u
>
•
u
A
m
E
E
L m
E m
o.m
u
o o
u
u>
E
a«
E
a o
y=
a
N
u C
C N
c
c c
E C
J
u
u c
as
io
'a
`m v
c
o°
v
m v
v°
c
o„Jp Q
'�
c
c c
2210-7,1
m x
E E
E E
G
Q Q
r
m u
U U
U in-
l7
=
a a
a a
vi
uf0i
a o
Z y
a se
K
i•
eN
d�
x � O
a =
�U s
� z r-

Appendix D. Stream Assessment Data
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report -FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 27 March 2011

" _
o
0
0
N
u
0
E
0
O
0
o
N
V
O
X
O
O
e
L
°o
N
M
LL
Y
m
f �
N
v
}
o
0
2 ui Z
m
N e
v
w a
z a O o
?
r ° -oc°� r° .1 1,a
m
�
>
W O m 0 IV ' m m rtf
N
Y!
y
}
af U! z
A
S O
N M m at N O N O M m O N m
O
O j
ilf
) W
<
NO h N N N N N N N N N N N m N m m
j
N
m O O V N Ori n N N fpp �tpp tp m m
46 � �2 N N N N� M M th t7 M V O
m
Q
i N
z
S O F O ¢
N
E
-�
mmmp o+mm
ins
m Mg
Nm N�NN
�9
n ,0 0�opp �Npp impp
00� eeo t7 MI N000
O e r o w
°n
O
O N �lI O� i0 N m O M I� b N aD N m
O1"
No
° �� NNNNCmv cmvrvr nn av
o0
0
LL
K
a3�f3
o<
w�lp uuiN yp°y m�oM!° on rr °m �ppnry rc°pn °ap
N N
�wN
N h N N u01 �OII N N N v01 N N �n
m ONi O iD ONI N O l� O e N O N N
N
U
a,
U ° o >
.z
M a
Z
a 0 F
v o
iUar'�n�
c
H �
�p
O� O OQmi n aND am0 m N cNV S ��1p1
O
O O
I�Ipp eNp �Np ��p {<{pp
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O
O
O
o
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
W
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O
I
N
w
O
o
N
N
O
N
N
e
O
e
N
M
O
m
N
N
O � <O
�p0
N� maD Mrm mpN r' mm
O Ai0 O N
ao1�n00
W
N
O
(1aaj)
uoryenal3
O
2 �
O
a.
M
`o
N
c
O
..+ N
y . .
C� �
G D
ma
a
V O
Y O
v
y O
U r-
-C4
0..
N W U
W 4)

1
o
O
`
i
O
N
CC
O
ytti`.
O
Q
'
- a
0
O
O
v
aoi °
g
a
"f
1�
o
0
N
Y
tm
I
k
Y
o
N? J J w =
0
M �
d
d
2 a O O O
V t0 O M O 0 01
pN
pp tptppp (p(ppp pp po
w N N UJ N� NNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C
O LL W
y
O
O C }
N°
O O N N N M O) p N
rn l. 1� N pp N N V Op N O N OD
� M
li
O
N IV v) ¢) m N N N N N N N N M M M N C O O
y
(n
N
N
O
V
}
oa
6
m w w m ?
a
z
J O O O O ¢
g °�nno
r'mm�rvmvl`Ono��oom
o w
}
alnro
N rl
0 m�
tp ap�ppp ppyy pp pp Qp pp�pp
o
� W
N N
J
°i
p p p
N Ny M O N h
m
N N N
y
O (V < N N N N N M NI M O O
I
C
O N N^
^ A N N
N
Z
of
3
a O F O a
J F r K
O
h
E
o t00'4� a
o
mom °e rvmaao °mn °`On
°n' `O
2 i
N
° ` .
m N�ra
C o
o
0
0
K Z
a3��3
ON
pp �1pp
0 W N N 2 V fD N � : N N N 00 N N rn W N I� W
o vg
� w
N N N N N N N NUgoi 1�mi ig°n v°i vaoi v°pi u°�g�vNOi vNOi�
�
O
tp QQ
N o N N N tNJ O oOD 0 O P T O N 100 < N O
N
N
d°
y
O M r N N N N N N N N N M M M V O
.Z
d
U w N o
Z'o E`Dn a
u?
ZaO�
m 2 Q a
F m
icSz�?r�
r
e
g O
°n cc''��°Jr �O1O °v naNOrv�rv�r'
o
0
0
y
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0
N
0
O
0
N
0 0
O N
0 0
O N
0 o
O N
O
O
o
N
W
0
O
1�
10
O
c0
O
N
O O
N
O O
0
O
o O o
0
O
N
O
NNNOOr,�ri�m��
N N I M N N O V
088j)uopenal3
e N� N
aciWmou
Iq
a�
o
v
C) v
R r
C
rO
>'n
I
O
o �
� N
R' y
r/yj U O
4 O m
V G" aCi
w W U
W
�z H

\\
\
)
}
/
)§
�\ }
\� r
\ d
\
\ k
_
{
-
}
_
.. k
§
oo
Z fb
}( } ) * \ )
( /
;
/
; |
/
)§ } ) *))) ƒ
§
{!!@;w7lmq ; §e¥gG;§;!!*4ggg
!
- „
_ +2;
)/
} » ) 2
|
, ==z»
§k
=2 _
§ \ \\ \ \ \. \\\
§!2
�
,zzzzz
)f!!
\\\)\\}}j{\7j })
{ {!!2
®
§)
}(
{ \ -6
-
;oa-
a\
))_
\
_
J) U /
,
,
N
{ /)!!!
\\
\
)
}
/
)§
�\ }
\� r
\ d
\
\ k

\\
\�
2
}
/
G
]b
)\ *
] \}
\/\
±
\/ /
E
\ i
�
-d)
>.
!
k
;
, ,� j \)j}} {)))
55 ,,,,� ,
\
°
.
)( ) ) !} ) )
)
§ ®l74mkG10 gF!!R«gepqmm §&g!
/ /27222
)/
} ! ) ƒ
+„ 222r,2rm ;a @ :2g�a
k|!
\!!!ak
6 q3; § /27 § /$qq /(\
9)
E�
2)
\
/
\
\ \
)
/ \ \\]/
�
(108A)
U04
EA01 ,
\\
\�
2
}
/
G
]b
)\ *
] \}
\/\
±
\/ /

Q
2 O �
2
m
O
O
v
N
M
O
O �
N
r
1= �
td =
� O
Y �
U a �
i.L7 O
iz H
o
0
i m
U
N
° E
E v
Qo m
t°
N
Q
m
F
°o
o
0
e
o m
X o-
f. U
0
0
�*
�
n
w
Y
m
I
d
°
0
m � Z
m? m m
d
o
a w w a
z ° o O o O m
>
°
0 1 inm °Mnn r-: . . .
C
G
y
yCDy .
m$uN°�:X :X ggguN°�gun°��m°n vo`i env
w N
y
O u m
>
�
y
o C
N
N m N N Obi . 00 W
N
R
�o��bm NNN NNnc`4, °d ddd
N
U
N �
r
m
m
°a
z m w 2 w m ?
,F �1
z
a
°o oNO
°ern �iNrnnnmrvv aoanrvvmi
~
h
o �
d
y d n m W n!
N
���pp ��pp ��pp ��pp pp pp pp ttpp ap�ppp pp pp
N N N N N N N N NN
i
�p eepp ��pp
2 W
N
G Vi Oi N N N N N N M S m O
1a1
I
a m m
m?
m 2 m ?
o
E
$ o
=ti�ppp
n o W N m W W n o
W o9i `fin m
E
r.m v>N.
p�j�o W
•�- •Q- ^ °�
y �
��p�ppn pm pnp pm �p�p Grp
N N i(I N N N N N N
� W
VI N �°(I �°(l
O
$ o
_ No o
O O o S O 0 S S y pN p N p p
N N N N N N 82 1 N o h N N N VI N
t
o
°.
y°m��uri
iii °n ino�vNi�Nnm� W mmNC�n °m Sa
NN povi
N N N N N N N
d
CiN m o^ >
O
c�I N m N d W m d N d N
o n N d O d m m N m m N N
O
O
o°
o
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O m O O Of m m N C'I fO
O h d1 m n m OI
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
a`Uwinop
_
Q n n o
Q N
(JeOA)
uoilena13
Q
2 O �
2
m
O
O
v
N
M
O
O �
N
r
1= �
td =
� O
Y �
U a �
i.L7 O
iz H

o
z�
w
o
a.
a
00
C
O
O
O
M
M
c
O
o �
� N
xv
F
C j
� � O
Y 0
O A
N W R
W U
O
�z F
O
0
o
of
E c
u y
3
0
s� U «
d
v '«
`L' v
Y o
x y
O
O
O N
L
o
a
v
m
0
U
0
0
sx
N
M
LL
Y
tt1
{
m
v Z J 22 D K Z
a
N
Z a p F p
>
o
C
co ° m rn a m m o ry a n m °r
� m mVp diplo
"
18 N pm oo$
pan N
I
Yop l
V 0 O
N h N N N N Ul ill Yl l Oa Yl O°Uo l
d
O LL
w
i
fn
>
°C
■I
O
T
081, n n�-mp m
O
N
N Q 0" N O N m tU OJ l0 Oi N N a m N N N c] O a
y
N?
J J 2 Z
m w 3 w
z °a
m
F a
O p m
4
g oul
-- lno�m oc�morm anm m
-actin vlmnomo�m
~
o 0
}
0
e o��rnM.
Y ry p n
n O
O U
rrpp ��pp pp pp fpfppp ap�ppO oo QQ
O O O O N o N N N o o loll N N N N N N �011
m
N
j w
i
n u u
o 0
} a
pp pp yy QQ p
O N iryn N N r to n N N OOi a m tN'1 YI tp
m
I� B O
pNp
O lV Ih N N N N N N N M (mn O 0 0
m
c
aYmNin r°o
u3
m m ?
°o
�i`+mmo�a�n
Ul
jmNamrvg
N`�mcon
_,w
OOmd m W
o$
o m r m N m
Nr'-M mm NI Of NM
i o m
m
rn
o o m n n ry cei v a a
°o
0
9
m m m o
Z
a O F O
a3��3
0 0
—inm
0 In m� r ry m N m n m m� rn m m ry rn r � N
m mm in mninm c�nin m mr r om e
o
0000000 o°o °o °o °oo o°o ° ° o°0000`�`�oo
o o o o
W
N m o N m N m N N m N ill8 N N m
z
iw
°
U
9
c
`o_$uO1io���'a
e`�oa�m�'rorn o MmOd
N
m
ry�rrmN�� �vi oivNNOOi vi ai
u
u u
N n o >
U)
m ?
v?
Z
22 m
a O F O
O O
n N d t� o N m N n
O
O
N
O N
O
N
N
N
O
O
O
D
C
y
j w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0
VI i0 V1 m m ill m h
O
O
m
O
m h
O O
1
O
m m
O O
N
O
N d
O O
d
O
W
" ° o
a U LL 0 U
oO
°odo��
M n d N to W Ul N
o�rr�mm�in `�ro
mNe�u �a o
N N N M e d d U1
u1
N N
V1
(1983)uol;en013
N 1A
N
N N
N
o
z�
w
o
a.
a
00
C
O
O
O
M
M
c
O
o �
� N
xv
F
C j
� � O
Y 0
O A
N W R
W U
O
�z F

0
o.
0
n
N
•
� V
O O
O
0
Q °
O
O
0 6
+
u
0
O ,c,4
$
N
}
�
00o
�
0
U.
1O
o
pg
p
o
Ln
N
O
° g° °
0 04b
g
° °o�0
0
N
g
i
0
O
M
o
N
}
0
04
O
0 I
O
0
0£+ZZ ?IS
U0!WS
o
°
N
084Z-041
AS °
1
O
O
}
c
0
O
0 0
0
�
N
LL
Y
o
8
m
o
00
°o
0
o
'
N
0
p N
N
O
+
00 00
00
°
}
0°
0
0
O 0
00
° °j
p
+
�
4�0a
ol
0
a
0 8,0*
C
UYraO �
ta 0
°
C
a
N
0
�
0 8
t
0 S
Y
w
°°
+
2
0
Y
m
° C
0
LL
C
0
J
0
�
m
o
=
U
0
o
m
0
0
•N
C �
0 B
N
O
}
°
°
O
+
c o °o
oo
B
Ind
eLg
uo!�S
3 ° -0
o
0 }
°° 000
o
0
0
go
LL
Y m
Ob
0
0 O
O
�
O
1
�
�a
6
Y
0
Z241 3qR
o
0
o$
°
Ind
0
£B +L
UoPOS
O
Y
O °
0
O
0
r
O
Q
0
0
0
(
O
0
0 +
°oo
, 0
0 0
° o°0
O
N O 00 Q N
0 0 0)
N N Q Q Q Q
N N
(1801) U04BAD13
8} k�
2
i
y �
a
M

C)
0
g
}
LL
Y
O
o
I
1
m
O
O
° O
°8 °°
1 t
g
O°
1
}
3
°O
O
O
1
1
1
0
0
o
0
op
}
I
0
0
2i
F
0 1
00
°
00
Cl)
0
°
p
0
o
}
o
L
tY m
°° 0 p
1
0
0 0
0
op
II
o
o
0
}
o
0
1
p0
0 o I
0
o
o
le
8
0 0 0
o
(D,7
wo
p
° ° o
a
o
}
Y O IT
dao
000
00
v
I
00
r
C
LL
m
tMC
;�«
o ° o °
o p
�
O 00
00
0
:tN
0 O
p
C ,
O
2C
O
}
I
� 000
0
o
F F
H
° o �
OWN +le3
luogaagss
c)oo o i
o p
op t
8
U-
Y
0
1
6 I
m
0
00 1
0
O OeO
I I
I
O
}
O
op I
o
0
1 I
lood Z)+Lel 1 u0!;3ag ss o
1 g
0
0 1 }
t
a o LL
Y
0 m
I
Op 0
O °
p 0 O O
t
O
}
° O O
8 °
I
0 0 o0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
{7 N N N N N N
(1001) uonenal3
8j
a
s
2
a
a
A
C ^
M
a
s
2
a
a
A
C ^
M

Figure 7. Pebble Count Plots — Cross - Section 2 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241)
Figure 8. Pebble Count Plots — Cross - Section 4 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241)
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 4: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
m
70%
A
60% —6 MY-
E 02
V 50% 0 MY-
40% 03
H 30%
c 20%
LL
10%
0%
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Particle Size - Millimeter
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number: 241
The Catena Group
36
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 2: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
d
A
60 %°
01
U50%
02
—0 MY-
c 40%
a
H
30%
c
20%
LL
0 10%
0%
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
100000
Particle Size - Millimeter
Figure 8. Pebble Count Plots — Cross - Section 4 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241)
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section 4: Riffle
100%
90%
80%
m
70%
A
60% —6 MY-
E 02
V 50% 0 MY-
40% 03
H 30%
c 20%
LL
10%
0%
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Particle Size - Millimeter
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project number: 241
The Catena Group
36
Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
Year 4 of 5
March 2011

Figure 9. Pebble Count Plots — Cross- Section2 — Mary's Creek (EEP #241)
Bed Particle Size Distribution
Cross Section T2: Riffle
100%
90% 8 666 6666 6
m 80%
70%
A 3 MY-
60%
E —6— MY-
V 50% 02
c 40% 0 MY-
R
30%
c 20%
LL
10%
0%
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Particle Size - Millimeter
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report-FINAL
NCEEP Project number: 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 37 March 2011

0
0
x
s
6
s
s
8 3
c �
3
3 0
9
m $
9 E
3 �
� 8
3 e
3 .G
E e
9
2
6 3
6
a
� a
9a
O
4,
w�
a
L.
M
0
.q
O N
N
G: y
e 7
y
x �
U cL e
W �
�z �
C
C
U
q
x
O
^
N
O
m
M
M
QO
f7
M
O
M
N
O
V
O
c
U
m
o
0
O
�
N
N
N
N
V
p
M
C)
m
)O
O
N
c
O
f�
C
N
O
O
o
0
o
m
_
C
O
O
Q
O
O
O
C
co
M
C
w
m
p
N
x
d
t
U
_
EN
E ( )
C
C/)
d
(9 N
(� C
mU
a� a
C �
N N
O
m Y
N
(6
C
x
m
V
o
O
M
L
�[
V
0
0
0
�ppn
r
o
rn
N
N N
c
o
0
0
0
Q
c7
M
O
O
N
O
O
m
M
W
c
y
a`
C
m
N
O
O
Q
Z
w
U
A
0
m
J
rv�
17f
A
L
L
L
L
cy
w
L
L
L
O)
L
N
o
-0
m
°.2
m
Oc
Oc )
N
m
m
m
2
W
c
N
o_
o
c
N
N
"O
m
m
C
C
m
oN )
N
N
o
>
C
a
O
m
C
R
O
C
75
E
o
x
U
3
m
U
L
> .
m
m
�L '
LN
p
a S
m
°
O
O
$
g
o
°
q
-
cu
m
L
°
0 )
m
m
�c
lc
f
m
m°
m
°
o
C
o
o)
c
F
a
a
O
—°
3
2'
m
R
YC
me
m
N
L
U
m
m
E
m
Y
u
S
v
w
y
m
m
o
�
m
E
c
q
m
m
c
d
LL
m
m
v
t
C
°
C
°
a
m
U
c
m
o
U
a
E
c
E
m
c
Q
m
c
x
a°
9
m
°
o
'a
p
R
m
a
o
a`
I
I
I
a
0
0
x
s
6
s
s
8 3
c �
3
3 0
9
m $
9 E
3 �
� 8
3 e
3 .G
E e
9
2
6 3
6
a
� a
9a
O
4,
w�
a
L.
M
0
.q
O N
N
G: y
e 7
y
x �
U cL e
W �
�z �

E
0
oq
O
O
rq
m E
. Z-'
ce)
Q o ca
m u
2z
Lo
-tr
co
cl
N
r
cc
Lo
lo
N
cq
co
m
cu
r-
N
x
clj
w
cl)
a(D
)
I
o
o
oo
N
O
ID
cl
)
N
'T
fn
cq
co
E CD
fi Lo
d
c
ca
C
m -le
cn
co
cc
N
LY
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
ui
cm
-7
7,
z
_7
E
t
9
u
2 ,
oc,
C
4)
Q.
5)
C
a.
W
c
CU
u
(D
v)
c
c
o
a)
a)
(x
co
C
c
x
m
Q.
(1)
L E
a
3
-2
u)
3
,
CLo)
a.
N
-
Q)
2!
3:
a)
,
C
Q)
o
a)
(1)
c
LL
ca
-6
m
m
2,
o
E
N
M
2
Lu
o
(L
c
o
u
U
o
o
m2
LU
c
-5
ca
-a
m
o
v
ow
o
m
cL
o
o
co
LL
I
m
m
(a
w
X
co
c
m
a)
c
v)
o
u
co
A
2
co
E
E
c
m
IL
co
c
m
4)
Q
L)
ca
W
a)
N
too,
C
cc
6
'c
(o
c
ca
tm�
0-
co
I
L)
.2
cL
E'c
m
ol
E
0
oq
O
O
rq
m E
. Z-'
ce)
Q o ca
m u
2z

_d
pC
E�
GD
O
O
s
G.
L
O
O
U
a,
0
L
V
bL
C
O
O
O
OC
ti
O
F
¢o
z�
Lz. �
O
a
rx
m
O
G
0
ro n.
O
N
tx �
a
Y �
y O =
W y
�z N
+
}c
N
Y
�
0
>
O a
m m
m m
N
N N
pryi m
N
N N
V
M
O N
M
p N
C N
m N
O N
M
G
pp
m
n
0
G
N N
m
N N
m
i0
Z
Z Z
Z
z
Y
a
m
_
N
O
V
M
+
M
O
o
Q
d
�
N
N
V!
N
>
M
}
O
n
N
O
O
O
C
CL
>
Rp O)
N m
M f0
(V N
m N
Z
i
C
Y
N t0
O lO
O
N N
r O
mn
O
Q
W
m
�
O
N
OoD O
N N
N M
O
Z
d
E
U)
ry
N
Q N
m N
m
N r
O N
m n
m N
O
_Q
L
Q
m
L
Z N
m O
N N
N M
o
Z
R
a
V
o
n
zZzzzzzz�
p0
Z
N
N
M
pop
O
R
T__
a
Q
L
O
OD
o
N
C N
o
T
o
M
N
o
d M
V
+
y
O
M
O
r: r
o
i
M
O
O
N
CD
C
m
>
co
oR
l°
M
a
m
G1 W
V
N
°
N
M
N N
M
O m
M
N V
n
a N�
N r
m
I
N
O
n
3 =
N ,lO
C
G
�
O a
V
+
Q r
N N
ry N
m N
0
N
>
N m
N m
m N
N
LL N
V
Y
N N
N N
N
O
CO
G
Y
0
�
R
r U
mL N
r0+
+
O U!
C
Q A
E
N
E
•L
a
(NO
O
N
o
M
m
O
o
I-:
CQ
n
O
M
O
a
Z
V%
Vci
T
Z
0
o
O
C
4
M
N N
N
r rn
n
v
N
U
N
ry
ry N
r
O
Q
Z
°
N
-
ry
�
N
L
WN
N
>
O
pp
N N
r
p
8
i T
Z
N
N
Lo
o
V
t+l
M
M
ip
M
°D
M
o
w
m
N
`
0
LO
6
f0
O
Y
N
�
m
ci
m
N
r
o
C'+
aL
<p
o
L L
L a
Or 0�
~
a
G V
'o
E 3
a c n
O'
m am y
p a
L
2 d
c
m
0
R
a y
C N
a O
cl
U=
Y
m
N
7
N
o
n i
vy d
c w
Y
m
O
O 0
m
M
q
LL Y
C
C
a
111
y
Z
_
�p
0
a
m
-
m a
in Q
z
Y
u
r
Y
m
c
K
m
E
WN
a
m
u
Q
x
0
a
U
d
rn
9
2q
V
m
c
m
m
m
r
2
d
¢o
z�
Lz. �
O
a
rx
m
O
G
0
ro n.
O
N
tx �
a
Y �
y O =
W y
�z N
}c
G
N
0
ci
V
M
0
M
O
o
V
N
M
}
O
n
N
O
O
n
-n
m
N
t-
<
In
O
a
O
C
Q
Q:
i.•
O
M
fD
M
�7
Qj
O
r
EC
t�
N
O
f-
N
O
m
L
d
N
N
}
O
o
N
o
O
r
M
o
n
p0
N
N
N
M
pop
O
°
a
Q
L
O
OD
N
o
N
o
T
o
M
N
o
V
O
M
O
o
M
O
co
oR
l°
M
a
_I
G1 W
m
°
M
Z
E o
+
0
r0+
N
E
•L
a
(NO
O
N
o
M
m
O
o
I-:
CQ
n
O
M
O
a
Z
V%
Vci
T
0
o
O
>2
o
-
M
n
v
N
w�
a
,
r
O
°
N
-
O
�
N
Z
O N
co
N
N
i T
N
N
Lo
o
M
ip
M
°D
M
o
w
m
<
Z
`
0
LO
6
O
N
0 i
ci
N
r
o
C'+
O
<p
o
Op
M
o
a
G V
10
M
O
N
Z
,w
m N
m
N
7
N
o
N
M
a
O 0
m
M
N
n
M
Z
_
�p
0
0
0
£
d y
z
r
t
r
of
of
K
m
E
0
�i
0
a
a
d
rn
in
V
m
c
m
m
c
r
2
d
N
-0
O
CO
O-
m>
C
m
Q
-
O
LL
Y
C
U
N
-
W
_
m
ai
y
d
m
m
O
C
2
m
C
y
d
U
m
m
W
o
V
2
m
m
C
=O
C
m
N
C
m
m
O
a
aa)
'�c
U)
_
m
0f
N
O
U
T_
mWm
a
s
^�
W
�
X
m
¢o
z�
Lz. �
O
a
rx
m
O
G
0
ro n.
O
N
tx �
a
Y �
y O =
W y
�z N

CQ
O
O
CQ
CQ
O
iYi
O
O
O
ctl
22
2
E-
N 0
•
gg
- —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
-
—
- —
— —
— —
— —
— —
.2:3 E
q E
la
o o
co
no
-6 0
LeL,
61
IL
c
0
Ei
v o. I -
iYi
O
O
O
ctl

Q 0
z°
u,
v
x
a.
�i
m
O
C
V
N
C
O
O 7
� N
CJ
N
E
Na
7
O m
U
W
�z �
C
N
N
�
f
�
c
c
o
0
0
0
o N
M N
r
o r
��
NO
N N
m•
\° m0
2
r O
r mQO
M-
N O
N
{tpp
N O
r P
1C
�
o
}
•-
N
O
O M
N m
fND M<
N
m
O
R (O
O
M
N
FM
W m
C
•
U `*
o
o m
o
a
N
m
m
o
GI
N
y!
N
N
n Cl
O
W m
m m
W�
N
L
X
c
^n
ui
I r
y
_
X
N
g
g
- a
°
-
E
c
n E
s n
N
o�m
o
m
k
0
c m C
c
p
T
L$««
C C
a a
o
e
0
o
3 3
0 0
0 o
A R
0«
k a
c c
d
c a
o 0
c o
o a
u
o`
�'
a d
o
w
c
o (7
c
T
le
am $ U a
d
C
o �1xx
2
m P o
0 e
E o
C C
J N
�
J �1x
2
—°o
N
pO
N U
Y 3
W
>
i
N U
m a°
N
W=
p [J
m v
a
s m
d d
a0
a
c o
c
o
o N$ m v o
m N
t ?
d
m m
d
d
U
6
L
5 0
m
Q 0
z°
u,
v
x
a.
�i
m
O
C
V
N
C
O
O 7
� N
CJ
N
E
Na
7
O m
U
W
�z �

Appendix E. Stream Assessment Data
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report -FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 43 March 2011

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Mary's Creek (EE P #241
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
Late 2005/Early 2006
Late 2005/Early 2006
Visual during
construction
N/A
September 18, 2008
September 7, 2008
Wrack lines
N/A
July 24, 2009
Unsure June 6, 2009
Crest Gauge
N/A
June 15, 2010
May 17, 2010 (3.3" rain
event )
Wrack lines /Crest Gauge
N/A
Mary's Creek Stream Restoration Year 4 Monitoring Report -FINAL
NCEEP Project number 241 Year 4 of 5
The Catena Group 44 March 2011