20110587 Ver 1_Application_20110622

d
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Ms. Liz Hair
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
June 17, 2011
JUN 2 2 ?011
4E7ZAND DSTrERQNA(RY
?NMWq?RN
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
110587
SUBJECT: Bridge #14 Replacement and Adjacent driveway pipe replacement on SR 1486
(Lee Cline Road), Catawba County
Dear Ms. Hair:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace an existing
bridge and pipe on SR 1486 (Lee Cline Road) in Catawba County. NCDOT proposes to replace
the deteriorating single span bridge with a 50' long 128" x 83" CMPA, with a concrete/rock
abutment which extends to an adjacent side channel and perched driveway pipe. Five feet of
riprap will be used at the inlet and outlet of the proposed pipe. Due to the proximity of the side
stream and the alignment of the new culvert, the side channel and the main channel must be
relocated. The adjacent banks along the streams and at the confluence of the relocated channels
will be excavated to provide a floodplain bench. Coir fiber matting will be utilized on the
benches. Streambed material will be salvaged from the channel to be filled to use in the newly
excavated channel. On the side channel, a 30-ft long, 36" driveway pipe will be replaced with a
30' long 36" pipe on new location approximately 15 feet from the existing driveway pipe. The
relocation of the side channel will result in an increase of stream length of - 19 feet. The
existing pipe is perched; therefore, to maintain a stable slope on the reconstructed channel above
the new driveway pipe, the outlet of the new driveway pipe will remain perched and a 5-ft rock
ladder will be constructed. Five feet of riprap will be used at the inlet of the new driveway pipe
also. The main channel alignment will be shifted to better align the stream to the inlet of the new
pipe and also to lessen the meander bend which is currently eroding the adjacent roadway. The
main channel relocation will result in approximately 15 feet of stream loss. Five feet of Class 11
rip rap will be placed at the inlet and outlet of the 128" x 83" pipe for structure stabilization. A
temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction
site as needed. All areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be graded and restored
back to pre-project conditions.
There will be 60 feet of permanent fill from culvert and riprap impacts on Bakers Creek. The
relocation of Bakers Creek will result in 75 feet of stream loss; however, 60 feet of channel will
be reconstructed utilizing natural channel design principles. There will be a permanent loss of 15
feet of stream length due to the relocation of Bakers Creek. There will be 20 feet of permanent
fill from increase in culvert length and riprap impacts of the driveway pipe on the unnamed
tributary to Bakers Creek. The relocation of the unnamed tributary to Bakers Creek will result in
a loss of 44 feet of stream; however approximately 63 feet of stream channel will be
reconstructed to reconnect the tributary to the main channel. There will be a gain of-19 feet of
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047
Bridge # 14/Pipe Replacement, SR 1486, Lee Cline Road
Page 2
May 17, 201 1
stream length on the unnamed tributary to Bakers Creek. The scope of the work will permanently
impact 95 feet of impacts (60 ft culvert/riprap impacts and 15 feet of relocation impacts on
Bakers Creek + 20 feet of fill due to pipe length increase and riprap impacts on unnamed
tributary to Bakers Creek). The streams are classified as Class C Waters by the Division of
Water Quality.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located,in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Iredell County (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include the
Dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nanii fora). The Natural Heritage Program records
document the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location approximately 5 miles west of the
proposed project in Catawba County. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes
(usually north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near
springheads. There is no potential habitat within the proposed project area, and no species were
observed. The project area is not located within '/z mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR
1486 a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the
hazardous spill basin checklist.
have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW4 14, sketches of planned activities and
location maps relative to the project. Please note that any mitigation necessary will be provided
in accordance with the procedures detailed in the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers letter dated
September 1, 2004, from Mr. Ken Jolly to Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150463-55120005-12B.201811-3372
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Polly Lespinasse, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality, Transporation Permitting Unit
eg?
2 bUKwai
> q
olii? c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWO project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes N No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1486 (Lee Cline Road)
2b. County: Catawba
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Newton
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 12b.201821
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f '
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
41b. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude: -
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Bakers Creek and Ut to Bakers Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A deteriorating single span bridge with vertical abutments which extend to a perched pipe of an adjacent tributary.
Landuse is mostly pasture land and forested. Bridge is on paved secondary road.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
200 feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace the deteriorating bridge for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace the deteriorating single span bridge with a 50' long 128" x 83" CMPA, with a concrete/rock
abutment which extends to an adjacent side channel and perched driveway pipe. Due to the proximity of the side stream
and the alignment of the new culvert, the side channel and the main channel must be relocated. The stream relocations
will be done following natural channel design principles. The adjacent banks along the streams and at the confluence of
the relocated channels will be excavated to provide a floodplain bench. On the side channel, a 30-ft long, 36" driveway
pipe will be replaced with a 30' long 36" pipe on new location approximately 15 feet from the existing driveway pipe. The
relocation of the side channel will result in an increase of stream length of - 10 feet. The existing pipe is perched;
therefore, to maintain a stable slope on the reconstructed channel above the new driveway pipe, the outlet of the new
driveway pipe will remain perched and a 5-ft rock ladder will be constructed. Five feet of riprap will be used at the inlet of
the new driveway pipe also. The main channel alignment will be shifted to better align the stream to the inlet of the new
pipe and also to lessen the meander bend which is currently eroding the adjacent roadway. The main channel relocation
will result in approximately 15 feet of stream loss. Five feet of Class II rip rap will be placed at the inlet and outlet of the
128" x 83" pipe for structure stabilization. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream
around the construction site as needed. Area affected by temporary cofferdam system will be graded and restored back
to pre-project conditions. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.)
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEC.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type

Preliminary E] Final
El
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? open waters ? Pond Construction
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
.W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 MP(-]T Fill - Culvert/riprap
for structure
Bakers Creek ® PER ® Corps
60
stabilization ? INT ® DWQ
Channel
75
relocation
S2 ®P ? T 60 feet of channel Bakers Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ
reconstructed:
Stream loss from
relocation 15
S3 ? P ®T Cofferdam bypass Bakers Creek ® PER ® Corps 150
pumping ? INT ® DWQ
Fill- Pipe length

S4 ®P ? T increase/rirap for
rock ladder and Ut to Bakers ? PER ®Corps
20
structure Creek ® INT ® DWQ
stabilization
Channel
relocation 44
S5 ®P ? T Ut to Bakers ? PER ® Corps
63 feet of channel Creek ® INT ® DWQ
reconstructed
S6 ? P ®T Cofferdam bypass Ut to Bakers ? PER ® Corps
pumping Creek ® INT ® DWQ 150
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts * 95
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3i. Comments: *Permanent Fill and Stream Loss Impacts
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No if yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
51k. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason 7Buffe Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name (square feet
)
(square feet)
Tem ora T im act
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ? PEI T ? Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minor channel relocations will be done following natural channel design principles. Due to the slope of the side channel, the
new driveway pipe will remain perched to maintain a stable channel and a rock ladder will be constructed at the outlet to
dissipate energy and to provided limited aquatic life passage.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this
® Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 95 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ® warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identity the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2D08 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answe red "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
? Yes N No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes
N No
impacts?

5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ?
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes N No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes Z No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation office resources and the National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area
(NCDOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number:3710374400J

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F.i ... ,j
N TIP

w Feet
E
?. -J
161
0 950 1,900 3800 ;\;

c a ,n I
fyF

4 1
\ 1

: 1 11
Y (
IN -A,

i lo.

/
? l
? I
I t
I I` `
l ?r J
_
?
I
? C
t ?I 111
?
,
,'.'
/. J
I I
Ir
^ o.
_
012. J /
, __
..tc•
'
`
?
1
i ._
•, L /
// '
?. _ Bridge replacement ,-..

?
?
?• -
?/ it
?1 ?' yr ??
-.., -_, / I ( )
. `

•
c-i- ?? Z
? ' ?' q
I
_ I

f '
' i
fr
I i
,
I
I
r
1
..AP )I
I,l
f
t 1 ,

'
I

,r i'Cr
?

L? Vicinity Map
STATE OF Norm CAROLINA Figure Z
UFYARTMENf OF TRANSPORTATION SR-1486 Lee Cline Road (Catawba County
i
Q d .. u
yvv 30
? u
d o c 3 v o
oE? ?.Na
a u c
} o
}c .a ?o
Vi cam? `o '2a
u u
Tu
? ?v .°. stn
Z .. N~
c
a ?-
d o
0
n?
d u
a'o'
a
"a
d a
c n
w'o
u
in
C
°dE
u a c
a0
w y m
C O? o
o u
- d N o
= o n° d
outs
cw d"
? r o
P "
a O1? v? ?
d o y u h o
o u a' 0 3
G u
c
•-uc d
f U C y
?NO4
w U ? r- " d c
`?dU OPO d
F
O u y d r p O
L d d c r
? ` n o ° u 3
^'a u
m c,t
N V ? d
r ? d .-
d`? CS
i _
? a V
nfZ
n
o c u
r c
v
a Edda E
a.n
u _ _ v
Eu« 6; u
o c._ 0 0
°y0
> a ] N O G
E d o o° u ?
u 5
n r.`? 6F
m
? E
m O N Q Q N

O
V
Q W
'? L
i
C
V p - t
3 v1 d
c
v
? } yS C
f ? O
c 3E
o IoM
u +-
°c?
3LL
-
'
rn
? t¢ cooU
O1 01 .4
} ` >
(\J CO co "

P?
0
0
° 65 0
5A5 y '.
_N

? P
?
ab
V-
g0
5
N
e
?' ,? o
o Ea
C
P
c O P
a O O
- ? r. ,
V in L V

9
b w E c
d $
m v+
r } d
V)
2
5 m d U O o P P .

_ } d
? mCU, ° VI
O
'Ab :w 1 ?vf ago a
" C d09 O
Q oM d L
T }
? o
° O_
X n v
w m
g ay 412

-
^ g 5
P
W P 1
W
G
a

? Y
? L
426
F
nn 5 S
? y9 .4. _
m?
9
m
16
.NO .4`25
na
°
K
LLl ?,
mmmmma ?1
mmmamm
d E
X.S d
OL L? L
0_d VI}
Q Nt 6
CV}?
O
N U E O 0
o
h of w vV
° EV) cm
V a c._
?oLV)
va?E
Nit O
W } L
d? 0
d'?D O N

P P Pr' r7 r7-1
W
W O
C ?
X ? C
L ? L
d?? E
V }L O_d
} C
O E E o c
d d O
L d o
d- tw
0w co } O
a-0?

bf6 Lri ef6 n ~
?
- 1 r-- T-T, w m O O
o N
PPPPPm PPP PO?P Q U } ?-? CL
^' U C3 V) c
Z C } o v
awl 4? DW m rv :o vI ++ y S ca
d O
•FF6 c; lu!Od I zy r f6 = d J

vi
o 3 O m

B2
6
o
I
P)p
1oW !?
O
O 01 C
m
.v ? y ? ? C y 3 tl
n n WOE }
y ??
rn " coQ

f6
..
a
f6
..
} ( w .z
> Q
'62 ry v « ,
N m ? N
6 y d mU

26
.6
N
n
d?
'
Y
^? a n
u n .S ma o 6 ° .. 'Y
'22 c
m v 2
6 u?S ^ u
E a
6 a l ;,4

O2 V m
o
°`
2f6 ?! ?
N ? - ?
Y
N
2f `O
P
m P.OFm

rn
m
6 a m
Y ? x Pp?
N 6 O m m
o m
n m N m
W
S26 mNN _
m
O[T
-
626 .?
P
'62
O

F2 x P 6 O
6 6
W
N
O
'S26 ? S' rv 0
P '92 m N ,9
r9I 4?tWl m Sf n
rn ? 6? "+!l 4?iW1 n N
S26 ? S26 6j w

o w
? V
0
d
0

FTT n
rT'?
E

-r-

r
E v
V?26 .--0 PPP P ma LU l?ia-- -S21' ---0 u
w ?

} c t
N U
V) 'e
C d
?.
926 N N S2 v o o a
... ')C
W 6
N
o p p
t

v o

F26
?
N

F26
P
rv Y ..
0 V.
o°
` O
.S2 .s. O n
6 C5
m o
s
u ° ? l5

b.
26
~ v
0: o
o
U 3
b'
2 G

C
T

P d 6 0.
Y N %
E
E O
N t V
QN
?' w
d Q .
..
3
l26 1[) . f26
N h
? v r o<
?
q ry N
C P dJN

POL
L 1[l r
'!J6 N W .1?6 ?
•f26 ? .F2
6 !?
n v
n

f26 N
<
F2

m 6 V
m
r?-rTT]
PPPP PP rrT

iv m PP
P TTI

q qP

ON ?E?
p U r °L#
°
C
v O ?+
3 N d v
ZC
tom U s
N
m y
O u 3 J
am
o =
° 3 LL
> w y
o E
ix o a
p m m U

NOO L ?Q ?
^ a X -°
^ y x n
v n > Owi
N Y
au
Y??«m
cuuc
vEx.t-?
V ° L
C 7 U-
V Q L n N 6
ae:L?Y
u ? E E
°
o e u ° Y
3
v_iS
w
u
J
LL
u

L /
w i'n

dg
' L
u
` s
Y W O `m
E
% O
°- yy
L< H 3LL
n3
n
° 30
o a u Y
d D o
n
a Y ?
s LL sa

3 u < ?

6J U n L °
L >
u y

m °
?
r
\
\
3
\ w
\ \ S
\
a ?l \
E -
u mo
n ? r?
Y

x'u
w ac
I
I
I
1
. a
P d
ryLa
3
Y
0 C
dJ M
a ?[f r
O
Y
Q
L
J
W
F- d
C
U
0 F
w
?m
Y
o`
-

a^?

^ E
` d
E
` N H Y
u u u o
D « p

U ? ? d Y

/ I
a
/ - t
y

Y
a°
m`>
c E
u
w
5R 1Aa6
} T
m'a
ca
`a
w?
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 19 County: Catawba Project ID: 12b.201811
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: 14
Route: SR 1486 Stream: Bakers Creek
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS rr r
ORW r rr
WS1 r rr
WS 11,111 OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Arterial Urban
Arterial Rural
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
r r
r r?
Yes No
r rv
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).