20020269 Ver 1_Complete File_20020222

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 24, 2007
DWQ # 02-0269
Nash County
CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
R.E Greene, Jr., P.E
NCDOT, Division 4
PO Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895
Dear Mr. Greene:
On February 4, 2002, you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) for your project on I-95 located in Nash County. We
wrote you on March 25, 2002 discussing concerns that we have regarding the design of
the project and placing it on hold until those concerns are addressed. Therefore we aze
returning your application. Once you have collected sufficient information to have a
complete application (please see our hold letter for the missing information), you will
need to reapply for the DWQ approval. Your file is hereby retired and will not be
reviewed until our eazlier concerns aze addressed.
Please contact me at 919-733-5694 if you have any questions or would like to
discuss this matter.
2~"' ` „`
John Hennessy
and Permitting Unit
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of EngineersRaleigh Field Office
Central Files
File Copy
Tmnspodafion Pennirong Unil
i660 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, Nodh Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Intemei: htto~!/h2o enr state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal OppoAunitylAffrmative Action Employer-50°~ Recyded/70°~ Post Consumer Paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources a
Division of Water Quality -.
Michael F. Easley, Governor ~~~~~~
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 25, 2002
Mr. Jim Trogdon, P.E.. Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 4
PO Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27893
Re: Permit Application for proposed streambank stabilization at Bridge Number 223 on I-95 over the
Swift Creek in Nash Countv
DWQ No. 020269
Dear Mr. Trogdon:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal fora 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar-
Pamlico Buffer Certification for the aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking
necessary information required for makine an informed permit decision.'The permit application \vas~
deficient in the following areas:
The application has no site plan that displays the proposed fill'superirtiposed_onto;,th'etNatural'resources
being impacted. Please provide an accurate (to scale with North Arrow)'~site plan that shows all protected
wetlands, waters, and buffers, and the proposed impacts to those resources.
No impacts to Zone 2 protected buffers are presented in [he application. Any activity that places rip
rap along the stream channel will undoubtedly impact Zone 1 and Zone 2. The Zone impacts are
presented in the application. However, accessine Zone I to place the rip rap will require access
through Zone 2 of the protected buffers. Please provide appropriate mapping and quantities of
anticipated impacts. . , y. _ ...
Therefore, pursuant to I SA NCAC ZH .0~07(a)(5) and liA NCAC 2B .0259(8)(b), we will have to place
[he permit application on hold until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the
information is received by the NC Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US
Army Corps of Engineers place the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you hare am
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 9I9-7335694.
R. Dorney
r Quality Ce ifi anon Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Central Files
C:\n cdot\I-954omes ponde n ce\0202G9h Id.doc
Wetlands/d01 Uni[ 1621 ~bI ail Service Center Raleigh. Nonh Carolina?7699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone] ,
An Equal Opponuniry Affirmative Action Employer i0'h recycled/10% post consumer paper

.~o,,~
~'
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
~'~
FEB 2 2 ~nn9
_..~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICIIAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 4, 2002
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609 ®~ 0 2 6 ~)
Attention: Ms. Jean B. Manuele
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Proposed Stream Bank Stabilization at Bridge #223, on I-9S over the Swift
Creek, in Nash County.
State Project No. 5.3232 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $200)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to stabilize
existing eroded str@am banks along the Swift Creek, near the existing Bridge # 223, on I-
09S NBL. The purpose of this letter is to provide notification to the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) under Nationwide Permit (NWP) #13, Bank Stabilization, and under
NWP #3, Maintenance Activities. This letter shall also provide courtesy notification to
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) according to concurrence requirements for Water
Quality Certification # 3258.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The proposed stabilization project will require minimal impacts to waters of the United
States in the Tar River Basin. The minimum necessary amount of riprap will be placed
adjacent to the existing bridge bents in order to protect them from erosive scour during
high water events. Currently a low and eroded scour hole, with an approximate elevation
above the ordinary high water mark, surrounds the bridge bents. Eroding riverbanks with
which currently have 1: I slopes will be reshaped and stabilized with coir fabrics, stakes
and riprap. The total length of the project will be less than 500 feet and will require less
than one cubic yard per linear foot placed along the bank below the plane of the ordinary
high water mark, on average.
Division 4, PO Box 3165, Wilson, NC 27895-3165 p~YM~N~
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] RECI`1~~E~

Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be
protected from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or
storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near wetlands or surface waters.
Minimization: Sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices for
the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to waters of the U. S. at
these sites.
Compensatory Miti atg ion: Construction of the project will result in only minimal
impacts to waters of the U. S. Impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent
possible during this stabilization project.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The proposed streambank stabilization project involves work within Zone 1 of a
river that is subject to the Tar/Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rule. According to the Table of
Uses (15A NCCAC 02B.0233 (6)) in the rule, streambank stabilization is allowable with
notification.
Dewatering
The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the work zone in the immediate
vicinity of the. proposed project. This will involve the temporary placement of sheet
metal cofferdams, or silt curtains azound the base of the slopes being stabilized, in order
to minimize temporary increases in turbidity due to construction.
Permit Issues
The purpose of this letter is to provide notification under Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 3, Maintenance Activities, for the placement of additional riprap in waters
of the U.S. Notification to the COE for the use of NWP 13, streambank Stabilization, is
provided as a courtesy for this project, as the bank stabilization activity does not exceed
500 linear feet. Also, courtesy notification to the North Carolina division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) for Section 401 Water Quality Certificate (WQC) No. 3258 is
provided for this project. NCDOT will comply with all conditions associated with the
applicable NWP and WQC.
Additionally, the purpose of this'letter is to request authorization under a Section
404 NWP 33 to temporarily dewater the immediate work zone during the stabilization
project. The 401 WQC No. 3114 (which corresponds to NWP 33) does not require
written concurrence from the NCDWQ as NCDOT intends to comply with conditions for
the WQC.

Mussels
Tim Savidge of NCDOT Project Development and Environmental Assessment Branch
conducted visual and tactile search for freshwater mussels on November 6, 2000. No live
mussels were found in the immediate vicinity of the bridge and project work area, or
within 500 feet downstream of the proposed project area. Based on this survey, and the
-ack of suitable habitat in the project area, NCDOT believes that the proposed action is
not likely to affect any federally endangered species.
Temporary impacts to the stream channel will be the minimum necessary to effect the
repairs, and all appropriate sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized.
Temporary impacts to the riparian buffer will not exceed 1500 square feet and any
vegetation removed will be restored within six months.

a
Summary
NCDOT proposes to stabilize less than 500 feet of eroded riverbank and repair
erosive scour damage in the vicinity of Bridge #223 on the Swift Creek in Nash County:
The project is located in the Tar/Pamlico River Basin. Impacts associated with stream
bank stabilization are allowable with notification under the Tar/Pamlico Riparian Buffer
Rule. The NCDOT asks that the dewatering of the work zone be authorized under a
Section 404 NWP 33. The NCDOT will adhere to all applicable Section 404 NWP's and
Section 401 WQC's conditions. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Mr. Jimmy W. Marler at [phone].
Trogdon, III, P.E.
Engineer
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wil'min ' on
Mr. John Domey, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Creedmo
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh ,
Mr. Bryant Bunn, P.E., NCDOT Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr. Don Goins, P.E. Chief Engineer, Operations

Office Use Only: Form V~ion October toot
®2~26~
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
^ Section 10 Permit
^ 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3. 13. 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII -Mitigation), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. James H. Tro don III P.E. Division En ineer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation/Div 4
Wilson NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (2521234-6174
E-mail Address: itroedon(c~dot.state nc us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:_ Mr Jimmy W Marler
Company Affiliation: Division Bridge Maintenance En>;ineer
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 3165
Wilson NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: (2 5 212 3 7-6 1 64' Fax Number: (2521234-6174
E-mail Address:_ imarler ,dot state nc us
Page 6 of lit

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,'
so long as the property is cleazly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge No. 223, I-095 North Bound
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):_
4. Location
County: Nash .Nearest Town: Goldrock
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to s4te (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): I-095 SBL 0.4 Miles North
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): LAT 36042 LONG 077489
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Rural_
Aericulture/CTrban
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream river/sound/ocean/lake): Swift Creek
9. River Basin: Tar -Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Gazolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at'...,.. ° ' >•~~~ ~~ ~~~ _ - ~~- •~~~~~^~ +>~~ )
Page 7 of 1 ~

10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: ' Streambank stabilization. less than 500 feet.
and less than 1 cubic yard of Riprap per running foot. on average and scour protection and
repair .requiring minimal amount necessary of riprap on slopes.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Heavy Construction
(track hoe excavator. dump truck)
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential/Commercial mix.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all Streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 8 of 1~1

mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
lineaz feet
Type of Wetland***

• List each impact sepazately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are no[ limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditchutg/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due [o both structure and flooding.
•• 100-Year Ooodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or PEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps arc available through the PEMA Map Service Center at 1-80038-9616, or
online at .;Gn:,Y~,~ ~.; ;;.1'.:;aa.c:'.
••• List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwattx marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Ntunber
indicate on ttta
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Ira ct Perennial or
Intemtittent?
leases c'
Rlprap <500 Swift Creek 80 Perennial

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and Flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
"" Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed [ributarv) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
.~ -,~..- Several intemet sites also allow direct download and panting oC USGS maps (e.g., .in~c.com,
.~.....;r,a;:y;:esto; ;.,, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: <500 linear feet
Page 9 of 1~1

Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on tna)
Type of Hnpact* Area of
Impact
(acres Name of Waterbod
(~ applicable) y Type of Watetbody
pake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba ,ocean, etc.
Riprap 0.05 Swift Creek Creek

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
Hooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints suph as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the proiect will be protected_from unnecessary
Encroachment No staging of construction equipment will be allowed in or near wetlands or _
waters of the U.S Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Mana eg ment
Practices for~the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
Page 10 of 1~

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with ISA NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modificatioh of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on Mazch 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment aze minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Cazolina, available at
C~^~';n_ onr ctero.___.__'~r-~. T."_.___n-n_`iria iiimi
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/lineaz feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review; process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at ~ ~ ',~,: ~ ~~~~~- ~~~ ~~ ~. ~~,,,,. If
Page I1 of 1-t

use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
__._ Amount_of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ^
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call. the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^ ,
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), ISA NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Suppl Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ?~ No ^ If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 12 of 1~

Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the ripazian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* uare feet) Multiplier Mitiottion
I 2000 3 0
2 0 1.5 0
Total 0 0
Lone 1 extends out 30 fcet perpendicular from near bank of cha~mel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Ripazian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Temporary dewatering and all appropriate best mana eg ment practices for sediment and erosion
control will be implemented durinp_ streambank stabilization and scour protection
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (] SA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No ® ,
Page 13 of 1 ~

XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose- limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Signature Date
is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Page 13 of 1 a

:`~`',
vicL~ iT~ ~ti ~P .
COLtiTY BRIDGE ~O. 3 S L _ ~ ~,~m ~J~ v~ ~s"Z/D6/ .=r
SCP.LE 1= ~ i,,.. r' (Diame) at~
S

_ ,~ . I
-' ~~ w ~7 ~ ~~ J _ ~ l ~~~ f~
t ~T ~~,` R~ ~ ,~ ~ /`~C ~ / ~ s
/^\ ` ~ ~..
1 ;LYE G^~ ti:: _ _
< y /
Jot ~ ~,~~9 t. `\ Gre ~. -- /s~/
u -l~
~ ~ .;i ~ f~A ~ Fa
t ~ ~ Ra'~~ ? ''.: Q ~ GoA ~
CC \ V.hi / J~' e1 4 "" )" ' 1 `/ ,',. ,, 303 -A
Cr ~.. y_-~ .,. io5 Ra `t A :,/~ C~2 ifu ~~.
3„• ' .-
C- t 7 ~ - r i e~
-' ~ / !f lVt, J l k r Y~~ Xk_A Cc ~ LLIf ` j Z trA 'A -r
~ 7,ir. ~ ~• _ NoE tr o •Ym - ( 0--. 2~ ..` -. i3 r~r y L
yi JB a f iJy, ~ {Y Np6 ' ~ ^ hCA c ,
-" a.S~ rrJ~j r ; ~ Ak \ v off` CieP,r ~~ r/e ~.:
y ~ y '~ ~ ': Na6~: r:ae _: N"5 ~4 r:~i. ` 4 ~ '.
t+ ~ i' C r 1 e _
'~h t J ,~.. ~. Ra N,.6 trams ~ P.p6;: NcA ~~ n Np6
L a•~
' ~~~ ~ f1 t'ro,. R ~ 1cA .' i. why' 3.•.:
f UA .- Ps'PY.`{L'', .,. NP9 / 35 GoA F~ p© 1 ~4©~ly NpA /7{f
\ yyE` JL oA P x-~ ~ ~ r fta t -
. "" y ~ t. ~r..~F „ f C .~ r r'-GoA `. /L~ !~` Ct ,.. ..C~
R fft~Sa3 ~ ~~ - hoB ~ ~ yJU1er Y ~~/i « ..~ 5
,~~ r VcA ~ Nod I oA ~ f.oA
NeA caC /
~ N
.4 1 ~'- ~ ^~ t CCA ' " r 1~` GoA. ~~ ~~ ~`\
) -r '' Ra a4 GcA Ra JoA r oA' Ra .l
y ~ G C ;_ 4 GaA
':i
,~Fa Fa ~' GoA 2' a ~,. n GoA tl '`~ ~,: ;!i
.~ L _' Y ~ P Pa ~
A \ 'y\lJ ~J ~-/
A Ir.. ~/~, gbr. /rcF. ~ Cr9 M
~ .E q
~J \ ~~i ~ .: ya Cow ~ ~ G..: -~
~ ,
/ f1 Pa \ ~ ~~'- /
«ct~i-n~ «P t ,
COL1~• ....[~~'~S_I_`-__. 3R.;'JGE:~O _~ ~ SL3~- ;y ~ =;W4T~~~ - ~s

H/ i ~ ~ I v Po ell Cem ; L~v /00 ; - i 1
d ~ I a'' it ~ ~ V ~ J
1
I
2 > > /
6 ~A ~~ / A
,v/i ,/ I ~r- `
r.. ~-~. - n .I o.
- --- :.
II ° a
o n
~' ~_ i] .;
r '= y. on \
J~\ c e n'-. b~ n ~pP-~:
S y /
S~• / J3 S •\ p 3 i o• J 0\\.
~;i r.
//~~~~~ o I `~ \ ~ ~ .. %30. ~~"~ ~ .. ~~
/ __/• J Sao I /~J9 II ~, ~ OV
_~_I', i~i ~, -` ~.,..ho' /, ~ ',., ~ ~~ i ,-_. ~ °, a~ yH moo. ~\.`,.
\ / o
II
~ 11/ A t AV VA ~~ //
31105. 1/ \ \ \\ Q //
° n -~ __..
'~\\\~ I ' Cem ' -' ~. -~ I\a ~~.•- ~.
;,
_ ICI ~. ~hF l;~_ ~•I• \ -L~-a- _ ~ ~~,_.4
`- / _~~ ~I2p / 1 / _
~~C+„ ; S21il6e ';\ v .Gold Rock . '~ -
\ ^~ / _1
~~ \\~
,J ./ _ -_ _ _~ _
~ ~ / / ~~ ~ _~_ i jlli ~~ ~ -- ~-..-
! ~ ~ ° u ~
~. n° ~ !, .,It ~,: /`_~ .~. 1/p Bra Cem.e / 'Jii--• / ~ :~ it ~ 1 o G_ -+
.•e % _` U ~ Y_- ill .~ ,n 1 ~IHdr er A
.• ~ _ / ) ii- ! _ • ~l 11 , ° _ : / \ jlCem n
l ~ ~' ~ 1 ;i \ / 1 125 ~ oM II
w %la/
3 /~ II ~ ''
I I
"L1SG5 TOPOQUAD bIAP" `
SCALE 1= zoco' ;,
~ ~ 24; eCC ~ L ~ r/, 7~Gu

~az3 s.Q.
~ e~vi~ O~ ~ 96