20010681 Ver 1_Complete File_20050721

Re: Construction issue at Site II on R-2907, Wake County '~ i - 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ T I
Subject: Re: Construction issue at Site II on R-2907, Wake County ~~~' ~
From: Christina Breen <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:25:54 -0400
To: Chris Murray <[e-mail]>
CC: "Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW" <[e-mail]>, "Robert L. Billingsley"
<[e-mail]>, William E Craver <[e-mail]>, Steve Mallory
<[e-mail]>, Donald Pearson <[e-mail]>
I am fine with these changes provided that no new additional impact occurs, that downstream water quality is
not impaired by the activities. Please be sure to show these changes on the final "as builts" and supply DWQ
with 2 copies for our files. Also, keep this email as proof of our discussion and DWQ's concurrence with your
assessment.
Chris Murray wrote:
Eric and Christina,
The Department is currently constructing the widening of NC 55 from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
NC 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County (R-2907). We are encountering streambank stabilization
issues at the inlet of the box culvert at Site II. This issue is addressed below:
Permit Site No. II (Permit Drawing No. 6 of 14 dated 3/19/02)
Construction Issue: The streambank at the inlet of the culver~js unstable.
Resolution: The Department proposes to line the east streambank and west streambank at the inlet with
Class I rip rap (see attached permit drawing). Additionally, the Department proposes to line the lateral
Swale with PSRM in an effort to provide additional stabilization in this area.
Permit Issues: A review of the permit application, USACE permit and the NCDENR-DWQ permit
indicates that the entire stream at this site was permitted as an impact from the outer-most limits of the
lateral swale at the inlet side of the structure to the outer-most limits of rip rap at the outlet of the
structure. The NCDOT paid mitigation for the entire streambank impact at this site. The addition of the
rip rap along the streambank does not result in additional impacts to the stream. Additionally, no new
additional impacts will occur to the riparian buffer.
In summary, the Department proposes to stabilize the streambank at the inlet of the structure. All work
will be done within the previously permitted footprint of the project. No new additional stream, wetland
or buffer impact will occur as a result of this activity. It appears that this minor construction adjustment
should be conducted without requiring a permit modification.
Please advise if you agree with my assessment of the issue addressed in this email. Thanks for your
assistance in advance.
Chris Murray
Division 5 Environmental Supervisor
Ll,.,,t ,.' >4-~~..., ~ ~p,.r
1 of 2 7/21/2005 1:26 PM

Re: Construction issue at Site II on R-2907, Wake County
F ~ ,~ ~ ;Y
..v , .~ ~ .x ~~~°z
_.. _ -. ____,.__. o
~n ,l ,• ~ ~
~ .
~~
~ ( PROt'pSCO ttM,YT:l1T h: ,. ~
' t 1#' 5" ~ A}"`fl did l R 7.Om x ~ twe pz9C ~
~L STA. ru~9t 6)
Q IMC/IM.4 4[OlN Nf~4 wrw 7tALL ~ 1"
_ .~ .. m .m - __ o- ~ ~ ~ _ r,,,~r,,;~~
a f
x#AwMt r, ralAw ) !
~ ~ ti~~1

un .__._~
f~ (~ ~
P ~~ H i ~1 V (~ Y Y ~ ( 1 ~ ~ 'N1 7
f y ~ h t 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~) Wfi• ~YI$ION 4r 1 MAAYS tIOiJ
WAf[ coLa,xY
~
l~ UfiroTCS rAl r1 iMfilup5 PROJEC/ R~~9nr
0[rtOT(S EItCAVA tUN N at IL AA#OS ~ 0 ~ ~~ NC 55 rk0u i(AlT11r A5t {lf SN M99
'
Mrro#(S rRl ~# SU~'T'AtE r~l(PS ~ _
V ~ `xil pA 50VT!#
It) MJR iNI1C5/ Ui
OF I#GL('r SPRINGS
(1(rHQt(S -[ClurrTEl1
C1 tAR+Y. nY tf ItuOS hS00

N
-----
`
- :.i~2_....___..._.........._-C.i] T-
....w..rww.+.r+.•r..w..
I
Christina Breen
Environmental Specialist II
NC Division of Water Gluality
Transportation Permitting Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
2 of 2 7/21/2005 1:26 PM

Zl
:~
~ ~ b~~T~;H ;.ENE - '
5EE SE~7. 5 OF I~
~
~ T ' '
t
~
~~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ I I ti
,
:c ~ ~ n ,
~ . s~ ~" y
~
~ , ~ I
I ~
I
•
~
c
~
~ ~ 1 ( ~ f .
~`~~~t ~
1.1 ~
'
' '
w '~
e' h .. f ~ _

~ - ~ ~
ti~ ~-~
7 ~

;y AiL ~ ~ ~~ f ~~.
~s "'lll
~
~~ I r ~ -
~
~.

I ~'
~ 1'
~ ~ \ 4
f

~ k
' ^' I
ll ~' i ~, ~'1
_ ,,_

`.
I
I

~' ~
~ --t ; I
~~ ~
_ A~
~ ~ ,
i ~ ~, ~1 ~
~~,
~~
f '
l I `~

~ ~ ~
~ \~ ~"
o
, t M I .
F~ ~~
1 ~ t ~ /
•l • ~ I
/
~

Y `\~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ (
f `~~.4 Y~ ~~ I ~
~

r ~ ~
~
~. a
/
~7 ~

. • ~~ ~
1 '~ f
7
O
n ~ ~ ~ ~
%"~ 1
~

7~ I ~
r
,' i
~ i
r'~ / .~
I
~ "~t
~1 fL~ "
~ ~

"~
,.+
'
. ~
Q'
~
wa
N
g~ ' MATCH LINE -S EE SHT. 7 0~ 14
~ - ~
~ ~ -

,.

~~~~ ~~~-
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27636-3726
January 22, 2002
Colonel James E. DeLony
District Engineer ~ ,
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6814
Attention: Eric Alsmeyer
Dear Colonel DeLony:
This is the report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on Public Notice (PN) ID
#199700175, dated December 28, 2001. The North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) has applied for a Department of the Army (DOA) permit to discharge dredged and
fill material impacting 3.02 acres of waters of the United States for the widening of a section of
NC 55, crossing Basal Creek and its unnamed tributaries and adjacent wetlands, from southeast
of SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to northwest of SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road), between
Fuqua-Varina and Holly Springs, Wake County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2907). This report
is submitted in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). It is to be used in your determination of compliance with the
Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) Guidelines (40 CFR 230) and in your public
interest review (33 CFR 320.4) as they relate to protection of fish and wildlife resources.
According to information provided in the PN, the NCDOT proposes to widen NC 55 for a
distance of 3.3 miles from Wake Chapel Road to Ralph Stevens Road. The widening will be
done asymmetrically, and no control of access is proposed along the project. The project will
involve fill in 0.38 acre of un-vegetated waters and filling, excavation, and mechanized clearing
of 2.64 acres of vegetated wetlands. The impacts to un-vegetated stream channels (774 linear
feet) and a portion of a pond, occur at three locations along the project. At stream crossings,
culverts or pipes will be used to allow for adequate hydrological flow underneath the roadway.
The impacted vegetated wetlands consist of palustrine forested, emergent, and pond fringe areas.
The NCDOT is proposing payment to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program
(NCWRP) to provide compensatory mitigation for the wetland and stream impacts resulting from
this project.

.s
w,
Based on the information contained in this PN, and discussions with DOA personnel, the Service
would not oppose issuance of a permit for this project, provided it incorporates all avoidance,
minimization, and mitigation measures that the applicant has committed to carry out.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this public notice. Please advise us of
any action taken by the Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers on this permit application. If
you have any questions regarding our recommendations, you may contact Tom McCartney at
919-856-4520 (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
~~
/~~~~~
Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: DNR, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
DWQ, Raleigh, NC (John Hennessy)
EPA, Atlanta, GA (Ted Bisterfeld)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:01/18/02:919/856-4520 extension 32:\pn199700.175

State or ivortn ~arouna
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources + •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor ~~~~~~
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
January '_'6, `_'000
~IENiORANDUI~I
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dornel~~~{
/s~
From: John Hennessy C
Subject: Comments on the FONSI for the widening of NC 55 from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road)
to SR L 114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County (TIP R-?907), Federal Aid No. STP-
»(5), State Project No. 8.1403501, TIP Project No. R-2907, DENR Project Number E-
~ 20-0296.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible
for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the U.S.,
including wetlands. It is our understanding that the preferred alternative, as presented in the FONSI, will
result in a maximum impact to 8.19 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 1453 linear feet of streams. The
DWQ offers the following comments based on review of the aforementioned document:
,~) At this time, the DWQ concurs with the Finding of No Significant [mpact. The proposed impacts
are not of a magnitude and nature to preclude the construction of the project.
B) Prior to an issuance of the 40l Water Quality Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded
t:rat they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and
streams) to the maximum extent practical. Should the impacts to jurisdictional wetlands exceed
LO acres, mitigation may be required in accordance with NCDWQ Wetland Rules { 15A NCAC
?H.0~06 (hl(~')). Based on the impacts described in the document, wetland mitigation will be
required for this project.
C) [n accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules {ISA NCAC ~H.0506(bl(6)}, mitigation will be
required for impacts of greater than IJO linear feet ro any single perennial stream. In the event that
mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be desi~~ned to replace appropriate lost functions
and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules (ISA NCAC ?H.0506 (h)(3)}, the
Wetland Restoration Pro~,ram may be available for use as stream mitigation.
D) Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However,
we realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that
culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms.
iVioreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove
preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the
maximum extent practicahle.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50°~ recycled/ 10°% post-consumer paper

01/31/00
Page '_
E) Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
F) Burrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Impacts to
wetlands in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
G) There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is
required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the
environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical,
it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be
required in conjunction with the issuance of a 40l Water Quality Certification.
H) Future documentation should include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream
impacts with corresponding mapping.
I) Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and
streams will require an Individual Permit application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding
401 Water Quality Certitlcation. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no
wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal
application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please be aware that any
approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream
impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development of an acceptable stormwater
management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any
questions ur require any additional information, please contact John Hennessy at (919) 733-694.
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, Corps of Engineers
Tom Mccartney, USFWS
David Cux, NCWRC
Steve Mitchell, NCDWQ Re~:ional Office
~iti C,~~-
C:\ncdot\T[P R-?907\comments\ R-907 FONSI comments.doc

NC 55
Widening to a Multi-lane Facility
from SR 1 108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
SR 1 1 14 (Ralph Stevens Road)
Wake County
Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), State Project 8.1403501
T.I.P. Project R-2907
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
AND
FINAL SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
Date ~,-William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
• Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
?~ o°f l9yq C
Date cholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA

NC 55
Widening to a Multi-lane Facility
from SR 1 108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
SR 11 14 (Ralph Stevens Road)
Wake County
Federal-Aid Project STP-55(5), State Project 8.1403501
T.I.P. Project R-2907
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
AND
FINAL SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
~. O ~......•~ ,a ,.
s ~e~ 9l
= SE At
• 11282
N~ •
~ ..... P O
Robert P. Hanson, P.E. ••''~.,R . ~ C;,•`~~,
/ O ~~ ~','
Project Development Unit Head
~~
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
I. TYPE OF ACTION ................................................................................................... ........................1
I1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .............................................................. ........................1
• III. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE ................................................................... ........................1
IV. SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ...................... ........................2
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................ .........................2
A. Typical Section .......................................................................................... ...........................
B Intersection lmprovements ......................................................................... .........................3
C. Landscaping ............................................................................................... .........................3
D. Structures ................................................................................................... .........................3
E. Greenways ................................................................................................. .........................3
F. Wetlands ............................................................................. ...................3
VII. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS ................................................................. ..........................4
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment .......................................... ..........................4
Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment ..........................
B ..........................4
.
Comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ..................
1 ..........................4
.
2. Comments from Department of Interior ..................................... ..........................6
3. Comments from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ........................ ..........................7
4. Comments from N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission ............. ..........................7
C. Public Hearing .......................................................................................... ..........................7
8
Comments from the Town of Fuquay-Varina .............................
l ..........................
.
Comments from the Town of Holly Springs .............................
2 .........................10
.
3. Public Hearing Comments from Citizens .................................. ......................... I 0
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .................................... .........................10
IX. FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION ................................................. ...................11
FIGURES
APPENDIX 1 Agency Correspondence
APPENDIX II Local Government Correspondence
APPENDIX III Public Hearing Notice
APPENDIX IV-A Correspondence Related to Historic Properties
APPENDIX IV-B Memorandum of Agreement Relating to Historic Properties

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
NC 55
Widening to a Multi-lane Facility
from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road)
Wake County
Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), State Project 8.1403501
' T.LP. Project R-2907
Roadway Design Unit
Sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of NC 55 within the Town of Fuquay-
Varina's municipal boundaries from SR 1108 to SR 1113/SR 1398. The sidewalks will be
jointly funded by NCDQT and the Town of Fuquay-Varina in accordance with NCDOT's
Pedestrian Policy. NCDQT will coordinate with the Town of Fuquay-Varina to ensure
proper placement of the sidewalks.
Roadside Environmental Unit
In accordance with the NCDQT landscaping policy, NCDQT will fund up to 0.50% of the
total project construction cost for landscaping. A municipal agreement for maintenance 'of
landscaping plantings will be coordinated between NCDQT and the local municipalities..
The landscaping will be coordinated between the Town of Fuquay-Varina and NCDQT.
To mitigate effects to historic resources, the following commitments have been
made:
1. Adams House and Richard Adams Farm
Roadway Design Unit, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
The State Historic Preservation office will be given the opportunity to review and
comment on landscaping, median cuts, and median tapers in the vicinity of these sites.
NCDQT will coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office.
2. Jeff Stephens Farm
Right of Way Branch, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDQT will move the historic house to another location within the historic property
suitable to the property owner.
..,
Roadside Environmental Branch, Project Development and';Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDQT will provide landscaping (off NCDQT R/W) around the new house location to !,
try to add to the historic setting.
Right of Way Branch
NCDQT will place the moved house on a suitable foundation.
Finding of No Significant Impact
September 10, 1999

i
i
I
Right of Way Branch
NCDOT will connect utilities to the relocated house.
Right of Way Branch
Ouse do not meet current code standards, NCDOT will fund the
If the utilities in the h
upgrading of these utilities.
II
Right of Way Branch
NCDOT will construct (or fund) an access driveway to the new house location.
Ri ht of Way Branch
g
NCDOT will fund suitable sanitary connections (well/septic or water/sewer connections,
as appropriate).

Finding of No Significant Impact
September 10, 1999

NC 55
Widening to a Multi-lane Facility
from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road)
Wake County
Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), State Project 8.1403501
T.I.P. Project R-2907
Prepared by the Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human environment. The FONSI is based on the Environmental Assessment, which
has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined to adequately and
accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the proposed project. The
Environmental Assessment provides sufficient evidence and analyses for determining that
an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The FHWA takes full responsibility
for the accuracy, scope, and content of the Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen NC 55 in
Wake County, North Carolina. The 5.3 km (3,3 mi.) project will widen the existing
facility to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph
Stephens Road).
A four-lane curb and gutter facility with a 16-foot raised median is proposed from
SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1113/1398 (Wade and Nash/Dickens Road).
Approximately 31 m (100 feet) of right of way is proposed for this section. A four-lane
divided roadway using a 9 m (30-foot) raised median is proposed from SR 1113/SR 1398
to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road). Approximately 46 m (150 feet) of right of way is
proposed for this section.
III. PROJECT STATUS AND SCHEDULE
This project is included in the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement Program
(T.I.P.) with right of way acquisition scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year 1999, and
construction scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year 2001.

The current estimated cost is $ 11,050,000, including a right of way cost $
1,950,000 and a construction cost of $ 9,100,000.
IV. SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The project will have a positive impact by improving the safety and handling
capacity of NC 55. The project will relieve traffic congestion on NC 55 between Fuquay-
Varina and Holly Springs. The proposed project is one of five projects upgrading the NC
55 corridor from Fuquay-Varina to the Research Triangle Park.
Approximately three businesses and two residences will be relocated. Effects to
natural resources consist of impacts to 1.9 acres of wetlands. Three farms along the
subject section have been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
They are the Adams House, the Richard Adams Farm, and the Alsey "Jeff' Stephens
Farm. The project has been determined to have a conditional no adverse effect on the
Adams House and the Richard Adams Farm. The Jeff Stephens Farm was determined to
be adversely affected by the proposed project. Mitigation is proposed as a result of
impacts to the Stephens Farm.
This project comes from a conforming transportation plan approved by USDOT
on August 20, 1999. There will be no substantial impact to air quality. Approximately 8
facilities with underground storage tanks may be impacted
Noise impacts are expected at 13 locations; however, noise abatement measures
are not recommended because of the access allowed to the facility.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the Federal/State
governments are no longer responsible for providix-g noise abatement measures for new
development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a
proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of
the location of this proposed highway project is the approval date of this FONSI. For
development occurring after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are
responsible to insure that noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility.
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENT.AI. ASSESSMENT
A. Typical Section
The environmental assessment for the proposed project designated afive-lane
curb and gutter facility with two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane as the
typical section for the southern half of the project. Following the public hearing and
coordination between NCDOT and the Town of Fuquay-Varina, a four lane curb and
gutter facility with a 16-foot grassed median is proposed for the southern half of the
project. The design would transition to a five-lane curb and gutter section south of the NC
55/SR 1108 intersection. The four-lane typical section was selected based on its
operational advantages. The median will better control traffic turning movements; it will
also allow median landscape plantings.
2

B. Intersection Improvements
Pedestrian crosswalks and refuge islands will be placed at the intersections that
are to be signalized. The left turn lanes will be narrowed by 0.3m (1') and the island
widened to 1.5m (5').
Wilbon Road will be widened for a length of about 60 meters (200') in length to
where the developer has improved the existing road. Additional width will be added on
NC 55 at the intersection of Wilbon Road to accommodate stopped buses.
C. Landscaping
NCDOT will prepare landscaping plans for this project. In accordance with the
NCDOT landscaping policy, NCDOT will fund up to 0.50% of the total project
construction cost for landscaping. A municipal agreement between NCDOT and
appropriate local authorities will be prepared prior to construction documenting
landscaping maintenance.
D. Structures
The environmental assessment stated that the existing culvert over Basal Creek
was anticipated to be retained and extended. Due to the amount of fill over the existing
structure, replacement of the culvert is currently proposed. The proposed culvert is a
two barrel 3.Om x 3.6m (10' x 12') structure.
E. Greenways
The Town of Fuquay-Varina adopted a greenway plan in February, 1999. This
plan shows 3 crossings if of NC 55 within the project limits. The Town has requested
that a pedestrian underpass be included with the new Basal Creek culvert to
accommodate pedestrians using one of these future greenways.
Because the subject greenway is not currently in place, funding for a pedestrian
underpass would be the responsibility of the Town of Fuquay-Varina. The pedestrian
underpass is estimated to cost $125,300. There has been no commitment from the Town
to fund this underpass; therefore no pedestrian underpass is currently proposed.
F. Wetlands
Following completion of the Environmental Assessment, wetlands in the corridor
were delineated and impacts recalculated. The wetland estimates stated in the EA were
based on determinations not delineations. Wetland impacts were estimated to be 1.8
acres in the Environmental Assessment. Wetland impacts are currently estimated at
l .9 acres.

VI. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment
The environmental assessment was circulated for review and comments to the
federal, state, and local agencies below. An asterisk (*) indicates that a written response
was received from the agency or municipality. Copies of the correspondence received are
included in the appendix of this document. Specific comments included in this
correspondence are addressed in Section VII.B. of this report.
*Army Corps of Engineers
*Department of Interior
*US Fish and Wildlife Service
*N. C. State Clearinghouse
N. C. Department of Cultural Resources
*N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
*N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
*Town of Fuquay-Varina
*Town of Holly Springs
Triangle J Council of Governments
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
Comments from the U S Army Coms of Engineers (COE)
Comment
"While the planned extension of the existing culvert at Basal Creek may not have
any significant adverse effect on the existing flood plain, we would like to note that the
extension could cause some increase in upstream 100-year flood elevations. Such an
increase would appear to be in conflict with FEMA's "No-Rise" requirements referred to
in our previous comments. The project should be design to comply with the requirements
of the National Flood Insurance Program and all local ordinances."
Response
Following additional hydraulic analysis, the existing culverts at Basal Creek are
proposed to be replaced with a two barrel 3.Om x 3.6m (10'x12') culvert. NCDOT will
comply with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. NCDOT will
coordinate with Wake County, the Town of Fuquay-Varina, and the Town of Holly
Springs to insure the project complies with local floodplain ordinances.
Comment
"When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of
development within any waters and wetlands, our Regulatory Division would appreciate
4

that opportunity to review these plans for aproject-specific determination of Department
of Army permit requirements. If there are only minor impacts to waters, including
wetlands, the work might be authorized under one or more nationwide or regional general
permits, provided avoidance and minimization of wetlands and streams are adequately
addressed. Asymmetrical widening which would minimize wetland or stream impacts
should be considered.
Response
When final plans are completed, NCDOT will contact U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers -Raleigh Field Office to discuss the extent of development within waters and
wetlands and Federal permit requirements. Applicable 404 permits will be obtained
during this project phase.
Comment
Considering the information on impacts to aquatic resources that is available at
this time, including the discussion of alternatives in the Environmental Assessment,
Alternative 4 would be the Corps preferred alternative. Alternatives 2,3,5, and 6 would
be the least preferred. Our initial review emphasis for North Carolina Department of
Transportation projects focuses on the impacts to waters and/or wetlands. However, if
degradation to other aspects of the natural environment (e.g. habitat of endangered
species) is considered to be of greater concern, an alternative resulting in greater aquatic
losses may be chosen as preferred.
Note: NCDOT further coordinated with the COE, and furnished the COE with
more detailed information concerning widening alternates and wetland impacts
(see July 12 letter in appendix). CDE's comments following the coordination is
as follows.
Comment
Based on the (new) information available, including the information provided at
the Mazch 1, 1999 meeting and in the July 12, 19991etter, it appeazs that you have
addressed all of the concerns and issues of which we are now awaze. However, since we
cannot yet determine definitely if the project can be authorized under a nationwide or a
regional general permit, and this project has not yet gone through our public interest
review process, we cannot concur on the least environmentally damaging practicable
alternative.
Response
Wetland impacts stated in the EA were 0.9 acres for alternate 4 and 1.8 acres for
alternate 6. The wetland impacts were based on determinations, not delineations.
Following wetland delineation, Alternate 6 impacted 1.9 acres of wetlands and Alternate
4 impacted 1.2 acres of wetlands, a difference of 0.7 acres. The difference of wetland
impacts between Alternates 4 and 6 decreased 0.2 acres following delineation.
5

NCDOT will obtain further COE approvals through the standard permitting
process during the design phase.
Comment
In all cases, and in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps, the sequencing process of
avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation of unavoidable wetland impacts
will be satisfied prior to the final permit decision. A Department of Army permit will not
be issued until a final plan for compensatory mitigation is approved. Mitigation for
stream impacts will also be required. Based on the probable impacts to wetlands and
streams, a compensatory mitigation proposal should accompany any application to the
Corps for this project.
Response
When final plans for the proposed project are completed, NCDOT will coordinate
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to discuss the compensatory mitigation proposal
to accompany permit application.
Comment
Development of a Memorandum of Agreement and other activities associated
with compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act should be
coordinated with the Corps of Engineers.
Response
A draft copy of the Memorandum of Agreement was forwarded to the Regulatory
Field office of the Corps of Engineers.
2. Comments from the US Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary
Comment
"We concur that there is no prudent and feasible alternative to the proposed
project, if project objectives are to be met. We also concur with the proposed measures to
minimize harm to the Richard Adams Farm and the Jeff Stephens Farm."
"We recommend continued cooperation and coordination with the State Historic
Preservation Officer, in order to complete the proposed Memorandum of Agreement,
which should include measures to avoid and/or minimize harm to the above two historic
properties, in compliance with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, as amended. A signed copy of the MOA should be included in the Final Section
4(f) evaluation."
6

"The Department of Interior has no objection to Section 4(f) approval of this
project by the Department of Transportation."
Response
The exact measures to minimize harm to the Richard Adams and Jeff Stephens
Farm aze also discussed in the Final Section 4(f) Evaluation (Section IV). Included in
Appendix IV-B is the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which was developed between
the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, the
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, and the property owner.
3. Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Comment
"The Service considers that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and
wildlife resources, Section 4(f) resources, and the potential impacts of this proposed
project on these resources. Based on the information provided, the Service concludes that
this project, implemented as described will not have significant impact on resources
under our jurisdiction."
Response
The comment from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been noted.
4. Comments from N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Comment
"We have the information included in the EA. Due to the environmental
commitments included in the document and the limited scope of the project, we do not
object to the project as proposed. At this time we concur with the EA for this project.
Response
The comment from the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission has been noted.
_ C. Public Heazin~
Following completion of the environmental assessment, a public heazing was held
on March 30, 1999 at Fuquay-Vazina High School. A copy of the news release for the
hearing is included in the Appendix. Citizens were encouraged to comment either at the
hearing or by mailing in comment sheets which were distributed as a part of the project
handout. A summary of the comments received through public hearing process and
responses to those comments is included below.
7

1. Comments from the Town of Fuquav-Varina
Note: These comments were discussed at a May 13, 1999 meeting involving
NCDOT and the Town of Fuquay-Varina representatives. The NCDOT
responses represent the resolution of the comments as mutually agreed to
at the meeting.
Comment
"Add pedestrian crosswalks and refuge islands to the signalized intersections."
Response
Pedestrian crosswalks and refuge islands will be placed at the intersections that
are to be signalized. The left turn lanes will be narrowed by 0.3m (1') and the island
widened to 1.Sm (5').
Comment
"Are the right turn lanes needed at intersections."
Response
Right turn lanes are proposed at 4 intersections. They are recommended due to the
volume of turning traffic and create a safer environment for the driving public.
Comment
"Provide for left turns into Green Lawn Memorial Cemetery and Wyndham
Drive."
Response
No left turn movement will be provided for at Wyndham Drive or Green Lawn
Memorial Cemetery. Both are close to existing intersections and allowing left turns
would reduce the amount of median available for landscaping. Fuquay-Varina could later
request a median access to the cemetery if conditions warrant one.
Comment
"Add bus pulloffs on NC 55 near Wilbon Road."
Response
Additional width will be added on NC 55 at the intersection of Wilbon Road to
accommodate stopped buses.

Comment
"Widen Wilbon Road back to the existing widened section.
Response
Wilbon Road will be widened back about 60 meters (200') in length to where a
developer has improved the existing road.
Comment
"Due to the Town's planned future greenway, add a pedestrian underpass to the
proposed culvert at Basal Creek."
Response
In accordance with our department's greenway policy, the Town may request that
a pedestrian culvert crossing be built as part of this project. However the town must fund
the entire cost of the culvert because this greenway does not currently exist. The cost of
the culvert is $125,300.
Based on no funding commitment from the Town, NCDOT does not currently
plan to construct a pedestrian culvert.
Comment
"Add landscaping to the median on NC 55."
Response
Funds for landscaping will be provided for this project. In accordance with the
NCDOT landscaping policy, NCDOT will fund up to 0.50% of the total project
construction cost for landscaping. Fuquay-Varina can contribute additional funding for
landscaping through an agreement with NCDOT. The Town of Fuquay-Varina will be
responsible for the maintenance of landscaping.
Comment
"Vary the location of the sidewalk from the curb."
Response
NCDOT will connect new sidewalk to any existing sidewalk along NC 55.
Continued coordination between NCDOT and Fuquay-Varina will be undertaken during
final design to ensure proper placement of the sidewalk.
9

2. Comments from the Town of Holly Springs
Comment
"Provide the capability to add a traffic signal at the Teal Lake Drive intersection."
Response
NCDOT is not planning to put a traffic signal at the Teal Lake Drive intersection
as part of this project. Signal requirements will be reanalyzed later in the design stage.
The Town's request can be reconsidered at that time.
Comment
"Add landscaping between NC 55 and the Somerset Farms Subdivision."
Response
NCDOT's Roadside Environmental Unit will study the possibility of adding
landscaping between NC 55 and the Somerset Farms Subdivision during the preparation
of a landscaping plan.
Comment
"Reduce the speed limit to 40 mph approaching Holly Springs."
Response
NCDOT has considered posting the speed limit at 45 mph but decided to keep the
speed limit at 55 mph on NC 55 to be consistent with the existing speed limit in this
corridor and the proposed speed limit on the Holly Springs Bypass.
3. Comments from Citizens at Public Hearing
Comment
"Keep five lanes in front of businesses at Wake Chapel Rd."
Response
The median in the vicinity of NC55/Wake Chapel Road intersection will be
removed to allow access to several businesses in this area.
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project as documented in the
Environmental Assessment and upon comments received from federal, state, and local
agencies, and from citizens, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of
10

Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the quality of the human or natural environment. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
IX. FINAL SECTION 4(IZEVALUATION
This Final 4(f) Alternatives Evaluation contains information relevant to this
project's involvement with three properties eligible for National Register of Historic
Places. The properties are the Adams House, The Richard Adams Farm, and the Alsey
"Jeff' Stephens Farm.
A. Description of the Proposed Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways,
proposes to widen NC 55 in Wake County, North Carolina. The 5.3 km (3.3 mi.) project
will widen the existing two-lane roadway to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake
Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stephens Road). The proposed cross-section for NC 55
south of SR 1113/SR 1398 (Wade and Nash/Dickens Road) is a four-lane curb and gutter
facility with a 16-foot median. The proposed cross-section for NC 55 north of SR
1113/SR 1398 (Wade and Nash/Dickens Road) to the end of the project consists of a
four-lane facility with a 9 m (30-foot) raised grassed median. Grass shoulders with
ditches will be used for this section. Outside shoulders will be 3.0 meters (10 feet) wide,
1.2 meters (4 feet) of which will be paved.
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and traffic
capacity of this section of NC 55. This project is one of several projects that will handle
the traffic demand on NC 55 from motorists traveling between Fuquay-Vazina and
Research Triangle Park (RTP). The two-lane roadway is currently operating at LOS E.
NC 55 is currently over its traffic handling capacity. Without improvements, NC 55 is
estimated to operate at LOS F within three yeazs.
NC 55 is designated as a major thoroughfaze on the Wake County and Fuquay-
Vazina Thoroughfaze Plans. The proposed multi-lane facility is in conformance with the
thoroughfare plan.
The proposed alignment involves property from the Adams House, the Richazd
Adams Farm, and the Alsey "Jeff' Stephens Fazm. These properties are eligible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places. These properties aze documented in
the Historic Architecture Resources Survev Report Phase II (Abrid~edl, prepared for this
project by the Historic Architecture Resources Section of the North Carolina Department
of Transportation.
As the proposed improvements aze federally-funded and will involve the taking of
National Register eligible property as currently proposed, compliance is required with
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (80 Stat., PL 89-670).
Section 4(f) is designed to insure that special efforts are made to "preserve the natural

beauty of the countryside, public park and recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl
refuges, and historic sites."
B. Description of Section 4(f) Resources
Name: Adams House
Location: The Adams House is located on sides on NC 55 approximately 1.0 km
(0.6 mi.) south of SR 1114.
Summary of Physical Description: the Federal-style house retains much
original, finely crafted fabric, including amortise-and-tenon frame, exposed and
beaded ceiling joists, flush interior sheathing, two simple Federal mantels, and
portions of a paneled wainscot. Exterior chimneys with freestanding stacks vent
the two fireplaces. An interior partition has been added to form acenter-hall plan.
Surrounding the house aze several outbuildings, including aboard-and-batten
detached kitchen, a covered well, and a smokehouse. The Adams family cemetery
sits across N. C. Highway 55 and includes graves of Adams, Norris, and Burt
family members marked with hand-carved stones, plain fieldstones, and
manufactured markers dating from the 1840s to the early twentieth century"
Setting and Landscaping: The house and outbuildings are situated among
several large pine and hazdwood trees on the edge of a woods, a few hundred feet
east of NC 55 across a small plowed field. Several old, large boxwoods and
cedazs line the walk to the house. The yard and small field aze well maintained,
but the house and outbuildings suffer from neglect and are rapidly deteriorating.
Date of Construction: 1820-1830
Style: One story tall with ahall-parlor plan, with engaged porches to the front and
rear, "coastal cottage" form.
Integrity: Despite its deteriorating condition, the Adams House retains its
integrity of design, workmanship, and materials.
Historical Background: According to D. Carlyle Adams, Jr., owner of the
Richazd L. Adams Farm, cousin of David Adams the owner of this property), and
great-great-grandson of James and Elizabeth Adams, the Adams House has
always been known in the family as the "Burt Place." Whether James Adams or a
Burt family member (related to the Adamses) built this house, it has always been
associated with the family. Much of the surrounding land, including the farm of
James and Elizabeth's grandson Richazd L. Adams, was once part of this farm.
The family cemetery on the west side of NC 55 is well maintained. It contains the
graves of James (1805-83) and Elizabeth Adams (1807-87), their grandson
Richard L. Adams (1858-1937) and his wife Annie Lee Adams (1866-1940), and
12

a host of other related Adamses, Burts, and Norrises, as well as several graves of
unknown persons marked by flint stones.
Evaluation: The Adams House is eligible for the National Register under
Criterion C (Design/Construction) for its significance in architecture.
Boundaries: The proposed National Register boundary for the Adams House
includes part of the parcel the house and outbuildings sit on and all of the
cemetery parcel across NC 55. The proposed boundary encompasses between
approximately eight and ten acres (see Figure 3 and Appendix III).
Name: The Richard Adams Farm
Location: The Adams Farm is located on both sides of NC 55 approximately
0.5 km (0.3 mi.) south of SR 1114.
Summary of Physical Description: The dwelling, which features simple
Colonial Revival details, displays a tall hip roof with interior brick chimneys and
a wraparound porch supported by Doric columns which is pedimented at the
entry. Eight outbuildings are arranged behind the house: a chicken coop, a smoke
house, a well house, a wash house, a garage, a corn crib, a concrete block gambrel
roof barn, and a tenant house. Except for the barn, all the outbuildings are of
frame construction. A lazge pasture north of the house is fenced for sheep, and a
lazge fteld south of the house and pecan grove is plowed. A dirt lane on the north
side of the farmhouse leads from NC 55 to the outbuildings and north pasture, and
is the original entry to the farm. Several acres of woods lie south and west of the
house and outbuildings. The property extends across NC 55 and includes another
pasture and a concrete block tenant house east of the highway.
Date of Construction: ca. 1910
Style: Two-story, double-pile house and farm.
Integrity: The farmhouse appeazs to be in good condition, retaining its integrity
of design, workmanship, and materials. Some of the outbuildings that survive
today aze original to the first house on the property. The two-room wash house
and the smoke house (originally covered with board and batten, but later resided
with weatherboazding) were built with the first house in the 1880s, and Cazlyle
Adams suspects that the corn crib and the garage (originally called the carriage
house) also date to that period. The chicken coop and the well house were
probably built ca. 1910 with the present house.
Historical Background: R. L. Adams was a native of Wake County who
evidently took his family to Georgia in the late 1880s and returned to the county
around 1895. According to D. Cazlyle Adams, Jr., owner of the property and
grandson of Richard L. Adams, the farmhouse was built on the site of an older
house. Richard Adams bought this property in 1885 from James and Elizabeth
13

Adams, but these were not necessarily his parents. Elizabeth Adams (] 807-87)
was Richard Adams's grandmother, but Richard's grandfather James Adams
(1805-83) had died two years before the sale. It is possible that the `'James
Adams" listed in the 1885 deed is James Theopholus Adams, son of Elizabeth
Adams and father of Richard L. Adams. Nevertheless, according to Carlyle
Adams, Richard built aone-story frame house on the property, probably soon
after its purchase. That house burned in 1908, and Richard built the present
foursquare house on the same site shortly thereafter. The 1910 census shows that
Adams was overseer of a lumber company (perhaps that of the Holly Springs
Land and Improvement Company), while his wife supervised the farming
operations, in which four of their sons (ages ten to sixteen) and one hired hand (a
nineteen-year-old black man named Lofton Matthews) were employed. One of
the most prominent houses along Highway 55 between Fuquay-Varina and Apex
in terms of size and setting, their former residence reflects the wealth and status
made possible by their two sources of income.
Evaluation: The Richard L. Adams Farm is eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places under Criterion A (Event) for significance in agriculture, and
Criterion C (Design/Construction) for its significance in architecture.
Boundaries: The proposed National Register boundary for the Richard L. Adams
Farm includes roughly half of the total acreage of this farm, and encompasses the
house, outbuildings, and cultivated fields on the west side of NC 55, and the
concrete block tenant house and cultivated field on the east side of NC 55. It
measures approximately forty acres (see Figure 3 and Appendix III).
Name• The Alsey "Jeff' Stephens Farm
Location: The Alsey "Jeff' Stephens Farm is located on the west side of NC
55 at the southwest corner of the SR 1114 intersection.
Summary of Physical Description: The Stephens house is a two story frame
dwelling, capped by a tall hip roof with interior brick chimneys. It also features
late-Victorian details, such as a wraparound porch and ornamental gables and
dormers embellished with small, decorative windows. The bungalow-style porch
supports are probably later replacements. Outbuildings include a log tobacco
barn, a number of frame barns and sheds, a covered well, and a frame tenant
house. A low hedge runs along the perimeter of the yard in front of the house.
Most of these outbuildings appear to date to the main house's construction at the
turn of the century, but the detached kitchen might have originally belonged to an
older house (possibly on this site, although no evidence to support this has been
found). The barn and tenant house are located in a small field north of the
Stephens house, and the tobacco barns are located south of the main house on the
edge of some woods. Cultivated fields stretch behind the house to the west.
Date of Construction: ca. 1900
14

Style: Two-story, double-pile house, with Victorian and Craftsman details
Integrity: Despite its deteriorating condition, the farmhouse retains its integrity of
design, workmanship, and materials.
Historical Background: A. J. Stephens started out with 51 acres on Bull Branch,
which he bought from James and Gilly Stephens (probably his parents) in 1881.
In the next three decades, he gradually acquired about 100 additional acres
(mainly Stephens family land) and a few town lots in Holly Springs and Fuquay
Springs. The 1900 census shows that five of his children between ages seven and
fourteen, were in school five months of the year, while the oldest son and
daughter (ages eighteen and sixteen) worked on the farm. A black farm laborer
named Jordan Richardson was listed with his family after the Stephenses, perhaps
living in the two-room tenant house still on the property. In 1910 the census show
two tenant families (one white, one black) next door to the A. J. Stephens family.
At this time the Stephens' employed two sons and two daughters on their cotton-
producing farm, while their twenty-four-year-old son, Clennie, was running a
separate tobacco-producing operation
Evaluation: The Alsey J. "Jeff' Stephens Farm is eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places under Criterion A (Event) for significance in
agriculture, and Criterion C (Design/Construction) for its significance in
architecture.
Historical boundaries: The proposed National Register boundary for the Alsey J.
"Jeff' Stephens Farm includes all of the parcel on which this farm is located, and
extends to the edge of pavement in order to protect the surrounding hedge in front
of the house. This boundary includes the house, outbuildings, farm yard, and
cultivated fields associated with this farm. The proposed boundary encompasses
twenty-five acres (see Figure 3 and Appendix III). Additional photographs of the
Stephens Farm Property are available upon request from NCDOT.
C. Impacts on the Section 4(fl Properties
The recommended alternative (alternate # 6) will impact all three eligible
properties. The project will require the acquisition of property on the east side from the
Adams House. Property will be required mainly from the east side of the Richard Adams
Farm, but some property will be required from the west side near the northern property
boundary. The widening will transition to the west side of existing NC 55 at the Jeff
Stephens Farm. The roadway alignment will extend through the Jeff Stephens house and
farm.
D. Other Alternatives Studied
All other alternates studied for the widening of NC 55 consist of the NC 55
corridor north of the SR 1113/SR 1398 (Wade and Nash/Dickens Road) intersection to
the end of the project.
l5

Avoidance Alternates
Two avoidance alternatives were evaluated for the 4(f) property.
Avoidance Alternate 1 avoids all three eligible properties to the west on new
location. Alternate 1 separates from existing NC 55 north of SR 1113/SR 1398 and ties
into the proposed Holly Springs Bypass 0.7 lcm (0.4 mi.) north of the proposed NC 55/
Holly Springs Bypass intersection. This alternate is 4.0 lcm (2.5 mi.) in length (see
Figure 3). The State Historic Preservation Office determined that this alternate will have
no effect to the three historic properties
Avoidance Alternate 2 avoids all three eligible properties to the east on new
location. Alternate 2 separates from existing NC 55 at north of SR 1113/SR 1398 and
ties into the proposed Holly Springs Bypass 0.4 km (0.25 mi.) north of the NC 55/ Holly
Springs Bypass intersection at existing NC 55. This alternate is 3.7 km (2.3 mi.) in
length (see Figure 3). The State Historic Preservation Office determined that this alternate
will have no effect to the Richard Adams Farm and the Jeff Stephens Farm. The State
Historic Preservation Office also determined that this alternate will have a conditional no
adverse effect on the Adams House.
Because of the terrain of the area and the extensive new location required by
Avoidance Alternates 1 and 2, these alternates cost $14,374,850 and $14,095,850
respectively. This is $ 4,140,500 and $3,861,5000 more than the preferred alternate.
Avoidance Alternate 1 will relocate 2 residences and three businesses, Avoidance
Alternate 2 will relocate six residences and three businesses. Avoidance Alternates 1
and 2 will impact 56 and 61 acres respectively, of previously undisturbed habitat. Table
1 lists the environmental impacts and costs of Avoidance Alternates 1 and 2.
Construction Right-of- Total Cost for Impact Impact to Effect to
Cost Way entire project Rclocatees to Undisturbed Historic
Cost Wetlands Habitat Properties
Avoidance
Alternate 1 $12.650,000 $1,724,850 $14,374.850 5 9.3 acres 61 acres No effect
all properties
Avoidance Conditional
Alternate 2 $12,250,000 $1,845,850 $14,095,850 7 3.6 acres 56 acres no adverse effect
(Adams House)
no effect
(other properties)
Alternate 6 Adverse effect
(recommended) $ 9.100,000 $1,950,000 $11.050,000 5 1.9 acres 6 acres (Stephens House)
Conditional no
adverse effect
(other properties)
16

2. Other Design Alternates Studied
Typical Section for Northern Half of the Proiect
From SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114, several cross-sections were considered.
Descriptions of the alternatives are as follows.
Five-Lane Curb and Gutter
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a five-lane facility.
This would provide two 3.6 m (12 foot) travel lanes in each direction and one 3.6 m (12
foot) center turn lane. Right of way impacts would be minimized under this alternative.
Following coordination with FHWA, SHPO, and NCDOT, it was decided that this cross-
section was not consistent with the rural setting in the project corridor. In addition,
outside curbs would require the current 55 mph speed limit to be reduced to 45 mph if
this alternative was selected. This may lead to safety concerns because motorists may
tend to drive in excess of 45 mph given the rural nature of this section.
Four-Lane with a 14 m (46 foot) Grassed Median
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 14 m (46 foot) grassed median. This alternative was considered due to the rural
setting of the area and the consistency with the Holly Springs Bypass cross-section.
Four-Lane with a 9 m (30 foot) Grassed Median (Recommended)
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 9 m (30 foot) raised grassed median. This alternative is recommended because the
cross-section maintained the rural setting of the area and had less right of way impacts
than the four-lane 14 m (46 foot) median facility. This cross section is also preferred by
the State Historic Preservation Office.
Alignment Alternatives
From SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114, two alignments were considered. Descriptions
of the alternatives are as follows.
East Side Widening
From SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114, widening NC 55 on the east side was
considered. Right-of--Way impacts to the Jeff Stephens Farm would be avoided under
this alternative. This alternative will require acquisition of property on the east side of
NC 55 from the historic Adams House and the Richard Adams Farm. The Somerset
Farms subdivision would be impacted by this alternative.
l7

East Side Transitioning to the West Side (Recommended)
This alternative will widen NC 55 on the east side from north of SR 1113/1398 to
the Richard Adams Farm. The widening will transition to the west side north of the
Richard Adams Farm to the Holly Springs Bypass. This alternative will require the
acquisition of property on the east side from the Adams House. Property will be required
mainly from the east side of the Richard Adams Farm, but some property will be required
from the west side near the northern property boundary. The Jeff Stephens Farm would
be impacted by the alignment. Impacts to the Somerset Farms subdivision would be
avoided. This alternative is recommended following coordination with the property
owners of the Stephens Farm, NCDOT, FHWA, and SHPO.
Summary of Alternatives
A summary of impacts for each alternative is summarized in the following table.
Widening on the East Side Widening on East Side Transitioning to the West (2)
(1) 1 2 3 4 5 6
Alternate (recommended)
Cross- Five-lane Four-lane Four-lane Five-lane Four-lane Four-lane
section 46' median 30' median 46' median 30' median
Length 2 miles. 2 miles 2 miles 2 miles 2 miles 2 miles
Construction
Cost $8,360,000 $9,845,000 $9,460,000 $8,415,000 $9,515,000 $9,100,000
Right-of-
Way Cost $1,929,135 $3,539,705 $2,474,355 $1,921,465 $2,886,295 $1,950,350
Total Cost $10,289,135 $13,384,705 $11,934,355 $10,336,465 $12,401,295 11,050,000
Residential 2 8 6 4 5 2
Relocatees
Business
Relocatees 3 3 3 3 3 3
Impact to
Undisturbed 2.7 acres 5.6 acres 4.5 acres 2.7 acres 6.0 acres 5.3 acres
Habitat
Impact to
Wetlands 1.1 acres 2.2 acres 1.8 acres 1.2 acres 2.3 acres 1.9 acres
Impact to Less than less than less than less than less than less than
Streams 400 ft. 500 ft. 500 ft. 400 ft. 500 ft. 500 ft.
Effect to Adverse Conditional conditional Adverse adverse effect Adverse effect
Historic Effect no adverse no adverse effect (Stephens Farm) (Stephens Farm)
Properties (all properties) effect effect (all properties) conditional no conditional no
(all properties) (all properties) adverse effect adverse effect
(other properties) (other properties)
18

E. Measures to Minimize Harm
NCDOT has committed to minimizing harm to the three national-register eligible
farms involved with the project. These measures were developed in coordination with the
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and are listed below.
Adams House and Richard Adams Farm
• The SHPO will be given the opportunity to review and comment on
landscaping, median cuts, and median tapers.
Jeff Stephens Farm
• NCDOT will move the historic house to another location within the historic
property suitable to the property owner.
• NCDOT will provide landscaping (off NCDOT R/W) around the new house
location to maintain the historic setting.
• NCDOT will place the moved house on a suitable foundation.
• NCDOT will connect utilities to the relocated house.
• If the utilities in the house do not meet current code standards NCDOT will
fund the upgrading of these utilities.
• NCDOT will construct (or fund) an access driveway to the new house
location.
• NCDOT will fund suitable sanitary connections (well/septic or water/sewer
connections, as appropriate).
The exact measures to minimize harm to the Jeff Stephens Farm are also
discussed in the attached Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which was developed
jointly between the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, and the property
owner. The Memorandum of Agreement is included in Appendix IV-B.
F. Coordination
NCDOT coordinated with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to assess
effects to historic properties caused by project alternatives. The effects determinations
for each alternative are listed in the following table:
19

Widening on the East Side Widening on East Side
Transitioning to the West
Avoidance Avoidance Alt.l Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Alt. 4 Alt. $ Alt. 6
Altemate 1 Alternate 2 Five-lane Four-lane Four-lane Fivc-lane Four-lane Four-lane
'
46' med. 30' med. 4G' med. med.
30
Adams House No effect Conditional Adverse Conditional Conditional Adverse Conditional Conditional
no adverse Effect no adverse No adverse Effect no adverse no adverse
effect effect Effect effect effect
The Richard No effect No effect Adverse Conditional Conditional Adverse Conditional Conditional
Adams Farm Effect no adverse no adverse Effect no adverse no adverse
effect effect effect effect
The Alsey No etTect No effect Adverse Conditional Conditional Adverse Adverse Adverse
••~e ff• Effect no adverse no adverse Effect Effect Effect
Stephens effect effect
Farm
The SHPO stated that their office preferred the four-lane facility with a 9 m (30
foot) median as the typical section for the project.
Property owners of the three historic properties have been notified of the proposed
project. In correspondence received on behalf of the Adams House and Richard Adams
Farm, David and Mildred Adams stated preference for widening the existing road on the
east side. The property owner for the Jeff Stephens Farm stated she preferred the
alternative extending through the present house location if NCDOT will arrange moving
the house and provide other mitigative measures (see above section). She stated that the
present location of the house is undesirable due to its closeness to NC 55 and she stated
that the house will be more livable and likely to be restored and preserved if the house
was moved to a more desirable location on the farm (see appendix IV).
Coordination between NCDOT, FHWA, SHPO, Wake County Public School
System, Town of Fuquay-Varina, Town of Holly Springs, and property owners was
conducted in the process of reaching a decision regarding the recommended alternate.
Alternate #6 was recommended following this coordination. Documentation of this
coordination is found in Appendix II and IV-A.
Federal and state resource agencies were notified of the project in a September 24,
19961etter notifying them of the project. The Environmental Assessment Draft Section
4(f) Evaluation was distributed to agencies as discussed in Section VII of this report.
Agency comments are included in Appendix I.
In addition, a citizens informational workshop was held August 22, 1996 to
inform citizens of the proposed project and solicit comments and suggestions. A public
hearing was also held on March 30, 1999.
G. Department of Interior Coordination
A copy of the Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation was
provided to the U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI). The USDOI response to the
document is included in Appendix I.
20

The USDOI concurs concur that there is no prudent and feasible alternative to the
proposed project, if project objectives are to be met. USDOI also concurs with the
proposed measures to minimize harm to the Richard Adams Farm and the Jeff Stephens
Farm and concurs with section 4(f) approval.
H. Basis for No Feasible and Prudent Alternative to Alternate 6
Two avoidance alternates and six alternates on existing location were studied as
part of this project. A comparison of the alternates shows there are no feasible and
prudent alternatives to Alternate 6. Problems associated with the alternates are described
below.
The two avoidance alternates would require extensive new location. Due to the
increased impact to undisturbed habitat, wetlands, and cost increases of $ 4,140,500 and
$3,861,500 more than the preferred alternate, these alternates were eliminated.
Alternates 2 and 3 consist of a 4 lane divided facility with 30-foot and 46-foot
grassed medians, respectively. Alternates 2 and 3 widen NC 55 on the east side of
existing NC 55. They would require the relocation of 4-6 homes in Somerset Farms
subdivision.
Alternates 1 and 4 consist of a five lane curb and gutter cross section. Alternate 1
would widen NC 55 on the east side of existing NC 55. Alternate 4 would widen NC 55
on the west side. It was decided that this cross-section was not consistent with the rural
setting in the project corridor. In addition, outside curbs would require the current 55
mph speed limit to be reduced to 45 mph if this alternative was selected. This may lead
to safety concerns because motorists may tend to drive in excess of 45 mph given the
rural nature of this section.
Alternate 5 would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility with a
14 m (46 foot) raised grassed median. Alternate 5 would avoid the Somerset Farms
subdivision and would impact the Stephens Farm. Alternate 5 requires more right of way
than the preferred alternate. Habitat and wetland impacts would also increase using
Alternate 5.
The property owner of the Stephens House stated that:
• Having the house so close to NC 55 has made it undesirable to live in and
therefore no effort has been made to restore the house.
• Moving the house away from NC 55 would make it much more livable and
more likely to be restored.
• She prefers the alternative extending through the present house location if
NCDOT will move it and provide other mitigative measures.
'' 1

• She is committed to preserving the house and property if the house is moved
to a better location.
Alternate 6 would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility with
a 9 m (30 foot) raised grassed median. This alternative is recommended because the
cross-section maintained the rural setting of the area and had less right of way impacts
than the four-lane 14 m (46 foot) median facility-Alternate 5. This cross section, utilizing
a 30-foot raised median, is preferred by the State Historic Preservation Office. Based on
the property owner's comments that the Stephens House will not be restored if left in its
present location, Alternate 6 is considered the only feasible and prudent alternative design
considering all environmental and engineering factor and the property owner of the
Stephens house. The property owner of the Stephens house stated that the house would
not be improved unless it is moved. Alternate 6 would require the relocation of the
Stephens House.
I. Conclusion
Based upon consideration discussed in this document, there is no feasible and
prudent alternative to the use of land from the Adams House, Adams Farm, and the Jeff
Stephens Farm. All possible planning has been done to minimize harm to these
properties.
22

FIGURES

t`

~- r. :Y,~
~i -
~~
~. ,
~; ~ {
s {
} ~ ~ ~~~
a
-~. ~ 7
-~' , , i . ~-''
~- y
i't 1 ~}}
'~ 4 1 ~YM1r l,` ~i'~~;
- -.
t ,' ~~ ~. ~~~ ~`
p .~. ~' f #3 ~ ,. er
`:.7y~~
~,
a. J
•
~ O_ W
.. ..
'<~"
Vie. r :r ~ Y i~ ! ( }~ ~ e.~ ~ a ~ C 1 ~ ~'v
-~,~ ~ F i7 a w w .'
,.: 'fig ~' ~ µ , ~~;" . ~_. ~ ~
} r
~ ~ ~ w
~ y ., t ~ #~' ~,
~~
~:~ 7Y 1.'~ *~.4.~ ~ Y h #J ` - ~., ~ ~ 'f , ~y eye ~~ti ~~A, . lY r~.i.
,. ,
,
r
~~~
r
'7 ~ ! C' ~ '~ ~t~ Iv ~~ ,~, < n~a ~r
1~ ,~,y , ~ - ~ r ~ '` ~9" :; ~"r ~ ,~~'•'~~ ~5 fem... ~~'
'~ ,~ ~-
,~
~" ,: ~ ,~~
` ,.
,~ „ M r . .~
,, .
+:: 1 _ ~~ r t~:.
rr t y F y'r~ ,
r.
~ e
~v _ ,-j~~s by _ ~ JJyJyy~ i , d 5~-, r y~
_ y it"~ ~ ; j~ ''kph _ ;~~.`g', ~ ~,r ~^ ~~y~' ,.~`
~£
j ` 4 ~;
~, Y .y. ~ ~ 4 ~ ~: Y4' ";} ~... .fit i Q.~y ~.{r _~, ~~.
ly,M .R4~ '` ti;; +a ~i , ~' ~~~ \ sf i; ~ y _ 4 ~ `A+'- - p''` .y y
f~~`~ ~:*fi}~ :~' ro~ r~. ... G~ ~~ ~} P ,,fit .r n. J 4.
s~
$ 7
- s. it>
r 6Y ' " W
.r , f ~ ~'
K~
. ,. ,
s
yy ~,
r
5 ~ ~ ~,. ~ \
,. ! i 11 itl ultUli~~, -- _ , F~ ~ ' b~
c.
..
ti
- - _ li,~ , ~. ~. ,Tt-
~- i~'
+ ~~ _ 'S^ i. ,,, ~~T~ ~ i. '~`a'~ „fit a 8

i
_.~ ~ x
~~

4
~ ~! }} 1
4~
J
~` .. `-~ ~' ~~-
~ t ~Y f
_
by 4. i
,~'
k '
'
~ ~ ~~t `~ .;1
Vii- "
(
4v
'> ~ ~
„~
+~' ~ 1
~.
~,
. ~ n ,'
a, v.', kd~ ,::
`, k,~?f ~~'~
a }}"
.y` 1,~.
t t~~:
~~'~
~,~.-
;_;,
w,, ~.''
.~-,
rte,
y
'rG

-_~ir"w iM. ~ Al ~ ~ ~k ~ ..~ .~' .6 ~ r ~ _, ~ ,
~ , 4 ' d ~IF13 P r r ~ r. ~, r }ei ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ;y, !• . '»a
'~'
~ .~ t`„~'~ ~ P' ~~. -- ~ ~ l
' n •~~~~ ';i,. 3~%kiP. r ~/y ' {~ f'~ f-. ~~ ~, /'. rx N't ....rte
i , `~
~'
,rr r r i, ^~ ~~~ r t
rJ ~r .~' ~ rl~ '9A! .n
,,~i
_s = l ~~ 'iix:
F F ~ , Rr' j 1 '~.'. N F'.
I• W 9~
(<< ~ r F r a t r. k ~~ r 1 - 4 r
f rl ! a ~+
~ ~ t P. ,S S ~~~ ~ ~~
4} yid ~ at ~ s '~ , 3 ~
3t a ~s~ , - ~ .Hra, n.
4 ~,~p~ y ~ +~, r
0 ',j l'~ Li ~. i
~, } ~ ~"• z'1 • Y ~ . r>~t. r f_ ~"'LLLM1~ ~~v t y ti~'; ~ -
~,~ _ : s ~ 4 t,~ _ p !~ : - F it ~ y zr n Y x~-g,4~` '{ ~'~~ ~ \ ~',' ~ ~ ~ 3 ~. ti"- .rb 4
~, FI ~ q, ~~
1y~ Fi1. ~ `v ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ i F~`~ } d i M4
~ a ,~*
` Y `4
-,,y ~ 1~ ' _ - - t L a ~ ,5 r _
'~~ ~R l ~ ~4 ~ , # ~ 1~ •1w"' c 3
F-~ ` i
: L~ .-a` Y.p •' ~t. ~ ~.. rKv ~' ~ ~ ~ '~3~"~>;j. `~~ rr 1J~ik ~,e 1
F~ ~ ly; e: F~ .i r~
1 ~i, ~ J Y
., _ J f9r ~: ~ r
. t ~ ss f
1 ? r 1 r ~
~ * ~ =r ,
~- ,` , ti ,, .~'
`'dlt ~ ~ ~~ + -
g,.
~ . ~ ., ~ . ~ ~ ~~ e~~ . Ede
n,
~ .,
._ =
r . s . `~ .
_ ~~.'.
~~~ ~ ~,
,; s S ~; ~o
~~ ~ ~+ ~ 4 t ~ ~ r ~R ~. y' i ` Sl '...
f .a, n;.i _ ~ it ~ '~ ant '. ~'
,~ ~ __ .. -
~ ,
g, ~ ~ ~. ,
r t'* ~'~.°~ ~ _~ " ~ ~.1F far ~ a' ~4V
v a
~'~ _ ~ " e.
..
:-
..
d
. - ..

~_ ,. ,
' .;. ~• fi:
.: ~w~
~. `~
L* ~ T, ; ~ . ~ ..
%1 t
`~ i ~ ~ `
4 e ~2~ -,~trd'~' "",5aYY~. ~ ~~, -
. •::3a
~~~. ' ~ ra~`e*x ~ .J, as ~ ,:
~L ~ , ~ y v ~ . ~ ~A J 45~
.., Y ~r `\1J~ 3
m~ I ~ a~
t-~ _1; 1 f '~i SSA
q ~~, it 9` ..2 ~'~ ~ Y \~~~MSI^j~~ ~r f ~ ~4 ~~,'~a~~tly* 5
~1~ ~ y, ~'~b~ ~.'Ay_ _ 4, j~lpr t9 4
*y t `,
'' ~ -..~ ~ , : `jay r rr. ~ _ ~~~ dpi ~. y -.
~~~ ~ ;~ ~ a ': i .~~ a `t~.: i `+'rl~ r ~~~~r r
' ~ ~ ~~f '~ J~~.ut' ,~!~-
...~, ,R s• r i!j a ~,. ar~. - ~":;~ .r . slr ~a r. ~ U. r{
~.
P eI'~~ _ r a~ '
~4p "~~ 1.s'4~ r "~' F,~ 1~~ ~ ~.i~ t, I' j ~ s, `~~ ~r ^I / } 1~~. ~ _
4' I r
a
i
r ~ ,~~ ~.. r ~ ~ ~ i/F 'iR ~~fi~ .i .K J ~
~~~ ~ i t - i
.-. .. _ y~
h~ Kl ~i. ~4 may,, f 7 ^ 2 , ~ f ~~ ~ +F'"
`~ b I •~ ~ r ~ Y.~ 1 ~ ~ ~ F I~~. ~1 Y 9
.~ i~ ~~,.. ~ ~ `` f<~~ - eau ~,,~;~i ~ p. ~ r
rk 9g t - ~ i'.
R, 1 ~ +~
>i ~ 11 li i i:.i t G' ,. f /':a
O~ >r ~a ~ a
cJ~ ~ ~ - ,`

~"' ~ .,~y ~ ~ ~
~~ j ~ ~~~ ~~~ I, ~
~'
i
f" 'f, t~ f ti
r ` 'a '~ ~' +~ . s r ~'
~ f
~~r ~ ;~
y ~. ~ ;~ ,
;{
~fpp. r R:~
+ ~~
.,yMyy"`t.r
:; » ate.: e d r.I + { G.'`` r ~' ~~' ~ M ~ ~ ¢ ', .
a E ~'~' ~°., - ~- ,. ~;~' ) ~''~,~~ +'j4 ~ '. f'c ~ Ef fit...
' }}
fT I ~ r f °y .ij' :~ ~ .18, ,~' i~
~ * ice: - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ •~
',~~ 1~ ~ ,~ `~t' ~f 4~~
f 1 I ~ ~~ ~ a, ~ ~ 4k`,
' Ii !" ~.
., ,
. ~f
,, r~,
r ~ t
~ '4 ' ~ I,'
,j.. ~
- r - ~ ~.
w ~ Ir ~. ~j, '~ ~~ ~~ ~.
r
~"
M 4 ~ '~ ~' r t r ~~ r
N ~ a ft~~~ ~~ ~'.
;,.. . '~
~, Y' ~ j ) ~'Ft8` . ,SR ~ x ~~. L
.,
r~ ~ ~ '/ ~~,, -
• ..~~ ~ w y/ ~{y
.
~.
~,
4 # ~ .•
_ - .~~s
~~ , ~ ~r
r. ,.
w+ ~ ~~ p~ t~ ,,r 4
_ XM r
~ •~ _~~f. ~ - At p?' ~ ~~ -
~yyp~ ~y a
~. jV
r
r
.a. ~"~ NMI ' .~,`a{y ~ - ,,. •`f, ~ ~ rV~' ~ ~~ •.
y ',.
~ '
. ?~ ~
.
~ ~ ~ . r
ti d .'kt r MEI'i rn,M~Ma,
yy 1~ -r ~ ~'.. ,~. 9MOlIFIrM 1
s ~+ E
~. :4 ._
,, :.. -
k ~ - 1 ~ }.,~~ yea • i }
- If .. i ~ -
~ ., ,
f
y
4 `.,~r5 ' I} '_ ~ j" + MY. 1 ~- ,X ' H~~ :MF f ,,~•~*~ ,~~Pr~a .~ •,~~
. 'ry('
~ q
. .~ .4 s j~ ~~ ~ sP ~iM .1r,1~!k ,M, ~^' ~y~ : ~,r.. ~ ~'~• ~ y t ; ~V".
taww.,,-M ~~,..:.~aw~r~eWwyr,Mn,,,~rr~ 4~*~++'1xR'~7aWtlk~~.lF~aw ~r'+^ .. .;~~,r~~ i ~.:.~-~~~~

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVLSION OF HIGHWAYS
p PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
' BRANCH
WIDENING OF NC 55
FROM SR 1108 TO SR 1114
T.I.P. NO. R-2907
I o I ale FIG. 2

~ ' ' I rN~/" ~r~•
--~----`--- w. n,~~ , o~
,~- L`~~~~.~ ~~~,L a. Gaoer.,
_ ~~
OL Y SP I N "=
2
.2,300 3
o
id
s
s
N
~O
^
N 1115
' `df~
~
NN e

Rd,
395
4030 ' 70 ~,
- ao2e.o8 ,ti o?e
038'
393
4029 31
1395 . p? `~
BASS
~3 049
~_ ~
tAKE
04 ~~ 048
2~ 39
`~ ~A46
1115
Je tephens _
AVOIDANCE L E ATE 1~
Ri har dams F ~ ~ NCE A LTERNATE 2
1397

dam io.. U` 1.66

07 QRS.
i.~~
~ ~~~ CRE
EK
87
1126 ~
w
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
e•~ ~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~ f PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
3RANCH
AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES
NC 55 WIDENING
WAKE COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2907
SCALE = 1 ~ 25 9 B~~ FIG.3

APPENDIX I
Agency Correspondence

~\ ~~
~v
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
August 11, 1999
Action ID No. 199700175, TIP No. R-2907
Wi~.liam D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
R E C~~G
o ~ o ~= ~
ym ~;,
S ~ 'J
(~~~~ 1'S ES B~~O ~
Reference my March 1, 1999 meeting with Ron Lucas and Robert Hanson of
your staff, and Mr. Hanson's July 12, 1999 letter, on the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposal to widen NC 55, from SR 1108
(Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road), north of Fuquay-Varina, in
Wake County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2907).
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss my comments on the
Environmental Assessment for the project, which included a rccomr.;endatior,
concerning the preferred alternative. Mr. Hanson's letter requests that the
Corps reconsider its recommendations on the preferred alternative.
Information provided at the meeting and in the letter summarize the advantages
of NCDOT's preferred alternative (Alternative 6 - Four lane with 30 foot
Grassed Median), and the restrictions present in the project corridor,
including three properties that have been determined to be eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places.
Based on the information available at this time, including the
information provided at the March 1, 1999 meeting and in the July 12, 1999
letter, it appears that you have addressed all of the concerns and issues of
which we are now aware. However, since we cannot yet determine definitely if
the project can be authorized under a nationwide or regional general permit,
and the project has not yet gone through our public interest review process,
we cannot concur on the least environmentally damaging practicable
alternative.

2
As your pwnning process continues, please be reminded that avoidance and
minimization of impacts to waters 'and wetlands s::culd be undertaken to the
maxir„um extent practicable. We appreciate the epcortunity to coordinate with
your staff prior to the finalization of the Findir_c of No Sicnificant Impact.
If you~have any :questions regarding our comments or correspondence associated
with this project, please do not hesitate to cor_tact me at .telephone (919)
876-6441, extension 23.~
Sincerely,
~~ '/
Eric C. Alsme;~er
Reculato r~ Frcect Manace=
Copy Furnished:
Mr. Roy Shelton
Federal Highway Administration
310 Nev/ Bern Ave . , Rm 410
Raleich, North Carolina 27601-1442

~~y~
_~
•O,Y; ;~:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTTVIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT 1R. P.O. BOA 2201. RALEIGH. N.C. "_' 1611-301 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 12, 1999
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Field Office
608 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
SUBJECT: NC 5~ Widening, from SR 1108 (W'ake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph
Stevens Road), State Project 8.140301, Fed. Aid. Project FR-5~(5), TIP
R-2907, Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199700175
The Environmental Assessment for this project was completed on October 5,
1998 and forwarded to your office in January 1999. Corps of Engineers comments on
this Environmental Assessment were forwarded on correspondence dated January 26,
1999. On March 1, 1999, Ron Lucas and I met with you to review your comments on the
EA which included a recommendation for Altemate -l. Alternate 4 consists of a five-lane
64-foot curb and gutter facility for the entire project length. However, the EA
recommended Alternate 6, a four-lane facility with a 30-foot raised grass median.
Alternative 6 transitions to a curb and gutter facilit.• with a narrow median south of SR
1113/SR 1398 (Wade and Nash/ Dickens Road).
Wetland impacts stated in the EA were 0.9 acres for Alternate 4 and 1.8 acres for
Alternate 6. These wetland estimates were based on determinations not delineations.
Our Department strongly feels Alternate 6 is the most appropriate design for this
facility based on traffic operational advantages and historic property concerns. Traffic
operational advantages of Alternate 6 were described in the Environmental Assessment,
page 4. These advantages are repeated below:
Northern Half of the Project
From SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114, several cross-sections were considered.
Descriptions of the alternatives are as follows.

07 1 ~ ~)9
P~~_e ~ of
Five-Lane Curb and Gutter
This alternative would widen NC ~~ north of SR 1113/1398 to a five-lane facility.
This would provide two 3.6 m (12 foot) travel lanes in each direction and one 3.6
m (12 foot) center turn lane. Right of way impacts would be minimized under
this alternative. Following coordination with FHWA, SHPO, and NCDOT, it was
decided that this cross-section was not consistent with the rural setting in the
project corridor. In addition, outside curbs would require the current 5~ mph
speed limit to be reduced to 45 mph if this alternative was selected. This may
lead to safety concerns because motorists may tend to drive in excess of 4~ mph
given the rural nature of this section.
Four-Lane with a 14 m (46 foot) Grassed Median
This alternative would widen NC 5~ north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 14 m (46 foot) grassed median. This alternative was considered due to the
rural setting of the azea and the consistency with the Holly Springs Bypass cross-
section.
Four-Lane with a 9 m (30 foot) Grassed Median (Recommended)
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 9 m (30 foot) raised grassed median. This alternative is recommended
because the cross-section maintained the rural setting of the area and had less
right of way impacts than the four-lane 14 m (46 foot) median facility. This cross
section is also preferred by the State Historic Preservation Office.
The project area contains three properties eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places. Alternate 4 has been determined by the State Historic Preservation
Officer to have an adverse effect on all three properties. Alternate 6 has been determined
to have no adverse effect on two properties and an adverse effect on one -the Jeff
Stephens Farm. While Alternate 6 would cause an adverse effect at the Jeff Stephens
Farm, we feel our coordination with the SHPO has resulted in measures that will
effectively mitigate impacts to this property [see Environmental Assessment, pp. 50, 51,
and Appendix III].
At our March 1, 1999 meeting, we agreed that wetlands in the corridor should be
delineated and impacts recalculated. These wetlands have been delineated by NCDOT
biologists. Impacts are currently estimated at:
Alternate 4: 1.2 acres
Alternate 6 (NCDOT preferred): 1.9 acres
Based on the above information, we request reconsideration of your position on
the COE's preferred alternative. We hope to receive your concurrence on Alternate 6 as

U?I~ 99
Pace . of
the preferred alternative. We are hoping to reach a~,reement with the COE on the
preferred alternative prior to acquisition of right of way.
Attached for your information are copies of comments on the Environmental
Assessment from the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission and the U.S. Department of
the Interior (office of the Secretary and Fish and Wildlife Service). We would like to
have your comments by July 27, 1999.
Sincerely,
Robert Hanson, P.E.
Project Development Unit Head
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: David Franklin, COE
Roy Shelton, FHWA

~.- ~.l~tr ~ ,~
~_
~~ ~/~ ~
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO January 26, 1999
Planning Services Section
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
.~.• ,~
`~~'Y 2 ~ ~
-. Dil,;~. 199 -..
• ' ~~~rj, F.t, r.
~~~~
r~~.,.
This is in response to your letters of November 13, 1998 and January 14, 1999,
requesting comments on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for the widening of
NC 55 to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph
Stephens Road), State Project 8.1403501, Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), T.I.P. Project
R-2907" (Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199700175).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources that
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
~ "\ ~
C. Alex Morrison, Jr., P.E.
Chief, Technical Services Division
Enclosure

January 26, 1999
Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for the widening of NC 55 to a multi-lane facility
from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stephens Road), State Project
8.1403501, Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), T.I.P. Project R-2907" (Regulatory Division
Action I.D. No. 199700175)
1. FLOOD PLAINS• POC Mr Bobby L Willis, Planning Services Section, at
[phone]
Our comments on flood plains for this project were furnished by letter dated
January 13, 1997, a copy of which is contained in Appendix I of the Environmental
Assessment (EA). Discussion of the project effects on flood plains is contained on
page 38 of the EA. While the planned extension of the existing culvert at Basal Creek
may not have any significant adverse affect on the existing flood plain, we would like to
note that the extension could cause some increase in upstream 100-year flood
elevations. Such an increase would appear to be in conflict with FEMA's "No-Rise"
requirements referred to in our previous comments. The project should be designed to
comply with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and all local
ordinances.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS• POC Mr Eric Alsmeyer Proiect Manager, Raleigh
Field Office, Regulatory Division, at [phone], Extension 23
a. Prior Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of
excavated or fill material into waters and/or wetlands in conjunction with this project,
including the disposal of construction debris.
b. Review of the project indicates that the proposed work involves the discharge
of excavated or fill material into waters and wetlands. Affected water bodies include
Basal Creek and unnamed tributaries above headwaters (as defined for regulatory
purposes).
c. When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of any work
within waters of the United States and wetlands, our Regulatory Division would
appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for aproject-specific determination of
Department of the Army permit requirements. If there are only minor impacts to waters,
including wetlands, the work might be authorized under one or more nationwide or
regional general permits, provided avoidance and minimization of wetlands and
streams are adequately addressed. Asymmetrical widening which would minimize
wetland or stream impacts should be considered.

January 26, 1999
Page2of2
d. The Corps of Engineers must assess the impacts of such activities on the
aquatic environment prior to issuing Department of the Army permits. Authorization of
aquatic fill activities requires that the project be water dependent and/or that no
practicable alternatives are available.
e. Considering the information on impacts to aquatic resources that is available at
this time, including the discussion of alternatives in the Environmental Assessment,
Alternative 4 would be the Corps preferred alternative. Alternatives 2, 3, 5, and 6
vrould be the least preferred.
f. Our initial review emphasis for North Carolina Department of Transportation
projects focuses on the impacts to waters and/or wetlands. However, if degradation to
other aspects of the natural environment (e.g., habitat of endangered species) is
considered to be of greater concern, an alternative resulting in greater aquatic losses
may be chosen as preferred.
g. In all cases, and in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps, the sequencing process of
avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation of unavoidable wetland impacts
will be satisfied prior to the final permit decision. A Department of the Army permit will
not be issued until a final plan for compensatory mitigation is approved. Mitigation for
stream impacts will also be required. Based on the probable impacts to wetlands and
streams, a compensatory mitigation proposal should accompany ~~ny application to the
Corps for this project.
h. Development of a Memorandum of Agreement, and any other activities
associated with compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act,
should be coordin?ted with the Corps of Engineers.
Questions or comments pertaining to permits may be directed to Mr. Alsmeyer.

,~,~ .
VENT OF th ~w ~
o
'~~ ~~ United States Department of the Interior
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
~~ACM ~ ~°-° Washington, D.C. 20240
ER-99/47
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E. MAR ~ ~ I~~Q9
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue
Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina ?7601
Dear Mr. Graf:

a
This is in response to the request for the Department of the Interior's comments on the Environmental
Assessment/Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation for the Proposed Widening of US 5~ to a Multi-Lane Facility, from
SR-1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR-1114 (Ralph Stevens Road), Wake County, North Carolina. ~- ~;~; ~ ~
We concur that there is no prudent and feasible alternative to the proposed project, if project objectives are
to be met. We also concur with the proposed measures to minimize harm to the Richard Adams Farm and the
Jeff Stephens Farm.
We recommend continued cooperation and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer, in order
to complete the proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which should include measures to avoid and/or
minimize harm to the above two historic properties, in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. A signed copy of the MOA should be included in the Final Section 4(f~
Evaluation.
The Department of the Interior has no objection to Section 4(f) approval of this project by the Department of
Transportation.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments.
Sincerely,
)~
,~G~%~~ f
Willie R. Taylor
Director, Offtce of Environmental
Policy and Compliance

1' ,
~~
J r
E"T °` United States Department of the Interior
P~~ ~ ' `. ~'•F
WP ~:~
~ ~'~' 9 FISH ADD WILDLIFE SERVICE
~ c
Raleigh Field Office
__..a - a ' Post Office Box 33726
M4gCN ~ ~e'" Raleigh, Torah Caroling 27636-3726
Januarys, 1999
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., 1\1anager
Plannine and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 2>201
Ralei~_}~, NC 2761 I
Dear Mr Gilmore:
~ L;~
r`
,r
r
.,t ,.,
This responds to your letter of November 13, 1998, requesting; colrllrents from the U.S Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) on tl~e Federal Environmental Assessment (FEA), dated September
1998, for the widening of NC 55 to a multi-lane facility from SR I IOS (Wake Chapel Road) to
SR 1114 (Ralph Stephens Road), Wake County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2907). This report
is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C.
661-667d) and Section 7 ufthe Endan~~ered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-
1543).
According to the EA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has evaluated
six build alternatives with wetland impacts ranging from 0.9 to 2.1 acres. Alternative 6, a
variation of widening on tl~e east side then transitioning to the west side, is the recommended
alternative. This alternative proposes to widen an existing two mile, two-lane, section of NC 55
to four lanes with a 30-toot ~=rased median. Wetland impacts be 1.8 acres and stream impacts
will be less than 500 feet.
Purpose s!n~l nlPed
The Service concurs that the primary purpose and needs fur this project have been adequately
stated and supported by written•discussion and tabular data.
Alternatives Analysis
In addition to the "Nu Build" and "Transportation System Management" alternatives, six build
alternatives were considered. Alternatives I, 2, and 3 restricted widening to the east side of NC
55 and looked at tive-lane, tour-lane with 46-trot median, and tour-lane with 30-foot median
options respectively. Alternatives 4, 5, and 6 transitioned widenim.: from the east side to the west
side of NC 5S The options were as deticrihed above An additional pair of "Avoidance

Alternatives" were evaluated but were dropped from further consideration because they were
nearly hvice the length of the other build alternatives and wetland impacts would have been more
than twice as great (4 to 9 acres).
As noted previously, Alternative 6 is the preferred alternative and represents a compromise
between wetland impacts and adverse impacts to properties.
The Service concurs with this decision. However, the Service retains the ri~~ht to recommend
other alternatives if data nut contained in this EA become available and to provide comments on
the final ali~,nment.
~V'etlands
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of tl~e Environmental Protection agency, the NCDOT
should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for wetland losses that
would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted on page 5 of the EA the preferred
alternative will impact I .S acres of wetland and less than 500 feet of streams. Avoidance and
minimization have been accomplished by selecting an alignment that minimized wetland
encroachment. In addition, tl~e use of tl~e steepest possible fill slopes in wetland areas, and high
quality sedimentation and erosion control standards fur the protection of surface waters and
wetlands will be utilized for tl~e entire len~;tl~ of tl~e project.
Although, on page 23, you note that appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is
required for unavoidable adverse i-npacts, you do not present a conceptual proposal for
compensating wetland impacts resulting= from implementation of tl~e preferred alternative. A final
mitigation plan, subject to agency approval, should be submitted as part of any application for a
Department of the Army (DOA) permit.
Endangered Species
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs 23-26) of the potential project
related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and candidate, species. There have
been four federally-protected species listed for Wake County and NCDOT I~as determined that
there will be "No Et~ect" of the project un any of the listed species The Service concurs with
NCDOT's "Nu Et~ect" determinations. However, this decision would be reconsidered if
additional information on listed species that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if
there is a significant change in project plans.
Section 4(n
Section 4(t) of the Department ofTranspurtatiun Act of 1966 specifies that the Secretary of
Transportation may nut approve the use: of land from any publicly owned park, recreational area,
wildlife and waterti~wl refuge, or other desi~_nated area, purchased all, or in part, with Federal

ti-nds unless a determination has been made that: (I) there is no feasible and pnrdent alternative to
the use of the land ti-om the property and (?), the action includes all possible planning to minimize
harm to the property from such use.
This document provides a 4(t) declaration that specifically addresses historic properties. Potential
impacts on these sites will be coordinated with the appropriate a~_encies under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. Huwe~er, based on review of maps of the project area it is
unlikely that there are any 4(t) lands under our jurisdiction that would be impacted by this project.
Summary
The Service considers that this EA adequately addresses the existin~_ fish and wildlife resources,
Section 4(t) resources, and the potential impacts of this proposed project on these resources.
Based on the information provided, the Ser-~•ice concludes that this project, implemented as
described, will not have significant impact on resources under our jurisdiction. However, any
DOA permit for this project must be conditioned to require implementation of a final, agency
approved, wetland and stream miti~Tation plan for unavoidable project losses.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project. Please advise us of any
changes in project plans and provide us with your response to any issues we have raised in this
letter. If you have any questions re~~arding these comments, contact Tom McCartney at (919)
856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerel~•,
John l\1 efner
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
COE, Raleigh, NC (Eric Alsmeyer)
DWQ, Ralei~_h, NC (Cyndi Bell)
FHWA, Raleigh, NC (Nicholas Grat)
WRC, Creedmuor, NC (David Cox)
EPA, Atlanttr, GA (Ted Bistertield)
FWS/R4.TMcCartney TM:01/07/9; 910/856-4520 extension 32 \R-2907.tip

;; -; ,~
~_
:! I
_.. _.-~ t
,•
• ! '~ ~~ FE6 - 119
...~.
,;~;OJcCi MANAGE ~~
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
January 29, 1999
Ivlr. Whit Webb
NC DOT
Program Development Branch
Transportation Building
Inter-Office
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Webb:
iw'v
°~~•~"~.
...
,~~~,.
North Carolina
artment of Administration
- ... ....
. E
~~ L 1 t1 :.. (;
i
i~ - ~ I~.~.~ •
.. ~ •J ~.-
Katie G. Dorsett; Secretary
0~',~C tna ~ f o ~ PM
~C : Cf ~'artnc~heu5~
nC7Ebco K-
c~s a~1~9~
Re: SCH File f 99-E-4220-0342; Environmental Assessment NC 5~ Widening to a multi-lane
facility from SR 1108 to SR 1114 in Wake County; TIP it R-2907.
(ADDITIONAL COMMENTS)
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
~~~
Ms. Chrys Baggett
Environmental Policy Act Coordinator
Attachments
cc: Re`ion J
~~
S., ~• t
~; ~; ~ 1999
. ~'^~ ~,. `;r 1, • ~I- '~
F• ' `~' C'
116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 Telephone [phone]
An Egwl Opportunity /Affirmative Acnon Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
e~~
~~-
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY
--- ---~ F ~ `~ ~
^•~^~am Deve'opmert Brae'
MEMO
To: Jeanette Furnev
State Clearinghouse
From: Melba McGee
Environmental Review Coordinator
Subject: 99- E-034?
Date: January 25, 1999
The attached comments were received by this office afrer the response
due date. These comments should be forwarded to the applicant and made a
part of our previous comment package.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachment
i.. _= ~,, ~~ , ,.. ,~
I ...._ ~...:
Ju~J < 6 1999,

P.O. Box 27667, RALEIGH NC 27611.7687 / S12 NORTH SALISBURY STREET, RALEIGH NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] Wvi v:.EF1N R.3uTE.NC.vS/EHNR/
AN [`DUAL OPPOPTUNITV /Af~IRM~TIVC ACTION EMPLOYER ~ cr°n R~CYC'_CC"C°o P'='+T~C ~'. :ll'~IER PAP[P

State of North Cstrolina
Department of Eo~'irontnent and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
IrTERGOVERNMENTALREVlEW -PROJECT COhiAtEhTS Project Numbcr: ~- fl-3 ~- Due Dau:
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR pcrtnit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtsincd in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these pctmits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse oC the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Rcgionsl Office.
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or R.EQiJIR.E~~NTS
D Permit to coaswct & operate wassuwater trsatmrnt Application 90 days before begin oonsurtction or award of caosuttction
facilitirs, sewer systerrt extestsions & sewer sysums contracts. On-siu irupcc'tion Post-application techninl conferrntt usual.
not discharging into sou surface waters.
D NPDES - permit to discharge into surfatt water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site iatpation. Pre-appltcauon
permit to openu and coruut,ct wastewater facilities conferrnce tuual. Additionally, obtain permit to consvuct wutewater
discharging into stau surface waters. treatmrnt facility-granted after NPDES. Rcply time, 30 days after receipt of
plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
D Waxer Use Permit Pro-application uchnical conferrntt usually nettssary

D ~/~LLS ~/TH~~ Tip
We(1 Cortstruction Permit
L ivL`~ D To ~~ Com lete licttion mutt be received and permit issued prior to the
P aPP
H,/L
Rl~/YT o - w~rr ~ <Q r ~ ,~ irutallation of a well.
D Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacrnt riparian property owner.
On•site inspection. Pre-application eonferrnce usual. Filling may require
Easemrnt to Fill from N.C. Departmrnt of Administration and Federal Dredge
and Fill Permit
D Permit to conriruct Rc operate .4ir Pollution Abatemrnt NSA
facilities and/or Emission Sources u per 15 A NCAC
(2Q.OI00, 2Q.0300, 2H.0600)
Any oprn burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
D Demolition or rrnovations of structures containing
asbestos mattrial muri be in compliance with 1 S A
NCAC 2D.11 10 (a) (i) which requvex notification and
removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control NSA
Group 919-733-0820.
D Complex Source Permit required under 13 A NCAC
2D.0800
D The Sedimrnution Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimrnution control plan will be required if one or more aces to he disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Qiice (land Quality
Sect) Al least 30 days before tuginning activity. A fee of S30 far the tint aae and 52000 for each addiuonal acre or part must
accompany the plan.
D The Sedimrnution Pollution control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrnced Local Ordinance.
D Mining Permit On-siu inspection ttstul. Surety bond filed with ENR Bond amount varies
with type mine and number of acres of aH'eetrd land. Any are mined greater
than one aae muri be permitted. The appropriau bond must be received
before the permit can be issued.

O I North Carolina Burning permit
O Special Z_'iround Clearance Burning Permit - 22
counties in consul N.C. with organic soils
O ~ Oil Refuting Facilities
On-siu inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit exmds 4 days
On-siu inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than
five aces of ground clearing activities are involved. Irupectiorts should be
requested at leaf trn days before actual bum is planned."
N/A
D Dam Safety Permit (f permit requved, application 60 days before begin construction Applicant
must hire N.C, qualified rnginexr to: prepare plans, inspect cautruction,
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require
permit under mosquito control program. And a 404 permit from Corps of
Engineers. An inspection of siu is necesury to verify Hazvd Classification. A
minimum fee of 5200.00 must accompany the application. An additional
processing fee hued on a perttnuge or the tool project cost will be requved
upon completion.
Normal Process Time
(rianttory time limit)
30 days
(90 days)
90.120 days
(N/A)
30 days
fN/A)
7 days
(1 S days)
ss days
(90 days)
60 days
60 days
(90 days)
20 days
(30 days)
(30 days)
30 days
(60 days)
1 day
(N!A)
1 day
fN/A)
90-120 days
fN/A)
30 days
(60 days)

Normal Prod Time
laII1lOR' 11fI]G Iutul)
PER\iTTS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIRE1vtENTS (S

O Permit to drill exploratory oil or gu well File surety band of SS,000 with ENR running to State oCNC conditional that
any well oprned by drill operztor shall, upon abandonmrnt be plugged
according to ENR rules and regulations. 10 days
(1; A)
D Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with ENR u least 10 drys prior w issue oCpermit
Application by letter. No startdud application form 10 dais
~%•4)
O State Lakes Coattruaion Permit Application fee hued on structure siu is chugcd. Must include drsniptiotss &
drawings aCstrutture & proof oCownership oCripariut property. ~ 15-20 days
(N/A)
O 401 Water Quality Certification N%A 60 days
(130 days)
D CAMA Permit for MAJOR developmrnt 5230.00 fee must acrnmpany application SS days
(150 days)
O CAMA Permit for MINOR developmrnt SS0.00 fee must accompany application 2= days
(2f ~K)
O Several geodetic monumrnts arc looted in or ncv the project uea. If any monumrntc need to be moved or desvoyed, plesse notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
O Abandonmrnt of any wells, if required must he in accordance with Title ISA. Subchapter X.0100.
O Notification oCthe proper regiunal office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) ue discovered during any excavation operation.
D Compliance with 1 SA NCAC 2H 1000 (Consul Stormwmer Rules) is required. 45 days
~%A)
• Other comments (atuch additional pages u necessary, being certain to cite commmt authority)
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional OtTice matited below.
O Asheville Regional Office
39 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
(704) 231208
_ . O Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
D Wuhington Regional OtTicc
943 Wuhington Square Mall
Wuhington, NC 27889
9l9) 946.6481
O Fayetteville Regiarul Office
Suite 7l4 Waehovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
D Raleigh Regional Office
]800 Burets Drive, Suite 101
Ralrigh, NC 27609
(9l9) 571x1700
D Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Exterssion
V,'ilrnirfgton, NC 28405
[phone]
O Winston•Salem Regional Office
S8S Waughtown SL
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 771 X600

~~ ~ !~ ~1~
~ ~~'~ North Carolina
~~ ~ JAS ~ 1 ~~`~ ~, .J ~
~ lr ~ ~
I :. ---.~;epartment of Administratlon
- _ ~~cT ~~at~tacL~.~~~~~ :._
James $. Hunt, Jr., Governor
K,~ CEDE.
,~
~ :,,: ~
~ .-ri!
.~

Katie G
January 13, 1999
IVIr. Whit Webb
NC DOT
Program Development Branch
Transportation Building
Inter-Office
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Webb:
PAOJFC~ FILF
~ () GE,~ER~;I CORRESPph~pFy~
() PUELIC ~EARIN(
()FILE ~N1TH ESTII4fATEg .
()
---~
~~ ~',
II°~1 -
~,5
SCH File ~ 99-E-4220-0342; Environmental Assessment NC 5~ Widening to a multi-lane facility from
SR 1108 to SR 1114 in Wake County; TIP n R-2907.
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by asencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ms. Chrys Baggett
Environmental Policy Act Coordinator
Attachments
~.:r .
cc: Region J ~~' " ~ ~ ~ '~:
~-
~~` ~. r
~ ~'~ .
~;~ ~
~~~,
• ~ .~
~ C~, ~ v 1999
v: .,.
G~ ~,~; ,, ,' :'~
~~ ~ ~r ,
r; y
Dorsett, Secretar}'
L r
C ~, -
~~
1 16 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-5003 Telephone [phone]
An [qual Opporumt~ /Affirmative Action Employer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
~~:
r~
_~_
t~CDENR
.LAMES 8. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
WAYNE ME:DEVITT
SECRETARY .;
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearin house
FROM: Melba McGee
Environmental Review Coordinator
RF: 99-0342 EA NC 55 Widening, ~GKC County
DATE: January 13, 1999
The Department of Environment and N~t::.al Resources has
reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are
for the applicant's information and consicerat'_on.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
attachments
.~~~I ~ 31999!

P.O. Ba>c 27 G07, RALEIGH NC 2761 I -7687 / 512 NCPTM SALI.'.BVRY STREET, RALEIGH NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAx 919.715-J000 wwvi.ENN n.s7A7 E.NC.uS/EHNR/
AN EOV AL OPI~rJPTV~~ITY /AEEIPMATIVE ACTION EMPL~V[P ~ ~C"., PCC~!'-~~/10"~ POST-CO ^15UMER PAPER

~ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Con~rnission~
~ 12 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Execurive Director
Mb:191URAN D U iv1
'TO: Melba Mc(;ec
Office of i,cgislalive and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: David Cnx, Highway Project Coordinator
I~lahitat Cortservalion Program j' `
DATE: llecember 23, 1998 C~
SUBJECT: North Csralina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment
(RA) for the NC 55 widening, from SR L l08 (Wake Chapel Road) to SlZ 11 ] 4 (Ralph
Stcvetts Road), Wake County, North Carolina. TiP No. R-2907, SCH Project No.
99-F.-0342.
Stat'f biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Cotnmission have reviewed tltc subject >rA and
are familiar u~itlt ltahitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to asses project
impacts to fish and ~~ildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the National l:nvirunmetttal Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 St<1l. 4U 1, as :rmen~Jed; ] G U.S.C. 661-667d).
NCDOT proroscs to widen existing NC 55 to multi-lanes from SRI 108 to SR 1114. Project length
is approxi,nalely 3.3 miles. Impacts to the natural onvironment from the preferred alternative include
impaetg to approximately 1.8 acres of jurisdictional wetlands as woll as approximately 4UU feet of
surface water impacts. '
We Iravc tlrc infirrm~~tiun included in the EA. Due Io the environmental comminnents included in
the document and the limited scope of the project, we do not object to the project as proposed. At this
time, we concur with the F.n fur this project. NCDOT should continue efforts to reduce wetland and
stream impacts. NCDOT best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control measures fur
sensitive watcrslrcds shuttlJ be employed to minimiu impacts to off-site resources.
Thank you fur the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any furtitcr assistance please
call meal (919 j 528-9886.
cc: t.1.S. fish and Wildlife Sorvice, Raleigh

,rur~ ~, ......... ~..., ~~., ,~.
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Charles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
~-----r
1 ~ •
~~
pE.HNR.
PROJECT REVIEW C02~NTS
Project Number: =1~ L ~ ~ Z
Project Name:

County : W ~~ e-
NC Office of State Planning - geodetic Survey
~/ This project will impact +'2 geodetic survey markers. N.C.
Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.0.
Hox 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional
destruction of a geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General
Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers. _ ,~r ~ ~,
-~~ ~",~_~' ~` Imo. ,I ,.
Other comments attached) I 1 ~- ,v ,~ \~:/ -
( ' ~1 11.1998 ~~_
For more information contact the N.C. Office of State ~ '~~~~~^~ L
Planning, Geodetic Survey O ~ce a 919/733-3836. ;~~,~
~e~ ~ .._ .z ~~ 98
F.eviewer Date
'Erosion and Sedimentation Control"
No comment
This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any lard-disturbing activity if
more than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as
part of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
/ If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality
Water Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental
Management, increased design standards for sediment and erosion
control will apply.
/ The erosion and sedimentation control plan ,required for this
project should be prepared by the Department of Transportation
under the erosion control program delegation to the Division of
Highways from the North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at 919/733-4574.
P viewer Date~~Geodetic Survey Section
Geologiccl Survey Section Land 9uelity Section (q )q) J33-3836
[phone] (FP1X) 733.2876 FPX: 733-4407
FAX:(919)733-G~C~
P.O. Eox 27f27, RCleigh. ~lorth Ccrclina 2761 1-7687 Telephone 9',2-733-3833 FPX 919•.33.4~;~7

Di=PARTIvIENT OF E~IVIRO~iti[i=NT, HEALTI-:,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONIviENTAL HEALTH
Proiect 1\iur: f,e:
Countti•
Project Name
Inter-Agency Project Revie:~• Response
~, CS'S
l ype of Proje ° ~~ 1 1
1
i The applicant should be aevued that plans and specific:.tions for a!1 Cate: s-: stem
C improvements must be approved by the Division of Environmental Hec!t`~ p-cr to the awand
of a GOt'iLraCt or Lhe lnltilt!CP_ Gf G.'~.nstr'1Ction (s re ;uired by 15A NCP.C 1SC .C~~GO e_. seo.).
For information, eortact t!e Public Nate: Supply Section, (919) 73 ~-?=~~.
~ This projec will be classified as a nor:-commur:iry public water supply a:-:d r^__, cor::ply F-it:l
'r •,.
state and federal driP.kinQ wa.e: r onitorin~ re~u:re:-ents. For r :ore ir.:e:--:c:__ : t__e aopucc_:t
s~:ould contact the Public ~`•:~~~e: Supply Se~~ior., (S 19) 7>j-?~??.
1 1 r ' „'
C I_ this project is consc.uctec ;.s p.rooose_. tie will recocn_~:en e:osure cc :~__ c. a~!cce:,c
~ Hers to the har-~ '- '~'~ ' .. -.~~ '~°'~` - n
~•a. •est cf s:.e..ns... ~Fcr !r.for,:.-cce reel:~in~ the s,:_---.s-: S_...____c p:cy:..
r:~; t_Re applic:.nt s;:culc c::::_ac_ t:e Si:ellfish Su::!._.:Gn Er:.:!C': a, !c _c) ~;~•c~_;
Tl-,e s,~oil disposal a:ea(s! prcposed for this projec_ r::w produce a r.:oscui_c b:~__:rte probie:-.
~ ' ~ '-
FOr 1nfOC:uaL!Or'i eonce:n!r.~ a~C'roGriate ri_OS~L:!LC cart:ol I'e:asL'.re=. t °_ ~_ _ ::C=a S~:OLId
contact the Public Health 1-'est hlar.a~°_.Tie:1L Sec_icr: a. ( 19) 725-Q9i~~.
^I t 1 1 1 r 1• 1 1
C the at7p1!CanL ShOL'.d be a_I:isec L::^_at prier tO L::e re.::GVa. Or Ce::.Cl!t!G' C: C!laplG_=?~
str~cures, a extea;ve roc_nt ccr_t:ol program--. r-cy Ee recess:._y i : cr:__: t:: pre~reat t=!e
n~Qrtion of the rodents tc~ adjacent areas. The informauor: conce:ni _~ rtcea tort:cl,
contac the locLL1_ health de:,u:~r:ent or the Public hie_lth Pest Mar:a~e:e :: S_~icr: at (S 19)
733-607.
The applicant should be advised Lo contac the local health depa.~:,,en_ re_a:e!r~ their
C re~uire.~nents for septic tan l_ installations (as re ;ui:e^ under 1~P. NCP.C lE ~_ .~9~~G et. sec.).
For infor::~ation eor_eernin~ septic tank and other on-site waste disposal re_:c:_; contact the
On-Site Wastewater Secion at (919) 7>;-2895.
C The applicant should be advised to contras the local heclth deparme_.t re~_r._g t e sanita_y
facilities rewired for this ~pro~e -.
Lf existing ware: lines will be relocated during the corstrucion, pp1_ns fcr t_e water li_^_e
relocation must be submitted to the Division of Environmental P-;ealth, Public G7ate: Suppl-y
Se~ion, Plar_ Review Branch, Parke: Lincoln Esilcir_g, Raleigh, North Caroh=a, (919) 7>;-
2c50.
1 ~ ~~~~ ~~ \ ~~
Reviewer Se~~ion/Branch D~_~

APPENDIX II
Local Government
Correspondence

Fl10UAY•VARN/~ NORTH CARpINA
January 21, 1999
TOWN OF FU9UAY-VARINA
1300 East Academy Street
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
[phone]
John C. Lansford, P.E.
Project Design Engineer
NC Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
ROADti";!NY DESIG~~ U~fT
DECEIVED FILE
'JAS 2 51°99

.i. .. .
Re: NC 55 project from Wake Chapel Road (SR 1108) to Ralph Stevens Road (SR
11 14) -proposed improvemeras, R-2907
Dear Mr. Lansford:
At the Town Board meeting held on January 19, 1999 the Board was presented with the
alternative to have a four (4) lane road with a 16 feet raised median instead of the five (5)
lane section with curb and gutter as was originally requested.
The Town Board instructed staff to submit this letter informing NCDOT that the Town
request the road section for project R-2907 be changed from the five (5) lane section to
the four lane section with the raised median. The new section would be from Wilbon
Road to Dickens Road. Sidewalks and traffic signals would still remain as proposed in
the original project.
Please advise the Town if there is any additional information that you need. Thank you
for your assistance and we look for`vard to the construction of this project.
Sincerely,
L. W. Bennett, Jr.
Town Manager
cc: Bob Barker, Mayor
Town Commissioners
Michael Sorensen, Pla~uiing Director
C LoW'.NC Dcpr.~Ueq e! Rans~anmion~US SSNeucr~piopo+aJ mm.,~cinrnii J~

wouu•v~ NoaTM c~ea-u
March 30, 1999
TOWN OF FU67UAY-VARINA
1300 East Academy Street
Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina 27526
[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation
Citizens Participation Unit
Attn: Mr. L.L. Hendricks
Public Hearing Officer
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Pt,~ ~~~; ...
Fi'L ~ !'vcLi
qPR ~ 1999
Re: Project 8.1403501, R-2907, Wake County proposed widening, and improvements
of NC 55
To the Department of Transportation:
The Town of Fuquay-Varina wishes to first thank NCDOT for the proposed
improvements to NC 55. We believe this project will have a major positive influence on
the Town and surrounding community. To be specific, this project cannot be constructed
fast enough, and any opportunity to accelerate this work would be supported by the
Town.
Upon review of the report submitted by NCDOT on the NC 55 project the Town has a
few comments and issues that we would like the Department of Transportation to
consider with the design and construction of the project:
The NC 55 corridor is part of the Town's sidewalks and greenway plan. There is
sufficient development existing and proposed related to employment, housing, retail
and educational uses that will require pedestrian crosswalks. These cro~swaiks
should be located at specific intersections and should be well defined and provide an
area in the median to allow pedestrians to stop before crossing the full street section.
Wilbon Road, James Slaughter Road and Wake Chapel Road intersections are the
recommended location for designated crosswalks with this project. Future crosswalks
should be located at Old Powell Road and Dickens Road.
2. Dedicated right turn lanes are proposed at most of the intersections. This will create
additional difficulty for pedestrians so it will be very important to have safe areas in
the median for pedestrian crossings. How necessary are the right turn lanes? Is this a
standard that NCDOT uses or are specific traffic counts causing the lanes to be
included? The Town wants efficient intersections, however, adding right turn lanes
appears to increase the speed of traffic through the intersection as well as make it
more difficult for pedestrians to cross. Can the intersections be just as effective
without right turn lanes and use the outside lanes for thru-traffic and right turn
movements.

3. Adding a left hand turn into Green Lawn Memorial Gardens Cemetery «~ould allow
funeral processions travelling north better traffic control into the site and the exit out
of the cemetery would be limited to a right tum only.
4. A left turn signal at the Wilbon Road intersection would provide traffic out of Sandy
Springs with the ability to make a safe U-turn to travel north. NCDOT should
evaluate the traffic pattern of vehicles traveling north from Town attempting to access
Wyndham Drive.
5. The Town would recommend NCDOT consider a "pull-off' area on NC 5~ for a
future bus route with a drop offi'pickup point near Wilbon Road. This would be a part
of an overall transit system for the Town. Considering the high school, Windsor
Point Retirement Community and the proposed shopping center this transit stop
would be important.
6. Plans indicate that improvements to Wilbon Road on the west side of NC 55 stop
almost immediately beyond the intersection. Approximately 100-150 feet beyond
where the project stops, Wilbon Road has been widened on the same side as Windsor
Point Retirement Community. It would appear that traffic going east on Wilbon Road
would be in an unsafe circumstance where existing road improvements give way to a
short section of unimproved road then back to an improved section at the intersection
of Wilbon Road and NC 55. The improvements should extend west on Wilbon Road
to the existing improvements on Wilbon Road at Windsor Point.
7. According to NCDOT plans, the crossing at Basil Creek will be reconstructed. The
Town has as part of its Greenway Master Plan a geenway crossing at Basil Creek.
The Town would request that included with work proposed at Basil Creek, a
greenway underpass be constructed following the Greenway Master Plan.
8. From now to when construction starts on the project the Town will be working with
potential development along this corridor to enhance pedestrian use and appearance
with landscaping. Some of the issues that the Town would like to address are:
• Landscaping along NC 55
• Walkways that may extend outside of ROW then back in again
• Potential landscaping within the ROW based on NCDOT guidelines.
• Coordinated landscaping plan with NCDOT. The Town would be interested in
working with NCDOT on a landscaping plan for the street section with the raised
median and the section with the 30-foot median.
• What amount of funding for landscaping will NCDOT provide for this project?
The Town thanks NCDOT for this opportunity to present our request and comments.
Please contact the Planning Department staff at [phone] if you have any questions
regarding these comments. Again the Town is very supportive of this project and will
work with NCDOT to implement this project at the earliest possible date.
Sincerely,
Michael Sorensen
Planning Director

1876 ~ °h,~
ti ~d'
? ~ ~ ~ y
n ~, 1µ5N ~
Tt1E TOWty Of
Holl
.y
S rings
P
P.O. Box 8
128 S. Main Street
Holly Springs, N.C. 27540
(919552-6221
Fax: [phone]
Mayor's 0lficc Fax:
[phone]
.~pril 4, 1999
A~1r. Len Hendricks
Citizen Participation Unit
PO Box 25201
Raleigh
North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Hendricks:
Please consider these comments for the public record
regarding to NC 55 widening from Fuquay Varina to Ralph
Stephens Road in Holly Sprinhs. My comments include this as
well as its connection to the NC 55 /Holly Springs bypass.
This wider road which ti~ill link to the bypass will not
immediately increase the amount of traffic, but it will act as a
catalyst for more groti•th and development in the area. I
encourage the state to look ahead and plan for increased traffic
volumes in the area near Ralph Stephens Road and Teal Lake
Road.
Some of the considerations the state should plan for
include traffic lights at Teal Lake Road as well as natural sound
barriers (combination of trees and shrubbery) in state o~~~ned
areas near this existing residential subdivision (Somerset
Farms). The plantings should be done no~~, ho~~ever, I ~~ould
like to see the planning framework for the traffic signals done
now, so when/if the need arises, implementation can be done
sti~iftly. I also suggest that the posted speed limit not exceed 40
MPH in the area leading in to Holly Springs.
,+t;~,
APR 6 1999
Since ely,
i
/C '~~~
Hank Dickson
To~~n Commissioner

APPENDIX III
Public Hearing Notice

NOTICE OF APRE-HEARING OPEN HOUSE
AND A PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED WIDENInIG/IMPROVEMENTS OF NC 55
FROM WAKE CHAPEL ROAD IN FUQUAY-VARINA
TO FZ4LPH STEVENS ROAD iN HOLLY SPRINGS
Project 8.1403501 ~ R-2907 Wake .County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hole the above pre-hearing
open house on Tuesday, March 30, 1999 from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m, in the Fuquay-Varina
High Schoo( Cafeteria located at 201 Bengal Boulevard in Fuquay-Varina. Interested
individuals may attend the open house at their convenience between the above stated
hours to become familiar with the proposed design. A FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING FOR
THIS PROJECT.WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE CAFETERIA BEGINNING AT 7:00 P.M.
The hearing will consist of an explanation of the;prapased location and design, right
of way requirements and procedures, and relocation advisory assistance. The hearing will
be open to those present for statements, questions, comments, andlor submittal. of material
pertaining to the proposed project. Additional material may be submitted'for a period of 10
days from the date of the hearing to: Len Hendricks, P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611.
The project proposes to widen NC 55 to a multi-lane highway from Wake Chapel
Road (SR 1108) in Fuquay-Varina to Ralph Stevens Road (SR 1114) in Holly Springs - a
distance of approximately 3.3 miles. A four-lane roadway divided by a raised median is
proposed for the entire project. The segment from Wake Chapel Road to the Dickens
Road/Wade Nash Road (SR 1398/SR 1113) intersection will have curb ono gutter and a
median width of 16 feet. Sidewalks are planned along both sides within the Fuquay-Varina
City Limits. The.segment from the Dickens RoadlNash. Road intersection to Ralph Stevens
Road will have shoulders 10 feet wide (~ feet paved} and a median width of 30 feet.
Additional right of way and the relocation of horses and businesses will be required for this
project.
A map setting forth the location and design and a copy of the environmental
document -Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) EvaluGtion -are available for
pubiic review in the Fuquay-Varina Planning Department located at 1300 East Academy
Street in Fuquay-Varina and in the Holly Springs Town Hall located at 128 South Main
Street in Holly Springs. ,
Anyone desiring additional information concerning the Pre-Hearing Open House or
the Public Hearing may contact Mr. Hendricks at the above address; by telephone at
(919} 250-4092; by FAX at [phone]; or by Email at [e-mail].
NCDOT - in compliance with the American's With Disabilities Act -will provide
auxiliary aids and services for disabled citizens who wish to participate in the hearing. To
receive special services, please call Mr. Hendricks at the above number to give adequate
notice prior to the date of the hearing.

APPENDIX IV-A
CORRESPONDENCE
RELATED TO HISTORIC
PROPERTIES

~,~. _.;
' ~r ~~~
? s~
•'~ ... r'
Q' I i A
.. .. i.
• ~.
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources '~
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Arc;tiva and History
Be:ty Ray McCain, Sectztary kffrey J. Crow, Dirt:ctor
November 1, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways .
Department of Transportation
J~ y~?~.
FROM: David Brook !'
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Improve NC 55 from SR 1108 to SR
1114, Wake County, R-2907, Federal Aid
Project No. FR-55-(5), State Project
8.143501, 96-E-4220-0271
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following
structures of historical or architectural importance within the general area of the
project:
House (WA 555). West side of NC 55, 0.3 mile south of junction with SR
1 1 10, Fuquay-Varina vicinity.
Adams House (WA 61 1). East side of NC 55, 0.6 mile southeast of junction
with SR 1 1 14, Holly Springs vicinity. This property is described on page
357 of the Historic Architecture of Wake County.
Richard L. Adams Farm (WA 612). West side of NC 55, 0.3 mile southeast
of junction with SR 1 114, Holly Springs vicinity. This property was placed
on the state study list•on July 12, 1990.
Jeff Stephens Farm (WA 6131. West side of NC 55 at junction with SR
1 1 14, Holly Springs vicinity. This property was placed on the state study
list on July 12, 1990.
We recommend that an architectural historian with the North Carolina Department
of Transportation evaluate the Adams House, the Richard L. Adams Farm, and the
Jeff Stephens Farm for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. We have
reviewed our file for House (WA 555) and believe it is not National Register-eligible
because it is an average example of the relatively common bungalow type. We
109 East loncs Sircet • Raleigh. Nonh Caroling 27601.2307 ~V

recommend that no further historic architectural survey be conducted for this
project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earfey, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: Wake County Historic Preservation Commission
State Clearinghouse
N. Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett

,.
jj%~ ~..,,
i ^~~AR~~
l~ t- ~ ~~
~,~~~F
.~ ~~,'
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
,tcs B. Hunt Jc, Governor
ietty Ray McCain, Secretary
June 2, 1997
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: NC 55 from SR 1 108 to SR 1114, Wake
County, R-2907, Federal Aid Project STP-55(5),
State Project 8..1403501, ER 97-914?
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
kffrey ]. Crow, Director
Q CEI~
O
~ ~J~M 0 ~ 1997
~.
rJ
- ~ ~~~ OF
~ N;Gi-iY~AYS ~o
~,~Py
Thank you for your letter of May 5, 1997, transmitting the historic structures
survey report by Scott Owen concerning the above project.
For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act, we concur that the following properties are eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places under the criterion cited: '
Adams House (WA 6111, east side of NC 55, 0.6 mile southeast of junction
with SR 11 14, Holly Springs vicinity. This house is a rare surviving example
of the coastal cottage type, and features shall-and-parlor plan, engaged front
and rear porches, and federal-style woodwork. It is eligible under Criterion C
for architecture. We believe the proposed boundaries, which include the
cemetery across NC 55 from the house, are appropriate for this property.
Richard L. Adams Farm (WA 612), west side of NC 55, 0.3 mile southeast
of junction with SR 1 1 14, Holly Springs vicinity. This property was placed
on the state study list on July 12, 1990. The farm includes a Colonial
Revival style foursquare house, numerous domestic and agricultural
outbuildings, tenant houses, pastures, and cultivated fields, and is eligible
under Criterion A for agriculture and Criterion C for architecture. We believe
the proposed boundaries are appropriate for this property.
Alsey J. "Jeff" Stephens Farm (WA 613-, west side of NC 55, at junction
with SR 1 1 14, Holly Springs vicinity. This property was placed on the state
study list on July 12, 1990. The farm includes a foursquare house with
Victorian and Craftsman details, ten agricultural and domestic outbuildings,
tenant house, and cultivated fields, and is eligible under Criterion A for
agriculture and Criterion C for architecture. We believe the proposed
boundaries are appropriate for this property.
]09 East Jones Sucet • Raleigh, North Carolina 2760]-2807 g~~

June 2, 1997, Page 2
Please note that the report did not contain a map of the project's area of potential
effect (APE) showing the location of the three historic properties. Please provide
two copies of an APE map to insert in the report.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. .
Sincerely,
~ ,•''
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: ~.~F. Vick
B. Church
Wake County Historic Preservation Commission

r•

Frcl~~ru1.-Ikl #STP-»(~) T!f' =R-?9Q7 C'c~cinn~: Make
CONCURRENCE FOR`I FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Prr~j~~c~ Descrip~ivn: NC ~~ from SR 1 I ~3 to SR 1 1 I ~
On March 19, 1993. representatives of the
© North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
© Federal Hi~_hwav Administration (FH~~~A)
~ North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
rev ievved the subject project and agreed
~ there are no effects on the National Resister-listed property/properties located ~~•ithin the
project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
0 there are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties located vvitl~in
the projects area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
~ there is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on the
reverse.
~ there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The propem~/properties and effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
Sinned:
Represe t've, 'CDOT Date
HW' for the Divi on Administrator, or other Federal A_ency Date
Representative, $HPO Da4e
State Historic Preservation Offic~er~ V J / Date

Alsey Stephens Farm (WA 613) DE
5-ItnN curb end gutter f uilittthrou;h Stephen< Farm -adverse effect
5-I,ne curb and }utter t uility avoidin; Stephens Farm -adverse effect
4-line 46' median facilirv throu,h Ste2hens Farm -adverse effect
-t-lane 30' median racilitLthrouah Stephens Farm -adverse effect
4-I~n =16' median facility avoidin}Stephens Farm - conditional no adverse
effect (conditional upon SHPO's opportunity to review and comment on the
following: landscaping, median cuts, and median tapers.)
4-lane 30' median facility avoidi,n~~ Stephens Farm - conditional no adverse
effect (conditional upon SHPO's opportunity to review and comment on the
following: landscaping, median cuts, and median tapers.)
NOTE: SHPO PREFERS THE ~3-LANE FACILITY WITH A 30' !`1EDIAN OVER THE S-LANE CURB
AND GUTTER FACILITY AND THE ~3-LANE FACILITY WITH A 46' MEDIAN.
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
Initialed: NCDOT ~Q~ FHWA ~ ~ SHPO

n~~
,~' y,
aS `L;
y - -~
'> ;_
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.o. Box 2;~oi, RaI.EIGH. h.C. 2'611-5?01 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVER'JOR SECRETARY
July 6, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO: file
FROM: Robert Hanson. P.E. ~'`U---~
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: TIP Project R-?907, Ivfeetins with SHPO, Property
OwT~ers. FH« :~.. and NCDOT to discuss alternatives at Jeff
Stephens farm.
On June 3, 1998, a meeting was held to discuss alternatives for Alsey J. Jeff Stephens
farm for TIP Project R-?907. The following attended the meeting:
Tammy Fish
Patsy Coley
David Brook
Renee Gledhill-Earley
Debbie Bevin
John Schrohenloher
Ron Lucas
'Robert Hanson
Property Owner
Propem• Owner
State Historic Preservation Office
State Historic Preservation Office
State Historic Preservation Office
Federal Hishwav Administration
NCDOT
NCDOT
The Jeff Stephens farm is eligible for the National Resister of Historic Places and is
owned by Mrs. Coley. Mrs. Coleys daughter; Mrs. Fish. has been designated to
represent the interests of the property owner.
The meeting was held at Mrs. Fish's house and began with an explanation of the agency
relationship between the SHPO, FWHA, and NCDOT. Two alternatives were discussed:
one would avoid Jeff Stephens house; the other would extend through the present location
of the house and adversely affect the historic property.
NCDOT has proposed moving the house to another location on Jeff Stephens farm
of the alternative extending through the present house location.

The SHPO representatives explained the'following:
1. Moving the house may make the property not eligible for the National Register
of Historic Places.
2. Tai credits are available for restoration of properties listed on the National
Register.
Certain tax credits are available to older properties (not listed on the National
Resister) through historical easements. These tax credits do not offer as much
tax savings as those available to listed National Resister sites.
Eligibility on the National Register can chance over time. Therefore, if
moving the house makes property not eligible, it probably will be eligible
again sometime in the future if no other major alterations are made to the
property and as the surrounding area develops.
Mrs. Fish discussed:
1. Having the house so close the NC 5~ has made it undesirable to live in and
therefore no effort has been made to restore the house.
2. IVloving the house away from NC 5~ would make it much more livable and
more likely to be restored.
3. She prefers the alternative extending through the present house location if
NCDOT will move it and provide other mitigative measures.
4. She is committed to preserving the house and property if the house is moved to
a better location.
5. While retaining National Register eligibility for the property would be
desirable, impacts associated with the house proximity to NC 5~ make moving
the house a preferred alternative.
NCDOT discussed mitigative measures associated with the altemative extending
through the present house location:
1. NCDOT will move the historic house to another location «~ithin the historic
property suitable to the property owner.
2. NCDOT will provide landscaping (off NCDOT R/W) around the new house
location to try to add to the historic setting.
3. NCDOT will place the moved house on a suitable foundation.
4. NCDOT will connect utilities to the relocated house.
5. [Possible] If the utilities in the house do not meet current code standards
NCDOT will fund the upgrading of these utilities.
6. NCDOT will construct (or fund) an access driveway to the new house location.
7. NCDOT will fund suitable sanitary connections (well/septic or water/sewer
connections, as appropriate).

hlovinR the outbuildings was discussed, but no decisions were made. It is unclear
whether the outbuildings are in suitable condition to move. In addition, the next phase of
design may better show how the outbuildings will be affected. The outbuildings will be
discussed afrer more detailed designs are prepared.
The meeting concluded with the following decisions. Based on all comments at the
meeting. alternative extending through the present house location w•as selected. The
mitigative measures discussed by NCDOT will be incorporated into the project.
A memorandum of agreement (MOA) for the adverse effect will be prepared
documenting the mitigative measures. This iV10A will involve the property owner,
NCDOT, SHPO, FHWA and other appropriate agencies.
This memo w•as reviewed by meeting attendees. Comments ha~-e been incorporated into
this final draft.
RPH

July 22, 1998
~; Nlr. Robert Hanson, P.F.
Planning & EnvirorIInental Branch, NCDOT
RE: TIP Project R-2907
This letter is in reference to our meeting on June 3, 1998. I would
like to confirm that it is my wish for the house to be relocated. On
the attached map, I have indicated the area which is my preference for
the new location of the house. It is my intention to restore the house.
It is my understanding that the NCDOT will be financially responsible for
the relocation which will also involve upgrading utilities, providing access
(drive~ray), well/septic system, landscaping, and possibly other improvements
to the property. It is also my understanding that all parties will be
involved in establishing a memorandum of agreanent which will clarify all
details of the relocation process.
Please keep me informed of all new develognents concerning this matter.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,^
~. Fish

1 - p
Advisory . _ _ _a--
Council On _._. -;
Historic - - ..; ...I
Preservation '~ -:~ .,~
4
The Old Post Office Building
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, MN, X809
Washington, DC 20004
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27601
Al!G 21999
.., ,
_. 1
l
-~~
, ,
. -~
REF: Alsey J. Stephens Farm ~- .. _ ..-~.._ ..:... ... __ ._: ~
Holly Springs vicinity in Wake County, North Carolina
Widening NC55 from SR 1108 to 1114 (Federal-Aid Highway Project STP-55(5))
Dear Mr. Graf:
On July 22, 1999, we received your notification of adverse effect and supporting documentation
for the referenced undertaking, which was submitted in accordance with Section 800.6(a)(1) of
the Council's regulations, "Protection of Historic Properties" (36 CFR Part 800 effective June l7,
1999 [64 FR 2744-84] ). Based upon our review of the background documentation, we have
concluded that Appendix A, Criteria for Council Involvement in Reviewing Individual Section
106 Cases, of the Council's regulations does not apply to this undertaking. Accordingly, we do
not believe that our participation in the consultation to resolve adverse effects is needed.
However, should circumstances change and you determine that our participation is required,
please notify us.
Pursuant to Section 800.6(b)(iv), you should provide us with a copy of the Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) developed between the FHWA and the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) and related documentation at the conclusion of the consultation
process. The filing of this MOA with tbe Council is required in order for FHWA to complete its
compliance responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
Should you have any questions, please contact Ralston Cox, at 202-606-8528, or by a-mail at
[e-mail]. Your continued cooperation is appreciated.
S' cerely, //
~,v "~ l/
1}t Don L. Klima
Director
Office of Planning and Review

APPENDIX IV-B
MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT RELATING
TO HISTORIC
PROPERTIES

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
Between the
Federal Highway Administration & the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer
Submitted to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
for Widening NC 55 from SR 1108 to SR 1114
Wake County, North Carolina
TIP #R2907, State Project #8.1403501, Federal Aid #FR-55(5)
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) has determined that the
widening of NC 55 from SR 1108 to SR 1114 will have an effect upon the Alsey J. "Jeff
Stephens Farm, a property eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places; and
has consulted with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36
CFR Section 800, regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Council)
implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC 470f); and
WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and Patsy G.
Coley, the property owner (Property Owner), have participated in the consultation and have been
invited to concur in this Memorandum of Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the FHwA and North Carolina SHPO agree that the undertaking
shall be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account
the effect of the undertaking on historic properties.
STIPULATIONS
FHwA will ensure that the following measures are carried out:
I. Documentation: To document the Stephens Farm and its setting before any construction is
initiated, NCDOT shall record the property in accordance with the attached Historic
Structures Recordation Plan (Appendix A) and submit the results to the North Carolina
SHPO in advance of any work taking place at the property. Following the relocation of the
Stephens House, NCDOT will again record the property and re-evaluate its eligibility for
listing in the National Register. The recordation materials and re-evaluation will be
submitted to the North Carolina SHPO within one (1) year of the relocation of the Stephens
House.
II. Relocation of the Stephens House and Outbuildings: NCDOT will move the Stephens House
to a new location within the farm's historic boundaries and provide a suitable foundation and
driveway for the house as well as utility connections, a well, and septic system (if no public
connection is available) so that the house can be made habitable by the Property Owner.
NCDOT will evaluate each of the outbuildings to determine whether or not they can be
successfully moved within the farm's historic boundaries, the cost of the move, and whether
or not the move would be cost effective. The results of the evaluations will be provided to
the Property Owner and the North Carolina SHPO. If a building can be successfully moved
in acost-effective manner and will be used by the Property Owner, NCDOT will move the

Page 2
building. Any buildings that cannot be moved in acost-effective manner or will not be used
by the Property Owner will be demolished by NCDOT.
III. Landscaping: After the Stephens House has been moved, NCDOT, in consultation with the
Property Owner and North Carolina SHPO, will develop a landscaping plan for the house and
provide for its implementation by either NCDOT or by the Property Owner. Any plant
materials lost within two (2) years of planting will be replaced by NCDOT.
IV. Rehabilitation and preservation of the Stephens House: Recognizing the historic value of the
Stephens House and the costs involved in NCDOT's canying out the above stipulations, the
Property Owner agrees that she will rehabilitate the house for residential use and provide for
its preservation and use in the future.
V. Dispute Resolution: Should the North Carolina SHPO object within thirty (30) days to any
plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this Memorandum of Agreement,
FHwA shall consult with the North Carolina SHPO to resolve the objection. If FHwA or the
SHPO determines that the objection can not be resolved, FHwA shall forward all
documentation relevant to the dispute to the Council and request assistance in accordance
with 36 CFR 800.2(b)(2). In accordance with 36 CFR 800.7(c)(2) the Council will either:
A. Provide FHwA with recommendations which the agency official will take into account in
reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or
B. Notify FHwA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR Section 800.7(c)(3) and proceed
to comment. Any Council comment provided in response to such a request will be taken
into account by the agency official in accordance with 36 CFR Section 800.7(c)(4) with
reference to the subject of the dispute.
Any recommendation or comment provided by the Council will be understood to pertain only
to the subject of the dispute; FHwA's responsibility to carry out all the actions under the
amended MOA that are not the subject of the dispute will remain unchanged.
Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by FHwA and the North Carolina SHPO,
its subsequent filing by the Council, and implementation of its terms, evidence that FHwA has
afforded the Council an opportunity to comment on the construction of the widening of NC 55
from SR 1108 to SR 1114 and its effects on historic properties, and that FHwA has taken into
account the effects of the undertaking on historic properties.

Page 3
Agree:
Federal Highway Administration
By: G Date: ~~3
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer
By: ~- Date: ~aS
Concur:
North Carolina Depnartrne of Transportation
By: l . ¢z.Q, Date: ~'(7
Property Owner
C
By: L o ~ Date:~7
Filed by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation:
By: Date

al-s.-c; of IoN
u-tld ally
nl.llr;I su:--Illaly .J.lal'~, '1' ~a~IV
A,~I,~I 71
wl;~ u~~c11o.1. f
1111!41 U~~I:IIlJ,1, 11~111l:f 1
oSI1s.11:J II
Dolls Il:l~lll 1)111! 01111t1~f !)
Siui1)1!Ilti luouullnl)J
~s11uIIIloM it
asnu11 uiltlnl U
uo11~11>I J
u~ISU U
~SI111111111:11~.1. ~/
~1
~`i' ~ .~
._.. ~-
~~~~..
- ~~~
~~ ~ ' '~~
I
I
~ '
.Oc1)unu11 ~:)Isi~i~il II•uoill•N Il~sullul~l .._...- _. ~-
_ ~
I
I
1
1
L
I
/ ~`
~.
~ ~
?~
1-~ ~• .
'`~~ °''
,;,,~ ~
.(~
~~ ,'~ ~
;i :'•~ ~ +
~~._...,
~~y , ',5
.I
yf'° ~, ,r,}"
~~ ,~
{r , ;s~~
.. ;.y
~~ 1~ 1
~~ ,`y~
~~
~;,::~
r-I ~-''~
~~~ ~ i -i
~,.1~ ~~ ~
v ~,nt--~,~, ~
C I~
~'-~,~
ICJ -"~
-^,~``
,%
'~ ,-
.~
~~
~~
ter..
~~ /~.1 ~I
I
~m~~ i
~.
~.
''
i
`~
_ ~w.~_
~~
~~ I ~
.., ...
,,, ... _-
i' -~ ~ W
/~ •~~ -..
l

DVJQ
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
January 8, 1999
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 2761 1
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
1J l ~ ~~ ~f (;~I ,,
i.;" ~ JAN I y lyyg
i
~~.,.~ WATER~~OS GROUT' .... .
U LITY Srr~=-
This responds to your letter ofNovember 13, 1998, requesting comments from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) on the Federal Environmental Assessment (FEA), dated September
1998, for the widening of NC 55 to a multi-lane facility from SR 1 108 (Wake Chapel Road) to
SRI 1 l4 (Ralph Stephens Road), Wake County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2907). This report
is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C.
661-667d) and Section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-
1543).
According to the EA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has evaluated
six build alternatives with wetland impacts ranging from 0.9 to 2.1 acres. Alternative 6, a
variation of widening on the east side then transitioning to the west side, is the recommended
alternative. This alternative proposes to widen an existing two mile, two-lane, section of NC 55
to four lanes with a 30-toot grassed median. Wetland impacts be 1.8 acres and stream impacts
will be less than 500 feet.
Purpose end Need
The Service concurs that the primary purpose and needs for this project have been adequately
stated and supported by written discussion and tabular data.
Alternatives Analysis
[n addition to the "No Build" and "Transportation System Management" alternatives, six build
alternatives were considered. Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 restricted widening to the east side of NC
55 and looked at five-lane, four-lane with 46-foot median, and four-lane with 30-foot median
options respectively. Alternatives 4, 5, and 6 transitioned widening from the east side to the west
side of NC 55. The options were as described above. An additional pair of "Avoidance

Alternatives" were evaluated but were dropped from further consideration because they were
nearly twice the length of the other build alternatives and wetland impacts would have been more
than twice as great (4 to 9 acres).
As noted previously, Alternative 6 is the preferred alternative and represents a compromise
between wetland impacts and adverse impacts to properties.
The Service concurs with this decision. However, the Service retains the right to recommend
other alternatives if data not contained in this EA become available and to provide comments on
the final alignment.
Wetlands
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of the Environmental Protection agency, the NCDOT
should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for wetland losses that
would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted on page 5 of the EA the preferred
alternative will impact 1.8 acres of wetland and less than 500 feet of streams. Avoidance and
minimization have been accomplished by selecting an alignment that minimized wetland
encroachment. In addition, the use of the steepest possible fill slopes in wetland areas, and high
quality sedimentation and erosion control standards for the protection of surface waters and
wetlands will be utilized for the entire length of the project.
Although, on page 23, you note that appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is
required for unavoidable adverse impacts, yorr do not present a conceptual proposal for
compensating wetland impacts resulting trom implementation of the preferred alternative. A final
mitigation plan, subject to agency approval, should be submitted as part of any application for a
Department of the Army (DOA) permit.
Endangered Species
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs. 23-26) of the potential project
related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and candidate, species. There have
been four federally-protected species listed for Wake County and NCDOT has determined that
there will be "No Etl~ect" of the project on any of the listed species. The Service concurs with
NCDOT's "No E$ect" determinations. However, this decision would be reconsidered if
additional information on listed species that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if
there is a significant change in project plans.
Section 4(~
Section 4(t) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that the Secretary of
Transportation may not approve tl~e use of land from any publicly owned park, recreational area,
wildlife and waterfowl refute, or other designated area, purchased all, or in part, with Federal

tirnds unless a determination has been r~~ade that: (1) there is no feasible and prudent alternative to
the use of the land from the property and (2), the action includes all possible planning to minimize
harm to the property ti-om such use.
This document provides a 4(t) declaration that specifically addresses historic properties. Potential
impacts on these sites will be coordinated with the appropriate agencies under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act. However, based on review of maps of the project area it is
unlikely that there are any 4(t) lands under our jurisdiction that would be impacted by this project.
Summary
The Service considers that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and wildlife resources,
Section 4(fj resources, grid the potential impacts of this proposed project on these resources.
Based on the information provided, the Service concludes that this project, implemented as
described, will not have significant impact on resources under our jurisdiction. However, any
DOA permit for this p--oject must be conditioned to require implementation of a final, agency
approved, wetland and stream mitigation plan for unavoidable project losses.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project. Please advise us of any
changes in project plans and provide us with yo~rr response to any issues we have raised in this
letter. If you have any questions regarding these comments, contact Tom McCartney at (919)
856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely,
John M. efner
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
COE, Raleigh, NC (Eric Alsmeyer)
DWQ, Raleigh, NC (Cyndi Bell)
FHWA, Raleigh, NC (Nicholas Grat)
WRC, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
EPA, Atlanta, GA (Ted Bistertield)
FWS/R4:TN1cCartney:TM:OI/07/98:919/856-4520 extension 32:~R-2907.tip

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP OATt j
-21.95
TO: RLP. N0. OR ROOM DLdO.
1=~;c C~AIh,~-b ~~HNR
FROMa 11tF.;NQ. OR ROOM, DL~
r
~ow Lur`_13S ~~~
ACTION ,'~
^ NOTt AND FILL ^ P[R OUR -0ONVLRfATl01~1
^ kOTL AND RETURN TO M[ ^ 7tRYO:UR R6QUtfT
^ RETURN WITN MORt DETAILf ^ FOR YOURAPPROVAL
^ NOTE ANO fti- M! ABOUT TNI6 ^ FOR YOUR INFORMATl01l1
^ PLtAft ANfWtR ^ FOR YOUR COMM6NTf
^ TRLPARE RtPLY FOR MY f10NATURt ^ fIONATURt
^ TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ^ IMVEfTIGAT6 AND RLPO~T
COMM~NTl:
i
,~~-
~~~
a ~t~c~~a~
~

.a
,~ 2 .~

F
~F~,I}
ILAU~~
Nlk
_
.
~'Jr1TkR t!r~Lls'~ , ~ !~

~i STATF,y
~p + wM f
Sa 1l~~
J +
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF 1~ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUN"l~ ~!L
Gcweltrlc~lt I'.O. BOX 25"101, RALEIGI I, N.L. 27611-5201
June 19, 1995
R. SAMUEL HUNT I ll
SG.CItETARY
MEMORANDUM T0: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager /~• ~k~G`- P!~
Planning and Environmental Branch ~ ~
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Widening of NC 55 from
SR 1108 at the Proposed Holly Springs Bypass, Wake
County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-55(5), State
Project No. 8.1403501, TIP No. R-2907
Attached for your review and comments are the Scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A Scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for July 18, 1995 at 9:00 A. M. in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 434). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the Scoping sheets, please
call Ron Lucas, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842.
RL/pl r U'~U`{ ~"~
Attachment /h~\ ~~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.
o~C~-
l
~. ~~~
~,.~-'
w ~~-- ~~ f
Ns~ 2~-~~-~5-3
~~ S. s,~
~~

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
Date: June 5. 1995
Revision Date:
Project Development Stage
Programming ~X
Planning
Design
TIP # R-2907
Project # 8.1403501
F.A. Project # FR-55(51
Division: 5
County: Wake
Route: NC 55
Functional Classification: minor arterial
Length: 3.3 miles
Description of project: Widening of NC 55 from two lanes to a five-lane
curb and gutter facility from SR 1108 in Fuquay Varina to SR 1114 at
the proposed Holly Springs Bypass. (See figure 1).
Purpose of Project: Improve the handling capacity and ease traffic
congestion on NC 55.
Type of environmental document to be prepared: Environmental
Assessment
Environmental Study Schedule: Environmental Assessment is to be
completed by Nov. 96. Finding of No Significant Impact is to completed
by Oct. 97. Right of way acquisition is to begin in fiscal year 2000.
The project is to be let in fiscal year 2001.
Type of funding: Federal and State
Will there be special funding participation by municipality,
developers, or other? Yes No ___~__
If yes, by whom and amount: ($)
or ( o )
How and when will this be paid?

R-2907
PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
Type of Facility: Five lane curb and gutter
Type of Access Control: Full Partial None ~,_
Number of: Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 0
Typical Section of Roadway: see attached fiQUre
Traffic Projections:
Construction Year (2001) 10,200 vpd Design Year (2021) 15,600 vpd
o TTST 6 % DURL ~^ o DHV _,~^
Design Speed: 50 MPH
Preliminary Resurfacing Design:
Preliminary Pavement Design:
Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost $
(including engineering and contingencies)
Right of Way Cost $
(including rel., util., and acquisition)
Force Account Items $
Preliminary Engineering $
Total Cost $ 5 , 500 , 000
TIP Cost Estimate:
Construction .
Right of Way
Total Cost .
. $ 4,300,000
. $ 1,300,000
4.200,000
1.300,000
. $ 5.600,000

R-2907
List any special features, snch as railroad involveaent, Mhich
could affect cost or schedule of project:
ITEMS RBQQIRSD ( ) COMl~NTS COST
Ssti~ated Costs of Isproveaents:
_X_ Pavement
Surf ace $ x, 2 5 4. 2 2 0
Base . $
Milling ~ Recycling $

Shoulders: Paved .$
Barth . $
_.Y_ $arth~ork $ 4 0 6, 4 7 3
Subsurface Iteas : $
~. subgrade and Stabilization .$ _257.443
~. ~'~rage (List any special items) $ _660 , 000
Sub-Drainage . $
Structures: pidth s Length
Bridge Rehabilitation x $
Nen Bridge x $
piden Bridge x $
Remove Bridge x $
MeM Culverts: Size Length $
Fill Ht.
Calvert $xtension $
Retaining palls: Type Ave. Ht. $
3keW
poise halls $
Any Other Misc. Structures .$
~ Concrete Curb ~ Gutter .$ _278,720
Concrete Sidepalk $
Guardrail ~
Fencing: W.ii. and/or C.L. $
X grosion Control $ 3 3 6 0 0
Landscape ~
Lighting . $
_~ Traf f is Control $ 6 6 0 0 0
Signing: NeM . $
Upgrading .$
Traffic Signals: xeM $
Revised $
RR Signals : 1~ $
Revised $
pith or pithout Ares .$
If 3R: Drainage Safety $nhancesent .$
Roadside safety $nhanceaent .$
Realignsent for Safety Upgrade $
~_ Paveaent Markings: Paint Therno.~_ $ 59,400
Markers ~_

R-2907
Delineators $
~ Other clearing,grubbing,mobilization,misc.. $ 640.000
OO[~'tR1~1(.T COST ( Subtotal) : $ ~ , 6 5 3 .0 0 0
CoIItingeacies & Engineering $ 547,000
Force lbccatmt $
Constractio~n Subtotal: $ 4,200,000
Right of Nay:
bill Contain rithin Sxist Right of Way: Yes Do
~_ Szistinq Right of Way Nidth: 6Q!
_~ DeM Right of Way Deeded: Width 100' 8st. Cost x_1.200,000
Saseaents: ?ype Nidth Est. Cost $
Utilities: $
*Right of Nay Subtotal: $..1,200.000
Total Ssti~ated Cost $ 5.500,000
(includes R/N)
*TIP Right of Way estimate

R-2907
The above scoping information has been reviewed and approved by:
Highway Design
Roadway
Structure
Design Services
Geotechnical
Hydraulics
Loc. & Surveys
Photogrammetry
Prel. Est. Engr.
Planning & Environ.
Right of Way
R/W Utilities
Traffic Engineering
Project Management
County Manager
City/Municipality
others
Others
INIT. DATE
Board of Tran. Member
Board of Tran. Member
Dir. Planning & Dev.
Chief Engineer-Precon
Chief Engineer-Oper.
Secondary Roads Off.
Construction Branch
Roadside Environmental
Maintenance Branch
Bridge Maintenance
Statewide Planning
Division Engineer
Dir of Bike and Ped
Program Development
FHWA
Dept. of Cult. Res.
Dept. of EH & NR
Others
INIT. DATE
Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineer for
handling.
If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping, note your
proposed revisions in below and initial and date after comments.
pr~~ By; Date:

^~~~~~~ ~ t ` si
• ~
~~d ~i~
P~"a
-- NOR111 CAROLINA DIiPARTM1eNT Oi~
'fRANSPURTATION
DIVISION OF HIGIIWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
WIDENING OF NC S5
N
FROM SR 1108
TO SR 1114
WAKE COUNTY
T. I. P. NO. R-2907

R-2907
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
5-LANE CURB AND GUTTER SECTION
2.4m
(8')
~-
orm
750 mm Cd~G~
(7-8~
3.8m
~ ~ 2~)
19.2m
(63')
-•-~
3.Bm 3.8m
(12') (12')
2.4m
(8')
Borm
750 mm C&G
(2'-e')
3.8m 3.8m
(12') (12')
FIGURE 2

Owa - G~.r'4~ y
United States Department of the Interio ~ ~~-
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Q
Raleigh Fic1J Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
November 25, 1996
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
tdanager, Planning and Environment Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Subject: NC 55 widening, TIP No. R-2907
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Vick:
This responds to your letter of October 7, 1996, requesting information
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for evaluating the
potential environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. This
report provides scoping information and is provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-
667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves as initial
scoping comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their
permitting and/or certification processes for this project.
Your letter indicates that the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen the existing NC 55 from SR 1108
(Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road). The NCDOT is
considering expanding the current roadway to a five-lane, curb-and-
gutter facility from SR 1108 to SR 1398 Dickens Road) and to a four-lane
facility with a 46-foot grass median from SR 1398 to SR 1114.
The Service's mission is to provide the leadership to conserve, protect,
and enhance fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing
benefit of all people. Due to staffing limitations, we are unable to
provide you with site-specific comments at this time. However, the
following recommendations should help guide the planning process and
facilitate our review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practical as outlined in the Clean Water
Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. If unavoidable wetland impacts are
proposed, we recommend that every effort be made to identify
compensatory mitigation sites in advance. Opportunities to protect
target areas in perpetuity, preferably via conservation easement, should
be explored at the outset.

Regarding avoidance and minimization of impacts, we generally recommend
that proposed highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing
roadways, utility corridors, or previously developed areas in order to
minimize habitat fragmentation and encroachment. Areas exhibiting high
biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and/or
region should be avoided. Crossings of streams and associated wetland
systems should use existing crossings and/or occur on structure wherever
feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert structures that
maintain natural water flows and circulation regimes without scouring or
impeding fish and wildlife passage should be employed. Highway shoulder
and median widths should be reduced through wetland areas. Roadway
embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using appropriate
erosion control devices and/or techniques. Wherever appropriate,
construction in sensitive areas should occur outside the seasons of fish
spawning and migratory bird nesting.
We reserve the right to review any required Federal or State permits at
the time of public notice issuance. Resource agency coordination should
occur early in the planning process to resolve land use conflicts and
minimize delays.
In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the environmental
documentation for this project include the following (the level of
detail should be commensurate with the degree of environmental impacts):
1. A clearly defined purpose and need for the proposed project
including a discussion of the project's independent utility;
2. An analysis of the alternatives to the proposed project that were
considered, including a no action alternative;
3. A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within the
action area of the proposed project which may be directly or
indirectly affected;
4. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands,
that are to be impacted by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching,
and/or draining. Wetland impact acreages should be differentiated
by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the
National Wetlands Inventory. Wetland boundaries should be
determined by using the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers;
5. The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and
permanent, that would be likely to occur as a direct result of the
proposed project. Also, an assessment should be included
regarding the extent to which the proposed project would result in
secondary impacts to natural resources and how this and similar
projects contribute to cumulative adverse effects;

6. Techniques which would be employed to design and construct wetland
crossings, relocate stream channels, and restore, enhance, or
create wetlands for compensatory mitigation; and,
7. Mitigation measures which would be employed to avoid, minimize,
rectify, reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated
with the project. These measures should include a detailed
compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland
impacts.
The attached page identifies the Federally-listed endangered,
threatened, and candidate species that are known to occur in Wake
County. Habitat requirements for the Federally-listed species in the
project area should be compared with the available habitat at the
project site. If suitable habitat is present within the action area of
the project, field surveys for the species should be performed, and
survey methodologies and results included in the environmental
documentation for this project. In addition to this guidance, the
following information should be included in the environmental document
regarding protected species (the level of detail should be commensurate
with the degree of environmental impacts):
1. A specific description of the proposed action to be considered;
2. A description and accompanying map of the specific area used in
the analysis of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts;
3. A description of the biology and status of the listed species and
of the associated habitat that may be affected by the action,
including the results of an onsite inspection;
4. An analysis of the "effects of the action" on the listed species
and associated habitat:
a. Direct and indirect impacts of the project on listed species.
Indirect effects are those that are caused by the proposed
action and are later in time but are still reasonably certain
to occur;
b. A discussion of the environmental baseline which includes
interrelated, interdependent, past and present impacts of
Federal, State, and private activities in the project and
cumulative effects area;
c. Interrelated actions are those that are part of a larger
action and depend on the larger action for their
justification;
d. Cumulative impacts of future State and private activities
(not requiring Federal agency involvement) that will be
considered as part of future Section 7 consultation;

5. Summary of evaluation criteria used as a measurement of potential
effects;
6. A description of the manner in which the action may affect any
listed species or associated habitat including project proposals
to reduce/eliminate adverse effects; and,
7. Based on evaluation criteria, a determination of whether the
project is not likely to adversely affect or may affect threatened
and endangered species.
Candidate species are those plant and animal species for which the
Service has sufficient information on their biological status and
threats to their survival to propose them as endangered or threatened
under the ESA. Although candidate species receive no statutory
protection under the ESA, Federal agencies are required to informally
confer with the Service on actions likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of these species or that may destroy or modify proposed
critical habitat. Federal species of concern (FSC) include those
species for which the Service does not have enough scientific
information to support a listing proposal or species which do not
warrant listing at the present time. These species receive no statutory
protection under the ESA, but could become candidates in the future if
additional scientific information becomes available indicating that they
are endangered or threatened. Formal listing places the species under
the full protection of the ESA, and necessitates a new survey if its
status in the project corridor is unknown. Therefore, it would be
prudent for the project to avoid any adverse impact to candidate species
or their habitat. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be
contacted for information on species under State protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project.
Please continue to advise us of the progress made in the planning
process, including your official determination of the impacts of this
project.
Sincerely,
/~~~~ U~ ~. ~~~
Howard F. Hall
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
Attachment
FWS/R4:HHa11:11/25/96:WP:A:wakr2907

FEDERALLY-LISTED, CANDIDATE SPECIES AI~1D FEDERAL OF CONCERN
(revised August 23, 1996)
WAKE COUNTY
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Vertebrates
Bachman's sparrow Aimophila aestivalis FSC
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened
Southern hognose snake Heterodon sinurs FSC
Southeastern myotis Myotis austroriparius FSC
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Invertebrates
Dwarf wedge mussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Yellow lance Elliptio larrceolata FSC
Atlantic pigtoc Fusconaia masoui FSC
Green floater Lasmigorta subviridus FSC
Diana fritillary butterfly Speyeria liana FSC
Vascular Plants
Sweet pinesap Moaroh-opsis odorata FSC
Ivlichaux's sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Carolina least trillium Trillium pusillun: var. pusillum FSC
I{EY:
Stahis Definition
Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction tlv-oughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or
a significant portion of its range."
Proposed A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or thueatened.
Candidate A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to
to support listing.
FSC A Federal species of concern, species which may or may not be listed in the future (formerly C2
candidate species, or species under consideration for listing for which there is insufficient
information to support listing.).
T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator) -species which are
threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and are listed to protect these
species. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and arc not subject to
Section? consultation.
EXP A taxon that is listed as experimental (either essential or non-essential). Experimental, non-
essential endangered species (e.g., red wolf) arc treated as threatened on public lands for
consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private lands.
Species with 1,2,3, or 4 asterisks behind them indicate historic, obscure, or incidental records.
* Historic record, the species was last observed in the county over 20 years ago.
** Obscure record, the date and/or location of the specis observation is uncertain.
*** IncidentaUmigrant record, the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
**** Historic, obsure and incidental record.
109

x_..f
..~
o`'~~ W A r~RQ~
a~~r
August 27, 2004
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 010681
TIP No. R-2907
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act and Neuse Buffer Certification,
Modification to the improvements to NC 55 widening ,from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph
Stevens Road) in Wake County, TIP R-2907, Federal Aid Project STP-55(5), State Project No. 8.1403501,
WQC Project No. 010681.
Attached hereto is a modification to Certification No. 010681 issued to the North Carolina Department of
Transportation on April 25, 2002. The attached modification authorizes the following:
Site Location Action taken Im acts
STA 59+60 to STA 60+00 Removal of 300 mm and 375 mm pipe structure and associated catch None
basins; change in super elevation of left turn lane to drain away from
median
STA 58+96 Removal of 375mm i e structure and associated catch basin None
STA 60+40 Change 900 mm pipe structure with extension to 750 mm pipe None
structure with extension
This modification is applicable only to the additional proposed activities. All the authorized activities and
conditions of certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated Apri125, 2002 and all
other corresponding modifications still apply except where superceded by this certification.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Attachments:
Modification to WQC No. 010681
nicer ly,
~~~~
an W. Klimek, P.
Director
cc: Wilmington District US Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
NCDWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Mr. Christopher Militscher, US EPA Region IV
Mr. Jon G. Nance, Division 5 Engineer, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Mr. Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Central Files
File Copy
N~o e~Carolina
Transportation Permitting Unit / ~utl~r~«J
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, NoRh Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Intemet.• htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Cluality
n..c..~,.,in ............:~.in~r.....,.~..,, e„r..,.,c..,.,i,.,,... cnor ~.,.-,,.i..ar~nor_ o..~~r.,.,..,,....,.o....,..

the project construction. Apost-construction as-built with the restoration activities included shall be
submitted to the DWQ no later than 60 days after the project is closed out by the Department of
Transportation.
4. No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened.
5. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium
of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The
applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing
by DWQ.
6. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with
this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or borrow sites be located in
wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road
construction activities.
7. No additional compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with this modification.
8. All other conditions written into previous Water Quality Certifications for this project still apply.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result
in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federa1404 Permit. This Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to t}ie Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Nicole Thomson at 919-715-3415.
nee ely,
G>~
~~ ~~~
~~2~p
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. ~"
Modification to WQC No. 010681
c:\Correspondence\D W Q010G81\wgc08244imod.doc

.~ SWi n~
~y y-y
~~
~~
x~~
.a ~ ~.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
July 9, 2004
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attn: Mr. John Hennessy
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
WETLANDS 1401 Gf~4UP
JUL ~, ;~ 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTIGN
Subject: Application for modification to Neuse Buffer Certificate for the NC 55
widening to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR
1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County. TIP No. R-2907, State
Project No. 8.1403501, Federal Aid Project No. STP-55(5). WBS
Element 3.4515.3.2. NCDOT Division 5.
Reference: NCDENR-DWQ Water Quality Certification Project No. 010681 and
USACE Permit No. 199700175.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is currently
widening NC 55 to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114
(Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County. The North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (NCDENR-DWQ) issued a Section
401 Water Quality Certificate and Neuse Buffer Certificate on Apri125, 2002. The
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a Section 404 Individual Permit
on July 2, 2002. The project was let in August 2002, and construction has begun.
The purpose of this submittal is to modify the Neuse Buffer Certification. The
modification of the certification is for the hydraulic design at Site 3. The revised design
does not compromise NCDOT's compliance with the existing permit conditions. This
modification application contains revised roadway construction plan sheets 17 and 18.
The revision has been evaluated for compliance with the avoidance/ minimization
criteria and the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules, and is in compliance with all previous
issues, including the following:
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONM17ENTAL ANALYSIS ~ SOUTH W ILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DON.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

o Protected Species
® Aquatic Life passage
o FEMA compliance
o Cultural Resources
Summary of Changes
1. Site 3: Catch basins, 300 mm pipe structure and 375 mm pipe structure from Station
59+60 to 60+00 Left (see Permit Drawing 8 of 14 dated 11/29/01 and 9 of 14 dated
11 /29/01)
2. Site 3: Catch basin and 3'75 mm pipe structure at Station 58+96 Right (see Permit
Drawing 8 of 14 dated 11/29/01.)
The NCDOT roadway design unit has recently revised the roadway due to a utility
line conflict. Due to conflicts with an existing gas line, the super elevation for the left
turn lane has been modified to drain away from the median. With this change in the
super elevation, catch basins, a 300 mm pipe structure and a 375 mm pipe structure from
Station 59+60 to 60+00 Left, and a catch basin and a 375 mm pipe structure at Station
58+96 Right have been eliminated from the roadway design. This change eliminates a
point source discharge and provides sheet flow~to the roadside ditch. Stormwater flows
to the same point in the landscape through sheet flow instead of a point discharge. The
hydraulics unit has indicated that the hydraulic design of the project remains in
compliance with the riparian buffer rule. 'There are no additional impacts to riparian
buffers from this revision.
3. Site 3: 900 mm pipe structure at Station 60+40 L (see Permit Drawing 9 of 14 dated
11 /29/01)
The permit drawing and original plan sheet indicates the existing structure is a
900 mm pipe structure that would have been extended with a 900 mm structure as part of
this roadway project. The stakeout of the structure during construction has indicated that
the existing structure actually is a 750 mm pipe structure. Therefore, the hydraulic design
has been revised to extend the existing structure with a 750 mm pipe structure. The
hydraulics unit has indicated that the existing 750 mm structure is sufficient to convey
water. There are no additional impacts to the stream from this revision.
Regulatory Approvals
Application is hereby made for the modification of the Neuse Buffer Certification
from the NCDENR-DWQ. The revision of the permit site on this project remains in
compliance with the Riparian Buffer Mitigation Program (15A NCAC 2B .0242) and the
Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). Therefore, as part of
the modification notification, we respectfully request that the NCDENR-DWQ note these
changes and retain this information for any potential compliance check. We also request
a letter from DWQ noting agreement with NCDOT's assessment that the revisions remain
consistent with the existing Neuse Buffer Certification.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Mr. Matt
Haney at [phone] or [phone].
Sincerely,
?~~
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Ms. Becky Fox, USEPA-Whittier, NC
Mr. Ronald Mikulak, USEPA-Atlanta, GA
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Jon Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer
w/out attachment
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington

I ~
J
~ _, .....
• . • ~ ~ u V
~C
UJ,
• y
' ~
' V
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 16 = ,
1 N
' , , N ~ ~~
a g ~ I ~ 1 1 5 F I ~~~ i `.~P ` , ~f
ul~ I 1 ~ ~ ca
I I ,
I I I ~ ~ I k ,r' ~'`. ~ ~~
• ~~ III ~ N ~ I ~ _~__ i_ ~' ~~, Cam` •'ZLZOZ6f''S
I I I - I' --- ,.I ~ ~ o ~, '
I '^ I ,
~C ~
~ ~ ~np f II ,}l I ~ lyr I I I 1 ' ~ ~ /-
0 ~{ f ~ P I~ R' 1j V ~ ~~ ~ ~' 1 ~i L•9
m Nm D I x' I h I ro o+ ~~ W IV 1~ W~i`•y 1
~ V1 O
p'~1 f 41' t' U 1 ~ - V "I'~b 1 1~ N~m'1•<
vnn ~r ! I- 1 2~,,°0 ~ ~,'4'"N ~~ ~ Rio owe^']in
~~3 N. 1 II II I~(`~,'~ 6..;7 1 c>tq~ -1 -I I 1 tn_ N•p~n
bhp ~ 11'-c_ ' 3 I •,cP,+„~~y Y~~ I 1 Ufa^~=o
si o ~c' ~~ _ I qm 4 IYt i 72m ' ~ q. 3~ ~~~ ~ Q ,f- i I ~ ^ N-1~-t
~ ~ ~~IM ~1 ~ ~I ~ ~~ ~Q~ r=m
N 1 'I , v
N 1~`p' 1 1 : I ~~ rly t ~ 'I C,S~~S "~ III ~ ~~ ~
rr~ r.~. 9 ti I II ~G i 1 ~rc ~ ~ Q2 ~i~ Rl "V
~o a yI II ~, ~ ' ' ~' I O Z
~~ -.
~! 2y v M 917,•.3•[ _ Uf17t ]7 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1 O
y° 2Lla ~ 3 ~I 1 ~ i 1 3 ;~l o
j To cif ~hm 1 J ~, / ~ ~ g y ~
'1 l ZD ~ + I I ~ th "1
_, <s
1 Sy Na rn~ +, N ~ I~ I I, ~ / (n „C
II ~ ~ ,',P
~ a ry ~~ I I ,~ , I 'r p
® ®
o
mm c
°~-~ v;
mPi or
~~
~
~? ~~ m'~• irT
u
~~ ~~ ter,
~~~ ~y
~z
-~
O= N AZ N~ o
A
In ~

® ~ © o

om
or In
~ i
o
Z

~ m
~-AC m
m s :O
N
~ ~
8~ ~m c~i"

1To~ m
NZ r
tn'~
O,O
' a~ WO
L p
Z
~ =mss ~~~ `I r~~-- _ _ jI
P1~STIC TE~C CkE OW pl B3T~ y Q' pl " Y _ I 1
I - i I N~ f TH'~n~ v
1 ` ~ OI I~ ].v~4v n ti I
~ 1 NC7' ~ ° 1i r~ r ~ I
nom, p~ 1 n~- :Ir ? ®IIJII I
^ ~ ~~ /~ r
a 8 ~~.1~ ~
~~
~ ~~ -' i
..~
~w
t--- -E~
1 m
v~ 1 I
~ i ~ =.
i ~ ~

~/ .
°a
P
~~
~$ a
._~~
~ ~ a ~ L ~ ~ C I I 1 `y~y. 1 I ,~~ h r' (3~ 1~:1. ~ ;n ,~„ ry1j~-1~D~
~ ~ °: V~1 tX _ ~ 8 ~ ter ~ 'Sf6u 1 II Al ' GJ `- ~ b u II 4 II Il O
N S3'.231•E ^ M 9]•705'[`-' w 97'17'C ~ S 1 N y I ( r III m v ~' (~ mr s(''ll~`N,(~~ I
1.931 ~--~I..
p -'Ic Z m ~ I II ~ J ~ ~ rn ~ ~ o ~~~~c~il
,+~. ~ d ® m b I is 4 ~• I a ~ ~d
Q,r O (~ m ^
val ~b ~Nrn a+~ ri~ R~ ~ II~ 1 I .•T~
t T II ~ -C
x
_~ n-i~ .'1 n I II v I I~ ~ N I 1^®
~~ M ~ Op ~~~ ``~ ~• N I• II A ~ ~~~ ~ rn ' ' ~ I• g$! rn~-IUD
•q ~ ., i ` 4 ~ ~' .l ~ II II ~ II I I QO '~ 4 II Il ppj~1
b ~ & G ~ ~ II'41 ^i1 rn / ~ WW z 2O~~s4O
~. A ~' ~ III ~ I ~ I I 6~ ~/ n
~ ~ n -~t5coN0 " a 1 11 ~ ~ ICI I m ~?/ O/,/ / / ~ ~CSo W
~ ~. ~ ~ It I': I / / / y~j
_ _ p a~ A -.
~-l.a~ ~a-f~ T~ _ ! ~ _ .. _ I III / n7 .O
__ 1
~ J ~ ~ r• - ~4-M_ 31399E I I ~ a ~ rl t,~/
cpYE~Et ~"r•l*~(5~T :;3, an ~ 1J I •. ~ 1 I / '- t': ~0 4+`~
I I ~ r
`•~ ~ 2,, I n;. ~ I ~h gI~ 1 ~ ~ / I // ~a / N ~~' n,rnl7e ~ro aC~x~
~...d ~ A ,~Y R, ~ ~ ~ _ ' ~ 1 ~ I I ~~ ~ III o i ~ t- / / ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ rl, ~ ~ vl
y _. io
~-• ^' ~_.c i•~ Q`o~ 9 ® ~ I 1 ii r ~/ "/ 1 . ~-`'``Re ./~'~/ • ~ ~a0/ ~G~ +~ ~i; N~
~~:.S;yr: a] .. ~~ '~ .y0~ ol•uo~ -?r o1, ~ 1'S' ~ tl ~ ~/ e ~ / // /•. / ~(/ 7j~~ ' ~ _~ 2) ~~~ 1
C4ff 9 ~ I I 1 I ry / / / ~• / / VI ~ $ M1 r~l~~'1 '1
`'~+'~,;r+::'t`;pt•c 1S °~,.~'~13d ~`' ~ I II yl I ( W ~I / , / // Nm
PIC_7 I I I /. ~- / o r
rnr mn yl ~ r~ / / ~ ~ 11 //'• // ~ ~
I~ ~ o
F~ I~ 4 IM I~ IP /• / s~i' ys
I
72m 7 1 ~!/i ~
o't A ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ _ • 1 ~ I // ryf~ ~ ~'•~ ro
~y I ~ 9I I III J• I / A ^ ~ ~'
•: ~
~ ~ '~ ~
. r
3..39 s~~ ~~..., III=,.. ~ , ~N 1 ~ +
~'111 ~ ® ]/.689 ; I I~ I / $ 1 ~~~ ~ J' ` ^`ly ~ ~ zz
' d ~1 • J m ~~4 wl~~ ' r F O
6,~~~.. MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 10 ~;? ~ „F-* -i1- -I,. \} .._ ~ .

i.
1
pr
or
:r
.~
!I
.~
v
i;
r ,
r
L
1
.,
~;
D ~
~;
>~
t
i
-

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 17
I~ ~ ~ ~ I
m't„3i ~ 1 rni 1
1 I F
c'~n?d ~ ~, li ~ a ~1
a'm-a~ I /^ ~ 4
~w~ m $ I 2 i OV b I 1
`n ko ~~~ ~ ~ ~ { l
w ~~ ~°c. ~ n ,p~ 4 ~ Z 1
~cn o: n~ ~I 1 ~ ~ e ~ S
nNir=~ '~ 3~ y I
n' ' g
x
l k ~I mr~ ~I
Y ooi' ~ ~ B '"I j4 ~m~"I
~"' ~ 1 = ate)
,~ _ ~, > _ I
F .~ i~ p ..~ . -
~ s ~ m .. rn ~ a ~, _
~~p ~ ~
~ ~ 1
~o o ~1~
tftr ~ ,t ~~ ~ ./ / ~ ~ v ~1 X15T
S~ ~, &: r p
IErrf +~ Nm7 ~mRl<m 1
p .. ~' o l 1
Om.OD 2~O~ may. ~"0 1 I
~... _ 1 I
x ° o 'o y I_~?
', a~mst Nn (~
4 .. ~ ~vr o ~ \~I
~ N ~ Z
._
_ -
Y,c-- -•--- Na sir --_~-- -____- ~ Q•P--- I \~
' .. ~~91J1~ 1~
' o~ ~ i I
a+A= o,Zz I p I
n~iO1~vomm t~i°~ I
~ ~ I I
t~;~ N ~ I I
I I
I§~~ I
t"'~ I
'~ ,Aet'~' I 1
,'' ,~ j~'~' 3 ahl4ti n I
~ ~ / I I
~ I I
I I
~ W ~ I 1
y +~ ~ I I
~/ o o.~ rZ+ -~ ~ p ~ I 1
: ~ r`S riOn n ~ I~ ° ~~ I I
rro~~a~w ~ o a
~`~ xc~ic'~°~v' © I I
~ ~ n.... ~,~ q1 I O ~ I I
1+ g°'c,'roin~ t. A 1 I
~~
---------------------- -------- ~ ~-O•`~ ` -
.. - -- ; J
,9a. ,.~ ~ , C7 ~ .-1 I 1
~ ~ ~- ~ j 3
m j' C. ('~•. I ~ 1
°$ " °~ b C. I~ I
~ma
Boa oo ,~ 'U~~,.
o m vfDn ~.\ iT7 ~ ';7' I 1
~~'° opz 1.1 ~ L~''1 i I
~oov°; ~ F?r I 1
~ o ~~ I I
I I
I• I 1
1 I
1 1
<- ~'~ nz I I
;~ ~~ r o. I 1
r a^'^ rr ~~ '^ I 1
+p ~ N Q I
Zm ~ .. ~m
P ~~ o~ t ~ti o ~~... I 1
-arfn o o r-fTl ,.~~1~~/~~7 1
° ,. NcD ,~ cD l'.
o~ g•"L' o o n -'f" ~ ~ 1 I
o. ~• oo I 1
vz a n ~ a [1D
y on a .~yri ro ~ I I 1
~[j~ ~~,,, I I
~r3g~jy 3~nJ-. ~h I 1
1 t
4~ ~
• ~~ ~ ~
+~
z ~' I I
~0 1 1 ,
., 1
I I I
~~ 1
1
' ~ 1
: 1
I
r
.r

c3
•- a ~
~ ~~
N
b yr to O m
r mp ~ Y
o~~r
m ~
F~R~
4~m~
~~~_
n
A
n~
~p
`O"
mp
O
W
iL1 N
w
~~T~ ~
~o ~ ~ ~
~~~~ ~
rba
~O ~ ~
~~~~
~~
ti
0 oa +.
V
N
O
c~
b
_x_x_x-
n~ x ..~;;,Q ~ a
~ g o s~ ~ a
!I r Q
• p E3~3 ~ ,
~ C34~a ~ ~ o x
a© r~ l: a I ~ © a
/ ^ 14 (~ i °
fp L ~ o
43~ ~ coca
~} O Ow N ~ ~ N ..
~L N~~IIy
Qf~ O~~v
p~ n 0
~'~~ x ~
ti ~a °1
a N ~, I a ° dL~.L9~
~~ - ~1A bt
x ~ /
x '
,~~°' m~-I~D
''/ ° e 11 II 1j1jj11~
j 'U 'b~.~o' 1111..,~)Vl'~~
r 2 Q yo '
I p ~ ~oo
-•1 ~
~rn 1._~~~x0 ,',
N p aroo~i ~~ ~'~
~~ n~~~ N II
\~ 1 ~ n L 51~~{P1 Tix eTi C'fi~'f~
gl
I 1 ~ ~~I ~ul~~ ~ ~
I I ~ o ~ ~ ' ~~ ~u
at ~~
~ %~, $t-
I I ~ N '' n
I I ~ ~
I 1 C///
yl i e /~ lY~e/\/\//// ,' ~
I ~ \\
I I~/
I
I / 1 ,.
I ~I
~/i i `~i fi
I l ~ n~
I I Ir
I 1 I I
I ~ 1
I ~ I c p
= I r~
I ~ 1 ~ +~ W
o I
y 1--~- ° ~ p ~ ~
f'-
a~t i II ' - ~
.n
0.
I R
I I ',
I 1 ~~ ,'•,~ ~ ~. 8
1 1 '. ~ ~
I 1
I I y~'
I I ~..•
I I r I
Q3
I I
I I ~ ~
I I ~ ~~•
O C•
I I e ~I ~/ p 1
. arm Q[ N 'f"
I '~ I . N
/ ~ ~
I I ~ `~f~ ~ ~ ~~ ~S2
. s
I 1 i
I 1 Q ; '~
1 I a D ~ ~ a ~
1 1 + Q i..i
1 1 0 0 0 oLaCAOO ~ ~
I 1 ,•
I t
l~ 11 I ~ V ~ ~~~~y
1 - ~ .~
~~
Ili I i ~
~a

m
rh
i
d
d
1
F'n
£i
~z

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
-s ~.
Michael F. Easley, Governor ~
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
April 25, 2002
ivlr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
148 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Re: 401 Water Quality Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed NC 5~ Widening to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR l l 14
(Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County (TIP R-2907).
WQC Project No. 010681
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3382 issued to The North Carolina Department of
Transportation dated April 25, 2002. You have our approval. in accordance with the attached conditions
and those listed below, to place fill material in 2.64 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, 291 linear feet of
streams, 0.27 acres of surface waters other than streams, 1.54 acres of protected Neuse River Riparian
Buffers. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated December 17.2001.
The purpose of the authorized impacts is the widening of NC 5~ from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR
1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Ron Ferrell, Wetlands Restoration Pro,ram
Central Files y '
File Copy
11'etlands/~301 Unit 160 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FA;C 733-6893
An Equal Opportunity ACfirrrtati~e Action Employer 50°r recycled/10;%~ post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
9 ~ o ~~ ;
~.
_~ k
~, ~
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
APPROVAL OF 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
and Neuse River Butler Rules
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 9~-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500, and 15A NCAC 2B .0233. You have our approval, in
accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 2.64 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands, 291 linear feet of streams, 0.27 acres of surface waters other than streams, 1.54
acres of protected Neuse River Riparian Buffers. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your
application dated December 17, 2001. The purpose of the authorized impacts is the widening of NC 55
from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharges of fill material into the waters of the Nesue
River Basin in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water
Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this
activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL
9~-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described
in the Public Notice. Should your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ and submit a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval
letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. Any additional impacts to wetlands,
streams, or buffers, for this project (now or in the future) will require additional compensatory mitigation
may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .006 (h) (6) and (7), and 1~A NCAC 2B .0233. For this
approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with all the conditions listed below. In addition, you
should obtain all other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project includin, (but not
limited to> Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed
regulations. This Certification shall expire three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the
same day as the expiration date of the corresponding Corps of Engineers Permit, whichever is sooner.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. Appropriate sediment_a_nd erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is more appropriate
(available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR Regional or Central Offices)
shall be in full compliance with all specifications ;overnin, the proper design, installation and
operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to assure compliance with
the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not
designated as trout waters; 2~ NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all salhvater classes; and 10
NTUs in trout waters);
~Vetlands/~101 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone]SG F:1X 733-6893
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 509x. rccycled/109o post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
~~
Michael F. Easley, Governor 1..~
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
2. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
3. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a FONSI
or ROD is issued by the State Clearinghouse. All water quality-related conditions of tine FONSI
or ROD shall become conditions of this Certification;
~. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
5. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or
borrow sites be located in wetlands or stream, compensator. mitigation will be required since it is
a direct impact from road construction activities.
6. All channel relocations will be constructed in a dry work area, and stabilized before stream flows
are diverted. Channel relocations will be completed and stabilized prier to diverting water into
the new channel. Whenever possible, channel relocations shall be allowed to stabilize for an
entire growing season. Vegetation used for bank stabilization shall be limited to native woody
species, and should include establishment of a 30 foot wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide
vegetated buffer on both sides of the relocated channel to the maximum extent practical. A
transitional phase incorporating coir fiber and seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap
may be allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the stream, but the applicant
must provide written justification and any calculations used to determine the extent ofrip-rap
coverage requested.
7. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams shall be done for 29l linear feet of stream impact
at a replacement ratio of 1:1. Therefore, compensatory mitigation for 391 linear feet of streams is
required. We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to
streams through an in lieu payment to the North Carolina ~~'etland Restoration Program
_ _,._.._ (NCWRP), and that the W_RP ha_s agreed to implement the mitigation for the project. Mitigation
for unavoidable impacts to streams shall be provided through an in-lieu payment to the North
Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) at a rate of 5135 per linear foot. Therefore. a
total payment of 536,375 shall be submitted to the NCWRP to offset the impacts. No
construction activities in jurisdictional streams shall begin until payment for stream mitigation is
made and the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable to
DENR~- Wetland Restoration Program). The payment to \CWRP shall be sent within two
months of issuance of the 40-t permit. If you have any questions concerning the Wetland
Restoration Program please contact them at 919-733-520S.
«'etlands1~301 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Ralci~h, North Carolina 37699-1621
Telephone [phone] F:~X 733-6893
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SU~c rccyded/I tl°u post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
~~
d~ o
` ~.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands shall be done for 2.64 acres of impacts (1.38
acres of riparian wetlands, and 1.26 acres ofnon-riparian wetlands). Applying a replacement
ration of 2:1 total mitigation for 528 acres of wetlands (2.76 acres of riparian wetlands, and 2.~2
acres of non-riparian wetlands) shall be provided. We understand that you have chosen to
perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams through an in lieu payment to the North
Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (NCWRP), and that the WRP has agreed to implement the
mitigation for the project. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts to streams shall be provided
through an in-lieu payment to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) at a
rate of $12,000 per acre for non-riparian wetlands, and $24,000 per acre for riparian wetlands.
Therefore, a total payment of $96,720 [(2.76 acres riparian wetlands* $24,000)+ 2.54 acres of
non-riparian wetlands *$12,000)J shall be submitted to the NCWRP to offset the impacts. No
construction activities in jurisdictional streams shall begin until payment for stream mitigation is
made and the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check (made payable to
DENR -Wetland Restoration Program). The payment to NCWRP shall be sent within two
months of issuance of the 404 permit If you have any questions concerning the Wetland
Restoration Program please contact them at 919-733-5208.
9. All stormwater runoff shall be directed to sheetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive
velocities, unless approved otherwise by this certification
L0. Of the total 1.~4 acres of impacts to protected riparian buffers, compensatory mitigation for
impacts to 0.94 acres of Neuse Riparian Buffers shall be provided for as described below.
Zone of
Im act Impacts
(Acres) Replacement
Ratio Total Acres of
Aliti~ation Re uired
Zone 1 0.257 3:1 0.771
Zone ? 0.109 1.5:1 0.164
Total 0.9-1
We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to protected
buffers through an in lieu payment to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program
(NCWRP), and that the WRP has agreed to implement the mitigation for the project. Mitigation
_ _.._- r unayntfinhlr im~CLS..ta.NPtitc~ Rip~rinn Ritffe~ ghnll b rpy.ified,.thL~lu~ L a min[
~-R ~~ ~-P Y
to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) at a rate of $41,62 per acre for
0.94 acres of buffer impact. Therefore, a total payment of 539,128 shall be submitted to the
NCWRP to offset the impacts. No construction activities in Neuse River Riparian buffers shall
begin until payment For buffer mitigation is made and the Wetland Restoration Program receives
and clears your check (made payable to :DENR -Wetland Restoration Program). The payment to
NCWRP shall be sent within two months of issuance of the 404 permit. If you have any
questions concernin~~ the Wetland Restoration Program please contact them at 919-733-208.
11. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification
of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been
completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the
401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
Wetlands/401 Unit 160 Mail Service Center Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1631
Telephone [phone] FA`C 733-6393
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 t~ recycled/IO~o post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
' ~
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
12. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below
the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life unless it can be
shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical. Design and placement of culverts
and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or
upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence
that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
13. No changes to the horizontal or vertical placement of the stormwater outfall locations, the
horizontal or vertical placement of the culverts, the horizontal or vertical placement of bridges,
the horizontal or vertical placement of grassed swales, or the horizontal or vertical placement of
open ditches is permitted without written approval from the NC Division of Water Quality 401
Wetlands Unit. In addition, no changes to the flow spreader locations or designs, preformed
scour hole locations or designs are permitted without written approval from the NC Division of
Water Quality 401 Wetlands Unit. Any request for changes to the referenced items above will
require submittal of a modification request, with seven copies, and corresponding fees will need
to be submitted to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and
may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification s1ia11 become null and void
unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or Coastal Area
1~Ianagement Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon the expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of
,administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27347, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an
original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.-
This t 25`s day of April 2002
DI SI R QUALITY
~l / '~
1
r y J; Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
WQC No. 3332
Wetlands/101 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh. ~onh Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAQ 733-6893
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50°o recyclecUlO'%- post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
4~. ® ~~:
~,.~.' ~
,~
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DWQ Project No.: County:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the
project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, ,hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction ~vas~observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Abent's Certification
I, ,hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
- ,- --- - --of ~1ort7rL-zTUli-rrr,-Iravin~, bezn autltorizrrt t~abserve (periodically, w-eekty; fuil-time)-the construttiarr
the project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in
the observation of the construction such that the construction vas observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
1Vetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAY 733-GS93
An Equal Opportunity AfFirmative Action Employer i0°e recyclecUl0`,~~ post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
d ©o ~ ~
~F ~ '
,~
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NORTIi CAROLINA -DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUl\II`IARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND i1IITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with ISA NCAC 2H.0500, the North Carolina Department of Transportation is authorized to
impact the waters of the State of North Carolina as indicated below for the purpose of widening NC 55 to a
multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County
(TIP R-2907), WQC Project No. 010681. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be
conducted in accordance with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. TIIIS
CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHIIIENTS.
COItIPENSATORY 1~IITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WETLAND RESTORATION:
LOCATION: NC 55 widening from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens
Road)
COU1~~I'Y: Wake
BASI1\/SUBB~~SIN: Cape Fear, Catalosing Unit 03030004
DWQ \o.: 010681
As required by 1~A NCAC 2H.0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of
wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade
waters of the state. Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitisated through the Wetland Restoration
Program must be rounded to one-quarter increments according to 15A 2R.0503(b).
291 linear feet of stream channel
2.76 acres of riparian wetlands
2.54 acres of non-riparian wetlands
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through
payment of a fee to the Wetland Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R.0503. If you choose this option,
--- --please-sign this-formand-mail it-tcttarrds RestorationFund~ht}n-address listed below:-r1n invoice-- - - -
for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE
ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR
PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Si~_nature Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAr~I
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P.O. BOX 29~3~
RALEIGH, NC, 27626-053
[phone]
Wetlancs/-101 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina X7699-1621
Telephone [phone]S6 FAX 733-GS93
An Equal Opportunity Affirmati.e Action Employer SO~k recycleJ/105b post consumer paper

1
~~ ~ •~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLF.Y
GOVERNOR
February 12, 2002
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
~.,_...
r,
~ r
ka
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
r. r~.
SUBJECT: Wetland impact revisions for NC 55 widening to a multi-lane facility from
SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road), Wake
County, TIP No. R-2907; State Project No. 8.1403501; Federal Aid
Project STP-55(5). Division 5.
Dear Sir:
As you are aware, the NCDOT proposes to assymetrically widen a 5.3 km (3.3
mi) length of NC 55 in Wake County. A permit application was sent to the regulatory
agencies dated December 17, 2001. Afield meeting was held with Mr. Eric Alsmeyer on
January 8, 2002 to verify wetland boundaries. As a result of this meeting, some of the
original wetland boundaries have been moved and altered.
Sites I and II are the only sites being affected. These sites are riverine. Table 1
reflects the original impacts and the current impacts after the wetland boundaries were
changed. All stream and buffer impacts documented in the permit application are
accurate. Revised permit drawings reflecting the current impacts are included with this
letter. '
Table 1. Original and Current Wetland Impacts Associated with Project R~2907.
Site No. Fill in Wetlands (ac) Excavation in
Wetlands (ac) Mechanized Clearing
(Method III) (ac)
Original Current Original Current Original Current
I 0.168 0.124 0.052 0.069
II 0.961 0.753 0.2 0.18
III 1.26 1.26
Total 1.13 0.88 1.26 1.26 0.25 0.25
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
• TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

The only impact on jurisdictional areas that will change is riverine wetland
impacts. The permit application shows that 1.38 acres of riverine wetlands will be
impacted. After moving the wetland boundaries, the current riverine wetland impacts
will equal 1.13 ac. This change will be communicated to WRP, who NCDOT is using for
mitigation.
A copy of this letter and drawings are being provided to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
Thank you~~forr'our assistance with this project. If you have any questions or
need any additional information about this project, please contact Mr. Matt Haney at
[phone], e~sion 333.
a'f~ ? ; ~
., . . ~ ; .
Sincerely,
l~ William D. Gilmore, Manager
(S Project Development and Environmental Analysis
WDG/mmh
Enclosure
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality

1

bl ~0 b °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~1dW
I
O a
O ~

W
~ ~
U
8
m I
-i
Q
J
~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ `.
~ \ \ ~ ` I
~ ~ ~ ~
~~
+N~ ~`'
~- I
I
o --~ w
I
I
I
~ o I
~o ~
w I
a w ~ ~ -. ~
I
~ 00 ~ ~
~
~~ ~ ~ I
\ ~ I

\ ~ 1
I I
\
3Q~ 6s~~
Z O O ~ I I
wwa
~ O - I~
~
O I
w I
Q Q
~ I
~
~ I I
w 1~
I

Q `^ I
I I $
~
~~ G ~ IH
+ ~.~. ~ X
w I
IIW
~~
°o, No II
I I
w
~ ~~ i~

~I
,
~_
~b
~ ~
° ~ ~ ~-
M
Cn I L
U w
~ J
O
J=~ «
W
~~0 ~~
t ~Q' J.
N O W
NUS, ~- ii
Q~N ~
~~-~ ~ ~
~w J
~ ~
J ~ ~
E
w
'r \
m
U
I~
I`-'
G
I
o= ~
z - r-
o ~~
E-
Q N cn O
~Q ~ o~.~

a=~ ~ w
~
~ °
U
L ~
=o
F-
~
i
O ~
U Y~
O~J
w
pZOQ
~
NWO
~N3 ~ ~_~
1 ~ ~ o- o -- O
J O O ~ O
li O
Z U
Z ~ Z N
O
~ O F- i
U ~

~ Z Z O
M
i

-~
~
b ~ ~ ~
~ o
+ ~ ~ N
~ E ~
w ~ o L
1 ~~
~ _
_ ~

~~' O ~
~

~
-~ ~
~ ~
~ ~`
O
2 ~ w m
CO

~
I
`
~ N
O
Z
.
D ~TDE- a O O
N N o -

~ ~ N N
W W
0 0
~
~
W z z
w w
E
O O In
~ I
N
~~ oz ~ I o
~ ~ a
a 3
~
~
I J~ I W
~
I Q

w ~ W
ZZ

O ~
a
3
I U G
J ~
U W O
Z
Q W
U
a

W L~
D LL.
W ~ J
F-
W W
~
~
w I _ Nm
Q ~ ~
Z ~,
Z
I ~ = O
I W N J J
~ ~ Li W

I
^. N Q
W J N
W Vl
W
0~

~ ~
b O W
z~ O
Z
o O
z
0
w
rn o Q o?
3 + ~.
~ I ~
I ~ ~

I ~ J .

o OO+f~z i ~ i E Q ~ o Q
W Z I ~ o Z I ° ~o c
~ I ~ I a ~,
Q N I ~ ~ ~ F-- cn
N W ~
a~ I I-~j ~ Q I oco ~_~ ~ ~~
J ~n ~ ~ O Ol z<?z , Qin~
- i ~_ J ~ I ~ I ~~ ~~ O~ =ov'
Q ~ ~ n._I. ~ ~ I (~ ~ WOW W O~J
i~ ~ I F - ~~L I r~~ ~ ODa 0 t/~30
~ ti a -` ~f`~ ~~ I a I ~ I c, ` ~ ~ w> ~ ~ ~ o
-/I ~~ I~ e ~ ~ o o ~.~- o
~~ No ,., ~ l I E I~~ ti `~ ~ ~,z
J <O ~ ~ [ I ~ o c ~ ~ ° z
~ -~- ~ ~`" I ~ `~ I ~ ~ ~ O ~ ° o
,rt-,-„ I o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o z ~
I ...
H I I~ r -
~ I c ~ 0~ N
I I~ I a I ~~I ~ ~
e>M ~ i~ I I t •:~:: ~ ~ci
I ~ "• I
I
E -' I I~ I Z N
~~ Q N I I r I ~ ~ ZONE
~ co N oo I ~ I ~. i ,
I ,.~,
...
-. I ~ I r 'I ~,, ,. N
w ~
+ ~ ~ I I I~ ~~ ~ = m ~
I I lCl w w ~
i~ :~ I x IX^~ I I l i ~ ~- ~ /~ z z O
Qj N ~' I I ~ ~ - -
_ ~ ~ -~ I .N ° a N
:. ; I` ENO I~ I I I o -~ a W o o
~ ~NpZ :. I ~ ` ~ I i, I I oo ~ J ~.. I
L~ I , -
-- ~ I~? ~ I I ~~ ~ I o
-=_ ~~ I ~ I l i p ~ I a
`~ ~ , I I ~ ~
w
,,~ a
0
i~~p ~. S o ~ OC~6 I~~ I Z
r' ~. ~ m a
~77 a I ~ ~ o
0~-~Ci` W ~ I 3 ~ Q vii
ICY ~ _L+ 4 -~ a w
~,~ 'LOS, ~ I . ~~~ _ ~ g ~ z ~ ~ w Z
OSi ,~ o w ~ -
m
1~~ v I I ~ Z z ~ w
0 oa o
z zw z
bl ~0 ~ °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~1dW Q ° °~ °
~ LL
~-

~ ~
-
o
z =~
0
bl ~0 9 °1H S ~~S - ~NI~1 H~lb'W ~ N°
Q~
~r oQ~
I I

I I }) I ~~ I ~ O Z (.~ Z N In N ~'
~

~8d-~b'
I -~ ~ a I 1 _~ ~
I (. ~_
~ w O N
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ 3
<, ~
r
I ~
~
Ow U O~J
~
m ~ I ~
~ ~ w=
°a3 ~
;i I J ~_
~ ~ ~ i
~ p F-N
~
~
~ Q •. I
1 ~ 'J
U
~ _ / I m
Q W~
~~
~~ ~
~ .
I ~ ~ p ~
J O
~ ~ ..II ~~~ CNtD
~ / I
~ ~U Z ~O O
~ ~~ ~~ t ~~ o
~ ~
l(l \ ~
~ ~ - ~ z
M

O
f - ~ w~ ~
I
~ ~
a~
•
= I

~
~
~
1
~
~ ~I

_

~ ~
~ o
~
z

;
~

W
N ~
~
~' l 1
I 1 r ~-~- ~

Q
_ ., , ~

z c
~
X
wl-- ._.__ ~

~

G
- _ _ ,~
- I
~
~
0 0 ~ ~ `i I
'
~
O ~
~- ~ I ~ ~
z ~
= E
o

~ ~ ,
~,,
~~ ~ ~ ~~ I

~
~
~ _~

t ~ -
~ .
~
~
~ ~ o
00+06 ~ `t ~ O
~n
~~~ ~ j ~
c' ~
~
E
. ~~ I I ~--
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~
I

~
I ~
<
I ~
~ I ~
<
~~ ~ I
~ (,091
BSZ'81
I
C
~
I

~
i .
` ~
_ I C
I
C ~
o
. ~ .
t ~
~
~
I ~ ~°
~
~

• i
I ~ I
~ J
J
W W ~ Z
3 N J
~ W '
' T ~,

' ~ c~ I

~ 3 z a w
x
3
o
~ , ~ ~ I
c
c
`~ ~
o / ~ ~
w z
G
~
r ~ r . I
~
3
~f '
N In
Z
Z W W ?
it
~ ~ ~ '~ I o
Q Z °w
w w ~
• ~ rr`~ ~` I w ~ O U

~ -~.
~
~
• . i~
~
I_ ~ i ~
~ , ~~_ ~ ~, II^1'
~ ~ ~ 3
.. I ~ I
~~ ~ ,t ,,,
,
i ~. ~ N . O
t
u

o=
-
z
~
o ~z
bl ~0 L °1HS ~~ S - ~NI~ H ~lb'W Qom, "'O

I /
I ~
~ ~ .. ~C~Z ~ QNIl
I r ~ Q=~ ~ WAN
p S

a
c~W ~
~ WZY W p~J
~~ /
j I i~1 ~~.. h-ln3 ~ ~2LL

I
)
~ .
p ~p
w ~
~
LL ~ ~ •
•
I
~ /`f y
1
%
I J I
~ I / U Z
/
O~ ~
I Z ~p
W )
• ~.~ I Z
•
I ~
I
• ~
~ / I I I
•
) ~ ~ I
,~ 7~}
I /
~ I I I
) ~
~0 /
iW
/ I
w / / ,~
~ ~r ~ 3 I
~ j' I I m I I f`~
" I ;
~~'~ ~ / ~ ~~ I w~~ I ~ I ~
~

~~
~ ~
~~~
~ I
I ~M~ a I ~
~ ~~ I ` ~ I I
xQ I
Z
°"I" ~°~
/ i
I~ ~ I
J o
I W E
00~ I ~ Flo
~
~

•~

I

I ~. M N

I
r
o
NO
" ~; I J ~

Cpl
~
I i /

9
~
f

I ~ I 1

I ~
J

I \
!Y

•~
°dl

i~ ~
/ N o

wa o

E

I I I

'

I

I

I
I ~
I

~ ~
C
u
~` .
~ ~
~: w~
I I

~ 5 1 I ~-~
I I ~ o
~~

~ .
ti ~ I I I ~_

-_
-7
~ c1 ~~ I J I I ~
o II
I
I I I L_l_~
_
' ~ I I I ' I ~
~ ~, ~
,
`~ ' • ~ I I I' I ~" ~ 1 ~ o
I I I I I ~ ~ ~ W
I I I I ~ w 3
_ w I I I ~
~ S
I I O ~ W

~• b

~

O I°

I

I ~;~

I ~
l
I ~.~
Z U
a z W
~ Z ~ C
o_
~ ~ w •''~
I
I ~ I I h
I Ql I I
I ; ~I
/
~ ~ z
~.
~
~ ~ } ~ f J X J L~
N I I~ Z
~,
m I ~~` ~ ~ ~~~ U

O
( I ~--
I
I N L~,
I I I
I
Q W W W LL

`~
1 I I
l
~ ~~

I

I ~ I

I

Z O O O C
Z Z Z ~

I I «, ~
/ o 0 o C
~~ _
1 bl .~0 S °1HS ~~S - ~3 N1~ H~ 1dW ~
1
1 ^
~ LL

I
I I I
I I I
I
\
~
~
I ~ ' o

08+Zb I
I I I
I I
I ~

~ ~

' °
a N N
N
°
~ ti
~ I I I

~

'' ~ ~ a
0 '`
0 °
~ _
I~ I I I ~
~ ~ Z~z N a~~
`i'
I
I I I
I I I
I 1~
i
~ ~1
L0 ~ o
~o ~
~ =o
~
~
J
I I I I ~
~ w w
oza ~ ~
°w~
~ I I ~ ~ ~~ ~~3 ~ o?~
~ I I ~' I oo moo
I I
' I '~'z
o
as
I /
~
~ I ~
z ~
~ ~ N
~

W
r

bl

I
I

N I

o ~"'

z _

"'

-, I
I
~ O ~
o

a
I
~ wp O
~
I ~ ~
o I I I '-~ ~"l: n. z
I

I I I

I I I

.

~ v' °
a
~

~
~~ I I I I o o
I I I
I ~ ~
~ II''
l~
/ I I I O ~~
I I I i
G 9
I I I I f `~
/ ~

/
/
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
~.~
~b
-. ~~
0
~~ ~
-
~
o

f---

E
I I I 1 ~ ~c
1
~ o
m
U I I I 3
I~
~ ~
~ ~~ ~
/ ~ _
o
I I I ~' <o ~ ~
~ ~ o
~, I I I IN ° ~
o o ` ~
Q ~ ~ I I I - ~
\
v ~
Iw
N
~
r \ -
~ ~
o I I I I ~ -

r ` ~
~~
' ~ E
~
~ •~ I I I I ~ t ~ ~ ~
~

~
I
I
~ ~
o ~ I ~
i ~

~
/
r

3
'
O ~, -

~
.~

+~,~ I I

I I I

, I

~, r
i:
~, ,
~
.~
~
,~
o 0
~ N
~
~
w
1 3 I I ~ . - I 3
~ I ; I I
I ~
~ li
/ .'//
. ,,
~ , .'

:~~i

I
~
I

I
I I
rte,

' ~ ,
~~
.,
-,- ~

~

~
a
t-
~ v,
~ o
a
~
Z P I ~ ~' rw ,- ~ ~ ~ ~^
~
X I Z I I ~/ ~ .rr
" F- ~„ O N / J J

wl
I I r
I i,
~,,ril i
- O
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ J
~ J W Z
~ ~-
I ~
I `~r N ii I ~~ ~ a~~~ ~ ~ ~~
.. Q z z z zw
I a I ~~~
' 9 O / ~ ~/ ~ o 0 0~
v~
3 . /~
~
bl ~ 0 9 °1 HS ~~S - ~N I~ H ~1dW
~ ~ ~.~

0
Z =~ ~
o ~~
~- cn oN
a ~,
Zc?z `~ acne
bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1bW ~_~ °' ~~z
a=o ~ w~~n
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~o`~ ~ ~~~
~ ~ ~` \ ~~ ~' ~ F--
~'
~,
~~ ~. ~.~ A ~ ~ .~~- ~` ~ ~o I I o ° ~- O
~ ~\ ~V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /v ~ u,z
/// ~ / \ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ , • j ~ \
~ ~ ~i / ~~~. ,~ _,
z ~~ ///~ ~` ~~ ~~~~~
o ~ ~/~~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ '~~ ~\
y,
.\ \
Z ~ ~ ~ ~_~
~~ \ \
\~ `~'
tii ~~ i~~,~,~~o~~~
0 +6~, ~ ~ ~~ ~I
,~i
~~~ ~ ~~ w I
~"f~ ~~
~ ~. ~V A~~ ~ ~ U
~~~~'
rY,.-
W
W
I ~
~~ ,~ (~
~ I
,,~~~ ~ ~ I L~ ~~
~ ~ }G~
~ - o
p W
I ~- ~~
~ U
c~ a O
_z
6 i1 ~_~
V / J ~Z C
9~b
va ~
~. o w -
N ~ O
z W
a~
=w
II wa E
W ~~ ~
00
I ~ ~ zu
~~ - ~ N
I ~, i a z
W ~
~ W
I
I I Z
W
~ o ~ m a
I
~ m N Q
Q W W =
J I I ~ W N N ~
N ~ ~ N
w w w w
0 0 0 0
I ~ ~ w w w w
0 a a o
I
I ~ n I
~~ L~

1
~ ~
o=
- ~
z ~- °
o ~~
i--
a ,~ in o
~ a ~ aQ~ ~

Z(~Z (V QN~
N
Z
J
J
O
U
Q
r
Z
w
bl ~0 ZI °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1bW ~~° ~ ~~" o
O U ~~J i
_

W

Z

I w w w O -~ m
N
N
p
N
~
~ ~ ~ O3 ~
-
3
o ~ ~ I ~ ~

I o
~o w
Z ~ O O
-~- - ~, Z~
<~
~"~ c I _ __
c, __
0~+09 ~ rt ?
I ~ U
I ~
I I~ ~ ~~

~
I I a Q E=
as p~~
d ~ ~ Q ~
I Io
IU of
~ I II''
I__I__

C0 J I I

USN --~
00p
~~„°o
~ I
I I --''``
wl
~ ~I ~ I
N
~
+- N ~ ` ~ ~ I- _ ~ I o
~~ +N°p I I II ~

~ I II
0 3
I I II ~
I
I I I
I VIII
00+09 I w° I I I
I aElll
I ~~III W
I I olll ~
2 ~~ . ~ I I III _
o~'~' / ~ I ~I III ~
~' / I ~I III
~~ I ~IIII I
w EIIII
~ / / ~ I ~ COI ~
/~ 0 ~ I ~I ''IVI ~
~ ~ ./ I IVI -
~ °• III ~
bl ~0 8 °1HS ~~S - ~Ni~ H~1dW
z
Q
V'
~GT
E
0
O
O
E
o ~ o
Z W H
~ a w
W 3 ~ ~
3 U
w U¢
z U Z d
Q
L~. ~ ~
z ~ a
~ ~ W ~
H N J Q
Q z U J
0 V-
Q W W
U J N 3
x
W ~ aw
Vl Vl = W
U
~ ~ W ~
o a ~~
z z o
W W ~ U
0 o z

~ I I
I i i
I I I
I I I
~ I I
~ I I
~ I I
z 01~+ l9 I I
IN I I
iw I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I i I
I I I
I
I
I ~ - -- J
I ~ ,
I ~
___ ._ ` , I
Ir5 4~ 38 45 W -- - ,_ L
~ - -
I c~ 0 +/9z ~ -~
I
I
I Z
I J
J ~
V
I O
3 d
~I r
of z
~I
I
z
~ I
I
I
I I ~ I ~ I `~
I ~'y
I ~
\\
I I `~ z ~ ~

I I I VA
?
I ~~ 0
i=-
vii o c
I I II ~~

I I I ~

~ `'-' I ~~ ~~
r
~
v N
~ = u

I I I ~~~ I ~ 3 r o r z~
I ~~ I ~.
~ ~'~z
z-= ~
~ ~,~~
a a
I~_I -750 I I
'
~ \'
' I a=°
~
~ ~ ~~~
°
~
-I--GONG ~j~ ` --- ~ o ~ ~
~
I I I ? I 1 ~ ~ ~ - I ~ °oa ~ ~w°
_.
I ~ ~ I
I rcn3 ~ ~_
~ I ~ ~~O
I I
~ I p~ '

.
i
U O
I ;
I i m i Z ~o

I I I I 3~ ``" I z t
I
t i t ~~ I ' i
<

I I I m `` I
11~ vNOI c
I I

I I ~m cQ,~l j `"
3 ~ ~
~ V
~
I ~
I
~ ~ -
~
I ~ ~~°I ,
~_ 3NI
, I '
L~
1-II~ /
I
I
\ ni O
I

~
, 375m I
~ '~'
I ~
~

~
I
~I I -
/ I
I
I
I
I I ~ /

/
;,
~ \
I~ I I I ~ /
I ~ " _
zl ; I I ~ I ~
~

~-L} ~I I
'~O ~
~
~
1 o
c
o ~
wf'
'$Z~ /
~
k N°. o.

I; I
I~ II
-I II
Ij II
I; ~
I~ ~
11 ~
~ ~ ~-_
~,
I m
bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S -
I I/ ~~ _
I I~
I I~
I ~ III I
I ~ III I
I III I
I III I I
I VIII
VIII a
I~ I I
~NI-1 H~1dW
w
i-
i
i ~~ ~
m;
W
z
Q

N
O

f' U/
p N t
O ~
O a0
O O
N
a
Q N 0 0 0 0
a
f
W LL
LL
O p m t O r N V O
m N C O O O
Z = (n
O O
~ Z
N C ~ ~ Q Y Q Q'
a
m E
v ° ui
~ ° ui
~ i
~~ ~ZV
~
~
=
w
U ~
°
'
a
Z= Z m o p

~
i y ~O ~ U~tL
Q 0 O '
O
LLZ
2S m E
~Lv o 0 LL
O Y
O~ ¢ a,01-
N
~n
wo Q
O W v
y m~ E
? N ao ~ °ND Z ~~
v (
u'SU E ~ N ~N
a ~
~
LL LL
~ ay t o 0 0 0 ~
C v
Q ~ U LL
Z ~

W ~
LL ~ O t ~ O O ~ W
~ _a-- o d w
~ ;~ " x
y ~
N N

C ~ ~ N
p N
p N
O
L
2
LL. ~-'
O
O
O
O
I
~
N
Q C
'C 'C ~ i0 N n O O
o 0 0
O
~
~ ~ ~
(n U C y

I- a ~~

> y
m
M
rn
N
~ L

~ o o
0 c
n
0 o
Q ~ ~
a 2 W c `
y C

- _ ~
~ m
8
3 a y L
v o 0 0 0 0
~ 3 E
_ ~_
~ N
y
C C h W V N
= T~+ L O O
lh O ch ,y„ O
~ ~ O O O ~
y
U
N ~
E
~
M d 1°
; ~
`°
y o
~+ y
~i N E ~ ~
2 N O ~ m
N ~ E ;
N O O
N
L L
M N
~ ~
W
~
J J
O J
O p 0
d O

C
~
q
fFO W
+ n
+
`° N y
~ x
~ E
io N ? ~
¢ N
N lL ~ O 1-
N
... p
N in
? (p
t _
N ~ ~ ~ w
(~ Z

_ J
Q
(~ Z

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT
OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL NO.0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 5 hours per response, Including the time for
reviewing Instructions, searching er<Isting data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of information, Including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service
Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202302; and
to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20603. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activkies in, or
affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material Into watere of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping It Into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on
this form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information la
voluntary. If information Is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued.
One sat of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity
must ba attached to this application (sea sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the DlsVlct Engineer having
jurtsdicUon over the location of the proposed activty. An application that is not completed In full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
• r
7. APPLICANTS PHONE Nos. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business [phone]
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND
TITLE (en spent is not required)
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
9. AGENTS ADDRESS
10. AGENTS PHONE Nos. W/ AREA
CODE
a. Residence
b. Business
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental infornation in support of this permit application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE
DATE

NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
NC 55 widening from Wake Chapel
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if app~icab~e)
Basal Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Wake Coun
COUNTY
North Carolina
STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructrons)
See cover letter
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See vicinity map associated with permit drawings
16. Nature Of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS
(it applicable)
Widening of NC 55, an existing two-lane facility, to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114
(Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County. The project is 5.3 km (3.3 mi.) in length. A five-lane facility wRh curb and gutter is
proposed for the southern section (from SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398). A four-lane facility divided with a 9 m (30 foot) raised
median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1 1 1 311 398 to SR 1114). The proposed right of way (ROW) width
for the project is 31 m (100 feet) for the five-lane cross-section, and 46 m (150 feet) for the four-lane median divided
section.
19. Project PUrp09e (Dssaibe the reason or purpose of the project, see instrvctwns)
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and traffic capacity of this section of NC 55.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Roadway fill, pipe/ cuMert construction
21. Type(s) of Material Being Dischar~ec~ and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Roadway Fill
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see inswctions)
Wetland Impact: 2.76 acres
Surface Water Impact: 0.32 acres perennial
0.04 acres intermittent
Surface Water Impact needing mitigation: 291 linear feet
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED
WORK

~ }
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (Ir more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
See listing of property owners associated with permit drawings
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies far Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED/ DENIED
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I
certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein ar am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
~_ . L r
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT D E SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person whc desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or
it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a
material fad or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
x10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
~ ~

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: ' aS o'7 Date: to `~
Applicant/Owner: C 0 '7- County:
a 2 il/ G
Investigator: Lo e..,, W ~~ io-~ c ~, ,~~ -~ ~ Q ac -
State:
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es ~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ~ Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum In for !
.D?/G_~'~sl~.f~-~n Vim ..,~~ ~..-, ~s g I'
3 . ~, ~.,... d rn ..rti e. ~ ~ G I:
t ~.
a. ~, ti u.s~n.,.,,, S, N S ~ ~ SC S S ~ , ~ ~~
i.
5. ,~.~,, r t~ 6 •~,..,,_ ~_ , 3.
,5.
s. , .
ry ?ercent of Dominant Species that ere OBL, FACW ar FAC II
II (excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Deta (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photogrspha Inundated
_ Other ~Seturated in Upper , 2 Inches
_ No Recorded Dsta Available ~ _ Water Marks
_ Drift Linea
_ Sediment Oepoaits
Field Observetiona: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfscs Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _~(in.) _ Local Soil Survey Date
,~`
Depth to Saturated Soil
~
y` ~ (i
) _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Ex
lain in R
m
k
)
,
:
n. _
p
e
ar
s
Remarks:

,~ ~ _..
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Neme
(Series and Phese-: Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup-: Confirm Mspped Typet Yes o
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon ~ylunaell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abunda)nce/Contrast Structure, etc.

ls2~L~ UR SG ~ d ~ ~

I C3 7 F ';i /~1 G ~ sG<,..~„~ C ~a ~Oa
"r ~~...
T ~-
II
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hiatosoi _ Concretion: ~
_ Histic Epipedon _ Hiph Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Ooor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquio Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List

---yReducing Conditions
/ Gle
ed
r L
Ch
l
C I
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
l
O
h
i
i
E
R
k
y
o
ow-
~
rome
o
ors _
t
er (
n
n
Y;.
a
emar
s!
~~
Remsrks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation PreasntT No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetlsnd Hydrology Pressnt7 a No _
Hydric Soils Preaent7 ea No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~es No
Remsrks:
Approveo by H r
3-4

(nx~ # (~f ...; ~ ."1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ~ - a 9 ~ 7 Date: ~ ~
~
Applicant/Owner: C O _
County: lrx,l~
Investigator: p ;e p,w s ~' ~ 2 ~~~ a ~ k State• A/ C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~e No Community ID: ~'V~a~~ ~,
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes o Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID: Z
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant
Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
/
I.LJ 4.~dr~-m~iv _~ 9.
1~~;o~.b„~~. •P~ ~
2. 7- 10.
1
3. Ln .~ r cC..,,~.,i 'Io P O n, t o ~ 1 1.
4. u d N l a r` ~.~,r S -
~/ 5 12.
5. ,~-~-~ ~ ~rMO f c Tu...e~ ~ ~ ~ V 13 .
s. t~SUs}~"...~„... S~we~vse S~ la.
7. 15.
8. 1 B
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remsrks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Dete (Describe in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photogrspha Inundated
_ Other
~ ~Setureted in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Deta Available r Wster Marks
~Drlh Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Dreinsge Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfecs Water: (in.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
' Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~(in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data

~ _ FAC•Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 5~+~
' (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~9 ~
~~q9s
3-3

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series end Phasel: Drainage Class:
Reid Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Oeacriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottfe Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inc es Horizon (Munaell Moffat) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
~- ~- ~~Y~ 3 1 S~ ,~% ~o~.
~~~ 0 JQ ~ S ~---d,., c ~~ ~o
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histlc Epipedon _ High Orgenio Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soila List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on Nations) Hydric Soils List
Gleysd or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (E:c~lain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prseentl Yes No (Circle) I (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Prssent7 Yes No
Hydric Soils Preaentl Yes No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland) Yes No
Remerka:
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: b~-~''~ /tr'- a ~D 7 Date: ~ f 9
Applicant/Owner: County:
a
Investigator: . ~..,. -~ i ~~--~- ~. l ~` ~ c aG./~ _
State• il/G
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: ~O7O~Ff`'~'e
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? es ~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Domin nt Plant 5 ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecie~ Stratum Indicat
2. ~ ~' ~-,.,, d M f ~,y. T ~ o.
a. ~ ~ err _ ~ ~ l i.
4. CQ- ~ l ~"`~- _~ 12.
s. ~, ~~,~ r ,~, ~ l i ,~ _ ,
I s. ~ a.
~.
I i 5.
8. 6.
Percent of Dominant Spsciea that ere OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Dete iDsscribs in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
__ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerid Photographs ,nundated
/ _ Othe- Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
V No Recorded Dets Available ~ /~Nater Merka
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators 12 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _y,~(in.) _ Local Soil Survey Dete
rr _FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: M/' r~'L`lin.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
P1-P2
d
3-3

SOILS
Map Unit Neme
ISeriea and Phasel: Drainage Claes:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: Confirm Me ed T
pp ypel Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munselt Moist) (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
©'
/
I
i
I Hydric Soil Indicators: I
Histosol
_ _ Concretions I

_ Histic Epipsdon ~
_ High Organic Content in Surtace Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soiis
_ AQuic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleysd or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other {E:c;.lain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Preeent7 es No (Circlet (Circlet
Wetland Hydrology Presentl No
Hydric Saile PreaentT es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by H i
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: - a.90 Date: ~ G q9
Applicant/Owner: C O T ~ County: ~
Investigator: fl~ ia.,,..~ ~~~ c u~ LY ~<< 'y - t State: ti
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: ~o~°,,,1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator

2. ~GO.f /~~~ Lr~~-,.~

6.
7.
8.

Percent of Dominant Species chef ere 09L, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator
s.
10.
11.
13.
14.
15.
16.
_ Recorded Date (Deacribs in Remerits-: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Laks, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicetora:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_ Other
~ _/Satureted in Upper 12 Inchon
No Recorded Dsts Available ~ ~GVster Marks
(/Drip Linea
~Ssdimsnt Deposits
Field Observations: ~.-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary lndicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfscs Water: ~.- (in.) ~xidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Lesvos
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Ng~~ (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Deta
(~
r _FAC-Neutral Teat
Depth to Saturated Soil: u~
r ~'" lin.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

3-3

SOILS
Map Unit Neme
(Series and Pheeel: Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: Confirm Ma ed T
pp ype7 Yes Nc
Profile Description:
Depth
inches Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moistl Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moistl Mottle Texture, Concretions,
AbundencelContrast Structure
etc
,
.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hiatosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sulfidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_ Rsducinp Conditions
_ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors
Remarks:
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_ Concretions
_ Hiph Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Orgenio Stresking in Sandy Soii:.
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on Nstional Hydric Soils List
_ Other (EY;.lain in Remarks)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Preeent7 No (Circlel
Wetland Hydrology Preeent7 No
Hydric Soils Present? a No
I Remarks:
• (Circlel
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~ No
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manuall

Project/Site: ~ - a q 0 ~ Date: ~o
Applicant%Owner; NGp 0 _~ __ County: W~a
Investigator. Lq ~.r, W ~ ~ I '~ C,„~IU- l r ~ r, r, c, e c State: ~t/ G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a No Community ID: ~~`~~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes ~f4~q~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
L
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Oominent Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. S
i~,~a, u.,,- ~,..f Co..-.«~o-.,r, ~ S S
2. nn
~'TCQ~1 ! L~V!_r.~ ~..r~

4.C;.,r,' ~iA IrQCQm,~ "~i, c'~vc. S~.S

s.
~.
a.
Percent of Dominant Spscies that ere OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remark:
HYDROLOGY
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
t0.
1,.
1"
13.
ta.
1~.
1 s.
_ Recorded Data (Oescribs in Remarkal:
_ St-esm, Laks, or Tide Gauge
_ Asrid Photogrsphs
/ _ Othsr
No Recorded Oste Available " Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
~lfiundsted
t/Setureted in Upper 12 Inches
~i(/Veter Marks
_~ibrift Lines
~.Sedimsnt Deposits
Field Observstions: ~= Orsinsge Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfsw Water: .S'~ ~ ~''~`~ (in.) _:Oxidiied Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Date

'
? _ FAC-Neutral Test
ur f
Depth to Saturated Soil: S
°`~L` lin.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~~ a.~,~
I~~~J
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Neme
(Series and Phaael: Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Typal Yes No
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Structure`etc.

t I~
I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
I _ Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon -
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils

_ SulNdic Odor I
_ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soii;:
_ Aquio Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
educing Conditions
~ _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
leysd or Low-Chrome Colors ~ Other (E:c;.lain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Preeentl ~(p No (Circle) I (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology ProsenN s No
Hydric Soils PresentT X931 No la this Sampling Point Within a Wetlandl Yes No
Remarks:
DDroved
3-4

DATA FARM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: ~~ ~ - o~ ~ ° 7 Date: tl (o c1
Applicant/Owner: ~VG !)~ r County: Jss
Investigator: ~°3~... /~ ~%/~ ~- --mss L c ~ ;,~ ~ ~ ~~> z Q ~ ~.Z State: C
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: C~.~ oV'~,
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ~
Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecie: Stratum Indicator
~ . lTw-~ c N S P.~ .f r~+f
?, ^~ ! u 5 d~/"' OSN S
~.
c
6.
7.
8.
Percent of Dominant Species that are 08L, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
Dom~nent Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
T_^
13.
14.
15.
18.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Deta (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stresm, Leke, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photogrsphs _/Inundated
_ Other
/ ~Seturated in Upper 12 Inches
,
No Recorded Dsta Available ~ _,,, Water Marks
Drift Lines
~Sedimsnt Deposits
Field Observations: ~ Orsinags Patterns in Wetlands
( Secondary Indicators i2 or more required):
Depth of Surfecs Wster: S"' `? `•"~in.) _ Oxidized Root Chennela in Upper l 2 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Date
~' _ FAC•Neutrel Test
Ospth to Saturated Soil: ~~ ~ T'-"`(in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~~57~~~
T
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Nsme
(Series end Phssel: Drainage Clasa:
Feld Observetiona
Taxonomy (Subgroup!: Confirm Ma
pped Type? Yea No
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Cancretiona,
inches Horizon Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contreat Structure, ate.
Hydric Soii Indicatory.
_ Histoaol
_ Histic Epipsdon
_ Sulfidic Odor
- Aquio Moisture Regime
_ using Conditions
Glsyed or Low-Chrome Colors
Remerka:
1
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_ Concrsuone
_ Hiph Organic Content in Surface gayer in Sandy Sods
_ Organic Stresking in Sandy Soils
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Liatsd on National Hydric Sods List
_ Other (Explain in Rsmarka)
Hydrophyec Vegetation Preasnt7 No (Circle(
Wetlsnd Hydrology PressntT a No
Hydric Soils Preaentl a~ No
Remerka:
(Circle)
la this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~ No
pproveo
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: f`- aq D ~ Date: <o R 9
Applicant/Owner: Nc po T County: wo
Investigator. (~ ,T..-. w~~c~...,,.,s l~>~J K' Er,~~- State: //G

Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ N t
Community ID: ~tPla~ -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes to Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Yes ~ Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Si
ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecie~ Stratum In for
n /
L/" ~~ ~-~ S ~,1 e a~ T 9.
2.Jtio-Ca ~ 10.
~
~
~
' S >
'
~ ~..~_~
a lp ,
~'i. i l
i
3. ~ 1 1.

I 5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8.
Percent of Dominsnt Specisa that ere DBL. FACW ar FAC
(excluding FAC-1.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Date (Describe in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
~
_ Stresm, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: /~
Aerial Photogrepha Inundated /
_ Other
`~N
R
~ _
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches /~
/
o
ecorded Dets Available _ Wster Merka /
_ Drih Lines /
Sediment Oepoaits;
Field Observations: _
_ Drainage Patter in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators or more required):
Depth of Surfecs Water: _ (in.) _ Oxidized oot Channels in Upper 1 Z Inches
_ W r-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) cal Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Satursted Soil: ~ lin.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remerka:
~ r r~~~~

3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Name
(Series and Phsael: Drainage Claas:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy lSubgroupl: Confirm Me
pped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concjetions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
~....~
I~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
1 ~,'~-"""~•
_ Histosol
f _ Concretions ~
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organio Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Spits
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic M s Regime _ Liated on Local Hydric Soils List
cmg Conditions _ Liatsd on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed o- Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Ex;,lein in Remarks) `
l
Remerkr.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation PrsssntJ Yes ~ (Circle) (Circle)
Wettsnd Hydrology PrssentJ Yes
Hydric Soils Preaentl Yes ~ Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
Approved by H /
3-4

~;~~ 3
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ~ ~-~
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID ~'~~~ APPLICANT NAME ~'~ I"~BC-~ DATE ~~~0
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., cul~ertnnrelocation, etc.) `- I
W:pTERBODY/RIVERBASIN /`~a~5e 1~iVtf I]2SV1 COUNTY/CITY Wake ~,1e~t' ~we~r'nc;
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS dIC
P SP NP Observation ('ommente or Description
FishiShellfistvCrustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e, tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. ravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) ~j~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~ Z ( 5
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) ~y,,y~f lvr ,yr,z-~
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure ~N,E~r
Flow fn Channel
Wetlands Adjacent Tv,'Contig. With Channel
Discontinue
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June throu h Se t.
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present VKFTl~4N~
Wrack Material or Drifl Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel i~/~/G/ S ~,Q/~~~
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /®
Does Cha~nel~.ppesr On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / N Approx. Drainage Area:
Perennial Channel (stop). Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nojd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

s~'-~ I
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ~~-
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION 1D ~'~91)7 APPLICAi`iT NAME / ' V~CfI NAB DATE ,b~~! ~d ~
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., cuh•ert. relocation, etc.)
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN ~CrnSG ~l~Cr IUcl~i/l COUNTY/CITY YVAn<'i/11fef ~~Ttnn
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS /IIC-~
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
FishiShellfisly"Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present(Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure WL/FY
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. ravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) s~~t/~ / jZ J i7 i~.r4 i~
Riparian Canopy Present ISP =/> 50% closure) ~L~G v~
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel v~vATE Q ~ 1f rT /UO fl4 W
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel
Discontinue
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
June throw h Se t.
SeepslGroundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drill Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel ~/N~i'h /NJl/17.~.
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y 1~
Dces Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / N Approx. Drainage Area:
Perennial Channel (stop) ~ Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of importantlunimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present 11/4/98

5 ate 3
roject Name: ~ a907 River Basin: NC~,,,S~ County: Vl~gk~, Evaluator: ~ ~n~ ~ ~~,~(
6Ad~
WQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: ~~ ~CCGk Latitude: Signature:
ate: ~-~-t-d ( USGS QUAD: ~u9uc~ Longitude: Location/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: /jevaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a Horn-made dItch, then use ojthis form is not necessary.
Iso, ljln the best professional Judgenrenl of the evaluator, the feature is a man-made ditch and not a modlJted natural stream-this
ting sys-em should nol be used*
rimary Field Indieators_ (Circle One Nurnher Per l.ine~
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ~ 2 3
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0
Are Natural Levees Present? 0
Is The Channel Sinuous? 0
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 I
Is The Channel Braided? I
Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? I
Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0
Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
NOTE /JBed cPr Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0•)
0) is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As lndicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? es=3 No=O
RIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR~7NTS:
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
is There A Groundwater
low/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
RIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Abs t Weak Moderate Strong
Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
)Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 I 0
Is Periphyton Present? 1 2 3
)Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
RIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
econdary Field Indicators:_(C'irc/r One Number /'er Line)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ~ .5 I I.S
Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .S I.5
)Does Topography Indicate A ~
atural Drainage Way? 0 (.SJ 1 1.5
ECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: /, S
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? I.5 1 .5
Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 f'S'~ 1 I.5
)Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 r:'.~ I l.5
Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 ~ I.5
ast Known Rain? (*(VOTE. IJDitch lndicated In N9 Ahove Skip This Step And MS Nelorv•)
Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 I .S
onditions Or In Growing Season)?
Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or [n Headcut)? es=l. No=O
ECONDARYHYDROLOCYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Ab~nt Weak Moderate Strong
Are Fish Present? (0/ .5 1 _ I.5 _
)Are Amphibians Present? .5 I.5
)Are AquaticTurtles Present? I I.5
)Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 I I.5
)Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 I I.S
)Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? ~ .5 1 I.5
Is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 I l.5
)Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
• NOTE: If Total Absence OJ All Plants In Streambed 2 I .75 .S 0 0
s Noted Above Skip 77iis Step UNLESS SAV Presents).
ECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:_~
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
OTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary ~(lfGreater Tlran Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream /.r At Least lntermFtttnt)

+e 1
roject Name: QL agD7 River Basin: /J~,s,~ County: WA~te., Evaluator: /Vla~l'I' f'~~ne.1 ~( Harp lo(
13 ~ad7
WQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: dal CCed~ Latitude: Signature:
ate: 12-'-1-0 I USGS QUAD: rHyuct7 Longitude: Location/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: ljevaluator and landowner agree that the jeature /s a man-nwdr dllch, then use ojthis jorm is not necessary.
lso, ljln the best professional Judgement ojthe evaluator, the jeature is a man-made ditch and no! a modiJled natural stream-lhls
ting system should no! be usrd*
rimary Field Indicators_ (Circ% One Number I'er /,ine)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 I 2 3
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 I Q 3

)Are Natural Levees Present?
0
2 _
3
Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 3
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 1 3
Is The Channel Braided? 1 2 3
)Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 2 3
Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 2 3
NOTL• /jBed ~ BankCaused By Ditching.lnd W/THOUTSinuosity Then Score=0•)
0) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
~
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 / t
I~o--~
RIMARYCEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: I f~
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Groundwater
low/Discharge Present? 0 t~ 2 3
RIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 9
II. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
)Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0
Is Periphyton Present? I 2 3
)Are Bivalves Present? I 2 3
RIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:!
econdary Field Indicators:_(CirclrOneNun~ber!'erLineJ
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ~ .5 1 I.5
Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 ~) I.5
)Does Topography Indicate A
atural Drainage Way? 0 .5 I I.5
ECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ~, S
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 .5
Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0
Are Wrack Lines Present? 0
is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
ast Knuwn Rain? (•NoTe: /jDilch Indicated !n N9 Above Skip This Step And NS Beloiv)_
is 'There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5
onditions Or In Growing Season)?
'(f~ I.5
1.5
Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Ur In Headcut)? Yes=/.5
ECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
Are Fish Present? .5 I I.5 _
)Are Amphibians Present? .5 1 I.5
)Are AquaticTurtles Present? .5 I I.5
)Are Crayfish Present? 1 I.5
)Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 I I.5
)Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? .5 1 I.5
is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 I I.5
)Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
• NOTE: /jTota! Absence OJ A!I Plonts In Streambed 2 I .75 ~ 0 0
s Noted Above S'kry This'Step UNLESS SAV PresenN).
ECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: /. y
OTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary~=ZZ (If Greater Than Or Equal To /9 Points The Stream Is Al Least Intern(lttent)

Y ~~ ~ x
~

` ~
o=
z
as

~ a~
~o
~
T~~ .Iw `~I^ Q W
~
J L
l ~. wl~
i~
~ I, ~ ~
~ TI`S
-I- ~ ~
.~.. ~ l
\
Ie a &~
~. Q m R
d

i 4 T
~ ~ 'h
w
~ m

C
~
~~ _J
"0 t1
u
Y~
1
~~
~~
BL '°N 133HS 33S 3NIlHJ1VW
'~ ~ ~ II 111
~ ti ~
I 1
I

_ ~ ry /~ • I
V .. ~ ~ , \
}N / \ •III
as ~; ~~\ ~ ( ~
~ Q , ~\ • • d
J \ _ I
Q ~
~w ~
i i Vf W T .
ii ~ II
o ~ i~ /, , U
~ o~ ~ ; • •/
~~
a 3 ~ ~~~ mm Stt RcJROIE~ ~Il •~
io ~~~ T - ~~ /~ ~. O .~W I
•••
~Vi CI1 Vi ~ N

b
~~

~
N 2
Q~j(~
~ II II II II II
_
aQJI+~(Wj~ ,JJ/
OW
®u ,
d~1
o
N
g
~ ~~ ~Q W

~~ N
o NNr.~ II II
'
N II II II II
~ ~Q~~~N

~ \ \ -
\ \ ~ ' . M~ n
~~ 2
~~ ~
\
dS ~e rs 3,~, 6~g. ~ W
\ ~~Hd b \b>"_ 3A
// ~
\ ^ \
>. ' ~ ~ ~
?
°-z~' s~9 ~ ~~ ~NOJ
u
Q g
~' ~ ~
~ b ~~\
~
1 i ~ p~
J
~" ~
~~ •,• ~ I
~, I
~ ~;~~,
/
•
^~~ ./•
ti~~~
v
, ~ aaQppQQQ_
~
~
V
P
W
~/
~Q~
•
/
• ' I
ry
~~
g I
~~
. ~ I I
ti
/ ~ W IU

I° I
I ~ l
WI
~I x

1- a
o
u -\
J /

W

~Q ,
_~
w I

a
"` I
+
~
o
J
V W '
W H ~ _
_
i•1
07
~ ~ a ~ W
~
•* _ -
O
~
I ~~~ ssi
~
a _ W
~p1~ O1
7 I ~ W
Nl

~ I
i ,r1
N v
~ I I a
~ I $I~
-,~ ~~ 3-
\~ ~ =
~.. ~ _
a
~1
_ ~ ~.~.
411
IyJJI a ~
II
Ili I1 1 ~ ~~I1
I x I
I I j~ j of I l
L ~ IW I:
jll~ ~I
~~+ I.kJ
Ij ~
G LYI'91 N
€ III 1 1
I
h' 1 -
II~ 11 I
IA
W
1 BSB'1 • N
/ Illi ~ I I / / 1
I'll III I
~I~~ I' II
~ '';I II II ~~I ly'''.
r9
V
~~I
1
r;tl
~~
G'
i
-e-. AJ'K.~B
~ ' /~- ~ -- aaaw '
~~3 ~~~~k v ~\ ~
,~ ~ /
` .'
~~.'3 Z W
/, ~* I~ Via.' III
~ , I
Z Ga g $ `I l I
~ J ~ W 1
I w~ ~ II
D W I ail W a~ 11 ~A II I
I N am 1
~~ i i II ~~ ~~ II I
W I ~~ I I
I /~> mLL I i~T * W~ 5 III I
^^+ Q ~~ 6 I
~~~ ~ ~ I ~ ul ~ O ~^~ ~ I
~ I I •O cn cn ~ ~ I
d~~' I I I N~ 81~ •0
~~
I a
s ll ~
~-
~.
. ,
. i
°~ ` ~
I1
k
~~d I ~~'~~ ~~
I ~~ II
II u, ~
~ II
,I ~I
I III
III
I
II I
II I ~I ® 1
II ~ nl1 _I

V
S
U~
/-m
. ~~
1 = ~ .
i ~~ \ I
/ /~ \~ ` J
~
~ ~
~ x.YSisi9
®I
I
~ S
699'9t ~
.6iT~i ~
~
1 `
`p
\V
x p~ g ~
~+g ~
LLON
~
SCS'C
\
M.62,10.09 S U
o m 3
~
Na
/ J
N ~
1~ ~ ~ ~ =
a
~ o
~ti I
Q'
o Qo o
H~~
W ° ~
o
p
'1~ I ~Jp b
QZ ON
t0

~ o
' ~
,~
ti 9
,~I N a N N
o~~ Jw
LLON

~ . -.wiri'" 1 ~..~ ~ ~ E
@g
C

/
I

~ `~
'
Iy0 V~
OI 1-1-x-
K J¢ J K K
.. 51 W ~~•3~~=r .
PET 506' ~., ~
~
~
-
8
~
~
_ ~
I M a rv a° o o O
S m O m+ i s
~ ,r~r -
-
~
.1
r
w 150 m~
b Q
~ m ~b o u, ~o u, 4 0 0
~
7 .1 ~ ~
0~' _} pp
~
~ pp emu
~ OV

J~ ~ - 000000
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r-
' 16.161 COR. t0 ~ N
1
00
u ~ ~ N N ~ N
x
~ ®~~ g~ }~o
J
w
Q+ ~~,ooo
~~~_-_
dd<dac
el f1 dU ~ ,~• N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
WZ NNtn NV1
+ ~ ~1 ~'~ ,'~J''
h R '' z1 z u
~ o
N
1 - u; ~1
~E ~ 1 ~ w I1
N + ~'1. 18
_ I ~= A~I~
~- ~":~ g 1,,,
~ ~ I~ -
~ _41 ~O' A~ ~s ~ ~d 135N3~°5~ i
u ~ Lsx~ ~ 9~
33t6sit w yl _ ~ ~-
_ ~ •
_ a
JCj ~. ~ r-
~~ _ I ~~ a 1
wwN0051 W 1
I o ~I ~~
I $ " ~,
Wp
= a
~. C~~ ~~ ti
x N ,~+m-1~~ ~ 1 W O
o` ~+` WNGI 2~ 1 ~~
a
3~~ ® I ~~ ~
uw I W ~' I ~ i
d ~ 12.215 5.66 LC6'll J 2 CU
N A.-!rb 1 1 3.ZO~CS N 3.SO~C pb.f N ~LS.Zb.[9 N ~
~1 w l ~
~ ~~ L o+ `~ ~I ~~
W
~ W sl (~o O NI Wi
"I ~ " I
® ~-~I ~ g I ~ I ~;
I ~
M
1Lt
J Yg
~
Y
~~
~ ~'

FApq
~o a
c
Vt0
z W~ r
~I~ ~g

O N

W
a
~~
~
~~
~ ~
~Z'~
~(~~
N ~ <~ ~r0~0y

~8
~ g
~ <°g
m
~ ® ® ®
o I .i~ I
III '" IOW, ~ I I I l i
II
~ +ti I ~ I
a 19.006 ,_ -~ w l l° ® I I
~~ i9 9 N 49'd4'44 E 1
u - II ss `'
II ~^ -~~" r _ 'Ar r _ l_d 1bOZ 15B ld HO 3WI 7Y31 ~Q56~ `
d~ j 1 _ _ d Opz '
~ w a SgtIs>~ N49•dZ~~~i~1 ~\, I I 11 `" ~ /
j~ ~~ I~I I I~ J~
I,~ ~ I ~~ ~ ^lo I
I~~ ~I I`
w W ~ IAM w o
~ +~ Nlry ~~ ~~ RIB
•V65 0
EI ~~ _
fl - I IBL'IZ I~
p ® h / 24.180 L3 dYAGL9 N ~^+
® ~ .-tl e9'tr3Tt -~
~ ~ ~~~ tt
(I qt E~ i c~
III ~ ,~
Ia~
'~~ ~ ~" ~
0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
II ~ ,,
4
,.~ ~` ~ ~
I~I~ ~ ~ <~
0
~~ ~,
ZL 1wn~ ~~
I q~ ~ 11 ~I
I ~I
~ ! `~I IIMI
II II III
_ i I ~ ; I Ik
9L '°N 133HS 33S
\ \/
VIII ~ ~ ~~ ~
~~` w~
3NIlH~1VW
S4f 68SSE44 Ef 8f6

z
~~
~ ~~
~~

.'.'
::.
,:
N~
~~54?~~
o~~u~jN
~ II II II II
h h
am~~~
~` 8 ~
~,~ Q ~
rn~~~N W
N1 II II
I I
~ o nn I I I
~ ~ ~~ I I
d' /
o --. ~ I I I
° ~ / c~' / ~
CONL (~
~, a ~ ~~ I ~~-~~
b ,~ ~ ~ e l l
I I I
i 1
~ ~ ~ ~ I I
I I I I
~ ~°~ ~ , -
`,
~ I I
~, ~ I I
I I
~ ~~ ~I I
.`
y ~I
`"t, 1. ; ~ d \n- ~
~ ~~ ~; ~ "'" r-II ~I ~ ~~;
rn
I~~
I ~ II::
I~I~
I I '.
~~ I I~
-I°"~ I I :~~~
~~I~I ~ ~.
I //I~:;
~/ I I:.
~~I I I
I I I~'
,(e i ~
~~ I I W
~~ ~ ~ I I
~
o
2 I 1
~
~ wcQi ' ~ I I
~
~~$~ ~~ I
~ I ~
I I _
~
o;g~ ~~ I ~ I I J
~
C'11
wl I ~ ~~ I
I - ~
I ~
}~
~
I`% I I
o~'~~' ~~~~ ~ I I
I~al~~~~~ 619Sm ~~/ I I I
,.M/////~ ~/x I I
A\ \4
I I I
/5 j~2m x
/
~~~ ~~a
I ~ ~ ~~
..1 ~ W
~n, Q W N \ i J g ~!1, I W~ I w i
r.
tW ~. ~ ~ NMI \vi^+Y Q Q~ 41 I I
~ , ~~a~ ~~ I ~ q
w ~ p ~, I ~;~~o ° 1 ~ I ~I ~
`.-'b~ac~gaa~~r~-~'~ IU
~ i
'(^~ ris y1.2 Imp i ~ '~ ~ a I U ..
_K~x_-x- ~ ~ ~ I o a
W
~~ Ivw1
a
~'

~
I I
~
WN
v~m
<_
Ia- 1

a
m
?
N +
o
w
I I
F-
j U J < W
~~
J C3o IA
} J
~~ a
~ ~'^ w h iw
J x
O ~ p Ifl N ~ .. I

VppT~~ ® N \ j~ O W
WI N
(D ~
I
<00 ~
A
4
~ I
. ~
1
IL
~~~ 6~1 \U

I ~
I I
i
x
I I ~.
i I I
d
I I ~ ~~
I I I ~ +cmE 4•LmE
cvn~ cvn
I I ~~ O LLoaa~ ~ LLo~~~
W I o ~ a p°a J
I I ~ I = ~ c pO 2 co~
I QU^ yr 3 ti o0 ~ U m 73a,
I I ~ !-~ 00
O~ a~ ~°'° pN't~.o "° i°°
_JrN ° F _Jr ~ ° N o
95~ = I a= ° ~ Q=N ~ °
'~ ~ ~V+~~ v ~lJ~ ~
I I 1 ~' ~ ~ way ~ $ w~} ~ $
a., I^ ~ az ~~ v~,
o~ ~ +Q I
I I I Z ~° LL~
I I ~ ~
I I
~_~ o o
I I 1 ~ LL~~y+g~
r -~_~ ° a
I I I Qa~ ~~o
oa ova
w a ~ o
I I I ~} ~°LL
~ I Qo e oo~
w V a a
a N N
I ~I I ( `~ C=m ~~
o`S -~' I In
I = I ~ ~ l`O" ~"
I ~I~~
I I,~. ~ I_~_-_--____
--~---
I I ~ ~ ~.
I I ~ i ~ b ~ ~~~~~ ~j~
I ~ ~. tia
I I I I ~ I~ I ~' ~~~d =1"
I I I I ° ~ II ~ J ~~~~ /
I I ; I it ~~ ////~~~
/
~ ~
/ / v,
/ N ~ 4/y,\m/ © © a ~s
I /// /~ ~~
N 51711d2' E ~~ ~- _~ _~
. ---~~- ~ ~ "' ~ 6lJ2gm
/ ~
I ~~~I I /
~I ' /
I ~~~I ~ '~
~' , /
~,
II I ~ /
I 1 184 I I `. O I t / /
~22A 4) yf j~~~a= / /
~, _~~I ,13.631 ~ ~ o~+~LN. .~ ///
ia(di i
Q~ ~ i /
I ><
I I ,g, ,
ca•Ifl y~ a ~
bZC'(6~~ ~~ i
- h
I ~.
v ~W
;; I ~ ~ o ~
oC _. ?QO W ..
~ I ~ •~~ ~ ~5~~
~ ~ W~~F•-Q ~'
I I I ~`~
"1 I
u I, ,
I,,
.._
I
qq` II
3'Ei'
y ~ ~
Ili ~~~~' ,~ _~ ~~ s `-~
1 1
I 1 ~ ' ~" ~ ~; 11 ~
I
~ Y _ _ I
I
1I ~ I
mrq ``~
rc
i~~ ~~~
i ~~
~
~ I~

~ 2

~

~,
Z

I
~ m i
F~
I~o
~ w
~ ~, ~ II
I
~ ~ I
~ ~
~ I~
W
IN ~ I ,~ ~
~ `° ~I
i ~ ~
~~ `t. '~6
,~
x \
r.
3a \
~~
/u~ u~ \
J o
J e
{o yW ~ "i\
N ~\
Or !Q
W "'tND p-p
~~g~ ® ~~
U
_--_
7d3~ I
~~~ I
~~~ _-
~o,~
~~
3~'
LL '°N 133HS 33S 3NIlH~1VW

914th 111491 if 44C1GIrtbtf 934 if iilf SFf
ti S
//~~4 1 \I ~ ~. M
~y ~~ l~V~ ~ I ~ ro r ~ ~M
/a
m A CO ~n~ CT~~ reb6 ~
0~m\\NC i~ ~1 II~~ o L~~ 3~II.OLO N m ~ t l~{~
~pn ^-ri I I I \ N ~ ray g~ a~ Iv
~ICD E, I I ~ y ~\ \ "'~ ~' ~ ~7nF~' S c}i ygj p_Op~
U1~`I~ ~ ^~~I W6 a~I ~~ o Is] 6 0 CONC ' a / \ r q 4 ~j- pO Yl Ty~~ y
m 1111 II IIQ ~'~~ jll~.y~I to ~ I EI ~ I m_ \~- I ~ C'~, ~o $~°~R3 ~4 ~' ~~~Ty ~
CN•~t~p> nI / ~/~ n I m ~ U+ N I~ E r " r ~~ C O ~~~+ m Tq ~
2 Atv,q~ j I I I a ~ ~ I I' I ~~~ mm 2 R! H r-• 'n rn'~`ayyy hl
(('~f• m
~~~NUTCS ~ :v"'°o9 I ~ ~ I ° I j ~ m ~ ~ on ~ ~ = ~ ~~o ~ m ~ to -Z~7
o~~ I~ ~ ,Nay ICI ~ ~ ~ III n~ - - N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ $~~~~
r III ~ ~,~~ II ~ ~I I I m r~ ~ '~ ~ ~~ S"a ~~'(y°, g ~ C$~r.l z
m~% ~ Dy 3IP I 8I I m = I U O ~ .n 4n ~, ~~t:~
ma~p~ ~ ~ III II ~ ~ i ~ I z ~ ~ ~~~~
II ~~~>`
II II II ~ ~~ Op vl- I I ~ ~I ~ I m I ~ '+ ~
~ O
n~~0%~Y~- I~ m~ ~o s ~II I I ~ ~I ~ E^ ~ - - - - N
VV~~~~~ ( n4 ~OC'4O IpII ~ ~ I I-~ I 9~ Q QQ~ d©© I~
N~ ~ C _ m I I
/'Q?~y 06 ~3 N~X 3~ ~~ II I~N ~~_88~~I ~6 ti
j n ~~. I nl • n I I n I ~
m l l 11 1 1 II 4 r ~ °p m T OED T ~ ~ ~q-i ° a I ~_ u vl ~
II ~ W N `~ Of TpE r ~ ~ a I ~ I` ~ ~ w m ~ I ~
rn bg$A~c' T Df ~ j Smro cG T~f~ ~I ~I ~ I ° ~•° I I I I m ~ ~ O ~ ~ _ ~
~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ O£\,Of \ j~f~ Tp fF\N -g~ I ~ I I : ~ 1 m ~ b d ~` ~ ~ N o ~ ~ I y
_ T60 mm CONC CSG _ m "om ~ v^~
N ~ c'4 w~~ Q ~ ~ ~ - ~ I ~IK I I r~i~• Q I\i ~ I 0
~,. ~ 4Y Y P, 160 ~ I A: ~ ~-
61.500 CORNER TO R/ ~ 1220 mm 4 0.. •0` ~ ~°I ~ mrn~N I
/ - - 5 slro9'33• - ,~ _ -a0 I, I Air a p IITL CAM1OPY N
~I .N ~ _ c~ X11
m a ~G _ ,amT _.-, ~ g , , , I ~
II II II q V1 / o r Nti / v _ 3 {I : I r
II C~IN~.P / ~~.~ n ~3 I ~F ~ ~~ ~ 3~~11 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 4.~ I I ;I ~- I a ~
~ ~ o T, . ~ ~ T
~~~~a ~ /~a cvfao ~~ ~",~ ~~~ I 'U I ~" I ~ ~ I I ~ch O ~ a~ I 11 13 '7 /
ppa ~I t _ O 1 I
do Nv~ I m + ~ Q I 3'' o° I
~~ ~ / a' N v Q8g ~ co DI I I< ~ Ca~.~. ~ ~~bj"a~` `~cIO„ O _m ~' ~ a~~~' I x
~ ~ ~. ~~_j'LS 51'0~'33'N x 9 ' ~ L7 ~~ I 13 Iy ~~ • (j t~,~~1 I :~' I~ / nl I >~ p s m
~c 120 mm w0 R ~i ; D 1 mm ZJl vf~ ~ / ' ~ a i~ O Z fl
/ 09.172 CORr4:R TO R/N ^ _ 4 I ~I_ Ir^ - V ~F r- I ~ 1 ~ / mN b
~"C ,~ I $ ~ ~ / dO OS 31 Iv' r`.l ^~ \~ SZ5? ~k ~' /' ' ~ ='2C C`~ ~cgxlm
A /a „~~ uW+rc"i °° / ~' ? I v I I o \ ~~ k\x 1~~ 1~, ' ~ l ``~~ rr
~FP~ ^~ yF 3 a ti ~ 3 / ~ I c
\ / ~ ~I~ ~+trO ° -I / / a~ mul v~ I ~ ~\V\ORMR ~k Qk / ~%_(~y
I i x / /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _JO GR F ~ I f 3 V j„ +"'i A~W _, // // 3~LS,bL81 N
~ .I I[,~ o
- '~ r ~.. ~... ~~~ ~ -~ 5 51'OB']3~N - I ~, I ~'lil~ ~ V x C ~.-~/1~;~1 / l1 I
/~/ i - ~9.L5 CORNER i0 R/N 24 GR - _~/ ~ i II,.,1 I ~ ~ r I k ~ Z N /'I//o ~ /~ /
omr// ---- °jGNiI I I~I ~ vr`~`~k 8 ~~m ~///~ /
~N w°c1 1 n Q auVi Q ~ n3ll I ~ ~ --~ /~~~~~ c ~ ~ !/ ~ C
0 1 V u m I I o 3 U I . I...:tn II I ~ ~_ -J ~.J ~ ~a~ ~'° .. l'l
~I~ Own\, ~9~ '~ ~ 3 I I z 8g _~ "' / / ~
^' ~ m n r \\ ~ V I I If ~3y I I '" 0 8 8 T~ . y ~/ c
V a 'j
5 61ro8'77'M ~ ~ -. - - - ~S slroe•]z~w~"'~ F I ? I AI~I ~ '~~ > o. ~ ' ~~ m / ~'~ ~'
41.1% p 45.617 CCRNCR TO R/N ~ •~ I ~ ~ I W B I : ~ `^ ° '~ 1 '~ ~ / ~ I ~ a
1)
s 3 /~ / (n
~I ~ CAS _ _ 'I ~ p I ~I~ I Cw a ~ #`~ ~ / ~ ~ ~
C "I n N p 24 GR ~ $ rII~I~!!N~~~)) I i~~ l~ ~ l m ~ C
~ "'a L • ~ ~ In~l I I - C r ~ i U I(li ~~ / ~ ~ / ~
~ ~ - ~ i I I ~, I m a g /= / ~ ~
Z OnZ ~ r •w'h ~ I n gyn. ~ z. ~,.~•~~-R'1Atl $/ ~_
N ~ ° ~ ~.' I i~Ti b rur_ y .a ~ TrN. n
W ~ ~ _ ~ m i P 13 ~ ~_ + _n ~N i ~ '`I.~ ~ ~~ 3/~ f/) / SOyS
sslro6.32•w II ~ I ~ r ~ v v`, ~ ~ O 9 i n°a~ m 3 ~''~ /~ ~
_ N51bR'7J'E 45.97] CORKR TO R/N 7y{ rn I ~ ,. ~6i ~ N ~ ~ H I~ N/ ~ ""•~"""'~-~'^~~+~+~.~....-.....
r 2 42.153 x_~ ~F ^G9 IF ~ a o ~ 'Q, ~ Oq ~ ~ r-+~-.._.....~..~....
~~~ x p ~t220 mm wD H41 ~ I a ~ 1 -.O ~ ~ v z n ~. / •r~o / ~ _
~~° ~ufa-I O ~ / I I ~ _ ~~ I ~I ~ Q LA _1
I m 4n -
a'u~i mm Q I I o ~ 9 ~ II l~ III ~" - r1' `~ ~~ ~} ~. N~ ~ \ \ ~'y'i ~r". C~.,, ~y..
I ~ eT.1ls CORNCfl ro R/N ~ ~ pd2o mm Z ~ - 7~ ba ~o P~: ~`' ~ ' _~' + ~t' N
~ + i
, ~ - - 24 SOIL y4/
~ O / . + I In ~. a ~ D 1. 2g. I "'V ~ z.
C1W =;T- / 4~~' `r o ~ I v'h~' 3 r>, 6p. = C/f l~ f~1 `w;+1
NIN WfA ~-1/rO `Y la lQ I ~~ I m ~` a ~l / / ~? I nC rj ~i
o°+ Qlm wl~cm ~ ~ o ~ ~ II_ ~ I _ ~ ~ D? o .~ a y ~ ~ ~-v N
C C ~
7 l !I' v. mtn
~ a ~ ^~ ~ 5 sl'G9~77•N !~ 1220 mm CHL F 1 }~~~ ~ 3 +` ~ : ~~.' a '• ~ A~N a ~+ O
N ZTTI I BT.54I[ORNER TOTO R/N '^-k - - - - alY9 I I;S ,I~V_, V' ~~ f'f • ~~ ~ ~ ~_ ir..
rfTl ~ \I° I I ~ ~ / ~ / ~ : ~ Ut
-~ v3-4- ( I ~ o ~ pp I ~ .p
°_ n r N ~~ d
~n ~p m 9 ~ ~
+ o o -1 ~ ~? ~ I /
o~ X r D ~ z4 mr1 I w + 4n
7 m U a - - - - ~F I I I~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~"
r1 0 ^ I o vF ` p m I I ~~`. ~ r ~' a s W
T m m ~ ,+, ` I o I I~ ® 8~ • ~ lfj ZOO
to D~o ~ yx CTT I I o m C ~ I I IQ ~~ / n ~? ~m
3 m7~ m ~'mO N ~b Q _ _ III - ~ ~ / ..~ / ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
N Z - - - ,'2 SO/ i r~ 3 I F' ~~,-~.,.I k N 2rT0
N I m 4n ~ ~ ` I i ~F 3 I I ^ CRrq ~ f -.' ,>,- ~ ~ ~ n `" ;~~ ~ Z
- ~ ~ ~
~ '~r -i
1 °zy k I ~
~~ tiR ~ II I ~~~* e ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~uu~ OR DIY:^. ~ ~ ~ ~'
in ~ - - - - s SIros~73'w -xJ \ .... - •4~o i.~ I ~ I- 7'f / Ln ~ ~ ~ N~ g
t c A ea.Ti6 C~IrER To a/N T T ~Y "` i ~ J~oo ~ _ C~ ° ~c~ tmilm if ~
'~~ ;,~ - scnou sr .J_+ esr- - -=` ~ I ~:~:/' ~ ~ r*, m o~ A ~ ~
bb -85.595 CORNER TO R/N ! 'ter _ - -5y~ ~ \ - I~ft ; i I .4 ,,, / A ~ ~ J~ma1m ~m A(1 u Z
'f ~`lin f5~ l.. ~~ '.' / \ f~ ~ rPl~ ~ Z 2 [l
ti~ ~ F ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~. I ° ~ I I ~ ~::': / ~ < ~ N': `"~, :'amt NP ~ z
~~ro °~~ I d a I ~ I ~~ ~I / o`n`o ~ ~rn wa z o
4n ,- •. ~9 0~ I I ~4. ~ I I Zo
~~ nA I / ~~'~ ~ I I Z~ rn
m~ MATCHLINE • SEE SHEET No. 5 ~ ~b "~ d z
~~ ~ z ~ $~ °
~~

iii+~~f~~sli'i~4++ocNSSSisssissss,<,<,«
I li _2s Qsr ` - -
m N - - - -
1~^'
I ~ 0~3 ~ Gl
I
~1 mw3
;~~ ~ ~~I~

N ~* 1
~~ ~ T ~ \, ,,;; 1 :~
??\Sg'~ O ~ ~ \ \ 1~9:f 1 III ~ ~w+
'oa \ \k y ~ ~ t 1 I IOI ~p IA~``
1 m `~ 3
\ to ~~ 1 w r+ + 3 ~ f_
~~Gks`s.eo6 coRlAx vl 1I INI • '
US1EE. T ,AEq •I i
°'`O
\ p\ 4ESIPO6 v,~+ ~ ~ \~' 3 ~I io ~ b6~+ ~N ~
I ~ ' N~ ~
\ ~ ~'~ 1~ I I i~ ~ o n ~ o m~~rD?
e9,~/ w 5 I I I j` rn •A a s p II II Il Y
I ~~ '~ $~ ~ a O 11 II ~`q
~~a ` I,1~~ I 9a ~^ I~ a ~ a, u b ~ ^
~ ~ hh ~ ~
I I~l m \\
~ ~ vl / m rl ~ ~ \` II II II II,
I ~ ~~ ~~ ~, I ~' nj I I ~I I I~ ^ .~ g ~ ~ /~ 0\B9~9Jj. rn ~~~~ "~
-- O / °m rm- I s 119 I ~ ~ 8{~ ~ ~" ~ ~~\ ~~~ \ R /o R \ r~ ~ c"
w
'd^~ w II• I~S I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~"L
A
I ~ ~ \ ~ ~
m ~ ~. 'f I ~ _ ~ ~ VA n ~~~ ~ ~$~ may..
\ m°~ R ~ ~ sl \\ \ \ \ m
\ °mn I ~ I I I I N ~ + ~N\ \~ ~~x ~ ~~~rD?
\sa\ \7o'or n O ~ ~ ` a + I ~ - 1 I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „~ ~°\ ~ ~ a O II II II II II II Q
Cp \N ~nO 3 3 I ~ I ( 9 ~\ _CTN ~~~~
CT fNN ~cR ~~ w \ W 3 ~ 1 ~ I I `~ I I I r \ ~ oQ1 a Rl n~~0~~
\ peSlFFw~~ \ \ \ ~` m ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ 8 `~~' u ~ m ~A'AN
\\\ s BpCrSOCO \\ d~'~^mw~ III ~I In~Q .: 83 ~ U r ~ ~C
aw.g?6\eyv.~s, 4 O \ w ~ ~ ~ $ ~' 3 i ~ l ~aya V © ^ a a $ I :~ ~
cpq~R \ ~ ` ~ ~ I I I ~' I I °i ~ t`
/o \ \ ~a I ~ I
i o RW\ \ \ I ~I Iy PD
w c° c \ \ ~ ~ \ ~I - I. ~. 4II ® Nano y
In n4 ~ \ \ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~. ~ - IWi. t ~ 'I. 4~ 4 ?~~ 3xs~ ~n~O ~ m ~)
a \ti ~' ~ \ ~~ so,/ P~, o T I ~ 3 mA1't n 3 3 N O ;; o ~ p
_ m \
p ~r~ \\~. ~.\ ~ f ~5 ~ 'I'. b H c~=N A Ul r ~a p m
O o~-- ~Cr ~ m 13 'I ~ ~ m I ~ NU~ UO ~ O D WCy~ ~
\ ~ oso ~~8 N ~ ~ -<
+O 3 m "=1 ~ ~a ~~ ~ \ ~~ ~I ~ I of ~ © m Uy ~ O oo ANiA m O
o ~° ~~°D ~ ><I^~ ~ ~I ~ 1.103 N ~ ak na ~
O IO Ino i a =S iV ~ ~ m ~. •IA . I I I'~ ~~ ~ IU \ ` '1. O 7~ t~/1
-i uan~ w n7 Og~a+ II ~I III m~ ap~6 bUi +Q m~* N
a m 7* ;:cn ~ 3 3 ~ II~ '' i I 1 ~ \~~7T~$g a~ ~i ~ w
mo ~-9 i I ~ `' ~ ~ (~~ V A ~ d
o : -Nip An + I ~I- m e ~ ,r\ \ ~ \ g ~y
4 _ a~ >~ a ' ~ I ~ t''" ~ ~`` y~ A A
to ~ ° -+m Nt 1 ~ ~ € ./0 ~°" F` ii '~ I wq<t ro~'~ a \
y rtr D_ '~ ~ ~ * ' . " I v dam 1.N ~ ~ ~ °??B~coeg~3s~,e t- '^
~ °,f` ~ v_ r ~ ~ ~ °' I I I'^ 1/ ^~ ~ I ~g r $ ° w a~~R To R> wgbn
` \ .
`*° ~ ~z o = Sn -I ' ~ I ~~ I:1 m m 3 ZN„ t; /" ~ ~ ~ S~ mm
~°, g; m o ~ 2 9 ^~~i II~3`F3' in ~~ ~`Q~~t°o I w~N~ ~ ~rn ~~
o°= `3~a N ~ v,.3~ ~$II ~1r~ WI m ~6t-a6+ `` ~ oo,mv' m' \~\895r.o ~l~ nom, rm~
Iw ? ~ _ `O ~ I 1 I. I ~~ ~ a ~ - ~ ~, ~ ~' W ~ ,''T B °j! N1~\ Pn a +~ ~1
3 i n -. ~! ~ ~ I~ ~'r III I~! I ~~ $' ~ ^ m ~~. v Ur V a $ -i \ T = ~ 2
~p` I ~~I~ T~; I m"nL ~ ~_ ~~rOV o~vmi~N z \ ~~ ~3
n i~ ~p ~. I{ I I I I `a ~~~ Ul by • ~ ern 'p v \
K 65.Z~~ E%ISTING R/N ,-t Z' (T- g <' rti 'I m + TD H+ nm ~~ ~~
90.96 r _ _ _ _ _ _ _0 m_ I ~ I ~ ~~ V ~j uci ~O ~ ~ ~ s w~
~ m r "' <
pel: ~ " _ `~ ~ ~Qa
d $k n D I it I I CJl n I Rl
° ~~' I I N 6620'5 E .S O (.Ia Z ~ ~~
~ to Z - _ _ fTl III ', f 9. 1 914 mm WD RAIL ~ ~ ~ ` ~N O I nl
~ ISO mm PvC i I _ _'{~ - l O
9J~~ I I I v, ~ I a ~ ~ ~~
5 65'2 59' 11- ~.~. * I
90.165 EXISTING R/M ~ Ua + I I~I ~/ ~1 ~- I m 3 IV I a~ jai
LLyVV1(~ x0 _ ~
~~ .: J 'n ~ I ~' I I I ~,,~7~ ~ ~ ~ 2 GA UuPS ~ I v' r' ~ ~I ~ n
I n3~~ I ANOPY ~ I ° ~ -~ ~
oo ~ u~s~+ II~i II a~ `II a° in ~ ~a+~ ~ ~I ~I ~N t~~ O H2O ~ ~
O~ ~ ~ II L+ ~ a+ ~hha( a ~ t$•~^sj ~, a+a~ Cyr In N %~'a ~j ~
NA V) ~~ ~ I II I L -I' lOi0 m'n IO Q ~ 3 ,4 ~ • 3 3 6l v 3 3 ~~j A~~,J ~Irl o4'y lJl
~ V .0 r C7 ~, I I ,I I ~ ~ LY1NC ~ ~ ~ ~" D ~ A ~ ~ _ 6Tx " wrA C.~ff
t
~ I ~ ~~ N~ I II I ~I c ~ \ -- ~ ~ •~^m Oacl :A

~ c A o "r I I~ ^ d ~ I __E E E E e I; o m M soN Y w
nro
n
A ~
Il'3 ~
i ~->c

~O ,
~
~

~
--)E-
© O
Of-

*
E%ISTING R/^
/ /
~ la
II

I \
\ '~~
\ /-
_~ --~.

6'%SYI -
~ r;. -' _.. ,_.
- 'grr,rrr~....
37
m
~
~ -~
%I iG ~d ~ 26.021
'
'
mm
T.!1
.opr

~p~.

~cb (
Sl
Ul -

~ ~

m -

COnC C8C - ! I

II w

I w

-~~CuoYE_ ®
Cfn pyC
/i
375
iv ~REU0v

$
3rle
N 6
E Gt

Z .n

=
I I ~ I I -Y3- O WlIDON RD 6D Bsr \~'
u r
~ Ix ~

~ II _NC C8C
_ ~I I

,~ I
~ I .~ ~ ..

~
~
~~ .. --.-_
_ _ _ _ _ - -~ 300 mm AC
_
,
--- - ---------u-__~cf _
_ m

_~
:
..
S
m
r p~
^Yd ~
~-
y \ I I
I
' ~ ~l/~~~ ~~~j
I IOD mm PL ~..s'-
~ ExIS1 M~ R
'
~) i11 Ny6 Z6.10~1E Z7°
1
YIQT ~ E%IS TINC fl /M
c9N \ )
QQQI'-I- I
d )
~p
f~- , N 6626'S1
E 75,tTT f. !ER
I ~~
~3.'I ~ - - ~ \

O ~ C
m~
A~
~
~I~
" ~g `' MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 6 SPECIAL CUT DITCH ~
I cSEE DETAIL 'a') ~ ~
"

i i
F}tltf11144M491tf1}f.NSFti iff 44f 3443tt

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 5
• ha a ~
nl I I ~ ICI I y X30 2 In //
f ~I ~I ~ ~~ O O /~
Ol~° 4~, R ~, ~n ~ >~
n ` ~ I -.III I ~ y ~ al ~
co °o ~ ~n ~ + ~ ~, I III I k u, 2 ~ m ti
W o+~i +o {~v h ~~ m ro4 I ~ I ~ h v ply
y r ° OOf~ 6 ~3 __ _ I l~ ~ 6 ~I m
9 y f~1 O ® ~ ~ I _.~ ~ - N 6176.1~~ .385 ~,{xISTMG R/M
~ _ ~ ~°~~ - -JNOJ wwSLC 750 mm CON & m~a I i ~., F ~~ p6o mm CONC [ C 5 Q!E' W -- ~ ` ~ ~ - - - -
y:~ ti}y I bSI I - ° WYNOFlAI! QR 9A ©SI ~Rf~glN
~ ~0 1 r ° _ so mm cc c csc o I ~ ~ ~`~'.r _ zoom P~=~-N- _ _ - - - - Jlsmm ~ Nc ` ~ -~ -
rnN'o ~ I b I <3.
t~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ \ I 3 , 9tt1I ~^'y[~~,~ ~ ~ - _ 15~mmr Y"_ _ _- _-wit 4 ru~~itiG CsG - - - - -°-
QZ ~ \ \ I ~ ti ~7~~' kj - / "~ ~E%ISTING k/w~. ~- ~ ~ 90.881 N 61'16'1-E --~ ~- -
v1 0 ~ ro g ~ ~ II ~ I ~ m j ~ y,14 p N 9,1~~ ~ F5_q'.a• M SANDY SPRINGS BM 1991 PG 443 _ ~
7 ~~ ~ , , I !!~.--~~~ I I W~-: ~.. .-, ~ ~ ~ 101.652 m4
I,
~~ ~o
~~ ~~
as
1~ ~, - ~1
n n "m0
o n(Tl
0 o rt~-i
++
as
00 p Onf=
1 -d C
00 N~
r.: n
O O o o,~ O
++ ~ rn D
Q1 01 ? d^
00 p
zr to lno~
-iii w o+4~
3 ~ j+
~, \\ ~~
1 ~~~ 3
/~ //<
/ / ,~j,~
./. /~I ~' / ` /
,/ / ~~i ~/
/ / ~~~'/
/ °'/ / \
/ ~/ \
/ >ss / ~ a ~~ ~,
/ © ~cZim
~ Q ©unt~
~+ x z
O H
N A j
N "~
..(
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No.7
rn
~ '~
x
0
~ s~~ I~
-,_ * I
W
~~~

i~~i~jif ~*li~ iiiiocNSCSSSSS1s1411s1s
I~

ox
w°
c~
N
v°1 chi m
"~ s too~~
(iH C
z
N .~(
~~
a~a
D
~~$2
v ~ ~ ~ 7$R'~API
~~ ~~ no
I ~~
~\
IV1gTCHUNE
I
® ~: I~'
~~ / ~ ~ I
~ i
~ ,, I
~~ I ~ ~ j
3~ ti~ \\ B r ~.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ /S K4P
QUA ~ ~ \ J\
~~
~F ~ C01 Q*~~ ~ ~
If.~' •1 `
~~+1 _
~~ Oh~ Zlfi - I, ~ 1i 150 mm
~ 6~ $ ~ w ~.
1 Iw ~ y Ol
1520 mm CnL
...L~-~ _ _o +9'26. x.24 B3 CC 7
T9.719 ~ ~ NX ~ 16.156 t0
~~° ~
3
° a -. 1 3 s
W ~,~ +
a ~^
~Ia ~_~ -g
N ° ~ZO® m
~ 9 I
~^ ~°y= °
I N `
l~71 ti Z
\ I - ~ g~~ ~ -- _ -
\~ \ ~~ ~ of ~ ~~
\ \ \ \ `4~ ~ • 3X ~ wm1 '•I ~
\ ... 1 ~ ~ I
\ `
\
\
\07\~~ \ N ~3 ~r. ~ -
R 7 -,
g r~ 0 R. \
\
3~6 \
\
_ZaNE 2 ~~~
~, . ~ "~ m
~nNF 1 1_ .I
~ ~ - , - ccI
' N ~ ~)
~ p ~ ~3~ ~
I 9
~rnN
N~ ,' 1 ~ ~ ~
~g ' a ~ n ~ $
9 I / 1101;
'v VI +
~~ / p~
$ /, 01
wN~ 30
~~~ I ~ ?oowp noAo
o ~ am
~[I / D moOOOx nzA
aa ~l -^` -i a I`
N~ 7r
um asa~~z 1 ~.l
P' W
• L+Nn po© ~ v+P~mr-OZ f
O ~ A
m w I s ^' m~~
~~ ~ uA xs a ~~ ~
N .Z7 ~~ X1.1 ~
1 _ ~ m
a
r
• \ ~
~~ ~ < "~
`~,~ ~ 1
~ I~~ + _
... ~ Iv m U Ina •
~ ~
1 \~• 1 ~' ----"'i ~
~[nE , , 2 ~NpZ

~ O ~ N
o ~7
°
07^ oZ °o~ a°om
a om rnZ
o v
W~
uC0C WO
a u~ u~
NA QO W ~
~
0 W~n
_r
r .Zm7
-i
0 o

v` o
°
v '"
~

C1Q c
sy
-c °N ~g
m o
~
r' ,~v
c
x o

a° ,s
N< a~ ~~
,,,, m N
co ~ arm
~r ~ Z
m
N
a
5 a ~ ~
SEE SHEET No. 6
I~ 2 ~
~~~ k1 ~
I ~~I I~ ;1 0

~,.~I I a1J.eu9~~N 67Y3'~d'E 169.167 CORNER i0 R/~-(,/7/ yr/~~
11 ~ .. .. .. ..
I ~ I~Irn ~ ~ .1 ,~ ..
II ~I 'RL, ~N ' n. I i~
. ~ I~I ~ In I I I I I '~
I a ',~ N N
li $ ~' ~Im~ ~ ti a ~ zl--r ~I I I ~n
' ~ 3
D ~ ~! €~ ~g ~ ~ I I I ~~
I ~75mr, - IL - R1
r: cL-- - 41j°4u~
V 3710
I ~~`2l71 \ _40 mm CONC C8G f3llCA~ i ~ ~
~ s so esr `~~~ii' b~gj~~~Cyq~~.
f Q _ ~~ ~ mm CONC CdGJ - - ~ V ti(N
iI ~~- 4'~ _ ~ N ~ ~
i, ~~ `~ I ~ L+" N i ~ ~ ~ Z 11 11 II 11 1j ~
s ~ ~O,__. .. II lO =~- I 152D mm COLIC = _ ~ ~ O~ ~ bb~N~(V
C <?T- _ 8 10711 Q
~ I I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 8 ~ ~~~.~~
CL` ~ ~
,;,~ I I"1m~ 9~3~ ~ IINn b
® I m
f`~
In + '~ +
~ ~ ~ ~ z j I ~ m~-,~p~
II ~ I
~ B~ ~ 0 ~m CQNC cdG 11 11 p II II l
` ______-__\__ _ ~~o
+ I m - 52 DST ~' \I b~~b~4~i
~ r i `~ - -G\ mmm CONC C8G© I I ~ ~ \ \ ~A~N
- ~W a~3~ II ~ I
~- (1 ~ I „ 'rn Vi ~' +~ • I l 0 1 I II II p II q ~
I I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~+' (' I I~ I I ~ b~~~NN
I~ c I lp ~ s I <
i I = ~I ~ I~. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ . I Im
Z1p
f ~ ~ ~ I
~ I ~ ~ `~I MI ~ v ~w ~ I I ~ I ~ ~°'
I I' \ , ~
III ~I, \ U I 0
II 9; `~ \
SRI + 1 N' ~
~,.. I I ~ ~ bat l.l~ 9/,pe 9~bp. '.-1 .J ~
I i ~, C 3~$ ; B ~aR,v~ \f N
R 7
« I ~i ~ N~ ~m~ OR'~~ ~'~bn._

C
~- ~ - - _
. _ ~ ~ r6 ----_---
m ~ -~, ~ \
` 1
+1 I \ ~ h \ \
,"r, e \
y

a 1 \ M sob
'
in
~ ~' ~ ~
~N ~ I
PD 5i
4+
~ 1
2 ~
~ < `=~a~m*7A
aZ Om
~y
, ,~ N ~ I ~w~ y
:°tnj m~~ N
~
~
p, a j ~o o ~n < m
\
~~ 2K~ a ~ 11 ~~o ~~rcn t~->Q
_

R'b
p

~~

4

I II°
~ •vON
~
' >
\
~
-o
~ ~ `` X
~ 3 ma
1 ~ Q' 't ~~r"~
ro
~Tlroo=O .
+ ~ N any°rr

,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
= I
I
~
~ ~ r m ~
n s /~.
W
~
~ w
_

~
1
I ~
O W
°
b,
. ~~ ~
1 ~0 p
a
um
1
N

m ~ I ~O©
I
~
y ~
1 (n~
n m ~

w +
~ ~ ~"
~ r~-r ~
I~ w ~
H
~ $ a AA ~~

N
I n~
N In

~ m °o
I ~g ~i~
~~ ~
,1
wa
~ ~~
;3

_` 1 ~ ~II
I ~ I A

3^
Y 'iga~F~
'~SY~ tNp ~
1 / ;
- ~~I--:~ r
ill r
II I
I ~' m
~^r'~~
iX
;_ F
sR 3 87 A ~
~ G, T
~I II ! 6 I
~o ~g < I ~ o
~
}~
~ o

~~ k
yq~

~ 'j:° A
rm
cnO

~ lu
IIII° k
II~I~ /
~ /

3
fin
y S ~
~ x 9S~ X$ ~ ~ ~ ~ N I .yyy,Il
,''~yz I I k. .. ..
~ q ~r° `~~ ~~ ~+ ~ III i

~~
,r
,Q
~~~~
=f
~~
wg
~$ my
hi o
~

~v
I ~?~i,~~

°I~I°'I° ~ g} ~Y~• m ~ III ~ ~r 1
P g~~ lv1ATCHlJ NE SEE SHEET No. B

bfi441f14 `I~~;iMF Sfi41~GNfttlSt tf if 4f tt3f
MATCHLINE
m
r''
a
L
o~
w
um
N
so©
~o
C7 ~
N
A
•~
r`
1,~
P~
\ \s e ~• ~ `
Jo0 ~ ~~
coN~ ~~rN
\ ~ \ J/S mm
C
"Y{~S/N'C
SEE SHEET No. 7
n ~„I
il~~ i i ~g'~~
II I m ~~ 8~
I , 1
I I P ~
N i I ~ I ~~~: I ~ro+~
g~ ~ ~~~ ~Ip ~~~ ~ m ~~ ~
Itl ~ ~ I
~~ I Irl ~I ~~ I
I
~ ,; ~+ -, ,
m ~ ~ ~~ I5 II ~ ~ ~' I m
I I I, I~ I
I
Soli
I II ,
'I~ ~ Ii I I ~$ u I~
m~ I 'VIII I ~ i I~ ~'' I m
I~I I~ _ I
_..I tm I~...- I
1 r ~~io . ~
~ I I 4~~I i it 1 rn
I I .I ' a
I I ~ II
I~~ III
p i ~
I I 9 ~ I m
r I
I ~ I ~
'~
m 1 ~"'„ w
Q 2 I ~ I ~~ I m ~g
a ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I
m - ~ C1.I
~ _ r` ~ ~ ~ ~ I I `yV~ m o
`c v n~ ~ I ~o b i I ~ ~~N ~Uo
I ~ y I~ o l,. •. N~
I
~ Rl ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4..~, ~rhm_ ~uQ ~qW
~iO O ~v Or~rn~ ~ I~~,s ~ I I ^ ~-.
2 ~ 3 C ~ ~ t I I r
yvl O az i
O ~ '~ A~ a3 ~ i l
I]~~ ^~ I~
I~
°~ ~ ~ ~g i ~!~ , ~ i~g~g I

O ~ I
~z ti+ ~wPZ 3* ~ I
i Q
1 qq~b
If~~ I~M1
1
~~~ I
~ ~ ~o~ `~ ~ , m
N

~A ~3 Q~.
~ 3 ~_~ I

~ Uli

~, i I I
I
I
II
~
~ ~
~'WiNq j ~ a D/ I~
C
5
~ \ ~ - f ~ \n ~ ~ /
1
I I
-~~
l
1
$ yt
~ ~ 3
O
O

y "~
O 1 J
O ; ~
+i ~ o
~
,
,. r
r
H
T ~ ZD
~ o .v o m ~
rt
f-
~
A m !~
D m
3 co °? t op ~
w nvuoml mil
v .. =
~TI nnvZi
o
~ I
~(~F°Iw oO°m
~,
3 330
~ =~ 7p

!e = N
U
a~= ~
~ ~o
f~~ $
N 11 ~v pm a
J ~ 5b
1
ro'u
HIS
~I`' ~
,r
N~ ~ `O
~N
a~ ~ ~
I~ ~~
C ~~~! pit \
g ~ ~ ,_ 3.~8 ~~N
F
3 ~ ~ ~~
. ~ .
1 k' ~ * I
~~ ~ ~ ~ I
~~ ~ 3 g~3:
? I ~ ~'~ / I~ l~'Jl~!3~
<~ ~ kg
I
V I i
n
:~
~o
Af
~~
.71 ~ f~m~ ~
.N C '
v. r.~~ ~ + ?~ I ICI
I~ ~ < ~ ~ 2 I ~ f^~
i
~ ~~ ~ I~ ?y
~g - I ;
hh
~p~ 3 h I. %II
~~
i~ ~ ---
~ ~ ~
II
'4 ~ / I I19
N
'
R . ~ I i
I
~ o, II
A `
~~ _ _ TJ5 mm
to ~ Ran, I I III
I I
8
~
I
~
I
ON ~/ ~,
~ . I~
~
MATCHLINE
I
~~J
N
0
I
I
.~
I
I
a ' I
~ ~ fir,
I I uc0~
~ w=
~ ~ a=I~
'1 C C~~
YL~ ~r
'1 O ~~`I
n ~ ~~~
W ~ nAI
`~° ~ ~ ~;

•9 /'~v jNa lT V
a
\~ ~ ~
~ ,o
iZ N~9 5 ~ ~\ ~ QO 9
'- ~`
~IL~ ~_ ` ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ .
~~~
\O \~8.
I N \ \Y
a
f-
a
~~
N ?1
O
n v
a
~~
Z
rn ~~~~~
II II II ° II
~ g~~~o I
O~v~~
~~
~~...
m~'I''~b
II II II II II i
~~Qo
~°'~g~ ~
~;N I
y
rn
I
O
0
O
_V
ZJ1
a?
w
s _ _- `._
3 / I m n ( `.~=.':~ ~ 1j ~~-39,q. \~ ~ `/1 3"~/zq fXr "'l.,
/ I ~ DSO. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ; \ \ ~ ~"
ti
~ v ~~', a V 'q''y: ~ ~ esr~ ~
I ~ O ~ O d '~ ~•'4 C ~qry~• \
I v I I i ~, ~ ` 1 ,Q
~ X (m ~ C~ ~ ~ `C ~ v+ Y rim' nn2// Y ~ ~gm k/ ` r` (g S RO
~> ~ v
,~~, of ~ c ~~ ~~~ ~
~y / I I;. I rt k n
~ I~ I 300 (n P '~( ~k
I 3 ~,m m_ o o~~ y ~~ ~, ~~
.~ ~,v
l1 ~ ~ ~ ' m~ N °0 v ;z I o ~. n
~ ~JJ ~~s Wo ~ o
~ ~ w ~ ~ /~ ~~ ~~ ~
q it ~ ~ ~~ N // ~~ ~a0 ~ ~ "~
~N I I I ~' m~~ /~~ ~j© ©©p N o
~ SSnn ~
Y3 I m $ ~° ~~ / k ~rn rnmm nK ~
3
~°
SEE SHEET No. 9 / ~ '' p''
~~p k ~ I ~~~ m=
//
//©© `k / N ~ r~~ Z~ 2
° ~ I ~~~ ~ o

fi/tFt55Y55 tI1~F4f 113
ff194.}g34.44.lf itf Ul:~d94ttfbfff3fff Sif
'k9r~yl,N~
,~-
N N
[_
S ~ pNU~
W $N1 OO
ONp~~ 00
3o~m® :~
nev=i yo
nO o
O A = ti ti
m
N
rtll Ir
a°'<
~ r c~ o
3
°l
~~•
~O ~
~+
x
~
O
r
~ ~•

~ \
°u` / \
z /
/ sm ~ ~~b
/ ~~q~ •

/
(t~T hh
' ~ ti 6
~~
9/S J~?1 ~I
,3 pp
/~ ~ ~ T * ~ ~.
/
_
$ \
~
o
/ ~
a
~ P
Ca y
m
mp aZ \
p
\ p .. '2
= a
4)\551,..
sz co~NfR ~ \
R.w \
:;~
\
\
~ \
mw ~ Je
\ '~- i
~ ~
\
CIZ
Z

`~ m
~ ~

~ ~
\ ~
~ \
~
~ ` r ` ~2~ $
~ ~ 1

JB ~~
,Q~,
~z''"
)7.611\
^
~
~~
p
`^
~° NF' \
\

i P ~ O~
_ ~Y mC~ ~
~
~
'
Im ~~ '~~
°
~
~ ~
T.
~ °'m
u
~a ` ~ ~Sl~ze
7J )7.559
NZ ,~{~
~."V \ O

01`® ~
~ "~~ \ ~
~
\
~ ~p~,
S ~
`
'S
' ~
`
~~
. ` ~ m _
e
©
p ~ ~ s s~y~
~ ap
~
S
I p Id71o ~
k\
x
~ ~, ~ , - ~ Iz2p
O
~
`
z
?t~ O
DAr a
~
~
,
j ~
p ~ '{75'"x'
I
!^
I
o= Q
~ ~ w K
~55_zl. N ~
r~.
4/
ZB.769 ~
~~ ~ ~ '~I~I (~~ ~ I
s _ a ~' ~ ° ~I ~d
.p. ~I
n~ O ~3 ~ €II' ~ ~ I m
N~ ~ I 'L ~ L
w f, p ~ Ii6
W I~ t m
'^ Q o o ( N iill ~ I~; z~; I
~, _sro•IS v ; o l l i z
3.OI,OS.05 N ~ _1200~~ C}Q ~ - m 7 j
_ I alm
~ x }Uil ta,' v~~l w rte- ~ ' a'~ I ~ I I I I
p
~3 8 ~~ ~n ~ ~I I I I
~~^, W p ~^lq I I m
o m~ a~ x I- mil I III I
u~ '1^ i20~mm c - - - -p I
~.x a
~ M .~z.ro.rr s ~ -~ m
`\\ /, ~z INI ~ III II I
~ ~uN g a p ? )~ I~
1 ter ~ ~ ~ X
~ S~ y m ~ " iw III I i= m
-.~ ~ ,LS a~•J9,J-,w In ~3 r _ p I ~1,II L I I
~ ~ 79.981 ~ .~. I I$N~~© 0 4 I 3 IIII ~' III II m
i
\4 W m ~ 3n rZ'.~ C jII ~ III I
~~~ aloamCai ~ IIII ~' lull) I I '.
y A~ 1N~~ { _ ~* III IIII m
0 o~,:{PI~~ >'v° ~ n~ lR lii €~, lulll I
~1 II I
ymix ~ x a~ ~ ~ i'I I II II m
~ n~ MATCHLINEP SEE SHEET No. 10
N
SF
ash syF~
.~ ~O• e
~ ~ A_
NI ~ a
Im
6~Z_ J I~
-~s r`.oc.~szt S:-~~ ~
i i o•es
w.9 r.CLZr S
~V

w0 4 II II II II ~

"~"
mn O II Np
4jc~.,a~IN
m b ~~~w~
f
v
~ ~
ALJ~~
~~
N ~
~ ~ti
~ C
~ ~
y I
T j
\~ ~ //I
9
\~\~ /~
\ / /
c
m
N
4
O
~O
NA
01
OuO Q°®W
~n
a
oo;~
N
an tnN~ Ip~SR
~ ~~::
AA A~-zz Ax
~~~ ~~ ~~
~~B~~SQoo~~~~~,~'
~~$~~R~g ~~~~'~~
aa~ ~~~
k~ ppp ~a@~
~O~`,',~C'~~ba a~pw,~~ 6
3~3a~~~~ry•~S~aa
ON
~ 9
~ ~ A
°w~ W1= ~o °v
m ~ oo ~ tnn Rl
A
a m a ~sr ~
N ~ V' Y
C~1~ ~K C/Z O
~~ N~ ~^ z
,,, A N m
~o < < ~
p A N

ff if ffif if bffff
160'6Z _
VS•6SOr n ~~ •sG• ~rx~
~ `~,~ .~ ®Q p p
` .y o r9i
~ ~ ~ ~ N ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
r
I xG
\ ~ ~
Oy N N~ ~ \ ~\~ /
\ S
O c ` \ ~i
inX` P try\\\\ \
• 1 \ \ ~~ \ _~'rf
~ ~"
ggZ96,
~ ~ =` v
c~ m ~ ~~
oQ
~~~ ~~~ ~~ x \ ~ l°o
N N ~ ~ ~
a
~ ~ 3 ,~~g"'.~~
`C
°°
(~
_ s ";1 5 `\\p" a
N°o` \ I~ \ a\\

~ 2
O
~
3X `•~ ~\\\~d

o ~ ~ m L >< \\\\
~ \ \ /
~\
^\
~ ~ \,t
x
~\

2 0 1 ~ \T\ Rt' N \
`00 0 S~(\~
.~/ ~
~a` dd\
~ a~~~m \~
/ h~
z1(`? II ~F_ \
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 9
> k~l r~~lrr-1~.T7~hitrlall ~~ ~ 1-0If9 'I I

$~
I
~,FI II ~.
.~ '" I
I I I
I
p ~ m
I ~ 1~ I II i'~~ I
m
~ C I I
m. - i~ I
_

~
~~-I
~ 1 _
ti
. lull
l

~b

I
~ ~3
\~3
ry` i
~ n
t I II~ I
~ I~1I
m
r~
~' lE'"
~'~
I ` lal
Irl~..
I m

I ~,.~•'

VIII a

~
I
~Ir
(III
II l

I
I

m
Il
~ ~II
' ~°,II
+II
I ~
~ j
(III
II
(III
~u
` ~
~ _

' ~
I(
X111 I ~I p
II;P I
I m

m
~
~ 3
3
- 3111
~I
~
8 I I I~
101
I ®
m
/
W
0
~^ ~,
N w °'
OD
~~
~_
NA
m~~`~~~
II II II II II
OOCwp\ O
1b71 ~ W (,~(~O
~~~A+
~1a~t~i,
~~
m~~`~~~
p II II II 11~.
taN'A o
~~bo~_q"o
a10~ ~ ~
~~
rn ~~~~~
p II II II II
N o
b w~~
• N I ylll b I I'~ I -( I t~
~ ~+ I {t ~• ~ N~ m O I
I C YI
1`~ `p: III ~ql m ~ y
I
i i~
®> VIII mr ~ II I~ I V1 Q ~~ ~~rA ~
O i~ I ~
2 I ` ~~~ VIII III m 55~Vnn'$+ ~ ~ ~nl; c:1~4 ~ ~i ~ ~
g II 1~, `3 O y, ~ ao ln4 i~ ~ ~
~,
~.u ~I If ~ m
~~~d ~~~.
,% I ;?
11~~`~ I~
II ~~ 1
~ ~ ~
~r _
lG I_
y -sT~"\
g~w,
~o ~oN~w
CN
~ w ~o,
/ / r
O .s' ~ / / ~
+ O s 2i9+/
Ivy N / / I ° m
~v '< ~o

~(~
W
a ~ ,~1 ,~ ~ r.. ~,~ I .P~r I ,. ~ 5 / cl ~ O v
NN \ t$~r ~ 3 III ~ I f~ \ ~ ~ ~
a ¢ \ if I a a / ~t ~~ I ~ I ~ I ~~ \ ~ ~ ~ , Oa~
` \
V ~~1~4 ~,; go III t« ~ \ ~n - x1 ~
~'\ as ~ ~ S1 III I \: n ~ ~~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~9 9~ N
go 1[~~!M"I, y l l I I N'~ I\ ° AO w ~ x /
~ • i I I~ III, cn~ \ y, m ~ ^~' ` x' ,/ ~ vx
~'y \ ~ ~ ~ III I I ~; v, \ ~ y ~~ / / w 8
\ \ / I o o ~ II a m r" \ 1 ~, 1 ~, ~ N ~
II e
\ Q Q ~ ~ --{ ~ ~ I HI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i g~9% ~ m m Q
~~ Qp Q Q~ III Il~u ~A ~ ~ m Ini, ~ ~v
Q $ ~? ~ ~I I III IIII~ my ~I~1 ~ ~ci
® © ® ® O
v

$
°
m n
~ ~
$
m
$ ~
° o
~ mf
if i
v t o
~ m
p
CoZ NC °f~r
~ aOC pr" ~ "I
~C nm oC OfN ~j -[
c1a c1a ~-~z

t coin ~P v~
n o
wZ
~~ ~N
n am
~ N
of w0 ~° ~ Z
A ~ A m~ az A
z N
M
3`11_ _ _~ ~ `'PAgy ~i t {, ~ A'p~ ~- t~ ~ ~ ~S Z ~~
,_5a67r2p 1°91 `l ,VI III ,.Y III I ~nN \~11 ~ ~`E Ja `i_D ~O I NfryRrA~1l
'A 6 ~~y~~ ~ 05 - ~I Y l~l ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~ B 3 Np `.Y7
~l. / ac.aev I I ~ _~ II ~ m ~~ ~~\ ~~: ~' m ~ ~ c:, ~ ~ a { ~ N f~ rn
N - ~ tin ll~ $$~i ~~` 3 ~ A4 "~~ I ~ a ~ `O v7 N ~ m m `"
// a+ ~a ~ I`I~ 13~ ~.f^v / ~1`dl 5 1 Imo' -0 ~~ ~ vl ~a~•hcj ml~l
/ ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ ? I I ~. ! ,"',I,~ Z m~ /r// ,.`~n \\ ~ ` ~ ~ I + r=r M~ m ~t ~ tm~i
~ ~'. p l 11 I (,,I~ A nc~ / ~ \ 1 I f^tr' T--Ap fv m~ 2
v ~ II I ~ III ~F~ n m ~' n~ ~ ip
I I la n
/ > ~ ~ / III III III 13 x~ ~ A m ~ _ ..:;/ I< m ,
n a ° o o / :n n°Di o ~! bz I ~ I ~ ~ .'~ ~ ..:i'/ ~ ^~ 1 ao ~
in ~ fu a x ~ veo o I I I
a a w '_.~ ~ `° ~ z~ 3 1 I1y+,1( ~ I ~ I~`1' \~ I I y~~/ t•.,c ~ y a ~ 1
wa+~rn-I / nr~iy / f 3 B~'~ I~I ~~I°vl I \\ A \ /S~ ~~N ~ i i ~~*1
000 `oL r D ~ Nfn ~ ~ + i Ifl ~I 1 I I I t I ~ ~o m ~ ~ ~
-f-f-+ I -+ ~ ~o'~hl / ~ III I~I I N m.l ~ \I p ~ ~i M1 '
000 0~ r' -, ZI II ~`j 1 I` k I ~ N ~ ;J y. vi 1
-~'i1^i"'+ ~~ ~ .a.1 ~ V ~+' ~II~ I 1 ~~ m ~b,i 1` y IX 13 ~ ~ N $~ iii
ano nom mvD ~ = N ~ ~ Ipf~~ N I 1 I ~ 1 1\ \ 5 N w~ A 4
w w a =I ~ / ~N ~ ~ '~~~ III II I m F~ 1 1 1` 1 ^ m ~ fn? ~ z
0 o p to o v_o / ~ ~ I, I I III I 1 1\ \1u a
~~ r 3 m~: ~ ~ ~ + m \ h l l I Y"1 N m 1 1 \£ 1 m z '~"~
H
ro ~ >q ~~ 1 III ~ NN f 1 y 1^ 1 \ \~ 11`Pn ~~~~ I m o
~IFj ~ ~~ ~ "n / ~ III i I li ~ A I 1 1 ~, \; ~ A,~ cq` ~ ~©
a x ~~ ~ N® ~IIII}I o{ II I I g m 1 1 `~' 1" $\~~ ~~ ~I
~n ~ ~ ~ III" III I ~ a 1~ s \ ~
x~ ;.A ~ z ~ - I ICI I~ ~ III I a I 1 1 \ \`m ` a \ \ . \ . (~ ~ o
bb og } / /~ a~`~ T ~ I I ~~ ~ I II I I I m ~ 1 1 ` 1 ' ~ \ \ ~ ~ ig
aul. ti w< + / ¢ II, t III ~ " 1 1 \~ e,~~ 1 I y'C t1D ~
~ ~ ~w~ \+ / ~ ~' ® ~~ II I~I~ s it I I y I r*i +p 1 1 1 1ts6z'e, ~ Nc~ ZK ~
Sul. Ul ~dfa• UI + /~ ~' ~ II:I ~ III Im'' 1 1 1./1\ ~ ~ i (J ~4 i"a~ ~ ~ ~
.-Wn+ fo'f O ~~ v I I I III ~ ~I I ~ _ 0 1 1 ~ \~ ~ Z ~~ \ 012 ci fn z
RppR11 U T ~ Z S ()
filar ~ G7NOA + ~//~ ~ ~iIII 1 Irt _~~^~ 1 1 \ 1\t ~~ - _ ~ ~0'q~ \ i~r m
1r., ~ ~tO~ ~~ MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 1 1 ~,^ 1 ~ ~ ~ 3 -~ • ~ °
r.. \ ~ 1~ ~ ° z "`
=1~ ~ ;~ Z~
~ an a a
~Fu p II II '
~~~u

l/tf3t5 ST14 tftff
ll4Af1#~~~N~NI 8fb4bUGN1{b{{ff 3f ti!!!!f

/
/
/
/
~
/ /

/ ~
/ ~

/ Z /
~ /
~
~W /

D
aa~~
/ /
~ A
~~~
/
`~° ~ a

r

~
/

v<
/ w~
w -

~ ~
rr
r

~ -
~
~

~ '
i o
o
<
an
-~ o

v

9 n
w z~
n n n . N
to
+++ o m
oop I -rn-i

000 o~r
V1 VfN ,nn V11
nn> ~~~ og

www
~ m l
m~D
+ + ~ ° _
OOp ~n°~
ono
~~~7
-i 3 m~+
W
~}Q.
V
SHEET No• 10
MpTCH1-INE , . ~ SEE \.! ~ ~ . I
N
~~
mm
mn
or
m~
~o
ny
~o
ri~
.: n ~,
x
cb
,y/ /
r ~
~ r
~ ~ ^ ` ~~
~ ~ 1 ~'
/ / ~ 1 am
~ N a
/ / d \
/ ~
= a
~d i~ / - \ ~
/
/ ~ / 1
/ / /
9~ y ~
~, Q a /
h ~$~ ~ 9 W /
~/ ~~~
h
/ N ~'
~ ~ ~ ~8
~ ~~
i ~ ~ ,~ i
~ D /
4
' 1 CRFEN y~UAfPS ~ N /
~ NCUSE 1 ~v ~ ~ ~ ^.
' CRFEN "'~ 1
I RousE m 1 ~'' 1 O ~,~ .
/ n 1 1 ~ ~f
' ~ / a
1 y N 1 ~ ! ~1
1 O1 n ® 1 / ' 'I
\ A to 1 { ~
' A No I;€ ~1
' ~ ~i9~C N g 1 `v~ 1 ~
. \ v 1• 1 © ~~. 1~
' - i
1 8 1 ~~ 4
F'~ ~ \ 1 a 1 ~ ~ it
~~ \~2 ,r~
~~ /~
1 ,y~
I I'
h1ATCNLINE v ~
SEE SHEET- Na• 12
~Y\
A
r
1 m ~~
~, W ~ '\
m r' O1
rn n a n
o~ ~°n®
n~ ~~
f ~ s ~ \
D~ v-~1
~: C1 ~ \
Z =
Z ~ s
a~ \Na
a .~
N O \
~\* 0\~ :~
~+ ~3~ n~\
~ ~' ^ *~ / ~
~ ~ J ~~,~ ~
s
N mN
a
Q
3 -O ~ N
v ~;'_.~. ~~~ ^~~ ~ ti
QN `t:. S
~W~® ~ 4
N
~ w•=
N 1.10 ~ S
~ ~
{
I
i
E
Z
0
Z~I
m~ a
rn ~
T N
J=
Z
m=
z~
~~
m=
an

434335
` ` ,
1
I \ ~, MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 1 1 ~ ~°07~ 1
N '~
~~ ~ II'I ®I. Ie w
I 72m l2m I ° I - ~
I ~~ ~ #-= I 2m ~ „iy c~ ~ I m I I M7ti o~~",N/p9
I ~ .. .. I I' I ~ -' 3 ~_~ ~ i~ •yttL 1
t0 ~? I ~ ge +_ i/
~- 1
y5~ ~~
I msp~'+ ~ ~ I ~ ~ A
© 1
I C~irr-v~i IV + I ~ a 0 ~ . t ^ ~ ~ in
r'ty ~~ , ~) 1~ o T =~ 1
Cn j ".
I ^r' m ~3 I I I~ t~ ~ v >~N°vn tnm 1
H s~7e'za•~ - - - - _~ ~ ( I to ~ m ~" m ~'
------ .zi.za f~ ~ ~ v~~A r 1
I + I y I t} ~ mw~ Tr
~~~ 71 I ~~ ~ ~~ 1 I ~ I~11 ~~1 a n r=3 o A~ I,n ~ V1~~IrD~
4
N~c °. rtm~ / ~ In • I $ I~I ~ Im rnbv~~N.a
°° y 2I~ ~ D I y ti 1 m cN~'~+v `~+ !~
000 ~ off-' I .' / // I i',.. P 1 (~r~ ~ ~~
~ 7 m~ o v I / / I I 6~}
n N / AL
NUN (70 O -1 ~ / I I B 1 1 ~n
° O • ~ tD l7 TI / / I ~ I Pf 1 ~ I .~ll
yyr oo = I // / of ICI m 3 ~ a
. ;' 3 3 $ ~, I / I 1311 I I I
ma I ~ / / ~/ / I ~I I I~ ~ ~ I 1
m -3
I
I I : ,II ~ I "' ou~~~ 1
~ + ~o / / - QI III I C N ~~w"'w'r
i ~ / / I III:' ~ N a~tn 1
r ° ~ ~o Iv / ( ie.zea I ~ ~ r3n~< o
to * ° - ,. r ~ d t60't I ~''. ~ i0 a y 7 l7 W S 1
r v D ! III tnAN c~ rn =~
~ ~ l Z...t ol^t I I I ~ rn I ~" + tn~~ .. '1' n NN
u m n ~, om~ ~ _ III I I ~,3 ~ rn~A r=r~= wm 1 0~
+nfT1 I m J I II III oL I Q^ van mr ur® °D~
o c~ °~ or-1 ~~ ° I II ~ III T ~ ~mi~m ~~ v~ 1 wV
o = II' U III .~ D~~ ~~ ciA .n
,n '~ to < _ ap a . O u A
N ~~ ~ ~ I ~s ~ ~~ I Iz II III - I ~ r;ON my a~ 1
m ,°~~ o_v I "rm- ~ _"' o~ II III $$ ~ WN'J A~ a= n=
y Aav°m on v:3~ '~~ I II U II ~'.6 I v mtny n~ 1 A~
r ~ ~ ~-x C7 I car, tnz ~ II ro II G, pig mm
~ vl°I°I° n ~ I ~ WIu `~ I I 8 ~ NTZ .cr-
> m» I o~ ~ : I I~ m _~DD a ~N 1 r
33300 twj4Z f"N I~ I I ~~ I O~ n 1
I ~ to n I I I III 'a I ~ I N 1
I ~~ x 11 I I~ ~ w 1 a
~~ f a A v 1 4 I
I ' `^ ~ ~~ I I I ~ 1 ~
~~ ray
I NZ ~ ,a I m I ~
I ~~ ILL ;14 I \ ~
n IN N
I ~n o~ m l I H g = 1
-i to h
76.440 conN[_TO a_w _ _ 00 _ _ 17` ~ ~ I /
'- s s6za•ze• w ~ ~ >~ / ~ I U w ~ /
a;
I ~~ ~I y ,n ~ ~. ~ Iim a /
~ ~t~t,,h~ a~ I ~u ',~10.8m ~ ~ /
I ~~ ~~a Q I I, IY I /
~ I 0
I o ~N m mm-Dt ~ w =~ a ~ i~ b I ~ ///
I~ z r a v~~A ~ ON.,. I N ill 3
(~ o~ 'nrD ~u+a -' / W II III I~ y ~ l as /
m W --rite ~aj'~ ~ 11 III ~ /
li OiO Atn P3 < ~ ~ I sI 11 ~ III ~ ~ I w ~ _~ /
~ m ~ / d II, I ~y II ~ A m 3
I N aA , 7 T ~ 1'' NI II ~I III ~ IC' 6,h~ is /
i A~ ~~ 13 ~ v/ x ' ~ II I I I I _ 6 I _~a, y
I ~ av ~ . , _ $ l m 172m ~7 72m ~ ` o`~V••
' L~ ~ II I~ ~ w I Q~m/ /w A ~
- s 57~s4•z6•w ~,~ - << II I tr r z 6 n ~~ ~ ~ ~~ L ~ o
I 75.965 .99.~ I - I - U .~ Q 3 ~_
~ `I II aO DC Q ~a 5 I~ S ~ 2'11'w
~ I _~ ~ - - - o ~ I I II ~ r to ( ~~ ti4~~ II.764\~
/ ~ iI s \
I \
// ~/ Q 8 In hah+ '6 ~ ~• I ~I +~~j ii , q ••/ ~• \ ~1 \"BO3
~ / m~NVQ N tn6 a 'I ~ ~ \
z I / r*7 ~n ~ m ~ .. 9 I I I: ~ ~~ ` ~ ~ / S?s sus.
vN a ~ W I I ~ ~ ~ °r~~
cc / ~tnzmQ ~ I oIu I a (y7{. '" .• / / /1~~Q~ _IJ ... 1 y
r 7l I i D~~.ZI W(L } ou ~ • O~ i• 7 o N Z ~ N
~ Q .,~ I copy ~~ ~ Uv7 ~~ I m Ie ~ II A2 • !'Et' • d Z ° ~ 1 mm~ ~ ?
~. s
{n~ I oA~ ~~ ~_~ o ~ I ~ I Ilsf • •- ~, ~°vn ' t!NA 1 rn~~ ~.
~ m -+rD I NnCO ~m~ ~ ~~ E I Ar I // mrnmN~ ` tnw~ 1 rood
o / °7D 1- $~ ~~ 4 ~ O/ I y I % ~ f,.//I mNn ~N® n3m 1=3~ ti4
' ~ m I ~D D ~ o n7 I ,• I -a n °' on ~ a o m
,~ ~' og I ~N v toN I - I I /,, / O~3nrOAn ~x~ 1 -+ $C
~vav3l~ ~~~ tCOnv~ inv~rp T~ , >I • A/ ~ m ~ ~ :~Wr 1 ~~ Le
° 3 I _IN nd m°N m ww ~ ~ I / ~ T ~ w3 ~ N /; 3 g
f"~I' o y i,,8 t,°i „ r,~ ~ $+ V,a~ !• ~ P • I I t~i ~ n'' 1 c~~a // ~ ~
333 m= ~~ w~ nNrO ~ `~ (~ ~ 4 Ilr ~ rZ I ~4a ~ 1 3wjt~ //
z ~ m / I I ~ o ~ '-^ -t //
I t` v a z o ~ ~ ~ ~~~"~'r I °~~ II ,pp " n < I ~ a ~ 1
r I v ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 1 0
-y . ~ n
I ? ~ 3 OI •'• c ~. ~ w / O D 1
~ ~, / ,,/~./ I III:Ix:n °w I WA
I ~ m Al ~ r
37 CuP
® 1 ~
~< I ~ ~ ,, /,~ I 'id 1~1 ,, ~~ ~~ ro ~N 1 0
a ~O •• ,• I I n7 u
~~ m of ~ ~ I'~ I~ w ~ ~~, ~ P
I ~ yr ~nn
•~ . • e ~ A2 II oA2 ~ ~ t^ v D r
~~ ~• / ~ I ~ I mm~ ~ m m b O
I ~~~ ~ ~ ~i ~ / / I 72m 19 ~ 72m l2m ~ ~ ~ rn W $ ~ m T
n ~
y ~ •• •A^• / ~ II y~' I ta, mgr -n~ Sal R) zf
I ~ Ia~ --~O~iQV /a * I ~ I II~~ to /oy~ 6~ ~~< wA ~Ct+ ~ Z<z°!~i~~
I ,~ •'~'• ~ ~ ~ ~i I ~r I ~~II~'m ~ l ~V 3v nv mm nm~ r~~2'S^'
l •/ • .~^~a~•~ ~. ~ ~ ~ I ~T ~ A3~, j`j~ .~ °7 A3 ~'~ V = S~ ~ z i v n
I \ •~ '•• /. , O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ICI ' mrn P ~ Z
\ •' • ~~ i III ~ ~ ~~ u ZO O
~ So \"°~8,~° •~ %>? ~ ~ MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 13
~ ao J,,a ,,~~5 I ~ m~ •
Z
~~ ® \ / ~ / ~ rZnC rn
cis ~ / ~ 2 C 7V ~
'~z I ~ P~ o

4434 ttt Off Eftt
/~'1 V I,, ~ ~OV
~ ~ ~ n,
i '~ ~~` /
I ~
~~oti
I ~ , A
I , ^~ -!
~ / "U
• '
w~ ~m
1
' ,,
1 NO .~ c
\ 0M~
\
_
~' ~~®
n /
~
C1 A
i 1 ~ Z 5~0 H 3 y
y
p p
p
00 Z
® I ~ U r
/y4y
~ ~
nA 1 / /
~N ' ~
r
/
~ I
y
~
~
N b~~
~
o°j `~~ + 4
`'``~ab ~ ~g °

A

i
~~
~
;o
0
r'rrr ~ ~ N
no ~~
-Ni~Ni~ 'm
aa~a `4 Or'~
idu° +ra-fT7
~o~o °~'- --I
0
'Sti-1 -+ V1~D
0000 T9 n r
oQ
oooo ; m x
~ ~ _
.'A4 ,rt .r+°, to
o ° "
II'' m
3
-i ~1
+ ~ =
a

r o
~ l j 1
C

N o
r
~ o l
o
-

.r
ti r ~ Za
~
r j
~ n
~'L -i
O m
+
`" ~ nfTl

D
<

°
~ rs .
n 'r
m ~ ~ o_ o
~anv m
Ol H

r ~

A 000 " 2
,y V IO~Iw w
N
3 3 3 0
v~
m=
~ v

r 0
j
n

o

s i
, -
~ _r
Z-ai~
om
N ` {D~
±
o ° ~" {'- D

-1 -~
00 0
r
tn~

~ ~
7 n
~ O
0o vv m ~ c mn
,. _
rr
ti H
I~IW
O
3 3 u=
N
~1
1
O i 0
y

J `
U
~j O
I
~
O r0
m Ow
~~
~~~~ ol o, np
r
>:~~
N
~
. r P *
o ma

pp
O NO+O
~ ~_ N
~~
N
r r r r m
9
~
N H H y V r H
o
u
m
O.ISm
y
4 o uln.
° a 0.3m
3 Nax.

O
~Npr<
Om
C1A
wVl
- ~~ i po_
N
0
0
~ I J
° '' o
~ ~ :gym
N ...I
~mD
O ;
ti °cr
i e ~
M
o ~_
m 3
n ~ ~' .ISm Nln.
q .3m Mox.
i
MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET No. 14

v~\
~ <
n
N~
Am
S =
OOH
rppA
'*1
H
\
\ ,1
O
W
I 1 v
r
mm~~~
~
1 ~2
Na
m U Nm
o"mon
o
' ~

~ 1 ~a
o°
w
=
~~
,
y
Pr,n ~ ~ 1 u
i
+v
3 ~!^ 0 1
rn

max
~' ~ '
1
m `^
A N

~_ ~ m II II II II ~
II 1
"~ ~
b~~~~a 1
,
rn w~~~~ 1
~ ~ ~ 1
1
~~
II
r 1
~rn

11 II II II ? 1
II _
c.,~
~ 1
~
~ 1
~ ~b
N y
.. 1

A
~
w A II
~,
6'
Nr
N"~
for
om ml
TA
G
n
WN

~/
m
/,

I
r
i /
,TT
y
l
/
? h
`~
0 ~ /~V

(11 /
~
af
~ ti/ o
V
4 0`~
O /~

/!
~V

°o~on
/

i -'Av
aDA
N
`-' m ~
~. ~
n ~ Qp \
w a E~ ~
O~i ~ ~
>:
nOA
~~
a
N A>C A n
V.(/4
.( ~ Z
$~ m
~m
~ ~
m
m~ p
Z
y ~
a

A
x
z
O
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 12

tf if it~.YST~'! f1//6
,fttfact:",M{It,l~~~,;tttttt.t.tttttt
f,tf„- tfft
_~
\ MATCHLINE
\ I
\ c
\\ ~ w A m i n
\ ~ N ~ W
\ ~ m I
\ ~n g} m I
\ n vn S~j
\ -• vii V ,'..
\u A ~ I ~ ..
\ I ~ [[~
\ \ \ m ( r O~ I
SEE SHEET No, 13
II ~ I I`
a I 13
I 160'1 I a ` ~ ~ ~~ •SS~O
II I ~ 3:~ ~~ I Kati ~ ~
3m II 11 ~ a m ~~ ` .~~ W~
N \
b~ ~ I ~Q of \ ~ n
1 .I A
I
St~ ~ I 'I yll ' I '~m ~ ~ A~ Q ~\\ ~A
~ 1 III ~~ I I H° a ~ \B~Ss
eN• T III w I i m `: n_ Q lr t\
~~g \ \m 72m I~ ~ m i / m I~ I p a \
~ ~ IIi 2 I nl m \
® „
7)
° c>
p P1 , ~
W A
A al
N K -~
~ r -.
o ~"
~ y CI
a
u ~ Z7
A Vf .q
Z
o
O y V

~
~ o N ,N
~ 3 v 1
zm ~^w 2
en
~ ~ti ~^~
~
~,
o ~m
°I" Ong
m cD

o n ~f

m r°
v
S ~~ N-1 _

pN Ap 2
^ ~~-
c
y
Io N o ~ -~
A
N N~®
o +o
3 vpsn
G1
~ ~ + p Co
V p
~Am'.H
H
0
_
~
°Q
r
_
~

m ~
~'i.
o ~ 0
g ~~
r~ mo-i ~
o ~
~<D ~
~"m~ U
n

e
~
~vr
o
mi~m i3 i I

O
` o
m~
"
~~ ~~ -/ 3
n~~ 3 I
I

A _
r3o U~
:
"~ O ~
l ~ -1 f~~ I
m
to ,., A 'Y
_ZBZ~I _ ...~
~1,7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
m -~ ~ M.SS.10.155 i
~
$ ^~
*
v
n ~
N ~~ ~

Q u°'i y
~E C
~
vvy
~' ~ v m
a ~~
oa ~~
~ i
a~'pZ a~
~ Oa N N 7
~N
~
n
218'101
------------ 3ss,taisti
-~
--
-9 w

m
~~
~ I

A
~
n'
8~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a
~i ,
~ m
t
x Z~
~ T P Y
oa<
N ~N = ~
k
~~ _ ~
CP
NAm~
H
'< 4
n
V `
3 ~
3~3c~, ~~
~V 8 ~..
TD TDE-
-~
v
I
v
_ _I
3.12.60.6V N ~ T Ertl
m
~ v ~~
v
Q1 m
w~y ~ , Sal 01-341
o

~rZ
N

~ p
N
3 ~ ~ V
~

~ i
D~Q
~ ~ 3
`~ ~ ~
n A '
A
A ` ~
A
A> _~

b ~
9 I
I ~ ~I` I
4' ~
~ A
p_ _~
~
c ~, l
I tA
ns

~
- F I
~ ~ I
~ II Took

o n:-r~
I

m I I :~ i ~I m
v>
~ . F
I I 1 ~ ~~N!
I ~y~N

I z.
D2 ~ ~
= I I ~

Pi .I

I
I ~' I
~
~' .4 62m ~ ! . m
~ ~~ ~= I I I I I II

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 15
m I
of III ~ l i I I ~I ~I
~I I I ~ I~
I I w, I m ~ ~
I
• ~~ ~ I i ~ i 13 ~ ~
~+ II I
S I II ~' ~ I m
I
€ I .I`I ~' i t ~ I
I III ~~ I I I m
II
I ,,I~II~' ~ ~
~l/I~ ~II I ~ m
II I
II ~I~ I I
I I m
l ~~ I
I I III
y' ~ ~ I ~ I m
a A3 A3 + ~ ~m, ~ I ~ ~
+l ii ~ ~ I ~~
I I +i m ~
I III n
A2 I I A2 ~ ~ I
~ _ I
-~-
O l I
~I i

A.

~
I
9
I m
~~
I
~ l ~I I m ~~ ~ ~i
I I dl3 I ~ ~~ ~
I II I'^I m
11 I
I II I~I 1~
V ` ~

P~~; I lil
I/
I
~ I
I II
I III
A/ ~ I II
,,
~~°6q I
I I I ~ . ~ ~ ~
2nt
.92~.~~ . 4 r
C~,. 172m
I l`~..~ III m \ _
I I ~© ~`6y 799
A2 _ I ~ i I ;1. vn
W
?' a~ lOB
;' .i .b`
f1
~o
v I I II
;I I I I
k~ ~ II
~I,I ~ I I
p~; 'I ~ I
i I I o f ..
Ni I ~ I ~~
n I l ~ If Au I
ill Ir ~lI
~i I I ~I~
4, I I l
~' I I '
:I 4
'-'~ ~-" ~
.a ~3ti
,3 I~.
v
~l l I ~:
r
A
z
S
ptn0
~ O <
^t A O
~F®
~oo
!.1'D P
m=
r yN
-~
" ~
~~ ,
//
// ~
ii 33
~~ d
„d
~rn~-+~p~
u 11 " II ,
u II N~o
m ~~~~+
~ ~ ~b
~w
~ ~
r
I
m I I ~,
~ ~ o ~~®~'
C1 N n I H
d s~'o=~ J
r nN I~m
~ .. ~ A I'm
~ `
~ `
ter,
~°~'sa.
9.70\ ~~
1
y
P
v
V
9~ m
3•
~m
h~
G
~; a
~1 ~
I o
I
0
z
m
i

a
2

ssssususssss

mm
mn
or
m~
~ C
a
~
r
v
~ v
x
~ H
0
"'rz

® m

4 N ~
N
p A ~ ~ `-
~o °' A
~ ~ ~
a o
~
a ~
f N/
~
S
3 9
i 9c~4~ /
' x3 / /
'
Wti ~M14 ~ _
/
yV~ S S {I b5 m
~
r \
~ '~
3
Z ~
g{. M ~
S
~y0d ~
~~ °
a
s

/ . N~
~~ ~
~
i

/ ' ~ 3Ii
~~~9 ~' 3F'
J Z
• m
~ ~*„
~
1
~ ~

~
~ titi
~ ~
~~ ~
v
~ rn ~
O
~ a
mr
r~
~
Q o
> _,
Z
j .- n
y
v

z
°

V ~
x
W~
~
+
A
~
r
m~ -t
g~,r'r
m
~~o
s
oASo
~$~L
~A~N
(~ "~ A A
n z
0 °~ \ _.
_i
0o
N N ~i
va
~~
zm I V
\

~ °c
00 D
-1 -1
00
,moo N -dr
a ~ I ~n

So
~ oo
m-i
~
m O
p
O o ~ ~ 2 ~ N
~
~

r v
~.~ o

lO NO T
l
I _
~
~ 3

i §
~ms~~~~~~~_~~~
'I AA~~~A-~z~~~.1Cz
a~~a~aQoo ~ ~~~
$~n~b~ ~~~~~"~~
> ~r
` ~ ~~ ~~~
~ ~~~bto~C~~ab;~~ ~~~
~ O D p ~"
1393s18a~~'e~~~~a
3 abl~
a~
o
y~ U
ca
T N
~' b
J
y-+ ~` Q
~N ~`'
~Y ~
MATC HLINE SEE S HEET No. 14
T
IA
~
I 1
t
+ ~ 1~
* .
f' I I ll~
~ ~ I~
~
11 ~~ I
w I II

I- T~~

~
I
~ '
~ 3 L I(,~
~ ( ,
D I
w I ~ 1~ ~ ~ I I I
m i. ~
3 '%a
I"j G
{,
I l I I

~
p
9 ~, n t~d

w
~ ~ m ~ I
II ~
I
X
, ~
i / II
~ I l il I
I
,~
~~ • ('
'
~
~ it
I iil
I
' 3.S?G
1L
/
i I ~ II
I
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ o I1 172m ~ ~I I I ~

~~'~ a i ~~
~
~ N
l
~
~
II~ I
I
I ~

c
,,
'E~ F~ ~ p
`i~~l
I s
` he',
7 ;; I I
~
1 I~
I V1 ,p`
~-i301-301 301
~}
~e
m ___
m ~
~J ~ l__. _
I o~
nl
^I
hI
~I
it
7
I ~ i ~'~
~~~` ~l `~ iX~ ;II
~i bell ~ I'I III
I'll IIII
I ~~ ll I
~ II ~ I I
~ II I I
a - ,, I
: ~I l ~' c I
,II I ll
~ yll i I
4
IIII I a
• ~ ~ I
Plla ~ 1
n a` 1
' llll3 3 1
III I
II
II c I
IIIIF
~ ~4i1~ i II
YII ~ I I I~'
~n I
III 3 I I
l i ill
~~ ~i l
III I
I ~~
~~+I
II
Ill
A
O
2
a~
(~~ U1V
~~

Av
z i'
ovi~s
W -+ ~
Si A i
o~rm®
c~io~v
~ s
~~~~
J K A A
c•
~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~,~ I ~ ~~~I~, ~, - - -
I I Y i - -zeS°q ---_ _--
I ! f ll ~; I I - - ' - - - - - - -
,III a 3 ;I ~ x~x~m=xw~ ~`v'``
3
III ~ III b ~x_x__
X
I ~
450mm ~ l ~ ~'. Il
k
.F' 3 ~~ ~ _ ~ I I v~ ~~~
~ I L 3

m I w
l2m
72m
9 h y

" ~
{~
'f 2m I I
I
I I
I ~ A

F N
~
n TDE-TDE TD AY II
I -
II I Q
~ ~
I ~
~ I I
Ir
1I I

~
~ ° ~Nm I
~
l

2
l
~
n
4
ti;
II
I D2
I
~
~y,
VI°

~ ~
I
~_
a + as
~'^ I ~ ~Nm . ~ I
I~ ~ Z
' ~~ r
a a, ~ ~~ I I ~ ~~
I ~' ~;
,~ I I~;
II
. b p I
~rrn I »
I I ~'
I f

~~m ~
I~r
~ }
;
I IN~ N
~ b
~. ~v
m
I ~'
to ~I 4
I IIII
I I ~ ~
I
n
ws
~~rn 3 I
ICI y~ ~ ~
Ilip
Ili }
~ p O

a m
~ ' li Y
III ~
~k~ a
y ~ ~

~ A
1
y l l
II
~ ~ '~
I
::
J
rn
I
I
I ~
~ 1 I I
l _
.
~
~ ~ ~
b ~ ~
~ la~E
(
''' '~
I ~ I
i
l °o
~ ~
i
I
~
~ •
_
G l
I I
l
I d
o ~
m
I ~ z ~ !III
~ I~
I

m
~ m

`

a'
`l

4
l
i
l
I `~ o v

3
~ 31

I
~
Wa
III
I ~ ~,
I l/,
2'
I m
m ~ry4
~~ IIII
III
l L~~ aot` w~~t - ;
3
sa,~
~~ O
I
~ ~"
72m
9. I
I ~ I
Ill _ _
CTI~~~ _ \~
A ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~
I '~ m ug ~
Y
I~ I II A
©
° ~3 Q\I 11 ~
2 I?~ I
rll I II
~ p
o
3 b ~~~ ~
I h~ .n . ~. _ .
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET No. 16
m
m
m n~i
1 mn,
i Mnl
~y
~ ~p
~~p
~ F
Qrna a.
A `
m~~'~~~
u n 'l II
II V~n~`,~p
~~~N .~~
,~/o~~
V
.~...
rn ~~rp~
II II II it II
...ppp~. p
~ ~ v~~
~~~
~`"
A
1
m a
o ~
v ~
~ a
m
2
A
°~

~~ i 8
~ ~ tS
i
ii ~
~~ 8
~~ ?
i ~
2
0
'L ~
°< ,.
~v
~N
zm
Z
0
f~ _
Z
Gl i.
7_ C
an

tfff4ffifff3f
MATCHUNE SEE SHEEP No. 15
II ~
:~~ ..
; ~

o Z
°

r ~
o
_

Z ~
o fTl
-~ _

N

ti-as
n > - ^~

zm
On~
~ + n
°
o~- o o
o°'o yD
~ Or
~~ pp0 ~
o
r
A ~
J = O 2 00~ o
OXVO^ N"~
ID
o~ ~
~ ~ ~ , ~m
~~~ ~m =
a
O
Iw y A A
ONE,

0
o ~
`~ ~
3 7
3 m 7 ~

~
O p
+
~
N

"' ~y
Z ...~
~ a ~
A
~'i

o
vh-
rtr--1 px
l
(pV'Yn
~ c n r
~~ oon r(~
nm

o'
m
~
°
°
"= \
Gl~sO
,
, I N=
~ loilu N aOm
ypTN
3 3 on
m _ KnA
~.
\

/
/ i,~
/C lL
/ n
/ v=

/ / vz mn
/ ~~ o~ o ,
/ ~~ mo ~ b
/ N y a C yq
N
~ ~ 1 ~,`~
~ ~ n ~ ~~~
n ~
~\ \~.
~ \ ~~ ~ 4
,\ \ \
~ ~ r
~ ` ~ ~.. .. ~ d ~
m ~
.~ \ , ~
~ J\ ~ \ ~
i ~ i v ~. . ~ ~ , ~
~ i ~~ ~~9so ~ ~~ \`F ~ ~
ss41 ~
~ / i / ~ / ~~ A \ may` ~ 9q0 ~ ` 1.
~~ o /' ~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~~ j\ 1 ~'
_ / ~C,D ~ Q ~JSr \ h
~ ~k
BTa /~ ~~.
/~ ~' F
~8 ~~
~~ .oy~/ i 2 ~°
o .. a
\ \ ~:~~ b ~
\ ~+ 2
~ ~ ~~ ~
`~
\ ~S .Q~ O~ mCm'f
\59e. ~ yaO,~O m n
,'r"0 a~ * 2 C~i `yam m ~
Z nc
~ Np r-1
,v
\ "_
~'' \ \ n =~
~\ \
~I x ~ ~ ~ ~ \
f N ~ '~ \
Cm oNm
N "7 ~ \
~ N 1P
eoln7 my ~sn p
•I O t7 ~ `v Z ~ ,
y o p
x
~~~ ~ -~~ ~
N
DIY
~ 1
Qom,' ~
~,
~- ~.,~..
~_X_~ ~ ,
1.71
A
Ao
W~~ A
H ~
~~ r
otl~r
,9nm
nAn°n
$~o
~, a
m =
ti'p'1 TN
'~ AC.
~ A
(*Q71
V
(n~~~p~
~m
uullu~
II p _~ O
m ~~w~$ o
rn~ ~ Z11
x ~v
N y
~~~P~
II it II 11 ~
c.~:a'~`o`o`w I
0 ~v~0
~~ v~ `
~~
~~
y
® .~
O
.9
,~ m
o p -7
~o ~
m~ ~
gN Z
m
m vl
y ~

o
1J1
~ ~
~
~ ~
~
~4 /?
ti`
~;o<
~9
\ /
\ H /
9~9Ly
2.
~8~4
n ~

r
N
m
-t O
pl

vy~'
w
ONIn~~
®N A y',
vom^
~m=° d
~~~
N
K
a n
o
Z rh
0
rn
m rm~7
i m~
xZ
Ap7~
4i
~~
=,~
~~
r ~ ~j
A
z
0

1
WAKE
COUNTY

VICINITY MAP
I a~~-~~~ ~i~~f ~,
rJ / ~,~
'
~ I- \ \ 1301
lE C~'
,
. ~
~ ~
i
~
`
~,\
~ ~
~ \ ~, ~
v \~. ~
.,
~~ ~ ~
1 1 14 `, ~ v I ~~ ~~.
I

~ 1101 ~ -~ ~ `~'= 1. ~
1113

L 1399\J
~\____~ 1

\ •
\ ~ l /, .~
(~ \ -
Z I ~ L.

~ ~ ~ ~
,
~ 1~-
I
~- ' • ~ ~
~9 ~ ,
0
.~~o° ~ 1 1 10 'i ~ ~ ~ 401 ~
"~ '

~.
_- ~
.~ ~v
B I i
, f PR - SECT ~ _ ~-~'I`~ j ~ i
~ ~

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
500m 0 ~OOOm PROJECT R-2907
NC 55 FROM SOUTHEAST OF SR 1108
1:500~~ TO NORTHWEST OF SR 1114 SOUTN
OF HOLLY SPRINGS
07-16-01 SH ET IOF 14
,Y\CUlgi~7-65~ V WZ~DO(\oa~r~t iLDGM

r-'
v
p = li
Z
O - F-
S ~
Q N N
W ~ oa ~
O pv~
- Z NSF- N NSCr
/
v J ~ Q=~ ~ WWN
~ ~LLU
OW ~
U F=-.4}
~~J
~- OpZQ O NW

0009
-'
a N ~
a =

o
° _ ``
0 00 mo

O
z ~, z
"' o °,
F- U F- ~
Z I
0005
W
~
r
V J

00*Ob
I
J
1
00~~
{-

ti
~~~~
a
z

Q

+= >-
00+01 ~
c~

0
~--

0
=
z
0 ~

bl ~0
b °1HS ~~S
-~NI~
H~1dW F-
~a N O
o~
~ ;
I I I ~ ~
F--
J N
N
Q=~ ~ to
~
WAN
I I ~ Fes- lt. U F-
O F=- O >-

°° Lll0 C~ I I
$ U ~
I L~
w W
°oa o O~J
~~_

(
s y
W~ ~ Li
O
~
~
Q
.J ~
•~ J J 00 0
C
WO

-~ / ~ I
I ~
~ J 0
]G ~ U
Z ~Z
c~ o I
~.
,-v
r
I
~ ` U
~ ~ Z
I
~~
`
~~ ~ I ~ y
~•~ ~ Q O~ ~ I I m
_ I* N~
- I ~ I I `~ ~
- -.~ - - Tyr-
1 ~ I I :~
+
~ ~ N
~ I ~ ~ ,7 N ~ ~~
~
z ~ ~ J I
,o
a. ~ O ~ ~, I
~
4- ~
.
d- ^ -
~

\
~ ~ p

~ w

'
~ L
.
~ o
l-
f ~
w
\
ILJ~
..~
\ ~ W _
IV _~
~
~~o ~ I I
1 ~
T ~
m m o
~
\ \
\~.~ \ - FY~~~ LL
CNV II
N 1
2 ` ~
~••.. ~ W W
Z Z
p O
0
In
Z ~'~ ~~.
~ Q N \ \~~\ ~ I
N ~
~p
~ I
I 2
~
o~
~~• ~ N O

~wQO

" ~
~
~
~ I~
~ ~~W
~~ _
• `
~, ~ '~
•~
W W W
w w
o o
E
in
N ~ . I ~ 3 ~ \ Z
~ ~

l .
~
I
~ ~ I
N ~
~
O ~
~ w=o
I r-n o
~
I ~ I)
I ~ ~ I
`
' ~ I ~
.~ Job
I I W
~ 1 t: r ~
O
~"'
~ . I
9 J ~ W
~ O i
-. -. ~' ~ I V~ .
O ~ U W
W a a
J LL.
l_Cli
I f ~ N I I m ~ ~ I ~~ ~~ ~_ ~' rn ~ ~ Z
~i o
o I
~
~ -
~ I I m
U ~. j,
~. is -~
~ ~,;
1W- -- ~, ~,
-W- H
~
N I i
j, I
I ~_ `

U
I

' -

\
~ oLL'
Z3 0 0
Z Z
W W
~ ~ ~' ~ ' ~ W
OZ D O
I ~
• m ~
r~~ z
, W I I
l
r ( o

- - - - - -
------
I ~
I ~
~
•~I

I_

~-~ _p
I r ~
J

v
o
o ~ Q p~ ~~ I IO Z z °_~ ~
w?~~tf- ~ z I O ~1 0 ~~
a ~n + ~ ~ -~~ o I c9 ~ ~ cn o v
~, .,~-t.- . --`.. ,
a ~- W~~ I-~~ I Q I o~ N=~ N ~~~
J I I ''-I I ~ o f N ~"~ a=~ ~ wwv~
r, ~ ~ ° = o
,L r- I , ' ~c
U i rry ~ pZQ ~ cnwO m
y
~~ 5L~ I ~ ~ o 0 o y= N
~ co n! o ,, r -{ I I E ~ ~ o N ~ ~ Z
I cn o d' _
~ ~~ V,~ ~W~ :~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ O p ~ ~ z v~ ~
. -Y,~
~ I o o ~ p O z
~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~w ~' ~ ~ NO i
~ I~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~~ N jai
I
I ~
'~ o g o ~ I~ ~ I ,~ •~: ZpNE
p • ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o ~~ - I .-~ I I ° ,~•~'~w~:,~~. ',ENE ~°
~h x4
~ siLS' t'~ --~ W E
w
~-- ~ I s. .f w vif ~-~• = m N
I l i 2 ( I tZla~ a~'l hl!i!• h O
~ nl :.~~ _ fl I I ,.. ~ ~ ~ - w w
. ~ I ~N I ~ ~ ~ ~ Via;!'. „ n'C ~ m ~ w w E
Q
I~ o I~ f~~., w~ `~ Q~ W o a
~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~
--- ~~ •~•v I I, ~ I v~~,~ ,s I ~" V 1 I a
~ I ~ Rc~ ' ti.~ {'+ I ~ ~
s
J
u ,~" 4 z J wZ
~ 05 ~ 0 p ~'-~ .~ ,y, o ~ ~. ~ -
o Fes' Y
I ~ ~~~ Y, U a' N N~ N
V bti'hav"s n.3h~•, ~ w w? w
O O Q O
Z Z W Z
bl ~0 ~ °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~1dW Q ° °~ °

m
o=
bl ~0 9 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW ~ ~o
aN N
~ I d o °3,- o
d ~ I ~ J NC~Z N NNE
~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a=a ~ w~~
p~ [O ~ I I ~~ / Z OZY ~ NNO
-`t ~ "1 I ~ fY O y O 3 S
U ~ ~ / I a W~ ~ ~~O
~p U to
~ ~ ~ ~ I /~ Z NO C
~ U ~
N ~ 3 ~°-. I ~ ~ :: Z ~
~/ I p c
_ _I o
o ~
F-
~ ~S
_ of
J ~ ~ C.
W .-~ ?I ~
a N
~I
. ~ -
_ ..
__--- ~-- - - - - ---- ----------~ ---- ------- ---~I- -- o ~G~
I Iv
o ~ I ~I
O~ ( I ~
~,~ ~ e
~ ~ I ~ I = a
N m I I ~ o
i ~~ I
J I ~ a ~
0006 ~ I 4~ o =- o
`n I ~ cr
~ `~ ~' °- W
~ ~, I ~
_ I ~: I _
~ I I ~
~~ ~ I
' (,09)
,~ 88Z'81 ~ I ~
~, N
~~ z°
• ~~a ~
J Q
~ W 1 I I 3 N J
Ir 4.' I o ` Z a w
_~
4, Il. / -~ v
~j ~~ I o ~ ?
11 I ~ w wz
I ~- f- ~
r~ ~. I ~ ~ °z °z w
3 . ~ I ~ i
~g"1 ~ 3 ~~ ~~ ~ n
. ~ ~ L_l.-
I ~ ~ N~Ir'P7 ~,\~~~ ~ i
r~ - mNINO
i

r~
\\~
V
p~~~~~~
~i a~
~ sN
~~fi~~~Q~
a~.
~ 'a
~~
~ ~tly!~y•~
~ • 3i~~iW
~oa~o~~~s~~
a ! I ,N. I!
a~

0
/v~~
o~~ ~

-~ b~b~ -.
ti w 1 ~:
~s ~
N~~~~~~~
"' a
~W~.~
~t~~~~~~~y~
<NNQO 2~
Oo>aSb~i~iv~,
_'°yyy
JY~w~~ti~
~~~~~~~~
hoooooc~~~ x
O
da
~~' W
<NNQO3 ~~iW
Oo>c3>~n~`iinj~
t~l .~0 L '1HS ~3S - ~NI~ H~1dW
~'I f.
I •.~
~
I
;~ ~ ~
.
m
N
~
N
I I
U
J
~
I
I
I NN
-
... ~ I X
W O ~
O
(1
J ~ ~
~`
(qW
N
I
!~
Ot
d1
Ux} ~
<
~
I
I
W E
'~ ° t
oo fz~

~ I '
aKi I H H
:~ ~ .o , ,
I ~
I
n. c~ i

~r I
I
~' 11, I `-
W ' ' ~ ~ ~'.
I I c
~ to
w I ~ I
I I
I
o
~
I ..

• m
~
~ ~,
^ I I
~ ~
a
•• bl
I I
7
= I •~ ; h
I I
I I ~ I
~
•. ~ ~:'; /
bl ~0 5 '1HS ~~S - 3N1~ H~1dW
" ^y y y
v b~~w-,~
~~ ~~~
o ~,~ ~~$
~~oooo~~o
N
~~
Q ~3.W
~.....w~~SW
J Q N N O O~~ S j
O O ~ d
'~ b b~
v~~\~` 1
ti. w'`
~~A~^ '~
a~Q~~~~~~~
~QFF b p~ oo~` gg~
~00000~'1~p
S
~ oa o
~' ~ 3 , W
Q... Wa
~aNN00~~9xW
00>~j tnJ~
~l 'q b
J~~w~~`-•,~
~~~~~~
~ooo~OO~gB i
0
~ a~ o
P ~ ~ . W
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~0.~iW
~oo~aQ~i~i9~~
`-~
~h
~ ~~h
\`~o
~~
o`er
o~'/ /
/ ,~

yam
~ h~~~
~~~~ ~~~
~~~~~Eh
O~ W
~~.~
~ W ~j
~OO~aQ~~1Nj~
yyy
.~
$~~~°~1~
~~~~~~~
E ~~
I~~~o~`eoc~~~ i
~a
da O
V- Via. W
Q ~~~
Q N N Q O ~~
oo>o>t~i~v>J~
W
o=
z
0 ~
a N c°n
~c ,,, ovtn
per}
= O C~
N(
jZ
z -
_ N
, NNCr
a n.
~
~
CJ ~ =WN
~
f'- ~ F- f"
~-
OZY
OQ ~ (n~O
w

~j3 O S
LL
p

00 ~ .
~
~~o
~o
U tf) 2
z `r' o
U ~-
Z

~~
O
N (
~~"`r
N
i
~ a
~ f

o
~

o, O
E

W

n
v i ~
~ ~
~
Z
Q
J W
F.
Q

I

~ F-
w
3 ~

W
a
J ? a
W N
F"'
y 2
° ~ 00
wa
=

? -
,-
' v
i
N
J
? a~
W
J a
U =3
-~ U
_ W ~~?
(~
w N
w !n N O
w w?
O
z O
z O OQ
zzw
z W
O W
O W W J
O OU F
Q
~ ~
..
i

-. ao
V ~o~~~M~~ V OoocNgoo" ~ ~v~ ~N
~ ~(((~~~~N ~N\o~\ 0 ~~ ~\ U~~O pS>- O Z
f~~~~00NN = ~ I~00000 NO Z ~=O ~ =~-~-N
~1 O ~ ~ ~ , 1-~V H F-O}
~C N ~ ,1 ~ _1 ~ w w o f' -J-i
V C'p i°a °w V '' oa W ooa ~ v~Wo
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~O~L~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~Q pp lL0
00~0>.~~NO~ QO~O~~Ci~j~ ~? l(7Z
Z to O
U ~ ~
Z
~^~~~~ `` h y y y ~
V ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~\
~ oOjo~oN~Nq~ U O~N~~~~N
Q ~*~~ v~ ~~ON ~ No~~ ~~~N
~- D CO y U ~ U ~ b`
v ~oo~ooo~°M$ z v ~oo`o~o~o~w°~ ~ LL
N
~ ~
~ oa ~ ~ ~? Wa o Q
~~ ~Q~W W~ ~~~~
~ ~
~OO~a~~~~ij~ ~ONO~a~.~~n9j~
N
0
h
J~ U~ U~~~ J~ y\ U~ -~
~ ~ 4~
p~g~EUE~~ O~~~E~~~~
I~doooo~~~r s ~ ~~o~~o~$$ ~ -
U tM W°a W V~ oa ~ W
pct- ~Q~~ ~~ ~~~W
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a J
QNN~~ ~W ~W
O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ d ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ 5
i
y h h y h h~ I
o °-'w~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~N~~
"' ~ W
W~~~~~Eo~~ ~ °~g~E~~~~ -
Q
m~~oooo~~o ~ ~~~o~~~~g$ ~ ~
N ~ O ,
W~ ~Q.~ C~"' 03 W Z
~Q ~~ ~~- ~~.w Q
v)~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J Q
JQNNOO a ~W OOa-~. ~L~LJ
~ Oo~o~.~cnSj~ ~oo~a~.CiGi9j~ r1
l,..L
i

I I I I ~,~
~ ~

I i I
' ~
I ~ ~
o
~
I I I I ~~ ~'
N
a N y
I I I 1"' ~~
~ °~} o °PZ
I I I I I ~ N~Z " NNE
I I I

I I ~'~ ~ w~0
~ ~o~ ~~°~
Y W ONJ
Li.
~
I I ~
I '~ Z
OOa
NW

N I I I
'~ ~~ O
=
~N~ ~ ~_~
W> ~ ~~o

a I AI
Z
Z O
W
J i I NI ~
pp ~ Z~ .
~
a I I ~~
I o p~
U

o
i
I I ~,
~ ,~., : ~: z
I
I I
i I ~ aN
i ~~
o = a
~
_
I ~
i ~ ~ ~
/ ~
I I I ~ ~
~
/ I I I ~ I ti ~`~
/ I I I ~
I ~
/ I I ,~
x~ ` ~
~'

U ~
~ ®

Q
a
I
I

I
z cp
IN o
~

g

/ . n
(! /
°
°
I I I ' ~
Ix
w N ~ ~ w\
_ °' o _
I I I :
~ \
I
' ti
r ~

°
° I I I I / W E

~ I I I ~ -
I i
cb.,z~• I I I I~' ~
° ~

1
3
I
I o
o, w
31 ~ I I , , ~,.; ~
/ i ~,
Z U
~I ~ I I I i F-~
~
~I ~ I
I
'
I ~
I - w ,~ ~ p
Z
3 v=i N a

l .
/
~
I (p
d' ~
Ll.~ J

zz
a w
.w z I I -
/
•~~
° x~
W
~ ~ ~ 2
/
~ ~ ~
Z
~. ~ ~ -

Q P- ,~
. •
~ z o 0 oQ
z z zw
' w
ti
Q i
{/)
bl
~0 9 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H -~ ~~ ~
.

~
o
=
- ~
~
F
-
z
o ~z
~ No
a ~,
~ }. pV N

~

bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW ~ a ~~ = c~
a=~ _
~ WNN
O =
_ ~ O

'.
..~
9+6~/ w
. ~
~
. j
~

I
~
cr

° ° `

, ~ ~ 1
, ~ ~ ~ix~, ~ ~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~ I
~ z
~ ~ ./ O p ~ ~ ~ ~' ~\ z

/j• / / ,...~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ I
O~ / / \
/ // ~ /\
/ / ~- w ~ ~` ~ ~
\ \
~ ~~` ~~ I

L~

~~
9
/ ~ ~ , ~~ ~ O .~~
"
/ •~
• ~~•# ~ , ~
z / / / ~~~~ \ ~ ` ~ I o W

~a o
a.
~
\ ~, a
J o
lf'I
I
~ / ~
V ~
• rn O W -
~ ~
z / ///
~ ` ~. , N s o
\ \ ~
(~ ~
\ ~
~V
/ ` a ~-
=W
w
\
~ ~~ a E
~ / ~~~ ~~~ ~ I ~ z
~
/
0 +65 / ~ `
~ ~ ~ ~
•\
I o
~
/ // ~~V~/-~~
~~ I I ~ zZ
~o
\
\ I W
w l
/ \
~
~~ I
~ Z W LL"
/ ///
~ ~
I
~
\ I

W o ~ ~ w
~ m N CD
m
/
~
~ I I ~
N a~
0
~~ \ ~~ W I U J I ~I ~ x o o win
W N N ~ Z
/
~\\\ I
~~ w I ~
I !
z F-
zz~z~

, /~
\~ W W W W Z
o 0 0 0_
~ ~
~ I ~ I
, ~

~ , ~.

bl HO ZI °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW
Z
J
J
O
U
Q
r
Z
W
~~ I ~ I
O~ I - I
~ w I II
T
~ ~
° ~ ``
z
o ~z
-=
aN v~ o
~Q ~ W°~~ ~
asr ~ ~~Z =
V)
=~ W
N
Q
~ ~
W v ~ LL
=o
E._.
O ~.
(.J I- r o
J ~, J i
c

~

~Z
Q

O
ONJ Q~
NWO N
N O
~N3 ~ ~=W
M ~ ~ n' O F- O
W-
O ~~
O W O W
U ~ Z ~
Z ~ O O
U H i
'-' m tD
~ (, I `' z
C:~
Oi~+09 ~ ~ I a
~"'" U
W Z
~ O
~ Q
~ Q O ~ ~
~ ~ ~~~
~ w ~00.~
~ ~~~
m J
Li.
~ °~°• o ~~
~ o
i- N lD ~
~Q°J ~-N~
O: \ ~ `.
O ~ N
00+09
ti~~~ ~~~,~'\'
.~o~~~ \
I
' la v

J
IJ ~ ~

~ i

I
I ~ ~

~I

~--
I o
I I I ~--
I
I I
I I ~
.: ~ I;
I <~I I i

~ I I ~OII ~
.
I I ~~III
~.
~ ~
I III I

~I
~ ~
,
l dill
I U ~I
I
I I .EMI
/ ~ .: j wEll~
~ ~ I col ,
/ ~ i / I '-III
/ ~ ./ I III W
°• III ~
bl ~0 8 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW
z
Q
nJ
1__L._
(Y `b~
~G~
E
0
O
O
O
E
~,
o ~ o
z w F-
a
J C W
W s O ~
U
} w a
Z ~ z °-
a
LL ~ ~
z ~ a
o ~ wo
~ ~a
a Z ~
> o f-
ww
U J N ~
W li Q W
N N = W
W W U J
0 0 ~2
z o
WQ w0 z V

p~
F

N O op tp

N N o
__
z
~
o
~a
~ a NN
I aQ ti oa'~
0
N=~ N
N
~Ir
A
Q
Q
Q=O fY W
N
~
' O
O

~ ~ W U O~J

ZY 'W
N
O
i ln
O
Oa O ~2
F-N~ ~ ~S
W~ ~ OHO
0 ~a
0
0
ci u~ Z
z `n o
~ U F-
l~ Z

QS

' ~ W

O
N
O
O
~ O
.. ~ O
O
v
E
O

O

axrsr~ td -J
J
Z
O a
J
W
3
W
F-
O
Z
W

N O W tp
N N

I I I ~, I I \~ ~I I
I I -~ I ~~. I~ Z °~
? ! o ~~
I ~ ! I I~
I I ~ I I .,~ ~ I ~, c N ~ N
I I b I I I I • ~,\~ I ~~ ~ a ti o Q' ~ i
I I ,., n-z~ ~ ~~Z
I I I ~ , I~ 750 I _ \~ I ~• Z~Z N av~a
I I I I I +~ I I I o0a o ~WZ•
I I I .II ~ I~ QO~n"~~O
I I I ~ I I I I ~ I `~- °•
I I I . I I I I I Q~ ~I Z ~°
I I III I I
I ~W Z
~I
~ / ' I I m ~ WI
I / J I I~ ~ tC• °: owo I v~ t
I _ ~ ~ fl ~_~~p ~ t
II ~NI ~ ~ ~
I
. ~
~- - _ ~ 1 ,I--~ ,~~
•~, ~~, 375m w
i"
I o f ~ I~
I ! I ;~ i ~ I-1-- o
I ~I I ~i I I ~ E
.Q
I ~ °
I ZI' I ~ ~I ~ I~o~ = o
I Z Ni I ~ 11 ~ I~ o ~ ~ ~,
I ~ wl ~ ~ I ~ ~; o -
~ ~ r
i ~ ~I' I I ~ ~ N` ° o, o
~ I Q Il ~I I Imo- - E
~I Z I~ I ~ W
~ II I ~ ~ _
~~ ~
I ,~ I II I
w
UII Z ~ z3
~ _ aZ
•' ~ ' I Z a
bl .~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb'W _ J
\ w w
ww
~~
0 0
z ww
00
Q ~

N
w
0
0
Q
W
z
3
O
H
w
0
W
a
Z
W
Z
0
~-
F--
W
(1.,
Q
O
Z
J
W
U
a
N r} W~ t~p ~ N t~V ~ oO~~ n
~ ~ n `N + N •~ ~ N ~ N a°0 0~ o~ a0 W
~ ~ _ N Vn ~-N N }q ~ tq~ ~ ~~ N1~-
'~ ~ fO a~O N N `e~ C`r S ~ ON •ti CC0 ~ Ou~l M EL~j *~~
L N ~N ~~ NV G~ }~ ~~ `~ NN J~ fAN ~N UN 3~
V C1 pV XO~ TJ~ $LLi EN yN NZp ~~ ~ ~ qX~~ 1Wpv~ NN
N~ ~ O a 0 n E 8 0 ~ O ~ O N~ ~ C N~ ~~ ~~ fi 0
~ ~ ~ m ~ w ,p. .. ° LL
4 ti ~ = S S ~ N
N
F-
(n J
U W Q Q
Z ~"'
z
z
N a 3 ~ z Z o
~ C~ Z J O O In ~ V}
lL Q ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ J S J N S
U C1C ~ ~ Q D ~ O 3 Q O Z U
o ° ~ a° a ~ ~- 3 s U° ~.
z
z
z
o~ w o w o w a: ¢~ Q
~ ~ Z N ~ J ~ F=-- tY !n ~ U ~
Q ~ p Q D S W ~ m ~ Z Z Q
m ~ = Q S O Z
~ J U ~+- W J = = S (r
Q W W O U ~ W S
J ~ ~ j
(~ _
U N
z
0
H
Q N
~"" ~...
°ar
Z ~ .z
Q O
~L.~U
ow
°oa
F-N~
~ ~
~ ~
V
.z
0
Ol
N
I
F--
U
w
O
ao
o=
_~
~~
No
LL
~ ~ ~
Z
Q ~ ~
= w N
~ O r
N N O
w=
Sao
~1..
~ Z
In O
U ~
Z
1

0

N
~" m
c ~
O N L
~
O m
~p
O
m
~ ~

N ~_

r
Q N v O O O O
a
f
~ _o
~
LL w m n m
O p °'
N
~ C~~
O L ^
~ ~ O
N V ~" ~
m
N
O
O
O O ~ r
~ ~
Z
= O
O
Z
U- N N F.. V7 d'
Q ~" O LY
~ m E ° vmi ° umi ~~ ~ZN
C L
W U ~p m O= } O O
ap F- N~J
O
= j ~
Z
~
~
v v
c
O O ~ V~ LL
~'Z w w~O
o L E o 0 o O~ Q p~ H
U
~ ~ p ~
~ j ~ a F-
O
N
cn
wo

o, v a~i
rn
°' o '~`
_
!7 N IQ a E N m N (7 Z =~
~ u'Sv E CO N O~
a
p
{ __
W
N ~
LL
~ L o O o o ~ ~
W E
~ - U u.
Z O

W ~
~ o t ° o o ~ w
~ m
- a ~-
'-' o o w
~ ~ x
~ ~
~ ro o ~
c~ L
`° '' ~
°0 N
0 0 0

Z
w 0 0 0 0
} D
/
lL N ~ ~ _ ~ N

Q
c C O N
N
m
O O
C
C ~~ L L
~ U ~ O
0 O
0
0
~ ~
~ N
~ U c ~

a 0
c

~
rn
~>p ~ L
~ ? ... O O M
O ('7
O C
Q O O
d Z
g W cc ~
N
~ N C
~
W ~y ~ UUUV
3 c0
~; v
v >y
O
O
O
O
N

~ 5 E
-
_
N
d
C C N7 V N
- 10 = t0
O m
~ O 7 ~/1 `O
U. ~ O O O O V
N
~ C N
f0 ~

v E
m
ri 3 d

o i0
~
O
U N
X
E N
N ~
U ~
(n O
" N -
~
'n @J E
3
N _
O O
fD
L L
~+7 N
m ~
W J J p 0
~ O O ~ O y
c ~
o m
+ n
+ m
~ x
~ ~ ~ ~ o E
N lL N
O N
~
4 O
m
4 F" ¢ N
N
ry
N
~
~ _
O W
tQ Z

~ O J
F-
(n Z _ - O
H

J
Q
~ ti
N ao
N m
N v
00

~ O O O O

I- O O O O

cam
ZW .-.
v
L

O

N

-

M
Z N O O ~ O
Q~
W w O O O O

-~~ Z
O
V~J N
~
p
-
W LL --~
N~
m
o

QZ - o 0 0 0
=
U
~'
W 0 0 0 0
W Z
~~ O
N

J
a
~ ~ ~- ~-
N ~
M
~
I- O
O O
O O O
.-.
v
pW
Z N O M

O ~

0 r-
QN W o 0 0 0

W~ O

~~
~~- .-.
~

~ r
U
Z L
- ~ N ~ ~
O o ~ N
~~ Z O O O O
~~ O

N
w a
{- - N I'~7 ~O
N ~

. ~~~
~~
~~
EPAR'TMENT OF THE ARMY
`/' l !~
+`~/
' ~~~~¢r~~S'~ ilmington District, Corps of Engineers
~~~ Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
~~ 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6814
(Web page - http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/regtour.htin)
Action ID. 199700175
PUBLIC NOTICE
December 28, 2001
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF
HIGHWAYS, 1548 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548, has applied for a
Department Of The Army (DA) Permit to authorize the proposed discharge of dredged and fill
material impacting a total of 3.02 acres of waters of the United States, consisting of 2.64 acres of
wetlands, 7741inear feet of stream, and 0.27 acre of a pond, for construction of WIDENING OF
A SECTION OF NC 55 (T.I.P. No. R-2907), crossing BASAL CREEK, its unnamed tributaries,
and adjacent wetlands, from southeast of SR 1108 to northwest of SR 1114, between FUQUAY
VARINA and HOLLY SPRINGS, in WAKE COUNTY, North Carolina.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans
submitted with the application show the placement of fill material impacting a total of 3.02 acres
of waters of the United States, including wetlands, between Fuquay-Varina and Holly Springs, in
Wake County, North Carolina. These impacts are necessary for the construction of the widening
of NC 55 (T.I.P. No. R-2907). The proposed widening extends 3.3 miles, from SR 1108 (Wake
Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road). The widening will be done asymmetrically, and
no control of access is proposed along the project.
The project will involve fill impacts to 0.38 acres of unvegetated waters of the United
States. These impacts to stream channels (774 linear feet) and a portion of a pond occur at three
locations along the project. At stream crossings, culverts or pipes will be used to allow for
adequate hydrological flow underneath the roadway. The proposed construction will also impact
2.64 acres of vegetated wetlands by filling, excavation, and mechanized clearing. The impacted
wetlands consist of palustrine forested, emergent, and pond fringe areas.
NCDOT is proposing payment to the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program to
provide compensatory mitigation for the wetland and stream impacts from this project.

,.,;.
r R,
i4
~ F,..,
;~ ''~~
. ~,, ,~.
~~The'pu'rpose of the work is to relieve congestion by increasing_the traffic. capacity, and to
i ct~'e safety, on this section of NC 55. The applicant has considered several alt~'rnatives to the
~.r.
,n-•°' proposed project, including the no-build alternative, symmetrical widening, and non-symmetrical
widening. In addition, the applicant has committed to measures to avoid and minimize wetland
and stream impacts, including using 2:1 side slopes in wetland areas.
Overall plans showing the proposed construction are included with this public notice.
Additional detailed plans may be reviewed at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory
Field Office at 6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6846, or at
the offices of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality at the address shown below.
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army permit will be
issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by
this agency, nor will a Department of the Army permit be issued until the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as
required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act
(33U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
NCDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have identified that there are
three historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, within the
area of potential effect of the project. NCDOT and FHWA, in consultation with the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), have determined that the project will have
conditional no adverse effect on two of the properties. The project will adversely affect the
Ashley Jeff Stephens Farm. NCDOT has committed to fulfilling conditions of the no adverse
affect determinations, and NCDOT, FHWA, and SHPO have signed a Memorandum of
Agreement concerning the necessary mitigative measures for impacts to the Stephens Farm. The
District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic
Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible
for inclusion therein, and the project does not impact any other registered property or property
listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer. NCDOT has
coordinated with SHPO, and SHPO has concurred that the project will not have any effect on
archaeological resource properties eligible for inclusion in the Register. The District Engineer is
otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological,
2

scientific, prehistoric, or historical data may-be lost or destroyed by work under the requested
permit.
The District Engineer is not aware, based. on available information, that the activity will
affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and its intended use on the
public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the
public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to
authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are
therefore determined by the outcome of the gene;ral balancing process. That decision should
reflect the national concern for both protection a.nd utilization of important resources. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife value-s, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use,
navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality,
energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if
the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other
applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines
that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes, and other interested parties in order to consider and
evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the
Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species,
historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest
factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or
Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments
are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public
interest of the proposed activity.

Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives State certification
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The
application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for
certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at
the offices of the Wetlands /401 Unit, North Carolina DENR, Division of Water Quality, 2321
Crabtree Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any
person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-1650, on or before January 22, 2002, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Eric Alsmeyer, unti14:15 p.m., January 28, 2002, or telephone 919-876
8441, extension 23.
4

.. _..... MAP
`~~~~ -
~~ `~ , 30,
~ ~,P w~~ _ _ \ -
-~
~ U ~ I -
_ 1 ~.
. \-f
I \ ~ c l-- : '1 ~' T
~ . ~ _{.
\ ~`,oo i 1 1 1 O ~ ~~ - 401 ~,
i 'C- ~
r .
~ .- - -_,~. PRO-~ECT '~-~.r. _ t , -'~.I`~~-i_ -~ ,' ~ ~~I~_`
-~~
4 _=.-.-
- ~,-r ~~.
RN.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
500m ~ I~~~m PROJECT R-2907
~~ NC 55 FROM SOUTHEAST OF SR II08
~:rj0000 TO NORTHWEST OF SR 1114 SOUTH
OF HOLLY SPRINGS
-.----__-- - -- 07-16-OI f~T~-
~ , . ~ -~~ l
~ -!, - 4 ~j~, -
/ '~ J

b
Z - H
~ N N
U ~ O
a~
~a ~ °~u
0
N=~ N N~~
Q2p pC WAN
~4.U r ~Or
Ow U O~JJ
OQQ ~ NW'J
a~~ °' °~o
pO ~o
U 1n Z
Z ~ O
U ~
Z
W
rl-
V /
W
'~
V !

PARCEL N0, I PROPERTY OWNER NAIAE
- -~.. PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS
V.. _
~6 _
-7_~-- ~ -
ILA J. BAREf00T FARMS INC.
PSLAC
GREEtA.A1MN 11EMORIAL GARDENS
CHARLES JOHNSON JR.B wANDA T.
~,a7.Ft. M. ROTH
_ OUNA ADAA15
~. CARIYIE ADAMS JR.
9 } __ ~ REO!)Y C. RAGAN
9 EDRITN D. POwEII
O `~ ~
i CLA180RNE X. riIISON
II TNOIAAS P. HAARISON
~ I~RY A. COLLINS
i FRANK C. MUN02 JR.
4 ~ ~TNEn"'. ATLANTIC RESIDENTIAL.
s+a sran. ~ we.
iar Oaks, KC, 2Tlth71
N,C. DEPT, OF TRANSPOf2TATI0N
DIVISION OF HIGNIVAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT f.:,JOt
NC SS FROA! SOUT4ffAST OF SR OOti
TO NORTNN'EST OF SR AI4 SOUTH
'l~ }IGLI.'! SPRINGS
.,.. ,~_,,. .-.-t,..~.-~-......

o
i = z~

N m - .. ._ _ __ _. __ _. .
U _ ... __ _. __
4 ~
Z ~
oay9R
~~+

3
ygg
n Y
3 d
p
a
N ~Td
A ~ 4
X ~ 5
q
~
S

~ !1 ~ A
pq
A ~ ~ 7i

a 3~ ~ ~
s ~~ ~ ~

s
~
~ sc
3~~
s y~~ ~
o ~ -~~ ~

ta~ z
n u
~ ~. 0 3~ ~
o~
~~o ~ 3~
Qi~n O a~
+
'
0
7 d
~O~
~
o m q o 3 ~m

N ~ t
1
x V G

-
P

g 4
~ ~ X ;

`o~aF w a rF9QG
~ ~
o -mac
M(chael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water puality
ay .
Mr. Phil Harris
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 ! . ~ ~ ~ 5
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: Project: Wake Chapel/Ralph Stevens Roads
TIP #: R-2907
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) will accept payment for wetland and riparian buffer impacts associated with
the subject project. Stream and wetland impacts will be mitigated in accordance with the
Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
Based on the information supplied by you in a letter dated March 15, 2001, the wetland
and riparian buffer restoration that is necessary to satisfy the compensatory mitigation
requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The maximum amount of
mitigation that the NCWRP will accept for this project is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetland
(ft2 or acres) Wetland
(ft2 or acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft2)
Im act 1.4 ri arian 1.4 non-ri arian 38332.8 -zone 1
Miti ation Max. 2.8 ri arian 2.8 non-ri arian 10018.8 -zone 2
As requested, the NCWRP will provide wetland and riparian buffer mitigation as
specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated
with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal Braswell
at [phone].
erely
___---
onald E. Fe yell,
Program Manager
cc: Rob Ridings, Wetlands/401 Unit
Eric Alsmeyer, USACOE
Steve Mitchell, RRO
file
~~~~
N~DENIR
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Program [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748

a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
~~~
NCDENR
February 5, 2002
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Re: Permit Application for proposed NC 55 widening to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel
Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County
DWQ No. 010681, TIP No. R-2907
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal fora 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
• An understanding of the stormwater design relevant to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules 15A
NCAC 2B .0233, cannot be obtained with the limited permit drawings submitted. Please provide'/z
sized project design drawings for out review.
• As designed the project proposes the placement of ditches through jurisdictional wetlands. In addition,
there is an explanation describing the rationale for the proposed ditches. However, after review of the
discussion, DWQ is concerned that the proposed ditches may be avoidable. DWQ recommends a
meeting with the design engineers to discuss'potential design options to avoid the ditches.
• In the event that the aforementioned meeting results in a definitive need for the proposed ditches
through jurisdictional wetlands, then the anticipated impacts resultant from the drainage of the wetlands
by the drtches needs to be provrded to the NCDWQ along wrth a mrUgation proposal
_ ~ x . ~ "rat a4 i t -. '~ '~ `S ~ ~ j~~,gy~~^'~ri , `^Tt' 'A,.~'.y~.,p;~ ~ r ;.,
e. -=.:w .~'.~y x ~,:.~~ ~4,' +xt+'; 4trw ,,. y;:..* ••a+{.fai~}' . o r 7 ~rMF.. ~7',W~~~st 7H4 ~Ba ~~ ~~:
.
Via. r ~ t' ~, .~ * ~~ a
.:. .. ':e..'. .... a. ..: ~.~... ... .,
.Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of,Engineers place
,.; the permit application on hold. ;~.,;~:. a~ X~ ,~~, .~; + ,~ • .
7
.. - w M L h +~ t, ..his , t '". r .".S V ~ _ i .. k
. - ~_
. }
. ,.
Wedands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center , ~ Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5046 recycled/104'o post consumer paper
},
,r
;,;

a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources'
Division of Water Quality
,~+~
Michael F. Easley, Governor ~~
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Sincerely,
1
ohn R. Dorney
Water Quality Certification Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
~~

,.n~7,s~
e y-„
4~s ~ ~~ S
~~(~ ~l
STATL OF NORTI{ CAROLINA
DLPARTNIENT OF TRANSPOR"hA"LION
Llicii,~ia. F. E:~S~.~:~'
~O1ERVOi:
December 17, 2001
US Army Corps of En~~ineers
Regulatory Field Office
608 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Ralei~~h, NC 27609
A"I•TN: iVlr. Eric c~lsmevcr
NCDOT Coordinator
!~
,' .n/
~~
c.J
;. .
Ll'NUO TII'Pi;~f~l~
SG('FE f:\Ia
~_~; ~ ~ iii~l
SUI3,IEC"I•: Individual Permit Application for NC » «~idening to a multi-lane facility
fi•om SR 1 lOS (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1 11-1 (Ralph Stevens Road).
~~-al:e County, "CIP No. 1t-2907; State Project No. 8.140301; Federal Aici
Project STP-~~(~). Division ~.
Dear Sir:
The NCDOT proposes to assymetrically widen a ~.3 km (3.3 mi) length of NC ~5
in Wake County. Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the
subject project. The proposed roadway is a five-lane facility with curb and gutter for the
southern section (from SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398). A four-lane facility divided with a
9m (30ft) raised median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1113/1398 to SR
1 114). The proposed right-of-way (ROW) width for the project is 31m (100ft) for the
five-lane cross-section, and 46m (1~Oft) for the four-lane median divided section.
Widening will occur on the east side transitioning to the west. No contrgl of access is
proposed along the project.
Summar. oy f impacts: Impacts on jurisdictional areas of the proposed project consists of
a total of 2.64 acres of permanent wetland impacts of which 1.38 acres are riverine and
1.26 acres are non-riverine. There will also be 0.27 acres of permanent impact to ponds
(fill and/or draining) and approximately 291 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts.
Summary of Mitieation: The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to
jurisdictional areas throughout the NEPA and design processes. Detailed descriptions of
these actions are presented elsewhere in this application. We propose to use WRP to
mitigate for the 2.64 acres of wetlands and the 291 linear feet of jurisdictional stream
impacts. We will provide $48,240 for compensatory wetland mitigation impacts at a
ratio of 2:1 by using the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP). This fee
is the cost for x.28 acres at the rate of $24,000 per acre for the riverine mitigation and
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: b'VYIhN.DOH.DOLSTATE.NC.US RALEiGHNC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

a
$12,000 per acres for non-riverine wetlands. We will provide $72,750 for compensatory
stream mitigation impacts at a ratio of 2:1 by using the WRP. This fee is the cost for 582
linear feet at the rate of $12~ per linear foot.
Purpose and Necd: The proposed project will relieve con~~cstion b~~ increasin~~ the safet}~
and traitic capacity of this section of NC ~~. It ~~~ill help accommodate traffic demand in
the NC ~~ corridor from motorists traveling bct«~een Fuqua}'-Varina and Research
"Triangle Park (RTP). This project is one of five projects up;~rading the entire corridor to
multi-lanes. The existing NC ~~ t~vo-lane roadway is currently over its traffic handling
capacit}'. Increased traffic volumes are expected within the next three years. The project
is scheduled to be let ~~larch 2002.
Alternatives: NCDOT ins-•estigated several alternatives for R-2907 which were discussed
in detail on pages 3 to 7 in the EA.
NEPA Document Status
A Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for R-2907 was approved by the
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch (PDEA) on October 21, 1999.
A State Environmental Assessment (EA) for R-2907 was approved by PDEA ou October
~, 1998. T•he Erb explains the purpose and need for the project, provides a description of
the project and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects of the
project. Copies of the EA have been provided to the regulatory review agencies involved
in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
Resource Status
Wetlands. The proposed project will impact three jurisdictional wetlands.
~'Vetlands were delineated using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual. Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) Raleigh Regulatory Field Office was contacted about the wetland
and stream delineation for this project on IV1ay 1~, 2000. Mr. Alsmeyer declined to visit
the project at that time. Drawings detailing and tables summarizing the wetland and
stream impacts are included with this application.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) rating system was applied to each wetland
site. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin, 1979) system and the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental
Management; Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands (Report No. 96-01, 1996). Table
1 shows the wetland communities, quality analysis, and acres of impact for each section
of the project.

Table 1. Wetlands
Site Cowardin
Classification NCDCNI2-DWQ
Classification DWQ Ratinb Acres
Lnpactcd
~ I l PFOI;~ Pond I~riny~c ~~ 0?2
II
I I'I=01/4t1 13ottumland I Iardwood 6~ 1.16
----
i II[
PL;ytll3
[~isturbec} I;mcr~~ent Wetland
~ ~2
1.26'`
TOTAL 2.64
~~~ 0.31 acres will be impacted inside the limits of construction and 0.4~ acres will be
impacted Outside the limits of construction Clue to ditch effects.
Pond fi•ingc occurs along a small pond adjacent to the south end of the project.
111C ~~~OOd}' vegetatl0ll In thest', arCAS lI1CIlIdC S~1'Cetgllnl (L1C~IrIC~CIr)l~a!' S't)%i'UCI~lIr[I), black
willow (Sulu rri~,~rcr), titi (C:tiv•illu rcrcentiJlura), elderberry (Scmtbtrcus cururderasis), red
Inap1C (l1CBl' ]'ll~)1'lllll), ~~il'glllla WlllOw (IteU l'!/'~'1111CCr), aIld river blrch (Betlrja 11l~'!'C!).
.lapanese honeysuckle (Loniccru jupariru) and yellow jessauline (Gela•errliunr
serrrper•l~ir•ens) cover much of the woody vegetation in some areas. The dominant
herbaceous vegetation in this conununih- includes meadow-beauty (Rlrcxicr rir~~rirriru) and
panic grass (Parricrnnscc~j~cn•itnn).
BOttOl111anC1 hal'd\vOOd 101'eSt OCCLII's A1011`~ Basal (:reek. The dOlllillilllt CallOpy
trees include sweetgum. sycamore (Pluturnrs occiclerttcrlis), loblolly pine (Pirrlrs~ tueckr),
and water oak (Oucrcus nigrcr). The understory is comprised of ironwood (Cur~~irzrrs
carolirriancr) and holly (Ilex upaca). Shrubs and vines include elderberry, privet
(Ligustr•um sinerzse), arrowwood (Viburnzmz nardzmt), spice bush (Lindera beri~oirl), and
possum haw (Ilex decidua). In addition, sweet pepperbush (Clethr-a crlnifolicr) and storax
(Styrax anrericana) are also present with the latter being uncommon to rare in the project
area. The dominant vines include cross vine (Anisostichus cnpreolata), Japanese
honeysuckle, and greenbrier (Smilax rnttmclifolia). The herb layer is comprised of
southern lady fern (~ltJlyrium asplcrzioicles), meadow violet (Viola papilialcrcca), panic
grass, bedstraw (Gcrliunl sp.), bitter cress (Curclamirre penrrsylvcrnicn), and woodrush
(Luzlrla eclrincrla).
Disturbed emergent wetland occurs at the northern end of the project. This area is
comprised solely of herbaceous vegetation including fescue (Fes[zrca sp.), Jirncus sp., and
sedge (Carex sp.).
Acres impacted includes permanent fill, eYCavation, and mechanized clearing ill
wetland areas and are itemized in the sununary sheets. The total wetland impacts are
2.64 acres, divided into 1.26 acres ofnon-riverine and 1.38 acres of riverine. Method III
mechanized clearing will be used throughout the project.
Surface Waters. Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters have been separated
from jurisdictional wetlands. Table 2 lists the acres of impact and the linear feet of
channel loss for each site. The station number for each site is listed on the summary
sheets in the permit drawings. Stream impacts for Sites I and III consist of small
intermittent streams (Site I scored a 22 on the DWQ stream sheet and Site III scored a
25). Stream impacts for Site II consist of a perennial stream and will require 2:1
mitigation.

Table 2. Surface Waters
Site No. Water Body Channel Impact
(linear feet) Acres Impacted
I Pond N/t1 0.27
~ 1 - l•ributar~~ to Basal
Creel: 66 0.01
II Basal Creel: 291 0.0~
1[1 ~I I'IbUTAI'1' to Basal
Creel: -117 0.0~
Total 774 0.38
l~edcrally-Protected Species. Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered, 'I~hreatened, Proposed Endany~ercci, and Proposed Threatened are protected
LlI1dC1' pl'O~'ISIOIIS Ot Sectlol) 7 and Section 9 Of the Elldallgel'Cd Species Act. As of Nlarch
22, 2001, a total of four federally-protected species are listed for «'ake County (Table 3).
Table 3. Federally-protected species for Wake County
SCIENTIFIC NAiAIC COiAL~ION NA-~IC S'1'A'I'US
~llasnticlattu he~eroclo,r dwarf «-ed`~e mussel _ Endangered
Huliuceltts /eucncc~hhulus bald ea~~le
' Threatened (proposed for
delistin;~)
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered
IZhus ntichnuxii MichauY's sumac Endangered
Endangered: a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" for the above-mentioned were resolved in
several docLlments IIlcllldln~l the Environmental Assessment.
_ Cultural Resources. The State Historic Preservation Office (SI-IPO), NCDOT,
and FH~'VA have reviewed the project and concur that there are tln'ee properties eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places located within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE). The Adams House, the Richard Adams Farm, and the Ashley "Jeff 'Stephens
Farm were determined eligible for the National Register. Descriptions of the individual
properties are included in Secs ion VIII of the EA. Locations of the properties and
coordination regarding historic properties is also included in tl)e EA.
The Adams House historic boundaries extend on both sides of NC 5~
approximately 0.6 miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a
conditional no adverse effect on the property. By widening NC ~~ to the east, the
proposed four-lane grassed median alignment avoids the cemetery associated with this
property.
The Richard Adams Farm is located on both sides of NC 55 approximately 0.3
miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a conditional no adverse
effect on the property. The proposed four-lane grassed median aliglunent avoids the
house.

The Ashley "Jeff' Stephens Farm is located on the west side of NC 55 at the
southwest corner of the SR 1 1 14 intersection. The proposed roadway alignment w-ll
c;xtelld tlll'OU~~11 the llOUSe alld fal'nl. The 1x1'111 \1'111 be adversely of}ected by t11C pl'OpOSt;CI
prO~eCt.
In accordance with Section 10G of the National I listoric Preservation Act. a
~~[emorandlun of A~~recment (MOA) is required. The ~tOA for the adverse effect to the
Stephens Farm discusses the n)iti~~ative measures to be taken during project construction.
The NIOA im~olvin~~ the property owner, NCDOT, FI-I~~~A, SI-IPO. and other appropriate
a~~encies .vas si~.:ned August 1999.
'1•he State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed the project and is not
Aware o}~archaeolo~~ical sites within the proposed project area. No archaeolo~~ical survey
was reCOlllnlCllded.
t`Iitigl><tion Options
Avoidance/~iininlizatiun. "I~he following is a list of the project's jurisdictional
wetlanCl anCl StrCalll avoidance/minimization activities proposed or completed by
NCDU'f.
2:1 slopes were used in wetland areas to minimize project impacts.
The existing alignment of NC ~~ was used with assymetrical widening.
.1o1u1 Lansford, Project Design Engineer with the Roadway Design Unit, provided
explanation of why NCDOT is using ditches within wetlands on this project. The
Holly Springs bypass starts just a few meters north of this area, and NCDOT is tying
into the bypass by using the grade of the bypass. NCDOT is attempting to stay as
close to the existin~~ road elevation as possible to make maintaining traffic during
CO11St1'UCt1011 aS eaS~' as possible, reduce impacts to the subdivision east Of NC ~~, and
avoid impacting the historic property on the west side of NC ~~ (just south of Ralph
Stevens Road), less than 140 nl south of the wetlands. In order to eliminate the
ditches, the construction limits for the project would need to be extended onto the
south end of the Holly Springs bypass, with additional impacts to the subdivision,
complicating the traffic control process in this area, and possibly impacting the
historic site to the south.
Compensation-wetlands and surface waters. Stream and wetland impacts will be
mitigated in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers dated November 4, 1998. A letter from WRP dated May 18, 2001 verifies that
they will provide wetland mitigation as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification
and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging
Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
Summary
Application is hereby made for a Section 404 Individual Permit as required for the
above-described activities. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting a 401 General
Water Quality Certification. Seven copies of the application are being provided to the

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Qualit}~.
I hank \'Oll t0l' VOlil' aSSlstallCC \\'Ith lhls }ll'l)~CCt. I I }'Oll havC ally C1llCSil011S Ol'
ilt'CCl All\' addlllOllAl Illtol'illatl011 Ah0(lt i111S Ilf(I~CCt. I)Ie~lse CO(1laCt `'ll'. ~'latt l Ia11C\ At
(9I9) 7 i~-7S-1-4. CXiC;IISIOII J )J.
SIIICCI'ClV',
L f~~G~
~'l~illiam D. Gihllore, Manager
PI'O~eCt DCVeIOplllellt gild Ellvll'O11lIle1ltAl AllalySlS
~~~DG/nunh
Enclosure
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilnlingtoll
IVIr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Ms. Kathy Matthews, Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. David Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Ray Arnold, P.E., Design Services
Mr. Jon G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Ray Lotfi, Project DFvelopment and Environmental Analysis

..
Neuse Buffer Addendum
Neuse~Ri )arian Buffer Rules. This project is subject to the Neuse Ri~'er Riparian Buffer
I~tt es. No crossings will impact greater than ollc-third of an acre of riparian buffer. In
~1reaS that are bUth \\'Ctiallds illlCi part UI the l'Ipal'lall bill lel' IUlll'. \\'C;tlalld lllltl~.!at1U11 0111\'
will be pruv'idcd. Riparian buffo mitigation vrill be provided in zone areas that are not
deSl`~llated t15 \Vetlalld. IlllpaClS lU IOneS I and 2 arC Sh0\1'll oil the 1)el'llllt dr~lWll1~.',s illl
are quantified in t___ 11~ ~;~ble-4: -- - - - -
Table -1. Suuunar~' of Imtrlcts to Neuse Ri~ru'ian Buffer Zones
Site Zone 1 impacts
~aC~ Zone 2 impacts
~aC~ Total Impacts
~aC~ Total Mitigation
~egllll'ed (ac)
I 0.19 0.13 0.3 2 N/A
II 0.30 0.21 0.~ I N/A
III 0.5I 0.20 0.71 N/A
Total 1.00 0.5-1 1.5-1 N/A
Table ~. Riparian Buffer "Cones minus Wetlands Calculations
Sites I II III
Zone 1 Impact 0.193 ~ 0.299 0.~ 11
Wetlands in "Lone 1 0.17 0.096 0.47
Zone 1-Wetlands 0.01 S 0.203 ~,~ ~ : -r 0.04 ,~

Zone 2 Impact 0.126 0.210 0.198
Wetlands in Zone 2 0.072 0.106 0.193
Zone 2-Wetlands 0.054. 0.104 .X ~, 5' ~ 0.005 ! •3
Total Buffer Impact 0.072 0.307 0.059
*A11 areas are In acres.
No riparian buffer mitigation will be required since there are no crossings ilnpactin~~
greater than one-third of an acre of riparian buffer.
Z.., .- I
d.~o t
v , o f•''I
Cv r .i~ ,
.~~-
Z
v.,o~l
°'~ ) ,
`~~l.i
6,,G~
v `~'
~,s~ ~
X ySiS~Go ~~fL

r~
~d r ~'~
S'fn'I'L; OF NORTI{ C~\IZOI,INA
I~I~.PAR"['M(~N"h OF T[ZANSI'OIZ"I'n"('ION
(i[~1 ![ItAt qt
Dece-nber 17, ?001
US army Corps of l?n~inecrs
Rc~~ulatorv I' field Oft ice
6108 falls of the Ncuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
V'1'"{'N: .Ylr. l~,ric Alsmcvcr
NCUOT Coordinator
Ll'NI)U ~lll'I'I:;~I~~I
Sf~ltlf~f,\Itl
'~
SUI3.ll~,C'~1~: {ndividual Permit application (or NC ~~ widenin~~ to a multi-lane facilit~~
from SRI 108 (VVaI<e Chapel Road) to SR 1 l 14 (Ralph Stevens Road).
Wal:c County. TIP No. R-2907; State Project No. 5.1403501: l~edcral ~\id
Project STP-~>(5). Division 5.
Dear Sir:
The NCDOT proposes to assymetrically widen a 5.3 km (3.3 mi) length of NC 55
in Wake County. Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the
subject project. The proposed roadway is a five-lane facility with curb and gutter for the
southern section (from SR 1 108 to SR 11 13/1398). A four-lane facility divided with a
9m (30ft) raised median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1 113/1398 to SR
1 1 14). "I-he proposed right-of-way (ROW) width for the project is 31m (100ft) for the
five-lane cross-section, and 46m (150ft) for the four-lane median divided section.
Widening will occur on the east side transitioning to the west. No control of access is
proposed along the project.
SummarSummar o~pacts: Impacts on jurisdictional areas of the proposed project consists of
a total of 2.64 acres of permanent wetland impacts of which 1.38 acres are riverine and
1.26 acres are non-riverine. "There will also be 0.27 acres of permanent impact to ponds
(fill and/or draining) and approximately 291 linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts.
Summary of MitiSummary of Miti ate: The project has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to
jurisdictional areas throughout the NEPA and design processes. Detailed descriptions of
these actions are presented elsewhere in this application. We propose to use WRP to
mitigate for the 2.64 acres of wetlands and the 291 linear feet of jurisdictional stream
impacts. We will provide $48,240 for compensatory wetland mitigation impacts at a
ratio of 2:1 by using the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program (WRP). This fee
is the cost for 5.28 acres at the rate of $24,000 per acre for the riverine mitigation and
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
154BMAILSERVICECENTER WEBSITE: NNWY.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27899-1548

$12,000 per acres for non-riverine wetlands. We will provide $72,750 for compensatory
stream mitigation impacts at a ratio of 2:1 by using the WRP. This fee is the cost for 582
linear feet at the rate of $12~ per linear foot.
Purpose and Neecl: The proposed project will relieve con~.:estion h~ incr~asin~~ the sal~t~~
and traffic capacity uf~this section of N(' ~~. It will help acconunodatc traffic demand in
the NC » corridor from motorists traveling between Fuyuay-Vagina and Research
Triangle Park (R"fP). "this project is one o1• five projects upgrading the entire corridor to
multi-lanes. The existing NC » two-lane roadway is currently over its traffic handling
capacity. Increased h~aftic volumes arc cspected ~~ ithin the neat three years. ~I•he project
is scheduled to be Ict March 2002.
Alternatives: NCl)C)"I• investigated several alternatives for R-2907 which were discussed
in detail on pages i to 7 in the EA.
NI_;PA Uocumcnt Status
A l~indin~~ Uf No Significant Impact (I~ONSI) t~or IZ-2907 was approved by the
I'ro.ject Ucvclopn~ent and l~.nvironmental Analysis Branch (I'D[:Aj on C)ctohcr 21. 1999.
A State I~:nvironnnnt~-I Assessment (1:A) for IZ-2907 was approved by pUl?A on October
~. 1998. The IAA explains the purpose and need Ii~r the project, provides a description o1~
the project and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects of the
project. Copies of the I-;A have been provided to the regulatory review agencies involved
in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
Resource Status
Wetlands. The proposed project will impact three jurisdictional wetlands.
V~~etlands were delineated using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual. Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of the united States Army Corps of
I~ngineers (USAGE) Raleigh Regulatory Field Oftice was contacted about the wetland
and stream delineation for this project on May 15, 2000. Mr. Alsmeyer declined to visit
the project at that time. Drawings detailing and tables summarizing the wetland and
stream impacts are included with this application.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) rating system was applied to each wetland
site. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin, 1979) system and the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental
Management; Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands (Report No. 96-01, 1996). Table
1 shows the wetland communities, quality analysis, and acres of impact for each section
of the project.

Table 1. Wetlands
Site Cowardin NCUF,NR-DWQ
Classification ('lassitication DWQ Rating Acres
(mpactcd
I Pf~Oln Pond I~rin~~c ~~ 0.?2
__

I I -- _ _

Pl~'O1 /4~\ l3ottun~land I lard~~~ood -
--
6~ -

1.16
~ III I'l~:iVl1I3 I)isturbcd l~:mrr~~~nt ~~'ctl~in~1 ~ ~2 1 ~6~

f ~

_
___ _
-
1~U1~i\( --
_-
x.64

''~ 0.8
1 acl'CS VIII bC llllpacled Insldt lhC IimltS oI CUns
lrUCllon anCl 0.4~ a -- - - - -
CPCS R'lll bC
Impacted outSlCll'. the lmlits of CUnstfUCilon due lU dllCh (:I~1CCtS.
Pond fringe occurs alun~~ a sm~ill pond adjacent to the south end ofthc project.
Tic woody vegetation in these areas include swectgum (IJyurcfunrhur,ti~lJ~rurrflr~u), hlacl:
~~~illow (,5'u/ix ~~~r,~rrcr), titi ((av~rllu ruccnri~lc~ru), elderberry (,~'un7h~-~ctrs cujxrc/cit.cis), red
maple (:leer ruhrum). Vir~.!inia willo~~~ (llc~u r~n~~ri~tic~~r), and river birch (/3c~tr~lu ni,~rru).
Japanese honevsucl:le (Luitrcc~ru ju/~n~rrru) and yellow jessamine (Gelsemrtrnr
se»r/~crriren.~~) cover much of the ~~~oody ve~~clation in some areas. The dominant
hcrhaccous vcgetatio^ in this comnnrnity includes meadow-bcauly (Rhe.viu vrr,~~irtirc~) and
panic ~~rass (l'ur~ici~nl ,~~rc~/~ui~rtrntl.
liottomland hardwood forest incurs alone Basal Crock. 'l'hc dominant canopy
trees include s~-vicet~~um. s~~canture (/'/~l~~tti.ti~ ncciclc~2luli.~~), loblolly pine (Prr~t~s luc~clu),
and water oak (~uercz~s i~rgrcr). The undcrstory is comprised of ironwood (('urpiYnr.~~
rurnli~~iuncr) and holly (Ilex o/~uccr). Shrubs and vines include elderberry, privet
(Li~us•lrtam sinense), arrowwood (Viburnurrt nucltu~~), spice bush (Lirtdera benzoin), and
possutl~ haw (Ilex dec•iduu). In addition, sweet pepperbush (Clethru ulnifoliu) and storar
(Styrux ame~~•icanca) are also present with the latter being uncommon to rare in the project
area. "fhe dominant vines include cross vine (Anisosvichus ccrpreolata), Japanese
honeysuckle, and greenbrier (Sn~ilnx rn[trr~c/i~olia). The herb layer is comprised oC
southern lady fern (Alhy~r•iu~~7 us/~leniorclc~s~), meadow violet (Viola /~a/~ilionacecr). panic
grass, bedstraw (Guliau~~t sp.), bitter cress (Curclu~~7ine pen~~syh~uhicu), and woodrush
(l,uzulu echinala).
Disturbed emergent wetland occurs at the northern end of the project. This area is
comprised solely of herbaceous vegetation including fescue (Fesluca sp.), Junc•us sp., and
sedge (Carex sp.).
Acres impacted includes permanent fill, excavation, and mechanized clearing in
wetland areas and are itemized in the summary sheets. The total wetland impacts are
2.64 acres, divided into l .26 acres of non-riverine and 1.38 acres of riverine. Method III
mechanized clearing will be used throughout the project.
Surface Waters. Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters have been separated
from jurisdictional wetlands. Table 2 lists the acres of impact and the linear feet of
channel loss for each site. The station number for each site is listed on the summary
sheets in the permit drawings. Stream impacts for Sites I and III consist of small
intermittent streams (Site I scored a 22 on the DWQ stream sheet and Site III scored a
25). Stream impacts for Site II consist of a perennial stream and will require 2:1
mitigation.

Table 2. Surface Waters
Site No. Water Body Channel Impact Acres Impacted
(linear feet)
I Pond I NiA 0.27
1 ~ I I'I hnttu V' to 13~lsal ~)~) ~ I~,t~ 1
I l l' l~
l l Basal ~~l'eci< ~~) 1 - O.OJ
111 1 Ililutarl' to 13<lsal ~ i 7 ~).0>
CI~Cek
Total 774 0.38
I~ederally-Protected Species. Plants and animals with Icdcral classifications of
Endangered, ~fhreatcned, Proposed lndangcrcd, and Proposed 1-lu~calencd are protcctecl
under provisions of Section 7 and SeCtlOn 9 of the I:ndangcred Species Act. As ofMarch
22. 2001, a total of tutu- i-cderally-protected spr;cics arc listed for N'al:e County (fable 3).
"fable 3. Federally-protected species for Wake County
SCIEN'I'1FIC NA~~Ih; COMMON NAM1F', ~ S"1'ATUS
flkrsmi~Jo~r~c~ lrc~l~~rt~clni~ ~ dwai f wcd~~c mussel I:ndang~i ed
I-
lluliuecti~s Ictirurc~/~hcrlt~.c ~ hald ~a~~lc ~I•Itr~atcncd (p~oposecl for
delistin~~)
Picoidc~.ti h~~rc~uli.~~ red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered
Rhos mrchuuxii Michaux's sumac Indangered
Endangered: a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" for the above-mentioned were resolved in
several documents including the Environmental Assessment.
Cultural Resources. The State I-Iistoric Preservation Office (SHPO), NCDO"f,
and FHWA have reviewed the project and concur that there are three properties eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places located within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE). The Adams House, the Richard Adams Farm, and the Ashley "Jeff" Stephens
Farm were determined eligible for the National Register. Descriptions of the individual
properties are included in Secs ion VIII of the EA. Locations of the properties and
coordination regarding historic properties is also included in the EA.
The Adams House historic boundaries extend on both sides of NC 55
approximately 0.6 miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a
conditional no adverse effect on the property. By widening NC 55 to the east, the
proposed four-lane grassed median alignment avoids the cemetery associated with this
property.
The Richard Adams Farm is located on both sides of NC 55 approximately 0.3
miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a conditional no adverse
effect on the property. The proposed four-lane grassed median alignment avoids the
house.

The Ashley ".left' Stephens Farm is located on the west side of NC 55 at the
southwest corner ol~the SR 1 1 14 intersection. '1•he proposed roadway alignment will
extend through the house and tarn. ~I•hc farm will he advcrscly affected by the proposed
project.
In accordance ~~ith SeCll~111 It)6 ol~the National I list~~ric I'rescr~~ation ~1ct. ,-
~lenmrandum ul~;A~~rccnicnt (~lO~Aj is rcyuir~~l. ~l~hc ~IU~\ ~~~r tllc ad~~crsc cl•Cect t~~ the
Stephens farm discusses the miti~ati~~c measures to he t~-l:cn during pr~~ject construction.
The v1OA invol~~in~~ the pr-~pcrt~~ owner. NC'I)O~I~. I~I I~~';A. Sl ll'O. and other appropriate
,-ccncics Baas siLncd :Au~~ust 1999.
~I~hc State I listuric Nreser~~ation Office (SI II'O) has re~•iewcd the project and is not
~-ware of archacolo~~ical sites within the proposed project area. Nu archacolo~~ical survey
\Vati I'CCOlnmellded.
Nlitigati--n Options
~~~~oidancei\-(inimir.ation. The follo~~~in~~ is a list of the pru.jcct•s jin•isdictional
~~etland and stream a~~~,id~-ncc/minimisation acti~~ities proposed or completed h.'
NCDO~1~.
?:l slopes ~~~ere used in ~~°etland areas to minimize project impacts.
The existing alignment of NC 5~ was used with assymetrical widening.
John Lansford. Project Design Engineer with the Roadway Design (Jnit, provided
explanation ofwhy NCDO"T is using ditches within wetlands on this project. "fhe
I-lolly Springs bypass starts just a few meters north of this area, and NCDOT is tying
into the bypass by using the grade of the bypass. NCDOT is attempting to stay as
close to the existing road elevation as possible to make maintaining traffic during
construction as easy as possible. rcdttcc impacts to the subdivision east of NC S5, and
avoid impacting the historic property on the west side ol•NC 5~ (just south of Ralph
Stevens Road), less than 140 m south of the wetlands. In order to eliminate the
ditches. the construction limits for the project would need to be extended onto the
south end of the Holly Springs bypass, with additional impacts to the subdivision,
complicating the traffic control process in this area, and possibly impacting the
historic site to the south.
Compensation-wetlands and surface waters. Stream and wetland impacts will be
mitigated in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers dated November 4, 1998. A letter from WRP dated May 18, 2001 verifies that
they will provide wetland mitigation as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification
and/or Section 404 Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging
Unit 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin.
Summary
Application is hereby made for a Section 404 Individual Permit as required for the
above-described activities. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting a 401 General
Water Quality Certification. Seven copies of the application are being provided to the

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality.
~I~h~u~l: ~~,u ~~~r ~~~~ur assistance ~~~ith this pr~~jcct. I I-y~~u ha~~e any questions ~~r
need an~~ adclitiunal infurnuttion about this ~~r~~ject. please contact f~'(r. I~~lutt I lance at
(~)1 ~)) 7 ~3-7~-~~. e.~tension ~ ;;.
Sinccrcly.
L- - ~~Ul (~i~,
William D. Gilmore, Manager
Project Development and I:nvironmcntal Analysis
V~~DGinunh
h;nclosurc
cc: Mr. Uavid hcanklin• COI?• V~~ilmin;~tun
Mr. •lohn Uorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cos, NCWRC
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Ms. Kathy Matthews, Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. "1'im Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
)\~Ir. Calvin Leggett. P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour. P.I:., Highway llesign
Mr. Jolu~ Alford. I'.1~:., Roadway Design
Mr. David Efendcrson, I'.E., Hydraulics l)nit
Mr. Ray Arnold, P.F., Design Services
Mr. Jon G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Ray Lotfi, Project Development and Environmental Analysis

Meuse Buffer Addendum
Meuse RiRarian I3uffer Rules. 'I•his project is subject to the Meuse River Riparian 13ufter
Rubs. No cr~~ssin~~s will impact ~~reatrr than ~~nr-third o(~an acre oFriparian huff~~r. In
areas that are both wetlands and part ut'the riparian buffer cone. ~~ctland mitigation onl}~
will be provided. Riparian buffer miti~.;ation ~~~ill he pru~~ided in ions arias that are not
C1CS1~._'naled as wetland. 1mpaCts l(1 Loncs 1 and 2 al'C Shol1'n On the pel'llllt dl'a\-Vln~~ti anCl
are quantified in the 'Kahle 4.
Table =4. Summar~~ of Impacts to Ncusc Ri~~arian Buffer Tones
Site Lone 1 impacts
(ac) "Lone 2 impacts
(ac) 'total Impacts
(ac) Total Mitigation
Required (ac)
I 0.19 0.13 0.32 N/A
II 0.30 0.21 0.51 N/A
[I1 0.5 I 0.20 0.71 N/A
Total 1.00 (1.54 1.54 N/A
'fable ~. 1Zi~arian 13u['icr Loncs minus Wetlands Calculations
Sites I lI 1[(
Zone 1 I mpact 0.193 0.299 0.511
Wetlands in "bone 1 0.175
---- 0.096
- --- 0.457
-----
Zone 1-Wetlands 0.018 0.203 0.054

Zone 2 Impact 0.126 0.210 0.198
Wetlands in Zone 2 0.072 0.106 0.193
Zone 2-Wetlands 0.054 _ 0.104 0.005
Total Buffer Impact 0.072 0.307 0.059
*All areas are in acres.
No riparian buffer mitigation will he required since there are no crossings impacting
greater than one-third of an acre of riparian buffer.

WAKE
COUNTY

VICINITY MAP

r-J ~~-, y
~ ,
.
~, ~ _ ~ ~ , 301
~E C ~'
,~
,
z
..
~
~,

-
,,
`~ -~

~ .1--
~ -T~,
\
\
~,
'
~`~ ~ 1 1 14 ~ ~
v
~~ ~
\
~~
, I
-~ \
~ ~ ~
~ \\

~ 1 101 o~,~,_ ''
1 1 13 ~
~
1 \-
~
_i f ~,
~_ ` 1399~~
- ---
~~
,~ f
~-- - ~ ~ y ~ ~
.~~o° '~ 1 1 1 O ~ 1~- __ !
~ '~ ~ ~ r ~ 401 ~
ti , '
I
~

\~ ~
\ ~ a ,-rte
~ B ~• ~ vy ~ _ ~~ ~
4,,
~ ~~
~ PRO ECT~
' j
\ ~ _
~-. ~
__
~.
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
500m 0 IOOOm PROJECT R-2907

1:50000 NC 55 FROM SOUTHEAST OF SR 1108
TO NORTHWEST OF SR 1114 SOUTH
OF HOLLY SPRINGS
07-16-01 H I 14
a~crowiosu,a, v,oz~oo~oo..rnna,

v
o= ~
-
- z
o = H-
~~

W
cn Q
~i ~~
o~-~
C~
Z O a
N= H a
N c~
~

~
Z~ Z
=
~ N
~
4 N~
~
(n 0
Q
HLiU
O ~
~ WWIn
F=..0~
W
0 0 U ~ ~ J
N

00*09 J
J ;
a N O
°~~' H S
~ = o
~ Q° ~o

O ~
z ,~ z
'~' o
F- v ~"" ~
Z 1
ti
~lJ'~./5
w
~
/
V
Y
00~
J
I
0~~ ~
~--

5
~O'~Z

a
z

Q

~ - >-
oaoi ~
a

0

m
o=
-
z
0 ~

bl ~0
b °1HS ~~S
-~NI~ H~1dW F-
~Q N O
oP
~ ;
~_~ ~~~
~ ~ J' J a=~ ~ wNC4i~
1 I I ~ ~
~OU ~ =o
~ J

m
WO m l I
U I
8~ E w
°oa o
NW=
~N3 ~
w~ ~ ~_
~~w
0
a
T ~
~ ~ J
Y J 0 O ~+- O

-~ I
I J D
U d V
Z to Z
V O
~
~~,~ ~ ~ I ~ Z Z 1
~----
^~ \ ~ I
E
os~zz ~ $ $ ~ ,~ I I °° a
_ __ ~~N~ I I ,I I 4 ~
~ .~ ~, _ E I I ~' o N
~~- (~ -ti ~ I ~ ~ I ~ N ~ ~4'~
~
~
~ ' ~ ' Q '~~~
v N
'-- J L I
N
~ ~Q~~
p
C~ w
~
~
o
w

~ ~ ~~
~
~_
~=
~
,. ~
~
~ ~ E
6
~
Ll
i,~~ . \ `
W
`t~
~
v
~ cr ~
~~wo I
N
~

~ ~ m

`
°
\~
~'`~t ~
~
~~ tea.
I
~jCJ~. T t~
"~ ~ I
t
~
to ~

~2 / /'~
V/ N
_
z z
O
'~
Z
,
_ o r, o N N

~
~ w ~ ~ W w w
O O E
~
~~
N ~ ` ~~3 ~~
Z
v
~ ~
~ Ir I ~. I Z ~

~
I I
I Q
woZ
~
I Z
~`~ ~ ~ I
_
~
I~
`~u , b
~ w I
~j ~ ~ ~~
~
,
~
J df ~
w
I
~
~ I ~ I I r
~
I ~ ~ w 3
+`- ~ ~
•
3
I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~y a rOV 0
1 "-~
oo.zz~ob

O
~~ ~
~ _Z
~{
I I
I

I I u
I
I
4 7'~,. ` ~
~ o
E
E ~~
~
'
w V W
o~

N m Q Q
~~

3 v=i
~ ~
cow `. ~
c
~. Iw ~ I ~
- --
I___ ~.' ~~-~iN ~
~ ~ =o Z Z

1
o ~i

N

I { '

m `~ ~~:
" ~

I

. ` °~ ~ rn

~

Z
J J
~i .
N ~ i
II
~I ~.i
I ;---
Q o w
z3 o 0
zz
w w
~ l
I
~ p I ~
~
I w
:iNU~ u;w 019_ __
-- -- _' ~ ~
~ I
I ~ LL
~
.~. ~ n
_,C}3 Z J W I I m, ~ l , I Q.
.~, ~ I V~ ~ ~ I _ ~ A~ I , ~

~' \
o
°
~ ~~ ~, I 1
~ ~
~
~
p
w ? l(1 ~ ~ ~
~ `-' 0
p z
~ I z
o ~
~ ~
Q
a vi ~ ._ '`, ~ ~ I ~j
, ~- v~ o v
~~ ~,m ~ .1-~". mil-J 1.`l-' ~' V~ i) t il,~ ~Q 1` O~~
a~ t I r

~-I ~ !

I Q ILL' ^
0 0p a=~ ~, ~~z
~, ~
J I lu
I 'I i
I ~

_--
I o~
In
c~z
N
~
~
I
~ a
~ I ~o ~
r'te',
+ ~ Q 2 0
~ ~ U ~ _ ,~ (~
O
I ~
] r
~ ~ H
>- _
J

`
~ ~ ~~ ~
h"
5L~ 1 t _ ~~
~ ~ ~
o li ~
°oa W
o O ~
~
~'w=
=
u,
~ w ~ ~
f\
b--
W~ e
' ~ ~
~
~ ~ ob
~ ~ -~
J ~ j
°° O F- O
~
b
~ oo N o ,'
,,.-' ~ I
>
I
I I
~
~ ~ b~
ti -.
~ °
~, z
+`n«~,~
. ~._.
-
- -` ~
W ~,
~ , ~ ~ I ~ Iz ~ o o~
~ z ~o
~ o
.
,
,~, .-, ~ ~
~
I" ~ ~, ~ o o ~ z
~ ~
~
~
o
I I ~
~ ~w

! + ti~E
~- d.

=
,~ ~ ~ ~' I ,
I ~ ~' ~o
~ ', I ~ j ^`5 of
~-
~ ~ ~
~

.. ~~ I ~ ~ ~
,. ~ ~ I

g
.J
~~,~ ~
•
oN
. ~

~ I'>

~
~ ~

I I ~

~: 2

ZpNE N
~
° •
.
N~~.: ~
I ~ I ~ ~

-x ., ~ I ,,
~, ~
~ ~ 'E O
~ _
~ ~ o ~ ZEN ~~~
o I ~ I ~'

+ ~ I l i
o
O ~
~ .
~
~ r=~~_
I ~"
f-
I ~ It1'
~l
I
-. o

~-- ~
W w
~
E
°
N ~ I I I I II m m
~ I f 'i . I ~ I~ o ~ o z
L I ~
~~ Z O. N V1 ~

L
N ~ ~
~ . _
I~ - I
~
~-~'
I ~
a ~' _ W
o W
0
.
:~
•
~
~ ''~'1'O
~ !,
I ~
~ m ~
~ a
W
o
o
~N~
:
• .. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ f--

~ I I~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
--_;
~~ '
~
I
., I
-
~,, ~ o
~
0~ 6 N
~ I a
3
,y
oc, ~. • • I , 0
~ ~ ~

m I f i ~,
~
a
W
a
1' 3 I ~
3 N C ~

O Y W •
~ - w
C> ~ Vl Vl Z V1
0 oa o
z zw z
bl ~0 ~ °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~l'dW Q ° °~ °

~~h~~~
~~~Qg~:
~+a '^ 6
~~~~~~~"
0
~ ' J
Q ~a.~
~a~>~>~~~~~
~-

b\~\ ^.
~ ~~
~~ ~~~~
~~~~~~~~
0000 ~ ~
M 44tl~~~
Ca.
(V p. , 3~3~yQyq~~y~l
~OO~C~g~j ~i v~j~
_ N
0
~~~~~~~~
~o~~~
;~ J
~ ~a.~
~ W~~
~o`~~$~~~~~~
~I .~0 L '1HS 33S - 3NIl H~1dW

~' I
I
I
m
N
h
~I
N
a
x ~
~/ ~ ti: /
tio~~
;i , I
/// I
` ~^ •f;
,~n _ ~ ;~
~ ~~` ~ I
I
~`~ n ~ I y:. ~ _I
U
m
V
Q'
E~
~~
M~
u
x1
E,
O
n'i u
~ ~
N i

y a y
h ~y~~
p~~~1`rlMo`w 4
0
~°oooo~~~o
a2 0
Q ~~,~
JOO~O~G~~jyJ~

°~~~
-r=°-
G
I
~~
I ~ I
bl ~0 5 '1HS ~3S - ~NI~ H~1dW
J ~ ~ w r:
~oA~~~^~
~~~~~~~'
I~ooooo~~$
S
~ as q
h~' ~3. W
~l<NNOg 3~33~~~iW
OO~a].~v~vfj~
y n h
\ ~.
J ~ w , k
o r~
Q
~ooooo~~$ i
0
~ ~ a w°
v ~3,W
~o~~a~~n4~iv~ii~
ayy
~~~~~~ ,
$~~~~~~
~ ~$9~4~~
~q~~'C`V~ ~,
!~0 000~V~o i
~' ' J
~ ~~,~
Q W~
~~..~~~~y4 ~t1
C~~$~G~i~i~njZ
~~
1 f , v0~
~O~
°`~/ /
o`~/ ~
~;,
~g
. ~: -.
. r,,.r
~~
_~
i ~
N
•~
.:. op
h b~
~ y 1 ~ ~
J ~ 'F3 ., ~
~~~~~~~"
Q
° ~~~~
~ooooo~ $ i
~ °a W
~~.~
Q w5~
~00~8~~~~n`~~~
o=
z ~..,

N N
F-
~Q
~3>- ti
o li
OV'!n
-~
N~Z N Nye
~ ~~ ~ S ~ N
F- ~ U F- F- ~)-
2Y ~ NN
J
0
~ 3 O O
3 =
w9 ~ ~~O
p° ~o
~ ~z
z ~' o
U ~
Z
r

~~
O
V~
N
d

/'~
V / O
~

o
E

W

n
~/ / N
p N
~
Z
a
-~ W
~
a

I

p ~
W
3 ~

w
a
J ? a
W N
~ O ~ W Q
N

W
Z F-
' J

W
Za~
Q
W =
3
~
li li
Z
J In
W In
W N N U
W W?
0
Z 0
Z 0 oa
Z ZW
z W
p W
p W WJ
p OU

Q _

i

-~ ao
,~ h y y y .i -. -. y~ h ~_
J Ov ~~O J ~~O''- ,'~ ~ ~O
V ^OOOOON- 2 ~VJ ~OOOOO~NO 2 ~ O ~ ~~~
N ' J Q~ " J LLOW W O~J
W~ 0 3 ~ U+ d a ° oZ~ -~ who
~~d .~ W~ W~ W o o x
~e.~ 3
W ~
W a~ a o~
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 j ~ ~ ~ b ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ V IA
Z ~ O
Z ~ ~
~~y\"\ hyhh ~
$ -
~~~~~~o~ ~ No~~~~~N
°~~~E ~~~ o~~ ~~E~~ ~
o Q ~ ~ Q
U E-ooooo~i~v- z U ~ooooo~~r~ z
~ .
co
+
W
~ W
oo~a~~i~i9~~ ~o`~~o~~i~i9j~ N
a
-.
O M~~~ ~ ~' ~ + off- ~~ (~
a' co~~ E~~ o ~~ ~ E~ ~`~~
V V ooooo-~v z
~tl- ~Q.~ ~~ ~Q,W ~
~n ~ ~ w tc Q ~- -
~o~~a~~n~n9~~ ~o~~o~t3n~i9~~
U y y\ _ y h y~ I
o ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~oA~~~h~
~ ~~"E~ ~a~~ ~ o ~~~ ~~ ~~~ W
~ ~Roo~o~~go "-~ U ~ooooo-~ga- z
N p
.
~~ W;W ~° W,W z
~~ ~3~3~~ ~~ ~Q~~ Q
JOd~d~inC~~j~ "OO~d~~~1~j~ n
L__L

I I I I 1W ~ ~_
I I I f ~ ~~ ~ No
oe'~ „ ~ I I I I ~~ ~
~ a
°
i I I 1~ ~~
~ oa
N=F}- '`
N ~~
NfY~

I
I I I I /'~ ~ w~.e ~o° =o
I I I~ 1.
~ oZY
oa ~ ~No
W
I I I '~
~~
~~~
W>
~
°
~
~_
~
~~o
o I I I °° ~o

w
I
.I
Z
~o
Z

>-
J I I "I
~ ~
Z
"~ I
~~

I I .: ~ ~:
~ -
:

I
I
I ~ : ~
Z
°

I ~ N
aN
~
~~
o a
~
I I ~ __
I I ~ ~--
/ ~
I 0 ~ ~
/ I I I ' I N ,~`~

i I I I a~ O~ ~
ti
I I I
3
I ~ •
~~ ~ o
m
~ I I ~
I ~.
Z ~ ~ /
a z
I~ ~
p'
p E
g
/ (~ o0

I ~
~ 'L
o I I I / E

I I -
rn
I I
~' ~ i
~ E
~
~ 1 3 I I
I I I
f~' o
~* ~ W
I /
D w
Z U
~I ~ i I I
"
F- ~
o
~I M I I I /

~ I.~ ' "w ~.

`~ / ~

W ~ ~

Z Z p
Na
J
z w
. XI a l I f ~--
"" ~

W I
I I I
~/ /
~~"
(~
/ -

~
J J
la
l.~ 3
w Z
~ -
_
n
I
"I
'~ v
~
F _ U

J
J N

~ ,
~
"
O

Z ~~
O O
W ~~
OQ
J
3 " Q ~
,
V ~ W
0 0 W
o U
N
bl ~0 9 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW -~
••

~
o= ~
LL
z - F-
o
~ ~~
~o
aN
~a
~
o~~
~
bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW °3~-
~Z ~ ~~Z =
a=~ ~ w~N
=

~ - ~ o

,'
~
~ ~, .
'-ow
v
~~-J o

U ~
_

~ ~~ ~``~
~~ • ~
/ .I / ,

~ ~
~ ~ ~
• : ~
w a~r
~,
~ ~ ~. ~
2 ,
,,,
~ ~
~
o~ ~
~
;
~ ~~~
~~ ~ ~ o ~, ~
;
,
~' - o
~ , ~~~
~ ~~~.~~ ~ o
~-- w
° v
o ~ ~~~• ~ ~~ ~ = a ~

/
~~
~
~ ~

~~~
6
9 ~
~d
- ~
Jo
0
°
d ///
~
~
~
~ :
~~ I
~ ~ ~ -
} ~
y
~ ~
~ o. ~ w
Z ,
~ ~~/~
~ ~.'-f-'~. ~ ~ N_ 3 O
2
~ ~ Q ~
, V , //
~ ~
~~,

W wa
~~ ~
~

~ ~~ ~~ ~ ova-
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ f~5 / !~~
~ ~
~.~" ~I o

~ .
~ ~
~
~~ do
~y! ,~- ~,
'
~

~i

i ~,

~ z
c

J
~ w

Z Z
, ~
,
~
~ Q o
,
~
(~,~~
~ ~
i~~
~ ~~
~ i
~ ~ w

/ ~
~~
~' t ~
~~
~ ~
w ~ ~
I
~
w J ~
~
w " w
~~V~ '
~~~
`. ~
. ~ ~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ [O m w m
N
~
~. V
~~
w
~ U ~
J ~ ~
~ Q W
c~ z
w o W 2
z w~
o ~Z

`~
~
~ w w
0 0 w w~
0
~ ~ 03
~ ~ w w w wZ
o 0 0 0_
/ I ~ I

I
W ,
~_
1~~_ ,~
' ~.
i
q~
b

~
o=
- Q.
~
z
o i-
~~
~-
Q N ~,~, o
~Q ti ~~~ F-
0..=~
Z OOi
N ~~~
N _

bl ~0 ZI °1HS ~~S
- ~NI~ H~1
dW = =
~
°
~ Q
~
~~} o
o
W ~

.mow ~
~
1
I
u~
~
u. ~
zY
OOQ w
~
O -~ m
O
~~'O N
3= I
t/i
Z ~ f~
O I I I ~
U r-
r~ F- N 3
W~ ~
d ~ _ -
0~~
o I
~ ,
~ ~O ~
~ L1J
~ f
i
~ ~Z ~
`~
a 'h (
_ z o 0
T

2 ~~~ ~ Z
06+09 0 I
Q
~
w ~J
z
I ~ <_~
~;
U ~ IQ

~Q
~~~
~ I~ ~ ~
~~I
o
~ ~- o o ~ I~ ~ I L_1_
~ W ~ ~~
~ I I I O '!/
~ ~
m J ~
I
II V
~ ~
LL
~ N
•
°p I ~
I
~~,
oo I- "- p-
~< ~
+- N ~ ~ ~ ~ I o
~~ °° + N oo I I I ~-- o
m ~ ~ I II

O 3 c/~

I

I =

I I
I ~ o
/
I II
~' I I I
a -
O
I I ~>I~I
00+09
I I w
~~III -
°
II W
~
~ I I
,~Ijq ~
~~I
2 i~ ~'
~ ~ I
I IIII ~ o
Z ~ o
~
~~~ ~
~ I
I ~I III
~
l a
w ~ w
a
3 ~~
~
/ ~ jj
EII I 3
? w Q
a Z~
,
/ wEI I z ~ ao
~ % ~OI ~ ~ ~ `
~ ~
i
~
~ Q
I
~I I~
I ~
a _
J
Z w w
~ ~

~ ~ , I III I_ U
x
w J N3

IL aw
III ~ ~--
wa
bl ~0 8 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1d W 0 0 ~~

z z
o z o
o ~~
a

a_

M N N
z
0
aN
F- ~.
03~
N~z
4 = 00
~ O U
W
OOQ
H N ~
oa
z
W
_W
W
I '~
L1
O
n~
L__L.~_
ti
0
m
N
i
F-
U
W
7
O
O =
vii o
og~
F..~z
~~n.
~~
~ O ~
O ~ J
N W Z
ago
~o
~z
'r' O
~ --
z
E
O
N
O
O
O
O
E
0
J
Z
Q
J
F-
W
3
N
W
F-
O
Z
W
D
N O ~b lp
M ~ N N

~I ~
M I
I
1
I
I
SONb71~M IO X903
M
O
SOM~713M 0 3903
iii M
~ ~ O
~ N
/ I
~,! i
ft ~
1 /
I ~`
I
YJ
M
o=
-
z
_o ~
~_
~
Q N N O
N
~Q
O;r ti
O Ovv1
=C~
N~Z N Ny[r
Q==
O ~ W N
LL.
~
H- 0 U ~--- =
F-- O }
W
Z
"W
U ~~ J
N
Op
Q
3 7
O WO
~_
W~ ~ Of'O
~
0O ~
~+- O
U N Z
z ~' o
U ~'
z

W o
'- ~ E
~
N
W

/ /~
V / J
Q
N
J
U

O
Q O N
J
I
Q

l!'! o
N E
O N ~
~
>

z

- 0
z
a

J J
H

3
w
'I
_.L
.J Z
n
/ J
~

I ~ i I '`I

I I I
I I ~ I
I I `~•~
~~
Z

-
I I

I ~ Z

I
~~
I I `~ o

a ~
~~
""
I I I b I
I
I ~\ ~ I
\••
cr I ~
~
a
r- ogcn
I
I I ~ I I
I
I
\\
J~
Z
z
~
750 \~ I . ~ cv a
a
; CONC ~ _ ` ~oU ~ ~°~
I
I I I ~ II ? II ~
_ I
~ ,~W W O--J

I I I
I I ;
~
~ oN~
w> ~
~- ~3
~~o
I ~ ~
I ~
I U I ~~ ~o
I
I I
I
, I I I
m a a ~I U
z I.n
`r'o
I I I ; Q~ ~I ~~
Z
I
I (
I
I
I
~I
I

I
J N
m
~ xl
i 1
/ - ~ I 1
~ ~~ol
I / J I I~ ~ ~ °: ~ I v~ `
"
I / I
1 ~, ;
t
~
I

-- ____
-
~

J I
1 °°3N1 I'
L_l
~

~- ~
- I ~

'~~~ .
~
~~, ~~ 3Z5m "
/
I M
I n, l
.I; I ~ ~_
~

I

y
~I ~

I
I I
I I

I ~ o
I---
E

o
I
I
~ zl,
~I I I
; I m I~~~
~ I
$ _
cn
J w
l .I ~
~
I
~ -
I l
r
:~ ~
I I o
I ~
i ~ N~ a o
I ~ I
l ~
I I I``
~ I
Q
II I
I E

Q,I

~
I
~
-I I
'
W ~
o I
z
I
I I ~, I I , ~-
I ~ a
I III ~
I I I r-n
/ o .
( ~ 4 ~/ a

I ~ I I
I I I I '~ I
i
Z w
3
d ~
I
`? I Y III Z
I I
/
~ w o
bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb'W
W
~
a
U
J
lL W
W
O W

Z
W O
Z
w
z 0 0
a

N
W
0
Q
W
z
3
O
>-
H
W
W
Q
Z
W
Z
O
>--
F-
W
d.
Q
Z
J
W
V
Q
d
Z
_O
F-
~ a ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~
_~
~N mlj y~~ ~M1 ~N ~r +~ HN -,~ 1~/1N YN ~N ~-~3+ ZC7Z
ti ~ x X ~ ~~ ~~ ~"~ NN V)~ ~ ~ ~ X~ ~~ yN ~ _ ~
CO ~
n~ ~ ~R>~~~aa'~a>~ Mo. ~ ~~ oZY
t~ 4 ~ = s ~ x N QQ
lV
U
Z
H
U Z Q
Z ~ Q
~ U 3 = ~ Z
atf
~ a o ~ ~ a
U Lr ~ ~ Q p fr
00 N ~ Z ~ Q Q U
W D., W O _! Q ~- D
W ~ Z W Z
Q 3 p Q p ~ W
m Q ~ _ ~ ~
~ J
Z J ~
Q W
J ~ _
V
J
Q
F-
z
w
Z Z D
y N ~
N
z V1

~ ~
3 J O
O Z U
a 3 S U ~ _

°
w
~
,Q ~ ~
z
Z V a
_ ~
-
- o a
~
Y ~'
Q m
~
Z
Z Q
y = Z
W J ~
U F- Li. ~
W
2

N

ti
0
Ql
N
1
H
U
w
O
a.
W
O =
~~
N ~
os~
Q N a
=WIn
0
N
°~o
W =
3
~ ~ O
~ Q
~Z
~ O
U F-
Z

0
~

F- m
p N t
O
~
O
O
~
N
~
U
Q N ~- o 0 0 0
a
~ o
W
LL
~
r
n LL
O
N
7 C A N
O t p ~ ry ~ O
m N 0 0 0 0 ~ ~
N ~
Z =
C7
~ ~ Z

v

o ~

N

N
~ _
N
Q Y O~
_
E o m o ~--¢ za

U
w L ~ ~ a= o O J
rn }
O ~ N F
= Z ~ o O
Z
~ O ~ ~
~
-
v
N
c O
LL
~' Z U W H O
~ E
Lv o 0 0 o LLO y -'LL=
F-
¢
O
w
~ ~O
va
~ a j ~ a F ~
'°
cn
w o
Q
v
rn w y

n

rn
m ~
a

U
c ~~ o o r
fn
v N N n E
u'~ i E N ~p
00 N ~"~
N Z ~ a.
O N
a ~
~ LL ~
3 LL
~ L o 0 0 0 ~
E c
Q
3 H - U LL
Z o
w ~
LL C O r ~ O o ~ W
~ -a-- o o w
y LL v ~

N
~
C A L
~ u7
O N
O O
O
O

Z
lL ~-' O O O O
~ C
~y
{y
Q
C 'C ~~
N ~
OD
O N
O
IC 10 L t
~ ~ .... O
O O
O
O
U ~
Q1
y ~
~ H
Q O ~
a ~
m
L ~ ~

N

C
U - ~
...
`~ O O 0 f
7
o 0
~
w 2
a ~ c
~

-

'
N
LL ~ N
c0
a
v
o
0
0
0 0
~
E
w ~'

F- c
- E

~
N
O1
c C OD O ~ ~ ~
- ~ L O t•1 O ? N `p
LL j
> O O O O U
y~

N
E
~
.; a~i f0
3 ~
'°
~ , o
N
j
~ x
E
~ p
2 o m ~
N "'
U E ;
o0
m m
L L
~ N
W ~
~~yJ J J p O
~
J O
m O
n ~ O
N
C O + t ~ _
~ X
~ Nv ~ ~ o E
U O
~
N ~
N
~ ~
O
O ~ N
Q N
O
N + + _
4
ry O
~ ~
~ _
~ w
N (~ Z
J
u~ Z O

J
Q
~ ti
N
O 00
N
O O7
N
O V'
DO
O
~
I- O O O O

~N
ZW .-.
~
L

o

N

-

~
Z
N
O
O
~
O
QN
W W o o ° o

-~~ Z
O
UW N
~
~
W V- .-.
N~ 0
Z
QZ L ti
0 co
0 ao
o ~
O
=
U
~
W o o O O
W Z
~3 O
N

J
Q
~ M
O V'
O C'
N ~
M
O
~-
o
0
0
0
v
pW
Z N ~ rn

O ~ ~
JN Z 0 ~ o O
N
3w
li.
LL.
~~
~
V
Z _
- ~
O N
O ~ ~
N
~~ Z O 0 ~
0 O
~3 O
N
W a
~ - N M O
N ~

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT
OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires October 1986
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, Including the time for
reviewing Inatructlons, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of Information, Including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquartere Service
Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202.t302; and
to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Protect (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities In, or
affecting, navigable waters of the Unftad States, the discharge or fill material Into waters of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping It Into ocean water. Routine Uses: Information provided on
this form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information Is
voluntary. If information Is not provided, however, the permit applkatlon cannot be processed nor can a permit tw Issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the locator and character of the proposed activity
must be attached to this application (sae sample drawings and Instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that Is not completed In full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
~ ~
7. APPLICANTS PHONE Nos. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business [phone]
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND
TITLE tin agent Is not required)
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
10. AGENTS PHONE Nos. W/ AREA
CODE
a. Residence
b. Business
I hereby authorize, to ad in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE
DATE

NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE Isee mstructwnsl
NC 55 widening from Wake Chapel
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (.r appiicabie) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS
(if applicable)
Basal Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Wake Coun
COUNTY
North Carolina
STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see inswdions)
See cover letter
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See vicinity map associated with permit drawings
18. Nature of Activity (Des«iption or project, include au reattxesl
Widening of NC 55, an existing two-lane facility, to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114
(Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County. The project is 5.3 km (3.3 mi.) in length. A five-lane facility with curb and gutter is
proposed for the southern section (from SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398). A four-lane fadlity divided with a 9 m (30 foot) raised
median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114). The proposed right of way (ROW) width
for the project is 31 m (100 feet) for the five-lane cross-section, and 46 m (150 feet) for the four-lane median divided
section.
19. Project Purpose loos«ibe the reason «purposs or Uie Prq~. see inatrudrons)
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and traffic capacity of this section of NC 55.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED ANDIOR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Roadway fill, pipe/ culvert construction
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Roadway Fill
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (sae inswa~ons)
Wetland Impact: 2.76 acres
Surface Water Impact: 0.32 acres perennial
0.04 acres intermittent
Surface Water Impact needing mitigation: 291 linear feet
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED
WORK

24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (H more Ivan ~n De
entered here, please attach a supplemental I~st)
See listing of property owners associated with permit drawings
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED/ DENIED
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I
certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
• ~_ ~ T,N, „~, y
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT D E SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or
it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsfies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a
material tact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or ropresentations or makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
310,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

~~e:~- I~--r/ ~

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: - ~ S o 7 Date: to `~
Applicant/Owner: C 4 7 County: L,J ~/ G
Investigator. C o o._., W'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, -r~ c, 6 ac State•
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sitel a No Community ID:,Qo ~~~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? es [~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Yes vi~o- Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.) ~/
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum In ~ for ~!
. til w•• d ''r -.f'~ ~. T~ ~ G I l i . II
a. ~ G u. s~n...,., .S ~ N S ~ nl SG S S ~ t ~ ( I
-~
/ ~
5. /Qrs., ('t~ 6 nn.,.... __~ 13.
15.
II 8' 1
?ercent of Dominant Species that ere OBL, FACW or FAC
I (excluding FAC-).
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_ Stream, lake, or rde Gauge
_ Aerid Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Dste Avsilebls ~ Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
~Seturated in Upper 12 Inchon
_ Water Merka
_ Drih Linea
_ Sediment Oepooita
Field Observations: _ Dreinape Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfecs Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Chennela in Upper,) 2 Inches
_ Water-Stained Lesvee
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~_(in.1 _ Local Soil Survey Oata

I _ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: r /" (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

~~
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Name
(Series end Phessl: Drainage Class:
Feld Observstlona
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes o
Profile Oescriotion:
Oepth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon tin ell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance Contrast Structure, etc.
.~e~.~ j R -sl. ~ 0 y ~

j ~ ~3, ~ n~ c ~ Sa--~.,, C Ca.,~ i/ov-...,.
I!
Hydric Soil Indicators: I
I _ Hiatosai _ Concretion: (
Histic Epipedon _ Hiph Organio Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ SulHdic Otlor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soila List

Reducing Conditions
~Gle
ed
Ch
L
l
C I
_ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
O
I
i
i
h
E
R
k
y
or
ow-
rome
o
ors _
er (
t
Y;.
s
n
n
emar
si
I~
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prsaent7 No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology PreasntT a No
Hydric Soils Present? es No la this Sampling Point Within a WetlandT Ces No
Remarks:
Approved by H r
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manuall
Project/Site: I~ - a 9 ~ 7
Applicant/Owner: ,(lCL~07-
Investigator: LpAa.., W~/l:u--.~sy~
I
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
i
Date: ~{~io~
County ~~~
~ ~ k State: N C a.
9
(~e No Community ID: ~'Y ar. an ~ , j~ ~~ „
Yes o Transact ID: ~ ~ ~ ~~_
Yes Plot ID: ~- ~/q 9 S'
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.L~c_,~te-~,6u ~ __~ 9.

3. ~~./~c¢...^n .Ion^n,Co, y 11.
~UbH1 ar`.~~s
4 -
S'~S
.
5.,fr-,~~ttijo fa~el~ o~.v
- Vim' 12.
13.
s. t~yUs~'..~„-. S~tive.vse ~ la.
7. 15.
8• 16
percent of Dominant Speciss that a re 08L, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
1
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Deta (Describe in Remarksl:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
~No Recorded Oate Available ~ Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
Inundated
~Seturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
~Dflh lJnes
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfacs Water: lin.) Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 1 Z Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _~(in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data

~ _ FAC-Neutral Teat
Depth to Saturated Soit: SU~
(in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Neme
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
field Observations
Taxonomy lSubgroup-: Confirm Mapped Type? Yes
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munaell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
o-~ ~ o Y vi 3~ s ,~% ~~~.

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hiatoaol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ Hiph Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on local Hydric Soils Liat
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other {Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prsssntl Yes No (Circle) I (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Prsssntl Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? Yas No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
ro
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ~ -~'`~ - o~ ~l O 7 Date: G
ApplicanVOwner: County:
Investigator: . `..~. ->' ~ «~-~- t ~- ~ ~~ ~ c a~.~ State: il/G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site( ~ No Community ID: I~mu~1 F,~~~g c
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? `Yes
~ Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Domin nt Plant Species Stratum Indicator
~~ . T ~. a j/' ~ 'nJ ~ L q _ S
a. ~ ~. .err v U
s.
7.
8.
Dominant Plant Soecie~ Stratum
9.
to.
11.
12.
1'.
14.
1 5.
Percent of Dominant Species that ere OBL, FACW or FAC II
~ (excluding FAC•).
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Rsmarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Leke, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerid Photographs inundated
/ _ Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
V No Recorded Oata Available r ~/`Vater Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Obssrvarions: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Lesves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: ~(in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Seturetad Soil: 'U/' ``~'`(in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks(
Remarks:
PSI -P2
~-~" G/1
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Neme
(Series and Phesel: Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile DescrioNon:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Hori2on (Mun
se
ll
Moistl (Munsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
~
~
~
~O /0 ~Z,
I
Hydric Soil Indicators: I
Histosol I
_ Concretions
_ Histio Epipsdon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Stresking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Liatsd on National Hydric Soils List
_ Glsysd or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other (Ex;.lain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetsvon Presentl es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Presentl No
Hydric Soils Presentl es No la this Sampling Point Within a Wetlandl Yes No
Remarks:
Approved by H t
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: -2.90 Date: ~ (7 ~9
Applicant/Owner; C /J T
~ County: ~-_
Investigator. n~ ~a-,,..~ -~, ~ ~~~ UG ~<~~. •~ . t:'s State• /V ~-
~
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No 1 /-
Community ID: ~07~,„~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Yes No Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
6.
7.
8.
Percent of Dominant Species that ere DBL. FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10. I
11.
13. ~ II
14.
15.
16.
_ Recorded Date IDeacribe in Remerksl:
_ Stresm, Lake, or Tide Gsuge
_ Aerid Photographs
_ Other
~No Recorded Dste Available ~ Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_/Seturated in Upper 12 Inchaa
_vWeter Marks
(/Drip Linea

Field Observstions: Sediment Deposits
c-Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

- Seconderylndicetora (2 or more required):
Depth of Surfecs Water: ~"
(in.) ~xidized Root Channels in Upper 1 2 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leevea
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N9.-.~ (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Deta
_ FAC-Neutral Teat
Depth to Setursted Soil: ~`r~'``'` lin.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

3-3

SOILS
Msp Unit Name
(Series end Phasel: Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: Confirm Me
pped Type? Yea No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mattle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munssll Moist) LMunsell Moistl Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc,

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Sulfidic Odor
Aquio Moisture Regime
_ Reducing Conditions
_ Gleysd o- low-Chrome Colors
Remarks:
l
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_ Concretions
_ Hiph Orgernc Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ O-garuc Streaking in Sandy Sou:.
_ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Listed on Nstional Hydric Soils List
_ Other {Ex;.lain in Remarks)
Hydrophytic Vegetstion Preasntl No (Circlel
Wetlsnd Hydrology Prsssntl No
Hydric Soils Present? a No
I Remerka:
(Circlel
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlandl ~ No
pproved by H
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

Project/Site: _r - a~ ~ ~ Date: ~ ~

Applicant/Owner: J G G D~ _
County: W ~~
Investigator: L~ ~.~.. W ~ ~ i '~ L,~d l r : ~,~ .~, c ~ c. State: ~ C
~
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? a Na ~e1-"
Community ID: Bo>Y~` ~~
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situationl? Yes Transact ID:
~
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
gominsnt Plant Species Stratum Indicator
n T
2. ~TLQ~ f i.~ ~ r ~ - -rte
L~,~, «..t a, j., ~o.-,, <-
... _ i
s.
~.
a.
?ercent of Dominsnt Spsciea that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarke
HYDROLOGY
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator II
9.
10. I
11.
1"
I.
13.
1 4.
1E.
1 s.
_ Recorded Deta (Deacribs in Remarksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerid Photog-ephs ~,Ffiundeted
/ _ Other l/Seturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available r oi(Aleter Merles
~brift Linea
l.$edimsnt Deposits
Field Observstlona: ~-~Dreinege Patterns in Wetlands
~ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: SU r~.a (in.) !.Oxidized Root Channels in Upper,l2 Inches
_Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Wster in Pit: (in.) _ Local Sail Survey Date

? FAC•Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: Sup ~(
°~`~`(in.) _
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
i~~~~
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class•
Feld Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottfe Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon Mun
sell
Moist M
ns
e
u
ll Moist Abundance/Co
ntrast Structure. etc.
jf
v
~'- ~ ~- ~~ l lCC l ~ •-
~
L
/
-
l 1 J ~ G~ ~ f~f/,!r c ~I c~Fri,t., ~f) c,~~_..
I~
Hydric Soil Indicators: I
_ Hiatosol _ Concretions '
_ Histic Epipedon _ Hiph Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soii:.
_ Aquio Moisture Regime Ustsd on Local Hydric Soils List
~
educing Conditions
~ _
Listed on Netionsl Hydric Soils List
leyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other {Ex;.iain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Prssentl ~p No (Circle) I (Circle)
Wetand Hydrology Present) s No
Hydric Soils PresentT ~A3) No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks;
ppro
3-4

DATA FARM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ~ ~- a ~ ~ ~ Oate: tl (o ~1
Applicant/Owner: aV~ 1)~ >' County: /J~
Investigator: L-°~-~,. !~ ~ ~~-'~~ --~r G c ~ ,- „ •~ .. , ~~° z DT~~ State C~
~ Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ No Community ID: C~.~ oy-e-r
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transact tD:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ~
Yes Plot ID:
(lf needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plan-t S ecie~ Strat/urm Indicator
. tin- c U S P f M- .t L.~ T~
2. ~' ~~ uS d •_gO.Sc.•S ~
~.
6.
7.
8.
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
,,.
1~'
~~
13.
14.
15.
1 B. j
?ercent of Dominant Species that ere OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remerkal: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photogrepha _/Inundated
_ Other ~Setureted in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Date Available ~ ~, Water Marka
Drift Linea
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ~ Drainage Petterna in Wetlands

~ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. S"' '
`~"~in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
//'' _ FAC•Neutrel Teat
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~~ ~J~O`1in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~~57~,.
T
3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Name
(Series end Phaael:

Taxonomy (Subg-oup1:
Drainage Class:
Feld Observations
Confirm Mapped Typal Yee No
Profile Description;
Depth Mstrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Hanzon Muna II Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
i~
r.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histoaol
_ Histic Epipedon
_ Suifidic Odor
_ Aquic Moisture Rsgime
_ ucinq Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chrome Colors
_ Concretwn~
_ Hiph Orgenio Content in Surface gayer in Sandy Soils
_ Orgenio Streaking in Sandy Soi~c
_ Usted on local Hydric Soils List
_ Liatsd on National Hydric Sods Llst
Other {Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Pressntl No (Circle)
Wedand Hydrology Pressntl a No
Hydric Soils Present? e~ No
I Remerka
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland) ~ No
3-4

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
41987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: {~- a g o? Date: ~o Q 9
Applicant/Owner: Nc po T County: Wa
Investigator. co ,,.._ w,u, .....,,5 1.>,~l k Er,`~ State: Ll/G
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~ N Community ID: ~tPLa-~ -
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes to Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Areal Yes ~ Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Pten S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soeciee Stratum In for
1.1°%G~t ~~ ~~` T 9.
2. T ~Jv u.G a ~ lo. ~
r
~~ ~,
,:
I) 5. 13.
6. 14.
II 7. 15.
I~ 8
Percent of Dominant Species that ere OBL, FACW or FAC II
(excluding FAC-1.
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Dats (Describe in Remerksl: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
~
_ Stresm, Lake, or rde Gsuge Primary Indicators: /~
_ Aerid Photographs
_ Other
~No Recorded Dats Available ~ _ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inchon
_ Water Marks
_ Drih Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Feld Observations: _ Drainage Patter in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidiz~ot Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ W r-Stained Lesves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: r_ (in.) cal Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~ (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
~. r r~~~~

3-3

SOILS
Mep Unit Neme
(Series and Phasel: Drainage Claas:
Feld Observetiona
Taxonomy (Subgroupl: Confirm Me
pped Typal Yea No
Profile Oescriotion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concjetions,
inches Horizon (Mansell Moistl (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
I'
i
i

I
I Hydric Soil Indicators:
1 ~--""~~~
1
_ Histosol _ Concretions j
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic M e Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
C~ng Conditions _ Liatsd on Nstional Hydric Soils Ust
` Glsyed or Low-Chrome Colors _ Other {Ex;.lain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Pressntl Yes ~ (Circle) (Circle)
Wedand Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Pressntl Yes ~ Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetlandl Yes
Remarks:
3-4

S ~ ~'~ 3
~_
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ~ ~- -~'
EVALUATION FORM
:1CTION ID 6Z',>240~ APPLICANT NAME _~~ ~nGy DATE ,~_O
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORKfi.e., cul~ert~Trelocation, etc.) ,,-- tt
~1'A"I'F.RBODY/RIVERBASIN /V~e 1`~Vtr ~S~/1 COUNTY/CITY WakL /nL~ Fw1wA~-Unr~nC~
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS C
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
FishiShellfisFvCrustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. ravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand) ~j.~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Z ~ 5
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) /yA~L~ lV~ Nfr,ZtG.q
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure 1N,E~ly
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To'Contig. With Channel
Discontinue
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June throw h Se t.
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present VYFrLe{N~
Wrack Material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel i~/~G/ S~ ~.Q/Z~~
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /®
Dces Cha~nel~ppear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / N Approx. Drainage Area:
Perennial Channel (stop), Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) 8 Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (nojd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nojd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present I l/4/98

S~'~ I
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL ~ ~~-
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID ~~~907 APPLICANT NAME ~ ' Y:l'il NAllt--t DATE
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., cuh•ert, relocation, etc.) /
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN /~CuSG hZNCr" ~AS~/~ COUNTY/CITY Wq~/ nr ~r ~~wt.~{ '~Qn~
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS /iIC~-r
P SP NP Observdtion ~mmentt or I_~escrjotion
Fish/Shellfishr'Crustaceans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians PresendBreeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
Riffle/Pool Structure WYfhiC
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. ravel, cobble, rack, coarse sand) rjA~e./~/ f2)t7 Z~/~
Riparian Canopy Present ISP =/> 50% closure) ~L~ v/~
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel wATt:2 ~ 1j~T NO vl4W
Wetlands Adjacent ToJContig. With Channel
Discontinue
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June throw h Se t.
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June through Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
Wrack Material or Drill Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel ~dNlivS' /r41GJ20.
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y ,~1
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / N Approx. Drainage Area:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location ofimportant/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (nojd)
Evaluator's Signature:
(if other than C.O.E. project manager)
P=Present SP=Stongly Present NP=Not Present l 1/4/98

S;+e 3
roject Name: ~ X907 River Basin: NU,~S¢. County: Vlfgka, Evaluator: ~/~}} ~n~ ~ I~Q,~(
6R~7
WQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: ~,~ CteGk Latitude: Signature:
ate: ~-~(-o ~ USGS QUAD: ~u9ua., Longitude: Location/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: tjeva/uafor and landowner agree Thar fhe jeafure is a man-made dlfch, then use ojlh/s form is not necessary.
Iso, ljln fhe best professional Judgement ojfhe evaluator, the jeafure is a man-made ditch and no! a nrodlJled natural stream---lhfs
ling system should not br used*
rimary Field Indieators_ (Circle One Number /'er Line)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate StronE
Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 ~ 2 3
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 2 3
)Are Natural Levees Present? 0 2 3
Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 2 3
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 1 2 3
Is The Channel Braided? 1 2 3
)Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 1 2 3
Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 2 3
Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0 2 3
NOTE: ljBed cPr Bank Caused By Ditching And W/THOUT Sinuosity Then Score=f!•)
0) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map AntUOr In Field) Present? es=3 No=O
RIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR`POlNTS:
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Groundwater
low/Discharge Present? 0 2 3
RIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Abs t Weak Moderate Strong,
Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 2 1 0
)Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 I 0
Is Periphyton Present? I 2 3
)Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
RIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
econdary Field Indicators:_(circle One Number!'cr Line)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ~ .5 1 I.5
Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 I.5
)Does Topography Indicate A ~
atural Drainage Way? 0 /.5J 1 I.5
ECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: /, S
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? I.5 I .5
is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 1 1.5
)Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 L•`~ l 1.5
[s Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 ~ 1.5
ast Known Rain? (•(VOTE. ljDitch indicated In N9 Above Skip 7lrir Step And a5 !felo~v)
Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 1.5
onditions Or In Growing Season)?
Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or [n Fleadcut)? es=l. No=O
ECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Ab~nt Weak Moderate Strong
Are Fish Present? ' ~ .5 I 1.5 _
)Are Amphibians Present? .S I.5
)Are AquaticTurtles Present? I I.5
)Are Crayfish Present? 0 .5 I 1.5
)Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 I I.5
)Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? ~ .S 1 I.S
Is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 1 l.5
)Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
• NOTE: IjTotal Absence OJ A!! Plants /n Streambed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
s Nofed Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Preaenr').
ECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:_~
OTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary ~(IjGreater T/ran Or Equa/ To /9 Points The Stream /.s AI Least Intermittent)

fife
roject Name: QC-~~-] River Basin: /J~~ County: ~~~(,e, Evaluator: /Vlrr~' I~,rx,, ~{ Hari b(
a tad?
WQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Basal Cae,~ Latitude: Signature:
ate: 12-)-1-o I USGS QUAD: f"Hyug7 Longitude: Location/Directions:
PLEASE NOTE: Pjevaluator and landowner agree Ihat the jeature is a man-nwdr ditch, then usr ojthls form is not nrcessnry.
Iso, ljln the best projesslonal Judgement ojthr evaluator, the jraturt is a man-made ditch and not a mndlJled natural slrrnm-This
ring system should not br used
rimary Field Indieators_ (Circre One Number /'er /.ine)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
Is There ARiffle-Pool Sequence? 0 I 2 3
Is The USDA Texture In Streambed _
Different From Surrounding Terrain? 0 I C
)Are Natural Levees Present? 0
Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 I f
Is There An Active (Or Relic)
loodplain Present? 0 1
Is The Channel Braided? 1
Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 I
Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0
Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
NOTE'• lJBed ~ Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Thrn Score=D•J
0) Is A 2"d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3
RIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:~~
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Groundwater
low/Discharge Present? 0 ~ 2 3
RIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: - ~
II. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Stron
Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
)Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 I 0
Is Periphyton Present? I 2 3
)Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
RIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:_L~
eeondary Field Indieators:_(Circfe One Number I'er Line)
. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? ~ .5 l I.5
!s There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 /r"1 I.5
)Does Topography Indicate A
atural Drainage Way? 0 .5 1 1.5
ECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ~, s
I. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? I.5 1 .5 0
Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 1 1.5
)Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 1 1.5
Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5 '~ I.5
ast Knuwn Rain? /•NoTE: /JDitch Indicated In tl9 Above Skip This Srep And MS Belnw•)
!s 't'here Water In Channel During Dry 0 .5 ~ I.5
onditions Or In Growing Season)?
Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Ur In }leadcut)? Yes=1.5 0=0
ECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
II. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
Are Fish Present? .S 1 I.5 _
)Are Amphibians Present? .5 1 I.5
)Are AquaticTurtles Present? .5 I I.5
)Are Crayfish Present? I I.5
)Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 .5 I I.5
)Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? _ .5 I l.5
Is Filamentous Algae Present? .5 1 l.5
)Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW
• NOTE: IJTota! Absence OJ A!! Plants !n Streambed 1 I .75
.+ Noted Above Skip Tliis'Step UNLESS SAV Present').
ECONDARYBIDLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: /. ~
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
m 0 0
~TAL p~IN7'.S (Primary + Secondary=ZL (1jCrealer Tlran Or Equa/ Tu !9 Points The Slreanr !.s At Least lnlermltlent)

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources ~ •
Division of Water Quality
-+~-r~~
Michael F. Easley, Governor ~~~
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 18,2001
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Re: Permit Application for proposed NC 98 Bypass of Wake Forest from west of SR 1923 (Thompson
Mill Road) to east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road) in Wake County
DWQ No. 010550, TIP No. R-2809
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal fora 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
• The project proposes the use of the NC Wetlands Restoration Program for wetland and stream
mitigation. However, at this time, no documentation has been received indicating if NCWRP is willing
to accept the mitigation for the proposed project. Until-the NCWRP indicates their acceptance of the
proposed mitigation, the mitigation plan for the proposed project is considered incomplete.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
~~~/ v "
.. Dorney
Quality Ce ificat' n Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
C:\ncdot\TIP R-2907\correspondence\010681h1d.doc
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO%n recycled/10%n post consumer paper

~y p ~ l
P „`
.~~~.
STATF, OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICIIAI;L. F. EASLGY
GOVERNOR
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
April 6, 2001
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
LYNUC) TIPPGT7'
SLCR[l'ARl'
r-~
I
- , -'~
.,
c:-.~ -- t
SUBJECT: Individual Permit Application for NC 55 widening to a multi-lane facility
from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114 (Ralph Stevens Road),
Wake County, Tip No. R-2907; State Project No. 8.1403501; Federal Aid
Project STP-55(5).
Dear Sir:
Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the subject project.
The proposed roadway is a five-lane facility with curb and gutter for the southern section
(from SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398). A four-lane facility divided with a 9 m (30 foot) raised
median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114). The
proposed right of way (ROW) width for the project is 31 m (100 feet) for the five-lane
cross-section, and 46 m (150 feet) for the four-lane median divided section. The project
involves assymetrical widening. Widening will occur on the east side transitioning to the
west. The total project length is 5.3 km (3.3 mi.). No control of access is proposed along
the project.
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and traffic
capacity of this section of NC 55. It will help accommodate traffic demand in the NC 55
corridor from motorists traveling between Fuquay-Varina and Research Triangle Park
(RTP). This project is one of five projects upgrading the entire corridor to multi-lanes.
The existing NC 55 two-lane roadway is currently over its traffic handling capacity.
Increased traffic volumes are expected within the next three years. The project is
scheduled to be let July 2001.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1546 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSI TE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

ALTERNATIVES EVALUA"TION
NCDOT investigated several alternatives for R-2907 which are discussed below.
Typical Section
Southern Half of the Project
From SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398, afve-lane curb and gutter cross-section was the
only alternative considered due to the intensity of development in this section.
Northern Half of the Project
From SR 1113/1398 to SR ] 114, several cross-sections were considered.
Descriptions of the alternatives are as follows:
Five-Lane Curb and Gutter
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a five-lane facility.
This would provide two 3.6 m (12 ft) travel lanes in each direction and one 3.6 m (12 ft)
center turn lane. Right of way impacts would be minimized under this alternative.
Following coordination with FHWA, SHPO, and NCDOT, it was decided that this cross-
section was not consistent with the rural setting in the project corridor. In addition,
outside curbs would require the current 55 mph speed limit to be reduced to 45 mph if
this alternative was selected. This may lead to safety concerns because motorists may
tend to drive in excess of 45 mph given the rural nature of this section.
Four-Lane with a 14 m (46 ft) Grassed Median
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 14 m (46 ft) grassed median. This alternative was considered due to the rural
setting of the area and the consistency with the Holly Springs Bypass cross-section.
Four-Lane with a 9 m (30 ft) Grassed Median (Recommended)
This alternative would widen NC 55 north of SR 1113/1398 to a four-lane facility
with a 9 m (30 ft) raised grassed median. This alternative is recommended because the
cross-section maintained the rural setting of the area and had less right of way impacts
than the four-lane 14 m (46 ft) median facility. This cross section is also preferred by the
State Historic Preservation Office.

1. Ali ng ment
Southern Half of the Project
From SR 1 108 to SR 1113/1398, symmetrical widening was the only alternative
considered. Right of way impacts will be minimized in this area by symmetrical
widening.
Northern Half of the Project
From SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398, two alignments were considered. Descriptions
of the alternatives are as follows:
East Side Widening
From SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114, widening NC 55 on the east side was
considered. Right-of--Way impacts to the Jeff Stephens Farm would be avoided under
this alternative. This alternative will require acquisition of property on the east side of
NC 55 from the historic Adams House and the Richard Adams Farm. The Somerset
Farms subdivision would also be impacted by this alternative.
East Side Transitioning to the West Side (Recommended)
This alternative will widen NC 55 on the east side from north of SR 1113/1398 to
the Richard Adams Farm. The widening will transition to the west side north of the
Richard Adams Farm to the Holly Springs Bypass. This alternative will require the
acquisition of property on the east side from the Adams House. Property will be required
mainly from the east side of the Richard Adams Farm, but some property will be required
from the west side near the northern property boundary. The Jeff Stephens Farm would
be impacted by the alignment. Impacts to the Somerset Farms subdivision would be
avoided. This alternative was recommended following coordination with the property
owners of the Stephens Farm, NCDOT, FHWA, and SHPO.
"No-Build" Alternative
If the "no-build" alternative were chosen, it would have a considerable negative
impact on traffic operations in the area. NC 55 is a highly congested facility at the
present, especially during peak periods. Projected increases in traffic would deteriorate
the level of service to an undesirable level. Increased congestion would lead to higher
operating costs, increased travel times and higher accident potential. Therefore, the "no-
build" alternative has been rejected.
Alternatives were analyzed and compared based on social, environmental, and
historical impacts as well as cost. More information on each alternative can be obtained
from the EA.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A State Environmental Assessment (EA) for R-2907 was approved by the Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch on October 5, 1998. The EA explains
the purpose and need for the project, provides a description of the project and
characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects of the project. Copies of
the EA have been provided to the regulatory review agencies involved in the approval
process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
Wetlands. The proposed project will impact three jurisdictional wetlands.
Wetlands were delineated using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of En Jim
Wetland Delineation Manual. Mr. Eric Alsmeyer of the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) Raleigh Regulatory Field Office was contacted about the wetland
and stream delineation for this project on May 15, 2000. Mr. Alsmeyer declined to visit
the project at that time. Drawings detailing and tables summarizing the wetland and
stream impacts are included with this application.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) rating system was applied to each wetland
site. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin, 1979) system and the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental
Management; Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands (Report No. 96-01, 1996). Table
1 shows the wetland communities, quality analysis, and acres of impact for each section
of the project.
Table 1. Wetlands
Site Cowardin NCDENR-DWQ DWQ Acres
Classification Classification Rating Impacted
I PFOIA Pond Fringe 35 0.24
II PFO1 /4A Bottomland Hardwood 65 1.19
III PEM1B Disturbed Emergent Wetland 52 1.32
TOTAL 2.76

Pond fringe occurs along a small pond adjacent to the south end of the project.
The woody vegetation in these areas include sweetgum (Liquidambar styracijlua), black
willow (Salix nigra), titi (Cyrilla racemijllora), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis),
redmaple (Ater rubrum), Virginia willow (Itea virginica) and river birch (Betula nigra).
Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and yellow jessamine (Gelsimium sempervirens) cover
much of the woody vegetation in some areas. The dominant herbaceous vegetation in
this community includes meadow beauty (Rhexia virginica) and panic grass (Panicum
scoparium).
Bottomland hardwood forest occurs along Basal Creek. The dominant canopy
trees include sweet gum, sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda),
and river oak (Q. nigra). The understory is comprised of ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana) and American holly (Ilex opaca). Shrubs and vines include common
elderberry, privet (Ligustrum sinense), arrowwood (Viburnum nudum), spicebush

(Linderu benzoin) and possumhaw (1. decidua). In addtition, sweet pepper bush (Clethrn
alni~oliu) and storax (Styrax umericana) are also present with the latter being uncommon
to rare in the project area. The dominant vines include crossvine (Anisostichus
capreolata), honeysuckle, and greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia). The herb layer is
comprised of southern lady fern (Athyrium usplenioides), meadow violet (viola
papilionacea), panic grass, bed straw (Galium sp.), bittercress (Cardamine
pennsylvanica), and woodrush (Luzula echinata).
Disturbed emergent wetland occurs at the northern end of the project. This area is
comprised solely of herbaceous vegetation including fescue (festuca sp.), Juncus sp., and
(.'arex sp.
Acres impacted includes permanent and temporary fill, excavation, and
mechanized clearing in wetland areas and are itemized in the summary sheets. The total
wetland impacts are 2.76 acres, divided into 1.3 acres of non-riverine and 1.4 acres of
riverine. Method III mechanized clearing will be used throughout the project.
Surface Waters. Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters have been separated
from jurisdictional wetlands. Table 2 lists the acres of impact and the linear feet of
channel loss for each site. The "Acres Impacted "column includes permanent fill in
streams and ponds by the subject project. The station number for each site is listed on the
summary sheets in the permit drawings. Stream impacts for site III consist of two small
intermittent streams and should not require mitigation.
Table 2. Surface Waters
Site Water Body Channel Impact Acres Impacted
(linear feet)
I Pond
II Basal Creek
III Tributary to Basal Creek
N/A 0.27
291.0 0.05
N/A 0.04
Total 291.0
0.36
Federally-Protected Species. Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected
under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of June
16, 2000, a total of twelve federally-protected species are listed for Wake County (Table
3).
Table 3. Federally-protected species for Wake County.
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATU
__
Alasmidonta heterodon dwarf wedge mussel Endangere
Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle Threatened
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker Endangered
Rhus michauxii Michaux's sumac Endangered
(a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion
of its range).
Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the forseeable
future throughout all or a significant portion of its range).

Biological Conclusions of No Effect for the above-mentioned were resolved in
several documents including the Environmental Assessment. The bald eagle has been
proposed for delisting.
Cultural Resources. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), NCDOT,
and FHWA have reviewed the project and concur that there are three properties eligible
for the National Register of Historic Places located within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE). The Adams House, the Richard Adams Farm, and the Ashley "Jeff' Stephens
Farm were determined eligible for the National Register. Descriptions of the individual
properties are included in section VIII of the EA. Locations of the properties and
coordination regarding historic properties is also included in the EA.
The Adams house historic boundaries extend on both sides of NC 55
approximately 0.6 miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a
conditional no adverse effect on the property. By widening NC 55 to the east, the
proposed four-lane grassed median alignment avoids the cemetery associated with this
property. New right of way will be required from this property on the east side.
The Richard Adams Farm is located on both sides of NC 55 approximately 0.3
miles south of SR 1114. This project was determined to have a conditional no adverse
effect on the property. The proposed four-lane grassed median alignment avoids the
house. New right of way will be required from this property mainly on the east side, but
transitioning to the west side at the northern section of the property.
The Ashley "Jeff' Stephens Farm is located on the west side of NC 55 at the
southwest corner of the SR 1114 intersection. The proposed roadway alignment will
extend through the house and farm. The farm will be adversely affected by the proposed
project. By widening NC 55 to the west, impacts to the Somerset Farms subdivision
would be avoided. This alternative was recommended following coordination with the
property owners of the Stephens Farm, NCDOT, FHWA, and SHPO.
In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is required. The MOA for the adverse effect to the
Stephens Farm discusses the mitigative measures to be taken during project construction.
The MOA involving the property owner, NCDOT, FHWA, SHPO, and other appropriate
agencies was signed August 1999.
The following commitments were made by NCDOT to mitigate the impacts to
historic resources:
Adams House and Richard Adams Farm
• The State Historic Preservation office will be given the opportunity to
review and comment on landscaping, median cuts, and median tapers
in the vicinity of these sites.

2. Jeff Stephens Farm
• NCDOT will move the historic house to another location within the
historic property suitable to the property owner.
• NCDOT will provide landscaping (off NCDOT R/W) around the new
house location to try to add to the historic setting.
• NCDOT will place the moved house on a suitable foundation.
• NCDOT will connect utilities to the relocated house.
• If the utilities in the house do not meet current code standards NCDOT
will fund the upgrading of these utilities.
• NCDOT will construct (or fund) an access driveway to the new house
location.
• NCDOT will fund suitable sanitary connections (well/septic or
water/sewer connections, as appropriate).
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has reviewed the project and is not
aware of archaeological sites within the proposed project area. No archaeological survey
was recommended.
Mitigation Options
Avoidance/Minimization. The following is a list of the project's jurisdictional
wetland and stream avoidance/minimization activities proposed or completed by
NCDOT.
• 2:1 slopes were used in wetland areas to minimize project impacts.
• The existing alignment of NC 55 was used with assymetrical widening.
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules. This project is subject to the Neuse River Riparian
Buffer Rules. One crossing will impact greater than one third of an acre of riparian buffer
(Site II). In areas that are both wetlands and part of the riparian buffer zone, wetland
mitigation only will be provided. Riparian buffer mitigation will be provided in zone
areas that are not designated as wetland. Using the multiplier for mitigation impacts to
Zone 1 (impacts x 3) and Zone 2 (impacts x 1.5) yields 0.294 ac and 0.153 ac
respectively. NCDOT proposes to offer buffer mitigation using the NC Wetland
Restoration Program (WRP). Impacts to Zones 1 and 2 are shown on the permit
drawings and are quantified in the Table 4.
Table 4. Summary of Impacts to Neuse Riparian Buffer Zones
Site Zone 1 impacts
(ac) Zone 2 impacts
(ac) Total Impacts
(ac) Total Mitigation
Required (ac)
I 0.34 0.17 0.51 N/A
II 0.35 0.23 0.58 1.11
III 0.17 0.13 0.30 N/A
Total 0.86 0.53 1.39 1.11

Table 5. Riparian Buffer Zones minus Wetlands Calculations
Sites I II III
Zone 1 Impact 0.336 0.348 0.173
Wetlands in Zone 1 0.138 0.054 0.086
Zone 1 -Wetlands 0.198 0.294 0.087

Zone 2 Impact 0.166 0.227 0.126
Wetlands in Zone 2 0.052 0.074 0.067
Zone 2 -Wetlands 0.114 0.153 0.059
Total Buffer Impact 0.312 0.447 0.146
*All areas are in acres.
Table 6. Neuse River Buffer Impact Mitigation Calculation
Sites I II III
Zone 1 Impact 0.336 0.348 0.173
Wetlands in Zone 1 0.138 0.054 0.086
Zone 1 -Wetlands 0.198 0.294 0.087
Mitigable Impacts
(using 3:1 ratio) N/A 0.882 N/A
On-site Mitigation N/A 0.0 N/A
Remaining acres N/A 0.882 N/A

Zone 2 Impact 0.166 0.227 0.126
Wetlands in Zone 2 0.052 0.074 0.067
Zone 2 -Wetlands 0.1 l4 0.153 0.059
Mitigable Impacts
(using 1.5:1 ratio) N/A 0.229 N/A
On-site Mitigation N/A 0.0 N/A
Remaining acres N/A 0.229 N/A
Total Mitigation N/A 1.11 N/A
*All areas are in acres.
Compensation -wetlands buffers and surface waters. NCDOT proposes to use
WRP for all wetland, surface water and riparian buffer impacts associated with the
project. A verbal agreement has been made at this time for WRP to provide stream and
buffer mitigation for the subject project. A letter verifying this should be received
shortly. A response from WRP concerning wetland mitigation should be received a
month from now.
Summary
Application is hereby made for a Section 404 Individual Permit as required for the
above-described activities. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting a 401 General
Water Quality Certification as well as an Authorization Certificate for Neuse Riparian
Buffer impacts from the NC Division of Water Quality. Seven copies of the application

are being provided to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality. In addition, in compliance with Section 143-
215.3D(e) of the NCAC we have enclosed a check for $475.00 to act as payment for
processing the Section 401 permit application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need
any additional information about this project, please contact Ms. Shannon Simpson at
[phone], extension 332.
Sincerely,
y~ c
ITV William D. Gilmore, Manager
b Project Development and Environmental Analysis
WDG/sls
Enclosure
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Ms. Kathy Matthews, Environmental Protection Agency
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. David Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Ray Arnold, P.E., Design Services
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Jon G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Ray Lotfi, Project Development and Environmental Analysis

r

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT
OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing Instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection
of Information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service
Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and
to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710.0003), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities in, or
affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material Into waters of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on
this form will be used In evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested Information is
voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity
must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having
Jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed In full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANTS NAME
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
7. APPLICANTS PHONE Nos. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business [phone]
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND
TITLE (an agent is not required)
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
10. AGENTS PHONE Nos. W/ AREA
CODE
a. Residence
b. Business
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE
DATE

NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructlons>
NC 55 widening from Wake Chapel
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS
(d applicable)
Basal Creek
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Wake County
COUNTY
North Carolina
STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
See cover letter
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See vicinity map associated with permit drawings
18. Nature Of ACtlVlty (Description of project, include all features)
Widening of NC 55, an existing two-lane facility, to a multi-lane facility from SR 1108 (Wake Chapel Road) to SR 1114
(Ralph Stevens Road) in Wake County. The project is 5.3 km (3.3 mi.) in length. A five-lane facility with curb and gutter is
proposed for the southern section (from SR 1108 to SR 1113/1398). A four-lane facility divided with a 9 m (30 foot) raised
median is proposed for the northern section (from SR 1113/1398 to SR 1114). The proposed right of way (ROW) width
for the project is 31 m (100 feet) for the five-lane cross-section, and 46 m (150 feet) for the four-lane median divided
section.
19. Pfoject PUrpOSe (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The proposed project will relieve congestion by increasing the safety and traffic capacity of this section of NC 55.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 iF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Roadway fill, pipe/ culvert construction
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Roadway Fill
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see msaucuons)
Wetland Impact: 2.76 acres
Surtace Water Impact: 0.32 acres perennial
0.04 acres intermittent
Surface Water Impact needing mitigation: 291 linear feet
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes _ No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED
WORK

24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (tr mcra than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
See listing of property owners associated with permit drawings
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED/ DENIED
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I
certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
•~.. ~ y
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT D E
DATE
SIGNATURE OF AGENT
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or
it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a
material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing
or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

r
r~l- -
~,
'\
a~
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE COUNTY
5OOm 0 IOOOm PROJECT R-2907
NC 55 FROM SOUTHEAST OF SR 1108
1.500~~ TO NORTHWEST OF SR 1114 SOUTH
' OF HOLLY SPRINGS
02-10-01 H 10 I
J\Cd110SV911~•~'-_-_ _ -fM11CY
l ~, ,
l; ~~
~~ ,
~_ -
MAP
~, - J J
~~\~ 1301
~~ ~
~ / ~~
< <~P~F,~'`~ ~
~ \
1114 ~ L~
~ `' ~~ I
~` . ~ ~ \
~ C' _
~ 1 101 6°5p . _ _ ~ ` `~ .~
1 1 13 1 ~-- _ ~
+ ~ ' ~ ~ 1399
` _ ~' „ ~ ~
` ~`J
- :~
~~ ~~ ~ ~1~-- 1
~ ~, l , :~
~ r- r 401 ~ ~
c B ~ _.__.~ ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~~

Q
o=
-
-
- z
o ~-
~~
_ ~
Q N N
~
~ C.7 °_~ ° ~~z
~ Q2~
U ~ =°N
N ~O ~
U ~ J
?- °pQ p NW2
J F- t/~ ; ~
a ~ 2 ~
00.09 o W'-
o° ~ ~ °
~
= -o
~ Z
~ U
Z ~ O i
~ 2 ~ ~
00.05
W
I
"
_
,
^
V I

QO.Of~
J

00'0 ~
_
+QZ
Q
_Z

Q

>--

00.0~ o

L~.
O

• Z °_~
o ~~ ~
~I ~0 ~ °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~1dW aN ~°
~a ~ o~.~ F
o ~' °- ~ z ~? z cu a N a~
W ? Np ~ ~=o ~ _~~
I ~ U O
[O ~ ` O ~ZY W ~NO
a ~` ~ N ~ ~ _ ~--
_~ 1 r ~ I e'a~~ ~p ~~O
3t ~\ JI U l1'1Z
\ \ I J Q Z ~O C
\ ~ I EI ~o Z
\ \ • • \~b.i1 ' ~ Z V C
U d n
O9~ZZ \\ ~\ rt O I ~ I ~ ~ Z C
I ~I I m
____ i I ,I
'----
_ - , I ZQ
_ = o ~ ~~~
oZ
~a
N d I I \N3 ~ ~
a ~ o ~ ~I ~'~ as '~~
~ vJi I ' • I I
\\ ~ I I ;.
\ I I I- E
~ ~ 51.E ~
\ • • \ \ may'.
\\\ \\\I ~f] ~ ` p~ ~ o°
Y ~
3 J N \~\ ~ I I I ` °' o_
Jew ~ : ~ I. i I I
ZOO _ , I I, ~ w E
~ ~ ~ ~ I \ ~
L7 I I I
0
a I E ~ I I ~ ~' I ~ °.
I .. a
I~I I I I I w
~ a
I
-,- w ~ I: I I I, ~ I ~ 3
(. ~ I I I N z
~ a a
J W
oozt . N I I ~_ E W es"
Iw I ~ ~ X _ Z
I II ~~ I- \\ JJ
U., lL
W W
~ I~ mSL~ I`-' ~~ z z z
-- ~ I ~I I ( Q o0
~NO~ ww 10 9 ~" ~ I ~ I I ~ ._J •
______= I m I I ~ ~
1S8 zs I I ~ I ~ J o ~
J
______- ~ L ~~
i

w I f
I I

'
'
I o
I
I _O
Z -
-
° I C

ZI
I I I ~ ~O
3
~Z
~ ~
~
~
m ~-
I I E I I I a ~~Z N ~~,~
I ~E ~ I `` a=o ~ =~cn
O Q ~~ I -~ I I O LLOW W OoJ
m ~ m I I W O O Q O N N=
W
~ I m I ~, w Q aN~ a o=~
rI'r > f-o
71LL U I ~ J J m p0 WZ
Z O 1
~ I ~~ 9 I I I, WN =~ U ~
z ~ i e .g I I I Z
~ I I I .10~.
~a ~ I~~
I. I
a
`` ~ I ' I I EI
. Z N
o ~ I I I of ZONE
W I~ I I ~
a I I I ~~~
m -_- I NE 0
I J I Y
~ I I o
I I- °-
E I ~ w ~£ ~ _
x i o
M ~
° ~ °
I °-° X I' I i I c ~
~,~ ~ O - I I ~ ~ °•
~ I I ~
a
_-~ I' I I -~ o - o _
U ~' ~
O a
• _ Z
~ ~ ~`~ ~, I I o ~ ~ 0 3
d I ~ Z U
• lil
`` • \\ I ~ H- ~ p O
(~ \•\ ~ I ~ I 3 N N J
Z Z Q~
~• I I I ~-1--~ Z
J J U3
~ J J W Z
li Li.. ~ -
5L N N N~
I` W W W?
F- F- I- ~
O O OQ
Z Z Z W
W W W J
~I ~0 ~ °1HS ~~S-~NI~ H~lb'W Q ° ° °"

~i~~~ i

O LL
Z - 1=- C
bl ~0 9 °1HS ~~S - ~Ni~ H~1dW ~ ~o
a~ ~
~ z ~a r~ oven ~
_ ~ ~.
I ~ O ~OZ ~ NNE U
. I ~ F- L~ U F- F-- >-
~~ ' Z OZY ~ tn~0
~ Oa O w=
• ~ / I m ~j3 ~ p=lL
w ~ ~ a o ~~o
J ~ O
Z
li N / Z ~ O O
~ i~~, ~~
f
~ I ~ N Z o
~ I w
J ~
J O
J
I ~ N
C
~ ~ ~~~
i ~ ~~~
~ ~ -
~ ~~ o
J I
w I ~
N I
Q
I _.L
~ I I ~ O
• J I I a O to
~~
~ I ~ (
2 I N ~
I
I F- O

N
I ~ J
I U ~

V )
I
~ ~
~ (.09) I
~ ~ 88Z'81 ~
I ~ ~
~
rr, I ~ z
J
V1
W Z
I
J W ~ W
N
I `''
3
z J
z~
O
\ =3
I
a
~ ~
~ w
~z
I z " "~
z zw
, I o
W
Q
D
D U

' I
3 ~
~9'1M I

1_
I
~
I
~}' N
~
N~
NM
I
' N.
oON 'O

o=
z - F-
~~
N~
Q N
bl HO L °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb'W
~Q ~ pvV1
~_~ Obi F"~?
I I `-'
Q a2~ ~ WNt~/1
I I '' ~ ~ o = o
I I ,~ .r.. I~ZY ~ NNo
-~ DOa O 3=
/ J o Li p
I a I W° ~~
/ I 3 I v ~Z
z ~
~ I Z~ ,
2i
~~,
~0 y I
~ 3 I ~.
/ I ° I I ~
I
Iw `~ I I ~ ~
>E
I ~~ ° `'~
I i I I~ ~ I ~
I" X+ I I o N
i I Iw E I I ~ o
\ I I~ ° I I ~ = I-- ~
~p~ - I I~ I I I ~ ~= o
l a I_ I~- N I I I Ewa ~
i• I I I o a o
I ~~~ -
--
ti I I~ W
.` j I I j ~" 1 ~ o
1 Z
~ a
~ ~
I i I a~
p 3 w
w I I t o Z Z~
N
a ~ N_ a a N
I I ~ l w W o w wZ
1 3 1 -'~~ 3~~NJ
3 ~~ I I w I LL l% I C I J a Z= w
1 ~ ~ U -J U3
W •• ~I I I Q I _ ` LL W li ~ ?
Jam' NI `~ I I a I - ~~~~~
~~ ~ I I I C I ~~ z=zzW
r z w w w w~
/ / 0 0 0 oc~
- Q
bl ~0 5 '1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb'W ~

~~
\
I I I I
,
~ Z °_~
I I

~
/
~ ~_
°~ I I I I ~ ~ ~
o~.~
~"
~
( I I I 1//
0
/1 v~i
a== '~ w
°
h
w~-
~
/
~~ 1 • ow ~ ~
J
Boa a ~w°
I ~.
'~ ~ ~m ~~3 ~ ~_
N I ~ w> ~~O
~
Q

o
I
I
~o
~
~ ~, z
Q
,,, I
I ~ I
Z O
~'

~- I
I
N I
Z
I I
Q
I I
o
' I
I I I
I I i
I
, ~
I I I ~ ~
~ I
I I
I
O ~
~ ~
I I I ~ ~G
~
~ I I I I ~ M
~ I I I I ~ ~
~
~ 0
~ °
~
I I I I ~
U I I I~ ~ o
~ I I I Iw m ~
~ ~ o
~
j i ~, Z
o I I I I ~~ ,~ W
~
~ °~ -
j i
.
~ ~
oo~ I I I i/, w
~ I I I o
~ i ,~' ~ i
Q
3
1 ~ I I ~
'~
~ ~' O W
Z U
m 3
/ ~
~ QQ
W = WZ

NI
M
I
IyI~ I
/
W ~ V1 NJ
Z?
W
_
I Z I I ~
/ =
3
W I ~ J J ~Uy1
i I N I , ~~,
N In V1
W W W?
F- h- 1- ~

J /~
i o
_ z
Z Z Z W
~ ~ °a
J /
IV_
Q ~ W W W J
O O OU
3 in
° ' -J
bl ~0 9
1H S ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb
W
W

bl ~0 6 °1NS ~~S -
~~ ~~ ~
// /
N
z ;
J j
J
O
U
d
[r
~-
~? ~ ,
_ /
'/ I
0065 / I
I
I
I
I
I
/ W
`~ i
F- O I
V N
i ~~
~NI~ H~1dW
1
J
I
z
0
Q N
F- ~
~a
Z~z
Q O
~ O U
W
pZQ
O
1- N ~
~ j
~~
U
Z

l__I___
0
rZ
V /
a
W
t~
i I ' '
~I W
i
Iz
I
r-
0
~,
N
I
H
U
W
O
m
o=
-~
~~
N N
OQ'~
~ z
N
=~V1
~ O }
~ ~ J
N W =
O LL
~ ~ O
l.~ p
~ Z
~ O
U ~
Z
(~~
,~G~

O
O
O
E
u~-
0
Z
a
J
H
W
3
Z
Z
O
F-
Q
Q
U
X
W
N
W
H
0
Z
W
0
W
~~
~ U
c~ a
Z ~
~ ~
Q ~
W z
U J
O ~
W
_N ~
2 W
a F.
=w
U J
W d
~~
o~
Z U
r

ti
O ~
Z -~
O
f., N O
Q N
N
F- Z 2
N=~" N N~~
bl ~0 ZI °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW ~~~ ~ =o"
~-
F- ° V = ~ J
W
~~ m I ~ III °oa o ~W=
t/1 ~ i-N3 ~ ~=W
a I ~ ~ I I I °- > °- ° ~. o
N I ~ I I I~ °° ~z
J Q
J I _ ~ IQZ z ;
~.~ , ~ ~ II I IAN
Q
Z
J
J
O
U
a
Z
W
~ I III I~~
II IN
m l III ~, M
' I Q I ~I~
1 I IIII ~--~ ~~°
III ~ ~~~
I V Cv
' I III
II
I-- O
I III =
Ilfl ~ o
IIII
~. I IIII a
Qo~o9
,

IIII
WIIII
~NIIII
IIII
~I I II
EIIII
E I ~I
I ICI
~I
bl ~0 8 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~lb'W

E

W

~- _
N
Z w a
a
J
Q W
i p ~
I W
3 v
Z U Z d
a
~~
z
o
~ ~
~ a
~ Wo
Vl J Q
C Z U J
W
Q
V
J W W
~~
3
X J N
W li Q W
= w
N N
U
f-'

° ~ W 4.
~~
°

z z
o z o
az~,
Q ~ ~ •

M !~ N N
z
0
Q N
f- ~..
~3>-
ZC~Z
Q O
~ O U
W
°oa
H N ;
a~
00
U
Z
W
~~
V 1
W
W
'J
l.~
~o
LL
ti
O
N
F-
U
w
O
W
o=
_~
vii o
O ~~
!- Z
N ~~
a N cL
=1.LN
O
~ ~ O
W =
~~
~ ~ O
~~
0
~Z
~ O
U ~"'
Z
E
0
N
O
O
O
O
E
0
N
F-
J
O
Z
Q
J
F-
W
3
N
W
H
O
2
W
N O oo cp
N N

r

~I
M I ~ I
I
I
I
SOM~7..L~M ~ 0 .00.3
+~ N
O
SOM~713M 0 X003
~ci M
J ~
~ ~ O
h N
I
I
~ i
I
YJI Q
M ~I
I
W
O =
Z
O = ~
~~
1- to O
Q N
~ N
O
Q
oar ,~
o '~ ~
N ~ Z N ~ N ~
Z- I Q ~

W U ~~J
OpQ O NW2
3
HNC ~ ~
W ~
0 ~ OF"'O
~~
~ ~- O
Lj ~ Z
z "' o
~~
z

W O 0
1C' ~
N
W

l/ / to U

O
J
Q O N

J

E
Q OZ
N E
-~; U
E_
~
~ O N >
I S
z
J
0
Z
Q
J
H
W
3
Z
J
J
!n
W
H
O
2
W
D
z~'~,
~~
fit. _~~
i

Ob•l9
I
I
I
I•
N ~
Z I~ Z
N I~ N
I
I~
i~
~ -
_~
T ~ - -~~ .
I ~'~~
I
I
~I
~I
OI
U
a
zl
W I
= N
W
I F- O
~ J
~"
I
'~
I I ~ ~
W I ,L
~ I I ~' _
I I 3111
1 I VIII
I I ~IIII
I w 11 1 1 a
I II I I ~"
m I III
=~ ~ I I ,,~
~ l I
bl ~0 6 °1HS ~~S - ~NI~ H~1dW
Q
°
~ ``
z -
-
o

~
Q N
N N _

N
~ O
~ ~ =O
~
~o
W ~
W ~-
J
l,~
O~Q ~ O~
NW=.
Ft/13 d ~_~
~
0~ ~~
.
O
U U1 Z

Z Lll -
O
U
~
Z -
M
~ G~~
O {~~
0
E
0
Z O
O
a O ~
E
W
~"
n O O
~/ ~ z
a ~-
~ ~
I N W
3 ~ U
v
? ~
J ? ~ -
i-- z a
°
~`'
3 °
~ "'
z
a

W Z
- Q

Q
> U
J
OH
W W
3
J X N
W W Q W
H
=
N
W !n
W W
V J
V-
O ~.
O W 4..
~ ~
o o zo
z
Q

J
I i ``~-
I I I ~\\
I II ~
I I \~
I,.~ 750 I _ ~~ I
'~ i =_
CONC _ ' 1 ~
II II '1~
I II
~ .I I I I 31
~, I I i
I I I I "I
I i I I ~I
W
~I -~O
I ~ ~ -' I
I~°1°• ~.~n VJ
~~
a.-- I I I
-~ I I I~
_ ~ III I ,
N ~ ~ .'~-
W I ~ : '~~
W ~
~.~N 3I.~ 1 ..
~ ~ ~1'
1

N z
N o
w pm ,~ $ -_
N S M ^ `" ~ N oI n Q N
~ MI MI 10 {O M) N U1 N ~ N m ONi m W
~ N h 1fl ~YNI LO UM tN N +~ N t0 O ~~ Nh O Q
Q ,K IA Y1 1- 1~ ``N t Y~1p +F o~ Cp p1 Off' P P m~ 3 ~"
o N plop 1IIN +N CN pM Lt0 ON oN OM OLN ~p l~ E`IN- ~a N=~
(~ L MIN 4CS yU M +r +~ ~L..U ~ J~ H ON ON 10 (' z
W U C; X~ x1j ~ $1 nN NN N2 U ~ C.S xU LL(.~ +N Z=~
Z o zf f m° u o< ~~ o~ i vz~ o~ +_ wV ~ O
o + ~ ~d ~g mg b~ ~i ~~+ ag ~g ~~ 8P Np LO °~ --OU
~ o d~ ~ N~ n~ ~'~ ap ~~ ~o'~o rC ~c c },~ ~'ZY
W ~ ~ ~ = 2 =p = ~ Q.
~ N W ~
O N ~
~ U
~ Z
H
N J
W Lj Z a Q
Q ? ~ Z Z
a ~ o
Z ~ ~ 3 ~ Z ...i ~ o to ~ N
3 ~ v o~~ o o~ a S a o z° v
~- W ~ ~ Z W Z Y'1- O = ~ N ~ V --~
~ a ; o a °_ ~ w~ __°m ~ z z a
~ ~ J ~ U lei W J = = Q Z
~ ', Z W O V F- LPL ~
~ J W ~ 1=-
p = O
U N
O
Z
J
W
U
DC
Q
N
Q
Q1
N
I
E-
V
W
Q
m
o=
_~
~~
N O
N
p Q ~
Q
~"_ _Z
N
W N N
_~
~o~
~~J
N w Q
3 =
_ LL
O f... Q
~ ~
~ p
~ Z
~ O
U f'
Z

_o
N
U
O N L (np
O N
O
O
N O_
(~
Q N G O O O
~_
Q
W
LL
LL ~
c ry m
^
^ n
O n
V O

m O t
N
C
O
O
O
W
Z = ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
vOi C
ca E
-°
° N
~
° N
i QQ ~ a
cn
¢ ~ n
Z
a c
tLU ,
m u
m o
O
F-
aC=7 N J
ZS Z oCO~

yc ~ _
QO ~ w¢O
~
p
c E
= o 0 0 o W
w ~
~
p ~ C
LL
U p
O
> 3 F-
O
d
w O 4 u1

rn a~ m

rn

rn o w

=
cn Nro`~°E
U E ° ~
m ° ~
m Z ~~
O~
U w
a ~
o
~ =
LL 2
LL
W E c L o 0 0 0 ~ `*
Q ~ . CJ LL
z o

V ~ ^ m m T
LL C O L ~ O O ~ 1-
~ =a
LL ° o w
N ~
~ lO 4

C .~_. L
~
O N
O (D
O 0
O

LL ? O O C
N m
!~ C
~
m

O
01
O
Q
~ !p fO
L
'~ V ~ O
0 0 O 0
~ N ~
Q ~

~ ~
c
O O~
o N
~
U ~~ o 0
Q z w c

c
L ~ N
- W
~. _
- ~
w N
a
N L O O O O
d3
f- c
c ~
- ~ t m
o
~' n
S co
~~ ° o 0 0
E
m
m
~ ~
U N m
x
E
L7 (n O
N m
N
W J J

O ~ O
~ O

O ~ O
t0
~

V +

(00 X

7
~ O
W
LL N
~ N
N O ~
N
N + t0
+ 3
c~ O ~ W
~ jj Z

_ J
Q
~ Z O
H

~
f~ N N
Q

~ N
O tf)
O LO
O Q~
O
~ O O O

W
Z
O ~

N
~
O
ti
ao
N M N I`-
~ N O O O O
W
~ W O O O O
Li Z
~ O
CD N
Z_

~_

(/')

Z
Q
J
I-
W p
~ L C.4 N ~

Ln
N
M M
-
- O O O -
O
~ W O O O
~ Z
U O
Q N
W

J
W Q
~ - N M ~
O
~