20020544 Ver 1_Complete File_20020408

V ?QFWATF9Q
> 4 ? W ?./s -i
O r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 2, 2007
DWQ # 02-0544
Warren County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E, Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke St.
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Nance:
On May 17, 2002 you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for your project on SR 1515 in Warren County. We wrote you on July 2, 2002
discussing concerns that we have regarding the design of the project and placing it on hold until those
concerns are addressed. Therefore we are returning your applications. Once you have collected
sufficient information to have a complete application (please see our hold letter for the missing
information), you will need to reapply for the DWQ approval. Your file is hereby retired and will not be
reviewed until our earlier concerns are addressed.
Please contact me at 919-733-5694 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter.
John Hennessy
ation and Permitting Unit.
cc: DWQ Wilmington Regional office
US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field office
Central Files
File Copy

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/n6wetlmds

\N ArFR
11
NI? r
? y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 2, 2002
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E. Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Re: Permit Application for proposed replacement of Bridge No. 131 over an unanmed tributary to Reedy Creek on
SR 1515 in Warren County
DWQ No. 020544, State Project No. 5.4152010
Dear Mr. Nance:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for making
an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
The project as presently proposed calls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The waters being impacted are
classified as C NSW. The information presented in your May 17, 2002 response was still insufficient to allow
for issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification. The information provided to date does not provide any
pertinent stream bankfull discharge information. Please provide information about the anticipated bankfull
discharge and cross-section at the proposed impact site. In addition, the culvert should be redesigned through
the use of culvert sills to mimic the bankfull discharge cross-section. In addition, DOT should consider a design
that includes cross vanes upstream and downstream from the culvert. A design that does not include an
appropriately designed culvert sill will require the use of cross vanes. Also, please provide the proposed design
specifications for the cross vane installation. Given that the project plans to replace a bridge with a culvert, we
need the requested information to assist in the determination that the project will not result in a destabilization
of the stream. If you believe the requested design changes are problematic, please provide additional
information detailing the engineering rationale, and provide an alternative design that provides for stream
stability.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold until we are
supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC Division of Water
Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place the permit application on
hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any questions or
require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
R. Dorne
r Quality
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
C:\ncdot\SR 1515\couespondencc\020544hld2.doc
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
State of North Carorna
Department of Envirinment
and Natural Resourers
Division of Water Quali4i
Michael F. Easley, Govenor
William G. Ross, Jr., Seretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph-4 Acting Director
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E. Division 5gineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
April 29, 2002
Re: Permit Application for prgosed replacement of Bridge No. 131 over an unarmed tributary to Reedy
Creek on SR 1515 in Warm County
DWQ No. 020544, State Boject No. 5.4152010
Dear Mr. Nance:
The Division of Water Quality U. reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Reviewof your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit deciiiiDn. The permit application was deficient in the following areas: - -
• The project as presently prgosedcalls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The waters being
impacted are classified as NSW. The application provides only 5 plan for the project. No cross-
section or profile informatim is provided. Given that the project plans to replace a bridge with a
culvert, we need the requestd information to assist in the determination that the project will not result
in a destabilization of the seam. In addition, please assess the potential for an upstream and
downstream cross vane to-@amnstructed at the project site. Also, provide the proposed design
specifications for the cross ne installation. If you believe the requested design changes are
problematic, please provideadditional information detailing the engineering rationale, and provide an
alternative design that prows for stream stability.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCrC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold -
until we are supplied the neces-say information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we rquest (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit applicatiim'on hold-
Hopefully, we can work togethe3to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional:idbrmation, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Cillice
US Army Corps of Enginars Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
C:\ncdot\B-33 17\correspon dencc\02043bkLdoc
? ?ation Dorney
Qua lity Certigram

Wetlands/40I Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1621
-'". Telephms919-733-1756 - FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Arf>®tive Action Employer 509 recycled/10% post consumer paper
i
a.. uwRs?
ti
??ard?
MAY 2 [ ?D
C
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 17, 2002
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. John Dorney
Supervisor
Subject: Replacement of Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed tributary to Reedy
Creek on SR 1515 in Warren County. NCDOT State Project No.
5.4152010. DWQ Project No. 020544.
Reference: 1. NCDOT Permit Application (April 4, 2002).
2. NCDENR-DWQ notice indication HOLD status of project (April 29,
2002)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek on SR 1515 in Warren
County. The replacement structures are 2@ 128 inches x 83 inches corrugated steel pipe
arches. A permit application outlining impacts associated with this project was submitted
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and copied to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
(NCDENR-DWQ) on April 4, 2002. The project was placed on hold by the NCDENR-
DWQ by letter dated April 29, 2002. The letter states:
The project as presently proposed calls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The
waters being impacted are C NSW. The application provides only a plan for the
project. No cross section or profile information is provided. Given that the project
plans to replace a bridge with a culvert, we need the requested information to assist in
the determination that the project will not result in a destabilization of the stream. In
addition, please assess the potential for an upstream and downstream cross vane to be
constructed at the site. Also, provide the proposed design specifications for the cross
vane installation. If you believe the requested design changes are problematic please
provide additional information detailing the engineering rationale, and provide an
alternative design that provides for stream stability.
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Please note Figure 1, Revised Figure 2, (new) Figure 3, (new) Figure 4 and (new)
Figure 5. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project on the most recent USGS
topographic map. Revised Figure 2 depicts a plan view of the project indicating riparian
buffer impact and erosion and sediment control plan. New Figure 3 provides the
hydraulic design/analysis of the project including plan view and profile. New Figure 4
provides a bed profile. New Figure 5 provides the county map indicating the location of
the project site.
Existing stream bed elevations, both up and down stream, are higher than that at
the proposed culvert crossing. Therefore, the stream bed is currently stable and can be
anticipated to remain stable after construction due to natural in-stream grade controls.
Also, existing low stream gradient (1.1%) minimizes potential stream degradation and
scour. Accordingly, the NCDOT does not feel that cross vane devices are necessary to
provide for stream stabilization. Division 5 personnel will monitor the site after
construction to ensure stream stability. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
"Christopher A. Murray, P.W.S.
Environmental Officer
cc: Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT, Raleigh
Earl Bell, NCDOT, Gillburg
r
?" r _ Jr A I ` .NJ l I/ - 1 i _ A
292
X3 7 'j
I
Odell,
\\ ' 2111 172 _ I
Y / /\
,
I n - _ _ , 1521
i A t
1 I 182
I . I l ? ? e, ? 1 I.. +s 11.
1 I Y N4 ? J
1 j i r I i N s+
"Q it e
/ ? ? Y ?? I Y J l
I \ a I ??
x22 I ? ? \
s 4 ?r
i
i/] x /n\
Y Reod r R gCLly
9h / a 1 l6
/ \ \
257
SITE 1/ - A 1 l" -°r?
v\ p _ _ _ .r 1 1 ? I ` N ??
1 4 l A 11 1
I 1?? ar I ? / A 1 ( ?? 141 I
1 I / _ ?\ I/.
Y f A kz ti 1-
/ Y? , I I ?•v ? µ ?? ,` 1 i /? f 250 1 %? 111 ?: ff F n N ? _ VI
/YO 17j ?A ,v I? w' (\v Illy 1 uli li?lf;??
211
J'a
b ?? VA. •. A i X291
t. 0
1516 ` / ?..,? , `"\ 1 I I n r r I
1 I , \ ? .? I I 26111 I /
i 111\li ? Li 1_%?1 S1 -1 ib .\?,\1 ? \- 1. •'1 1 1.? ?..- 1 V
Project Study Area /
1\ + % Replacement of Bridge No. 131 on
(\ - ?' v \ I SR 1515 in Warren County i
211` Hollister USGS Topo Map (1973)
/ / .
Figure 1 1:24,000

Note-
(DOO Rip Rap
Temp. Rock Silt Check (Type A)
Fill I n Surface Waters Temp. Placement of
Sheet Piling to
Dewater Stream

) %//////i,
k
C
O
' I ? i I OI OI
i N 1 1 N N
Temp. Placement of
Sheet Piling to
Dewater Stream
i
Site 1-Construction Impact and
Erosion and Control Plan
Replacement of Bridge No. 131
on SR 1515 in Warren County
?w,y Figure 2 1"=40' S.i6.oz
10+00 P.O.T.
,i P.K.
9+50 P.0.T%
0" irr\
RIP RAP
WOODS
S -------------
WOODS
r / 11+00 P.O.T.
WOODS
Q
------- ----------
SR-1515 TO SR-1517
-------------.-----
00
O
ACV o
WOODS
\RIP RAP
N01 E: HIGH DEBRI
2+00
Inlet Control Outlet Control
R
k

0

H
W

do do+D

h
I
H

LS
I

H
W
I emar
s
Size & Type Ke HW/D .
. 2 p O .
.
.54 3.7 _=j ===1 6.5 0. .2 6.3 10 YR.
12811 x " EL. = 97.5
590 ,77 5.3 7.9 0.8 .2 8.5 25 YR.
° EL. = 99.7
° L0 6.9 =_ __= 8,6 1.9 .2 10.3 100 YR.
FL =
,
Hydraulic Design and Analysis--
Plan and Profile
Replacement of Bridge No. 131 on
SR 1515 in Warren County
Figure 3
I" = 50 feet (horiz.)/I"=10 foot (vert.)

\
i
it
9+00 ` 10+00 11+00
t
N
e ..

Hydraulic Design and Analysis--
Bed Profile
Replacement of Bridge No. 131 on
SR 1515 in Warren County
Figure 4
1" = 50 feet (horiz.)/1"=10 foot (vert.)

I \ < V i
I •?` k! ? ? JJ.\ 1 f0?l;`??
:? \ y 1
? \ 1
'3J3 prtl? x0 \
a/ tlJJ I
Ri ` i €? te..6 ?. ? I
1 1 €/
[[ I
1 I / pl I
Z
I.. 1351 In)
r- -? p Ime / uas `
\ s l i I ? 5 p.Nr I

15e O

W?

ON
-JON
( \ I]IB
a IJIB ee,
,6 .3

159 ? OM l _

I• a
]
?
/
O IYI ? I. •O. ? I f/
I
:_L: 'Ina
Ian
.
no
q

n

1'a2 I I ° a: ? .@

sse
Iax,'In ? • ? f.
6 a
\.c i1 - IC / I
Ixe :!: - '?e :lJ 2
. S.
L
mA
um
.

' 'wl
\ Ibl 15os \•? las nmN
`

h

?
o N _ IuI U
1110
l
,
Tall a ?'
/1.2 l
Y I]I i ?. ?. ?p? ,]
I u3
? I? f IY ?
?l 1611 'I n / L, ? I?Ia I IS /

? / .a 5 '2 I
\ f

'
I

' Isla h' I
Project Site
1 /
1512 Ia16 '
% l In)L'
•
/' /? GAY .. '\ ?.? M1 I Isle ISI) I

I IYI I
ISIJ

S

?
153. •
w %
' F.•
Iaal Ie9 \ + 5Ia IssI
-
zI

zs X
169 ...

.?` I"''a 'r' 1 Inn
'
L < L)
- y I6]a
3
)
A '' \ I Inn ou s.1nu..m N
\ . a

'.? ??<Ia? 5cn.
I40
/ p
I6A IBJS /

is
Project Site
l? ? `r
Replacement of Bridge No. 131'
?;. SR 1515 in Warren Count
x' NCDOT Warren County Ro/
Figure 5 1" = 2 milt.`
C NOSH
N
II
/
S
?,
a
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 4, 2002
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
APR 6 OF
7
ECT/pN
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
®20544,
Subject: Replacement of Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed tributary to Reedy
Creek on SR 1515 in Warren County. NCDOT State Project No.
5.4152010
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to replace
Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed perennial tributary to Reedy Creek in Warren County
(Figure 1). The existing bridge was constructed in 1960 and has a timber floor with
timber posts on timber sills. This bridge is currently in poor condition; it is structurally
deficient with a sufficiency rating of 48 out of 100 points. It has been determined that
this structure must be replaced. The proposed replacement structures are 2 @ 128 inches
x 83 inches corrugated steel pipe arches (Figure 2).
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Construction of the project involving replacement of the existing bridge will
necessitate impact to waters of the United States in the Tar-Pamlico River basin. Here
the project crosses an unnamed perennial tributary to Reedy Creek (NCDENR-DWQ
Index No. 28-79-25-5, Best Usage Classification C NSW).
Bridge Demolition and Removal
Bridge No. 131 has a timber floor with timber posts on concrete sills. The bridge
will be removed under Case 3, where there are no special restrictions beyond those
outlined in Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal. The bridge
construction site will be dewatered during construction, thus precluding the dropping of
bridge components into live water.
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] ,9`?
/F?? "
/<jl ` lo
Bridge Replacement
Impacts to the perennial tributary associated with the project from the
replacement of the existing bridge with two corrugated steel pipe arches (including
minimal amounts of rip rap to protect the structure) include 80 feet existing channel
impacted and 0.02 acre fill in surface water.
Dewaterine
The NCDOT will dewater this perennial stream during the construction of the
project. This will involve the temporary placement of sheet piling in the stream channel
approximately 10 feet upstream of the proposed pipe inlets and approximately 10 feet
downstream of the proposed pipe outlets. To maintain water flow during construction,
water upstream of this impervious structure will be temporarily pumped out and
conveyed downstream of the impervious structure. The stream will be dewatered less
thantwo,weeks. This will result in temporary impacts to the surface water. Temporary
impacts to the streams from this activity will result in the dewatering of 0.02 ac of stream
bed and 80 linear feet stream channel. The sheet piling will be removed after
construction.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be
protected from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or
storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near wetlands or surface waters.
Minimization: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control by Best
Management Practices for the Protection of Wetlands and Surface Waters will be
enforced during project construction. Continued coordination will occur with
maintenance forces and the Environmental Officer during construction to minimize
impacts to waters of the United States.
Compensatory Mitigation: Construction of the project will result in only minimal
impacts to waters of the United States. Impacts have been minimized to the maximum
extent possible during the design process. Due to minimal impacts, compensatory
mitigation for impacts to waters of the U.S. will not be provided for this project.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The construction of the project involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject
to the Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Buffer Rule. The unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek is
depicted on the most recent version of the Hollister, North Carolina topographic
quadrangle (USGS, 1973) (Figure 1). Personnel from the Natural Resource Conservation
Service in Warren County stated that the Soil Survey of Warren County has not yet been
published. The construction of the project impacts 2,432 square feet in Zone 1, 0 square
feet in Zone 2 and 62 linear feet of riparian buffer.
The NCDOT is requesting that the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality (DWQ) complete a "no practicable
alternatives" determination. The NCDOT certifies that the criteria documented in Sub-
Item (8)(a) of the buffer rules (which find that there are no practical alternatives to the
project) are met. The NCDOT requests an Authorization Certificate for this project.
Information supporting that there are no practical alternatives for the issuance of this .
certification is summarized below:
The existing structure has a sufficiency rating of 48 out 100 points. Improvements
must be conducted at the site to allow the roadway to remain open for traffic.
The decision to replace the bridge with two corrugated steel pipe arches is partially
based on fiscal accountability and responsibility. The replacement cost of the
existing structure with corrugated steel pipe arches is less than replacement with a
bridge structure.
The replacement of the existing structure with corrugated steel pipe arches reduces
long-term maintenance and provides increased public safety. It has been
documented that these structures will require less maintenance than a bridge.
Additionally, bridge rails often are broken or sheared during accidents. Structures
that utilize corrugated steel pipe arches do not utilize bridge rail and are considered
safer structures.
Best Management Practices for the Protection of Wetlands and Surface Waters and
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be enforced
during the life of the project.
The design of the project has reduced the footprint of the project as much as possible
to allow for only the amount of fill necessary to complete the project.
The NCDOT proposes to install temporary erosion and sediment control devices
at Site 1 in Zone 1 of the riparian buffer. Specifically, the NCDOT will place a
temporary rock silt check (Type A) in Zone 1. The temporary structures will be removed
once vegetation has been established and then seeded with a seed mixture of fescue and
bahia grass. Based on impacts to the riparian buffer at this site from this use, this activity
is allowable. The sediment and erosion control plans for Site 1 is depicted in Figure 2.
The NCDOT certifies that the criteria documented in Sub-Item (8)(a) of the buffer rules
(which find that there are no practical alternatives to the project) are met. The NCDOT
requests an Authorization Certificate for this activity at this project.
Protected Species
dwarf wedgemussel --Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Tar spinymussel- Biological Conclusion: No Effect
NCDOT Division Environmental Officer Chris Murray conducted a mussel
survey at the site on September 7, 2001. Mussel surveys were conducted at the existing
structure and for a distance of 300 feet downstream and 40 feet upstream of the project
crossing. Survey methodology included wading using visual and tactile methods along
the banks and throughout the stream. No mussels were found during the survey.
A review of the NHP rare and unique habitat database did not reveal the presence of these
species within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area. Impacts to these federally
protected species will not occur from project construction.
Historical Compliance
Historic compliance work to be scheduled and concurrence with Historic
Preservation Office will be obtained if required.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed perennial tributary
to Reedy Creek in Warren County. The proposed replacement structures are 2 @ 128
inches x 83 inches corrugated steel pipe arches. Impacts associated with the project from
the replacement of the existing bridge with the corrugated steel pipe arches (including
minimal amounts of rip rap to protect the structure) include 80 feet existing channel
impacted and 0.02 acre fill in surface water. Temporary impacts to the stream from
dewatering will result in the dewatering of 0.02 ac of stream bed and 80 linear feet stream
channel.
Construction of the project will result in impacts to the riparian buffer. Riparian
construction impacts associated with bridge replacement include 2,432 square feet in
Zone 1, 0 square feet in Zone 2 and 62 linear feet of riparian buffer. Based on the
impacts to the riparian buffer at this site, this crossing is allowable. The NCDOT
proposes to install temporary erosion and sediment control devices at Site I in Zone 1 of
the riparian buffer. Specifically, the NCDOT will place a temporary rock silt check
(Type A) in Zone 1.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and NWT 33 and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3375 and No. 3366 and riparian buffer certification for
construction of this project. The NCDOT will comply with all applicable NWP, WQC
and Riparian Buffer Rule conditions. A pre-construction notification is attached with this
request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
?Lo,_--6-
Christopher A. Murray, P.W.S.
Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT Bridge Superintendent, Raleigh
Mr. Earl Bell, NCDOT, Bridge Maintenance Supervisor, Henderson
\ ® , 1 t
Il n
p
1 1 N / J
V `V A
1
i
t J y?

r V III V1(?
.1115
I a
b N , 6* i I

a
,
°
9 \ I ?
\ \ .?\

9aeM ? . I , - _
v.

314

/ I ? 1 \

?
I 1 1 r( ?\
lA?

\ J ' Il

i,
r N.
11 A ? 11 I - VA?I? ? I \ ?? II ` '-V '
\1 li i
l
I Z96! 1 D `
4J 1 I / /?
29< /? p I/. / ., l
ze<` /.._. -` seT Odell .,?
i
1
I
1i 1 + 1
'28° 1511 1
I
IV ' ? / _ . 1 I ? ? ? ? p I
V 1 "V I Il I tl 9? /
1.- ` l y° II i +
I
I / /IIO 1 44 I I/ S5 r I o I 0
r a 6 \ •
I 10 9' 11 U 4
1
m u ° /I
r
\ X
- - alai
?l

SITE

/ '1I \ I \ 1 \ 1
?r
k2 I. \ II, 1
' ?
'
zso
\ I ', I I
I
1
1 \
1.

? ?i it A, , •
i / IX292 \ ?.. -
l ? 1
\? O r
J00

J \\
1.
\ ? ? N
?3, 111

` ISU
I
\ 1 11 d
II lV? n 1? 1i
1 ,ten Av.)?
1 ` X11 1 w
I v ?f r:
?I 1 I ry I I
I1 P -?
1?? II
V I y
I I
I I ??
fu
1 .YF _` IJO t l //??
261 /
1 % f\? \ / I 11? 1 1 I I
i 1 1 I `-
"
Project Study Area
Replacement of Bridge No. 131 on
SR 1515 in Warren County --J
Hollister USGS Topo Map (1973)°
Figure 1 1:24,000 \<
I

Note-
OM Rip Rap
Temp. Rock Silt Check (Type Al
Fill I n Surface Waters Temp. Placement of
Sheet Piling to
DewStream
cter
ry
f ti
/
" ti

J%/%%%
N N
o t o II I v
C C
O O
Temp. Placement of
Sheet Piling to
Dewoter Stream
i

Site 1-Construction Impact and
Erosion and Control Plan
Replacement of Bridge No. 131
on SR 1515 in Warren County
Figure 2 1"=40'

of wATFR
;`
` a
>
rir ?-9y+ t?
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://vvww.siw.usace.armv.miI/wetlands/Perm aop htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at httpJhvww.sakv.usace.armv.mil/wetlands/re<_tour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 11
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on -
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at littp:/hvww.saw usace army milhvetiands/nwptina]FedRg}pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then.a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.chnr.state.j)c.us/ncwetIands/fees.htnil. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 11
Office Use Only: iolm Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No02 0 5 4 4
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Il. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT/Christopher A. Murray
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke Street. Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 3 of 11
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be. informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge No. 131 over an unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek on SR 1515 in
Warren County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or Work Order: Work Order No. 5.4152010
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Warren Nearest Town: Warrenton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Warrenton travel southeast
on NC 58, turn right and travel southeast on NC 43, turn left and travel north on SR 1517,
turn left and travel northwest on SR 1515 to project limits.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 17 233374E 4024965N UTM
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Site is
surrounded by wooded land.
7. Property size (acres): Project footprint is 53 feet long and 84 wide. Property size is
approximately 0.1 acre.
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek
9. River Basin: Tar Pamlico River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/naps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Replacement of Bridge No. 131 over an
unnamed tributary to Reedy Creek on SR 1515 in Warren County. The replacement
structures are 2 @ 128" x 83" corrugated steel pipe arches.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Excavator, crane,
backhoe and bulldozer.
Page 4 of 11
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Wooded land.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous ro ect jurisdictional determination or permit histo associated with site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland
Wetland Impact 1m acts

Type of
Area of
t
I
Located within
ear Floodplain**
100-
Distance to
Nearest Stream

Type of Wetland***
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Impact* mpac
(acres) y
( es/no) (linear feet)
hot a,n not limited lo: m echanized clearing, grading,
fill,
* List each impact separately unit tucvmy iompo,ay ....N- ?..,.---- ------
excavation, flooding, ditching/drautage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
•• 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at tutu'//ceow linra.eov.
•*• List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
Page 5 of I I
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
Impact
Length Average Width of Perennial or
Intermittent?
(indicate e on on Type of Impact* r
(linear feet) Stream Name** Stream Before (please
map) Impact specify)
Rip rap placed at structure inlets
Site 1 and outlets for stabilization only. 20 UT Reedy Creek 15 feet Perennial
Site I Placement of structures at creek 60 UT Reedy Creek 15 feet Perennial
Site I Temporary Dewatering 80 UT Reedy Creek 15 feet Perennial
List each impact separateiy and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not hunted to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightming, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wArw. usss, eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., \cww.torxvoue.com,
w\\,v.Imnxlhcsixom, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 80 feet existing channel
impacted 20 feet of rip rap for stabilization and 60 feet for placement of structures and 80
feet temporary impacts for dewatering.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbod
y
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, occan, etc.)

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If-construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
Page 6 of 11
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The existing bridge is structurally deficient and must be replaced All wetlands and surface
waters not affected by construction will be protected from unnecessary encroachment No
staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near
wetlands or surface waters. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion Best Management
Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be conducted during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the Environmental
Officer during construction to minimize impacts to waters of the United States The design of
the 1roject has reduced the footprint of the project as much as possible to allow for only
amount of fill necessary to safely complete the project.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr. state. ne. us/ncwetlands/strni,,ide. html.
Page 7 of 11
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description'should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Not Aoolicable.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at i,uu://li2o.enr.siaie.nc.tis/ivrp/rode. litin. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 8 of 11
and must be clearly identifiable' on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must.be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* lft)
(square Multiplier Required
1 2,432 3
2 0 1.5
Total 2,432
• Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Not Applicable
XL Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existing: 0.02 acre impervious surface of 0 1 acre total project size
Proposed: 0 02 acre impervious surface of 0 1 acre total project size
Erosion control measures will be placed in a manner to preclude sediment from leaving the site.
All temporaries disturbed areas will be revegetated immediately after construction
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
PPage .9 of 11
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
t(. 4. o2
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 10 of 1 I
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276994617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Sorry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page I I of I I