20050851 Ver 1_Complete File_20050520

Ot WATFjQ Michael F. Easley, Govemor
`Ord % William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y Mr Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
¢ -11 Division of Water Quality
VWQ Project No..- 0 50 8 5 1 County: ___LAlak e
Applicant: NCPor 7Di V S Ion G. !lance
IsroiectName: SR 2333 (Gkory RA)
Date of L9suance of 401 Water Quality Certification: 054 Z°105
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent mudifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the4011Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699,1621. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to
send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Co.AficatigQn
I. -6. N01r)ce , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and othe , tpp aterials.
Signature: Date: U
,agent's Certification
1. , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Watcr Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Date:
Engineer°s Certification
Partial final
1. ?...._ , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the
,Pcrmittcc hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date ? ?@4%??
SFp R"74w,
d?Op ?T?4N pSAN? )urn ?Gq6
Ohl
Trsnspomtbn Permltd ig Unit
1654 Mell Service Canter. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crebtras Roulavard. Suite 250, Raleigh, No* Carolina 27604
Phone. [phone] PAX 919-7336693/ Internet hltpM o eenr state.nc.us/ncwetiands
O?O? WAT k919
>_ y
4 `C
May 20, 2005
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 050851
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and NEUSE RIVER RIPARIAN BUFFER AUTHORIZATION
Mr. Jon G. Nance, P.E. Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Nance:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts for the purpose of
three pipe replacements on SR 2333 (Glory Road) in Wake County.
Impact Stream Impacts - Concurrent Stream Wetland Impacts - Riparian Buffer Impacts
Locations Permanent Fill Impacts - Temporary Permanent Fill (Square Feet)
(Linear Feet) Dewatering- Acres)
(Linear Feet)
Site 1 36 36 N/A 2,091 (1,297 Zone 1 + 794
Zone 2)
Site 2 N/A NIA .04 4,702 (3,385 Zone 1 + 1,317
Zone 2)
Site 3 N/A N/A .02 3,473 (2,128 Zone 1 + 1,345
Zone 2)
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received May 16, 2005. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that the stream impacts and riparian buffer impacts described are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3404 and 3366. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 14 and the Nationwide Permit 33 issued by the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Neuse
River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits
before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge
and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
IWo Carolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Nawra!!b
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
An Fmtal 0nnnrhmily/Gffirmatiua Ar4inn Fmnlnvnr _ r n0/ Ramtrlarl/10 Pnet r:nn-mar Panar

2.) All stormwater runoff shall be directed to §heetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive velocities, unless
approved otherwise by this certification.
3.) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers.
4.) Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
5.) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be
restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
6.) Any riprap used must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow
conditions.
7.) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
8.) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders `and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is prohibited.
9.) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this
authorization shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts
to areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification.
10.) There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this
permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or
stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
11.) Heavy equipment must be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into the stream.
12.) Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the elevation
of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the
culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control
measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or
banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide
evidence that the equilibrium shall be maintained if requested in writing by DWQ.
13.) If the above condition (#12) is unable to be met, due to bedrock or other limiting features, encountered during
construction, please discontinue activities and contact the NCDWQ for directions on hove to proceed.
14.) For projects impacting waters classified by the NC Environmental Management Commission as Trout (Tr),
High Quality Waters (HQW), or Water Supply I or II (WSI, WSII) stormwater shall be directed to vegetated
buffer areas, grass-lined ditches or other means appropriate to the site for the purpose of pre-treating storm
water runoff, and must not be routed directly into streams. Mowing of existing vegetated buffers is strongly
discouraged, so that they may be utilized for storm water sheet flow.
15.) No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened
16.) The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or
other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the
immediate vicinity of the culverts.

17.) All work shall be performed during low or normal flow conditions.
18.) All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1.
19.) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division
Engineer and the on-site project manager.
20.) For 36 linear feet of stream at Site 1 being impacted due to site dewatering activities, the site shall be graded to
its preconstruction contours and revegetated with native vegetation.
21.) We understand that you have chosen to perform compensatory mitigation for impacts to streams and wetlands
through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The payment to EEP, and the stream
and wetland mitigation shall be implemented in accordance with all the Memorandum's of Agreement signed
between the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the NC Department of
Transportation that govern the practice and function of the EEP.
22.) All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the
preconstruction contours and revegetated with native woody species upon completion of the project
construction. A post-construction as-built with the restoration?activities included shall be submitted to the
DWQ no later than 60 days after the project is closed out by the;pepartment of Transportation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Christina Breen at 919-733-9604.
rely;
Alan W. Klimek, P. .
JEH/cmb
Attachment
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Mr. Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
NC DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
c:\Correspondence\20050therProjects\DWQ050851\052005wgc.doc
r
A 5 0 8
l?
?R q
R9N?h
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 12, 2005
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 PAYMENT
Raleigh, NC 27609 RECEIVED
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Secondary road improvements to SR 2333 (Glory Road) from SR 2331
(Jack Mitchell Road) to NC 96 (Zebulon Road) in Wake County. WBS
element 5C.092071.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade and
pave SR 2333 (Glory Road) from SR 2331 (Jack Mitchell Road) to NC 96 (Zebulon
Road) in Wake County. (Figures 1-5). Total project length is 0.99 miles. Transportation
and highway laws of North Carolina (G.S. 136-44.6, 136-44.7, 136443A, 136-44.8, and
136-44.9) require the NCDOT to develop annual work programs for construction and
maintenance of secondary roads. These general statutes specifically set forth
requirements for annual construction and paving of existing unpaved roads. Paving of
these roads is performed in priority order as established by the NCDOT for each unpaved
road within a given county. This number is based on characteristics of each road,
including number of homes, schools, churches, businesses, industries, recreational
facilities, traffic counts, presence of school bus routes, and value as a thoroughfare.
SR 2333 is scheduled to be paved as part of the Secondary Roads Construction Program.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Site 1 (STA 25 + 51) - Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an unnamed perennial tributary to the Little River
27-57-(1), Best Usage Classification WS-II HQW NSW; HUC 03020201] (Figure 3) in
the Neuse River Basin. The existing structure conveying the creek is 30-inch corrugated
metal pipe that is 40 feet long (see Photographs 1 and 2). This pipe will be replaced with
an 81" x 59" corrugated metal pipe arch that is 60 feet long with headwall. Permanent
impacts at the site associated with the longer pipe include a total of 20 linear feet of
existing fill in surface water in addition to 16 ft of rip rap along the stream banks. The
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

2:
work zone will be temporarily dewatered for approximately 5 days. This will involve the
temporary placement of sandbags upstream and downstream of construction. Once the
stream has been dewatered, the replacement pipe will be installed. To maintain water
flow during construction, water upstream of construction will be temporarily pumped out
and conveyed around downstream of the construction. Temporary concurrent impacts to
the stream from this activity will result in dewatering 36 linear feet of stream. The
sandbags used for dewatering will be removed after construction.
Site 2 (STA 28 + 78) - Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an emergent linear wetland supported by an
ephemeral channel (Figure 4). This wetland is positioned along the roadside ditch then
continues across SR 2333 at an 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe (rcp) that is 36 feet long
(see Photographs 3 and 4). The existing pipe at this site will be replaced with a 36" rcp
that is 60 feet long with a headwall. Permanent impacts at the site associated with the
longer pipe, grading, reworking of ditches, and used of rip rap within the 60 ft right-of-
way will include a total of 1,757ft2 (0.04 ac of fill) in wetlands (see Appendix One for
USACE Wetland Delineation forms/DWQ rating sheets). No surface water impacts are
proposed at this site.
Site 3 (STA 56 + 39) - Waters of US
Construction at this site will impact an emergent linear wetland supported by an
ephemeral channel (Figure 5). This wetland is positioned along the roadside ditch then
continues across SR 2333 at a 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe (rcp) that is 33 feet long
(see Photographs 5 and 6). The existing pipe at this site will be replaced with a 36" rcp
that is 60 feet long with a headwall. Permanent impacts at the site associated with the
longer pipe, grading, reworking of ditches, and used of rip rap within the 60 ft right-of-
way will include a total of 742ft2 (0.02 ac of fill) in wetlands (see Appendix One for
USACE Wetland Delineation forms/DWQ rating sheets). No surface water impacts are
proposed at this site.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
Site I (STA 25 + 51) - Buffers
The construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. The unnamed perennial tributary to the Little River at Site 1
is depicted on the most recent version of the Zebulon (1968/1981) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) as well as on the Soil Survey of Wake County (USDA-SCS 1970)
(Figure 2). Erosion and sediment control devices along the project are comprised of
temporary rock silt checks, temporary silt basins, and temporary silt fence. The NCDOT
proposes to install temporary erosion and sediment control devices in Zone 1 and Zone 2
of the riparian buffer. The temporary structures will be removed once the vegetation has
been established and then seeded with a seed mixture of fescue and bahia grass. Please
note that the placement of these structures are within the 60 right-of-way width and their
associated impacts are included within the site total of 1,279ft2 in Zone 1 and 794ft2 in
Zone 2 (totaling 36 linear feet of riparian buffer impacts). Based on the impacts to the
riparian buffer at this site, this crossing is EXEMPT.
3
Site 2 (STA 28 + 78) - Buffers
The construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. The unnamed perennial tributary to the Little River at Site 2
is not depicted on the most recent version of the Zebulon (1968/1981) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) but does appear on the Soil Survey of Wake County (USDA-SCS
1970) (Figure 2). Erosion and sediment control devices along the project are comprised of
temporary rock silt checks, temporary silt basins, and temporary silt fence. The NCDOT
proposes to install temporary erosion and sediment control devices in Zone 1 and Zone 2
of the riparian buffer. The temporary structures will be removed once the vegetation has
been established and then seeded with a seed mixture of fescue and bahia grass. Please
note that the placement of these structures are within the 60 right-of-way width and their
associated impacts are included within the site total of 3,385 ft2 in Zone 1 and 1,317 ft' in
Zone 2. Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at this site, this crossing is EXEMPT.
Site 3 (STA 56 + 39) - Buffers
The construction at this site involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject to the
Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. The unnamed perennial tributary to the Little River at Site 3
is not depicted on the most recent version of the Zebulon (1968/1981) topographic
quadrangle (Figure 1) but does appear on the Soil Survey of Wake County (USDA-SCS
1970) (Figure 2). Erosion and sediment control devices along the project are comprised of
temporary rock silt checks, temporary silt basins, and temporary silt fence. The NCDOT
proposes to install temporary erosion and sediment control devices in Zone 1 and Zone 2
of the riparian buffer. The temporary structures will be removed once the vegetation has
been established and then seeded with a seed mixture of fescue and bahia grass. Please
note that the placement of these structures are within the 60 right-of-way width and their
associated impacts are included within the site total of 2,128 ft2 in Zone 1 and 1,345 ft'- in
Zone 2. Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at this site, this crossing is EXEMPT.
Waters of the U.S./Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands and surface waters not affected by the project will be protected
from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands or near surface waters.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional
sites. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices
for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites.
Compensatory Miti ag tion: Unavoidable impacts to 20 linear feet of stream (surface
water fill) associated with this project will be mitigated (at a 2:1 ratio) by providing
40 linear feet of warm water stream restoration equivalent, in the Neuse River Basin
(Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03020201). Unavoidable impacts to 0.06 acre of non-
riverine wetlands associated with this project will be mitigated (at a 1:1 ratio) by
providing 0.06 acre of non-riverine wetland restoration equivalent, in the Neuse
River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging Unit 03020101). All compensatory mitigation
4
requirements will be assimilated on a quarterly basis and provided to the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) for their acceptance with a copy provided to the USACE
for verification and accounting purposes.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 29, 2003, there are four federally protected species
listed for Wake County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterdon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii). Glory Road is not adjacent to open
water suitable to provide foraging habitat for the bald eagle. The open areas surrounding
these sites do not offer suitable forging or nesting habitat for red-cockaded woodpecker.
These UTs to the Little River are small streams and do not provide suitable habitat for mussel
fauna. The roadway shoulders along Glory Road are heavily maintained, eliminating the
possibility for Michaux's sumac to exist in this area. Additionally, a review of the Natural
Heritage Program database (last updated April 2005) revealed no occurrences of
protected species within the project area. Therefore, based on lack of suitable habitat
observed during the 02/07/05 site visit and the NHP database review, biological conclusions
of No Effect have been rendered for each species.
Historical Compliance
This project has been screened by all pertinent parties to ensure historic compliance.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to upgrade and pave SR 2333 (Glory Road) in Wake County.
Permanent impacts, including surface water fill and fill in wetlands, are proposed to
Waters of the United States. Unavoidable impacts to 20 linear feet of stream associated
with this project will be mitigated (at a 2:1 ratio) by providing 40 linear feet of warm
water stream restoration equivalent in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging
Unit 03020201). Unavoidable impacts to 0.06 acre of non-riverine wetlands associated
with this project will be mitigated (at a 1:1 ratio) by providing 0.06 acre of non-riverine
wetland restoration equivalent, in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Cataloging Unit
03020101). Additionally, impacts to the riparian buffers within the Neuse River Basin are
proposed at Sites 1, 2, and 3. Based on the impacts at each site these crossings are
EXEMPT.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit (NWP) 14, NWP 33, and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water Quality
Certification (WQC) No. 3404 and WQC No. 3366 for above-described activities. An
automated payment procedure has been implemented between the NCDOT and
NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the Division to apply for the 401 WQC without
submitting a check for this permit application. This new procedure will provide payment
to the NCDWQ by charging the permit application fee of $200.00 directly to the
appropriate NCDOT WBS element 5C.092071. A pre-construction notification is
Y
attached with this request. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Ms. Heather Montague at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jon G. Nance, P.E.
Division Engineer
cc: Ms. Nicole Thomson, NCDWQ
Mr. Brandon Jones, P.E., NCDOT
Mr. Chris McGee, P.E., NCDOT
Ms. Katie Simmons, NCDOT

c _ .r

Photograph 1. View of inlet.
aL ; !

-aC.. . t •I,• ?i
?J 1? f
?7
Site 1, SR 2333 (Glory Road) - Wake County
Photograph 2. View of outlet.
FTE
• 7
J•
1. -

i !I dF
ALI
` ? l µ sr v* J :?_ _ Y
III ,J.? ?. L7•,}?/S1 /?J .-y Y .Ir.
1^r ??- ?7. '1? ?1??•; 11 ??! i;l 't ?.1 \ 1'''PI j' r. 7-.,'?/', '-'Pl - - ... ?j?,y, `•1.
. 49
I^
t
Photograph 3. View of linear wetland/ephemeral stream at inlet.
Photograph 4. View of wetland/ephemeral stream at outlet.
Site 2, SR 2333 (Glory Road) - Wake County

? j
L? -
Photograph 5. View of linear wetland/ephemeral stream at inlet.
Photograph 6. View of wetland/ephemeral stream at outlet.
Site 3, SR 2333 (Glory Road) - Wake County
. t i. w'teUa 10 h k ,
.:• ,t i „? iti s ??? St o nx Ch .. ? , @ t W r
it A,
f • ... Cen, K + x
%
. r.
r J ?' t ?? , 1 1 i'
300
art _ v `?
11? '
r ??•ti? v 'a ,? Lr
.. ?%? v i
2331
-
,
E k
Lauding StriF
--u , t -- - t
Begin Project
?S
• IT E
-SITE 2 (cituu'?i.-.b l .?
SITE 3
1
-? n Project
y _
k
r
u
77 ,
,
•
. 7
? Y
t;
Project Study Area
1 i SR 2333 Glory Road
i,
r .•. .. t
' Wake County
'
1
? Zebulon
USGS Topo Map (1968/1981)
C? fi , tl Figure 1 1:24,000
Corwriaht (C) 1998. Maotech. Inc.
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 43
ApB Me DuB Me
AD62 aj 4 BoD VaC2n. V3 DUB ?i??wf p6 - R ADB
F
r
` •h ? v„ao '..? a?? ? li Wa6 s. ? ?C??`O Va6 APB 96\\=::: ? ?+a'T ".?
e?'..
PQ x "`" ioc Begin Project Me ??
,?; Me r,r,-t • ?,,.? ? ? ?? ??? _ I VaC2 r O p A B? r D - ?`? sw
(I LoC4" Me -.. 8 • ` ;P82 SITE 1 u`
C APC i h ? '`: Vr LoC AP Gc AW4 • ( x y,-
;?ApB
Me .. 3 SITE 3
I A
ii4 ? DuB ? ? 1M APC 'r'Y. a APB2.. r P .: ? - ?? :f -• ?" A'pB2
:tom ?..+ 482 "` Orle - C t,;'. ( ?? \
}f Cn AoB
tI Dub a` t C ti A Cn p oC Va82,!,
ApB i 2 ?.° End Project
1 ? LdC P ? ? "" ? „' Dub ??\ -- ? ? - " ?i•? ? ? p. _ ?, ? ..
ApB2 ?Q0 Cn
„ARB APB Du Bt L - GZ ApB2 e_ x ?IMc# \ e: v0
pP ?3 r ? t1` `:'i ?
E u 4w AgB oQQ hfd dR = APC2 ApB2 J Ap62?i1
^rl rya., x f :Dub APC2 ?
APB2,Ap
ti ?? f O t ?- 't' a
'? Cn
xc t A ? ApB2 APB pC . Cn rr ?` (.
AR APC2 p82
P ;? Low ?` Wo ?
r. w'.
?j? •z. '" (tile ? r? u6 f DuC ? G
T
t Ma s LoC 'f (ApC20
µ Q A DuB C
va- Dub
k , y4 u6: m ?I ApC ADC k 'APB2 ».
T' - ? ? uC ,? 1 _? ? y?q p r -a"?r ?. ? y? .R ?-- ,. _l?? A Z; Va6''? l7 S Il JG ",x.-< ? f- ---r •f? ;gy ? ? ;A\ e.;., t
4 RO q" -. a? qpG .C B
.,??•? .
f ` ApB3 f U Vc ?!r c ?'? ? 'RP$'5;? ApB2 ? p , Gi"? Me 1 Lh u
PBZ
/ DUB ii APB ?n ;2 4C LoC° .<'. r APC2
?r? 7 APB ? ? q ,oC Ir, 'Z' ?- ,?, ..? rt':' ? AD62?. 'n !r• A ?t:` ? ,? ? '
O rx? m r GL? »?. V
J. 11 r. APCr Q pU APC24r • a' DuB
o
1t
f ?rr ?c s j ,/ s t N> Ap82 A
' n Ap82 DuB of ?' ?? APC' e DuB
Q Itl ..kit W DuBa gpB2
9 ApB2 o n
r IF y G
rill ?,_ I', g ? ? = ? % ?*?,, ?- ?ti ," ?;• f ApB PQ ,.? „ ? ??
•'- y PQ Ap82 ApB2 x v u8
A ApC x,tr ?. ? t r '? • _ ? ?Ir ?'?
SC2Z ?
BBB s 7``„ n r?"s'.. PQ-? .?• ``K,?'a . -
- v6 '?. ? •'? " t- ,?`?'?' _=+.? APB2 .i ??
I 6 0? r ? F ..t .rr
DUB a PQ r 6r? 1 ApC2 - APg2 './
r APB2' ApD ry-T Y3 ApB2 Cn ar /r
I? .\?•? C7 + x r^. n it _ :VaB
a
Me rdti ° LoG`?? Wn tt a y ,•r ?`t 9?B
B2 --fir. LoB QQ.6ai ?Y, ?? a l08 } 1?P Me `a
4y AP ; g C. Ap62 £F - ' ..S A` . c y . c APg R'y j
Q) t?. A;.. ?V08 ??44
l
ApB2 V
••Q4 '<c 9 Meo r B
?•?, rg ? ? I ?r' ?? -? ? ter- ?'
II A 2 c APB2 d 3
•.? .? X00 _ _ f ? ApB2 ? ? ?.?
i 6ti Pp r.B2. P
Avc
t?
ADCZ LoD ApC
(n
c
C)
C, -? o 0
C O M
O II
L
r.+ T M
O V
p M ? M
C>
v ? V M ? O
T a) o I N
(0 C-- -
?Tw
CL 4- 4.0
U o + ..
L O C/]
p a CD
LL
F
c U)
O w w
O + > L I
Q d L Q p v I
^
p O I (D
3
L a 0 I >
1 a T I
O C v
L p L C I v 1
4- O I 0 o
p L I Oj O I
N 7 ps -
(n c c I
O 0 3
a + (0 -0 I I I I
O- O p auoZ I I I
L x L N II I Z auoZ
0- LL LJ W =
E II II
N ? -- I I I I
4- II
o w 1
z II = 1
;I auoZ i I o I I auo
3 I Z
I ? N? I I
I O .La
ao w
`+- I o a L I I
+ II a-L 1 4-
4 1104-
~ L q° ; co
U) N I 3 I
o
0' O
p ? I I I I V !?' o'
ON \ ) I I I -v - - Oa,
c I I Nc
+ m m I VIM o v V `? L
O
o o' I ?n o ++
3 L, I + L C0
E? v} I +n+ I I + a 0 (D
m a' I I x0 1 1 ;? L my
oL mL I I my I I L
O
E U
O
av I auo auoZ aw
I I I I
II j1
I II
LO -0 If II
aUOZ I L I Z uau'OZ
-I- T I } 1
L 1 N v i
O >
0 3 I
N N 1? v -?I
M
Q I 4- O I
N I N O 1
,^ 1 L
v / LL LL
F- ?
W

T
4-
U
0
L.L.
[
Q U)
Q)
.- U
+
II j
CL L
U O
C)
Q
L
U
O
W
_Q [ +
[ [
L O
U 4-
N ?
t4 [ [

O O
O '-
OL
1)
in c 3
o o _ o
L X
a W L =
W LL N
2
LL
9
o LLJ ;
z -
oo
N + T
_o
w ? U
F- M
rn
V/1 Q M
I ?
N
E
0
m
L
[L
00
+ L
U m
mE
L-C
°n
3 m
Oq-
4- 0

r
i
i\AA JA. ?_
11 l_ _`
VL 1
O,
+ L
4- a
auo-Z
GUOZ
m`
o?
"O 3
m o
U) m
O
CL 4-
0 4-
L O
n ?
LL
?
W W
~
W
I
I t I
I ? 4- I
I N 3
I > I
I a T I
O -?I
3
I ? ? I
I O O I
N O
I L
I I
'I II
I
I 11
II II
II II
I I
11 I
I II
I

?Z avoZ
I II
II _ II
II p II
o o a I I

t auoZ
11 NaN I I
o
f
I O
I
I
a4-.C
04-
L 0
3
I I I
I I 1
II i ? ,??
XkG. Y ?
?n
0
C ?
y -? o

L ° U
pcr,? ?
tJ M ? i.
N Lb
d ?
..a
I
I I o?n I I
II ?+ II n
'? I O
' N r?i I I ;`j L
a
I I I ? 0 L
I II 41
II II /
I I , a o
I L
I I O? L
C
II II N
? I 0,5
+L
_ 4-
I m U O
> I of
I O 3 L-C
I L CL
? T I '? 3 N
0 04-
0 t 0 4- O
I ?
,O O I
I N 0 I
I L
LL
F- lt.
W W

0 0
T N
O ?

_ 4
Cl -
+
- O 4-
L
a O
(o
o
U- LL
H LL
F
C ? w w
O U I I
I c I
4- I
O ;
0
C a
Q C
0
+ -0

2 a?,V I >
I a I
T I
I
p C C Z
;
I v
v I
L O
U I 0O I
t I L I
N p?
C ?
C -
a I
I I
Q+ ( 3 / avo I I l
O (n A
O 0 L Z' I
I I
L X
a- w L
W LL N
= c(0
Op I
I I I Z aUOZ
I

LL. L
(D I
+O w t5r i I -
Z 11 .. 1 ?--- 3 0 1 1
o I V I .I auoZ

o
r
C?
YYy ? ?

Ci

Imo.',
L ? U

N
M Gr

4-
w o -71 v 11
I N a
I I ?
?l L
I I a+ I I a
L
I O4 + I I
I LO -
I a?3

?

o0

1 I
I I I I + L
V N
l I 1 Q) EV
I'M ' I
Cl

,
N
41 .

4- o --
O4
i I ?a i I
L I
I
ca v

cpL .T 4-
I 4-
X r) I I

:COL
BG
o I I (D
ff; I I I
I .I auoZ

? II I
I 11
II II
II II
I I I I u

.
M c I
I z auoZ
T

L

?
D a I
N
I ? I
CD
0 ?G

O I v 3 I

L
rn ff; p, T I
i
V) < I 3

N 4-
I v I
Ln I N O
I
LL
w
L
F L
-
w
6 ? efFj
Office Use Only:
USACE Action ID No.
Version March 05
085-1.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
Z 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5 Jon G. Nance
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St. Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: JNance(a)dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map'trlearfy showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Proposed replacement of structures conveying unnamed tributaries to the
Little- River in association with upgrading and paving SR 2333 (Glory Road in Wake
County.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Zebulon
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Zebulon take
Hwv 96 towards Younssville. From iunction with US 64, travel north for approximately 2.0
miles and make a left onto SR 2333 (Glory Road).
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum):
Site 1: 35.8569 ON 78.3520 °W
Site 2: 35.8566 ON 78.3511 °W
Site 3: 35.8555 ON 78.3420 °W
6. Property size (acres): 7 2 acre (0.99 mi)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Little River
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 9
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is surrounded by wooded areas and agricultural land.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Grade,
drain, pave, and erosion control at SR 2333 (Glory Road). The NCDOT will also dewater
the work sites during construction. Equipment may include excavator, backhoe, bulldozer,
grader, and crane.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is part of the 2004-2005 secondary
road paving program. The existing gravel roadway will be paved with asphalt.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Existing pipes will be replaced with
longer length pipes in association with this secondary road The NCDOT will also
dewater the UT work sites during construction.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested
marsh 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) ,
,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
Site 1 NONE N/A N/A N/A N/A
Site 2 Fill in Wetland Emergent Wetland No 0 ft 0.04
Site 3 Fill in Wetland Emergent Wetland No 0 ft 0.02
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.06
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.06
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Impact linear feet (acres)
Site 1 UT Little River Fill (piped length) Perennial 2 ft 20 0.0009
Rip rap armoring
16
N/A
along stream bank
Temporary 36 N/A
dewatering concurrent
N/A
Site 2 N/A Fill (piped length) N/A 0 N/A
Rip rap armoring 0 N/A
along stream bank
Temporary 0 N/A
dewatering
N/A
Site 3 N/A Fill (piped length) N/A 0 N/A
Rip rap armoring 0 N/A
along stream bank
Temporary 0 N/A
dewatering
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 36 0.0009
Page 4 of 9
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0009
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.06
Open Water Impact (acres): NONE
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.0609
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 36
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. All wetlands and surface waters
Page 5 of 9
not affected by construction will be protected from unnecessary encroachment during
construction. Strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of wetlands
and surface waters will be enforced during construction. Only the smallest amount of fill
necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the United States or protected
riparian buffers.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NCDOT proposes to meet mitigation requirements by payment into the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Compensatory mitigation requirements will be
assimilated on a quarterly basis and provided to the EEP for their acceptance with a copy
provided to the USACE for verification and accounting purposes.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Page 6 of 9
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wip/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 66t
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.06 cre
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note:. If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ?
Page 7 of 9
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Site 1 (STA 25+51)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 1,297 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 794 1.5 N/A
Total 2,091 N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Site 2 (STA 28+78)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3,385 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 1,317 1.5 N/A
Total 4,702 N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Site 3 (STA 56+39)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 2,128 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 1,345 1.5 N/A
Total 31473 N/A
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0244, or.0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Existing: 4.2 acre impervious surface (avg 25
foot wide gravel road) of 7.2 acre total protect size. Proposed: 2.4 acre impervious surface
(proposed 20 foot wide asphalt paved road) of 7.2 acre total project size. Erosion and sediment
control devices along the project are comLnsed of temporary rock silt checks temporary silt
basins and temporary silt fence The NCDOT proposes to install temporary erosion and
sediment control devices in Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the riparian buffer. The temporary structures
Page 8 of 9
will be removed once the vegetation has been established and then seeded with a seed mixture of
fescue and bahia grass. Please note that the placement of these structures are within the 60
right-of-way width and their associated impacts are included within the site totals listed
above.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate wastewater.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Upgrading SR 2333 will not result in additional development.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
51131oS
(,lpplicant/Agent'stignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Appendix One
(USAGE Wetland Delineation forms/
DWQ rating sheets)
DATA FORM -
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

Project / Site: S` Z 3 3 3 Date:
Applicant / Owner: iG?"?: -r> f - T?J ( /Uav? ce County: VAIN
Investigator: ?? r"Y1 14a c"./ . State: A C
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
-
- Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes NO
7 Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION...-,
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum . Indicator
-T 9
2._C,atg Y' ?- FAC 6 : 10.
3. T :? t i4 r:,, _ 1-,-A4ek /f r&- 11.
4. 7 7 12. b:,..
5. 13.
6 14 ... ,.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...

HYDROLOGY:
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Prima Indicators:
_ Other undated
Saturated In Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: p tom, Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves

Depth to Saturated Soil: Local Soil Survey Data ,
FAC-Neutral Test .
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
f?
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No.
Profile Description:
Depth ., Matrix Colors
Inches Horizon Munseli Moi j Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moist). Abundance/Contrast Structure etc. -
_
Or le Z117- ., _
Z, 5 k IV
Hydric SoilIndicators:
- Histosol Concretions
- Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_Reducing Conditions' Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No'. Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes r/?No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: ' Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual:
5t
Project Name SR 2333 Nearest Road SR Z33_3
County 4k/a 'le e- ?i`etland Area D- aches Wetland Width 50 feet
Name of evaluator Date z °s
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
Zother head?iau.rs Wra""? j ylarf
Soil series
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
predominantly mineral - non-sandy
redominantly sandy .
Hydraulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width z 100 feet
Water storage x 4.00 =
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
? Z
S? .
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin _ Carolina Bay
Bog forest - Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream charnels
weight
R
A
T
I
N
G
Bank/Shoreline stabilization
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, ups-lope, or radius)
forested/natural vegetation 75 %
agriculture, urban/suburban 2° %
impervious surface _5 %
Dominant vegetation
r
(1)?__ ??l?1ulS ??
(2) e
Flooding and wetness
_ semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
?intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
x 4.00 =
Pollutant removal * x 5.00 =
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 =
Aquatic life value
x 4.00 =
Recreation/Education a x 1.00 =

Wetland
Rating
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 112 mile upstream,
-----u-pslo-pe: or radius-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) ?,f(k
Project ! Site: S l' z 3 3 (G%,, Date: 2-1110 s
Applicant / Owner: NC'. v r - , /'V,, . County: t;J<' cc
Investigator: /Y10hu?? State: - !O_
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
'VEGETATION

Dominant Plant Species .: _$tratum Indicator .. Dominant Plant Suedes Stratum , Indicator
n?
9.
2. e) H FACgW 10.
3. i.. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...

HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primarylndicators:
_ Other ??inundaled
turated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: Water-Stained Leaves

0 - kocal Soil Survey Data .
/
(in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: FAC-Neutral Test
,
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes- No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors - Mottle Colors. Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munseli Moist). Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. -
?' Z ib yle ?f z ?mY l Amy
Z'1Z F 215 y"2 2 Z 5 Y,/-,
Hydric Soil indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfldic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions" Listed on National Hydric Soils"List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain In Remarks) • ?
Remarks: :
r ? CYY`G SZ?1 FS ??"P CQ:+n?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ? No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes _2::f' No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
"'

tii •< • :::i;>a<•.••ay:: ::>..'_ - --.y: - •:<. <•r.?> o« y,y.: .: y.? .:<•, - :•::hr• 't:i<t:: i.it :. - r5R
,. 3::h.':Yf:F r...• ••w;? .. iS :fi. ?: K,,. r b•e :??i. .<1•b?t? _,..
?•?::.:.:.<>..R ?::.,y:a;f:...,.,'?tiZ:i:Y.•???i?`a5W4S. nv?,.e>: ?:.:.S.s, .iS• . t9?. 'gi.:;iii??E?.,.ro'.t3?tZ<?,tJ.?;,3.is,':.;K.J>•;?4.;?<<.e: ?. o::ri.?r;:rs iY.•3e?i(;Z;?:s::>L'',:3r5.
t ..v.. Y• .Yn•
Project Name 52 2333 Nearest Road s2 -z 33 3
County Y?/Ake Wetland ea pOZ ages Wetland Width < S?? feet
Name of evaluator flQa?Ae-r My?? a?1r?G Date z os
Wetland Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
-/other heacfwd?ty? clra f?????1
Soil series
predominantly organic - humus, muck,
or peat
Predominantly mineral - non-sandy
predominantly sandy .
Hydraulic factors
steep topo=aghJ
ditched or channelized
total wetland width i 100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within 1/2 mile upstream, ups-lope, or radius)
-/forested/natural vegetation -75%
?agriculture, urban/suburban Z° %
impervious surface S %
Dominant vegetation
(1)' ?ur1C((S S?
(3)
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
?intermittanly flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of floodin¢ or surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bolton land hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest - Other
*the ratinq_system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or str __ charnels ______________
weight
`> =<"
R Water storage 2 x 4.00=
A Bank/Shoreline stabilization x 4.00 =
T Pollutant removal * x 5.00 = ' h'<<
I Wildlife habitat I x 2.00 = >->`
Aquatic life value x 4.00 =
G Recreation/Education O x 1.00 = <<<
Wetland
*Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/2 mile upstream,
u slo a or radius -----------------
4
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Z 4- -3
hb
J"4( A
Project / Site: 5X 2-333 KGrorq Al) Date: 2- O5-
Applicant / Owner: A10 Uo'T- Joy 9 anc e, County: h/a
Investigator: ?, ' ,?r<a v State: /jL1
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ,/ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No, Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No Plot ID
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION ...
S
Dominant Plant Soecies • .: Stratum , Indicator Dominant Plant Saecies „ Stratum Indicator
1. nn t't0e-I `r 6 i tlro 7- 61
-
- 9.
2. Pit r- (r
::F
r- r 10.
3. `' < u i arx' St?C?ttil"' T Fffi 11.
4. _ L`ornct5. ?!ayrCl:. 31,? f?i.'? :. 12.
5. 13.
6. _ 14. .
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). _
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are/are not
Classed as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken...
Al
HYDROLOGY:,
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other _ Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits
- Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: n°rne (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 7 12- (in.)
) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water-Stained Leaves

- _ Local Soil. Survey Data.
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:.

SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Y94__•._ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moist). Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.•
Z 715Y?

Hydric Soil Indicators:
- Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer In Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils'List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks`
Remarks: _
0'0 n t;
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ? Is the Sampling Point
Wetland. Hydrology Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes_ No I/r
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual:
?? Z i 3