20050027 Ver 1_Application_20050106

a `
e°` srAiF °
05002
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 3, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers D Q
Washington Regulatory Field Office LS k_U>
D
P.O. Box 1000 JAN 0 6
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000 2??5 DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETS S AND TORMWATER BRANCH
ATTENTION: Mr. Bill Biddlecome
NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
Subject: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 13 on SR 1341 over Burnt Mill Creek,
Perquimans County, NCMA 1006, WBS Element 37479
Please find attached the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form for the
referenced project, which is being submitted to assist you in reviewing details of the proposed
action. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 13 over Burnt Mill Creek at the Perquimans and Chowan County boundary (Figures 1 and
2). During construction, traffic will be detoured off-site using existing secondary roads. The
anticipated let date for this proposed project is September 2004.
The existing structure, which was built in 1959 and has a sufficiency rating of 36.7, is
structurally deficient. The superstructure is composed of an asphalt covered timber floor on
continuous 1-beams. End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The existing
structure is 55 feet long and has a clear roadway width of 19.2 feet. The existing bridge will be
removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal (BMP-BDR). The timber and steel components will be removed without dropping any
components into Waters of the U.S.
The recommended replacement structure is a two span bridge 85 feet in length with a
clear roadway width of 28 feet. The approach roadway will hold the existing horizontal
alignment and will be approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. Deck and
roadway drainage will be maintained by utilizing a grade of 0.4 percent and a minimum cross-
slope of 2.0 percent for the proposed structure and roadway approaches. No deck drains, funnel
drains, or drainage structures are included in the project.
MAILING ADDRESS:
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
SUITE 100
EDENTON, NC 27932
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
113 Airport Drive
Suite 100.
Edenton, NC 27932
The proposed bridge replacement is a Case 2 demolition project as described by the
NCDOT BMP-BDR. The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) states
that anadromous species are found in this portion of Burnt Mill Creek, including alewife and
blueback herring. A significant fishery for sunfish also exists at this site. NCDOT will
follow all stream crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including moratoriums
on in-water work between February 15 and June 30.
Burnt Mill Creek is located within the Pasquotank River drainage, subbasin 03-01-52,
and hydrologic unit 03010205. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage classification for Burnt Mill Creek of "C; Sw" from its source to the
Yeopim River confluence approximately one mile downstream of Bridge No. 13. There are
currently no 303(d) impaired waters, high quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource
waters (ORW), drinking water' supply waters (WS-1 and WS-II), or 303(d) listed waters
within a one mile radius of the project study area.
Permanent impacts to Waters of the U.S. include 70 square feet (<0.01 acre) of fill in
wetlands from widening of the eastern roadway approach to conform to current design standards.
Existing wood pilings will either be pulled out of the channel or cut flush with the substrate.
Construction equipment will be operated from the existing road surface and/or upland areas and
will not enter wetland areas. Measures will be taken to ensure that sediment releases from this
activity will be contained to the immediate location of the pile removal operation. Jurisdictional
wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the existing bridge (Figure 3).
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified one Federal Species
of Concern (FSC) as occurring in Perquimans County. In addition, the USFWS has identified
one Threatened (proposed for de-listing) (bald eagle) and one FSC as occurring in Chowan
County. Suitable habitat for the bald eagle does not exist in the project study area. Therefore, it
is reasonable to conclude that project construction will have No Effect on this protected species.
We are proceeding with the understanding that the proposed actions are authorized under
provisions of Nationwide Permit No. 3. We anticipate that 401 General Water Quality
Certification No. 3376 will be authorized by the NCDWQ. The NCDOT will comply with all
conditions of the 401 Water Quality Certification. Since this project lies within the jurisdiction
of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) due to the presence of public trust waters, which
is an Area of Environmental Concern, we are concurrently applying for a CAMA General Permit.
A copy of this application is submitted for your consideration.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the project, please contact me at
[phone]. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
6 4?L-
Clay Willis
Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 1
Attachments
PCN Application Form
Permit Drawings (8.5 x 11)
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Project Topography
Figure 3 Waters of the US
CAMA Application/Cover Letter
w/attachments
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Ms. Lynn Mathis, NCDtM
Mr. Mike Summers, P.E., Bridge Maintenance
Mr. Kevin Austin, Mulkey
Office Use Onl : Form Version May 2002
050027
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: 9
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: Highway Division 1
113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
Edenton NC 27932
Attn: Anthony W. Roper, P.E., Division Engineer
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: aroper(adot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Clay Willis
Company Affiliation: NCDOT Division 1 Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: 113 Airport Drive, Suite 100
Edenton, NC 27932
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ctwillis(a dot.state.nc.us
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge No. 13 over Burnt Mill Creek on SR 1341 (Burnt Mill Road)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Moving Ahead 1006B
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Perquimans & Chowan Nearest Town: Edenton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Edenton at the
US 17/NC 32 intersection follow US 17 North for approximately 5 miles. Bear right onto
SR 1343 (Hopewell Road) and travel approximately 2.2 miles to the intersection of SR 1341.
Turn right onto SR 1341 and travel about 0.75 miles to the bridge site.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36005'18.20"N, 76°30'26.81"W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 1.4 acres (estimated based on 1,000-foot length project and 60-foot
wide right-of-way)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Burnt Mill Creek
8. River Basin: Pasquotank
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/a(huin/niVs/.)
Page 2 of 8
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing bridge over stream. Land immediately surrounding
upstream and downstream bridge area is undisturbed cypress/gum swamp forest. Rural
residential and agriculture fields are located within %2 mile of bridge site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
existing structure is a 4-span 55 foot long bridge constructed of asphalt covered timber deck
on continuous I-beam and timber joists. The existing bents and piles will be removed, and
new end bents .- > will be poured on site. The recommended structure is a two-span,
85-feet long cored slab bridge with concrete end bents and interior bents. Traffic will be
maintained using existing local roads for an off-site detour. Equipment to be used includes
standard bridge construction equipment. See Plan View sheet 5 of 6 (attached).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Existing bridge is structurally deficient and
replacing it with a new structure will result in a safer structure that conforms to the latest
safety standards.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
The NC Division of Coastal Management issued a determination on April 8, 2004 stating that no
CAMA jurisdictional wetlands are located at the bridge site..
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
Page 3 of 8
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Permanent impacts to Waters of the U. S. include 70 sq.ft. (>0.01 acre) of fill in wetlands from
the approach roadways g widened to conform to current design standards. Existing timber
pilings will be either pulled out of the channel or cut flush with the substrate. Construction
equipment will be operated from the existing road surface and/or upland areas and will not enter
wetland areas. See Plan View sheets 4 and 5 (attached).
2. Individually list wetland= impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1. Wetland fill 0.002 yes 0 to 200 Swamp Forest

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate. Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.2 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.002 acre (70 square feet)
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below: NoNt-
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.go_v. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Page 4 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: N/A
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma) acres bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related.to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts will be avoided by replacing the bridle in place, having an off-site detour, having no
deck drains over open water, and no equipment will be in wetlands. The new bridge will be
approximately 30 feet longer than the old bridge, thus endbents will be moved farther away from
the waters edge, increasing the floodplain area under the bridge. Use of NCDOT's Best
Management Practices (BMP) for Protection of Surface Waters (PSW) will minimize temporary
impacts to water quality.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
Page 5 of 8
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ht!p:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.htnil.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
__ /`I't;nn?;n^ is rtn? l-,einc= Yecn,Neti-??G?, ?»f a-?a n.bD2 F}rr¢r o? ir,???, k)eGG)?
i
W' 1\ rtStnY'e f? ?? acres n-? i ,a4l?vvr? Diu re_+rwii?.n? C'cr?.?.xt).f. ?+ 1? ,
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application,process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at htlp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 6 of 8
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed. Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existiniz impervious acreage totals approximately 0.17_acre and proposed impervious acreage
totals approximately 0.22 acre of the total 1.4 acres on the site. The increase in impervious
acreage is due to the longer bridge structure and wider roadway approach at the bridge. There
will be no deck drains funnel drains, or drainage structures on this project.
Page 7 of 8
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) states that anadromous species
are found in this portion of Burnt Mill. Creek, including alewife and blueback herring. The site
is also a significant fishery for sunfish, striped bass, white perch, yellow perch, and catfish.
NCDOT must follow all stream crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including
moratoriums on in-water work between February 15 to June 30. Field investigations were
conducted to assess habitat presence for protected species listed for Perquimans and Chowan
Counties. There is no suitable habitat in the project area for bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus , the only species subject to Section 7 consultation that is listed for these counties.
i/.7/o
Applicant(igent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 13 on SR 341 over Burnt Mill Creek
Page 8 of 8
FORTH CAROLINA
®0
{
° d
thei
u 9,M?Lfr e-
BRIDGE X13 / r
'"+? r?'" ?- JJJ! Greenfield
40,
?r? f - t++[iddleron Creek ~` l
3 i rr-
NCDO JL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY PERQUIMANS COUNTY
PROJECT: MA-1006
MAPS REPLACE BRIDGE X13
ON SR 1341 OVER
BURNT MILL CREEK
SHEET / OF {O 2/13/04
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 JIMMIE M. PARISH 410 OLD HERTFORD ROAD
EDENTON, NC 27932
2 WALTER L. BLOUNT 330 BLOUNT MILL ROAD
EDENTON, NC 27932
3 LEON D. WEBB, JR. 137 OAKLEY ROAD
BENTON, KY 42025
r
4 GAIL WIGGINS P.O. BOX 102
EDENTON, NC 27932
5 WARNER L. BONNER 1663 GANDY STREET
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32208
1V CD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PERQUDLA NS COUNTY
PROJECT-MA-1006
REPLACE BRIDGE U13
ON SR 131 OVER
BURNT MILL CREEK
SHEET 3 OF ? 2 / 13 / 04
0
N i u i
? I M a I ?
?/?
I N ?'
Li J I CO
;? as
+ I
icic - Z! Ch
l owl I U Op?U
` f- ! I i i I v?! a ?4
0- cn 10 V w' ft,
9 Z it ; -? I ti r o
`{' m V i w C O a' v' z
x
Q i. o+ I q to 3 a s a O
LLJ
M a w / d
Ld
i I u
SJ ?
VJ f, j'-' ? ? d
c
?00fil I, IN
Q s ; ; Z 3?
m
V 3 I ' m t 3
tl LL O
tU')
N r -?
i 3
1 I <
m
I
w
W t V \ J ?? ' ? ?
U
I ~' DO-
!i \ y l
oo+b Q J
H " ?1 C?
r1 <I: f y,
W u ! ^ ? m 'SL ? r

N o

W Z N19
O

Q
J
r

V
LL
` o Y
cc
w CO
O
>-
a
¢ co T-
U)

T
cc OU¢ OJ
L
CD T C/) S
LL U- Z W
r
Z 2w oa
Z
w o s
- 00 in
2
aC
CD
cc
T-
W
? wa ()w

) cc
< a g0
(L
C
z o w
E cc
w
'' U
Z
J
U ... o
C
C 2
U
w

N Z
Q Z
O

W
U v
G
w

J
J
U- ?.
na v O
w
F-

W

D o ft? G m
?- 0 N W Q
? @
-1
0 N
T T T

JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
EXISTING ROAD
STUDY CORRIDOR
r
WA 2 5,® W A
1.3 AC W A24 A ®W A3
i A2
A2'" ?iAl WgA4
/WAe-'I' WA9
WB ?wA2Q???' AC?
0.2 AC TWA 8 7WAI
WB-1 WX?,w- >>>? WA1
W B 8 WA
.? ? W-A1•? ??
1.1 AC
,?WB2
B3 W5
WB
0.6 AC
4-MULKEY WETLANDS SCALE: Figure No.
cNOw?up r eaNpu?rwNrp 7q _ 150'
=rp=p MA1006 I" = 150'
pwLt .w. N.C.
?• __?_?
19191 ppl•191=
IWWW91 NYILKM?NOeCON Bridge No. 13 On SR 1341 Prepared For:
Over Burnt Mill Creek 3
Perquimans County -wwmff9,
A
??9t,;?ahS C
cho?a'--?.. o?h?
I
1102

.wycrross
tisviiie
ert
Belvidere ??
c Ch panr,he
4-'
PER .UI ANS
.,._.__ 3i Winfal??
1 77
GP ls:Ji
Duran,; Neck

MA1006
Bq Mili Cr?ek

0.25 ol
PROJECT VICINITY
PERQUIMANS COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 13 ON SR 1341
OVER BURNT MILL CREEK
NORTH CAROLINA MOVING AHEAD!
MA1006
FIGURE 1

File: G:\project\2002\290.33 MA 1006\Survey\ma1006wet.txt 4/28/2004, 12:12:07Pb
3001,860610.767,2737012.336,100.00,3627-WA1
3002,860589.090,2737011.451,100.00,3627-WA2
3003,860573.634,2737022.589,100.00,3627-WA3
3004,860549.149,2737037.072,100.00,3627-WA4
3005,860537.503,2737017.505,100.00,3627-WA5
3006,860538.512,2737005.612,100.00,3627-WA6
3007,860544.149,2736984.656,100.00,3627-WA7
3008,860566.476,2736970.869,100.00,3627-WA8
3009,860525.305,2736933.058,100.00,3627-WA9
3010,860480.007,2736878.819,100.00,3627-WA10
3011,860457.588,2736839.101,100.00,3627-WA11
3012,860435.550,2736783.938,100.00,3627-WA12
3013,860415.312,2736749.20Q,100.00,3627-WA13
3014,860397.389,2736685.385,100.00,3627-WA14
3015,860374.522,2736630.356,100.00,3627-WA15
3016,860341.558,2736558.079,100.00,3627-WA16
3017,860396.190,2736541.819,100.00,3627-WA17
3018,860427.917,2736611.365,100.00,3627-WA18
3019,860448.009,2736659.272,100.00,3627-WA19
3020,860464.525,2736716.940,100.00,3627-WA20
3021,860491.129,2736773.108,100.00,3627-WA21
3022,860511.082,2736819.412,100.00,3627-WA22
3023,860536.506,2736861.196,100.00,3627-WA23
3024,860589.909,2736925.437,100.00,3627-WA24
3025,860644.820,2736983.357,100.00,3627-WA25
3026,860319.516,2736501.047,100.00,7000-BRIDGE
3027,860352.712,2736548.297,100.00,7000-BRIDGENE
3028,860367.862,2736540.894,100.00,7000-BRIDGE
3029,860340.313,2736486.923,100.00,7000-BRIDGE
3030,860295.311,2736513.896,100.00,3627-WB1
3031,860270.147,2736471.508,100.00,3627-WB2
3032,860223.336,2736426.439,100.00,3627-WB3
3033,860219.480,2736441.743,100.00,3627-WB5
3034,860403.924,2736474.149,100.00,3627-WB6
3035,860389.086,2736425.405,100.00,3627-WB7
3036,860373.965,2736371.750,100.00,3627-WB8
3037,860390.776,2736357.007,100.00,3627-WB9
Page: 1