20110311 Ver 1_Application_20110405

of °
7IR - 5 201, 1
o -c
DENR . WATER QUALITY
WMAMM dun c- .... -
Office Use Only:
14
2 03 Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
I a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: RGP 31
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Pitt 173, SR 1565, South Grimesland Bridge Road Over Island Swamp Pitt County
Bridge to Box Culvert Replacement
2b. County: Pitt
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Grimesland
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 213.207411
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. WA
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no. 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no_: 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a_ Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Pitt 173,SR 1565, South Grimesland Bridge Road Over
Island Swamp
Latitude: N 35.496609 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.181518
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Island Swamp
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico Lower Tar 03020103
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Pitt 173 SR 1565, South Grimesland Bridge Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture
dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge to Box Culvert Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Box Culvert Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 22' Long by 24' Wide Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 19'-0" x 6'-1" x 38' Aluminum Box
Culvert. Excavators,Dump Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Box Culvert Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): NCDOT Other: NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February,2011
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps 0 Sq
ft

? No
? DWQ .
.
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ 0 Sq. ft.
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes
? No ? Corps
? DWQ 0 Sq. ft.
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ® Corps 0 Sq
ft

? No
? DWQ .
.
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: 0 Sq. ft. 404 Wetland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary M (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Box Culvert Island Swamp ® PER
? INT ? Corps
® DWQ 20' 46'
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps 0' 0
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps 0' 0'
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps 0' 0
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 46 LF
3i. Comments: 46 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ® Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required.
B1 ®P ? T Fill Island Swamp ® Nos 545 Sq. Ft. 375 Sq. Ft.
B2 ® P ? T Fill Island Swamp ® Nos 560 Sq. Ft. 380 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Island Swamp ® Nos 610 Sq. Ft. 405 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
H Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ® Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
131 ®P ? T B4 Fill Island Swamp ® Nos 560 Sq. Ft. 400Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
63 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total butter impacts 2275 Sq. Ft. 1560 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments: Buffer Zone 1 Impacts = 0.05 Acres Buffer Zone 2 Impacts = 0.04 Acres
get
Pa of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 0 Sq. Ft. of 404 Wetland Impacts for this Project: Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the
greatest extent feasible, with just those impacts occurring for the Box Culvert installation for the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
3. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b_ If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and Special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will
have wattles installed to treat water before entering into the buffers; the roadside ® Yes ? No
ditches are vegetated and will treat stormwater as well.The Existing Ditches and
Pipes in the Buffers will remain Intact; there will be no disturbance of the existing
pipes and existing ditches in the buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and Special Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will have wattles installed to treat water before entering into the buffers; the roadside ditches
are vegetated and will treat stormwater as well.The Existing Ditches and Pipes in the Buffers will remain Intact; there will
be no disturbance of the existing pipes and existing ditches in the buffers.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local govemment's jurisdiction is this project? NIA
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
® Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes
? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b . If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
? Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E) Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCWRC and On-Site Investigation
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT Historic Architecture and Archaelogy Natural Environment Unit of PD&EA
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Box Culvert designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson March 18, 2011
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name pl ge pfs'
Signature
Date
(Agent's signature val o y an orization letter from the applicant
r ed.
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Moratorium Pitt 173.txt
From: Wilson, Travis W.
sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:57 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: RE: Pitt 173
WRC does not have any specific concerns.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:32 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Rogerson, Maria A; Johnson, Jay B
subject: Pitt 173
Good Morning Mr. Travis.... Division 2 plans to replace Pitt 173,an existing timber
bridge with a proposed Box culvert. we would like to know if there is a moratorium
at this location. Thank You.... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
March 10, 2011
Attention: Mike Sutton, Division 2 Environmental Specialist
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: Freshwater Mussel Survey Report for Proposed Replacement of Bridge 173 over
Island Swamp, SR 1565 (Grimesland Bridge Road), Pitt County, NCDOT
Division 2.
From: Matt Haney, Environmental Specialist, Natural Environment Unit
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 173 over Island Swamp on SR 1565 (Grimesland Bridge Road) in Pitt County. Island
Swamp is a tributary of Chicod Creek in the Tar River Basin.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recognizes the federally
endangered Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio steinstwi ana) as occurring historically in Pitt
County. The Tar River spinymussel is endemic to the Tar and Neuse River Basins in North
Carolina. This mussel requires a stream with fast flowing, well-oxygenated, circumneutral pH
water. The bottom should be composed of uncompacted gavel and coarse sand. The water
needs to be relatively silt-free and stream banks should be stable, typically with many roots from
adjacent riparian trees and shrubs.
Prior to conducting in-stream surveys, a review of the NC Natural Heritage Program
database was conducted to determine if there were any records of the Tar River spinymussel
within the proposed project study area. This review indicated that there are no known
occurrences within the project study area. The closest historical record of the Tar River
spinymussel is in the Tar River near Tarboro, more than 10 miles away from the project site.
According to the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) database, the Tar
River spinymussel has never been recorded from Island Creek or Chicod Creek.
A site visit was conducted on February 21, 2011 by NCDOT biologists, Karen M. Lynch
(Permit # NC-2011-ES- 165), Dr. Logan Williams, Matt Haney and Mike Sanderson. At this site
the stream is channelized through an agricultural watershed. In our habitat assessment we found
no evidence of mussels or shells. The substrate is composed primarily of shifting,
unconsolidated sand and habitat was found to be degraded and unsuitable for the target species.
As a result of this site visit, as well as physical characteristics of the creek and a review
of historical data, it appears that the Tar River spinymussel does not exist within the project
vicinity. The Biological Conclusion for the Tar River spinymussel for proposed
replacement of bridge 1.73 is "No Effect".
MAILING ADDRESS
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
LOCATION
1020 Birch Ridge Or,
Raleigh, NC 27610
Project bwrking.Vo. (A,terrarl Ltse)
I0-I2-0007
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORAI
PROJECT INI.ORM1IATION'
Project No: Countv: Pitt
HBSNo: 2B?0741 1 Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
1--.A. No: N/A Funding.- ® State
? Federal
Federal (US11CE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type: RGP 311 NWP 3
Project Description: Pitt 173 is an Existing 22' lone x 24' wide RC floor on timber joists bridge, to be
replaced with an aluminum box culvert.
SUMMARY OF CULTUR.Ai RESOURCES REVIEW
Briefdescription gfrevietirac•tivities. results olreview, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, historic designations roster, and indexes was undertaken on 27 January
Ml 1. Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LID. DE, or SS properties in the Area of
Potential Effects (APE). Goo-le Maps "Street View" and current Pitt County GIS Mapping and tax
information indicate that there are three structures present within the APE. 2585 S. Grimesland Bridge
Road was constructed in 1978 and is not historic. 2566 S. Grimesland Bridge Road is older than fifty
years of age, and 2632 S. Grimesland Bridgc Road was constructed in 1955 but both structures do not
meet the criteria for National Reirister Eligibility based on Google Maps "Street View" and Pitt County
GIS Mapping.
Brief E_rplanation oj-why the available information provides a reliable basis far reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
HPO quad maps recording, NR, SL, LID, DE, and SS properties for the Pitt County survey, Pitt County
GIS information, Pitt County Tax Information, and Goo-le Maps "Street View" are considered valid for
the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Maps
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAI. RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL NO SURVEY REOUTRED
ARCHAEOLOGY ElISTORIC .gRCHITEcruRE (CIRCLE ONE)
Cultural Resources Specialist O Date
Vo Stwri Required-Dorm for Ahnor Tnv,sportatio.n Projects as Qualiiird in the : UO' Programmatie.igreemoa
NCDOT ArchaeokoKv & lhstoric Archilecture Groups
Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
10-12-0007
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
WBS No:
F.A. No:
2B.207411
2B.207411
Federal (USACE) Permit Required?
County: Pitt
Document: MCC
Funding: ® State ? Federal
® Yes ? No Permit Type: NWP 3 and RGP 31
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 173 on SR 1565 (Grimesland Bridge Road) over Swamp Island
Swamp with aluminum box culvert.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The maps and file at the OSA were reviewed for this project on 1/27/2011. There are no previously
documented archaeological sites in the APE, based upon reviewing OSA quad mapping, no are there
previous environmental reviews or surveys. The CRS also reviewed photographs, various mapping,
including soils, and design plans submitted by the Division 2 Environmental Program Supervisor.
Additionally, Pitt County mapping from the 1938 Highway Commission maps was reviewed for any
details of particular cultural or industrial interest. No further work is recommended. Note, cemeteries in
the local vicinity should not be affected by this undertaking, as currently planned-
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
It is unlikely that undocumented, significant archaeological sites are located in the limited and disturbed
APE.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: vicinity map
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED - Archaeology
1/31/2011
NCDOT Cultural Resources Specialist Date
"No Survey Required "farm for Minor Transportation Projecu as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
NCDOT Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
10-12-0007
PI TT 1-3
SR 1563. GRLUE-SL.- ND BRIDGE RO..1D OI'ER ISL.-1.NDS1-1;4211P
EXISTING 22'x 24' TIMBL;R BRIDGE: TO BE RF-PI_ ICED IVITH
PROPOSED 19'-0"x h'-1 "A L C' 111 N111 BOX C-1 Z VF_ R I'
KILAI•IRLSG.SOl.11).11AP-1.'1DSHl_F_TV -11BER&P-8
OF THIS SOlt Sl RI TY-O1' PITT COUVTY LOJI R T4R 03010103
FIRM PANEL 5644 K ISL. JA 1) S {V-1:11P CI-ASO,
AIAPNt';11BI:R 3"10365400 K J B,S ELEMENT A l :11BI;R 28.10741
- -- F F
i
X
1 ' 1 l usoo,.Ci,x}
Pill 1 -3 - - - -- - - - --L- - - - -?, }
Y'- h.lOhl6.Ull??
N--254 1?3?.'9h9 -
tdtc:.ut
1 35^-2W-418"
N3S,d96609 DEGREES
ff' 7;.181518 DEGREES ;
i
n 1000
Feet
No Survey Required "form for Minor Transportation h gxcA' as Qualified in the :007 Programmulic Agreement.
NCD07• Archaeology & Historic Architecture Groups
OLINA - SHEET NUMBER 66
CLINA - SHEET NUMBER 65
• '?? Rp ??
1 co ??''
: r tom; crt2
CrA
Ca 6t
I LEA `
c CAA rs: ? -
i i
L*A
sr ? ! f
erv
co C,A
ft k' LOA a Cr ;.pA -?/ .
s Cr8 LoA. ? - I ° .
1r CFA r Crq
!A
LOA
Co /.. .
{ CKA F ?? 1
Ls
rip 1
1 ' r
1 I f
P -
Bd `
9y ?
r
INFVHMA'LWN AGENCY
ti LA
By
?l
1
dd.
PITT 173
SR 1565, GRIMESLAND BRIDGE ROAD OVER ISLAND SWAMP
EXISTING 22'x 24' TIMBER BRIDGE TO BE REPLACED WITH
PROPOSED 19'-0"x 6'-1"ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT
WILMAR USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET NUMBER 66-B
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF PITT COUNTY LOWER TAR 03020103
FIRM PANEL 5644 K ISLAND SWAMP C; NSW
MAP NUMBER 3720564400 K J1 BS L:L1 .II .1 7' .1't 1IBr-R'B. 20-t ",'
h

Dixon Ri
f
W
y i.

s

Pitt 17.3
: iJ
Y= 640626.0022 .
X- 2541232.2969 J'

W 77^-10'--53" .. - -?
N 35.496609 DEGREES `''- - 4
W
7" 1815
18 DEGREL-S
_
.

73,1173

?
1- fl/?fr l?!`L I,Y} ? ?! ! r? t ?
!? `? ?
+ _ 'A•` •Y?",' ?•jf
' ?
W
3- ,
inn = --1.000 feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
Feet \\

Z
,6
ce a?
.. Q.: C7!a6
z= C9
g? za a s
w (,j1
64
(,0)?
O o
C,05 yy
O b
? U

oUfY,
o
?r?r
'
O
W

? ?

? O ??

a v
v
??
N
>- rn
LL u3 II II II II IIyVU?
-60
C/? rw 1 h r a; Wa N
LI.J
nJ ?' V V V V a l C'? ??tiR??'h ??r
"V
N W
1?1 Li
C? U)(,ill aL ,rN II I A'"~ ?O VI?,,Z
Q Z T n rwd yw?wy I Zw N ?H?
`J N NJ??N 1? 'V C? I I i i
X (a Jom NN " j o l N t®, ?C~i3 00
IJ O v [O D m N
° d'?w A ?O x
_1 N aa? I I i a as
O O ,? pq pq I I ? I i', I ? ? p0 ? 0
? ?U) I ?I ? I I N I
X ~ I /, /? co v ~ 'Y'
F- CD \ w Cti e° qO
\ \ R' ~ Sn e
in r,
{ a °p N en Ol o
O - - w
?
I :L_ -
ISLAND P '? Ea1
U? y? gal w by
?I N
O y?
? - I
U Q
o
11 'Zb way /I I I W /f ?'?
tii
00 < (105 CO) CO)
I I I
3 I I 'IJ I
f? co) in MQ'N 4jVjVj? Ohm
C? Rj F II
X o
II II ti m w i o oe I N (0) eq "."
? I
II II
x
? \0 co ° w
?!?•oif II?o? Ugh
° IIHH
?UV I it II N +
???? II i ?I I ?E';4 ?CQ
A? I
? w w N -co) Q0 N
IONN RZ)N
[•, a i 0 O a
I
°ww
ww ?aa? ?w w I
? *4*
°aa ?,'ww?c as
- ?wwColl ?1 ww w?
w '4t* '
I
I
I
the I
I
SSSf Stf SESSESSSEN`]?S SS.. ESi
i S... ?%I1 .ASt4154f
I
. SNOISIAitl I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _._
®oo l oo o
1

m
a ?

s
B
C

W
S

I

glli

u p: