Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110257 Ver 1_Application_20110307 t y SL7t 3ayN J ? ?? J ? STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BEVERLY PURDUE P. 0. Box 25201, Raleigh. NC 27611-5202 GOVERNOR PHONE: 919-733-2520 March 15, 2011 Mr. Monte Matthews U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Mq?; ® n T U c.???RT QTY EUGENE COA. SECRETARY Subject: Nationwide Permit #14 SR 1134 (Harold Road) Alleghany County, North Carolina Project Number: 11C.003070 (DWQ Permit Fee: $240) Dear Mr. Matthews: The NC Department of Transportation is scheduled to grade, drain, base and pave SR 1134, Harold Road in Alleghany County. Total project length is approximately 0.37 miles. The improved roadway will be widened from 16 feet to 18 feet with impervious surface area increasing by 0.09 acres. This project will require the replacement of two wet pipes as shown below. Stream Impacts: Station Number Existing Pipe Size Proposed Pi a Size Riprap impacts ft. Temporary Dewaterin ft. Total Impacts at this Station 11+10 40'x 72" 50'x 72" 20 40 70 21+40 50'x 48" 70'x 48" 10 40 70 Permanent Fi1URiprap Impacts = 60 feet Total project Impacts = 140 feet The replacement of the above noted wet pipes will require temporary dewatering. An impervious sandbag dike will be constructed upstream of tke existing culverts to create a small pool. Clean water will temporarily be pumped around the construction areas and will be discharged downstream. Any dirty water located inside of the construction areas will be pumped into a silt bag if necessary. Once the new pipes are in place, the impervious dikes will be removed and preconstruction streambed elevations will be restored. P. O. Box 250, N. WILKESBORO, NC 28659 PHONE (336) 667-9111 F:A-x (336) 667-3549 Mr. Monte Matthews SR 1134 (Harold Road, Alleghany) Page 2 The wet pipe at station 11+10 carries No Head Branch (Class: C, Trout). The wet pipe at station 21+40 carries an unnamed tributary to the Little River (Class: C, Trout). This project was reviewed for the presence of threatened and endangered species on February 16, 2011. This project will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plant or animal species. Historic compliance work will be scheduled and concurrence with the State Historic Preservation Office will be obtained if required. The project impacts are not significant in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality uses. Pipe sizes used will be the minimum necessary to create a safe roadway. By utilizing the erosion control measures outlined in the attachments to this application, downstream water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction. Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets with proposed erosion control measures, a marked county map, a marked topography map and photographs. By copy of this letter, it is requested that Mr. Ron Linville, Mountain Region Coordinator, with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit application with a copy sent to me. Please note that a trout buffer variance will be requested for construction activities from stations 20+00 - 23+00. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding five (5) copies of this application package to Brian Wrenn, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, for his review. It is requested that any comments related to the 401 certification be forwarded directly to me with a copy sent to the US Army Corps of Engineers. We would like to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please let me know. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated. Sincerely, Heath Slaughter Division Environmental Officer cc: Monte Matthews, US Army Corps of Engineers (1 additional copy) Ron Linville, Western Piedmont Region Coordinator, NCVVRC Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Qualit;- (5 copies) Amy Euliss, Division of Water Quality Matt Gantt, PE, Land Quality Section Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer Brandon Whitaker, PE, District Engineer Scott Gallman, PE, County Maintenance Engineer Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer Scott Pipes, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Technician 1 OF W A 7Eq Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit: ? Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. ® Yes ? No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ? Yes ® No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: SR 1134, Harold Road 2b. County: Alleghany 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Whitehead 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 11 C.003070 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 801 Statesville Road 3e. City, state, zip: North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 3f. Telephone no.: 336-903-9202 3g. Fax no.: 336-667-4549 3h. Email address: hslaughter@ncdot.gov Page I of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version t 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 2 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version N. B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.46094 Longitude: - 81.14352 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 2.3 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: No Head Branch & UT to Little River 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Trout 2c. River basin: New 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Unpaved road in a rural area. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 linear feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Upgrade roadway. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See attached cover letter. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: ? Yes ® No ? Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ? preliminary ? Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d . If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a, Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown 5b . If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No 6b . If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Temporary ? Yes ? Corps W1 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W2 ? P ? T !] No ? DWQ Li Yes ? Corps W3 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ ? Yes ? Corps W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g• Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ®T Piping, Riprap & Dewatering No Head Branch ® PER ? INT ® Corps ® DWQ 2 70 S2 ®P ®T Piping, Riprap & Dewatering UT to Little River ® PER ? INT ® Corps ® DWQ 2 70 ? PER ? Corps S3 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ ? PER ? Corps S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 140 3i. Comments: 80 linear feet of the impacts are temporary Page 4 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries. tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ?P?T 02 ?P?T 03 ?P?T 04 ?P?T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If p.nd or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: NIA 5h. Is a darn high hazard permit required? ? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWD) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g• Buffer impact number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary T im act required? ?Yes 81 ?P?T ? No ? Yes B2 ? P ? T ? No ?Yes B3 ?P?T ? No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. ThP nine lennths are the minimum needed to improve roadway. 1 b. r r Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ® Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Mitigation bank ®Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: EEP 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 30 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ®cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10. 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ? Yes ? No Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Secondary Road Project 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ? Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program ? DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? ? Phase II ? NSW 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? USMP apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed ? Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ? Coastal counties ? HOW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW (check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246 ? Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No use of public (federaUstate) land? 1 b. If you answered `yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered 'es" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval El Yes ? No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No 2c. If you answered 'es" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No impacts? El Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? GIS and visual observation 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? WRC will comment 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? ncfloodmaps J. Heath Slaughter 3/15/11 n t/A ent's Si li Date Applicant/Agent's Printed Name g g can App (Agent's 'nature is valid only if an authorizati etter from the applicant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 9 W: v ? p ? •Q O b Q7 s _ ?Ul W I- !.z :o to ?W N I? i IA ti IC. 0 , ? ? IL ZL \ o?? Q7 ` I 77 ?W m W IW 0 `? `IC o p m IA/ a = at • !\ I N n? !.b Z in ? ? ? N IN IWI ?_ 2 7C C ,'???' Irp $ o m ?? D / I IJ O i J f ?v N o W W go 10 ^ Ip? ? IC ? %I A ?h ? ; e'er N?i f , , IW IJ m O S W ? A ? If ?1 ? ?'? ?a N r /7 I? u 10 / m ? r/ r m o f r ' / 81.06 , ?. N .A I47 IN ?? \ 0,n _ ? / + CD A m? ° jA \\<ot IA N Dm ? '? II w ? 1 c ? J ?/ ? ' / ?1•Ly ". \ ? I`t ? ? to 1 i I j GG.?77 f/ JCo? 1 c,0? I? , ?' a ? A r o c n n? = A ? - o A l w Q.Qv A 'W w \ J t IO V ? ? ? o m. , V ? ? i7.y I ' 7Q y ? o •J - - )a O -O ti ' j .p IA f l 'r i Y-? ? O IfQ 1 i I O a Cm _ CD A N u ? ? ~ ! t o 1 a _ V 9 -4 I •?' ?o IN I 4 I W A `? cc (O A s : 7i .O nv , 0?? ? r IV e Map Name: WHITEHEAD Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. Horizontal Datum: NAD83 Print Date: 03/15/11 Map Center: 036.4607346° N 08 a ?! -7 Le % Joao S6 ? J ? 1 Z \ s \ ages • `,fir ' 1 ` „ ? c ?? ?p ? ?. ? PA ? ` ??.??_ i \ C 22 +40 \ I \\? 11 ??Z # ?Ltc-j 4 ? 1 Z / r ri / J( / ?\ . .? - ? • ???'° ? SR 1134 . n ?\ Z o 11+10 y•? i \C? ? ?;? Z , ) tx-? yt, r'- n is , } ° ? ?? ) ?? ? ? ~ ? r i J ?{?? l , • ) C-' /20 r " 2009 kAyTojx 081.1400000° W 081.1300000° W 081.1200000' U SCALE 1:24000 FEET 1. 11+10 upstream view on SR 1134, Alleghany. 2. 11+10 inlet view. 3. 11+10 outlet view. 4. 21+40 upstream and buffer view. 5. 21+40 downstream and buffer view. 6. 21+40 outlet view. 0 W v rn C!? I? m m 1 ale ?e A b n H b ti 4 r A ti 7 ti 0 m O r Q V1 1+ zm QVj c? ??w z b ?y xx r 'C Ur a ?o z V y n --/: 0 --- -- / 00, z? BEGIN PROJECT I ego POT Sta. /0.00.00 O MD02 = r" S, / m N? Wp,MP •. Il ? ? rrm' T JF mNo, HINT. LIMM? z?z EX1ST1? S? Al L cam I I =pcn a, m C :A - po-ZI _r ZCE C: ri) m? fn 1 N 0- y C7 m (? _I Z mcno - - Z a r` LZ ?m? ' Z m p oZ??mz r m _l D x C , p (1 i ? ?ry I x m ,m ,m ox cn 0 ? ?'I rSTfJo X I N \? ' < ??? p l -Mmo, z O m I x N ° w x 1-?Z0 ?J o ^} m o Urn m----? ?? ? W ? 6289 C17 0 M-0 co x ?9?;?j U 1 1 Ow T U) Iv ? X Q-r=? I 1` -I I W U) m N z wCf) _ T--i G7mc? QZ22-p! Ul mG»m = 1z>= 4 10 0 rm-1 ," co l J 0-4 O? N r d T Q r l o rnfV N Z DZ?O -? i fNl ,? D o o c,, ., I C< z W ?Z oIQ pry=D o MATCHUNE SEE SHEET •3 MATCHUNE SEE SHEET '2 Sto. 13+89.02 FLn2 m i pff( ?i m, 11zjM,?Or r m m pz?m'- ? ZOO v7' Xmm1tDn m D== m?m=z 1 \ m cox (h CZ 2,>-, rz- =1 z?m?a \\, ` mA c°v o I m m m \ 1 \ m?zl OD \ `? x \ ?m w 1 1 ?zr =0m w 1 ?' \ ocn iz? C n? 1c, %1 m 4?? °9,? 1 1 1 ^ 1 LV 1 i ? ?J ono /- ?C LIMJ C?'a ? 1D 1 l? N ? • ' gym ? ?? 1 ? a _ ?' 11 0? p? ? ?' pm N d i 11 mm ?-? CA) > 1 W?? 111 ' I 4?1 r' 1 I tl1 1 v z 1 1 x -u mD?cn = XxF ; 1 1 _ I 1 1 0Z22? mG) Dm= 1 , of a;7+6307°°-?pO0 z zZ 1 mmWz or -G O ' -D MATCHUNE SEE SHEET '4 YATCHUNE SEE SHEET 13 0 0 z n ? W x W ll? x Win x T- 4 _ 0 who e-? (-14 N N R; 03 (-n Ul J CIO C) 0) 0 - ?0 r II II II II I? ? ? ? -4 Uq ONpoC9 \AQI j pcn w C) L-4 03 (-J,4 -A -. 00 CtJ x Do Ul -OM U) ` N N X G) M oooi G) ) D?z r ! S D Z r;,o c z m zm m5mm?ccnn l C m?? O ? < oOO,x Dm , l ? z = l o Z { TpN - I1 mo a ocmnm . o' YATCHUNE SEE SHEET •5 iz Al? Aeell > ° d O? ' \ ° x Z W ?b cf) x ! W N? ' -AC p - iOm 41h ? 0 ?` b ! + m0 4?oa ; M?z o ??? x <p O) rn 1 ZO m 1 'W ? 1 ? I ? I \ O J / ? 1 x nor / (/1 A ? ? ? fl ? ? I o a?? v N?°? ° ? I m a rno X 1 JoT .ors ld 4 1 T mo mpX i x MATCHUNE SEE" SHEET •s m m? oa I-OZK `cIy z? Om z z 0 0 4 = mz O -M ?d W r? cn , WO 1 _A h--, V/ vac oN ? b o ? o 0 0 N) :?u o y dx tz o 0 C) 00 U) s -------------- i w d X Cz dCl) r N` ' ''NC1 NCO O-__I „i Lmn z mz-mr n > TZw F M 01>W , p,TnV7?=Z O(n ?N ?-y Z-2Dm D? v ? __ rol b O -a n o l- u a -P A o cn I wti I oti cpNC. GRove i \? a ,o ?p /-a XD R O cn m -=-i DG) mLo - cn G)>m mjzD= > Cc-) G)00O D?C*o <rnz?? m??=o D MATCHUNE SEE SHEET •3 ?n I \ o O? ? rod N II II II II II ? ?, '. ? ? ? J 03 l o? o° x 2 Z::) .Q ,mc,, '. W 1 , \e V --oyr-pD --D " % \ ac w? - mom w oZ O c-n I I I I I I I i I I C'' tom ;; Q b? ?°m ! fV -'-I L-4 C? IO?o) ?IU ?? ,-, $ mo Q `wN ° do ('? ?` ?\ `spa NC1 •N o> W W? C.Jl -0 mD?v) W 0 -00 1' x -?G)mca OZ 0Z=_-p m = o? I i Oz? 0'66+ I z 'oS ld 0 CY) 00-000O -00 r \I I ?_ 70 C*o ?7 I I o ? C zZ?p m ^ o p^ ?,? I I i? 2 O nmo I I ? , ? D I I II ? I I MATCHUNE SEE SHEET •5 ° f PROJECT: IIC.003013 ROAD: SR 1134 HAROLD ROAD COUNTY:ALLEGHANY TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60 SHEET IOF I DATE: FEBRUARY 01, 2011 STREAM - NAME: NO HEAD BRANCH RATING: 1 2' AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH I `L_1 `1jT`?R,vER _ I I \ I? \ II ? , W I U ? ? I I I Z I 111 . ? ?•• PROPOSE[ 100' X 100' I I SIGHT TRIAN( EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 72" X 40' CMP NEW PIPE SIZE: 72" X 50' ALUMINIZED PIPE 9 9' LINE PIPE 11-10 PIPE TO BE LAID ON A 118° SKEW WITH 1.0% FALL 99 98f 0 5 10 Temporary erosion control devices are not shown, but will be installed Gs needed 15 20 25 30 35 PROPOSED IM SLOPE 40 45 50 SURVEY DAl E: 02-01-II CONDiJCTFD t:,Y: B8, 16, JR DRAWN 6Y:.J. BRYANT 74 CENTERLINE --?- PROPOSED R/W W PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING EDGE OF ROADWAY - - - - - - NEW PIPE EXISTING PIPE - -, pROPOSED PPC,JEi.; C F,'-'i-',r-; _, -- - 7 ROAD: S 3=; HAR O_D hO.,U R COUNTY. A.LLEGHANY PROPOSED R/W TYPE: WET PIPE SURVEY PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PLAN SCALE: I" -- 60' EXISTING EDGE OF ROADWAY - - - - - - SHEET IOF I NEW PIPE DATE- FEBRUARY 01, 2011 _ STREAM NAME- UNNkMED TRI BUTARY TO EXISTING PIPE LITTLE RIVER 3 VV E F" 1 J E 1 r, ? r1 M V? I C T H ?' CEN `ER L !!"E P. F RIVERS EDGE LANDING °° DB 305 PG 1612 - \ vYP 'X _ - - X -------- 10 ? X- / / / ` J ? 6?I1 WivRE ? W / L o ? 04 L EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 8" X 50'' Cl",IP NEW PIPE SIZE- 48" X 70' AL UMINIZED PIPE PIPE TO BE L AID ON A 39° SKEW WITH 4.01 FALL 1007 1005 ,a . 1000 l 0 5 10 15 20 25 Temporary erosion control PROPOSL, devices cre not shown, but will be installed as needed DRAAN P'(: 1. B YAPJT