HomeMy WebLinkAbout20100944 Ver 1_Application_20101112
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
gNQ?04q?q(/
?q?Rty,
"'hC
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE
GOVERNOR
November 9, 2010
Mr. Brian Wrenn
Division of Water Quality
401/Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
SECRETARY
10 9
SUBJECT: Pipe Replacement on SR 1637 (Smith Farm Road), Alexander County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization for the replacement of a
50-foot long, 36" CMP with a 70-foot long, 60 " CNW with inlet headwall on SR 1637 (Smith
Farm Road) in Alexander County. The new pipe will be placed on a different skew to create a
better stream/pipe alignment. Additionally, minor stream relocations will be done upstream and
downstream of the new pipe to provide better stream/pipe alignment and to prevent continuing
bank erosion in the vicinity of the road crossing. The upstream stream relocation will result in
18.3 feet of stream loss, while the downstream stream relocation results in 13 feet of stream loss;
with an additional 10 feet of stream loss due to pipe fill.
Five feet of riprap was used at the pipe inlet and outlet for structure stabilization. Additionally
-20 feet of rock will be used as bank stabilization along the edge of the relocated upstream
channel. Rock impacts is contained within the channel relocation impacts. The scope of the work
resulted in 41.3 feet of permanent impacts to an unnamed tributary to Third Creek, which is
classified as Class C waters by the Division of Water Quality.
The project area is not located within %, mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 1637 a rural
or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous
spill basin checklist.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Alexander County (USFWS listed date September 22, 2010) include
dwarf flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nani/lora) and the bog turtle (Glyptemmys muhlenbergii)-
(T/SA- Threatened due to similarity of appearance). National Heritage Program records
document the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location -10 miles south of the proposed project
area in Catawba County. The heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047
SR 1637, Smith Farm Road
Page 2
November 9, 2010
north facing and of the oak-hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. There
is no suitable habitat within the proposed project area and no species were observed. Natural
Heritage Program records document the nearest bog turtle location -1 northwest of the proposed
project area along the main drainage of Third Creek. Bog turtles are typically found in bogs,
marshes, and wet pastures. T/SA species are not subject to Section 7 consultation; however,
there is no suitable habitat located within the project area and no impact on this species is
anticipated.
I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned activities,
erosion control plans, and location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
0 Work order number: 150465-55120005-1213.200211-3300
• TI P4: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: 1"'L?
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: Polly Lespinasse, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
j Q?oF w a regoc
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
I a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
jb. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
i
Ic.
Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
? Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
i e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit
® Yes ? No
,if. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ®No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
Yes
El
®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1637, Smith Farm Road
2b. County: Alexander
.2c. Nearest municipality / town: Taylorsville
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 12200211
!3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
1,3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f
applicable):
3d. Street address:
13e. City, state, zip:
13f. Telephone no.:
l3g. Fax no.:
I3h.i Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
1Ib. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
yid. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 .
elf. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
ig. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
1h. Email address: mholder@ncdot.gov
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
5b. Business name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
Sd. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
Sf. fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: tsimon@ncdot.gov
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
R. Project Information and Prior Project History
I
'I. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
Latitude: 35.8485766 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 81.0516132
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: <.10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Third Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C (from source to Fourth Creek)
2c. River basin: Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Paved Secondary Road. Landuse is designated cropland and pasture.
31b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to extend the existing pipe to create a better roadway shoulder for the safety of the
travelling public and adjust stream alignment to prevent continuing bank erosion and promote stream connectivity.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace an existing 36", 50- foot long CMP with a 60", 70-foot long CMP with inlet headwall. The
new pipe will be placed on a skew to better align with the stream channel. Additionally, a minor stream relocation will be
done upstream and downstream of the proposed pipe to provide better alignment to prevent continuing bank erosion.
Temporary cofferdam/bypass pumping will be used to divert the stream flow around the construction site, as needed.
The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.).
'4. Jurisdictional Determinations
!4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determinations made by
the Division 12 DEO.
41b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
I4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
I4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
`
15. I Project History
I5a.I Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.; If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
I
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Ei. Future Project Plans
fia. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
fib. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C:. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
[I] Open waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
\N1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
\N2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
N4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
`N6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
?g. Total wetland impacts
?h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
Loss of stream
S1 ® P ? T channel due to
change in pipe
UT to Third Creek
®PER
?INT
ED Corps
® DWQ
15
41.3
skew and increase
in pipe length
S2 ®P ? T Bank stabilization UT to Third Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 3.5 20
S3 ? P ®T Cofferdams/Bypass UT to Third Creek ® PER ? Corps 3
5 110
pumping ? INT ? DWQ .
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
1 ? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
I ? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
1 ? INT ? DWQ
Ph. Total stream and tributary impacts `41.3
3i. Comments: ' Upstream - 32.4 ft of stream channel filled & 19.4 ft of stream channel reconstructed; Downstream- 41.8 ft of
stream channel filled & 23.5 ft of stream channel reconstructed - resulting in 31.3 ft of stream loss due to channel change + 10
1 1 Page 5 of 11
PCN Fnrm - VP.rSlnn 1 3 r)acamhpr 1n 9nnR Versinn
ft of stream loss due to pipe fill. 20 feet of bank stabilization is contained within stream realignment area, therefore total
permanent stream impacts =41.3 ft.
j. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P)
br Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.
Type of impact 4d.
Waterbody type 4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
102 ?P?T
l03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
If. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
.S. Pond or Lake Construction
I
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID 5b.
Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
?5f. Total
59. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary T impact required?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
IB2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
I
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
`fhe new pipe is being placed on a different skew to better alignment the pipe with the stream. Additionally, minor stream
relocations will be done immediately upstream and downstream of the new pipe to provide better pipe/stream alignment and to
prevent additional bank erosion.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Appropriate erosion control measures will be in place during project construction.
i
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ®No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 7 of 11
Clm Form, - va DIUII 1 .J Uecel, ba I V. zouo vcl Jlull
9c. Comments:
i
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
'If. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
?ih. Comments:
!i. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
,'5 a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
i
Ili.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
iib. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
:Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
:Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
i
Gg.
i
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
5h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E_. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
9. Diffuse Flow Plan
I
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
I
b. 1
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
I
? Yes ? No
Comments:
I
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
i What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA %
1
2b.
I
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ? No
2C. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Com plies with NCDOT's individual
NPDES permit NCS000250.
I
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na
rrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2 e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
i
:3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase It
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs El USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
j attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
® HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
1
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
I ' Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes El No
El
I
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
I
a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
N Yes
? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
I
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes N No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
i
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes N No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213.0200)?
1
2b. I
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
? Yes
N No
I
2-c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes N No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is classified as a minimum critieria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not
result in additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
:4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5 I
. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
I I
5 I I
a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
? Yes ® No
habitat?
I
b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
? Yes ®No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
I
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database.
1
f I i. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
I
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
I
? Yes ® No
t3b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
71b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation Office resources and the National Register of Historic Places werer reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement projects occur within a previously impacted area (NC
DOT Right of Way).
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
$b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
1 3c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number: 3710378600K
1q, r%. Ak 41 /V& 6 --
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
' Date
s signature is valid only I an authorization letter from the applicant
(Agent
is provided.)
Page 1 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
I
o a
I I I
I I
m o ?O > m m
?I?I?I?I?I
e
B
JA
? B
J9
o
x B
Je.
I '-
u 6
Match Pt.
m ?
y Ma tch Pt
A eaw In
P BJ
P p.
o ?O a m m °' 3 A
I o se " o eJ
9•
2
e
? ?
o n
a'o m
y
-
ej9•
o a
3rv ° e
on - q,
-?
R= o
L° yq
D e
B3, o A
N tc+d„
Bbp,
a3 F o
a
m
N
rv 3 I m g
?xuu
o v r
o ?
I I F{
Q
A_
69
2.
1??
ee B9
3, 3
o g3
m Bg3
y 99
.
e9
- J.
B
9
•S' m
x 6
'
J
69 y V
6
e b 0 b y?•
P PVWN es
-
P
Match Pt W
3
99 m Bg
m A _
A a Match Pt
?
9 .
3 N 0p• v -
m e9
9
s !nom ? ?
D "? rt S N y
x o
0 o p
v
N
90
m
-
90
? 3
<
< - 3• 0.
a Dn 3
n a e 90
0"
3 w N Z eg
9.
p ?° o o n
A o
a -'I
o _
? I I
I 199
9.
I
O
O
O: K
Nail set in wooden fence post Q
Assume Elev 100.0' (L Unnamed Tributary to
r Third Creek
Existing 5 strand
yC
electric fence (n
Existing Bench
35' Adjusted Channel
'
(3-4
wide)
n
Existing 36' CMP 50' Long Flood Bench to Remain
with double headwalls to be
removed _
Existing Bench _ Class II Rip Rap to face the edge
to Remain I? of the proposed channel, embedding
AdJ usted Channel the rock into the existing streambed.
(3-4' wide) Slope the banks back to tie into the
existing contours. ( RipRap along the
channel to be approx.10'-)
Class II RipRap or Shot Rock
placed at all 4 corners not to
exceed more than 5' past the
ends of the culvert
Proposed 60" CMP 70' Long with
M headwall on the Inlet End
NO
ti
Q
V)
1) Pumping system to be used to
divert the stream around the
construction site as needed.
2) Any contaminated water within
the construction site is to be
pumped inton silt bag.
3) Silt fence is to be placed around
stack pile and project as needed.
4) Upon completion of the project all 12Th Div NMOT
silt fences are to be placed as needed.
Brid
e Maintenance
Also seeding and mulching of disturbed g
areas.
Pipe Replacement and
5) Existing streambed material to be Stream Adjustment
excavated and stored. Then to be Smith Farm Road SR 1637
reused along the proposed channel.
Alexander County
Revised Fe: B-3 drs
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 12 County: Alexander Project ID: 1213.200211
River Basin: Yadkin Bridge No: NA
Route: Pipe Replacement on SR 1637 (Smith Farm Road)
Stream: UT to Third Creek (Class C)
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r W.
WS1 r W.
WS 11,111 OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area r r
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Arterial Urban
Arterial Rural
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
r. r,
r r
Yes No
r_ P
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
• • • • ? ••• • 1??i1tFr
•
•
rr
•
f
• _ • s •
- -71
(?T , , ?E IT11,iiE'
Pipe Replace Went
• ? r
• r
vl?
71
Narne: STONY POINT Location: 035.8485766° N 081.0516132° W
Date: 11/1/2010 Caption: Pipe Replacement, SR 1637 (Smith Farm Road), UT to Third
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Creek, Class C Waters, Yadkin River Basin
Copynqht (C) 1998. Maptech, Inc
I
Pipe Replacement
SR 1637, Smith Farm Road
Alexander County
F yp? .? ? L
i
+' :ate .. '•.. r ???
Inlet
la-
k.? Y
F G?/M ?z
outlet Downstream
Upstream