20100619 Ver 1_Application_20100729

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Beverly E. Purdue
GOVERNOR
Gene Conti
SECRETARY
July 23, 2010
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, N.C. 27889- 1000
Attention: Bill Biddlecome
100619
Subject: Request for a NW 14 Pennit and DWQ 401 for a curve relocation on Colington Road (SR 1217)
in Dare County.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is requesting the issuance of a NW 14 permit
and corresponding DWQ certification for a project that proposes to relocate approximately 500 feet of
curve along SR 1217 in Dare County. The current roadway alignment is creating a safety issue by reducing
the driver's ability to have adequate site distance for safe movement through the curve. Therefore, NCDOT
is proposing to realign the curve, placing the alignment on new location, which improves the site distance
and reduces curvature. This new alignment has been placed along a corridor that crosses non-riverine
wetlands, which currently have no hydrologic connection. However, do to historic connections and the
availability of ground water movement the wetlands are still claimed as jurisdictional wetlands by the COE.
The new alignment will impact 0.214 acres of this non-riverine wetland system. This impact is the result of
clearing, grubbing and filling for the roadway. Avoidance and minimization to wetlands have been
considered and the proposed plan is what resulted after safety and roadway stability where established.
Therefore NCDOT is requesting 0.214 acres of wetland mitigation from EEP. The acceptance letter will be
forwarded to your office as soon as DOT is in receipt of the letter. There are no Protected Species issues on
the project or impacts to Historic Structures. I have met on-site with the Division of Coastal Management
and the project as currently proposed will not impact any AEC's, therefore no permit is being required from
the DCM.
Included with this letter are the location ntap, permit drawings, and PCN. If you have questions or
need additional information please call me at [phone]. Permit fees can be charge to W BS 9 41682.
Sincerely,
Cc: Garcy Ward, DWQ
Sonia Gregory, DWQ
John CeCe, NCDCM
Scott Fenwick, NCDOT
Jerry Jennings
Acting Division One Engineer
Clay Willis 4gi f ^
Division One Envi nmen a Officer
?0( yV A T(-qO
> ti
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c, Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? N Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
lg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ® Yes ? No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ® Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Collington Road (SR 1217) Curve Relocation
2b. County: Dare
2c. Nearest municipality/ town: Kitty Hawk
2d. Subdivision name: Collington Harbor
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 41682
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): NCDOT Division One
3d. Street address: 113 Airport Drive
3e. City, state, zip: Edenton, 27932
3f. Telephone no.: 252-482-7977
3g. Fax no.: 252-482-8722
31h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): n/a
Latitude: 36.0091507
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Longitude: - 75.7044738
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 1.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Kitty Hawk Bay
proposed project:

2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: class SC
2c. River basin: Pasquotank
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site condition consist of Secondary Road SR 1217, Church Property and adjoining parking lot and residential
housing. Some of the project area is wooded with some wetlands. The wetland does not have a clear hydrologic
connection, but historically was connected.
31b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.30 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
There are no streams on the project area
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To improve safety along SR 1217 through a blind curve by relocating the roadway and reducing the curvature of the
turn.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves new construction of approximately 500 ft. of roadway on new location. The roadway subgrade will
have to be constructed by placing earthen fill material as shown on the included plan sheet. Once the roadway is built,
then asphalt pavement will be laid and grassed shoulders established. There will be some mechanized clearing and
undercutting along the new alignment, which will impact 0.214 acres of non-riverine wetlands. The new roadway portion
will tie into the existing road. Some of the old roadway will be removed and vegetated to reestablish vegetation. These
restoration areas are shown on the plan sheets in large cross-hatch. Equipment used will include excavator, dump truck,
bulldozer, motorgrader, asphalt paver, asphalt rollers and various other road construction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
41b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ® Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT
Name (if known): Clay Willis Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? yes ®No E] Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ? T Fill Non-Rivenne ® Yes
? No ® Corps
? DWQ 0.214
? Yes ? Corps
W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W3 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.214

2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c . 37d . 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
? PER ? Corps
S1 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S2 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S3 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S4 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: None
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number ofpond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tor-Pamlico Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact required?
?Yes
B1 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
62 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B3 ?P?T ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: None
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to wetlands have been minimized through the reduction in the roadway footprint. The roadway and shoulders are set
at a width that allows for safety concerns to be met and establishes a stabile slope. Unavoidable impacts will be mitigated
throught the Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
NCDOT will follow Best Management Practices by installing safety fence, silt fence and other erosion control devices to
control off site sediment and erosion.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ® Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

® Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.214 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: EEP letter will be sent, once it is received. The request was sent 7/19/10
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ? Yes N No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 25%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes O No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: less than 1 acre disturbance
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
NCDOT state stormwater permit for highway system is applicable. NCDOT will follow guidelines for Erosion and
Sediment Control. Stormwater will not be directly discharged to surface waters.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NCDOT
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
N Other: NCDOT Stormwater
Permit
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes N No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review

? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply

(check all that apply): ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
N Other: NCDOT stormwater
permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
? Yes Z No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be created from this project
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Natural Heritage GIS Database
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ® Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Marine Fisheries, Project is adjacent to Kitty Hawk Bay that flows directly into Albemarle Sound. Proposed project will not
impact any surface waters listed as EFH or Secondary Nursery Area
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Natural Register of Historic Places, clearance letter from SHPO included
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: project will not have an effect on adjacent 100 yr floodplain
elevations
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA map
Clay Willis 7/23/10
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/ ent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Print Form ",
/ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: /niinc >i:n /UN_(__VW re -zZA?Xfe,,/ City/County: A l/ - rrP. Sampling Date: (s I D
Applicant/Owner:, C/' rJr -,01 i/S /Oa/ ?fr1 - State:L ?/ Sampling Point: ' G?/
Investigator(s): ! y ] Section, Township, Range: / ?n'/
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 4&zsG_J1?,,( kv, ,12jj) Local relief (concave, convex, none): e ekyA,/42_ Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /? Let: .2o- ?I SD Long: - 7S? 738 Datum: AbIP93
Soil Map Unit Name: 4 /1 L NWI classification: PG?I r4
Are climatic / hydrologic conaitio s on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ?, Soil _?, or Hydrology ? significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ©No ?
Are Vegetation ?, Soil ?, or Hydrology ? naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Lr No ? Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes t?l?No ? within a Wetland? Yes ?NO ?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _U-No
HYDROLOGY
Indicators:
drolo
Wetland H Se condary Indicators (minimum of two required)
gy
y
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired? check all that aboly) 0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
2'1 igh Water Table (A2) T?1 Aquatic Fauna (B13) Patterns (B10)
`

S
"
?
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
u
I?
P
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Moss
_
_
l?l Water Marks (Bt) .
,,,/
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor CI)
8 ,O H Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
tL-11 Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
xidized Crayfish Burrows (C8)
B Drift Deposits (B3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ? Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
/
Algal Mat or Crust (84) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
7
-? ??-r
E
l Geomorphic Position (D2)
uilard (D3)
Shallow A
?r Iron Deposits (85)
© Inundation Visible on Aeral Imagery (B7) )
Thin Muck Surface (C
0 Other (Explain in Remarks) rt
0 q
1SAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations: ?,/
t
P
W
t? Yes [2 No
th (inches):
? De
resen
er
Surface
a
Water Table Present? Yes E] No p
? Depth (inches): ® //
l
Saturation Present? Yes O No ? Depth (inches): am
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes u NO ?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region- Interim Version
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 4,KA
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ?a 5 /h'/?,5) `% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
S
1 Jr r,11?,i? y? 1CL? (A)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ
21 f Dominant
r
T
l N
b
t
3. {/5PG hn/Pnni it ?? ?"? um
e
o
o
a
Species Across All Strata: (B)
?
4.

? Percent of Dominant Species
O
5. (A/B)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: C

6
.
©
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
?r? = Total Cover 2
2
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: © 5S ) - x 1 =
OBL species ;
1. 11127[11% ?.m r?/'N/'. /0 ? FACW species 7 x2=
??y„?
2 tl Q/, ?? 20 ? /;i FAC species 1 x 3 = 3
//
3. ye, ? F? FACU species D x 4 = b
4 ? UPL species 0 X5= b
5 ? Column Totals:./D_ (A) (B)

6.
? Prevalence Index = B/A=
7
.

=

Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
x'f' )
Pl
t
i
h
b St
t VDOminance Test is >50°k
s
ze:
ru
ra
um (
o
S
i. Zl"I'i ?/.-.+i ?n.n dos v m /O ? !prevalence Index is 53.0'
2 ?09, ??/ _?'?¢
f ?p ? Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
?
3
. ? 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
4
El be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
6 ? Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
?
7. excluding woody vines
lants
Tree - Wood

Herb Stratum (Plot size: ?. 6 xQ[lC?S )
= Total Cover ,
,
y p
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. 1a u r rvs /'Po/'Nd?: Se vines
din
wood
l
d
l
t
W
g
y
,
s, exc
u
oo
y p
an
Sapling -
2. 0/31, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
r, than 3 in. 7.6 cm DBH.
©
4. Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 ? approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height.
©
6 including
Herb - AII herbaceous (non-woody) plants
.
7 ? ,
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
? plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
B i
ht
i
h
it
t
? g
.
m)
n
e
3
I
9.
? Woody vine -AII woody vines, regardless of height.
10
?
11
.
12.

D
5 ?!A'F = Total Cover
J )
?
Woody vine stratum (Plot size:
/
? /
7 r?•
El )*K y
?L ?o
3mr
1
. !
6 ?
2
. ?
3
. ?
4
.
? Hydrophytic
5 Vegetation
/
. rte
f= N
?
Y
117 = Total Cover o
es
Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
SOIL
/
Sampling Point: Zb
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks

'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
H,( dric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
L? Histosol (Al) OPolyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
- 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Q Histic Epipedon (A2) 7
LJThin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
?
? f
ack Histic (A3) T
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
D Reduced Venic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
drogen Sulfide (A4) ^I
_01-camy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
ratified Layers (A5)
t epletetl Matrix (F3) fl Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
MLRA 153B)
ganic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) IDDepleted Dark Surface (F7) ] Red Parent Material (TF2)
TF12
LRR T
U
©
? ?,' ick Presence (A8) (LRR U) )]Redox Depressions (F8) ) (
,
)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (
_
?
L
?-J. 1cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)

lc ]Marl (F10) (LRR U)

O
- r
l
yU Other (Explain in Remarks)
{? uepleted Below Dark Surface (A71) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
-?
Q Thick Dark Surface (A12) ?
T
J..?IIron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
I 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) L
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
- unless disturbed or problematic.
Q Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) OReduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
I
'
' I
Sandy Redox (S5) J--(Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
]
f
.
.
L1 t
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
_ 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
/
Type: I-t/
11
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes L? No
Repimilts.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Interim Version
A PPROVEDJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE, NAb1E, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Dare City: Kitty Hawk
Center coordinates of site Hat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.0091507° R. Long. -75.7044738' W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest vvaterbody: Kitty Hawk Bay
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Kitty Hawk Bay / Albemarle Sound
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUG): 03010205
® Check if map/diagram ol'review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites. disposal sites, etc... ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Officc(Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Datc(s): 4/6/10
SECTION 11: SUMMARV OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Ar ne "navigable waters offhe U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RI TA).iurisdiction (as defined by 33 CPR part 329) in the
review area. I Requiredl
R Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past. or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There `Are, "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Requireal
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): '
TN Ws, including territorial seas
® Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
? Relatively permanent waters' (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNN's
Impoundments ofjurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: I acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: J9871Jelineatio"_ri_Manual
Elevation of established 01-1 W M (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):'
? Potentiallyjurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supponed by completing the appropriate sections in Section If below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that ppically flows )'car-round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
tag., typically 3 months).
' Supporting dOCUalentit on is presented in Section 111, 17,
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section II I.A.I and Section I I I.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section H LB below.
1. TNW
Identify TN W: Kitty Hawk Bay / Albemarle Sound.
Summarize rationale supporting determination: Visual observation of Waterbody adjacent to project area.
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent": It is only seperated by a roadway (SR 1217).
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (TIIAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACFNT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section IILDA.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section 111.6.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Pick -List
Drainage area: CP.ick'?Gist
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNN W.
? Tributary flows through Pje List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick?List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick Lisi river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
7.List
Protect waters are Pick aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Fxplain:
Identify flow route to TNW':
'tributary stream order, if known:
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales. ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
Flow route can be described by identifying, e. g., tributary a, which Flows through the review area. to flow into tributap' b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ? Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: PickUst.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? silts ? Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ? Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/%cover:
? Other. Explain:
'tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding. sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Pick rl st
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Plow:
'tributary provides for: Pick :-list
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year. Pick'Lisf
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Pick List. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Rick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributan has (check all that apply):
? Bed and banks
? OH WM6 (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
? changes in the character of soil ?
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
? leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
? sediment deposition ?
? water staining ?
? other (I ist):
? Discontinuous OI'IWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OI I WM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by: "?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
Ine lateral extent of GWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum:
? physical markings:
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g.. water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality: general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identi N, specific pollutants. if known:
°A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground. or where
the 01IWM has been removed b} development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
71 bid,
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non=TNW:
Flow is: Eick iik Explain:
Surface flow, is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface Ilow: Rick List. Explain findings
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacenev Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to l NW
I'm*ject wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick Lis[ aerial (straight) miles from'l-N W.
Flow is from: PicKList.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick;L;ist floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g.. water color is clear, brown. oil film on surface: water quality: general watershed
characteristics: etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type. average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? I Iabitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick:List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts'? (YIN) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological. chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the now
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TMy', and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rnpanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example: -
• Does the tributary; in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
l-N Ws. or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species. such as feeding. nesting. spawning. or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section 111.1):
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSM'ETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
'?? TNWs: linear feet width (ft). Or, acres.
® Wetlands adjacent to TN Ws: I acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
EJ Tributaries of'IN Ws where tributaries typically flow year-round arc jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g.. typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.E. provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonal Iv:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (Il).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWs" that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Q Waterbody that is not a'FN W or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a "IN W, and it has a significant nexus with a
'IN W isjurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
0 Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that now directly or indirectly into TNWs.
0 Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus arejurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section 111.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they arc adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands. have a significant nexus with aTNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Q Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a lNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates forjurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.'
As a general rule, the impoundment of ajurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Q Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.." or
Q Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6). or
Q Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED (INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):'u
0 which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
F1 from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
F which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
0 Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
El Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
"See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III. D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
"' Prior to asserting or declining C9'A jurisdiction based solely on this category. Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA IIQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapmros.
Provide estimates for iurisdictionaI waters in the review arca (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (fi).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of watcrs:
® Wetlands:) acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SIYANCC." the review area would have been regulated based sole) • on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area. where the sole potential basis ofjurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species. use of water for irrigated agriculture). using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
M Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (11).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the -Significant Nexus' standard. where such
a finding is required forjurisdiction (check all that apply):
Q Non-wetland waters (i.e.. rivers. streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Q Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested. appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps. plans. plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/dclineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
E] Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
?? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Gcodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
? Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
Soil Map-Dare County, North Carolina
38° 0' W
36-0 ' 19'
36' 0'3&'
W.0' 19'
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7123/2010
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3
Map SmIe: 12,830 f pnnted on A Size (8.5" x 11 ") sheet
v
N Meters
0 25 50 100 150 r
Feet
0 100 200 400 WO
Soil Map-Dare County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Dare Count North Carolina NC055 { < `
':' -` Map_UNt Symbol,, "P' s "" ?MaR.Unlt Name Acree"s m AOI ;?' , `Percent of AOI?'G'= "' `.-.
CnA Conaby muck, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
flooded 8.4 20.4%
CuA Currituck mucky peal, 0 to 1 percent slopes,
frequently flooded 0.0 0.1%
FrD Fripp fine sand, 2 to 30 percent slopes 23.8 57.9%
OsA Osier fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely
flooded 3.3 8.0%
w Water 5.6 13.6°/a
Totals for Area of Interest 41.2 100.0% 1
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11L31LUIu
;am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
10-NOV-2009 10:14
d:\curreni pro ect s\sr1217-colt ington\ss-490ig\dlddc_t sh.dgn
sp enwick AT ?ICAD248190
[WBS: 41662 TIP -P-R- OJE C.
0 0

u, U
O
T

m o o
a
I
o n
c

Q O N O [•
,
G
D m Ch
I
+
I•

N N
O O
til
II H
O
? a
i

o
z
rn
?
i
?n ?I y
?I
N
z
?'

v m
u ,
pp
o y?

`c? r
mm
N GI ?"
g t
o 'R]'
?' W to
a O o

? b
$
b

'
? f?n1
m ti R
T
? [l
n
? ? O ?

?
X m
m N t?
F-
? m ?
ee
? 9 7J
m
0~
C$ Z

wu
t!?
4?

REV. SLOPE STAKES RT. SIDE -Y- STA.
I5 10+86.12 THRU STA. 11+00.00 (07/15/10)
O \J?1L-200 ?9ojecos\ 81217 Co ILngcon\55-49011 \dlddc-s65.dgn SPF
Z Y
WOODS
C W De ?O
I a ? O ?
O
? v
L C? a
W \
c ?i \
d?'E O $ ?,g SHeC T £R n \?
k ?
a L? \?q ( < Z r
A?. .? , /?cT c?9GF ? ? j
Y
ob/
? O 92 `rT Ci,? /mil
? s AC cy /T4 i
s .?
s? O
S
ko i
o III OIIN
r
Nary °°? v C
Nay O " CD
I ??a 1 0 ? ? b ??.
o a AQ,
oz I / < p \
CID
D•
G)m O / \
G) m ^a p?
? ?7 so, zoX5BS4 ?' ? So/ ? O
? Si°•2i?? ?? / // ? ??Ir ODD ?
X
II II II I II VI 4
pCC ? ??la".iyOS ?
ti I
FP ONS
I5-FEB-2010 P5de
oAC-ent . ject5\5Rl217 -couiogton\55-4901 \dmdc-:M.dgn
1-1-1 AT rnn?4Q- 1
30.00• 20 BST OR P y %? s ??S,
EXIST Ri
C
? c
? ? II / ?tirOD?
r-t / 0O40?H
C'1 C7 D? O O X? /as
--j QD v
O a w Q
O rn ' I ? Q?Q
ti
di3 of -x o 9p
D ,89'9 PS- I p B ?Q
? dip
T 6 /9
`, oc C S 9SS,O
??VM `y O ? S
170
FT JNO3 I \ <
N Z rOD?
s m Md13 X10 j ?Jwwq? o
0
5 m \°Q?Nb o
3:8Q Z6 $ro
D
°r
mz
N O
?r
°m
?C
O
00 -O
::o I
m cad
011-
-P
? O 007

11

C'? a` /gy \ n?? pCr
yo' p/ io
?
o? ^p /6,
X ? dy
b
r ESP !i

SR 1217 Colington Road Curve Relocation
Dare County Quadname Kitty Hawk

Burn;
- 4! 4and
-

• 4
y
9

;
lffar d r
Z.

O -

trdylg:pr? .
d
-- '? "?:
'?
•? ?25ittt
rr,
+
pralnr ? ,[..
ti
?
. '. ,? . '
, I

Uot

Y?o

' Proje(%Curve Relocation
ton
~Cdklll

r g
Lat. 16.0091507
7044738 );' - 'r.a- tr
Long
-75
P
I
. .,
.
.
C em
' ?? I. ? ? '. ? rt -??'S Iir{?14or.'^.' • 8x:3 ! qp".. ,'t ._::.,,_„Y- -

"
t,, ye wr-..
?,xy,•
p I?t'''r r" SA ,
? ?•yL791F` ,? ?.,
.t jj'-?' J r , s t. e
.
ti 'g
_•i?:.
,
r {? .yam
I
:?. L

a
?d? . ^t c 1 7
S ? nl? r ,
E
.
?
?ttiodor!`fs
fi
?,C I ? ?

-`- "s;O'OLIN'GT0N ISLAND

N
0 0.5 1 2 Miles
I I I I I I I I