19970692 Ver 1_401 Application_20100722

1111111 i?lll Ifliiii iiill iifi IIII FAST LANE PICKUP DATE PICKUP TIME
28014 828-0303
n. DRIVER # OF PIECES WEIGHT
- `SAME DAY' - -
q_ BILL TO : SHIPPER RECEIVER 3RD PARTY
NEXT DAY CAR VAN ROUND TRIP CHARGES
FROM S & EC TO r
a{ a 110 10 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD DWQ
RALEIGH, NC 27614 2321 CRABTREE BLVDr+"a3l0Ws
uINfID2t31dM ?N3p 846-5900 RALEIGH, NC 27604 0?oz 7, 711f
PROJECT
SIGNATURE ,f': f r ,. , .f PRINT DATE TIME/ _2.
1 ?
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Jamie Shem
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Nicole Thomson
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Re: Ansleigh Subdivision Sewer Extension, Wake County, NC
sPAID
On behalf of the owner, Eastman Development Companies, LLC, please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permits 29 and General Water Quality Certifications 3821.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Anslei h Subdivision Sewer Extension
Project Type Sewer Extension
Owner / Applicant Eastman Development Companies, LLC
Coun Wake
Nearest Town Raleigh
Waterbod Name UT to Beaverdam Creek
Basin / Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-33-15
Class C; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.002 (temporary)
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water impact (acres): 0
Total impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.002 (temporary)
Total Stream impact (linear feet): 34*
Total Neuse River Riparian Buffer impact (sq. ft.) 2,292 sq. ft. (1,619 sq. ft. Zone I & 601 sq. ft. Zone 2)
*Please note that the proposed sewer line installation is within a previously permitted rip rap dissipator pad
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
NRCS Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
USGS Topographic Site Vicinity Map
Agent Authorization Form
404 Approval (USACE AID 199708094, 199708095, 199708096)
401 Approval (DWQ No. 970692)
Overall Site Plan
Impact Map Details
$240 Application Fee to DWQ

^? ? IJULI

Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Ian McMillan
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
- 0 LP 1 July 21, 2010
S&EC Project # 3099.P2
O?OF W ATF9OG
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 3821
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Ansleigh Subdivision Sewer Extension
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: Ansleigh Subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Eastman Development Companies, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 09837/1692
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Stephen B. Eastman, Jr.
3d. Street address: PO Box 19205
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27619
3f. Telephone no.: 919-781-1827
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Owner; please copy both owner and agent on all
communications
4b. Name: Stephen B. Eastman, Jr.
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Eastman Development Companies, LLC
4d. Street address: PO Box 19205
4e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27619
4f. Telephone no.: 919-781-1827
4g. Fax no.: N/A
4h. Email address: N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Nicole J. Thomson
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.: [phone]
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1736225269
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.8439 Longitude: - 78.5528
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: +/- 1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Beaverdam Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW; 27-33-15; 03-04-02
2c. River basin: Neuse River (USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This small section of the property is currently forested. The remainder of the surrounding landscape is dominated by
common open space or existing residential developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
None
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
None
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to connect to an existing sewer line off property to provide sewer to the 4 proposed lots.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project will be to install an 8-inch sanitary sewer line and tie into an existing sewer line off property. The
location of the existing manhole necessitates one temporary stream crossing. As this sewer line is within Raleigh, the
municipality requires that the sewer line maintenance easement be 20-feet wide. Equipment typical to sewer line
installations will be used including impervious dikes, trackhoes and loaders.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer did original work on the
Ansleigh development in 1997; AID's 199708094,
199708095 and AID 199708096
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary [D Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: S&EC
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Due to the age of this project, the original JD maps cannot be located; however, we have included copies of the prior
project approvals.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The Ansleigh Subdivision was originally approved by the USACE on September 24, 1997 (AID's 199708094, 199708095
and AID 199708096) and February 10, 1998 (DWQ Project No. 970692) by the NC DWQ (see attached 404 Verification
and 401 WQC). The impacts were approved under the USACE Nationwide Permits (NWP) 12, 14 and 26 which
corresponded to the appropriate NC DWQ General Certifications (GC) 3101, 3103, 3108. The impacts approved included
235 linear feet of channel impact (0.026 ac.) and 0.733 ac. of wetland impact (total 0.75 acres of waters) under the NWP
26, 0.20 acres of wetland impact under the NWP 14 and 0.20 acres of wetland impact under the NWP 12 for the
purposes of constructing the necessary roadway infrastructure and supplying the necessary utilities for the proposed
Ansleigh Subdivision.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 13
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ®T Utility installation UT to Beaverdam ® PER ® Corps +/-3 34
(temporary) Creek ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 20
3i. Comments: Please note that the proposed location of the sewer line is within an already impacted section of stream. The
sewer line is proposed to cross the stream at the existing rip rap pad for a previously approved road crossing for the Ansleigh
Subdivision. The applicant determined that this was the more logical place to propose the sewer line crossing to tie into the
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
existing sewer line located on the eastern side of the stream. The only other option would be to bring the sewer line behind
the lots and tie into the existing sewer line located in the subdivision to the south. This option would necessitate extensive
amounts of wetland impact due to the large wetland/beaver impoundment located along Beaverdam Creek which is between
Ansleigh Subdivision and the development to the south. Therefore, the applicant chose to run the sewer line through a pre-
existing stream impact in an effort to minimize overall impacts to the maximum extent practical.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.

6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
Utility Line ? Yes
131 ? PET Installation UT to Beaverdam Creek ® No 1,691 601
(temporary)
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 1,691 601
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant cannot locate the sewer line without this one temporary stream impact due to the fact that the existing
sewer line manhole exists off property to the east, on the other side of the stream. Directional drilling or boring is not
feasible due to elevation issues at the existing manhole tie in. The applicant recognizes that the proposed temporary
impacts for the sewer line installation will be for the minimum period of time required to complete the activity and that the
stream area must be returned to pre-impact conditions. The proposed sewer line construction corridor as well as the
proposed permanent easement corridor is only 20 feet wide (i.e. does not exceed 40 feet in width). The proposed sewer
line is not anticipated to interfere with navigation nor is it proposed to be aerial in nature. Rip rap is proposed over the
sewer line installation, but that is only because it is located at the existing rip rap pad for a previously approved
road crossing. The applicant chose this previously impacted section of stream in an attempt to reduce overall
project impacts.
Please note that the proposed lots (Nos. 54-57) were originally required, in 1997, to be part of the dedicated easement for
the proposed South Hall Road extension. However, that project was never pursued by the City of Raleigh and therefore,
the applicant was able to request that the City of Raleigh remove the deeded easement requirement for the proposed
roadway extension. The applicant then decided to create 4 new lots at the end of the existing Avenal and Arbor Lodge
roadways. This is what has required the need for the sewer line extension to provide sewer service to these 4 new lots.
The applicant considered several alternatives to provide sewer to these lots. The applicant determined that crossing the
stream at a previously impacted site, within the permanent rip rap pad, was the more logical place to propose the sewer
line crossing to tie into the existing sewer line located on the eastern side of the stream. The only other option would be
to bring the proposed sewer line behind the Lots 54-57 and tie into the existing sewer line located in the subdivision to the
south. This option would necessitate extensive amounts of wetland impact due to the large wetland/beaver impoundment
located along Beaverdam Creek which is between Ansleigh Subdivision and the development to the south. Therefore,
the applicant chose to run the sewer line through a pre-existing stream impact in an effort to minimize overall impacts to
the maximum extent practical.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The sewer line installation will be for the minimum period required to complete the activity. The stream area will be
returned to pre-impact conditions.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: There is a pre-existing tail-ditch located along Arbor Lodge. The ? Yes ® No
minimal amount of new pavement added (for the cul-de-sac bubble) will be
discharging to this pre-existing conveyance.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? <24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project pre-dates the stormwater management requirements put in place by the Division of Water Quality (i.e.
originally permitted and developed in 1997). Further, there is no stormwater collection system proposed for the four
additional lots. The addition of these four lots will result in less than 24% imperviousness and therefore, the applicant
believes that no stormwater management plan should be required for the proposed sewer line installation.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Per CE Group, project Engineer. ? Yes ? No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Per CE Group, project Engineer. ? Yes ? No
Page 11 of 13
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The proposed
sewer line installation does not meet any of the "growth stimulating" criteria. Additionally, the proposed sewer line is
within a developed landscape and there are already existing utility lines off the subject property. We anticipate that you
will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
It is not anticipated that this project will generate any waste water. Further, the municipality will insure that the capacity of
the subject facility for this sewer line connection will not be exceeded.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?

Raleigh
?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USACE previously approved the impacts associated with Ansleigh Subdivision (AID's 199708094, 199708095 and
AID 199708096) and therefore this was previously determined to not be an issue by them.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The USACE previously approved the impacts associated with Ansleigh Subdivision (AID's 199708094, 199708095 and
AID 199708096) and therefore this was previously determined to not be an issue by them.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The USACE previously approved the impacts associated with Ansleigh Subdivision (AID's 199708094, 199708095 and
AID 199708096) and therefore this was previously determined to not be an issue by them.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http://www.ncfloodmaps.gov

Nicole J. Thomson ` July 21, 2010

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name „-. pplica1VAge6t's- nature
' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if a
ri'"aufho`nzation letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 13 of 13
8

IF
:-7s J)
I' mkM

SITE
r
1
? r
r
PROPOSED SEWER CROSSING
,

r
?h
10 i
-?
Project No. Figure 1 - USGS
3099.P2 Topographic Map
Project Mgr.: Ansleigh Sewer Extension Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
NT Eastman Development 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
Scale: Companies, LLC [phone] - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
1" = 650' Wake County, NC
07/21/10 Raleigh East Quad

? ! LO E
.

? A
W#nB
i1 y
E}. It
V "I
Name:
E•nviro nmenta1 Cry s Itar.ts,
f
l1Glfl B*vtn Rift Road. ` tta1 8 . NlcrtA C*Wjo.a 71614 • Pboae; tq.i9184r5900 ' tiax (9t9y 846-94b7
aewvR:
AGENT AL?'I'HOMAMN M '.
AAll planks To Be Filled in B?? The Cutrreat N '? -r,?r1AN i2
Addres* ?v x Iq Z a

2'7 co•t
,
Mom( ? '_7 ? 1 - g ?-
}'5ra ect Namel I rit on T sw Prow #...?--?---
Date:
The VepKtment of the Army c
U.& Aft ' of Snoeere; ?'? OD .
r.O Bpx y8go
Wkn irig#on, NC 2M
Attm'
Field W z POA
Re; Wttim& Rekod C;onSuktgg.t ud 1?ef'134t8lt5
• '?o ??'horri:xe ??y C?vaicera?:'
ant
S -A
tier.,
y
4?cY tut}' 1a ffie of.pet?rriit P . ' ;card. 'i'!i of
pwbm d#
?e• fialan tip' day. .
1efi:irEfCtrn?at3or? #it SuFp+ait ofppliat1<?c?sr'.?
ent' or ibis roar'
'? , O'tr ndwe Co?ueei'n :{f1eag
Tliia xidtificatiiiscipersedes• any
tiigbii<?• . .
edai tdxt ski.
p S Y"
nt a>s to'r ter. Pmi . '??' . •
ghc Jtit? lr?-?.
. Ea~ ucs?pgJR ?;:?te .rpiectft kriar to
print property" O"eYs NAttne
ca } s cyndi "Iy'
kj1CDMiR - DWQ
2321 Crebbtree Boulevard.
tom: lair. Darin: GAY ? ?? ,
pA
Sol, dt Envit r%b '
Raleigh; NC 27604
r?,.?t.v?..r f?oo: 3617Dd?
w #At'Q OR CwrL Sane c a a gw",14C 2705
CEv c=41 K 26025 4lionc 03369 540-8234
"woe., (704) 72a•94f)S (r3'J6) 504=1
Pox: (704)'P-0-94%
3?,aq
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 199708094, 199708095, 199708096 County Wake
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Eastman Development Co. Agent: Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Address: c/o Margie Buffaloe Hathaway ATTN: Mr. Steve Roberts
419 Emerson Drive 244 W. Millbrook Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone No.: 233-2060 846-5900
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): Approx. 50 acre tract, adjacent to
Beaverdam Creek, and unnamed tributaries, above headwaters, southeast of Kyle Drive, northeast of Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Description of Activity: Discharge of fill material impacting a total of 1.17 acres of waters of the U.S., including
wetlands, for construction of a road crossing, sewerlines, and lot fills associated with the Ansleigh residential
development (0.20 for NWP 14, 0.75 for NWP 26, & 0.22 for NWP 12).
® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
F] Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
n Section 404 and Section 10.
12, 14, & 26 Regional General Permit or Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject
the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve the
undersigned permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits.
The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work. If you have any
questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer at telephone number
[phone], extension 23.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature_ Tel. No. 919-876-8441. ext.23
Date September 24, 1997 Expiration Date Dec&ber 13, 1998
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE
FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
CF: S&EC
Wake County EHCD
Town of Fuquay-Varina
_ZZ
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
1••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NaURAL RESOURCES
February 10, 1998
Wake County
DWQProject # 970692
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules and ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS
Mr. Stephen B. Eastman, Jr.
PO box 19205
Raleigh NC 27619-9205
I L 16'7'A
Dear Mr. Eastman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place
fill material in 1.175 acres of wetlands and 235 linear feet of stream for the purpose of developing a
residential subdivision (Ansleigh Project) at Pasture Lane, as you described in your application dated July
30, 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Numbers 3101, 3103, and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide
Permit Numbers 12, 14, and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues them. This approval is also valid for
the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B .033). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval
will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the
General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except
as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you will be required to send us a
new application. If total permanent wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed in lots with remaining jurisdictional
wetlands and waters to restrict future wetland and/or impact and to protect a 50-foot wooded
buffer along Beaverdam Cheek. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the
date of this letter.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a
written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Raleigh District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Parker, DCM
Central Files
Steve Roberts; S & E C
Ms. Margie Hathaway 970692.1tr
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50°A recyckxVl0% post consumer paper
owne r. RE
w d, .

O
00

II
Y
J
Q ??

fA i:i W
N U

II O Z O N
_
Q M
Z
'
Q
U

L
a
- LLJ
-H
w OI > i c 3 II
M U i I

= c Z Q
~ V) ?
0 3
Z C14
O
H cJ
?
? J v

F-
p
A
I

W -in
O
?

W C? U Q O xL
w
i 'U Z W - ql
.

Q xo
= ? ? Z Z ?J
Z Z o
H O (?
J
Q 0!
( 1) C
'

-- 1 Z W

-
- 1 1:
Y
3
- - - I I
4 I
-i
J O
G
i
_
1
O
O
J

- 1
r Ell,
a
1 -4 -
O
J
Z

N LO
w,
?
L O
r Z
X > O

O V)
U
Z
W J g - O W
M U X ~ > N
r Z ® U
00
owo
1
1
Z
Q W N II
L

3
LI

9

z

z
W N W II L N
LJ
-

N LLJ
F-
N N
L
I

AS
z0-3a?
wacr cnW o U o
.
// // N W U 4 U) Q O j
??p \\ O Z
?W
C
WQrZz3 W?Um ?
Ra Call / I N? N 4\,
-
/x

?w K \ /.
i

i a-
-
?- \tv-7.
`

.
\40
+
?a
x
/ O;rY W

W
L?
c?
z
P 0
w=

_ . - - ?/ EXIST_ C O R S ?6 .913
_
Z ____-- gO.M 1935
/ ?r33a? wva a3nV38s11-
/'./ r''A?ly jV. C3WVNNn ,? `
0 V) tK' C,
---------/
9 Z
? O 99 0 h
Z U
Q / m N a.
w
w
-C,4
C? D
C.D
F - F
U) U) W>
w QJQ' Q,ZP'?;
a \
-¦f
4x___
loo
z
1 A
1 j
9
o9
r
Jm
?
p(n 0
3J Imo- ?Wv

Z m N
0Z
?WUVi
------ - ------ -- a 3
LL,
o

0
03
Q Z N LLI Z
Y w 0
3
~
Ln p 0 -j
Zmmao
00
?::
J o
Q

w
°
U
° LL
c
\i
2
z ?
c
a
o
V

ov1J a?a
HuQ
xLUF
w?
0?"LM
a,
C ?
q J
cc Z
v"J•, c
C7 z
w ?
w ? vw,
2 C
o Q
U U?
a g,, i

N
?
z z ¢ -

N ?N
H? K
,? I m
r