20100188 Ver 1_Application_20100308

OF W A TF9
o Office Use Only:
o? y_ 1 ®
Corps action ID no.
0 38
i , ®, r DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PC Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
ER Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 - or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization

_
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for. DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

® Yes ? No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ®No
I g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: B-4236 Pitt 121 Bridge Replacement SR 1541, Mason School Road Over Grindle
Creek
WBS Element Number 33579.1.1
2b. County: Pitt
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greenville
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 33579.1.1
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail] p rLZ pin
11 MAR Q 8
D
2010
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form *410
-Version 1.3 Decert?iPR8N?0
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consuttant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: _
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

Page 2 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): B-4236 Pitt 121 SR 1541, Mason School Road Over
Grindle Creek
Latitude: N 35.660241 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.289487
(1313.1313131)131)) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: N/A acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Grindle Creek, a Tributary of the Tar River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;NSW
2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1541, Mason School Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Bridge Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 121' Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 130'x 27-10" Concrete Bridge. Excavators,Dump
Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge Replacement And Telephone Line Installation.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property
/

? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
September, 2009
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ -
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps -
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: 0 Square feet of 404 Wetland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER) or (Corps-404,10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts None
3i. Comments: No Stream Impacts
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
Ot ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Welland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number ofpond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
511 Total Nona
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ®Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
81 ®P ? T Fill Grindle Creek ® Nos
I

558 Sq. Ft.

401 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Grindle Creek ® Nos 2097 Sq. Ft. 1407 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Grindle Creek ® Nos 2480 Sq. Ft. 1607 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible, with impacts occurring only where necessary to accommodate
the Proposed Bridge.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c- If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation -
3_ Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a- Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c- Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: -
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. _
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ® P ? T B 4 Fill Grind a Creek ® Nos 834 Sq. Ft. 593 Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 5969 Sq. Ft. 4008 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
G- f?
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes Z No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
pennittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). _
N/A
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet Flow through the Vegetated Shoulders and Special Sediment
Control Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Run-Off From the Road. New Pipes
Will Be Installed At Staion 17+00,Lt. And Rt.-L- to Replace Existing Pipes for the
soil maintenance roads that run parallel to Grindle Creek. Stormwater Will Flow
Through Wattles For Treatment. Roadside Ditches Will Not Enter Into the buffers.
From Station 12+61 To Station 15+56,Rt.-L-, Proposed Silt Fence will be used to ® Yes ? No
contain sedimentation. Proposed Special Ersoion Control Fence At Station 15+15,
Lt.-L- will allow diffuse Now to take place through vegetation.At Station, 15+15,Rt-L-
Water will be transferred via cross-line to the Rt.-L- and enters outlet energy
dissipator, thence dispersed into vegetation for teatment. Roadside Ditches Will -'
Not Enter The Buffers. From Station 17+50 To Station 20+00.The Roadside Ditches
Will Flow Through Wattles placed at the inlets and outlets of the drive way pipes at
Station 17+00 Before Entering Into The Buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A Roadway/Bridge Project %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Diffuse Flow Through Vegetation and Special Sediment Control Fences at Sta. 15+00.28' Rt.; Sta. 15+15, 31' Lt.. An
Outlet Energy Dissipator will be used at Station 15+15,29' Lt. Silt Fence will be used to contain sediment on the project as
shown on the plan sheet.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HOW
(check all that apply): ? ORW
? Session Law 2006-246
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b . Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ®Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,' provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
On-Site Habitat Investigation of Tar River SpinyMussels by Logan Williams,NCDOT Biologist
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) _-
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ® Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
On-Site Investigation,NCDOT Biologist Reports, and Moratorium Information From Travis Wilson, NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Bridge designed to no=rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson Feb20100 24,
App(icanVAgent's Printed Name Ap i nV nt's Signature
' Date

d authorization letter from the applicant
(Agent's signat is v id only .
is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version`
concurrence from US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS): Under new conventions, because of the
presence of even marginal habitat, the determination would have been "May Affect-Not Likely to
Adversely Affecf'and a new survey would be required if more than two years passed prior to
Letting the project. In order to Let the project on time, the Office of Natural Environment (ONE)
has scheduled another survey for later this year. The results of this survey will be forwarded to
USFWS for concurrence.
All Design Groups/ Division Resident Engineer - Tar Pamlico Buffer Rules
This project is subject to the Tar Pamlico Buffer Rules.
/
1517 _
a
\ 1541
/ 1538
r B-4236
Geek
1528 /
a
L
1538
Studied Detour Route --
/ -d----
-d- - - -
??` NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTa4M OF
i` TRANSPORTATION
sJ` DmsioNOFHIGHWAYS
PROjEoNDENr&
ENY?tOHhffNTALN1AL ANALYSIS BRANCH
a
PITT COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 121 ON SR 1541
OVER GRINDLE CREEK
9-4236
Fewrel

Bridge #121, SR 1541, Pitt County
Erosion Control Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control measures according to plans.
• Grading of slopes; 1.5: 1= stabilize with Class B riprap
• Seed all disturbed areas as soon as final grading is completed.
• Clean out and/or rework all temporary sediment control measures after
significant rainfall event (or as otherwise needed). These measures should be
maintained until a permanent vegetative cover is established and project is
complete
Pipe Installation Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control devices per plans.
• Remove material while limiting, as much as possible, material and sediment
from entering the stream and/or escaping from the project.
• Prepare pipe foundation while taking care to limit material and sediment from
entering the stream and/or escaping from the project. Where possible new
grade should be below the existing streambed. Bedding material will be washed
stone.
• Place new pipe and compact fill.
• Install slope protection on outlet and inlet ends of pipe (Class B Granite riprap)
• Establish permanent vegetation as soon as possible
• Remove sediment control devices after project has stabilized and permanent
vegetative cover is established.
VICINITYMAP
PITT 121, SR 1541, MASON SCHOOL ROAD
OVER GRINDLE CREEK WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33579
GREENVILLEAE USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET NUMBER 28-A
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF PITT COUNTY
d?
N h
0600
o
o ??7 E ?.
`g VY L" ? Schcb/
N
? v
a e'rgr ad
..
Rd ?
2
048 r
y
67 -

0123
0
730111 ?t
m w
'w 730109
ingwr^ w n 062
0
730124 _
c
730a -? ad Morris .
am5 Ln t oy Forbes R d
a a
a` Bnd
8 009
o u
r 730
n Qa
? u r
°
v 0
- 121
p' c 0118
6a q g

Q
2a
?
o m
?
J
Industrial Blv Fitt 121
30 Y= 699632.7013
SRpg52g 730304 Rams m Rd O X= 2508066.0607
"
^
a
^o -239-37
N35
U3-264 7300 W 77^-17,_22•,
` N 35.660322 DEGREES
e
aPa`? W 77.289515 DEGREES
o
F 73005 - N
0 m i
o a
p
.
0034
m
O
E
Oy t
A ?
?a Od`a ?Oc v

O N
_
73 2
730072 d3 Qa 1

870
0 5,500 11,000 22,000 33,000 44,000
A

VICINITYMAP
PITT 121, SR 1541, MASON SCHOOL ROAD
OVER GRINDLE CREEK WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 33579. 1.1
GREENVILLE,NE USGS QUAD MAPAND SHEET NUMBER 28-A
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF PITT COUNTY
N
W E
S
Pin 121
Y= 699632.7013
X= 2508066.0607
N 35A_239-37"
W77 A -1 7,-22 "
N 35.660322 DEGREES
W 77.289515 DEGREES
19
is
0 1,150 2,300 4,600 6,900 9,200
Feet

ne Was VICINITYMAP
PITT 121, SR 1541, MASON SCHOOL ROAD
OVER GRINDLE CREEK WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 335
GREENVILLE,NE USGS Q UAD MAPAND SHEET NUMBER 28-A
OF THE SOIL SURVEYOFPITT COUNTY
csO ?? R
?
o• N
a ?Oh?
30409 ?: o_ •P•(y W $ 3
lo%s gRv m
.
a
011 .
3 A U
a'O n eargra of S

$ p/ Rd U) n a
^0 ° 7304 30 02
30482 ,? ••
?
° j
-
30078 c
°
.?Q
m
11 m
30111 -
m 30123
n m a
30109 O
?9
in91OM n ??
730124
0 026
?V
Z
730 -ci Carl Moms R

O
°s
ms 1.n
c oY Forbes R n
a
d U
o

d9o
a M ds r
°
730
c ?a
well d 0? 1
a aa° 3 Pitt 121
ron Y= 699632.7013
Industrial Blvd 'O X= 2508066.0607
S 1529 N 35A-239-37"
730304 Rams Ho Rd W77 A-17r22rr
ao N 35.660322 DEGREES
N
US-264 2sa 730088 W 77.289515 DEGREES
N
m 4: c ids Yan
dQa ?o u S

r= o .<
R er Dr
73005
m ,
m
7 05 m P a°Fi
30034 n

B l p? /T
? ?
7 0
°c
re nR m
ra
s ? ?
G ?
Go
p NG 0
y0 - N
d 33
m
o
°m
o f
F
3012
2 a 072 ?a 129
m m
??' m
3 087??

0 4,800 9,600 19,200 28,800 38,400 °rst
Feet
10 a
0/0
.
"
/G?IVELI
1 ••
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley. Governor
Livheth C. Evans. Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
April 28, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: David Brook 1
ern :
µ q\' a
ZA"G
'j, 5'Awws
Division of Historical Resources
David J. Olson. Director
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 121 on SR 1541 over Gtindle Creek, B-4236,
Pitt County, ER03-0963
Thank you for your memorandum of Apn17, 2003, concerning the above project
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic
resources which would be affected by the project Therefore, we have no comment on the
undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please ate the above
referenced tracking number.
cc: Mary Pope Furr
www.h Acrstate tic.us
Isratiso Mailing Address . Telephooc/Fu
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St. Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Sari= CCata, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone] •733-8653
ADMINI
ADMIN 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Cmta, Raleigh NC 27699.4613 [phone] •715.4801
RESTORA'171014 STRAT
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N_ Blount St. Raleigh NC 4618 Mail Srnia Cents. Raleigh NC 276994618 (919) 733'6343 •713-4801
3Y,
From: Williams, Logan mussel survey B-4236 Pitt 121.txt
sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:26 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Caldwell, Betty A; Mombaerts, Gerard E; Johnson,
Jay B; Tran, Van K; Lynch, Karen M
Subject: RE: B-4236 Pitt 121
Hi Mike, good to hear from you. The Biological conclusion remains "no effect" for
both projects. No further surveys are required for either of these projects. if you
need further information please contact us. Thanks, Logan
-----original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 2:00 PM
TO: Williams, Logan
Cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Caldwell, Betty A; Mombaerts, Gerard E; Johnson, Jay B;
Tran, Van K .,
Subject: B-4236.Pitt 121
Hey Mr. Logan.... Division 2 is planning to replace Pitt 121. A Tar River Spinymussel
Survey was Conducted in 2002 with a Biological Conclusion of "No Effect". Is this
recommendation still valid at the present time? Pitt 121 has a May,2010 Let Date.
will we need to schedule another mussel survey? Pitt 118, B-4235 is downstream from
Pitt 121 and it's Biological conclusion was "No Effects". Please advise .... many
thanks ...mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Sutton, Michael W
From: Lynch, Karen M
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:40 PM
To: Williams, Logan; Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Caldwell, Betty A; Mombaerts, Gerard E; Johnson, Jay B; Tran, Van K
Subject: RE: B-4236 Pitt 121
Hi Mike,
I sent out the concurrence letter and 'No Effect" for B-4233 (Pitt65) and B-4234 (Pitt98)
so you should receive it by Monday. Yesterday Jay Mays and Mitchell from our group looked
at B-4236 (Pitt 121) and discussed the project with USFWS Gary Jordan. He agreed with the
"No Effect" call for B-4236 (Pitt 121). If you need anything else, just let us know!
- Karen
Karen M. Lynch
Biological Surveys Group,
Natural Environment Unit
[phone]
Mailing Address:
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Physical Address:
4701 Atlantic Ave., Suite 116
Raleigh, NC 27604
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Logan
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:26 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Caldwell, Betty A; Mombaerts, Gerard E; Johnson, Jay B; Tran, Van
K; Lynch, Karen M
Subject: RE: B-4236 Pitt 121
Hi Mike, good to hear from you. The Biological Conclusion remains "no effect" for both
projects. No further surveys are required for either of these projects. If you need
further information please contact us. Thanks, Logan
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 2:00 PM
To: Williams, Logan
Cc: Alligood, Dwayne H; Caldwell, Betty A; Mombaerts, Gerard E; Johnson, Jay B; Tran, Van
K'
Subject: B-4236 Pitt 121
Hey Mr. Logan.... Division 2 is planning to replace Pitt 121. A Tar River Spinymussel
Survey was Conducted in 2002 with a Biological Conclusion of "No Effect". Is this
recommendation still valid at the present time? Pitt 121 has a May,2010 Let Date. Will we
need to schedule another mussel survey? Pitt 118, B-4235 is downstream from Pitt 121 and
it's Biological Conclusion was "No Effects". Please advise .... many thanks ...mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

Moratoriums Division 2 Bridges.txt
From: Wilson, Travis W.
sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Sutton, Michael W
subject: RE: Division 2 Bridges
mike, i think this covers all the bridge replacements projects you have requested
comments for, however if I have left off anything let me know.
B-5200: This crossing of Blount's Creek should have an anadromous fish moratorium
of Feb 15 to June 15.
B-5201: No concern
B-5202: No Concern
B-5203: No Concern
B-5204: No Concern
B-5205: No Concern
B-4234: No concern
B-4236: No Concern
if you have any more questions let me know. -
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
\PROJECTS\PITT\pitt °121\plttl2l-pshl.dgn
$$USERNAME$$$$
CONTRACT.
UI N
O O

N N
0
Q N U
T
r
T
9
n
o
2! N ('
N N N
O O O !
•
p
,
Cry
a
•
y
O

n
O
t?i ? O y
A y "i
c II ?I
N C ?v
W

TIP PROJECT:

I I /w

ICI
I?I
CI
r
I
w
?
?,
? ?Z
??
'?\s?
I ??

ICI
i i ? ? ?'I`1 a
I
I
ro o
?
O ? 1I ?? I
I I
I I a
rn ?
I I
0)

o b : y
g

r
I O
? Z
n
ti -T3
O
ZZ:
O
n
fAfft ?
? Mme C\

o v? S 3} 0 a3? o m 3vv a v x° a' y v o
c ° 'a m 'm r? 43. 3 g m 0 5 o L ,' m' CO
v ° o B o m m m
3 m Z C a
6
o ° a m o 0 o tQ m v l7 m a F m m ; n °a. 'm y 00 m N N N OQ Q ° m / O O g C C J p' cm j 3 p r
3 O m m Q
S ° O
°. 3 o S. ` d 6' j 0 m
F a a n $ i m C
o to o
Q o S S °m
n n ° c
z v° c ?
f T?Ilii? I I ?I
"0 0 9 & S t x u ao vo
,? ?a?o I III
QD
Iill
01
3 0 °d a o m f.? o 0 o ° m 3 Q v i v o° v$g° vo• 7 nm o a `f S ?O' iyO° `
a a m T y 3 N a n ?a O$$ S m m n a 3 m 3 m o m m 'm 3 s
Q<°-mpaG1$m a a?o 93m33ox?33
m g y 3 °o- a a a 3 ao o} m o m' m m e' m m$ a c m m T S o '^^`JJJ 3; 3
c n o ° nm' o o' e' a o 3 d s. O°. n3. 2:E F m
- 3 0 m .0 3 Z 3 3 Ss• ; F m F F@ 3
°
o a '
a
3 p C C n° fi ?° v I
go 20--
m m o
v ? o o e o A
m m ° a
w y 3 3 3
II'
??Ii? III I ?
Iwo
??? I I I I I ? ? i+ ?
m m g g m o e m x OF
3 m a a x a a q as 8. S z a
n~ T x t T n a. v 8 a n p ti $ o n a P v a
a o. $CT' y° m a m m a o m S' ?. u E o o. ?- a v, O m a c ° ?.
"' u? 0 0 0 ?. m n o o i' u 2s m m m C
° s T° v o- 3 E° C v 6 x ° F
T u o n o x o°° o m m° c o n o
f Om 2-
O g 0 o x o° o m [: a o° m m S n C
4 3° 3° o ° G m °a °. c C
s m m > > x <
p o n; n 10 o_ m n ? n z y
m c m o m d ?I
N
`m a •.
m m I m
0
F -F
tt •121\pr[t121_wh2.dgn
r
C
m
rn
I
I
O
y
O

O
1

n
j
FI
I I
II
II
?I I
v I I
II
If
14
I I
II
Ir
I N
I
i I
?C
I I C
m
O c? ?
I
?o
v? 2
w
A
Z
O
rn
n
rr,
Z
O
rn
rn

Z
m
Z
2
O
m
ti
m
f C J

o m
o x
_ ~ 9 Z
m -1

m
.+ <
m
O
-4 D
D m o
o
m
m N
m
m
m
v
m
i
N m

D
w m
N
?i

W
r
m
N'.
m

91
NI
O:
jl
01

i
r
r
r
r

C
c
@Hll " tIg
0 4

C a I
i i 1
rn s n

rnN e Q ?
N LO cri
.
f? - . ,F1

' i ? O
?
y N:
1 ? V
N
,a.
Q m„
E
t

N
W
00
Z
_j
rf?
W
Z
W
I D
? m
N
Cke

I
?

mi
m 4. I
Tb m
m
m w4wvu ?
?I ? +
F
/m
<
U%o
!gm
(V
N
O ? O

VI
m
O
d
?? m h3 QO
W Z

? I
?;

¦'t oV
0 U mm
N
J
?m
Vz
m.
m ?

p,
C
X
7
-? N pro N
U
H

W W W

?
N Z W } pp
z
m
Q z

Q
N
I
Co
0
Q p
w
m C6
H
O
Q 0 z 7 co

Q
I O O w w H
Q Z O M Q O LL
Z

MQ U; GQ w F

N U
H "
U m 2 COO
yt+..zw a F- F-
= wHa?'
U 4
z
.
. w
C30 } W WW
"
9 H J Y a
oO
p [t

O 0 0 W U
U 9 F

>- co 0
W
a
Q M W
0 w z W
z C
dQCac
z
w 00 Fav

a
?d
o
z
t o mm
J c
?
O W
4?<
?O
V
ON
No>om
oowQ
\
\ _L
?3iyJ
zom^m
z
a7.
wPOm
?o
W
Q
U
m
N
W
IL
I I
/ I
II
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I`mo' I
I?NI
I ?
I$? I
Ix
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
t
Q? l
? N Ol
Z < QM
a j g Z t
a y ?i-§ ¢L 4a Zo
C1r a W S1V Vei?? 2 ??°,?
Q 2 -
y OOW
C?# W i? W ?N 3 alf( WUo
yi aig ? ?L, tfJ??cL
?8C LWS IV WQz Y= m
LL?- ?Ri
-7- OV30+03 'DJS
1 \`
r? \

m
N
I
lP ?
o
5
ti V' ° I? II
II Op ?
II
d cr U OC
p N N N N
v Q M CO m

P
Z>?
O<1 m
1- N
r Z ?c?
O ?NOZaa
Q' ?r-?W I O
Y J
N W V J ??
N O > O LO
O p Z LLJ mp
y3t l ?S?p Sb37
M 7) pp?l 4I,N0 4OSjbp0
p
.w? . Illy
Joel ? ? ?
I ? ` ? ? bb )/OS
NbJ N3-)bJ ? « v
3) c

tr
P I(J
W J?? m
ZO°r
P 3 U N d<
O WWZZ mN
NQOWPO.. tD
p<YV07-
t, z
?W
U
Oaf `l
W
Pie
W
O

I I W
?
I I ?
gg
.0 09 3 Z T
? ?
I
I I
I w N
m
?? ??a

I I ?
w ~w?
as X23
I I

'? 2 ?
I I a
8 a
I I
I I a
I
2
? "" a
W

I1S

31
m
Q, ?
JJ
J J P
I I ~
O M??N4
I « y N«0=
W W

3 Wpr-?
J?PV
I N
C
?
I
8 I
I

12 I

I?
I?
I ? I I

I
I ?

I I r ? a?
lw ,g s

??jN J W
N
W \OI??
WO?n2 ?
W J ??
Z OIL
r = Nd V
Piu <
M !n U I
N rJ Z P
MZONMN
p < Y O N
UPON
F
? P N m
'D'N 'MI370

SAYWHSIH 30 NOISIAIO
NDll MOdSHVILL i0 '1d30
VNIIOM NLHON
i0 3MS

ON31 IONINOO 1N3NI03S TVI33dS
Iai ONWHO ONVONVIS 4SI1ON3
C!

m
m

O 55
H

N
NN
?
U G ? N
s =? o

f

F ? a B S
b
g?
>o

i y¢TT
ei, J
0
W
b W
6

LL g
` ¢
b ?
? 9

fjl Ui 0i
W Sw ? t?

i
8 s

STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRANING FOR o
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL SEDIIMNT CONTROL FENCE
DEFT. OF TRANSPORTATION C
DIVISION OF HIGHMAYS
m
RALEIGH, H.C.
39N3d 11IS AMOdIaL
E
w•
??Qy
A F
d
35 ¢
= QyN3; au?
?? SJ
00 !?
?v
qU
6
LL
W
J
LL
Ir
U J
qQ LL
LL
a
u
w
0
a
S °o1 J 6
6 ?u
___ __ Syr
+ LL
LL6
I OF
OO
z

1
t?llE?
E
J?j
W
D
M
J
J
O
DL
F
M
3
W
J
H
Q
3
a
9
i
6 -1 ,0, 3dAL dVV1 1
I NO! DNIH
8
"s
r
s
o ?s
a
o.
S
I t? y
C7<? N
2
8

y?
1\\V

? iavPit?, 110
w.ro