20100310 Ver 1_Application_20100429

?.9 . O
'°"°.? ?s?q?q moo D
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION y
BEVERt.Y EAVES PERDuF
GovERNoR
Mr. Tom Steffens
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
(Two Copies)
Mr. Rob Ridings
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
(Three Copies)
EUGENE A. CONT4 JR.
SECRETARY
?0(J
Subject: NWP 14 request, for the construction of an egress only road (for Talecris
Biotherapeutics Corporation from Powattan Road to Talecris property in
Johnston County, NC. WBS # 59002
Dear Sirs:
Please find enclosed the Pre-Construction Notification for the above referenced project.
The purpose of this new road is to provide an emergency exit for Talecris employees due
to occasional blockage from railroad activities of their main entrance/exit. There are
unavoidable impacts to wetlands, buffers and one stream crossing associated with this
project. An unnamed tributary to the Neuse River is located will be impacted and is
classified by the Division of Water Quality at this crossing as WS -IV, NSW waters. Best
Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly adhered to
during conscructuion of this project. Also enclosed is a Talecris mitigation plan to provide
offsets to mitigated buffer impacts associated with this road crossing as well as additional
mitigation that will be banked for future NCDOT projects.
Federally Protected Species and Cultural Resources
The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) currently list four federally protected species for
Johnston County (Table 1).
April 26, 2010
[phone] x 3532 [e-mail]
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Table 1- Federally Protected Species of Johnston County
Federal Status Habitat Biological Conclusion
Common Name Scientific Name Present
Red-cockaded Picoides borealis E N No Effect
woodpecker
Dwarf wedge mussel Alasmidonta heterodon E N No Effect
Tar spiny mussel Elliptio steinstansana E N No Effect
Michaux's sumac Rhus michaucii E N No Effect
No element occurrences are listed on the NHP database within one mile of this crossline.
Biological surveys was performed by NCDOT NEU and Chad Coggin DEO on Feb. 10, 2010
with a conclusion of No affect for all four species. Historic and archeological reviews were
performed by NCDOT HEU with a no affect finding.
Minimization Information
impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection
of surface waters and wetlands, restriction against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to
waters of the US, and coordination (including a pre-construction meeting) with the Division
Environmental Officer.
Regulatory Approvals
USACE Section 404 Permit: The project qualifies for Nationwide Permit 14 (Linear
Transportation Project). All permit condition will be followed. For our files, please provide
written authorization that the activity is authorized.
NCDWQ Section 401 Certification: The project qualifies for 401 General Certification number
3704. All conditions of the general certification will be followed. For our files, please provide
written authorization that the activity is authorized.
NCDWQ Buffer Rules: Road Crossings are an allowable use. For our files, please provide
written authorization that the activity is authorized.
Please contact Chad Coggin [phone] or Byron Bateman at [phone] if you have
any question or need additional information. Your time and effort are appreciated.
Respectfidly Yo ?9
c
A
Bobby Lewis, PE
Division Engineer - Division 4
[phone] x 3532 [e-mail]
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
O?OF W AT fq
h Y
? r
? T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval soughtfrom the
Corps:
®Sectlon 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number.
I c. Has the NW P or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is rat required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ®No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or indieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ®No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Egress road for Talecris Inc.
2b. County: Johnston
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Clayton
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Forth - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ® Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Bobby Lewis PE Division Engineer
4c. Business name
(d applicable):
NCDOT Div. of Highways
4d. Street address: PO Box 3165
4e. City, state, zip: Wilson, NC 27895-3165
4f. Telephone no.: 252-237-6164x3501
49. Fax no.: 252-234-6174
4h. Email address: bobbvlewisQncdot gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chad Goggins
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
NCDOT Div. 4 Environmental Officer
5c. Street address: same
5d. City, state, zip: same
5e. Telephone no.: 252-296-3532
5f. Fax no.: 252-234 6174
5g. Email address: ccoaains(a2ncdot.aov
Page 2 of 11
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.6233 Longitude: - 78.4131
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: UT to Neuse River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Industrial park open area mowed fields and wooded areas
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
10 ac. 1
3c. Listthe total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1100'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Emergency Egress road for telecris Inc. current exit gets blocked by train on occassion
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project involves the placement of culvert crossing in this UT as well as grade base drain entire roadway from back of
telecris property out to Powatan road we are only going to pave 1°' 300 ft of roadway from Powatan Rd rest will be stone
.
Standard road and bridge construction equipment will be used, including cranes and excavators.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
Comments: stream shown on topo map and wetland form
included
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Chad and Byron
Name (if known): Qther
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtalned for ? yes ? No ®Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
ff there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T

W1 ®P ? T
Fill Drained
pond/Rivenne 0 Yes

®No ® Corps

? DWQ
0.06
Swamp
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? POT ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? PEI T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER) or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
St ®P ? T Culvert UT to Neuse ® PER ® Corps 10 70
River ? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ® T Dewatering setup UT to Neuse
River ® PER
? INT ® Corps
? DWQ 10 30
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 100
3i. Comments
Page 4 of 11
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water im acts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number-
Permanent(P)or
Tempo ry (T) 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
number 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 11
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
ff project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. ff yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Netue ®Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T required?
B1 ®P ? T crPipeg UT to Neuse River ® Nos 7092 4542

B2 ®P ? T Parallel
impact
UT to Neuse River ® Yes
? No
21
1360
from road
B3 ?P?T
?Yes
El
No
6h. Total buffer impacts 7113 5902
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la . Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Road alignment is on top of blown out dam plus this is the only option that called for one crossing other locations would
have crossed stream twice. has been designed so that no structural components will be placed in channel
tb . Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All construction equipment will be staged and operated from the existing dam fill and associated uplands. DOT will also
install sift fencing to protect the stream and wetlands adjacent to this project, and safety fencing to delineate those
environmentally sensitive areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ®No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ . ? Corps

2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Paymentto In4leu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Sa. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Forth - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ® Yes ? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. ff yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 Parallel 21 3 (2 for Catawba) 63
Zone 2 Parallel 1360 1.5 2040
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 2103
6g. ff buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration. see enclosed mitigation plan
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? if no, explain why.
Comments: See attached plans grass lined swales and level spreader plus all but ® Yes ? No
300 ft of roadway will be unpaved
2. Stonmwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
All stormwater associated with roadway will be handled through grass swales and/or level spreader where applicable plus
all but 300 ft of roadway will be unpaved.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stonnwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stonnwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federallstate) land?
1b. 0 you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetlarb Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ®No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. if you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Forth - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat? Mussel survey attached
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts? Mussel survey attached

5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ?
Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP GIS data layer and completed mussel survey with no affect finding
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
AFSA GIS layer and this section of channel is currently rip raped with large drop off down to normal flow elevation
downstream. Also base flow is only about 5 inches deep. Not assessable to anadromous fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU survey completed
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodpiain? ? Yes ® No
8b. tf yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC flood Map
Yv '(4?
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
09-12-0021
NO SURN E REQUIRED FORM
PRO.II:CT I:?POR\i:\'I'ICl\'
!'sties'? N"':
COMM": nlit
tutstort
1(:,5,1?r s4niai' !),,,,tint Ir?: AICDC
Al.
/'.L':7: ('tilti(:Iflf; Q 1t:kli' 1•ccjc'l ai
lJX'Wb,t 1'c'rDrr? It ctjllrPka?' 1 el ? No Pe•rnai 1lyw: N:t1am•,vi0,c
Prrieet (J+ ecri Nimr:l )ear .r sea rvrr'.4:cruin!!in Talcs ris /liolhc'rul.+e'utics Cnrlwratrun, !'rt p< str( rvrd iv
r r?cv= loco?ioa rrl,j>ro.iim«te!: J, bbli f i i !ring fm(l 60felt frill::.
SU UMARl' OF CULTUR.ILI: Rl':SOURCES REVIEW
!iris(+lc?rcrrj!tiurr of r-rn•*cu' uctit•itit?,c. t•e.cairs rr/',-rvkr4r. «nJ2ru»rlarinris-
Review consisted of background research amictamination of aerial phori rtphs of file eL-ra of Potential
Ellects (A.P.E,)- Thclu are riot previously recorded arcliaeolo,tical sites within the A.P.S.. and the ARE.
has nod becn reviewed or surveyed fior archaeolo;:icad sites. A small parecl loem4d on the southwest side
of the A.PT- and a pipeline ('.') li,caicd in the drainage Valle at the north end of the ARE. mere
previously rcviewrd by the State Historic Prvicrvaiiori Office (1.1110). li.tiaatination of historic rv2ps
( PAW soil map. 1911 soil map; 1919 postal service map and 1935 hiulm'-ap map) don't shore ar:v
structures in the A.1'.1 . The aerial phoa, rrph indicatca file upland part of ilic A,P.E, has been '_raded ter
cotunuction. The rest of the A.P.E. consists of side slope. and a small stream
lSrt :1 L•:rn!rneuh->» of-u'ht• Me invrilahle info wratiwr ju•rn^,'/ ,7.v a relial r$ iris:c,fn'rz^trcrinaf?rt j7r•edic-tntvr
tha! tlrc"C'we trn ru:i;!l:Ir fiat! iri,rtrrric j;rup4-salsa' i» tkc : (1'/ '
The project will not httpact any sites that ate eligil:de Ji,r thQ Milional Rcgisierof Iistoric Places{VRH1''
I IPO h u revic;ved oar; projects ndiaeent to the 1 P.G. and did mol rceommcmd and archae5,Iouicil survey
ii+r them. 'I'hc MIA". is located pn t id,:e. sidc clopcs• and narrow iream vallec, landl'irrm witha low to
moderate potential iar prchistotic archaeological sites- I hsioric tm:ps indicate there were trot anv
structures in the A.P.E. in the early to staid '!l's ecraury. 'I he ridge top parr of the A. P.F. has been ,uadcd
for construction and there is little powntial for undiswrhad arehacolo-•ia€ sites.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: V7 ?1;:p1a1 ? Previous Sun'ar lntit ? Pholos Ocorrespondenec
? Photocopy of County S'arvcy 4luics
FINDING BY SC: DOT CUTATRAL RLSOURCLS PROFESSIO\A1.
NO SUR1'I;.l' Rajulklm
Zd /2610
iNCDOT Cultural Rusourera Sl.ccialist Date
.:., .. r.an'Y ,a'i•:.i",. ...v PlLx.r T•nr.:/•.+?no:irrn :'n;; rr m iru?rri.?d rn ri:r Zrl:'i'r'a,n.v.rmai av?rnaxr.
taYr%/', V. imrn/nY: h l d5:pr: ,{::inhi'M1U a !,roust
NO St R\ PA REOC IRED FORA
a It ?a_c?
I'RO JEC-'I' INFORMATION
l,r.,lt fi.,:
U :1n:1 i;
1-..1 VIA'
„,.S,K A-.; PzIoN; Y"
[v:: ran.:\' (D(
Fcdcra
???i ?:'I'rrrri !.'?•' /V ??4'wV--Ili
L'IMTV:'vcv r,!?reis jnr l<fccre Rn;l.+:cr:ge'trrr:. C:nl;o, u! SR 19111. Pmi,hweln,
SUMMARY 01- CULTURAL WiSOURCES RrA IF'.\\'
!;"tO ti'C?':ripfi!m q(r'i'I h:u ,!,:!ittt.% frv'/t r'c A -iclt', tined crm(:"!cif ms
vct iow DI 111 Y,jund leaps. Instmx uMignamm, n+slco and indc.';cs tin, i,ndcttakcn on UCtcaihcr
?;:(:`r: ;I :ev! t :!f I IP0 rrs:yi r-e.•s ;a II?;: ilr.:occl ac::, k?e};inr';::_• •.; nh saner tiles, tc:l. '. idtn(AC.1 on
March, q, '.009. Po.,citirtall 0: igimil Pr" Will Ifartist Church t I F 9121 shat in the pn_ii:a aim Ilad lay:
been dneum n ed in I vs! dunng Ian kutehi o's Iuhl?SIOn l`bunly I I:Stilrie. AfCidtrcturc Sun e.'.' :Iliap;a::!reii pnlenlia?I': e i_•i?tii'.: in nnfc-, ao dovmvIw ii':: tvoIli, I a%! r.,xxss::rv. the cl:u:clt ,iI.•-
3 _k-Ib chcckcil nn hl;"h u 2ITA Bawd un Kis renew. it is co:: hob d there arc In, csi,tiig NR. 5L, LI.f tit{.
of SS protarlics in the Aral It 1' 1'otenli:d FIIt-os (APLI-
1fr'r 'i:., clr.i,r.,w of i•9: ;it:: r. •.:rtr... ri?rnr+::f;ru; i,rn: n:I :r :. .:.,.... ai •?;;ci•: 1. u'r_tJOU:;N??•,•i ?r'::;1i:., _
Aiiai -1Afu A : fin, 'jo unii il'!r'i1Ji i i iti ? i ir,r•i (' •; o'ulri!Yi i ? :..:1:I:.'1: '1::
I hC lohustim t:otsuty Surct:_• seas updated ;n All. 13-20,1_16, hu1 has nol v<a Ixxn rclalscd. m, I'm- :111
I) [l':Insei.BetcIl.ktI? i4s;-1M QI:'myrC<1?i1FY:ad id lOrt;ic-,Apo5eS i!2RY:1Pt1:a";Ii,:lik:Ihf:OaUI
historic resource; heir, prmur :\n ncrial map provided lie Inc p:(,jcc[ engineer shows tiro Talotm:!
ndiaccnl de%clopmcm has, besidcs enn:p re:??isinh P:r•mhatan Church'., into:! it_e u:'scttin<_'. rc moved one
othCr blliir'.'i .tu[ied ruri r:!_ the J<,h...... '!': C i:`I?•.;cr'. _ . t!?C !>H ;t: R', Inltrs I IouiC i PL S'71.
SUPPORT DOC:I::)tF:NTAYMN
Ste attachat: Mapi>l, Precious Sun'cv Lnl'-t Photos. PQlo;v.pv of !?rates srom coma.) sung'.
FINDIN(. 11) NCUOT Cl. LTURAL RF.So (A4(T S PROITSSIONA I,
V(-',)(I'h Cult
Oil - IL C??I
"/, /y 20 I o
Rc,our,!:!< Specialist

Inn:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
10 February 2010
Memorandum to: Chad Coggin, Div. 4 Division Environmental Officer
From Jason W. Mays, Biological Surveys Group
Subject: Novo Nordisk/ Talecris access road environmental evaluation
Jason Mays, from the NCDOT Biological Surveys Group, with help from Chad Coggin, Division
4 Environmental Officer, performed surveys for Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana, TSM),
dwarf wedgemnsel (Alasmidonta heterodon, DWM), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) and red-
cockaded woodpecker along the alignment for the proposed access road on new location, located behind the
Novo Nordisk facility off of SR 1901, Powaten Rd. in Johnston County, NC. Mussel surveys were
conducted within an unarmed tributary to the Neuse River and extended approximately 1312 It (400m)
downstream of the Iii-nits of construction. Habitat within this tributary was poor to marginal for DWM
which is normally an inhabitant smaller streams: This second order stream did not have the habitat
constituents necessary for TSM which typically inhabits high order streams or rivers. There were no
mollusks or fish observed within the stream during surveys and the stream appears to be subject to periodic
summer drying which would preclude most mollusk fauna. Visual searches for Michaux's sumac within
maintained open areas did not reveal any stems. Appropriate nesting trees for red-cockaded woodpecker
were not present on site.
Biological Conclusions
Tar River spinymussel: No Effect
Dwarf wedgemussel: No Effect
Michaux's sumac: No Effect
Red-cockaded woodpecker: No Effect
Principle Investigator
Investigator: Jason W. Mays, Environmental Specialist
Permit: NC - 2010 ES 133
Education: B.S. Biological Sciences, UNC Chapel Hill 2002
M.S. Fisheries and Wildlife Science, NCSU 2009
Experience: NCWRC Field Biologist May 2002-October 2003
Environmental Specialist, NCDOT, March 2004- Present
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TMWIXIRTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALV519
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT UNIT
1$98 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
LOCATION:
4701 AtIandc Ave.,
suite 110
Relelah. NC 27604
Talecris Mitigation Plan
UT to Neuse River
WBS No.59002 Division 4
April 26, 2010
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will perform on-site mitigation for
impacts associated with Talecris access road project, Division 4 WBS No. 59002 in
Clayton NC. An alternative access road is proposed from SR 1901 Powatan Road across
the NovoNordisc property to the eastern side of the Talecris property. The mitigation site
encompasses approximately 1160 feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to the Neuse River
and occurs on the Talecris property.
NCDOT proposes that the mitigation site will provide 1160 feet of stream enhancement,
75,000 sq ft of buffer restoration, and 1 acre of wetland enhancement. Onsite mitigation
is proposed to offset impacts due to the roadway project of 21 sq ft to Buffer Zone 1 and
1360 sq ft to Buffer Zone 2, for a total debit of 2103 sq feet of buffer mitigation.
Existing Conditions
This project is located in Johnston County near Clayton at the Talecris Biotherapeutic
facility on Hwy 70 (Figure 1). Within the site, the UT to the Neuse River was previously
ponded by a dam at the northern end of the site. Currently, the UT enters the site from the
south at a stone culvert under the railroad. It flows in a northerly direction approximately
1200 feet before to its confluence with another unnamed tributary. The UT then exits the
site across the breached darn of the old pond. The drainage area is 350 acres. The UT is
approximately 8 feet wide and 2 feet deep. The slope varies from.01 to.02 ft/ft. The
banks along the entire channel are fairly stable but are covered only with herbaceous
vegetation. The buffer along the portion of the channel within the old pond bed is
composed of herbaceous vegetation with pines along the outer edge. One acre of wetland
was delineated along this portion of the channel. The buffer along the upper reach of the
channel is wooded.
Proposed Conditions
NCDOT will construct the Talecris access road from Powatan Road across the
NovoNordisc property to the Talecris facility. The access road will enter the Talecris
property from the east and cross the UT of the Neuse River at the location of the old pond
dam. The proposed crossing will be in a baffled culvert on a slope of.02 ft/ft.
NCDOT will enhance approximately 1160 feet of the UT by planting the banks of the
channel with live stakes of silky dogwood (Cornus amomum) and buttonbush
(Cephalanthus occidentahs) on three foot centers. Approximately 75,000 sq feet of
buffer will be restored along both banks of the channel by planting a minimum of 50 feet
with bare root seedlings on 8 foot centers. Bottomland hardwood species will be planted
as available including at least three of the following: water oak (Quercus nigra), tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), willow oak
(Quercus phellos), sycamore (Platanis occidentalis), water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica),
swamp chestnut oak (Quercus'michauxii).
A two foot sill will be constructed at the culvert inlet to prevent a headcut through the old
pond sediment and stream channel. The site will be protected by placing it in a
conservation easement granted to NCDOT. See the attached Figure 2 for the conservation
easement , stream enhancement, and buffer restoration boundaries.
Monitoring
The site will be visually monitored and documented with photo points for channel
stability and vegetation survival for three years. The conservation easement will be held
in perpetuity and recorded on the Talecris deed. The mitigation site and conservation
easement boundary will also be placed on the Natural Environment Unit's Mitigation
Geodatabase for long term stewardship.
WBS EI.EMEN]

O w L N
T
t
m
_ n
O
N
O ZZZ
H
o
?
o
D

0 0
• gg
u o n• n o o x
s
h'
y?
?
a•
a
h'.t9
?o

'ti`z o

II
0
a
W
00

?

ss o
? o
ob
?
YS
O 1.7 ? O 1
tO
6; O ;

? .OM s

?C
?
r n ? 8
d

0
V
O
V
O

O
ti
b?
b
V
O
WBS ELEMENT
N N
O O
v
Q
U
N
T
T

O ZZ
N
O
o H
O yy
H

r
ti
O o
gg
< o x ti
n u IF n u u
o
x
h
A
0 ark
A A•
ti
O i
b? O
n ?
0
N
Go N
?l
h
yy ?
a
r7 c @+?G?
ZZ o O
n ?
O

x
s
?a
D
V
O
N
O
o
J
b
V
O
Ica
IAN
N kN
CA FA
V K
04+44444+441

+nY
? y
g ?
S

wo

Is Fiff
N p4R+
W ITfffF
A WA
HERE
-1144
V
's l

Z1?
cl
R u+
Jp
m??
O
I I
..uYr
I.X
1
ZIu
pu+
y ? 0
2g?
prr^Ssll
nli
x u
G1u+
[loc p?
.a
SI
m
P
O
m .
a?
nu
1
A
0o Fp
on 1
U.
ti
a
m
O
z1
n"
a
s
mq
n
V
+
OVO
0 0
Z?=
pn_
S
3
62
Q,
8y? `?? 4
R ? / 3=
/
P /
?S
c? O
H
r> v
m
4
x
1 1 m
I N a
Op J + I I
4HO
o ? p
n g a ? m ?: I'
9 ? ? N I
N H N .F
o m
- _ old
m r m y i? I
$ Yy
RR??^ O Rya?ll
a?Y? R II
mo ? I?I
" j ? rn 5 ,tt
O J/r • ? +u Ye t'fi ail
• a#? $ Fps ?'?
r..
+ 1`
C no

O m O ?Z-i yr
n O-n

G O5Z
N
I C=
N, N Z

t

VIA-

m

O

D
r
W
0 N
D X
_
D
D o
03

.1 Q
+ o +
4 O O
i

X
v
0 0
0 0
N N
A A
U cn
A A
N N

W W
W W
A A

WBS ELEMENT
N U
O O

N
0 U
T
m

0
n
N N y
^
O O O
y

O O
? ogg
<
u u u•u u x
v
c
3: a"XX y
x
0
V
O

o`
? O
a
g
° •e
a to

?
n ? nn? C
Er

I
N

ti
h :tf

BA
M
O

w
II

o

00
h
S•.
1
O
b
'jr b
y?
x
b
14
O
m
Z
m c?
? on
i
i
IN
4f

A
I ?
I W
N
I
aaeg
RR??? O
„ R
F

sR
or
r,

'£

a?