20021955 Ver 1_Complete File_20021223

Vt(A TFR
?O? QG
February 7, 2003
Pamlico County
DWQ Project No. 021955
APPROVAL OF 401Water Quality Certification
Dr. Gregory Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
You have our approval, as described in your application dated December 20, 2002, and in accordance with the
attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 3579 square feet of jurisdictional wetlands, and
46 square feet of surface waters for the purpose of widening and improving SR 1303 and the replacement of Bridge
Number 64 in Pamlico County except were modified by the conditions listed below. The project shall be
constructed in accordance with your application dated December 20, 2002. After reviewing your application, we
have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3371. This certification
corresponds to the Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should
acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire
with the accompanying 404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1. Stormwater shall be directed to sheetflow at nonerosive velocities through the protected stream buffers.
2. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
In accordance with the on-site mitigation plan, the permittee anticipates that there may be some areas where the
current depth of fill material within the existing causeway being removed, including asphalt, may be below the
natural wetland elevation. The permittee will ensure the removal of all unsuitable material to prevent potential
contamination of the adjacent water bodies. The permittee will backfill any void left by the removal of this
unsuitable material with clean, unconsolidated sand to the same approximate elevation of the adjacent wetlands
upon project completion. The area shall be revegetated with Juncus roemerianus and Spartina cynosuroides. If
appropriate substrate is not available for backfilling, then DWQ approval of the substrate to be used is required
prior any backfilling of the old causeway fill site.
N-MEM
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
?QF \,N A TFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`O G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
f Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
C3 ?
4. Due to the possibility that compaction, mechanized clearing and/or other site alterations might prevent the
temporary wetland impact area and the mitigation area from re-attaining wetland jurisdictional status, the
permittee shall provide an annual update on the wetland areas temporarily impacted by this project. This annual
update will consist of photographs provided during the agency monitoring report meeting and a brief report on
the progress of these temporarily impacted areas in re-attaining wetland jurisdictional status. Three years after
project completion, the permittee shall schedule an agency field meeting with the NC Division of Water
Quality, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the NC Division of Coastal Management, and the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission to determine if the wetland areas temporarily impacted by this project and the
mitigation site have re-attained jurisdictional wetland status. If at the end of 3 years the wetland areas
temporarily impacted by this project have not re-attained jurisdictional wetland status, NC DOT and the above
listed agencies shall determine whether a compensatory wetland mitigation plan will be required.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694 or Mike Thomas at 252-946-6481.
Attachments:
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
Cathy Brittingham, DCM
Central Files
File Copy
c:\ncdot\SR 1303\wqc\021955wgc.doc
Sincerely,
Klim1,P. E.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
December 20, 2002
?`Q1955
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney r
r ,.,
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
_? 2 3 ,
ilk
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
APPLICANT: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT LOCATION: SR 1303 (DON LEE RD.) & BRIDGE #64 CROSSING GATLIN
CREEK, IN PAMLICO CO.
PROPOSED PROJECT: PAVE SR 1303, WIDEN THE ROAD SHOULDERS & REPLACE
EXISTING 45 FT. LONG TIMBER BRIDGE OVER GATLIN
CREEK WITH A 120-FT. LONG CONCRETE BRIDGE & THE
ADJ. COASTAL WETLANDS. 45 LINEAL FT. OF CAUSEWAY
WILL BE EXCAVATED, RESTORING 1,747 SQ.FT.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by January 9, 2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Doug Huggett at [phone], ext. 244. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data is requested.
REPLY
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are incorporated.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
i orth Ca' I n
Michael F. Easley, Governor
NCDENR
a Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
December 20, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
APPLICANT: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT LOCATION: SR 1303 (DON LEE RD.) & BRIDGE #64 CROSSING GATLIN
CREEK, IN PAMLICO CO.
PROPOSED PROJECT: PAVE SR 1303, WIDEN THE ROAD SHOULDERS & REPLACE
EXISTING 45 FT. LONG TMIBER BRIDGE OVER GATLIN
CREEK WITH A 120-FT. LONG CONCRETE BRIDGE & THE
ADJ. COASTAL WETLANDS. 45 LINEAL FT. OF CAUSEWAY
WILL BE EXCAVATED, RESTORING 1,747 SQ.FT.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by January 9, 2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Doug Huggett at [phone], ext. 244. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data is requested.
REPLY
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are incorporated.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
f
t ? r
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT C
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 9 55
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: SR 1303 (Don Lee Road) and Bridge No. 64
crossing Gatlin Creek, in Pamlico County
Photo Index - 2000: 78-864 grid: R-8 to S-5 1995: 78-846 grid: L-9 to J-12
State Plane Coordinates: x: 2661500 y:453800 . GPS: Rover File # X102816A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 9/10/2002 and 10/28/2002
Was Agent Present - YES (J. Johnson, 9/10/02)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received as Complete- 11/22/2002
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan -Pamlico County
Land Classification from LUP - Rural and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: CW, EW, PTA and CS
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Secondary gravel road and bridge
Planned - Secondary paved road and bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A Source: N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
F,xcavatpd Fillp.d (IthPr
(A) Coastal Wetlands- Juncus roemerianus, 2,202 sq. ft.
Distichlis spicata, Cladium jamaicense
Ty hn a spp.,Sap rtina patens and
c nosuroides
(B) Public Trust Area - Shallow Bottom Rip Rap
46 sq. ft. hcit is 90Q sq. ft.
onal
Shading 530 sq. ft.
(C) Other - 404 Type Wetlands 1,377 sq. ft. 131 sq. ft. Shaded
High Ground 85,000 sq. ft. disturbed
(In road ROW)
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 2,778 sq. ft., 0.06 acres
(E) Total area disturbed by project: 89,286 sq. ft., 2.05 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: No
(G) Water Classification: SA; HQW, NSW
(H) Open for Shellfishing: YES
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to pave SR
1303, widen the road shoulders and replace the existing 45-foot long timber bridge over Gatlin
Creek with a 120-foot long concrete bridge spanning Gatlin Creek and the adjacent coastal
wetlands. 45 lineal feet of causeway will be excavated from the existing roadbed, restoring 1,747
sq. ft. to its previous wetland hydrology.
t
FIEIA' VESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT - SR 1303 and Bridge No. 64, Pamlico Co.
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The site of this proposal is State Road 1303 and Bridge No. 64 crossing Gatlin Creek, 4.3 miles
southeast of Arapahoe, in Pamlico County. The general purpose of the project is to pave the
approximately 1700 foot long SR 1303, widen the road shoulders, replace the deteriorated 45 -foot
long by 20-foot wide timber bridge with a 120-foot long by 30-foot wide concrete bridge spanning
Gatlin Creek, and remove 45 lineal feet of existing fill causeway through coastal wetlands marsh.
Construction of this proposal would restore approximately 1,747 square feet of fill causeway to
the elevation of the surrounding coastal wetlands and allow safer driving conditions for the
traveling public and numerous busses using SR 1303.
SR 1303 begins at SR 1301 and extends westward approximately 1700 feet to the Camp Don Lee
entrance on the south side of the road and grain bins on the north side of the road at its western
terminus. Pine woods exist on the north side of SR 1303 from SR 1301 to the wetlands at Gatlin
Creek. Approximately 800 feet from SR 1301, Bridge No. 64 crosses Gatlin Creek near its
confluence with the Neuse River. The bridge crossing Gatlin Creek is flanked with coastal
wetlands, except for the southeast quadrant, which is developed and currently supports a
residence. Creek width at the crossing is approximately 45 feet and is consistent upstream and
downstream of the bridge. Vertical clearance between the water and bridge bottom is
approximately 4.5 feet. A causeway, approximately 500-foot long by 40-foot wide, was
constructed through the coastal wetland marsh on Hobucken Muck soils when the bridge was
constructed. The shores of Gatlin Creek are Coastal Wetland Marsh consisting of Juncus
roemerianus Distichlis Licata Cladium jamaicense Typha spp Spartina patens and Spartina
cynosuroides, except the southeast quadrant where a residence is surrounded with grass, myrtles
and pines. The Cypress-gum Swamp surrounding the coastal wetlands consists of Bald Cypress,
Sweet gum, Willow, Red Maple, Greenbrier and Poison Ivy. Soils on this site are mainly
Hobucken Muck adjacent to Gatlin Creek and Dogue fine sandy loam in the upper elevations as
classified by the NC Soil Conservation Service. Approximate elevations on the site range between
1 feet and 10 feet above normal water level. No evidence of SAV beds was noted. The North
Carolina Division of Water Quality classifies waters of Rocky Hock Creek as SA; HQW, NSW at
the project site. No Primary Nursery Area, as designated by the North Carolina Division of
Marine Fisheries, is located at this site. The Pamlico County Land Use Plan designates the
project area as. Rural, with all CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern designated as
Conservation.
The proposal is to replace the existing 45-foot long by 20-foot wide timber bridge with a 120-foot
long by 30-foot wide pre-stressed concrete bridge on the existing alignment. The proposed bridge
will have a vertical clearance 0.3 feet greater than the existing bridge (approximately 5 feet).
Constructing this project would include removing 45 feet of the previously filled causeway (that is
approximately 40 feet wide) and grading it 6 inches lower than the surrounding Coastal Wetlands
to facilitate the precipitation of organic sediment into the restored wetland area. The bridge is
being widened from 20 feet to 30 feet to more closely correspond to the 10 foot paved tra vel lanes
and 6 foot grassed shoulders proposed for SR1303. Three Existing bridge bents will be removed
from the waters of Gatlin Creek and one bent consisting of 7 H -piles will be installed (vibrated
and/or driven) west of the main channel. NC DOT Best Management Practices will be used for
erosion control and bridge demolition.
. . L
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT -SR 1303 and Bridge No. 64, Pamlico Co.
PAGE 3
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the construction of the bridge approaches with 1.5:1 slopes armored with rip rap
would require the filling of approximately 2,202 square feet of Coastal Wetlands, 1,377 square
feet of 404 type wetlands and 46 square feet of Public Trust Waters AEC (open water). Widening
the bridge from 20 feet to 30 feet would result in the shading of an additional 530 square feet of
Public Trust Waters AEC (open water) in addition to the current shading of 900 square feet from
the existing bridge. Widening the road shoulders and paving SR 1303 would result in
approximately 85,000 square feet (1.95 acres) of impacts (disturbance) to high ground. Removal
of 45 feet of previously filled causeway would result in the disturbance of approximately 1,747
square feet of high ground. A minimal disturbance of the creek bottom is expected during the
installation of the pilings using vibrating and driving techniques. Approximately 2,640 square feet
of the above described ground disturbance will be within the CAMA Coastal Shoreline AEC.
NC DOT has reduced the Coastal Wetland and 404 type wetland excavation and fill impacts
associated with this proposal by lengthening the bridge from 45 to 120 feet and using 1.5:1 fill
slopes in wetland. This would reduce fill in wetlands that could have occurred by widening the
bridge approaches. The NC DOT has proposed to use standard BMP's to minimize the impacts of
erosion as well as installing type A rock. ditch check damns, type B permanent silt basins and
diffuse flow of storm water through vegetated uplands before entering wetlands. Lengthening the
bridge would also create a wetland buffer between the bridge approaches and the waters of Gatlin
Creek, allowing some treatment of the storm water run off associated with the bridge and
roadway. NC DOT has committed to dropping no materials from the bridge demolition in the
water and to using top down construction to minimize impacts.
The proposed removal of 45 feet of existing causeway should restore approximately 1,747 square
feet of fill causeway in coastal marsh to its natural hydrology. NC DOT is asking for coastal
wetland restoration mitigation credit for this area as well as enhancement mitigation credit for an
area extending outward from the removed causeway, calculated as a quarter circle, the radius of
which is the length of the removed causeway (2,937 sq. ft.). NC DOT has agreed to perform
hydrologic monitoring in this area (mitigation plan to be submitted). NC DOT will be impacting
approximately 2,202 square feet of coastal wetlands and 1,377 square feet of 404 type wetlands in
this proposal and would like to use the restoration and enhancement credits created to offset these
impacts. Using created coastal wetland mitigation to offset coastal wetland impacts at 1:1 for
restoration and 4:1 for enhancement would use all coastal wetland restoration credit generated and
leave a deficit of 455 square feet of coastal wetlands to be compensated for with 1,820 square feet
of created coastal wetland enhancement credit. The remaining 1,117 square feet of enhancement
credit would be dedicated toward mitigation of the 404 type wetland impacts.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 2.05 acres
Bill Arrington
December 2, 2002
Morehead City

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
November 20, 2002
Mr. Bill Arrington
Coastal Management Field Representative
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
151 - B Highway 24 Hestron Plaza
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Re: Bridge #64 Pamlico County on SR 1303
Dear Mr. Arrington,
LIndo
NOV 2 2 2002
Please find enclosed the revised CAMA MP forms and map for bridge #64 on SR 1303 in Pamlico
County. Redesigning the road, bridge and their alignments has reduced CAMA wetland impacts to 2202
sq. ft. from 3125 sq. ft. 404 wetland impacts were reduced from 1456 sq. ft. to 1377 sq. ft. The proposed
bridge will now be 40' longer than in the previous (80') design. The new longer (120') bridge is designed
to span more previously filled wetlands allowing the NCDOT to remove 1747 sq. ft.of causeway and
return it to an elevation resembling that of the adjacent wetlands. The removal of the old causeway will
mean that approximately 1747 sq. ft.of fill will be removed from wetlands associated with Gatlin Creek
and the Neuse River. After the causeway is removed, wind tides and high water flows can return to a more
natural hydrologic cycle for the surrounding wetlands. Water will be able to flow more unimpeded
beneath the new structure, allowing the natural wetland hydrology to return. The NCDOT asks that
enhancement mitigation be granted for the wetland area that will benefit from the improved hydrology.
Approximately 1747 sq. ft. of existing causeway will be lifted, restoring the wetland underneath. The
NCDOT proposes riverine wetland enhancement extending outward from the lifted causeway. The area of
enhancement will be calculated as a 1/4 circle, the radius of which is the length of the causeway removed.
The total enhancement area will equal 2937 sq. ft. The causeway will be excavated to 6 inches below the
elevation of the surrounding wetlands. The intent of this is to provide a base substrate while allowing the
natural hydrologic processes to move organic material and sediment into the excavated area. The NCDOT
asks that the remainder or balance of enhancement credits be allowed as credits on future projects with in
the Neuse River Basin. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call.
Sincer)son
Jay Jo Division 2
Environmental Officer
CC: Mr. Neil Lassiter, Jr., P.E. Division Engineer NCDOT Div 2
Mr. Dwayne Alligood, P.E. Maintenance Engineer NCDOT Div.2
Mr. Thom Edgerton, Bridge Superintendent NCDOT Div.2
Division Two • P.O. Box 1587 • Greenville, N.C. 27835
t
Form DCM-MP 1
APPLICATION
NOV 2. z 2002
(To be completed by all applicants)
MANAGEMENT
REHEAp
1. APPLICANT b. City, town, community or landmark
Minnesott Beach
a. Landowner:
c. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1303
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address P.O. Box 1587
City Greenville, State N.C.
Zip 27835 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Jay Johnson, -NCDOT Div. 2
Address P.O. Box 1587
City Greenville, State N.C.
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Gatlin Creek tributary to the
Neuse River
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace Bridge # 64 on SR 1303
Widen and Pave SR 1303 from beginning to end.
Zip 27835 Day Phone [phone]
Fax _(252) 830-3352
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Both
c. Project name (if any) SR 1303 Pamlico
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Pamlico
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? _Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Purpose: To upgrade existing
gray el secondary road to a 2 lane paved (20'el secondary road to a 2 lane paved (20' wide
pavement with 6' shoulders) to improve safety of
traffic movement and to comply with State
Highway standards for secondary roads.
METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION: Standard roadway
and bridge construction methods; DAILY
OPERATIONS: Conveyance of vehicular traffic
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Dogue fine sandy loam, Hobucken muck
e. Vegetation on tract Juncus roemeranus, Spartina
patens, Distichlis spicata, Spartina cynocuroides
f. Man-made features now on tract Existing gravel
road and timber bridge.
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed X Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
N/A
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
j. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes No Unknown
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No
Coastal (marsh) X Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
NOV 2 2 2002 ?t .
m. Describe existing
NIA
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface Runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)

4
06 W i
Form DCM-MP-1
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Don Lee Farms Inc.
Address 4406 Don Lee Rd., Arapahoe, N.C. 28510
Phone Unknown
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $400 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S.113A -1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERNUSSION TO
ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in- this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 20 th day of Oct. .2002
Print Name Jay Johnson
Signature
La w r uthorked Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
X DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other Bridge
and Road
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
N/A N/A
1700' 2@
6'
Avg.
t
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MI-1W or NWL in cubic yards 1747 sq. ft. or 389
cu yds.
b. Type of material to be excavated sandy clay
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes X No
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards 1747 sq.
ft.
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
(See Attachment)
a. Location of disposal area NCDOT approved
upland spoil area
b. Dimensions of disposal area Varies by location
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
X Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes _ No
If yes, where?
t
W .
Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
X Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION N/A
Type of shoreline stabilization
X Bulkhead X Riprap
X Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water.
N/A
(2) Dimensions of fill area 2 (a 6 Avg. x 400'
(3) Purpose of fill To widen and prepare
road for paving.
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No 404 Wetlands
b. Length Ends of Bridge approaches
c.
Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
It C9 . CAAM 441- \
d.
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area 2 (a, 8' Avg. x
400'
Maximum distance waterw )f MHW or NWL
Y? uvuv eft ctS 2r' ?o
? 2 0? S. GENERAL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
N/A
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material Steel bulkhead,
and Class 2 Rip Rap
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to 'be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap _ 0 cu. yds
(2) Bulkhead backfill N/A
h. Type of fill material _Sand,Clay Loam
i. Source of fill material Local
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
(2) Purpose of fill To widen SR 1303
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Silt Fence
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Standard road and bridge construction
equipment
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
NCDOT SR 1303 Pamlico
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
11/20/02
Date
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Form DCM-MP-3
UPLAND
DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or
structures proposed Replace Bridge # 64 on SR
1303. Widen SR 1303 and pave to end
b. Number of lots or parcels N/A
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the
units per acre) N/A
d. Size of area to be graded, filled or disturbed
including roads, ditches, etc. 2 (a) 6' Avg. x 1700'
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control
plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? Yes X No
If yes, date submitted
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete) to be used for paved surfaces.
Marl, Asphalt and Concrete
g. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
MHW or NWL, or within 575 feet in the case of an
Outstanding Resource Water, to be covered by
impervious and/or built-upon surfaces, such as
pavement, buildings, rooftops, or to be used for
vehicular driveways or parking. < 10%
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development
Permit may also require a Stormwater Certification.
. V 4.
Has a site development plan been submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management for review?
Yes X No
If yes, date submitted
i. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
N/A
j. Have the facilities described in Item i. above received
state or local approval? N/A
(Attach appropriate documentation)
k. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to
waters of the state (for example, surface runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent,
"wash down" and residential discharges).
Surface runoff from roadway and some bridge
surfaces; stormwater capture and retention from
near-shore bridge surfaces
1. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g.
well, community, public system, etc.)
N/A
in. Will water be impounded?
If yes, how many acres? _
Yes X No
n. If the project is a oceanfront development, when was
the lot(s) platted and recorded? N/A
NCDOT SR 1303 Pamlico
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
11/20/02
Date
Form DCM-M -5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Concrete and Steel
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Gatlin Creek tributary of the Neuse River
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 6.6'
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 45'
(2) Width of existing bridge 20.1'
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 4.7'
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) Yes, even the bulkhead
will be removed to the MHW and Rip Rap
will be placed on/behind the old bulkhead.
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MI-1W or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 120'
NO V 22 2002
h. Width of proposed bridge 30'
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
Crown to Bed =13'
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
X Yes No
If yes, explain Flow will be less restricted because
of longer bridge
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
5'
1. Wifl the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? X Yes No
If yes, explain Flow will be less restricted because
of longer bridge
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
I CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
N/A
b. Number of culverts proposed N/A
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
N/A
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes X No
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert N/A
g. Width of proposed culvert N/A
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWT N/A
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes X No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes, Causeway removal for mitigation
(1) Length of area to be excavated 44'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 40'
(3) Depth of area to be excavated 6"
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 389 cu. yds.
O '
AVs _ 0T fef1W tI ds
_ Coastal WetlanLeeD
If yes, STAL AA
(1) Length of ar ENT
(2
) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 35'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 10'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 78 cu. Yds.
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Temporary spoil area is existing road bed
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
20' x 40'
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes . No N/A
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below MHW
or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill

b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: No
? .J 7
I.i
J,
Form DCM-MP-S
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
result in any fill (other than excavated material to project site? Yes X No
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs - Other Wetlands environmental impacts.
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes No Unknown
If yes, explain in detail
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail To protect bridge structure
at shoreline and end bents. RipRap will be placed
behind old bulkhead to prevent scour.
NCDOT-SR 1303 Pamlico
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
11/20/02
Date
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work channels?
Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Silt fence
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? _Typical bridge construction equipment

: °
, Y1 w v CM

R

Ini

ti?+ blwh
it
?
- ? 4?1wa W ?,:

/ G 47

0 1000 2000 3000 4000
meters I I I . i . I
miles I 1 I
>f 1 09/24/2002 4:48 PM
. v - 1219 •
32
Ed • \ S ' 2 a '- - - _?•- _ ' ' •11? 1333 G
GmrKSbwo 1 ?? tl • B ( ?? ? ? ?? 1324
STONEWALL
`•
276
w. .2 \.° _^< 1945 POP,
.' ?'>• •.L.' `? if J RO4`-•??--?tJjSj^??q SAY60R0 ?` 1 c;, •;
1108 C_• . ror. 735 16
t tat 1347 '?4 ?. 2 ?
Nov 2 2 2002
J l Q
PAL ?
'. 2'a ? 1.10? 5 /C o Co4t"N7-1 1 ; C,13's i -?
> l Of 8? 1335 ; i' AtsT ,gIVAG MEfVT
1108 - - caowa+* EN qp
13
1 3.3
•?? •? 132,•
t I• ' 1. '
1100 .1315 Co;lcore /:
G P, G U Af D a -'=
p
iMI
/ !- G 1 V J 1 1313, \\
\a it15 (. ?ri -'\. i• \2. 1321
t ` \ rfj
21
"-56 1 /• /gyp Z 1312 ` '1 N?loia `•, f
s?
' 14 r 28
t. ( r ; • - •t 1005 ' • 6 ,Knld+aw : ^ ' ?3j
• c 9 1005 `,, ?,y J • , ; '? ; 1??s i M ILI `
ARAPAHOE I '•\ t ;? C?eet
10?. 461
1308 1
1368 l r /
1iT40 of 1 117t. ?, _ ; y!.'. 13°7
134 1350
- b [3 r 1301 1306 Jn bn. 1
?_'• 1117 (, 1 \ • 13C
-Comer / •1
•3 / 1 1 No.2 /•¢i?i` t..
• 1 132 / it •? -4 1. 0 1302 / • •?E„ ?, i e
13°5 /•
`; •r .. \?'.-? ?• ` 1369 •/• Oi;
?` - t •\'• 3 i t 1301L
` t•/ •\•\ '
•\ \ B
27 b \.\
64
Wr \
4
P
Y t'i.
-1
> A
N roil
w N
°nm
r A
-H1 =
A
S
r,
Nr
z?
v
m
T
of r
t
m '
r
m ON
z :
-i OX
H r-;;
O A
= iA A
1Hfl m o
? m
m
r
n
n
m
m
O <
? D
m
x_ o
(n
m
O
D
0
T)
0
0
U)
m
p
vl
m
m
z
r7
m
v
° m
° x
N
r
° °w
m
0
C)
m
0
m
m <
X D
(n
i o
o ,
0
n D
nN m
y=m
O
T
i p
1
N
z
A
< O
m U)
0 (A
H m
-1 cli
S H
z
co
O
3
rn
9
H
A

T
a
m
1
o?
m
c?iv
x•

? s
? g
m ?
- -
m -

1I
-cJv-lv'
-
r
> .

O
n
7Z
Ln

n
S
m
n
N
,

m

D )
J
N
IY •. i
)
m
1
w „c ti
O
z
= m H
y D N c
•d` I H rp
N.VI d.
z r
.

m
3
ro
0
S
b
S
S
0
C)
X
CA
H
r
0
S
m
0
ro
m
F?
Ig
a
9
a ? a
I ??( N
H

?I a

Q X
ro-
p
hh m
m_

Z
cn
?Y? I^
°
I < O
F
1? C)
N
1 D „,
m -n
0 r
U;?I
r -1
D =
z ?
0
v) ?
-? i C)
cu
m S
m

D 0
0
>
D
m

-< m
z
TJ
C) -i
m

to _
z
r C-)
-? N
r
rn
W y
N
z ? n
-0 a: r
D
r m z
T ? ? Ut 1?
O
TI ?' (n m
- C1

_? >k
T? SHO ULDER POINT \ ?N

EDGE OF PAVEMENT

EDGE OF PAVEMENT
m
D
? r-
C-)
r
C7
r
IMC.
K 1
1 , I )
1 I
C') i I 1 O O -I -i
O I I m m m m m In
D n 1 z i I n o v v Sri
In N-1 I m I m 1 -_I m 0 0 0 O ED
N n I C 1 C I O !P D n y n
r In 1 to o m < ?? `
O m ?? T x
m m LA o 'o -
o 0 O r 0 oT ~ x o m
r
n
z m
n O mi -0 m rU) z y y
r
m D r m m n n
r n D D ` n
D z
z T v
m m m
cx) r c6 D
C r
m
-,l n
m
:o mn
F-
m
? ? -rl
m
r
n
U)
r- z
o C7
U) m
m
r,
o?
(n
r
m
m
z
(7
m
-n
m>
xm
F,
Z °D
C-) c
m
D Cn
Dr
mo
i ?
C) -n D
(n r- m
C V j D
?m
moo
0.0
W
m
y
c
c
c
D
z
m
s?oApy
F
00
C
FD
C
CD
m
n
D
m
n
N
? rn n
? y olm
T ?
n n
? n
+ u
o
N
N
Oti r-
Q
C

rn ?
o
(Tj
n
Z
I n
O (?
?o
Dm
r?U
0
m (n
-0
nz
x
(n (7
= O
mza
m
O
r
r
m
0
m
z
p

o

f?
-I- m
O
°
4-
®
O+
?D
D ® ?-

0 A
0 X

-1
-D-1
m m
Fri g
- D +
r, N

m n
m
r -.{ D
r ?
m

-+
--< z
" ::o

m _
o
:Do x
<
D A
r m
? =
zo D
O

F- C)
o 0
z -1
v D
-i r
m m
z
Fri m
r
m m
m m
?
U
m o
C
-i m
v)
-+ 1
m
(n
D
r -i
D
r
-1 C
? m
Dm
mr
D
(7 ?
=m
N Z
=p
M.
m
--I

mw'
.gym
w
w
PROJECT o SR 1303 CAMP DON LEE ROAD
PALM LICO COUNTY

I ?
It
o ?

?
o

z

Cr1 '
0
cn >-
® d
tai y
Z

® x
? m
0
1
m
? m
0
11

cn
x
?
o d
>
ci
a
C
?

r
a
114 h

y
m
z

?
z z
m
m
x

z
X
?
x
h
a 41
x
0 c

0
0
io I
I
N
SR 1301 0
DON LEE ROAD
El_
?o
° t
x I
I 1? I? ? t=+
10 i?
I I iZ I?
I 1 ? 1 ?? I
i®
I? I I I
l ` I ? I I? ICS ? I
I I I I?
I o I 1 im ; i
Ito I
. I I 1? 1®
I I Imo, >
? 1 '••? I I IV I
-9 I I 1 i '
? I I
10 1 1 C)
I cn I 1 I I CQ1 o-???
.? 1 1? 1 ?a
10 1 1® 1
Iz I I I
• ?„«?" I I I C? I I
?' • . I I 1z 1 I
I 11 •
1 I I 1? I
I I I I I
I I 1 I
? i I I I I
f ; I I 1 I
t 1 I I
,,1 1 I I I I o
Q
1 1 I 1 I I ? `1n?'
I 1 f
I I N
1
I,
,r wy M Y 0 ? ? C
rnrn
o0 ,gi
nl O m
? rn
om ?
Q ®
rn z NN
z
FYI

x
a
?
x b ?
?

r O x ?

w
? h
?
r- by

a
d

0
Go -
SR 1,301
w
- DON LEE ROAD
N 3° 30' 32" E
EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/ --------- 70--- --- -
a
o
? -D
o
rn o
o
rn
4 0
4 0
Lf? o
o ?
rn
x
m
0
rn
0
0
D -L, p
:;o -r? O
O D O Z
ppa(J-)
=
om
-,o Om rn

zrD Q
O °
?nm7a 0
mK
N 0 0
Co N?:7°
?OoO - rn
CD D n
O? 0
0
O
? o
Q) y
° o
N 3° 30' 32" E o
O
EXISTING R/W
O
a
rn
0 0
? o
o ?
? rn
rn o
0
?C 4
EXISTING R/W
(J)
m
0
N
O `
rn
Ln Q
IO' z vci ?J
G)
m
0
m n
C)
? rn

o
n T
lJ
_ O

Z Q
0 DAD
Qo ?O O
C)>
z

f
0
Co
O
? o=om
°
O F-q OOm
?mz

p m
? ? Z r D
r ?nm?
n
rn Q m cn
ODN?U°
?co0-
Z
_ D
o n

,SZ
Q

O
rn ?
o ?

Lf)

D
o 0
?
?

o m Lh
m

Cpl
CC)
O Ul
O
N t'1
N
7D
D
m

m

o
m
o O m
N
V 70
n
y Z
C)
m
0 O
r?
rri
C N

C)

n
n T
m
cn i?:: w
orn ? o
?rn
' m ? ? o ?
?D o
m
r N
n

??
O
N
cn
0
Z
C
r
m
O Z!

C)
i
0

?I
rn n
r
?10 N
?o
ON
Ul O
m
N O I O an
I

II ' ?I p II II II II (f) D ? p N SZ
O> II II Ul O co O pDozo rn
03 cr,
C:) O ?
Co
N N?oom
N

oo CID Q0 O N =pm o 0
c
03
uq oom
0)

?mz
(,D v,

o
N) m
r v -DZrD a,

a r rn c
rTl

o
y rn
0
C)
rn rn o
rn
rn
rn rn
I.
m
i
?
O G n ?' n
n rn

n rn

n
m
n
v
rn

o

A

r,3

?z ::o

fn
z n
rn
n A
•, °
rn rn m C o
ril
~
v
c?

Z DO
rn n
° n rn o
rn i o
`

N
O N
G CO
0 O
k
p
Un
N A
r> 0 0 rn

c
c O
n O
??
z
?
rn
rn n
::D c
rn
rn
rn rn
r
o
0
n m m m
°
°
,
rn y nr,
rn

O p ::o :!D N O~
r n v n n ?' o
n O A W N d n0 2
m n o ° z
Irn rn y
$
~
m

s
A

z
rn
?
o ?
z V
o n
Do
o n

co
Rl

II
~
O v C* Co O rn ??
n
O N N r A

n C)
C
D CZ
]'
?
?
°
C
to
Ov
rn rn rn rn rn ° °
rn rn
rn rn
1"n
rn rn

rn y

o x

0
rn
r'n m
~ m
~ rn
~ ~ n u
y r

n co
?
°o
::o ::D DD ::o Z v o
n n L n
O
-D ?
A lv N - G) Z D

c
V m
n
rn ? m
o
m
0 0 o rn rn y -6 rn
0 0 0 0 ?
C C C C ° y
rn rn r O
'TI 11

m -^

r
rn 11

rn C

n

rn
o
z p D O Z
n memo-)
z N ?D r
`"
-0 On ?CDoM
O
v Z ?C?, m` ( „JmZ -r?
vrni zn mZr>
Cl) rn n o < G7 C-) m x
rn ?-D ?5m m?
rn°y cooN)X-
-j OD C)
rn0 pZ p
P

.
O
Im
' ?
Z U
-
y r
)
-I
rn I:z o~
° PI ?rn z? D
O °:]D Nn F-
rn Q)
O
rn Ln
O
?z
rl) c?
?
Z
y
r
?
CO
?m
mL m
rn u) rnLo
v
-it
n c??n z?
rn z° z y
?
rn? ?
z I I
?
?-
z m
m p co ?7CI- 1+r(
y m?o
mK
0-) V)
00 N 70
--j 00 o-
U-1 D n
op0
.?' d
U)
o ? rn
D ?' z g
I I
N O•
O O ??J
O ? y
~ N Zoe
IF-ri k
I
VK-
? D
'? II
T? N
V O
0
oo
r
°??51d

Dz
-11. 0
pDoz II

N Wmm
II
II
II
II

o
} =pm
? ?
O O
03 mZ

1
W r, i
00 N . \
N

` O
00rv?:a -`n

O X000- X31

TpC7 _
- O
L-A

O ?
O
U)z
?F-
m ?L
rIl rn rn
y F-ri T
U

F-q
(

.D
m ? >

c rn m
\ p n C")
CO
D v 1 Q >

ac `I Vrni
03 ` rOr??, ` J

O \ "V

O 00 0

1D
A°
z
4? rn
n v, zzr
n

z `
1
m
rm
`°Nm
?c
o
iz V I
Q 000
?o
\ o
p
"z n?" nN a
z
m
0 \
j? rn ny
rnm
O orn z
?
°
CD
` ?
Fn
° O Q G
rn 6
?
?QQO

rn ?, (? rn

x
rn °

v
° rn
"
aa` ,' ,
o rn
y
z
F-ri
-D
rn
?0~ Z?
°

Fr v, rrnz
i (T
0O
l
#
mr-
?? ii C^
C? o LO
C))
rn o ~ ?
R'o 00 \
O D ?p zrn o~rn rn? r
Q rn O Zrn
-0Oz LZ
?O
03
=
m
?j p
OOm rJZ z, + z?

\
\ ?mzm o? rnrn N?
IT
C < ? Z F- D ZRZ cn -i-
C)
?m? n?
zrn ? (f
o
? Vl z n
ODN?o °
--j CO
U) tn1:0
D Z Z?

Z
p
"
S-
??
N
K- o
?
n 0
o rn

v
C
, a. CID
rn
n K- ' rn
z
Go
z
K- rn
a

O
rn nl
° o 0o k ? ?
r
o? m
ri Dip
D7
l k -N 0
T, -1? -rl
m rn
OD
?t' -2 K- =m _o
m
r? m o
mom
mL K- zrD
0 Ln- D
0C)m?u Q z
y
m N
0')
]?

m

m? c Z 00N:U°
?00O- NW
n Q) rn

?m
K- >z

?pn Z rn

QD
rn
?1

?O

o 0
C) ::D rrl
Z?
K-
z?
zc
2 ° ?
n K- K- nnom, n o ~
cj
'<?? o
~
?
n ?
0) F:- z ?
Urn zz oy CD yzzrn
?
z::?i nm!?
Csl k- ° ° m rn ? o i/) Q
kO K- K- 1O) rn ? o Ul rr

rn?
?,~ C,
rn0
(/? )
??IZc?::D
ril o kn ? o ov cn
rr,
M
it K-
g CD
zrn -1
°
?
zn
n
"'
rr :
-

C IF
IF
i
Z
rn ?
0
? o

-n

o
?n K- K- O?rn Zn ZO o N m
o rr, m?
m N m
g'` rn OCD U)( rnRl O --I y m
O
K- zz
k
~ U ? n
m n cyj ? o z
?
l 2
n
CD

z? I1
""'1
I I O
- `

? x °' crn
z

Z
v'
r

n
::D L

n V)

n m
i IF
' ?''? v
i
? ?z A
zL
=rn
Op
Ln K-
K? K-
CD
m n
r
y oni
I I C-0
r-- Q
i
n o
??p::D m
l
z CIE k m mrn ? m o ?
v K-
IE K-
R, n, OD Nn
?orr,OQ oCm° o
rn? z n

N o
IKE K- °o
O f\l u,
~
'
\
b MZ,
I
Ftf-
rnn bb I
x:.3 '?

n
°o
it:
n b
?m
s i
N?•'
?
^ a
rn
n
Z
°rn
~ ~ n
o?
0
N
.?' Ca
rt,
?r m
b b s
?o ?cn n ao b mm
my o D ? m ;

D O Nn mm -N c2F

1 2 C? ° 0 C n ID '`
'olSld = a

'
rnrn r
rn
M
Z9
R
?rn 2,
62 co CA

' z m ~ -
_
a
on ?
? r y
C
rn r
D ?
II
Do
N
?
_

II y Q it II II II ? N p -
N

Iv

> -NO
X-No
ODOZ
m 00-)
rom
:5-oom
mz
m
zr?
m
m?
o?
Co r\) ;7 -N
--ICOo -
LnD Z
O O n
CNi?
O
W D ; rn? . K
k
fF
w K n K- rn
K- o rn m?

33
CI K-
m K-
K-
r
C Z k ?Z K-
m 2 K- K-
K-
+
4
rnrn K
K-
o ~ tin K-

oI K-
g K- KF
Kv
L4 $ K-K- K
A
k
K-

att.
1 (J)
T
?_
C
' C
m

o -? r

I
o
?
'
O 0

O

r rl
o {
I
N ? 0

I '` O O
L
-J- I^
v 1
0 0 cw
r
Q ° °
mm rnm 00 -?z
t i yy ??
cy)
ya. i?,b rn b m (A y -4-

Q O
1

I
m z
v, O °
y b
yb ~O
°a? no
?rn zrn
o? ?D
orn
a
y

n?
, r
I
.
JCD ? `
TANKS 0N?
CONC. SLA_B__I
N lj?
0/

z
CD
q<
ill,
z1o
1\9
CD
y
0
-!A
14
D -N CD
X-No
ODTOZ
V m
T D r
Mom
:::5 OOm
?mzm
Z r D
oom:a
mK:
61 cn
CoN;7-j 000-
Ul y Z
O o c7
Ul
b
rn
rn?
?pn
2 lit b V
0 1Ti C,
b
? N
it m R
w
r'n
:0 LY
bN?
ON ?
N
NO ?
o
-i
D
rn
m
z
0
EA
0
O
z
DO
r
I
i'
is
i ".
i
i.
O
L
m
m
m
m
m
:.
I i
m
z
m
z
0
(A , ,.
m i.
m
-1
z
0
o _
-1
v
r
N
x
m
m
-i
In
.0_•o
PROJECT NO.
DATE: REVISED 11121102
ROAD NAME: CAMP DON LEE RD.
111MIJUE.- 64
EXISTING LENGTH: 45
EXISTING WIDTH: 20.1
SUPERSTRUCTURE: TIMBER DECK,CAPS.PILES
HEIGHT CROWN TO BED: 130
WATER DEPTR 6.6'
DISTANCE FROM NVVL TO CROWN: 6.4'
SKEW: 90 DEGREES
EXISTING BULKHEAD
UPSTREAM PROFILE VIEW
PROPOSED PRESTRESSED CORED SLAB BRIDGE
1 60.01 1 60.0' 1
4- LOOKING EAST (SR 1303)
120'
EXISTING TIMBER BRIDGE
LOOKING EAST (SR 1303)
45'
1.T
4.T NO V 2-2 2002
WE
/na.)00
I/lg4aZ
UPSTREAM PROFILE VIEW
EXCAVATION ABOVE NWL
SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED AT
1 1/4' : V WITH RIP RAP (CLASS II)
EXCAVATION BELOW NWL
1747 SQUARE FEET
PROPOSEDWIDTH: 30'
PROPOSED LENGTH: 120'
SPANS: 2 Q 600 - 120' TOTAL LENGTH
SUPERSTRUCTURE PRESTRESSED CORED SLAB
HEIGHT CROWNTO BED: 13'
WATER DEPTH: 6'
SKEW. 90 DEGRESS
RIP RAP: CLASS II a SLOPES PLACED @ 1 112' : 1
DRAWN BY: BG UTTLETOR JR
TECH V
NEW BERN, NC
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
17.7 10.0' 17.8'
ell?
DCM % DWQ %
Development Type FEE 14300 16014351000§3 1625 6253) (243001602 435100095 2341)
1. Private, non-commercial
development that does not involve $250 100%($250) 0% (SO)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
.
II. Public or commercial development aJ
that does not involve the filling or $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
III. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A. B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commercial
development, If General water Quality S250 100%($250) 0% (SO)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality $400 100%($400) 0%($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and 5400 60%($240) 40% (S160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to water
quality or aquatic life:
III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) $40 60%($240) 40% (5160)
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more 5475 60%($285) 40%($190)
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
?'x