20020926 Ver 1_Complete File_20020611

d
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYviLLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
October 15, 2001
Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Response to September 24, 2001 request for additional information - Orange County,
Upgrade of Hester Road (SR 1512) from an unpaved secondary road to a paved
secondary road. DWQ No. 011030.
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
The following is being provided per your letter of September 24, 2001 requesting additional
information:
1. Revised site plans are attached providing information on the use of level spreaders. Level
spreaders are being placed at Sites 3 and 4. Level spreaders cannot be placed at Sites 1, 1A, 2
due to right-of-way and topographic constraints. However, the proposed sediment basins placed
at Sites 1, 1A, and 2 will be constructed for 10-year storms and left in place once the project is
complete. As indicated on the plans the sediment basins are being designed to discharge parallel
to the intermittent streams located at these Sites 1,1A, or 2.
2. Neuse Buffer impacts were addressed in the corrected permit application dated July 12, 2001 and
are as follows:
Zone Impact
square feet
1 3780
2 2520
Total 6300
A copy of the cover letter from the July 12, 2001 application is attached for your review.
Riparian buffer impacts assume widening of the travel lane from 18' to 20' at each crossing.
Because this is through road with anticipated high speed (45-55 mph) traffic, and it is used by
school buses the road must be widened to facilitate the safe movement of vehicles.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
ea?o?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEymLLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
3. The application addresses riparian buffer impacts for all the stream crossings associated with this
project including the buffer impacts associated with the Site 3 and 4 pipes that are not being
replaced.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Chad Kimes at (336)
570-6833, or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and assistance are appreciated.
Sincerely,
D. Chad Kimes
District One Engineer - Division Seven
cc: Mrs. Jean Manuele, USACE
Mr. Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS, NCDOT
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
PEY?SED 1o-?2-bt

A LEVEL SPREADER WILL NOT WORK
IN THIS AREA BECAUSE OF THE BACKSLOPE
TO THE DITCH AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS.
??..? z°X3xz \?

2°x3X2
/;
gZrRCn/q--p// ?

3 ?p3?I ?1 II A LEVEL SPREADER WILL NOT
WORK IN THIS AREA BECAUSE
OF THE RIGHT OF WAY RESTRAINTS.

? 311'" . ? ' PIPE
+43
F662
z0AJE 0' RIPRAP WILL SCE
2 STR. B/w so',ll 1 coNrnlNe-D WITHIN
zoNE o? THE R1GHToFWAY
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT `

L_E?EC- ?NRtRDE7?

*TERRAN MAX SLOPE Design Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
LEVEI 21 cfs ----minimum dimension In feet----
ROL1I in•i n_in in 0.5 3 10
SITE # 1
HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 1 "=50'
L.EVC-L 5PRF,9DEIe i
Temporary Rock Sediment
Dam Tyne-e
Temporary Silt Fence . -
?,?, \, o
POSSIBLY SPRING FED
`y 1 \ NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE I = 30 FEET
ZONE 2 = 20 FEET
REVISED to-t2-pl
SITE # 1A `
HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY ORl1,
SCALE 1 "=50'
N
O Tl
\ O
? Cyr ?. _ SPREAD ER ? M
Temporary Silt Fence
? ? r\I
_a
C v
Temporary Rock Sedimenr C
ID
Dam Tcpe-B o a
3= a
boy o m 3
R1GHTOF WAY :1 :) b
201-0. 6 0 6 0 n. '
$-0
SHOULDER PAV SHOULDER OrT SLOPE W \
ID
m
114" / FT. I 1/4- / Ff.
1'/ FT. 3 I
SLOPE
* o ?
A LEVEL SPREADER WILL NOT WORK
IN THIS AREA BECAUSE OF THE BACKSLOPE P/L
TO THE DITCH AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS l 1 30'
*TsuwN MAX. SLOPE N
LEVEL 2:1 pR E?D (oo ?_ z? cP N
-}-
LLI
RHELLL.Y z:1
1- 1/2:1 zoNE ZONE I 1 Iz,? I (?
zox3xz ,o'xZx? 1Cr-S cP
l CFS I
X10 PEE - H ?? ` EIP
R i c F? /
--`- Q-P P/L
- m P/L 25
WORK PE'
rx'?X 2 1cFs' 21;+,20 A LEVEL SPREADER WILL NOT 30
WELL 1 IN THIS AREA BECAUSE OF THE BACKSLOPE
1A0 45t----- TO THE DITCH AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS.
25f NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE ZONE I = 30 FEET
+ 1+00 I ZONE 2 = 20 FEET
.00
TAIL DITCH
j PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
/ ',? RIP -RAP W 1 t. L DE C o r?fT KL I N ED JOHN
To RIGHT c,F l,?Ay 74
REVISED to-I7_-oI
Design Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
cis ---minimum dimension In feet----
0-10 10 0.5 3 10
,voR r,4
• eoSLOPE 1 / FT.
l b I /
SITE # 2
HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 19'=501
RIGHT LOF WAY
06'-0- 6-0'
SHOULDER PAVNT SHOULDER Drroi
*LOPE
1/4- / FT. 1 I/4' / FT.
I'1 FT
=kTERRp..LN MAX. SLOPE
LEVEL 2:1
ROLLING 2:1
FM_LY 1- Inn /
'Temporarv Rock Seciim?nr /
Dam Type--B
S1 4.7- Fcvc6-
LEVEL SPR?FYDC'"?
0 /
z
Lu
?
?z
„ z
Y O
V
3
LU 3
01 1-0
z? o
?0U
V7 Of
u1 Q Z
U z
Q LL)
w 00 z
F_
LU to LLI
-, Q C,
Lz F
az o
Zox3xZ
?T A LEVEL SPREADER WILL. NOT /
WORK IN THIS AREA BECAUSE
OF THE RIGHT OF WAY RESTRAINTS. /
? ? ZoNE1 I I
zoovcI ZCFS
I zay I ?
32+20 i -- - -._.
:J 32+2(
I /
I? 32+00
we i L / C_ FS
I(flX3'
x&6
<Z
A LEVEL SPREADER WILL NOT WORK
IN THIS AREA BECAUSE OF THE BACKSLOPE
TO THE DITCH AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRAINTS
RIP-eAp w11LaE
W I-rH /hl
V Y1 ?-\ Tt+E RIGNr of W,9Y
/
0
`?? ZONE l ZOA/E
SLOPE

*TERRAIN MAX. SLOPE
LEVEL. 2:1
ROLLING 2:1
HB T Y 1- 1/1:1

bo'
YAR)A$C..C R1GiffOF WAY
S'-0' 2T-0-
SHOULDER PAVEMENT
114- / FT. 1/4- / FT.
I-/ FT.

0
tD
6'-0- 6•-0- N
OULOER orroi SLOPE
• * O to 'T1
I- /FT. p
4.1
m
REVISE-1D to-iz-a t

0
I m
SITE 3 3 a
s
HESTER ROAD 3
ORANGE COUNTY o a °
Ln
SCALE V= 50' s
rn
m
r
m
PT 47+00.46
0 m
J 60' a
\? w m a
s
PT 47+00.46 2- C-)=
PERNUNENI' DRAENAGE
30
EANEMEVT S
\ s
NOTE: RIPARIAN BUFFER
?? ?X3 XZ' f ZONE 1 = 30 FEET
r '
? I I +? ZONE 2 _ 20 FEET
T 7+00.46 \ a z1 E CREEK cROSSL /A, e=
30' 3
48+50
2CFS b !.'\ zoNE 601
x??• \ ,? , ? ? IE? 1 cis ? /
??? z ENE ? \ \ ? ? /
48+50 /
-00 \ , . 30'
P"I' 47+00.46
\
ZaNE /
601
48+36' \ \ \ D
60' 48+36
iy 30' \ \
PERMANENT DRAINAGrF
z cFs
TEmPaRARy ROCK SEl?Ih-jENT ? \ \ \ ?\
t-m '1'Y PE - B
TErnFoR/?-XY S)!v1'- FENCE' / \ \
1,E-VEL SPREI9DEIZ / \ \
ea,
R1GifCOF WAY
20'4- 6%0" b
SHOULDER ?AVF-MF14T SHOULDER DrrCH SLOPE
1/4- FT. 1/;44' FT I-/ FT. r I
SLOPE
RCVISCD IO -
SITE 4
*
TSUUUN MAX. SLOPE RESTER ROAD
LEVEL 2:l
BODING 21
HE I -Y ORANGE COUNTY
1- IR:1
ago SCALE I"= 50'
XD?? /
Y,ERMANF=NT DRAINAGE
EASEM NT
L , 97+? ?ati? NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
J ZONE I = 30 FEET
ZONE 3 = 20 FEET
G
97+88 /J:5 E e x I s / hI
° 30' j
\ \ J2.? / ?Ro55 LINE
_ CkEEK /
IZ`4IZX3 \ ? moo- ? '1J
z??s f 30 \
97+80
97+ " • ' z cis
60
919 + 0 C?
1
J '
R D 1 98+80
60' Doti No P E
/ ? ?.CYEC. SP/4EADFR ?I I `
Q T?mPoRARY RocK
/ l SEDImSNT ZAm ryP4;7-G
? / TF»7PoRR?Y SJ S?E3?4E -i,T-ff i--+H
All; It,
LEVEL- SP1955_0 _
Design Flow Entrance Width Depth End Width Length
CIS ----minimum dimension In feet---- -
0-10 10 0.5 3 10
- -- -- -
s.? SWty?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNw TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 12, 2001
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN: Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
SUBJECT: Orange County, Upgrade of Hester Road. (SR 1512) from an unpaved secondary road
to a paved secondary road
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade Hester Road (SR
1512) from an unpaved to a paved secondary road. Perpendicular Neuse River riparian buffer
impacts will result from the replacement and extension of crossline pipes to facilitate travel lane and
shoulder widening during the upgrade. In accordance with NCAC 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (6) this
Pre-Construction Notification Application package is intended to notify the NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) of proposed impacts to Neuse River Riparian Buffers. Proposed impacts within the
Riparian Buffer are as follows:
Zone* Impact
(square feet
1 3780
2 2520
Total 6300
In addition to a request for authorization to impact Neuse River riparian buffers this application is
also intended as a request for written authorization for filling activities covered under General Water
Quality Certificate # 3289 (NWP 14). These activities are more fully described in the attached letter
addressed to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Please find seven (7) copies a Pre-Construction Notification Application package attached for you
review. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Chad Kimes at
[phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Thank you for your time and assistance.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
ea5fA7Fv?
3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIVIFNT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
Sincerely,
D. Chad Kimes
District One Engineer - Division Seven
cc: Mrs. Jean Manuele, USACE
Mr. Lenwood Smith, II, PWS, NCDOT oI
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
PHONE [phone] PAX 336-334-3637
\(ATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
`OHO ?QQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
U "C
July 3, 2002
Alamance County
DWQ Project No. 02926
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. J.M. Mills, P.E. Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 7
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
Dear Mr. Mills:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material
permanently in 0.04 acres of wetlands and 101 linear feet of streams. In addition this certification authoirizes
temporary impacts to 20 linear feet of streams. The project purpose is the improving SR 1512 (Hester Road) in
Orange County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated May 28, 2002. After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number.
3375. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition,
you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval
will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify. DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) For the 20 linear feet of streams being impacted due to site dewatering activties, the site shall be graded to its
preconstruction contours and revegetated with native vegetation.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447.. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
F WATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
\O?O RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
f Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
C> '?
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694 or Steve Mitchell at 919-571-4700.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
Klimek, P.E.
?/4
c:\ncdot\SR 1512\wqc\020926wgc.doc
k91

0209 2 6
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 28, 2002
l r
?
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. John Hennessy 'JUN, I i 2002 if;
Wetlands/401 Unit
FROM: C.N. Edwards tJr s U;oup
District Engineer, District 1, Division 7
SUBJECT: Payment Information - Water Quality Certificate fort orange. County,
Hester Road (SR 1512)
In accordance with General Statute 143-215.3D(e) the following information if being provided to
facilitate payment of fees associated with the appropriate Water Quality Certificate:
• Certificates being requested: #3375 (NWP14)
• Work Order Number : 6.502071T
• Amount of fee: $200
Sincerely, f?
C.N. Edwards
District Engineer, District 1, Division 7
e
2 42
JAN ra
N. C. DEPT. CF TR;'^:cPr``}'TIJN
isi_, ?Jr J,, , rl,i+y 1?
DI`d

PAYA! "?T
REC?iVED
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Ir
05?
Nq.
STATEOF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 28, 2002
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTN: Mrs. Jean Manuele
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Mrs. Manuele:
SUBJECT: Orange County, Upgrade of Hester Road (SR 1512) from an unpaved secondary road
to a paved secondary road. USACE Action I.D. 200120746
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade Hester Road (SR
1512) from an unpaved to a paved secondary road to reduce future maintenance needs and increase
traffic safety. This activity will result in the impacts to waters of the United States including streams
and wetlands. Stream impacts will result from the replacement and extension of crossline pipes to
facilitate travel lane and shoulder widening during the upgrade. The pipe replacements, which are
occurring in US Waters within the Neuse River Basin, are as follows:
Site Exist' Pie Proposed Pie Stream type Impacts ft
1 20' of 18" RCP 48' of 42" RCP Intermittent 28(en), 10(tmp),
6
IA 18' of 24" RCP 44' of 24" RCP Intermittent 26(en), 10(tmp),
3(rp)
2 24' of 24" RCP 56' of 42" RCP Intermittent 32(en), 10(tmp),
6 )
3 35' of 60" CMP Use existing Perennial No impact
4 40' of 60" CMP Use exist' Perennial No impact
Cumulative Impacts 86(en), 20(tmp),
15
RCP = reinforced concrete pipe; CMP = Corrugated metal pipe; CMPA = Corrugated metal pipe arch.
en = enclosure; tmp = temporary, rp = rip rap energy dissipaters placed above ordinary high water.
Permanent impacts will result from stream enclosure and placement of rip rap energy dissipaters
above the ordinary high water mark on each side of the newly installed pipes (energy dissipaters will
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
I '
be included within the confines of the temporary work area). The streams being impacted are
intermittent; therefore, temporary impacts will result from the placement of a rock silt screen
downstream from each pipe outlet. On-site detours will not be provided for pipe replacements in
intermittent streams due to the short duration of the activity. Within 15 working days of the of the
pipe replacement activities all dewatering structures and rock silt screens will be entirely removed
and natural stream contours will be restored and seeded.
Wetland impacts will result from the placement of fill material in wetlands to facilitate travel lane and
shoulder widening during the upgrade. Individual wetland impacts are as follows:
Site Wetland
Units Classification* Impacts
(acres) Comments
1 A PFO 1 C 0.02 None
2 B PFO1 E 0.02 None
*Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of
the United States. US Dept. of the Interior, USFWS. FWS/013S-79/31.
See the attached data sheets and Natural Resource Review Evaluation Sheet for additional
information on the wetland being impacted.
Stream mitigation is not anticipated, as the impacts to any individual stream do not exceed 150 feet
Wetland mitigation is not anticipated, as wetland impacts do not exceed 0.10 acres and do not occur
in a unique natural wetland. The project is located in a High Quality Water. The project will not
impact an Essential Fisheries Habitat. No Threatened or Endangered species were observed during
field surveys conducted by Len Smith, Tim Savidge, or Logan Williams for species known to occur
in Guilford County (See the attached Endangered Species Review Sheet for further information).
Records from the NCDOT Historic Architect indicate that no National Register, Study List, or
Determination of Eligibility properties are located within the project area. Secondary impacts will be
minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surface waters
and wetlands, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US, and
coordination with the Division Environmental Officer.
The NCDOT anticipates that the proposed filling activities will be authorized under Nationwide
Permit 14. This application is intended as a request for formal written authorization from the
USACE to place fill in the wetlands at Sites 1 and 2 under NWP. This application is also intended as
request for written authorization from the NC Division of Water Quality for filling activities under
General Water Quality Certificate # 3375 (NWP 14). Enclosed please find the Pre-construction
Notification Form and supporting documentation for the above referenced project. Construction is
anticipated to begin as soon as practicable following authorization and take 1 week per crossing to
complete.
.j
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact C.N. Edwards at
[phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and effort are appreciated.
Sincerely,
1n ry-%??
. Mills, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division 7
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ ? 65-rl2 8/6
Mr. Lenwood Smith, II, PWS, NCDOT
Mr. C.N. Edwards District 1 Engineer, NCDOT UC
Mr. Frank Vernon, Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Buddy Garrard, Grade Crew Foreman, NCDOT
.jr
d??o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTS OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 28, 2002
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN.: Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
Dear Mr. Hennessy
SUBJECT: Orange County, Upgrade of Hester Road (SR 1512) from an unpaved secondary road
to a paved secondary road. DWQ. No. 011030
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade Hester Road (SR
1512) from an unpaved to a paved secondary road to reduce future maintenance needs and increase
traffic safety. This activity will result in perpendicular impacts to Neuse River riparian buffers. Each
of the pipe replacement activities occurring at Sites 1, 1A, and 2 (See the attached letter to Mrs. Jean
Manuele) are impacting less than 40 linear feet of buffer and are therefore exempt from the riparian
buffer rules {I 5A NCAC 2B .0233 (6)1.
Please find seven (7) copies a Pre-Construction Notification Application package attached for you
review. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact C.N. Edwards
at [phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and effort are appreciated.
Sincerely,
rn
Mills, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division 7
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ g?l
Mr. Lenwood Smith, II, PWS, NCDOT e? os/ '`-7 e5 2
Mr. C.N. Edwards District 1 Engineer, NCDOT CNG .5 -3o - a 1--
Mr. Frank Vernon, Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Buddy Garrard, Grade Crew Foreman, NCDOT
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
it
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 02,0926
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. J.M. Mills, P.E, Division Engineer - Division 7
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (336, 3? 34_3673
E-mail Address: mmillsndot.state.nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Not Applicable
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Pagel of 8
• d
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Hester Road (SR 1512)
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):6.502071T (non-TIP)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N//-1
4. Location
County: Orange Nearest Town: Hillsborough
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NIA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The project is located northwest
of Hillsborough. From I-85/40 take NC-86 north through Hillsborou to Hurdle Mills Road
(SR 1506). Turn right Cnorthbound onto SR 1506 and proceed for approximately 3.7 miles.
Hester road is on the right just past Wilkerson Road (SR 1507).
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See the attached sheet
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Mixed usage. Primarily agricultural and forest with some residential
7. Property size (acres): N/A
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): North Fork Little River
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To upgrade an unpaved secondary road to a
paved secondary road. PayingL and widening are being conducted to reduce future
maintenance costs, bring the road up to current construction standards, and increase traffic
safety.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Road construction
eguipment (trackhoe, grader, backhoe, and bulldozer).
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project:
Forest and scrub shrub.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1 Placement of fill 0.02 No Headwater - 0 PFOI C
2 Placement of fill 0.02 No Headwater - 0 PFOI E

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/draimge, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplams are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
onlineathttn://www.fema.g .
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma (linear feet Before Impact lease specify)
28(en),

1
Pipe replacement
10(tmp), UT to North Fork Little
1.5,
Intermittent
River
6(rp)

IA
Pipe replacement 26(en)'
10(tmp), UT to North Fork Little
1.01
Intermittent
3 River

2
Pipe replacement 32(en),
10(tmp), UT to North Fork Little ,
1.0
Intermittent
6( ) River
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. V a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.rnMuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 86- enclosure (en
20- temborarv (tmp), 15- rip M (Kp)
Page 4 of 8
.+
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Pine replacement and placement of fill material are. necessarv to increase travel lane and shoulder
width to current construction standards. Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best
Management Practices for the protection of wetland and surface waters, restrictions against the
staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US, and coordination with the Division
Environmental Officer.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
A finding of insignificant impact is anticipated. Cumulative impacts are less than 0.10 acres
for all wetlands and 150 feet for streams. The maximum amount of impact to an individual
wetland is 0.02 acres. The maximum amount. of impact to a single stream is 38 linear feet.
No Outstanding Resource Waters, unique wetland types, essential fisheries habitat, or
federally protected species or their habitats are being impacted by this project. The project is
located in a High Quality Water.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrpAndex.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 8

Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No 19
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Neuse )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3780 3
2 2520 1.5
Total 6300
Gone 1 extends out 3o teet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Lone z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Each of the pipe replacement activities occurring; at Sites 1, 1A, and 2 are impacting less than 40
linear feet of buffer and are therefore exempt from the riparian buffer rules 115A NCAC 2B
?}.
.0233(6
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
In accordance with the February 25, 1991 delegation agreement one copy of the sediment and
erosion control plan will be submitted to DENR - Division of Land Resources and NCDOT
Roadside Environmental Prior to construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
X1H. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Glsl°L
Lt/Agent's Signature Date
signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action 1D. 200120746 County Orange
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/Agent: NCDOT/SR 1512/6.502071T
Address: Attn: Mr. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division Engineer
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Telephone No.: [phone]
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): SR 1512 (Hester
Road), east of SR 1506 (Hurdle Mills Road), near Hillsborough, North Carolina. The project is
located adjacent to, and above the headwaters of, North Fork Creek and three of its unnamed
tributaries.
Description of Activity
Mechanized landclearing, excavation and filling activities associated with the replacement of the
existing one line of 20-foot long 18" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with one line of 60-feet long
42" RCP, one line of 18-foot long 24" RCP with one line of 60-foot long 24" RCP and one line of
24-foot long 24" RCP with one line of 60-foot long 42" RCP associated with secondary road
improvements from a gravel to paved surface. The project will permanently impact an additional
118 linear feet of previously unimpacted stream channel associated with culvert installation and
rip rap placement and 30 linear feet of temporary impacts associated with dewatering and
cofferdam construction. In addition, 0.04 acre of jurisdictional wetlands will also be impacted by
the project.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
198200031 Regional General Permit.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above
may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve
the undersigned permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work.
By signature below, the permittee certifies an understanding and acceptance of all terms and
conditions of this permit.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date 2 August 2001 Expiration Date 31 December 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
SITE COORDINATES
Site Number Easternly Northernly
1 17 06 71 675 00 40 09 778
IA 17 06 71 373 00 40 10 017
2 17 06 70 990 00 40 10 078
t3'
?.
724
ila v
f r
lop, 'j
.. F 0
{t
,
?_.
'r RE iii 10
F
r s Raa, _'? ?,_ -
-T -7
is
J ? / r 4 _ ? I J h Try f i, A
10
1'512 5ft?
4 ti
1 \ 17
o/ /?? t\?. L ?\6'J t 667.Y - lei _ l
"N"
1-7
-Y
„
t x_152 5 t
12 Site IA
r - 11
?512 Site
f ?
566 ?? 7 VA r
/ tt
665
a3? ,
1 .- s
/ V
J
rr ? .
8* W
Name: CALDWELL Location: 17 670478 E 4010802 N
Date: 5/23/2002 Caption: Location of stream crossings on SR 1512
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
,-

NATURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION SHEET
State Project # SR Number Road Name County Investigator(s)
6.502071T 1512 Hester Road Orange Len Smith, DEO
Date: River Basin: Water Quality Designation Buffer Rules (Y/N)
09/14/01 Neuse WS - II NSW Yes
Primary Land Use Percent Residential Percent Agricultural: Percent Undeveloped:
Agriculture 40 50 10
Types of Undeveloped Upland Properties
Community Dominant Tree(s) Dominant Shrub(s) Dominant Herb(s)
Type
Pine Forest loblolly pine flowering dogwood, red Nepal microstegium, ground
maple, American beech, pine, Japanese honeysuckle
willow oak
Pine- loblolly pine, sweetgum fringetree, mockernut muscadine grape, Solomon's
hardwood hickory, American beech, seal, downy arrowwood
forest slippery elm
Hardwood tulip tree, loblolly pine American beech, Christmas fern, Solomon's seal
forest mockernut hickory
Waters of the US
Perennial or Ave. Wdth Ave. Dpth Ave. Wdth Ave. Dpth
M.M. Stream Name
Intermittent
OHW
OHW
OB
OB Notes
0.2 UT to North Fork Intermittent 1.5' <0.5' 2.0' 1.0'
Little River
UT to North Fork Shown on soil
0
5 Intermittent 1
0' <0
5' 2.5' 1.5'
. Little River . . survey.
0.7 UT to North Fork Intermittent 1.0' <0.5' 2.5' 1.5'
Little River
1.0 UT to North Fork Perennial 7.0' 1.0' 8.0' 2.0'
Little River
2.0 North Fork Little Perennial 7.0' 1.5' 9.0' 5.0'
River
Streams
M.M. = Mile Marker, OHWM = Measurments made from Ordinary High Water Marker, TOB =
Measurments made from the Top of the Bank
Wetlands
Within 100-year Distance to
M.M. Nearest Stream Cowardin Classification Dominant Plants
Floodplain
linear feet
0.2 No Headwater PFO1C Red maple, Carex s p.
0.7 No Flood lain PFO1F- Red maple, wood reed.
General Notes/Comments:
Division E vironmental Officer
O?
ate
ti-
ENDANGERED SPECIES REVIEW FOR DIVISION 7
DISTRICT 1
State Project # SR Number Road Name County
6.50207I T 1512 Hester Road Orange
Alamance County
No Endangered or Threatened Species are listed.
Orange County
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
Yes 09/14/01 Len Smith 4.0 None observed
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
Yes 09/14/01 Len Smith 4.0 None observed
Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
Yes 05/18/01 Len Smith 1.5 None observed
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
No 09/14/01 Len Smith 1.0 N/A
Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Dwarf Wedge Mussel (Alasmodonta heterodon) - Neuse Basin
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
Yes 02/07/01 Tim Savidge, Len Smith, 3.0 Insufficient sized channel to
Logan Williams support mussel populations.
State listed species known to
occur downstream
James spinymussel (Pleurobema collina) - Roanoke Basin
Habitat Survey Date Investigator (s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
No
General Notes/Comments:
???
Division Environmental Officer
Date
Date
1.
J
J
ti

? n
oc
O
^. w m
c r _
C w m
O O O
N
wLu
O
U
= n
O©
C ?
1.10

Q4 °
-

•
C -;
N
T
7

1 }
11 0
:
u u
c
N
C
n U e > r
?
v
o n
-' n
x C w
. 0
N O
f N
c CA
a a E . N ° } .
O -
._ c
. U Q C c c
O is
v U ? ? o c
° : 7
u
C _ J ? 6
C ? O °1 C C W

L o 0 ? ?' L
0
J
]
Q
? _ 1
1
f
I
? I +

y o

_0 2

v1 0 ° c 3
4\

`
v W -.Nac

c• o
p w N
o Y
°
7 e c ?
e o E
J o: a o n o 10 I
c _> C
O L N F p
V7 M
?`/

(?
?? a O
'_ 11 C U
E
o
w
O m O
m
OUN O
UFa.
O
q

U r }

0
c
4
_

3
_ m
cc m_.
a
? a
E
x
4 i
ij a
a
a
N N Q
U ? d p
O
2-6

E v aci x
c J ' ` .c c °'
U
10
y ?
o h
a
m ?
rv m
? m m

z m ?.

a < < O O1
0
.Ei
EI I
w?
e
N
C
C
U
}
7
C
3
r`
c
N
U
Z
O
Z a. c
? c e
0
w - o
1 'o o ?
G ? ? n
z =?N
O
II d e O
=3?
3
I
r
- n
_

C
_ w ? E a e p c

r J
^ n o,• ° U j
N o
C ° C
° J p S
\ •
x
C=?? C e 0 a e
:
N
?
° •
r J °

? -2 -2
p
? }
J
N
°
Q
Q i
I I
?
I
I
` l? I

5 LL
' ' I I 3
II ?
ill
I LL N
EI V /?`1 q ? m V
N I O
I t \I
J ? w
\O N
N ^ `
Z e J ? o u.
C 1 i u j J
0

?o
Eo
t _
e
cF

O ? e _ N

p N < O ? ? e
}
? ? I I I_ 2 ? o N

O v
°
O C ? L L ? Y

c
O c
I ?I ?'
C o o c E
?

G,
e
J
z
O =
r
< 2
z c
O
C m
w m
c r
C w y
U.
"- o N
iN
_.? 3
Z0
' U
? n
O °
C M

1
v s`
h'I
J
O
N
Y U N
rc o • ?
N a j
p Q .. _t .. J y
w N 7 -
C a a C C C?? C C
o
u u - _ a c
= c o ON c c
O? :? - Y O O W N
^ ?, ? VI I I IJf I ? ?
16
a o z ?0 E E
S x. Ll: c o U O o
` C C e j
U ? o
P OI ?? I • e-? O J T V C } C
• - ?1 w a O
^ ? I'nQ v: t7 CI o u ^
0 ? 0l i ? ?,I Lc
E c ? ol. ? i l l l I"4 ? O "
? e C ?fL e? ` ? e •: ? 6 e N Y
ec cY v E
N o X10 ? ? ) Q } o ? ° tl
2 -. F- ` ? C: i ?+ ? 3 ?C
i 3

T
n! (?

_: ?-m"
O u in

O O
INI
m
E m o
U

L lV7
N N
r
C
1 0

in u
r ?
v c
_
cC
d,
_
c ? Q m
-- m N

N N O
?1 ? ? C
O
C
i
O
C
?
e
o
' m C
r

C C C:
3 .. U
m
0
y
m
O' E m
t9
_ 8
C
O
r m m r
m.
C d Z L
-
c -
G C C m N

I
i EI
?I

I

N
v
C
E of
O - 'i n < N o
'

I f I
3
U

rl V )
J \ L
n

\ a
c U
0
C
J
E
I
. ? n ? ? m n
mo vi i c
z
O
r
<
w
L
w

" tee. I

c c

o e
c
C w? e a _
c
C e -? N O p 4J

OQ ? NS ONO TO3JY_O ? V
>z(il lil??lllll '?
c E ° a
L N ? \
3
A
C C C ? '
y
o
E°.
cF
=
a
s
`o S
> ?
V a o
e J O ? C c
- H

e
I I I;
z= o e
u D L L "
a
v
G O
D 6 C
'- o o c 'Y

E

}
C7
O
O
C
Q

?' n1
J
v
? n
2
? .s
c ? ,n
C ? = O
O ° p N
? G N
-
m
?3
Z0
F U
? n
c CO
C? T
J
f
0
i
P
? N
°

}
O
C e

G
0 N
n U y

L
- E _ , N 7 p V Y
P, w7 I _ N O
?° o
U - J o Gam=
C
?
O r ? ? C G G
1
= c a
_r
\ S C O P - t
O
V = O 7 ? O
?
? 1 ?
W e 1
J
u= ?

0 2

`o o ? ? E E

U, 3, 4(3
Q
.. c ?
^ tY

.°. P OI ?_ ? N L C L

} n N
? t /
e e z ° C u
Jo
o ?-
? >
_ C° C
zN ? a
i
QI

n O
OUtn
} O
C tl
E
E c O
UF-a

n
r4

N
-
" V
m C

.
O? < m

a m
A
Q U ?
C
? ?
O
>
_ c
A.
C m
"
E v X

m
a
U
ei O C '^ m Q

°? I I I I
.
' ° I I
• ? E,
N
a
c
al `71 I
I
T ?
o y ? R? A
e
o s ??, r\ s
w
L OI ?: r v? m n
p
U
0
's
V
J
O
n O
N
c
o ?
O P
G G
•? E
}
n C
s
a
3
3
4
P
E
I
-
U
o e o
F_ c
< i c
c e
C ? 4. w
w _o
C ? P a •
O
C o
G v N
V
?\1
J
G
f
?I

O
G
4
3 r I
H ?
G ? c V ?
o a ? - J
C3 ? C a 0: N .? W
c° 7? - ° i o 4
-? ? N 3 O N O O S? W O
t? III id I I I S
'c E e `' A
y N ? `w
v
E:
e °
o?<o?
? III
J o C
e o
cl wl
v
3
3 c 9
Z N`o
? L t - Y
O n n a
= o o c E
L•
QI }
3
.a
e
N

C ?
O •

-J O I S ?

C

?
C
c?

L
J ?

o Y ?/

FF
z L _

O
c? G

o

I

c C.
o
a
T
C V
O n
I + : 2
O-
O iC V

I ?
I 1
vl

I

=
o
O ^ a
I ? ? EL•
L ?
E 2
=- c r E

LU m _t e e

_
C UJ
O
2 y
O O O to

j ? U
C C)
? N
I
i 1\0

S ?
O
I I
a J
? ? C
ri

?
m 0 ?°
O U to
? ?
0
C -
U ?
E m p
N
O r o
U }- d
L?Q
N N N
m }

V1 ? m
? y U
m C
c C d

"?Em

N y O
V "1 U d Q
A to c
S y C -. m
d
` E
x
m
?
m
=
C
y? .. = C G
U N t0?

O m
m ?
m m m m
m
? A C' E n m C
c
_ N 0 m m _
a n> o--
c < C Q ° -
i
V ? r
N
> z N
? ; O V Y
N
N u ?
a ?
'o G c 5
o • o _
J ?. 6
O p 01 C C W
= u o o _,
c o p = = i
Ililll
a
U
•
'c E
ago
C O
- U
o • c 3
G i p J

o u v ? ?

N
e
T
a ? INI<I?I?I
?i
1
\r ,
?V v
v ?
s? J 3
C II V`
' ? If I
I
I
i 'I ?
I
_
I
! wl
_ ^
e
C
C
G
c
? V
I I I

u ? ` ? `L
_
?? /? ? ? .?• N a•
III
NI

I I
o
3
o
m
I
I> \ r S? r

N ?

e 3" ? N
G U
C
oY
O
cI
a
nn v u+ o

n m

?

c
3
3
0
C
N
U
? O O
V r
O o
j7Z
Z ` c
?r i p O V
1. O
GI >•oa
O }_ - a
7- G ? N Y
S O ? V O
3 .. s
c
i

U = e ? Y
3 2 " ' 'E \f

S E G a 0 c \' C
C
w L O= o V J ^

u ? Y X04 ?.
Q d ? C ? y? 3?

C w_
j x
a a
y
r
T 7 < _
-?
p+ C? `
C = O r ? ? ?
v 7? e u C.7 L ?
?
oa ? Ny O NO }O3?t?O \? I
I I I I I I
I I I
?' r I I Q ? ?
E e ? ,t
D_ N cV 1
3 ?
. \
c
c c ?S' i

E?
c?
Fr
r
S ?

H Ed _? 3 3 e ?

O N<O.fl =
j
N
4
.7 i I I O >
.
L G
b
1 ? a s r r s
7 a Q a c a
c _
I ? n o c E
r
> I

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division:Seven County: Orange Project ID: 6-5020711
River Basin: Neuse Bridge No: N/A
Route: 1512 Stream: North Fork Little River
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
ORW G C
WSI ? IT
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W. S. Critical Area C
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban ? P
Arterial Rural C C
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? G
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
May 23, 2002
Site 1
Construction Sequence and Erosion Control Plan for Pipe
Replacement of Pipe with Pipe in an Intermittent Stream
Orange County - SR 1512
Work to begin as soon as practicable following authorization
Construction is anticipated to take 1 day.
1. ALL WORK WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE DRY.
2. Prior to removing the existing pipe, install a rock check dam downstream to prevent
incidental sediment loss due to unforeseen precipitation.
3. Remove one existing line of 20' long 18" RC pipe.
4. Excavate to sufficient depth to allow 20% burial of the pipe, place base stone, and
single line of 48' long 42" RC pipe.
5. Backfill the structure.
6. Place rip-rap on the four corners of the exposed banks.
7. Seed and mulch remaining disturbed areas.
8. Silt fences to be placed as site conditions require.
I

loo'
RIGHT OF WAY
20'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0"
?ISHOULDFRI PAVEMENT SHOULDER DITCH
\\` 1/4" / FT. 1 1/4" / FT.
1"/ FT. I' / FT.
4:1
\ SLOPE I
?d
d?
,2 POSSIBLY FED
3 + \ EX?srrNG Q•
PI L \ Z- d-p r _ ?O \
a° EO f
25, \
? ,? RC p \

P/L
2 4?x 3?1CZ' 25'
e
ooo
30'
6+23
2 STR. B/W 5o'
PERM ANENT DRAINAGE
E=ASEMENT
(j)
LATHA.N F. HAWKINS
1960-553

Kevi-sed 5-20-4Z
*
SLOPE
?
x

C C

f
?1. Q
r+43 24x 3 K Z
50'

\ SITE # 1
\ HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 1 = 50

g
May 23, 2002
Site 1A
Construction Sequence and Erosion Control Plan for Pipe
Replacement of Pipe with Pipe in an Intermittent Stream
Orange County - SR 1512
Work to begin as soon as practicable following authorization
Construction is anticipated to take 1 day.
9. ALL WORK WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE DRY.
10. Prior to removing the existing pipe, install a rock check dam downstream to prevent
incidental sediment loss due to unforeseen precipitation.
11. Remove one existing line of 18' long 24" RC pipe.
12. Excavate to sufficient depth to allow 20% burial of the pipe, place base stone, and
single line of 44' long 24" RC pipe.
13. Backfill the structure.
14. Place rip-rap on the four corners of the exposed banks.
15. Seed and mulch remaining disturbed areas.
16. Silt fences to be placed as site conditions require.
t

NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE I = 30 FEET
ZONE 2 = 20 FEET
.Do N 0 T p& 7-, IvP-RAto
IN S7*67&f " 63EV
Intermittent Stream ?-
2DM?
? Z Z ?

TAIL DITCH
t '
J
.00
\
\
PAL
pROPd5E0 Pi Pc:
44#@ 94liRCP
PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMI M
t
SITE # 1A
HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 1 = 50
or, 00
.000
f

23
May 23, 2002
Site 2
Construction Sequence and Erosion Control Plan for Pipe
Replacement of Pipe with Pipe in an Intermittent Stream
Orange County - SR 1512
Work to begin as soon as practicable following authorization
Construction is anticipated to take 1 day.
17. ALL WORK WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE DRY.
18. Prior to removing the existing pipe, install a rock check dam downstream to prevent
incidental sediment loss due to unforeseen precipitation.
19. Remove one existing line of 24' long 24" RC pipe.
20. Excavate to sufficient depth to allow 20% burial of the pipe, place base stone, and
single line of 56' long 42" RC pipe.
21. Backfill the structure.
22. Place rip-rap on the four corners of the exposed banks.
23. Seed and mulch remaining disturbed areas.
24. Silt fences to be placed as site conditions require.
r

f
t /
X3?XZ?
32+20
32+20 / Q
i
/
It .
/
r
1 /
r /
i

or
_ {?R o Pos c p
S?@ 4Z" ?Cp
X60
Intermittent Stream
• lL. NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZOM ZONE I = 30 FEET
2 ZONE 2 = 20 FEET
ZOjNE V- NOT 1Pur A(P 1t'AA
L IN S774Egr*a .l3Ep
ZO/,(
Temporary Silt Fence . - M-- Mi
SITE # 2
7 HESTER ROAD (SR 1512)
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 1 = 50
Temporary Rock Sedimenc ID
Dam TvIN -B
Temporary Rock Silt ?
Check Type-B .
.,. _ c Basin Type-B ???
i
VAR )A Z - RIGHT OF WAY
g a- ZO -0" 6'-0' 6'-0.
SHOULDER AVEMENT SFT. .1/4" Fr1 "/ F . SLOPE I
*TERRAIN MAX. SLOPE
TllEV 1:5c-d J dV L&f-
LIN 2:1 SITE 3
ROLLING 2:1
FM LY 1-1/2:1
HESTER ROAD
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE 1"= 50'
PT 47+00. 46
60'
\ PT 47+00.46 PER LUNEVT DRAE A
GE
30 ?sx3XZ EASEMENT
NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
\ \ I ZONE l = 30 FEET
\ \ ` ZONE 2 = 20 FEET
T 7+00.46 ?;' ?,° zoNE CREEK cSOSSLiNE
30' 48+50
ZoNEI °
O• \ o. i
.??` z 1NE \ \ °z 48+50
4 Into
-00 30'
P'1' I ?e?tsh- -I7+?H). 6 Lafi
60 •20NE \ i?x3 xz
'
n„ 49 i \ i
48+36'- ? \ \
60' ( 48+36
PERMANENT DR-AlNA('E ?
EASEN.NT \ \
\ \ 6-
a R1Gi{TOF WAY
27-0- 6 -0
- 6
SHOULDER PAVEME.N SHOULDER DfiCH
1/4- / FT. 1/4- / Ff. 1-1117T.
I-/ FT. s:1
SLOPE

z,ONc
l
I
i
_bed
"SC
SITE 4
HESTER ROAD
ORANGE COUNTY
SCALE I"= 50'
MOENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT NOTE : RIPARIAN BUFFER
1
*TEI AIN MAX. SLOPE
LEVEL. 2:1
ROLLING 2:1
FLY 1- 111:1