20020310 Ver 1_Complete File_20020227

aw s
c
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
020,9 10'
MEMO TO: John Dorney, DENR/DWQ/401/Wetlands Unit
FROM: Trish Simon, Division 12 Environmental Officer-ff
DATE: February 21, 2002
SUBJECT: Pre-construction Notification
Enclosed is a courtesy copy of a pre-construction notification permit application
for a bridge replacement project in Lincoln County for your review.
is
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047

6"Ood
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 47, 1710 East Marion Street
Shelby, N. C. 28151-0047
February 21, 2002
Mr. John W. Hendrix - NCDOT Projects
US Army Corp of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Hendrix:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, proposes the following
project for your issuance of a Section 404 Permit. We believe this project can be accomplished
under NWP #3, Maintenance.
COUNTY: Lincoln
LOCATION: Bridge #134 replacement on SR 1216, northwest ofLincolnton
STREAM: Little Pott Creek, WS-IV Waters (From a point 0.8 miles downstream of
Lincoln County SR 1197 to Pott Creek), Catawba River Basin
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project cons!PIS ent of existing 30' x 24'
structurally deficient an steel bridge vvi w 60' long x 3 'wide con ridge,
bridge piles are to be o -year oo ; t re, ewatermg o of
necessa et of Class'I riprap will be placed
both streambanks un e e wide bri d Ir d e xtending 10 fe eyon e o
bride for scour pro on o the end bent steepi es. i era c will be used under the
riprap. No wetlands are impacted by the proposed project. The existing bridge will be removed
:
following NCDOT's "Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal"
Enclosed is a PCN application, a sketch of planned activities, relevant site photographs, and
location maps relative to the proposed project.
Mr. John W. Hendrix
Bridge #134 Replacement, SR 1216
February 21, 2002 - Page 2
Based upon the "Guidelines for the Location and Design of Hazardous Spill Basins"(referenced in
DOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters), the applicable locations
for the placement of hazardous spill basins are at stream crossings located within '/Z mile of the
critical watershed area and on highways functionally classified as rural or urban arterials. The
proposed project is located in a WS-IV watershed in the "protected watershed area"; however, it is
approximately 8 miles from the critical area. In addition, SR 1216 is not classified as a rural or
urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required for the proposed bridge project
project. Enclosed is the NCDOT hazardous spill basin checklist.
There are two federally listed threatened and endangered species listed for Lincoln County - the
dwarf flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii). A survey
was conducted on February 20, 2002 in the vicinity of the proposed project for the heartleaf. No
heartleaf species were found. It was determined that there will be no impact on this species. The
optimum survey window for Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) is May through October.
According to the available information, there are no known populations located in Lincoln County
and it's listing is based upon historical data (>11 years). The land area impacted by the proposed
project is located roadside in NCDOT right of way, which is a possible habitat site for the sumac.
No impact on this species is anticipated; however, a survey for Rhus michauxii will be conducted
during the proper survey window prior to project construction. A review of the available
information from the National Register of Historic Places was also conducted. It is anticipated
that there will be no impacts to the National Register site by the proposed project.
By copy of this letter, we are asking Neil Trivette, NCDOT Roadside Environmental Field
Engineer to comment on the above project. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting
concurrence from the Wildlife Resources Commission and U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any
questions, please call me at 704-480-9020.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Officer
Mr. John W. Hendrix
Bridge #134 Replacement, SR 1216
February 21, 2002 - Page 3
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Michael L. Holder, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Dan Holderman, P.E. , Division Bridge Engineer
Mr. Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental Field Engineer
Mr. Ron Linville, WRC
Mr. Brian Cole, USF & WS
Mr. John Dorney, DENP DWQ,401/Wetlands Unit (Courtesy copy)
File
Office Use Only: t?F,orni Version October 2001
W l U
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 3
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder NCDOT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, NC 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: NCDOT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, NC 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 12
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge #134 replacement with bridge, SR 1216, Lincoln Countv
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 5.8352006
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NCDOT Right of way
4. Location
County: Lincoln Nearest Town: Lincolnton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Lincolnton, take North
Grove Street (SR 1008) to SR 1113 Turn right onto SR 1216 and proceed two miles to
Bridge #134.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°32'43N/81°19'28W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Bridge on paved secondary road (NCDOT right of way)
7. Property size (acres): 0.10 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):Little Pott Creek. WS-IV,(From a
point 0.8 miles downstream of Lincoln Countv SR 1197 to Pott Creek).
9. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o enr.state.nc us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The project consists of replacing an existing 30'
x 24' structurally deficient timber and steel bridge with a new 60' long X-30' wide concrete
bridge. The bridge piles will be installed on the 100-year floodplain• therefore dewatering at
the site is not necessary for installation. It is proposed that a total of 50 linear feet of Class H
riprap will be placed along both streambanks under the 30' wide bridge and extending 10 feet
beyond edge of bridge for scour protection of the end bent steel "H" piles Filter fabric will
be used under the riprap.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe will be used for
excavation and riprap placement and a crane will be used for setting bridge components
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project The surrounding area is wooded and
residential.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts NO WETLAND IMPACTS
Page 7 of 12
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100 year Floodplain**
ves/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

' List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
•' 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://",N» . fema. eov.
List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream
Impact Site Length of Average Width Perennial or
Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
ma
I Class II riprap on stream
banks (on 100 year floodplain) 50 ft Little Pott Creek 8 feet Perennial
" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Avww.usgs.Qov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., ,vxNr%v.topozone.com,
NArwm,.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Riprap on streambanks
and 100 year floodplain = 50 feet.
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. NO OPEN WATER MPACTS
Open Water Impact Area of Name
Wate Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact
I e)
(if applicable) (lake, lmnd estuary, sound'
indicate on ma (acres) bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation NO POND CREATION
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Page 8 of 12
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
NCDOT Hydrographics Unit recommendations for this project included: 11 Replacement of the
bridge with a double 14' x 8' concrete box culvert or 2) Replace the bridge with a new 60 foot
bridge. There was only a -25% cost difference between the two options: therefore, Division 12,
DOT has chosen to replace the deteriorating bridge with a new bridge to avoid stream impacts.
The bridge piles will be installed on the 100-year flood plain of the stream; therefore, riprap must
be used on the streambanks under the bridge to protect the end bent steel "H" piles from scour.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ide.html.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmy
Page 9 of 12
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
IMPACTS < 150 FEET; MITIGATION NOT ANTICIPATED
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at 1mp://h2o.cnr.state.nc.ushvrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
Page 10 of 12
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
XL
XII.
Yes ? No N If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Identify the
mitigation
multipliers.
square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
Zone* mp Impact
(sq feet) Multiplier Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
• Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 fed from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
No additional impervious surface is proposed in this project
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XHI, Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No N
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No N
Page 11 of 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
The optimum survey window for one of the federally listed endangered species in Lincoln
County, Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii is Mgy through October. According to the available
information, there are no known populations located in Lincoln County and it's listing is based
upon historical data (>II years) The land area impacted by the proposed project is located
roadside in NCDOT right of wgywhich is a possible habitat site for the sumac. This application
is being submitted prior to the survey window; however, a survey for Rhos michauxii will be
conducted during the proper survey window prior to project construction.
0 2-
A/
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
15 7-7^2 ?Q l ¢
3D? L X Z4' t.1
ua
Q 0.Ll
? u
0
I
i I
0

* -
PeolvoSCS-J -13eob,c,G
'Lo ' L u 3 a' L/
OwSTZQ"
Li,? rf C _
?-z=G. ff Pick
4 l? L ?rlcC Pa7T? creCZ.5
41 12,
PI
l?u cr? ?3 Dti E 7V
OF 3ei
00 'aorv)
Sc,q-et; : / uz Zo '
C-11 C-041-100

qL s2 ILK,
r/lOr?as? j /uv
W?'/L Cc v'v
6" e,352 ooc,
k-Y-- b0 -
L vGpC„J COU477-1
52 / Z /!o
11G- ,rw7- o c ee, w /3 ¢
a1 )d
?
.
_ ? 1? j ? •?? C? -' ?? err'"; ... , ? '' ti • •? ?s W?? ? y+
$ 1, y•'??? • '_` ''L t ??+'?` '''` 1 ?.....
R #? 341 lace ent ?.?
' s' ?+ tai f???._--?.,.I ` ? ?'•,, ! ' ?'••+ •..?•-•-•` ''f
•?j?lr` ?'ti 1 ??
yr ? .. ?./ ``i •1• 1, • ^ •?a? • • i ? 4 t? 1 /?.
7* W
Name: REEPSVILLE Location: 035° 32'42.3" N 081 ° 19'29.0" W
Date: 2/21/2002 Caption: BR#134 Replacement on Little Pott Creek on SR 1216, WS-IV,
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Catawba River Basin
,Imptech,Inc.
-, Ivey
JA

L
le
I
?s•n
P125-\I P126 c
111.t ?
s
nit
\2
mij
c o /
24E

r -
,VC?oT
I ? . 12 -' ? ? ? ??L ???/arl L71ZZ?F? LJC:
L i??? J GQu,u?

1
f N1AI
(
?
I 7O
LIN[Ol N
I
I I
t?uwes
Upstream of Bridge #134 replacement on SR 1216 on Little Pott Creek in Lincoln
County
I
i

Downstream of Bridge #134 replacement on SR 1216 on Little Pott Creek in Lincoln
County
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: /Z County: 4-14,,KOL-J Project ID: ?p35 Z one
River Basin: f-4rAe.,j,3,4 Bridge No: /3¢
Route: 5,e / ZI (P Stream: L; i Le py7 ,
Water Quality Criteria: C.v 5"
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r? r
ORW r r?
WSI r r?
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area r r?
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation- Yes No
Arterial Urban r r?
Arterial Rural r r?
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
r fr?
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
LLM-i [-?,,TERNIITTE IT CHA-Nti-EL
EVALUATION FORA
:ACTION ID
DATE
PROPOSFD CHANNEL WORK,i.c.. culvert, rcloc;lnon. ere.)
W;1i'F.R30DY%RI%'F11H,\S1N h ;.t C,. -- ,-(%.F i.' COUNTY/CITY L
ti/ !_-) , i?
Rt:CEV'I' WEATHER CONDITIONS
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map! Y ?N .approx. Drainage Area:
Dete-mination-
Perennial Channel
Intermittent Channel
Ephemeral Channel
Ditch Through Upland
,J) [J"' - -
(stop) Important Channel LF PROJECT;YIGR. Initials
(procQt:
f:ntmoortant Channel LF
(nojd) (tlttac:l -lap indicating loc,uion of important/unimportant ;hannell
(no id)
Evaluator's Signature
(if other than C.O E. project manager)
P Prescnt SP-Sion?ly Prescnt NP=Not Present
/-1/9S
H/4/98
Important To Domestic Water Supph :' A N
i CDNVO Stream Ciassificition Form
Project Name River Bum: 1-,/6, (, VI r County: tf?
DWQ Pmicciwumbec Nearest Named Stream: ? i Latitude:
. f j
Date:
?. i _ f
USGS QUAD: -
Longitude: r;

'PLEASE NOTE: !/a.duaror and /andoMnar otree that the jw- it i man-made ditch, than usa o/thu/ann it nor -ressar

Also, i/in tha brat prolasi-I judgement o/tl
u ..N. or, rhe/sature is a ...-ad, ditch -d y.
-t. mod!/kd nat...f ,meant--this
wkir sysr w should not be used-
Evaluator: i ., 1
Signature:
LocatioNDircctions:

Primary Field indicators: 7urck0.eN..rber/re,b.e/
Ceomornholnrv Absent Wenk Moderate Sfrnu
1) Is There A RiMe-Pool Sequence? 00 01 02 Is The USDA Tcxmre In Streambcd
2
O p 01 02 0?3-
Different From Surrounding Tem. in?
J) Are Natural Levees Present? all- 01 02 0 2
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 00 01 02 Qr-
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic) Floodplain Present? 00 01 02 0-j-
6) Is The Channel Braided? erlo, 01 02 03
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 00 01 02 a
8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 00 01 02 0-Y
Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? ((??
q)
•
q 0
0
0
!
0
(
NOTE: IIBrd d Ba.r Cem.d By Ditehl.a Aod wrrHOOr Sl.vwtty 711.. se..r.a 1 2
-3
Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated On Topo
10) Map And/Or In Field) Present! 0 NO-0
PRIMARY GEOAIORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: #VALUEI
11. HYdr01o Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A G oundwater 0 0 O 1 0

Flow/Discharge Present? 2
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS.
2 #VALUEI
111. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed7 ) 02 01 00
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed7 02 01 00
7) Is Periphyton Present? 00 0 2 03
4) Are Bivalves Present? ('l0 01 02 03
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: #VALUEI
Secondnrv Field indicntors: (ciTi o.,m-b,,P,Li.e)
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Sarong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0-0 00.5 01 01.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point in Channel? 00 00.5 0 1 Q?bT
Does Topography Indicate A
?) Natural Drainage WAY?
0 0
0 0.5
01
0.1'f
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS,
ll. Ihdrology
Absent #VALUEI
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Is This Years (Or Last's) Lcatlitter
1) Present In Streambed? ry?S?
01
01
00.5
00
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 00 00.5 01
J) Are Wrack Lines Present? 00 00.5 01
01.5
Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since ((?'') aa
4) Last Known Rain? /•NO7Er!/DUrhl.d/rated 1. a9 Above Saio Ibis S)rp And sS?rl Wry
005
01
1.5
?"
Is There Water In Channel During Dry

5) Conditions Or In Growing, Season)?

00

00.5

01
li+'f5
6) Ara Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (a N Heaueut)? Yes-1.5 0 No-0
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS.
111. Biology
Absent #VALUEI
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1) Are Fish Present? O. 00-5 01 01.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 00 .S 01 013
5) Are AquaticTurtles Present? Q411 00.5 01 01.5
4) Are Crayfish Present? 00 cva.S 01 01.5
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 00 .S 01 01.5
6) Arc Imn Oxidizing Bacteria/Fungus Present? 00 00.5 01 QA-I-
7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0 00.s 01 01.5
E) Are Wetland Plants In Surambed? SAV Alostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
f• NOTE: //Total Ab...te O/All R... /. S,-.bed As Now 02 01 O 0.75 00.5 00 00
Aber Slay 7h4 St.o UNLESS SA P p-, -)
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS:
<
#VALUEI

TOTAL. POINTS (Prim nT + Secondonj- #VALUEI (I/Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
I r1
FILE COPY
TO: Mr. John Hendrix, USACOE
Asheville Field Office
FROM: Maryellen Haggard, DOT Permit Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: February 26, 2002
SUBJECT: NCDOT bridge replacement of No. 134 on SR 1216 over Little Pott Creek,
Lincoln County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is requesting a concurrence
letter from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Biologists on staff with the NCWRC have reviewed
the proposed improvements and are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These
comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-6674) and the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C.
466 et seq.).
NCDOT proposes to replace the existing bridge over Little Pott Creek with a new 60'
long x 30' wide concrete bridge at the same location. Replacing the bridge with another bridge
should have minimal impacts on aquatic resources. Therefore, we do not object to the project as
proposed.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDWQ
Trish Simon, NCDOT