20020069 Ver 1_Complete File_20020115

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality ITk?WAA
4 • 612
Michael F. Easley, Governor NC ENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DWQ Project No.: 0o200(aq County:
Applicant: , ?rooC?Gn?, +?•?, ?S,on ?n?•„cc?
Project Name: N ?L LUn
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: oalC?5?a0oa
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the
project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Ap icant's Certification
I, 1Ck-r4 f- , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care. and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be-built.
within substantial compliance and ;intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved. plans and ' specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of
the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in
the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Registration No.
Date
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality

Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 5, 2002
Johnston County
DWQ Project No. 020069
APPROVAL OF 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Neuse
River Buffer Rules
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, as described in your application dated January 2, 2002, and in accordance with the
attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 0.06 acres of wetlands and 17 linear feet
of streams for the purpose of widening and improving NC 42 at the intersection of NC 42 and US 70 in
Johnston County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated January 2,
2002. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number 3289. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit Number 14 issued by
the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with
your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control. Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby
responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future)
exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). ). This approval shall
expire with the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the General
Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Stormwater shall be directed to sheetflow at nonerosive velocities through the protected stream buffers.
2. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed.
The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the
Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recvclee1/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1 ? •
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-1786, or Steve Mitchell at 919-
571-4700.
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineer
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\NC 42\wgc\020069wgc.doc
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50`7a recycled/ I 01,o post consumer paper
rC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
January 2, 2002
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls u f the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609

Attention: Ms. Jean B. Manuele
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Proposed Widening of NC 42 at intersection with US 70 in Clayton,
Johnston County.
State Project No.6.317084 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $200)
Dear Ms. Manuele;
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen
NC 42 by approximately four feet to the south side in order to provide an additional turn
lane from US 70 eastbound, onto NC 42 eastbound. The proposed impacts fall within the
footprint of the future proposed NC 42 widening (TIP Project U-3825). Wetland and
stream impacts have been delineated in the project area for U-3825, and have been used
to calculate impacts for this project. Total project length is approximately 2900 feet or
0.067 miles.
The proposed widening of NC 42 has been identified as a necessary safety
improvement, needed to reduce traffic congestion for eastbound traffic turning from US
70 onto NC 42. The left turn lane on US 70 frequently has over one mile of vehicles
waiting to turn at this intersection during peak traffic volumes, creating an unsafe
situation. Funds have been allocated to correct this problem, for the interim period, until
U-3825 construction is completed in 2005. It is anticipated that NCDOT could obtain
authorization to make minimal interim impacts for the subject project from the USACE
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
and DENR/DWQ under Nationwide Permit 1.4 and Water Quality Certification Number
3289.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Construction of the project will necessitate minimal impacts to waters of the
United States in the Neuse River Basin. The project crosses two unnamed ephemeral
tributaries to the Neuse River, which are shown in the following table. Impacts to the
stream from construction will result from extension of the existing pipes with collars at
the outlet ends. Total impacts will include less than 50 square feet or less than 0.01 acres
of surface waters, and an additional impact of less than 20 linear feeX,of stream channel.
LOCATION EXISTING EXISTING_ PROPOSED PROPOSED
Station Width (in.) Length (ft.) Width (in.) Length (ft.)
18+50 42 85 42 90
36+00 18 48 18 60
According to the wetland delineation conducted in April, 2001, by Jill Holmes of
the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch of NCDOT, approximately
0.06 acres of wetlands associated with roadside shoulder and ditch construction are
anticipated due to the subject project. The appropriate Wetland Determination Data
Forms are included as Attachment A for the impact areas. "Wetland K" is located at
Station 36+00.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be
protected from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or
storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near wetlands or surface waters.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at
jurisdictional sites. Sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices for
the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be strictly enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. at
these sites.
Compensatory Mitigation: Construction of the project will result in 0.06 acres
of impacts to waters of the U.S. Impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent
possible during the design process.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The construction of the project involves two road crossings of ephemeral channels
that are not subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. Mr. Steve Mitchell of the
Division of Water Quality, on October 25, 2001 conducted a stream determination, at the
crossings
listed above. Both channels were determined to be not subject to the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules. , 41
Dewatering
No temporary dewatering or temporary access will be required during the construction of
the subject project.
Regulatory Review
According to the attached letter from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO),
dated June 7, 1999, there are no structures of historical or of architectural importance
located within the planning area for R-3825. Since the subject project footprint falls
entirely within that of R-3825, no further coordination should be required. (See
Attachment B.) The archeological site (31 JT342), noted in the above-referenced letter, is
located outside of the subject project footprint, and was found to be ineligible for
inclusion of the National Register of Historic Places. Please references Attachment C for
the referenced letter from the SHPO, dated March 22, 2001, and reference map for the
site.
Ms. Jill Holmes, Environmental Specialist for the Project Development and
Environmental Analysis Branch of NCDOT, reviewed the subject project, for the
presence of listed threatened and endangered species. The subject project has been
determined to have no effect on any listed threatened or endangered plant or animal
species.
Permit Issues
The purpose of this letter is to request authorization under Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14, Linear Transportation Crossings. Also, notification to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) for Section 401 Water Quality
Certificate (WQC) No. 3289 is required for this project. NCDOT will comply with all
conditions associated with this NWP and WQC.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to widen NC 42 eastbound for approximately 2900 feet, to
provide an additional turn lane from US 70 eastbound in Clayton, in Johnston County.
Impacts associated with the extension of the existing pipes at two crossings at this project
include 50 square feet (<0.001 acres) of additional fill in surface water and 20 linear feet
existing channel impacted. Approximately 2850 square feet (0.06 acres) of wetland
impacts are anticipated as a result of the subject project. The project is located in the
Neuse River Basin. Both stream channel crossings were determinc(rto be not subject to
the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rule, by DWQ. The NCDOT will adhere to all
applicable Section 404 NWPs and Section 401 WQCs conditions. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Robin M. Little at (252)
237-6164.
lly yours,
Jain s vrrKgdon, III, P.E.
Di isi n Engineer
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, ilmi gton
Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Creedo r
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO, Raleigh
Mr. Bryant Bunn, P.E., NCDOT Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr. J.C. Rhodes, Assistant District Engineer
Mr. Jerry Page, P.E., Division Design-Construct Engineer
Ms. Jill Holmes, PDEA Environmental Specialist
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
Section 10 Permit ?.
® 401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. James H. Trogdon, III, P.E., Division Engineer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation /Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: -itrogdon@dot,state.nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Robin M. Little
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation/Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: rmlittle@,dot.state.nc.us
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-sizd Plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: NC 42 Turn Lane Addition and Widening
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): State Project No. 6.317084
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Johnston Nearest Town
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):_
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): UTM 17 731520E 3946733N Clayton
Quad
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Commercial, retail and residential and undeveloped land use. Impact area (south of NC 42)
is undeveloped and wooded.
7. Property size (acres)
NA
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake)
Neuse River
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. Tile
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Clayton
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Provide additional eastbound turn lane
capacity by widening 4 feet on existing road shoulder, to south of NC 42.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Backhoe, excavator,
dump truck, heavy equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Commercial, retail and residential and
undeveloped land use

IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
R-3825A is proposed for let in 2005. No application has been submitted at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Page 7 of 12
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Station 36+00 Fill/excavation 0.06 No 100 feet Forested wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
W
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.06 acres
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
Station 18+50 Culvert
extension 5 UT to Neuse River 36 inches ephemeral
Station 36+00 Culvert
Extension 12 UT to Neuse River 18 inches ephemeral
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coni,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 17 feet
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Page 8 of 12
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): F-] uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, buildirig'ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Interim project widening within future proposed widening of NC 42. Minimal widening on
existing shoulder to south. North of NC 42 is developed retail, commercial and residential
properties.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Page 9 of 12
I . Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
IX.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes E] No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
Page 10 of 12
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes No ® If you answered "yes", providg the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
Gone 1 extends out SU feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Page 11 of 12
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes E] No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes F_? No
v.
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applica /
(Agen s si
Signature Date
is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
1 1700
\\_i ?? U 21117
I.4
Shwh?l
' '?1 Nam ? /• 193_ / 1930 146
/ - /J 1729 I 1730 1733 uroad?i \ A \\ } >
`
y'. /•., 71 ` ,{h 4 ` I. S/ `u7 rye{ 730
I 1?' /' t• 1)25 J \: C?'N ? O I 0 1 ]34 .1.- b r j ?. ` z 1?7 //////(_, \
b `2122 ry l CI/`.??\ 2129
I 1 !17 •1711 1739 1739 '1 ? 2124 2
/ 17 1 1720 'r • 1700 / ?, 1 1733 A
I 177(l ; 0 ' \' \? .. _.. • 1-,3 n rb ^O J c 2125 ~- •• y - /. 2128 2129 / .
1)33 ,J. 1735 / 1?? • - /' • '.)
L J fro - ( n d - 2126 2127 1011 39
t741 > \ . • 1736 ) ` 1905 1947 0
171 1)2C) 1°rd°^ O% - . ` y ?. 1938
-6
1748
I_$ 17 t- T&Z1 1144' 1] „ /Y Elr Or,ch 1729
I]4?7 1700 '- ' \ 'j:• ju,anol ?• 1731 1934
Creef • ?-.•' 1 -- 1745 12 2131
. / b 1746 1720 1410/''
1717 lA.I/o/o m I, I 17 X . Nf .
1767 I 174 4 2001 1936 1
7
I 1718 ?. fad 1
ry 1774 ,1• \ • W r 7 2010
1747 1]47 1796,
I1 1717 1701 1 ?/95_ " pd. w • . \ 1903 /' . I
• / . \ ` ? 1 179 ?^ ? 17 ? . \ C 937 y 39
D 204
b
3 1735 .2 96 930- 1935
/ 21:
) ,?J'9 177]
1774 j \ . _ 1939
O7 Ill-
1716 170 I Red Hill 1941' A cylve 00, 1981 1936 19?
V \ 17 1 2610• 2611 1003 . 7 Ch. Ch. y 1 8 m
N 1. O
1 I O1 960 / 16
2041
I ]07 A2616 O .2 1 4 2(121 1
J! 1715 \ 2042 -.2
I' \ CI*I / 1700 96
O .„?? O"1 19cs s 1 \
• \ +' / / 19O
•] 1 e 1705 100 1 ] SFIMA\
1799 2613 0
P. 3,671
Nom. • "?: 1700
1714
4 2602
isz6ae° 1773 1700 b d. RIVER 2034 2035
1714
2617 1914
iloll'i
i \. atis ?IwY'\ 903 p 'Y/ ]•'/ANtOM\ 1 12
CIO \ ?i 1 MIU3 1
i HEUSE nos 1 /. 7 78 /
2623 1700 2006 1
2014 AO
/ h 2oJS
2624 • / ;'/ -? 203Z_ / 39 ??
SWlllFlllD
2622 2620 n 1708 •3 b 1 -.1 191 _ ror. 1"1" \\
.4,• NN / ?.
'O Tr1F. - -/
1769'1 7 SW I 13 70
/\ 0 42 1913 -'-? /
1713 O
1614 1793 1709 //\7 / \..1 191 37?-,\
- 22558?20 71. 190
?1?. 793 1700 _ •Jl-/ `- 11 1 4 ,Tf- 7 /•.\ 7 \ j' /'•? ,l ?.,l.
1612 b -0, 9 .3 -3
dNle /'9vo . •1-'?'-.r'[ 3??.??/? 7
1 177 ` 153 17a1 /1 /^ _ ro+.hdwn 255
7 2566
•j 17 \CL
1 _ 1370 ,7 s\\/
17 9 C1ArOH 1 J IB0? 2 -- •.? 573 I.-?6 ee'i he sda % 70 11
11797 1 ror. 7,377 1 9 1 71'• lem ]O
1"70f, 1782 1 L1 1 1 1 \. Cn. _ 3.4
004 . , • I1SAfl a 1573 •. r- - ., /, \ 1
\ e f ? 11954 / 774 •? \ 'r. I. I "? / 10
66 1955 . \ / 1 I 157 1372 1572 /
f / .1. ? IB59- •?
70 ''._/ "1 1936 iy? \ 157 ./Swlf1 Of. 1' /?
3 %` \ l -)- \ N / I e I 1562 l5_] I I 5G3 • •?'. h lehnxen Colmry • \ ./; /
\ ). IS ?.: 1567 /'• AFpal 1579 \.P(.
y BI "Unlr - 11877 %T •6 \•/' b 2 IS01 ; „y
N eT IS9D ' isI I ?••? ftt lle Crcok /• J
\ 1560 -'i 1680/ I6ai• Ch. 1578
1 r T6 TST3 P S7 6 '79 3 \ > 0 . ^ . wee -X
`r - 2
1637 1557 - 678 36 1 1701 .l
4 \ 15 S -T^ 168 1577 /•/MY. .'V
16ad -- 1? I \
' y T m
`'•
?.. i.. ?/'

/

o" 1504 N i..
2-0

1301

'
? IS34 ISSB 1 'J

1692
]
1
1561
1
?

1897
rl--J

MIdd10 q
?
.'
1
1550
' 62
6"
1961
? J921
] 576
^ &. J A
'H.?.I -
i aVt... 7
IB]I
q 7 1676 •4' 693
•, 1693 1643
\ '> \ / C' a It19B\
,/ -
/ I
^1
•
' loPdw^Ilr 1
Ch.
1664 1656 16 -? 0 ni 1504
1 SO
1
•
rl 9 I'?9
3V .T?----66gg•B??8??I
! 1 1016 ,-
^ X5(75
h b
?
1 c
202??3 \ 32?^N
7a , ,y 15'Y! • ',) y
C/bel I 19 e `
'
/ m 1330
?
`
1343
.1 -... (
" .
^ v
?? 1 10 ` I?
\
4/ f
/
y .;? b
.. ISI
1326 _T ..? 1706 51 '/ 19)) If
1340
.158] .,
/ 40 1548 /
15_O \
1879 T16
]9 /
/
,.
7
.'
1
..
312. •
..
? rou11

J /
-

?
/
?
220
/

1782

1382

.\
U17

...

-?

IOC.

1 c O
/ I
..6
151 330.
• " . , 1 \ ' ? °
. / ;?'•
1
?
(1
/ 2
2 3
1 39 0 1339
1
'`

'

4
4
1

1
ClNF1.W9 1509 /
\
' ?
,
,
?
?
,/ ?•.
I!A)
d
J
.17
7
5 y
W /?

'
'
J B
J
1 D51ore
® 715 1503
J J
' ry
. 1337 4
1 ,?, 1.\
I•
mot
161 J / 7 . •)
. L i 13 _ 7 I I .
"SITE VICINITY MAP"
SCALE fL a PAIkES
`TOHNSf01J CD NGbOT J DAD VA )k P
F) G U P. E 1_
N `.
try/o L _ ,«
OWL,
(Name) (Date) 14/"r or ,..•?,
V
LO
C?
x
w
Q U AW.,
O
oTx SoV
14
LLJ
z ?. `?/?
LLJ
0
`fe
?t v pith
10
N
4I'
Q
Q
U
h- 'a)
w?

/ I
I
I
/ II I /
1 ? I I /
/ I
\ I
I
.I
r
/
/
, ti ¢ p
/ cf1 '
/, •\ co • $ ?I ,P d ?I
\ I
0t
\ I
rY ^ \
O ;
\ -
LL
1 \ ??I 1
n KI \ /
/ •i Bd \
40*
I \
OI -
/ 12 0

ryl
R?
I
I _ (j; }
I
P \
\
/
/

1
I
I
I ?

O '
9 / I
V \

/ I el
?Io
I \ ?, \\ '2 1

I t ? ?. I
j1 1f? J ?_--l
I
_
I ?I
/ _ ---- ,
I , I
I
I ,
I ?
I
A I ?

VI
%I
`?i r?e?tr
i
G
c??tt pirr.
v
a ?.
N
J
N
IL
%A
V_illo
Haa
_? ?I. Rhelg?l ?i "?
\ \ 1 w r \/\.,. \` 1 rl
l

I\ •.
`? 111 \ / ?. `l n ?-
,
?
^u.???<IJf,??i
`
?? _ / _ ?"

9 ? ?• ?,
L

t., ,? ?,? \-??
TON
"cp
41
- -?-; ; ? i

'•
nnnn....
_ ? ? ?

_ ? .?? ,- \ . -__

=rte--
?
_
_
_

004
V? fiv
?% ??`Y` •;?e IOW ?
? •
AA ?__ A
?
?
• 29??
??
?• /1? ? _
?
? ?
1
???j
? /

O
'
Y
?'J t - %• (' .? -- ...?_ 11563, , ??.• ?• / .. \\_ -
X
?t\ )V?? \

t ?(p?/•
\M? 4
`?? 83'
? ? )
V r
?
?
? ??, ; i :
/ ?
-Q/ _
„/
`•Y?? .•
?
/
,
I \VCfTI
?` ?
Ui
?-
?
? ? ?/
? r / ?
//
\ /
/
?
?: \ ? :t?4\;\')
?'? -- ?? 111 \. J?1 '??J? 15?? ? I,
I •/ _?
•
loses. \ . . '\\ ?l? •
?.- ? .. ??j '? o \ \' ?
?? '> v?• `;? ;`? ?",`; /=i ? \
_t r-? ? ' ,\ , ?
%- -? I ` ??`, ? ?:i??! ?
% ? :ilk-;;??, , l
KL
,

9 L
'3
27'30" 1 3

SCALE 2

1:24 000

MN.,...
1000 05 - 0- --KIL
0 DM[7Ef1S - - I- - - ..
0 5 0 _.-._
a
USGS QUAD MAP
SCALE 11= 2ooo'
cI.roN QWA3>RAIJ •LE R?llc_ //zloZ
s (N-e) ^? (Date) •?"`'? o, ,.••`?
. ,
WOB M B V' r t PaD
WoB MOD
Wall,
\ Y CeC PaE
E
\
h' "??A WoQ ,'"_: 3 ?, I Wb(3 Pa
A ,fQ WoD . WOD NS r ID
NoD y ??. J ''dy
Pat
VrB CoC r "I ( eD Wf \.; CeB
r ? 4$P :: r sy ?a, ogrr Wt ? ? ? - --? Paq. '. ? Ce
ON + d :7 Utl' GeV w GG Ceti
/ Iw b 1' a MCB r
NOD ?y a tt Y :?¢? /„ Wt PaD
PCB .
PaE Pab +GrR Wt'^.?r
t Bb'l r S c PaD Vvt GCB
NkB r NuA ?w t 1'af ia.? ., Mc13 `CPS , PaD f C•
D '?1 Le8 Pa EE 7 i St r y °O
m :. MQB }? Cob r ?Mcb CeC'
NuA 'Ce8'• d0 PaF Wt t?..
!WdB• Ud, n CeC \? WoB CeC . er
WoD NuA
1 m PaD? 1 s \ Ge
h Nuq FtdDw Ce9 , a
NuA 1 r f., aE / Pal a.r'1i
f.. ? 9 RdE Q?? ?Iru a0 s: CeG.,
i+ f? c v ,rt"?Y r p? 6 '
Paq rt+??j a rr „, r ,a.
NUA \ t? 4 J G 1 ., 5w 'a'
r:
CoB' ? 9?}("• 'tf f "y x, ? 1F a f'd r, ti ?..
W,.? ok /I` ?' tiLiC •• Yfi ry,N ; aro ? ? ? V ??, + r y'*+ ? I ?Y CA, E ,?? tD kti a :'; ?T "rB:
A nB
'5+.: ?1 xdr wa>.y`ti?` > ?i ' , r,r No!
y Wn % y ~ qta' /t011 CeB
wt Ra
NuA. ., No
F r. ea y ?4 ?' 1Jf \eB f N
i '
t ?1 0
j l ? ,PaD p VrA S i, NoA o NoA
a n Wo ' ?' t n,W ,
r Well ? A " t NoA \ 1 Ra i h.
NO CeB • sgb r a?w ta' rO6 ? ? r
NuA
Vr8 NoD X08 n5., ?,.?' r r : VrA ??'. ?'' ? ,r
a ? a MaR C 0 CoD u M ?''
{ Lrr Nob ?( sr i i a
?.?. NI.- NoD
o r.. •,c •,
W f3i: t a `7n' !?a
r
Wp nP rr s; ,
1 ,1 -? 'X' ? •#s a a
0
WoD WoD s .; r?Q r't +'Ra ?S IV
NoB- a' RnF +ati . M - NoR
Y ? k r 2'y, n ?' •: ..•.e MaB ? rc .. x
Pa a GeD •r
` :dF 1'r M WoB I
NGD t ..
qdq° W.0 Col r - ?: NoA D.
T ',? ?. ' y CeD . Bb
A MaB
W0 WoD 1 , CeB Alt- Ct ?? > at,?,. ?
R b4 °? AaA; CeB ?o©a'". ,Rapy?.y„e?}r x 'GeD! t
NoB McB d , McB r McB " Vr8
Mc ° Vet GeD
b $ i To a, e t ?f, ` m COB Vr
aD
CeC NOD (Joins sheet b)
!partment of 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 5000
'ating agencies. - - _- - - _- -? ----_ -
U. S. Depart- 1 .5 0 Scale - 1:24000
ial photography.
shown, ale
USDA/NRCS SOIL SURVEY
COUNTY U-vgNsTpN SHEET #
SCALE I'= 2-606'
,N o, .e?rx II
f
d?
.L .
R1mk / Z/ o y
s (Name) (Date)

O W/NTL CONOPY
0 ISNppS
x

_. _ coNc
x 6'C0. a 7Snw
I
0
Li
10' C NC
BSI
B5T
3LITH? LT
-RETE ti ??9._•.P -P 1 .. .. ,. 1
D t 1 \ `? / x
Q
I ALBEMARLE PROPERTIES NC-

POSIS DO 1721 PC 334

0000
\

\

1 °o
30, R0, 70•pCy
nr sra• aoz E NC ,? w
I I?
------------- --- - - 0
PROP 4' PAVED SHOULDER 3
---
? Ty
? Lib n ?
\-SLOPE STAKE LINES SLOPE STAKE LINOS COLLAR
-L- POT 184-15.98 AND
95 = BL-2 PINC 1291.55
,00 48.50 RT 19.88 RT/I[ EXTEND
T6 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY
OB 867 PG ?82
:f
15 TONS CLASS 'B' RIP RAP /
'B' RIP RAF, 37 SY FILTER FABRIC
MIC
1 + rn
RI

, w
i

J : 4.
-
_

E
------------
1

- - - - -- -- -- --- - ----

- - -- ---- - -- -- -- -
Y"
y
. .._....._...

- - -- - -- -- -- - -
- -- - -- -
-
--
-
-
--
--
--
---
-
-
-
_M_

-- -- -- - -- -- -- - ---- -- -- - -- -
i

- -- -- -- -- -- ---
-
-- -
340
-- --
- -- -- -- - -- -- - - - -- -- --- --
-- -
- -- -- -- --
- --
-- ---
-- -- -- -- -- - -- - --- -- -- -- -- -
- - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - --
.

_

1

1 1

1T 330
m -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
1 - _ . - - - - - - - - -

...
..
. _ -
.t
_
._
_
.,
..
.
. _.
t
..
_.
..
.-
.
.
.
_
_
-
_
_

_

-

--

_ .........
L
-
t
--
--
--
--
--
-- 320
- - -- -- -- -- --
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - z

_
.
-"

;.

.

.

..

.
-

-

. - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --- --- -- --
r -

310
-- -- -- --- - - --
w
?- -- a

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

\. ` u JOAIM C??O
NCDOT SITE PLANS
SCALE: 1= 6-,01 M
c (Name) (hate) •'?`"'vtI¦..\?

%// / J FOND
_ _ _ _ _ _
l /
Poc + Jt
END PROJECT
X X X4B'PLASTC RAC "/ / `^ IB'PLASTIC HAIL
-?X--X--'/' / XXX--X-X-X---X----X---- X---X--X---X---X---X---

N 72 39 33.4' E
N 72'27 499'E
?riC 42 BST r----- .-__-_-_-__- _-. -- -
--____
O -__- _ _-- ?-

/A
^
-- /
?
n
APPXIM CA
4tPP?EN N OI1N R? ?...
rn
rn
--?

V1 t Y Y 600'TAPER SCOPE STAKE LINES

COLLAR
AND PTSta. 39+09.99
EXTEND PCSta. 37+0997
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD CpwANY
OB 067 PG 402
Pt Sta 38+0998
A = O IF 43.5 (RT)
3 TONS CLASS 'B' RIP RAP L - 0'05' 51T
L - 200Ar
10 SY FILTER FABRIC T - 100.Or
R - 58,644.85'
r
14+

-

-

E.
m

-- -- -- -- -- - - - -- -- - - -
H
t
- - -- -- - -- - T : T
:

- - -
- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

-- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- --

-
- -- -- -- - -- -- - --- -- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- -- -
: k . -. .
l : - - -
m

-
..

--
:

--

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

- -

- --

-- --

--- -

-- -

-- --

--
-- --

-- --

-- -

--

-

r = -

F I . T - - -- -

t
}

35 36 37 38 39 40 41

WETLAND IMPACTS
NCDOT SITE PLANS
SCALE: 1= 5-01 -? L oZ M
,Y a -iOFly f
NCDOT SITE PLANS
SCALE: 1= 50, L2,40 L -
S, (Date) ate) ?'`f+f 0!_.F F??yt
it
ATTACHMENT A
October 12, 2001 '
Memorandum To: Robin Little
Division 4 DEO
From: Jill J. Holmes
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Subicct: TIP R-3825, Johnston County, Natural Resource Information to Assist
Division 4 Project on NC 42
Attached are data sheets for Wetland K and some background information on two
intermittent streams N1 and N2 (please see attached figure). These streams wdnd wetland are
located between Station No. 28 and Station 37 as depicted on the preliminary plans. Please note
that at Station 12+90 there are wetlands located outside of the proposed ROW that have not been
delineated.
Concerning the biological conclusions for the dwarf wedgemussel and the Tar
spinymussel at streams N 1 and N2, they will have a biological conclusion of "No Effect". Logan
Williams and myself surveyed the smaller streams on R-3825 on 6 June 2001 and determined that
there was not habitat for the dwarf' wedgenuissel or the Tar spinymussel at streams N 1 or N2.
The "Unresolved" conclusion is due to the fact that the Neuse River has not yet been surveyed.
If I can be of further assistance, please to not hesitate to contact me at [phone],
Extension 332.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
11987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) '
Project/Site: R- 3Q2o Date: Z.Ld?f / b f
Applicant/Owner: C OT County: sAW
Investigator: 101 I' s State: N
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: l
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ' N`o Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
Nw W?}lan(j as?C_ w1 N1 } N.7 (; ) ttilktMS
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
y\ ?t Indicator
f7 Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
-r Fl-lir L41
2. W ot, )14AY •A qyt o?" ? \ L 10. &4rls .k?O N 9 T ?I
?-A 16
3. FAC 11.
>
4. f?vliA? rr 12.
H _ 13.
6. A: iti V FAG 14.
5?Ajxtjlvo' 15.

B. 1 vs FR C 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
b
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
`
I??y r 1???
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or ride Gouge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
-inundated bn Art -'S
_
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_

Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Z Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
-Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
1
?rt?It??
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: -3'?do Date: ?Y
Applicant/Owner: NCnOT County: o vtS
Investigator: 1.0 w7f t State: 4d
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ys? No Community ID: K
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ` Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes N) Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1
igs fgeda V? IF AC
p Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
N/
.
r
2. 6eY4*)r'Hm sn. 10.
3. I e 2.07 G a AeA ik ii.
4. /? v d?1 r 1p. 12.
S. l S r v-??4! q_ 13.
6. , WI ?t f etc K.? S S M ?r 14.-
I'S ? T ?t i F?.
7 15.
.
a. C w e.ws ASS- cJ F-KYJ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC V7 q??o
•t
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
?yp Q1?, ? Y? 1, err. ;5 ? t s(Mv J SA 111\1 6;; t
1 ? I
1Ny17Rn1 nr;y
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs ` Inundated
Other V Saturated in Upper 12 Inchcs
_
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines

Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ` Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ]

?y rd n l?
?o (?l h? t -4 O

i S

P
R-3825 Natural Resource Information to Assist Division 4 Project on NC 42
General Field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by NCDOT
biologists Jared Gray, Matt Haney, and Jill I lolmes on October 23, 2000 and by Chris Rivenbark
and Jill Holmes January 9 and February 8, 9, and 13, 2001.
2.2.1 Characteristics of Water Resources
UT 11N 1 is an intermittent stream that originates as stormwater drainage from north of NC
42 and flows south and eventually converges with a tributary of the Neese River outside the
project study area. Wetlands are associated with this stream. NC: 42 crosses UT #N I
approximately 0.6 mi (1.0 km) cast of the intersection of NC 42 and US 70.'
UT #N2 is an intermittent stream that originates as stormwater drainage from north of NC
42 and flows south and eventually converges with a tributary of the Neese River outside the
project study area. Wetlands are associated with this stream. NC 42 crosses UT #N2
approximately 0.7 mi (1.1 km) cast of the intersection of NC 42 and US 70.
Stream Tributary Class Width ft/ Depth' irtl Clarity Flow Substrate,
of: m Cm
UT #N1 Neuse R intermittent 1.510.46 1 12.5 poor slow si, sa
UT #N2 Neuse R intermittent 1.510.46 2 /5.1 poor slow si, sa
4.1.1.2 Jurisdictional Wetlands
Wetland K
Wetland K is located south of NC 42, adjacent to UT #N2. It is in a riparian fringe
community and has emergent vegetation with scattered shrubs. The soil was saturated thror.?ghout
and in some areas was inundated I in (2.5 cm). I,ow chroma soil colors were observed.
Dominant vegetation included a giant cane, greenbrier, netted chain fern (Wooclivur(liu oreohaa),
blackberry, river birch, and black cherry.
4.2.1 Federally-protected Species
Picoides horealis (Red-Cockaded Woodpecker) Endangered
Animal Family: I icidae
Date Listed: 13 October 1970
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION
NO EFFEC'F
Potential habitat for the RCW is located within the project study area. A known
population was visited on 13 December 2000. Red-cockaded woodpeckers, ideal habitat, and
active cavities were observed. A survey for red-cockaded woodpeckers in the potential habitat
areas at the project site was conducted on 8 March 2001 by Jared Gray and Jill Holmes. No red-
Cockaclcd \\oodpcckers were observed. nor \Nere nesting cavities. or any other evidence that they
C7 -
may be using the project study area. A review of the NI IP database of Rare Species and Unique
Habitats on 15 November 2000 revealed no known occurrences of the red cockaded woodpecker
within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the project study at-ca. Therefore it can be concluded that construction
of this project will not impact this species.
Alasmidonta heterodnn (Dwarf Wedgemussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidac
Date Listed: 14 March 1990
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION
UNRESOLVED
Potential habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel is located within the project study area. A
survey for the dwarf wedgemussel will need to be conducted.
E•lliptio steinstansana (Tar Spinymussel) Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidac
Date listed: 27 June 1985
13101,0GICAL CONCLUSION
UNRESOLVED
Potential habitat for the tar Spinymussel is located within the project study area. A survey
will need to be conducted.
Rhus inichanxii (Michaux's Sumac) Endangered*
Plant Family: Cashew (Anacardiaceae)
Date Listed: 28 September 1989
Best Search 'T'ime: June (May through October)
Potential habitat for Michaux's sumac is present within the project study area. A known
population was observed prior to the site visit. A plant by plant survey for Michaux's sumac
where habitat existed along the project corridor was conducted on 25 May 2001 by Jill Holmes
and Jared Gray. No individual plants or populations of Michaux's sumac were observed. A
review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database of Rare Species and Unique
I labitats on 15 November 2000 revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.6 km (1.0
mi) of the project study area. Therefore it can be concluded that construction of this project will
not impact this species.

r
7(
!

~
.I ,.11 ')I •.• ??•/-'^..?.-.
1 %' ;11,; t
\ e_
-/I/'?`?; /''? 1;j, ?•?\'
..Jo
I ''?r?`?- V 'o - (r. L? //
` 1, !
--r\-'-f1L-'?'_; / , ,
`vi i< ;',,1..
?• rI- ;/ :- 1 i7- ;!//Y!

y `, \} ,?,?;: r
?ti``. C.:' .'ll t
? I '- -
?'
r?' - _

\ • .
_
,7G 1?) __yi ?i `
•? ? ?i, - ..? ? I "+r *?

r , j .._
\\; .
?!'??\?? ?(•/`\\?r2?
?-\??...y> i r ..?" .r
I ;
? ')
?1 1' *! `/`?"_ \ / ??i
..??'/ ) sr?!Sj
J / di:]-•F.
' C ?.. rs •
Z - ..ice
J? ??\T?`?:'??V
.f ?j ;'4,,.-- 'I
I '?

"I'?`.
?„?•-?C
(' _ tiw J J
/?
-\- \ ? ? a:: ?wa ? (I ? / f?? ?y V J -/ r-"`.,I ,.l r/?/ ' / („ " J ?
? / ti
" J ?,.? ` ? ? .
/-
?

• 7 \?
/"A- (? \'?, ' l/
???-\
of •l? \
a?J?? /+
`-.
I??°?`,••
( ?( ?
?/l'},)? `?_
l
?." J1?::j H I
;
?

~?`

Jn,
? I ?.-i: - ? 1=

r -'`•l;l?)
- ?/?

' ` ?
Ir?? '•? ',lam ?J -

'
`\\?? (I`??C,\:' ??
??? \\\ -``? \ -I j` F

'??.. ?? ?!;\ \t?\}'„I,\
?C' !; ' /- -i1V? ;

\? `'/j "i J'ti'.--y 'l ?.f,?C? /A'•
?? ???• ? ( -?\,r r? ,

y-r/ ''•r_J 1 , a /' \'¢??.
., ,.?\-- j?; (

\. ?•'" ? , l??
? ,_.. ,, t • 7
'
? -

.?>? 1' 4'
.

\'
y
1 ?• ?? "'<;;r?•.?
`? ?? , ?' 1? \ . ?..?
•,y% /.. j1
4. •''`?!I ' Z?•C ?? ??? rr??
` •-? :-.-,=??:. _ .... ?
r .? 1 S > S' ? :'\?j ??
c'
^?```? ; h''`r' .
/ j '
?
`?? ?
?'
? 1 /- ? \ ..:' • ?? N/f
i ?
i
/ i
•"- ? ?u?\l?.
,
,\ \.
??
\?-_.J
-? ? ?? Cc< ?'% r ?
.
•
-. ?
1 J??
'stn ? l' ? •-
`?t
'
9?
L?\`l`???
- ''
C-
``-i'-•\'?` i /-..l f i?
.:
.
\
{
?
' ie F .. I
a
?"•
_..._.
?1
? ?4
r;
,_ l
•
' ,?
?
?
? >
`?
+
C? .
h
??,
.a. a :3_
?r ,
- \
1:..?\
?i• s

? ....

\? -
1 \ ri? •.
f? \ '
4 /? ?/! 7:' ???? ?\ ?
? ' _ r -'i ?ti
??- ? ? ?? •.
n
/\ \ ? . ?l_
1??• ,,f?`J' ? C'-?. ?
.. '" ° f ! ? ? (tom:
' ? ? ? ? i}J? r
y '?
('-+ jg .z>.;? ?;I(?
"Il
((C
r ?• %l:. ;
:c' ?-'?l yJs+
r
t ? l ? ? ,
• ,? ` ? •-\J ?
y
R
-r -
:? 1.i
? .? ?. 1 SS \. ,7 ? ? {
?. . '1 - ? \' ?'
?/l -?\ •
l
1?
'h I`, ? ?? cw .-•• ?
1? I ? )I ? -SAL ?V? ??? ?
?
l
? `
?` \
?
/ ?\\ •\\• \N D j
..J ?\ ??V \ ? .- ??lr!r? I
1?
?
•'
1... 1. ? ?•-? ??
\
c
? ,
??_ ??-'fj}?4'?' ?? ? ?
?'C
" ? ?`"/" ::'
I
/
?
? ? ???._., ? %
•
?I
? T.,F:.?. I ::'r
__?
•''
?
,
? \ J
;
-l
/
,?
? 11
??' 1 ??" .
y ' ?
_'l
l
fl c)?
_',?
-.
!?? / t i
\\i l
?
_
`
?
': ?
\
`?? ? .
r
) ?
,?
??`C' '\
1\•?. ... _ I•
i ?''
', ?..; ;
?
?\
-`r,
f ?'
C., _
)7
r
....,
/ , r
'/?.. \
?
\
?
- \ \
C
:_!, .
M
f
.
--_ r
1 '
l ?
\
C' -

,
' K ? r . r', ' // ??7,

\? -
)' .I. /-\: 111?/,?,. -. ?IL.,, .

r.`\? 1
wa?
C ,

4
'< I ?1 \\ %

J
•
?/ J -? 1. ` ?

?1
f
I
y ?. / ! ? ' f•3?

,
j
?

''
Ise _ ?

...i ;
,
`.-?/
,n
? fj J1
i 1 §?a'^s°?
' ?- a-. ?
=n f I ,I / ,,\?t
y7 Jt? 1 -''? _.
,r-•,?)
LL ;, )J
t,,? .?O?U c r ?? .. _ ? S
?•` `?? \
/ I L? \\
i r l•
? ? I I 1 ? C \\
1. l?
? -
ll ?
p1
5?
, ,\, J?? ( ?. ? k?(
._, ot .
??
L\..-??(
/i
\ ?....
,(?„
'`? •\ ?} `._ --1,
?' ( \\ L?? 7
) ?
?..a•.' 1
!?? ?
_ l t ?! \ ??', ?I(,
( _ l
??
/ ,..
'f ? ' • j' I ?) !
r/.• c:,.,
1, i
_
•
/.

V) I

J
F'+-
{'
O
1
1 P
?
_ a?;, ?,?
?,
?` o°
a?? '
: L ``? ??) ?' 1-
/? I,? ? i // ? I / ? ._
?
V f/r s_
?`' '. ? ?> -
\`\\. ?1,-
?._, ???1 ?
)`
' \'
??
L -.a'> f ll (....';',l
\_
\\,?
%l II ?`??„?? ?c('
?I ? ,`, ? L_,
} ,?•>?? m?.•
??-// ,
? /rl
?. .
.s ,
'
?
.
? ''?? ?
) .\ ?t.?)
? ??.
+ _
?`??
\;
_`-1%
\\: ? c ' ? '\ ?
?/
l
.
r?
)? ?
? t ??.? ?
f
I
_?,? S ASS ,,r'
? ? ?•,?1 „I\) f` it
?'
1 (1
2 1,`•.'?J'' 77
? •l? ?
1
? ?

`-.' _, .?\
.`,
;-:gin? 1 1??
r
?', ? , .) 9 ?
Y.
!?? ''J, l l,.
??? -?` ?
? a\\ ?
((
?
, f<??-1s?.?,°? u!(?\l?`
(if
?
(
?
?
, .
.,
l , r',\ ??.J.:
/' \
?-?-N `?
/.? I ?
? ?
.. 7
?
-
? ) ?I CJ %
? ° 1
1?- w?_- ..r
'
4
l j ?_J

J V?\ / _ ,
• I ,.
L \\
) \
' 1?
? ?
? -. ••
•

E '
•\
?-,-_
l ?/ L` ,/ ?!'
•1
?; (? ? ;? ) `
J „?\
4
\C ? r
I
? 4?-+`\?. ? ? \ ?r \ _ /.
'Y. "..?
.+- _ - . _
,? \?}
)
?:
t / J i? .r? / ?
l
II , ?.
f \
1
j•.
? l.?-•-'r
? -f,•'-

? r ? r

All (rr\ . k47
O _ "_
pl I III i ; :;\? f l
j ? l ??- f?'
? :\
`%
?
?? ;`c..? . _Lr? J
` il?? j`;J ,
??
` ` ? \\.r ?j fJ" ".Y'? v
???? \??. ? c d
,? \•?? __.?`- / ?(\ U.:
? ?,1 , ? ??
`?`?'_
~ J ?°? ° J ? 1-' ?*1? ?
L iI? '???? `?`
am
:? ? /__ 1 ,l ?
- /f /'_? ?_ - ` ?
?
?
?? ? / ?_- /
> /?' ? ??\?/ f
_
.
•
J ?d ?, ?••?
"'"%i• ' i?r?
n.
'-'
(
? (
,
? ?I ?????
?
? ?. °?
? m
•? .
?
? .
j J
?? ?
?
.
• .
i
` J
?
?
f%
/41 r•
? ''??---
--?? '•?= __
E• '_ -? ?.\'
' / , •?) `? (l (.?r
I
/
, \-
???, :f ?
1. ? ? c.? .'
'?.- - ,-' ? 1, r;? _? !
I?. k (?
lf
? '"!','•y' 1/ ??t ?:>.?
'?! u / ?„ `-.
r
•"?1• \\ L` ,
•?
,
?/ yr ?
- `v ? ?
{I' /> 5? _,.., •.,
'\? = 2_.: '!'*
'`:'?? \\?' ?`?' ? ? rr r ?? ,. \
L? •• .! / \: _
~•'?• ? .-
>\
;
? ,
-?
!
? ,
?
.
, \\ ?\
y ,
-
..
\ ( ; , ?
f?. ` S ? ?
? ( ?
?
\
` `
`
\
?
?
`
'' ?
- y ?
\ I11 ' J
i?'
y,? ?,? 1/f1?
?
/\? L%i ? ?.'r
?-. /r? ?(//! _ //'? ? ,
?l'?,
J j
)? '
t::y` ? f ? ? !? C_ /\ O
_
-?
1
\
a
\\ \, '' ?` / /)
?\ `
\ \
/ Jl \
, J'
.
`?\?4>/ ? ?
??? 1\
??
? • \
l i
li%.\
l ?
t
\?..?? \ I '/\JN?
I ) _
I ?
?,? I? l ,? ` r ??\ ? I
' .
1?
? ?? , y
1, !, ,) •,v* 1 ..? ? ? •:: , ? ?: <<
\\ ti
' ? ,? `- , ? . ?:y?:,`?1, `'?`,' _
•? I -1???' ? ? ?:!"I , , ,/; , ? ,; ,? ,? ?. ,.. _ ?,;

1 '? ?./ ??. ;??'1 l" „!%
r
J
i •
/ / (-' ? -_ - ?-
•f -a`?
l\`
i'' ? _
/ \' ? ? ?'' .? ' - i\ say
?I'
Y' ?
\??`i? ' ;; _ ? )? ,'?;
•--/ ?ti w ??
X
^
' '/?? `- -\ • ? r '.
` ? ??, ?? f ?
l
rj- ,ate
7
1
?
/r j??;
_.J `J l ?...
P>
\ ?•?.J ?i ? ,
/
4 ,
-.
. j
.. i
/ f

??? A
'L !'/tom-?"? f !. ` )`?
,? i-1 'J d'i;"'
? ` r
P' i / •y?'/ r
jo) \\.i} - ?r,,
?t ?/ /? _ ?i•:?1f
? I °?' •'%:-•-
?'- ?L
?r?s ,
F i ?.?----r:r,??r <?' ? °`4' i i,
???1?`
• !.?.? ? \? ?\. ?
?- •S ? - ' ?5
J -? ?'?
v ?f ' ' •}• 1 ??? r" _:\ ??/%?? \ ') ? 1 ,, r-
?` ? ?ti. l
?yI i)
,
7?il i'i( K •?. J / ' ,
`
\ l • ti T" .? L' ?
?\ ? \
_1__` 11L _1 • / _ '^'"? ?• ••?
Y `?J-T'` /
. .'YT 1
?T
n,
•I'T. .4 U

ATTACHMENT B "'

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
MAILING ADDRESS
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
June 7, 1999
MEMORANDUM

TO: William D. Gilmore, P.F,., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
Department of ' 501sportation
FROM: David Brook
Deputy State 4istonc 4eservaonO leer
SUBJECT: Widening of NC 42 to multilanes from US
70 to SR 1003 (Buffalo: Road), Johnston
County, State Project 8.1312301, Federal
Aid Project STP-42(4), TIP R-3825, ER 99-
8910
Thank you for your letter of May 5, 1999, concerning the above project.
LOCAnON
507 North Blount Street
Raleigh, NC
State Courier 53-31-31
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of historical or
architectural importance located within the planning area.
There is one archaeological site in close'proximity to the project (31JT52**) and there
are a number of high probability areas which should be considered. We recommend
an archaeological survey be conducted of the project area.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800,
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning
the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review
coordinator, at 919/733-4763..
DB:slw
cc: Nicholas Graf
Bbrbara Church
Thomas Padgett

Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director

ATTACHMENT C

X-3 i?2s
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Govemor Division of Archives and History
Usbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey 1. Crow, Director
March 22, 2001
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. GITiore, P,E., Manager
Project Development a.nd Environmental An2lysis branch
From: D2vid Brook tr ?'?-??t?-
Deputy Statc Historic reservation Offices
Re: Archaeological Sumey Report and Evaluation of NC 42, Johnston County, ER 99-8910
'flank you for your letter of Janizuy 24, 2001, transmitting copies of die Above refetenced report.
We have reviewed the report by Coastal Carolina Research and offer our comments. We agree that
the single site located during the survey, 31 JT342**, is not eligible for inclusion of the National
Registet of Historic Plates and that no further archaeological work will be necessary for the p.toject
as planned.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National 1-3istolic Ptesorvation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's RgAations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFTC. Tart 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration, if you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Re,iee Gledhill-Earley, l? nvirownental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4.763.
1]li:kgc
cc: John Wadsworth, FHWA
Loretta Lautzeaheiser
Tom Padgett, NCDOT
bc: County
Reading
Cl,,twa/Clauser
Location MnVlfng Address --- TelephondFlix
733-8653
Administ?stion j07 N. 131ount 5t, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh 27699.4617 `919' 7334763
0715-4801
kcstoratlaa 515 N, Blount $t, Ralcigh , NC 4613 Mnil Serviao Center, Raleigh 276999-46138 (919) 733733-6763 .715-4801
ku,-vey & Planning 515 N, (Mount St, Ralcigh, NC 46)$ Mail Sorvieo Center, Rnleigh 2
rwaeirr'I':A`lt:x:i`.n W •?....-.x?:???L/A?IM3ixui'/?iMiuaWV?A?xli^1nlAwnun,a,.n:io'w.cmm:ar!anA.•ak>.w.T'.?..,, r. ., ,r.,-.. r..........,
fy Y , r ? ? f 11 0 \ \
f
'a1f •' .rte-.?=? ??`?::.? ;4 ??, ? f
+r l . - __ ?`^ -- ??. ? !' ?_ ? ? ,711 ,?'' A `l ?..?".-?.
??? r..^ f I?_.? ? ,...+..w ? .._. ...•+- ?'-+?_.-?..._+w.?...,v. ?_ ,rte ..`
•.+?;: ? 1 ?_ MJ• ~f.?? `tom, ....^.. ,1 . ?' \
rrrn
di
t?
w ?
l?n