20021148 Ver 1_Complete File_20020722

x
0 WA
?? ' Opp
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1 r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: 4., '4' 4-5p
Company: ,)e--ou>q
Number of pages including cover sheet: _?-
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: As2 -5Y?
Date:

MOO
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NCDENR • 0 200
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resarge
.
Division of Coastal Management
gfa JqNN
OWT
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director !`` QT J ., MEMORANDUM

TO: Bill Biddlecome, USACE
John Hennessy, DWQ
CC: Bill Arrington, DCM
Clay Willis, DOT
FROM: Cathy Brittingham, Transportation Project Coordinator
DATE: September 26, 2003
SUBJECT: Request for Minor Modification to CAMA Permit No. 129-02 for SR 1111
(Rattlesnake Canal Road) in Hyde County.
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed permit modification
and return this form to the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh Office, by October 17,
2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Cathy
Brittingham at [phone] x238 or Bill Arrington at [phone]. When appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY _ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
- This agency objeets to the project for reasons described in the attached
memo.
Signed
Date
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.6nr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer -50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
. ,, N0.663
08, - ^??z 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 82522473330

STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LYNDO T1prETT
MICR, EL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
AtI pst 18, 2003
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza 11
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Bill Arrington,
SECRETARY
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace an additional draiA
the that has collapsed under SR 1111 (Rattlesnake Canal Rd.). The replacement of this
the was not covered under the original Major Permit (129.02) for shoreline stabilization.
The damaged the was discovered after the permit was issued.-This damaged the is located
approximately 150 feet North of the existing stabilization project. The shoulder of the
canal has become unstabilized and is eroding into the canal bottom, which has caused the
road to begin to collapse. Therefore, NCDOT is requesting a letter of refinement from
DCM to allow the replacement of the drain the and the placement of additional rip-rap to
be covered under 1v *r Pemait 129-02. This will stabilize the canal bank and prevent and
further damage to the roadway. This will result in an additional 320 square feet of rip-rap
to be placed in the canal bottom. The rip-rap will be carried up the canal bank to stabilize
the shoulder. Included with this request are work plats detailing the work area, proposed
pipe replacement and rip-rap placement, if any additional information is needed pleaso
call Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
Sincerely,
Don Conner, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay Willis
Environmental officer, Division One
Cc: Sterling IIaker, NCDOT
D02
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 - Phone: [phone] flax. [phone]
08/18/2003 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 82522473330 NO.663 D03
N
•
'
e l • • .
?i
r
3
X

`•1.X04 w_
.• •
!

• O

x?
4oeedee ort'fae lea! tt tsbinu . , .? -..W-•

...may .•x t?1
F
• Leoadou of P St•bn oo "t
•
s •

• i

1 . ,
• Ruins,;. ? ? ' • • , •

r.
NU%n
N
U T,

?

?• 1
• ' '•5 416-
:
a. ... . . .I
AL.

Ah.

'
•:?:? i'.ii•. .Ya DIY .?. .,p-
? :1'.??,, :, tt
'
'
,
?
.
}.;
J-B TOPOU9449 c OPM01 V 19" VeLorme Yarmoutb, ME 04096 source DAM USG,S f----- -1701F n Scale, I : 17,600 paten: 134 Datkoic: WUM
08%1812003 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 92522473330

N0.663 D04

oMO ?' ?
O
OLr??
? V tip 01
w. N
N
? ? O ct H iJ
$
Cr
0
uj
In LL. i a

z a W
MUL
c
.
J y

a fl c
a =

V II

` f?
< II ?

?
? s

s: pip=
s.

r f

a o.

q r
Q
u
fl
I
0 ? W ?

' 08/18/2003 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4.82522473330
C
0 c
Q
H ti
CD
c
m b
?i
U
-? WU W
r

z>

0
c
C
w
z,
0
i
NO.663 D05•
F
0

o
?o
N

W
t
a
i
?

L

•r
r'
/ f Ln

p
J
'
L6

a +
Lo
?
V
s u
' LU
! V3
•
a?
' a
a
c
C
w `
r
`.: ? to V7
z r'
Q G .r

D 2
'M L M. DS 1-401 C-POW
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural ResgQ Q 2003
Division of Coastal Management Ngf ?± N
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director QaT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Biddlecome, USACE
John Hennessy, DWQ
CC: Bill Arrington, DCM
Clay Willis, DOT
FROM: Cathy Brittingham, Transportation Project Coordinator
DATE: September 26, 2003
SUBJECT: Request for Minor Modification to CAMA Permit No. 129-02 for SR 1111
(Rattlesnake Canal Road) in Hyde County.
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed permit modification
and return this form to the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh Office, by October 17,
2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Cathy
Brittingham at [phone] x238 or Bill Arrington at [phone]. When appropriate, in-
depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY _ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
_ This agency objeets to the project for reasons described in the attached
memo.
Signed
Date
1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://dcm2.dnr.state.nc.us
An Equal opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
0W.. ^^?Z 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 82522473330 NO.663
afi o
'vr wJ'
STATE or; NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO
SECRETARY
GOVERNOR Division of Coastal Management
151-B Hwy. 24
Hestron Plaza 11
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Mr. Bill Arrington,
August 18, 2003

902
;AUG 2 6 2003
KOF
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing to replace an additional drain
toile that has collapsed under SR 1111 (Rattlesnake Canal Rd.). The replacement of this
the was not covered under the original Major Permit (129.02) for shoreline stabilization.
The damaged the was discovered after the permit was issued. This damaged tile is located
approximately 150 feet North of the existing stabilization project. The shoulder of the
canal has become unstabilized and, is eroding into the canal bottom, which has caused the
road to begin to collapse. Therefore, NCDQT is requesting a letter of refinement from
DCM to allow the replacement of the drain tile and the placement of additional rip-rap to
be covered under Major Permit 129-02. This will stabilize the coral bank and prevent and
further damage to the roadway. This will result in an additional 320 square feet of rip-rap
to be placed in the canal bottom. The rip-rap will be carried up the canal bank to stabilize
the shoulder. Included. with this request are work plats detailing the work area, proposed
pipe replacement and rip-rap placement, if any additional information is needed please
call Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
Sincerely,
Don Conner, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division One
Clay illis
Environmental Officer, Division One
Cc: Sterling Baker, NCDOT
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 - Phone: [phone] Fax. [phone]
08/18/2003 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 82522473330
NO.663 903
1 -}
• N

r
X

. r G
N

X-' `\ <E
t Deaden orApe UP) H94bltl- ?_••

• Laudon of P Stebtl lon opt

Y
E

? .i
0'

f•,
Ru3as?

,
. 1. .:f .1 ? (?• ?, r,",',?:)?:.,i,?
ka*....
:J:•
f'•
'4 ?,.
1, ; r i ?f
::
49 -

l ? •',:`w
•
.... ? .f
. .f.. ?. 1. ' .?.. ?' .dY.
'n_ • Ir,ij s?M. ??

3-D To
p t 1 AeLortoe Yirrnoatb, ME 09 Source beta: lfSGS 700 h Scalar 1: 17,600 Aetall:l34 Aamal: WCS&t
n
8/18/2003 09:04
DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4 82522473330
NO.663 D04
r
v
. M FL m r w
? r
'? OC r x "` A 03 y o
C car. 4 O v(dnN C7
J
0
9 d?
d p
d ?
ti
a fi a
G
!' V
d
v II
J a.
II
f?
? II <
0 1? ?
? s
V
Pam-
r '
SI
W
• O
q r
f?G %J c
08/18/2003 09:04 DIVISION 1 EDENTON 4.82522473330
n
NO.663 D05

0
c
s
C
V
z.
D
C c
0 0
c v
am y N rtrJ
.j LU WUW? ?I
U ? R
N N ?t
I p?
(
r
r
A
? I
• 1 f

? a I >
e
N I ?
W
J ? :O

L I
a?

y

O ? U

a

a
O '
? z
? u
L
r
.o
G
O_

a

n C
I` Y C2
N

C J?
a z
'

' ?.?aac
S4 ••m
D
Q
o ?L
a4

N

Ln

0

u
a
LLI
s (1)
4
a
w
z ? o

W
V
? 7
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O?OF W ATFRQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
- G-4
September 20, 2002
Hyde County
DWQ Project No. 021148
APPROVAL OF 401Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS and Tar-PamlicoRiver
Buffer Rules
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, as described in your application dated July 18, 2002, and in accordance with the attached
conditions and those listed below, to place fill material along 415 feet of streambank for the purpose of replacing
two existing terra cota pipes along Rattlesnake Canal along SR 1111 in Hyde County. The project shall be
constructed in accordance with your application dated July 18, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3353. This certification corresponds
to the Nationwide Permit 13 issued by the Corps of Engineers. This approval is also valid for the Tar-Pamlico River
Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259). In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before
you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and
Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). ). This approval shall expire with the corresponding Nationwide
Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow
the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Stormwater shall be directed to sheetflow at nonerosive velocities through the protected stream buffers.
2. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.

N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O.
Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for
a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694 or Deborah Sawyer at 252-946-6481.
-4
Kli mek, P.E.
X
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\SR I I I l\wqc\021148wgc.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: torn steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Roger Thorne
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1 r ? Facility Name NCDOT - SR 1111 : Rattlesnake Canal stabilization County HYDE
Project Number 02 1148 County2
Recvd From DCM Region Washington
Received Date 7/22/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type canal stabilization
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet BE
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
CAMA Waters O YO N 129-52-3 SA fli??%V 30,307. F_- I F_
r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
I F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issue n/c
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
I •
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
July 18, 2002
MEMORANDUM: w_
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney
Environmental Biological Supervisor JAI
Division of Water Quality 2002 i '.
?k7LfiNDS
FROM: Doug Huggett Uhif??$aCT?fDP
Major Permits Processing Coordinator ...r w _ .
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review 021148
Applicant: NC Department of Transportation Project Location: Hyde County: Rattlesnake Canal, which runs parallel to SR 1111, 115 miles
southwest of Middletown. 1
Proposed Project: The applicant proposes to stabil' e 41S' of Rattlesnake Canal shoreline along SR
1111 and replace 8" terra cotta fa Iles with 24" culverts where two farm ditches
cross SR 1111.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
August 07, 2002. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Bill Arrington at
[phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
t
Development Type FEE DCM % DWQ %
(1430016014351000 93 1625 6253) (243001602 435100095 2341)
1. Private, non-commercial
development that does not involve 5250 100%(S250) 0%($0)
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
11. Public or commercial development
that does not involve the filling or $400 100%($400) 0%(SO)
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
III. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetlands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, B, C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non-commensal
development, If General water Quality 5250 100%(S250) 0%($0)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(B): For public or commercial
development, if General water Quality
$400
100%(5400)
0%(50)
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
III(C). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached)
could be applied, but DCM staff
determined that additional review and 5400 60%($240) 40%($160)
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to wdter
quality or aquatic life:
II(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) 5400 60%($240) 40% (5160)
can not be applied:

IV. For development that involves
the filling and/or excavation of more $475 60%($285) °
40 /
($190
than one acre of wetlands and/or °
}
open water areas:

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Rattlesnake Canal, which runs parallel to SR 1111,
1.5 miles southwest of Middletown, in Hyde County
Photo Index - 2000:114-1383 grid 0-6 to W-8 1995: 114-1224 grid P-18 to X-19
State Plane Coordinates: x 2883893 y:636556 GPS: Rover File # X071113A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visits - 3/21/02 and 7/11/02
Was Agent Present - YES (Clay Willis)
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received as Complete- 7/11/2002
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Hyde County
Land Classification from LUP - Rural and Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA, EW and CS
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Secondary gravel road and farm tile
Planned - Secondary gravel road and culvert
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A Source: N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
F.Yeavated Filled Other
(A) Public Trust Area - Shallow Bottom 300 sq. ft. 3952 sq. ft.
(B) Other - High Ground in Coastal
Shoreline AEC 280 sq. ft. 404 sq. ft.
(D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 4936 sq. ft., 0.11 acres
(E) Total area disturbed by project: 0.11 acres
(F) Primary Nursery Area: No
(G) Water Classification: SA-HQW
(H) Open for Shellfishing: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to stabilize 415
feet of Rattlesnake Canal shoreline along SR 1111 and replace 8" terra cotta farm tiles with 24"
culverts where two farm ditches cross SR 1111.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT - SR 1111, Hyde County
PAGE 2
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 021148
The site of this proposal is SR 1111, between SR 1110 and SR 1108, approximately 1.5 miles
southwest of Middletown, in Hyde County. Farm Tile One and Two are 1140 feet and 1368 feet
respectively, southeast of SR 1110. The proposed stabilization begins 2060 feet southeast of SR
1110 and ends 2475 southeast of SR 1110.The general purpose of the project is to stabilize the
road shoulder and repair the broken farm tiles under SR 1111, to alleviate erosion into Rattlesnake
Canal and provide safer driving conditions for the traveling public.
State Road 1111 parallels Rattlesnake Canal and provides a 15 -foot gravel travelway and a road
shoulder averaging 7 feet wide on the southwest side and 5 feet wide on the northeast side (outside
of the proposed project area). In the proposed project area the canal bank has eroded into the
gravel travelway in several areas and is less than 5 feet in the majority of the project area.
Rattlesnake Canal was originally excavated for agricultural drainage and the proposed project area
is completely surrounded by agricultural fields. A small marina exists approximately 4000 feet
downstream of the proposed project area on the southeast side of the bridge crossing Rattlesnake
Canal on SR 1108. In the proposed project area Rattlesnake Canal is approximately 50 feet wi de,
with the canal bottom 7.5 feet below the ground surface and terminates at the Pamlico Sound.
Approximately 2.5 feet of water is in the canal at Normal High Water. Farm Tile One and Two
are 8" terra cotta pipe sections connecting the existing farm ditches to Rattlesnake Canal. Both
farm tiles have collapsed sections allowing water to escape under SR 1111 causing undermining of
the road travelway and shoulder. The surrounding agricultural fields were planted with wheat,
soybeans and corn. The ditch banks are vegetated with Dewberry, Honeysuckle, Poison Ivy,
Virginia Creeper, Cat Brier and Bermuda grass. The NC Soil Conservation Service classifies
soils in the project area as Hyde Land Silty Loam. Approximate elevations on the site range
between -2 feet and 5 feet above normal high water. No evidence of SAV beds was noted. The
North Carolina Division of Water Quality classifies waters of Pamlico Sound adjacent to the
proposed project area as SA-HQW and they are subject to the Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Rules.
No Primary Nursery Area, as designated by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, is
located at this site. The Hyde County Land Use Plan designates the project area as Rural, with all
CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern designated as Conservation.
The proposal is to armor 415 feet of canal bank with rip rap, in an alignment approximating the
original canal bank, to a height 2 feet above NHW to provide a stable base to backfill a 5 -foot
wide soil road shoulder to more closely correspond to the adjacent road shoulders. This riprap
armament alignment would extend water-ward of the existing eroded areas from 6 feet to 11 feet
and be covered with soil stabilizing fabric. The proposed soil road shoulder would be installed
above the soil stabilizing fabric and include the same fabric between the existing canal bank and
the soil backfill. Two 8" farm tiles that have degraded and collapsed would be replaced with 24"
corrugated aluminum culverts after the erosion sediment is excavated from the canal bottom at the
end of the farm tiles. The canal bank will be armored surrounding the culverts for a 15 -foot
radius. NC DOT Best Management Practices will be used for erosion control.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
NC DOT - SR 1111, Hyde County
PAGE 3
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:
As proposed, the construction of the riprap armament would require the filling of approximately
3652 square feet of shallow (canal) bottom. The replacement of the two farm tiles with culverts
would require the excavation of approximately 300 square feet of shallow bottom and 280 feet of
high ground in addition to the filling of approximately 300 square feet of shallow bottom and 404
square feet of high ground (canal bank around culverts).
NC DOT has reduced the shallow bottom excavation and fill impacts associated with this proposal
by increasing the canal bank side slopes to 2:1. The NC DOT has proposed to use standard
BMP's to minimize the impacts of erosion. Principally local residents use State Road 1111. The
repair of the road shoulder and replacement of the deteriorated farm tiles with culverts should
enhance the safety of motorists using SR 1111.
The collective disturbance area for the project is 0.11 acres.
Bill Arrington
July 17, 2002
Morehead City
fkQ- Co.
e,,. STATEa
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 12, 2002 ?.
Division of Coastal Management J`'r`'?
"002
3411 Arendell Street
P.O. Box 769 ^~? -
Morehead City, N.C. 28557
Attention: Bill Arrington, Field Officer (Transportation Projects) .
Subject: Road shoulder stabilization on Secondary Road I 1 l 1 (Rattlesnake Canal Road) near the
town of Middletown, Hyde County.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to stabilize a section of SR 1111. This
road parallels a drainage canal that flows out to the Pamlico Sound. Along a portion of this canal, the bank
has become destabilized and significant amounts of erosion have taken place. The erosion of the canal bank
has caused SR 11 I I's roadbed to be undermined. If the canal banks are not stabilized then further erosion
will continue and the roadbed will eventually be washed out completely, resulting in road closure. The
length of the area to be stabilized along the canal bank with class B riprap is 415 feet, with an average
distance waterward (NWL) of 6.8 feet. This will result in 65 cubic yards of fill below the NWL. The
primary cause of the bank erosion was two drainage pipes that carry water from adjacent agricultural fields,
under the road, and into the canal. These pipes are old pipes that have collapsed under the roadbed. These
pipes will be replaced in conjunction with the bank stabilization. Once this work is complete we do not
anticipate having any further problems with bank destabilization along this canal.
The purpose of this letter is to request authorization under a CAMA major permit for impacts to
Public Trust Waters. Rattlesnake Canal is a navigable water and can be accessed by way of the Pamlico
Sound. In the area of the proposed work there is essentially no recreational use of the canal as Public Trust
Water. Approximately 0.5 miles south of the project area, there are a few commercial boats that dock along
the bank of the canal. The purpose of the canal is drainage of the adjacent agricultural fields. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Clay Willis at 252-482-7977.
Sincerely,
Don Conner, PE
Division Engineer
CIa?Iillis
Division One Environmental Supervisor
113 Airport Dr., Suite 100, Edenton, NC 27932 - Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Form DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
r
(To be completed by all applicants) I "
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton
State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Address 113 Airport Road
City Edenton State N.C.
Zip 27932 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
c. Project name (if any) Rattlesnake Canal Rd.
Stabilization (SR 1111), Hyde County
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Hyde Count
b. City, town, community or landmark
Middletown
d. Is proposed work witf
jurisdiction? Yes
its or _plannirig
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Rattlesnake Canal , drains to
Pamlico Sound
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Canal bank stabilization adjacent to SR 1111 and
the replacement of two drain pipes that cross
under SR 1111 emptying into Rattlesnake Canal.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? Maintenance
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed project.
If more space is needed, please attach additional
pages. Two existin _pipes have failed and
require replacement and the canal bank has
significant erosion and destabilization. These
repairs have to be made in order to stabilize the
adjacent roadbed for roadway safety and
reliability.
c. Street address or secondary road number
(SR 1111) Rattlesnake Canal Rd.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL
N/A
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Land adjacent to canal is Hyde Land Silty Loam,
0-2 percent slopes, rarely flooded.
e. Vegetation on tract Cultivated crops, canal banks
have various upland species, no coastal marsh
species along bank.
f. Man-made features now on tract Canal
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification
of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
_ Conservation Transitional
_ Developed Community
X Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Rural, Agriculture
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? _
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? _ Yes X No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
None
archaeological assessment been
Yes X No
? `; J:if 1 ? 2i;OZ
n. Describe location and type of dischargesto waters of
the state. or: example,.- surface7-,tunoff, sanitary
wastewater, Tiindus`inal/e o ?m: meccial effluent, "wash
down" and resi entiaTdischargeS-.) -Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
None
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward
a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the
owner claims title, plus written permission from the
owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site
or location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel
unfamiliar with the area to
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
*A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats by
certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that
they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the
Form DCM-MP-1
proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name James E. Midgette Jr.
Address 1441 Nebraska Rd. Englehard, N.C. 27824
Phone
Name Earl D. Pugh, Jr.
Address 32 Nebraska Rd. Englehard, N.C. 27824
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
N/A
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10)
If the project involves the expenditure of public funds
or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting
compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
JUN 1 4 2002
I certify that I am authorid tcs;_iic,do?nact?ant
permission to representatiVerdf sfafe and-fe erad 1 review
agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 07 day of June, 2002.
Print Name Clay Willis
Signature 2?z &?.
Landowner o Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
_
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
_
DCM MP-5
X Bridges and Culverts
_
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill
activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
415' Varies 2.5' 2.5'
6-11'
1. EXCAVATION N/A
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards None

JJi?1 14 2002
CC, NtAi?
b. Type of material to be excavated N/A
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes X No
d. High ground excavation in cubic yards N/A
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N/A
(See Attachment)
a. Location of disposal area N/A
b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to disposal area? N/A
Yes _ No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? _ Yes _ No N/A
If yes, where?

Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No N/A
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes No N/A
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead- X Riprap
b. Length
415'
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
6.8'
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NAIL
9'
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
unknown
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
NCDOT Class B Rip Rap
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1)Riprap 65 cubic yards
(2) Bulkhead backfill N/A
h. Type of fill material NCDOT Class B Rip Rap
i. Source of fill material NCDOT approved quarry
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES N/A
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
j UJ ,J 14 2002 i
3 9 ,
If yes,
(1) DimensidffTZffrltAt`'eA---
(2) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best management
practices for the prevention of erosion and
sedimentation will be implemented
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for
example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Backhoe / Excavator
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to
project site? -Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
Clay Willis, Environmental Officer
Applicant or Project Name
Signature v
Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Yes No
If yes, explain
?1? ijlll'?
;J 1 JUN 1 4 2002
1. BRIDGES N/A k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
a. Public Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes No
If yes, explain
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
h. Width of proposed bridge
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes No
If yes, explain
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning
their approval?
Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
2. CULVERTS
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
Culvert being placed under roadbed, conveys
water from field ditch into Rattlesnake Canal
b. Number of culverts proposed two, one at each
location depicted on the permit drawings
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
24" corrigated metal pipe
d. Will proposed culvert replace,an existing bridge?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
_X _Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert station 11+40
pipe is 35'. Station 13+68 pipe is 35'
(2) Width of existing culvert 8 inch terra cotta
pipe
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL 1 foot (estimated)
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) all of the existing pipe
will be removed
f. Length of proposed culvert 50 feet, both sites
g. Width of proposed culvert 24 inches, both sites
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL 2 feet
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes X No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
X Yes No
If yes, accumulated sediment from the bank
washing in.
(1) Length of area to be excavated 25', each site
(2) Width of area to be excavated < 8'
(3) Depth of area to be excavated 1.5', each site
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
2002
i
c. Will the placementi ofthe proposed bridge pr culvert
require any highgrJund`&xcavatcsn?:
X Yes
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated 35 feet
(2) Width of area to be excavated 8 feet
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 130 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
NCDOT approved waste site
(2) Dimensions of sp it d' posal are
unknown , S A) u ,f aNk? ial??
(3) Do ou claim title to t"disposal area?
Yes No
I o, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any 0)np0raAh4§t#%rc4t tW 1o be excavated in cubic
Yes X No
if yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work channels?
Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NC DOT BMP's
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? backhoe, excavator
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail
Stabilization will done with rip rap as detailed in the
permit drawings
NCDOT SR 1111 (Rattlesnake Canal Rd.)
Applicant or Project Name
/./say
Signature
Date
,
r J
UIV ( 7
X02 1
o __.e__? name

?
?
" ? j ?
r ;? ?
.,
:
moo > -?? /
"? • `, y Ii'
'?_
ZM,

t
'
Y
w
I ' \ ` ,
,
F
=
(k •?
it ?J . , 1 ` ' :
1 ,? .
? '
-

,
t. n s t d ? 1
' Ie t 1 I ?? •r C

Z-10 to> c
mL-ZOZ
p G r' , ;
sig. g r c
4 M
m -i cc ? ? ? 1 r 1 ? ?

-? n
?, o Z ?, 1 J u rl 1 4 2002
i

v rr
Q•
r
Microsoft TerraServer Print Page http://terraserver.homeadvisor.msn.com/...mage.asp?S=13&T=1&X=254&Y=2452&Z=18&W=1
---
41 . '
?J
7 km NE of Mount Pleasant, North Carolina, United States 01 Mar-1993; 4
2002
;USGS

I
l

a. yE
of '1Km 0' 1,5Mi
Image courtesy of the US Geological Survey.
o
.-
I O
»- CL
_ o > 94
O + +
N N
Q
O

{" 4.

z -
in
I-S
ZOUo
p
? I _] O O
?-+ Q?JYNO
?ao(n C?

F J
_ 0
W a Z N II z
Q Z: to
+ -
.T
E W J Nm.
ooQu-IU
a
?
+ -

ZOZ
W J F..
?
,
z °c maaU a'

A!i
I in
%c
;+t

"+
I
o
+
1 N
N
r-
N

j: O UY?
? z a=Qa
_ _{` _ L] Q C x

_ - xz
-r }

•
N

11
S.cY'.
F.t ' a
yF.
z Z
O
'
is >
t Z
Q W N

Q? '=ti r I Q i
W CCU I ?, ? x
'? Uz

t a Z
L'?
Q
Q
_-(A
O V I
? ..?
Z :i ¢ C ++ O
¢?W? x N Q x in

#1 000E , r ?;?r 1 o k

N

JUil; 1 4 2002

I
N I r-. ? n p:
O
? r C c:
?V ? I C
V+ ? ? z r ?

N
rn

a
O

Z T
Z

IV

O
I.
7 V:

7 ?• h

Z
C:

C I
0 -0 03 0
NC I
O
C
mjmZZ

DD <
? m
C < °
CID
N'

Z
s r D C
D
" O (n Cl)
N Zg
-* 0
D
co
l N ?o
m m
II
n
n 0
?
o
-+ D Ut I? X
O N O
Z O p (n ?'
N to O

r-
? co
(D N
n ?'
?
?J •r
. C7

Juiv

O
-->' n C
O
m -
V• C _
>

N
O
rn ' °

^
IJ T
M

O
7
Z > ?!
Z
V r

? _
t

r.
0-4
O c

I
>

z
v oz -u w /
-i O
C
E
m 'mz
I '
CD
0
x
a)
_
D m DDS
?o <O I I
z CO
m> N
w n 7
> C)
CD
0
70
N rn
'^ O N II
-A O O O z l

r z
o
o C
?
Q O
N
c
c U)
Q Q-
Q
0 0

2o

i

I /r z
N r r ii u

?- T
C
r
? •9
z r
I r
c n
o
, y
m
0

? T
D
z
O W.
Z T
z

_
r
W z -

I
? L
C

Z
c I

r
'O mn Z /
M:
M D?;u DO
cnc
m j0 C7 I _
`
;Mz ° s
?
D m Duo <0 I
--4
Co D m
CD 0
N'
Z D
0 g .-r
O O •
d rt 0 v

z
o z n -»• - ?' D 07 v

70
N
m
O cn 11 'i O X
N O O

N z

O

C) cn cn 7D
°

U

M

w U) (0

(D
U)

5 0-
0 0 0
J
y
? '
n 1
... '' a rn
3 O I`
sY
Cj)
v

I

J ;; i?z 2CO2

00
CA (A
a
z
v O ;

o y z°

ts7

O
m
v ?` z
A
Z ?
b
r
? = v
z '? n
o i I ?, o
a
c II <
a 11
?

> II a
-c

? II
I

O z
G E'' 00
N '
n
3 U

M O

T
0 DXDCO
Z r
v a
(7
M --1 p to D c
?m`-zvz
v -
-? m 0? c

?
D u ???v
?mD?ov
y'? m_,?
z+?? v n
?
°ao?Drm CD n?z? c
z ?o m3 •ii rl.
O r ?zr vim,Q
oDO?
o O? yac??
.? n
m Z
l/1
?Q d

c

Cl)
G
U2
z?nM,
i
u nx?a.

N
=
i ?a
cr
t
n
? A
`

r« z v
? n

JUN 1 4
t r? _ m o

f}
i ?+-?._._,_,',..?.?+.+..v..._
_
t
f ...
... ........
N
a

^ v
n

3 a ?'
z

cn
p
r
v z a a ,

3
m
rr .
I m a a

V+ O

m
v

? rr

z
I m
0 - r
v
z
v
I I z
m
O N i.

Z
o

> n

3
I

co

0
,z
70. r
m DODO Z O
X -i p cn c 0
-?
mm - =3 Z
p I -n
-n CD
v ca > _ c
D C-D-??o 3 <0 I v
C >
T> M CD N (A ?j
;o 0
? Z n p E n
o D p D W
-'_ r O
N cm -mnm n -Dr
p N it I? X -, !n
-0 al U En -0
N cn cn o
cn
sv CD CD Q-
C)
0 0. o.
v v ?

fi a z o r l 7 IL ffi 1
?a a e j
{ 3 z t. i 2002
::r± >c
n v
3 X
O z z o
eo ? ? r
m ? c
?Sa T
? z D N
O O
< ZZ
G
W .a
7? ? 11 ? o
a (I ?-+ D
.p + <
Ell C. r
II
it y
W
o (I z
?, II 00
N
44- >
n .c
u -
T
r ?
v v
r-.
m o D?Dco Z z
o mCZDvz O
r .. m .. CD O -n
M 0 <
o - D?= z v
? ? v r
cm-mvri?
D°rm CD
Z wmF? ? a
0 K) CD Cl) 0 '* o O v c
v<
Nm Z z>nz r
?
o
m
_ ? c A z
v z n
m v
o
v x

.
14
1

o O
.j

-o

C

O
z 3
a
n
?

o z ° a a

m I
n -

mn ? Z

Z
pr

° V
.? ? 1
I I
+ o

I
n ? >

r
r
a
I

I
N
r:
a
r
o
DODO

m
- n I r
z
L
z
m ..
m
--I
m c?
'p n
O
v o
o
D= _
O
>rDm CD N ( !A C
c
? cn p v n
D 03
r- 0

M -R'
c)m
c)
p
-« K) II
? -? x -, !n
_0
0 ? c
N p cn co cn 0

.-r CD
n CD CD
n
0 0' o-
° :