Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20010996 Ver 1_Complete File_20010703 (2)' r iw . TIP PROJECT B-2967 STATE PROJECT 8.2290801 F. A. PROJECT BRZ-1252(1) Bridge Project Scoping Sheet DIVISION 4 COUNTY Edgecombe ROUTE SR 1252 Purpose of Project: REPLACE OBSOLETE BRIDGE Description of Project: Replace Bridge No. 44 on SR 1252 over the Tar River Will there be Special Funding Participation by a Municipality, Developers, or Others? YES NO X EXISTING LENGTH 131 METERS; WIDTH 7.3 METERS STRUCTURE 429 FEET 24 FEET TIP CONSTRUCTION COST ...................................... $ 325,000 TIP RIGHT OF WAY COST ...................................... + $ 25,000 TIP TOTAL COST .................................... $ 350,000 CLASSIFICATION: Rural Minor Collector ?? - ( --? y) {? 15 C .Y North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Highways Edgecombe County Replace Bridge No. 44 on SR 1252 Over Tar River B-2967 Figure One l 20 Z1 1t' - -7 subst4a, I B.0 I9.0 it \'\ Dunbar ?- - ----------- ?- -? 10.5 _ ---------- ---- 7 Dunbar -',. zo?? ? ? ? 8 dge a - 30 Hartsease - _..-- = _ - l I Trader - - _ ?_ - / I Park 3o.s %"\ - iu ?ll 1207 i1 Easc 6 4L State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources / • • Division of Water Quality Ja mes EL Hunt, G owe r p E H N R Jonathan B, Howe 4 Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director March 27, 1997 MEMORANDUM To: Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager, NCDOT, Planning & Environmental Branch From: Cyndi Bell, NC Division of Water Quality ?. L 6 Subject: Water Quality Checklist for Bridge Replacement Projects Reference your correspondence dated January 21, 1997, in which you requested scoping comments for four bridge replacement projects (B-3110, B-3111, B-2967, B-2589and B-3129). As I will be unable to attend the scoping meeting for these projects on April 8, 1997, I am forwarding these comments to you and the appropriate project engineers in writing. The Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following generic environmental commitments for design and construction of bridge replacements: A. DWQ requests that DOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0024) throughout design and construction for this project in the area that drains to streams having WS (Water Supply), ORW (Outstanding Resource Water), HQW (High Quality Water), B (Body Contact), SA (Shellfish Water) or Tr (Trout Water) classifications to protect existing uses. B. DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on existing location with road closure, when practical. It an on-site detour is necessary, remediation measures in accordance with DWQ requirements for General 401 Certification 2726/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering) must be followed. C. DWQ requests that hazardous spill catch basins be installed at any bridge crossing a stye un classified as HQW or WS (Water Supply). The number of catch basins installed should be determined by the design of the bridge, so that runoff would enter said basin(s) rather than directly flowing into the strewn. D. To the maximum extent practicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek. E. Wetland impacts should be avoided (including sediment and erosion control structures/measures) to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be chosen: Mitigation for unavoidable impacts will be required by DWQ if impacts exceed one acre. Smaller impacts may require mitigation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. F. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or b rrow. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 2626-0535 Telephone 919-733-9960 FAX # 733-9919 An Equal Opportunity AMinnatlvs Action Ertployer 50Y. recycledM 0% post consumer paper Mr. H. Franklin Vick Memo March 27, 1997 Page 2 G. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. If the new structure is to be a culvert, it should be countersunk to allow unimpeded fish passage through the crossing. H. If foundation test borings will be required, this should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved under General 401 Certification Number 3027/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey Activities. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is required in designated mountain trout counties. I. If this project is processed as a Categorical Exclusion, NCDOT is reminded that mitigation will be required if wetland impacts exceed one acre, in accordance with DWQ Wetland Rules { 15A NCAC 21-1.0506 (h)(2) 1. The attached table has been prepared by DWQ for your assistance in studying the systems involved in these bridge replacements. This information includes the DWQ Index Number, DWQ Stream Classification, river basin, and preliminary comments for each crossing. Please note that National Wedand Inventory (NWI) map references are not to be replaced by onsite wetland determinations by qualified biologists. Thank you for your request for DWQ input. DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and designated uses are not lost or degraded. Questions regarding the 401 Certification or other water quality issues should be directed to Cyndi Bell at (919) 733-1786 in DWQ's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch. cc: Melba McGee Bill Goodwin John Williams B3110.DOC r` rn N M N N CL cr z 2 w C) p p '? O D o° c s o a s m° 3.5 ° 3 cd o m C ro E p -? p -- 3 L? m ? Y m 3 E N N N> p O V N $ f0 "' a N n CL n E D c c m e E E c z E E 3 Z Z Z; Z C ? $ 10 ° E x ?i z r- a > m U. F? (n a b ~ Z U U) c H = ) > U =° m (n 3 U Ch 3 o U E p m 7 Z N v v? L9 co x 0 O C r- I N II II ? ? ? Z, CD lC4 j N 0 N Q Q m c p m m w ? E E m m N °' N m Y m m Z V U > U m U E ro -b °c 8 3 ' c b j ~ U 0 cu o N U d ? 2 O m o'er a a a a A CL U) Iz Iz cr ¢ cr (0 ? N_ O N M ?- V Q Q Q Q Q J (n (n (n (n (n d co r v m Z ° m N a co co CO N co co m m m co sr - STAIZ STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 GOVERNOR April 21, 1997 MEMO TO: Project File FROM: Bill Goodwin. P.E. -22 ?_ Project Planning Engineer RFC FI O 'L/1 ?'Ur 99 / GARLAND B. GARRETT JR. SECRETARY SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting for Replacement of Bridge No. 44 on SR 1252 over the Tar River, Edgecombe County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1252(1). State Project No. 8.229080 1, TIP No. B-2967 A Scoping meeting for the subject project was held on April 8, 1997. The following persons were in attendance: Debbie Bevin Lanette Cook Don Sellars Meredith McDiarmid Craig Young Dan Duffield Norm Miller Kathy Lassiter Glenda Gibson Bill Goodwin SHPO Program Development Right of Way Traffic Control Traffic Control Hydraulics Structure Design Roadway Design Roadway Design Planning & Environmental The design speed will be 100 km/h (60 mph). The roadway approaches will have two 3.6 meter (12 foot) travel lanes and shoulder widths of at least 2.4 meters (8 feet). The shoulder will be wider where guardrail is warranted. The proposed structure will be 9.2 meters (30 feet) wide, with two 3.6 meter (12 foot) travel lanes and 1.0 meter (3 foot) offsets. Mr. Dan Duffield of the Hydraulics Unit indicated that a new structure approximately 131 meters (430 feet) long will be required to replace the existing bridge. The new structure should be placed at approximately the same roadway elevation as the existing bridge. A temporary detour structure, if required, should be 73 meters (240 feet) long and could be placed 1 meter (3 feet) lower than the existing bridge. Utility conflicts will be low for this project. There are electrical and telephone service lines along the west side of SR 1252. Ms. Cyndi Bell of DWQ indicated, by memo prior to the meeting; that the Tar River has a stream classification of WS-IV NSW. Implementation of High Quality Waters - Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures was requested. Replacement in-place with an off-site detour would be preferred from a water quality standpoint. Mr. David Cox of NC WRC indicated, by telephone prior the meeting; that High Quality Waters - Sedimentation and Erosion Control Measures will be requested. This section of the Tar River is a spawning area for anadromous fish, so a moratorium on in-water construction will be requested between March 1 and July 1. Replacement in-place with an off-site detour would be preferred from a wildlife resources standpoint. Ms. Debbie Bevin of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) indicated that there are no known architectural sites in the immediate project area. However, there is one known archaeological site that may need to be evaluated [31Ed5]. An architectural evaluation of the houses to the north of the crossing was also requested. The Traffic Forecasting Unit has indicated that near Bridge No. 44, SR 1252 carries 2000 vehicles per day at present [1996]. This f igure is expected to increase to 4100 vehicles per day by the year 2020. These traffic figures include 3% dual tired vehicles [DUAL], and 2% truck-tractor semi-trailers [TTST]. The design hourly volume [DHV] is 10%. SR 1252 is classified as a Rural Minor Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System. The Edgecombe County School Bus Transportation Coordinator indicated that there are two school busses crossing this bridge twice per day. An off site detour will cause some delays and inconvenience, but no significant problems. Two alternate will be evaluated for replacing Bridge No. 44 over the Tar River. Alternate One - The existing bridge will be removed and replaced in place. Traffic will be maintained on a temporary structure located west of the existing bridge. Alternate Two - The existing bridge will be removed and replaced on new alignment to the west of the existing bridge. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction. The TIP cost estimate for this project is $ 350,000 including, $325,000 for construction and $ 25,000 for right of way. Preliminary constriction cost estimates are not available at this time. The current project schedule calls for right of way acquisition to begin in January 1999 and constriction to begin in January 2000. r N 1407 1. 6 I 1416 11 97 2. O .r 1.0 -? 2 1 ?1. 2 Penelo u /? I?64 2'0 eto t", LEGGETT / 1409 l I POP.109 , B Wrwxk" \ - v rf L' 1407 ?. ) 2.0 1406 N O l 254 0 ?.3 1' 4 2 1253 I 1255 Or 1252 1 ' f,100? !1.54! ?• A A Heartsease ' .4 1339 ?' ? Q 1217 ar ? 1349 3. f p 1? h ?pFNORTNCgq\ North Carolina Department of ?ryr 0Transportation Division of Highways y SQL" Planning & Environmental Branch OF TPA ..' Edgecombe County Replace Bridge No. 44 on SR 1252 Over Tar River B-2967 Figure One {Nhitakers 13 Roa FBettlebao 3 -i• eCe docky ?tG- Z sD4? 6 B E