20021713 Ver 1_Complete File_20021003

021713
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
October 2, 2002
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615-6814
ATTENTION: Ms. Jean Manuele
Dear Madam:
SUBJECT: Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 Permit Application. The proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 56 over Byrd's Creek on SR 1751 in Caswell
County. Federal Aid Project No. MA-BRZ-1751(2), State Project No.
8.2481201, TIP No. B-3319.
Please find enclosed three copies of the project planning report for the above referenced
project. Bridge No. 56 will be replaced by a two barrel 14 ft X 10 ft reinforced concrete box
culvert in approximately the same location as the existing bridge. The proposed right-of-way is
60 - 160 ft. The project length is approximately 1,010.0 ft. Traffic will be detoured offsite
during construction using other existing local roads. A project vicinity map and preconstruction
notification form are also included with this permit application.
Temporary De-watering Information:. A culvert diversion channel to detour existing stream
around the culvert construction site will be needed for project . Work includes; constructing
diversion channel, disposing of excess materials, providing and placing filter fabric liner,
maintaining diversion area in an acceptable condition, removing filter fabric liner, backfilling
diversion channel area with suitable material and providing proper drainage when diversion
channel area is abandoned.
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the de-watering of the stream will
be removed after their purpose has been served. The temporary fill areas will be restored to
their original contours once the materials are removed.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION: IM
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING C.
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH, NC
2. Schedule: The project schedule calls for a December 17, 2002 let date. It is expected that the
contractor will chose to start construction of the diversion shortly after the project is let. The
diversion will be in use for approximately four months.
3. Disposal: After the diversion is no longer needed, the contractor will remove the materials
used for the diversion. All containment materials will become property of the contractor.
The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal and disposal of all
materials off-site.
One perennial stream in the Roanoke River Basin, Byrd's Creek [HUC 03010104, DWQ
Index No. 22-56-7-3-(1), 5/1/88] is crossed by SR 1751. This stream carries a Best Usage
Classification of C. Construction of the proposed culvert will result in permanent impacts of
249.4 linear feet of streams and fill in 0.04 ac to surface waters. The length of the proposed
culvert is 70.0 ft, however tie Finaining 179.4 ft of impacts will occur during construction of the
floodplain for the low flow culvert. These impacts are depicted in the attached drawing (Sheet
3). No jurisdictional wo nds will be impacted as a result of project construction
Bridge Demolition: -Bridge No. 56 has 6 spans totaling 74 feet (22.5 m) in length. The
existing bridge is composed entirely of steel and timber components, with an asphalt overlay
wearing surface. The bridge has a timber deck on steel girders and floorbeams. The substructure
is entirely composed of timber. Therefore, the bridge will be removed without dropping into the
water. The asphalt wearing surface will be removed prior to demolition without dropping into
the water. During construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal
will be followed.
Compensatory Mitigation: Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for this project.
The additional impacts of 179.4 ft are due to the construction of the floodplain for the low flow
culvert. The new channel will be constructed to match the cross section of the existing channel.
Once the bench is created, streambanks will be vegetated to ensure stability.
The project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical
Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we propose to proceed under a
Nationwide Permit in accordance with Federal Register: January 15, 2002 (Volume 67, Number
10, Pages 2019-2095, by the Corps of Engineers. The provisions of Section 330.4 and appendix
A(C) of these regulations will be followed during construction of the project. It is anticipated
that these activities will be authorized via a Nationwide Permit 23 (Categorical Exclusion) and a
Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering). We anticipate a 401
General Certification number 3361 will apply to this project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0501(a) we are providing two copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their records.
4 If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Chris
Rivenbark at [phone].
Sincerely,
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Manager
PDEA-Office of Natural Environment
WDG/mcr
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
Mr. Len Smith, Division 7 DEO
Mr. Dennis Pipkin, P.E., PDEA

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 23 and 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: F-1
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Mailing Address: Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 3 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 56 on SR 1751 (Fitch Rd.) over Byrd's Creek
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only)
B-3319
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): n/a
4. Location
County: Caswell Nearest Town: Anderson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Anderson, travel
approximately 1.0 mi. north on NC 62, turn right and travel 3.2 mi northeast on SR 1759
(Roscoe Dameron Rd.), turn left and travel 0.7 mi northwest on SR 1751 (Fitch Rd.) to
Bridge No 56 over Byrd's Creek.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N36° 19.075', W79° 19.271'
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
rural highway, forested
7. Property size (acres): approximately 2.4 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Byrd's Creek
9. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 13
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: replacement of Bridge No. 56 on SR 1751
over Bvrd's Creek
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: backhoe, crane, bulldozers,
heavy-dutv trucks
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: forested, pasture
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
n/a
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:
n/a
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 5 of 13
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: n/a
Total area of wetland impact proposed:_
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Site
Number
(indicate on map) Type of
Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
Site 1 fill 249.4 Byrd's Creek 25 feet Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap.
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. l1SGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com.
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Page 6 of 13
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 249.4 feet
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
Site 1 Fill 0.04 Byrd's Creek stream

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Project involves bridge replacement with a double barreled box culvert in approximately the
same location and elevation as the existing bridge with no impacts to wetlands. Waters of the
U.S. will be impacted in order to construct a low-flow channel. An portion of the existing
channel will be excavated to create a new floodplain. Traffic will be maintained on existing
roads during the construction period. Any material that falls into the stream will be removed as
soon as possible as part of the bridge removal process.
Page 7 of 13
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
n/a
Page 8 of 13
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like'to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes F-] No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes F-] No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 9 of 13
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
n/a
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Impervious area will be similar to that of current conditions. The existing bridge is to be replaced
near the existing bridge location and at approximately the same elevation. NCDOT BMP's for
the protection of surface waters will be followed throughout project construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Page 10 of 13
f
Yes No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes F? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
n/a

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 1 1 of 13
I
CASWELL ^ ^ _
COUNTY e?
SEE INSET
.'
BELOW 49
END PROJECT
8-3319
?e5
62 1
1754
1749 1758 BEGIN PROJECT
L55 , r B-3319
? i
1117 ?. 1751 %..? ' /.
j 1752 ? ? , . S, i
1759
c
1753 , /.. - .
1133 .: 1756? r r i
1757
? j
Jericho /1?.1?4 1755 ' f 1759
1172
Fitch 1783
j y 1170
0
i
1
111
d
1001
SCALE
5 0 1 Mile
62
1759 1760 \
1
119
Anderson
1001
Baynes
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CASWELL COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2181201 (B-3319)
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE No.56 ON SR 1751
OVER YRDIS CREEK
SHEET I OF 3/20/01

LEGEND
--•WLB---- WETLAND BOUNDARY
1\0-l b",
Az -k \i WETLAND
WLBI
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
* • DENOTES MECHANIZED
* CLEARING
E- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
- B TOP OF BANK
- WE
- EDGE OF WATER
-- C _- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
---E-- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-A
? , PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
-- NG---NATURAL GROUND
- - PL - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
--EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - - - - WATER SURFACE
XXXXX
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
T:::?
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
0 SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
¦ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
o VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CASWELL COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2481201 (B-3319)
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE No. 56 ON SR 1751
OVER BYRD'S CREEK
SHEET _?n_ OF 6 3/20/•01
Y
i o
z
f I 1
\ ; i ?I 11 ? z ??a
1 ? ., w v
?\\ f I II I Z U BUZZ
Lli cc i >"
:? r I ? I w z 3 a z ?o?l
O O
;'? ?j Y I a
0-4
v o> o
? ? ? `?? Iv o A a o? EMI
1-.. _ O 2?, I I U a
F
` I i w z a w
l ° w
r? 1.Lj) I a 1
,I V 1
v)
I < CL
111 ~ I p I O `I :??? .r +' ^J'- fr. N
r
lod
LL/ V)
° J f-
L °
z W ° N. JQ
O N o LL 3
(n Lu
oa W U
N In i °O t- a
O LL
1 f / i _ / O N
Q
LLJ
301
m j I w' O
301 j I
1 i ti's I I `/
LL,
?. i Cl-
v Lij
ILL Ca
.,; tip. ( ?I I +
In
LO
OZ'S cR?? I ?' x N
,''?Rd 'O I I w v j
N
I I J, O
Li ?? N
N O
r1 O p o
I Q)
z
o z U ?ooA
o
co
wa' ° as
Z w z
D o o wAwa ?.
o
>
~ a
z v o??? C A ap ?
?Tl
Q) U
z ?
\ w
\ J u
\ -? co
F U
I N U Qm
\ U
?m
W I \ U a
Z I 1 O W 0
z
0--W
0
J I ~o
U X V )o
I za.
W W
° CD 1 , 0 m
Q ° Om
CC -
N (oj
CDUJ
co
W I nl Z= Ln
Y
O u-
0 00
cr X I --- ---?\ -i
d W i '?-- -- lnz
-bi
j I ' z C?]
I----?_?• _?Llj
O
I z
j w
a w
/ N J
' a
N
? J
Z Q
/ O u
\ 0
\J O W
/ / O Q 2 >
L
I 0 0
0 C) o
Ln Ln Ln ? m Ln Iq
N CV
L

L?
O O U 8
cl)
U o

a ?*

N 8
W N ?
I
T O

LL °
LL -
- -
m O
0 c(aa $ Z
O
N -

I ° a fn rn
v
N CC Q o
O N
c

O cCa

O e z

m
Z) co
Z O N O
L
U
Q
LL J co z
m
W
U
~
Z
LL
E-
O w
O
N c a; F-
.,x 1 C a. U n o
a wU E C\+ 0 o z

Z
W li 3
a
a N m S ?
3 m o

I- w
O
W
U
,u^'
¢
M c U
w /
U
) 0 m o F
w
ii o w
a:
U)

U o
Q C N N
LL Z O O

V
N C -
.
C C ?O O S
o
U
ui

U
a

o
Q ?
C N
a -°

IL
m S
o
x O
w C
D - - - - - - -

Z
_ ) - - - - - -
J
LL C
a7
W o a? m
E O
0
o
c
v
? c
o
-_ !a O
O O
O
LL > O
U
co
U
a) cr
5m
U N o
2 x
to v
C?
N
O J X
= E co m J
o a Q
~
LL O
J J
H
U
w
in z O

d

Project No. 8.2481201 (B-3319)
Property Owner List
For
Each Site
Site Parcel Name Address
NO. NO. DB and Pg
O Frances W. Talley 2218 Fitch Rd.
DB 235 Pg 819 Burlington, N.C. 27217
John W. McKinney
O DB 246 Pg 57 1543 Vinson Rd.
PB 10 Pg 29 Burlington, N.C. 27215
1
O N. L. Oliver RT. 1 Box 54
DB 93 Pg 487 Yaneyville, N.C. 27379
Paul L. Taylor
O DB 193 Pg 76 2489 Finch Rd.
PB 11 Pg 318 Burlington, N.C. 27215
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CASWELL COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2481201 (B-3319)
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF
BRIDGE No. 56 ON SR 1751
OVER ?YRD'S CREEK
SHEET OF _ 4/24/01
1
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
Federal Project No
A. Project Description:
B-3319
8.2481201
MABRZ-1751(2)
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 56 in Caswell County. Bridge No. 56 carries
Highway SR 1751 over Byrd's Creek. The existing bridge will be replaced with a
2 @ 12 ft by 10 ft reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). The roadway typical
section will have a 22 foot travelway, with at least a 2 foot grassed shoulder on
each side. Traffic will be detoured onto other existing local roads during
construction.
B. Purpose and Need:
The sufficiency rating of the existing bridge is only 16.3 out of 100.0.
Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is neither practical nor economical.
For these reasons, the bridge needs to be replaced.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g.,
parking, weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (311 and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn
lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage
pipes, including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including
the installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median
barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the
construction of grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad
crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach
slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint),
scour repair, fender systems, and minor structural
improvements
dO Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited
use of right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant
adverse impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas
used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where
such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located
on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus
and support vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of
users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high
M
2
activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected
bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there
is no significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a
limited number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a
CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of
alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction
projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project
development on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has
been completed.
D. Special Project Information
Construction Coordination:
Construction of TIP project B-3131 (SR 1736) will be coordinated with
B-3319 (SR 1751) in order to avoid closure of both roads simultaneously.
Environmental Commitments:
1. All standard measures will be implemented to avoid or minimize environmental
impacts. The NCDOT's "Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface
Waters" shall be adhered to.
2. In accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(33 U.S.C. 1344) a permit will be required from the Corps of Engineers for the
discharge of dredged or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Corps of
Engineers Nationwide Permit # 23 will be applicable for this project.
3. A North Carolina Division of Water Quality Section 401 Water Quality General
Certification will be obtained prior to issue of the Corps of Engineers Nationwide
Permit # 23.
Estimated Costs:
Total Construction Cost $400,000
Right-of-Way and Utilities 46,500
Total Project Cost $446,500
3
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 300 VPD
Year 2025 - 500 VPD
Proposed Typical Roadway Section:
The approach roadway will be 22 feet wide with at least a 2 foot grassed
shoulder on each side. Shoulder width will be increased to at least 5 feet where
guardrail is warranted.
Design Speed:
The design speed will be 60 mph.
Functional Classification:
SR 1751 is classified as a Rural Local facility in the Statewide Functional
Classification System.
Division Office Comments:
The Division Engineer supports road closure and replacement at the existing
location. The Division Engineer also requested that construction of TIP project
B-3131 (SR 1736) be coordinated with B-3319 (SR 1751) in order to avoid closure
of both roads simultaneously.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions.
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? ? X
(2) Does the project involve any habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? F1 X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish?
? X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-third (1/3) acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takin
s been evaluated?
X ?
g

4
(5) Will the project require use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ?
X

(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
-
impacted by proposed construction activities? F
1 X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ? X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? ? X

PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AECP ? X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources? ? X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
F-1
X

(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? ? X
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? ? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? ? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? F X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or ? X
low-income population?
5
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X ?
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control? ? X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? _X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/ or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X ?
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? ? X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing

roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? ?
X_
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility) X ?
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility?
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic and
environmental grounds concerning aspects of the action? F1 X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws

relating to the environmental aspects of the project?
X ?
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
F-1
important to history or pre-history? -

(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? F1 X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act F-1 X
of 1965, as amended?
6
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the natural Wild and Scenic Rivers? ? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
None.
G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-3319
State Project No. 8.2481201
Federal Project No. MABRZ-1751(2)
Project Description:
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 56 in Caswell County. Bridge No. 56 carries
Highway SR 1751 over Byrd's Creek. The existing bridge will be replaced with a
2 @ 12 ft by 10 ft reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC). The roadway typical
section will have a 22 foot travelway, with at least a 2 foot grassed shoulder on
each side. Traffic will be detoured onto other existing local roads during
construction.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
X TYPE II(A)
TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Date Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Date Project Planning Unit Head
Planning and Environmental Branch
Date Project Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Not Required
Date Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
8
. -N

Caswell County
Replace Bridge No. 56 on SR 1751
over Byrd's Creek
B-3319
Flume One

...?Alu
c - ?rC?
Mn
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
April 22, 1998
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Bridge 56 on SR 1751 over Country Line Creek,
Caswell County, B-331 9, Federal Aid Project
MABRZ-1751 (2), State Project 8.2481 201, ER
98-8598
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
We regret staff was unable to attend the scoping meeting for the above project on
March 26, 1998. However, Debbie Bevin met with Dennis Pipkin of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) on April 1 5, 1 998, to discuss the
project and view the project photographs and aerial.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ???
Nicholas L. Graf
4/22/98, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely, ?J
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: H. F. Vick
B. Church
T. Padgett
you have questions
Gledhill- Earley, environmental
v STA7{
K 4
V?
•? Pun ?'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
January 14, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
Wayne Elliott, P.E., Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Unit
E. NoR is TOLSON
SECRETARY
Chris Rivenbark, Natural Systems Specialist Ov-
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Natural Resources Technical Report for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 56 on SR 1751 over Byrd's
Creek in Caswell County. Federal Aid Project No.
MABRZ-1751(2), State Project No. 8.2481201,
TIP No. B-3319.
ATTENTION: Dennis Pipkin, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
Bridge Replacement Unit
The attached Natural Resources Technical Report (NRTR) provides
inventories and descriptions of natural resources within the project area to assist
in preparation of a Categorical Exclusion. Estimations of impacts likely to occur
to these resources as a result of project construction are provided as well. If you
have any questions please feel free to contact me at 733-9513
CC'
Phil Harris, P.E., Unit Head, Natural Systems Unit
File: B-3319

Replacement of Bridge No. 56 on SR 1751 over Byrd's Creek in
Caswell County
Natural Resources Technical Report
T.I.P. No. B-3319
State Project No. 8.2481201
F.A. Project No. MABRZ-1751(2)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Natural Systems Unit
Chris Rivenbark, Natural Systems Specialist
January 14, 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 1
1.2 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................
1.3 TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS .................................................................................. 1
1.4 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................ 2
2.1 WATER RESOURCES ...................................................................................................
2.2 SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 3
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 3
3.1 TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................ 4
3.2 SUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED IMPACTS ............................................................................ 4
3 .2.1 Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities ................................................. 5
3 .2.2 Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources ........................................................... 5
4.0 JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS ..................................................................................... 6
4.1 WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES ................................................................................. 6
4 .1.1 Permits ................................................................................................................ 6
4.2 FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES ................................................................................ 7
4.3 FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN AND STATE LISTED SPECIES ........................................ 8
5.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 9
LIS T OF TABLES
TABLE 1. SOILS OCCURRING IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA ................................................... 3
TABLE 2. ESTIMATED TERRESTRIAL IMPACTS TO COMMUNITIES ............................................. 5
TABLE 3. FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR CASWELL COUNTY ....................................... 8
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following Natural Resources Technical Report is submitted to assist in
preparation of a Categorical Exclusion.
1.1 Project Description
The proposed project calls for the replacement of bridge No. 56 over Byrd's
Creek. Two 3.7 m X 3.1 m (12.0 ft X 10.0 ft) reinforced concrete box culverts will be
used to cross the creek. The proposed right-of-way is 18.2 m (60 ft). Project length is
approximately 61.0 m (200.0 ft). Traffic will be detoured during construction using other
existing local roads.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to describe and inventory the natural resources
identified within the project vicinity and estimate potential impacts to these resources.
Recommendations are made for measures which will minimize resource impacts.
These descriptions and estimates are relevant only in the context of existing design
concepts. If preliminary design parameters change, an additional field investigation
may be necessary.
1.3 Terminology and Definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms are used concerning the
limits of natural resources investigated. Project study area denotes the area bounded
by the proposed right-of-way limits. Project vicinity describes an area extending 0.8
km (0.5 mi) on all sides of the project study area. Project region is equivalent to an
area represented by a 7.5 minute USGS quadrangle map [163.3 sq km (61.8 sq mi)],
with the project as the center point.
1.4 Methodology
Prior to the site visit, published resource information pertaining to the project
vicinity was gathered and reviewed. Information sources include; U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) quadrangle maps (Anderson), NCDOT aerial photographs of project
study area (1:1200), Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of protected species and
N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database of uncommon and protected
species and unique habitats.
A field survey for the project was conducted on November 12,1998 by NCDOT
Natural Systems Specialists Chris Rivenbark, Logan Williams, and Tim Savidge. Plant
communities were identified and recorded. Wildlife was identified using a number of
observation techniques, including habitat evaluation, active searching and recording
identifying signs of wildlife (sounds, tracks and burrows).
1
2.0 PHYSICAL RESOURCES
Water and soil resources, which occur in the study area, are discussed below.
The availability of water and soils directly influence composition and distribution of flora
and fauna in any biotic community.
2.1 Water Resources
Field surveys revealed that one surface water is located within the project study
area. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has assigned index numbers for streams
and tributaries in North Carolina. One perennial stream in the Roanoke River Basin,
Byrd's Creek [DWQ Index No. 22-56-7-3-(1) is crossed by SR 1751. This stream
carries a Best Usage Classification of Class C. Class C refers to waters suitable for
aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture.
At the time of the field visit, Byrd's Creek had no water in the channel. Isolated
puddles approximately 5.1 cm (2.0 in) deep were scattered in the stream bed. The
average channel width was approximately 6.1 m (20 ft). The substrate consisted of
sand, silt, cobble, and boulder.
Point sources refers to discharges that enter surface water through a pipe, ditch,
or other defined points of discharge. The term most commonly refers to discharges
associated with wastewater treatment plants. Point source dischargers located
throughout North Carolina are permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program. Any discharger is required to register for a
permit. There are no permitted dischargers located within1.6 km (1.0 mi) upstream of
the project study area.
Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater
flow or no defined point of discharge. There are many types of land use activities that
can serve as sources of nonpoint source pollution including land development,
construction, crop production, animal feeding lots, failing septic systems, landfills,
roads, and parking lots. Sediment and nutrients are major pollution-causing
substances associated with nonpoint source pollution. Others include fecal coliform
bacteria, heavy metals, oil and grease, and any other substance that may be washed
off the ground or removed from the atmosphere and carried into surface waters
The DWQ has initiated a whole basin approach to water quality management for
the 17 river basins within the state. To accomplish this goal the DWQ collects
biological, chemical and physical data that can be used in basinwide assessment and
planning. All basins are reassessed every five years. Prior to the implementation of the
basinwide approach to water quality management, the Benthic Macroinvertebrate
Ambient Network (managed by the DWQ) assessed water quality by sampling for
benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites throughout the state.
2
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by DWQ
and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses
long term trends in water quality. The program assesses water quality by sampling for
selected benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Some
macroinvertebrates are sensitive to very subtle changes in water quality; thus, the
species richness and overall biomass of these organisms are reflections of water
quality. There are no BMAN sites within the project vicinity.
2.2 Soils and Topography
A Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey has not been completed
for Caswell County. A general description of the soils that are present in the project
study area was provided by the Caswell County Soil Conservation Office. Both Enon
and Mecklenburg soils found within the project form on broad and narrow ridges and
side slopes.
Table 1. Soils occurring in the project study area.
Map Unit Mapping Unit Permeability Slope (%) Drainage Hydric
Symbol Class
EnB Enon slowly 2-8 well non-hydric
permeable drained
MkB Mecklenburg slowly 2-8 well non-hydric
permeable drained
Caswell County is located in the uppermost center of the Piedmont
physiographic region of the state. The elevation at the project study area ranges from
approximately 152.4 m-158.5 m (500.0-520.0 ft) above mean sea level.
3.0 BIOTIC RESOURCES
This section describes the ecosystems encountered and the relationships
between vegetative and faunal components within terrestrial, and aquatic ecosystems.
Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented where applicable in the context of
plant community classifications (Schafale and Weakley, 1990).
Representative animal species which are likely to occur in these habitats are
cited. Animals observed during the site visit are denoted by (*) in the text. Sightings of
spoor evidence are equated with sightings of individuals. Scientific nomenclature and
common names (when applicable) are used for plant and animal species described.
Subsequent references to the same organism will include the common name only.
3
3.1 Terrestrial Communities
Two terrestrial communities, maintained roadside and piedmont alluvial forest,
exist within the project study area, and will be impacted by the subject project. The
maintained roadside community consists of the highly maintained shoulders and some
less intensively managed areas that grade into the surrounding natural communities.
Significant soil disturbance and compaction, along with frequent mowing or herbicide
application, keep this community in an early successional state.
Dominant plants in the heavily maintained portions of the roadside community
include fescue (Festuca sp.), and plantain (Plantago sp.). In the areas which receive
lower levels of maintenance, more diverse communities can develop. This community
was populated by ebony spleen wort (Asplenium platyneuron), yellow jessamine
(Gelsemium sempervirens), panic grass (Panicum scoparium), and greenbrier (Smilax
spp.).
The piedmont alluvial forest community included herb and vine species such as
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), goldenrod (Solidago altissima), Japanese
grass (Microstegium virmineum), rabbit tobacco (Gnaphalium obtusifolium), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). Trees found in this area include tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), river birch (Betula
nigra), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), dogwood (Cornus
florida), and sweet gum (Liriodendron tulipifera).
Wildlife found in these communities are limited and consists primarily of
wide-ranging, adaptable species which are well suited to coexistence with human
development. Mammals common to disturbed edge areas, such as eastern cottontail
rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus), and gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) may inhabit forested fringes. The
most common reptiles found in such habitats are eastern box turtle (Terrapene
carolina), predators such as black racer (Coluber constrictor), and eastern garter snake
(Thamnophis sirtalis).
. Birds likely to frequent such habitats include common crow (Corvus
brachyrhynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), mourning dove (Zenaida
macroura), and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Freshwater fishes likely to be
found in creeks such as Byrd's Creek may include bluehead chub (Hybopsis
leptocephala), cresent shiner (Notopis cerasinus), and creek chub (Semotilus
atromaculatus).
3.2 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on the biotic
resources described. This section quantifies and qualifies potential impacts to the
natural communities within the project study area in terms of the area impacted and the
4
organisms affected. Temporary versus permanent impacts are considered as well,
along with recommendations to minimize or eliminate impacts.
3.2.1 Anticipated Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Impacts to terrestrial communities will result from project construction due to the
clearing and paving of portions of the project study area, and thus the loss of
community area. Calculated quantitative impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the
relative abundance of each community present in the study area (Table 2). Estimated
impacts are derived based on the project length of 61 m (200 ft.). The entire right-of-
way
18.3 m (60 ft) was used for this calculation. The entire right-of-way will probably not be
impacted, therefore actual impacts to the communities may be considerably less.
Table 2. Estimated terrestrial impacts to communities.
Community type Estimated impacts
Maintained roadside 0.09 ha 0.24 ac
Piedmont alluvial forest 0.02 ha 0.04 ac
Total 0.11 ha (0.28 ac)
Flora and fauna occurring in these communities are generally common
throughout North Carolina because of their adaptability to wide ranging environmental
factors. Moreover, a similar roadside shoulder community will be re-established after
construction. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities should repopulate
areas suitable for the species following project completion. As a result, it is unlikely that
existing species will be displaced significantly from the project study area following
construction. However, to minimize the temporary effects of project construction, all
cleared areas along the roadways should be revegetated promptly after project
completion to minimize erosion and the loss of wildlife habitat.
3.2.2 Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Outstanding Resource
Waters (ORW), or Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of
project study area, however impacts will occur to Byrd's Creek.
Estimated impacts to Byrd's Creek will be approximately 0.01 ha (0.03 ac).
Impacts are calculated by using the width of the stream channel [6.1 m (20 ft)] and the
entire right-of-way 18.3 m (60 ft). The entire right-of-way will probably not be impacted,
therefore actual impacts to the stream may be considerably less.
Aquatic communities are sensitive to any changes in the environment. Any
action that affects water quality can have an adverse impact on aquatic organisms.
Although most of the disturbance caused by project construction will be temporary,
some environmental impacts caused by the proposed project will be long term or
5
irreversible. Installation or modification of instream structures, such as replacement or
extension of culverts, can permanently affect many physical stream parameters.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
- Increased silt loading and sedimentation from erosion of disturbed soils.
- Changes in light incidence, water clarity and water temperature due to increased
sediment load and riparian vegetation removal.
- Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in surface or
ground water drainage patterns.
- Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and oil from
construction equipment and other vehicles.
Precautions must be taken to minimize these and other impacts to water
resources in the study area. NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMP) for the
Protection of Surface Waters must be strictly enforced throughout the construction
stage of the project.
4.0 JURISDICTIONAL TOPICS
This section provides inventories and impact analyses pertinent to two significant
regulatory issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected species. These
issues retain particular significance because of federal and state mandates which
regulate their protection. This section deals specifically with the impact analyses
required to satisfy regulatory authority prior to project construction.
4.1 Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the
United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part
328.3. Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or
wetlands falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Surface waters are waters used
in interstate or foreign commerce, waters subject to the ebb and flow of tides, all
interstate waters including interstate wetlands, and all other waters such as intrastate
lakes, rivers, and streams. Surface waters include all standing or flowing waters which
have commercial or recreational value to the public.
4.1.1 Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated from the proposed
project. As a result, construction activities will require permits and certifications from
various regulatory agencies in charge of protecting the water quality of public waters
resources.
6
A Nationwide Permit 23 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (23) is likely to be applicable
for the crossing of Laurel Creek. This permit authorizes construction provided the
following conditions are met:
• the width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the actual crossing;
• the fill place in Waters of the United States is limited to a filled area of no more than
0.45 ha (1.0 ac);
• no more than a total of 45.7 m (150 linear ft) of the fill for the roadway can occur in
special aquatic sites, including wetlands;
• the crossing is culverted, bridged or otherwise designed to prevent the restriction of,
and to withstand, expected high flows and tidal flows and movement of aquatic
organisms, and;
• the crossing, including all attendant features, both temporary and permanent, is part
of a single and complete project for crossing of Waters of the United States.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ
prior to the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or
licensed activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. Section
401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of
the construction or other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401 permit from the
DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
4.2 Federally Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of
decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human activities.
Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a species classified as
federally protected, be subject to review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened
(T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under
provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. An endangered species is considered to be a species that is in danger of
becoming extinct throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A threatened
species is considered to be a species that is likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
As of 14 May 1998, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) does not list any
federally protected species for Caswell County. Therefore, this project will not impact
any federally protected species.
7
4.3 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are two Federal Species of Concern (FSC) listed for Caswell County.
Federal Species of Concern are not afforded federal protection under the ESA and are
not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed
or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Federal Species of Concern are defined as
those species which may or may not be listed in the future.
These species were formally candidate species, or species under consideration
for listing for which there was insufficient information to support a listing of Endangered,
Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are
listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Significantly Rare (SR) or Special Concern
(SC) by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) list of rare plant and
animal species are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act
and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979. However the
level of protection given to state listed species does not apply to NCDOT activities.
Table 3 lists Federal Species of Concern and State listed species, the species
state status and the existence of suitable habitat for each species in the study area.
This species list is provided for information purposes as the status of these species may
be upgraded in the future.
TahlP 3 Federal Species of Concern for Caswell Countv.
Scientific Name Common Name Habitat status
Isoetes virginica Virginia quillwort No C
Lotus helleri Heller's trefoil Yes C
Note:
"C" denotes Candidate (a species which is very rare in North Carolina, generally
with 1-20 populations in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by
habitat destruction. If these species are relocated in the state, or if present land
use trends continue, they are likely to be listed as Endangered or Threatened).
Surveys for these species were not conducted during the site visit. A review of
the N.C. Natural Heritage Program database of the rare species and unique habitats on
January 12, 1999 did not reveal any records of North Carolina rare and/or protected
species in or near the project study area.
8

5.0 REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L. 1997. Natural Heritage Program list of the rare plant species of North
Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDEHNR.
Fish, F.F. 1969. A Catalog of the Inland Fishing Waters of North Carolina. North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. The Graphic Press, Inc.
LeGrand, Jr., H.E. and S.P. Hall. 1997. Natural Heritage Program list of the rare animal
species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and
Reptiles of the Carolinas and Virginia. Chapel Hill, The University of North
Carolina Press.
Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States, 3rd ed. John Wiley
and Sons, Inc.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill,
The University of North Carolina Press.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and G.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.
Rohde, F.C., R.G. Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of
the Carolinas, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. The University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina. Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDEHNR.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Endangered, Threatened, and Candidate Species
and Federal Species of Concern in North Carolina
Webster, W.D., J.F. Parnell and W.C. Biggs, Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas,
Virginia, and Maryland. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.
Chapel Hill and London.
9
IF INCORRECT RETURN TO
Warrant NO. 1347652 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Date 09-26-2002
RALEIGH. NC 27699-1515 43381 0682 003
INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE
PURCHASE ORD

OR CONTRACT

INVOICE AMOUNT

(-) DISCOUNT

(+) FREIGHT

NET AMOUNT

I 09-24-2002 475.00 475.00
3.0
la '

?p