20021692 Ver 1_Complete File_20021017

?aM
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Mrs. Jean Manuele
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761
(Two Copies)
Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
(Courtesy Copies - Three)
021692
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
r
OCT)Z
r
SUBJECT: Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge 31 on David Moore Road (SR 1584)
across Buttermilk Creek. W. 0. Currently N/A.
To Whom It May Concern:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace exiting 1 @ 18', 1
@ 17', 1 @ 18'timber deck bridge identified as Bridge 31 with a 1 @ 25', 1 @ 40', 1 @ 25'cored
slab bridge. This activity will result in the placement of new bents outside the channel and
dewatering. The NCDOT anticipates that the new bent placement will be authorized under
Nationwide Permit 3 and the dewatering operations will be authorized under NWP 33. This
application is intended as a request for formal written authorization from the USACE to place new
bents on the stream bank under NWP 3; and dewater the stream under NWP 33. This application is
also intended to provide a courtesy copy to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. The
following information is being provided to satisfy Nationwide Permit Condition 13 (Federal Register
January 15, 2002).
1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
October 11, 2002
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
Road Name SR Number Structure Number
David Moore Road 1584 Bridge 31
River Basin: DIDQ Stream Name

Cape Fear 16-14-15 Buttermilk Creek
Buffer Rules' Buffer Rule Conditions Water Quality
where applicable) Designation
No Not Applicable WS-II NWS
Protected Species Presentb CAMA Essential Fishery Habitat
AEC
No No No
'Separate documentation attached as needed: ° See the attached Endangered Species Review Sheet for further
information.
STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT INFORMATION
Existing 1 @ 18', 1 @ IT, 1 @ 18'timber Proposed 1 @25', 1 @40', 1 @
Structure deck bride Structure 25'cored slab bridge
Construction In channel diversion. Dewatering ABC aggregate
Method Device*
Burial Depth Not Applicable - Bottomless Survey Plan September 17, 2002
Structure. Date
Construction June 2003 Duration 4 months
Date
Impacts ft. 100-temporary
Temporary Temporary impacts include the placement of cofferdams to dewater the
Impacts construction area and remove the existing in bents located within the stream.
Restoration Within 15 working days of the activity, all temporary structures (cofferdams
Plan and silt screens) will be entirely removed and natural stream contours will be
restored and seeded.
Special No.
Conditions
*A less intrusive dewatering device may be used in lieu of the one proposed.
MINIMIZATION INFORMATION
Impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of
surface waters and wetlands, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of
the US, and coordination with the Division Environmental Officer.
-2-
MITIGATION INFORMATION
Stream mitigation is not anticipated, as the stream bottom will not be permanently impacted as a
result of this project.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
Enclosed please find the Pre-construction Notification Form and supporting documentation for the
above referenced project. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please
contact Dennis Johnson at [phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and effort
are appreciated.
Sincerely, '
Mr. J. . Mills, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division 7
cc: Mr. Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Dennis Johnson, Bridge Maintenance Engineer
Mr. Donald Pearson, Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer
Mr. J.L. Cornell, Bridge Maintenance Supervisor, Alamance and Orange County
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
-3-
Office Use Only: OGA 1V c n 7FLu Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3 & 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. J M Mills P E Division Engineer - Division 7
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 14996
Greensboro. NC
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mmillsgdot state nc us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Not Applicable
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Pagel of 8
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1 Name of project: Replacement of Rockingham County Bridge 73
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Currently Not Available
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Not Applicable
4. Location
County: Alamance Nearest Town: Elon College
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not Applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
The project is located north of Elon College.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 36.2188740° N 79.4739899° W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Not Applicable
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Buttermilk Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Floodplain forest and successional old field.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project will involve the replacement a structurally deficient bridge with a bridge
Equipment used will be standard road construction equipment trackhoe, grader, backhoe,
bulldozer, and crane).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To replace a structurally deficient structure.
Structural modifications are being; made to bring the existing; structure up to standard
Veications.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Not Applicable
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Not Applicable
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Temporary stream impacts will result
from placement of cofferdams and siltscreens within the channel. Within 15 working days of the
activity all temporaU structures (cofferdams and silt screens) will be entirely removed and
natural stream contours will be restored and seeded.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
yes/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciuae, out are not urmtea w: mecntu MCU ta=llug, gmu"%,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For darns, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online athttp://www.fema.Qov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Not Applicable
Total area of wetland impact proposed: Not Applicable
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream -
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(pleasespecify)
Bridge 31 replacement Bdg 100(tmp) Buttermilk Creek 13' Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts include, lain are not immea to: ctuverts and associaLeu np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapyuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 100- temporary (tmp).
Page 4 of 8
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: nit, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Not Applicable
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Not Applicable
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed activity is being conducted to replace a structurally deficient structure and insure
the public safety. Temporary impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best
Management Practices for the protection of wetland and surface waters, restrictions against the
staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination with the Division
Environmental Officer.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.tic.i.is/ncwetlan.ds/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
A finding of insignificant impact is anticipated, therefore a mitigation plan is not provided
Permanent impacts will result only from the placement new bents on the bank of the stream.
No Outstanding Resource Waters federally--protected species or their habitats or essential
fishery habitats occur in the project area The proiect is located in a High Quality Water.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Not Applicable
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Not Applicable
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Applicable
cable
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Appli
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Applicable
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* s uImpact arre feet) Multiplier MiRequired
ati n
1 N/A 3
2 N/A 1.5
Total N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Not Applicable
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The proposed activity involves the replacement of an existing structure with no addition to the
travel lane, therefore the percent new impervious surface equals 0%. To minimize stormwater
discharges no deck drains will be constructed over open water. Stormwater from the bridge will
be funneled and discharged from each ends of the bridge.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not Applicable
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
,() -//-D L
A cant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's 4iinature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
NATURAL RESOURCE EVALUATION SHEET
FOR STRUCTURES
State Project # Structure Number Road Name SR Number County Investigator(s)
Not Available Bridge 31 Davicd Moore Road Alamance Len Smith
Date: Stream Name DWQ ID. Stream Type River Basin:
10/10/02 Buttermilk Creek 16-14-5 Perennial Cape Fear
Water Quality
Designation Buffer Rules (Type) High Quality or Rare Wetlands Federally Threatened or
Endangered Species
WS-H NSW Not Applicable No No
Profile Information
Location Width (OHIM Depth (OBEWM) Width TOB Depth OB
Upstream 11' 1.5' 13' 4.5'
Downstream 15' 1.5' 18' 6.0'
AVERAGE 13'
OHWM = Measurements made from Ordinary
Top of the Bank 1.5' 15.5' 5.3'
High Water Marker, TOB = Measurements made from the
General Notes/Comments:
i'----
Division Environmental Officer
October 10, 2002
Date
ENDANGERED SPECIES REVIEW FOR DIVISION 7
DISTRICT 1
State Project # Structure Road Name SR Number County
Not Available Bridge 31 David Moore Road (1584 Alamance
Alamance County
No Endangered or Threatened Species are listed.
Orange County
River Basin: N/A
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Cane Creek (Cape Fear Basin) Area.
Is the activity within the primary or secondary zone Yes ? No
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) May be surveyed for from June to September
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) May be surveyed for from May to October
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) May surveyed for from May to June
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
Dwarf Wedge Mussel (Alasmodonta heterodon) - Neuse Basin
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
James spinymussel (Pleurobema collina) - Roanoke Basin
Habitat Survey Date Investigator(s) Man-hours Comments/Findings
N/A
General Notes/Comments:
October 10, 2002
Division Environmental Officer Date
E "tt If // ![ f r Y y (? # \?iI38d (i•! i?4 S a `1
S °5
CP.rn
? ;) i ti ? _ f `// r? -.,? i '? ,•.'?.../r ? F 73J`, !r { d ? , t I ?\ \. _ t i r' ia? -? ` _
`''\?\\\ i:fr ;? ti '\ rC:'? t?•-- E,fr-1, ir% \? \-/.-•.?I? 1, 'I \\?, \ i
1, V ?• \y f jai, .' I ?/ -'?.r nltJ\
j
J 1 1
/tii ?? 'I??? .. :?f\"-' frg?/,•,r'"_,.-??r`?l/'}i- _
ri, 1\,;/-' 1' I i??, ' ", / r` r ?: i ,/- .???f"_ 1{ it ' % f.;, , /.
r 1 ! rr I - iii` i/ 1 rJ?? 4 \
6.5
'- 699r
%'r
! // 1 J y'(/I J U d
t \
J
_..?? ! r ?' S1? }? \,\?•` ??o"?', t +` i? --{ .1( ? U r\ I 7 y f i,5 l1 \, r?.. 'l +? J t f;j ?
\ ` \\
I Ly 63 s f fl f \ 1 1 i l', l ! ?9Lr t \\` •IS j1. ' ?l r
s \,
`f \ '1 i
/~\ r?\ \ -? (-. f?' . ?,/r•LZ' i # ! ', 4 ? r'r t/ ? / I .! ?, I I e .? ? ? •? 660 J?...J ri
WrX \.+?N?.? ` I? ° J/- ? ?16t i ?._ r i •".. ( fl i I r/ ' .'q .t.`\." \`+n."- '`:. \.. '`-? . TI-S$J J,,//?
/?, \\,\1. `.;N)`•, t1 ??^ ?' \ 999\ \' i ?\ nr? w
r?1 , 6?!/.:jam •",? _ .
,Z''`1, 4._J' (i 6rk1 ``?`• C cY ?.? , ?i \ ? i I / - ?'.
I f ?
y?JC+I oayCrk
? ?- i fJ>>
-I1,r ln-""\ f r,, r'i ? J frr , `J? 5 1+T/:' ?, r ,'{/rrll,' r ` / \ .. •-/ .a. I? / t. ;.
/ '??! rid\! r-?O < thi1F ? 1)! -\ 1(i,,, / •,??
t ?
/r z r,--.. ? ` ?? 'I l r a,?, lr , 1 rT
••^ , ``? j. ?.? ? .. '..,)t 1 -, r 14 r \ , `?,.rA•LJ rrf:` / i??? .. !' ? ? `?` ? ? 7r'l b`?
i 4; •
4./ r .i I_ ,\ l ?- 1 I ?r ?,3;? I?U f ! t / \I .'? t ? :-. ..: ?r_
-, Jr ? r! ,/ tS #,al. 7?a 1 r. ?. t\ ? r /., , ? ipsf,? i•. ,.
\ l'y'j
Ax, NJ
J'o
, r
8° W [ fJ !fit - 60 Name: LAKE BURLINGTON Location: 036.2188740° N 079.4739899° W
Date: 10/10/2002 Caption: Location of hamance Bridge 31
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Copyright (C) 1997, Wptech, Inc.
View immediately upstream from Alamance Bridge 31.
View one (facing north) of the substructure for Alamance Bridge 31.
View two (facing west) of the substructure for Alamance Bridge 31.
View three (facing south) of the substructure for Alamance Bridge 31.
View (facing north) of the superstructure for Alamance Bridge 31.
PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS

STATE PROD. NO. F.A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
RIVER BASIN:----CAPE- FEAR-
WATER QUALITY CRITERIA:
YES NO
STREAM CROSSING BLUE LINE ON USGS In 0
ORW 00 0
WSI M O
WS 11,111 OR IV, CROSSING WITHIN 0.5mi OF W.S. CRITICAL AREA O C]
ROADWAY CRITERIA:
ROUTE DESIGNATION- YES NO
ARTERIAL URBAN D C]
ARTERIAL RURAL D C7
YES NO
IS A HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN REQUIRED? = CR
0 DENOTES ROD SOUNDING
i
ITI ii-I'l = ?_? .,;f;-; -I -1 11
??(((1111(iflICIII'i?1?`-11 A
0
0 0
-< o
c
co cn cn :;o
u n r0 n C?
-C?, WD ONZ
?I oo r - --i

n
N in D
O n

_
?. L0„ D
u
o
v

0
? a

(.n
cn
0
0

cf) (n V' V'

p00 ii ii C--)
O?lOz
?Lo
n
N W
D
_ N r

U
0
fV
T

?1
d_ vi
0
w

1".
,.a
-o
O
u
°
a
0 F-
-u °
Qo
C)j
? N
G7
N
D
V
o
0
Cl) O
C) O
v
O
00 Q0 O
Co 0 0
vi
z
O
-I
m
Oz
rO
n
m
0(-)
? 7?
rno
z?
? D
D z
m
- U) -
D
^? O
I?.1W
O
O
r?
N
Ln
O
m
0
CA
r
D
co
-T,
c
z
z
m
F-
R°
-n
c
z
Z
m
F
0
I?
z

7\- O
CD

Co

D
CD
I
?
l
?t
I
?
D
N

?m
x
`fix ?
-X-X- O D
- m
N
Cyl (A
C)
o ?J
-
0 O m
n
0 0
=I
O ?C
M F

I CD M
D
o

-9