20020531 Ver 1_Complete File_20020403

- - - .
des5U7Eo
Q V+w?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
March 28, 2002
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN: Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
R n..
;PR 32002
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
020531
SUBJECT: COURTESY COPY - WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION NOT REQUESTED
Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge # 90 on Phillips Chapel Road (SR 2151)
across Meadow Creek. F.A. # 5.4752.
Please find a courtesy copy of a Pre-Construction Notification Application package submitted to the
US Army Corps of Engineers in fulfillment of the "Notification" condition for Nationwide Permit # 3
and 33. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Dennis Johnson
at [phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and assistance are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mrs. Jean Manuele, USACE
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
d.?SfNE??
y.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
March 28, 2002
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTN: Mrs. Jean Manuele
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Mrs. Manuele:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge # 90 on Phillips Chapel Road (SR 2151)
across Meadow Creek. F.A. # 5.4752.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing
1@23'6 timber deck bridge identified as Bridge # 90 with a 28' X 8' Con Span with Endwalls. The
existing bridge is being replaced due to structural deficiencies. The footings from the proposed Con
Span are being located within the same footprints as the bents of the bridge being replaced; therefore,
no new fill will be placed in Meadow Creek. Temporary impacts will result from the placement of
ABC cofferdams are less intrusive dewatering devices on the streamside of the existing bridge bents
to facilitate removal of the existing bridge bents and placement of the new Con Span footings. The
maximum length of each cofferdam is 60-feet giving a total temporary impact of 120 feet. The
dewatering structures used will not stop channel flow. Within 15 working days of the Con Span
placement, all dewatering structures will be entirely removed, and natural stream contours will be
restored and seeded.
The project is not located in a High Quality Water. The project will not impact an Essential Fisheries
Habitat. No Threatened or Endangered species or habitats were observed during a field survey
conducted on March 14, 2001 by Len Smith. Historic compliance work to be scheduled and
concurrence with the Historic Preservation Office will be obtained if required. Direct and secondary
impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition Removal and Protection of Surface Waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment
in or adjacent to waters of the US, and coordination with the Division Environmental Officer.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
-+ 6f SLUE0R
r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTNMNT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
The NCDOT anticipates that this activity will be authorized under Nationwide Permits (NWPs) 3
and 33. This application is intended as a request for formal written authorization from the USACE
to place cofferdams in the stream under NWP 33. This application is also intended to notify the NC
Division of Water Quality of activities being conducted under General Water Quality
Certificates3376 (NWP 3) and 3366 (NWP 33). Enclosed please find the project site map and the
pre-construction notification form for the above referenced project. Construction is anticipated to
begin in spring 2003 and take 2 months to complete.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Dennis Johnson at (336)
375-5589 or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and assistance are appreciated.
Sincerely,
<?41217 2
"
42
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
e+4A7tu?
y ?-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTWNT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 28, 2002
State Historic Preservation Officer
Division of Archives History
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
CS-52-31-31
ATTN: Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Dear Mrs. Gledhill-Earley:
SUBJECT: Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge # 90 on Phillips Chapel Road (SR 2151)
across Meadow Creek. F.A. # 5.4752.
Please find a Pre-Construction Notification Application package attached for you review. If you
have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Dennis Johnson at (336) 375-
5589 or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and assistance are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mrs. Jean Manuele, USACE
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Office Use Only' Form Version October 2001
020531
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 3 & 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. J M Mills PE Division Engineer - Division 7
Mailing Address: 1584 Yanceyyille Street
Greensboro NC 27415
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mmills@a dot state nc us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Lenwood E Smith; II PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT - Division 7
Mailing Address: 1584 Yanceyyille Street
Greensboro NC 27415
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: lesmith@a dot state nc us
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge # 90 - Alamance County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 5.4752 (non-TIP)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Alamance Nearest Town: Burlington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Proceed west on I-85/40 take exit
148 onto NC 54 East Proceed 4.42 miles on NC-54 and turn riaht onto SR 2153 (Bruce
Wood Road) Proceed 0.50 miles on SR 2153 and turn left onto SR 2151 (Phillips Chanel
Road) Proceed 1.2 miles to Bridge 90
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 17 06 51 973 E 00 39 84 721 N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Maintained highwgy right-of-way
7. Property size (acres):
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Meadow Creek
9. River Basin: Cape Fear -
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps .)
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Replace the existing 1(x23'6 timber deck
bridge identified as Bridge # 60 with a 28' X 8' Con Span with Endwall. The existing bridge
is being replaced due to structural deficiencies.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Crane and Road construction
equipment.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Forest
IV. Prior Project History
if jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A

----?--"? ------ ?J:_.. All
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciuae, our are not umneo to. mudumizcu 0cwu,r, 61autur,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hgp:HN%i%ly. feiiia.sov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leases eci fy)

Bridge 90 Placement of
temporary
dewatering
structures
120 (tmp)
Meadow Creek
15'
Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
%,,Nv •. uses. sov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., xv%vw.tonozone.com,
%tiuw.manquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 120-temporary (tmn)
running parallel to the channel
Page 4 of 8
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. impacts mciude, but are not urmiea to: un, excavaucu, wCuguig,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically. describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts to waters will be minimized by replacing the existing 24-foot long single span bridge
with a 28 foot wide Con Span. Use of the Con Span will facilitate replacement of the existing
bridge with a structure that spans the channel The existing bridge must be replaced due to
structural deficiencies Direct and secondary impacts will be minimized by strict enforcement of
Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition Removal and Protection of Surface Waters
restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US and coordination
with the Division Environmental Officer.
Page 5 of 8
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
ide.html.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmp
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is anticipated because the proposed impacts are temporary.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o enr state nc.uS/M/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Page 6 of 8
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
I N/A 3
2 N/A 1.5
Total N/A
Page 7 of 8
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
In accordance with the February 25, 1991 delegation agreement on cony of the Sediment and
Erosion Control Plan will be sent to DENR-Division of Land Resources and NCDOT Roadside
Environmental prior to construction.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIH. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
1 _
?j
9M 6L12 Trini I
ply sus, _`r J' _ _• ?
i' (? (\ 1. ,a•,\J - . 1'hllipn x%.". = i l? ? \ ? '1?? _, - - _- '
x",
`ter
1
L ^
C ?• _ C- - q <95
.. \ `A: 1 /
?" r-1 "
L' I ??- % 570 }
620
x5to
?.. C:
("h 1
e ,,JJ
8'W
Name: SAXAPAHAW Location: 17 651973 E 3984721 N
Date: 3/28/2002 Caption: Location of Alamance Bridge 90
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc
PROJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS

STATE PROJ. N0. F.A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION

HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
CAPE FEAR
RIVER BASIN:
_
WATER QUALITY CRITERIA: YE NO
STREAM CROSSING BLUE LINE ON USGS ® E7
ORW 0 CED
WSI 0 C?g
CRITICAL AREA
S
5ml OF W
ING WITHIN 0 a 129
.
.
.
WS 11,111 OR IV, CROSS
ROADWAY CRITERIA:
ROUTE DESIGNATION- YES NO
ARTERIAL URBAN 0 CED
ARTERIAL RURAL 0 CE3

YES NO
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN REQUIRED? 0
IS A
DENOTES ROD SOUNDING
4
7-1
+"-
.
r ?}1 ? i Y - t - 1 P
'1?L - s ?? x f 3b ?T ` vJi ?f/e f ? •?I
3 -3P?1 s t' ,? f,.
View upstream from Bridge # 90.
:XI;
View of the Bridge # 90 substructure.

ry t t F z?+ ?, ??- -
MEMO%

View of the Bridge # 90 superstructure - facing south.
rK-k ?1 r n ?e

f
vi 3

,74 i_

R
?
?
n9l err
`
6? 1 - - -
rr ?,,,_ -ems
m?
View of downstream from Bridge # 90.
N.C.D.O.T.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ALAMANCE COUNTY
B„RG.# 90 ON SR 2151
OVER MEADOW CREEK
SCALE: 1"= 501HORM
1"= 10' VERT.
SURVEY BY: LDC, TGH,JJB
DRAWN BY: LDC
DESIGN BY:
/1
CHBCIED BY. -
1"i
1"i

i
S t ?(a; Fie#`R??-. ,
kit r. .,k•?;.`. { ?-. 6 r<:- .tr' ?! °it.??? ? 1 ? ?i, ???w ,.?- ???.
- ?{? -b'! _.-. . ..,.._ ,._ i ,2m.. „tf. ,_.t ,5 f?fii+ ,.N ?L?Y_ z, btk. 9?, ^a,;iy,??7,..d'i"? - - ..i, ? ..
N
.TJ
N p

7C 0
Z

r D
I (
W ??

. I I
D
D
I
X r
r
I
:?a 93

bi I I I
S
O r' ( I
D
D
(A m I I I -

m N
?
X
m I
I
(A
KttJJJ
_ x ra
I I L
x
z x x x- N m
v 00 C-)
I I a
r .0

.
O

O
0
00
l U)
n m
o
77--- -- _ z

---
--- rri
- MEADOW CRK. (n

?? ? I ' :
N z C
I O
m I
D m
?rZ
z aD r-
N
I x --4
I
G?
n
IN

X v D
?... O
O
D + M (1)
r
O ] N

m I I r
N
7K0
-?
N IrnNI
-I D
r
z D - j?
_
?-. L ------------------------------ I.
m
C) +
3AI80 ?3AV89
m ---------- --------------- --------

m
0

n
Cw;

?
t
v?;?t J Yr ';° 4 ?

9

y A.. C

• ' I
• •

c
•
•

Q(
C
C
C
^^?
f C
C
C
a