Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020356 Ver 1_Complete File_20020308r' a ?0? W A rF9P 7 O ` `C Michael F. Easley Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Water Quality DWQ Project No.: Of_03 $4oo County: &AZ Applicant: xvC ' - crlr5ia !Z . ?-7 Project Name: ?c?co.4zE?r c?T" DF M., 4ecG * 614 /&31 Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: s?A ZS . Z. /V Z? Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, M, L • 1:610(C / , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved pla?/ns?a? sp cifi?catj'ons, and other supporting materials. , / Q;"_QhVTP• //Jr/I?4y 7_.T A ' T)AfP_ / / 70 ?n ?/ Agent's Certification 1, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. if this project was designed by a Certified Professional I, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permitee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. Date WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP FEB 0 4 2004 WATER QUALITY SECTION WKI NNT E IRK Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Wetlands/401 Unit: (919) 733-1786 d Fax: (919) 733-6893 APR e WA7?. Michael F. Easley, Governor `O9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - C/1 7 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. j Acting Director 4 Division of Water Quality March 25, 2002 Alexander County DWQ Project No. 020356 Replacement of Bridge No. 144 on SR 1631 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Ms. Trish Simon, Division Environmental Officer NCDOT Division 12 P.O. Box 47 Shelby, NC 28151-0047 Dear Ms. Simon: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to incur 130 linear feet of impacts to Elk Shoals Creek for the purpose of replacing Bridge No. 144 on SR 1631 in Alexander County. The project should be constructed in accordance with your application dated March 7, 2002 (received March 8, 2002). After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 3289 corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Number 14. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing and send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and . approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or if stream impacts exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. , 1. NCDOT shall follow Best Management for the Protection of Surface Waters (March 1997) and comply with the requirements for WS-IV waters as specified in 15A NCAC 2B .0216. 2. Stormwater must be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and must not be routed directly into streams. Mowing of existing vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for storm water sheet flow. 3. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation must be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground-disturbing activities to provide long term erosion control. 4. The structure and riprap required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced nor the stream channel widened). Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address) 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location) 919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/ locations of the culvert. The culvert shall be installed one foot below the stream to allow for fish and other wildlife movement. 5. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions. 6. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than the stream channel. Under no circumstances must rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate vicinity of the culverts. 7. Where disrupted, natural floodplain benching should be restored, including the area in front of and below the culvert headwalls. Base flow should be directed through the culvert. 8. Any existing vegetated buffers should not be mowed in order to utilize it for storm water sheet flow. 9. Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rather, native vegetation is to be planted when practical. If necessary, rip-rap must be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark, and vegetation must be used for stabilization above high water. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion" form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919-733-9646 or Mr. Pete Colwell of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704.663.1699. A - X-- Attachment 0 y J. Tho e, Ph. Directo Pc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers V John Hendrix, USACE Asheville Field Office Pete Colwell, NCDWQ Mooresville Regional Office Central Files File Copy Vz STATE of NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY 020356 MEMO TO: John Dorney, DENR/DWQ/401/Wetlands Unit FROM: Trish Simon, Division 12 Environmental Officer -(S DATE: March 7, 2002 SUBJECT: Pre-construction Notification/401 Automated Payment Enclosed are seven copies of a pre-construction notification permit application for a bridge replacement project in Alexander County for your review and comments. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure • Work order number: 4312B-549-5.7852-558-SR1631-78144 • TIP #: Not Applicable • Project Category: $200.00 Fee PAYMENT RECEIVED is Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047 vrw+? STATE of NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N .C. 27611-5201 LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY P.O. BOX 47, 1710 East Marion Street Shelby, N. C. 28151-0047 March 7, 2002 Mr. John W. Hendrix - NCDOT Projects US Army Corp of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006 Dear Mr. Hendrix: 020356 The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, proposes the following project for your issuance of a Section 404 Permit. We believe this project can be accomplished under General Permit 198200031. COUNTY: Alexander LOCATION: Bridge #144 replacement on SR 1631, south ofHiddenite STREAM: Elk Shoals Creek, WS-1V Waters (from source to a point 1.4 miles upstream of mouth), Catawba River Basin PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of replacing a deteriorating 20' wide x 20' long timber with a 80'long, double line of 96" CMP with an inlet concrete headwall on 0.10 acres of NCDOT right of way. At the inlet and outlet of the pipe, it is proposed that -15 feet of riprap will be placed on the stream banks and five-foot riprap aprons will be placed in the stream channel extending from the pipes to provide structure protection and stabilization. Temporary cofferdams will be used to restrict stream flow and a temporary pipe will divert the stream around the work site during construction. The existing stream width is approximately six feet wide. Natural channel dimensions will be maintained at the inlet and outlet of the new culvert by constructing floodplain benches. The culvert is to be buried a foot below existing streambed elevation based upon thalweg (deepest part of the stream channel) elevations taken upstream and downstream. I have enclosed a PCN application, a sketch of planned activities, and location maps relative to the proposed project. The project is located in a WS-TV watershed; however it is not located within 'h mile of the watershed critical area nor is the roadway an urban or rural arterial roadway. Hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the NCDOT hazardous spill basin checklist. 4? ? lnk 4 j"e e?rs Mr. John W. Hendrix BR# 144 Replacement, SR 1631 March 7, 2002 - Page 2 A review of the Natural Heritage information for the threatened species listed for Alexander County, the bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii), did not reveal any known sites in the vicinity of the project. I have conducted a survey for the bog turtle in the project area on January 10, 2002. None were observed. It was determined that this species was not located in the proposed project area. No significant effect on this species is anticipated. A review of the available information from the National Register of Historic Places was also conducted. It is anticipated that no historic sites will be affected by the proposed project. By copy of this letter, we are asking Neil Trivette, NCDOT Roadside Environmental Field Engineer to comment on the above project. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting concurrence from the Wildlife Resources Commission and U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service. By copy of this letter, I am also forwarding seven (7) copies of the application package to John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetland Unit for review. Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions, please call me at 704-480-9020. Respectfully yours, M.L. Holder, P.E. Division Engineer Twelfth Division BY: Trish Simon Division 12 Environmental Officer Enclosures cc: Mr. Michael L. Holder, P.E., Division Engineer Mr. Dan Holderman, P.E. , Division Bridge Engineer Mr. Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental Field Engineer Mr. Ron Linville, WRC Mr. Brian Cole, USF & WS Mr. John Dorney, DENR,DWQ,401/Wetlands Unit (7 copies) File Office Use Only: 0 2 0 3 5 6 For` Version October 2001 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than leaving the space blank. I. Processing Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project: ® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules 2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Regional General Permit 198200031 3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification is not required, check here: ? 4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ? H. Applicant Information 1. Owner/Applicant Information Name: Mike Holder. NCDOT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47 Shelby. NC 28151 Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401 E-mail Address: 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.) Name: Trish Simon Company Affiliation: NCDOT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47 Shelby. NC 28151 Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401 E-mail Address: tsimonna dot.state.nc.us Page 5 of 12 III. Project Information Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided. 1. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge #144. SR 1631, Alexander County 2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 5.7852 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NCDOT Right of way 4. Location County: Alexander Nearest Town: Hiddenite Subdivision name (include phasellot number): NA Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Hiddenite south on SR 1005, right on SR 1614, left on SR 1631. 5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM orLat/Long): 35°51'55N/81°06'01W (Note - Nproject is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.) 6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Bridge on unpaved secondary road 7. Property size (acres): 0.10 acres NCDOT ri of way 8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Elk Shoals Creek (From source to a point 1.4 miles upstream of mouth. WS-IV waters 9. River Basin: Catawba (Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.) Page 6 of 12 10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The project consists of replacing a deteriorating and structurally deficient 20' wide x 20' long timber bridge with 80' of a double line of 96" CMP with inlet concrete headwall. The pipes will extend approximately 10 feet upstream of the existing bridge and -50 feet downstream of the bridge. At the inlet and outlet, five foot wrap aprons will be placed in the stream channel and fifteen feet of riprap will be placed on the streambank pipe for structure stabilization. Temporary impervious cofferdams will be used to restrict stream flow and the stream will be piped around the site during construction. 11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe will be used for excavation and placement of riprap. 12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: The surrounding area is wooded and an area along one side of the stream is farmed. IV. Prior Project History If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits, certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project, list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with construction schedules. r NA V. Future Project Plans Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application Yes. This road is an unpaved secondary road that is to be paved in 2-3 years. There are three more jurisdictional areas on unnamed tributaries to Elk Shoals Creek that will be impacted at the time of the secondary road paving project. At that time, another permit request will be submitted and the additional jurisdictional areas will be addressed. DOT- Alexander County has proposed a change in the road alignment, however, the right of way for this alignment has not vet been obtained and it is possible that the proposed alignment may change, therefore, changing the anticipated stream impacts The bridge is structurally deficient and it is necessary to replace it prior to the paving project. VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a Page 7 of 12 delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet. 1. Wetland Impacts Wetland Impact Site Number (indicate on map) Type of Impact* Area of Impact (acres) Located within 100 yearFloodplain** es/no Distance to Nearest Stream (linear feet) Type of Wetland*** * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding. 'x 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at httpWwww.fema.gov. List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0 2. Stream impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams Stream Impact Site L=gth of Average Width Perennial or Number Type of Impact* Oinear feet) Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent? (indicate on map) Before Impact (please specify) 80' double line of 1 CMP with inlet 90 feet Elk Shoals Creek 6 feet Perennial headwall Riprap apron in stream bed at inlet 5 ft inlet; 5 ft outlet 1 and outlet for Total =10 feet structure protection Placement of riprap 15 feet (inlet) 1 on bank for 15 feet (outlet) " structure protection Total = 30 feet I Temporary coffer 100 feet " dam/diversion pipe • List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.toyozone.com, wRVw.mamuest.com, etc.). Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Double pine and & rprap aprons = 100 feet of impacts: Riprap on bank for structure protection = 30 feet: Total temporary cofferdam and stream diversion impacts = 100 feet. Page 8 of 12 Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other Water of the U. S. NO OPEN WATER IMPACTS Open Water Impact Site Number (indicate on ma) Type of Impact* Area of Impact (acres) Name of Waterbody (if applicable) Type of Waterbody (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, ocean, etc. * List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc. 4. Pond Creation NO POND CREATION If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application. Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.): Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area: VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization) Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. NCDOT has chosen to replace the existing bridge with double pipes due to the lower costs associated with this option Riprap use will be minimized to only what is needed for structure stabilization around the pipes and headwall. Temporary cofferdams and a pipe diversion will be utilized to allow for construction to be done "in the dr3' and to reduce sediment impact. VIII. Mitigation DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial streams. USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, Page 9 of 12 but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.btml. 1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet) of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view, preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate sheet if more space is needed. IMPACTS < 150 FEET• MITIGATION NOT ANTICIPATED 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/arp/index.htm. If use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information: Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only) Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local) land? Yes ® No ? If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation. Page 10 of 12 Yes ? No If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ? X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only) It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the applicant's discretion. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233 (Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )? Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information: Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer multivliers. * Zone Impact (square feet Multiplier Required Miti tion 1 3 2 1.5 Total * Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260. NA XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only) Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. No additional impervious surface is proposed in this project at this time. Page 11 of 12 XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only) Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. XIM Violations (DWQ Only) Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules? Yes ? No Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional): It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control). M , J, 'L 7S 3--7-0 Applicant/Agent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 12 of 12 / ulk"o s •? -5774, 73f!90 4,s er, Q, lov, f isr 52 It.'?I ?3t SO \ tc--p-tioPnSb? /* wo0), 1 Y40 wb.c?b fA 46 f Ra5L3? 'CC.?f?S Z P-)PWA .?- L:L/L c2CaK , A c`?tST ?,aT, ta/l Llp5r"C, c,6,ob ?v ST?Z?itWi Sv./o '7 ?Ci1?577c 7 IF,), 70 SAL. 15' Pao !?5 U? SST ??vc-?-?s o ? Pe 5CA4,E i'%lC ;)v7.. r1?4t, ? ? lJ IZ - ;3 tR iE MAIL-41 f??A?3?'1. Gazlvrr1 52 1t?? I GG+-? 1i aF 32, *I44 ?i)j.? -57,4.734-av i ti.-..- i ` '??y ,4 `y •'"^ ?...- f`rlr F f ter: !4 8 11 .? e w ?,• ! ?'?'a:'+ ?? yx??+`' tt 4 i of M n! x { 'l.`T,? 4 f ' 4 '?4 A rr?` d 1 1 .(?'y?^'?`'??' t '*? F J/jf I' ?' IN .• yk-..?'" '?,SR.?? Y i ? ? '?'vtr'. _ c r .;4, r j •b YPv s? ,i'9 , r eplace er#A r .T-- y \Y mss` xT a }3r Ar d } } N 1 ?}y 4y_? IL try ? _ -:.;? r irk ? . Name: STONY POINT Date: 315/2002 Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Location: 035° 51'42.Z' N 081 ° 06'00.3!' W Caption: Bridge #144 Replacement on Elk Shoals Creek on SR 1631, WS-IV, Catawba River Basin Gop"nt (c) 1997, Maptech, Inc. 7 $ 9 - o 3` o U N T Y 0 148T CAP I& MOUM ?. - jA.M "As .? 269 \ 6297 e D a 1 1UL aa ' \ .1 .9 e - t m y » t. Roc,(.v \9 6298 Q 16aa a - C29 28 -? ° . , 7 . \ 1 5 4 n \ 8 !Qu 1 FAI FU 4 2.8 "1 '? 3L1 .1 a FEI ? 1;)4 29 87 14 1"1 x267"?\ ' .I s R 1 1 ,?)O e 2 5 10 FEC 'AS? FEE F a % . . .oo 2 Iui a 1.1 Cr 3 es- FEO \ `P`3 R 1 7 J I Ins . \ - n 33 N -? NL, PEA KHM !L AEI ° 6. ( ` 40 '?' IN E HFV• 1850 .' , ] , ,,.• V ;.. , , a I ? 1 ? 36-00• Ie , ¢ TRAI t 13M, 29 _ / ? ?5 1> laV ,.3o V ?? -0 1? °f. Hi Ill] _ ?] ? . ISI '° 1 11 27 \ i % , ? NIGI DE7A CZ? 71 ,•+1 13" ^ , III, 11 / / P281 \/ •- 1!1Z .J \' J62i 184 '? \ .l, " l.s] ! ? 0 INTER: J !? aL . ILiA RCK,(y FA , > Rodry f .?: HEV. 1814 i. Gew ,u -32.2 1 I W ?J V.S. N 141 S y Is" ..? ' e • RO n6e7 57A:Luz. 14 u S., \ 1, UWD TOP 3 SP@K MTN tb !szz .26y b ? E37¢ p• 58 a ft-w T \ O NC Ni \ PSOG V • I q c 26 V A58VYT p J HEY" 1750 12 MOUNTA.4 1 1620 !tir 79 '= .,.6 n1 ,9 5T ut A L 44 u lw - .•?.. Z 1 0 N°.N J .9 ., 4 '? 1.s 1!aCh. =y - } o 304 27 1 1 I.aj ° 3 . + , IN7F45 w -?2 t? .( . .3 , 5,, , _ . 199_ ., .3 , 1.0 cor]eI„ OO ., '.?., la '' S. A 7 O - Ilpp sECOM MATCH m , • Ch. la A \ l9a ? SwelRe ' CaRrwr pr, ?D 259 9 17 = • _TEL . UNDER( 160 .9 .9 ICU ... 3 4 -.LL 1?eQ , 164' < ' ? ?- RAFROA USED RY it M In U IS 'lip 51 1=96 ' I? P305• It G aa? 1 ? RAILROA USED BY COMPAn = " " 8 , • 53 - 4f - 4 8 • • e RIGHTS( FAS O F9 ::.4 , ' E 1341 36 21?121-n 1.0 A ?lit,,_ 1 0. ? J 3.1 1172 I ?11 T- GRAILROA( RADE Cl L1nO 11 . 6 ` % u/ ' .S 137] E 1 - Y } T UNDER PA, OVERPAS POP. I,10] _ MATCH 1 .:. f?Sy "i IIA" .1 J Y I? lama a R " K 35*35• ? ; RAILROAD ARMY. NA 1 J R -!i9 '67S 16 C '..? COMM OI i• 4 ..D P21,?? MARRED A' NAN IS" Ian 1.4 IL _ . G,4 C {II••-..:? FREE It 2 .2 W NNld6lRlti 9 'e OR TC ? IIG D `7 p 248 - h f 1 310 n NiMOVS CS? in - t 1 r ?T IA" el• COAST (:U. (ANA( e I647, 16" 1 It ^ .e IM 't \y? t) .I D 1.3 I.r)a \. l 74 I ,e} NARROW $1 WIDE ST4Ewi 6 1611 .0 ras] A / ' , ' !'73 Iego 1622 1171 8 ' l JAM w,'HL 167, ! 284 - L7 DAM 1 \ J i •s i t ?o- \ 1 1\ -?? t ` RESERVOIR. P J 13 0 31 Poy J 5763,.- PROMWEN7 P '.= wDICAIE E(E\ = Sfor? ML Neb Ch_ ?'? /P % .? ROAD THROUI C'1 ST POINT tata 1619 1 144 nIGNW,Y BRIT , ?./ CO ?.• ..] •/ I.a ".. I POP. 1. 150 1637 I 162 I ..1.y.?? DR-W P- L 9 !pOS 90 HIGHWAY TUN =? 14 1 ^•\ rO \6 t:. 1 U J„ C / J? ---- FORD - ??- STATE LINE - \ 166a CD d 1.6 - -_- :°UNrY LINE CITY UMR / v \ Ie1) _ _... "_._ _..... 1676 I : i $ .. .... _. . p 3rs I C I)0 \ LOOK D OUT 1 - t61) ' R 262 / )G,V MA L)r6WA43 L)- IZ - bb ! 16]6 RtYER oxFOxn y D •• Sc/ 127 ` 16 DAM - lAzz C129 v 5?. 1(93 1 o ? - 0,4- fi? 144, N i ` ldlR ° $- ?i?Pc.iFzG-mom ov avx : s ' ? New alignment at Bridge #144 (Red topped stake in forefront of photo indicates the proposed centerline. The majority of the new proposed double pipes lie at the existing bridge location and downstream of it). Downstream of Bridge #144 on Elk Shoals Creek on SR 1631 in Alexander County. (Proposed double pipes will extend approximately 50 feet downstream and -10 feet upstream of existing bridge). ?'. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SR I(o3! C2 PCC2 (Joins sheet 4) PCC2 PCC2 Y CeB2 - oos PCC2 Qa? ' ' ?'?. •' i PC( CeB'2' - PcC2 CeB2 CeB2 4 CeB2 cPc p. ` a.? _ Pc t CeB2 PcC2 .e s CeB2 _ a, ?? V, I Za• CeB III 7 N t Pc. u' s '1«x PCC2 LP C2 - ; 3! CeB2 :? c q' CeB2 eB2 t7. ?/1 NCDOT HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: iZ County: tk??I?456 Project ID: 5-2&5Z, River Basin: CA-r-,4 w13,4 Bridge No: */4¢ o, 3 c, 7P Route: sg &::51 Stream: A Water Quality Criteria: Yes No Stream Crossing Blue Line. On USGS CV r ORWr_ rT/ WSI r r-? WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area r r? Roadway Criteria: Route Designation- Yes No Arterial Urban r rP' Arterial Rural r r? Additional Site Information: Yes No Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? r r? Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997). _NCDNVO Stream Clissiflention Form Pro; crNlme:?j(? ?- f({q River Basin; e-faWb? County. Axa4lde.? DW 7toer'.CC'ttir?i•1ber: r Named stream: (/ I. tituae: ? Date: 3 L. U ? ?h6a 16 ?I?- ?O W/ Q `I ( Longitude: ?/.D(, ,j)) PLEASE NOTE: If emiuator and landowner re t 1,Y1 1, & Q man-made dLch, then use of ihis?? it not neewitty. Also. i/in the bat professional judgement of the emiumor, thelruare it a man-mods ditch and not a modied natural stream-this rating rjrfem should not bs used• Primarv Field Indicators: rrircie one Na-berrerliy Lvaluator: Signature: n _ _ / Location/Directions:: Ce g y3' ' /& 0! F ?a ?rvt , J , e a? Ceomnrnhol-, Absent Weik Moderate Slrnn 1) Is Them A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 00 01 02 2 Is The USDA Texture In Streambed Different From Surrounding Terrain? 00 01 02 3) Are Natural Levees Present? 00 01 02 4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 00 01 02 !_1' 5) Is These An Active (Or Relic) Floodplain Present? 00 01 02 6) is The Channel Braided? 0 01 02 03 7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 00 01 O ra 8) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 00 01 02 9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? R'OTE: ff Bed & Bank Camrd By Ditching Aad WITHOUT S'naori y Then Scare-09 0 01 02 Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated On Topo 10) Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes-3 O N0-0 PRIAIARYGEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATORPOINTS. 11' HvdroioZv -7 Absent #VALUEI Weak Moderate Strong 1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge Present? 00 01 02 l'73 PRItARYHYDROLOGYINDICATORPOINTS. Ill. Biology 3 Absent #VALUEI Weak Moderate Strong I) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 02 01 00 2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 02 01 00 3) Is Periphyton Present? 00 1 .. 02 03 dl Are Bivalves present? qw, 01 02 03 PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. Secondary Field Indicators: lehe/ro.,m_b_Pn L;, 1. Geomorphology Absent #VALUEI Weak Moderate Strong I) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 00 0o.5 01 01.5 2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Chanel? 00 00.5 01 6- .T-3) Does Topography Indicate A 00 00.5 01 0415, Natural Drainage Way? SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR #VALUEI 11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1 Is This Years (Or Last's) L.catiitter Present In Streambed? •s 01 O o.s 00 2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 00 00.s 01 11 3) Arc Wrack Lines Present? 00 O oS 01 ,5 4 is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since Last Known Rain? MOMIDitchAdicuredtoe9AbowskinTMsstepAndasBop_., OOS 01 5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry Conditions Or In Growing Season)? 00 O OS 01 6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or Ice Herkut)1 Yes-1.5 O No-0 SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 111. BioloEry Absent #VAL UE! Weak Moderate Strong 1) Are Fish Present? 00 00.s 01.5 2) Are Amphibians Present? 06 00.5 01 01.5 3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? 00S 01 01.s 4) Are Crayfish Present? .00 S 01 01.S 5) Are Mac obenthos Present? 00 S 01 01.s 6) Are Iron Oxidizing Bacteria(Fungus Present? 0'0 00.5 01 01.5 7) Is Filamentous Algae Present? WA O o.S 01 013 8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV blostly OBL Dioslly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPI, 1' NOTE: IfT m! Ab n Ol'Att Rana la,V r mrdAs Naed Q 2 1 O 0.75 O 0.5 O 0 O 0 .[be.a Skip 7ha Strp UNLESS $AYResr.,-). SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: #VALUEI TOTAL POINTS /Primnn• ++ Seeatdnnh #VALUEI WGreater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent) I LIM-i C HA V r'-E L ..:.. INTER_MITTE NT EVALUATION FORIM ACTION ID APPLIC.,vNT.NVVIE DATE t 1 / PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK('.e., culvert, rctocation, rte.) 1 i y. o py - ` n vPJ?F '7 •'R fag= `x r wATERBODY/RIVER BASIN :L1 2•[ .Lc-- i??f? COUNTY/CITY t:;4, 6 : !.e of KECFN"r WEATHER CONDITIONS SP NP Observation Fish/Shelltish/Crustaccans Prese:u Bent, is Macro Invertebrates ?I .->,:nphibians Present/Breediml a?#F,:'d'?ralhy ae AndiOr Fumsus !water quality function) dlife Channel Use (i.c. tracks, feces, shells, others) Protected Species Present (Discontinue) Riffle/Pool Structure Comments or Description W? I I I Stable Streambanks i Channel Substrate (i.e. gavel. cobble, rock, coarse sand) Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) Undercut Banks/htstream Habitat Structure Fiow In Channel I? Wetlands Adjacent'roiContig. With Channel (Discontinue) Persistent PoolsiSaturated Bottom (June through Sept.) SecpsiGroundwater Discaar ge (June throu h Sept, i Adjacent Ftoodplain Present Wrack Material or Drift Lines Hydrophvtic Ve_etation in adjacent to channel Important To Domestic Water Supply' S N Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Nlap"L%' N Approx. Drainage Area: s 3 ?J 0. c rP? Determination: nnial Channel (stop) .,tittent Channel r (proceed) emeral Channel (nojd) Ditch Through Upland (no jd) R portant Channel: LF PROJECT NiGR. Initials Unimportant Channel: LF (attach map indicati, location of importantiunimpurtant channel) Evaluator's Signature: (it other than C.O.E. project manager) P=Prescnt SP=Stongly Prescnt NP=Not Present 11 /4/9 8