20011048 Ver 1_Complete File_20010711

\o?QF W AT ?9?G
? r
O 1;;?? '1;?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
October 2, 2001
Johnston County
Project # 01-1048
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
James Trogdon, III
Division Engineer
NC Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Dear Mr. Trogdon:
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River buffer approval was received in the Central Office on
July 11, 2001. According to our rules [15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final action is not taken within 60 days, the Certification is waived
unless DWQ has objected in writing to your application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401 Water Quality
Certification for your plains to impact 16 feet of streams for improvements to SR 188 from SR 1008 to SR 1192 in Johnston County as
described in your application.
However if additional impact occurs or your development plans change, this waiver is no longer valid and a 401 Water Quality
Certification will be required.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
W SiUere,,,
1
e J. Thorp , D
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
A9*Q
NZ-DENR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
C
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GovERNOR
July 5, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
01 10 J;.8
SECRETARY
Subject: Secondary road improvements to SR 1188 (Mill Creek Church Road) from
SR 1008 (Harper House Road) to SR 1192 (Newton Grove Road) in
Johnston County. State Project No. 6.312098T.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade
SR 1188 (Mill Creek Church Road) from SR 1008 (Harper House Road) to SR 1192
(Newton Grove Road) in Johnston County. SR 1188 is an unpaved roadway that will be
upgraded to a paved roadway. Total project length is 0.527 miles.
Transportation and highway laws of North Carolina (G.S. 136-44.6, 136-44.7,
136-44.7A, 136-44.8, and 136-44.9) require the NCDOT to develop annual work
programs for construction and maintenance of secondary roads. These general statutes
specifically set forth requirements for annual construction and paving of existing unpaved
roads. Paving of these roads is performed in priority order as established by the NCDOT
for each unpaved road within a given county. This number is based on characteristics of
each road, including number of homes, schools, churches, businesses, industries,
recreational facilities, traffic counts, presence of school bus routes, and value as a
thoroughfare. Mill Creek Church Road is scheduled for paving in the 2000-2001
Secondary Roads Construction Program.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Construction of the project will necessitate impacts to waters of the United States
in the Neuse River Basin. The project crosses one unnamed intermittent tributary to Mill
Creek, which is shown in the following table. Impacts to the stream from construction
?:TD 3?
Fri
C7 __<
-c_
(-T, i
CID =i
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
include an additional 168 square feet (0.004 acres) fill in surface water and a total of 60
linear feet existing channel impacted.
LOCATION EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED
Station Width in. Length ft. Width in. Length ft.
27+35 36 44 60 60
No impacts to wetlands associated with roadside shoulder and ditch construction
are anticipated due to the subject project.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be
protected from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or
storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near wetlands or surface waters.
Minimization: Sedimentation and erosion control Best Management Practices for
the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be strictly enforced during project
construction. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts to waters of the U. S. at
these sites.
Compensatory Mitigation: Construction of the project will result no impacts to
waters of the U.S. Impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent possible during
the design process.
Riparian Buffer Impacts
The construction of the project involves a road crossing of a stream that is subject
to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rule. Construction impacts at the jurisdictional crossing are
less than 40 linear feet of riparian buffer. Based on the impacts to the riparian buffer at
this site, the crossing is exempt from the Rule. Efforts will be made to minimize the
impacts of additional storm water by the installation of extra check dams, level spreaders
and vegetated swales wherever possible.
Dewatering
The NCDOT proposes to temporarily dewater the stream during the construction
of the project. This will involve the temporary placement of sandbags, sheet metal
cofferdams, or Class B or Class 2 rip rap covered with filter fabric in the stream channel
approximately 10 feet upstream of the proposed pipe inlet. To maintain water flow during
construction, water upstream of this impervious structure will be temporarily pumped out
and conveyed downstream of the construction activity where it will be allowed to filter
through vegetation before flowing into the stream. The stream will be dewatered for less
than five consecutive working days. This will result in minor temporary impacts to these
surface waters.
Temporary impacts to the stream from this activity will result in the dewatering of a total
of 210 square feet (0.005 acres) of streambed and approximately 70 linear feet stream
channel for the proposed pipe replacement. The sandbags or riprap covered with filter
fabric will be entirely -removed after construction.
Regulatory Review
The subject project has been reviewed and concurrence obtained from the State Historic
Preservation Office that there is no effect to any National Register or Study-listed
properties within the subject projects Area of Potential Effects.
The subject project has been reviewed by the Environmental Officer for the presence of
listed threatened and endangered species. The subject project has been determined to
have no effect on any listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species.
Permit Issues
The purpose of this letter is to request authorization under Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14, Linear Transportation Crossings. Notification for the use
of this NWP to the USACE is provided as a courtesy to the USACE. Also, notification to
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) for Section 401 Water Quality
Certificate (WQC) No. 3289 is required for this project. NCDOT will comply with all
conditions associated with this NWP and WQC.
Additionally, the purpose of this letter is to request authorization under a Section
404 NWP 33 to dewater the stream during project construction. The 401 WQC No. 3114
(which corresponds to NWP 33) does not require written concurrence from the NCDWQ
as NCDOT intends to comply with conditions for the WQC.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to upgrade and pave SR 1188 in Johnston County. Temporary
impacts to the stream from dewatering activity will involve 210 square feet (0.005 acres)
of streambed and 70 linear feet of stream channel. Impacts associated with the pipe
replacement at this project include 168 square feet (0.004 acres) of additional fill in
surface water and 60 linear feet existing channel impacted. No wetland impacts are
anticipated as a result of the subject project. The project is located in the Neuse River
Basin. Impacts at the stream crossing are less than 40 linear feet in the buffer and are
therefore exempt from the Riparian Buffer Rule. The NCDOT asks that the dewatering of
the stream be authorized under a Section 404 NWP 33. The NCDOT will adhere to all
applicable Section 404 NWPs and Section 401 WQCs conditions. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Robin M. Little at (252) 237-
6164.
Y,
Trogdon, III, P.E.
Engineer
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE,
Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ,
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Creedmoor
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley, SHPO, Raleigh
Mr. Bryant Bunn, P.E., NCDOT Division Maintenance Engineer
Mr. J.C. Rhodes, Assistant District Engineer
Mr. Don Goins, P.E., Chief Engineer, Operations
Office Use Only: Ponn Version Apil 2001
USACE Action ID No. D`VQ No. 0 1 ? 0
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14, 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. James H. Trogdon III P.E Division Engineer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation /Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: 252) 237-6164 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jtro,don a, dot. state.nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Robin M. Little
Company Affiliation: Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation/Division 4
P.O. Box 3165
Wilson, NC 27895-3165
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: rmlittle a dot. state. nc. Lis
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailedsite plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: SR 1188, Mill Creek Church Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): State Project No.6.312098T
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: JOHNSTON Nearest Town: Harper
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): 1-95 south to US 701 east,
immediate left onto SR 1009, approx. 12 miles toBentonville, 2.2 miles to left onto SR1008,
1.6 miles to SR 1188 on left.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM orLat/Long): UTM 17 743580E 3909233N - NEWTON
GROVE NORTH quad (Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinctNN-aterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Rural,
residential/agricultural mix.
7. Property size (acres): NA
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Mill Creek (DWQ ID # 27-
112-5, Sw, SC, NSW
9. River Basin: Neuse River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available ath1tp://l12o.enr.stat.e.ttc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Grading, drainage, base, paving and erosion
control to brim existing gravel road in compliance with standard safety design specifications,
replace culverts.
Page 4 of 12
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project:
Heavy construction equipment ( back hoe, track hoe excavator, dump truck)
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Rural residential/agricultural mix.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: NA
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located witlun
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/110) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
0 no

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized creating, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both stnuctutre and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through tlne Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local f7oodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at tttn:/iw??w.fema.?ov
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Peremnial or
Intermittent?
(pleasespecify)
Stn 27 + 35 60" CNIP 60 UT to Mill Creek 3 Perennial

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associat dp-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both stntcture and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both tlne original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
do«nstrcam naned stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
ww'X 0!3S..'3.^oy. Several intemet sites also allow direct do\Nmnload and printing of USGS maps (e.g., ww w.topozone.conA
w??tiv_1na1xLnLst_cc?m etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 60
Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts includ, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
Page 6 of 12
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary
encroachment. No staging of constriction equipment will be allowed in or near wetlands or
waters of the U.S. Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best Management
Practices for the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during project
construction.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
stream s.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Pagc 7 of 12
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htlp://li2o.enr state,delis/ncwet]ands./strin?ide,litniL
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at t?up lt7izo enr.state.nc.u"?? n7;intlex.ht??i. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres)-
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
LX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 12
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* lutpact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 3 0
2 0 1.5 0
Total 0 0
* "Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Gone L extendsuf
additional 20 feet front Qte edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Page 9 of 12
Existing Pravel road surface area will not be widened within riparian buffer Temporary
dewatering and all appropriate best management practices for sediment and erosion control will
be implemented during pipe replacement
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violationof DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicantl?gent Signature date
(Agent's sitgnatur is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Arrny Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln RoNi'an Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Page 10 of 12
e?
"SITE VICINITY MAP"
?Ll / S S. (Name) (vale) ,?`' v, ,?'`?'

CUM
191

1
r 1139 , ,

C -n' ra?? ,- ?_, J ?- - I cal ? ?
f
50
BF?,ITONVILLE BAM.EGROU NU C
em
(STATE NISTOfiI SIZE)
187
'164
Gra© r ?=

e Li t"L 1?ir
Ul 115,
75 , 0, t
t I 1 ? ?-?
?,

-_.?- Niys?-11 I0?

_
\ 1 A ?? -
x 169
i 1! \` ? ? , / ? so F ,

1701
'
?
\
/
.
,/??.-__ '' - I?! !III li? ?
?
\ ??
? ?/ '•;M , ?
_ 1no
1 j
Massey
I j BM 103 Sam.
{
\
1 Cem -v aM
169 ?? 1•? - • ? I '
i

"USGS TOPOQUAD IIAP"
SCALE 1- Lccc
Ale i/jt;'i C;(-( yc= (?') uAD

1 rt??`"` ` /r•' .,P _lC_ jV N`A GoA
y
NcA d ? GcA
e J _ ,
r i { ° rja . YlaB r GeD f a - t
.
J
'
;

LY
`?i. ., a ° j • Goys
GeD YlaB S
?'?II y ,J }
' t ?; °
','-r k r` y UcC \ A
© Gcq'
n Go
r1 Ra 'Lod A r *•'"'
st)

i

I 11 v; \ BnA CcA 4 Gc4
BnA Y, GoA Jc? y

s ? _ _A L •, ''
N3B
Ra
/
• t
?
AuA LY R3 `Ra 5
ViaB NoA GOA 'LY ,
Q -: i !
E
tE€{ip
g a
P ? ???.? ??' Gc0 Tr .GoA.1?-• LY ?i ' GoA ..- r ?° p r
L
? -?
' .
t ({
: GeD
y ,,Bn+
1 cA Ra Ly r /
.{ AuA ?
AuA
y
y
NoA
W3 8 V -W
Ly,
AuA
i
a3
r
NoA .° y ql yy?/GcA v Ra'` i Ly GcA (y r a
BnA `?
J
y , t
Ra
N
A
`
o
NoA
Ly
'' 1
•
A
,
.
} l GeD' ' Gc
,
Gb
r Bb Ly
1
?
5 /
,
r
1 r
COG
Ly
/ + R3 1Y Ne / CoC-
' Z
{

6 a
c
?.,
!!
GzD
EY r GaD C ^
NcA
IR`i lx j r GeD`
1a , NOA r
ly
? ?4 GoA \

i

' ?
J
1 y R? L. Ly Ly GoA r a
'•' ? y ? ? ? r 1? ? t+
f
i

Ly
, 41
Ra GOA

']
cc)
,
,
01Z r `
`
d
'r t
'
Y
.i } _i
?.
4
fi
- .
+
:
,
4
4Y
t
.
t •
t }

1 r.• i _ ?..i y . i {.

ttty -f` ? ?
-?.?d •f rrl ? ?

USDA/NRCS SOIL SURVEY
COUNIY,`,SHEET # I,)?
SCALE t='GVG `
L'/ L
s (\ l :. J (D :Le)
C/72
c-
O
E-+
V
w
0
w
E-
O?
E-
w
0
r^?
E-+
? O
-? V
? o
0
? w
? d
w
O
w
CZ.
z
O
p F
U
o?
o?
+ F 1
.4 Z
E-O
O U
az
I?
.4w
I m
a t1,
SR1188 UD
z

o ? a

>
Z
E-
P-4
zE-
? W

HWY.
i 701
1011 08?y
rjLR?'S R
c? Er
+
E-+ Z
O O
P. U
alz
Iw
r?Y
V
yti
'/NI? 0 4 WD
,G9 2
N??' sg
?w
O?
J ?
? Z
W ?
On
aw
J
Q FW-
Z
J
O
Qz
V) U
F- W Z
:D CL a
?1
Z u
z
z
o w
LLJ ?

Q d'
00
N p Q Q

S p T
W X ?
U
Z LL
:
E 0
~ Of W
Z
N Z J
rn U Clf
Of LLJ
?Dz
U U
V)
?1- w w
-
r
O w
0
IY
U
w
z
J
z
J
U v Z z
O
=tea ? w
?00 Q
Z - O

Of
Z Z

v Cl) n

A
Z_
O
13

A
a 0 U
?Q
z W
Q
?

?w

o
QJ°
a
?s0

LU >-
J
F-

a ~J
FF
--11

u
Z LZ W °
O w
Z
; a H
d
= Of
W O H s A
mI-Z w
?-+ O z
M E-

C) 0
O , O
O O
LO LO
a
O
LO

0
H
O
r?
w
0 LO
a O
--1
-114
H
H
CL
7X3X2 SILT
BASIN
(ARLES LEE BYRD
D.B. 1816-591
PRO,,. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
6-3i Z 0 28 'T 6

70.4'
v ? 11
w I D N1 (?

(n Ld
Y O
O
U f.?

CHURCH
1 I
? .i . _ 30' Q FFER ZONE
1O' LEVEL NOT TO 13E DISTURBED
SPREADER FROM TOP OF BANK
7X3X2 SILT (TYP.) (TYP )
BASIN
TOTAL SHEETS
8
REMOVE 36"RCP AND
REPLACE WITH
60'-60" CMP
Hcwz. sc lu i
VE.Ri. SGLE
i?
I PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
26+00 27+00 25+00
l_. is EPJ ?11'S [LEE. F'. A.
?I. FPPROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
103 S. FKGNi 57RF_i (919) 9G1-106
SId17HF;ELD, rJ. C 27577
1? 1
P,ILDUI/F&E bKKLH tax Flay LJ U1 IQ-« r.U.D
Count},: Johnston NCDOT Division # 4 District A 3
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL
REGISTER.OF HISTORIC PLACES,
FOR STATE FUNDED SECONDARY ROAD PROJECTS ONLY
Project Description: Pave and Widen Johnston SR l I 'in the vicinity of the Bentonville Battleground , JT 4 (NR
& NHL).
On M y 23, 2001, representatives of the
yr North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
[ North Carolina State Historic Preservatiorr, Office (HP.O)
other
Reviewed the subject project at
a scoping meeting
photograph review session/consultation .
other All parties present agreed

There are no properties over fifty.years old within the. project's Federal Permit Site's (or Sites') area (or
areas) of potential effects (APE).
There are no properties less than fifty years old that are considered to meet Criterion Consideration G
ithin the project's Federal Pennit Site's. (or.sites') area (or areas) of potential effects.
There are properties over fiftyyears old (list attached) within the project's Federal Permit Site's (or Sites')
area (or areas) of potential effects, but based. on_the historical information available and the photographs of
each property, properties identified as-CS are considered not eligible for the National Register and
further evaluation is necessary. ?. -
There are no National Register or Study-Listed properties located within the secondary road project's area
of potential effects.
_There are no historic properties affected by this project. The Bentonville Battleground, JT 4 (NR & NHL)
i t out of the APE of project.
State Historic Preservation Officer
Date
If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.

oa
N
crZ
w?
w
Er F-
U LL
W 0
cr .
m
O Z
W
Z L
? F-
0
0
`? F

C)

= O
O
O O N

O c.7
\ z

0
W
I-
Q

O
?F O
O
O
o
Q N
O
z
r-1
F O
O
A N
w \
_U to
O O
O
O?
M
r
a 0)
w cY1
q
0 ?
O
z
z 0)
? U O
Z
O 0
o
J