20010487 Ver 1_Complete File_20010328

.6 t:
Py py'.
1 ? 1997,
T.4L8CIE1V06,S
tDC`37
@?a (3 t c)(4`37
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA D
DEPARTMENT OF TkANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GiARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 8, 1997
MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cyndi Bell
DWQ - DENR
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for the following projects:
Project T.I.P. County Bridge No. State Route Planning Engineer
B-3267 Wilson No. 29 n? SR 1`653 ill Goodwin
B-2110 Brunswick No. 62 N NC 2k 1 ill Goodwin
B-3365 Richmond No. 33 SR 1124 ill Goodwin
B-2951 Davidson No. 135 NC 109 ?Dennis Pipkin
B-3322 Cumberland No. 36 Cir I-95B/US 301B ill Goodwin
B-3179 Guilford No. 459 US 29 Dennis Pipkin
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets and location maps for the
subject projects. The purpose of this information and the related review procedure is to have an
early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the projects. Scoping meetings for these projects are scheduled for
I n the Planning and Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470).
These scoping meetings will be held back to back beginning at 9:00 A. M. for B-3267 and
B-2110. The remaining project meetings will begin at 9:30 A. M. in the order shown above.
These meetings typically last 10 to 15 minutes per project so all attendees should plan to arrive at
the beginning of th r 9:30 A. M. session as applicable. You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting, mail them to us prior to the meeting, or e-mail them to
[e-mail] prior to the meeting.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meetings or the scoping sheets, please call the indicated Project Planning
Engineer, at 733-3141.
HFV/bg
Attachments N n SJ/2 .S-C???2 w,?? or CvW
[t._*1]!'&W*
f
Y
010487
3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY"
March 22, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. Eric Alysmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Davidson County, Bridge No. 135 on NC 109, over Abbott's
Creek, TIP No. B-2951, State Project No. 8.160130 1, Federal Aid
Project No. BRZNHS-109(2).
Dear Sir:
Attached for your information is a copy of the project-planning document
prepar,?by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) and signed by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on February 2000. The project calls for the
replacement of Bridge No. 135 "in place" on NC 109 over Abbott's Creek in Davidson
County. The new bridge will have 3 spans totaling 141 feet in length. A paved travelway
of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 4 foot paved shoulders on each side. The new
structure will be at approximately the same elevation as the existing grade. Traffic will
be maintained on the on-site detour to the west of the existing bridge. The on-site detour
structure will consist of a temporary bridge 100 feet in length with an elevation
approximately 3 feet below the existing bridge elevation. In reference to the design
permit drawings (attached), the preferred and chosen alternate will result in 0.02 acres of
wetland impacts.
The project is being processed by the FHWA as a "Categorical Exclusion" (CE)
in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an
individual permit but propose to proceed under a Nationwide Permit in accordance with
33 CFR 330 Appendix A. (B-23) issued 13 December 1996, by the Corps of Engineers
(COE). The provisions of Section 330.4 and Appendix A (C) of these regulations will be
followed in the construction of the project. The DOT asks that the bridge replacement
work to be authorized under a Nationwide Permit 23.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION - FAX: [phone] _ TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
41,
It
It is anticipated that a 401 General Water Quality Certification for an approved
CE will apply to this project. The NCDOT will follow general conditions on permit,
Section 404 Nationwide 23. A copy of the CE document has been provided to the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), for their review. The DOT is requesting that the WRC provide comments to the
COE concerning permit requests.
It is anticipated that construction of a temporary work pad will be authorized
under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 (Temporary Construction Access and
Dewatering). The DOT is therefore requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit
authorizing the construction of the causeway. Enclosed are construction drawings of the
temporary causeway and a completed preconstruction notification form for a Nationwide
Permit 33 and General Water Quality Certification.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr.
Jeffrey Burleson at [phone], Extension 315.
Sincerely,
4 LL-
William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager
Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, DWQ
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mrs. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Programming and TIP
Mr. John E. Alford, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. David Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. S.P. Ivey, P.E., Division 9 Engineer
Ms. Maryellen Haggard, NCWRC
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Don Lee, Roadside Environmental

3/25/96
DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #): 33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1),COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME:
2. MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: Raleigh
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS,
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
P.
0. Box 25201
SUBDIVISION NAME:
STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27611
INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK) : 733-3141
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Davidson NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Thomasville
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridae NO. 135 on NC 109 over Abbott's Creek in Davidson Count
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin
N. C. Department of Transportation
Abbott's Creek
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
.y
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
1
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: N/A
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
0.5
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0
FLOODING: N/A OTHER:
DRAINAGE: N/A
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE
LENGTH BEFORE: 90 FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on norm
EXCAVATION: N/A
0
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.00
BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
AFTER: N/A FT
al high water contours): N/A FT
WIDTH AFTER: N/A FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER: N/A FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER
orarv Causewa
2
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2"
ONLY): See attached CE and attached drawi
OF TYPE OF
X 11" DRAWINGS
nca s
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: To install a temporary work pad to
replace the inadequate bridge no. 135 over Abbott's Creek
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The temporary workpads must be installed to install the
new bridge structure. Alternates with a on-site detour was chosen that
would span the entire waterway. Temporary causeway
avoided_ etlands
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL
HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED: date of letter(ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE. STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: December 16., 1997
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
SIZE OF THE
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?

YES [X) NO [
3
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [I
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPJ-,TED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT,.INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Agriculture
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
' `UD C LJl . 6,44v-
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
2- 2, Zv1
ATE

VICINITY MAIP
1 ,

t Ledford Senlor
1752 High School
?
1798 1700 1753
-
1753
Ledford
M
Middle e PROJECT B-2954
School
f 1756
1 ?
1755 ~
1926
?1D ACBOWS aftK
BEGl1 STATE FROJECr 8-2951
BEGIN F.A. BRWS14- 109
I
I
EM
it 1

LEGEND
LINE WT LINE WT
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY 4-6 PROPOSED BRIDGE 6
WETLAND

WL
4-6
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
6
DENOTES FILL IN 2 PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND
12"-48'
15
DENOTES FILL IN
2 (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
'
SURFACE WATER PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54 6
1c11/1lI1J & ABOVE
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER 2
2
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY 2 2
FILL IN WETLAND WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION 2
IN WETLAND
® DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY 2
FILL IN SURFACE
ROOTWAD
2
?1LLLLLd
WATER
» DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING 2
2
--- FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP 2
T` 2-4
_ TOP OF BANK
WE 2 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 2
- - - - EDGE OF WATER
- O
5 OR PARCEL NUMBER
2 IF AVAILABLE
-? - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
F
- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
2
1 BUFFER ZONE 1
- BZ
2

--- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY 2 .
BOUNDARY.
2 BUFFER ZONE 2 2
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND BZ 2
- BOUNDARY
--PL- PROPERTY LINE 2
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE 2
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE 2
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
PLANT BOUNDARY
2
O
- - --- WATER SURFACE

X LIVE STAKES
X
X 2
TION
X
X N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORT A
E2D BOULDER 6 DIVISION OF HIGHWA YS
DAVIDSON COUNTY
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROJECT: 8.1601301 (B-29 51)
REPLACE BRIDGE x135 ON
NC 109 OVER ABBOTT'S CREEK
,

o z
I- O
SZ m4"m
O_
C)ZLLj
N
J OJ
V
i
I
?. I
i
W
Y I
Q
a
w I
z I
Q
l
OZ I
I1
1
I
I
J
J
N LL
N ? Q w
aw &a
4.z ?? rV
Q
VIJ WZ WLL
z; zw 20 .
In ou 3z
9 N,
z
0
?7

®3z ? ® x
v?
E.
®z

I ® z
0 U
0
5
®
w
(
j >
I U
a
z
1 a
V

C\i r
F-
1
L_Li J
w
O
rT.
W
w

t LL 11
e ? x

' W
J

?

,t
tt
I r
? LLJ t
I ? t
I u t
t
I ?-
I N
I z
I ~
I X
W
I e
T-? Ln
J
N
' ( Z
N 1
f 11 \
L
m
N I
O ? ?
I
W ?
o
a
0
U z I
z
i= o
N ? I
x
W J I
a I
a
z
O O O

z .
? z w
E-
®
? z
- z ® v
Z U c
1-7
?
H
® ® > m

O U ? W
z ?
d-
N
W
U a
U]

z

O O U
O x
+ CO O
1
N
0 0
O `v
O
+
N
N
ll?

b
El
z w

H ® Z W
? ® O 9
G rig
z
®
A
H
w ? A a U>
o A a
ILA ® ? ? ? W

0
m

a
w
N
O.
rn

U
M N a
T ?
Ln
?- O
L.n rn o
O
Q o -

S
a L
? a
? }Q v

U
W? ,N
ui a d w
C
p N I ?? Q
N h-
C? UN N Q Q L
D V a ui V U

m
01
0-1 LL-

U.

a)

W

> O
J
w
Ld O
Q
V) LL
C L d H -i
O Q W
n
L
? Q
M j

ZI

t ? U
H
i
l
l
I
l
i
l
l
1
1
1
1
1 p
fA N a
r ?U
U

O N fU0 O
? N
W
LL
U.
7
m
0
O
N
a r
O C r O
U L
WU
Z
m y O

o Co o t= cn

m
a= =
O
rn aN
Z S U c+°i
C C
O

g
-
M U «.
N
a O
o)
a' o
r0 co
y t
WU E 0 co
v p

l O
O'
()
a !n C
)
p

O 0
F E .,S a
¢
3 r Z
U.
W
U
LL C C U C) W
z _ CL W
y
CL
_

co
c
0
O
.
(0
LL ?

Q N C

S M CU =
s CD
'

4 C N
oa
t- a M .T
M

°
Q c m?
U
a Z ??

? g

W N
= a
LL c
3 O U
E m
a? 3 O
r?
N
C C

G

O
LL 4) O O

}
Q

y W
U N ?
v

O
g J
E rn
!n
LL N
N O
t
N
N
J
N
fA z O
r

O
PROPERTY OWNERS
SITE NAME ADDRESS
I VAN E. PARKER 4337 N Highway 109
. High Point, NC 2726.5
i RICHARD DOUGLAS CALLICUT 387 Ledford Circle
High Point, NC 27265
It
2 FAIRGROVE REALITY CO.INC. 304 Cedar Lodge Road
Thomasville, NC 27360

col /?s?'FO-,
Davidson County,
Bridge No. 135, on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
Federal Aid Project BRZNHS-109(2)
State Project 8. 1601301
TIP Project B-2951
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
APPROVED:
2-2q-00
Date
-00
Date
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

01048.
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project.Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

Mcholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Davidson County,
Bridge No. 135, on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
Federal Aid Project BRZNHS-109(2)
State Project 8. 1601301
TIP Project B-2951
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Branch By:
f f
'??--
00
Date Dennis Pipkin, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
L_ 29-va
Date
2-2`l-0°
Date
V V G y y,,2 / /-'7/i 0 7?
'e?QEES•S0
SEAL
t' ••..r r. ° XWayne Elliott
6976 -
r
Bridge Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
16
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS:
B-2951, Davidson County
Replace Bridge No. 135, on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
Federal Aid ProjectBRZNHS-109(2)
State Project 8. 1601301
1. Roadway Design Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Resident Engineer:
Revegetation: The temporary detour structure and approaches will be removed after the
new bridge is completed, and the area will be revegetated with appropriate plant species.
2. Roadway Design Unit, Structure Design Unit, Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch (Permits), Resident Engineer:
Bridge Demolition: The entire existing bridge, both superstructure and substructure, is
composed of reinforced concrete. Thus, there is a potential for components of the bridge to be
dropped into Waters of the United States during construction. The resulting temporary fill
associated with the bridge will be as much as approximately 190 cubic yards. During
construction, Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed.
Categorical Exclusion Document Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
March, 2000
Davidson County
Bridge No. 135, on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
Federal Aid Project BRZNHS-109(2)
State Project 8. 1601301
TIP Project B-2951
I. SUMMARY OF PROJECT:
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge Number 135, in Davidson County. Bridge Number 135
carries Highway NC 109 over Abbott's Creek, in the northern part of Davidson County. NCDOT and
FHWA classify this action as a Categorical Exclusion, due to the fact that no notable environmental
impacts are likely to occur as a result of project construction. NCDOT will replace Bridge Number
135 at the existing location, as shown in Figure 2. The existing bridge will be replaced with a
structure consisting of a new bridge approximately 141 feet long. A paved travelway of 24 feet will
be accommodated, with 4 foot paved shoulders on each side. The new structure will be at
approximately the same elevation as the existing grade. An on-site detour structure will be placed to
the west of the existing bridge. The on-site detour structure will consist of a temporary bridge 100
feet in length with an elevation approximately 3 feet below the existing bridge elevation.
The estimated cost is $1,586,000 including $36,000 for Right-of-Way acquisition and
$1,550,000 for construction. The estimated cost projected by the 2000-2006 Transportation
Improvement Program is $401,000; including $75,000.in prior year cost, $53,000 for Right-of-Way
Acquisition, and $273,000 for construction.
II. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS:
A design exception for the vertical alignment near the bridge will be needed. At such time as
the future R-2568 widening project is constructed, the profile can be improved to eliminate this
exception.
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
NCDOT classifies NC 109 as an Urban Other Principal Arterial Route in the Statewide
Functional Classification System. The land use of the surrounding area is rural residential, with
scattered small businesses. There is a public school (Ledford Middle School) near the bridge to the
south.
Near Bridge No. 135, NC 109 is a two lane, paved facility, 20 feet in width, with 6 foot wide
grassed shoulders on each side. The existing bridge carries two lanes. Horizontal alignments in both
directions are good. Vertical alignments require a design exception as noted above.
Bridge No. 135 was built in 1932. The bridge is 141 feet long, with a 20.0 foot roadway
width. The bridge has an asphalt overlay wearing surface on a reinforced concrete deck on reinforced
concrete deck girders. The end and interior bents are of reinforced concrete. The deck of Bridge No.
135 is 19 feet above the stream bed. Two lanes of traffic are carried and the load limit is posted at 27
tons for single vehicles (SV) and 31 tons for Truck-Tractor Semi-Trailers (TTST). According to
Bridge Maintenance records, the bridge's sufficiency rating is 47.1 out of a possible 100.0.
The current traffic volume at the bridge vicinity is 9,600 vehicles per day (VPD), projected to
increase to 22,700 VPD by the design year (2025). No speed limit is posted in area, therefore it is
assumed to be 55 mph by statute.
NCDOT Traffic Engineering accident records indicate there were 3 vehicle crashes reported
in the vicinity of Bridge No. 135 during the three year period between June 1, 1994 and May 31,
1997. The Transportation Director of Davidson County schools indicates that there are 11 school
busses crossing the bridge twice per day, for a total of 22 trips per day. Road closure would cause
long delays for school busses.
IV. ALTERNATES:
Three methods of replacing Bridge No. 135 were studied. These alternates involve a
replacement structure consisting of a new bridge approximately 141 feet in length. A paved travelway
of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 4 foot paved shoulders on each side. The approach roadway
will consist of a 24 foot travelway with a minimum of 8 foot shoulders on each side.
The project alternates were studied as follows:
Alternate One: (Recommended) - Replace bridge on existing location with a new bridge
approximately 141 feet in length. Traffic would be maintained by a temporary on-site bridge placed
to the west.
Alternate Two: - Replace bridge on new alignment to the west of existing, with a new bridge
approximately 141 feet in length. Traffic would be maintained on the existing bridge during
construction.
Alternate Three: - Replace bridge on new alignment to the east of existing, with a new bridge
approximately 141 feet in length. Traffic would be maintained on the existing bridge during
construction.
The "do-nothing" alternate is not practical; requiring eventual closing of the road as the
existing bridge completely deteriorates. The sufficiency rating of the existing bridge is only 47.1 out
of 100.0. Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is neither practical nor economical.
V. COST ESTIMATE
Estimated costs of the alternates studied are as follows:
Structure
Roadway Approaches
Structure Removal
Temporary Detour & Structure
Misc. & Mobilization
Engineering & Contingencies
Total Construction Cost
Right-of-Way and Utilities
Total Project Cost
Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Alternate 3
(Recommended)
$367,000 $367,000 $367,000
167,000 675,000 654,000
20,000 20,000 20,000
488,000 00 00
306,000 331,000 307,000
202,000 208,000 202,000
$1,550,000 $1,601,000 $1,550,000
36,000 59,000 45,000
$1,586,000 $1,660,000 $1,595,000
VI. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 135 at the existing location as shown in Figure 1.
A temporary on-site detour structure will be utilized to maintain traffic.
NCDOT will replace Bridge Number 135 at the existing location, as shown in
Figure 2. The existing bridge will be replaced with a structure consisting of a new bridge
approximately 141 feet long. A paved travelway of 24 feet will be accommodated, with 4 foot paved
shoulders on each side. Total shoulder width including grassed portion will be 8 feet each side. Where
guardrail is required, shoulders will be a minimum of 11 feet on each side. The new structure will be
at approximately the same elevation as the existing grade. The approach roadway width will consist
of 32 feet of pavement accommodating 24 feet of travelway and a 4 foot paved shoulder plus a 4 foot
grassed shoulder on each side. The project will require 1,160 feet of improvements to existing
approach roadways. An on-site detour structure will be placed to the west of the existing bridge. The
on-site detour structure will consist of a temporary bridge 100 feet in length with an elevation
approximately 3 feet below the existing bridge.
Initial design indicates that completed project will provide a design speed of 60 MPH.
NCDOT recommends that Alternate 1 be constructed, in order to minimize environmental
impacts, and to optimize the bridge's alignment for connection with future TIP Project R-2568. The
bridge constructed for B-2951 will have a cross-section that will be compatible with the 4-lane
median roadway facility envisioned by R-2568.
The Division 9 Engineer concurs with the selection of the recommended alternate.
NC 109 is not designated as a bicycle route, and there is no indication that an unusual number
of bicyclists use the road.
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. General Environmental Effects
The project is considered to be a "Categorical Exclusion` (CE) due to its limited scope and
insubstantial environmental consequences.
The bridge project will not have a substantial adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change
in land use is expected to result from construction of the project. No adverse effect on families or
communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition will be limited.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to
adversely affect social, economic or religious opportunities in the area.
No publicly owned parks, recreational facilities or wildlife or waterfowl refuges of national,
state, or local significance are in the vicinity of the project.
Construction of the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the floodplain or
associated flood hazard. The elevation of the 100-year flood will not be increased by more than 12
inches.
NCDOT expects utility conflicts to be of a medium level for a project of this size and
magnitude.
There are no known hazardous waste sites in the project area.
B. Architectural & Archaeological Resources
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, as amended, & implemented by Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
for compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires that if a federally
funded, licensed, or permitted project has an effect on property listed on or eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation will be given an
opportunity to comment.
Architectural Resources
A meeting was held with The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on October 15,
1998, to evaluate potential effects of the project. The existing bridge was built in 1932. The SHPO
concurred that Bridge No. 135 is not eligible for listing in the National Register. Also, the SHPO
concurred that there are no other historic structures located within the area of potential effect (APE)
for this project. Thus, it is concluded that the project will have no effect on historic architectural
resources.
4
Archaeological Resources
The SHPO indicated that there are no known recorded archaeological sites within the area of
potential effect, and it is unlikely that any archaeological resources could be affected by the project.
Therefore, the SHPO recommended that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection
with this project. Thus, it is concluded that the project will have no effect on archaeological resources.
C. Natural Systems
PHYSICAL RESOURCES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this section is to inventory and describe the natural resources which occur
within the proposed right-of-way boundaries and which are likely to be impacted by the proposed
action. Assessments of the nature and severity of probable impacts to these natural resources are
provided, along with recommendations for measures that will minimize resource impacts.
1.1 Bridge Demolition
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 135 on NC 109 over Abbott's Creek in
Davidson County. It has 3 spans totaling 141 feet in length. The entire bridge, both superstructure and
substructure, is composed of reinforced concrete. Both the bridge rail and the asphalt-wearing surface
will be removed without dropping them into Waters of the U.S. There is potential for other
components of the bridge to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction. The resulting
temporary fill associated with the concrete bridge is approximately 190 cubic yards. This project is
classified as a Case 3 bridge demolition; there are no special restrictions beyond those outlined in
Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface waters. The Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal (BMP-BD&R) will be followed and adhered to.
1.2 Methodology
Research was conducted prior to field investigations. Published resource information
pertaining to the project area was gathered and reviewed. Resources utilized in this preliminary
investigation of the project area include:
• US Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle map (Midway).
• NCDOT aerial photographs of the project area (1:1200).
• USDA Soil Conservation Service, currently known as Natural Resource Conservation Service,
Soil Survey of Davidson County, North Carolina (1994).
• NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Environmental Sensitivity Base Maps of
Davidson County (1995).
Water resource information was obtained from publications of the Department of the
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR, 1993). Information concerning the occurrence of federal
and state protected species in the study area was obtained from the US Fish and Wildlife Service list
of protected and candidate species (as of February 4, 2000) and from the N.C. Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database of rare species and unique habitats. NCNHP files were reviewed for
documented occurrences of state or federally listed species and locations of significant natural areas.
General field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by NCDOT
Environmental Biologists Logan Williams, Jeffrey Burleson, and Wendee Britt on 13 July 1999.
Water resources were identified and their physical characteristics were recorded. Plant communities
and their associated wildlife were also identified and described. Terrestrial community classifications
generally follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible, and plant taxonomy follows Radford,
et al. (1968). Animal taxonomy follows Martof, et al. (1980), Menhenick (1991), Potter, et al.
(1980), and Webster, et al. (1985). Vegetative communities were mapped utilizing aerial
photography of the project site. Predictions regarding wildlife community composition involved
general qualitative habitat assessment based on existing vegetative communities. Wildlife
identification involved using a variety of observation techniques: qualitative habitat assessment based
on vegetative communities, active searching, identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat,
tracks and burrows).
Jurisdictional wetlands, if present, were identified and evaluated based on criteria established
in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual" (Environment Laboratory, 1987) and
"Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina" (Division of Environmental
Management, 1995). Wetlands were classified based on the classification scheme of Cowardin, et al.
(1979).
2.0 Physical Resources
Soil and water resources that occur in the project area are discussed below with respect to
possible environmental concerns.
2.1 Regional Characteristics
Davidson County is in the center of the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina.
Most of the county is characterized by gently rolling to hilly landscapes. The highest elevation is on
Flat Swamp Mountain located in the Uwharrie mountain chain with an elevation of 1,180 feet. The
lowest elevation is 510 feet at Badin Lake on the southern boundary of the county. The project area
elevations average 228 in (750 feet). The county is drained by the Yadkin River and its tributaries,
which flow south to southwest. Major watersheds are Muddy Creek, Reedy Creek, Swearing Creek,
Abbott's Creek, Bushy Fork Creek, Rich Fork Creek, Hamby's Creek, Flat Swamp Creek, and Lick
Creek.
2.2 Soils
The project study area in Davidson County lies in the Chewacla-Congaree "General Soil
Mapping Unit". The Chewacla-Congaree grouping is located in flood plains, slopes from 0 to 4
percent, is very deep, somewhat poorly-drained to moderately well-drained, fine-loamy, mixed soil,
formed in recent alluvium flood plains (USDA 1994). There are three soil types located in the project
area.(Table 1) A brief description of these soil types is provided following Table 1.
6
Table 1. Soils occurring in the project area, Davidson County
Map Symbol Specific Mapping Unit % Slope Hydric Capability
Classification Unit
Ch Chewacla loam
0-1 Inclusions of Ivw
hydric soils
SfB Sedgefield sandy loam 2-8 Non-hydric Ile
EnB Enon fine sandy loam 2-8 Non-hydric IIIe
Chewacla loam, frequently flooded (Ch) is nearly level, somewhat poorly-drained soil located on
first bottoms along creeks and rivers throughout the northern, central, and western parts of the
county. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 9 inches thick. The seasonal high water
table is .5 foot to 1.5 feet below the surface. Permeability is moderate. The shrink-swell potential
is low. The depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches. The soil is generally unsuited to building site
development and recreational uses because of the wetness and the flooding.
Sedgefield sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (SfB) is a well-drained to somewhat poorly-drained
soil located in upland areas on ridges, in depressions, and on gently sloping side slopes at the
head of drainageways. Typically, the surface layer is brown sandy loam about 9 inches thick. The
subsurface layer is light yellowish-brown sandy loam about 3 inches thick. The perched seasonal
high water table is l foot to 1.5 feet below the surface. Permeability is slow in the subsoil. The
shrink-swell potential is high. The depth to bedrock is more than 60 inches.
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (EnB) is a well-drained soil located on broad to
narrow ridges on uplands. Typically, the surface layer is yellowish-brown fine sandy loam about
8 inches thick. The subsoil is about 26 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 60
inches or more is multicolored saprolite that has textures of clay loam and sandy loam.
Permeability is slow. The shrink-swell potential is high. The depth to hard bedrock is more than
60 inches. The clayey subsoil, the slow permeability, and the high shrink-well potential are the
main limitations affecting building site development. Removing the plant cover on construction
sites causes a severe hazard of erosion unless erosion-control measures are applied.
2.3 Water Resources
This section contains information concerning surface water resources likely to be impacted by
the proposed project.
2.3.1 Best Usage Classification
Water resources within the study area are located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee Drainage Basin;
Division of Water Quality sub-basin number 03-07-07; U.S. Dept. of Interior Hydrologic Unit is
03040103. There is one water resource, Abbott's Creek, in the project study area, which is crossed by
NC 109.
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), formerly Division of Environmental Management (DEM), which reflects water quality
conditions and potential resource usage. Unnamed tributaries receive the same classification as the
streams to which they flow. The classification for Abbott's Creek [DEM Index No. 12-119-(1),
8/13/92] is classified as WS-III. Class WS-III refers to waters protected as water supplies, which are
generally in low to moderately developed watersheds. Point source discharges of treated wastewater
are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subchapter. Local programs to control
nonpoint sources and stormwater discharges of pollution shall be required. Suitable for all Class C
uses: freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and
survival, and wildlife.
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-In
or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area.
2.3.2 Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
Abbott's Creek at NC 109 is approximately 10.67 in (35.0 ft) wide and ranges in depth from 0.3-
0.6 in (1.0-2.0 ft). In the study area the creek consists of a sandy loam with occasional cobble,
pebble, and rubble substrate.
2.3.3 Water Quality
This section describes the quality of the water resources within the project area. Water quality
assessments are made based on published resource information and existing general watershed
characteristics.
2.3.3.1 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Basinwide Monitoring Program, managed by the DWQ, is part of an ongoing ambient
water quality-monitoring program that addresses long-term trends in water quality. The program
monitors ambient water quality by sampling at fixed sites for selected benthic macroinvertebrates
organisms which are sensitive to water quality conditions. There is a BMAN monitoring station
within the project vicinity [DWQ Site # B-10], located 0.96 miles upstream from NC 109 bridge
where SR-1755 crosses Abbott's Creek. This upstream site is five meters wide; the substrate contains
some gravel and rubble, but is mostly sand. During the time period of the July 1999 visit, this site
received a bioclassification of Good-Fair.
2.3.3.2 Point Source and Nonpoint Source Dischargers
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the
National Pollutant Dischargers Elimination System (NPDES) Program. Any discharger is required to
register for a permit. There are three permitted dischargers, located upstream from the project area on
Abbott's Creek:
• NPDES permit # NCG550247, 11/01/93, residence - Gary J. McClellan,
located 1.67 miles upstream from NC 109
• NPDES permit # NCG550246, 11/01/93, residence - Thomas E. Lauer,
located 1.71 miles upstream from NC 109
• NPDES permit # NCG0034452, 08/18/93, facility - Willow Creek Builders Inc., located
1.78 miles upstream from NC 109
Nonpoint source discharge refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater or
snowmelt. Agricultural activities along NC 109 may serve as a source for various forms of nonpoint
source pollutants. Land clearing and plowing disturbs soils to a degree where they are susceptible to
erosion, which can lead to sedimentation in streams.
2 .4 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
In order to minimize potential impacts to water resources in the project area, NCDOT's Best
Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced during the
construction phase of the project. Impacts can be further reduced by limiting instream activities and
revegetating stream banks immediately following the completion of grading.
3.0 Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include terrestrial and aquatic communities. This section describes the biotic
communities encountered in the project area, as well as the relationships between fauna and flora
within these communities. These classifications follow Schafale and Weakley (1990) where possible.
Representative animal species that are likely to occur in these habitats (based on published range
distributions) are also cited.
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided for each animal
and plant species described. Subsequent references to the same organism refer to the common name
only. Fauna observed during the site visit are denoted in the text with an asterisk (*).
3.1 Biotic Communities
Biotic communities include terrestrial and aquatic elements. Much of the flora and fauna
described from biotic communities utilize resources from different communities, making boundaries
between contiguous communities difficult to define. There are five communities located in the
project area. These communities are discussed below.
3.1.1 Maintained/Disturbed
This community is located on both sides of NC 109 and will be impacted by both the bridge
replacement and the on-site detour. This community is made up of fallow farm fields and disturbed
roadside areas. Because of mowing and the use of herbicides this community is kept in a constant
state of early succession. The dominant species in this community are fescue (Festuca sp.), bahia
grass (Paspalum spp.), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), English plantain (Plantago lanceolata),
red clover (Trifolium pratense), trumpet vine (Campsis radicans), black-eyed Susan's (Rudbeckia
hirta), cat's ear (Hypochoeris radicata), daisy fleabane (Erigeron annus), wild onion (Allium
canadense), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisfolia), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), pokeweed
(Phytolacca americana), poison ivy (Rhus radicans), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and yellow poplar (Lirodendron tulipifera).
A small, marginal wetland is found within this community on the west side of NC 109 and on
the north side of Abbott's Creek. The 0.05 acre wetland has water-stained vegetation, low chroma
soils (Munsell moist-10 YR 4/2) with oxidized rhizospheres, and hydrophytic plants [rush(Juncus
sp.), black willow (Salix nigra), sedge (Carex sp.), and orange-spotted jewelweed (Impatiens
capensis)).
3.1.2 Piedmont Levee Forest
This community is the riparian area along the banks of Abbott's creek, between the
maintained/disturbed community to the west of NC 109 and piedmont bottomland forest community
to the north and south of Abbott's creek to the east of NC 109. This seasonally to intermittently
flooded area is subject to relocation due to the forces of the river and will tend to be very fertile. The
canopy is dominated by river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore (Platanus.occidentalis), yellow poplar,
boxelder (Acer negundo), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red oak (Quercus falcata), and loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda). Understory species located within this community are American holly (Ilex
opacca), dogwood (Cornus florida), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), red maple (A. rubrum),
bamboo (Arundinaria gigantia) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua). The vine layer is
composed of Japanese honeysuckle, greenbriar (Smilax spp.), grape (Vitus spp.), and poison ivy. The
herbaceous layer contains Japanese grass (Microstegium sp.), violet (Viola spp.), and privet
(Ligustrum sp.).
3.1.3 Piedmont Bottomland Forest
This community is found in two different places within the project area (one to the north and
one to the south) and are contiguous with the.piedmont bottomland levee forest to the north and south
of Abbott's Creek on the east side of NC 109 to the interior of the project. The northern boundary of
the northern piedmont bottomland forest community on this project joins with the dry mesic oak-
hickory forest. The southern boundary of the southern piedmont bottomland forest is a fallow field.
This intermittently flooded community supports a wide variety of different vegetation. The canopy is
dominated by green ash, sycamore, and red oak. The understory is abundant and is made up of
several species, such as, box elder, red maple, sweet gum, winged elm (Ulmus alata), strawberry bush
(Euonymus americana), and ironwood. The herbaceous layer is made up of agrimony (Agrimonia
parviflora), orange-spotted jewelweed, goldenrod, and knotweed (Polygonum sp.). The vine layer
consists of trumpet vine, begger's tick (Bidens sp.), green briar, poison ivy, and Japanese
honeysuckle.
Within this community, there is one wetland on the east side of NC 109 and on the north side
of Abbott's Creek. This 0.05 acre wetland contains "wrack lines", water-stained vegetation, low
chroma soils (Munsell moist- I OYR 4,2), oxidized rhizospheres in the soil strata, and hydrophytic
vegetation (orange-spotted jewelweed, sedge, Japanese grass, and agrimony).
3.1.4 Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory Forest
This dry-mesic community, common to the piedmont, is found at the northern-most and
southern-most stretches of the project in three different locations. Two of the locations are at the
northern-most boundary on both sides of NC 109 and are contiguous with the piedmont bottomland
forest and maintained/disturbed fallow field. The third location is at the southern-most boundary of
the project on the east side of NC 109 and is contiguous with the maintained/disturbed fallow field.
These upland flats and mid slopes are commonly multiaged with gap-dynamic succession
occurring sequentially. Periodic fires, silviculture practices, and periodic storms allow this
community to remain in a constant state of succession. The canopy is dominated by loblolly pine,
white oak (Q. alba), red oak, black oak (Q. velutina), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), pignut
hickory (C. glabra), and sweet pignut hickory (C. ovalis). The understory is comprised of American
holly, sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), dogwood, black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple, and
tulip poplar. The vine layer is comprised of grape, trumpet vine, and poison ivy. Herbs inhabiting
this habitat are sparce, but spotted wintergreen (Chimaphilla maculata), beggar's tick (Desmodium
sp.), and rattlesnake plantain (Goodyera pubescens) may be found. In addition, wetter species, such
as netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata) may be found in moist depressions.
10
3.1.5 Agriculture Row Crop
This community is planted and harvested annually for several varieties of row crops for their
commercial value. The field edges and medians are kept in a constant state of early succession, due to
mowing and use of herbicides. The dominant species found within this community are fescue, bahia
grass, Queen Anne's lace, English plantain, red clover, daisy fleabane, wild onion, ragweed, dog
fennel, and goldenrod.
3.1.6 Piedmont Perennial Stream
This community consists primarily of Abbott's Creek. Aquatic insects that may be found in
this community include the water strider (Gerris spp.), riffle beetle (Psephenus herricki), crane fly
(Tipula spp.), stream mayfly (Ephemeroptera) and black-winged damselfly (Calopteryx maculata).
Gamefish such as chain pickeral (Esox nigra), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and
sunfishes (Lepomis sp.) may occupy Abbott's Creek. Other fishes, such as shiners (Notropis sp.),
golden shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas), eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia afnis), darters
(Etheostoma sp.), chubs (Semotilus sp.), daces (Clinostomus sp.), and catfishes (Ictaluridae) may
occupy Abbott's Creek and its tributaries.
Several other animals representing all vertebrate classes are integral parts of the aquatic
system. The northern dusky salamander (Desmognathus fuscus) and the two-lined salamander
(Eurycea bislineata) may occur under rocks and logs within the riverbed. Frogs preying mostly on
aquatic insects are abundant in this habitat, such as pickeral frog (Rana palustris), southern leopard
frog (Rana sphenocephala), and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) also may occupy this habitat along the
creek bank. Other reptiles and amphibians occurring in this habitat feeding on small fish include
northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon) and snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina).
3.1.7 Wildlife
The conglomeration of community types within the project area form a contiguous and
diverse association of habitats, which allows for similarly complex faunal components. Because of
the disturbed/degraded nature of all of the habitats in the project area, the faunal component is
expected to consist of opportunistic animals able to adapt to the "edge" habitat created by human
activites. Conversely, species which require large undisturbed forested habitats are likely absent from
the project area.
Despite the degradation of the forest areas by invasive species such as privet and multiflora
rose, a vertically stratified and complex habitat with abundant food and shelter resources is available
for a variety of fauna. The canopy strata provide a plethora of food items including insects, mast and
leaves. Primarily bird species such as downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens), red-bellied
woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius), ruby-crowned
kinglet (Regulus calendula), golden-crowned kinglet (R. satrapa), brown creeper (Certhia familiaris),
blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), yellow-rumped warbler (Dendroica coronata),
white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), gray catbird (Dumetella
carolinensis) and northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) utilize the canopy. However, grey
squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Virginia opossum, grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis or H. versicolor)
and eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) also utilize this strata.
11
Bats are also important components of forested communities. The northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis) and evening bat (Nycticeius humeralis) are two of the more common species
that forage on forested hillsides, while little brown bat (M. lucifugus) and eastern pipistrelle bat
(Pipistrellus subjlavus) more commonly forage over water. Old buildings, hollow trees, or crevices
under tree bark are often used as roost sites by these species. Caves and abandoned mine shafts
(which are not present in the project area) are used as hiburnacula by many bat species in winter
months.
Many of the ground-dwelling species, including worm snake (Carphophis
amoenus), southeastern crowned snake (Tantilla coronata), southeastern shrew (Sorex
longirostris), woodland vole (Microtus pinetorum), and eastern chipmunk (Tamias
striatus) are fossorial (living in burrows). Other species occupying the forest floor include the
ground nesting ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus), American toad (Bufo americanus), ground skink
(Scincella lateralis) and eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina). Earthworms, insects and other
invertebrates constitute the majority of these species' diets. The woodland vole and the eastern
chipmunk consume mainly plant material and fungi are an important dietary item for the eastern box
turtle and various rodents.
Top predators expected to occur here include great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), various
hawks (Accipiter spp. and Buteo spp.), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and copperhead
(Agkistrodon contorix). These species are important in maintaining populations of rodents, small
birds and other small animals. Because of the open, relatively non-stratified nature of
maintained/disturbed communities such as pasture/field and roadside habitats, resident vertebrate
fauna, are generally small in size. Small mammals such as least shrew and house mouse (Mus
musculus) are able to utilize the limited amount of vegetative cover of crop fields and pastures. The
burrowing eastern mole (Scalopus aguaticus) and woodchuck (Marmota monax) are common in open
areas bordering forested tracts. These small mammals are import ant prey items for black rat snake
(Elaphae constrictor), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamacensis)* and other birds of
prey.
Few animals reside along roadsides because of the limited size and complexity of the habitat.
Various species of birds feed along roadsides on seeds, berries and insects. Some of these species
include: the northern cardinal*, American robin (Turdus migratorius) and white-throated sparrow
(Zonotrichia albicollis). Snakes such as the black racer (Coluber constrictor) and eastern garter
snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) may venture into this habitat to feed on insects and small mammals.
Virginia opossum and raccoon frequently forage nocturnally in these habitats, or travel along
roadways between habitats. These animals are often road kill victims. Consequently road kills attract
a large number of scavenger species including turkey vulture (Carthartes aura)* and common crow
(Corvus brachyrhynchos)*, as well as domestic dogs and cats.
3.2 Summary of Anticipated Impacts
3.2.1 Terrestrial Impacts
Table 2 summarizes potential losses to these communities, resulting from project
construction. Calculated impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative abundance of each
community present in the study area. Estimated impacts are derived based on known project lengths,
12
and the entire proposed right-of-way width of 18.3 m (60.0 ft) for the bridge replacement. Project
construction often does not require the entire right-of-way; therefore, actual impacts may be
considerably less. Since alternates two and three have permanent terrestrial impacts, alternate one
with the temporary terrestrial community impacts would be the preferred alternative. Alternate two
would be recommended as the "runner up alternate", with the less impact to biological diverse
systems than the third alternate. Alternate three has the greatest impacts to biological diverse
communities, and thus would be recommended as the least acceptable alternative from a natural
resources view. Alternate two has a substantial acreage of impacts in the maintained/disturbed
community. Also, alternate two impacts the dry mesic oak-hickory forest to a lesser extent and does
not impact the piedmont bottomland forest or the piedmont levee forest to any degree. The piedmont
bottomland forest, piedmont levee forest, and the dry mesic oak-hickory forest communities have
greater biological diversities, supporting a spectrum of animal-to-animal, animal-to-plant, and plant-
to-plant complex relationships moreover than the maintained/disturbed community.
Table 2. Estimated area impacts, to terrestrial communities.
Community : Impacted Area-ac(ha)
Alternated** A6rnated2* Alternate 3*
Maintained/disturbed 0.964(0.390) 1.422(0.575) 0.906(0.367)
Agriculture row crop 0.289(0.117) 0.634(0.256) No impact
Piedmont bottomland forest No impact No impact 0.868(0.351)
Piedmont bottomland levee forest No impact No impact 0.152(0.061)
Dry mesic oak-hickory forest 0.127(0.051) 0.344(0.139) 0.522(0.211)
Total Impacts 1.380(0.558) 2.400(0.970) 2.448(0.990)
*Permanent Impacts
**Temporary Impacts
3.2.2 Aquatic Impacts
4.0 Jurisdictional Topics
This section provides inventories and impact analyses pertinent to two significant regulatory
issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected species.
4.1 Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States,"
as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Any action that proposes
to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or wetlands falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Surface waters include all standing or flowing waters which have commercial or recreational value to
the public. Wetlands are identified based on the presence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and
saturated or flooded conditions during all or part of the growing season.
4.1.1 Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Criteria to delineate jurisdictional wetlands include evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation and hydrology. Two wetlands (0.10 acres total) are located within the project study area
and are both found on the north side Abbott's Creek. Wetland one, described above, is located in the
13
maintained/disturbed community on the west side of NC 109 in the corner of the fallow field (0.05
acres). Wetland one will be impacted by construction of alternate one and two; however construction
of alternate one will only temporarily impact wetland one. Wetland two, also described above, is
located in the Piedmont bottomland forest on the east side of NC109 (0.05 acres). Wetland two will
be impacted by construction of alternate three. Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are calculated
based on the linear feet of the stream that is located within the proposed right-of-way. A length of
9.14 in (30.0 ft) of Abbott's Creek and 0.01 ha (0.02 ac) of streambed may be impacted by the
proposed bridge replacement. In order to minimize impacts to jurisdictional surface waters Alternate
1 would be the preferred alternative.
4.1.2 Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated from the proposed project. As a
result, construction activities will require permits and certifications from various regulatory agencies
in charge of protecting the water quality of public water resources.
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (23) is likely to be applicable for all impacts to Waters of the
United States resulting from the proposed project. This permit authorizes activities undertaken,
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed in whole, or part, by another Federal agency or
department where that agency or department has determined that pursuant to the council on
environmental quality regulation for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act:
• that the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment, and;
• that the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished notice of the agency' or department's
application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that determination.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to the
issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state issue or
deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a discharge
to Waters of the United States. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be temporarily
impacted for the duration of the construction or other land manipulation. The issuance of a 401
permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
4.13 Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
The COE has adopted through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) a wetland
mitigation policy which embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The
purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological and physical integrity of
Waters of the United States, specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined
by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts,
reducing impacts over time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three
aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting
impacts to Waters of the United States. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate and
14
practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the
scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology and logistics
in light of overall project purposes.
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the
adverse impacts to Waters of the United States. Implementation of these steps will be required
through project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on decreasing
the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction to median widths, right-of-way widths, fill
slopes and/or road shoulder widths.
Compensatory mitigation in not normally considered until anticipated impacts to Waters of
the United States have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is recognized
that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and every permit
action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse
impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has been required.
Compensatory actions often include restoration, creation and enhancement of Waters of the United
States, specifically wetlands. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent to or contiguous to
the discharge site.
Compensatory mitigation is required for those projects authorized under Nationwide Permits
that result in the fill or alteration of-
• More than 0.45 ha (1.0 ac) of wetlands
• And/or more than 45.7 m (150.0 linear ft) of streams
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands would be avoided and minimized if alternate one is chosen.
Compensatory mitigation is not anticipated for construction of this project.
If a mitigation plan is required, written approval of the final mitigation plan is required from
the DWQ prior to the issuance of a 401 Certification. Final permit/mitigation decisions rest with the
COE.
4.2 Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either due
to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human development. Federal law (under the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to
adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
4.2.1 Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under the provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of February 4, 2000, the FWS lists
three federally protected species for Davidson County. A brief description of the characteristics and
habitat requirements for these species along with a conclusion regarding potential project impacts
follows Table 3.
15
Table 3. Federally-Protected
for Davidson County.
Common Name Scientific Name - 'Status'
E .
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened
Schweinitz's sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T(S/A)
Note:
• "Endangered" denotes a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
• "Threatened" denotes a species likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range.
• "T(S/A)" denotes its similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for
protection. T S/A species are not subject to Section 7 consultation and a biological
conclusion for this species is not required.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Animal Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: March 11, 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail. The
body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar.
Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path
to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. The breeding season
for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles.
Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
The project area is within one-half mile of water (Abbott's Creek). However,
Abbott's Creek is too small to support an eagle population and field surveys at the time of
field investigation, revealed no sign of bald eagles within the project area. In addition, the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database was reviewed and revealed no
records of bald eagles in the project area. Thus, construction of the proposed project will
have no effect on this species.
Helianthus schweinitzii (Schweinitz's sunflower)
Plant Family: Asteraceae
Federally Listed: June 6, 1991
Flowers Present: mid September-early October
Distribution in N.C.: Cabarrus, Davidson, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Randolph, Rowan, Stanly,
Stokes, Union.
16
Schweinitz's sunflower is a rhizomatous perennial herb that grows 1-2 m tall from a cluster of
carrot-like tubrous roots. The stems are deep red, solitary and only branch above mid-stem. The
leaves are rough feeling above and resin-dotted and loosely soft-white-hairy beneath. Leaves of the
sunflower are opposite on the lower part of the stem and usually become alternate on the upper stem.
The broad flowers are borne from September until frost. These flowers are yellow in color and
arranged in an open system of upwardly arching heads. The fruit is a smooth, gray-black acheme.
Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to North and South Carolina. These sunflowers grow best
in full sunlight or light shade in clearings and along the edges of open stands of oak-pine-hickory
upland woods. Common soils that this species is found in are moist to dryish clays, clay-loams, or
sandy clay-loams, often with a high gravel content and always moderately podzolized. Natural fires
and large herbivores are considered to be historically important in maintaining open habitat for these
sunflowers.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable habitat was found within the project area; therefore, a plant-by-plant survey was
conducted on July 13, 1999 by NCDOT natural systems specialists Logan Williams, Jeffrey Burleson,
and Wendee Britt during the flowering season. Several Helianthus sp. individuals were seen, but no
H. schweinitzii was identified. The NCNHP database has no records indicating that this species exists
in the project area. Therefore, there will be no impacts to this species during construction of the
project.
Clemmys muhlenbergii (bog turtle)
Proposed Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
Family: Emydidae
Date Listed: May 01, 1997
The bog turtle is North Carolina's smallest turtle, measuring 7 to 10 cm (3 to 4 in) in length.
It has a dark brown carapace and a black plastron. The bright orange or yellow blotch on each side of
the head and neck is a readily identifiable characteristic. The bog turtle inhabits damp grassy fields,
bogs and marshes in the mountains and western Piedmont.
The bog turtle is shy and secretive, and will burrow rapidly in mud or debris when disturbed.
The bog turtle forages on insects, worms, snails, amphibians and seeds. In June or July, three to five
eggs are laid in a shallow nest in moss or loose soil. The eggs hatch in about 55 days.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NOT REQUIRED
The bog turtle is listed as Proposed Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance (T S/A).
This is due to its similarity of appearance to another rare species that is listed for protection. T S/A
species are not subject to Section 7 consultation and a biological conclusion for this species is not
required.
17
4.2.2 Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
There are three federal species of concern listed by the FWS for Davidson County (Table 4).
Federal species of concern are not afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and
are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed
as Threatened or Endangered. However, the status of these species is subject to change, and so
should be included for consideration. Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are defined as a species that
is under consideration for listing for which there is insufficient information to support listing. In
addition, organisms which are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by
the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program list of Rare Plant and Animal Species are afforded state
protection under the NC State Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection and Conservation
Act of 1979.
Table 4 lists federal species of concern, the state status of these species (if afforded state
protection), and the potential for suitable habitat in the project area for each species. This species list
is provided for information purposes as the protection status of these species may be upgraded in the
future.
Table 4. Federal Species of Concern For Davidson County.
- Scientific Name Common Name NC Habitat
Status
Etheostoma collis collis Carolina darter SC YES
Aster georgianus Georgia aster T* YES
Lotus helleri Heller's trefoil C YES
"T A Threatened species is one which is likely to become endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"SC"--A Special Concern species is one which requires monitoring but may be taken or collected and
sold under regulations adopted under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General
Statutes (animals) and the Plant Protection and Conservation Act (plants). Only propagated
material may be sold of Special Concern plants that are also listed as Threatened or
Endangered.
"C"--A Candidate species is one which is very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations
in the state, generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction, direct
exploitation or disease. The species is also either rare throughout its range or disjunct in North
Carolina from a main range in a different part of the country or the world.
* -- Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
A review on November 23, 1999 of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats
shows two occurrences of FSC and/or state listed species approximately 1000 ft. to the North of NC
109 Bridge that crosses Abbott's Creek; [quad - MIDWAY, Carolina birdfoot-trefoil (Lotus helleri),
survey date - 08/05/37, last observed - 08/05137, updated - 06/05/95], [quad - MIDWAY, Heller's
rabbit tobacco (Gnaphalium helleri); only state listed survey date - 09/14/56, last observed -
09/14/56, update- 04/02/91, found by Ahles & Leisner]
18
D. Air Quality and Traffic Noise
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, thus it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required.
If the project disposes of vegetation by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with
applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15
NCAC 2D.0520.
The project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will have no
substantial impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during construction.
E. Farmland
The land use zoning in the project area allows agricultural, commercial, and residential uses,
as well as light industrial uses. The bridge is located in a sparsely settled rural and agricultural region.
Farms and their associated dwellings and outbuildings, as well as traditional dwellings and mobile
homes characterize the area. The bridge is surrounded by Chewacla (Cw) soil. This soil is only
considered Prime Farmland when it is elevated and well drained. Thus it is concluded that the project
will have no effect on Prime Farmland.
19
N
0OF NOMTh North Carolina Department of
Transportation
N
Division of Highways
e ?`' Project Development g Environmental
?Fr,o? ?NSV°p Analvsis Branch
Davidson Count,
Replace Bridge No. 135 on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
B-2951
Figure One

r .? rv (t iy't t aun yalew _. UZ, Pit
<r Abbott's Creek
xf, f a
V J,
0
?Z
Q?
o l
a?
Y
co
C
N
Y
1 Q
p4 ?
aui? 4aleW
1,?? ????? ?^"?-., `?,?i .-?-. ?-^'? ??.r '??`. ?r '''? a .?? .?rFy? ?f?F,t?./??-.^ ??,? ? ?.,.• r ? /" !: to ti ?..?'fi?'e?i-+ ?.. w' ?
ILA
h ,? .a ?-?????? ? ?' w- - ? -"' -r :?.. cry cam , t ,?r? ?Fi ?a •r.• ? w,
`ter '+? x`!?t' ,?r?tr3?,r?! •-:i f ^-??c '? ? t",,,,j Jlr •???./??F ?P'

?r

ti .?YyJt
, r`?. tea .. r?, .L'-k 'h Yi,x' 1i't tT•, of
.14
Oai
3..MJ?? • ?,;, +?'i1 r. ~_ i'4 .s?. r . ,'t 4x" T. ?• 4 L? ?:.
jim,
ri.
(??•[?'+'?-4. -r•' tY:? ,:
;1?71711-40-w W,

may.

= o tU

` a t E o? ?
? s y ,.., I

u ?' bo Y

11 °o
d
`rs OEPP'
-
i
NO MV

Looking north across
Bridge No. 135
Looking south across
Bridge No. 135
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development S Environmental
Analvsis Branch
Davidson Count}'
Replace Bridge No. 135 on NC 109
Over Abbott's Creek
B-=951
FiEiure Three
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dennis Pipkin, Project Planning Engineer
Planning & Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Co ator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: December 5, 1997
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements, Davidson, Guilford, Forsyth, and Stokes
counties, North Carolina, TIP Nos. B-2951, B-3179, B-3330, B-3332, B-
3333, B-3374, B-3324.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
conducted site visits as need and have the following preliminary comments on the subject
projects. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment.
The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human
and wildlife passage beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and
does not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the
stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
Bridge Replacement Memo 3 December 5, 1997
avoid destabilizing stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old
structure should be removed and the approach fills removed from the 100-year
floodplain. Approach fills should be removed down to the natural ground elevation. The
area should be stabilized with grass and planted with native tree species. If the area that
is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to wetlands. If
successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other
projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2951 - We have no specific comments.
2. B-3179 - We have no specific comments.
3. B-3330 - We have no specific comments.
4. B-3332 - We have no specific comments.
5. B-3333 - We have no specific comments.
6. B-3374 - It is unlikely that this stream supports trout. We have no specific
comments.
7. B-3324 - We have no specific comments.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and
maintain sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent
wet concrete from contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of
bridges with spanning structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is
recommended in most cases. Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along
streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation and vehicle related mortality at highway
crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding
bridge replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity
to review and comment on these projects.

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
Division of Archives and History
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Jeffrey ]. Crow, Director
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
December 16, 1997
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replace Bridge #1315 on NC 109 over Abbott's
Creek, Davidson County, B-2951, Federal Aid
Project BRNHS-109(2), State Project
8.1601301, ER 9.8-7696
Dear Mr. Graf:
We regret staff was unable to attend the scoping meeting for the above project on
November 4, 1997. However, Debbie Bevin met with Dennis Pipkin of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) on December 2, 1997, to discuss
the project and view the project photographs and aerial.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, Bridge #135, built in 1932, is the only
structure within the general project area that is over fifty years of age. We
recommend that an architectural historian with NCDOT evaluate the bridge for
National Register eligibility and report the findings to us. We recommend that no
additional architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in-connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.-
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
,no T:„, T,..,., c .-.,r • Pole;-h. North Carolina 1-7601-'-S07
A
7.-,l :,Id - ?NH5-ID9 (z Tip - ?-2u51 C:.ur , DAV IT)
SIN -
CO1tiCl:RRC`iCE FORM FOR PROPS %TILS `OT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Brice Prcjcz: Dcsc:iotion e to ?f j cLn e- Nk) .1315 a n MC 1 Dq DV 2(
?rrho•?1-'S re k
On C? .15 I q ?{ representatives of the
? Ncrh Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
V""** Fcdcral Hil hway Administration (FH%vA)
North Carolina Statc Historic Preservation OfIicc (SHPO)
Other
rc,Ac,.vcd :hc subject project at
A scooine mcc:im:
?Historc crchicccturcl resources chotc_*r; ph rc•: ic•x scss,cn. consultatlcn
C?tr._- - -- -
'.I1 ,a.,.--s :,resent ar::__..
;f:C.'C aCC no Oro CCttiCS 0,er ti ' 'Cars oto \\'i[lal: t1:C _, S arca
_ ulcrc arc orcoc:tics over n,'t• ycars aid (list :ma=te-) within the pro1cc:*s ar; ± of potcral'al CITCC:S,
but based on the historical infomiation'availabic and the phetoamphs of each prepcm, prep=: lcs
idcmificd as F)yi A e- ?O. 1--:? ti c ccrsidcrcd not cii2iblc
?thcrc arc no oroocrtics less than f ftv %•ccrs old %viiic`.i -.7C considered to meet Cruetc-
Ccnsidcmtion G within the project's arca ofpetcnticl c=cc:_
iur varicnzt Rc2lstcr =dJ,-io n-urtncr.Vziu:ation of ti cm :s -,cczssz V.
V :.SCfC afC no National ,,CalstCf-Itstcd properties within tl,c oro'cc: s arca ct _otcatlal c^cc:s
lg 1cC:
?_ 1 U 15
R.ores nl VC, N DOT Dam
r
FH%vA, for tic Division Administrator, or other Fcdc -l Agency Datc
I NA
Representative, HPO Datc
State istoric Preservation Of;•,Ecr 'Date
s::r•c rrr.??rt is :c=aste ?, 1 1 111=1 cut, ut Qus :ur.:i a:l :!:c L:chc1'.ist •?ii, ,e ..:c!t:?c