20010666 Ver 1_Complete File_20010430

F WAIF
\O?? RpG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 1, 2001
Clay County
SR 1173 (Muskrat Creek Road)
DWQ Project No. 010666
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. Ralph Cannady, P.E.
NCDOT Andrews District Office
P.O. Box 1551
Andrews, NC 28901
Dear Mr. Cannady:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 221
linear feet of Muskrat Branch and tributaries for the purpose of upgrading SR 1173 (Muskrat Branch
Road) in Macon County. The project should be constructed in accordance with your application dated 19
April 2001. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification No. 3289 corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit
Number 14. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water
Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying §404 permit unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is
thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional
conditions listed below.
1. Any trout conditions as determined by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, to protect
the egg and fry stages of trout from sedimentation during construction.
2. Storm water should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly
into streams.
3. Sedimentation and Erosion Control Guidelines for Sensitive Watersheds (15a NCAC 4B .0024) must
be implemented prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to downstream aquatic
resources. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within
IS days of ground-disturbing activities to provide long term erosion control.
4. The new stream channel should be completed and stabilized prior to turning water into it.
5. The culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream
profile is not altered (i.e. the depth of the channel should not be reduced by a widening of the
streambed). Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert
extensions.
6. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Page 2of2 _
7. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be regularly inspected and maintained
to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic
materials.
8. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances should rock,
sand or other materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit,
except in the immediate vicinity of the culverts.
9. Mowing of existing vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for storm
water sheet flow.
10. Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rather, native vegetation is to be planted
when practical. If necessary, rip-rap should be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark,
and vegetation should be used for stabilization above high water.
11. Rock silt screens at culvert outlets should be removed at project completion.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a
hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C.
27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.733.1786 or Mr.
Mike Parker of the Asheville Regional Office at 828.251-6452.
Sincerely,
Attachment
tevens
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
DWQ Asheville Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NCDOT - SR 1173
Project Number 01 0666
Recvd From DOT
Received Date 4/30/01 Recvd By Region
Project Type road improvements
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F14 Stream O Y OO N F- 1-5-1 TR 40,501. F- 221.00 221.00
I- I
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetiand Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more Info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 10 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y pO N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 350234 Longitude (ddmmss) 833807
Comments:
Check stream classification Thompson Creek is "c".
All but one stream crossing_ar 4 short extensions less than 25 feet.
The channel change is at the end of the road and stream has previously been impacted. It is a "C"
type stream. I asked DOT to try and do stream improvements when they do the channel change
hopefully to a B or C. They verbally agreed.
No concrete in stream. Sediment and Erosion control devices.
New channel should be completed and stabilized prior to turning water into it.
Culverts should be installed in such a manner that existing stream dimensions are maintained and
fish and wildlife can move through them.
Stormwater should be directed to buffer areas or detention basins.
County Clay
County2
Region Asheville
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name NCDOT - SR 1173
Project Number 01 0666
Comments (continued from page 1):
County Clay
Regional Contact: Michael R. Parker
Date:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

STATr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
SR 1173
Clay County
Mr. Steve Lund
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
Dear Mr. Lund:
r-ri
T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to grade, drain,
base and pave SR 1173, Muskrat Branch, primarily along the existing roadway. In order to
construct this project in accordance with our current secondary road standards and due to the
proximity of a trout stream (Muskrat Branch tributaries, Class C - Trout Water and Thompson
Creek, Class C) and extension of pipe culverts, we are requesting authorization under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (Nationwide permit 14).
I am sending a straight-line diagram with the proposed erosion control, stream, stream
bank, and construction limits and various sites along the project where we will be in conflict with
the stream. In addition, I am sending a typical section of the road, cross sections, drawings for
pipe culvert replacements, general notes and standards on some erosion control measures, and a
marked map. We propose to install all the new culverts slightly below the existing streambed
elevations where bedrock is not encountered to minimize impacts to wildlife habitats and allow
the existing stream gradients to remain as unchanged as is physically possible. No threatened or
endangered species are known to be present in or near the project area; therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated from project construction.
The best management practices will be used to minimize and control sedimentation and
erosion on this project. The construction foreman will review all erosion control measures daily
to ensure sedimentation and erosion are being effectively controlled. If the planned devices are
not functioning as intended, they will immediately be replaced with better devices. The rocksilt
screens and other erosion control devices will be in place prior to pipe culvert construction and
will remain in place until the project is stabilized.
kndrews District Office
P. O. Box 1551, Andrews, N. C. 28901
April 19, 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
01 06 66
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Mr. Steve Lund
Page 2
April 19, 2001
By copy of this letter, I am asking Owen Anderson, North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) Western Mountain Region Coordinator, to comment directly to you
concerning the 404 Nationwide Permit request.
A request will be made on this project for a temporary encroachment in the Trout Water
Buffer Zone of a tributary to Muskrat Creek from station 55+10 to 56+35, and I am asking Mr.
Anderson and Mr. Ed Ingle, Area Roadside Environmental Engineer (NCDOT) to comment
directly to me concerning the Trout Water Buffer Zone encroachment.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization to proceed under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act from the Division of Environmental Management. (A check payable to NC
Division of Water Quality in the amount of $475.00 is attached to this application with the new
fee schedule).
We would like to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is
required, please call me at [phone]. Your early review and consideration will be greatly
appreciated.
Sincerely,
I
Ryl Cannady, P. E.
County Maintenance Engineer
RC/rr
Attachments
cc: Mr. Richard Phillips, P.E., Regional Engineer DEHNR
Mr. R. G. Watson, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. E. L. Ingle, Area Roadside Environmental Engineer
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, DENR (with attachment)
Mr. Owen Anderson, Western Mountain Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr. B. C. Burch, P. E., District Engineer
Mr. T. A. Woody, Transportation Supervisor III
Mr. Mark Davis, Division Environmental Officer

>l .Era5lOn ?n-?c'?? ?k fan
,ty
0
ti
z?
,. ??tavcmcn
,', ?tl1. D tC?l
AOW
y
7]
oool?
p 00 i -
Illl
11?
Ilp
v,
CTEIER pE•FI
V. 5.Clo `. o BRASSTOWN
_ _ . l .
' 1 O N A L 1-
\ ? ?. CEEB C=?
\ / ?? u. 1 S ?? SCI t W
\ Ir._ yC I ? ? 1.
1 ? Iln J 1
•?aG %C 1% uCwr.•
-( F /o \
REST, •`
STANDING INOLN WLOU!!
J O I /+.vL.GW!NT Al1A
IIy;I
J 11 ?,. bPl ?>r \ QI ???
/ I .. .. r• Crtir- /
` J \ a rC
I \ an
u ?I I
I ° ° r r I
u5 kc CA C cue whoa
5 - M3
c?Qy co???y
i0rl?.
x.13 c
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
4
- CZAY
ROAD NAME: MUSKRAT CREEK RD. ROAD NO. SR-1173
WORK ORDER NO. 6.922072
FROM: END OF PAVEMENT STA. 0+00
TO: END OF PROJECT STA. 59+50
ADDITION: YES NO xx
IMPROVEMENT: YES xx NO
TO BE PAVED: YES xx NO
GUY WIRES
POWER POLES TO MOVE: YES NO xx
CABLE BOXES GUY WIRES 1
TELEPHONE POLES TO MOVE: YES NO xx
RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH: 50
SCALE: lit = 50'
REVISED
DATE:
9/13/00
I
I i
i
I
1 112: 1 slope
orflatter 91
/ SHLD.
CI L
I ?
l:1 slope
or flatter
I
9' 4 I - >
SHLD. T
DITCH '
_I
------------------- L----------. L.-- •-------? -----I----I

sj`?'" ?-`:' si ?!• FLOW ROAD NAME:
R-117 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
STATION SIZE LT. RT. REMARKS
0+60 18" REPLACE WITH 18" CMP.
2+50 18" -? " " 18 CMP.
10+90 36" 36" CMP.
12+85 24" 36" CMP.
17+45 1811 to 18" CMP.
21+85 NONE ADD 18" CMP.
28+70 24" REPLACE WITH 36" CMP.
32+00 NONE ADD 18" CMP.
35+40 18" REPLACE WITH 18" CMP.
41+90 36" 11 11 36" CMP.
46+45 36" 36" CMP.
49+15 NONE ADD 18" CMP.
53+85 24" REPLACE WITH 18" CMP.
54+70 18" 18" CMP.
55+80 24" 11 36" CMP.
58+15 24" 36" CMP.

F-' V L I= UH I A -
PROJECT: SHEET NO.
COUNTY: CLAY CO.
WORK ORDER NO. 6.922072 OWNER OF POLES
GTE
ROAD NAME: MUSKRAT CREEK RD.

POLE DIST. FROM
CL OF
PRESENT RD. DIST FROM
CL OF
PROJECT DIST. TO
CL OF PROJ.
AFTE MOVE
STATION N0. RT. LT. RT. LT. RT. LT. REMARKS
2-GW 279
29+50 MOVE ONE G/W

I
3L
• I
510.
RI W-
4.50 ®- 1 _
I
i
I
I
4.00 v
HAROLD E. & EVELYN L. PARKER
473 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC 28904
I
3.50 v
- I-
(2) I
I

I
3 '110 v-
I
2+70 ® I
TILT BASIN
I
-
TYPE B --_-I
--
12x3x2 _
_ 5 0'
I
I
2-C ® I_
I
I
I

1 I
1-50 I ?I
v
CHECK. DAMS
SPACED AS REQUIRED

..
I
I
l.oo I
-
i
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
8x3x2
EXISTING R/W
0+30
4.50
BERNICE HOGSED BURCH
2040 BEAVER RUN
HIAWASSEE, GA
30546
4+00
7.50
(1)
z""A
EXIST. 18" CMP. TO BE REPLACED
WITH NEW 18" CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 2+50
z-CIQ
1.50
SILT FENCE
ROCK BERM
11+00
(1)
EXIST. 1811 CMP. TO BE REPLACED
WITH NEW 1811 CMP. LT. OT RT.
STA. 0+60
510'
RI
0=00 v I
0+00
sio• ,
RI W- ,
'.*iIECDORE & MONTREAS BAILEY
2641 E COMPTON ST. g+gp I 9+50
ORLANDO, FL 32806
(4)
LINDA JEAN MCCRAY
P.O. BOX 221
HAYESVILLE, NC 28904
(3)
(2)

.00 I
I
I
I_
I
I

+00

8+65 I

8+50
I
I 8.50

8-00 I
I
I
I
I

8.00

7.50
7+45 I
I
I
I o.

7.50
7+45
s
RI
I
I
7-ca I
- -
I
1' SILT FENCE
&

I ROCK BERM

6.50 I
_ I
I
I
I
I
i
6.50
6+00 6+00
CHECK DAMS SPACED
AS REQUIRED
I
5+50 I 5+50
V
I
510
RI
5+00 I 5+00
(3)
(1)
. I
slo.
R I W-----7
14+50
- 14,50
I
(7) I
I
I 14+:
CHECK DAMS SPACE 14.00 _
- 110+oo
AS REQUIRED V I
I
I
I
13-5 17.50
0 ® I
I
I
I
13.00 13+00
I
JIMMY & JOYCE BRYSON
P.O. BOX 651
HAYESVILLE, NC
28904
(9)
MILDRED Y. HOGSED
600 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC
28904
(8)
EXIST. 2411 CMP. TO BE REPLACED
END RIP RAP DITCH WITH NEW 3611 CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 12+50 I STA. 12+85 SEE SITE # 2
CARL E. & MARTHA PATTERSON -'"A-50000 2+50
rz-w F
671 MUSKRAT CREEK RD 0o I --
- J S 0'
HAYESVILLE, NC do0 RI W
28904
000
000 i
1.00 I
(7) ppJ
000 I
r2 CO 000 1
-
- 2-100
I
coo

BEGIN
RIP RAP ?Qo
oo?
I
ITCH STA 11+0 oo
co
0
0 I
0
11.50
11+50
I
I
00
11 25 I 11+25
LID

STA 12+50
END TSF & R
MRS. ROBERT EULENE HOLDEN
118 ROBERT HOLDEN DRIVE
HAYESVILLE, NC 28904
(5)
or I JOHN A. & RUTH H. SIMMONS
(5) 40 328 SAN REMO RD. SW
11+00 Q00
_ I 11+00
00 -I 10+90 PALM BAY, 6
10+90 ) 32908
pp- -114?q
-I- - - EXIST. 3611 CMP. TO BE REPLACED
WITH NEW 3611 CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 10+90 SEE SITE 1
10+50
(4) 10.30
I (3)
I
sio.
10+00
10+00

SIO,
R I W -?
19+50 19+50
I
I

19+00 I
1

. 19+00
BEGIN SILT FENCE
AND ROCK BERM I (7)
STA 18+50
I
18+50 18+50

BEGIN CHECK DAMS
(7) i STA 18+00

I SILT BASIN
TYPE B
18.00 .18+00
I 12X3X2
I
I 17+75
EVELYN HANNA REERS
17+50 44 WEEPING WILLOW LN
HAYESVILLE, NC
EXIST. 181, CMP. TO BE REPLACE
-1- - - 28904
F
H NEW 1811 CMP. LT. TO RT. 1 17+5 (11)
. 17+45
NANCY CURTIS
17-,00 . 17.00 130
WAYNE MCCAW RD.
..ND CHECK DAMS I IRMO, SC
29063
STA 17+00
1 16+70
I (10)

16+50 v - 1_ f6+50
I
I

16+00
v I
I
16+00

I
I (9)
(7) 15+50 - I 15+50
I
I
510"
R1
15+ 00 - I 15+00
: `_F?GARET S. BRUNTON
KAY S. BRUNTON COUODE
11 W UPSAL ST.
PHIOADELPHIA, PA 19119
I
slo•
RIW
24.50 24+5C
I
I
i
24+00 . I- 24+00
I
I
I
I
(14) 23+50 _ I _ 3J
I
BEGIN CHECK DAMS
STA 23+50
CHARLES & TRACY PARKER
769 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC 28904
(12)
END SF & R
STA20+70
(7)
I
23'40 2300
I
I
I
I
22.M I 22.50
22+45 510 +1
R
I '
I
I
22-00 I_ 22+00
I
(13)
BEGIN SF & RB
STA 23+60
DAVID HOGSED
774 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC 28904
ND SF & R
TA23+10
(13)
BEGIN SF &
STA 21+85
(11)
® ADD 18" CMP. RT. TO
- - i - - - STA. 21+85 .1
I
21+50 _ I 21+50 21+
I
I
I
I
21+00 _ I 21+00
I
20+80
? I
I
20+50
I
I
.51
RI
20 + 00 I 20 + 00
(7)
END CHECK DAMS
STA 20+50

I
510,
RIW
29+50 v - I-
I
I
BEGIN CHECK DAMS I
STA 29+15
29-00. _ I-
I
I
EXIST. 24" CMP. TO BE REPLACEAAl
WITH NEW 36" CMP. LT. TO RT. -I
STA. 28±70 SEE SITE # 3
I
STA 26 28«50----1----
END C
i
I

28.00 I
I

I ?

(14)

27.50 I
I
I
-
Slo. I
- -RIW-j ::
I

2700 1

I
I

26+50 I
I
1
- I
I

6+00 I
I
(-
HECK DAMS I
+20 1
I

z5+50 I

I
i
510'
RI
25 + 00
28+00
27.50
26+50
1 25 + 00
(14)
IBEGIN TSDI
STA28+90
28+
END SF & RB
STA 28+50
(13)
34+70 - 510,
RI W-
r
1
END CHECK DAMS 34+50
- I-
STA34+25
I
. I
I
34+00 1
I
I
WILLIAM N. & CAROLYN G. GREENE 1
P.O. BOX 1077 I
LUMPKIN, GA 1
31815 33+50
I
I
(15) I
I
33+00 v
I
I
I
I
32.50 _
510•
RIW
SILT BASIN
TYPE B 1
8x3x2 I
I
I
31+60
31+50 1
- I
I
. I
I
31+00 _
i
I
(14) I
I
30+50 _
I
I
510'
RI
30 + 00 _ 1- 1
(17)
4+7
34.50
(14)
BEGIN SF &
END TSD
STA 33+2
.50
3z?
ADD 18" CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 32+00
(14)
30 + 00
9+50
510'
- -R1W-
(18 )
39.50 39+ Abbie Sawyer

: I c/o Horace Ledford
1145 Muskrat Creek Rd.
Hayesville, NC
39+2 i 28904

38+00 I
- 39 o GIN SF & RB
N
I-
I A
39+00

I (18)
36+50 - I-
I 38-5038+50 P
I SF&
=

END
CHECK DAMS
ETA 38+00 3600 v _
36.00
OR

I M
RIS & LAURA D. SPIVEY JR.
P.O. BOX 1106
HAYESVILLE , NC

I 28904

John E. Deckert II I
I

2175 Eagle Fork Rd. 37.50
v
- -
I J7+50
Hayesville, NC W
R
1 ?
28904

(16)
37.00 I

I
I

37roo (17)

36+50

v i
I

I
I

36+50

36+00

_ I
I
I
I

35+00
I
I
SILT BASIN I
TYPE B
8 X 3 X 2 33+50 _ _ 35+50
I
EXIST. 18" CMP.:TO_BE.:REPLACE
:.
--
- -
---
510
WITH NEW 18" CMP. LT. TO RT.
S

RI TA. 35+40
35 + 00 _ 1 _ 35 + 00

510'
RI w-
.:ORACE & ETNA LEDFORD 44.50
rr«so
1145 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC I
28904
I
44«00 I_ 44+00
(20) I
43+80
I
I
+50 I 43«50
CHECK DAMS SPACED
AS REQUIRED I
NEWELL LEDFORD
2155 BURROW RD.
CARROLLTON, OHIO
44615
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
(19) 12x3x2
(18)
CHECK DAMS SPACED
AS REQUIRED

I
I
47.00. __ I-- 43.00
I
I
I
I
42-50
42-50 (18)
510
RI
I
41.00 I 02.00
- - EXST. 36" CMP. TO BE REPLACE
- - WITH NEW 36" CMP. LT. TO RT.
41+70 I I STA. 41+90 SEE SITE 4
I
40+00
41+50
I
-
I
I 41+50
I
I
1+00 1
- I_
I
I
I
.50 I
I
I
S 10,
R
I
4
40
40+
41+00
4o+so
00
49+50
BRUCE & FRANCES KING
1245 MUSKRAT CREEK RD.
HAYESVILLE, NC
28904
(21)
CHECK DAMS SP
AS REQUIRED
(18)
(20)

48+50
48+00
47.50
47+00
45+50
45+00
slo'
-- RI W--- -;
I
49+50 J
l =IN A
DD NEW 18" CMP.
- - - - I - - - -
STA. 49+15
49+00 0
I
I
END TSF & RB
STA 49+00
I
48+50
I
I
I
I
. 48+00
I
I
I
I
I
I SIO 47.50 (18)
R vv -
i
I
I
I
I I -_ 47+04
I
I
I
I
s6+50
EXST. 36" CMP. TO BE REPLACE
- - -I- - - <4 WITH NEW 36" CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 46+45
I
i 46+00
I
I
I
I
I
45+50
I
I
RIW i
_ l - 45+00
(22)
EXST. 18" CMP TO BE REPLACED
WITH NEW 1811 CMP. LT. TO RT.
54+50 54+50 ® - I - 54.50 54+50 STA. 54+70 PL
I
I
I
I
SILT BASIN 54.00
sa+oo
TYPE B I
12x3x2
EXST. 241' CMP', TO BE REPLACE
- ---I- - - WITH NEW 18" CMP. LT. TO RT.
STA. 53+85
53+50 _ I _
I SJ*50
END TSD
STA 53+50
I
5-7+00 - I
53+00
I
I

(18) I
I

BEGIN CHECK DAMS I
5z *50 - - 1
sz+so (18)
Slo
STA 52+50 _
R I W-
I =

END CHECK DAM I
52
-00
I

z-oo
STA 51+75
I
I
I
51150
I
I
I
51+50
I
51+00
51+00
I
50+75 I
I
50+50
i 50+50
(21) I
510'
RI
50+00
_ I _
150+00

W
\ R -
I
ROJECT
--`= _ I
59+50 59.5 /
-
_ _
I
9+SO ?
59+50
END OF PROJECT
END CHECK DAMS I END SF & RB
STA 59+35 I
I STA 59+50
59+00 ® - 1_
I
I 59+00
I
I
58+50 v - 1 _
I

58+50

WILLETTE & WELDON TANNE
71 I
R _ -I - -
-
EXST
24"
1 WELDON ST. N ® .
CMP. TO BE REPLACED
GASTONIA, NC -
I - -
58-co - - - - WITH NEW 36" CMP. LT. TO RT
_
_
Sawo .
STA. 58+15 SEE SI
28052 I
I TE 6

(25) I
I
I
-
57-!o _
51?
s''s°
PAUL M. KREAGER
1
--R
W--, 9810 KINGS RD.
I GAINESVILLE, GA
30506
BEGIN CHECK DAMS I
STA 56+50 I
57-,00
. _I_
I 57.00
I
56+65 I
(23)
I
576.570 BEGIN SF & RB
CLINT & CLIFF SPIVEY (ES _
TATE) ® I V STA 56+50
I
$M ff*.r Zont
(24) 1
I STA 56+35 END CHANNEL CHANGE

SILT BASIN , 56+00
TYPE B 8x3x2 1

MORRIS & BARBARA SPIVEY ® EXST. 24" CMP TO BE REPLACED
1371 MUSKRAT CREEK RD - WITH NEW 36" CMP. LT. TO RT.
.
HAYESVILLE, NC ' STA. 55+80 SEE SITE # 5
2 8 904 55+50
1 55+50
(22)

55+00
- 5
5 + 00 13wffcr Zone-
E`°5-STR. EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS
STD. NO. DESCRIPTION:
SYMBOL:
PG. N0.
245.03 TEMP. SILT DITCH
- TSD
-- =VI-2
245.05 - - - -
TEMPORARY
DIVERSION
_ ---? TD .?? VI-4
893.01 TEMP.SILT FENCE
Vl-6
890.05 TEMP. SLOPE DRAIN -" "-
WITH EARTH BER?X1-8
245.02 SILT BASIN
TYPE-B ?'1 12
895.10 TEMP. ROCK SILT CHECK "
TYPE-B 6
892.02
- - - - _ „_ _
TEMPORARY
ROCK SEDIMENT DANI V1-20
TYPE-B
;Di
897.01 ROCK PIPE I
NLET
PROTECTION VI-22
894.01
V1-24
ROCK SILT SCREEN
DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL
EXISTING FENCE: --?
OR 4-
-------------------------------
PROPOSED ROAD: -?
----------------------------------
EXISTING ROAD:
RAILROAD: --? - - - - - - -- . _-
CONTROLOFACCESSLINE--------- -------------------------------
SLOPE STAKE LINE: -?-
BRIDGE: -?
CONCRETE CULVERT: ?
CMP PIPE CULVERT
WOODS:
TELEPHONE OR TELEGRZ PH POLE
TOWER POLE LINE:
POWER POLE:
EASEMENT LINE
GUARD RAIL:
SANITARY SEWER LINE:
WATER LINE:
GAS LINE:
BRUSH BARRIER
EXISTING CHANNEL :
C
--------------------
----------------------------------
-------------------------------
j
--------_ _-_ _ _--- _ ---- ------
-------- ------------------------
.__.- - - -----------
%f
-a EXISTING: --o-. PROPOSED: -p-
--------------
EXISTING: _ _ _ _
PROPOSED d
-------------------------------------
--------------- c I-----I,--
PROPOSED CHANNEL CHANGE:
FIBER GLASS ROVING: _2?B_
----- --S.S--------- ._.---- S.S. -
---------------
------------
\ -------------------
------ --------------
.....................
r
FGR
--------------- --------------
91
1 304
'80
I}
Muskrat Branch, SR 1173, Clay County
Shooting Creek Quadrangle
Site #1, 10+90 replace existing 30 ft. x 24" pipe with 50 ft. x 36" CMP
Site #2, 12+85 replace existing 46 ft. x 18" pipe with 40 ft. x 24" CMP
Site #3, 28+70 replace existing 25 ft. x 24" pipe with 48 ft. x 36" CMP
Site #4, 41+90 replace existing 25 ft. x 24" pipe with 50 ft. x 36" CMP
2' 30'
N s
W N
?Y
-i W
j W
Of
W U
2?
Muskrat Branch, SR 1173, Clay County
Rainbow Springs Quadrangle

Site #5, 55+80 replace existing 26 ft. x 18" pipe with 40 ft. x 24" CMP
Site #6, 58+15 replace existing 30 ft. x 24" pipe with 40 ft. x 36" CMP
Station 55+10 to 56+35, Channel Change and Buffer Zone Variance
M
ti
r
r
Cl)
a M
C? O
C V
LLI
F U V
c
Y
N
c
u (U cu cu
?

.c .c .c .c .c
` ` `
o o O o O

(U m
a?
i a?
i m
v, i v 5
=
H N N N Ln y
t
Y L
t+ L
W+ .L L

O
J U U ? U
f0 (0 5 tU f0
O O O O O
e 4? e ct? e 4? e
N N N
N N N N N
Y
U U U
?j
? C C C
U m ca c
o
c m co `
co

Y d
Y Y Y
N
fn
fA
N
0 :3

W c o 0 0 0

w s Z
CL
0 `°
=3
0 :3

-p
E
E E E
c c c
c c c c
c

O O
_ O _O O_ _
N _ (n c N
U c ? c c c

IL x x
ai ai a
i
F F

Z
0 LO
°
rn
co
0) co

Q co

H st U
N
W
r N (7 to

.c
0
cn
L
O
(0
O
O N {p
M
r ?
U U
m [2
mm
I? N
Z L>-,
cu cu
.` .c
c c
c c
N m
u
m
N c Z
c L >
U c
N
C m
M co
to
+ m
ao +
LO CO
O
O
CO +
LL-)
?trL 1 STA. 10+90
O¢?
NEW & OLD
CL
ROCK INLET
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
8'x 3'x 2'
CHECK DAMS -
SPACED AS
REQUIRED .
EXIST. 30'
24" CMP.
rcczn
ROCK SILT
SCREEN
SILT FENCE
&
ROCK BERM
I-
_
r tY

Y
- CE

SILT FENCE
&
ROCK BERM
sl rr` gz STA. 12+85
NEW & OLD
CHECK DAMS CL
SPACED AS --?
RE UIRED
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
12'x 3'x 2'
ROCK INLET ?
CHECK DAMS ExISTINC 46,x
SPACED AS • 18?
REQUIRED Cl?p-
RIP RAP DITCH
4.5,0
00
. CHECK DAMS
SPACED AS
REQUIRED
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
8'x 3'x 2'
44 ROCK SILT SCREEN
SILT FENCE
ROCK BERM
- - C
I - 1
_ - I---?-I _- -f- ?- ----
IT,
- E -- -,-
- -- -- - - -- -- - -
SITE # 3 STA. 28+70
NEW & OLD
CHECK DAMS .
SPACED AS
REQUIRED

SILT BASIN
TYPE B
12'x 3'x 2'

2' BRANCH EXIST. 25'x 24" CMP.
ROCK INLET
SILT BASIN
TYPE B -?
12'x 3'x 2'

CHECK DAMS
SPACED AS -< <

REQUIRED

I
A
NORTH
MAG.
H
cn
C7
13 - __? ROCK SILT
SCREEN
H
d
I
tl L
J4
JTJ
T- - - - J - -. I - - - - I- I l
-- ---?- I-?i-- j-_- -
r -- - ,
_L_ - A- -, -- - _- -
_t7r,.
NORTH
SITE # 4 STA. 41+90
NEW & OLD
CHECK DAMS CL
SPACED AS .
REQUIRED
y
SILT BASIN b
TYPE B
12'x 3'x 2'
ROCK SILT SCREEN
ROCK.'INLE!T !y EXISTING 25'x 24" CMP. 3' BRANCH
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
12'x 3'x 2'
N
CHECK DAMS
SPACED AS
REQUIRED
FFL,
{ r F -?14
III 7T
-T F
- - - - - - - - - .. - I -
Ci- - - - - - 1. - - - - ?- - - - RO - P
_ -1
SMG- At
_ -7C
- L 1- - - - - - L - v E.1
SITE # 5 STA_ SS.A 1 VAoR? I
CHECK DAMS NEW & OLD
SPACED AS . CL END RIP RAP DITCH
REQUIRED STA. 56+00
SILT BASIN
TYPE B
12'x 3'x 2'
SILT FENCE
ROCK BERM
ROCK INLET
?xI
STI
SILT BASIN NC
TYPE B 26 x IBS, ,
8'x 3'x 2' C
1' BRANCH
CHECK DAMS nU
SPACED AS T
REQUIRED . Y SILT FENCE
. ROCK BERM
BEGIN RIP RAP DITCH
STA. 55+00
4 -4 S E ?

4 ? I
# # t
-

-
-
-
-
I
-
P
- 4 w

- 4pl _ - - 11 - - - - - - - - - = - -
-

- -
i , - -

-
- -
- S
- C
- A
- L
- E
-
-
-
--
-

- p 4 - - - - - -

M
- ± L H - - - - -
T
- - -Ti
SITE /f 6
CHECK DAMS SPACED *VAS REQUIRED
SILT BASIN
TYPE B /
12'x 3'x 2'
ROCK INLET
SILT BASIN

TYPE B
8'x 3'x 2' /
10
A

CHECK DAMS
SPACED AS A
REQUIRED

STA. 58+15
NEW OLD
CL CL
5' !
1
Exr l
STI
N? 30 ,x
II 4?-a!
I
?O
G
SILT FENCE
j &
ROCK BERM
i
ROCK SILT SCREEN
\U -
3 BRANCH
SILT FENCE
&
ROCK BERM
I ? I I ,
II II I -
_?_I I I I I ? I I I 1 I I? 1 I I I I ' I I ? I , I
H=1 i I I I ; I ?I I I I I
! I l
' I I I I I
I I V I I HEW -
?? I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I i I I I I I'
?l r i I I? ? _ I I I I C I I I
PRO?OS-ED ih?IL3,
- ?'
I I I I I I ;
I I I I I? i
I i I I I ; i I I
I I I I I I I I'
I I
I I I
I
I i r - - I
I II
O I
I ?
i
i 1 1 1 i i
?--?--?---? I
LIPLI L
' I I ' I I I
I I?
I I " I l l i I I I
I ? I ? I I I ------?--?-_- ? I! I t I I I I I I I I I I
I I L.' _ I I! I i
-- I i i I I I I I -
1I I i ? -- I I I I
I ,- I I? I I I I i ?; I III IIII' II Ili.
I I , i l l ??, I I I I I I

>
o ?
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/wetiands/Perm app htm.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/wetlands/re!ztour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U. S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetland s to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 12
LAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www.saw.usace.army mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state. nc.us/ncwetiands/fees. html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 12
f
?v
Office Use Only: '0 Form Version April 2001 106 Id,
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ? ,j /A
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ? NfA
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name:_ Nsffk Cfkro1tn., ?e?cN}nnt?1' of Trg»tPo??w?i??, NGOoT
Mailing Address: Po Box 155 I
Anlmw5 NG Z8CIO
1
Telephone Number: S a - 3 1- 410 S Fax Number: 8X9 - 311 - 3 -vZ 6
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has sinatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:_ T. Ralp 1. 0^_v-44* P>r
Company Affiliation: N c. o c T'
Mailing Address:_ S•?w•t ns owwov
Telephone Number: 628- 311 - 41o 5 Fax Number: 8.t8 - 311 - 3218
E-mail Address: r Ca?,nd'H ( aof. s'+ it- . A c.. J S
Page 3 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: M(A5 14 f-0.'1- BraV1G)^ Rcas SR 1173
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): r-o-
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): r, 0,
4. Location
County: C lA ca Nearest Town:_ AAI-C5 V11
Ili
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): ?, ?a
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Na?f1, .f ?s 6 N
ih Casftrr% fermi o.+ of Cl&!A CoN4i
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):___ J/,t
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
rcStde?,'f'ia( ?+w.l??d Pas?u??- "foveS-{-
7. Property size (acres): N
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Av skr--" Brnrol.
9. River Basin: N*. w a s st r
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 4 of 12
t
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: CoAsfvMO+ roan +o c4vy%ewv "
N e- Ao-r St tonAdof4 root] s?-?Iv?irtvaS
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: tr.?kt,o? ?o?er
f rDnt e.•+.? lOwJeV Moiegirwdev dyvv%p Irwcks
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: r (
PVC JO M; r+AA-fil, :fO[V 7 JA .,e1 wn? OVtS f
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
ri1a-,
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 5 of 12
I. Wetland Impacts Po We.tIand ,)WFAe}S
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***

# T _L
.-F- -F-1.1 W- ,-,,,.y Tc,,,Nv,a,y unpacu. tu,pacts mciuae, out are not limped to: mechanized clearing, grading, 611,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.fema.2ov.
**# List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
Cave,f- 20' 73•?- s• - CvesK '
2 CMII,?,?(- • G ' ?r fo 71,... s.,• C,k 2.61 P
3 C,.Iv?•f 13/ uT ?o rt1Ns/t Br. 2.010 /
Y t? l ,,.rt 2S1 3. o' P
S Glwlvsr-f 7.y ,• 1.0 /
G Gwlvs?f log .. 3.0
6 G?ln?+) c 119 ' . •
'
3-0

- --r-----•? -•-- - •••••.. •?•••?•.••? ,,,,t,a..•o. uutia-3 tiwtuuc, out u u not limnea to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, tip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mayguest.com, etc.).
See r.flwel.t.1 SvN,n,•rl
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: St`rtaa? M .ta(-s
dire: 14oW, EAek sf f{.e $')r t,fet ?s er. .1;f.fvreh
detr.sst ?'re- 4et i+ L, stria tti. or frr; 6..}a
3 yNC?,east ?M T%r? lehafl. 2 ? ?' fo+?? j.,.PRCf ?o
_ / j ntrta3? ?? T'f { a $-?1^tarnS o N Preto
4* 4
slf? d'< _ y r ntrtJll?'- ' n P'P` 11. J?fI. Page 6 of 12 r"
St IL'C- _ / ?N?rtasf? tM 0... 1<N?17? 1 f?iLS' CkAnwc GHAM3G f 135 ?Ofw? IMPaG?`
$i & # 6 t o v
r
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. /J o o fe" vj#.'f<? i voP-a4 s
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres)
(if Name applicable) Wat) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,

bay, ocean, etc.)

. ?3< GU1 1 1111I/i3Gl bupujacly WJu wcnuiy temporary impacts. impacts mciuae, out are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
mP's will f,t set ?4riti cowl s1e.C+; .5,_ ,Sage ?tHscNe? 000ee,?
1sJ?sv
Page 7 of 12
VIII. Mitigation /J'R
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 8 of 12
I
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at litti)://h2o.cnr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federaUstate/local)
land?
Yes No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? N for
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only) Nlpr
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Require ents), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No CT If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 9 of 12
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
s uare feet
Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
I-.,I« I UALU11 u uuL w reef perpenoicwar from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
"o h
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only) ,j
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
Page 10 of 12
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
9
14 /191oi
Applicant/Ajnt's Signa%reU bate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 1 I of 12
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276994617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kemersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 12 of 12
Proiects reviewed with comments:
010712 - (Madison Co., DOT) the affected waterway, Paint Fork, is WS-II. Road crossings are
allowed assuming no practical altematives, and bua must be minimized, stormwater must be
diverted away from surface waters, and DOT must use/follow their BMPs document
010691 - (Mitchell Co., DOT) no WSWP impacts, but Roaring Branch is C Tr.
010678 - (Durham Co., Triangle WWTP) the project is within WS-IV Haw River (Jordan Lake).
Kick it to Durham Planning Dept. for enforcement of BUA requirements. Crossings ok, assuming
no practical altematives, and bua must be minimized, stormwater diverted, BMPs for water quality
used.
010666 - (Clay Co., DOT) the project is not is WS waters, but it's in Tr.
010637 - (Granville Co., John Braddy) the project is within WS-II NSW. Kick it to Butner Planning
Dept. for enforcement of BUA requirements. Crossings ok for public projects, assuming no
practical alternatives, and bua must be minimized, stormwater diverted, BMPs for water quality
used. Since it's a private project, then road pavement must be included in the total bua and
crossings not ok without a variance.
010630 - (Watauga Co., Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.) not is WS waters, but it's
within TR HQW.
010628 - (Stanly Co., Gerald Goodman) The project is within the Lake Tillery WS-IV-CA. Kick to
local planning department (Norwood?) for review of bua and buffer compliance. The state
minimum for WS-IV projects is that the WSWP rules don't apply to projects not needing a SEC
plan, but local gov't can be more protective. If SEC plan is needed, must comply with bua/buffer
requirements.
010626 (S&EC Consultants, Inc., Iredell Co.) - the site is most likely in the WS-IV-CA of Lake
Norman. No new roads in CA to the extent practicable; if allowed must minimize bua, divert
stormwater, use BMPs. Private roads must be included in the bua calculations. The state
minimum for WS-IV projects is that the WSWP rules don't apply to projects not needing a SEC
plan, but local gov't can be more protective. If SEC plan is needed, must comply with bua/buffer
requirements.
Proiects reviewed with NO comments/not is WS waters:
010726 - Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., Wake Co.
010730 - Donal Humphrey, Onslow Co.
010728 - Levie Carson Bunch, Currituck Co.
010725 - Tommy Moore, Jones Co.
010724 - Rowland Carlson, Chowan Co.
010737 - KBB Developers, Union Co.
010683 - DOT, Guilford Co.
010672 - Land Management Group, Inc., Brunswick Co.
010671 - City of Lenoir, Caldwell Co.
010668 - DOT, Tyrell Co.
010654 - Ingles Markets, Inc., Buncombe Co.
010648 - Casey Jones, Guilford Co.