20010453 Ver 1_Complete File_20010327

o?OF W ATFROG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 22, 2001
Alamance County
DWQ Project No. 010453
Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. Lenwood Smith, II, Division Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 7
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, NC 27415
Dear Mr. Smith:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 145 linear feet of
Jordan Creek for the purpose of replacing Bridge No. 104 on NC 62 in Alamance County. The project should be
constructed in accordance with your application dated 21 March 2001 (and as revised 14 May 2001). After reviewing
your application, we have decided that this project is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3289. This
certification corresponds to Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any
other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the
accompanying §404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. The following additional
conditions will be required:
1. Storm water should be directed to buffer areas or retention basins and should not be routed directly into streams.
2. Sediment and erosion control measures shall adhere to design standards for sensitive watersheds (15A NCAC 4B
.0024) prior to any ground-disturbing activities to minimize impacts to downstream aquatic resources. Temporary or
permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within 15 days of ground-disturbing activities to
provide long term erosion control.
3. The culvert required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not altered
(i.e. the depth of the channel should not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
4. All work shall be performed during low flow conditions.
5. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
6. The presence of equipment in the channels must be minimized. Under no circumstances should rock, sand or other
materials be dredged from the wetted stream channel under authorization of this permit, except in the immediate
vicinity of the culverts.
7. Mowing of existing vegetated buffers is strongly discouraged, so that they may be utilized for storm water sheet flow.
8. Use of rip-rap for bank stabilization is to be minimized; rather, native vegetation is to be planted when practical. If
necessary, rip-rap should be limited to the stream bank below the high water mark, and vegetation should be used for
stabilization above high water.
9. Rock silt screens at culvert outlets should be removed at project completion.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should
your project change, you must notify the DWQ ard submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions.
If the proposed fill is in excess of 150 linear feet of stream length or 1 acre of wetlands, compensatory mitigation will
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Page 2 of 2
required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed above.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919.733.9646.
Sincerely,
Attachment
Stevens
Pc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
NCDWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy

.. AATt
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLF" STREE"r, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
May 11, 2001
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
ATTN: Mrs. Jennifer Frye.
Dear Mrs. Frye:
n
IBM
W TLANDS G1ZOUP
NOTY CnnN
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62 across Jordan Creek
DWQ Project # 01 0453 - Additional Information
The following is being provided per your letter of April 27, 2001 requesting additional information.
(1) Reasonable efforts have been made to practice avoidance and minimization of impacts to surface
waters. Jordan Creek is narrow enough at this location to facilitate use of a spanning structure
such as a Con-span or Aluminum Box Culvert (ABC) with footings assuming that bedrock is
present near the surface for footing placement. The Con-span was immediately rejected due to
the inability to add extensions to this structure. Use of extendable structures is standard
procedure for bridge replacements on rural arterials that may be widened within the life of the
new structure. To facilitate both the minimization of surface water impacts and possible future
extensions a new method was devised allowing for the addition of extensions to an ABC installed
with proper modifications. Unfortunately, a sounding measurement made on May 11, 2001
indicated that bedrock at the project site is at least 10 feet below the surface. This project is
being conducted to increase travel safety (see the attached accident reports for the three bridges
in the project vicinity), not because of imminent bridge or roadway failure, and is therefore not
eligible for Transportation Improvement Program Funds. Because driving piles is cost
prohibitive for this project, a Con-span or ABC would require flooring for support; therefore, the
a Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC) will be used due to its increased life as compared to
an ABC, the ability to extend this structure, and the availability of contractors familiar with the
installation RCBCs. Impacts to aquatic resources will be minimized by burial of the RCBC to
one-foot below streambed elevation, placement of a sill on one of the barrels to increase water
depths during low flow, and implementation of NCDOT Best Management Practice guidelines
for Bridge Demolition Removal and Protection of Surface Waters.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

N i
wit

.. SrME
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415 LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
GOVERNOR
(2) The exact linear footage of the impact is 70-feet for the RCBC and 75 for the rip-rap energy
dissipater. The rip-rap energy dissipater is to be place above the ordinary high water mark.
(3) Compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h) will not be required as the
impacts have been reduced to less than 150-feet in length (including the rip-rap energy
dissipater).
(4) Per our discussion of May 7, 2001 a full copy of the design sheet (with modifications to the rip-
rap energy dissipater) and the streambed sounding report are being provided for your review.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Len Smith or Dennis
Johnson at [phone]. Your time and assistance are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
PI IONF. 336-334-3192 FAX [phone]

STREAM BED SOUNDINGS BR INSP. WORKSHEET It
(SEE NEXT SHEET FOR PROFILE SKETCH) Revised 10/9/98 (? Irk Lt ?J.- w.
Bridge# 104 COUNTY ALAMANCE DATE 12/2/98 e : 8
i
RECORD SOUNDINGS FROM TOP OF RAIL. OTHER LOCATION IF NEEDED
DISTANCE HIGHWATER MARK TO TOP OF RAIL: 11 ? LOCATION H. W. MARK: ABUTMENTS WATEE QUALITY SECTION
NOTE:Draft a Stream Bed Profile sketch and record soundings at the stream face of abutments, GL of piers, WE, WS, and major
contour changes on the downstream side Record soundings at the stream face abutments and C/L piers on the upstream side
DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM
DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION
7 17.6 WS & WE WS & WE
14 17.6 WS & WE WS &WE
0 3.5 FF
0 3.2 TOP WINGWALL.
2 14.4 14.3 A-1
3 14.4
4 17.0
7 17.6 WSWE
10 18.0
14 17.6 WSWE
19 17.0
25 17.0
35 17.0
40.5 17.2 17.0 A-2
42 3.2 FF,TOP WING

Page 1 of 2
d'!,. INS?: YORKSNEET <i- 3-90)
?OUfVOZ Nd5
STitEF4" 6WE01
GSEE NEXT SHEET FOR PROFILE SKErcm)
BRIDGE NO. 101
couNTV 4L A r-hA A./GiK O.TE 1l • Z ? • 7?
RECORD LOUNDINOS FROM TOP OF MAIL. OTHER LOCATION IF NEEDED:
Rv I. >e ,4•
A f.3 u i 5
GIS7ANCE N. Y. HARK TO TOP OF RAIL I' LOCATION M. Y. MURK
NOTE: DRAFT A STREAM BED PROFILE swETI,H AND RECORD SOUNDINGS AT THE STREAM
FACE OF ABUTMENTS, CIL OF PIE61S, WE, 6 US , ANO MAJOR CONTOUR CHANGES ON THE
DONNSTREAM SIDE. RECORD SOUNDINGS AT THE STREAM FACE OF ABUTMENTS
AND %L OF PIERS ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE.
r'1f "?JC V- MID. ?d=k P-4
U F- S T M E Fi lr"f
STATION 1 SOUNDING 1 DESCRIPTION
------------
O_Qs2----
-----------------
--------------------
--# o ----- -------- .?' ----- -? T? - ------
-----°-? ---- --? --- . S ----- -------------
----
1?4 !r. S -----
------ --------------------
------ ------- ---! -'5----- ' ------------------
-- t 19t----- -- ---- =-°- --- -----------
---} ! Z- ---- --' --!_S_-° ----------------------
S
---- } 9 ----- ---
--?-- - ------------------
ZS --- --? ---°-=-°----- --? ------
-_s Z?a,o I
------------------
--- s ---- --?---? 9= ---- -- ------------------

----±= 39----- --? --- ' Z--- --- ------------------
-- }-`-°=-- --? ----1-?=?=-- - ------------------
--
-__ +A-?-----

---------------
---------------
---------------

--------------- --------3,-Z ---
I
----------------
----------------
----------------
I
---------------
-
--------------- --i --- ' ----------
1
- ?-
-
----------------------
i
----
-
----------------------
--------------
---------------
-------------

--------------

---------------

---------------

------- -----
-

--------------
------------ -
I
---------------
----------------
I
----------------
I
----------------
I
----------------
I
----------------
t
-- --------- ---
---------------
- ----
-
---------------------
-
---------------------
-
---------------------
-
--------------------
I

------------------
- -
I
- -- - -
----
- --------- - --

------------
-------------
-------------
----------
- ---------------
-
----------------
I
--------------
-- --
a
-------------- - - ---

---------------------
---------------------
-
---
-
-
-------- ------ -
--------- ------ i
-
---
-
------------ -- -----------
i -- -----
-
------------------
-----------
--------- --- -----------
I
---------------- - -
--------------------
------ -- ------ - ------------------
STATION i SOUNDING I DESCRIPTION
--------------------------------------------'-----
I I
--------------------------------
I I
--------------------- -------------------------------
--------------- -----L-4 ------- -!4j ----------
1 I -
-----------------------------------------------------
I ' -----------
----------------------------------- ---
' ---
t
--------------- -------------------------------------
I I
------------------------------------- -
I I
-----------------------------------------
I I
--------------------
--------------------------------------
-
---
------------------------- ---------------------
- -
----------------------------------- - -
1
?-------
. -
-----------------------------------------
Z 4.-- - ---------------
I I
---------------------------------------
I I
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------- ------------------
------------------------
1 1.
----------------------------------------
I I
----------------------------------- ------------------
----------------------------------------
------------
---I--- --------
------------- ---------- ---
-------------------
----------------
------------------ ------------------
------------------
-----------------
----------------------------------------------------
- -
t I
-----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------- ------------------
- I 1
---------------------- -------------- _
I I
---------------------------------------------------
I I
---------------------------- ----- -----------------
I
--------------------------------------------------
I -----------------------------------------------
I ----------------------------- -------------------
---------------------------------- ------------
I
-----------------------------------------------
- -
--------------------- ----------- ----
------
-
---------------------------- ---- -------------
-
-----------------------------------------------
I I
----------------------------------- -----------
I I
SHEET OF
O Ul O CNl?
I I I '
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I '
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I i ( I
I I I '
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I ? I I
I I I I
I I
I I I
I ? I I
I I
I I I '
I I I I
I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I '
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I I
I I I '
I I I
I I I '
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I
Sounding
N
O
? J
Cn O Cn
--i
O
10
O Q
O M
M
0
Cl)
O
C
CL
m'
co
v
0
a
to
CD
?k
0
l
0
C
7
n
D
Z
n
m
X
v
v -o
N

N
O

n O

'71
o
n;
cD r= m
cn

0 m
v
o
?
N
i?

X
o
T
N
(3
N
N
-06
O
O
N
' STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA &/Z
SUBJECT ' PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _
:?A/
RZ:
13Cp
?
PRnFiC,E
?LLlI???GC COUNTY
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS -
?
n
4
'4
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY l?-•
"
• DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
CHECKED BY
DATE j
STR NO SHEET OF--
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611
SO-01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT g? 1pq_ PROJECT
I:PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ST (2,>`A M P v - ti _ ?'`?--A ?1A ?.! 000NTY
DIVISION OF MIGHWAY5
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE Z 5TATIQN
IN. O. Cox P5201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27811 CHECKED BY DATE alit t10 DHEET of

7- j.. 1 _

_r ! _. _ .. _?...

LD- ? _
bKWO? 10"I
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Study Criteria Summary
I ,rte OUP J
County: ALAMAZICE City: All and Rural
Date: 11/01/1997 to 12/31/2000 Study: BRIDGE14CONTIC62
Location: Strip analysis of NC 62/bridge 104 between Alamance/Caswell Co. Line and SR 1761 in Alamance Co.
Act; Total Injuries Road Light
No Crash ID Milepost Date Accident Type Damage F A B C Cndtn Cndtn
1 98715874 23.580 11/08/1998 RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT $ 3500 0 0 0 0 1 5
05:30
Unit 1 : 1 Alchl/Drgs: 7 Speed: 55 MPH Dir: S Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk: 62
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due dlllgenc• In nterpreting and further representing this data.
>•r
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Summary Statistics
High Level Crash Summary
Number of Percent
Crash Typo Crashes of Total
Total Crashes
1 100.00
Fatal Crashes
0 0.00
Non-Fatal Injury Crashes
0 0.00
Total Injury crashes
0 0.00
Property Damage only Crashes
1 100.00
Night Crashes
1 100.00
Wet Crashes
0 0.00
Alcohol/Drugs Involvement Crashes
0 0.00
Crash Severity Summary
Number of Percent
Crash Type Crashes of Total
Total Crashes
1 100.00
Fatal Crashes 0
0.00
Class A Crashes 0 0.00
Class B Crashes 0 0.00
Class C Crashes 0 0.00
Property Damage Only crashes 1 100.00
Vehicle Exposure Statistics
Annual ADT 1800
Total Length (Miles) 0.200
Total Length (Kilometers) - 0.322
Accidents Per 100 Million Accidents Per 100 Million
Exposure Type Vehicle Miles Vehicle Kilometers
Total Vehicle Exposure (per million) 0.42
0.67
Total Crash Rate 240.08 386.38
Fatal Crash Rate 0.00
0.00
Non Fatal Crash Rate 0.00
0.00
Night Crash Rate 240.08
386.38
Wet Crash Rate 0.00
0.00
EPDO Rate 240.08
386.38
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Trafflc Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due dlllgenc In Interpreting and further representing this data.
.2-

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Miscellaneous Statistics
Severity Index - 1.00
EPDO Crash Index - 1.00
Estimated Property Damage Total - $ 3500.00
Accident Type Summary
Number of Percent
Accident Type Crashes of Total
RAN OFF ROAD - LEFT 1 100.00
Injury Summary

Injury Type Number of
Injuries Percent
of Total
Fatal Injuries 0 0.00
Class A Injuries 0 0.00
Class B Injuries 0 0.00
Class C Injuries 0 0.00
Total Non-Fatal injuries 0 0.00
Total Injuries 0 0.00
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing this data.
-3-
IF
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Monthly Summary
Number of Percent
Month Crashes of Total
Jan 0 0.00
Feb 0 0.00
Mar 0 0.00
Apr 0 0.00
May 0 0.00
Jun 0 0.00
Jul 0 0.00
Aug 0 0.00
Sep 0 0.00
Oct 0 0.00
Nov 1 100.00
Dec 0 0.00
Daily Summary
Number of Percent
Day Crashes of Total
Mon 0 0.00
Tue 0 0.00
Wed 0 0.00
Thu 0 0.00
Fri 0 0.00
Sat 0 0.00
Sun 1 100.00
05/0912001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
cl -4-based S theeuser of this report to exe c se due dltigenced by In Interpreting and further representing this data n
Y
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Light and Road Conditions Summary
Condition Dry Wet Other Total
Day 0 0 0 0
Dark 1 0 0 1
Other 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 1
Object Struck Summary
Object Type Times
Struck Percent
of Total
CONTRUCTION BARRIER
1 100.00
Vehicle Type Summary
Vehicle Type Number Percent
Involved of Total
PASSENGER CAR
1 100.00
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input enteric provided by the report 's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.
-6
l
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Yearly Totals Summary
Accident Totals
Total Fatal Injury Property Damage
Year Accidents Accidents Accidents Only Accidents
1998 1 0 0 1
Total 1 0 0 1
Injury Totals
Class A, B,
Year Fatal Injuries or C Injuries
1998 0 0
Total 0 0
Miscellaneous Totals
Year Property Damage EPDO Index
1998 $ 3500 1.00
Total $ 3500 1.00
Type of Accident Totals
Year Left Turn Right Turn Rear End Run Off Road Angle Side Swipe Other
1998 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
05/0912001 All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing this data.
-7-
r
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident :analysis System
Strip Analysis Raport
Study Name Log No. PH No
BRIDGE140ONNC62
Request Date Courier Service Phone No. Ext.
County Municipality
Name Code Div. Name
TIP No. K/A Cf. S/C V. ADT ADT Route
76.8 8.4 1800
Fax No.
Code Y-Line Ft. Begin Date End Data Years
ALAMANCE 0 7 All and Rural 150 11/01/1997 12/31/2000 3.17
Location Text Requestor
strip analysis of NC 62/bridge 104 between
Alamance/Caswell Co. Line and SR 1761 in
Alamance Co.
Fiche Roads
Name Code
NC 62 30000062
Strip Road
Name Code Begin MP End MP Miles Kilometers
NC 62 30000062 23.390 23.590 0.200 0.322
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.
-9-
i3RH)6E IV
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Study Criteria Summary
County: CASWELL City: All and Rural
Date: 11/1/1997 to 12/31/2000 Study: BRIDGE14CLriC62
Location: Strip analysis of bridge 14 on NC 62 in Caswell Co.
Acc
No Crash ID Milepost Date Accident Type
1 98074655 0.480 04/21/1998 REAR E21D, SLOW OR STOP
09:20
Unit 1 5 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 45 MPH Dir: N
Unit 2 1 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 15 MPH Dir: Pi
2 991:1685 0.480 06/28/1999 RAM OFF ROAD - RIGHT
08:15
Unit 1 12 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 45 MPH Dir: S
Unit 2 12 Alchl/Drgs: 7 Speed: 50 MPH Dir: N
3 98215194 0.480 11/07/1998 SIDESWIPE,OPPOSITE DIRECTION
13:50
Unit 1 11 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 40 MPH Dir: N
Unit 2 1 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 40 MPH Dir: S
wr cli 0 ki
i l l
?ISE P
Total Injuries Road Light
Damage F A B C Cndtn Cndtn
$ 4200 0 0 0 0 10 1
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk: 49
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
$ 80000 0 0 0 1 1 1
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk: 49
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
$ 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
MOM= All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon '?-
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Summary Statistics
High Level Crash Summary

Crash Type Number of
Crashes Percent
of Total
Total Crashes 3 100.00
Fatal Crashes 0 0.00
Ncn-Fatal Injury Crashes 1 33.33
Total Injury Crashes 1 33.33
Property Damage Only Crashes 2 66.67
Nicht Crashes 0 0.00
Wet Crashes 0 0.00
Alcohol/Drugs Involaement Crashes 0 0.00
Crash Severity Summary
Number of Percent
Crash Type Crashes of Total
Total Crashes 3 100.00
Fatal Crashes 0 0.00
Class A Crashes 0 0.00
Class B Crashes 0 0.00
Class C Crashes 1 33.33
Property Damage Only Crashes 2 66.67
Vehicle Exposure Statistics
Annual ADT 1400
Total Length (Miles) 0.2
Total Length (Kilometers) = 0.322
Accidents Per 100 Million Accidents Per 100 Million
Exposure Type Vehicle Miles Vehicle Kilometers
Total Vehicle Exposure (per million) 0.32 0.52
Total Crash Rate 926.04 1490.32
Fatal Crash Rate 0.00 0.00
Zion Fatal Crash Rate 308.68 496.77
Night Crash Rate 0.00 0.00
Wet Crash Rate 0.00 0.00
EPDO Rate 3210.27 5166.43
05109/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysts -2 -
the based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due dlllgence In Interpreting and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Miscellaneous Statistics
Severity Index - 3.47
EPDO Crash Index 10.40
Estimated Property Damage Total - S 84200.00
Accident Type Summary
Number of Percent
Accident Type Crashes of Total
RAN OFF ROAD - RIGHT 1 33.33
REAR END, SLOW OR STOP 1 33.33
SIDESWIPE,OPPOSITE DIRECTION 1 33.33
Injury Summary
Number of Percent
Injury Type Injuries of Total
Fatal injuries 0 0.00
Class A Injuries 0 0.00
Class B Injuries 0 0.00
Class C Injuries 1 100.00
Total Non-Fatal Injuries 1 100.00
Total Injuries 1 100.00
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon '3'
the user of this report to exert!se due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Monthly Summary
Number of Percent
Month Crashes of Total
Jan 0 0.00
Feb 0 0.00
Mar 0 0.00
Apr 1 33.33
May 0 0.00
Jun 1 33.33
Jul 0 0.00
Aug 0 0.00
Sep 0 0.00
Oct 0 0.00
Nov 1 33.33
Dec 0 0.00

Day Number of
Crashes Percent
of Total
Mon 1 33.33
Tue 1 33.33
Wed 0 0.00
Thu 0 0.00
Fri 0 0.00
Sat 1 33.33
Sun 0 0.00
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the reports creator. The onus Is strictly upon -4-
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Numoer of Percent
Hour Crashes of Total
0000-0059 0 0.00
0100-0159 0 0.00
0200-0259 0 0.00
0300-0359 0 0.00
0400-0459 0 0.00
0500-0559 0 0.00
0600-0659 0 0.00
0700-0759 0 0.00
0800-0859 1 33.33
0900-0959 1 33.33
1000-1059 0 0.00
1100-1159 0 0.00
1200-1259 0 0.00
1300-1359 1 33.33
1400-1459 0 0.00
1500-1559 0 0.00
1600-1659 0 0.00
1700-1759 0 0.00
1800-1859 0 0.00
1900-1959 0 0.00
2000-2059 0 0.00
2100-2159 0 0.00
2200-2259 0 0.00
2300-2359 0 0.00
05/09/2001 All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various input criteria provided b
th
t
y
e repor
s creator. The onus Is strictly upon
-
5.
the user of this report to exercise due diligence in inter
r
ti
p
e
ng and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Light and Road Conditions Summary
Condition Dry Wet Other Total
Day 2 0 1 3
Dark 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0
Total 2 0 1 3
Object Struck Summary
Object Type
BRIDGE RAIL END
Times Percent
Struck of Total
2 100.00
Vehicle Type Summary
Vehicle Type
PASSENGER CAR
SINGLE UNIT TRUCK (3 OR MORE AXLES)
TRUCK/TRAILER
VAN
Number Percent
Involved of Total
2 33.33
1 16.67
2 33.33
1 16.67
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report 's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data. _6.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Yearly Totals Summary
Accident Totals
Total Fatal Injury Property Damage
Year Accidents Accidents Accidents Only Accidents
1998 2 0 0 2
1999 1 0 1 0
Total 3 0 1 2
Injury Totals
Class A, B,
Year Fatal Injuries or C Injuries
1998 0 0
1999 0 1
Total 0 1
Miscellaneous Totals
Year Property Damage EPDO Index
1998 $ 4200 2.00
1999 $ 60000 8.40
Total $ 84200 10.40
Type of Accident Totals
Year Left Turn Right Turn Rear End Run Off Road Angle Side Swipe Other
1998 0 0
1 0 0 1 0
1999 0 0 0 1 0
0 0
Total 0 0 1
1 0 1 0
05109/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Tratric Engineering Accident Analysis
5 tte user ofdthis oreport to exercise due diligencedin int
-7-
h erpntting and fut?er repro enting this data n
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report

Features Milepost Crash IDs
0.380
0.390
0.400
0.410
0.420
0.430
0.440
0.450
0.460
0.470
Structure.160014 0.480 98215194 99122685 98074655
0.490
0.500
0.510
0.520
0.530
0.540
0.550
0.560
0.570
05/09/2001 All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input critena provided by the report's croator. The onus Is strictly upon the user of this report to exercise due diligence in interpreting and further mpresenting this data.
r North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Study Name Log No. PH No. TIP No. K/A Cf. SIC Cf. ADT ADT Route
BRZDGEI4CNNC62 76.8 8.4 1400
Request Date Courier Service Phone No. Ext. Fax No.
County Municipality
Name Code Div. Name Code Y-Line Ft. Begin Date End Date Years
CASWELL 16 7 All and Rural 150 11/1/1997 12/31/2000 3.17
Location Text Requestor _
Strip analysis of bridge 14 on NC 62 in Caswell
Co.
Fiche Roads
Name Code
NC 62 30000062
Strip Road
Name Code Begin MP End MP Miles Kilometers
NC 62 30000062 0.380 0.580 0.200 0.322
05109/2001 All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis .9-
the based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus is strictly upon
the user of this report to exerclse due diligence in interpreting and further representing this data.
?? I DG 21
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Study Criteria Summary
County: CASWELL City; All and Rural
Date: 11/1/1997 to 12/31/2000 Study: BRIDGE28ONNC62
Location: Strip analysis of Bridge #28 on NC 62 in Caswell Co.
Acc
No Crash ID Milepost Date Accident Type
1 99245739 0.730 12/07/1999 SIDESWIPE, SAME DIRECTION
16:55
Unit i 10 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 45 MPH Dir: N
Unit 2 2 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 45 MPH Dir: S
2 99209337 0.742 10/23/1999 SIDESWIPE,OPPOSITE DIRECTION
16:23
Unit 1 1 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 45 MPH
Unit 2 1 Alchl/Drgs: 7 Speed: 40 MPH
3 98233091 0.776 11/30/1998 FIXED OBJECT
19:00
Unit 1 : 3 Alchl/Drgs: 0 Speed: 55 MPH
11 14 E ?- 31 --"j q y `
o o f ?L Sb-KG/we'•
LA r
Total Injuries Road Light
Damage F A B C Cndtn Cndtn
$ 1500 0 0 0 0 1 1
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Cbj Strk:
Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
y
$ 2000 0 0 0 2 1 1
Dir: S Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
Dir: N Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk:
$ 3500 0 0 0 0 1 5
Dir: N Veh Mnvr/Ped Actn: 4 Obj Strk: 50
o 13 J? 31- o cz-,, o-7
Se- c-r0ZIP ` 8 1
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon -1
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing this data.

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Summary Statistics
Nigh Level Crash Summary

Crash Type Number of
Crashes Percent
of Total
Total crashes 3 100.00
Fatal Crashes 0 0.00
Non-Fatal Injury crashes 1 33.33
Total Injury Crashes 1 33.33
Property Damage Only Crashes 2 66.67
Night Crashes 1 33.33
Wet Crashes 0 0.00
Alcohol/Drugs Involvement Crashes 0 0.00
Crash Severity Summary
Number of Percent
Crash Type Crashes of Total
Total Crashes 3 100.00
Fatal Crashes 0 0.00
Class A Crashes 0 0.00
Class B Crashes 0 0.00
Class C Crashes 1 33.33
Property Damage Only Crashes 2 66.67
Vehicle Exposure Statistics
Annual ADT = 1400
Total Length (Miles) = 0.2
Total Length (Kilometers) 0.322
Exposure Type
Total Vehicle Exposure (per million)
Total Crash Rate
Fatal Crash Rate
Non Fatal Crash Rate
Night Crash Rate
Wet Crash Rate
EPDO Rate
Accidents Per 100 Million Accidents Per 100 Million
Vehicle Miles Vehicle Kilometers
0.32 0.52
926.04 1490.32
0.00 0.00
308.68 496.77
308.68 496.77
0.00 0.00
3210.27 5166.43
05/0912001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing this data.
.2-

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Miscellaneous Statistics
Severity Index - 3.47
EPDO Crash Index - 10.40
Estimated Property Damage Total - $ 7000.00
Accident Type Summary

Accident Type Number of Percent
Crashes of Total
FIXED OBJECT 1 33.33
SIDESWIPE, SA14E DIRECTION 1 33.33
SIDESWIPE,OPPOSITE DIRECTION 1 33.33
Injury Summary
Number of Percent
Injury Type Injuries of Total
Fatal Injuries 0 0.00
Class A Injuries 0 0.00
Class B Injuries 0 0.00
Class C Injuries 2 100.00
Total Non-Fatal Injuries 2 100.00
Total Injuries 2 100.00
05/0912001 All data presented in this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis .3-
the based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing thls data.

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Monthly Summary

Month Number of
Crashes Percent
of Total
Jan 0 0.00
Feb 0 0.00
Mar 0 0.00
Apr 0 0.00
May 0 0.00
Jun 0 0.00
Jul 0 0.00
Aug 0 0.00
Sep 0 0.00
Oct 1 33.33
Nov 1 33.33
Dec 1 33.33

Number of Percent
Day Crashes of Total
Mon 1 33.33
Tue 1 33.33
Wed 0 0.00
Thu 0 0.00
Fri 0 0.00
Sat 1 33.33
Sun 0 0.00
05109/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon '4'
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Hourly Summary

Hour Number of
Crashes Percent
of Total
0000-0059 0 0.00
0100-0159 0 0.00
0200-0259 0 0.00
0300-0359 0 0.00
0400-0459 0 0.00
0500-0559 0 0.00
0600-0659 0 0.00
0700-0759 0 0.00
0800-0859 0 0.00
0900-0959 0 0.00
1000-1059 0 0.00
1100-1159 0 0.00
1200-1259 0 0.00
1300-1359 0 0.00
1400-1459 0 0.00
1500-1559 0 0.00
1600-1659 2 66.67
1700-1759 0 0.00
1800-1859 0 0.00
1900-1959 1 33.33
2000-2059 0 0.00
2100-2159 0 0.00
2200-2259 0 0.00
2300-2359 0 0.00
05/09/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus is strictly upon -5-
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In interpreting and further representing this data.

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Light and Road Conditions Summary
Condition Dry Wet Other Total
Day 2 0 0 2
Dark 1 0 0 1
Other 0 0 0 0
Total 3 0 0 3
Object Struck Summary
Times Percent
Object Type Struck of Total
BRIDGE RAIL FACE 1 100.00
Vehicle Typo Summary
Number Percent
Vehicle Type Involved of Total
LIGHT TRUCK (MINI-VAN, PANEL) 1 20.00
PASSENGER CAR 2 40.00
PICKUP 1 20.00
SINGLE UNIT TRUCK (2-AXLE, 6-TIRE) 1 20.00
05109/2001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System based upon various Input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence In Interpreting and further representing this data.
J
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Yearly Totals Summary
Total Fatal Injury Property Damage
Year Accidents Accidents Accidents Only Accidents
1998 1 0 0 1
1999 2 0 1 1
Total 3 0 1 2
Injury Totals
Class A, B,
Year Fatal Injuries or C Injuries
1998 0 0
1999 0 2
Total 0 2
Miscellaneous Totals
Year Property Damage EPDO Index
1998 $ 3500 1.00
1999 $ 3500 9.40
Total $ 7000 10.40
Type of Accident Totals
Year Left Turn Right Turn Rear End Run Off Road Angle Side Swipe Other
1998 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1999 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
0510912001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis ?7?
System based upon various input criteria provided by the report's creator. The onus Is strictly upon
the user of this report to exercise due diligence in Interpreting and further representing this data.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Strip Diagram
Milepost Crash IDs
Features
0.630
0.640
0.650
0.660
0.670
0.680
0.690
0.700
0.710
0.720
0.730 99245739
Structure:160028
0.740 99209337
0.750
0.760
0.770
0.780 98233091
SR 1114
0.790
0.800
0.810
0.820
All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
creato
0510912001 .8. based
criteria
rovided
variou
The S the user of thli report to exercis due diligence in Interepreting a d further represent ng thisydapta n

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis System
Strip Analysis Report
Study Name Log No. PH No.
BRIDGE280NIJC62
Request Date Courier Service Phone No. Ext.
Municipality
CASWELL 16 7 All and Rural
Location Text Requestor
Strip analysis of Bridge #28 on NC 62 in Caswell
Co.
Fiche Roads
Name Code
17C 62 30000062
TIP No. K1A Cf. B/C Cf. ADT ADT Route
76.3 8.4 1400
Fax No.
county
Name Code Div. Name Code Y-Line Ft. Begin Date End Data ears
150 11/1/1997 12/31/2000 3.17
Strip Road
Name Code Begin MP End MP Miles Kilometers
NC 62 30000062 0.630 0.830 0.200 0.322
05/0912001 All data presented In this report comes explicitly from the Traffic Engineering Accident Analysis
System the user of thisreport to exercise due diligence dIn by the report's creator. The interpreting and further representing thisydata n
-9-
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: I arry Coble
Date: 5.118.12-001-
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NCDOT - Bridge 104 on NC 62
Project Number 01 0453
Recvd From DOT
Received Date 3/27/01 Recvd By Region 4/5/2001
Project Type culverting
County Alamance
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
14 Stream O Y _@N ? 16-14-6 WSII HQW 30,602. [ 145.00
F-? O Y O N ?-F? NSW G\ ?? F-
7_-F__o Y o N F__F__F_F_f __F_-F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? ©Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y @ N
Recommendation: Oo Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 361405 Longitude (ddmmss) 791921
Comments:
Request for more information sent by RO on 4/21/01. Information received on 5114101.
Total impacts have been reduced to 145 LF (70 LF for RCBC and 75 LF of rip-rap) - no mitigation
rewired.
The WSRO recommends that this 401 WO Certification be issued,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
h %
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 27, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7099 3220 0006 8502 5318
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Lenwood Smith
Division Seven Environmental Officer
NCDOT
4261 Camp Burton Road
McLeansville, NC 27301
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62
Jordan Creek
DWQ Project # 01 0453
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Smith:
(A/
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material
into approximately 200 linear feet of Jordan Creek, Class WS-H HQW waters, Cape Fear River
Basin, for the purpose of a road crossing. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude
that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below,
we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H
.0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
place your project on administrative hold.
(1) Please provide documentation detailing your position that the project has been
designed such that adverse impacts to surface waters have been minimized and
existing uses have been protected to the best of your ability.
(2) Please provide the exact linear footage that you propose to impact. Include the
length of stream impacted by the box culvert and associated rip-rap energy
dissipaters.
(3) The project will also require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506(h). Your mitigation proposal is insufficient since none was proposed. If
the project is re-designed to impact less than 150 LF of Jordan Creek,
compensatory mitigation will not be required.
c '
01 0453
Page 2
(4) Please provide supporting documentation that the design and placement of two
box culverts will not cause a dis-equilibrium of the stream beds or banks, adjacent
to or upstream and downstream of the structure.
Please respond, in writing, both to this Office and to John Dorney, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 within three weeks of receipt of this letter outlining your
intent to proceed with this project or withdraw your application. If you wish to proceed,
please address the items listed above.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer Frye at
[phone], ext. 275.
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 26, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7099 3220 0006 8502 5301
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Lenwood Smith
Division Seven Environmental Officer
NCDOT
4261 Camp Burton Road
McLeansville, NC 27301
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62
Jordan Creek
DWQ Project # 01 0453
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill material
into approximately 200 linear feet of Jordan Creek, Class WS-H HQW waters, Cape Fear River
Basin, for the purpose of a road crossing. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude
that your project must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below,
we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A NCAC 2H
.0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
place your project on administrative hold.
(1) Please provide documentation detailing your position that the project has been
designed such that adverse impacts to surface waters have been minimized and
existing uses have been protected to the best of your ability.
(2) Please provide the exact linear footage that you propose to impact. Include the
length of stream impacted by the box culvert and associated rip-rap energy
dissipaters.
(3) The project will also require compensatory mitigation as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506(h). Your mitigation proposal is insufficient since none was proposed. If
the project is re-designed to impact less than 150 LF of Jordan Creek,
compensatory mitigation will not be required.
_, r
01 0453
Page 2
(4) Please provide supporting documentation that the design and placement of two
box culverts will not cause a dis-equilibrium of the stream beds or banks, adjacent
to or upstream and downstream of the structure. Please provide assurance that
the natural hydrology of the stream will not in the destabilization of streams.
Please respond, in writing, both to this Office and to John Dorney, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 within three weeks of receipt of this letter outlining your
intent to proceed with this project or withdraw your application. If you wish to proceed,
please address the items listed above.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer Frye or me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO
401 apps
Subject: 401 apps
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 13:19:15 -0400
From: Megan Owen <Megan.Owen@ncmai].net>
Organization: NC DENR, DWQ
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
John and Cyndi:
I've reviewed more 401 applications. Please let me know if my review is too simplistic or if there's
something else that's missing. Is it possible to add a question to the application form to identify the
classification of the impacted waters? If so, you might not have to wait on any of my input. Have a good
holiday weekend.
401s with Comments:
Vey 010422oudy lopp) - project is in WS-IV-PA and subject to the water supply rules and randleman rules.
Note that land disturbing activities are not allowed in zone one of the randleman buffers. -t-
010452(DOT) - the project is in WS-II-PA HQW. The WS Rules ask that DOT follow their BMP
Guidelines document, as well as, ask for them to minimize BUA, divert stormwater away from surface ws
waters, and employ BMPs.
010453(DOT) - same thing as above. The project is in WS-II-PA HQW. DOT must follow their BMP
document.
0 010400(crabtree creek greenway) - this project is not in a water supply watershed; however, it would be
?fy1?J? great if parks and rec could make their boardwalks of decking materials with 1" spaces to allow for more
infiltration. They are also subject to Neuse Buffer Rules, eventhough greenways are an allowed use.
I 1 010379(delta engineering) - the project is within WS-IV-PA NSW (Little River). The project will need to
comply with WS Rules (mostly BUA and buffers) and Neuse Buffers.
\ l 010382(the villages at reedy creek) - unsure about their location, but most likely subject to the Randleman
c Rules.
?U 010383(masond moghadass) - the project is within Falls Lake WS-IV-PA, and subject to WS Rules (BUA,
,??tbuffers, etc.)
p? 010368(Kinmere subdivision) - project is within Lake Wylie WS-IV-PA. Watch for WSWP buffers and
BUA. And subject to Catawba Temp Rules? -
010440(larry's homes) - project is within Flat River WS-III-PA and subject to WS Rules and Neuse
Buffers.
010294(duke energy) - project is within Lookout Shoals Lake WS-IV-CA and subject to WS Rules and
J
(Catawba Temp Rules?).
y?t'j 010292(duke energy) -same as above, project is within Lookout Shoals Lake WS-IV-CA and subject to
?) WS Rules and (Catawba Temp Rules?).
401s with no comments:
010397(Joseph Coughlin)
I of 2 4/12/01 1:50 PD
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
s.• s??
µ
J?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1584 YANCEWH I.E STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
March 21, 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN: Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele
Wetlands/401 Unit / ll }}
Dear Ms. Van Der Wiele:
SUBJECT: Alamance County, Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62 across Jordan Creek
Please find seven (7) copies a Pre-Construction Notification Application package attached for your
review. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Len Smith or
Dennis Johnson at [phone]. Thank you for your time and assistance.
Sincerely,
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
Pr, }7'/lL 1iiT
RE CE i` vED
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
n°?F=7Io
y r .+.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCMILLF STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
March 21, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Almance County, Replacement of Bridge 104 on NC 62 across Jordan Creek
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing one-
lane bridge on NC 62 with a 2 @ 14'X 9' reinforced concrete box culvert 70 feet long. The bridge
must be replaced due to structural deficiencies. No federally protected species or their habitats were
observed during a site visit conducted by Lenwood Smith, II on March 22, 2001. A soft rush
(Juncus effusus) dominated mudflat that meet the definition of a jurisidictional wetland is located
within the confines of the stream channel. Wetland impacts will be less than 0.01 acres. The site is
located in a high quality water zone. Impacts will result from the placement of fill in 70 linear feet of
channel
The NCDOT anticipates that this activity will be authorized under General Permit 198200031.
Enclosed please find the project site map and the pre-construction notification form for the above
referenced projects. By copy of this letter we are also requesting a General Water Quality
Certification #3289 from the NC Division of Water Quality. Construction is anticipated to begin in
August 2001.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Len Smith at (336) 375-
5589. Thank you for your time and assistance.
PIJONE336-334-3192 FAX[phone]
a-AN[
3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOITRNOR
Sincerel
x1-
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele, NCDWQ
Mr. Dennis Johnson, NCDOT
LYNllO TIPPE'rr
SECRETARY
PFIONE 336-334-3192 FAX[phone]
DWQ ID: 00-0239 CORPS ACTION ID 199921280
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT {I) General Permit
198200031
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2. APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3. COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7)
COPIES MUST BE SENT TO THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY.
ATTN: JOHN DORNEY 4401 REEDY CREEK ROAD. RALEIGH NC
27607. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE.
1. OWNER'S NAME: NC DEPT OF TRANS -Division of Hi.Qhwa s - 7
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 4261 Camp Burton Road
SUBDIVISION NAME N/A
CITY: McLeansville STATE: North Carolina ZIP CODE: 27301
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (HOME) (WORK) [phone]
4 IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: Lenwood E. Smith II PWS Division Environmental Officer
4261 Cam Burton Road McLeansville NC 27301
[phone]
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Alamance - NEAREST TOWN: Burlington
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ECT.) Bridge # 104 on NC 62
across Jordan Creek. Bridge # 104 is located approximately 3000 feet north of Lowder Road SR 1761).
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Jordan Creek
RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear River
7. (a) IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER, (SA),
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORw), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES X NO ? IF YES, EXPLAIN: High Quality Water (HQW) with a
Water Supply If (WS-II) designation. The critical area is over 8 miles south of the crossing A hazardous
spill catch basin is not required. See the attached checklist
(b) IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ? NO X
(c) IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8. (a) HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROJECT? YES X NO ? IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PERMIT
AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION): _
Action LD. # 199921280. Approved under Nationwide Permit # 26 Expired January 5 2000
General Certification 3103 provided under DWQ #00-0239 See attached documentaion
(b) ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES ? NO X IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
(a) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBERS OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: <0.02
(b) ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
<0.01 acres of a Juncus effusus dominated mud flat formed on sediment being retained by the existing structure
10. (a) NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: <0.01 EXCAVATION: N/A
FLOODING: N/A OTHER : N/A
DRAINAGE : N/A TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: N/A
(b) (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED,
PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION:
LENGTH BEFORE: AFTER:
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): 44 FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: I FT AFTER: I FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: 70 linear feet of channel impacts
IL IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED? (ATTACH PLANS; S 1/2 BY 11 DRAWINGS ONLY)
Replacement of a structurally deficient bridge with a 70-foot long a 2 0 14'X 9' RC box culvert resulting
in 70 linear feet of impact to a perennial stream and impacts to less than 0.01 acres of a Juncus effusus
dominated mudflat within the confines of the stream channel.
Road construction equipment.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: To replace a structurally deficient bridge and improve traffic
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS)
The one-lane bridge has to be replaced to ensure public safety. Replacement by box culvert is preferred
due to the extended amount of road closure associated with bridge construction. In addition the activity i
part of a linear project where waters of the Unites States cannot be avoided
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND/OR
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY
LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL
HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED No federal ly protected species or their habitats were observed during a site visit
conducted by Lenwood Smith, If on March 22, 2001
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA
WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED NC State
Historic Preservation Office records from April 12. 2000 state that the existing bridge is not elieible for
listing in the National Register of Historic Places (See attached)
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OT THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND? YES X NO ? (IF NO, GO TO 16)
(a) IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT? YES ? NO X
(b) IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE YES E] NO ?
IF ANSWER 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OF FILL MATERIAL INTO
WETLANDS:
(a) WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES, AND
PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38).
ALL STREAM (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON
THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE I INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OF I INCH EQUALS 100 FEET
OF THEIR EQUIVALENT.
(b) IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PRODUCT.
(c) IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
(d) ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
(e) WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Agricultural/Residential
(f) IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? N/A
SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE US MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
I. ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2. EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFICATION, AND
3. (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM,
WNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED).
-- ' ' /
i\'I1W /
.
'
s - - _
Idge 0,
Brid 1A
I
/ I Q r \ tit! / r 1 \\ ? , \ r li:
678 ???' )v ?? VA AVM • 1
0, 1 V I l?i'\ ?i'(?j f? ?? ?r.
J ?t. % `' ?f J ,? I' I (? ,y?? \y ? ' ?.-? /? /1?` i` ,I , it ' \ ? ?V, `\.// r ??? -(_. ! 1" ' V /\? .r'_\
f i ?/,?..,?_?( 1y?/i, ';\I? '.,,r ?? ? Z ?i? \\ {`??,t??„- III ,I,I \?iL.:'? t fr _ ? `?_!/ J?\...?
A,? \\\ \t ?/ i' '?\ \\ W rr tty (??' , / i' ; ( .? 1`,?, I• `'
',
h t
\ /r 7( / .(
\\ ?..r _ -1.?,_ (???,'?,J ?'•_ f\
`?;,\ ?? I !' .l 1,`! ?r?.JO.7 ?1 ''? .??` rl l :, r I ? >'; -,`J` 11 .?,,!`_.l 1 ?,-/ _? r-:
?'.,? `?i! (r ,i.l`% \ ;? n (+ ! ? J:i EsoV-1,.??Iti\?`_I ?l? ( -.1 1 ? '? I ?•?`\,
' / ?If'/ II-ir \ ;.I? ??y./' ??! ?.? Lnu, ILt f` '--\,?/. __,i•??,\,a.1_ 1 i if ' ?; ? I 1 i h i ?:,_ (- .? I/ 1 _ , ?
`'' ?':. j n , t l I ?? \??\\(, ? 1 r ?.'I, ? i \I ? , ? r \`?--?? •? •? ?. `?\? 1 'V 1 i`., 1\\y. i? ? ?' _ ?? _/4` I, ? .?• '
p 1 p N t .?,?. \ \ ` T , \ 'I /t ?. ? yi ?' •Br14?gL .1 ?`} \"; \\-. \l V, " ..l (\ C?\ \?+/_
Ji,
1 yy
\_
_ / / / i - ?. (,? ! ?_1 .111 .- `,_ !? y i ?I O Crr ` ` -f I /!)/ 1" I 13
• •,
_ ?` ; r• ,/' -. ~ \t , -' _ ( , ?y 1 - r - `\ •-?---.? \ ` ,?- i r/ ? °// 1 1, i ?? .
f13'47iv
\ \ \ l l C
` e7c ? "1
-- + Y _ .... ?? 't,\ 1, ._r\.\ 4 ?? 1 1 ` ?' \ •l % ,,i' 1' {
Name: BURLINGTON NE
Date: 3/20/2001 Location: 036° 14' 39.3" N 079° 19' 25.4" W Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Caption: Bridge Replacements on NC 62
Maptech, Inc.
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: S .v .n County: AInm?nr e Project ID: 5.4742268
River Basin: Cape Fear Bridge No: 104
Route: NC 62 Stream: Jordan Creek
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS j ?-;
ORW 1 ! F
WSI r-1 1?
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area 17 F
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban F
Arterial Rural 1r F
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? ?_F ? F-
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).
Adjoining Property Owners
Proposed Replacement of Alamance County Bridge 104 across Jordan Creek
William N & Melida F McCauley
2938 Faucette Lane
Burlington, NC 27217
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
4: S a ® v A
rl. c. r r u,
Dept; ;
-Co X49
March 10, 2000
DWQ# 00-0239
Alamance County
Mr. Dennis Johnson
NCDOT
4261 Camp Burton Road
McCleansville, NC, 27301
i i Water
di i 1\ V VH LUri,? ?t?}? Ql..iiitty
Dear Mr. Johnson:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to replace bridge
No. 104 on NC 62 across Jordan's Creek (16-14-6-(0.5), WS-II, NSW) in Alamance County, as you described in
your application. received by the Division of Water Quality on February 8, 2000. After reviewing your
application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3103.
This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified
in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If
the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby
responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed
one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to
be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional condition listed
below.
1. Hazardous spill catch basins should be installed at this crossing, so that runoff will enter the basins rather
than directly flowing into Jordan's Creek.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which
conforms to Chapter 150B or the North Caroiilla General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O.
Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask
for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
i erely,
' rr &tn j
t '
Non-Discharge Branch 1621 Mail Service C n er Raleigh, Nort Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] \, { FAX tt 733-9959
An Equal Opportunity Affirmotive Action Employer 5M; recycled/l0% post consumer paper
ER 00-7396
Received 8/23/99
Due 9/7/99
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REVIEW
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
rT?
APPLICANT: Dennis L. Johnson
Bridge Maintenance Superintendent
NCDOT
P.O. Box 289
Siler City NC 27344
Project Location: CASWELL/NC 62 over Jordan's Creek
Proposed Project: Replace Bridge 104
We have received the application for the above project from the Applicant and our
comments are noted below.
Additional information is needed (maps, photographs, other).
}Q No comment.
We have reviewed the requested information and have no comment.
Signed. a?
Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
Historic Preservation Office
919/733-4763
FAX [phone]
Date
i
[D 1, 7 1 Qg9 OF-r, - - .--
W ?x Q PR 1 9 c. 0th
..
.. ':
T r'
BRIDGE UP11T,
North Carolina Department of Cultural ResourcesDept.. Co F" 49
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
fames B. Hunt Jr., Governor
3etty Ray McCain, Secretary
April 12, 2000
Dennis Johnson
NCDOT
4261 Camp Burton Road
McLeansville, NC 27301
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 104 on NC 62, Alamance County, ER 00-8896
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Thank you for your letter of February 1, 2000, concerning the above project.
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following structures of historical or
architectural importance within the general area of the project:
Bridge No. 104 was built in 1921.
We recommend that an NCDOT architectural historian identify and evaluate all properties over fifty years of age
and report the findings to us:
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our present knowledge of the
area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological
investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,.
,1/ P7 0",
David Brook 1?--Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
cc: W. Gilmore
B. Church
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
DAIINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] 733-8653
RCHAEOLOGY 421 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4619 [phone] 715-2671 j
ESTORATION 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4613 [phone] 715-4801
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID 199921280 County Alamance
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: NCDOT/Bridge No. 1041NC Highway 62
Address: Attn: Mr. Dennis L. Johnson
Bridge Maintenance Superintendent
Post Office Box 289
Siler City, North Carolina 27344
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town,
etc.): Bridge Number 104, on NC Highway 62, approximately 0.5
mile north of SR 1761, approximately 5 miles northwest of Mebane,
North Carolina. The project is located adjacent to, and above
the headwaters of, Jordan Creek.
Description of Activity: Mechanized landclearing, filling and
excavation activities associated with a reinforced concrete box
culvert, impacting less than 0.1 acre of jurisdictional waters of
the United States.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
26 Nationwide Permit.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or
Nationwide Permit referenced above may subject the permittee to a
stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit
verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility
to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate
State and local agencies before beginning work.
Regulatory Project Manager Signatur?oc
Date 15 September 1999 ExpiratiorP?Date 5 January 2000
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST
BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR
AVAILABLE.
PL/?iV Sh'CCr
WOODS
WOODS
SEE DETAIL "A" RIP-RAP.
FALLOW °-
a I
4 .
111 4 111 1`1? 111 ? 111 4 111.111 ? 111 4 111 111 111 4 111 4 111 111 !.
I1 ', 111 } TOE FROP
? ?c FILL - OSED FILL
-------------`--?"---
N04'47'57'E - - - - -_?-
NC 62 - -
---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.. ----
-_`?, ? 1 1 ? I I I I ? I I I I ? 11 ? I I ? I I ? I I I I I I I I ? -- - 1? 11 1114I1I4 1114 I I --------------------------------------
414141414141 114 ? 41
C3
E FRI
793.9 -
TOE PROPOSE F
I
SEE DETAIL "B" W00D\_?j`' FALLOW
WOODS
i
).B. FLR. STA. 10+00.0 o E.O.B. FL R.
SON NAIL) EL.=. 796.87 0
(MASON NAIL)
_RIP CRAP
S
i
'I
i
I
Construction Sequence
Bridge No. 104 - Alamance County
1. Install rip rap check dam.
2. Remove structure.
3. Install sand bag/stone coffer dam
4. De-water contained area for construction of barrel no. 1
5. Upon completion of barrel no. 1, adjust ends of coffer dam, allowing
stream to flow through barrel no. 1.
6. De-water contained area for construction of barrel no. 2.
7. Upon completion of barrel no. 2, baclifill structure.
S. Place rip rap on all four corners and exposed banks.
9. Seed and mulch remaining disturbed areas.
10-Silt Fences to be placed as site conditions require.
11-All de-watering will be into a 15' x 15' Dirt Bag
?J
3-23-0?
i
?' o n
? r
C7 d
d
1
c?

-- CD

N • _

/I

?1 y

0---_
b
p
0
C7
w
B
I?
V 1
N

C?

? L{ 1
^

o
,?

a.

View of the channel characteristics under Bridge 104.
The Juncus effusus dominated mudflat is present in the foreground.
I
r`
t 5
(
t l
t 11 ti
I.
t / 1 S j'k,
Y? 1 'I? `JY 71 ,Y?, lrf s ..
Iky ? fFr??
North facing view of the Bridge 104 platform. Note the stopped car allowing the truck to pass.
The Juncus effusus dominated mudflat to be impi
Ij
1 ?}
M
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
April 18, 2001
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
ATTN: Mr. John Hennessy
Wetlands/401 Unit
Dear Mr. Hennessy:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Caswell and Alamance Counties, Replacement of Bridges 14 and 104 on NC 62.
This letter is intended to inform you of errors that are contained in the PCNs that were submitted for
the aforementioned projects. Both PCNs were mailed on March 23, 2001. The PCN for Bridge 14
states that the channel width is 18 feet, The actual width is 10 feet. The PCN for Bridge 104 states
that the channel width is 44 feet. The actual width is 7 feet. The widths reported in the original
PCNs are the distances from bents. I hope that this information will clarify any questions that may
arise regarding these applications and I apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Len Smith or Dennis
Johnson at [phone]. Thank you for your time and assistance.
Sincerel
Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

STREAM BED SOUNDINGS ER. INSP. WORKSHEET (1/l/90)
(SEE NEXT SHEET FOR PROFILE SKETCH) Revised 10/9198
Bridge u: 14 COUNTY CASWELL DATE 6/8/99 BY: GDP
RECORD SOUNDINGS FROM TOP OF RAIL. OTHER LOCATION IF NEEDED:
DISTANCE HIGHWATER MARK TO TOP OF RAIL: 51 LOCATION H. W. MARK: End Bents
NOTE:Draft a Stream Bed Profile sketch and record soundings at the stream face of abutments, C/L of piers, WE, WS, and major
contour changes on the downstream side. Record soundings at the stream face abutments and CIL piers on the upstream side.
DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM
DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION
2 16.2 WS & WE WS & WE
12 16.2 WS 8 WE WS 8WE
0 5.7
2 5.7
2 16.2 End Bent* 1 / WSWE 2 14.2 End Bent# 1
6 16.4
10 16.6
12 16.2 WS 8WE
15 14.5
18 12.2
20 11.9 End Bent# 2 20 14.0 End Bent# 2
20 5.7
22 5.7

Page 1 of 2

STREAM BED SOUNDINGS BR, INSP. WORKSHEET (1/1190)
(SEE NEXT SHEET FOR PROFILE SKETCH) Revised 10/9/93
Bridge: 104 COUNTY ALAMANCE DATE 12/2198 BY: RLA
RECORD SOUNDINGS FROM TOP OF RAIL. OTHER LOCATION IF NEEDED.
DISTANCE HIGHWATER MARK TO TOP OF RAIL: 11 l LOCATION H. W. MARK ABUTMENTS
NOTED. aft a SVeam Bed Profile sketch and record soundings at the stream face of abutments. CIL of piers, WE, WS, and major
contour changes on the downstream side. Record soundings at the stream face abutments and CIL piers on the upstream side.
DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM
DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION DISTANCE
(Station) SOUNDING DESCRIPTION
7 . 17.6 WS & WE WS & WE
14 17.6 WS & WE WS &WE
0 3.5 FF
0 3.2 TOP WINGWALL.
2 14.4 14.3 A-1
3 14.4
4 17.0
7 17.6 WSWE
10 18.0
14 17.6 WSWE
19 17.0
25 17.0
35 17.0
40.5 17.2 17.0 A-2
42 3.2 FF,TOP WING

Page ' 1. of
ALTERNATE STRUCTURE PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SHEET N0. T TAL SHEETS
i@ 32'x9' CON-SPAN OR EQUIVALENT
w/CAST IN PLACE F OOR SLAB STATE PROJ. N0. F.A. PROJ. N0. DE CRIPTION

RECOMMENDED STRUCTURE
2@ 14'x9` RCBC
WOODS

RIP-RAP *w SEE DETAIL "A'
,.3 FALLOW = WOODS
q
~Z%~ T 1°
~ ~ ~ ~{~~~{~d~?,~i{r~{~q~~~q~~~q~~,q,pq,pq,~,q,~,q,l,q,{,q .,,~~?a
R` q OE PROPOSED FIL WOODS
~ L `~i± ' r
R' T I I WOODS
r TO NO4 47 57 E L- TO RIP-RAP
. SEE DETAIL "A"
SR 1761 NC 62 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 20' BST SR 1768-~` - °m°m - - - ~ _
Q~{~4,I~Q~pQ~1~4~I~Q~i~44~p~J~pQ~p~~p ~p4`~~{~ ~4,p ~pQ~pQ~PS`4~I~q
k _ - ,a GARAGE FIB. d 4 i~~,p~q~Q I~ Q Q 4 Q Q
~ EL- T93.9 ~ TOE PROPOSED FILL- 4~ ~Q~I~ • TOE PROPOSED FI
~ L Ll
' FALLOW SEE DETAIL B DSO II - "1
~ WOODS ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ..r..c~_c._
N04°47'S7'E 'L- TO
B.O.B. FLR. STA. 10+00.0 T ' Ni E.O.B. FLR. STA. 10+45.1 SR 1761 NC 62 NC 62 20'BST SR 1768
' iMASON NAIL) EL.= 796.87 iMASON NAIU EL.= 796.98 _ - - - - - - - ^ ~ - r
RIP-RAP • ~ ~U • 4~ ~I~ ~p~,?~p4`~~p4~~p ~pf~~pQ ~4~p ~pQ~h4~U4~1~. " u ~ I ~'1 Q 4 4 ~ DETAIL A
w~'` 9 , GARAGE FRL - f - F1.= T93.9 BASE DITCH ToE PRDPOS (Not to Scale)
Fill Natural ~ Slope
SEE DETAIL "B" FALLOW Ground ~ I~/F-t, WOODS d D _ ,
, _ WOODS PROPOS D AREA- 288.0 sf WOODS W Min.D__.2_Ft.
~ ALTERNATE STRUCTURE ~ Max, d - _2._Ft. I STORY BRICK Min. b= 2' Ft.
~r,:.~l, B.O.B. FLR. STA. 10+00.0 / ~ ~STa.1O+27.0 -L- 0+00.0 E.O.B. FLR. STA. 10+g5.1 sFD 6= z' Ft.
I@ 32'x9' CON-SPAN OR QUIVALENT (MASON NAIL) EL.= 796.87 796.87 ~ - IN. FLR. EL.= 796.0 Type of Liner= CLASS 6 ~ (MASON NAIL) EL.- 796.98
w/CAST IN PLACE FLOOR SLAB DETAIL "B"
~ 90 SKEW ~I~, LATERAL 'U' DITCH
( Not to Scale )
j RIP-RAP ~ slolle Natural ~ p
FIN.FLR. I 80 800 /I ~ ~ round I'/Ft. L~ D
Nc. Rt.._ Ex~sr EL.= 793.9 we C / ~ . RADE P- ~ d Rr . 2 Min. 6 _Ft.
f ~ ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING GRADE - ` l i, _ _ Max.d= Ft. b= Ft.
_ - - DESIGN 50yr, I Type of Liner= TONE
~ WS EL.= T90.0 I - - - I
EXISTING 50 yr. WS EL.- 790.2 •`-=~a_ I _
PROPOSED 50 yr. WS EL.- 790.0 • I ~ _
4 \ ~ MS EL.= T82.3 1 snTis~
EXISTING 100 r. WS EL.= 790.9 y , • NOTE: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED 100 r. WS EL.= 791.0 r:;,:;, 780 ~ 780 REQUIRED.
NOTE. WATER SU FACE ELEVATIONS FROM HEC-RAS ~ ~ BED EL.= 780.2
6 + 00
7 + + 0 4. . 3 ~
R~

1 r4 . -
:t
~qq.' \ _
1~ . @ ` `
~ ` f, _ -
. " _

b _ -
- -

'p .
F~F",';:' F N d fj
`k, ;
F
- } s
sl
,
N _
r., . i;::,
i
I
Q, I, :J _ i

Yl - _ HE ITS . . . . HE BALL
I, - p
{ - DI VISION OF HIGHWAY
ALAMANCE COUNTY
- - - - BRG.# 104 ON NC 62
~ ' OVER ORDAN CREEK J
scAC~ 1"= so'aoRrz 1"= 10'VBRT.
• • SURIBI' BY; MBK
' DRAWN BY: MBK DBSIGN BY.•
CBBCI~D BY:
~ 899
+ti.