20000827 Ver 1_Complete File_20110419

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources'
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
0 ® © ` -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 17, 2000
Richmond County
DWQ Project No. 000827
APPROVAL OF 401Water Quality Certification
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC„27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
You have our approval, as described in your application dated June 14, 2000, and in accordance with the
attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 1.4 acres of jurisdictional wetlands (1.2
acres of permanent, and 0.2 acres of temporary fill) for the purpose of replacing Bridge Numbers 4 and 27
over the Little River. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Number 3197. Certification 3197 corresponds to Nationwide Permit Number
23 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local
permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire when the
accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified
below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby
responsible for complying with all the conditions. If additional wetland fills for this project (now or in the
future) exceed one acre, or total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). ). This
approval shall expire with the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the
General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1.) When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the enclosed "Cettif7cation of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed.
The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the
Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) Compensatory mitigation for 12 acres of wetland impact shall be provided by removi'ng the old road
bed, grading to the original elevation, and revegetating the area. The mitigation plan shall be
implemented as described in your July 19, 2000 proposal. The mitigation plan as presented provides
1.5 acres of wetland restoration, and 1.3 acres of upland buffer. The Certification of Completion Form
(described in condition 1) shall be submitted to the NC Division of Water upan completion of the
project's construction to verify that the road and mitigation sites were constructed as proposed.
Wetlards/401 Unit 1621 INtail Service Center Ralei_h, Noith Caiolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5050 rccycled/10% posr consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
n
3- a ® °
1
1 '?:2m
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
3.) As builts for the mitigation site shall be submitted to the NC Division of Water Quality upon
completion of the project construction.
4.) Monitoring reports as described in the July 19, 2000 mitigation proposal shall be submitted to the NC
Division of Water Quality for review.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646.
Sincerely,
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\TIP B-2608\wqc\000827wgc.doc
C
e . Stevens ,
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5017o recvclcd/10'7o post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
4
D) [E ?1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 23 (APPROVED CATEGORICAL EXCLUSIONS)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Regulations in 15A NCAC 21-1, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 213 .0200 for the discharge of fill material to
waters and wetland areas as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (23). This Certification replaces
Water Quality Certification Number 2670 issued on January 21, 1992 and Water Quality Certification
Number 2734 issued on May 1 1993. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers reauthorize
Nationwide Permit 23 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of the DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate applicable
portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Proposed fill or substantial modification of waters or wetlands for this General Certification requires
written notification to the Division of Water Quality regarding the extent of impact to waters and
wetlands;
2. Two copies shall be submitted to DWQ at the time of notification in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0501(a);
3. Fill or alteration of more than one acre (0.45 ha) of wetlands will require compensatory mitigation in
accordance with 15A NCAC .0506 (h). Written DWQ approval is required for this mitigation plan
which may utilize the State's Wetland Restoration Program;
4. Fill or alteration of more than 150 linear feet (45.7 meters) or streams may require compensatory
mitigation in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506(h). Written DWQ approval is required for this
mitigation plan which may utilize the State's Wetland Restoration Program;
5. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent edition of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design
Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources
in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) are utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate
turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout by DWQ; 25
NTUs in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
6. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and the
natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
7. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a FONSI or ROD is issued
by the State Clearinghouse;
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, titirth Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 509o recycled/ I017o post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
4 © 0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
3. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this Certification in
order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent standards;
9. If the project is not completed within three years from the date of the first notification to DWQ, then
the applicant will again need to notify DWQ.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project shall result in
revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formal
application for individual certification for any project in this category of activity, if it is determined that the
project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a Certification
decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality.
Effective date: 11 February 1997.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.,
Director
WQC # 3107
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Ivlail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employcr 50°o recycled/ I01'o post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
County:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 101 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1621. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the
project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Date:
Partial Final
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full tithe) the construction of
the project,for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycle(Y10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
4
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Ccntcr Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAY 733-9959
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 505 recycled/ 1017o post consumer paper
. STAIf
STATI; ( NO,ri I CAKOLINA AUR 2
DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION
WERANr,
JAN1FS 13. 1 IUNF .Iii. WMUMCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRFI'ARY
July 19, 2000
Mr. David Timpy
Wilmington Regulatory field Office
U.S. Army Corps of'I'ngineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dcar Mr. Timpy:
Subject: Mitigation plan for permanent wetland impacts resulting from fill and Inechanlz.Cd
clearing in wetlands and details regarding temporary causeway removal and
bridge demolition due to replacement of-Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River and
Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A. Project No. BRSTP-
73(3), State Project No. 8.1581001, 'HP No. 13-2608.
As was discussed in the phone conversation between David Timpy of the U.S. Army Corps of'
Engineers and Lynn Smith of NCD0T on July 10, 2000, a mitigation plan is being prepared for
permanent wetland impacts resulting from TiP No. I3-2608. This portion of the plan outlines key
points concerning the on-site wetland restoration and upland buffer proposed to compensate for
permanent wetland impacts. Removal of the temporary causeways and bridge demolition are
also discussed.
The Department proposes to use on-site restoration of wetlands and upland buffers to mitigate
for the 1.2 acres of'permancnt wetland loss. The NCDOT will grade the existing roadbed down
to meet the elevation of the adjacent land. Areas adjacent to wetlands will be replanted with
black willow (Salix nigra), river birch (Benda nigra), water oak (Quei-c•ns nigra), southern red
oak (Q. f ilcxNa) and cherrybark oak (Q. fidcala var. pagodilolia). Areas graded down but not
adjacent to wetlands will be replanted with the same vegetation and.will serve as upland buffers.
The mitigation area will be comprised of' 1.5 acres of wetland restoration and 1.3 acres of upland
buffer, The Department asks that this mitigation plan be used to satisfy wetland mitigation
requirements for 1.2 acres of permanent wetland impacts due to the replacement of Bridges No.
4&27.
Please find attached a portion of the wetland mitigation plan including a map defining the
mitigation area, bridge demolition information and the species which will be planted after the old
roadbed and the temporary causeway associated with the overflow are removed. Photographs of"
the site can be found in the CE. Supplemental information including final design plans and
planting details will be forwarded to you as soon as they are available. Thank for your continued
MAILING ADDRESS: TEI FPHONF 919-733-3141 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT Or TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL. ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WE6SITE. WWWOOH,DOT.STATF_.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

assistance and cooperation. Il'you have any questions or concerns, please call Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
1/ C', eC4
klq-William D. Gilmore, P.I?., Manager
Project Development and Fnvironmcntal Analysis Branch
als/WDG
L'nclosures
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, COF, Wilmington
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Bruce Lllis, Natural Systems Unit I [cad
Filc: 13-2608
Wetland Mitigation Plan
Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
TIP No. B-2608, Richmond County
E'xisling C'ondilions
The project area is dominated by it pine plantation with the exception of a portion of the
Little River Overflow. The pint plantation consists primarily of loblolly pine (Pinus lue(la).
"file overflow area supports a greater diversity of'vegctation including black willow (,S'ulix nigr(t),
red maple (Aces ruhruni), sweetgunl (Licluidcnnhar s/yruci?luu), river birch (Relulu nigrcl), green
ash (Fi-axinus• pennsylvunicu), deciduous holly (Ilex (lecicluu) and rush (Jumuti• spp.).
Summuiy ol'Inipacis
'file project will result in 1.2 ac oCpermanent fill and mechanized clearing (Method 111) in
wetlands due to the replacement of? Bridges No. 4 & 27 on new alignment. "Temporary impacts
to surface waters, including wetlands, totaling 0.3 ac, will occur Crone the construction of two
temporary causeways. No stream relocation or channel change will be involved. The causeways
will consist oCClass If Rip Rap topped with smaller Class B Rip Rap with 1.5:1 slopes. After
the project is completed the causeway in the Little River will be removed to the extent
practicable without disturbing the creek bottom. The temporary fill associated with the
causeway ill the Little River Overflow will be placed oil geo-textile fabric and the area will be
restored to its original elevation and replanted with vegetation, listed below, at 320 stems per
acre.
Bridge Demolition
The NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be
adhered to for this pro.jcct. It is NCDOT's intent not to drop any bridge components into Waters
of'the U.S. According to a Ally 18, 2000 email from the NCDOT's Structure Design Project
Engineer, Allen Raynor, PI?, the following is a standard policy for bridge demolition. "'I'hc
existing bridge shall be removed by sawing and/or non-shattering methods such that debris will
not fall into the water. The contractor shall submit the plan for the bridge demolition to the
engineer for review and approval." Should any portion ol'the sti-ucture tall into the water during
demolition, it will be removed immediately.
Resloralion Puramelei•s
• Areas between the northern side of* tile existing road toe of slope and the northern side of the
new location toe of'slope will be graded to meet adjacent land elevations and replanted,
restoring 1.5 acres of wetlands and 1.3 acres of upland buffer (see attached map).
• Pictorially measured, photos will be provided at annual monitoring illeetings. At the cnd of
the third year, NCDOT, regulatory and resource agencies will meet on site and determine
75% survivability. If'wetland areas temporarily impacted by this project have not re-attained
wetland jurisdictional status, NCDOT and the U.S. Arnly Corps of Engineers shall determine
whether compensatory wetland mitigation will be required.
• Temporary causeway will be removed within thirty (30) days following completion of
Construction.
Trees will be planted 320 stems per acre consisting of black willow, river birch, water oak,
southern red oak and cherry hark oak.
Replanting will occur between December 15, 2000 - March 15, 2001.

c
O
-',
ro :j)
fiV
U
W
4-)
cn p
CE
co
occ
W
N
W
£8 aVN

Ewa •lB-- - ? . ?,.
d,M?P
a
i? .
I
4
e
•lB --J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\1
I
I
O
z
W
W
J
N
B
A
W
B
Q
O/
0
q ?
N ?
w m ro
0 L L
C u o u
O 9 C q
q
in a c-i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment Tk",NWA
and Natural Resources "
Division of Water Quality A&4? *
IT
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611
Re: Permit Application for replacement of Bridge Numbers 4 and 27 over the Little River and the Little
River Overflow on NC 73 in Richmond County
DWQ No. 000827; T.I.P. No. B-2608.
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
• The Wetlands Restoration Program has not agreed to accept the proposed mitigation for the project.
Until we have verification of their acceptance we are unable to confirm that appropriate mitigation has
been performed for the referenced project.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(4), we will have to place the permit application on hold until
we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
S' cereiv.
ey
o R. Dorn
ter Quality Jif on Prog ram
cc: Mooresville, DWQ Regional Office
Dave Timpy, USACE
Central Files
File Copy
C:AnCLION3- 2608Acorrespondetic6000827h1d.doc
Wetlands/401 Unit 1631 :Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
.An Equal Oppornuuty :Affirm,tlicc Action litnplover W", rec}cled/10'% post consumer paper

STATE (w NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALFIGI1. N.C. 27011-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SI{CRETARY
June 14, 2000
cv ?
3 S. Army Corps of'Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 08 ?_7
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement ol'Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-7 3 (3), State Project No. 8.158100 1.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject prolject. The North Carolina Department of "Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on ncNv location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4. over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridpe No. 27. over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam, therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to 4ters of the U.S. have increased since the completion ol'the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge, to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of'reinforced concrete girders. deck.
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. 't'here is potential for components of the deck and- subStRICturc_ totaling 184
yd' of material, to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
t
l

temporarily filling 2117 yd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30. 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove tile riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
ol'and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). "I'hreatcncd (T).
Proposed Endangered (PF,), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of'Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (f-laliaeelus leucocephaltrs), shortnosc sturgeon
(Acipenser hrevirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides horealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.

The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy ofthis letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
l ?
jk William 1). Gilmore, P .F. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John I)orney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis

DEPT] iL': 0 0 08 2 1 CoRI' F,CT10l1 TP:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (K'ROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) :NWP 2i & 33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK) : [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
Little River & Little River
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:

r
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
L
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF' WE'T'LANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER:
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur north
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO [ ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
U?
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
tl. i:f

01 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0-
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Cool'
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo
June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x 10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
June 9, 2000
multiple cells arc required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms arc at stream banki'ul stage (similar to I,yonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of'the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. Ifsmultiple pipes or cells arc used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildliic passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of'structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prcier the replacement of'the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April I and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.

I 2 S' ^ r --- i
i l) OID1117B -- - - • 6
- ' co
O I y, N 9 v
j O?
a
C\j
0) ° 83 00 I
Lf)
Cl- Ln r
? t
01 _, _ \

L? CYN

w?

i'

/
I
II w
PLI
II
?
<1
by Ln

?qd t LIJ

cn
J
I?
FR R
aER
I
I I ?

? II
I
N II r

w II ?

G5 II
Lo

m
?

2 ?
N. C. 01, TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION CAT HIGHWAYS

RICHMOND COUNTY

PROJECT: WHOM 002608)
?g NU 73
BE T'"Who Sit 1155 AND 115=

SHEET 2 Ol 13 5/ 21 / 00
LEGEND
-iJLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
LIVE STAKES

L WETLAND C2D BOUL DER
DENOTES FILL IN --- COIR FIBER ROLLS
WETLAND
O ADJAC ENT PROPERTY OWNER
DENOTES FILL IN OR PARCEL NUMBER
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED BRIDGE
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
SINGLE TREE
- -t- FLOW DIRECTION
WOODS LINE
TB
IB
- TOP OF BANK
J DRAINAGE INLET
--- ------ EDGE OF WATER _
--C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT ROOTWAD
--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
PROP. RIGHT OF WAY f f f I I I I i VANE
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- -P?--- PROPERTY LINE RIP RAP

TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE RIP RAP ENERGY
EASEMENT
s OISSIPATOR BASIN
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE a
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
BUFFER
ZONE
BUFFER ZONE
- EPB - EXIST. ENDANGERED - -
PLANT BOUNDARY
----`?---- --- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEPT.O TRANSPORTATION
I IVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
P1UUM"I': 8.1581001 (B-2800
Nr Jy
7
I3P,'I'1V'1?I?N SIB 11:15 ANI) 1I5?
SH]"ll."T -3- O]' 15 5/24/00
NAME. AND ADDRESS
'(OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
191 PEACHTREE ST.
TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 29TH FL MC 201
ALANTA, GA. 30303

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
I'RCOJEC'I': KL`381001 (8-2608)
131?'I"?1':I;I?N SR 1155 AND 115=
'OF 1;i 5/24/00

w
C

O
?,..?
o

oz ° w o

W ?, P? ?- H

? z
w a? o Iq
?
Lo

' =
k
Q,

1
Q
2 ?

v r ? ?
N O ??
O r'l O N O N O O ap O 0) o

?
? o O
A
CO

J E° a o ° N `?N

3 Ln C
)
oi .
W

C O
:zz °oo
`
'00 N t? R g r'1
o
N
'n
O
O N
;0)
U- 3 t/1 ?l O O N p O N O 0 7
Q cn V? ? .. (A
a N CL
V) t
V1 P

o O J O J O 0 O
O O
o Fo + +' + + N + N + ? +
U* +
r +
0 +
V) N N N N N N N Co 03 )
r'1 -
?l 0
hl N
P p
P r?
V
V?

?? °
V zt _ - N hl ?"1 P ul O
0
Q
3N/7 y? x
`06
Y
u C)
- I -
0 08
j ' oo0 0o°
LITT LE RIVER -
Ik I I I?
IW I I 1 -- ?
fi-
a Ic I!I I I _--
?'z I I o I I
Q I II L _
(,D>
w L6 z Q
I 1 U CX3 Q Lf,
co \ 3
I I_ J1 / V)Cfl z
r
-ul
II
0A
LU u
a? ?w?
wzl 1 I I { II ? I? ? ? ??? ?
_I?I I r I1 1 Qoo
??1 I l o i i ?I / ?, z
III I Iw ?3 / <?
' =f I I I I ? ? ! li I, /
>a
7l
N
0
0
CD
cv o O
01 O
co O
N

Q r / v

_ G
CD
° :Q
+
v I
? z

?
N I f
Ln

L-Li

00 O

~ o_

I d

\ 3
?
? I
15 ??PL I m

L) 0
0?'a
:a

C) \ U H CD
to Oo ¢
oo ?.

+

CC"i

L?J
¢

S od U
$oo
ppqpp

OOpd
00 O U

k

? .
u 000
_

L Q o

3 3 00o
a
00
0
0
_ ~
o
w
Z m
0 ?
0
1
00001
004 O
v?1
D
Q 0
/ o0od m
Z? U a ?\ w ?--
m Z ?-, C
I
W m ,0'I z

a
L,
3 _
m
(n
CD

O
?
O
/ C

J
+ 2 U
N
N --
_ J
/ L
U

? u
U

H .-a
o o 0 U
CD F
+
'
N
'
N x

c>

N CD C-)

Ui o
a0
N
'V
I
?3 ? I I
?? III I
- II I
`? I I
II
71i I
I
U3 ? j ? II
I I I
C-D
II
lD
cU; I I
__ II I
<<r; i I I I
Ii I I
00.20 3N17 1-1jjV N
>I I M = I
>I 143 I ? ,
III -?_ I I ?-
>I I III I I
111= I I W
I III I ? ? T
I
rl ?? ?? ,09 I
'09 I
11= ' `J
'I I C I- ? ? `` I Z N
Z
20
?Q Y Q
.I I I - I U)
J 03 Ul J
I I I
?U
I I I I Z
1II I 3 o W
0
I I _. F I r r
0
f_ N I
III "j Ln
I I I `r '? I z o !
OO+?Z 31V17 y`?1 vn o -
Dm
cc CD
uC?
c)` N
L
0
•lJ _ IN
Q r
rn I aG
06
11 c
a>
I? I vo
I
z
I, I I Z Jo U?
Q W?
u Q Liz
1 Iir? Q I I - F- -1 W
1 n W ??
C) I I 3 FW WU
o ?-
I I I I `? z o
?c j I I _j ° Wo
I »
?I I = I,s? ? ?? I
i I li f, i o
_ I~
0020 -3N17 H?1 b ?Y
po)
_ 11: m
COL.)
U! -
z
N
O
O
Q
?CX3
n ?
J 0 5+8? 3NO NOldW
z

m cr -

'I -
?
0
LIJ
V)
o
L-
I ?' 0
I
I
4r3
A
w
i
c?f
I ?!
I ,?l
?4t'
I Er
Y4
x Q
Q%
%
0
0
? ^, cv

z Ge
t'?
,y M

Q
P

L
VO
._J
V) w
C1-. N
O Z
Z
7? ? J Q C 7
S
H p U Z
Z
LL ¢ ?
" p W? Q
( W
' J
t c W W w
J F- ? H O
F- O
W Z O
W Z
3
p
O w
1 y J
0 ?
h ??•
?
?
J
.a
U
J Ln
1
O
N
om
crcr)--
U Q
Z Z

O

Cv O
o
CD O
o
O

CD
+ LO
LLI
(nco- Q
N L
,
OJ
I WOO
Cfi

U 2 W W
c/) U CJ G
O Q
O
~
00

I
J @j I I
Lq V)
Q

d in N I ?p
..
Lo Q D b ?,

?O W
I
ii
m 0
0
00 U)
Q
-i

CD
CL

J

~ Q

" 0
d
soool
oo
°g
U

-
+ W v u
x
o o
ooo

a) ___----1 Qo 3 000c,
00
------ --

-r--

----

?'
I
o
,?
w
cn aZ
o
0
g
o
J,

Q o
d
`mo
co o
co
I a
ELI cc
a
0'I z
Q
I
--
I ? cr
00
_ U)
I Q
C)
O I I I
U
+

I
O
O
L
o W
..1
J

.a U
I F .a
O o O u
I 1 F
O
0 I z

x

>
+
rLn I
I ??
N
I
I
`-

a?m
CDC-)
om

Cv
O I
n
O
O U_ Z
N CV N -
0
e
?n
?wl a w
sd , c r.
- °cr- ?.
J -
48
cr_-
O
71
CD ?Q0 P
'I
L? I W
H N
a
UT-
r o ¢ w
_ ui¢
C
T-i 1 - 76 Q z LO w
CD J H3 WU
H O
3 O O
L1
F 4j,
--A 0-41A
3
"
Q
O
9 O? u
tri ? I _ ? N <D ? ?
I C LL? Ln
J
F-
C) I sd ,i7
Ir.
0?+8? JN0 N01dWQ -
7Z
N

III
I; ? I j ? I I --
li I? II ??I? j?l
I? ? I Ili it I ..
I
I I ? I I
Q
l C'I 1
III I ?'I II
I? I I ? I I ?r;
I ?
i I I II
U
I 1 1 `?
I ? 'III 4r3
I I I I ?I I?
43
I I I I I CD
I I I I I?11?
? I I I' ' I
I I l
i ?
?
I I ?, ; 1 I- I
I /X\1
i ?. i I ! 4r I
i I
I

J '
? I o6
J (e 76
.1 --
? o
J
I
r
hc_
2r 76
J
ti
Q
cc:
1?
Q-
0
cc
QL-
I
f
I
I
I
II
I
I J o
LL)
CIE N
- -i o =?
U
.-.Z W?
U LLa ?Q
z W
a
LL, W wU
03
3 w z
p W
CIE } J
J
U
L
I
I O
` I mcn
M CD
jZ N
STATE
?yy w w Sri
STATE o NOwr1I CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT Oh TRANSPORTATION
.JAMES 13. HUNT JR. P.O. M)X 25201. RAI.I:IGII, N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
60VERNOR SIA'RI?. I ARY
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit I lead
Consultant Unit.
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist tll`p
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Federal
highway Administration (FI IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, 1'IP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion ofthe
Cl-,. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
"The study area lies entirely \? ithin the Yadkin-Pec Dcc River Basin. The
previously submitted CE assigned an incorrect DEM Index No. for Little River. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification for Little [liver and its
tributaries (DEM Index No. 13-25-(19.5), 107/01/731) is "Class C". l)nnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The -Class(... classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. Ilydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced Cf.".
Neither High Quality Waters (IIQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-II), nor
Outstanding; Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 kin (1.0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of and, kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTI,:D SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (111), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of'28 February 2000, the U.S. Dish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaee/us• leucocel)halns), shortnose
sturgeon (flcipenser brevirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Mcoides
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asl)erulaelblia), and MichaUx's sumac
(Rhos ?nichaurii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michallx's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Ha/ineetus /eucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: I 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. Eagle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half ?nile, with a clear flight path to water, ofthe proposed project.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural I Ieritage Program (NCNI-11)) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of' the
project study at-ea. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural I leritage Program (NCNI 11') database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Head
File: B-2608
floodplain area to be affected is not considered to be significant.
All borrow and solid waste sites will be the responsibility of the Contractor. Solid
waste will be disposed of in strict adherence to the NC Division of Highways "Standard
Specifications for Roads and Structures." The Contractor will observe and comply with
all laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees regarding the disposal of solid waste.
Solid waste will not be placed into any existing land disposal sites that is in violation of
state or local rules and regulations. Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas that are
outside the right-of-way and provided by the Contractor. The Contractor will be
responsible for obtaining borrow sites, delineating wetlands in borrow sites, and obtaining
written concurrence on delineated wetlands in borrow sites from the Corps of Engineers.
Borrow material will not be stockpiled or disposed adjacent to or in areas where they may
runoff with stormwater into streams and impoundments. Where it is absolutely necessary
to store materials adjacent to streams, they will be stored above the mean high water mark
in such a manner that they would not runoff with stormwater. Disposal of waste and debris
will not be allowed in areas under the Corps of Engineers regulating jurisdiction. In the
event that COE jurisdictional areas cannot be avoided, the Department will be responsible
for mitigation.
The Contractor will maintain the earth surface of all waste areas, both during the
construction phase and until the completion of all seeding and mulching, or other erosion
control measures specified, in a manner that will effectively control erosion and siltation
into areas under the Corps of Engineers regulatory jurisdiction, streams and impoundments.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no significant adverse
environmental effects will result from implementation of the project. The project is a
Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of significant
environmental consequences.
29
saufl9ii
E.-Y ?.
asp BRIDGE NO.4 812,7 1
C/'?o f / /, a / 1722 ", I
0
oil iie. ?s . h ?IgO .99
iif,
m of d.?- i. , el'hln Mil -o? ?e reek `N ,t, u u ^ f
nee nel ,. ?
?' IIt7. / a11f9 ? ° t e
1.0 2
's - Ilef 1.7 nw1 1 II .µ U n 'i!9- co.ingt LS
f
o lov ^ \
Homer Creek o r. p 7 .9 / -•?
Concord ,
Le ?i
7 7 Mangum
' 111 _
`'
O °o
c m
3
O

e le

\ 1!, CV 13 ??_? II Big s10
\ „

t
LL

i l t4
Lilt'e
i
G ? 313.
?
If u ?
Ni J
nl `
Ir I \ 1 3 .

0
1307 1
•

?? n w
.r ? ° a ` ypl L9
? ?lenMOn 7 f
?
?
cl?` ? I o- J
/
\ S
I?
?p l •mtron 'f
LL4_'
?
-illow
f a
IAr !39?
J•%- III 1141
I f\
-° Grove-,(
' 4
BLEWETT FALLS
C
-/,LAKE 111111

! Norman
13
I' foitne
. y V.11 age
Ellerhe
"R I C H M O N D offl?.r;
9 Roheidel Maralo
y % olnu
? '`?o?hingh7
Co'do t Hamlet
a ?y 38 all
erlan - _ _ 6 Gh,
NCDOT HIGHWAY MAP SCALE 1" = 2 MILES
.'' .yt(J SJe. ,r'
M

z 04
E O0?o
00 r? N (?
W o W
N ? ? m P o ?
J o ? d. r,a ? ? C g
z ao? o
w w O W V E
?za o

en
4-1
O
N

, tl i i {y ? a '? x t . , n}
r ?, ? +. 1r e: , ? . !fib ? • 1
• ..• ? 1 ?t/?r}i:4J*y '?,.1?F y?rt,t t ., ?1 t >.? li,.
1'.. trr'+? b.rY. • h 1 .? a .,? ? r, t laf ? t5 ,?; ? i
4,
,'T{ r Hi(yl V' .t I , ?• fir( ? ,
? r r rt fr,T •1 , .,1 r? JL/L, ?, +• .., t +'R r st ?t t' ?[,'. 5u
? 1+: t+ c' i,t 'Yri ??ti ,?•, t :1 tAl?a 1 ;?'.ytfr ?r. ), {{?f
1.r Jy. ` 0 .?j4 t ytr,; ' ! •n I /? Jl7r.-;' 11111
y r! J ! . ? ' II, T Y r 11 'y? 4,t • ° !i t I
•!. ? _}' ? a • 1 f 1/ ?1?.? ?` ??r?. .. ? W.? .tip ? ?'
• r r r rr ra?r r t' t 1
? t f `t?.•twf ,+ 1?J t.
A..
rtvt /`r
14
rf '. ./ 1 1. t r1??}{ 1e•
..Oil
f
i f .
i

11

Li.
M
??•?r(A 1 r? I r
1? `\a w Ol
t `A C^
J ;r
air
.h ?f 1 +• J O ? Z
'I% '' Ll car H '?
9AV
H O
w U
O
OW'7G

P

L

VAURNUrA31 -uvz1xv!r,vV 111 LJ1-?L1IVj-rrr
i
K w- Mao-
4
FACING WEST- OVERVIEW OF BRIDGE #4
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BRIDGE NO.4 & 27 ON NC 73 FIGURE 4A
RICHMOND COUNTY TIP NO. B-2608
4
T c.?,!
? fi" ? X11
A A
ggs •i" N T
Fli' '"`w
:' CJ

t r i
1?I1.I71V1V1VL LVVI? 1 1
r
L

L
FACING EAST - OVERVIEW OF BRIDGE #27

FACING WEST- OVERVIEW OF BRIDGE #27
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BRIDGE NO. 4 & 27 ON NC 73 FIGURE 4C
RICHMOND COUNTY TIP NO. B-2608

BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BRIDGE NO. 4 & 27 ON NC 73
RICHMOND COUNTY
FIGURE 4D
TIP NO. B-2608
Il IP'li' ?
FACING NORTH - OVERVIEW OF BRIDGE #27 j j
AP-PENDIX
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Rc Fox 1690
A WILMING i CN, NCR7H CAROLINA 26402.1890
e_= _G_: __G-_..
T"
? P
:7C. 155570,1_.- , and _OC'f rJ ..COE (various br_: Ce __-_acemert
,c- -ects
^VG Bran _h
Nc CGpartment ra-sp _tat_cr.
tiG
R E C?
SD ?
y /
L
f'? f % ??Sj fy?/
`?, cy ?`?Zr? /fJ J
._=__=-ce _ =otters d.ated Fe__uary _2, 1997, rec-uest_-- comments or.
rot=-.t_al eT --c--r,e^.ta_ _ :acts and. scope of work that should be performed
=- t--- --- __ _e_ _aceme nt pr _ects __sted be.ow (please reference our ;=ctic._
G =..t-r°_res=, nde nce recar =_^c t-ese prC)eCtS) .
a, --= __-_ --- B-__?6 R,ch...,..... Ccunty, B__dce No. 4 and ::o. 27 on
-:.-;er and L__tle =_ver overflow.
Cc_.. y, Br_d.ce No. 6 on S. OF C.'er
-__dce No. 5 on L'S 52 over :)e^ct
__._.__ _-'?C?• -_.^.JGttS maw qquG_? for NGt_cnwide Permit Aut*-= _.^.Gt__--
..?\: ,._ as a ..at- __cal the :rcject D?arS-_ ?g re>r ?irt S-c Lld
Ccc.:ment that the - _ :Dosed act:. _-:? CO_S
_nf.._7Gt_c- to
.... .. ..a E ...__ _ than a r,_n-mal ind11 d.L'a1 Or C::mll'_catlVe impact on the aC'uat_C
we offer t-e fallowing comments and reccmmendat_crs
_ .Gt C hv.__r :e ad...ressed in the planning report .
a. _ =crt should contain the amount of permanent and temporary
Lacts _c waters and wetlands as well as a description of the type of hab=tat
be G_rec_ed.
_,- Cff-site d.eto?rs are always preferable to on-site (tempora_?) detours
_f an c -,site detour is proposed, sufficient justification
s-cu_d _ded as we!_ as a proposed restoration plan. for the affected
area.
-a TT•-tmEntS L_ c _^C_lae t.^.e --emova_ of all tc^-CYar%l f-__S
ShC
c. ? _r_s cr. -stream work _L
-
a u W. _Gnds and "time-c-9 -year" r restr=Ct . --•
--- waters
the -NC 4- 1 _e Resc;.rces Commission. acci-io. -
_
em,pcrary aetcurs the ?n der. .:t mate=_a_ should
_ -.._ r _
s necessary :
he s- be used restore the site.
recreational nav_cat_cn (__ an.v
_he re=__Yt snot:_._ address 4mpacts to
- -ce c^ `w=__ be re=laced Wit., a box Culvert.
4c
e. -: e r =^_ -.. s-..-_d actress pctentia npacts to ana-omcus fish passage
b re=laced with culverts.
_ _ __ _ -_e cc_tu^-ev to ccmmEn t cu__nc this :base of plan=i-19
_ __.a v - est a or comments may be addressed to me in the
S_:.CerE? y,
Scott McLendon
prc=ect manager
--' -s- .,_ _ .. ___._ En?G_ •.GnaCE'nEn_
_- • -- Meh-, ea_ _ and
.VG __rG_ _Cvu_=0C
Car=ac- na _7611-766 7
a, o -?? _. •- T...=--tea _-Ceram Ma nacer
_a Resources Ccmm_ss,cn
:a_:. _.
-- - -- c cer-::.Ce : oat
Carcl4na 27522
e r so 'r ?y. "
far t ? Z s ":
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Govemor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
March 25, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook 41?4v
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Bridge Group XIII, Bridge 4 and 27 on NC 73
over Little River, Richmond County, B-2608,
ER 97-8561
?r
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Thank you for your letter of February 20, 1997, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following structure
of historical or architectural importance within the general area of the project:
John Phillips Little House, north side of NC 73 opposite SR 1155, Little's Mill
vicinity. This property was listed in the National Register of Historic Places on
December 20, 1984.
We look forward to meeting with an archiiectural historian from the North Carolina
Department of Transportation to review the aerial and photographs of the project area so
we can make our survey recommendation.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our
present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may
be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the
project construction.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for
Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
91911733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: N. Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett
100 East Jor.es Street • Raleigh. North Carolina 27601-2507 ?,??
Federal Aid r 6WIT9 Tip ? 2t+og? County KM o 140
T-
_ CONCURRENCE FORM
FOR
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Brief Project Description
I4FILa,e5 PjRt7GII4 No. 4, ANV rte. vi PP4 t4[.'•(7j oyr- Uirmr- QIyE,2 ow;) L-irmr-
• R1v? Ovek.FLo?..1 ? ?21DGI (rR.OuP X411
On representatives of the
_ ? No'orh Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Of-,ice (SHPO)
Other
reviewed t"e subject project and agreed
? there are no e^ec:s on the National Register-listed property within the project's
area of potential erect and listed on the reverse.
there are no e:Tec:s on the National Register-eligible properties located within the
project's area of potential e Fe--: and listed on the reverse.
ti-,e-e is an e ec: on the National Register-listed property/properties within the
proie- 's area of potential eEect. The property-properties and the effect(s) are
listed on the reverse.
_ there is an erect on the National Register-eligibie property/properties within the
project's area of potential erect. The property/properties and erect(s) are listed
on the reverse.
Siene-:
f1-.

Represent4tiv,g`?CDOT, Historic Architec:urat KesourceS z)ectton
r 2,4 ?15? .
Da e
FH1?'A, for the Divis n Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
A I._J -7I -4-41
?
Representativ ,'SHPO
/ // ";? n, '' ?/ / . \ ?A
ate Historic Preservation Officer Date
(over)
TRichmnna (1,*nuntllchnnl5
p_,t O'flce Drawer 1259
Hamlet, North Carolina 28345 =?,r. cs?: • 5az's

;,ttention: He--rrzn Lancaster
Bridgr Renlacesneent
B 2608 Between Ellerbe ?•&
rid?s 4' 4 & 27 Located on NC Hwy 73
i.-,t Gilead IBC,
e no adverse e ffects on Richron3 Cot?ity Schools Bus
There wall b
Traffic or Bus Routes with on site location of these -%m bridge
rO-_iaognents .
vwa-jn, e Stephe s
) Ct?'
rangy=atior. Di-ector
TO: Wetherill A-Osoc- Inc.
4915 t4atere6ge'lDr: -
suite 295
Raleigh, Nc 27606
Fax: [phone]
NC 73
Bridge Nos. 4 and 27
•

V 7- j
Over Little River and Little River Overflow
Richmond County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-73(3)
State Project 8.1581001
TIP No. B-2608
13
Categorical Exclusion
US Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
NC Department of Transportation
Division of Highways

T
Approved:
1 D
Date H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
q co ILL-
3
Date •icholas L. Graf, PE
Division Administrator, FHWA
NC 73
Bridge Nos. 4 and 27
Over Little River and Little River Overflow
Richmond County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-73(3)
State Project 8.1581001
TIP No. No. B-2608
Categorical Exclusion
US Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
NC Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
January 1998
Document Prepared
by
etherill Associates
,,?,.??N•CARO?l ,y •,?:
EsS/O,y••
Norman Willey, PE SE AL l .?
Project Manager "s 36 55
for the ;NN H. `ll
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ' SPORTATION
. A. Bissett, Jr., PE Unit H a
Consultant Engineering Unit
&U1, &AQ
By E. Brady, PE
Project Planning Engineer
NC 73
Bridge Nos. 4 and 27
Over Little River and Little River Overflow
Richmond County
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-73(3)
State Project 8.1581001
TIP No. B-2608
Bridges No. 4 and 27 are located in Richmond County on NC 73 crossing the Little
River and Little River Overflow. Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 together are programmed in the
1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) as a bridge replacement project.
This project is part of the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program and has been classified
as a "Categorical Exclusion." No substantial environmental impacts are expected to result
from this action.
I. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• All standard procedures and measures will be implemented to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts. All applicable Best Management Practices (BMP's) and "Design
Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during
project construction. The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC) has
identified the Little River and its tributaries from its confluence with the Pee Dee River to
the headwaters as one of 25 areas in North Carolina that have formally been proposed as
aquatic Critical Habitat (PCH). These habitats are considered essential for the continued
survival of several FSC listed mussels, including brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa), and
Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), and Savannah lilliput (Toxolasma pullum)).
' NCDOT's Stream Crossing0uidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages will be
adhered to for this project.
• No in water construction will be allowed from late March to May due to
spawning of bass and sunfish in the river.
3
• NCDOT will search for Michaux's sumac prior to right-of-way acquisition
II. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Bridges No. 4 and 27 will be replaced with new structures on the south side of the
existing roadway. Traffic will be maintained during construction on the existing bridges.
The new Little River bridge will be approximately 65.0 meters (213.5 feet) in length
and the overflow bridge will be approximately 42.0 meters (138 feet) in length. Both
bridges are 9.7 meters (32.0 feet) wide including two 3.6 meter (12-foot) travel lanes.
Approach work will extend approximately 1066.8 meters (3500 feet). The roadway
approaches include two 3.6 meter (12-foot) lanes and 2.4 meter (8-foot) shoulder width 1.2
meters (4.0 feet) paved. The shoulder width will be widened an additional 1.0 meter (3.28
feet) where guardrail is used. Based on preliminary design work, the design speed will be
approximately 100 km/h (60 mph). Standard bicycle safety accomodations will be included
on this project.
The estimated cost of the project is $2,076,000, including $2,050,000 in
construction cost and $26,000 in right of way cost. The estimated cost of the project in the
1998-2004 TIP is $1,250,000.
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
NC 73 is classified as a Rural Major Collector in the Statewide Functional
Classification System. The speed limit along this section of road is 90 km/h (55 mph).
The road serves both local and through traffic in the western area of Richmond County.
The study area is primarily agricultural, with scattered farm residences.
The existing Bridge No.4 was completed in 1950 while Bridge No. 27 was
completed in 1929. Bridge No. 4 is 64.6 meters (212 feet) long and 7.9 meters (26 feet)
in width providing for two travel lanes. Bridge No. 27 is 42.0 meter (138 feet) long by 6.0
meters (20.0 feet) wide.
According to the Bridge Maintenance Unit records the sufficiency rating of bridge
4
No. 4 is 44.2 out of a possible 100 for bridge No. 4 and 52.6 for bridge No. 27. Presently,
the bridges are not posted.
The horizontal alignment is good 152.4 meters (500 feet) beyond both ends of the
bridge as well as between the bridges. Shoulder width on both ends of the bridge are
approximately 1.2 meters (4 feet) wide.
Traffic volume is currently 1500 vehicles per day (vpd) and projected to increase
to 3400 vpd by the year 2020. NC 73 in the project vicinity is designated as a bicycle
route.
The Traffic Engineering Branch indicates that two (2) accidents occurred near the
Little River Bridge and no accidents have been reported within the last three years in the
vicinity of the Little River Overflow bridge.
There are four daily school bus crossings of the bridge two (2) in the AM and two
(2) in the PM. The Richmond County School Transportation Director indicated the project
would have no effect on the school bus routes.
There is no sign of fiber optic cable in the vicinity of the bridge. An aerial utility
cable parallels the north side of NC 73. According to Richmond County Water
Department there are no public water or sewer lines in the vicinity of the project.
The John Phillips Little House is on the National Register. It is located
approximately 0.5 km (0.3 mile) northwest of Bridge No. 4.
Undeveloped land exists on both the upstream and downstream sides of the bridge.
Research of public environmental records and on site inspection did not find any
evidence of the presence of hazardous/toxic materials in the immediate project area.
IV. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES
• Two build alternatives, a "do-nothing" alternative and a rehabilitation alternative
were considered for the proposed improvement of Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 in Richmond
County.
5
Alternative A consists of constructing an on-site detour on the south side of the
existing bridges, removing and replacing both bridges in place, while traffic is maintained
on the run-around detour. The temporary detours would be removed and the natural area
restored upon completion of the new structures and approaches. The design speed for
replacement structure and approaches is 100 km/h (60 mph). The design speed of the
temporary detour is 64 km/h (40 mph).
Alternative B (Recommended) consists of realigning the roadway just south of the
existing bridges and replacing the bridges on the revised alignment. The existing bridges
will continue to carry traffic during construction. The existing bridges and their roadway
approaches will be removed following completion of the new bridges and roadway. The
design speed for the replacement structures and realigned roadway is 100 km (60 mph).
The east approach to Bridge No. 27 and the roadway between the two bridges is
subject to periodic flooding (6 times in the last 13 years). The Division Engineer
recommends Alternate B which will allow an adjustment in grade to eliminate the periodic
closure of the roadway due to flooding (see letter in Appendix).
Due to the historic property located on the north side, no relocation or temporary
detour was considered on that side.
There are no primary routes in the general project area that can be utilized as an off-
site detour for NC 73. A review of all secondary routes available as possible off-site
detours for NC 73 around the proposed' replacements revealed that none are feasible.
Deficiencies in pavement width and strength, vertical and horizontal alignment, and posted
weight restrictions on bridges eliminated all feasible combinations of secondary routes
from consideration.
The "do-nothing" alternative is not feasible. This will require the closing of the
road as the existing bridge deteriorates to the point where it is unsafe at any posted weight
limits.
Rehabilitation of the existing deteriorating bridge is neither practical nor
economically justifiable.
The NCDOT Eighth Highway Division Engineer has reviewed the alternatives and
concurs in the recommended improvement.
6
V. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
No design exceptions are anticipated on this project.
VI. ESTIMATED COST
ITEM Bridge No. 4 & 27
Alternative A
COST Bridge No. 4 & 27
Alternative B
(Recommended)
COST
New Bridge Structure $1,302,000 $1,302,000
Bridge Removal $74,930 $74,930
Approach Roadway $377,070 $400,000
Temporary Detour $858,000
Engineering & Contingencies $438,000 $273,070
Total Construction $3,050,000 $2,050,000
Right of Way $18,000 $26,000

Total Cost $3,068,000 $2,076,000
GRAND TOTAL
VII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 will each be replaced with a new bridge structure on revised
alignment over Little River and Little River Overflow. Traffic will be maintained on the
existing bridges and roadway during construction.
The new structure for bridge No. 4 will be approximately 65.0 meters (213.5 feet)
in length and 9.2 meters (30.0 feet) wide including two 3.6 meter (12-foot) lanes. The new
structure for Bridge No. 27 will be approximately 42 meters (138 feet) in length and 9.7
meters (32.0 feet) wide. They will be constructed at approximately the same elevation to
slightly higher than the existing bridges to eliminate periodic flooding.
Approach work for Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 will extend approximately 1066.8 meters
(3500 feet) from 252.9 meters (830 feet) west of the end of Bridge No. 4 to approximately
295.6 meters (970 feet) from the east end of Bridge No. 27. It includes two 3.6 meter
(12-foot) lanes and 2.4 meters (8-foot) shoulders with 1.2 meter (4-foot) paved. Based on
preliminary design work the design speed will be approximately 100 km/h (60 mph).
1.2 meter (4 foot) paved shoulders and standard bicycle safety acconnnodations are
recommended due to NC 73's designation as a bicycle route.
VIII. NATURAL RESOURCES
The proposed project study area lies in a rural area of Richmond County,
approximately 8.0 kilometers (5.0 miles) southeast of Mount Gilead, North Carolina
(Figure 1).
Methodology
Information sources used to prepare this report include: U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) Mount Gilead East quadrangle map (1982); Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil
Survey Sheet of Richmond County (1989); United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory Map (Mount Gilead East 1995); USFWS list of
protected and candidate species (1997); North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database of rare species and unique habitats (1997); North Carolina Department
of Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
water resources data; and North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC)
proposed critical habitat information. Research using these resources was conducted prior
to the field investigation.
A general field survey was conducted along the proposed project corridor on
February 25, 1997. Plant communities and their associated wildlife were identified using
a variety of observation techniques including active searching, visual observations with
binoculars, and identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, tracks, scats, and
8
burrows).
Impact calculations were based on the worst-case scenario using the full 24.4 meter
(80-foot) wide right of way limits and the width of the replacement structure, the width of
the stream for aquatic impacts, and the length of the project approaches. The actual
construction impacts should be less, but without specific replacement structure design
information the worst case was assumed for the impact calculations.
Definitions for areal descriptions used in this report are as follows: "project study
area," "project area," and "project corridor" denote the specific area being directly
impacted by each alternative. "Project vicinity" denotes the area within a 1.6 kilometer (1.0
mile) radius of the project area.
Topography and Soils
The topography of the project vicinity is characterized as rolling hills with moderate
to steeply sloping banks along the major streams. Project area elevation is approximately
61 meters (200 feet) above mean sea level. The project site lies within the Coastal Plain
Physiographic Province.
According to the General Soil Map for Richmond County (SCS 1989), the project
area consists of Chewacla-Riverview and Peawick-Hornsboro soil associations. Chewacla-
Riverview association is described as nearly level, somewhat poorly drained and well
drained soils with a loamy surface layer and a loamy subsoil found on flood plains.
Peawick-Hornsboro association is described as nearly level to gently sloping, moderately
well drained to somewhat poorly drained soils that have a loamy surface layer and a clayey
subsoil found on old stream terraces.
The specific map units within the project area include Chewacla loam (0 to 2
percent slopes), Peawick silt loam (0 to 3 percent slopes), and Peawick fine sandy loam (0
to 2 percent slopes). Chewacla loam (0 to 2 percent slopes) is found throughout the project
area and is not on the local hydric soils list. This soil type is described as nearly level,
frequently flooded, very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils found on flood plains.
Peawick silt loam (0 to 3 percent slopes) is found in the southeastern quadrant of Bridge
No. 27. This soil type is a nearly level to gently sloping, rarely flooded, very deep,
moderately well drained soil found on terraces. This soil has hydric inclusions. Peawick
fine sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes) has hydric inclusions and is found in the northeast
quadrant of Bridge No. 27. This soil type is a nearly level, very deep, moderately well
9
drained soil found on terraces. These soil types were confirmed in the field by taking soil
borings.
Biotic Resources
Living systems described in the following sections include communities of
associated plants and animals. These descriptions refer to the dominant flora and fauna in
each community and the relationship of these biotic components. Classification of plant
communities is based on a system used by NCNHP (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are used for the plant and
animal species described. Subsequent references to the same species include the common
name only. Vascular plant names follow nomenclature found in Radford et al. (1968).
Terrestrial and aquatic wildlife were determined through field observations, evaluation of
habitat, and review of field guides and other documentation (Conant 1958; Farrand 1993;
Robbins et al. 1966; and Whitaker 1980).
Terrestrial Communities
The predominant terrestrial communities found in the project study area are man-
dominated, mesic mixed hardwood forest, pine plantation, mesic pine flatwoods, and
coastal plain bottomland hardwood communities. Dominant faunal components associated
with these terrestrial areas are discussed in each community description. Many species are
adapted to the entire range of habitats found along the project alignment-but may not be
mentioned separately in each community description.
Man-Dominated Community
This highly disturbed community within the project area includes the road shoulders
and the utility line easement (Figure 2). Many plant species are adapted to these disturbed
and regularly maintained areas. Regularly maintained areas along the road shoulders are
dominated by fescue (Festuca spp.), ryegrass (Lolium spp.), plantain (Plantago spp.),
henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), clover (Trifolium spp.), wild onion (Allium cernuum), and
thistle (Cirsium spp.). The irregularly maintained area along the utility line easement
includes the preceding species as well as dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), blackberry
(Rubus spp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), common greenbrier (Smilax
rotundifolia), aster (Aster spp. ), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), smooth sumac (Rhus
glabra), and panic grass (Panicum spp.).
The animal species present in these disturbed habitats are opportunistic and capable
10
of surviving on a variety of resources, ranging from vegetation (flowers, leaves, fruits, and
seeds) to both living and dead faunal components. Although only an American crow
(Corvus brachyrhynchos), rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), field sparrow
(Spi--ella pusilla), and the carcass of a Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) were
observed during the site visit in these areas, species such as white-footed mouse
(Peromyscus leucopus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis),
Northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), Eastern kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus), American
robin (Turdus migratorius), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), and slender glass lizard
(Ophisaurus attenuatus) are often attracted to these disturbed habitats.
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
Within the project area of Bridge No. 4, this community occurs in the northwest
quadrant and along the river banks in the northeast, southeast, and southwest quadrants of
the bridge. Within the project area of Bridge No. 27, this community occurs in the southeast
quadrant and in a small area in the northeast quadrant.
The canopy layer is dominated by sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), river birch
(Betula nigra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata),
southern red oak (Quercusfalcata), water oak (Quercus nigra), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda),
and red maple (Acer rubruni). The understory includes American holly (Ilex opaca),
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and red maple saplings. The shrub layer is sparse and
includes scattered American holly and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). The herbaceous
layer includes common greenbrier, giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Japanese
honeysuckle, and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
In the southeast quadrant of Bridge No. 27, this community is disturbed and is
dominated by red maple, sweetgum, loblolly pine, and southern red oak. The shrub layer
includes privet and the herbaceous layer consists of greenbrier, Japanese honeysuckle, and
blackberry.
_ On the day of the site visit, downy woodpeckers (Picoides pubescens), Carolina
chickadee (Parus carolinensis), cardinal, and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
_ tracks were observed. Other species which may reside or forage in these areas include
racoon (Procyon lotor), grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus
lloridanus), turkey (111eleagris gallopavo), bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), Carolina wren
(Thryothorus ludovicianus), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), red-eyed vireo (Vireo
olivaceus), tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), Eastern box
turtle (Terrapene carolina), American toad (Bufo americanus), and squirrel treefrog (Hyla
11
squirella).
Pine Plantation
This community occurs in the southeast and southwest quadrants of Bridge No. 4
and the southwest quadrant of Bridge No. 27. This community is dominated by loblolly
pine saplings as well as scattered saplings of red maple, sweetgum, and river birch.
Common greenbrier and Japanese honeysuckle are prevalent throughout this community.
A portion of this community in the southeast quadrant of Bridge No. 4 contains
wetlands. The soil is a gray (IOYR 511) moist clay with dark yellowish brown (IOYR 4/4)
mottles. Hydrologic indicators include standing water and water stained leaves.
Species which may reside or forage in this community include several species of
mice (Peromyscus spp.), ground skink (Scincella lateralis), Southern toad (Bufo terrestris),
house wren (Troglodytes aedon), Northern mockingbird (Minns polyglottos), American
goldfinch (Carduelis tristis), and Eastern garter snake (Thaninophis sirtalis sirtalis).
Mesic Pine Flat-woods
This forested community occurs in the northeast quadrant of Bridge No. 4 and the
northwest quadrant of Bridge No. 27 outside of the right of way. The area is dominated by
mature loblolly pines with a sparse understory consisting of scattered red maple and
sweetgum saplings. The herbaceous layer is sparse and includes Japanese honeysuckle and
broomsedge.
Species which may reside or forage in this community include those species from
the adjacent communities as well as screech owl (Otus asio), brown-headed nuthatch (Sitta
pusilla), pine warbler (Dendroica pinus), white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis),
Eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus), and rat snake (Elaphe obsoleta).
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods
This community is located along the overflow at Bridge No. 27. This area is
disturbed and contains loblolly pine saplings, red maple saplings, sweetgum saplings, black
willow (Salix nigra), highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum), leathery rush (Juncus
coriaceus), blackberry, and scattered Chinese privet.
12
The soil in this community is a grayish brown (1 OYR 5/2) loamy clay. The soil is
frequently flooded and has an aquatic moisture regime. Hydrologic indicators include
standing water and water in the hole at 10.2 centimeters (4.0 inches).
Species which may reside or forage within this community include the cotton mouse
(Peromyscus gossypinus), marsh rabbit (Sylvilagus palustris), wood thrush (Hylocichla
mustelina), blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), white-eyed vireo (Vireo griseus),
common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), three-
lined salamander (Eurycea guttolineata), green frog (Rana clamitans), Eastern mud turtle
(Kinosternon subrubrum), and Eastern ribbon snake (Thanntophis sauritus).
Aquatic Communities
The aquatic community in the project area exists within Little River and Little River
Overflow. Within the project area of Bridge No. 4, Little River flows south and is
approximately 26.8 meters (88.0 feet) wide. On the day of the field investigation the water
was turbid and the flow was moderate. The depth of the river was approximately 0.5
meters (1.5 feet) along the bank then became deeper toward the middle of the river. The
river bottom consisted of sand and gravel with some boulders. Within the project area of
Bridge No. 27, the overflow flows south and is approximately 7.6 meters (25.0 feet) wide.
On the day of the site visit, the overflow was turbid and the water was not moving. The
bottom consisted of sand with silt. A beaver (Castor canadensis) dam is located within the
overflow underneath Bridge No. 27. The depth of the overflow ranged from 0.1 to 0.6
meters (0.3 to 2.0 feet) with the deeper water occurring behind the beaver dam.
Vegetation along Little River banks includes ironwood, red maple, river birch, and
sycamore. Vegetation along the overflow includes loblolly pine, red maple, and black
willow. Animals such as the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina), Northern water snake
(Natrix sipedon sipedon), and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) may also reside or forage within
this aquatic community or along the waters edge. Clams and mussels were found along the
bank of the Little River.
Macro invertebrates such as larvae of the mayfly (Ephemeroptera), stonefly
(Plecoptera), and caddisfly (Trichoptera) would be expected to be found within the snag
habitats and within the riffle areas in the river. The macroinvertebrate fauna within the
channel may be dominated by chironomid larvae (midges) and oligochaetes (segmented
worms). On the day of the site visit, mayfly larvae were collected by dipnetting in Little
River. Scuds (Amphipoda) and isopods (Isopoda) were collected by dipnetting in Little
13
River Overflow.
According to Wayne Chapman, District 6 Biologist for the NCWRC, fish found in
the Little River include largemouth bass (Micropterus sahnoides), white bass (Aforone
chrysops), redbreast sunfish (Leponzis auritus), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), channel
catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), crappie (Ponroxis spp), white catfish (Ictalurus catus), brown
bullhead catfish (Ictalurus rnelas), carp (Cyprinus carpio), and various suckers (family
Catostomidae). Mr. Chapman stated this area is a good fishery with a variety of species.
Mr. Chapman also recommends that no construction should take place during the spawning
period for white bass and redbreast sunfish which occurs from late March through May.
(The North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC) has identified the Little River
and its tributaries from its confluence with the Pee Dee River to the headwaters as one of
25 areas in North Carolina that have formally been proposed as aquatic Critical Habitat
(PCH). These habitats are considered essential for the continued survival of several FSC
listed mussels, including brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa), and Atlantic pigtoe
(Fusconaia masoni), and Savannah lilliput (Toxolasma pullum). BMPs and Design
Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be applicable for this project.)
Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
Biotic community impacts resulting from project construction are addressed
separately as terrestrial impacts and aquatic impacts. However, impacts to terrestrial
communities, particularly in locations exhibiting gentle slopes, can result in the aquatic
community receiving heavy sediment loads as a consequence of erosion. It is important to
understand that construction impacts may not be restricted to the communities in which the
construction activity occurs. Efforts should be made to ensure that no sediment leaves the
construction site.
Terrestrial Communities
The mesic mixed hardwood forest, pine plantation, mesic pine flatwoods, coastal
plain bottomland hardwoods, and the man-dominated communities serve as nesting,
foraging, and shelter habitat for fauna. The loss of these habitats will result in the
displacement and mortality of faunal species in residence. Individual mortalities are likely
to occur to terrestrial animals from construction machinery used during clearing activities.
14
Calculated impacts to terrestrial resources reflect the relative abundance of each
community present in the study area. Project construction will result in clearing and
degradation of portions of these communities. Alternate A will result in the impact of 0.31
hectares (0.81 acres) of wetlands. Alternate B (recommended) will result in the impact of
0.35 hectares (0.87 acres) wetlands. Table 1 details the anticipated impacts to terrestrial
and aquatic communities by habitat type.
TABLE 1
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO
TERRESTRIAL and AQUATIC COMMUNITIES
HECTARES (ACRES)
Replacement Man- Mesic Mixed Pine Wet Pine Mesic Pine Coastal Plain Aquatic Combined
Impacts Dominated Plantation Plantation Flat-woods Bottomland Community Total
Community Hardwood Hardwoods
Forest (Wetlands) (Wetlands)
Bridge No.4 0.54(l.34) 0.01 (0.03) 0.05(0.14) 0.03(0.09) - 0.05(0.14) 0.68(1.74)
Alternate A
Temporary 0.008 (0.02) 0.05 (0.13) 0.11 (0.28) 0.08 (0.21) - 0.02 (0.06 0.23(0.70
Bridge No. 0.4(1.00) 0.08(0.21) 0.06(0.15) - 0.14(0.11) 0.01(0.03) 0.59(1.50)
I27
Alternate A
Temporary 0.008(0.02) 0.10(0.25) 0.07 (0.19) - 0.06(0.16) 0.004(0.01) 0.24 (0.63)
Bridge No. 4 0.79(l.96) 0.49(1.20) 0.88 (2.18) 0.22(0.54) - 0.13(0.33) 0.06(0.15) 2.57(6.36)
and 27
Alternate B
NOTES:
• Mesic Pine Flatwood are within National Register Property Boundary and will not
be impacted.
• Impacts are based on 24.4 meter (80-foot) right of way limits.
• Actual construction impacts may be less than those indicated above,
calculations were based on the worst case scenario.
Aquatic Communities
The aquatic community in the study area exists within Little River and Little River
15
Overflow. The Alternate A replacement of Bridge No. 4 & 27 over Little River and Little
River Overflow will result in up to 0.084 hectare (0.24 acres) disturbance of stream bottom
(which includes a temporary detour). The Alternate B (recommended) replacement of
Bridge No.4 & 27 over the Little River and Little River Overflow will result in up to 0.06
hectare (0.15 acres) disturbance of stream bottom. This represents worst case conditions;
actual disturbance area will likely be less. In addition, impacts to the adjacent man-
dominated and forested communities can have a direct impact on aquatic communities.
Construction of the bridge and approach work as well as the removal of trees will likely
result in an increase in sediment loads and water temperature and a decrease in dissolved
oxygen in the short term. Construction activities can also increase the possibility of
toxins, such as engine fluids and particulate rubber, entering the waterways and impacting
aquatic organisms. These factors can potentially cause the displacement and mortality of
fish and local populations of invertebrates which inhabit these areas.
Best management practices (BMPs) and "Design Standards for Sensitive
Watersheds" for the protection of surface waters will be strictly enforced to minimize
potential adverse impacts due to this project. Since Little River is potentially anadromous
fish spawning habitat, the NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish
Passau will be adhered to for this project. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide
guidance to NCDOT to ensure that replacement of existing and new highway stream
crossing structures will not impede the movement of anadromous fish.
Water Resources
This section describes each water resource and its relationship to major water
systems. The proposed project lies within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River drainage basin.
Water Resource Characteristics
Little River flows south through the proposed project area with a width of 26.8
meters (88.0 feet). Little River Overflow also flows south through the project area and has
a width of 7.6 meters (25.0 feet). Little River drains into the Pee Dee River. This section
of the river has a classification of C from the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR). Class C indicates freshwaters protected for secondary
recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife. The
Classification Index number for this portion of the river is 13-25-18-1.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
for Richmond County (1989) indicates the project area lies in Zone A, where no base flood
elevations have been determined.
16
Benthic macroinvertebrates, or benthos, are organisms that live in and on the bottom
substrates of rivers and streams. The DWQ uses benthos data as a tool to monitor water
quality as benthic macroinvertebrates are sensitive to subtle changes in water quality. The
DWQ also uses the North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity (NCIBI) as another method to
determine general water quality. The method was developed for assessing a stream's
biological integrity by examining the structure and health of its fish community. According
to Ms. Nancy Guthrie, the DWQ does not have any benthic macroinvertebrate data or
NCIBI data for the Little River within the project area. Ms. Guthrie also indicated that
there was no data available for any nearby locations that would give reliable information
about the water quality at this site.
The Richmond County Watershed Map indicates that the project area is not within
a Critical Area. No waters classified by DWQ as High Quality Waters (HQW),
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or waters designated as WS-1 or WS-II are located
within the project vicinity.
Point-source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Any discharger
is required to register for a permit. There are no NPDES permitted dischargers located in
the project vicinity.
Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through stormwater flow
or no defined point of discharge. In the project area, stormwater runoff from NC 73 may
cause water quality degradation as there are no agricultural, residential, or commercial sites
within the area.
Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Impacts to the water resources will result due to the placement of support structures
in the river and overflow channel. In the short term, construction of the bridge and
approach work will increase sediment loads and removal of trees which provide shade
along the banks will likely result in an increase in water temperature. Sediment loading can
reduce flow and result in a decrease in oxygen levels. The NCDOT, in cooperation with
DWQ of the NCDENR, has developed a sedimentation control program for highway
projects which adopts formal BMPs for the protection of surface waters. The following are
methods to reduce sedimentation and water quality impacts:
• strict adherence to BMPs and "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" for the
protection of surface waters during the life of the project
17
reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into the water bodies
and minimization of activities conducted in streams
placement of temporary ground cover or re-seeding of disturbed sites to reduce
runoff and decrease sediment loadings
reduction of clearing and grubbing along streams
Special Topics
Jurisdictional Issues: Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United
States" as defined in 33 CFR 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Waters of the United States are regulated by the United
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE).
Wetlands will be impacted by the subject project as wetlands occur within the pine
plantation and forested wetlands occur around Little River Overflow. Investigation into
wetland occurrence in the project impact area was conducted using methods of the 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual.
Wetland impacts due to the project may be up to 0.35 hectares (0.87 acres) for the
recommended alternate.
Project construction cannot be accomplished without infringing on jurisdictional
surface waters. Anticipated surface water impacts fall under the jurisdiction of the
USACOE. Up to 24.4 in (80 feet) or 0.06 hectare (0.15 acre) of jurisdictional surface water
impacts may occur due to the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 4 and No. 27.
Permits
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USACOE
1344), a permit will be required from the USACOE for the discharge of dredged or fill
material into "Waters of the United States."
Since the subject project is classified as a Categorical Exclusion, it is likely that this
project will be subject to the Nationwide Permit Provisions of 33 CFR 33-.5 (A) 23. This
permit authorizes any activities, work and discharges undertaken, assisted, authorized,
regulated, funded or financed, in whole or in part, by another federal agency and that the
18
activity is "categorically excluded" from environmental documentation because it is
included within a category of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively have a
significant effect on the environment. However, final permit decisions are left to the
discretionary authority of the USACOE and DWQ.
A 401 Water Quality Certification, administered through the NCDENR, will also
be required. This certificate is issued for any activity which may result in a discharge into
waters for which a federal permit is required.
Mitigation
Since this project is likely covered by Nationwide Permit 23 and wetland impact are
anticipated to be less than one acre, mitigation should not be required by the USACOE and
DWQ Mitigation for impacts to surface waters of less than 45.7 meters (150 feet) linear
generally is not required by the USACOE. A final determination regarding mitigation
requirements rests with the USACOE and DWQ.
Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of plants and animals have been or are in the process of decline
due either to natural forces or their inability to coexist with humans. Rare and protected
species listed for Richmond County, and any likely impacts to these species as a result of
the proposed project construction are discussed in the following sections.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists four federally protected
species for Richmond County as of the November 4, 1997 listing.
19
TABLE 2
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
FOR RICHMOND COUNTY
Scientific Name Status
Common Name
Acipenser brevirostruin E
(Shortnose sturgeon)
Picoides borealis E
(Red-cockaded woodpecker)
Lysimachia asperulaefolia E
(Rough-leaved loosestrife)
Rhus michauxii E
(Michaux's sumac)
NOTES:
E Denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of its range)
Acipenser brevirostrum (Shortnose sturgeon) E _
Animal Family: Acipenseridae
Distribution in NC: Anson, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Columbus,
Craven, New Hanover, Pender, Richmond.
The shortnose sturgeon is a large [60 to 100 centimeters (23.6 to 39.4 inches) long]
anadromous fish with a short snout and wide mouth. This fish is dark brown to black
above and light brown to yellow on the lower side with bony plates or scutes along the side
of its body. It has a shark-like tail and small dorsal fins.
The shortnose sturgeon exists in many habitats but it appears to prefer the shifting
sands in relatively fast flowing, medium sized rivers and medium to large creeks. It is also
found over gravel and coarse sand substrates. Populations have been reported in the
Brunswick River, the Cape Fear River, and possibly in western Albemarle Sound. These
fish migrate upstream from estuaries to river spawning grounds in January and February.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
20
In Richmond County, the only occurrence of the -shortnose sturgeon is
recorded at the US 74 crossing of the Pee Dee River which is approximately 25.6
kilometers (16.0 miles) south of NC 73 crossing of the Little River. Habitat is not
present in the Little River for the shortnose sturgeon due to the Blewett Falls Lake
Dam. A search of the NCNHP database showed no recorded occurrences of this
species within the project vicinity.
Picoides borealis (Red-cockaded woodpecker) E
Animal Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 10/13/70
Distribution in N.C.: Anson, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick,
Camden, Carteret, Chatham, Columbus, Craven,
Cumberland, Dare, Duplin, Forsyth, Gates, Halifax,
Harriet, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lee,
Lenoir, Montgomery, Moore, Nash, New Hanover,
Northampton, Onslow, Orange, Pamlico, Pender,
Perquimans, Pitt, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson,
Scotland, Tyrrell, Wake, Wayne, Wilson.
The red-cockaded woodpecker is a small (18-20 cm long) bird with black and white
horizontal stripes on its back, a black cap and a large white cheek patch. The male has a
small red spot or "cockade" behind the eye.
The -preferred nesting habitat of the red-cockaded woodpecker is open stands of
pines with a minimum age of 60 to 120 years. Longleaf pines (Pinus palustris) are
preferred for nesting; however, other mature pines such as loblolly (Pinus taeda) may be
utilized. Typical nesting areas, or territories, are pine stands of approximately 81 hectares
(200 acres), however, nesting has been reported in stands as small as 24 hectares (60 acres).
Preferred foraging habitat is pine and pine-hardwood stands of 80 to 125 acres with a
minimum age of 30 years and a minimum diameter of 25 centimeters (10 inches). The red-
cockaded woodpecker utilizes these areas to forage for insects such as ants, beetles, wood-
boring insects, caterpillars, as well as seasonal wild fruit.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Habitat does not exist in the project corridors. On the day of the site visit, no
red-cockaded woodpeckers or cavity trees were observed within the area of potential
impact. A search of the NCNHP database will no recorded occurrences of this species
within the project vicinity.
21
Lyshnachia asperulaefolia Rough-leaved loosestrife E
Plant Family: Primulaceae
Date Listed: 6/12/87
Flowers Present: mid May - June
Distribution in N.C.: Brunswick, Pender, Bladen, Carteret, Scotland,
Cumberland, Onslow, Hoke, Pamlico
The rough-leaved loosestrife is a rhizomatous perennial herb with whorls of 3 to 4
leaves encircling a slender stem. This plant reaches 0.3 to 0.6 meter (1 to 2 feet) in height.
Showy yellow flowers are produced from mid-May through June and fruits are present from
July through October.
The rough-leaved loosestrife is endemic to the coastal plain and sandhills of North
Carolina and South Carolina. It occurs in open ecotones (edges) between longleaf pine
uplands and pond pine pocosins; on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow
organic soils overlaying sand. It has also been found on deep peat in the low shrub
community of large Carolina bays.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
This habitat type does not exist in the project area; there are no areas of long-
leaf pines or adjacent pond-pine pocosins. A search of the NCNHP database showed
no recorded occurrences of this species within the project vicinity. It can be
concluded that the construction of the proposed project will not impact the rough-
leaved loosestrife.
Rhus nzichauxii (Michaux's sumac) E
Plant Family: Anacardiacene
Date Listed: 2/28/89
Flowers Present: April - June
Distribution in N.C.: Davie, Durham, Franklin, Hoke, Johnston, Lincoln,
Mecklenburg, Moore, Orange, Richmond, Robeson,
Scotland, Wake, Wilson.
Michaux's sumac is a densely hairy shrub with erect stems which are 0.3 to 0.9
meters (1 to 3 feet) in height. The shrub's compound leaves are narrowly winged at their
base, dull on their tops, and veiny and slightly hairy on their bottoms. Each leaflet is finely
toothed on its edges. The flowers are greenish-yellow to white and are 4-5 parted. The
plant flowers from April to June.
22
Michaux's sumac is found in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic
soils. This plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an
open area.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: UNRESOLVED
The irregularly maintained area under the utility line casement provides
suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac. A search of the area will be conducted during
the spring or summer. Leaves would be present during this time allowing for easier
identification of this species. A search of the NCNHP database showed no recorded
occurrences of this species within the project vicinity.
Federal Species of Concern
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are not legally protected under the Endangered
Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are
formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Species designated as FSC are
defined as taxa which may or may not be listed in the future. These species were formerly
Candidate 2 (C2) species or species under consideration for listing for which there is
insufficient information to support listing. Some of these species are listed as Endangered,
Threatened, or Special Concern by the NCNHP list of Rare Plant and Animal Species and
are afforded state protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North
Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979; however, the level of protection
given to state listed species does not apply to NCDOT activities. Table 3 includes listed
FSC species for Richmond County and their state classifications.
23
TABLE 3
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN
RICHMOND COUNTY

Scientific Name North Carolina Habitat
Common Name Status Present
Ainzophila aestivalis Sc Yes
(Bachman's sparrow)
Corynorhinus rafinesph" Sc No
(Rafines ue's big-eared bat)
Heterodon shnus* Sc No
(Southern ho nose snake)
Moxostoma robustum Sc Yes
(Robust redhorse)
Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus Sc No
(Northern pine snake)
Atrytone arogos arogos** SR Yes
(Aro os skipper)
Amorpha georgiana var. georgiana* E No
(Georgia indigo-bush)
Astragalus michauxii C No
(Sandhills milkvetch
Kalmia cuneala E-SC No
(White wick
Lilian: iridollae* C/PT No
(Sandhills bog lily)
Lindera subcoriacea E No
(Bog s icebush)
Polamogeton confervoides C Yes
(Conferva ondweed
Stylisma pickeringii var. pickeringii E No
Pickering's dawnflower
24
Scientific Name North Carolina Habitat
(Common Name Status Present
Ahnophila aestivalis Sc Yes
(Bachman's sparrow)
Corynorhinus raftnesquii** SC No
(Rafines ue's big-eared bat)
Heterodon sin:us* SC No
(Southern ho nose snake)
Aloxostoma robustum SC Yes
(Robust redhorse)
Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus Sc No
(Northern pine snake)
Atrytone arogos arogos** SR Yes
(Aro os skipper)
Amorpha geo giana var. georgiana* E No
(Georgia indigo-bush)
Astragalus michauxii C No
(Sandhills milkvetch)
Kahnia cuneata E-SC No
(White wick y)
Lilitun iridollae* C/PT No
(Sandhills bog lily)
Lindera subcoriacea E No
(Bo s icebush)
Potanzogeton confervoides C Yes
(Conferva ondweed
Tofieldia glabra C No
25
TABLE 3(cont.)
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN
RICHMOND COUNTY
Scientific Name North Carolina Habitat
(Common Name) Status Present
Xyris scabrifolia C No
(Rou hleaf yellow-eyed grass)
NOTES:
* Indicates no specimens have been found in at least 20 years.
* * Indicates obscure record - the date and/or location of observation is
uncertain.
E Denotes Endangered (species which are afforded protection by state
laws).
SC Denotes Special Concern (species which are afforded protection by
state laws).
SR Denotes Significantly Rare (species for which population
monitoring and conservation action is recommended).
C Denotes Candidate (species for which population monitoring and
conservation action is recommended).
PT Denotes Proposed Threatened (species proposed for official listing
as threatened).
A search of the NCNHP database showed no recorded occurrences of any FSC
within the project vicinity.
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Habitat is present for a federally protected species, Michaux's sumac. A survey for
Michaux's sumac will be conducted during the appropriate flowering season prior to right-
of-way acquisition. According to the NCNHP, there have been no recorded occurrences
for any rare or protected species within the project area. Habitat is also present for four
FSC (Bachman's sparrow, robust redhorse, arogos skipper, and conferva pondweed).
IX. CULTURAL EFFECTS
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historical
26
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 35 CFR Part 800.
Section 106 requires that for federally funded, licensed, or permitted projects having an
effect on properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation can be given the opportunity to comment.
The John Phillips Little House, a property listed on the National Register
of Historic Places in 1984, is the only property listed on or eligible for the National Register
located within the project's area of potential effect. At a meeting on July 24, 1997, with
the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) it was agreed that the recommended
improvements would have no effect on the Little House and a concurrence form was
signed. A copy of the concurrence form is included in the Appendix.
The SHPO, in a memorandum dated March 25, 1977, stated it is "unlikely that any
archaeological resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected by the project construction." SHPO did not recommend
that an archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. A copy
of the SHPO memorandum is included in the Appendix.
X. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of two
inadequate bridges will result in safer traffic operations.
The bridge replacements will not have an adverse affect on the quality of the human
or natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation.
No significant change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. No relocatees are
expected with implementation of the proposed alternatives.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not
expected to adversely effect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
27
There are no publicly owned parks, recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl
refugees of national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
No geodetic survey markers will be impacted.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the potential impacts to prime and important farmland soils by
• all land acquisition and construction projects. Prime and important farmland soils are
defined by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). Since the relocated bridges will not
replace any farm lands, the Farmland Protection Policy Act does not apply.
The project is an air quality "Neutral" project, so it is not required to be included
in the regional emission analysis (If Applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not
required.
The project is located in Richmond County, which has been determined to be in
compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Part 51 is not
applicable because the proposed project is located in an attainments area. This project is
not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment area.
The traffic volumes will not increase or decrease because of this project. These are
no receptors located in the immediate project area. The projects impact on noise and air
quality will not be significant.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. If vegetation
is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2d.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway traffic noise
(23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAAA and NEPA) and no additional reports
are required.
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Groundwater Section and the North Carolina
Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section revealed no
underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Richmond County is participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. The
approximate 100-year floodplain in the project area is shown in Figure 3. The amount of
28
l' CL rv? t -1(C ?t -{ ? v n Clot,-)
l ( C?eS (9{'1 n- n s Ia
a? iv lct?"?c+ n ???:1
lhl?-x1C'?t11C1
•-Cpl-:_< <"?'? v L J ? S CL ? ?? i L' 1 1- `? l -?
??t??'??i L'V?l? Cti(?17 11LLL'j?i?: ?'] Gtf 1C( l `>>C? ? ?t-t?
'-??>I I Thts 15 SOI-(ClO cl
LL(

001032
STA'I F OI, No wri I CAROLINA
DI-:PARTMI ;N"I' UI ']-'IZANSIIOR"I'A'I'ION
JAMES B. I It INI JR.
UUVFI(Nt11(
.lily 19, 2000
Mr. David Tinlpy
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps ol'Fngineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, N('28402-1890
Dear Mr. Timpy:
Ji
1)nvlu M('Ccl%,
SECI(LIAKY
Subject: Mitigation plan for permanent wetland impacts resulting li'onl fill and mechanized
clearing in wetlands and details regal-dillg telllpol'ary causeway removal and
bridge demolition due to replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River and
Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, I.A. Project No. BRS"TP-
73(3), State Project No. 8.1581001,'I'II' No. 13-2608.
As was (IISCllssed ill the phone conversation between David Tinlpy ol'the U.S. Arnly Corps of
Engineers and Lynn Smith of N('DO"I' on July 10, 2000, a mitigation plan is being prepared for
permanent wetland impacts resulting Irons 'I'll' No. 13-2608. This portion ol'the plan outlines key
points concerning the on-site wetland restoration and Upland bUlfel- proposed to compensate lilr
permanent wetland impacts. Removal of the temporary causeways and bridge demolition are
also disCLISSC(l.
The Department proposes to Ilse oil-Sill' restoration (11 wetlands and upland bUI'Icl-S to mitigate
for the 1.2 acres of'pernlanent wetland loss. The NCDOT will grade the existing roadbed down
to meet the elevation ol'the adjacent land. Areas adjacent to wetlands will he replanted with
black willow (Sulix niigrcr), river hirch (Belulcr Uignt), water oak (QUel-rUS rni il'(1), southern red
oaf: (C). /i(lculrr) and cherrybark oak ((). /i11rutu var. pttgm1l i)1hi,). Areas graded down but not
adjacent to wetlands will he replanted with the same vegetation and will Se?'ve as upland buffers.
The mitigation area will he comprised of 1.5 acres of wetland restol'atloll and 1.3 acres Of Upland
huller- The Department asks that this mitigation plan be used to satisfy wetland mitigation
re(luirements for 1.2 acres ol'permanent wetland impacts due to the replacement of Bridges No.
4 & 27.
Please find attached a portioll 0l the Welland 1111tigation plan including a neap (IC1111ing tile
mitigation area, bridge demolition inl'Ormation and the species which will be planted after the old
roadbed and the temporary caLltiewa)1 associated with the overflow are removed. Photographs of
the site can be found in the CF. Supplemental inlormation including final design plans and
planting details will be lilrwarded to you as soon as they are available. "Thank for your continued
MAILING ADDRESS: TI:I IPHor& 919-733-3141 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT Of I RANSPOR I A I ION (AX: 919-733-9794 1 RANSPOR TA I ION RuTT.DINO
PR<uecIDevtIOPMENTANOFNVIRIINMElit At ANAI-YSIS 1 SOUTHWILMINGTONSTREET
1548 MAIL StHVIUCLtilt -R WEBS11F. WWWDOH.DOT.STATF_.NC.US RAIEIGHNC
RAI rlcn NC 27699-15413
ryl
C) -Z'C
m ?
assistance and cooperation. If you have any (Iucstions or Concerns, please call Ms. Lynn 'Smith
at [phone].
Sinccrcly,
/!(" 4 ll? k
4-It.-William D. Gilnwrc, P.F., Manager
111-oicct Dcvclopmcnt and 1;nvironmcntal Analysis Branch
ills/WD(
I?nclosures
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, CUTF, Wilmington
Mr..lohn I Icnnessy, DWQ, Ralcip,h
Mr. Bruce I?Ilis, Natural Systems Unit Ilead
File: 13-2008

Wetland Mitigation Plan
Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
TIP No. B-2608, Richmond County
F,.visling Conclilions
The project area is dominated by a pine plantation with the exception of a portion of the
Little River Overflow. The pine plantation consists primarily of loblolly pine (Pinzrs luecl(l).
'file overflow area supports a greater diversity of vegetation including black willow (Scllix nigra),
red maple (Aces ruhrunn), sweetgum (l,iquiclumhur slyruciJlrru), river birch (Belulcr nigra), green
ash (Fruxinus pennsylvunieu), deciduous holly (Ilex cleci(hucr) and rush (Juncus spp.).
Slln?nlu/y cif Imj)crcls
The project will result in 1.2 ac of permanent till and mechanized clearing (Method III) in
wetlands due to the replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 on new alignment. Temporary impacts
to surface waters, including wetlands, totaling 0.3 ac, will occur from the construction of two
temporary causeways. No stream relocation or channel change will be involved. The causeways
will consist of Class II Rip Rap topped with smaller Class B Rip Rap with 1.5:1 slopes. After
the project is completed the causeway in the Little River will be removed to the extent
practicable without disturbing the creek bottom. The temporary fill associated with the
causeway in the Little River Overflow will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the area will be
restored to its original elevation and replanted with vegetation, listed below, at 320 stems per
acre.
BrOge Deniolilion
The NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be
adhered to for this project. It is NCDOT's intent not to drop any bridge components into Water
of the U.S. According to a July 18, 2000 email from the NCDOT's Structure Design Project
Engineer, Allen Raynor, PE, the following is a standard policy for bridge demolition. "The
existing bridge shall be removed by sawing and/or non-shattering methods such that debris will
not fell into the water. The contractor shall submit the plan for the bridge demolition to the
engineer for review and approval." Should any portion of the structure (all into the water during
demolition, it will be removed immediately.
Reslorulion Purumelers
Areas between the northern side of the existing road toe of slope and the northern side of the
new location toe of'slope will be graded to meet adjacent land elevations and replanted,
restoring 1.5 acres of wetlands and 1.3 acres of upland buffer (see attached map).
Pictorially measured, photos will be provided at annual monitoring meetings. At the end of
the third year, NCDOT, regulatory and resource agencies will meet on site and determine
75% survivability. If wetland areas temporarily impacted by this project have not re-attained
wetland.jurisdictional status, NCDOT and the U.S. Army Corps of I?ngineers shall determine
whether compensatory wetland mitigation will be required.
"Temporary causeway will be removed within thirty (30) days following completion of
construction.
Trees will be planted 320 stems per acre consisting of black willow. river birch, water oak,
southern red oak and cherry bark oak.
Replanting will occur between December 15, 2000 - March 15, 2001.
- (yp11lB?•? •?
4
/MO MlB-?_ • _ • , • 04Y 011- '
/Yy`f
' I I
• ? I M
1 I I
I I ,
C I I
O ?I ? I
I
Olp
i c
0 ? r t l
I
CE
03 ???
I ,
(? or I I
m ??I
.o
I I? MO Y!B -"-?
I I
I ?? I n
, Z
w
w
I I -?
_ I_ •?I I
- !J
i
N
m
N
1~
B
B
N
Q
Q
c
0
N
U l
43
f N 1] N
N In N
c l L
c o u
0 0 c 9
0
3 ?
J. ST TEo
001032
STA'rE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. Hilt r JR.
GOVERNOR
August 4, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
.
l LrS?_??. - _.
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000. ?-
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven CM
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31, r?
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00. ruTn --,?
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.

als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
"", J, 11
Ski':
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWW.DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US RALEIGH, NC
r

I
qhn tvn( T U l f
d ? 5p?no
,3 P
STATF, OF NORTII CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. 11.0. 13OX 25301. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.181001.
"TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 " wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However. Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam. therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 1)-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of' 193 yd3 (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge. to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of'reinforced concrete girders. deck.
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd; of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal. however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in

temporarily filling 21 17 yd' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway Nyill consist
of Class II riprap topped with a laver of smaller Class 13 riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County. bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephaltus), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser hreriroso-um), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides hvreulis)• rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimuchia asperulaefolia) and Michaux"s sumac (Rhus michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000. Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47. Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
j William D. Gilmore. P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox. WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis

()1()32
DE[' ID:
CjR.P,? A:TION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT k;EQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):NWP ?3 & 33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3.- TELEPHONE NUMBER jHOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
1
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little River & Little River
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
FT
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur north
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [J (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A_SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
G'
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
C, C, t
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coo _
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo 2 June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x 10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of'at least 10 feet should remain on each side of' the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least I foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
June 9, 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. 11'culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places ibr fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bcd.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April 1 and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
N'? ,r
O
r
OI
1 1
G/?
a 1
L.Lj
CO 100 -' / Z N r - -
un a
V
? 0) Y
U 00
P
W

QZ _ -rn --
Cl- cr n

for,' z
00

.1

-o
by
N
W
Gi
k-
V)
?I
lf)
aE RN ER
I?
II ?
III r
W
V)
?g
rn
N
R ?rl.
P N. C. DEPT. O TRANSPORTATION

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PR'OJR'CT: 8.1581001 (I3-2608)
NC 73
BETA EE,N SR 11;')5 AND 115-'
SHEFT 2 ()1-' 13 5/ 2 / 1)I)
LEGEND
-idLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
LIVE STAKES
C--LB-' WETLAND E:2D BOUL DER
DENOTES FILL IN - - - COIR FIBER ROLLS
WETLAND
O ADJAC ENT PROPERTY OWNER
DENOTES FILL IN O R PARCEL NUMBER
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED BRIDGE
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® D ENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•

•
•• • • •
CLEARING .
SINGLE TREE
? -?- FLOW DIRECTION
WOODS LINE
TB
- ?- TOP OF BANK
WE DRAINAGE INLET
-
- EDGE OF WATER
- -C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
ROOTWAD
--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY- } } } f l l l i VANE
--NG- - NATURAL GROUND
--PL-- PROPERTY LINE RIP RAP

-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
BUFFER ZONE BUFFER ZONE
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED ------
PLANT BOUNDARY
----?7----- -- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DI'V'ISION OF HILIHW AYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (13-2800)
NC 71-5
I3I;"1'11'1?G\ 81( 11:15 .,AND IN)
:?I1? R"I" 3 O l 13 5/24/00
PE,oE?E:E?r
Nr1N11: AND
OWNEWS NANIE )A ;E :E
ADDRESS
ADDRESS

TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 191 PEACHTREE ST.
24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA 30303

N. C. DF,PT.OF TRANSPORTATIO;
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHdIDND COUNTY
PROJF,C" I°: 8.11581001 (I3-2608)
BETWEEN Sly II55 AND 11;5-'
SHEET ' DF 1;; 5/24/00

tj 0
o
o c ...? Q
W v 'f; ? ? a Q

g Q?
(b Q)
x

??z w
g8 oz ° w w o

UO U O 3
W w g w, in.
w

U w
Q ?
? z
I'1
W
? ? U
Ln

O o Q r'1 n'1
Lrj O
O

c13
R F,

O I?
a ? U
O ? O

W

y
o

? Ln
Ln
O
?tiQ
?R,
o
g

S
a
ga
? ? ? O N O N Z) tr1 0 00 O m 0

?J

o O
11 U
O o
cl 3
b - W
Q zz o
c
W ? ? U
X3
V'
O1
7 Ol
N
I_ 0 ° Lq
05
W '

?
oo o
g
Q
8
g
o
N
N N
N

Li ? N
I L o o o
3 (n ? O - O N O M O N O W) ? O d`
CU ? 2
N ?
Q- Q - ZT
InWW L 2P

O
-j tiO
ct?
M
O-
c E
CO
?

LO
S
N
00
rn
L')
N

I-

Y) p

5 p

?

?

?
+

O

O
o
v +
N +
? +
? +
v +
? +
0 +
rn +
00 +
03 +
U + +
OD + +
ti N N N N N N N N N ^1 ^? v v v

a
2
N
n?
?l
P
ul
?D
O

c?3
I I
I I
3 ? /
C2
I I?
?I I I I ?
IV
?I I I ?
I
I?
I?
I
I O
// I Q
I02
Q
/ I
? I
L.ij
W L? I
??? I I I
LU
i -f II i I
0 31V17 N01 day
w ow,
Ln
co
u ?
Cf) (,0
Z CO
cl- ? J
J
LLj j?
O
Om
M(D
C-) 0
- C-) a
7L
Q
r
?, x Q
?x
U?
z
z
CA
,

? ? =
x
U ?
a
c
a
RIVER
a
r-'ll
u
z
J
J p
p L: Z
Z Q
Q U) J
J W ~
F W
LL) ~3
0
3 z
w
p
J
J
.a
Ln
0 -
LC)
N
D
O
O
?.? O O
(v O

ci ?n

r
f

Q

O ! 1
ti `? M
O n
k
+
V I ? =
N I

W

LO 00 CL-
1-
a

\
U O
001 U)
a
\ U ~
CD
n Q
0
good U
?.

N \
w
¢

LiJ $0

000
O?
'I
N -? O 0 0 0

L Q o
3 3 00 cl

o
°

,
_ Lij
z
U)
a
?
a
?
w
o°o°o d o
-
Q / cPod co
7s i
- O_ 1 LJIJ J 7
LJ
Z
z
0' l
u
W I I
In a
U k
U/
1
3 m .

O
Q: Ln
O
+ O
Z J
U
N
/ L

U
-? u

?? O o O
o
CD
+ I
N I ?n -
! N ?n
O
N oo C')

Q CD
0.7
N
C
C
C i

Q r

- U c C?

p, ? U Ca
w? ? Fb F

l v
CD
CD
CD
C3
CD
CD
`D
`D
`D
00"20 3N17 H ?1 y`y
OO?Z 3N17
N01 viv
CO
CL
?. w
Z N
z
Q p
J
p U= Z
Z W C?
Q E Q
O N I- w
U) -i
z w Li w
u
J z O
w w z
w p w
3 p
•
J • •
• r
W
U
0
9(,)
_ ?CDm
o'l
N
z
0
o
I { Pi
_I
?i I I_,? I ? j I Q
I ? o
i r I C) z ca
w
I
I-
4
I
III=- rn ? ??
jllD
I?CD
>? I -- - - -------- °
- - - - Z N
OZ J O L,
= a Z w?
a
J
I I y w 3 03 N? ? (n U
I I
I- I I Z
I w z
iI I I ->j. -J
°
I- I 7 I . . Ic D- I I . .
I I= r •'•
I ? .
'i Ic?j I
If-
1,5? I
I o
00.20 3N17 H01bW
om U
Mm
"° -
Ua
ZZ
Ln
N
O
?
rn

L-Li
z
OS+B? JNo Nj1dW
L.LJ

r
t m ? -------I
I
i LQ Z Q

Q O - ?/
° O
o

,
V
ota
.
0
0

x C4

g z
12
.- '-? x C

,. g
L~
?
g
az

nU
x
z

VY
4 o -
cR
LITTLE RON,
Ic OV E R r" L _ ! -
Ly
LLJ
1,00.0 000 (J) ° C:) U
00.
00 0,0 0-0 Eo Oil 411
Ir , ?; 0°0000n1
O
II j,, I loo°oo/
W 0 -0 `/ 000 ?g? U z N
w z I ooa0oococ <1
0000 o0or oc a:° wW,
?¢
I C) J ' 17-ti ()-o I a
. 1 z U- w
L j 10°°°°(1(1, a w LLJ L)
I? (? 3
- Q I 000 V o OC t5? 11 w O
?S ?1 I .. o oZS 11 3 w
W:z_ C.. ?00 0? b? I I I 0 0
o o?o b®c °°? I 00 LJ
vC)
?T°
? O J
E •'.
? 0 90° 0,;OJo °O of
I I w
I c; I ?I b
om O
-?? (r,m -
0
c) z
Z Z
N
CD O
° o 0

+
Q- un 0 2
?

r?
I LLJ
I` Q-
?W Q r J
Q Lx-)
z

C:)
z
I z
V) ) Q l-,
I v 2 W W F ?? Gs

O ? C r?
+ u
Co
7
";
Lr?

v ?

Lr) Lo a-
a
?
d N i I Q N R?P
O ..
U oad N
fh 0000 J 7
?
p
J
~ J $ooq
00
0 u `T J
+
r~
I
I
W
> N li.l =
o 0
0
ooo K
J/
Qo :3: 0
00
00-
! -__--_ --

-r--
I

--- I

i
O
w O

Cn =
p 00
(-
00 O
0d
o 0

O

?T\y

I W
V)
Q w
m
J
r
? ? W +?,

cc
z
zz P

?-

?, I m U
L
Q
0
U
+
M I ? r'
?
I
I V''? I °
b
Ln C)
o
J

Q
I
O o O

O
0 I o

x
+ I ?,
N Ln

I
-7 om
CD -??
0

O
O

0 - UZ
Z
cli
CV
C?j 0
O
CT
c
c

v
f

Ca
cn . ? ?? ?n

z u
c?
?1J 1
O
W
N_
..
Z
2
.J.p UZ
Z W X
p W Q 2: Q
Z W
WW WU) -i
U
J ~3
W Z O
3 W W
p p
J r
• r
r
r r
pm
?-7 Ua - ?7
zz
L•a
Q
U
O V)
O
Ln
N
og.p JIVI1 r1./-LVri
?I
1 I
r
I
'i I I
I?
Ij I
4--
I
II
I
II i
I?
I' ! I
,II I
II I
? II I I
I I
II I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I

' III r?S

'
I I
I =

00
s

!I i
I? I I __
U I
II
i I
I! I
II ? I I ?
I I I I I ?I
I I I,
CD
I i I .1 cc,-?
!? I
RN, old I ? I?'il?
I I I I ?; 1
I
I ? I Ic D.
III ? I I
I I % 'X I I
III ? I
I i I
J
Q
? II
I
I?
I,
i J
cl-
0
oz
F.?
76 1

I
I
-1-
I
I?
W

u

?

J

O
W
N
_ Z
Z
Q C
7
J .
2

Z
¢ wM
o
z Fa
J
wL'
W n
(
J H
3 W U
F p h-
w z o
3 w z
o w
0

.•.
u
o
i
o
I om
Uc?
Z? N
-5TATI
Arl
t,
STATE, or Nowrii CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES 13. HUNT .1R. I'.U Is??z ?>?ul. It;u.la(?Ii. rJ c 27011-i-N] DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SI c[(I I'%1t%,
May 24, 2000
MEM( RANI UM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit Ilead
Consultant Unite
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist L Ili
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Federal
Ilighway Administration (FI IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion ofthe
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
The study area lies entirely within the Yadkin-Pee Dec River Basin. The
previously submitted CF, assigned an incorrect DFNI Index No. fur Little River. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification fir little River and its
tributaries (DEM Index No. 13-25-(19.x), (07/01/7)1) is "Class C Unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they 110\v';
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. Ilydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced CF.
Neither High Quality Waters (IIQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-11), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (LO mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened J),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond Count)', bald eagle (11aliaeenus Ieucocephalus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser bre-viroslrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picuicles
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaelblia), and Miehaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 11 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a hall mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view ofthc surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. Eagle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food Source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed proje? t.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI-IP) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences of'bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI IP) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Head
File: B-2608
SwATt
001032
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. Htwr JR. DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
August 4, 2000
un.
Mr. John Dorney x..,. .
Department of Environment and Natural Resources LrDS - 4
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands 1621 M ail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
NY S?C T?• ,,
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000.
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven 'za
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31,
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00.
-T.1
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of --t
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.

als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
"?,J, o
5c-&C?
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWWDOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH, NC

qonbal I
n M SiA1F u
STATF, OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALC1aH. N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GUVE:RNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.158
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
Ulf
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam, therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CI:. Little River
I(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge, to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders. deck.
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure, totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
temporarily filling 21 17 yd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
ATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). "Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalzrs), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser hrevirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michmixii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
j William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
DE p01032
N
Nr`,TIONWIDE PERMIT RE,)UESTFP ( PPOV If)E NATION',,')E PERM- 17 4) : Nb•iP "' ; &
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS
P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3.- TELEPHONE NUMBER .(HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
I
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little River & Little River
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
Public Transvortaion
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIEL
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nortl
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO [ ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A-SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
G'
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))

l".
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission KN
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coo -
Habitat Conservation Program "'4
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo
June 9. 2000
be planted with a spacing o1'not more than 10'x 10'. I f possihle, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of' tile
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried,at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
.lunc 9, 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should he placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsfield design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill Oil the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should he designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage,
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April 1 and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
Af -7
2 C
vr:?ID?
off' rv , ? ? -
Y\! NI /
i
I\ co
co Ci
?p I C z cv
P
N li u
W
rn
cn - ?
i
C\j
?, ?'
E? CNN
I I ?°
I I

LLJ

l l
rE F 1R
a
Lli

? I
II ?
I
N II r

? II ?

? II

LQ

/I
?g
w ¢?
W m
W
h
a?

W ?
W W
i' Qx
io
N. C. DEP"T". OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJE('T: 8.1581001 (B-?608)
NC 73
I3l;T«'LBN SR 1155 AND 115-'
SH'EI T 2 OF 13 5/ 2 ' / 1) 1
LEGEND
-lLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
LIVE STAKES

L WETLAND C2D BOULDER
DENOTES FILL IN --- COIR FIBER ROLLS
WETLAND
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
DENOTES FILL IN OR PARCEL NUMBER
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN
®
SURFACE WATER PROPOSED BRIDGE
(POND)
® D ENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
•
•• • • • CLEARING
SINGLE TREE
EE- FLOW DIRECTION s l l_??_?,L WOODS LINE
TB
?- TOP OF BANK
WE I?
EDGE OF WATER DRAINAGE INLET
----------
--C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
ROOTWAD
--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY- f } { I I I i i VANE
--NG-- NATURAL GROUND
--P'-- PROPERTY LINE RIP RAP
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT RIP RAP ENERGY
a DISSIPATOR BASIN
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-Epg- EXIST. ENDANGERED BUFFER ZONE- BUFFER ZONE
PLANT BOUNDARY
----??------- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEFT. ®F TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHIINiOND C,OZTNTY
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (I3-280(,)
N '1
I3I?']'11'I;E\ SIB 11;5 .1NI> 115"
SHE' L'F 3 0 1-, 13 5/24/00
:pR011,L,R'lJ'-1 WXNJ,-,.fZ
NANIE AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
191 PEACHTREE ST.
TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA 30303

N. C. DEPT.©F TRANSPORTATId
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHINIOND CORN'["h
PROJF,CT: 8.1581001 (A-2{)08)
Nt" 73)
13ETWI;I?N SR 11,5 AND 115-.
Slit-'ET - OF 13 5/24/0
)N
O
O

W L' Q1", ? iy^ c
D ?
a

g ? U Q?
C-j
°°
°
E-4
o
Q ? z
LL O

gg
oz O
w w
O ti m

oc: W 4
F C
l
:
0
U
Q ?

O
L 1
L
Q Q
O 'XI S O

O
C5
Q-
L

C3 U
O 0 O
`
2 Ln

D

P $ _ O r1 O N O N O Ln q 4o 0 m O

?
Q ? ooh
o
L
b ? W

? `O ? U ?T' Ql P O1
V) Lq

W

?°° ko
`° ?
g o g
o
?
g
?
g
?
a
N
?
o
o
No
LL-
3Ln ? O ? O N O O N O ? O ti 0 v .

ln ? V 1P
Vl ? W
?? ? p
O C O O ? O
E O S N oroi N i? p
o p
o W
i 0
p +
N f + + + +
N + +
N -}. +
Lf) +
r" +
N - +
° +
v
li N N N N N N , v
tai

V) 2 O
F
-_, 7?
=mill w
S lit
II
i
CD V
III
I c
I?
I?
I
O
I
?/ I Q
I
1
? I
WV??
J (I
ail II
W??II I
??1 I I I I
,? ? II I
i -f II i
00?""z -7/V/7 y?l bey
?1
_ I
111 ? 111
6 ?
L
co rq
LLI
L Z
cl-
J
Cl)
Q ?
J
L-LJ
V) j
J O
U O Z
om
?m
can
ZZ
O_
a
2x
a7
??
U?
z
x
Q c C?
x ?,
u C)

RIVER
J
all,
z
J
10
p E Z
Z Q
Q J
J W ~
W
LL) ~3
p
3 Z
w
O
J
J}
c.
1
0 ?
Ln
0 -
lr)
N --
0
o
O O O
O O u
:I'i J ? fa ti
NJ
CD
CD
+ z
V)
N
Ln
1
llJ
O
t 00 1- a
Q o °°
CD \ ?o?a
CD 000d d
+ I w On
+ $0 q
N 000
N -? p 000
Q o 3 oooa
W o 0 0000
D ?ooc1 w
(O Q CnOd co
7s
u , W kJ ^l_?
Q Z
W I d 0' l a ^ u
vn cr
3 U
co
:z co
O O J
+ 2 - / U
N _ J
N
/ Ln C
U ...7
L)
F .a
U
u?? O O O
O
O ?.
+ 0 ::7
N ' N >
O O O O
N c j-)
N
II
j I
? 111
_ I11
1i I
jl I
? 311 i
? zl I
?1I
? `?1 I I
II I
? II
_ I I I
CD II
II
II I
c D II
II
??? I I I
I00"20 -7N/7 NOlbW
10 > I h =_ I
I I III I
'1 III - I
;I 1 110 I
;' I 111=
-? I I IC I
I IID
09
II=
I I I ? -?
111=
I 1 I- ?
I I ?
I II_ ~
I I ? ? N
1 ?3
III-- ?
? I
I I - ?
zl;
al o
OO+bZ 1V17 N)1 v/T
o
_

?s
p I

? ? Q r. Fa :n
c C?
Q U

I
I
i I
,091
I <? 'O
I ? O
I w
Z N
a?
I Z
1 J
UZ
I ZL
LL 2:41
O U) ?J W
1 Z W w W U
~03
1 -? Z O
~ W Z
I W W
I a Or
\ ? J • r
I
I ?• J ? rrr
I ? L
I J
?I O
0
om
¢m
CDo
Ua N
zz
0
o ?? O
!r,?3 I 7_. U c C?
I? ? I I ? Q ? ? '? ? ca
i I f I a ?? ? ?
r I
V) I
I^CD
------------------
w
¢ Z
O J =
I I Z ?O U
a F a
J I I Co I y W u, (n J
o I 3 0 LLJU
:it
( I I z o
w z
LLJ
I I o-'A °
_- I I
I J
I_
'i I I
?I I = I st I
'f ?; I I o Ln
7 I Ln
00.20 -7N17 N01 b {N
0
Mm
C7 p
Ua
ZZ
N
?10 >
O
Q
CY) CK)

05+8? ?Nl? HOlb W
Z-,
W I- w

m ------?
z o
j owoopff
.
?
(D? - - L?
U
I
i ?1??°°° CkSb,
ihn°n° , o

C7
Q /.
?z
r4:
71
x
cc
cr,
ti
0
0
.n
G
x
U

--1
S~
1
O
W
N_
Z
Z
J ¢ t_7
2
H 0 U
Z
LL ?
J W
O F Q
Z (n ? W
W W W U
J h- 3
F O
W Z OZ
3 W W
0 0
J r
r r
? +rr
.a
d
:J
Ln
O
N
om
0 co -7
UO
ZZ

N O
O O
OT
/ O
N
O
O
I
Y
U
C
x

~
C7
+
-1
0 I O Z
` I_ ?( Cfi
CI
?f)
0
LLJ
C?Cl-
z
z
C3 Q r
n
° V
? u O = C2 ??
oo
LAJ C\j

I O
? ? O I .?
?
,-r
aC
? ? M
?
(n Q I ?
r. F--+ Q

00 .a

I ?

J ? I I
Lq ----- Q
0=
v

Ln J

U Ln
N
u
i
r+
r W t
o .
.o
o
o
."
)
.

--
---- o w
(n oZ
o oo
oo
.ooa
,:O
0)00
0

W I I
3
D
Q 2
.
o
o
0
o
LO
m
I a w
I z 7P

I N
N

C)
I
I Q
r
-
0
+

O

L C>
a

U u

I F
?

O o O
I I ?-
° I o
o
+
I
?,
x
J
,"', I N Ln
M(T)

-??
-? CDO
c'o

V
C) I
C
CTS U Z
Z
N N N
-) Q i

7 7
l
...? i
rte. `
Q
? ? ?
rr
r

7
Q ! ol. _.

;, ? U 9 3

U?
i

Dom.
t 1
_u G1
O
W
N_
.Z
Z
J Q co
JO 51: K
..
L?Q WCr
O J z a
Z (17 F LU
C W W W U) -i
U
J F- 3
F- O H
W Z O
3 W w
O O
• •
om
¢m
uo = -?
C)a
7Z
L-]
d
U
Ln
Ln
N
0946 --JN11 11J1v/r
o
l? ? I I I ^ z
i, II'? _ _ j a ? ? ^ C d 9
?, I I = I c? 7 r % Q
III I II?U I cr,
I I LO j I O 0 5 1?
I I I,? I i I r_? ? .38 76
I ?, I I
F O
?-
?
l i I oo j ICD
I j I? ;! I - I u_
I I I II I '? I? I ? ?
i I ;! = I ?' cry
I I i W ? ?. Z N
I I I ! I? ;` ? ? Z
z
Uz
I I I i I LL ?w
l! '? I CD a ?wJ
wu
LL) Z 3 0
I I = °
v I I I III - 3 w w
CD 0 0
\ I 'i
•2c 76 -J
I- ? _ _ I • r
I I ? \
I I I. ?r I I `?
I I I ?I I = i I :?
I I ? I
r
,I I I I
_frCDLCD
z? N
STATA
STATE ( NORTFI CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
.TAMES B. HUNT .1R. I'.U. IWX 25201. ?t,vLIAGII. N.C. 27611-i201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVIAZWK Sruio:1'\m'
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit I lead
Consultant Unit-
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist t)l'P
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Federal
1Iighway Administration (FHWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRS'1'I'-73()).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion of the
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
The study area lies entirely within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The
previously submitted CF. assigned an incorrect DFNI Index No. for Little River. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification fOr Little River and its
tributaries (UEM Index No. 13-25-(19.5), 107/01/731) is "Class C". Unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. I lydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this kvater resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (IIQW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-II), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (llaliaeelus leucocelAilrrs), shortnose
sturgeon (tfcipenser brerirosirum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoicles
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimcrchia crsl)erulaelblicr), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhus michauxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced Cl.' and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 1 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land
Hurnan disturbance can cause all eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. Fagle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breedin?? season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source fo?- bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a hall mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed projet:t.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient sire for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI-111) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNf-IP) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Mead
File: B-2608
3l
yA... STAtE
NN ?.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAML'•s B. HUNT, JR. DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
August 4, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Q3
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000.
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31,
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00.
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.
(?It)
als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
"'-J I I.
SWilliam D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone]
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWWDOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
T` T
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH, NC
I VL U ?
d..? STAT[ °?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 2761 1-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GovE.RNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.1 581001.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
0 Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox, from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam, therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CF,. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a laver of'smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge. to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders. deck,
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
14
temporarily tilling 21 17 vd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class II riprap topped with a laver of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove tile riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Halicieetus leucocephalr.rs), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser brerirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATI
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic ``Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
_56 William D. Gilmore. P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis

fjo 1032
DF.fs ID:
ION II`
NATIONWIDE PER?,ILT RE7UESTEP 'PE<;_)VIDE NATION69IDE PERMIT N) :NUP 2_i &
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS
P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little River & Little River
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE:
OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
FT AFTER:
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER
FT
FT AFTER:
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE:
FT
FT
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIE[
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nortl
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO [
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO []
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A.SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR.WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN TAE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Menlo 2 June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x 10'. I f possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Mcmo
June 9, 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. if culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April 1 and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
LI)
o i
- '?
I
lD ? I
OlDf/n8 1 Y 6
r
\ P ? If
O ( , ?f Lf) I a3 _ n
co I _9 _n 9 ' Co
C\j
N
P}
° co llei
U 1
LIJ
s
rn C
Cl-
CX)
-64
<y? bb4t Ln
-Li
V)
Y
? aE F'1,6 1
L7
ii
Lli
C\j
R aJ
? ..? R
ui i
/I
c,
/ h
N. C. DEPT. O TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJEICT: 8.1581001 (B-2608)
N C 733
BETWEIEN Sly 1155 AND 115-'
5HEHT 2 OF 13 5/ 2• ! 1)
LEGEND
--WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY

LIVE STAKES c: r WETLAND
L
L
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
•» »• • • • CLEARING
- -? FLOW DIRECTION
i TB L- TOP OF BANK
- WE---- EDGE OF WATER
--C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
--PL-- PROPERTY LINE
-TOE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
l- t L? L L WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
f f! I I I I VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
BUFFER ZONE BUFFER ZONE
----?7------- WATER SURFACE
PROPERTY ONVNER
NAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
191 PEACHTREE ST.
TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA.3O3O3
N. C. DEFT.OF TRANSPORTATIC
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJF,CT: 8.1,581001 (13-2008)
(' ,% q)
131:1"11']?]',N S1( 115,5 AND ll;i-'
SHEF,1" = (V 13 5/24/0,
N

o
off 0
z °
, ?
W C-) .t°
i?' C
0 N
7
F ?.,

Q 06
M
LL
D
CL-
g 9z w
$
0 z ti
? W

C
U
Q ?
? z
? ~
z ? ?

C LL- U
O
q
^
?J
[
Y
V? LL-

3
co
~
O q
2 V)

/
)
N
LL.
U1
I?
LO
O
Q'
P ?? ? q ?I O N O N O ?n 0 4? ? (3) O

o O
^ ?

b - W

Q ?` ° ? U V' Ol P Ol
N
cu ,N N N

W

'o L
ci °
? k
o

$
?
o
?
g
?
$
N
O
r,
o
o
o
N o
3
Q V) 2
N Q,
(n LU a
? C?
P

o O J O - O cr O
N

+

O In
+ O O

N 0.7 ?1

N ?l

+ u'1

+ Ul P

+ q

O ifl

O
C,
N
+
ko
03
0)
OD
?
;
?
v
v
N N N N N N N N v

°
2 N v Ln o 0
V) J I I
ti
C JD
4_3
CC)
CD
? I V
III
I?
I?
IW
a Io
I
IQ
Im
Q
WV4-
(I Y
ar I
WzIII I I
??? I I I
Cl i -f II I
OD.?Z 3N/7
1v/,y
Hi

Lr)
CXD rq
u ?
? ?,o
L Z CK)
O
Q ?
J
W Q
LLJ :z
j O
om
cl? Q)
?a
7I
O
? x
?x
9
Q
?a
U?
z
x
v i
z Cam. ?..
1
%
J
RIVER
a
Lll
. P 1

z
J
p W Z
Z Q
Q J
J W F-
F W
W ?3
3 Z
W
O
J
c
C)
o-
N
0
0
C>
N o
C) rn
co
oc
_

I ?^?„ ? rya

_. C?
I
O
N
I ?
Ln

W
0 O
cr
h ?
00 cr
Q m
?
U p
o?
a N

p
\
m o
a
g
ood u ;

+
N
~
_
~ a
l.iJ = Oopp
S
0
00
000

u
000

L Q o
3 ? 3 oo o01
pOO
_ LLJ i CL
o 01
o?
Q
Good co
Q
u s
m z ?•
I
Lij °-

m ,0'I
3 r?
co
m

CD :Z?
cc m
O
+ /
2
J
u
N
N -
_
O O

U

?
a

o O o O
o p
++ 1
?n >
I N ?
0

Cpl
0
0 0
c))
?
0
0.7
N
II
II
I I
? III
= III
? III
- II I
II I
- jl I
CD ?I I
II I
I I I
II
? II I
CD II
-- j I
? II I
0 II i
0
II
0
- II
00}20 JN17 N01dlN
I Ih= I
I I III I
III - I ? ,
I I il? I
III
I I I? I
.09
I I? ? 7
111= -?
1113
?1= N ?
III ?
I I
I I I- ?
I 11=
I I ? ? ? N
3
III. ?
Flo
2/0
1I ?I
00+0 307
N,?1 bW

r
,J r
U ac C?

Q 06 U
?
Oz ® U 7
w

I
I ?
,09 I --'
1 ? p
Z N
Q?
I Z
I J S
p V Z
I Z w<1
U' Q
F
p u) FJ - w
Z W w W U
1 ¢ 0 3 F
1 J Z p
~ W Z
1 w p w
I 3
I
I O?• J N ••.
I Q, c:
I
?I o
I
0
?m
CD"
CD o ?n
zZ N
0
o
Q ?? O
I I;? I I u'; ? ? p ??
I I• - I i? I ? ? ..?
" - U > Ca
1- I I I a ?, u ® C
11= j ? I z
114r,? l? I ? I
I' II'
LLJ
Ilr
1114,`3 I ? ? J ? ?' ?
? II ? I I ?
- W
I I o J =Lo
I I z Io
h= Q ?a W?
ICD I J
i I a I I 3 WW wu
O
Z
I I ` I I o3 ~
{ I? I I W W
-Y, J O O
a
.
I I ?
I_ I
it I?? SL I v
I I Ln
?i
00.20 3N17 NOl b W
C)(D v
_r.. m -
C)o
Ua
ZZ
N

Lai
z OS+B? ?Nl? HOldW
LIJ L
I LJ
-- `
? ?
c
?
I J I
I
I
? I
Ii

C?

---- i
r , co ----
i?
3

I Q
LLJ CL-

LJ z 0
::5i 0.99-POOPPY
I ?' I
I Q O
I
1 Ili'??. ° n 0
0
0

n ° rn

rte-. ? x / , .?-• .-+
z

?U tom`

urrLE?PI
?'`R
ovER^L-0'v
II r wLn
1 '.0
000 1
0
_ 0 0 OTC I I `(' w s--
00 ** 0of) `rte T
I'D rn I IO.
00 L
f i ?0?000?;? ?? 11 Q r-? N
o
LLI
W Q)0% 000 0 1 1 0 - z
W z00'..00.0 0'OC i J Jo = T-Z
Z
00,°a00 O OO r 0 Q L-Lj
a
C)
C) J '\I I t? ?` z U, -j cn wJ
m I ° ?0
11 ° o .00
W o0 0o0C,0g a
0.. ?o ??• OO b? I 1 I o
LLJ
U) b®c ' 000y I °OooO°vo . .
c) 0 0 O o O ?S O[[[???o J r
• .
I v > Ll- Qoo-?Q
C ? ogCpOO Oo I r
W VO a O , r
I r I I w
L7
I
I ?? I ? I w
om o -
CD
o
Ua
Zz
N
CD O
° C>
m o

L?
` _
r O
+ LC)

°w 9
N
I Q?oo

7 10-1 j
U2WW x ti a

O
+
..
co j
I ?

J? I I
Lr)?
?
a
CL N i

0
Oo
occ U)
U)
?Q- Ln W
I I CL m a L?
O N CD > „
++ ?J a 0 f
0

o
Q
o 0
00
00
w
o
cn
Z 0 .
.
.
0
W Q m Lli Lm?
I ? ? w
?
I
I
W
cr

'

z
z
z q
?- o ,0
I

?
I
U
(1] _
U CIS
?
? I

O I
I I Q
v -,
O
+
M I i r
I
I
L9?
\ I
I
O
C?
L
o
a
?
U a
.:
I ?
J ?
I
I F -?
O o O
I ? F
O
O I
o
x
+ I ?n
I om

O
O I
?
C-) - UQ

Z Z
N
C?j N N p-

Q
'
rc, cr% 4=

q z
?,

U Ca :
>
L

u
G-<
d,)

?1J J
O
W
N
Z
Z
7
¢ (
J .
O U
Z
¢ W cr
o
z
(n ? 2: a
w
w W U) -i

J
F- 3 U
W
O F-
W z O
3 w w
O
J •
• r
• r
om
IrCD
?C)
o?
C) <I
ZZ
G
U
Ln
O
Ln
N
O?i'L6 -7y/V/ 1 rl Div f r
0
I I i I _ G:, Q , l Q
i I Q
ct: ' r..
J I i I LIJ., I I I C 6
-I I I I _ z5 7t, Q-
I I = ? ?r O
III I ?'I I CL- I o
'III I ?I I = ? I
f'
? i i l I r?l I !; I= I? I
00
I I it l l? I ?;
I I I II ?' j I {? {, I?
I I I iI
I I I ?_ ' li l? J
I I I I - ? ?-?
I I I Ii ?! ', I? I
I I I I II
I I °
E N
i t I I Z Z
I I I ?o w?
! I = o NQ ?¢
w
U I I i I I I t" 3i 3 w3 0
p w
O
Ij !i l - N C
?I \I r r
? • R •2c 75 u
I ? ? I r r
u
I I ?I I' '. I? I I o
;'I I? ?I I? I I I I "'
I I I"? I I f I
a? m
V o
N
../ ; 5TATI q
r? Nurr rJr?r
S'l-All cal NORTI I CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. IIUNT JR. P.O. IWX 25201. RA1.111GIL N.C. 27011-i201 DAVID MCCOY
Govi:RNO R S[CKV 1 AKY
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit Ilead
Consultant Unit-
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist t
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Fcderal
I Iighway Administration (1`1IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously, submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion of the
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
1 he study area lies entirely within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. 'I he
previously submitted CF, assigned an incorrect DEM Index No. fiir Little River. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best Usage classification fin' L.ittlc River and its
tributaries (DEM Index No. 13-25-(19.5), 107/01/731) is "'C'lass C". Unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. I lydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (IIQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-11), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1,0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Dish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaeelus lencocephalus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acil7enser hrevirosirt(m), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Mcuttles
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysinwchia asl)erulaelblia), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhos michauxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeettts leucocephaltts (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 1 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having all Open VICN? of the SUrrolinding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. H'agle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eaole begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the lorm of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed project.
Open water, (Blewett I-ails Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of' the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences 'of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI-1P) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Head
File: B-2608
tee,,. STATC„
0 010 3 2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNK JR. DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SI:CRFrARY
August 4, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
IV WETLANDS GROUP-_
..,.,... ATER QUPLITY SEC11ChI
,.a
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000.
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven '
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31,
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00.
L?
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.
(;-t-)
als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
"", J, `I.
5William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE. WWWDOH.DOT. STATE. NC.US RALEIGH, NC
_r.k
qhnbvn(JYL Ulf I
d..? SU7F o
• V V Q?w'u?d'C,
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RAt,E1611. N.C. 2761 1-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GoVF.RNOR SF.CRF.'rARY
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.1581001.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of "Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on ncN, location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam, therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge, to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders. deck,
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
r
r?
temporarily filling 21 17 yd 3 (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove tile riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaeetus leuc•ocephalus), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser hrei,iros•trum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
MPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NC DOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hard Wood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in'the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000. Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
-5,d William D. Gilmore. P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
r .
DEM ID: 0 010 3 2 CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED !PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #;:NW11 23 & l3
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3.- TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
1
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Little River & Little River
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATE
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTA
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FO'
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATIO]
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE O]
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:

l0a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIE
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nort
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL.STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A_SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
G'
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))

J ::

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor _
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo 2 June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing ot'not more than 10'x10'. If ossible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Tearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of'at least 10 feet should remain on each side of' the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. 'him
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of'the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
.Iunc 1), 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to l,yonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bcd.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April I and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
?`f r
Ir!
\ o ?.
V? ??;! 7,2 O
I n ?
? lD ? 1
\ Y\ ? y
r
U?
M
OlDjjn8 1/ y 3.6
o
co W ! W L,
Lnj ?3N Ln
CIO 9. N vU g CO
N 1 ?
C\j
W ?- S ? a
W
CET O N t t \\
3 \ 1
Ili ?' ^ I ? ?.\
h,
m ?
hd
wm
9VAJ J
b
II W
LIJ
II

?? ? ?? RNER
OJERFW?'
r =? II
II

N II

w II ?

cn II

R

i?
'ITT
W

r
I
W
w

a
4
N. C. DEPT. ®P TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

RICHINIOND COUNTY

f? hld?C?JI;t'"]": R.1:i81001 (I3-2bOR)
?$ NC 73
BEITWI;T;N SR 113 AND 1115-'

SHHH'I' 2 OF 13 S/ 2<'! 11
LEGEND
---WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
WETLAND
L
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
?- -- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
TOP OF BANK
- WE---- EDGE OF WATER
--C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--? PROP. RIGHT OF WAY-
--NG- - NATURAL GROUND
--PL- - PROPERTY LINE
-TOE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
----? ----- -- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEPT. X03' TRANSPORTATION
DWISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICI-IMOND COUNTY
a
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
-- - COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
r t-- "LL WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
I{{{ I f l i VANE
0 RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
BUFFER ZONE BUFFER ZONE
PROJF('T: 8.1:81001 (I3-2806)
NC 1?
I31?T8VEHN SR 115,) .AND IN-'
NAME AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
191 PEACHTREE ST.
TIAA TIMBERLAND 11, LLC 24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA 30303
N. C. DEPT. OF TRA NSPORTATIC
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHAMOND COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (I3-2008)
I3L'1"WEEIN SR I1S5 AND 115
SHE1?"1" = Ol' 1,; 5/24/0
)N
0
9 kn 0

W a Q
'
te
Q
?„
r
c,
.n

OG
? .n
g ` U 0
fi 0

Fez w
4 gg Oz w w O

Q
- W
w
?
F
- G
.
U?
Q ?
z

l
Q L
Q-

N
LL.
Sod o o in

O ti

v ?,

?
N g

i

?, a g?

?,
f O
p
C3
'z r
j O c O O v
i 03
0
o
.

?
A
(-?) ? 0 0
o
LL
.
3 O
W
b Zi
O
Z
Q Q U-
Q y o
N

N
N?
N
?l
I? q 3 Ln ,n
Q; o ?n
o; o
W

00 ? g ? g ? g ? o N ? o o ??
? 3? ? O ^ o
O N O ? O N O ? O ti 0 7?
N ln?` 2
N Qm?p
V)W? QCT
V)P
kn
o O J O J O O
Q ?
E
O g o
N 03
p) Lr)
N L u,
rn p p
O ?
N P O
O Ln
O
V) N N N Ln ~ OD v v v
ti N N N N N N i
^

d
?'

V) Z! N hl ?") P Vl 10
O

F
CD
= I
3 ?/ % cc
?v
I I?
IV
I I?
I I?
I c?
I?
I?
?? I Q
Q
If I?
Q r
?? I I
w zl I I I
??? I I I I
,? ? II I I
i ?f II I
OO??Z 31V17 HO1 y?y

9 (m
T (D
u0
zz
0
H?
r
z
x
oc f?,
o
e
RIVER
Y-l
z
J
J O
p Z
Z Q
Q J
~
F W
- W
J
W o3
3 Z
W
O
J
}
0
Ln
O-
ir) _
N
C)
o
O

N ?
G

CSI O

UJ
O

F
_

x
O

CV
` N

x r ? M

CD '~ a

+ I ;, Z
C"i
l
I Ln

W

LO 00 CL
C?
?
W o ??a s
in a
Oo
d
CD
r
?

N

_?1

- w
a
H

0 0
d
$o q
000

D
?

} N
-? O ?
p0O
L \
-
- - 3 O

L
Li 3
a

0
00O'
0d
6 ^J
.
i O 0o
0
O

Q w
0004
cAod co

?P.
U ?1 w

Lo
u
r
3 m

O co
+
+ O
/

N
N -
_ J
Ln O

??
O F
o .a
O u
G p°
+
N ?n x >
I N ?n
0

N O
0

O? O

co
N
V
jl
II
I I
? I I
III
? III
_ III
CD I I -
II
= jl I
?_ 31 I I
_ ?I I I
CD ? I I
CD ?I
II
'D II
_ II I
CD II
II
II I
4? II i
II
II
? II
II
? II
_. I I
00"20 3N17 H01d1'V
k,3
I Ih= I
.I I p? I
.I III - I
110
I I 11 -0
I
111=
I ` - , 109
I I I_
I I?
1?1= W
I I
II
III=_
I I ?
I II_
I I
I I I=
I I ??
III- ?
II ? ?
II
I I = ?
I I I I `J
CIE
20
? ? N I

zoo _
00 }?Z 3N/7
N01 yp?
I

F" +
c?
z
Q r / C,

z = U c C?

z U 7.,

z
I
I u
I
I
,09 1 z K
I ? v'a
I ?- O
I W
Z
I z
J QL
I
I Z W CL
WQ ?a
O LO LL
Z W W W L
I Q o 3 ?-
I -? Z O
~ W Z
W O W
I 3 O
I • •
J s r
0
I ?
I o
Ln
0
Qm
?c3o - ?n
z N
z
0
• o
I I ?, ? I v'; C4 ® ?? .n
C?? I 7 .?. cam,
7j
j I - I ? I 7_.
I j?? ?\ I ?1 I
i I (J)
C31) I h? T`
111 I / v, ?,
III = I ? ? ?
II `D
??II =
?, I - - _ - ?_- - - O
LLJ
_ Z
____ I I o J
I I Z 10 U
I? Q W Z W r,-
CXD I Q ?W
?-
W N
y W
I 3 3 ?U
0
z z
I ICD I I O
-Y: -? ? O
f IC D. I ?. I W W
I_ I
?; I = Ise ?, I
,I i s I I Ln
00.20 3N17 I-IJI N
Gm -
GO
Ua
ZZ
N

Q
CO
n <D
, z O5r8? JNO NOlV W
,
LO I- w
C) I ??I I

cr
-
el-
I W :? 01991P.0
\

' Tt(l° 0 0
C

Q
U z
C?

t`.3 -
a
LITTLE RP? ,R
} c _
LO,v -
;I ov ER -
-_ - -__ - - - - a a r?
A? 0
cr-
o C)
I. CJ IO0O
,Or J ? ! d y
000 Oil r '
41
0* b 004L
n 1G ?: °
i0 W01.0000 0.00000 i ?- N
W (v 09 1 0 z
-j I 0-000 II o z
00°00000(0 0 1 H° =Z
t
0 0 of Z, w?
C3 -i
1I11 II Z U) H U) J LLJ
W i0.°.. W U
I m I °01 0 3 0
W 1 •° o °0 , O ?0° Og 11 3 w z
f LUG 0.. O?? Ooh 00(l 1 ?y-? I ° o
t .? O?b . b®' o°9 I lo?Oovo
1, N
-J
?? ???-o- 00 0 0? O Ll U ] - -
? . +.
O ,
< ? 0 O° ~o2cc)oo O o
-?? f I LLJ
?. j Q
w
4r I ? ,
I -rr _ I . I
nq
3
(c,
?o
C)a
ZZ
N
CD
N o
° O
X. c

O

CDO I ' x _ ca
+
m
I
p i
a( cif
_
M I CLF
Q)
-_j w?--
v) qj N

y
p rl vi
200 Q - C
I ??NI -T?
C, ^? M
Y_.
? cz) Q
v2WW

O ?.
O e
00

i
J ? I i `

r 1
Q
lr
. Q- N
?in N_ I i a
d `n N i I N
N V ?

Q-
_
CL M a
-i
CD >- u
+ 1111 a ?
Qp

--
---- ° w z
CL
°
?
W Q m ?- J
C
( ? L
z
L

I ` ~ c
CI

CD I Q L
0
+
M I , r i
I
I
??
` ?
I
O
C)
L
o
U

I Q

O o O

°
CD I o ..
+ I u? x >
`n I N Ln
I
I
om
it m
CDo

°
CD
C) ua
Z Z

N
N
N a

? x

? r ? f^•2 n

J

a% ? u

ca ? ? = FM

t?-
C°1
u

O
w
N_
Z
J Q U
2
Z w Cr
o LL ? a
z cn, w
w w w Lo -i
U
J H3
w z O
3 w w
O o
}
r
••
r
• r
om
C)a
7Z
6:.1
U
O
Ln
O
Ln
N -
09'L? JN/ / r7J.tvir
11 ,` ?'?? I ? x w
CY) 3c
l " .^ c/',
?. Q cr_
v
I I -i I, I I O ??B 7? C)
it I I I i I c Jj i Cl-
I
I I I ? I ?? I- .l s I
III I ??I ''I
co cC3
II I 1?? ?I
it I II ?;l? I? ? ?
I i I ?I -
I I II I?!I `"? I
I _ I / ! cry
I .I
Lij I I I II
LLJ
N
ILL ¢ w<1
?-' w
?I I I I I' I Y
I I 'I I LL,
w WU
I = I N C
' R ; ` ' ?I 4 2c 7ti J •
I I? ? I, i ?1 `r ? •
` I ?I I.i; I I "-'
Oco
C) <1
Cn
N
STAT?
?, s
STATE, (w NORTI I CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES 13. 1IUNT JR. P.0 BOX 25201. RA1.1:1611. N.C. 27011-5201 DAVID M(VOY
GoviANOR sl-ul l m,
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit I lead
Consultant Unite
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist tll$
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Federal
Highway Administration (FI IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion of the
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as ?nuch as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
]'he study area lies entirely %whln the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The
previously submitted CE assigned an incorrect DEN1 Index No. for Little River. "I'he
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification fir Little River and its
tributaries (DI:M Index No. 13-?5-(19.5), [07/01/730 is "(-'lass C". l)nnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they floxv,
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, %Nildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. I Iydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (11QW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-II), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of28 February 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaee/us lencocelihalus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser brevirosirtan), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Mcoicles
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysinrcrchia asl)erulaelblia), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhos ntichausii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of"No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeetas leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: I 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding Find.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. F,aglc nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source fir bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. "There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a hali'mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed projeo.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI 1P) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI IP) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Ilead
File: B-2608
4
JAMES B. Hinv'r JR.
GoVERNOR
w 01Q3
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
August 4, 2000
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
DAVID MCCoY
ETARY

Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000.
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31,
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00.
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.
( / ;YL)
als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
?I
S?
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
u>
CT ..
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX'. 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBS/TE WWW.D0H.D0T.STATE.NC.L1S RALEIGH, NC
rn
C7 -<
E-1
rn
0 -A
r

qhn tvni 1 U l f
w_
STATE or- NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. 130x 25201. RALFIGt?. N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SeCRGTARI'
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of?Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73. Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3). State Project No. 8.1 ~81001.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectiti .
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam. therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge, to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders, deck,
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material, to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
'T'ile existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
temporarily filling 21 17 yd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class 11 riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all Unused materials off-site.
THREA'T'ENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Hciliaeetus lettcoc•ephalits), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser hrei,irostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
j William D. Gilmore. P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
001032
DEM ID:
. :; 7CTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT 4) :NUP 23 & 33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS
P.O. Box 25201
SUBDIVISION NAME:
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3.- TELEPHONE NUMBER .(HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
I
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
Little River & Little River
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER 0
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 40
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
2
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF' WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will,
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIE
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nort
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [X] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A_SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
1'N N '

fTi t ?S

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor '
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo
.June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than ]0'x10'. if'possihlc, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegctate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
JUnc 1), 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. [f culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bcd.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDO"I' should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April 1 and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
j 77
Ic,
ter-:'
O ,
\ s?\
-?
l? r?? -
°lDjh
cr-
O ai ?.°
Lid
Lr-
Cv
C/ S o-
CC) 0 ° 7I b
n
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 'OF HIGHWAYS
I{ICHDIOND CDL'NT`9'
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (11-2608)
N(1 % 1)
11 ;IWEEN SR 1151-) AND I15=
till1,l;"1' nl 13 5/24/00
V-? C'YN
4 ?
m ?
'^ d
m cr
?m
a?
? a
? W W
I r
I I 1
W

P-1 V 1
Lin
?SS7

dsti? I
Lki
;?
I F-
7

?? ?i
URA RNER
piERF(DM
II
?

N II H

? II ?

?
R_-
P

-fill

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIN71SION OF HIGHWAYS

/
I + + RICHMOND COUNTY
? ? d
PId'•CJEC "J": 8.1581001 (B-2b08)
NC' 73)
BETWHEIN SR 1155 AND I1S,!

LEGEND
---- rlLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
LIVE STAKES
ti
L WETLAND C2D BOUL DER
DENOTES FILL IN -- - COIR FIBER ROLLS
WETLAND
O ADJAC ENT PROPERTY OWNER
DENOTES FILL IN O R PARCEL NUMBER
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED BRIDGE
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
•
• DENOTES MECHANIZED

•
•• • • •
CLEARING ,
SINGLE TREE
?- -_.
FLOW DIRECTION

WOODS LINE
TB
?- TOP OF BANK
WE
DRAINAGE INLET
---------- EDGE OF WATER
- -? - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT ROOTWAD
- - F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
---?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY- f f I f I I! I i VANE
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
--PL--- PROPERTY LINE RIP RAP

- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
BUFFER ZONE BUFFER ZONE
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED ------
PLANT BOUNDARY
---- ----- -- WATER SURFACE
N. C.
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
D IVISION OF I-IIGI-IWAYS
RICHINIONI) C',OUN'I'Y
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (B-2800)
N (v 1
I l-'-l Vl-'l?N SR 1155 AN1) ll;>'
S:FI]?l;'1" 0 Ol I.> 5/24/00
NAIME, AND ADDRESS
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
191 PEACHTREE ST.
TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA 30303
N. C. DEPT.OF 'FRANSPORTATD
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNT`)'
PROJF,CT: 8.1581001 (13-2608)
N'U ? o
BE"I WE'EIN SR 1155 AND 115-
SHEEIT % 01' 1,; 5/24/(

0
0

? z
?
oC 7_.
?

z ?
00
?
a 00
w
Q

CL ?

g g LL O

O z .z ?
U
w
? ? ,? ,
H o z w
ti w .?
O
3
W U

0
U
Q tn
? z

cr-

6 O O

F?

p O
`

1 D ZZ
N
?SE W V
O
O
Ln

N
iiRl
O

N p
O
?
?

V
?
N
gv

O
p rn O O C) Q) ao 0 0)

co o ?
O V
O
U 3 p

Q ?
o

Q _
? `O ? U
a v p o a•
N Ol P Ql
N?

W

o?
o? ,o
ko ? o g a g ;
Q) Ln Ln ?N
?C)
Stn "gy p ? p N O ? p N p r?1 0 Ln
? O v?
v Q WT ?
U N ?
V1 m ?0
Wyj CL
V1P

o O O
- O
Q:-
?O
p
\
a E 4O
+
O Ln
+ O
N
R Qb
0) u?
cV u pp
0 pp
O
W a

* O

O tl

O
o
v
N +
N
N
N
co
Ln
^
+
W
N
O
r?
N N N N ? ^l r'l P P P

N
r?
^?
P
Ln
?o F
O
F--
1? I
4?3 ti /j I ?
I
co
CD.
I?
?I Ill ?
? I V
III
v?
I?
I
o
I I
Q
?I
a / I I
LtJ zl I I I I
?` i' I I I
??II I
i -f It I
lv?y
'i
1 CD
6:,-
U
v
I I
Z co
J
W
Qmcn
J
O
C),)
CCL
7z
i
a
E?
?x
J
U?
z
x
I I
RIVER

1
z
J
J z
?Z
z Q
Q N J
-
J LLI1 W
w ~03
3 z
w
0
J
J -h
O `
o-
Ln
N
0
0
0
N CD
c J 0 0

-
co

x

-

Gam`!

Ca ;? %
r l
cs,

C:.. Q

O
+ Q GH
v
N
%
I
LC)

W

oo CL OL
i
L_
Q % i
cr
'"
W u 0
0?a U

CD \
m °O
00 Q
od U-i

N

??1

w
¢

iJ
oa
8
00 0°
N l o°°
Q o
3 ~ 3

a 00 °q

0000
?
?od
w
z o o

kq D
Q
? oood co
co k-'
W I a
a ,0'[ z u
V)
3 U
co

O N
a
O
N
/ L

U
.?
Q
? U
n
F
0
O -a
CD
O
+ '
N
N ?n
0
N 0o
CV O
O? C)
Ci7
?? I I I
? III
? III i
_ II I
II
_ I I
?I I I
? ?I I
CD I
11
? II I
-- I I I
II
l
II I
? II I
II
II
j I II
?U3 I I I
II I
00.20 7N17 kio_ZV N

Ili- I
??I Ill I
I I I?
I, _ ,09
I l l
? I 111=
?i N
I l I _ ? ??
I I
II?
I I II_ ?
I I I- ?
,I I l 1-
I I I ?` ? N
h
11
l I I _ ?
40-
010
00},V7
3N17

Q _

O

.. c C?

" U
I

U

I f
I
.09 I
I ? p
I w
N_
I Z
I J =:
JO U:
Z
?J 2: <
L
I z ww wL
¢ ~0 3
I J z
w z
W p W
I 3 p
I r ?
I ? «
\ O-N r w
I
L
O
LDcn
C3m - Ln
zI N
0
o
r,i ?_ ? I U? o p R??
(T1 II- I I I x L7 ...?
?C
Q
w
I
Its
I LLJ 1
I I r? i
I ? `cry I ? ? /?
LLJ
--? . ?-- J - - - - -- -- - - -- - Z Z
°Z JOZ WU?
I? I I Q W OC
Q ?Q
N I -i
CO F-
y W N? -j LL,
(nJ
W
1- o I 3 ~03 F-
I I I I _ Z O
w w
U
,I
00}LZ 3N17 N?7t?W
_ °m U
Ct m
"° -
c, a
ZZ
N

0) CX3
I W
? z OSB? ?Nl? NOldW
I? W
I_ I\ O C)
I
-
C2 ,-
------
I
w C a 0 }
r .
i? j J OIWOO
, CI)
' Rol 0
C

r?• ?_" .
L , rte-. ',Xi / ? .?.
J U,
f
ca

"U
z

Ii 1 "_ r•v _ _T_
41
p cn
000. °
I?- v°°°•0°:0O?Ci S-
° r?
0 000 our J
tl °
' ?0 0. off 000 QD i o N
g
- ?' 0-000 °00 Z
w 00°00° o00 00( g ??2;
0 w?
0 LL <r
LVL), LL,
0 3 ~
?- Q 00 0 0° 0g °
I Z
3 w°
W z ' 0•° 00?, 0(1 Co 01 i ? ° 0
r J ?'o?o o O, o®to,11 0 00 J '?r
U , o . r.
Ti
&Cp l08?Oo O of
3
I? I F? I NL-i
n4
om
-7 C)cr CF)
C>a
o
ZZ
+r•
o V)
0
Ln
N
O
N CD
CD CD

/ O
CV
Q

O
U _
x
C7
+ I `f? o =

?

N
m
Ovq vi

%

U
?

o
a

??

I 200
?WN? .., c

I V):?Q
I ?o?
U2WW z
F ®
e
~ C?
I ^10
O
--
id
00
I
?

J ? I I ?
PV) ----- Q

0
V41? I U °
I
b W
u
m
o OOH U)i
a
J

7
?
p oo0
$ooq s

r~ I ( W > N -' 0 000
kq Qo 3 ooaq
!------ --
-f --
---- I I O W o O Oopo°o0d
O
p
W
V)
D O
oo
O
co
U w

' z
(n- 1
,0 ¢ i

Q

m

U
_ r
m
?! L
N
I
Q
C
L
O i
,
O
+ ,

I _ I
°
b
Ln

U
:J

I
O 0 O u
I ? F-
° I o
0
+
I
u?
x

I Om
I '7 Oo
0

O
O
O
?j UZ
Z
C\i N N N (:3-)

Ca _

Q

x Cam,

9

y? C> 9
W
UQ ?
z
W
N_
Z.
Z
J Q O
S
?p Z
U
Z
W W
p Q F Q
Z (? W
W O
Q W W
J !-
O H
W Z O
3 W w
a °
• r
J •
Ccn
Cr. m
-? ?CDo?-- ?-1
ZL
C:7
U
O
Ln
U
N

1 r, I = f)
11 a?
I I I I i t "< I ?'.'
I II ? I ilj :I? _J r I c?,
?? I III Q I ?? ??
cr-
I I I I LL), I!! I CF 0 5
III ? I! I ;' I o ? ?-`5 76
cl?
Cl-
Ci-
I I I ? I ,I =- I ,
r ;
I? I - I r ,
LLJ I I I? ? I =-
1I
Z a Lo
II I I III
o x a
-
I ji !' I ? Q ww w w
u
U I I I I I 1= 3 z 0
'I I C o LLJ
NC 41
r r
j ter- - - ? / • r
I I I? ? 1' ?1 ? I • r
1 I I I. I I I "'
I I f XII
(ICD
N
,,. STATE
STATE Or NOR-rii CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. MA 25'01_ iini.iAGI1. N.C. 27011 -iDl DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SGc lu. m'
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit I lead
Consultant Unit
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist tllP
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a l,ederal
I lighway Administration (FI IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion ofthe
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
The study area lies entirely within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. The
previously submitted CE; assigned an incorrect DEM Index No. fir Little River. The
Division of Watcr Quality (DWQ) best usage classification tier Little River and its
tributaries (DE:M Index No. 13-25-(19.5), [07/01/730 is "Class C Unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. I lydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (11QW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-11), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (LO mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed "Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Huliaeents lellcocephulus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser hrei,iroslruni), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoicles
borealis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysinwchiu us7)er1dcie ulia), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhos michuuxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Halioeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 11 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the surrounding land.
1-luman disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. L'agle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat ?n the form of' large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed pro.1"t.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 nil (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI 11)) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Head
File: B-2608

a „a SCAT[
c1032
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT .IR.
GOVERNOR
August 4, 2000
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
WETLANDS GROUP
_,,.,,, WATER Q11"t ITV SFCTI
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000.
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31,
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00.
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.
(?ft)
als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
o -

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
? -v
C
rn
rn
rn z
p -i
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWW. DOH.DOT. STATE. NC. US RALEIGH, NC
,...??nv ?hn ?rn?7 V L
•? PMV..?• fy
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALFIG11. N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2000
LI.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.1 581001.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of "Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
Ulf I
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam. therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd3 (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a laver of smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge. to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders, deck,
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 ft long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in

temporarily filling 21 17 yd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class lI riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporar" wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off-site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipenser hrerirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoicles borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolicr) and Michaux's sumac (Rhzrs michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site. Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal I Iighway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore. P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS. Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
DEC IC: 'JRPS i""!'i0?1 ID:
[iTiTIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTF.P (?R.OVIDE NA1'ION`?9IDE PERMIT #) :F]UP 2' &
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
1
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
Little River & Little River
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION'
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 4(
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: FT
FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIE
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nort
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [X] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [XI NO [I
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A-SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
G`
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor¢i-rrat
Habitat Conservation Program CC
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. TIP No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo 2 June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x 10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least I foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
June 1l, 2000
multiple cells arc required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsficld design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of'sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of' structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April i and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.

At -ft-

1

-
/
1 Lf)

LLJ Ln
Ln
9. Qj
l0
a' o ?If ?t - co Lf)
r c ?i
I a ?
I
? ?i
00

E i? CNI
?a
$w
Yo

II LJLJ

II ?_
?
b
?jSS7
LLJ

71
?\ II

r-y ?? RIVER
W ERFLOM'
I I

I I LLJ
u
I

N r
II

L-Li
II ,?

R
Lli
n
y
I
w
w

? N. C. DEPT.O TRANSPOKTATIO
rr DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

rr
r, ± RICHMOND COUNTY

PROJI,"UT: 8.1581001 (I3-2f)O8)
?$ N C' 73)
3I;TWI:EN Sly 1155 AND 115,!

SHHH'.1' 2 OF 13
LEGEND
--WEB WETLAND BOUNDARY
LIVE STAKES

L WETLAND C? BOULDER
DENOTES FILL IN - -- COIR FIBER ROLLS
WETLAND
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
DENOTES FILL IN OR PARCEL NUMBER
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES FILL IN PROPOSED BRIDGE
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
DENOTES EXCAVATION
® IN WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
•
•• • • • CLEARING
SINGLE TREE
?-- -AQ FLOW DIRECTION
WOODS LINE
TB
T_ TOP OF BANK

WE DRAINAGE INLET
-
--- EDGE OF WATER
--C - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT ROOTWAD
- - F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY- f f f I III i VANE
--NG- - NATURAL GROUND
--PL-- PROPERTY LINE RIP RAP

- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
ONE
BUFFER Z BUFFER ZONE
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED --
-
PLANT BOUNDARY
----??----- -- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEFT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HMHWAYS
RICHMOND (',{AUNT'!'
hRD.IECT: 8.1561001 (I3-280(;)
M-'TlCI?GN SR 1155 AM) 1151.
S:?I l':l;"C 3 O . 15 S / 24 / 00

Nr'\.'*7E AND
OWNER'S N.?ME 0'", NER
ADDRESS
ADDRESS

TIAA TIMBERLAND 11, LLC 191 PEACHTREE ST.
24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA.30303

?I
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTAT;
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMC)ND COUNTY
PROJECT:JJ8.1, 181001 (I3-2608)
;`a, 1 u?
13F,T1 EEIN SR 11;55 AND 11
SH]:E"1' n]' 13 5/24/
D
00
0
z
g ? ?, c .? ca
*Ilk

?? n z
v

00

Q b
?, o
z
gg oz U
w w
? E ` ?; o ? ti w •?
W w W
j C
LLJ
U
Q ?
? z
U
o ? n tx)
O O

C LL- U

O
O
= ?
?i

o I?
J LL- o
p O
`
?
k

Q u o ° '
4 q LO
O
NZ Q2 0 1 O cV O N Ln Q 0.? vi O

o O
v
?30
?

? O ? U
X3 7 Ql R Ol

I? 0
W

??

c°

? W

? v g ^i rLnj ir1
Ln

o

o kN

o
?
3 ? "? O ? O N O O N O „? O L n v
?
J
W
?? 2
y
L V) ¢
?WW Q
(nP

O J O O 0 O
C) \
lz- O ?1 p O ul ?l ul p
61 pp
0. a O O

? ? N N N N N N N N 03 Lf) rl_ ? v vi a

N l ^? P fl 1D O
s? I
_- 1
43 //I I
CID I Ili \7
? I V
I
I
tQ
I?
I?
I?
IW
?" to
Q
?I
W
j
afil II
LtJ ?? ? I I I
??? I I I I
?? I I I
i ?f I I I
00+''2 -3N/7
Hj1 yiy
G
U?
z
v
L
J ? L
U 9 ?
RIVER
ow
CX3
rn
!?, c?(,D
Wz?
J
OJLU
J
LLJ
lLJ Q
J O
C) (T)
?CDm
CDo
a
ZL
0
0
_C)

C"i 0 0
CXD O

Q r J .,i
v, J Q c ??

C) --
M
o
+
I Ca
U ,
v
N
I
Ln

W

in
e o0 CD
1-
m
?
\ 3 J N ?MPL i ?
\ 0 L
op Ln 00
000d u
+

N \

~ ¢

uw 2 $ood,
oo
00 p

?a
O o o
Q o 3 oooq
000
(L-Lin 0 o ooo O l o
oood w P
?
Q 00001 co r")
CL I w
lll k'-

W yyy
z
0' I

3 U VO
m

O cn

+
0 2
/
v

N
N -
J
/ L

?
CD LE O F
o O
N ?•
+
N I
I N
0
N 0 0 0

C i Q? 0
00
0
? ??-

Q r
CG
C)c

F U
e
" C) L
i
®? ® U ?7.

CD
CUB
00.20 3N17 1-101Vn
OO?Z 31V17 ---?

?

-- o
W
Z N
Z

J Q
=?
?O U.
Z
W W(
J ?
O
Z ?F-
WW

Q
03 WI
F
-I
~ Z O
Z
W W
? W
?

? J
-?
J O
r
+
r
r
nm
?CrCD
Q
zZ
0
Ln
0
N
0
7-7 ?11
?7 r S I i, 7 .. U c C?
r II 1 I I 4 x
I' x x
I`- I ?f, I a x ti `
?, U q ?
I I CA L
I i` I Imo` a
I
LLJ I
1;3 1
I I I 4V
j cb
11
Ili - -
CY,
- I -- --
? O
> Z LLJ
-- - O J = Z
,.,
I I Z J Oz Lw ?
= a W
v, I I -i ¢ f
C) N y W Ww NJ
I I 3 ~03 0U
I I I I Z
W Z
I I J°
? 1= I 7 I ?. . .
,III I ?' I L)
I o Ln
OO+LZ -3N17 N ?1 b `V
LD U
Cr CD
CD O
tea
ZZ
N

rn?
u <D
JNO HOldW
w I? w
oo I I

m
Y `-
I Q
Q- ,
-
?I
Z
0
- I W
l
°
o
o
?
Q p ?' -
Ll-
0
o
o ?
F# LITTLE ER -
OVFRFLON
v I IOO. 000, O'
cy) 00 0.
rn rn 00.0 000 U 4
l)l
n
?0 0.0o 000 Qc0 1
I
l
,0°000°00 Og I
0
W 00`00 0 0 0 0 0 -X.
0 1-
7
? ? I\ ae ao I
0 11
0 ndJ
1
Q 0 0 0 0 °t5 I I
z

x

a
n

x k:

r.

10

> ?. .?`
71
7.

Lr)
?J
Ol P

v o
W
D
O N
O
?: Q
J
0 T-

U
z W
g o
z g
cn F
Q W W
J
H 3 W

~
F-
W O
z
Og 11 o
° 0 3
?Ll I° z
lLl 00 00T 1 I o
O?b b®°9
00 I o?0? .
° ° o o -J
Q p fir-- -- ?Qo .
V o 6 +I
&X6 0
OODOOOOOl I ? r I W
r? Ii'; I W
n4
o? o
?o
ua
ZZ
N

N CD O
/ °o
N

4- FF
CA
rf.-?
L7
CL LLJ
O W Q
U)
:
. I'D Zt _
I Z
?WNI? ? .Ti :?
y M
V) 't
? C)
vaww F cT

CD Ca
O
+
OO u

I ?
LQ
P I ?
I

Lq V) c:
V
N
?
I I cr
cr
_
U N F?
i
00

Lo
c.W
N Ob
i C?? I

1

W

co oooood
000d Q

-i
u ,
M I i IImo,, 111
W a
?- L*j =
-? O f
__----1
l r _
Op Q
3 ~ 3
r
------ --
-t---

---- `
, I
? O W
°
(n Z
a_

0

i W i

Q 0 o
L) CL
<
FA
LLJ

' z

I I
,0 a
III
F
II
?
m
U O
r
? ?

O I I
I
v
O
+
I
I I
O
O
e a

:J
I N ?

I J
? V)
I
O O O Q
I ? H
O I O C
O
+
I
?,
x
>
,`f', I N Ln
om
I -c CD o -___-?
CDo

O
O
O
O zz
CV
N
N O
N (TI

Q _

v;
? U 9
-1
Ga ? ? w €
G ?

L
u
C/

L-r-)
r?rmJ
O
W
N
.Z
Z
Q
J = ?
?O UZ WC
O LLa f<
Z (n L
ww WC
J F- 3
O
W Z O
3 w W
0 O O
0 J •
• w
••
J '
•
Om
cr m
zz
O
Ln
O
lf?
N
09-Pi -?(Nl I C"1J1vil
{{
UPI' I ? I
I Ii ? I
II I
II I I
U-I
I? ' I
I? ? I
I? I
-, I I
?I I
v III I
II I
I I I
Ij I
II
I I
?I I
?I I
I I I
I I
;? I I
I
I I i
I I
I
??I I
III
R
F-r I
I I I
I ? I
= I I I??
i I
I I ?
III
?I
l
-,
i ! I' llS I
it ? I? I M _
Q J
I
o jE 7F
o f I it I ?? .1 ? ? I
I I
I I I u
I? ! I CD a
I I ? I ?/ l
N
{ - Z Z
QLO
'i I CIE J ° U Z
Z W [L
I? = O WQ ?Q
W
I? it I J ?W WO
l I r-W? ?I 3 z 3 O
I! I ?, Wo
?I!I NC •
I' 2c 75 / J
? J •
?II I , ? I » •
U
Ln
II r am
' I v !, I --ZO N
?,,. STA)?
J IW.o ..y r??a
STA"IT or NORTI I CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. I?IUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25'_01. RAH AGII. N.C. '7(,I I -i'_UI DAVID MCCOY
GOVIAMOt SIA'Iti- m lo,
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Toni Kendig, Unit I lead
Consultant Unit
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist t )l`
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJECT: Water resources and protected species review for a Federal
I lighway Administration (1`I1WA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. 13-2608; State Project No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. I3RSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion of the
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
']'he study area lies entirely x4ithin the Yadkin-Pec Dee River Basin. The
previous])' submitted CF, assigned an incorrect DEM Index No. li)r Little River. The
Division of' Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification tier Little River and its
tributaries (DFM Index No. 13-25-(19.5), 107/01/73]) is "Class C". unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. I lydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities ol'this water resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (IIQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-11), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants a?ul animals with federal classifications of'Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed "Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of'Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Dish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (llciliaeelus leucocel)hulus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostruni), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (f'icurcles
borectlis), rough-leaved loosestrife (Lysimuchitt crsl)erultielblia), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhus ?nichuuxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of "No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeetus lerncocephalus (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: I 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open vieNy of the surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. :agle nests
are approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. "There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half mile, with a clear flight path to water, of the proposed project.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI-IP) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences 'of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 km) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNT11') database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit Head
File: B-2608
l
STATE, OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
C iovGRNOR
August 4, 2000
DAVID MCCoY
SECRFI'ARY
Mr. John Dorney
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/ Wetlands ,JIli?
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 WMR tlA I S CTION
Subject: 401 Certification for the Replacement of Bridges No. 4 & 27 over Little River
& Little River Overflow on NC 73, Richmond County TIP No. B-2806.
Dear Mr. Dorney:
The permit application for the subject project was originally sent June 14, 2000. rri
However, NCDOT did not send the required 401 Certification fee of $475.00 nor seven rn
copies of the application. Per a phone conversation with Mr. John Hennessy, on July 31, rC r-TI
2000, I am sending seven copies of the permit application and the check for of $475.00. q --.t
By this letter, NCDOT is requesting the 401 Certification. This project has a let date of
October 2000. In order to meet the let date, NCDOT must have the 401 Certification by
August 28, 2000. Thank you for your cooperation with this project. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith at (919) 733-
0374.

als/WDG
Attachment
Sincerely,
""'J, I .

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Mr. Dave Schiller, Natural Systems Unit Head
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone]
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE: WWWDOH. DOT. STATE. NG.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH, NC
J?nn ?rn? 7
. d,,. SiATT a,
STATF OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIC}1. N.C. 27011-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GoVFRNOR SECRETARY
June 14, 2000
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTENTION: Mr. Dave Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: NWP 23 & 33 request for Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little
River and Little River Overflow on NC 73. Richmond County, F.A.
Project No. BRSTP-73 (3), State Project No. 8.1 581001.
TIP No. B-2608.
Dear Sir:
Attached is a copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Water Resources and Protected
Species Update Memorandum, permit drawings and Pre-construction Notification (PCN)
for the subject project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace Bridge Nos. 4 and 27 with new bridges on new location and
reconstruct the roadway south of the existing roadway. Bridge No. 4, over Little River,
will be replaced with a bridge approximately 260.9 ft long. Bridge No. 27, over Little
River Overflow, will be replaced with a bridge approximately 247.1 ft long. Both bridges
will be 32.0 ft wide. Approach work will extend approximately 700.0 ft on the west side
and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project. The roadway approaches will be 32.0 ft
wide. The shoulder width will be widened where guardrail is used. Traffic will be
maintained on the existing bridges during construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
• No in-stream activities will take place from April 1 to May 31, due to the spawning of
bass and sunfish.
Ul I 1
• All applicable Best Management Practices and "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" will be included and properly maintained during project construction.
• Wet concrete must not be allowed to enter surface waters directly or indirectly.
The CE states that NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passages
will be adhered to for this project. However, Mr. David Cox. from the Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC), stated on 09 June 2000 that this project is located above
Blewett Falls Dam, therefore the anadromous fish passage guidelines will not be required.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.
Surface Water Impacts
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. have increased since the completion of the CE. Little River
[(DWQ Index No. 13-25-(19.5)] and Little River Overflow have a best usage
classification of "Class C". Surface water impacts will occur from the construction of a
temporary causeway in the Little River and bridge demolition. Construction of the
causeway will result in the temporary filling of 193 yd' (an area of 0.04 ac) in the Little
River. The causeway will consist of Class II riprap topped with a laver of' smaller Class
B riprap. All temporary fill material will be removed after construction of the
replacement bridge. to the extent possible, without significant disturbance to the stream
bottom.
The existing Bridge No. 4 was completed in 1950. It consists of five spans and is 212.0 ft
long and 26.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete girders, deck.
and railings. The substructure consists of reinforced concrete caps on reinforced concrete
columns with webs. The bridge rails will be removed without dropping them into Waters
of the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck and substructure. totaling 184
yd' of material. to be dropped into the Waters of the U.S. during construction.
The existing Bridge No. 27 was completed in 1929. It consists of eight spans and is
138.0 It long and 23.0 ft wide. The superstructure consists of reinforced concrete deck
and railings on timber joists. The substructure consists of timber caps on timber piles.
The bridge rails and substructure will be removed without dropping them into Waters of
the U.S. There is potential for components of the deck to be dropped into the Waters of
the U.S. during construction. The resulting temporary fill associated with the concrete
deck is approximately 75 yd'. Coupled with Bridge No. 4, there is potential for a total of
approximately 259 yd' of temporary fill to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during
bridge removal, however none is anticipated.
Wetland Impacts
Jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.4 ac, comprised of 1.2 ac of permanent impacts (fill
and method III mechanized clearing) and 0.2 ac of temporary impacts. A causeway will
also be used during construction of the Little River Overflow bridge and will result in
temporarily filling 21 17 yd ' (an area of 0.2 ac) of wetlands. The causeway will consist
of Class II riprap topped with a layer of smaller Class B riprap. In order to minimize
temporary wetland impacts, all temporary fill will be placed on geo-textile fabric and the
area restored to its original contour and replanted with the appropriate vegetation.
RESTORATION PLAN
1. Restoration Plan: The materials used as temporary fill in the construction of the
causeway will be removed. Reference elevations will be taken prior to construction,
and the temporary fill areas will be graded back to the original contours. The affected
area will then be revegetated with the appropriate vegetation.
2. Restoration Schedule: The project schedule currently calls for a September 19, 2000
letting date with an availability date of October 30, 2000. It is expected that the
contractor will begin the construction of the causeway at that time. Following the
completion of the bridge substructure, the contractor will remove the temporary
causeway. The estimated construction times indicate that the causeway will need to
remain in place for approximately fifteen months.
3. Disposal Plan: The contractor will use excavating equipment to remove the riprap
used for the temporary causeway. After the causeway is no longer required, all
material placed in the creek will be removed and become the property of the
contractor. The contractor will be required to submit a reclamation plan for removal
of and the disposal of all unused materials off site.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E). Threatened (T).
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. as amended. As of
28 February 2000. the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five federally protected
species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Hctliaeetus lencocephalus), shortnose sturgeon
(Acipensei- hrei,irostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), rough-
leaved loosestrife (Lysimuchia asperulaefolia) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
As documented in the CE and the Water Resources and Protected Species memo,
Biological Conclusions of "No Effect" have been rendered for all of these species. An
additional review of the NC Natural Heritage Program database of rare species and
unique habitats on 24 May 2000 revealed that no known occurrences of any federally
protected species occur within one mile of the project area. Therefore, project
construction will not affect these species.
COMPENSATORY WETLAND MITIGATION
Permanent jurisdictional wetland impacts total 1.2 ac. Mitigation in the form of
preservation, at a ratio of 5:1, will be used to partially satisfy mitigation requirements.
The NCDOT mitigation site, Gibson Pond, consists of bottomland' hardwood preservation
and is located in Richmond County. We have also requested mitigation in the form of 1:1
restoration, including 0.06 ac of riparian and 1.14 ac of nonriparian wetlands, from the
North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program and will forward their acceptance letter
upon receipt.
This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
programmatic "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed
under a Nationwide 23 and Nationwide 33 in accordance with the Federal Register of
March 9, 2000, Part VII, Vol. 65, No. 47, Pages 12817-12899. By copy of this letter, the
appropriate 401 Water Quality Certification is requested from the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Lynn Smith
at [phone].
Sincerely,
_5?j William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
BOE/als
cc: w/ attachment
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorsey. Division of Water Quality
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. Tim Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Bill Rosser, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Ms. Nancy Campanella, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
DEM
I!i'1TIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED ( P!,OVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT 0) :M,11) 23 & 33
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET).
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NCDOT/Project Development & Environmental Analysis
2. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC
SUBDIVISION NAME:
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little
River Overflow on NC 73
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Richmond NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Ellerbe
I
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:
Overflow (DWQ Index #13-25-(19.5))
RIVER BASIN: Yadkin-Pee Dee
Little River & Little River
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [X] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)?YES[ ] NO[X]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION`
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER C
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 4(
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [X] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE:
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 1.2 (temporary & permanent) EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER: 0.2 (Mechanized Clearing)
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 1.4
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER:
FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours):
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER:
FT
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL:
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: Construction of causeway resulting in 193 CY of temporary fill
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 112" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Replace bridges over Little River and Little River Overflow
with new bridges south of the existing roadway. The Little River bridge
will be approx. 260.9' X 32.0' and the overflow bridge will be approx.
247.1' X 32.01. Approach work will extend approx. 700.0 ft on the west
side and 3100.0 ft on the east side of the project and will consist of
two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders. Shoulder width will be widened by
3.28' where guardrail is used. The causeway used at Little River will
include 193 CY of Class B and Class II riprap. The causeway used for
Little River Overflow will include 2117 CY of the same riprap.
Mechanical equipment used will consist of heavy duty excavation
equipment. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridges during
construction.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Replace Bridge Nos. 4 & 27 on new location
(Public Transportaion)
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRI
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): The existing alignment is being straightened because of
safety concerns. Wetlands are extensive on the south side of the
existing alignment. A historical property is located north of the
existing alignment, therefore project construction could not occur nor
of existing alignment.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE US:
OF PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [XI NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES-THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [X] NO [ ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [XI NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21,
26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS
50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Forested
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A.SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
c
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
c

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Lynn Smith, Project Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor¢ittat
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: June 9, 2000
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacement in Richmond County, North Carolina. "I'II' No.
B-2608.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
Bridge Memo
June 9, 2000
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible. when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
Bridge Memo
.lunc 9, 2000
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsf field design). This could be
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of,scdiments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells arc used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bcd.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-2608 - Richmond County - NC 73 bridges over the Little River and the Little River
overflow. The Little River supports a good fishery for largemouth bass and other sunfish. No
in-water work should be performed between April I and May 31 to protect sunfish egg and
fry stages from sedimentation.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
r ,
? '\ Y
I rl_ A
2 i
cr: ? ' , I cr -1, ' f? -_?-
CDI
\ ?? 6, 83' ?? L Af
\ ?/? ?? rZ
ol s, n S /l
OIDJJV
C7 l
O -? _ P IJ
Ln i- =
O Ln ?!3N _ nl r.
i
CO g N N
O
N
-LD
-1
U i tr L j? cam, ? rv
L-Li
cr-
Q- (1
co?
.1
Ni. C. DEIST. (C)F TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 'OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJI;C'T: 8.1581001 (13-2608)
Nu %>
M,'TWE.E,\ SH 1155 AND 115-'
SNI;I;"1" 1 DF 15 5/24/00

d
m
W
a
i ?

N
W
I?

N. C. DEP T. O TRANSPORTATID
DIVISION OF HIGI-iIVAYS
. RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1581001 (11-2608)
NU 73
R1;TWE EIN SR 1155 AND 11;5
SH1?F".I' 2 OF 13 5/ 2
LEGEND
---- WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
s WETLAND
L
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•+ CLEARING
- -r FLOW DIRECTION
TB
T_ TOP OF BANK
- WE_ - EDGE OF WATER
--? - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- - F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY-
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- -PL - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
----U----- -- WATER SURFACE
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
f I I I I I I i VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
BUFFER ZONE BUFFER ZONE
N. C. DEFT. X01' TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RIC'HDiCOND ('.OUN'FY
PR0JE,('T: 8.1581001 (I3-280L)
73)
A1;7"11'I;l;A Sl( ll;i5 r1N1J I15?'
5H1?1?'I" :? OF 15 5/24/00
NAME AND
OWNER'S NAME kDDRESS
ADDRESS

TIAA TIMBERLAND II, LLC 191 PEACHTREE ST.
24TH FL MC 201
ALANTA GA 30303

I'
N. C. DEFT.OF TR.-kNSPORTAT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJF,CT: 8.1581001 (B-2608
N'(_% /a)
BETWP'EIN SR 1155 AND 11
SHBJ."T -' nF 13 5/24/
I1C

Ol

o 0
? o

W U ?' C Q

o ? ? ? Q o
?
: c U?
cr ? x

IZ)
o
Z
gg oz w
w
? ? F? N
?
' U
? O 3
cr-- ` ? a F
Q
U
Q ?
Z4
LQ Lr)

Q °

o Q Q
P

Ll- ~ O O
Qz

Ln

a?
LL-
o 0

"O'er O U) X o 8 ? o ga
g o o
to
U 01
? 4
O n
O
O
O Ln
O
O 0)O
?
?

o
3 V)
1

? O ? U
X3
° V'
? Ol
N V' Ql
N
0 O LQ
o
ti m rn
W

ro z
-o2 ?
%0 ?
g O ?
v
8 a
8 g
^Z e,
o ?
N Ln
"'
O
O ?N
W 31n O , p
O N O O N O r?j O ti O v?

N
L

o O C.3 O J ti O O
? o Ln -3 N U-) L., 8 8 00

lij N
N n-?
N r?
N V
N
N W
N p?
N Co
N 00
cv ul
"l r-
"? Qo
"'? N
v lp
v r-
v

N
??
v n
p
0

Sly/7 W
I=
?_ - J I I I I I/ `
Z?j,I ?? II If 3 //
??too0?CC o c
? j I I I W
? ; I I? 1
W I? f
I
? jo ?! ;fi I
? I °I I
w
I? I I Q I _ a -?-_
I cl- - . ?
QI
I I ?w lI
-? Ir
-Lj
I
II u 1 L
w?,I I I I Ij l I-t?
?I I i I I I I ,?--
IfI
??? I I I I J IIII
'C II I I Ili l?
?? .f I I I I I ? i I,_.
d ,b
?08

LITTLE R IV E R
V
.?
0
V)
C-)

Q _

o `"

z
C
rn
wz00
ci-
° LL,
°
? m ?
LLJ
LLj Q
Z_-
O(T)
(1:(r)
c)O
ZZ
0
0
0 00 0 0 /o 00
N c,i CT)
I F5 r ,? q
I u C)
.?
O c?
+
Q. ? T
N I
Ln
un
w
W
in 00
?\ 3 J N P?PL I m
Ln C:
H Qo?'a
00 0
C) CD 0 C:
CD Ln
000d U-i
$Ooq
j _ I--- w
L*i 1: °c08
N ?? a 00 ?.,
000
Q y 3 o1
°z 0 002,000V o v?
\ 3 pOO°
12 0008 w
Q a'Od m .? su
CS? u -a ? Z
m -,
W I a ,0'l a uk
N m UJ .
m u
3
cn
o
+ J
O Z / U
N
N
/ L 0
U
CD ?E O o O
CD N
cv ' ?n
I N Ln
o
0 0 O 0
N m 00
N
V
? II
j i
I I I
CD III
III
0 III
_ II I
CD I?
II
jl I
'D 31
?I
til
CD II
,C?? I I
`l f,
I I I
II
II I
r? I I
'V? I I I
II
II
? II
I
c II
0020 -3N17 N ?1 d?V
00-t'Z 3N17
H01 viy
a
lam, [
u
.Z+ t
J ?
JO ?
?Z
J
O H
Z LL1 W
F- F
J C
F- Z W W
? V
3 C
r
J r
0
Ln -
o-
om
CD0
ua N
zl
Q
?f
Q r
? Cn
® 'lX-
E? .?
Un
U ?
x .
ell .?
E^ C1
p ?? 7
L7
ti
Q ao
J
0
o ?? O
1 I I _ .-r
V I I I Q 0 J
z ' C)
I ? I ? I
11<
I11? I ? ? J 41
I^cb
li (D-
111 _ - ?,
LLJ
- - - z N
_ _ I I n 2
I I Z
a ?? u?
1-1 1i- ?¢ W?
Q
V I I -j
I- 0 y W W~ ,W
I? o I I 3 03 ~U
II I I Z o
W Z
W
# I. I I N -' o
"D I I . .
r ?
it 10
_ I i I O
I Ln
r
00.20 3N17 H01 b W
0
?m
?n
Ua
ZZ
N -
U
Q> CO
n
LQ z 05+8? JNO NOldW
L IJ
C)
j C
M
Y a
Q R
I
CL
Lj Z
j oWOO PRF
I'K
I
fi
I
I
I
I?
V? ;
14
?CD
I 4"

rum
01

U
U
Z
r
J ?
J O ?
Z U
O Q
Z ?F
U
a ww
U
J H 3
O F
F
W Z C
3 w U
O C
J
R NY
Y
O
L-
C? -
L
N
Q
r? a
F' 9
7_. 1z1,
fit{ ? nL1
7_.
x
,
k21 '°°
t=•

n

om
C C)
C
C-a
ZZ
C>

`? O
° CD
0?

r O

o
.
J

CD
Q

?- _
0-1 C)
\

Lki
Q- Q-
o m 9
~ 6,
N
?
t r? .J ^

x

r
z
o o .
I ?~O ?^' "ter aC
cr,
_
U 2 W W ti x ?? Ca -'

CD
~
CD
+
"
°°' j 7 `r,

P

J ? I I \
VLq ? Q
r. N
? I
d ?, N I ? ? Q N°??P
U o
°?
X14 W I I'
CL
m o

O

a

r'P?

?N?? I
W
F-w
11 OOOCI
p
Oopp
?
U
u

t`?

I

I I
'
W

u

-y
O ;

000
00 ?

?'
?
rnr? Q o
3~ _
3 000-
0
OO
r
_-_--- --
-}---

----
I i I
?'
O
W 2
0
~ Oo
Q
00 od
\y
W I 1-4 ood
3 I I ? U ? ? \ w ? ?
\ Z
_
_ Cl]
U)
I
O I I
I
U .?
O
+
M I i r i

I
I

??
` 'Lor

I

O

O
L

`C m
J
I ?

F Ln

I
O o o

O I Q C
O
+
I
??
x
Ln
N
Ln
I ?m
CDC,

O
O
O
C7 - UQ
Z7
CV
N
Cv O
N Q)

? x
r
,

c
F A f C G
Q
L M ,Lr ti G++

U ?

LO
P-'
c
Li
N
z
-- z
a
J =
O c
Q LL
O
Z (n F -
<E LLJ U.
J F 3 LL
f O
W z C
3 Lit z
O LL
•
O
Lr) _
C?) -
Om
G- c)Z
7_
L-n
N
09'Yi ?N? l rl,)1vir
1
I I i II ? ,?
}r? I I f I Imo`
?/I I I I I i I,, II I ,lN
I I -
I ?I i I'I ,• I -
`I it I I I I' ?II ??a
I iI I r
I' I I I I I C I `li.
.I I I ? ? I I I' _
i
II j I Lij I c3
VIII I'i ?I
I I I ?; I
III I ?I ;III,
I I cri I ? I ?,??s
? I I i l l
I I ? I -
j l I jl I CD
I I I I
;i -
I
I I I ?I ? '; I
I
CD
? I I I I'?il?
? I I I?' I
CD
IX,/
? I I I _ I
I \I ic?3
;'I I ??I I. ?,' I I
I I ? ?_? 1 I? I?; I
c I
III ??\ I
u
I C-
I
J I
Q
c?
i
0 I
I
I U
o V)
I o
om
--?? U m
0
Z
Zz N
I
I
LLJ
W _ N
CIE 'iJ r Z Z
CIE J = C.7
O U
~ Z W CL
o L`¢ ?a
Z N W
CIF Q H W W U
F- p 3
3 w zz
o W
0 ? o
} J
,4 ••.
I
I
Fi
J
? 0 6
? ?&7E
s
J
AT(
STATE' (n Nowri i CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES 13. 1IUNT JR. I1.0. IWX 2-5201. RAH 116IL N.C. 2701 1-5201 DAVID MCCOY
Govi:RNOR S1:('I(1, 1,vm,
May 24, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Kendig, Unit Ilead
Consultant Unit.
FROM: Lynn Smith, Natural Systems Specialist L O)
Natural Systems Unit
SUBJEC'T': Water resources and protected species review for a 1`cderal
I{ighway Administration (Fl IWA) Construction
Consultation for the Replacement of Bridge Nos. 4 & 27
over Little River & Little River Overflow on NC 73,
Richmond County, TIP No. B-2608; State Projcct No.
8.1581001; F.A. No. BRSTP-73(3).
ATTENTION: Nancy Campanella, Project Engineer
Consultant Unit
REFERENCE: (1) Categorical Exclusion (CE) prepared by Wetherill
Associates, Inc., dated January 1998.
(2) Protected Species Update prepared by NCDOT, dated
February 2000.
The following memorandum provides information to assist in the preparation of a
FHWA Construction Consultation for the proposed project. It addresses water resources
and federally-protected species potentially impacted by the project and serves to update
the previously submitted CE with respect to these two issues.
WATER RESOURCES
Jurisdictional wetland boundaries have been modified since the completion of the
CE. Consequently, wetland impacts have increased. The CE states that wetland impacts
may be as much as 0.87 acres, but actual impacts, including permanent and temporary,
total approximately 1.5 acres.
]'he study area lies entirely within the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. 'I he
previously submitted CE; assigned an incorrect DLM Index No. for Little River. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) best usage classification for Little River and its
tributaries (DEM Index No. 13-25-(19.5), 107/01/731) is "'lass C Unnamed tributaries
receive the same best usage classification as the named streams into which they flow;
therefore, Little River Overflow receives the same best usage classification as Little
River. The "Class C" classification refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. Hydrologic
characteristics and existing aquatic communities of this water resource have been
described in the referenced CE.
Neither High Quality Waters (11QW), Water Supplies (WS-1 or WS-11), nor
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project
area. No direct impacts to sensitive water resources of any kind will take place as a
result of project construction.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PI:), and Proposed "Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions
of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of 28 February 2000, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists five
protected species for Richmond County, bald eagle (Haliaeems leucocephalus), shortnose
sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum), red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picuide.s
borealis), rough-leaved loosestri(e (Ly,simachia asl?erulaefVia), and Michaux's sumac
(Rhos michauxii). Bald eagle has been added to the list since the completion of the CE.
Descriptions and biological conclusions for the other four species are provided in the
referenced CE and Protected Species Update. Biological conclusions of "No Effect"
were given for shortnose sturgeon, RCW, and rough-leaved loosestrife in the CE. The
Protected Species Update rendered a biological conclusion of "No Lffect" for Michaux's
sumac. These biological conclusions of 'No Effect" remain valid for these species. A
description and biological conclusion for bald eagle is provided below.
Haliaeetas leucocephalas (bald eagle) Threatened
Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: I 1 March 1967
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate- brown in color. Immature eagles lack the
white head plumage; the body plumage has a uniform brownish to blackish color with
blotchy white on the underside of the wings, belly, and tail. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar. Adults range in length from 69-94 cm and have a
wingspan ranging from 178-229 cm.
There are several factors that affect an eagles selection of a nest site. Eagle nests
are found in proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear flight path to the water,
in the largest living tree in an area. and having an open yicW of the surrounding land.
Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable habitat. Eagle nests
arc approximately three meters across. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in
December or January. Fish are the major tood source for bald eagles. Other sources
include coots, herons, and wounded ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Suitable nesting habitat in the term of large trees with a clear flight path to water
is not present within the project study area. There are no large bodies of water or large
river systems within a half mile, with it clear flight path to water, of the proposed proj"t.
Open water, (Blewett Falls Lake) that is of sufficient size for foraging opportunities for
the bald eagle, is approximately 7.5 mi (12.1 km) southwest of the project area. A review
of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNI IP) database on 24 May 2000
indicated that there are no known occurrences 'of bald eagle within 1.0 mi (1.6 kill) of the
project study area. Therefore, project construction will not affect the bald eagle.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNEIP) database on
24 May 2000 indicated that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected
species within the project study area. "Therefore, this project will not impact any federally
protected species.
cc: Bruce Ellis, Natural Systems Unit I lead
File: B-2608