19970975 Ver 1_Complete File_19971110 (2)

. 4 - t
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment Owl
and Natural Resources AT4 •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary D E N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 21, 1998
Frank Vick
NC DOT
PO Box 25201
Raleigh NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed Rea Road Extension
WQC Project #970975,
Mecklenburg County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3176 issued to NC DOT dated January
22, 1998.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
ston How' ard, Jr.
I`
Attachments
970975.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Enviro. Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 211, Section .0500
to NC DOT resulting in 4.89 acres of wetland impact in Mecklenburg County pursuant to
an application filed on the 10th day of November 1997 to construct the Rea Road
Extension.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into
the waters of Six-Mile Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not
result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your
application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must
notify us and you may be required to submit a revised application. If total wetland fills
for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be
required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water
Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining
Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or
Central Offices) shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity
water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated
as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10
NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has
released the project;
3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into
contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
4. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation is
required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities;
i
i
5. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Corps of
Engineers requirements. DWQ shall be copied on the approved ratio, location,
size and method of mitigation (restoration, enhancement, creation and
preservation) within 30 days after the 404 is issued and annual reports for the
entire length of the monitoring period.
6. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Corps of Engineers
requirements. This will involve 9.8 acres of restoration at the Long Creek
mitigation site in Mecklenburg County. DWQ shall be copied on the specific
location of mitigation for this project, along with annual reports for the duration of
the monitoring period.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this
Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall
become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404
and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This
request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box
27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification,
you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are
made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 22nd day of January, 1998
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Howar , Jr. P.E.
to
WQC # 3176
c' 1 , r
NORTH CAROLINA - DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, NC DOT below for the purpose(s) of proposed Rea Road Extension. All
activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted in accordance with the conditions listed in the attached
certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR WETLAND RESTORATION
LOCATION: Rea Road Extension in Charlotte, Near Six Mile Creek
COUNTY: Mecklenburg
BASIN/SUBBASIN: Catawba
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for the above
impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to
conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Wetland Restoration Programs must be rounded to
one-quarter acre increments according to 15A 2R.0503(b)
9.8 acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetlands
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
linear feet of stream channel
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment of a fee
to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the
Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you
upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE
NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS RESTORATION
PROGRAM.
Signature Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
P.O. BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0535
[phone] ext. 358
4EMORANPUM PRINT
Re,
C0: JOHN DORNEY WQ
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES BRANCH
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
''-'EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (USE N/A FOR
PERMIT YR: 97 PERMIT NO: 0000975
APPLICANT NAME: NC DOT REA ROAD EXT.
PROJECT TYPE: ROAD EXTENSION
COE #:
RCD_FROM _CDA: DOT
REG_OFFICE: MRO
ZIVER AND_SUB_BASIN_#: 030838
STREAM-CLASS: C
WL IMPACT?: Y/N
WL REQUESTED: 4.46
WL SCORE M :
MITIGATION?: Y/N
MITIGATION-SIZE:
NAMES: _
viewer:
SUPV.
DATE : _ - `
NOT APPLICABLE)
COUNTY: MECKL/UNION
PERMIT TYPE: IP
DOT #: U-2506
DATE FRM CDA: 11/10/97
STR_INDEX N0: 11-138-3
WL TYPE: BHSF
WL ACR EST?: Y/N
WATER IMPACTED BY FILL?: Y/N
MITIGATION TYPE:
DID YOU REQUEST MORE INFO?: Y/N
IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Y/N
HAVE PROJECT CHANGES/CONDITIONS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH APPLICANT?: Y/N
1 4k ?"'
RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY
COMMENTS : L?iIl:?jN`?? S S / /? A& = v,1227 AC-F-0 LE- pR?-V:?:-C K?`
T7 T
Regional Office
Central Files

TRIAGE CHECKLIST
Project Name: C
Project Number: ((? ?s
County: The attached project has been sent to you for review for the following reasons. Please consider whether a
site visit is needed to determine the impacts. Particular attention should focus on the below checked items.
Please feel free to call the central office staff member assigned to your region if you need assistance.
_ Stream length impacted.
- Stream determination (i.e. intermittent or perennial, or any channel present).
Wetland impact and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGS topo map.
- Minimization/avoidance options.
NW 14. (is access to highground or wetlands)?
Neuse buffer rules.
Pond (water) fill (i.e. is the pond drained or holding water)?
Pond creation (i.e. in uplands, in a drained channel, or in wetlands). Please locate streams and
channels (if any) so that the central office can determine.
Mitigation rat-ies.
Stormwater pond placed in wetlands.
Ditching in wetlands.
Is the applicant's proposed stream/wetiand mitigation site available and viable?
Applicant/consultant has a history of non-compliance (check drawings and application for
accuracy).
Has project been split from previous work to avoid mitigation requirements?
Consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concerns.
OTHER:
e„a5U7Eo
ram
@a,y.vrO'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
October 31, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. Michael Smith, P.W.S.
Dear Sir:
970975
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
RE0411116'0
NDv 1
FNill
D/VNr?v 199J
SUBJECT: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REA ROAD EXTENSION IN
MECKLENBURG AND UNION COUNTIES, TIP U-2506.
Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the above referenced project.
The proposed roadway consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction separated by a 21-foot
raised median. The project begins from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in
Mecklenburg County to NC 16 in Union County. The proposed project is approximately 5.5
miles and will be constructed mostly on new location. An analysis of various alternatives and
the explanation of the preferred is detailed in the State Environmental Assessment (SEA), the
State Finding Of No Significant Impact (SFONSI), and the Addendum to the State Finding of No
Significant Impact, signed May 1994, May 1995, and March 1997 respectively. The state project
number is 9.8100352.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Wetlands. The project will impact nine jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland delineations
were conducted using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual. The middle section of this project, from station 61 + 99.743 to station 76 + 14.194, was
delineated by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and contains a portion of site 25 and all of site
25A, as shown on sheet 1 of the attached drawings. These delineations were verified by Mr.
Steve Lund of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Asheville Regulatory Field
Office on February 10, 1995. The rest of the project delineations were performed by NCDOT
biologists and verified by Mr. Steve Lund on February 6, 1997.
Wetland sites 20, 23, 25A, 31, 33, and 36, as identified on sheet 1 of 7 of the permit
drawings, are characterized as wooded riparian systems dominated by sweet gum (Liquidambar
stvraciflua); red maple (Acer rubrum), willow oak (Quercus phellos), green ash (Fraxinus
0)
A
2
r ? ly?G`
pennsylvanica) cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis), and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Site 10 is a
scrub-shrub riparian system characterized by American elm (LTlmus americana), box-elder Acer
ne do), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida). Site 26 is an isolated
depression characterized by goldenrod (Solida og_W.),. soft rush, panic grass (Panicum sp.),
American elm, and red maple. Site 25 is a hardpan forest hydraulically connected to a riparian
forest adjacent to Sixmile Creek. It is dominated by willow oak, sweet gum, American elm, and
red maple.
The Division of Water Quality rating system was applied to each site. The scores ranged
from 26 to 54. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin) system and the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Schafale and Weakley classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. The
wetland communities and quality analysis are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Rea Road Extension Wetland Communities, Quality Analysis, and Total
Impacts
Site Cowardin
Classification Schafale & Weakley
Classification DWQ
rating Acres
impacted
10- PSS1B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.11
20 -- PF01C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.20
23, PFO1C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.13
25 PFOIE Piedmont Swamp Forest 54 0.98
25A PF01B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.79
26 PSS1D Low Elevation Seep 34 0.84
31---- PFOIB Piedmont Bottomland Forest 28 0.14
33 PFO1B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.82
36 PF01C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 43 0.45
TOTAL: 4.46
PSS1B: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PF01C: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded
PFOIE: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Saturated
PF01B: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PSS1D: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Well
Drained
Total impacts to waters of the United States are 4.89 acres. The 4.46 acres of wetland
impacts listed in Table 1 is comprised of 3.79 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of Method III
mechanized clearing. The remaining 0.43 acre of impacts is due to fill in surface waters. There
will be no steam crossing that will impact more than 150 linear feet of stream channel on this
project.
t
3
Based on preliminary wetland determinations, the SEA and SFONSI anticipated total
jurisdictional wetland impacts of approximately 1.8 acres. However, after wetland delineations
and final design, acreage increased to 4.46 acres because wetland sites 10, 20, 31, 33, and 36
were not identified in the SEA. Additionally, surface water impacts were not figured into the
total in the SEA.
Endangered Species. There are four federally listed species listed for Mecklenburg and
Unions Counties, the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Michauxii), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). Survey's for Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower resulted in no species
being identified in the project area.
Environmental Commitment 3. in the SFONSI states "a search for the Carolina
heelsplitter will be made during the spring prior to construction in the streams directly impacted
by this project." NCDOT biologist have conducted the search and reached a biological
conclusion of Not Likely To Adversely Affect. A copy of their study is attached.
There is an established population of Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
along Marvin-Weddington Road from station 30 + 00 to station 35 + 00, near the crossing of
McBride Branch. Based on the original design discussed in the SEA and SFONSI, the project
would have impacted some of these plants. However, since the project is state funded and the
impacted plants were not within any federally permitted area, the ACOE determined that no
Section 7 consultation was warranted. Nevertheless, the NCDOT committed to relocating these
plants to an experimental- prairie restoration site in Mecklenburg County in a coordinated effort
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Subsequently, due to the change of alignment addressed in the Addendum to the
SFONSI, the project will impact more of the plants then the original design. Therefore, the
ACOE will have to reevaluate the project to determine if the new design warrants a Section 7
consultation. The NCDOT will continue to coordinate with the USFWS on the relocation of the
plants.
This population has been grouped into nine subpopulations and labeled as Clusters A-1.
The location of these nine clusters and the proposed placement of the new road are shown in the
Appendix of this application. The following table summarizes the approximate number of stems
in each cluster and indicates those clusters which would be impacted by the original and
amended alignment with a YES:
4
TABLE 2. Schweinitz's Sunflower Cluster Stem Counts and Impacts By
Alignment
CLUSTER STEMS ORIGINAL AMENDED
ALIGNMENT ALIGNMENT
A f 125 YES YES
B f 25 YES YES
C f 7 YES YES
D 50 NO YES
E 75 NO YES
F f 75 NO YES
G f 1 NO YES
H t 25 NO YES
I . t 8 NO YES
TOTAL ±391 f 157 ±391
Cultural Resources. In the comments of July 21, 1993, the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources recommended that no archaeological survey be performed in the project area.
However, since that time, numerous archaeological surveys have been conducted within the
general vicinity of the project. The results indicate the area near Sixmile Creek is quite rich in
archaeological sites. Since the crossing at Sixmile Creek is a federally permitted area, the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, in a letter dated September 17, 1997, has
recommended an intensive archaeological survey be conducted in project.area. However, the
final decision on whether a survey will be required will be made by the ACOE.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The ACOE has adopted a policy, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a
wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing.
Mitigation of jurisdictional impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts,
minimizing impacts, and compensating for impacts. The NCDOT has employed many
avoidance and minimization strategies during the planning phases of the SEA, SFONSI, and
Addendum to the SFONSI. In addition, the following measures have or will be taken to
minimize wetland impacts:
• Slopes: The NCDOT will employ 2:1 fill slopes throughout all wetland impact areas.
• Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters and wetlands.
• Ditching: No lateral ditching will be employed in wetlands, thus attempting to preserve the
hydrology of adjacent wetlands.
• MedianWidth: The project is designed with a 21-foot median which is the narrowest
acceptable design that ensures the integrity and safety of the road while minimizing impacts to
wetlands.
t
• Special Construction Measures: To ensure that the hydrology of the hardpan forest be
maintained, no excavation will be used in the impact area.
M
W
M?
LW

t-'

w

O
II.'

F-
m.
O
a.

a
FID

co
a?
h
o
LL N aD O
}-' j of `Q

U N
Q

Q
v

d. N
(N

a
_
N m
d N in-
I= Qm
pp N
N r
N
F Cl)
N
_
N
_
0
N

c
'c
E
a?
tll
N

N

R
N
N
Sly Q
C
O
f0
N

p w c
°
U m -
o? 2
? o
C N
N ?
Ch U
N =
J ? l/)
6
COMPENSATION. The NCDOT proposes to utilize the Long Creek Mitigation Site to
mitigate for the wetland impacts. Utilizing a 2:1 ratio for restoration, 9.8 acres of restored
bottomland hardwoods will be offered to mitigate for the 4.89 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
that will be impacted by this project. Both the project site and the mitigation site are located in
the Catawba River basin. Table 3 reflects the original acreage, the allocated acreage, the
proposed acreage, and the remaining acreage (NOT subtracting the proposed acreage) of the
Long Creek Mitigation Site.
It is anticipated that these activities will be authorized through an ACOE 404 Individual
Permit. By copy of this application, the NCDOT requests that the N.C. Division of Water
Quality review the proposal for authorization for a 401 Water Quality Certification. If you have
any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Michael Wood at (919)
733-7844 extension 306.
Sincerel ,
H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, COE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. B. G. Payne, P.E., Division 10 Engineer
L,
,.,r'r• n -,?• w
WI :.. lr t ^y •?. .t- , - ?? '. Y T _
r ?+?: t ,?j,,t•?..'?.?.Nti aS'? :4di ?I
k a+i- 3
nEd^
C+?k
; ?
d ?i ?Y ?A?
?Y:
'
k
XR .? P Y T• + ?. j! '?.1 •?'••'y,, 7^?A$?'•^Y °y??
n ? r-w? .?. {??, s .s...r t A ?c
'
k

.
.
r
7ws
?
•
+«'-? 4
,
Y
,/
-
..

4 l
y 1' ' Q s
?s4 _ Ae
'eerie
4.4
` L o

lei

al?f f. QriY!'f f
1? r n
ice: r?
a . i•.
• 4 ?, v
Schweinitz's Sunflower
a•, Impact Area
??j/ `` j,}., ems, ! S?e•
War
.'JC i ` ' ?ii?• ` M /

\l

vafca
i ?
' P
is
END PROJECT
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
HECK L-ENGURG-UN I (IN COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NG 16 (PROVIDENCE R,)A(, )
TO °,OUl HERN OUTf:R LOOP
F• 5
SHEET-L OF-5-
1000 0 1000 2000
1000
Scale Feet
-

I

I
r I I I ' .. Via. \ •T.
I \

rt .:

c
r i
'
1 i Q, _

O' JAKE C- HELDER

08.0564-0001

J. -. 4- 0
J
N
.
J CLASS ?' RIP RAP L4
EST.l F T.NS O

> ES..5.3 i6.M.F;LTER •',8. pi

>
w u'
PERU,

DRAINAGE \p
EASE
T
'
J
MEN
m .
r.
? ? r. r rvooo,
TEMP. .5?
17.25 TYP. 17 P. CONST.25 TY
•_0
r EASEMENi -rY 19 ?5.46'1
(62.34'I ! i
i I ?..r?w •5' l
10
SAVE TREES i/ •80 X46. 6 20
26'1 167.
(IF POSSIBLE)
I 90.526') 544.,1'1 15.451 OEi
Cluster A
e I E '
E 150..9'
' f -----JI F (CROR
------------------r'?-i'------ - -
m
I?
A661
i.
(65.62'1 R.1
•58
ET`/ ? w
(78) I ',15 RCP 75 RCP I r`
CIYTy
C1
-A.v :,p ,S pc. T -- ----- --- - - - - 375 RCR-_, ca _
cBO -.Cv
375 RCPjj`' 77
IRON
OTE: E ur t8o
ROUGHT IRON FENCE (6.35
0 BE RETAINED.
D NOT DISTURB.
?v h
F 1750 C&G__" --
E E - Cluster B
00 X26.1 3 I .46 - PROP. R/M ?80
. 5i
0
159.05') (cOZB) 16200.05T (55.:8')
$74'09'04'W
.
aD CONS T.
TEMP cli
LEND AFER
:GIN TAPER CASEMENT
!5 *25 N
c
NOTE:
THE ROCK WALL ON PARCELS 21 n 21
AND 24 ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED. ?-
I
j ?? ? .7 0 0
8 ?-; r :sl o «, mvc 0-/
1 ° come -?
C
N_C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.81.003S7- (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NG 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAL, )
TO SOUTHERN OUTI_R LOOP
SHEET A_ OF 5

°Ib3 4+ '-C-=76562
= c59 ; R = 101.039
0(10 T = 36.789
. 0
2! 42'.5'
= 46.03: \
= 23.03(
(
?? ay Cr•?F1?'$y.TT •"°?'MC'....+ `` wF,.'?. K 'T'. vi :.Y i Six r'FF???' ?7 STS. rV 1'?l°W4..i?Fo.Fner?"?.yj,YTi{Yt?.rt,?r?,
r
13 = 91.197
Lc = 43.835
Rc = 500.000
Ls = 69.000
9s = 03'57'12.1'
LT = 46.011
ST = 23.010
V. = 80 km/h
e = O.04m/m
RUNOFF = 69.000
0 - N 15'07'59.9' W
Sm 0 IOm
SCALE
ONST.REV.
"REV.
NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS ANO/OR
/ MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
N
y }
70 Q
c O
JAKE C. HELDER
08.0564-0001
W '<
0 C,
O N
W \ ?
t
+56.0,7 nr: q • ,??
-=•''•...- „ =? 1x9.211 \ 'SLOPE 1 %KE UNE -,
23
JAKE C. HELDER
08.294-106
'S 1yP. '9.5
t,,. ? (4350'1
TENS.-` Cluster F
CONS 1. \ r
EASE`eEN f I / I ",-.e
cluster D
(68.90'1 ' (60.70'1 c -. (33).•'' "
750 C&C E CB
lCNO
jt5 Pc?°o ,,'.
3
CJ1
n
J
" V

? - `o" _ 3EVOVE
- -ter
Vo c
&G?
.32, s Cluster

205

..
";ti,.w•"
..._
•• 1
Cri0a0
I PACE/DOWD
PROPERTIES LTD.cp i
? E
•
? ?
,. .
f 1 _? 1
3i
- -?0 ? .
'
f
" +i5 .931 71
?
I
18.5
(59.06'1
\y.:0
3. Cc
:53.1;6'1
m
w
'Z
Nf)
-'r
J
d
z
,
I \
I ALL DRIVES ARE 6.3m
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
mot`~~ V 9.8100252 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD) TO SOUTHERN
OUTER LOOP
FOR -L- REV. PROFILE. SEE SHI
FOR -YS- PROFILE. SEE SHEET SHEET 3 OF S
14 46-
1 41.46'1 08.90.)/
-I)?.931 4Z? 25
5 I e I PACE/OCWD PROPERTIES LTD. 31
4 «
1911'1 159.05'1 ? 1,C1."I'1 I
23 I L-5L:PE STAKE
159.05'1 L'N•
`4AINACE = '-''?
CASEMENT ss
.1g
15
(41211
?PE6N.
DRAINAGE
EASEMEN
;P.AINAGE
;ASEM641'
i
1
-r+ A _
LA 111153 Pal: 08 88.8ae
23
JAKE C.
HELDER rrH ItS _a0
08.294-106` (68•90•1.61 10
1 +80 f..4 '5
60
.), 1106 u3') ?I \
? (95J4'I F ??-? - - -
? I E ..................
Cluster _E
E
Cluster H
1 - E
Cluster G i
87 a P rlk r c \ ao
a P (EX OPT 1 P Z. .pp (59.05't
J N(8? ` i;' 65
(.62')
E .79.97" ` 4x.97,
f ?`! 50 ? 1 1 9
15 .21't .?P TCONST. EMP. (9.21'1
15 ?OE 149.211 20 ; ^^ EASEMENT
Ip•
•32 (65.621
I.UM BASE `
DITCH WITH { 191 t? 2
CLASS '0' RIP RAP o..34) ¦c>ncs r
10E.
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET ??•32 +
68.90'1 `G
31
1101.7111
TEMP.
DRAINAGE N
( EASEMENT,-'
t '-PERM. „-•r ` iD
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT N
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
EST. 30 TONS
__..:0: ;C. M. FILTER fAB.
N_C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLE)18URG-UNION COUNTY
1 9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OOTER LOOP
? E'i•:ET ? OF J
r
BASE-INLET DITCH
I
= 65.33
25
PACE/OOWU PROPERTIES LTD.
w

O '

PRA -BASE IWET DITCH

DRAINAGE NAGE AP. ISEE DETAIL rINS ,HEET3

EASEMENT -RAINAGE
I ASE!AENi

\ 95S
49 /
I t28 t73.a2'1 861 -PROP. GUARDRAIL
Rc = 420.000
Ls = 69.000
9s = 04.42'23.1'
LT = 46.016
ST = 23.015
V = 80 km/h
a = 0.04m/m
RUNOFF = 69.000
J ; 000 SLOPE STAKE LINE
•80 ?.
t59.06'f TOE.,`
1T.63Z \ ?
? t5T.85'1 \ E 0
REMOVE
L pP.7;P..?1 x-1,8
(SEE MUCTURE PL
!A ELT

I PROP. ---J
(;UARORAIL

EASENENr
175.461 `TO - rE?AP.
2 / CONST.
`95 *3 175.4161 E W
ASEMENT
(59.06'1 (59.06'f / A •h?
E (62.34'(
w r •• MEL r PROP. Riw E
--------------------
8 C8 RCv
-L-
0 '(CF
Y?..K Cluster I
-13
\``v 59.o5't 159.05'( h5p
1 ?'
TOE ME \ . \\ (6 ..6't I
/ PERM. a ?25 i
H2.5 DRAINAGE 21
23.5 EASEMENT -68.90') I
(77.10'1 X33 \ OO'
• -E ourLET OITCJ 1(104.94'( .;55
N/CLASS ! nIP IAP \ 182.00
EST. 45 rONS I
E-T.68 M.!A.FILTER 8. ` \*27 I `
SEE DETAIL 'FNS SHEET ;8
(59.05')
`-':LASS '8' RIP RAP
( -' .0.9 TONS
F8•°`3 t EST, 1.2 S0. !A. F!LTER FAB.
25
PAC_i/OOWO PROPERTIES LTD.
a("XS
NATURAL-,
GROUND
O.'m
RAP II.Dm EST.:.D.E. - IIm3
E DITCH W/ CLASS '8' RIP RAP
F -L STA.32,26.5 RT.
'.a ',IAA
I
i-NATURAL EST. O.O.E.: -,.Om;
?GROUND + -`
? r+rsnr I
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG -UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SHEET 57 OF 5
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
!33 CFR 3251
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Washington, DC
20503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
NCDOT
Planninq and Environmental Branch H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
a. Residence I a. Residence
b. Business b. Business
11 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Rea Road Extension from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in Mecklenburg County
to NC 16 in Union County.
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN afappilcaeie)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (ifappiicabiei
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Mecklenburg and Union NC I N/A
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, )see instructions)
See Attachment Drawings
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached-Drawings.
ENG FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. JProponent:
4 8. Nat-,go of Activity (Descdpdon or project, include eN Ieerurdw
Construction of two-12 foot lanes separated by a 22 foot raised median. Begins at the
proposed Providence Road west relocation in Mecklenburg County and ends at NC 16 in
Union County.
19. Project Purpose Mescribs the r"son or purpose or the project, see Instructione
Public Road
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s)i for Discharge
Construction of public raod on new location.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
37,000 y3
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled Iseeinsrructions)
4.22 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of mechanized temporary clearing.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Drawings.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
- U. S.GPO:1994.520-478/82018

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF T11ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
October 13, 1997
Memorandum To: Michael Wood, Permit Specialist
From: Tim Savidge, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
Subject: Preconstruction survey for the Carolina heelsplitter at the Proposed
crossing of Six Mile Creek for the Rea Road extension;
Mecklenburg/Union Counties; TIP No. U-2506.
The proposed project on new location involves a crossing of Six Mile Creek.
Previous status surveys of Six Mile Creek conducted by the North Carolina wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) have not found the presence of the federally Endangered
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). However, several mussel species with viable
populations have been found in Six Mile creek. As part of the COE 404 permit
requirements, NCDOT committed to conducting a final survey in the water bodies
impacted by this project.
Six Mile Creek was surveyed at the proposed crossing on September 16, 1997 by
NCDOT biologists Tim Savidge and Mike Wood, using tactile survey methodology. A
total of 178 elliptio mussels (Elliptio spp.), of varying size classes and 3 eastern
creekshell (Villosa delumbis), which is considered to be Significantly Rare (SR)* in
North Carolina were found in the project footprint in 30 minutes. The creek was also
surveyed by wading in the stream from a point 1/4 mile downstream and proceeding
upstream to the project footprint. Mussels are common throughout this stretch of the
stream an additional species, Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), which is
considered Special Concern (SC)* in North Carolina was also found in this stretch. No
Carolina heelsplitter mussels were found.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Based on the survey results, it is apparent that the Carolina heelsplitter does not
occur in Six Mile Creek. It can be concluded that project construction will not impact
this species. Because of the viable mussel populations it is recommended that High
Quality Waters (HQW) erosion control be implemented at the Six Mile Creek crossing.
Additionally, the NCWRC should be notified prior to construction to allow for relocation
of mussels in the project footprint.
0

North Carolina Status
r
* SR (Significantly Rare): "Any species which has not been listed by the NCWRC as an
Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in
small numbers and has been determined by the NC Natural Heritage Program to need
monitoring.
* SC (Special Concern): "Any species of wild animal native or once-native to North
Carolina which is determined by the WRC to require monitoring but which may be taken
under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statues; 1987". SC
species have legal protection status in North Carolina.
cc: Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Environmental Unit Head
Hal Bain, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2506
File: Aquatic Issues

1. ???y?y?' C?• ?i /? . i {~.. (I
17 o r. 9
??- •. r'' '?; 3 2
\ 9
9 34
oji. T' 28 31 DOX 40
VICINITY MAP SHOWING STATE PROJECT 9.8100352 27
NOT TO SCALE SHIPPING POINT - CHARLOTTE 37
?<? x
-1 0 36 o
%
35
0y?s?
25 25A 26 3 33
23 24 , 91,E
z?
38
0
xV0 ???E?K
22
16 21. S°+°° -1
3 49 +33. LZ2 -L- R15V 47 +.S5
-•20
19
G 14 sxc 18
15
(liv ?Dc
12 ,? a4-o
0
10 ? ? Zhu
8 ?
7 vx
Fox `NpO
rJ N.C.
V Divi
yR \?0 MECK
1?x00 9_81
4 3 REA
1 TO E
L SCAL
2
SHEE
100 0 300 M
SCALE

SITE STATION FILL IN EXCAVATION IN FILL IN EXCAVATION IN MECHANIZED TEMP
SURFACE SURFACE WETLANDS WETLANDS (HA.) CLEARING IN WETLANDS
WATERS (HA.) WATERS (HA.) (HA.) (HA.)
1 10+60 LT -L- 0.005 0 0 0 0
2 11+50 LT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
3 12+70 LT -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
4 14+20 LT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
5 18+45 LT -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
6 22+20 RT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
7 27+40 RT -L- REV 0.007 0 0 0 0
8 30+60 LT -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
9 32+50 RT -L- REV 0.005 0.001 0 0 0
10 34+00 -L- REV 0.003 0.002 0.033 0 0.011
11 36+10 -L- REV 0.002 0 0 0 0
12 37+00 -L- REV 0.003 0 0 0 0
13 38+00 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
14 39+70 -L- REV 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
15 41+20 -L- REV 0 0.009 0 0 0
16 41+70 -L- REV 0 0.003 0 0 0
17 42+60 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
18 45+60 -L- REV 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
19 47+40 -L- REV 0.015 0 0 0 0
20 49+20 -L- REV 0 0 0.073 0 0.006
21 49+10 -L- 0.007 0 0 0 0
22 49+80 -L- 0.013 0.003 0 0 0
23 55+20 -L- 0 0 0.014 0 0.036
24 56+25 TO 61+60 LT - 0.017 0 0 0 0
25 61+50 -L- 0 0 0.341 0 0.062
25A 72+45 -L- 0 0 0.282 0 0.042
26 77+00 -L- 0.005 0 0.293 0 0.048
27 79+20 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
28 80+00 -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
29 80+40 -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
30 82+15 -L- 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
31 83+30 -L- 0.003 0 0.054 0 0.005
32 84+50 TO 85+70 LT - 0.005 0.002 0 0 0
33 87+70 -L- 0.006 0 0.278 0.012 0.039
34 88+70 -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
35 89+00 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
36 91+60 -L- 0.007 0 0.153 0 0.023
37 92+85 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
38 95+30 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
39 95+90 -L- 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
40 97+50 -L- 0 0.008 0 0 0

SITE 25
E 60,. o
Vic
ki!_'- _ _.. .. mr•-? '? :? ? `? i ;'C to
47
O „' GCS '4? h `• ?: er`r' ;.?. •??"1_ ?.
/
O ^q+° Loo 0
41
5.?a, X00 w? i j'
?. a
l
o
_F v FILL IN WETLANDS.
a MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING LIC XJ
o ?\ IN WETLANDS
v
a o ca\
?yaaoa .. 10 0 20
' M SCALE
I W i S63< 1 W `_a M
L- Eza1 N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKL:ENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9-8100352 (U-2506)
S REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
y\\\\v'? \'' TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
?? - SHEET 3 OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
ROP, C&G \
SITE
PROP. SIDEWAL
0 25A
4 \\%? ???
y
z W! ``,?\
i i 1 • ? .. 3 ?,ti ? ?
PROP. SLOPE STAKE \\ \
? ? ooati 1 ` `
10 0 -4-
00
C4 0
00
PROP. SLOPE STAKE
OOtZL PROP. C&G
ROP`.SIOEWALK •\
Z
10 0 \ 20
??
FILL IN WETLANDS
It
® MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING
IN WETLANDS
SITE 26
7 7-t-60
MAIC,PLINE

1 ..
?
4 1 I? ?F ? nrl r
. t

ig
.-
- -
w
.
4
.
i
c `Lv in •
'F+?•'

.J .I• L'i

?x 1
,Y .
"
p
+LL W a-
r
1
p
w
. 1 1
a N
?N0'CV
?
? ,
O
? ra
N
t ??
ll ?
0 ? y I
C .
O N` 1 t 1 }
y

[Y Ci qDcl: : p 7 a+oQg .? Nti

?'3.. ?Q ?'' -
? 1 ,•.9
is
1?
°
•,?Y? ? ??. y,
1
_ ?1"'F-- 1'. ?1 t
i•
?
tO dpi ':?- -

FW ??-' J J w Q . ..1 -.
??rn 1 .,1 p..
w scow: / P i,
.I
W ?
.. o,
.
A •
CL

• Xf- " Il \
CA 'y 1
T.2
ao

z© f5.0 +

FILE IN WETLANDS L , 10 0 20
NECHANIiEO' iENP. CLEARING ?- S C A L E
IN WETLANDS
SITE 33
MATCHLINE 88+60 -L-
T (!III IIII Ilfl'a
,- o
N W c ? Q
?Zpa r?
WtJW
C
?N
r p
J J Z W 2
W
Q O.3 ? G N
W ap 60y6j
( u-
Lp? /
mr,?
fN
N r
61-N a(laJ7
UWW J??m
via
N
8 r M? hO?
O a
s "
1
SA s
1
1 p
1 O
1 v
1 ,
\

\-

1
,
1

CO
h
s

j W c
\
WW
L - `
34d
1
W
d
6
1 W
6
tr
? Q.
ao

W
Q
j W

IZ' ) Z 1
'SIN
30 3 u il"N ? d r? W

v J tX. 1

in -
to in
MN 1 L I .; 1 C O ~?
S
N
CL
?y , .._ ?. U Ill ? ..
1
Li
,

1
1
a
Nti
Z W 1
?a ... In
v 1\
MATCHL INE 87+00 - L-

N_C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- - -'- --- MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS IO 0 20 9-8100352 (U-2506)
MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING ®---? REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
IN WETtANDS SCALE TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 6 OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
r SITE 36
_ 1 O 1'1W.
L' ,s
os
1 ` ? o
_ c
w ylm C^
73
mI
?. 1 I ?^ 11 \ NNm?
1
VI cr
-L_ ST 92+16.819 _ 111 .611
a. ,-, i--? MI?°'' '1 oUL• Q 111 °
r1 Nam U 1 V? 1 1 cr
1 ?
IS 1 ^ 1
v1 - 11 'J? •' 1 1
Q .7
c•
.O I \ V ^ 1 J6 ?'
u \ OZ S 11 O W W
a -`'1 1 a 3 W
02
11 <o
aZ? ?Z ? 11 0. ?
X00 J J R 30 ? 1 ?N?
m N Ow -gym 1 1 6_ON
NP C3 `^W 1 ? 1 ??
NN (. QO J? `'.1 1 w .DN
UWW l\ 1 NN1.0
41-1-
? 1 V wi'
111 1 Cpl -
_ m Di f
ZuyZj ao f 1 Om
© Z y _ 1 1
?QN j Nm v?
1 aow ?o.°0 1 04? a! i
1
/::.W ;o z w
cc o aa3
E
?. I 1? s Qm? ME ?W
J Z 11 K F\ 1
?? /taL ? 1 O
d'U? 111
1w ? .4 ? d N W ; 6 (.90^n651 L 1
1
?Oh O O? O W 1 Oi Om
O L Z' L
/ o. s a w i Z' L
O O
1 a' ro
'^? W 1
/ y 1 ' : ?. ? PDE
7,2 T.0• .T:2. ?.
/ 1 I W _ ?1
91+00
a
1 _ t
MATCHLINE 90±$0 -L-
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS 10 0' 20 9.8100352 (U-2506)
KECNANIZLD if.tP. CLEARING - , REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
IN WETLANDS ® SCALE TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET--!-OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 1998 10:39 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: NCDOT REA Road EXT.WQC Project # 970975
Cyndi,
I met with Michael Wood and visited all the proposed wetlands sites along the Rea Road
Extention in Mecklenburg County. Also, drawings for sites No. 10, 20, 23 and 31 have been
submitted as requested. This Office offer no objections for the issuance of the 401 Certification.
Please call me at 704-663-1699 if you have any questions. Thank You.
Samar
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Frank Vick
NC DOT
PO Box 25201
Raleigh NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Re: Proposed Rea Road Extension
Mecklenburg County
WQC Project #970975
A&14
D E N R
January 9, 1998
On November 10, 1997 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt
of application for your 401 Water Quality Certification regarding your plan to fill
wetlands for the purpose of constructing the Rea Road Extension in Mecklenburg County.
On December 10, 1997 Mr. Samar Bou-Ghazalie of the Mooresville Regional Office and
Mr. Michael Wood of the NC DOT conducted a preliminary site review. At that time, we
advised your staff that the application would not be complete until drawings of sites 10,
20, 23 and 31 are provided. This office received these drawings on January 5, 1998, and
you are advised that our processing time did not start until that time.
Please call me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of
our rules or procedural materials.
cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington Corps of Engineers
Central Files
John Domey
Sincerely,
r
J R. Dorney
Water Quality Ce ' c lion Program
970975.app
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # 733-
9959
`r
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
N'C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
IZ-3f- 13-
TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
/(/1, l,Joa cJ 0 - 2 _
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS X FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? 'TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
/tD,,,) i na vac. D A LlaC, 5 Fop U - 2 5C?
(464 6. CA-i?s (ono ) RECEIVED
ef NN 2 1,56
ENUIR(1WTALSC .
"5h?1
z
® RECEIVED a
H
ENVIROM ENTALSCIENCES N x
d C
O
o C o
a
L ? a
-j
c:l
z.
?- N
o m
J U ?L ?p
JAS
a- c
? Lam. m
< a W
ca F ? H
00 ,Q '--
U t?
LLJ
F
Lr)
+
QQ
ao
CA
U
c? W
U+ 00
N
N
Z
,Q
J
CL
a TDE
oa. -~
?Q x=
a C) - w
ul Of
'- w
o
0
4
u7
L,
q9+so -L-
µAT CKLINE 5T A
V)
5io
z o
m
< r CO
Lr?
x LO
C?
Qo
s
LiJ
DE?
0
vtL
J
P
0
LLJ

J
ti
4
F3 T5-0
RCP
.4-
DE -

uJ
LL

TD
a
o
c
i?
c.a m
uJ q w r
Q p? t
w
?r-
v
?o RCP
na+Ab d 1S
0
° X _
o
elk
O
y a
U A a
x
a
c.
a ?
U
I
r
L
0
nn,, L'; 'd 1S 3? I'd H

a
a
U

o?
9o
a
c
yn
H

0n-rr%4

0
0
L-
W
z
0m ?a
0
0 0 c4
? H
z

z
0.4
lot

MATCHL I NE STA. 83+80 -L
Vt d
a 75 R
.2 7
08+678 VIS 3NI -IH
CP ? ?
a

0
L_
N cy) ?0 O
H a
z ? x
? wQ x o z F
-
9.0
H O ? $ cx ? ts„
00
II
O
O C W
F E -
I w ?
II ? ? U C 0 ? E Q-i
? z
I N
I
I O t0
II II
U?
tD
OII Om
a +? J O
M ?
t7 I a, Q1 (sO
I Nw A A
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I ?
I
I
a
I ?
I
I
H a
O U
i
C
x ?
I
I
I
0 0
Lq N
rz-H
O
Lq
N N N
?Y ?ST?o
W e yam
.??.n . g 7 p 9 75
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
October 31, 1997
ATTN: Mr. Michael Smith, P.W.S.
Dear Sir:
R8G
19.01
?Nt?NOV
iROnNFNrAC?ci?N??
s
SUBJECT: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REA ROAD EXTENSION IN
MECKLENBURG AND UNION COUNTIES, TIP U-2506.
Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the above referenced project.
The proposed roadway consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction separated by a 21-foot
raised median. The project begins from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in
Mecklenburg County to NC 16 in Union County. The proposed project is approximately 5.5
miles and will be constructed mostly on new location. An analysis of various alternatives and
the explanation of the preferred is detailed in the State Environmental Assessment (SEA), the
State Finding Of No Significant Impact (SFONSI), and the Addendum to the State Finding of No
Significant Impact, signed May 1994, May 1995, and March 1997 respectively. The state project
number is 9.8100352.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Wetlands. The project will impact nine jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland delineations
were conducted using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual. The middle section of this project, from station 61 + 99.743 to station 76 + 14.194, was
delineated by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and contains a portion of site 25 and all of site
25A, as shown on sheet 1 of the attached drawings. These delineations were verified by Mr.
Steve Lund of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Asheville Regulatory Field
Office on February 10, 1995. The rest of the project delineations were performed by NCDOT
biologists and verified by Mr. Steve Lund on February 6, 1997.
Wetland sites 20, 23, 25A, 31, 33, and 36, as identified on sheet 1 of 7 of the permit
drawings, are characterized as wooded riparian systems dominated by sweet gum (Liquidambar
5Zraciflua); red maple (Acer rubrum), willow oak (Ouercus Rhellos), green ash (Fraxinus
Eo
2
pennsylvanica) cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis), and privet (LiQustrum sinense). Site 10 is a
scrub-shrub riparian system characterized by American elm (Ulmus americans), box-elder (Acer
ne ndo ,soft rush (Juncus effusus), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida). Site 26 is an isolated
depression characterized by goldenrod (Solidago W.), soft rush, panic grass (Panicum sp.),
American elm, and red maple. Site 25 is a hardpan forest hydraulically connected to a riparian
forest adjacent to Sixmile Creek. It is dominated by willow oak, sweet gum, American elm, and
red maple.
The Division of Water Quality rating system was applied to each site. The scores ranged
from 26 to 54. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin) system and the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Schafale and Weakley classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. The
wetland communities and quality analysis are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Rea Road Extension Wetland Communities, Quality Analysis, and Total
Impacts
Site Cowardin
Classification Schafale & Weakley
Classification DWQ
rating Acres
impacted
10 PSS1B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.11
20 PF01C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.20
23 PF01C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.13
25 PF01E Piedmont Swamp Forest 54 0.98
25A PFO1B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.79
26 PSS1D Low Elevation Seep 34 0.84
31 PF01B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 28 0.14
33 PF01B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.82
36 PF01C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 43 0.45
TOTAL: 4.46
PSS 1B: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PF01C: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded
PFOIE: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Saturated
PFO1B: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PSS 1D: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Well
Drained
Total impacts to waters of the United States are 4.89 acres. The 4.46 acres of wetland
impacts listed in Table 1 is comprised of 3.79 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of Method III
mechanized clearing. The remaining 0.43 acre of impacts is due to fill in surface waters. There
will be no steam crossing that will impact more than 150 linear feet of stream channel on this
project.
3
Based on preliminary wetland determinations, the SEA and SFONSI anticipated total
jurisdictional wetland impacts of approximately 1.8 acres. However, after wetland delineations
and final design, acreage increased to 4.46 acres because wetland sites 10, 20, 31, 33, and 36
were not identified in the SEA. Additionally, surface water impacts were not figured into the
total in the SEA.
Endangered Species. There are four federally listed species listed for Mecklenburg and
Unions Counties, the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Michauxii), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). Survey's for Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower resulted in no species
being identified in the project area.
Environmental Commitment 3. in the SFONSI states "a search for the Carolina
heelsplitter will be made during the spring prior to construction in the streams directly impacted
by this project." NCDOT biologist have conducted the search and reached a biological
conclusion of Not Likely To Adversely Affect. A copy of their study is attached.
There is an established population of Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
along Marvin-Weddington Road from station 30 + 00 to station 35 + 00, near the crossing of
McBride Branch. Based on the original design discussed in the SEA and SFONSI, the project
would have impacted some of these plants. However, since the project is state funded and the
impacted plants were not within any federally permitted area, the ACOE determined that no
Section 7 consultation was warranted. Nevertheless, the NCDOT committed to relocating these
plants to an experimental prairie restoration site in Mecklenburg County in a coordinated effort
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Subsequently, due to the change of alignment addressed in the Addendum to the
SFONSI, the project will impact more of the plants then the original design. Therefore, the
ACOE will have to reevaluate the project to determine if the new design warrants a Section 7
consultation. The NCDOT will continue to coordinate with the USFWS on the relocation of the
plants.
This population has been grouped into nine subpopulations and labeled as Clusters A-I.
The location of these nine clusters and the proposed placement of the new road are shown in the
Appendix of this application. The following table summarizes the approximate number of stems
in each cluster and indicates those clusters which would be impacted by the original and
amended alignment with a YES:
4
TABLE 2. Schweinitz's Sunflower Cluster Stem Counts and Impacts By
Alignment
CLUSTER STEMS ORIGINAL AMENDED
ALIGNMENT ALIGNMENT
A 125 YES YES
B f 25 YES YES
C f 7 YES YES
D 50 NO YES
E 75 NO YES
F t 75 NO YES
G ? 1 NO YES
H ± 25 NO YES
I . ± 8 NO YES
TOTAL ±391 f 157 ±391
Cultural Resources. In the comments of July 21, 1993, the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources recommended that no archaeological survey be performed in the project area.
However, since that time, numerous archaeological surveys have been conducted within the
general vicinity of the project. The results indicate the area near Sixmile Creek is quite rich in
archaeological sites. Since the crossing at Sixmile Creek is a federally permitted area, the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, in a letter dated September 17, 1997, has
recommended an intensive archaeological survey be conducted in project area. However, the
final decision on whether a survey will be required will be made by the ACOE.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The ACOE has adopted a policy, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a
wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing.
Mitigation of jurisdictional impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts,
minimizing impacts, and compensating for impacts. The NCDOT has employed many
avoidance and minimization strategies during the planning phases of the SEA, SFONSI, and
Addendum to the SFONSI. In addition, the following measures have or will be taken to
minimize wetland impacts:
• Slopes: The NCDOT will employ 2:1 fill slopes throughout all wetland impact areas.
• Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters and wetlands.
• Ditching: No lateral ditching will be employed in wetlands, thus attempting to preserve the
hydrology of adjacent wetlands.
• Median Width: The project is designed with a 21-foot median which is the narrowest
acceptable design that ensures the integrity and safety of the road while minimizing impacts to
wetlands.
• Special Construction Measures: To ensure that the hydrology of the hardpan forest be
maintained, no excavation will be used in the impact area.
M
W
?Q

m'
w-
a-

a

0
0-

a-

, 94
a
Uji co
m
d
F N
? oo
of O
Q
U N
, Q
F- m

Q N
Q N

U ?
m
M co
CN co
N m
F- a: Qm
co

N
N
n
N
M
N
_
N
n
N

H N
LPL

rn
c
' n
?
c
E
0)
N
N
U
Q

N
'cr
C'
a CO
m
N
N
U
Q
c
O
f0
N

x; o c

rn = m

V uci ?
U =
D co
6
COMPENSATION. The NCDOT proposes to utilize the Long Creek Mitigation Site to
mitigate for the wetland impacts. Utilizing a 2:1 ratio for restoration, 9.8 acres of restored
bottomland hardwoods will be offered to mitigate for the 4.89 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
that will be impacted by this project. Both the project site and the mitigation site are located in
the Catawba River basin. Table 3 reflects the original acreage, the allocated acreage, the
proposed acreage, and the remaining acreage (NOT subtracting the proposed acreage) of the
Long Creek Mitigation Site.
It is anticipated that these activities will be authorized through an ACOE 404 Individual
Permit. By copy of this application, the NCDOT requests that the N.C. Division of Water
Quality review the proposal for authorization for a 401 Water Quality Certification. If you have
any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Michael Wood at (919)
733-7844 extension 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/pir
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, COE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. B. G. Payne, P.E., Division 10 Engineer
ri 75 * ; y ,r+?? rZ Y:`T?'i, ?' M_Y??,X ? ?+`t^'y ? 'FY°"M^ R+•?i? f~y"?c ..
'? !1 ? 9''sF•'(??*t?'i'k. x.. '•1? ? Mfr' .J ,,y
._1
y Yy wa?SWX$t? 6. h :SN ?* V'h. f

1 -t, 1 PJ
,nA,L7 f,
Q?AL
• `. I + . 1 1 J
?c JAKE C. HELDER r,
O' ' 08.0564-0001
a! 0
W <
c" C)
• N M
EST`:LASS 3' RIP RAP v'
.I F r..rIS - °
ESr.5.? iu.M.FiITER '.8.
w PERM.
DRAINA z
GE
~ ?. ; ' .. EASEMENT

TEMP.
CONST. %17.25 TYP.
17.25 TYP.
•20
'9
+5
)
4
6'
EASEMENT
-' ,r i r':•, (62.34') 4 /
-96
996 1 r
4
(67.26'( SAVE TREES ; 20.5
(IF POSSIBLE)) (67.261 .
5
49.21'1 C . (65.6;'1
luster A 15.451 /
OE
?--°E E
1
i
c - I (50.69
E ' °
---

------- ?- 0WOR
--
------ _

mp
(75.46
-18
( (65.621 R.1
+58 --{
15.249
(50.19'1
T8) I 'TS RCP 75 RCP 1 ?. 1
CIU;
P.'8.V :7o :9 >c- - -- - - -- - - - - 375 RCR-. CB
i
3T5 RCP f C 77 ? _ _--_ F (• 750 C&G-r
-------- -----
N C_
•
?- - RROUwIt-t= E7 E -- E-Cluster B .AD
IRON 0
r • +00 +26.1 3 .46 - PROP.
R/tr
DTE: 47 cur +8 % 18.7 15.29:3 19 (55.38')
zoo.os,
ROUGHT IRON FENCE (61.35'1 1 (59.05') (50'18) (62.341
0 BE RETAINED. sr+v9'o?
0 NOT DISTURB. TEMP.
v
f
03 ? rASEMENT
r y> v ENO TAPER M
BECW TAPER ci
.85 -25 N
v
I NOTE: °
THE ROCK WALL ON PARCELS 21 21
AND 24 ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED.
1
71
1 ti? LT O O
r: o 'Im?/ I?tTJ
51 COAL r
C
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF T.RANSPORTATI(N4
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9 .8100352 ( U-2506 )
REA ROAD FROM Nt; 16 (PROVIDENCE R: )AL, )
TO SOUTHERN OUT1=R LOOP
SHEET a.OF 5
+ rr r+-s,?. ? -?.. ? ???? ? y,+.a ? ?,"bi-??'??..iYv.-r.??'A?i?r•. ?rv*=?`'??'i•8.1`??*'`'??
4- -G =-'TifS62 Ts = 91.19T --
= I 9 R = 101.039 Lc = 43.835 5m a tam
0110 T = 36.789 Rc = 500.000
r=46.03 n. 0 Ls 2 69.000 SCALE
"42S' 6s = 03'57'12.1' ONST.REV.
LT = 46.011 .031 ST = 23.010 Ir REV• i
V. = 080 .km/h
e NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS APE IN METERS ANO/OR
=
= 6 699..000 000
RUNOFF / MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
QL
0- N 15'07'59.9' W r N
\ r 2 ? 0
JAKE C.HELOER -
vy 08.0564-0001 ?-? 23 ?' Spa')
\ JAKE C. HELDER
} N / 08.294-106 1
C\ re `1 `5 tYP• (4350'1 3
3:1
TEMPi F ?
130 CONS . N :luster
?, n (a9.?11 EASEAEN r t = i
«FO ?
SLOPE 4KE LINE
.6c.?c; , •09 931 `? / . '' sa., h
?? ) ;. Cluster
,qo
(68.90') f (60.101) X33
150 CSC E it I 6 tC pltpl C CB
.1 >. o; f may;/ ? 9 •g• 'ri ?.? :a .19.
aro. EV. '? .2S ti'Q, 1N / IS
-- 375 1 1 ?.
j 1p ,REUOVE ' 'V r' ? - ?r?p`r C 14a )
?„ "0., 32;,? J75 Cluster E -? PERM.
..,? •" _ - -_a;? - E (? ORAINAGE
EASEMENr
25 ?Ib
04 (b,
PAC
DOWD
- •- ;?, ,r: - _ -?? r I sr°,'v? PROPERTIES LTO. i
tCN0R0 I : (, 31 ' ap ?`.. ` ~ + ':,? • 73.831 7] t
-15
14 1 «1.9 I ?RAINdGE
t 2.a6i (49.2(')
E jq $4d I 114 46-) 3 :I _ASE..ENi
-21 ; I :, srs r, 68.90') ;
25 - .13
«00 `?0?.331 27
5 I 8 I ?` PACE/OOWD PROPERTIES LTD. 31
59067 i49.21'1
54.05'1
%
1.5 (59.05'1 L'ERU.
:59.86'1 qR dINAGE : "`-•^+ . \ '
co cASEMENi sr, i
Pe 6
'0 6 PT 9
Z ' ALL DRIVES ARE 6.om
`n UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE[
-t- N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100252 (U-2506)
r _ ----- - REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD) TO SOUTHERN
v-'" • "` OUTER LOOP
L.
?. I
FOR -L- REV. PROFILE. SEE SHI
FOR -YS- PROFILE. SEE SHEET SHEET 3 OF S
i?
Q/ •1 •
-r-, W
LA
Jr 'S POT as eezaeo
ea1 O
2]
JAKE C.
HELDER ` rrN p: !40 ,?
08.294-106
168.90') •hl I (1
5
f 3o
f.' \
I .60 49211
003.:5) ?5Ja) \`\ /?
{ c.s
- CE
t95J4 I ` Cluster F - E/?sy? E 111-
.. ...............
__-
I Y _
= t ° •?"" ?'? Cluster H
---
Cluster G -w ` - E
/ a p Alw C .40
00 18
(N (EX 0
159.05')
E
(65.62')
° - ?' ?' E .19.97^ ` .4A.97° '
?c 4 c1l ^kE '3° 141211 TEMP. 15
I G- ?Ot? 15 160 ^Y rONSL (49.211
14.21'1 20
(65.62') EASEMENT
•32 1p,
IA"' BASE 19 ?? •=? (In
`.6..34')
DITCH LASS 'D'RIP RAP ^ "mos
30E. r
C
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET .! \ •32
21
(68.30')
O
-c LT1) ? ? J??.. '
TEMP. i
N
I DRAINAGE
` EASEMENT,` -+
PERM.
DRAINA_E
+
N
EASEMENT
-LASS
'8' RIP RAP
.? EST. 30 TONS •?
0.2 SC. 61. FILTER FAB.
v
N_C- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLE)18URG-UNION COUNTY
1 9.81003S2 (U-250(,)
lJ REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUFHERN OUTER LOOP
?' E' i":F_T "T OF
65.33 Rc = 420.000
vAa1ES 25 Ls = 69.000
LOm-2Am PACE/OQWU PROPERTIES LTD. LT = = 4 466.01.01623.1'
BASE -INLET DITCH LT 5
ST = 23.015
W V = 80 km/h j
_c?. e = 0.04m/m I
+
O RUNOFF = 69.000 1
'
•eI PERM. O -BASE $LET DITCH
22 ORAINAGE ISEE DETAIL rims ;HEETI
?itl8'1 :RAINAGE
EASEMENT I ASEMENi
•45.5 -PROP. GUARDRAIL
``? 9 X84
•T8
F` (9350.1 9e (TJ a2'1
(T :8')` `••. 191.861
SLOPE STAKE LINE J
18 1'5.461 •70 - TEMP. )
(59.061) 23
CONST• •I 80
X80 r, •95 •30 (15.46') EASEMENT /?
18 ?, 18 18 (49.2n
(59.06'1 \ TOE, 159.06'1 (59.061)
` % i •??
(ST tl51 0 E E (62.54) i
Ems{ % I
E __- - ? _ ' • . r- - -_---- i MELT CROP. R/W E I
CAT-L U.• - _•
,?)-?ri_=`-._ -r••t _r_ 1--"-=APPROX. LIMITS
ca -L- REV.
Pop x 1.8 -Ac.
(SEE iTRUCTURE PLANS)-it 88) `r 315 .RCP -
uELT Cluster
f r E (59.05'1 ` \ X40 c F-
.70 is
( ` ,.59.051 00
59.05'1 I i V <: ?• O
•70 *86 TOE / PERM. TOE 74.1Z5 61.25') I i
` (75.46'1 (5?.U5') •,Z•S DRAINAGE 21
EASEMENT (68.90') i
PROP. / 23.5 *33 \ I0 ``
GUARDRAIL (77.101 12 \ y
\.. 7.5 .?.i
SASE OUTLET DITCJ 1 (104.991
131P ?4P
/ ST.45 S 182
7 E .00 `
S45 TONS
86 E-T.63 :0. !A.rILTEP. ==8. •2T I :`
1108 2') TEMP.-' ScE DETaII THIS SHEET (59.05')
OR AINAGE T
EASEMENT _ ASS 'B' RIP RAP
0.9 TONS
1 ?8•'O EST.4.2 S0.%FILTER FAB.
' ? 25
PACE/OOWC PROPERTIES LTD.
nr,CCS
I
I
NATURAL
GROUND
VAR.
'i 0.,
o.im i-
?I.Om EST. I Im)
)ITCH W/ CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
-L- STA.32?26.5 RT.

i-NATURAL EST.O.O.E.::Z.Om%
GROUNOgl?
?..6m S#?CS
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG- UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SHEET S OF S
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
lq?v f33 CFR 3251
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
_r.,Amments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information0perations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suits
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC
20503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
//TFMC RFl AW Tn AF =I J Fn RV APW JCANT
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE fan agent is not required/
NCDOT
Planning and Environmental Branch H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 25201 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Raleigh, NC 27611
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W AR A CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE

a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business b. Business
1 1 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Rea Road Extension from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in Mecklenburg County
to NC 16 in Union County.
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN iilappacabie)
1
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS afappacabie)
Mecklenburg and Union NC I N/A
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,. IF KNOWN, iseeinstructionsl
See Attachment Drawings
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached-Drawings.
ENG FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. roponent:
A 8. Narwe of Activity (Descdpdon of project 1nWude aN ieerur"
Construction of two-12 foot lanes separated by a 22 foot raised median. Begins at the
proposed Providence Road west relocation in Mecklenburg County and ends at NC 16 in
Union County.
19. Project Purpose !Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see Instructions;
Public Road
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s1 for Discharge
Construction of public raod on new location.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
37,000 y3
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled ism instructions)
4.22 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of mechanized temporary clearing.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Drawings.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
U.S.GP0:1994.520.478/82018
l

eiaAA7jo
rye.
N
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
October 13, 1997
Memorandum To: - Michael Wood, Permit Specialist
From: Tim Savidge, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
Subject: Preconstruction survey for the Carolina heelsplitter at the Proposed
crossing of Six Mile Creek for the Rea Road extension;
Mecklenburg/Union Counties; TIP No. U-2506.
The proposed project on new location involves a crossing of Six Mile Creek.
Previous status surveys of Six Mile Creek conducted by the North Carolina wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) have not found the presence of the federally Endangered
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). However, several mussel species with viable
populations have been found in Six Mile creek. As part of the COE 404 permit
requirements, NCDOT committed to conducting a final survey in the water bodies
impacted by this project.
Six Mile Creek was surveyed at the proposed crossing on September 16, 1997 by
NCDOT biologists Tim Savidge and Mike Wood, using tactile survey methodology. A
total of 178 elliptio mussels (Elliptio spp.), of varying size classes and 3 eastern
creekshell (Villosa delumbis), which is considered to be Significantly Rare (SR)* in
North Carolina were found in the project footprint in 30 minutes. The creek was also
surveyed by wading in the stream from a point 1/4 mile downstream and proceeding
upstream to the project footprint. Mussels are common throughout this stretch of the
stream an additional species, Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), which is
considered Special Concern (SC)* in North Carolina was also found in this stretch. No
Carolina heelsplitter mussels were found.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Based on the survey results, it is apparent that the Carolina heelsplitter does not
occur in Six Mile Creek. It can be concluded that project construction will not impact
this species. Because of the viable mussel populations it is recommended that High
Quality Waters (HQW) erosion control be implemented at the Six Mile Creek crossing.
Additionally, the NCWRC should be notified prior to construction to allow for relocation
of mussels in the project footprint.
a

North Carolina Status
* SR (Significantly Rare): "Any species which has not been listed by the NCWRC as an
Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in
small numbers and has been determined by the NC Natural Heritage Program to need
monitoring.
* SC (Special Concern): "Any species of wild animal native or once-native to North
Carolina which is determined by the WRC to require monitoring but which may be taken
under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statues; 1987". SC
species have legal protection status in North Carolina.
cc: Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Environmental Unit Head
Hal Bain, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2506
File: Aquatic Issues
I`
r
a>
a,
< .
32
?.. ,. 29 34 sxo
0,41. 7
28 31 9°x 4
VICINITY MAP SHOWING STATE PROJECT 9.8100352 27
NOT TO SCALE SHIPPING POINT - CHARLOTTE ??Sx 36 37
o
0
25 25A 26 35
3033
39
38
?..?
r .lr
9 ?
24
23 ?.
17 ??%oo Rs < .
22
-4 ?FeK
16
21.
13 q?1 +33.1x52 -4- RED 47+r?5,
20
o 19
mss.
G 14 18
15
may. ? ?. ?Ev ? \0 Ac
12
fb?
0
0
10
xPC)
9
7 100 0 300M
SCALE
FOX \NGO
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
O DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
O MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
* 1?X 00 9.8100352 (U-2506)
4 REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE Rt
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SITE STATION FILL IN EXCAVATION IN FILL IN EXCAVATION IN MECHANIZED TEMP
SURFACE SURFACE WETLANDS WETLANDS (HA.) CLEARING IN WETLANDS
WATERS (HA.) WATERS (HA.) (HA.) (HA.)
1 10+60 LT -L- 0.005 0 0 0 0
2 11+50 LT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
3 12+70 LT -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
4 14+20 LT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
5 18+45 LT -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
6 22+20 RT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
7 27+40 RT -L- REV 0.007 0 0 0 0
8 30+60 LT -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
9 32+50 RT -L- REV 0.005 0.001 0 0 0
10 34+00 -L- REV 0.003 0.002 0.033 0 0.011
11 36+10 -L- REV 0.002 0 0 0 0
12 37+00 -L- REV 0.003 0 0 0 0
13 38+00 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
14 39+70 -L- REV 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
15 41+20 -L- REV 0 0.009 0 0 0
16 41+70 -L- REV 0 0.003 0 0 0
17 42+60 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
18 45+60 -L- REV 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
19 47+40 -L- REV 0.015 0 0 0 0
20 49+20 -L- REV 0 0 0.073 0 0.006
21 49+10 -L- 0.007 0 0 0 0
22 49+80 -L- 0.013 0.003 0 0 0
23 55+20 -L- 0 0 0.014 0 0.036
24 56+25 TO 61+60 LT - 0.017 0 0 0 0
25 61+50 -L- 0 0 0.341 0 0.062
25A 72+45 -L- 0 0 0.282 0 0.042
26 77+00 -L- 0.005 0 0.293 0 0.048
27 79+20 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
28 80+00 -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
29 80+40 L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
30 82+15 -L- 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
31 83+30 -L- 0.003 0 0.054 0 0.005
32 84+50 TO 85+70 LT - 0.005 0.002 0 0 0
33 87+70 -L- 0.006 0 0.278 0.012 0.039
34 88+70 -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
35 89+00 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
36 91+60 -L- 0.007 0 0.153 0 0.023
37 92+85 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
38 95+30 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
39 95+90 -L- 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
40 97+50 -L- 0 0.008 0 0 0

w
v
SITE 25
?aT K?,N
?•,. ,, 2
in pit '114
0 0?? 1 '' ' C >'irr 1•h?
11-- t t'? Y ? ; 1X.a
- ,•?,?I?•_?j??vs 1. t`Ii'. •' ??? S +Y.•
i gam.
YD
a°
j ?
M / I
?0
?a
Y
?llol"a?
do ?~0
N
I _
y Fz

ti
o? 0a0 ?" ? T
oaa/ ' to ?,v o??0? FILL 1N WETLANDS.
t?a '?EUANIZEO TEMP. CLEARING OLX xJ
,av?? •:.. ?Bys IN WETLANDS
7 ?
r ,
I I /
N
r'
t\
v ..

10 0 20
SCALE
N.C_ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF 7' DECEMBER 1996
s \
PROP.

. y

g'
1 \
\
` 1
0
\

\
\
I

PROP. SLOPE STAKE--A
OO+Z L PROP.

l FILL IN WETLANDS
ROP. C&G \

SITE

25A

PROP. S LOPE STAKE `\ \

\ 0MC0o00?p \\`\

\?' (000 oo O.*OpC \
N?M?Mt?iA• m ?

1\ V7 YJ? j?,sv? /i/

ovo

90
'G /
/
ROP"SLDEWALK \
10 0 20
® MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING
IN WETLANDS
SITE 26
MA-TC.NLINE 7 7160
s' n tie ?; +, i 41#
r' 14 1 •t ? 'fy?_ x S
. Vf y 1 ? t• i TY ? `l'? ' ? ??•. ?- ©? i'f`s'
s ?ai,r ,1 -w•
F-N .r i j D ?}upf
W trT
J
F-
pO+LL N?
o
• ? ?•17 ? ? O NN 1 ? YVV t ??'
0 m? O N` i 1 ) '1•
?V'•i-t- `tea = +
NW 1
O. z F.• 1.. '' 'I mom
L?N f..J?. ?coW: /'.? Q is
w' ;.I
1 t
- .. Via. 1 , ,?• .?
ou 1
'IY y` - N tVto
cr;
1 15.E i
O N.N.• W ? 5 f ?' w ? O
Nt0
FILL IN WETLANDS ? . 10 0 20
NECHANIZED'IENP. CLEARING
IN WEYLAN LANDS
SITE 33
N
OQ?e
dNW
? O d
WJW I
? O
Z
Z
tD K r W [Wj ?j
W
? pa.W ?aN
W 1<`p ?1 ?p yl
\\ W ?- • m
[ 1f Y'? u6.
O [
a 1
i w
1i 1?0 0.`O
1
N 1 ?v7p ?
W
1
j W
P ;
? N O
?QW
I[1N
m

1~J N?

m
O JNW
? V r UW
Q ? W
= Q r J W
? J
O \?

2 1 ?S P \
N v\
a: o
OM Ja v
MATCHL INE 87-00 -L-
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- - -- MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS 10 0 20 9.8100352 (U-2506)
MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING ® REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
IN WETLANDS SC /? L E TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 6 OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
MATCHLINE 88+60 -L-

-L- SS ycT, .-
a
rs
r?
00 I _ _ ?.
W?
o \
moo ?Q
f-" COO_ XIJ-
O W
V1NT IL 3
uWw ¢?

ff,, J Z
4? Q
S K u ?--
1',,b?s4 • ? d ZNZ W
j{°h O ? F O 4
W
91+00
SITE 36
A U -
1 I O dl.'1W. ..
9f
a
MATCHLINE 90+80 -L-
FILL IN IIEILANDS O 0 20
KECOHIUD UnP. CLEARING
IN kILANDS SCALE

M?1Ev?
??auw w> W 7 ®W 7 5
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
28 October 1997
Mr. Mike Smith, Chief
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27516
Dear Mr. Smith:
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
*0
04 1.99?
Ftir?1?LR`?????
Subject: Craven County, Replacement of Bridge No. 28 on US 17 over the Neuse River
and the widening of Bridge Nos. 83 and 84 on US 70 Bypass over the Trent River
in New Bern, Federal Aid No. BR-OOOS(33), State Project No. 8.1170801,
T.I.P. B-2531, USACOE Regulatory Action ID No. 199401568.
Pusuant to regulatory conditions for the subject project, we are submitting the
results of a marsh vegetation survey adjacent to the Trent River Bridge. The survey was
conducted to determine the effects of a temporary work platform on vegetation within the
marsh. This survey was conducted on 26 September 1997 by NCDOT biologist Bruce O.
Ellis.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please call Alice Gordon at
919-733-7844 ext. 307.
Sincerely,
Bruce O. Ellis, CLM, Environmental Bilogist
Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
?%
cc: W/attachments
Mr. Charles Jones, Division of Coastal Management
Mr. David Lekson, COE Washington Field Office
Mr. David Cox, Wildlife Resources Commission
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR, Division of Coastal Management
Mr. Whitt Webb, P.E. Program Development Branch
Mr. R.L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, Jr., P.E., Division 2 Engineer
Dr. V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Unit Head
NCDOT Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
,,7? MST?o
STATE OF NORTH QAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF Tk NSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
P.O. BOX25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
07 October 1997
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Unit Head
Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
Bruce O. Ellis, CLM, Environmental Biologist
Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
SUBJECT: Marsh Vegetation Survey, Freedom Memorial Bridge, US 70,
over the Trent River, Craven County, Federal Aid No.
BR-OOS(33), State Project No. 8.117080 1, TIP No. B-2532.
ATTENTION: Alice Gordon, Environmental Specialist
Natural Resources, Permits and Mitigation Unit
Pursuant to your request, a survey of marsh vegetation associated with the widening of
the Freedom Memorial Bridge over the Trent River was performed by NCDOT biologist Bruce
Ellis, on 26 September 1997. Specifically, the inspection focused on the marsh vegetation
associated with the removal and installation of temporary work bridges on the northwest side of
the Trent River (Figure 1).
The survey area is bounded to the north by Lawson Creek and to the south by the Trent
River. Standing water in the marsh increased in depth from Lawson Creek to the Trent River.
Existing (non impacted vegetation) within this area is predominantly composed of big cordgrass
(Spartina cynosuroides), and cattail (Typha spp.). Total length of the survey area is
approximately 365 m (1200 ft).
The temporary work bridge located in the northwest quadrant of the study area was
removed in July 1997. Photos 1 and 2 show the extent of revegetation within the impact area
following the removal of the bridge. The area is being revegetated with sedges (Cyperus spp.
and Carex spp.), camphorweed (Pluchea spp.), and smartweeds (Polygonum spp.). Cattails are
present within the impact area, however, their distribution is relatively sparse. Generally, the
shallower portions of the impact area contain denser stands of vegetation than the deeper portions
of the impact area. This condition is well illustrated in Photos 1 and 2.
?r
A temporary work bridge is being installed within the northeast quadrant, (Photos 3 and
4). Vegetation within current construction impact area has been cleared. Construction of the
bridge consists of a platform supported by pilings. The platform is not placed directly on the
marsh sediments. Preconstruction vegetation within this impact area is dominated by big
cordgrass, and cattail. Small open areas within the marsh contain scattered individual specimens
of bull-tongue arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia). Shallower portions of the survey area, near
Lawson Creek, contain sparse occurrences of sapling and shrub size red maple (Acer rubrum)
and black willow (Salix nigra).
The results of the survey indicate that revegetation of disturbed areas within the marsh
proceeds rapidly. At this time, early successional species such as, the smartweeds and sedges
have occupied the impact area in the northwest quadrant. It can be expected that big cordgrass
and cattail will begin to revegetate this area within the next growing season.
Construction methodologies for the installation of the temporary work bridges has
reduced permanent impacts to the marsh. Placing the work platform on pilings significantly
reduces compaction of the marsh sediments. Major impacts to the marsh vegetation result from
cutting and clearing, and by shading from the bridge itself. Both of these impacts are temporary,
and once the work bridges are removed, the area will be rapidly revegetated.
Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information (ext. 305).
cc: Hal Bain, Enviromental Supervisor
Kelly Beissel, Environmental Specialist
File: B-2532
,
14
.10
I A09
,, o
•09 .0? ?
Woodrw9 )0

?'v+r
z,. I emporary Work
z? Bridge Removed
IT9_ ./6
341 /6
I
_ eo
JAMES CITY T70
i
1
I I o c 0 -
20 05.07 .07 m 61
1607
I /
N
MARSH VEGETATION SURVEY
B-2532
Freedom Memorial Bridge
Over the Trent River
Craven County
1 inch=0.5 mi Figure 1

PHOTO 1: Northwest quadrant of Freedom Memorial Bridge. Looking south from
Lawson Creek to the Trent River.
y? fY YH;
MIA
PHOTO 2: Northwest quadrant of Freedom Memorial Bridge. Looking north
from the Trent River to Lawson Creek.
e
I

Y
L
I AL
? ^ta N
Y. .
PHOTO Freedom Memorial Bridge northeast quadrant. Looking south
from Lawson Creek to the Trent River.
PHOTO 4: Northeast quadrant of Freedom Memorial Bridge. Looking south
from Lawson Creek to the Trent River.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
1
+?„ Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890 ? if
e ?,,.'R,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199830725 June 4, 1998
PUBLIC NOTICE
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Post Office
Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 has applied for a Department of the Army
(DA) permit TO DISCHARGE DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO 4.46 ACRES OF
WETLAND AND 0.43 ACRES OF SURFACE WATERS IN AND ADJACENT TO
McBRIDE BRANCH, SIX MILE CREEK, AND UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES OF FLAT
BRANCH TO FACILITATE THE EXTENSION OF REA ROAD (SR 3624) A
DISTANCE OF 5.5 MILES SOUTH OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG AND UNION
COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA (TIP NO. U-2506).
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and
from observations made during an onsite visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers.
Plans submitted with the application show the proposed extension of Rea Road a distance of 5.5
miles from Ballantyne Commons Parkway on the north to NC Highway 16 on the south. Most of
the proposed project would be constructed on new location, however the southern approximate 1
mile of road would involve widening of existing Marvin-Weddington Road. The proposed
roadway would be a four-lane divided facility with a 22-foot wide raised median and a 24-foot
paved, curb and gutter section. This project would impact a total of 4.46 acres of wetlands at 9
separate locations. Of this total, 2.53 acres are characterized as wooded riparian wetlands
dominated by sweet gum, red maple, green ash, willow oak and privet (Sites 20, 23, 25A, 31, 33,
and 36). Approximately 0.95 acres are scrub shrub wetlands vegetated with American elm, box-
elder, soft rush, sedge and panic grass (Sites 10 and 26). The remaining 0.98 acres consist of a
wet hardpan forest dominated by willow oak, swamp red oak, and elm (Site 25). A total of 0.43
acres of surface waters would be filled. Pipe and box culvert installation will generally be less
than 150 linear feet. A span bridge is proposed to be constructed over Six Mile Creek. The
applicant proposes to mitigate for unavoidable wetland losses at their Long Creek Mitigation Site
in northwest Mecklenburg County. A total of 9.8 acres of restored bottomland hardwood forest
would be utilized to compensate for project impacts. The applicant completed a State
Environmental Assessment on May 17, 1994 and a State Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) on May 10, 1995. An Addendum to the FONSI was completed on March 2, 1997. The
purpose of the proposed work is to serve projected traffic volumes and provide access into the
city from a developing area. Plans showing the proposed work are included with this public
notice.
2
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army (DA) permit ..v
will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and
reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has determined the applicability of a Water
Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in this
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as
being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the
extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of
the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is aware that the proposed activity
will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. It has been determined that there are several subpopulations of
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) within the permit area along Marvin-
Weddington Road. Consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act has been initiated.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the
public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the
public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to
authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are
therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in
accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion,
recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and
welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in
waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by
such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.

3
Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be
granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not
be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers
whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army (DA)
permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607. Copies of such materials
will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, on or before
June 15, 1998, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mr. Steven Lund, until 4:15 p.m., June 26, 1998, or telephone
[phone].
N
CD
C
z
Q U
0
M O
tll '? O
C N
?C 1
u? cC
Q d
. chi
d
0
a
z
° w

Fa U
w ?.
O?: j ?? I Q N
z 7 Q i 0 O

Q co
a 0
p
?
?
p
z U
z

W
cc o
m
z o
.?
a
o
v
2 w N W d x N
F LL >
WOCO > LL O

00 N

l1 l
C,) a J
0
M
00
e p W
W Q
US a; Q
a= U
ZO`2 of 0? O (1)
w
OU
a
Q
¢Q ? i
C Q W
1=ZQ
Z_
05
uj
?WUQ
3LL.
N
3
ti
Q
F

V

°z
J Q
.J
C) LLJ
3
a- LL-
QO
\ I i
U+00
????' A
d
y
0
a
a
a
a

a
W

LAJ
00% -j

J
Ld a,
1-131
xpw
? oho
u1 Q M w ,.U
1 U?
s

I
m
z
c c
E.
rc LD U r
pC pry

O

F
a
?--
?.
L) d
i
z
00
Q
co
CD
m
w
i p
z
a
?CL
f TDE
v ts?
,a w ?j
IRw P
W
Z
LL-

t4
o
?z
Cn
Q F-- Sao
x +
Ln
C3
ao
W .
E?
?- PD
v4.
s
w
?r
0
w
d \
\p
?W
w
0
r
r
aE-
ow
a?
•?5efi•se+
r-
cr-
+r•
a
` o t
Lrl
RCP
co
c
w 0
co
ti m RCP
-?- 09+8b V 1S
O O Q.
m o U- r m
O a C
w
. C C ? O eh
O ?
z
0
M
o
? o
ICU-
"r-
m r
:J
vi
V

OO+LS -i-
_. ,r- u1 1 dY'1
4
V
z

-4

v
a
°
r o

a?

a

?CytS?
W
z
C4
O
O
SITE 25
? G ? n1q 1
ps U <i,?E 6
o
8.4
7.11
m r- ? • a
h ? $ E 1 N
H' : ? '`fir«: • t4,,\ >?` : 5 w' •' 1, ?
b•?= •?7y? '?i\f? '? ? '..earl •: Yn?:
J, '/1. , 'rn' `.? • "'' CAN,
t ' ?. ^1 .
120 .?2 ??' • °tb . ? ate' ? / ?' .cd , •:
F v FILL IN NETLANDS Lit
k6ANIZE0'TEMP. CLEARING L?L?J
IN YETLAN05
10 0 20
\\ ? ? fZ-iJ , j ? \
SCALE
L £z a` N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
-' MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
f SCALE AS SHOWN A 4 S?
:'',°? SHEET _,!5__0F IL M ?l 1
40
ROP. CLG \ \
SITE
PROP. SIDEWAL \ \ \
25A
y;-
i f ? r ,y \ \b? „' \GON ? ? '? \
PROP. SLOPE STAKE \ \
CID
10 go.-O
N
-Z to
i ? tr
i
PROP. SLOPE STAKE . \ / . .
OO+Z L PROP.

FILL IN WETLANDS
? 'SO
R P"SIOEWALK •\
10 0 \\\ 20
® MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING
IN WETLANDS
SITE 26
m.
• a
a.
FILL IN WETLANDS Es,?7,. 10 O 20
MECHANIZED' TEMP. CLEARING lY_]C?GL.
IN WEIANDS SCALE
w x o? :-
Na`
.._•r.1y •? _
nn+I
7 7
MAIC.NLIN7-t-60

A
SITE 33
MATCHL I N E 88+60 - L-

1 3

1
1
^ 1
? rp W 1
? N? .D CJ? ? ? ? I 11
r 1
?
Op 1
1
I

II
20
6V' V ^ ?LL
e
N Cal
? .l
NW \O ?
W V W ? ?
I 1 1 =+
l

rN W '
:F Q
i

3 I i
3 1
d \
? \
W
Z r
m x? WuW 1
' N I
W
1
.+ K3 d ZW
W <O yOW ? CO 1 <
1
' O a?N
LL 1 U ^
1
1 `!?C .- K ?
00

_
T 1 I
)? ?h? Irv
?ZC
? ?
/?'
U
? 1 _
' W i / Vu1?J
IBC:
NNE , / ' U 1
30d \
aN? ?? i
V\yyl
N? \O O _
.'
?p.?1 ?
1 ? W

m
is
U
m
30d
O
s c'?
C
\ ? W
`\
a

i
?
OZ
cr,
WW
G? .'' W u N
m
1
?
m
, i

,f ? •51 ' 'SI ,.w
?i
6?
U W
f
J
y?

V T -
,
<?WZ HM Jw ??•. ! .Q? : ?.?j?Q'' ? . I ?
W
g a f:IZ'GV , T IZ b? ) f + '"g

N1 v N
2
1
? r \ O N?
I- O+Ntn
'a 1 "p 1
Q
?4
Q
MATCHLI N E 87+00 -L-
FILL IN WETLANDS 411] 10 0 20
MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING
. IN WETLANDS SCALE
zap
'a W
Gaa
60W
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN M R y
SHEET T5 OF
v
1?
t
s-l
r?
VJ
o?
z?
?+d
z
0
4
W

i

,.,,,
0 cc -y.
d 375 R P
N
-?- 08+Z2 y 1 S 3N I -lH01
r' i' fr 4 v M
r ?
m L* ?? r C1
o °4 I w
a? a
oz?
d
-? a H
u, v a a ? S
s.l x - m
CP LL
a
E
O
MATCHL I NE STA. 83+80 -L-

SITE 36

?n1 ¢ N N
? O
? _ K 00 ? J
4 ?ll wZ.mFN \\\bb_Jm
O W
?( NNT fL 3 W
UWW ¢ O /
1 hb ? Q. ZNZW ?
/ tD s d
Q LL?
J
91+00
Q
' tt
MATCHLINE 90+80 -L
FILL IN WETLANDS 10 0 20
mamhud TOP. CUARING
IN WETLANDS SCALE

r
? r
x

I a °• a o
?? ? z z °' A x

I

I U a. ? F ?

I z
N
I
1 00
J , VU.
?O
O?
?O
q
i
c?
1

Y? } O J

~ J
Q H W

Q

W

?
a
z?
a?

z
0

C.)
U

a a
?
h
z a
?
O
N
a U
F
a
o
x ?
Lo Lr)
C,-
.E
H 0
E
N E
N
rnI rnl rn
.moo ? X79 ?3 a 72IS`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C 27611-5201 ACMARY
October 31, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers '-`
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890 4 0,; Wilmington, NC 28402-1890! ?'"
IJ
ATTN: Mr. Michael Smith, P.W.S.'
?YL t '?' ?'^ LN
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: INDIVIDUAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR REA ROAD EXTENSION IN
MECKLENBURG AND UNION COUNTIES, TIP U-2506.
Please find enclosed the permit application and drawings for the above referenced project.
The proposed roadway consists of two 12-foot lanes in each direction separated by a 21-foot
raised median. The project begins from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in
Mecklenburg County to NC 16 in Union County. The proposed project is approximately 5.5
miles and will be constructed mostly on new location. An analysis of various alternatives and
the explanation of the preferred is detailed in the State Environmental Assessment (SEA), the
State Finding Of No Significant Impact (SFONSI), and the Addendum to the State Finding of No
Significant Impact, signed May 1994, May 1995, and March 1997 respectively. The state project
number is 9.8100352.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Wetlands. The project will impact nine jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland delineations
were conducted using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corns of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual. The middle section of this project, from station 61 + 99.743 to station 76 + 14.194, was
delineated by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and contains a portion of site 25 and all of site
25A, as shown on sheet 1 of the attached drawings. These delineations were verified by Mr.
Steve Lund of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Asheville Regulatory Field
Office on February 10, 1995. The rest of the project delineations were performed by NCDOT
biologists and verified by Mr. Steve Lund on February 6, 1997.
Wetland sites 20, 23, 25A, 31, 33, and 36, as identified on sheet 1 of 7 of the permit
drawings, are characterized as wooded riparian systems dominated by sweet gum (Liquidambar
gyraciflu red maple (Acer rubrum), willow oak (Ouercus phellos
), green ash (F1'axinus
?? i
2
pennsylvanica) cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis), and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Site 10 is a
scrub-shrub riparian system characterized by American elm (Ulmus americana), box-elder (Acer
neg. ndo), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida). Site 26 is an isolated
depression characterized by goldenrod (Solidago st).),.soft rush, panic grass (Panicum sp.),
American elm, and red maple. Site 25 is a hardpan forest hydraulically connected to a riparian
forest adjacent to Sixmile Creek. It is dominated by willow oak, sweet gum, American elm, and
red maple.
The Division of Water Quality rating system was applied to each site. The scores ranged
from 26 to 54. Each wetland was also classified according to the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service wetland classification (Cowardin) system and the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program Schafale and Weakley classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. The
wetland communities and quality analysis are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Rea Road Extension Wetland Communities, Quality Analysis, and Total
Impacts
Site Cowardin
Classification Schafale & Weakley
Classification DWQ
rating Acres
impacted
10 PSS1B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.11
20 PF01 C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.20
23 PFO1 C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 26 0.13
25 PF01E Piedmont Swamp Forest 54 0.98
25A PF01B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.79
26 PSS1D Low Elevation Seep 34 0.84
31 PFO 1 B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 28 0.14
33 PF01B Piedmont Bottomland Forest 45 0.82
36 PFO1C Piedmont Bottomland Forest 43 0.45
TOTAL: 4.46
PSS 1B: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PF01C: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded
PFOIE: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Saturated
PFO1B: Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Saturated
PSS 1D: Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded/Well
Drained
Total impacts to waters of the United States are 4.89 acres. The 4.46 acres of wetland
impacts listed in Table 1 is comprised of 3.79 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of Method III
mechanized clearing. The remaining 0.43 acre of impacts is due to fill in surface waters. There
will be no steam crossing that will impact more than 150 linear feet of stream channel on this
project.

3
Based on preliminary wetland determinations, the SEA and SFONSI anticipated total
jurisdictional wetland impacts of approximately 1.8 acres. However, after wetland delineations
and final design, acreage increased to 4.46 acres because wetland sites 10, 20, 31, 33, and 36
were not identified in the SEA. Additionally, surface water impacts were not figured into the
total in the SEA.
Endangered Species. There are four federally listed species listed for Mecklenburg and
Unions Counties, the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), Michaux's sumac (Rhus
Michauxii), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). Survey's for Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower resulted in no species
being identified in the project area.
Environmental Commitment 3. in the SFONSI states "a search for the Carolina
heelsplitter will be made during the spring prior to construction in the streams directly impacted
by this project." NCDOT biologist have conducted the search and reached a biological
conclusion of Not Likely To Adversely Affect. A copy of their study is attached.
There is an established population of Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
along Marvin-Weddington Road from station 30 + 00 to station 35 + 00, near the crossing of
McBride Branch. Based on the original design discussed in the SEA and SFONSI, the project
would have impacted some of these plants. However, since the project is state funded and the
impacted plants were not within any federally permitted area, the ACOE determined that no
Section 7 consultation was warranted. Nevertheless, the NCDOT committed to relocating these
plants to an experimental prairie restoration site in Mecklenburg County in a coordinated effort
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Subsequently, due to the change of alignment addressed in the Addendum to the
SFONSI, the project will impact more of the plants then the original design. Therefore, the
ACOE will have to reevaluate the project to determine if the new design warrants a Section 7
consultation. The NCDOT will continue to coordinate with the USFWS on the relocation of the
plants.
This population has been grouped into nine subpopulations and labeled as Clusters A-I.
The location of these nine clusters and the proposed placement of the new road are shown in the
Appendix of this application. The following table summarizes the approximate number of stems
in each cluster and indicates those clusters which would be impacted by the original and
amended alignment with a YES:
4
TABLE 2. Schweinitz's Sunflower Cluster Stem Counts and Impacts By
Alignment
CLUSTER STEMS ORIGINAL AMENDED
ALIGNMENT ALIGNMENT
A t 125 YES YES
B f 25 YES YES
C f 7 YES YES
D f 50 NO YES
E t 75 NO YES
F t 75 NO YES
G f 1 NO YES
H ± 25 NO YES
I f 8 NO YES
TOTAL f 391 +157 ±391
Cultural Resources. In the comments of July 21, 1993, the North Carolina Department of
Cultural Resources recommended that no archaeological survey be performed in the project area.
However, since that time, numerous archaeological surveys have been conducted within the
general vicinity of the project. The results indicate the area near Sixmile Creek is quite rich in
archaeological sites. Since the crossing at Sixmile Creek is a federally permitted area, the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, in a letter dated September 17, 1997, has
recommended an intensive archaeological survey be conducted in project area. However, the
final decision on whether a survey will be required will be made by the ACOE.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The ACOE has adopted a policy, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a
wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing.
Mitigation of jurisdictional impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include avoiding impacts,
minimizing impacts, and compensating for impacts. The NCDOT has employed many
avoidance and minimization strategies during the planning phases of the SEA, SFONSI, and
Addendum to the SFONSI. In addition, the following measures have or will be taken to
minimize wetland impacts:
• Slopes: The NCDOT will employ 2:1 fill slopes throughout all wetland impact areas.
• Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters and wetlands.
• Ditching: No lateral ditching will be employed in wetlands, thus attempting to preserve the
hydrology of adjacent wetlands.
• Median Width: The project is designed with a 21-foot median which is the narrowest
acceptable design that ensures the integrity and safety of the road while minimizing impacts to
wetlands.
• Special Construction Measures: To ensure that the hydrology of the hardpan forest be
maintained, no excavation will be used in the impact area.
6

COMPENSATION. The NCDOT proposes to utilize the Long Creek Mitigation Site to
mitigate for the wetland impacts. Utilizing a 2:1 ratio for restoration, 9.8 acres of restored
bottomland hardwoods will be offered to mitigate for the 4.89 acres of jurisdictional wetlands
that will be impacted by this project. Both the project site and the mitigation site are located in
the Catawba River basin. Table 3 reflects the original acreage, the allocated acreage, the
proposed acreage, and the remaining acreage (NOT subtracting the proposed acreage) of the
Long Creek Mitigation Site.
It is anticipated that these activities will be authorized through an ACOE 404 Individual
Permit. By copy of this application, the NCDOT requests that the N.C. Division of Water
Quality review the proposal for authorization for a 401 Water Quality Certification. If you have
any questions or need any additional information, please contact Mr. Michael Wood at (919)
733-7844 extension 306.
Sincerel ,
H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, COE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. B. G. Payne, P.E., Division 10 Engineer
M
w
GQ
Q
E""
to
1 3 ) .
i
WAL
? ;• I! ? 1' ? tA' v
}
t 1 4. ;
~'' 1

=

I i

' JAKE C.HELOER
r
C ! ;
m O 08. 0564-0001
O m
+
m
'
.. ? °'
r rn
F•- ,,' 'LASS °.• RIP RAP
EST
I
F f^NS
O
-
'N j 1 .
.
.5.. 5.? x6- M. Ftl i
R '.8. +
'n
w PERM.
ORAINACE
i

%
EASEMENT c?,

' 110005
TEMP.
CONS T. '' 17.25 TYP.
IT.'S TYP ..1
"'! .7 ?5+'-?
f75
EASEMENT -f
.40
I
1/11_60K2561 SAVE TREES
1 (If POSSIBLE)
D' n i
?E t?-=
4-------------------- -i--?-
1
o •,?,colvc?
RCR
Cluster C
----- _ f --? -1-----j-- -?- a.. 60
375 RCPIT`r( 77
IOIRON
`J 0 .80
ROUCHT IRON FENCE 161.35
0 BE RETAINED. r
0 NOT DISTURB. ?
? v
i
-_?- F=-------- - C

CJ ?
4

-- - _?- y

-

.
26
E Cluster B --
-46 - PRO
°
R/W -`
`90
11
app
..
.
2°5 s5i
159.05'1 150.16'1 16 zoo.o57
155.)8'1
suroror?
TEMP

0
BEGIN TAPER ENO TAPER ' .
CONST.
°
ASEMENT
+885 +25 N .
Q
i +
NOTE: o
THE ROCK WALL ON PARCELS 21 rn 2I
AND 24 ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED. ti
f ^V• .^• r T O O
I ^ P ?4 ?
51 C11N.
L 1 -!

I
U
CC1
Cal
?. / (62.341
1• i p
•80 •96.996 20 -58
A9 X05 5 165.6") 15.244
167.26'1 Cluster A 15.451 OE ,ISOJ91
` - 1 E (50.69'
--- f ICHOR
? 78) 1 ------- 375 RCP 75 RCP
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9 .8100352 ( U-2506 )
REA ROAD FROM NG 16 (PROVIDENCE R )Al, )
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
11
SHEET C _ OF _ 5
-_...f%1 4--- --x-70 -
"... ?ryGE+ • a Lr.FTW)'rKYu tom. w+Y x I 3)
r
• .. qty
.562 13 2 9L197
= I 9 R = 101.039 LC = 43.835 Slmu?.o Iom
0110 T = 36.789 Rc = 500.000
69. 0 Ls = 69.000 SCALE
06'42' S' 6s = 03'57'12.1•
46.03. LT 2 46.011 ST.REV.
= 23.031 ST = 23.010 V REV. i
V. = 80 km/h
6 = O.U4m/m NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS ANO/OR
RUNOFF = 69.000 / -MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEO• I
?1.
O - N 15'07'59.9"M f ? O
-Q
` JAKE C. HELDER 2
W m 08.0564-0001 23 ' 'S: i't E
+ JAKE C. HELOER i
/ 08.244-106 O i
o ,1 'S 1 tP- / (93.550')
3
T `
+56.0 7 CONS. Cluster F
EASE!AEN f = 1
SLOPE atcE L!NE
65.:90 09.9A / as
141 Z11 Cluster D
8.90'1 / '160.709 .y-? ? -??`3J>:- ? ? /? ??'?/'to•'
-150
---- tC amt _=-'j 08
-------
_S o 3i 'ro O ' E l5?2'S9 'o o ,N / IS
150 C&G j ?- tQ ,REMOVE'/ 'V 5 <; •" S ?? r',Ip' s ` ? 149.21'1 ,
3,1 p
s-Cluster E
DRAINAGE
25 b/ EASIVAENr
- - v' u-ast•'t?r-t PACE/OQWO ?.
RO) PROPERTIES LTD. cp f
•ti- - ?'C? f i -I 31 , ? •_-a0 ?? ' 1 . %3.9?I :T) ? t _ _
?9 ;P.e1N4Q
I 14.461 I49.2P>
I 5c.. /
!4.5_244 I GI _ASc.•tENT
!4T•a6't
9 ? ?6d a0't i
? , o ? 25 ? •. rs w. "? rt I
`00 PACs/0OWD PROPERTIES LTD. 31
. I t I
59 06'1 149.21'1 ` 59.05'1 :C1
!53.66) 159.05'1 'RAIN ` 00 c
r^ EASEMENT
N
I? N
le 6 FT
'= J ALL DRIVES ARE 6. I'M `n UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE[
-t N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
r`++ 9.8100-252 (U-2506)
?r? -_? ---_- REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD) TO SOUTHERN 'f
y-' •L. !a» =' OUTER LOOP !
FOR -L- REV. PROFILE. SEE SHI '
FOR -YS- PROFILE, SEE SHEET SHEET 3 OF S I
,J
L
,l
if
-rte LJJ
l!?
23
JAKE C.
HELDER rra:a : .ar)
DB. 29a-106,
Q 10
•80 ro 5
•60 t44•yl
, -5.141
E
t Cluster F
Cluster H
o?
Cluster G ` - E
i w 2,2Vt jlo E.
??o s y 87 --- _ ? '
A p Ali C. 1 . 18
40
N(8 A p'? lEX 0 r 1 p / 18
•20 t59.05J97'
165.62')
_ - •19.91' i
1
E
f c ' 11' 60 49.21•t CIMS t5
1 ?VL 7, 149.2
11?`\ (49.211 20 c
CON5 7,_• EASEMENT
LUm BASE 165 6 ')
DITCH WITH
CLASS 'O' RIP RAP
SEE OETAIL THIS SHEET
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP 2
. f EST. 30 TONS
c:_ M. cn rca cea
,37 . 2 ? ,,tp•
t \? 19 17•="?
' ?
cD?
:62.34
1 w0 uro5 r

6 (W
1
8.90'1
\
\ -32
TEMP. N
DRAINAGE +
.t
E?SEMENT; '
t
`PERM
.
DRAINAGE `D+
EASE
MENT ' N

N_C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
-DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLEt18URG-UNION COUNTY
9.81003S2 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUrHERN OUTER LOOP
'1.
65.33 Rc = 420.000
v?RIEi 25 Ls = 69.000
L01K•ZAm PACE/00)MU PROPERTIES LTD. LT = .01623.1'
BASE INLET DITCH ST = LT 4 466.01 23.015
5
W V = 80 km/h I
e = 0.04m/m
RUNOFF = 69.000 )
O '
O
'81 . -BASE INLET DITCH
PERM
22 PERM E -tEW. ISEE DETAIL 7ws SHEETI
ORA
17218')
EASEMENT 'RAINAGE
:a.EuF1aT -PROP. GUAROR AIL
*78 ,dg -i5.5
N8 `.
' t9Ld61 73.329
_ 193501
t 1218')
i :
~ T 00 SLOPE STAKE LINE '
9 \ - _ / 115,06') *30 -TEMP.
Z3 S .40
t 90 6 t \` `' *45.5 .30 175.46'1 / EASEMENT s
i8 \\\\ \ IB 18 / w4.Zt't
159,06'1 \ TOE 159,069 154.069 7 i •5/ 0
* T ij
4'1
(ST 85) 1624 E 0 E - % E ` PROP. a/y,
MELT
?APPRO%.IUYTS 2.-._
R' up-LIM - Py ?OF NETLANO ?
89 - Pro 30 .------
-"
_ -' GB -L- REV. -_-------
(SEE STRUCTURE PLANSI?' 375 PCP
Cluster I f. - '
AF-LT
r E (59.051 F` c \ 40 c F _•
l .TO o ?. •13 d •50
'd (59.051 ?p I 00
i .70 I ME ME
'TT \
3 86 / PERM. *a 25 I i
175.N6'1 t5?.US't / N2_i DRAINAGE ZI
PROP / 23 5 EASEVENt (68.90
GUARDRAIL ?d4 (77.10'1 *33 \ 140
32
1 q ?0't !104.99')
E )UTLET DITCH
/ VLASS I -1P -AP 182.00
EST. 45 (DNS 1
E"T. 63 •O.V.FILTER ==8. '*27
TE I
S' MP.-' SEE DEfZ HIS SHEE' 8
u08 219 DRAT E (59,051)
EASEMENT 'T L.:LASS '9' RIP RAP
0.4 'ONS -SL`'P7c
EST. 4.2 i0. M.-MER P48.
I ? 25
PAC 00W0 PROPERTIES LTD.
neces
i
i
NA rURAL-, 1
GROUND / -)IATURAL EST. D.O.E. = i2.0m; !
GAOUNO
I
VAR. \, r
I :.0 'AAd S+rClir 1
_p 3m N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RAP ILOm Ev7.M•E•' IIm) DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DITCH W/ CLASS '8' RIP RAP MECKLENBURG -UNION COUNTY
•L- STA. 32*26.5 RT. 9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
J TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
I
_ _r_. ... _._ . _ SHEET 57 OF 5
` `=9 (33 CFR 325) I Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
r. "mments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suits
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC
20503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS(
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
f1TFMS BPI nW Tn RF All 1 Fn RV APP11CdN71
5. APPLICANT'S NAME S. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE [an swt is not required)
NCDOT
Planning and Environmental Branch H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Rea Road Extension from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in Mecklenburg County
to NC 16 in Union County.
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN lit applicable)
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS litapplicabie)
Mecklenburg and Union NC I N/A
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, two instructions)
See Attachment Drawings
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached-Drawings.
ENG FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION 0 SEP 91 I OBSOLETE. (proponent:
4 8. Nat--are of Activity (vssc iptdon oI p.o/sct, b cwds.a I"t~
Construction of two-12 foot lanes separated by a 22 foot raised median. Begins at the
proposed Providence Road west relocation in Mecklenburg County and ends at NC 16 in
Union County.
19. Project Purpose fDescdbe the reason or purpose or the project see instructions/
Public Road
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of public raod on new location.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
37,000 y3
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled iseeinsrrucrionsi
4.22 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of mechanized temporary clearing.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Drawings.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. 1 certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE
SIGNATURE OF AGENT
DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if-the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
U.S.GPO:1994.520-478/82018

J
y a`?_TEo
"hn
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECUTARY
October 13, 1997
Memorandum To: - Michael Wood, Permit Specialist
From: Tim Savidge, Environmental Biologist
Environmental Unit
Subject: Preconstruction survey for the Carolina heelsplitter at the Proposed
crossing of Six Mile Creek for the Rea Road extension;
Mecklenburg/union Counties; TIP No. U-2506.
The proposed project on new location involves a crossing of Six Mile Creek.
Previous status surveys of Six Mile Creek conducted by the North Carolina wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) have not found the presence of the federally Endangered
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). However, several mussel species with viable
populations have been found in Six Mile creek. As part of the COE 404 permit
requirements, NCDOT committed to conducting a final survey in the water bodies
impacted by this project.
Six Mile Creek was surveyed at the proposed crossing on September 16, 1997 by
NCDOT biologists Tim Savidge and Mike Wood, using tactile survey methodology. A
total of 178 elliptio mussels (Elliptio spp.), of varying size classes and 3 eastern
creekshell (Villosa delumbis), which is considered to be Significantly Rare (SR)* in
North Carolina were found in the project footprint in 30 minutes. The creek was also
surveyed by wading in the stream from a point 1/4 mile downstream and proceeding
upstream to the project footprint. Mussels are common throughout this stretch of the
stream an additional species, Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana), which is
considered Special Concern (SC)* in North Carolina was also found in this stretch. No
Carolina heelsplitter mussels were found.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Based on the survey results, it is apparent that the Carolina heelsplitter does not
occur in Six Mile Creek. It can be concluded that project construction will not impact
this species. Because of the viable mussel populations it is recommended that High
Quality Waters (HQW) erosion control be implemented at the Six Mile Creek crossing.
Additionally, the NCWRC should be notified prior to construction to allow for relocation
of mussels in the project footprint.
M
North Carolina Status
* SR (Significantly Rare): "Any species which has not been listed by the NCWRC as an
Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in
small numbers and has been determined by the NC Natural Heritage Program to need
monitoring.
* SC (Special Concern): "Any species of wild animal native or once-native to North
Carolina which is determined by the WRC to require monitoring but which may be taken
under the provisions of Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statues; 1987". SC
species have legal protection status in North Carolina.
cc: Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Environmental Unit Head
Hal Bain, Environmental Supervisor
File: U-2506
File: Aquatic Issues
SrATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TkANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
January 16, 1998
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-189
ATTN: Mr. Michael Smith, P.W.S. l.v0
Assistant Chief
Dear Sir:
F I LE 604a3aL
S LU&J
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR THE REA ROAD EXTENSION IN
MECKLENBURG AND UNION COUNTIES, TIP U-2506.
On October 31, 1997, an Individual Permit application for the referenced project was sent
to you. In a memorandum dated November 18, 1997, you stated the permit application was
/incomplete and listed additional information which was required in order to complete the
application. The following information is provided:
1. The application is signed.
2. Permit drawings for wetland sites 10, 20, 23, and 31 are attached (sheets 2-5 of 6). Drawings
for sites 25, 25A, 26, 33, and 36 are in the original permit application. The following are the
principle streams each wetland site is associated with:
SITE CROSSING
10 McBride Branch
20 McBride Branch
23 Sixmile Creek
25A UT to Flat Branch
31 UT to Flat Branch
33 UT to Flat Branch
36 UT to Flat Branch
.)
2
3. A new location map is attached (sheet 1 of 6).
4. Major streams and wetland sites are labeled on the new location map. The principle stream
crossing for each site are listed in 2. above.
5. A typical cross section of the road through wetlands is provided on sheet 6 of 6.
6. Proposed impacts to the Schweinitz's sunflower and the requested additional information will
be provided in the Biological Assessment which is scheduled for distribution in early February
1998.
7. There are two reports on the Long Creek Mitigation Site in Appendix A. The first report,
labeled pages 44-48, examines the vegetation at the site. Approximately 37 of the 42 acres
were planted in March 1997. The remaining 5 acres are scheduled to be planted by March
1998. A survival rate of 99.4%, which equates to 676 trees per acre, has been obtained this
year.
The second report, Table 1. Long Creek Monitoring Results (Nov. 1 - Jan 5), examines
ground water level within monitoring wells. However, the growing season for Mecklenburg
County is March 22 - November 11, so this data does not prove success in meeting the hydrologic
criteria. This data for the dormant season does look promising.
If you have questions or need additional information, please call Michael Wood at 919/733-7844
Ext. 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, PE, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/hrs
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, COE, NCDOT Coordinator

APPLICATION FOR CEPaR'N1E`IT OF iI1E .aR,L1Y PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NC. 0710-00?
(33 CFF7 3251 Expires October 1990
ptiblic reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
,-. mments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductioh Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC
20503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is' not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
IITFMS RFI nW Tn RF FII I Fn RV APPI M AAM
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE ton agent is not required)
NCDOT
Planning and Environmental Branch H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W /AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Rea Road Extension from the proposed Providence Road West relocation in Mecklenburg County
to NC 16 in Union County.
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN tifappikobjel
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS Olapplicowel
Mecklenburg and Union NC I N/A
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, lseeinsrructionsl
See Attachment Drawings
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
See Attached Drawings.
• 3 ?of AC;iVity (Description )r =roiect, include a// leerures/
Construction of two-12 foot lanes separated by a 22 foot raised median. Begins at the
proposed Providence Road west relocation in Mecklenburg County and ends at NC 16 in
Union County.

19. Project Purpose /Describe the reeson or purpose of the project, see inst uctionsl
Public Road
E BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reasonls) for Discharge
Construction of public raod on new location.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
37,000 y3
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled ism instructions)
4.22 acres of permanent fill and 0.67 acre of mechanized temporary clearing.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See Attached Drawings.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made fof a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
applic ion ' co plete and/accurate. I fu her rtify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
dul au agent of ica
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DA AE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
' U.S.GPO:1994.520.478/82018
Long Creek Mitigation Site
I. Project Description
Site located off Beaties Ford Road (SR 2074) along Long Creek in Mecklenburg County.
This site consists of approximately 156 acres of land. The mitigation provides for
approximately 42 acres restoration of bottomland hardwood forest
II. Project Association
This mitigation project is to offset wetland impacts associated with projects R-211 EA,
EB, R-2123 AA, R-2248 AA (Charlotte Outer Loop).
III. Project History
March 1997
September 1997
IV. Success Criteria
Site planted (except for approximately 5 ac. of
haul roads- to be planted by March, 1998)
Vegetation Monitoring (1 yr.)
• Minimum mean density of 320 trees/acre of approved target species surviving for at
least 3 years.
V. Results
totals/(avg)
Plot # Trees(p) Trees % Survival Density/acre
1 35 34 97.1% 661
2 35 39 111.4% 758
3 35 15 42.9% 291
4 35 44 125.7% 855
5 35 42 120.0% 816
6 35 25 71.4% 486
6 35.0 34.8 99.4% 676
Notes from Report
• Plots 1-2: no problems noted.
• Plot 3: Heavy grass/weed infestation.
44
Plot 4-5: Heavy sweet gum volunteer. Also heavy trumpet creeper in these sites.
VI. Summary
There were approximately 37 of the total 42 acres planted in March,1997. The
remaining 5 acres involves the planting of various haul roads associated with the project,
which will be planted by March, 1998. There were 6 plots established throughout the
planting areas, encompassing all plant communities. We obtained an average of 99.4%
survival based on the number of planted trees contained within each plot. This equates to
a survival estimate of 676 trees per acre.
VII. Proposed Remedial Action
None at this time.
45

• ? ek J+ . ?
'?h ,Q c?
? ss oA
?
Long Creek Wetland Site N

21
..
ED ?'? BUFF 7-?
Z p?E 2
0
SSR 2?3 lcdowell C, eek Tributary TO \ N

ejlc
o C, /
reek \

rtbutarY.Na
e
T s?? i ?,ss a
? Gt
.
e
k
Cowell Cr
Vt Ri ? ? ? ?
`
ry/?? p s 2 ` `
O ti , 21 tee
`off

?I pgC'q'?.gR y

V
R
4v a
-t 2 3;z EN AKE s ?Q
0o c
/ ?' QOM w R AN E \

\\? / 2074
G%
i
ree pyE
i / W Z N Gar G
o Creek o ???ti°
Y
M1? 4J a`?G
yv MIDAS SPRINGS RD
G?
ai
V
711:?
Long Creek Wetland Site ,E
Ri
?RF
RONT
m
V
p -iPRiMM RD ?
i© 1997 DeLorme.- Street Adas S
pE4?' y
Rp

G1eew O`
VA
QO
00 ?
?utidy
Swaringer Lake S~ p
\ ? o
Long Creek
01

4g
3
Table 1. Long Creek Monitoring Results (Nov I-Jan 5)
Monitoring Well Total Days Max Consecutive Days
LCW-1 0 0
LCW-2 42 15
LCW-3 66 66
LCW-4 13 6
LCW-7 0 53
LCW-9 52 26
LCW-10 52 26
LCW-11 47 47
LCW-13 51 26
LCW-14 66 66
LCW-15 66 66
LCW-16 62 54
LCW-17 62 54
LCW-18 44 44
LCW-20 33 14
LCW-22 51 14
LCW-23 62 45
LCW-24 66 53

VICINITY MAP SHOWINC STATE PROJECT 9.8100352
25 25
39
38
A
8.
32
9
29 34 9sxo
0
28 31 40
xDO `
27_
17
00 ` `tEC,r
22 C C
16 21. "00 -1--
13 99+33.52--rze?- 4
20
19
500
G 14
18
,. 15
oc>,' ?Ev V ok ,1:
12
10 p
8 ??-
?' 14
Fox"'oo
5R `3?Q 5
,`1 '?-? y4x , 5X o o -,-
4 3
37
% 36
\<% 35
s
33
T
9 p
?J
100 0 300M
SCALE
N_C_ DEPARTMENT OF T.RANSPORTATIOY4
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100352 (U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 1 OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
SITE STATION FILL IN EXCAVATION IN FILL IN EXCAVATION IN MECHANIZE .5 PEMP-r
SURFACE SURFACE WETLANDS WETLANDS (HA.) CLEARING IN WETLANDS
WATERS (HA.) WATERS (HA.) (HA.) (HA.)
1 10+60 LT -L- 0.005 0 0 0 0
2 11+50 LT-L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
3 12+70 LT -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
4 14+20 LT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
5 18+45 LT -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
6 22+20 RT -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
7 27+40 RT -L- REV 0.007 0 0 0 0
8 30+60 LT -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
9 32+50 RT -L- REV 0.005 0.001 0 0 0
10 34+00 -L- REV 0.003 0.002 0.033 0 0.011
11 36+10 -L- REV 0.002 0 0 0 0
12 37+00 -L- REV 0.003 0 0 0 0
13 38+00 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
14 39+70 -L- REV 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
15 41+20 -L- REV 0 0.009 0 0 0
16 41+70 -L- REV 0 0.003 0 0 0
17 42+60 -L- REV 0.001 0 0 0 0
18 45+60 -L- REV 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
19 47+40 -L- REV 0.015 0 0 0 0
20 49+20 -L- REV 0 0 0.073 0 0.006
21 49+10 -L- 0.007 0 0 0 0
22 49+80 -L- 0.013 0.003 0 0 0
23 55+20 -L- 0 0 0.014 0 0.036
24 56+25 TO 61+60 LT - 0.017 0 0 0 0
25 61+50 -L- 0 0 0.341 0 0.062
25A 72+45 -L- 0 0 0.282 0 0.042
26 77+00 -L- 0.005 0 0.293 0 0.048
27 79+20 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
28 80+00 -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
29 80+40 -L- 0.001 0 0 0 0
30 82+15 -L- 0.002 0.001 0 0 0
31 83+30 -L- 0.003 0 0.054 0 0.005
32 84+50 TO 85+70 LT - 0.005 0.002 0 0 0
33 87+70 -L- 0.006 0 0.278 0.012 0.039
34 88+70 -L- 0.004 0 0 0 0
35 89+00 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
36 91+60 -L- 0.007 0 0.153 0 0.023
37 92+85 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
38 95+30 -L- 0.002 0 0 0 0
39 95+90 -L- 0.004 0.002 0 0 0
40 97+50 -L- 0 0.008 0 0 0
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
9.8100352(U-2506)
REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD) TO SOUTHERN !
OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2 OF 7 DECEMBER 1996
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
?. DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
f~T/ ? ss^
1
NCOENR , June 16, 1998
- R
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR MEMORANDUM.-._.- S 1°
t y `;
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY Director
Division of Water Quality -
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
ROGER N. SCHECTER Inland "404" Coordinator
DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199830725 dated June
4, 1998 describing a proposed project by NC DOT (Mecklenburg & Union Counties) is being
circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10
permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 6/26/98. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at
733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office supports the project proposal.
Signed

,

R
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Date
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 276 1 1-7687 / 2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
NCDENR June 16, 1998
JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
?WAYNE MCDEVITT -
SECRETARY - - Director
Division of Water Quality -
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
ROGER N SCHECTER Inland "404" Coordinator
DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199830725 dated June
4, 1998 describing a proposed project by NC DOT (Mecklenburg & Union Counties) is being
circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10
permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by 6/26/98. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at
733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
w REPLY
L
' t !
Signed
F • Ty 3

This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Date
P.O. BOX 27687, RALEIGH, NC 2761 1-7687 /2728 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27604
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199830725
June 4, 1998
PUBLIC NOTICE
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Post Office
Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 has applied for a Department of the Army
(DA) permit TO DISCHARGE DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO 4.46 ACRES OF
WETLAND AND 0.43 ACRES OF SURFACE WATERS IN AND ADJACENT TO
McBRIDE BRANCH, SIX MILE CREEK, AND UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES OF FLAT
BRANCH TO FACILITATE THE EXTENSION OF REA ROAD (SR 3624) A
DISTANCE OF 5.5 MILES SOUTH OF CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG AND UNION
COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA (TIP NO. U-2506).
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and
from observations made during an onsite visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers.
Plans submitted with the application show the proposed extension of Rea Road a distance of 5.5
miles from Ballantyne Commons Parkway on the north to NC Highway 16 on the south. Most of
the proposed project would be constructed on new location, however the southern approximate 1
mile of road would involve widening of existing Marvin-Weddington Road. The proposed
roadway would be a four-lane divided facility with a 22-foot wide raised median and a 24-foot
paved, curb and gutter section. This project would impact a total of 4.46 acres of wetlands at 9
separate locations. Of this total, 2.53 acres are characterized as wooded riparian wetlands
dominated by sweet gum, red maple, green ash, willow oak and privet (Sites 20, 23, 25A, 31, 33,
and 36). Approximately 0.95 acres are scrub shrub wetlands vegetated with American elm, box-
elder, soft rush, sedge and panic grass (Sites 10 and 26). The remaining 0.98 acres consist of a
wet hardpan forest dominated by willow oak, swamp red oak, and elm (Site 25). A total of 0.43
acres of surface waters would be filled. Pipe and box culvert installation will generally be less
than 150 linear feet. A span bridge is proposed to be constructed over Six Mile Creek. The
applicant proposes to mitigate for unavoidable wetland losses at their Long Creek Mitigation Site
in northwest Mecklenburg County. A total of 9.8 acres of restored bottomland hardwood forest
would be utilized to compensate for project impacts. The applicant completed a State
Environmental Assessment on May 17, 1994 and a State Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) on May 10, 1995. An Addendum to the FONSI was completed on March 2, 1997. The
purpose of the proposed work is to serve projected traffic volumes and provide access into the
city from a developing area. Plans showing the proposed work are included with this public
notice.

2
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army (DA) permit
will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and
reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has determined the applicability of a Water
Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in this
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of
Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as
being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the
extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of
the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is aware that the proposed activity
will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act of 1973. It has been determined that there are several subpopulations of
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) within the permit area along Marvin-
Weddington Road. Consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act has been initiated.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the
public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the
public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to
authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are
therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in
accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion,
recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and
welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in
waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by
such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
s
i

3
Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be
granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not
be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or waives
State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ considers
whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of the Army (DA)
permit serves as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607. Copies of such materials
will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, on or before
June 15, 1998, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mr. Steven Lund, until 4:15 p.m., June 26, 1998, or telephone
[phone].
N
4)
C
Z 7
N U
C
{1J O
M O
in
C N
c0 ?
0
C
W
CD
. C1
C1
O
Q
O

f'

o LLJ
Z z o
0 }
O
F- 2

> ?` I Q N
CL
Z D
O T
a Q
j Z O
N °o
o

LL
U
W 0
O
I m
Zj J CCa e
W-0 N Q 0

.
0 C%

O
LL
? . LL 0 = ?
c): 0 co
Q Z

Z .
.
N
co
Q J
(n
Q

'
r
(L
WOW
WOW
O
W 1
U>W m Q? U
Z?? of cl? O N
GC
N
0U
Qo*
c Q W
~
Q
Z Z
3 .?
V W
W Q E
LL.
N

C)
?L
u?
U+ 00
I 111v `
z I
C p
ro

•

A D

?

? U

a
.'? r

?

c
O
a
e m
E4
c

?

N
z
d ?
z
0

?o
?Z °
Q
x Ln
ao
LL]
E\
?-- PD
0
v0-
J
D
0
b?
LLJ
d \
\p
?w
?L 1
W
O
t--
586'58+
i _
r- 721

? y°'„ F c ? C Q i
axe- x?
m o U r m
44
E
U A a ? ? o?
z
1 ?
o ?
0
o F ?
r
CO
a- v v- 15C
? RCP
l5C C
r ? A
DE o
0
c?
c-
o
? H
o
? 03
Lil
`? o
v3
Q'
315 ? `
RCP
-?- 09+9b d 1S 3N1?H01d Lin
f
i
00+LS ',,15 -i-
--..,. u-, dVq

'
C

~ ` ?
r t
z a
a a?
o
a
o

a
"it I ?

00-rSS
W
z
a?
0
0
SITE 25
40
.a r
y 1^.y -.?' 'kJ
iIIK
DC(h
?y `9 99 • p;a s?foC. nGV;.
61.
o oo m ti?
D ? s a 0Q
o q?; ao=a
16
CS
F v FJLL 1N YETLANDS X11 1!
\a 11ECNANIIED TEMP. CLEARING
slow IN WETLANDS
s o \ ?. ,a
ti\ l?`gti ?,`aa°a 10 0 20
SCALE
A
1 ul? sst?. \w ?-a
y Eaa? N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
y- MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
v mss \ ;`??\? 9-8100352 (U-2506)
b \\\??? REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
ti TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
' SCALE AS SHOWN Q
M
SHEET 5 OF I? A?
ROP. CLG
\ ?\
PROP. SIDEWAL SITE 25A
/
.. .?= X36 g1'? 1 \ ?
PROP. SLOPE STAKE \ \
84
1 `1
C-A \\ 1 r ???? t • • • 1
j /
``? \\ \ 1? Y 01
\\ .\ V7 O ovu
PROP. SLOPE STAKE \ / •, \
90
OO+ZL PROP.C&G
ROPOEWALK •\
10 0 20
!_?LI FILL IN WETLANDS
® MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING
IN WETLANDS
SITE 26

MATCAL_INE 7fi60
r •:
.-
- m

oa:
d
V
O Nu
FILL IN WETLANDS E=q. 10 0 20
MECHANIZED'IEMP. CLEARING ? IN WETLANDS SCALE
ti
Na`
l '
L

MATCHL I NE 88+60 -L-
T .";p 1
t? ?f? ??" , 1 p \
1- O
? Ups N
?? W O N
a?W Q?Q
W ? d
'?JW
N N
Z
? J ly W Z
d py! Qd?
z a; aaa
W ap ??W
f
mr,?
fN
QrN IM?
UWW _` .C .?.I?
c J /

-`.of
(AZW O

LLJ
a'.

= 1 a!f 1

aQM 3Q W 1 Q t

MATCHLIN
E
870
0 -
L- 3
1 ,
J 1,
v 1\
1 I '
W /
4
I \\ ? ?1f ti'
W 1 d ? 1
J i 3 a VI¢,i
1/
1 ? ~ 1 W
tD t _ n
o
I ? r3Od ?j4,
o$ CL
,, J W W
d

Q 1/1
17,
'SI ' 'SI
u ??
. .. - - 30 3 k`
g , W
!

! W
/ O 1 Z <
\
< ?? W
1 d
U V
I J
1 J

.I+J1? !fj / R3

W
m
Q
1 W i
d J
K ?
?O
mr Q.
m
Q?IN
vy! W
W
' W
c n
j W

N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
- MECKLENBURG-UNION COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS 10 0 20 9.8100352 (U-2506)
MECHANIZED TEMP. CLEARING REA ROAD FROM NC 16 (PROVIDENCE ROAD)
IN WETtANDS S C L E TO SOUTHERN OUTER LOOP
SCALE AS SHOWN MAY I 1
SHEET OF "
SITE 33
-?d f
a
1
VJ
0
CL-
1 ?
?z
?Q.
3
'QO

^
I -

M
irl ?
U

MATCHL I NE STA. 83+80 -L- ° a c
- ? oza?
( a
cn il Ql-
C) lIZ3 -
ZZ EL
101,
jm? S a
?? S`??Q` `sue N
DE

? o
CL
=
U
W

l?oj
? ?yJ
S v1 - Y
+50 RGP a
7.2 ~ ?-
o

a
a
U-
CL g `` w
a
Z O '0

W N
?
C8f Q
0 m
375. t
OS+ZB d1S 2I 07.
t 2
H01VN
P ?
0
375 RCP
P ?? A
_ , L,

SITE 36
.y
1 ? 1
ST 92+16.879 _ ;
m Ir
1
40 -?_ a==
92+ _
?

_j CO .

CP
M'
?
1
?
\ GO J
'1 NNmO
u ` a

c'
.n
`
G
1 V? \ 1
K
02
I

1 G
'c;
s
m '?
11
1 ? a
1 rm
u2 ? aLL
1 <O ?
1
\ d
1
1 1 ' ?'ON

_ \I W Nr?n.D
\
, LL
\
<? ? t =' i 000
Q a VWi i Nm ??O 1 1 h r?0.
nW.o\a., X3•°_0 1 04? # i
Q ?. _' 1 W W V Z
-L- CS 91+47.8T9 ( Z
1 m o a
l 1 O? ?.W
( `, ? QmN. WK4
1 y O W
P
1
gbh 7 J W W 1 O? ??
Z-L
PM,
91+00
a
Q 1 U ? ??
1
1
.. j 4DN 111 .. 'ii?_ ;?• ; cpay '?h'2
MATCHLINE 90+80 -L- -
?
S hOO ?^C? ;U
{? ?
N 1Q

?
!1 •0o I K? _

6.1 ?
mtiN

NNT
4 cQ O
'Jm
° W
5 3 W
Q IJWW? 40 J3
Z

FILL IN WETLANDS 10 0 20
NECnANiiED '10P. CLEARING
IN WETLANDS SCALE
i

^
1 ?4 ? r ? V7 ? 7?

' r v v
c r
., z r

I-W
c

E-o °
z O A J O
cr.
O G
C
U Ca g
5 c E
? a A W a
U a.

o?
pa
?GLL
t~O
O?
n
a
c?

pm ,
co

~ J
Q N W

T

z?
A?

6.?1

F
z a
.q4
O U
o
x m

0 0
E
N E
N

? rn
?

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199830725
June 4, 1998
y?
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality .
North Carolina Department of WATER al_ITY SEQlON
Environment and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division
of Highways for Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification
to fill, excavate and/or mechanically clear 4.46 acres of wetland and 0.43 acres of surface waters
in and adjacent to McBride Branch, Six Mile Creek, and unnamed tributaries of Flat Branch to
facilitate the extension of Rea Road (SR 3624) a distance of 5.5 miles south of Charlotte,
Mecklenburg and Union Counties, North Carolina (TIP No. U-2506). Your receipt of this letter
verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section
325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to 404 of the Clean Water
Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the provisions of
Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the
certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by July 27, 1998, the District Engineer will deem
that waiver has occurred.
-2-
Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Steven Lund in the Asheville Regulatory
Field Office, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
i
i"
Robert W. Johnson
Office Manager
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Enclosure/as
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

KG"I?,A _
°370?.
C(??l
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS E. NORRIS TOLSON U Qi;rc?
GOVERNOR August 16, 1999 SECRETARY Lkn ?Iv
PROJECT: 9.8100352 U-2506
CONTRACT NO.: C105217
COUNTY: Union - Mecklenburg
DESCRIPTION: Rea Road Extension from NC 16 in Union County to North of Ballantyne
Commons Parkway in Mecklenburg County South of Charlotte
SUBJECT: Preconstruction Conference
Blythe Development Company
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Dear Sirs:
This will confirm that the Preconstruction Conference on the above referenced project will be
held Tuesday, August 24, 1999, at 10:30 a.m. in the conference room of the Independence
Transportation Park in Matthews.
You are reminded to submit your Progress Schedule to the Resident Engineer prior to this
meeting in order that we may review it.
Yours very truly,
41
f L/
i
Benton G. Payne, P. E.
Division Engineer
BGP:TMB:cld
cc: Messrs. DeWitt, Burwell, Johnson, Williamson, Reaves, Brown, Flowers, Baldwin,
Shoemaker, Cravens, Ritchie, Thrower, Harris, Allen, Buchanan, Ferguson, Grady, U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers, NCDENR, N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission, U. S. Fish &
Wildlife Service, Alltel, Bellsouth, Telics, Time Warner Cablevision (Union - Meck.),
Piedmont Natural Gas, N. C. Natural Gas, Duke Energy Corporation, Union Electric
Membership, Union County Public Works, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utility Department,
Charlotte Department of Transportation
716 West Main Street, Albemarle, NC 28001 9 [phone] 9 Fax [phone]
ge s
o