19971061 Ver 1_Complete File_19971121

W. • .
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
LIU.WA
00
D E N R
January 8, 1998
Guilford County
WQC 401 Project #971061
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Frank Vick
NC DOT
PO Box 25201
Raleigh NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill in 0.71 acres of wetlands
or waters for the purpose of constructing the High Point Intermediate at Loop from NC 68 to SR 1471 as you
described in your application dated December 17, 1997. After reviewing your application, we have decided
that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3100. This Certification allows you to
use General Permit Number 31 which has been issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to)
Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General. Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). You are also advised that the impacts approved under this
certification will be added to the project total when you apply for future segments of the High Point
Intermediate Loop. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions
are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
V n Howard, Jr.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John-Domey
Central Files
971061.1tr
NUOT/P9E BRANCH
Fax :[phone] Jan 2 '98 10:08 P.01
From: Phillip Todd
To: Cyndl Bell
Date: 12131 /97 10:44am
Subjeet: X-2 and U-2536
Cyndi:
post4t• Fax Note ,71371 Data _ p?y? F p
To
r? • ?.
From
"ic:>n
coJDept.

F. 0
Pax 0
I spoke with you before Christmas about. scheduling a day to look at streams for X-2 D in Fayetteville. I have set up
Jan 22 as the day, meeting time at 10 AM at a school, US 131US 301 interesection. Hal and I will be going so if you
want, you can ride with us down there. Please let me kn6w What you travel plans are In case you desire to drive
separately.
Here Is the information you requested regarding U-2536. jn High Point. The developer of the mall site was
responsible for obtaining the permits (per the contract with DOT). The COE Issued a NWP 26 on June 14, 1993 and
the OEM Issued the 401 on June;;16, 1993. The SEA/ FONSI for the 9 section.of the project states that 4.9 +1- of
wetlands would be impacted by mail, construction/ road project, with 0.4 acres of impacts from the road project. The
SEA/ FONSI does not say.if the wetlands were In fact delineated and confirmed by the COE_ I can send you a copy
of the SEA/ FONSI if you'd like.
Hope this information is what you wanted. Have a goad: one.
Philll+p

y -? lam( a5 3?e C-
P -
l ./CA (?p11e1,J ??KQ dJ? o?Pte,
wL ??
(:?) , ? ? 1q, c_
LA ?53(p L3 =
e-,,, 04 SO
6ac 1 GEC
b? ??/3 )
ci L,
Atvc/
?,.. STAB
y ?t N
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT )R. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. 80X25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
November 19, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Michael Smith
Assistant Chief
Dear Sir:
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
.? W/ low
1,.
Subject: Guilford County, High Point Intermediate Loop, from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue), State Project No. 9.8071087; TIP No. U-2536 C.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes to construct a second
segment of the High Point Intermediate Loop. This project, identified as TIP No. U-2536 C,
connects NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) with SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue) by constructing a new
location facility and widening US 29 A (East College Drive). The project has a let date of
October 1998.
The subject project has been described in a State Environmental Assessment (EA), that
was signed on September 28, 1995. The State Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
project was signed on June 26, 1997. These documents, particularly the EA, include studies
pertaining to impacts to natural systems and protected species for the combined project. Copies
of these documents have been provided to regulatory agencies involved in the permit review
process.
The project involves the construction of two roadway facilities. The DOT proposes to
construct a four-lane divided curb and gutter facility on new location from NC 68 to US 70 A
(Lexington Avenue). From US 70 A, the existing facility will be widened to a five-lane curb and
gutter. This portion of the project extends to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue). Total project length
is 2.4 miles.
Construction of the proposed project necessitates impacts to waters of the United States.
Impacts include the replacement/ extension of an existing culvert and cut/ fill of wetlands.
0
2
Jurisdictional wetlands for the project have been delineated by DOT biologists (October
1995) using criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engine rs (COE) Wetland
Delineation Manual. This delineation during the natural resource investigation, revealed four
sites within the project study area for U-2536 C. Wetland evaluations have also been performed
according to Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina, Fourth Version, by
the Division of Environmental Management (DEM).
The DOT has avoided and minimized impacts to wetlands and streams to the extent
practicable. During the natural resources inventory investigation for the EA, the DOT delineated
jurisdictional wetlands and located these wetlands using Global Positioning Systems (GPS).
Based on this information, the DOT avoided one (1) wetland in the C section of the project and
three (3) wetlands in the A section of the project. Minimization of wetland impacts has also
occurred by selecting the roadway facility which requires the least amount of right of way, and
therefore minimizing impacts to wetlands. Figure 7 in the EA depicts the selection of the
recommended alternative and the avoiding of jurisdictional wetlands. This mitigation process
has been documented in the EA.
Table 1 summarizes impacts to waters of the United States by the project, and includes
DWQ rating, Cowardin classification, and impact areas for wetlands and surface waters.
Cowardin classification refers to guidelines developed to classify wetlands and deepwater
habitats as outlined in Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States by
Cowardin et al (1979).
Table 1.. ' Impacts to Wateis'of the United States from TIP No. U-2536 C
Station.NO. DEM Rating, Cowardin Wetland Surface Waters
12+40 to 13+80 37 PFO1C 0.63 acre N/A
14+20 to 14+70 50 PFO 1 C 0.08 acre N/A
27+36 (culvert) N/A N/A N/A 0.03 acre
Total Impacts 0.71 acre 0.03 acre
Note: PFO 1 C denotes palustrine broad-leaved deciduous forested, that is seasonally flooded.
Of the wetland impacts, 0.04 acre will result from mechanized clearing. The remaining
0.67 acre involves fill and cut of wetlands. These wetlands are associated with a drainage
channel which transitions to a intermittent stream at Station 12+70. These wetlands are disturbed
bottomland systems with areas of the forests dominated by blackberry (Rubes sp.), greenbrier
(Smilax sp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans).
At Station No. 27+36, two culverts will be installed, one for a greenway crossing and
the other for Boulding Branch. The crossing is associated with US 29 A (East College Drive)
which will be widened. The length of stream enclosure is 106 feet, or 0.03 acre.
As mentioned earlier, wetlands and streams impacted by the project have been minimized
by project planning. The DOT believes the wetlands are of low quality. The DOT believes that
compensatory mitigation for project impacts should not be required.
3
During project construction, the DOT will utilize standard Best Management Practices
(BMPs). The EA states that Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be used in the Oak
Hollow drainage area. This section of the project does not lie within this area.
The DOT has investigated issues related to cultural resources and Areas of Potential
Effect (APE). The DOT has received concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
that the culvert crossing at Boulding Branch will have no effect on the High Point College
historic district, which is an eligible National Register property. The concurrence form has been
attached to this letter.
Since completion of the EA and the FONSI, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
has been listed for Guilford County. This issue has been reviewed, and a biological conclusion
of "No Effect" has been rendered. A copy of this report has been enclosed with this permit
application.
In summary, the proposed project impacts 0.71 acre of wetlands and 0.03 acre of surface
waters (106 linear feet). The DOT has taken practicable measures to avoid and minimize
impacts to waters of the United States. The DOT believes that the proposed project can be
authorized by the COE under a Section 404 General Permit 31. Enclosed with this letter is a
completed preconstruction notification form and permit drawings that depict impacts to waters of
the United States from project construction. Application is also made for 401 Water Quality
Certification by the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance with this permit application. If you have any questions or
need any additional information, please contact Mr. Phillip Todd at [phone],
extension 314.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/pct
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, COE, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC, Northside
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. J. S. Watkins, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
T
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID: T.I.P. No. U-2536C
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #): General Permit No. 31
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NC Dept. of Transportation; Planning & Environmental Branch
2. MAILING ADDRESS: Post Office Box 25201
SUBDIVISION NAME:
CITY: Raleigh STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Guilford NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: High Point
1
I
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): NC 68, US 70 A, US 29 A and SR 1471 in
High Point (See Cover Letter)
s
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Boulding Branch
RIVER BASIN: Cave Fear
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT,
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS
(WS-I OR WS-II) ? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, EXPLAIN: _
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [x)
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST
OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS
PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
TIDAL SALTWATER (SA),
(ORW), WATER SUPPLY
2
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: N/A
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
0.71 acre
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.60 acre EXCAVATION: 0.07 acre
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: Mechanized Clearing - 0.04 acre
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.71 acre
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE:
FT AFTER:
FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: x
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY):
Road construction equipment used to build roadway facility and widen
existing roads.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Public roadway
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT
IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
Restricted study corridor and project termini. All practicable steps to
avoid and minimize wetland impacts have been taken (See EA and FONSI).
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET)
REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING
ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED:
(ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED:
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [x] NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT?
YES [x] NO [ ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [x] NO [
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED
TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003,
TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29,
AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE
SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH
EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Suburban residential
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY
IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
2 =?2-- ?Lzl
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
2
TE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
&1-4?1
D
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
October 31, 1997
Memorandum to:
From:
Subject:
Reference:
File
Phillip Todd ??Ck
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
Guilford County, High Point Intermediate Loop, from NC 68
(Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue), State Project
No. 9.8071087; TIP No. U-2536 C.
Natural Resources Technical Report for TIP No. U-2536, by
Phillip Todd, dated May'), 1995.
Since completion of the referenced report, the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) has added the bald eagle to its listing for Guilford County. The FWS has listed
the bald eagle as Threatened, a species that is likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A
description of the bald eagle has been provided, as well as a biological conclusion.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) T
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar.
Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear
flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the
surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable
habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are
the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded
ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect

No habitat for the bald eagle exists in the project study area. The nearest water
body is Oak Hollow Lake, which is over 0.5 miles southeast of the project's beginning at
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive). A mall exists between the beginning of the project and the
lake.
The database of the NC Natural Heritage Program was consulted on October 31,
1997, in regard to the presence of the bald eagle. This search revealed no occurrence of
the bald eagle in the project study area. The proposed bridge replacement project will
have no impact upon the bald eagle.
File: U-2536 C
' #` u • Is 3` Federal Aid #
CONCURRENCE FORM
FOR
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
County _GuIL.R0V-D
of Project Description
?NT'E?MEDtATE ?P ?rR.wt f•?IQTti} MI?nJ ?>T'RCF.r To J?N?.koN Sr'R.C?
AaD NwM tie, (Vq7 TIP GLLfX,& t7110/e. I4*o- Potwr
XMIL Vt 111s , representatives of the
v North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) - Aor rxev ?y r-04C co
v North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
viewed the subject project-and agreed
there are no effects on the National Register-listed property within the project's area of potential
effect and listed on the reverse.
? there are no effects on the National Register-eligible properties located within the project's area
of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
there is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties within the project's area of
potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties within the project's area of
potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
igned:
FL +/z-1 1,;-
'.epres , NCDOT a
'HwA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Z'I q
-pp
esentative O ate
State Historic Preservation Officer D de
(over)
TIP # U- 7.c;"& Federal Aid # County GutLFOV-D
Properties within area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is National
Register-listen (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
? icy po?N,r Ua?v??? CpE?

'-operties within area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status (NR or DE
ad describe effect.
l ialed: NCDOT =fit FHwA SHPO
StATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
December 17, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Michael Smith
Assistant Chief
Dear Sir:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
fr4:C4Llt?,
NV?RU?M??T? 19,E f
47
Subject: Guilford County, High Point Intermediate Loop, from NC 68 (Eastchester
Drive) to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue), State Project No. 9.8071087;
TIP No. U-2536 C.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes to construct a
second segment of the High Point Intermediate Loop. The DOT requested the Corps of
Engineers authorize the project under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit 31 in a letter
dated November 19, 1997. The permit drawings were inadvertently left out of that
transmittal. Drawings are being distributed with this letter.
A more descriptive vicinity map has also been included. This map depicts the
project in regard to its individual sections.
The B section of the project was documented in a State Environmental
Assessment/ Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI). This document was signed
on December 10, 1993. Construction on the B section began in June 1994 and was
completed in August 1995.

Thank you for you assistance with this project. If you have any questions, please
contact Mr. Phillip Todd at [phone], extension 314.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/pct
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, COE, Raleigh
Mr. Eric Galamb, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC, Northside
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. J. S. Watkins, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
. . I
M r
Ir1 PAU 1..
PAU
$ Dr.
I tf .07
J ' 11?
Dr.
o?
_j c mroao es,AU HIGH POINT nu r.,+•"
rAUDOlrll 7r 1111.0
[pAwosorr !5? POP. 61,380 s
d5
SCALE
0'S 1 I>_04 ?i
u GreM SA E 1 - 0 1 ,ntlE
!( EAU °
L ?C ,.rJ l _
N. C, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VI `? IN `y I T GUILFORD COUNTY
PROJECT: 9.8071087 (U-2536C)
MAPS HIGH POINT INTERMEDIATE
LOOP FROM NC 68 TO SR 1471
SHEET-L_ OF
' S T O K li l_r'1 I 1••• J, Hilhlnwerf oe tnurn Jnv
acre \,`.r-•'•' a9 EII souro I r t0 Meesv,Ht
moo` .Dlllor In a filch .IeP E IS
Walnut P e UIh I 1 TTII
I Pe 5l _,J
`I,. I tiKm. rove1, H.•leu: 65 1 i9 AI
•r„t Si ? nmanlor '.. L^Av I ! It f I If 1 IurAle :Y
Ee /qr_ •? 1 S I5 io k
1 Wilh am Shur Mrllt
S1°h?e it let 1 -- :5 rro:oec ton
Tob accoal?,, 65 - - - S = -7 ? - - -• ? - _ _ i _ ? Matwmt - _ - _? Il I1! ???1
^ 0 Rur I Ilall 9ele cr r > - -
1t Bena-i.' ( f ..•. lo'` Oueoh I 1 S
1 1 ?, Gtek 1 llu.hnur'rtr Carr 5 1
1f)• Slan ervrgt, ( I I ?` • Sum erhe tl'Blowns ;I5 N.•. t Un-
Mon hullo r' I
L 5A
B! Ihanra
d
a 1 171 i^? all er town I Oa 50 Summa'7/, 10 Rl l!
o ? "Wilt 1-uA,• tit Y.? Altamaha
F• 1'-l I H h a R,wWr ??Jr ._ Q1roQtr 6i f e9 .I Ba
In rams; ,+.: -' ,{ .-
yT J` rlaIII ?w 2 t 5• Efnn Svi le 0 R , D LEI ai men. G leg
Burlingtor
dlle? en llrel l
'slh. lewisvi le 2- •' -, i 1 C tai ?.° r 17 n Mc antvdl NS w
+wC??. r? 9 \ \ 1• r ? Cwllord' c`jjj(fff??(((? ?j ,S?6fonvr O O ? '0 1. 1
n'Salem y 2' , " J :Co\en`o2 Sedalia , ,-=L 1 i) ;; *:a If 66
1 1e' '' %F,'s
\t. ?1 ! /?1.' I 1 J ilia 69 .?' S 10'': MI Wmtstl
?•, a _?;?/•N ?Sd I A - -o _ . - ' edReTlehir? ' ' + _ ® ! Alaman raha *a 19
IM?1d,Clemmons - Ifer ;: - io.f `Greensboro I' S.'°^""'/ +? Swepso 1e O
ISRJ ro-? f 11 s I n / - 71 u.. aJ J n/,
'l oin?
dvan[S 5 ,`AM1tadu Si!'f Nig l -1'f I t Pleiunl Cuoen f !AIAMANCE 1 J? 1
I? ?I E + 5 Mlewar I ,Jy, f i21 Nrmef: p! r f s
T .1 [ 101
`i tlcome aA?ec?lr-
f
;?Itr w adkrn ! ?, Thomasv ille..'
5 eUS /?- f+Tr rl rClld e 1 Imi _ ,\,,,,.,.+. ..+Y?"' r Itf Sl;l
.,? Collette .?1 •?
C Z5' •r ?,?. 49 ?Eh hilney rr
J'ni .rlv'• 1 lc
jor? 1 'Y?" ' 1 q • 1, 61 G11 la ertl Crotf \? , I / Snaw Camp _,- - Ar•? r rC
't, JII 1 ):oe iI Liberl5 -
Reed I 1 - 1 1 ?!s?I.E1;lOg(On ? ,.` 6 .?
ma 1 ?y
\ 150 1 it + Randle
)I'`?. S I Sopnu ) O Gnrf Che.e1,,• I. I ?•fearrin to $ tic .
rUKh4ndfyf0 7f _kr i ?. Crulchhtld Xrdi
we r J s "? Staley, . aJ y, Villap, r 1,1
m 5 I' ? Vrprl vAl f L ?.,,.SilkHope 1S \ favmIt n,
D A V, O N ' Rt A N D P I?HI
5 7 I 5 I:f ^ aid •' frankhnv 11 IJ I ~X `f it .-? Rr^um
?( r.: • 1p ) a U e r_'• ?1 r ?y Scale of Mlles 14 l
t ?oencei'? n „ CIA 0 5 10 20 30 c/
East e.vhdl
JnlnCll SOUlhmo^I + farmer I
m 1310h Hp.A I i• - (21,0 5 0 10 20 30 AO 48 ''
Glanile J."A" \ 1 S Scale of Kilometers 1H,
1.3
1123
IAU
c ,.
- ,
1.10
lo•
`epos EJ,J
0
1V, .ya MU / %
z
H
U
@ W4 ?. M rx
pFe I ? @ F c w ?
"? ? ? O CG
a' LT, ?. Z U
cc1
c? o G ? E-+ z O
\? O z U Z
?d\ ````` \ ?t O 0 0 RiI
1.0 ot \ W ? W C G4 E-
1
Cc tOC TT
? ? ' \11 1 ?' To
f o
I? .
Z_ _o
Q u ?I
m a
C7 l all?li \ U o
r?? ; ? ;? J ,\ 1 o A Q
?h If : I? II ° U 3 .? z
°° /b4? ? ?• i 1 ?\ I ?? ? ? W F H
?3°? i° c c? ? ? F U F ?
c -15 a? I'1? •? ? I O ? O
SO ?1? I, z a z z
1
Ilp
1?\ al.
e
NN- 9
c i
C\j
\ oA .- , wQy ° u i i
? All
00'60+ZI Od - g I °o
g\\dl
O
Z?2

,\ Ali 77,
;.
II ?II ??
COO,
a
j ail ??? Z I ?I
X11 .. 7 ! U
I Vu
i
00+01 I i
M
I \
009 ?,\ ?i+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I4
I
I
0
z .4
w^
U

?

?
w
°
zU vl
° o Z o
?
o ? F
z
0 v O° MI
a > w `o
x
w
a
U 0. C
z

J

0
u')
O
O
O
a °
z =
w o
U ?
N C
z
Ul
a
?
u
w
?z ?a
v. In v, w
rv F. w 3
Zn? zz
KXx
W
..a
U
0
N
0
E
0
}
?? m Ala
\ k?T l
\ - /

II \ 96-01.90?n v3yY
'SSYl7 ON
f-10-90 ONnoj
I? I? II_
11 i ??/ f
1``I 11„ ?I
11? I
a ?>
W
II ? ? C2
I
i I I ? I
z .,

a d' F ? w

4 ?F
z
.< ? U ; x,00
U
b] 2 z? l
F o z

o
Z
u F O
o w

o za w
U A a

z -?
N?\' 1 fey \ \ \\ '. ?7
oa
Q Q \`i'p OS! i
' <
w, l J SRO d?b\ Iy
+? ?^.Nn ,? o a \ , "`111
m I I l
II ??
k
r ? I
0
z
W ,
J
F U
WO
G m
W
U
C
N?
?J
w
a
w
3
w
O
!x
, CA
.y
c? 4 ? 1?
cl.
G 0 0 0 0
?? o 0

4o Q

.fir Ci
O
O M
N M
N
.
q u M M

b ^.
o ar . 45
6
a 0 0
o o 0 0
a- a' v

L
N
O
O
N
3 x o 0
b
?. 00
o 00
0 0
U ? ? o 0
b

[ ' ?. cua a o 0
O ON
ct: o.x o o o
u ... 0 0 0

U
o ? U

O
? N M

O
M Ct C?
N

?
? N M
I
z
O
¢Cntn
Ir?
a x a Q 0
00
2 O O o
U
w
H O z?
p ZOo;?
00?aE-+ 0
a?aUaC?4
O
w?>C7C0001
Q O
U a x 0 E
z
I
MEMORANDUM
DWQ - Water Quality Section
RECEIVED
jot 2 41996
DATE: July 17, 1996 EpNIRONMENSALSCIENCES
TO: John Dorney, ESB, Wetlands
FROM: Michelle Suverkrubbe, Planning Branch 44?
THROUGH: Alan Clark "Supervisor
RE: Transmittal of FONSI; DEHNR# 97-0029
DOT - High Point Intermediate Loop
US 311-Johnson St.; NC 68-SR 1471
Guilford County TIP#U-2536
Original EA #96-0328
Attached is a copy of the FONSI for DO?'i S proposed Intermediate Loop for High Point,
NC. Eric Galamb originally responded to^?A and his letter is included in Appendix A.
Please review and provide written comments, if any, to Melba McGee by August 9, 1996.
Please cc me on all your responses to Melba.
Thanks!
Please give me a call at [phone], ext 567 if you should have any questions. My fax
number is [phone] if you would prefer faxing me your comments.
m1s:Vhpfonsi.doc
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resrurces
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: County:
Date:
? Project located in 7th floor library
Date Response Due (firm deadline):
fa N 5? ?-? ? ?? - ? , t,?d rat U s 3i i -- 9 AH .>L st
t ?G?B -,o s2?`??l 0 TiP - IA-25 3Co
This project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office/Phone Regional Office Area In-House Review
? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water ? Marine Fisheries
? Fayetteville ? Air ? Coastal Management ? Water Planning
? Water ? Water Resources ? Environmental Health
? Mooresville
?Groundwater
Wildlife ?Solid waste management
? Raleigh ? Land Quality Engineer ? Forest Resources ? Radiation Protection
? Washington ? Recreational Consultant ? Land Resources ? David Foster
El Coastal Management Consultant El Parks and Recreation ? Other (specify)
El Wilmington
? Others
'Environmental Management
? Winston-Salem PWS Monica Swihart
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager
? No objection to project as proposed
? No Comment
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
II
?Recommended for further development with recommendations for
strengthening (comments attached)
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attached/authority(ies) cited)
In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
?Applicant has been contacted
.]Applicant has not been contacted
? Project Controversial (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement not needed
? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
? Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO
Melba McGee Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Ps 104
Proposed Intermediate Loop
From US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP Project No. U-2536
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For Further Information Contact:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
NC Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
atD e- H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Proposed Intermediate Loop
From US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP Project No. U-2536
STATE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Documentation Prepared By:
%%
kk AR
,666806
ESS1
SEAL
19818
Date 96 Mafk L. P, P. ?''?qR!{ "? Qt ??.•`?
Project Planning Engineer •?I oil* Date Linwood Stone, CPM
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS
A. A bicycle and pedestrian culvert is proposed at the existing High Point Greenway near
McGuinn Drive. This greenway culvert will provide electrical conduit to allow for
lighting, and the City of High Point will be responsible for the lights (refer to discussion in
Section II.E of this document).
B. Hazardous spill catchment basins are proposed along the project between Old Winston
Road and Johnson Street because this portion is located within the critical area of the Oak
Hollow Lake watersupply watershed (refer to discussion in Section I.F of the
Environmental Assessment (EA)).
C. Sidewalks are proposed along both sides of the project between SR 1471 (Montlieu
Avenue) and US 70A (Lexington Avenue). These sidewalks will connect with the
existing greenway (refer to discussion in Section II.D of this document).
D. The project relocates approximately 30 meters (100 feet) of unnamed stream #2 (US #2).
The relocated channel will be designed according to the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) guidelines "NC Stream Protection and Improvement Guidelines."
The proposed channel design will be similar to the original channel in width, depth,
gradient, and substrate. Site specific requirements for re-establishment of bank vegetation
with planting regime, meanders, and habitat structures will be determined through
coordination with the NCWRC field staff during the hydraulic design phase of the project
(refer to discussion in Section II.B of this document).
E. Erosion and sedimentation in the area draining to Oak Hollow Lake will be controlled
through the specification, installation, and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation
control appropriate for high quality waters (refer to discussion in Section IV.B.4.b of the
EA).
F. The project may require a floodway modification. If required, the NCDOT Hydraulics
Design Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
and local authorities during final design regarding application and approval for the
necessary floodway revisions (refer to discussion in Section II.C of this document).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE RECOMMENDED ACTION ................................ I
II. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES ......................................... 2
A. Permits Required ................................................................................. 2
B. Stream Rechannelization ..................................................................... 2
C. Floodway Modification ....................................................................... 2
D. Sidewalks ............................................................................................ 2
E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Culvert ........................................................... 3
III. NEED FOR ACTION ..................................................................................... 3
IV. CIRCULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .......................... 3
V. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT......... 4
A. City of High Point ............................................................................... 4
VI. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING AND SUBSEQUENT TO THE
PUBLIC HEARING ........................................................................................ 4
VII. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ....................... 6
A. Cost Estimates ..................................................................................... 6
B. Cross Sections ..................................................................................... 6
C. Right of Way ....................................................................................... 6
D. Design Speed ....................................................................................... 6
E. Intersection Improvements .................................................................. 7
F. Median Openings ................................................................................. 7
G. Retaining Wall ..................................................................................... 7
H. Alignment Shift .................................................................................... 8
1. Wetland Findings ................................................................................. 8
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ............................. 8
Figures
Figures IA and IB Vicinity Maps
Figure 2 Proposed Typical Sections
Figure 3 Proposed Median Openings
A en ix
Appendix A - Agency Comments
Proposed Intermediate Loop
From US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street
and From NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
High Point, Guilford County
State Project No. 9.8071087
TIP Project No. U-2536
I. DESCRIPTION OF THE RECOMMENDED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct the
Intermediate Loop as a multilane facility involving mostly new location. The project is divided
into two parts: (1) Part A, from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson Street and (2) PartC,
from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue), a length of approximately 3.8
kilometers (2.4 miles). The middle portion of the Intermediate Loop (U-2536 B) between
Johnson Street and NC 68 has been constructed.
The project is included in the 1997-2003 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
The estimated project costs are summarized as follows:
TIP Cost Current Cost
e nt Estimate Estimate
Part A $6,150,000 $5,512,000
Part C $6,325,000 $4,934,500
Total $12,475,000 $10,446,500
The estimated cost in the TIP is $12,475,000, which includes $5,425,000 for right of way and
$7,050,000 for construction. The current estimated cost is $10,446,500, which includes
$4,996,500 for right of way acquisition and $5,450,000 for construction. Part C is scheduled for
right of way acquisition in fiscal year 1997 (FY 1997) and construction in FY 1999. Part A is
scheduled for right of way acquisition in FY 2000 and construction in FY 2002.
The recommended alternative (Alternative 2) provides a five-lane curb and gutter section
and a four-lane divided curb and gutter section with a raised median. The five-lane curb and gutter
section extends from US 311 (North Main Street) to Old Winston Road and from US 70A
(Lexington Avenue) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue). The four-lane divided curb and gutter
section extends from Old Winston Road to Johnson Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to
Lexington Avenue. Refer to Figures 1B, 2A, and 2B for proposed typical sections and their
locations.
The five-lane curb and gutter cross section provides a 19.2-meter (64-foot) roadway with
two travel lanes in each direction and a continuous center turn lane. The four-lane divided curb
and gutter section provides a 21.3-meter (71-foot) roadway with two travel lanes in each
direction and a 5.7-meter (19-foot) raised median. Both typical sections include 3.6-meter (12-
foot) lanes and 3.0-meter (10-foot) berms on each side of the road behind the curbs.
II. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES
A. Permits Reauired
Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters are anticipated. In accordance with
provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a permit will be required
from the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged or fill material into
"Waters of the United States."
Impacts to surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands resulting from the proposed project
may be authorized under one or more Nationwide Permits (NWP), i.e. NWP 14 or NWP 26. A
NWP 14 is likely to be applicable at most ditch and stream crossings found in the project study
area provided criteria set by the permit are met. A NWP 26 is anticipated for any discharge of
dredged or fill material into headwaters and/or isolated jurisdictional wetlands provided conditions
set by the permit are met.
In addition, this project will also require a 401 Water Quality General Certification from
the DEM prior to the issuance of a Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed
activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. Final decisions concerning
applicable permits for the subject project rests with the COE.
B. Stream Rechannelization
Approximately 30 meters (100 feet) of an unnamed stream (US #2) will be relocated with
the project. Coordination will be conducted with the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission
(WRC) district fisheries biologist during the hydraulic design phase of the project. The relocation
of the stream will be similar in nature to the original channel in terms of width, depth, gradient,
and substrate. Site specific requirements for re-establishment of bank vegetation with planting
regime, meanders, and habitat structures (root wads, wing deflectors, etc.) will be determined
through coordination with WRC field staff. These items will follow WRC's established document
entitled "NC Stream Protection and Improvement Guidelines" and will incorporate any highway
specific guidance jointly developed between WRC and the NCDOT Hydraulics and Roadside
Environmental Units.
C. Floodwav Modification
The project crosses an unnamed tributary to Boulding Branch that is included in the High
Point Flood Insurance Study. This crossing is in a designated flood hazard zone and is included
in a detailed flood study. The stream has established regulatory floodplain and floodway limits
and corresponding established water surface elevations. Because the roadway grade will need to
be raised to accommodate the proposed culvert extension and supplementation, the project may
require a floodway modification. If required, the NCDOT Hydraulics Design Unit will coordinate
with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and local authorities during final
design regarding application and approval for the necessary floodway revisions.
D. Sidewalks
Sidewalks are recommended along both sides of the roadway between Lexington Avenue
and Montlieu Avenue in the vicinity of High Point University. The sidewalks will connect with
the Boulding Branch greenway. NCDOT will participate in 60 percent of the sidewalk cost up to
a total of two percent of the project construction cost. The City will be responsible for the
remaining 40 percent, as outlined in the NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines.
E. Bicycle and Pedestrian Culvert
A 4.3-meter (14-foot) by 2.4-meter (8-foot) reinforced concrete box culvert is proposed
at the existing High Point Greenway near McGuinn Drive to allow bicycle and pedestrian traffic
to cross under the Intermediate Loop. The proposed greenway culvert will provide electrical
conduit to allow for lighting, and the City of High Point will be responsible for the lights.
III. NEED FOR ACTION
The roadways in the vicinity of the project are mostly radial facilities which carry traffic
between the High Point central business district and outlying suburban areas. Several of these
radials are currently experiencing congestion during peak periods and have accident rates two to
three times the statewide average for similar roadways. In addition, the existing roadway
network does not provide adequate mobility between the radial facilities.
The proposed Intermediate Loop will increase mobility in the area by connecting these
radials and completing a loop around the central business district. The project implements a
portion of the High Point Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan and will function as an urban minor
arterial to improve access to the northwestern portion of the city. This facility will provide
greater traffic carrying capacity and will help reduce the accident potential by decreasing the
traffic volumes and congestion on the intersecting roads.
IV. CIRCULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The environmental assessment was circulated among the following federal, state, and local
agencies. Written comments were received from agencies noted with an asterisk (*).
Army Corps of Engineers
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Environmental Protection Agency
* Department of Cultural Resources
* Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Department of Public Instruction
* N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
* State Clearinghouse
Revon G Planning Agency
Guilford County Commissioners
* City of High Point
These comments and related issues, included in Appendix A, have been addressed in this
document.
V. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. City of High Point
Comment:
The lane configurations at the following intersections along the Intermediate Loop
may need to be altered or further investigated (refer to letter in Appendix A for specific
recommendations):
US 311 (North Main Street)
Old Winston Road
Johnson Street
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue)
Response:
The projected traffic volumes and proposed lane configurations at each of the
above intersections have been reviewed. The results of this review are described below.
At US 311, a shared through and left turn lane was considered for the westbound
approach but not recommended. This shared lane does not allow desirable signal phasing
at the intersection. In addition, the projected left turning traffic volumes do not justify
dual left turns. At Old Winston Road, an additional northbound through lane was
considered but not recommended. The northbound through volumes on Old Winston
Road are not high enough to justify this additional through lane. At Johnson Street, dual
lefts were considered along the westbound approach but not recommended. The
westbound left turning movements onto Johnson Street do not warrant dual left turn lanes.
At Centennial Street, dual left turn lanes were considered along the southbound approach
of Centennial Street but not recommended because of right of way constraints at the
intersection. An exclusive right turn lane is needed at this approach to separate turning
traffic from the high volume of through traffic. At Montlieu Avenue, a single left turn lane
was considered along the southbound approach but not recommended. Dual lefts are
needed to accommodate the high volumes of left turning traffic. The auxiliary through
lane on Montlieu Avenue will be of sufficient length to safely merge the traffic into a
single lane.
VI. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING AND SUBSEQUENT TO
THE PUBLIC HEARING
On 1/23/96, a public hearing for the subject project was held in the Fellowship Hall of
Christ United Methodist Church. Approximately 175 people attended the hearing including
representatives from the City of High Point, High Point University, and NCDOT. The following
organizations expressed their support for the Intermediate Loop:
City of High Point
High Point University
High Point Chamber of Commerce
High Point Economic Development Commission, Transportation Committee
Oak Hollow Mall
Christ United Methodist Church
First Wesleyan Church Complex
These groups believe the project will reduce congestion and improve accessibility to this northern
portion of the city. In addition, these groups requested that the project schedule be further
accelerated to keep up with the increasing travel demands.
Comments and suggestions were also offered by the public. Principal topics of concern
and responses to these concerns are discussed below:
Comment:
Noise barriers or landscape buffers should be considered at the Wesleyan Arms
Retirement Village near Centennial Street and at residences adjacent to the project in the
Greenbrier Subdivision.
Response:
Based upon the traffic noise analysis included in the Environmental Assessment,
noise barriers are not justified. However, a landscaping buffer will be included at these
locations to act as a visual screen between these properties and the proposed roadway.
NCDOT's Landscaping Guidelines make provisions for including trees and shrubs up to
3/4 of a percent of the construction cost. Additional landscaping may be incorporated
into the project if the City wants to participate in the funding. The responsibilities of the
City and the NCDOT regarding the proposed landscaping will be finalized during the
preparation of the Municipal agreement.
Comment:
Representatives from Christ United Methodist Church, Wesleyan Arms Retirement
Village, and the R. L. Honbarrier Company requested that NCDOT maintain suitable access to
their properties.
Rest:
During the final design stage of the project, the NCDOT Roadway Design Unit
will review the property owners' requests in maintaining acceptable access to these
properties.
Comment:
A median opening and traffic signal should be considered at Windchase Court to improve
access for residents of Windchase Townhomes.
Response:
A median opening will be provided at Windchase Court. However, a traffic signal
is not recommended at this location because the distance between Windchase Court and
Johnson Street is less than the desired spacing between signalized intersections.
Comment:
Consider shifting the alignment to follow more of existing College Drive on the north side
of Lexington Avenue.
Response:
The northern approach of College Drive intersects Lexington Avenue at a different
angle from the south approach. To connect with Centennial Street at the proposed
location, the alignment cannot be acceptably designed to use all of the northern portion of
College Drive.
Comment:
The Norwood Avenue and Centennial Street intersection will be located approximately 45
meters (145 feet) from the Intermediate Loop. Improvements should be considered to make
Norwood Avenue a safe intersection.
Response:
A minor realignment of Norwood Avenue is proposed at its intersection with
Centennial Street. This realignment will enhance safety at this location by increasing the
spacing between the intersections and improving sight distance.
VII. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Cost Estimates
The project is currently estimated to cost $10,446,500, which includes $4,996,500
for right of way acquisition and $5,450,000 for construction.
B. Cross Section
The median width along the four-lane divided cross section has been increased
from 4.8 meters (16 feet) to 5.7 meters (19 feet). This provides sufficient room to contain
a 0.5-meter (1.5-foot) curb and gutter on each side of the median and a 1.2-meter (4-foot)
island where left turn lanes are needed. The berm width along the entire length of the
project has increased from 2.4 meters (8 feet) to 3.0 meters (10 feet) in accordance with
recently adopted design guidelines. This wider berm allows more space for sidewalks and
utilities.
C. Right of Way
The proposed right of way width has increased from 27.4 meters (90 feet) to 30.5 meters
(100 feet) throughout the length of the project.
D. Design SReed
The design speed has been revised from 70 km/hr (45 mph) to 80 km/hr (50 mph).
E. Intersection Improvements
The lane configurations at the following intersections have been revised since the EA was
approved.
US 311 (North Main Street)
Channelization is proposed along the east and west approaches of the Intermediate Loop
at the US 311 intersection to prevent conflicts with left turning traffic at the intersection.
Pine Valley Drive
Section I.D of the EA stated that a "T" intersection is proposed at Pine Valley Drive to
provide direct access only to the southern portion of Pine Valley Drive. However, the distance
between the Intermediate Loop and the Sunview Avenue/ Pine Valley Drive intersection is not
sufficient for providing a safe intersection with the project. For this reason, Pine Valley Drive will
no longer intersect directly with the project but will be accessed from Old Winston Road.
Centennial Street
Figure 4C of the EA shows dual left turn lanes on both approaches of Centennial Street
and on the northbound approach of the Intermediate Loop. Because of right of way constraints at
this intersection, these dual left turn lanes are no longer recommended.
US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
Channelization is proposed along the south approach of the Intermediate Loop at
the Lexington Avenue intersection to prevent left turning conflicts at the intersection.
F. Median Openings
Nine median openings are proposed along the project at signalized intersections and
designated locations. Median openings will be provided at the following locations (refer to
Figure 3):
Old Winston Road
Windchase Court
Johnson Street
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
Northern Entrance to Wesleyan Arms Retirement Village
SR 1507 (Centennial Street)
Southern Entrance to Wesleyan Arms Retirement Village
Entrance to Christ United Methodist Church
US 70A (Lexington Avenue)
G. Retaining Wall
To avoid relocating the High Point University track, a 67-meter (220-foot)
retaining wall is proposed along the west side of the roadway beside the track.
H. Alignment Shift
Representatives from the City of High Point and Wesleyan Arms Retirement
Village requested that the alignment be shifted away from the retirement complex west of
Centennial Street. A shift of approximately 9 meters (30 feet) is recommended near the
retirement community to provide a buffer between the roadway and to minimize impacts
to the property.
Wetland Findings
Executive Order 11990 requires appropriate documentation to show that there is no
practicable alternative to the proposed construction and that the proposed action includes all
practicable measures to minimize harm to jurisdictional wetlands. Jurisdictional wetlands, as
defined by 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground
water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do
support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions.
All practicable steps have been taken both to avoid and minimize impacts to
wetlands. The alignment was located to avoid three wetland sites associated with
Unnamed Stream #1 (US #1) between Pine Valley Drive and Johnson Street (refer to
Figure 7 in the EA for locations). However, because of the fixed endpoints on Part C and
the extent of the development on each side of the project corridor, Sites 1, 2, and 3 near
Centennial Street cannot be avoided. The proposed curb and gutter cross section
minimizes impacts to these unavoidable wetlands with its relatively narrow construction
limits. The actual wetland impacts have slightly increased from 0.2 hectare (0.6 acre) to
0.3 hectare (0.7 acre) due to an alignment shift, but the adjusted alignment minimizes
impacts to the Wesleyan Arms Retirement Village.
Impacts to wetlands have been minimized to the extent practicable. During
construction, NCDOT will implement stringent erosion and sedimentation control
measures along with Best Management Practices to control sedimentation in adjacent
wetlands and to ensure that the amount of impacted wetlands will be minimized. Based on
the above considerations, there is no practicable alternative to the proposed construction
in wetlands, and the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to
these resources.
VIII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the proposed project documented in the Environmental
Assessment, and upon comments received from federal, state, and local agencies and the public, it
is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation that this project will not have a
significant adverse impact upon the human or natural environment. Therefore, an environmental
impact statement will not be required.
MLR/plr
FIGURES
High P
0 t
rh d ?fO1nf MontmNb If
Summit
j, r~ 7 Osstoef
LR O R D IE
„ Is
yc??snfwl sonvt
I 70 Sf slr
6 i. +w•
1 22 10 Wmtfsf Alf7n
reensboro
P11111111 nt Golden f
1 I 1A711 e, Kano
U-2536 A
PROJECT
LIMITS
00 ??•,
•
•
mild
rGUUKM 62, It`
ttANtIOt1M „
awoaat ab
HIGH POINT
POP. e3,3W

U-2536 C
PROJECT
LIMITS

1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
PROPOSED INTERMEDIATE LOOP
FROM US 311 TO SR 1471
HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY
U-2536
FIGURE I A
VICINITY MAP

C\j
IL-S?h_
. II J Y II i.
7: - Ai
?L+?PJ
I ''i
J P,r., a ,K IS
I r
3 7M
E:17/
J OOM UrE ...,\N A Sr.
o O / yep N \?? ?
\ o SON eO?'? ? I ? \
- t ¢ Z 1 9 ???'`y
m b
WAY NICE ?BOLING6R KE -'tom 1 ]110H `\ bK;, \
`? ?/ .i s M '1 NQ
z ~I J i?,;NV 1 as
,? cYi I - - n B R A G G
t z \ ? i I ? ° i0?- COQ ! +'E? z u. U \ ?` - [J V]
C S u z V
z l O
m ?
\ iul •t N ?j ri
a n '^ lJ \ N i0hv - ld' N7(lay 1 L)R. Q /-. 1\.? I Z yt
111 k
JT w
rz? E
DH Y\A
"LL V ,lnwr St POD
s } a u?? E? tH
_ _ ? ? I `Y ? ?u 1 z w / N ? f
1 6 , ?3 m F .k ? d N. u+
u r ?, r i
WII __ ? J
(.Lg:lllJ.S I'VINNA I NFID) LOC 1215
W???O.,b dR :?
G r ' ? ?Ll
NN ? ?/ V, d Ya °If
L
° B7w( -
/ rd mw c n ? r
o°
sx u
`G
U• ` lS S7N9p 't5 ANN 30,
-1i '
11 "• U z J _"1 - ??
/ '1S a- ° 1S3tl U! r
QI / 3 a z? Ta L U 1 ?s
0 p"' ., p ? ? W inn [?, .: .J J O
)? Q j ..1 r? z° w ?• 1 c' W 705 OObB
\? Q ???? o ,?/ ? C 3901tlH W `?•j 1 41 ? _ I N
?
\? I w PO + ? ?.
7E
?\ `` ?°'-i H-•t ??? O W n u W J O Q= Oro' ? +/
I
6 ?
? v w
t3 'l' ?? /'y''k ° m •ul"t DR. W wwo
v? ? O R Z U O ?J w W Z
O O Z N Y 7 to W Ci
? ?-•? 3 Z O
Ste,1,`,?? F a
N ? u m u u n ]o V
?-'1 W d V
. Z w ? / 1S M U a
n 1// s
=H3153H0 MAD?SC N O 3901#1
?j ap J U
0 (?
d / N0 111W VR N, u nAMllf ;N ? ?`? SOM
LS , N of ??"?V
'Otl 53w ? , N ` M S 7 r ?/ ? S
NOSN.or '.v
n ?
?4,p0' 1 ? ? > (n 1S z o ti' ? i vli? "?vE f1
fj ? RDA ?4.=J Ih I 1S j 4 ? y-+t NtlOB 13M ? ? k- +Q ?j 00Ny 1';?' ? / 1+\.' ?i '
3a u s v, a L o > I o i
l ? I o t ? ??r? ?,, t
f h , 1 II .. d „1 ? l i ?? h n? t'? \I\
00 *4
L S T. O /
I ? O / 'St i? ? ?Q W
f?rclRKw00D \? f
\ DR. y t l h ?
//kk $( y U ?
i?POSI vA? w a S s F n n I Ft d
> y y 110DS 3tfd
I / a t F
W I ; w w .-? i th v i T v, I? Ok'G _ ld
iFU a a n ° rt /1 LAUREL _ b0 m
Y 1pb
I-N ?y \ yJ? ?? W ??j J .Z- ) ° (rS i a l EA(
CO
? n /f?-?+ ? a s w U r- p J h 0 " i°ti
d _ z W ; u > k'(t LL
ab z / a t v)J O U ] 6 (SJ?w vER Z S p a J
EN00 j
MCI. >
j Z v w 2 a p
_ jy' 'b NS ? s ?(k C+ n I ?_ arm z
? a r
.10
J 7
?a /?_ Wtl?re i ?"? v
ci
"l/rn L , Cl) fiREf NM0.1U ?? HALL 51] ?_ 3. '•+' Q?
r) 1,
'?`J" /`?' ?1 II I II Q p'
wOG et9N3A 0 p O D
i z
s. z / \Li W H III +' Ir?\ ` / ` ^ ?= - / °L CC Z
Z V ?-+ 1 7, f 3
STC"E
-,-- Z-,,Z

w
0
U
cn
J
U
f'-
W
Z
Q
J
tt')
w
C7
0
a U-'
CD
D
U
r
3
0
0

i
E
F-
O
3
a
3
LL
O
Q
Q
w
r
r
O
0
z
a
m
0
vi

O a
0

N g?
r
U
J 5
Q Z Z E ,. E ,.

?
a W m
?CC N N
DU

W ¢3
Z
J E (V

E
2
O_
a
3
LL
O
r
c?
Q
cc
w
r
r
m
C7
O
z
a
53HDL53?
n (5
° O x ?m0
F Z Z / G ; z In AHD
° F c En r
~ PINE HURST OF' / I \ rte. ' ^ f ^ ^O
y I \\ o VO 4/ ?l
m OVERBROOK wALDO ISrJ n ?Nr i 94a, ?+ r R' ``
?ZJ
CLU
' I 5, r y
R
0 ?a wHnE I [ if, noH n OcOMN331!19
D 1BHIS,p, , I(III? S(? ?r1 /??
DR• O01
1 D r A it U O?
? rQ p r,l O w m m (???,
0W in • ??? O
o n A m r? Z .? V ? ,I.
2 T C O r Z nm m n ,, ?`?? • OlyN1 Ov q4?..
'Do
nd0 NE +' / n
f i ON3M 0 1s ry00p. ° T Ll0 =Vm o ql
m DR C, m
m d 3 t`0 Z m 4 ° O z m q f
q m A I = _ v m 0
org4 Otv3 i Nl n a I T h
Y H
NI H
Oq i Ell O
n •?a HICKS 13tl r1Vl
A A p u a m v
P %_
H L ? I/ _ E m ,?„ G2 S n
ONO ?I ?_ EARLS ~ 7
PgESCOT T
D D m ; v m ^^bn ISOd
S T Pi
/ %D ,?„ O O nr
. • Ba n ^ ? 15 ? \
y000 .1S l m EIOO?HtliN = ^ tl0 ?,
• ? 1Y ? I I O? n
ILI
T / N Z l:. _ I? 1? - n m \\ I ?_ SnIpE
11(( //J I r
to m 1? ST 0 . Oki
to 1, D
,1N0 ? rr ? :1 ? wEl BORN
1n / I S o r z $ 1 En r~ / O ^r^`
a °
?E L
JOHNSON L
L4 oo
l (? I~O, IIf kl ry t
\ n? I?.?- I o ? N µ ` I . N , YE 5 RD.
c? ?
4
S I
p0 NC IIIWtlH J.?,
'N HA MIL Tpp O ??- ,
x -? FF
o(' p N1510vrv CHESTS Rm RIDGE
\ /\ Cly at AIN I-m mD ?.
F, to cr, 0 u z -, to? y T ??
C m 'v z ??? \ ??'
'tic 1, I"Inj
zI ?= e D o 4 ? b
s O r ? r /`? S T,
O O q 9 ,^ 4 0 ??
ID 00)
O xDV Or c+ . a o ?? ~?
`? Gw < Z COO- mST y ? ?__
O ddb ? ? * ??? ? I
A G O? ` D q ? a v ?????
a p
N td„
//-? ? yR10GES ! 00 ???
O 1
BHOO- SIDE m VNda A S Ira v / ?????`` O?. -
._J 5 r r °o i ?yyTJ a ? I?
V FOREST tl o o L, r rr1 C
ST. DE AGNE S Si n I?
n m
•= ? r I x A o ° ?o [ ~ C/] n
D m v C 4 A ,x no O O ? n O (\
n r co G m ., s A, + L Q)
Z ?J1 O nm m O F n* T C='Ii
1?.11?' \ 0 O 9c Smm PAL ME R 5i
9 , I-
D D
n
0
IM7 - -- !,
c n Bvenu, n-^ s ?, r
• I` r SR 1507 (CENTENNIAL STREET)
cr T• s r D v _ I
m U ., ?n1 --.-? ?.JI --??tl F r n 1 2 ^ c n p \ ET o
rn
's 0
1 m s' A r u
r y A n 4 \ U I
303?? \ mom ,,, D = a =? o t m
V4.
r Z A ^?7j o n "IL I
? / Jr? Od' ? x 4, O D D v
NO 'A fl
O D A K / 1'1
\ Y O Ir _ n
2 ( 2 u
'BO ARUCN PL. ARDlN PL 1, ?, v o
\ , xx IO T1,0' '?? IS
S
J 2 ^O? ?? M^ OE r- n D ?C 1 IE G`
O \ ?,,,? ^^ / * 4?y-J / ? O SHAVEv m ? a o T' v ? ,
,10
n J I /tom s ° r° 4D L FS -?
" 2 I p
O
P 1' ,,9 ? W O s N4 DR. _ ?. KNOLL C7, Z
? N
ra OS2 D3r,-
.10 1 y / ,1 J -??ZSi M? Gu Z~ I p O m
\ d \
'A CJ3
W'JIN 1VM \
4 O- CIR. A O
?- Tp 01 \
4?..r?r?, l? ? ? wiL TSH?RE 5, xr O S m _--
G I r , v
m - m
CANO D
o
[VV 0o C
002
\ L , F c ?? n.? c .C t 4
7 '-.l a ? n / } WAVE FL r?a i/ ? p v ? O
? 7 2 0
ST. C)
r U r. +
I
dV
j
3J
?N`+,? ? 'tl0 r3
? Z D
G
nr^ zD ?.
- m C, _
' o T
IN --1?
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
AGENCY COMMENTS
FM206
e
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
MAILED TO FROM =RAN', DEVELOPMENT M11T
N•C• DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MS- JEANETTE FURNEY
WHIT WEBB ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
PROGRAM DEV. BRANCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
TRANSPORTATION BLDG./INTER-OFFICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ENV. ASSESS. - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INTERMEDIATE LOOP IN
HIGH POINT FROM US 311 (N• MAIN ST-) TO JOHNSON STREET AND FROM
NC 68 (EASTCHESTER DR.) TO SR 1471 (MO NTLIEU AVE) TIP ##0-2536
TYPE - ENV. ASSESS.
THE N•C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE HAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE PROJECT FOR
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED STATE
APPLICATION NUMBER 96E42200328• PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER WITH ALL
INQUIRIES OR CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS OFFICE.
REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE COMPLETED ON OR BEFORE 12/28/95•
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL [phone].
:? r
North Carolina
Department of Administration
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
December 29, 1995
Mr. Whit Webb
N.C. Department of Transportation
Program Development Branch
Transportation Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Webb:
Re: SCH File #96-E-4220-0328; Environmental Assessment for the Proposed
Improvements to the Intermediate Loop in High Point: TIP #U-2536

The above referenced environmental information has been reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made by state/local agencies in the course of this review.
Because of the nature of the comment(s), it has been determined that you may submit a Finding
of No Significant Impact to the State Clearinghouse for compliance with the Act. The attached
comments should be taken into consideration in project development.
Sincerely,
42
Jim
Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director
State Clearinghouse
CB/if
cc: Region G
JAN 3
Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary
116 West Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 • Telephone [phone]
State Courier 51-01-00
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment, 6TZW*WA
Health and Natural Resources 1 • •
Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
-ft -
James B. Hunt, Governor p E H N FZ
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Henry M. Lancaster II, Director
MEMO
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee ?/
Environmental Review Coordinator
RE: #96-0328 - High Point Intermediate Loop Guilford County
DATE: December 12, 1995
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources has reviewed the
proposed project. The attached comments are for your consideration.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
MM:jr
Attachments

DEC i
P"C. STATE
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
NCWRC,HCP,FRLLS LRKE
TEL:[phone] Dec 01'95 14:12 No.002 F.03
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. j?
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwcxxi, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba Mcgee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DEHNR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project wdinktor
Habitat Conservation Program ?L70?_
DATE: December 1, 1995
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment
(EA) for the High Point Intermediate Loop, from US 311 (North Main Street) to Johnson
Street and from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montlieu Avenue), Guilford
County, North Carolina. TIP No. U-2536, SCH Project No. 96-0328.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA and
arc familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the North Carolina Ftivironmental Policy Act (G.S. 113A-1 et seq., as amended; 1 NCAC 25).
NCDOT proposes to construct a two segments of the High Point Intermediate Loop, mostly on new
location, from US 311 to Johnson Street and from NC 68 to SR 1471. The proposed roadway is a multi-
lane, curb and Sutter facility. The project length-is approximately 2.4 miles. Approximately 0.60 acres
of wetland impacts are anticipated and will likely be covered under nationwide permits.
The EA adequately addresses impacts to wildlife and fisheries resources in the project area. Due to
the developed nature of the project area and the environmental commitments included in the document,
we concur with this EA and anticipate concurrence with the upcoming Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSi).
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further assistance please
call me, at [phone].
State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS J Project Number: Due Date:
94-v32,Y
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Process
o....:...ai nri:..n F r.-.
C
C
C
C
C
C

C
C
C
C
C
L
(statutory time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS limit)
Permit to construct d operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions. d sewer construction contracts On-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters. technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90.120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally. obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters construct wastewater treatment facility-granted after NPDES Recily 1NiA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit-whichever is later.
30 days
Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary
(N/A)
7 days
Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well.
(15 daysi
Application copy must be served on eacn adjacent riparian property 55 days
Dredge and Fill Permit owner On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of 190 aaysl
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
Permit to construct d operate Air Pollution Abatement 60 days
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15A NCAC 21H.06 NIA (90 days)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
60 Gays
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A
NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal N/A
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
919-733-0520. (90 days)
Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800.
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion b sedimentatio
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Duality Sect.) at least 30 20 days
days before De innm activity. A fee of S30 for the first acre and $2000 for each additional acre or an must accom an me tan (30 days)
] The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance: (30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR. Bond amount
Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permited. The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued.
J North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds s days (NIA)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day
J counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned."
90.120 days
Oil Refining Facilities NIA (NIA)
If permit required, application 80 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. 30 days
Dam Safety Permit Inspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv-
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And (60 days)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is neces-
sary to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum tee of SM.00 must ac-
company the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
t;onunuec on reverse
Pb n;
Normal Process
. T-

111 __..rr of riparian properly.
El

?
?
•

PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit)
File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to Slate of N.C. 10 tlays
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon (N!A)
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations.
Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with EHNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form. (NIA)
Slate Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include 15.20 days
descriptions 6 drawings of structure & proof of ownership (NIA)

401 Water pualily Certification
NIA 60 days
(130 nays)

CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
$250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)

CAMA Permit for MINOR development
$50.00 lee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
Several geodetic monuments are located to or near the project area. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed. please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey. Box 27687. Raleign, N.C. 27611
Abandonment of any wells. if required. must be in accordance with Title 15A. Suochaoter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(NIA)
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority): ?
?
?
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone] [phone]
? Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville. NC 28115
[phone]
? Washington Regional Office
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
[phone] *18025 inston-Salem Regional Office
North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
[phone]
? Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
? Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources / • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
ID C F1
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary C
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 11, 1995
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorn
From: Eric Galamb
Subject: EA for the High Point Intermediate Loop
Guilford County
TIP # U-2536
DEHNR # 96-0328, DEM # 11105
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for activities which impact waters of the state including wetlands.
The document states that approximately 0.6 acres of waters including wetlands will be
impacted. Approximately 100 feet of a tributary to Oak Hollow Lake will be relocated.
DOT has committed to implementing HOW soil and erosion control measures for this
project. Hazardous spill catch basins will be installed due to the water supply critical
area. Stream relocation will be accomplished using DOT's stream relocation
guidelines. Due to these commitments, DEM concurs with the project.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA or FONSI by DEM would not preclude
the denial of a 401 Certification upon application if wetland or water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
hpintlop.ea
cc: Raleigh COE
.Mark Reep, DOT
FAXED
DEC 1 1 1995
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consxner paper
North Carolina Department of Cultural
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Bay McCain, Secretary
October 11, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportatiion
FROM: David Brook
Deputy State istoric Preservation 4icer
SUBJECT: High Point Intermediate Loop from US 311 to
Johnson Street, Guilford County, U-2536,
9.8071087, 95-E-4220-0110
4?GEIVN
_ J
OCT 13 1994
DIVIS?CN 0.
..HIGHWAY`
ivisi - es and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no National Register-
listed properties located within the planning area. However, High Point College
Historic District is located in the area of potential effect for the project. In
February 1989, the historic district was determined eligible for listing in the
National Register of Historic Places during Section 106 compliance for a federally
funded project,.
These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive Order
XVI. If you have any questions regarding them, please contact Renee Gledhill-
Earley, environmental.,review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
B. Church
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
CITY OF HIGH POINT
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
December 11, 1995
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
NCDOT Planning and Environmental Branch
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. Vick:
My staff and I have reviewed the Environmental Assessment for the Intermediate Loon
(TIP Project No. U-2536) in High Point. Although we do have comments regarding the lane
configurations in Figures A-D, we do not feel a Environmental Impact Statement is necessary.
After review of the EA we determined that many of the intersection diagrams were not illustrated
as they currently exist. Enclosed with this letter are the existing lane configurations and our
recommendations for the proposed Intermediate Loop. A revised capacity analysis calculation
may be necessary to correspond with the revised intersection lane designs.
Please review this information and advise me of any questions you may have. I can be
contacted at 910-883-3225. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
document and I look forward to the completion of the Intermediate Loop in High Point.
Sincer y,
Phil Wylie, E.
Director of Transportation
E p
Ca
enclosures 01) z
G?2 a
G
& EN
Telephone [phone]
P.O. Box 230, 211 South Hamilton Street, High Point, North Carolina, 27261, FAX [phone] TDD [phone]
CITY OF HIGH POINT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
INTERMEDIATE LOOP - TIP PROJECT U-2536
Intermediate Loop and North Main St. (US 311)
At this intersection, we currently have westbound dual lefts from the Intermediate Loop
onto Main St. We feel that the dual lefts will still be needed in the future. The outside
left turn lane could be a shared left and through lane with the appropriate signal phasing.
Intermediate Loon and Old Winston Road
Due to the amount of traffic that travels on Old Winston Rd. and Oakview Rd., we would
like to see if it is feasible to carry an additional northbound lane on Old Winston Rd.
from the Intermediate Loop to Oakview Rd. This section is approximately 450 feet long
and the lane would be designated as a right turn only lane.
Intermediate Loop and Johnson St.
Along the finished section of the Intermediate Loop between Johnson St. and Eastchester
Drive, lies the Oak Hollow Regional Mall with numerous outparcels. At the intersection
of the Intermediate Loop and Johnson St., we are currently operating the Intermediate
Loop with dual left turn lanes and dual right turn lanes. We feel that it will be necessary
to continue to operate the Intermediate Loop with dual left turn lanes onto southbound
Johnson St.
Intermediate Loop and Centennial St.
At this intersection, we feel that there is not a need for a southbound right turn lane on
Centennial St. Instead, we feel there is a need for southbound dual left turn lanes from
Centennial St. onto the Intermediate Loop.
Intermediate Loop and Montlieu Ave.
We feel there is not a need for southbound dual left turn lanes from the Intermediate Loop
onto Montlieu Ave. We feel that the dual left turn lanes may create a safety problem due
to the short section of the two eastbound through lanes before it merges into one through
lane. Also, we currently do not plan to pursue any widening on that section of Montlieu
Ave.
?t ST .. it,
1 V
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
November 19, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Michael Smith
Assistant Chief
Dear Sir:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
cv

Subject: Guilford County, High Point Intermediate Loop, from NC 68 (Eastchester Drive)
to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue), State Project No. 9.8071087; TIP No. U-2536 C.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes to construct a second
segment of the High Point Intermediate Loop. This project, identified as TIP No. U-2536 C,
connects NC 68 (Eastchester Drive) with SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue) by constructing a new
location facility and widening US 29 A (East College Drive). The project has a let date of
October 1998.
The subject project has been described in a State Environmental Assessment (EA), that
was signed on September 28, 1995. The State Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
project was signed on June 26, 1997. These documents, particularly the EA, include studies
pertaining to impacts to natural systems and protected species for the combined project. Copies
of these documents have been provided to regulatory agencies involved in the permit review
process.
The project involves the construction of two roadway facilities. The DOT proposes to
construct a four-lane divided curb and gutter facility on new location from NC 68 to US 70 A
(Lexington Avenue). From US 70 A, the existing facility will be widened to a five-lane curb and
gutter. This portion of the project extends to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue). Total project length
is 2.4 miles.
Construction of the proposed project necessitates impacts to waters of the United States.
Impacts include the replacement/ extension of an existing culvert and cut/ fill of wetlands.
0

2
Jurisdictional wetlands for the project have been delineated by DOT biologists (October
1995) using criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetland
Delineation Manual. This delineation during the natural resource investigation, revealed four
sites within the project study area for U-2536 C. Wetland evaluations have also been performed
according to Guidance for Rating the Values of Wetlands in North Carolina, Fourth Version, by
the Division of Environmental Management (DEM).
The DOT has avoided and minimized impacts to wetlands and streams to the extent
practicable. During the natural resources inventory investigation for the EA, the DOT delineated
jurisdictional wetlands and located these wetlands using Global Positioning Systems (GPS).
Based on this information, the DOT avoided one (1) wetland in the C section of the project and
three (3) wetlands in the A section of the project. Minimization of wetland impacts has also
occurred by selecting the roadway facility which requires the least amount of right of way, and
therefore minimizing impacts to wetlands. Figure 7 in the EA depicts the selection of the
recommended alternative and the avoiding of jurisdictional wetlands. This mitigation process
has been documented in the EA.
Table 1 summarizes impacts to waters of the United States by the project, and includes
DWQ rating, Cowardin classification, and impact areas for wetlands and surface waters.
Cowardin classification refers to guidelines developed to classify wetlands and deepwater
habitats as outlined in Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States by
Cowardin et al (1979).
Table L Impactsto Waters of the United, States fro' TIP No. U-2536 C
StationNo. DEMRating Cowardin Wetland Surface Waters
12+40 to 13+80 37 PFO 1 C 0.63 acre N/A
14+20 to 14+70 50 PFO 1 C 0.08 acre N/A
27+36 (culvert) N/A N/A N/A 0.03 acre
Total Impacts 0.71 acre 0.03 acre
Note: PFO1C denotes palustrine broad-leaved deciduous forested, that is seasonally flooded.
Of the wetland impacts, 0.04 acre will result from mechanized clearing. The remaining
0.67 acre involves fill and cut of wetlands. These wetlands are associated with a drainage
channel which transitions to a intermittent stream at Station 12+70. These wetlands are disturbed
bottomland systems with areas of the forests dominated by blackberry (Rubus sp.), greenbrier
(Smilax sp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans).
At Station No. 27+36, two culverts will be installed, one for a greenway crossing and
the other for Boulding Branch. The crossing is associated with US 29 A (East College Drive)
which will be widened. The length of stream enclosure is 106 feet, or 0.03 acre.
As mentioned earlier, wetlands and streams impacted by the project have been minimized
by project planning. The DOT believes the wetlands are of low quality. The DOT believes that
compensatory mitigation for project impacts should not be required.
3
During project construction, the DOT will utilize standard Best Management Practices
(BMPs). The EA states that Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be used in the Oak
Hollow drainage area. This section of the project does not lie within this area.
The DOT has investigated issues related to cultural resources and Areas of Potential
Effect (APE). The DOT has received concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
that the culvert crossing at Boulding Branch will have no effect on the High Point College
historic district, which is an eligible National Register property. The concurrence form has been
attached to this letter.
Since completion of the EA and the FONSI, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
has been listed for Guilford County. This issue has been reviewed, and a biological conclusion
of "No Effect" has been rendered. A copy of this report has been enclosed with this permit
application.
In summary, the proposed project impacts 0.71 acre of wetlands and 0.03 acre of surface
waters (106 linear feet). The DOT has taken practicable measures to avoid and minimize
impacts to waters of the United States. The DOT believes that the proposed project can be
authorized by the COE under a Section 404 General Permit 31. Enclosed with this letter is a
completed preconstruction notification form and permit drawings that depict impacts to waters of
the United States from project construction. Application is also made for 401 Water Quality
Certification by the Division of Water Quality.
Thank you for your assistance with this permit application. If you have any questions or
need any additional information, please contact Mr. Phillip Todd at [phone],
extension 314.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/pct
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, COE, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, WRC, Northside
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. J. S. Watkins, P.E., Division 7 Engineer
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID: T.I.P. No. U-2536C
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #) General Permit No. 31
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: NC Dept. of Transportation; Planning & Environmental Branch
2. MAILING ADDRESS: Post Office Box 25201
CITY: Raleigh STATE:
SUBDIVISION NAME:
NC
ZIP CODE: 27611
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Guilford NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: High Point
1
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): NC 68, US 70 A US 29 A and SR 1471 in
High Point (See Cover Letter)
s
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Boulding Branch
RIVER BASIN: Cave Fear
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA),
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER SUPPLY
(WS-I OR WS-II)? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [x]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST
OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
Sa. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF PREVIOUS
PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
2
i
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: N/A
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
0.71 acre
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.60 acre EXCAVATION: 0.07 acre
FLOODING:
DRAINAGE:
OTHER: Mechanized Clearing - 0.04 acre
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0.71 acre
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: N/A FT AFTER:
FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER:
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: x
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY):
Road construction equipment used to build roadway facility and widen
existing roads.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Public roadway
3
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT
IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
Restricted study corridor and prolect termini. All practicable steps to
avoid and minimize wetland impacts have been taken (See EA and FONSI).
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)
AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET)
REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING
ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED:
(ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED:
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [x) NO [] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT?
YES [x] NO [I
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [x] NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED
TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003,
TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29,
AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE
SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH
EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Suburban residential
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH
CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY
IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE
////,-`-AP2
DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (18g.))
A ? STAIty?
ISa?y M
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
October 31, 1997
Memorandum to:
From:
File
Phillip Todd
GARLAN D B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
Subject: Guilford County, High Point Intermediate Loop, from NC 68
(Eastchester Drive) to SR 1471 (Montilieu Avenue), State Project
No. 9.8071087; TIP No. U-2536 C.
Reference: Natural Resources Technical Report for TIP No. U-2536, by
Phillip Todd, dated May 3, 1995.
Since completion of the referenced report, the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) has added the bald eagle to its listing for Guilford County. The FWS has listed
the bald eagle as Threatened, a species that is likely to become an endangered species
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A
description of the bald eagle has been provided, as well as a biological conclusion.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) T
Adult bald eagles can be identified by their large white head and short white tail.
The body plumage is dark-brown to chocolate-brown in color. In flight bald eagles can be
identified by their flat wing soar.
Eagle nests are found in close proximity to water (within a half mile) with a clear
flight path to the water, in the largest living tree in an area, and having an open view of the
surrounding land. Human disturbance can cause an eagle to abandon otherwise suitable
habitat. The breeding season for the bald eagle begins in December or January. Fish are
the major food source for bald eagles. Other sources include coots, herons, and wounded
ducks. Food may be live or carrion.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
R%;
No habitat for the bald eagle exists in the project study area. The nearest water
body is Oak Hollow Lake, which is over 0.5 miles southeast of the project's beginning at
NC 68 (Eastchester Drive). A mall exists between the beginning of the project and the
lake.
The database of the NC Natural Heritage Program was consulted on October 31,
1997, in regard to the presence of the bald eagle. This search revealed no occurrence of
the bald eagle in the project study area. The proposed bridge replacement project will
have no impact upon the bald eagle.
File: U-2536 C
• Zs?i(i
Federal Aid W A. County Gu1l.F-IiZa
CONCURRENCE FORM
FOR
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
roject Description
I?treQ+??EC?a.T? l-o? pwNn ?J?RrK 1???+?J SrRea- To J•K?x,,N SrRecr'
representatives of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) -- v4pr reee?y r.UaJ>eo
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
.viewed the subject project-and agreed

there are no effects on the National Register-listed property within the project's area of potential
effect and listed on the reverse.
? there are no effects on the National Register-eligible properties located within the project's area
of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
there is an effect on the National Register-listed property/properties within the project's area of
potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
there is an effect on the National Register-eligible property/properties within the project's area of
potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the reverse.
igned:
IL 2:1 Ili;'
Zepres , NCDOT a
::HwA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency Date
Z? q
esentative HPO ate
State Historic Preservation Officer D e
(over)
TP # U- 24z,(o Federal Aid # NJA County
'roperties within area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if pr
Zegister-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
N ?? po?Nr U a??? ?? ? pEl
'-operties within area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status (NR or DE)
ad describe effect.
aled: NCDOT =? FHwA SHPO