19970098 Ver 1_Complete File_19970207

"(- 40.
State of North- Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 • •
Division of Water Quality
10
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor AVE
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C) E H N F=1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 25, 1997
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick,
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed US 17 Improvements from SR 1503 to West of the Chowan River
WQC Project #970098, COE #199400838
Bertie County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3139 issued to N. C. Department of
Transportation dated April 25, 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
I Ll Y
eston Howard, r. E.
Attachments
970098.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Enviro. Sciences Branch. 4401 Reedv Creek Rd.. Raleiah. NC 27607 Teleohone 919-733-1786 FAX # [phone]

NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500 to N.C. Department of
Transportation resulting in fill of 19.86 acres, draining of 3.17 acres of wetland impact and fill
0.25 acres of open water in Bertie County pursuant to an application filed on the 13th day of
February, of 1997 to 4 lane existing US 17 (TIP No. R-2404 B and C).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters
of Salmon Creek and its unnamed tributaries in conjunction with the proposed development will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable
portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in
'accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application,
as described in the Public Notice or as modified below. If you change your project, you must
notify us and you may be required to submit a revised application. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow
the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available
from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) are
utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs) in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; and 10 NTUs in trout
waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed
and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the
project;
3. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a FONSI or
ROD is issued by the State Clearinghouse;
4. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
5. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation will be
required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities;
6. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Corps of Engineers
requirements. DWQ shall be copied on the approved ratio, location, size and method of
mitigation (restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation) and annual reports for
the entire length of the monitoring period.
,r0
7. On 17 April 1997, the COE and DOT agreed to modify the design at site 6 (sheets 8,9 and
10 of 30). DWQ shall accept the design that the COE agreed to. DWQ shall receive a
copy of the revised drawings for our file.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and
may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless
the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act
Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you you have the fight to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 25th day of April, 1997
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
F
ston Ho ar , Jr E.
WQC #3139 ?
DEHNR Fax:[phone] Mar 19 '97 9:43 P.03/06
Sfc to s . i # ;it ? pro in a.
:.ire ` : rrkro :r ;?itronm6nt,
1446 f i rt rral Resources
D[WV:": 0: ' of CoasFc?i Management
.1arr?es.•8•.;: Nuns, Jr, Gavernvr
ihatt?n 8, Howes, IF Y.
' . I?og?f i?:Sch?c;ter, Director
.... .. 71?tqp*
RWA
RECEIVM"
WASHINGTON 0FV1('F
- rEB 2 1 1991
D. E. A

,02119197
GIs ,Doborah. Sawyer
NC D. XH&.NR
Div-'.' snv rwmentaZ Management
>Tatasringtii%. •NC 2788
;R F'ER NG?E: .AE.';xD-9?4-0838 County: Bertie
; pp L. cane./ on or: .,NC Department of Transportation
.No.. ;,R 04 F,11 & Drain Wetlands us z7, SR 2503 to Ghowan Rarer
le.. Ms sawyer:.
Thy.' attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice,- dated
:0.2J23f ? c er.oribing.a federal project or permit is being circulated
't~ere?f;ed state agencies for comments •.concerning the ,proposal's
?ons.iste icy with the North Carolina Coastal ganagement Program.
:Rlcase:indicate your viewpoint on the proposal and return this
,foxes.. to*
o me'
tee ?efQre 03120197.
Siuc rcly,
r /?n• .??
'te Herr l3_ Renton
. P
Consistency Coordinator
REPLY This office objects to the project as proposed.
--Cornmeitts on this project are attached-
This office supports the project proposal.
?•Y -:No comment s
Signed
Date
Agency
Rto. goic•27687 Rawgh. North cored= 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A.rt : t d QpportunttyAtfrmative Acton Ernployer 5o% recycled! 10%post consJrner pooer

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
October 3, 1997,
Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth q P
District Engineer, Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers cis
Post Office Box 1890
'Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 -
Attention: Mike Bell
Dear Colonel Youngbluths
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service`(Service) is satisfied that
the outstanding issues we raised with the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in reference-to Action I.D.
No. 199400838 (TIP No. R-2404 C); the Salmon Creek crossing.
project, have been resolved: The resolution,,although-imperfect;
,from the standpoint of fish and wildlife resources, reduces the
level of anticipated impacts at the specific project site.
Pending finalization of agreed upon compensatory mitigation
plans, we withdraw our objections to the subject proposed
activities.
We reiterate that our objectives in all C1ean'Water Act
proceedings reflect those of the legislation itself: to restore,
protect, and maintain the biological, chemical., and physical
integrity of the affected waters. As such, all activities,
including replacement/upgrading,of road facilities, should seek
to restore, maintain, and protect balanced populations of
indigenous fish, shellfish, and wildlife. This emphatically
includes species and guilds which the NCDOT may not consider
"rare aquatic populations. and/or high quality wetlands" (see
Frank.Vick's May, 1997 letter to Mike Bell).
The Service reserves the right to make recommendations in future
federal actions which ensure that these goals are met, and to
raise issues which may not have been (a) previously addressed in
formal comments, or (b) approved by the applicant.beforehand. We
reject the NCDOT's,complaint that using.,the language from the law
itself to evaluate .a Clean Water Act S 404 permit application
without prior approval by the applicant "has the appearance of
seeming, arbitrary" (see the above -referenced letter..) . In fact,
- -------- we--bel-ieve--the--,resource' agencies __:simply---took -a . formal,

``'?`,

,.
??
RECEIVED

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DWISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
May 6, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Branch
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
Dear Sir:
MAY 088 1997;
ENVFRCNMENPAL SCIENCES
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Section 404 Permit Application for Impacts to Wetlands and Waters
Resulting from the Proposed Improvements to US 17 from SR 1503 to
West of the Chowan River in Bertie County; TIP No. R-2404 B & C;
State Project No. 6.0109001T
The Department of Transportation submitted a Section 404 permit application for the
subject project on January 31, 1997. The Department of the Army Public Notice for
Action ID No. 199400838 was issued on February 13, 1997 with a published closing
date of March 14, 1997. On March 31, 1997 we received your letter, soliciting
responses from the Department to comments which had been received from state and
federal agencies during the public notice interval. The Department's responses to these
comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS), and the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF), were submitted to you on
April 11, 1997.
Since our April 11, 1997 letter responding to these agencies' comments, the Department
has had discussions with state and federal agencies in attempts to resolve outstanding
permit-related issues at Salmon Creek (R-2404C). The Department is proposing to
widen an existing causeway and bridge (replacement of existing 2-lane bridge with
multilane structure), and the proposed widening of the causeway will neither exacerbate
existing surface water dynamics, nor will the proposed bridge structure diminish or
restrict established stream hydraulics.
low%
?Nl
Page 2
May 6, 1997
Mr. Bell
In an attempt to address agency concerns about restoring surface hydrology at the
Salmon Creek site (ostensibly an interest in the restoration of historic, pre-causeway
patterns), the Department proposed a system of surface water storage and distribution
canals interconnected by cross pipes. Recent discussions among the Department and
agency representatives at the recent permit meeting in Raleigh left little doubt that this
proposal has been rejected by a consensus of those agencies represented at the meet-
ing. Accordingly, the Department withdraws its proposal to construct this canal system
at Salmon Creek.
In a related matter, the Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) recently recommended
that the Department install three 8' X 8' box culverts in the causeway at Salmon Creek.
These box culverts were being recommended to (1) facilitate the exchange of sheet flow
across the wetland at Salmon Creek and to (2) provide for safe wildlife movements from
one side of the wetland to the other. This recommendation would result in the expendi-
ture of approximately $500,000 over and above the cost of the project as designed. In
response, the Department made a counterproposal that would result in installing two 72"
metal pipe culverts in the causeway, estimated to cost approximately $50,000-100,000.
As a result of vigorous discussions with the agency representatives at the referenced
permit meeting, the Department conceded to installing three pipe arches, with a
horizontal dimension of at least 72". Pipe arches will be installed at locations and with
invert elevations agreed upon during upcoming discussions between the Department's
Hydraulic Unit and the WRC. The anticipated cost of installing three pipe arches is
estimated at approximately $100,000-200,000.
Recent discussions were held with the FWS concerning their March 13, 1997 comments
to the Regulatory Branch (Section 404 Public Notice comments). According to the
FWS, most of the concerns raised in its March 13 letter have been satisfactorily
addressed by the Department's April 11, 1997 responses. The Department agreed to
readdress two outstanding issues: "safe and effective passage", and opportunities for
on-site mitigation. The following comments are submitted in an attempt to satisfy these
remaining FWS concerns.
In so far as the issue of "safe and effective passage" (as raised in the FWS
letter) is concerned, the Department acknowledges that its proposals should
take these issues into account during the planning and design processes.
The fact is, Departmental biologists do make recommendations for special
hydraulic crossings and conveyances when a proposal is likely to encounter
significant natural resources, i.e., rare aquatic populations and/or high
quality wetlands (recent examples of such recommendations are found in
Natural Resources Technical Reports for R-2548 and U-3449, dated March
1997). The Department's planners and designers take a pro-active position
on many of these recommendations. The Department recognizes that con-
struction at existing causeways is a matter deserving special consideration.
Therefore, the Department is supportive of convening, or participating in, an
interagency forum that will examine the implications of such actions from the
Page 3
May 6, 1997
Mr. Bell
perspective of ecological, regulatory, transportation and public interest
policies. The Department looks forward to meeting with the FWS and other
agencies to discuss and plan for this forum.
In so far as on-site mitigation opportunities for anticipated impacts at Salmon
Creek, it is only fair to point out that the Department has historically found
that it is not economically feasible to address single-site mitigation concepts
for projects involving multiple Section 404 sites. The on-site mitigation
approach for each impact site would involve considerable effort and would
result in excessive expenditures of public funds. The Department
does attempt to find suitable sites in close proximity to proposed projects
and in some instances the Department has pursued on-site parcels very
close to sites of impact. However, the difficulties the Department has
encountered in finding "willing sellers" for potential mitigation sites strongly
suggests that the on-site approach does not yield results commensurate
with the efforts expended. The Department's compensatory mitigation thrust
has focused on large, multi-compartmental sites within basins where
impacts are anticipated. Although approved sites have not been located in
each river basin, the Department's has been making progress toward
achieving that goal.
Another issue that needs to be resolved is the question of the magnitude of impacts
anticipated to result from ditch excavation at wetland sites 8, 9 and 10. The Section 404
application estimated a lateral zone of influence ("ditch effect") that was based upon the
permit analyst's mistaken assumption that anticipated ditch depths would be only 2 feet.
The actual maximum ditch depths (bottom of ditch measured below natural ground ele-
vation) will be 6.5 feet. Although this maximum depth will occur in only a portion of the
wetlands, the calculation of revised ditch effect for the three wetland sites given below is
based upon this maximum value. Calculations of ditch effects for ditches 6.5 feet deep,
using the ellipse equation, yields a ditch effect of 89 feet. (This calculation was made
using barrier depth [d] of 6 feet, relative hydraulic conductivity [Ke ] of 0.25 for leaf loam
soils and a water balance, or drainage coefficient [q] of 0.00099.) Dwane Hinson, NRCS
soil scientist, was consulted during the calculations to confirm assumptions about barrier
depth, etc. Given the length of proposed ditch excavation at each site, the revised ditch
effect (DE) values, to be substituted in Table 2, are: 0.25 ac (Site 8), 9.9 ac (Site 9), and
1.34 ac (Site 10). This results in a revised total impact from filling, clearing, excavation
and ditch effect of 30.88 acres. As a result of this recalculation the Department's pro-
posed mitigation is revised as follows:
1. The anticipated impacts to all wetlands, except for the Salmon Creek wetland (Site 6), are to be miti-
gated at the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site (DSMS). It is recommended that a compensatory ratio of
2:1 be used in mitigating for the expected losses of wetlands from the construction of R-2404 B & C.
These impacts (not including Salmon Creek, Site 6) total 2.13 acres (riverine) and 26.33 acres (non-
riverine). This ratio would result in a reduction of available mitigation acreage at the DSMS of 4.26
acres (riverine) and 52.66 acres (non-riverine). If approved, the revised mitigation acreage available at
the DSMS, following mitigation for R-2404 B & C, would be 38.71 acres'(riverine) and 380.7 acres
(non-riverine).
3q
as

Page 4
May 6, 1997
Mr. Bell
2. Impacts to the Salmon Creek wetland should be mitigated at the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank
(CSMB). The high quality nature of this wetland would be more appropriately debited at the CSMB,
which is substantially comprised of similar wetland systems. Since the CSMB is a preservation bank,
the Department agrees to a ratio of 10:1 for replacement of the Salmon Creek wetland losses. The
2.44 acres (revised from original 2.91 acres by deleting impact that would have resulted from
construction of storage/distribution canals at Salmon Creek = 0.47 acre) of losses that are anticipated
at Salmon Creek would result in a debit at CSMB of 24.40 acres. If approved, this action would result
in a revised balance at the CSMB of 640.71 acres.
In a final matter, the Department has initiated archaeological investigations that are
intended to satisfy Section 106 concerns. The results of this investigation will be made
available to the State Historic Preservation Office. Please do not hesitate to condition
the Section 404 Permit on the satisfactory completion of this important task.
The Department wants to emphasize that it is vitally interested in cooperating with the
regulatory and environmental review community in making reasonable, feasible and
practicable commitments that are intended to mitigate.for impacts that result from its
proposals. Our attempts to resolve outstanding concerns are evidenced by our
November 27, 1996 response to agency concerns and comments, our January 31
permit application cover letter, and our recent April 11 and 14 letters responding to
agency concerns.
In spite ofthes'e facts, there appears to be a concerted effort by some state and federal
agencies to associate arguable environmental liabilities at the Salmon Creek site with
the proposed action, simply a widening of an existing facility. Attempts to hold the exist-
ing proposal accountable for unsubstantiated losses of ecological function at the site is
unfortunate. The Department feels that an interagency forum should be convened to
discuss implications of existing causeways as discussed above. Recommendations
from such a group could serve as the basis for transportation planning decisions on
future projects. To abruptly require the Department to redress perceived ecological
dysfuntions that were presumably caused prior to the Clean Water Act, when such
requirements have not been levied on similar projects in the past, or have only been
discussed on occasion, has the appearance of seeming arbitrary, particularly during an
era in which the partnering concept is so important to all parties.
Your thoughtful consideration of the issues presented above will be sincerely
appreciated. The Department is hopeful that final Section 401 and Section 404 permit
decisions can be made in the near future.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt

Page 5
May 6, 1997
Mr. Bell
cc: Mr. Mike Smith, USACOE, Raleigh
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR-DCM, Raleigh
Mr. Terry Moore, NCDEHNR-DCM, Washington
Mr. John Domey, NCDEHNR-DWQ, Raleigh (Attn: Eric Galamb)
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS, Raleigh (Attn: Kevin Moody, Howard Hall)
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
Ms. Sara Winslow, NCDEHNR-DMF, Elizabeth City
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT, Highway Design Branch
Mr. D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT, Division 1
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT, P & E Branch-Division 1

-,
a.w S(A1F °
m?
s?+n?.,,m^ 3ZCr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF 1PANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
April 14 1997
N.C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
ATTENTION: Mr. Eric Galamb, Environmental Specialist
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
???'Rory, 1,9/ 0
r, SUBJECT: Proposed Improvements to US17, Including Replacing the Salmon Creek
Bridge in Bertie County; TIP No. R-2404C; State Project No. 6.019001T
The Department of Transportation will be widening the causeway through the
Salmon Creek floodplain and stage-constructing a replacement bridge to accommodate
four lanes of traffic across Salmon Creek.
In a recent phone conversation you enumerated three Division of Water Quality
concerns that must be addressed before a Section 401 decision can be made. These
concerns and the Department's responses are provided below:
• How will long-term maintenance activities, i.e., ditch clean-out, impact the concrete
"ditch plugs" at each of the four surface water storage/distribution canals proposed
at Salmon Creek ?
Maintenance of ditches and canals is a routine activity undertaken by Division
Maintenance personnel. Sedimentation effects, storm debris and/or dense plant growth
can (and do) impede normal flows through ditches and canals. As a consequence of
flow restrictions, water backs up creating localized flooding. To alleviate this problem
the Department monitors potential sources of flow restrictions and takes measures to
eliminate the problem(s). The Department also is engaged in preventitive measures
that result in ditch clean-out on a recurring schedule, a methodology which targets
drainage ditches for routine maintenance whether there are acute obstructions or not.
Where ditches are accessible to rubber-tire equipment, ditch maintenance often
involves the use of a standard back hoe. In other instances, where terrain is too steep,
or too wet, cross-section of ditch is large enough, etc., it may be feasible or practical to
use a tracked excavator, or a tracked back-hoe for ditch maintenance. Finally, in areas
that are generally inaccessible to equipment, or where equipment is impractical to use,
ditch maintenance is often accomplished by hand work.
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Courier: 10-62-26 AIk

Page 2
April 14, 1997
Mr. Galamb
Due to the existence of a saturated substrate adjacent to the proposed canals in
each quadrant and the fact that the canals will be built very close to the existing
causeway, it will not be feasible to operate heavy equipment adjacent to the canals for
clean-out purposes. However, the issue of accessibility may be a moot point anyway,
because a similar canal system installed along the US 17 causeway-Roanoke River
wetlands immediately east of the Roanoke River in Berite County has never required
removal of sediment accumulation. Vegetation management may be the only potential
maintenance problem and this can be alleviated more practically with hand labor.
• The proposed 750 mm (-30 in) diameter cross-pipes that are to serve as
hydrological conduits between the canals located on the north and south sides of the
causeway are small enough so that blockage by sediment, debris and vegetation is
a real concern.
The Department agrees to utilize 1500 mm (-60 in) diameter cross-pipes in an
attempt to marginalize the potential maintenance burdens associated with pipe clean-
out. Although this substitute pipe size grossly exaggerates the volumetric capacity
needed to redistribute excess surface water from one side of US 17 to the other, the
long-term maintenance concerns will be significantly reduced.
The Wildlife Resources Commission has recommended that three box culverts @
8.0 ft X 8.0 ft be installed in the causeway to facilitate movement of animals and
provide for cross drainage under the roadway. The DWQ is equally concerned
about (1) providing adequate hydrological exchange between the two wetland
fragments at Salmon Creek, and (2) providing opportunities for the movement of
species which utilize the Salmon Creek wetlands.
In this regard, the Department's proposal to install a surface water storage and
distribution system in each of the four quadrants will go a long way toward distributing
surface water to both wetland fragments. Having a canal along the entire wetland
boundary in each of the four quadrants will ensure that excess surface water will be
collected and made available for transport to the opposite side of the causeway via
cross pipes. In the absence of the canals, much of the runoff will flow directly into the
creek. Some of this excess water could be collected by other cross pipes (or box
culverts) for transport to the opposite side, but unless the water was directed into these
structures through grading, it is likely that a substantial portion of the water would still
flow directly to the creek channel. The Department's recommendation will ensure that
most of the water is captured and directed to the opposite side of the causeway.
Although the proposed bridge opening undoubtedly facilitates the movement of
many animals from habitats on one side of the highway to the other and vice versa, it is
reasonable to assume that additional openings could accommodate additional animals
who might not cross at the bridge opening. The Department agrees to install two 72"
pipe culverts in the causeway, one on either side of the proposed bridge. Final locations
and invert elevations of the 72" cross pipes will be determined through consultation with
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission.
Page 3
April 14, 1997
Mr. Galamb
The Department of Transportation has agreed to make these commitments in
the spirit of partnership with state and federal resource agencies and to demonstrate
how transportation improvements can be undertaken without causing irreparable harm
to the environment.
Please call M. Randall Turner should you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
cc: Michael Bell, USACOE
David Cox, NCWRC
Ron Sechler, NMFS
Sara Winslow, NCDMF
John Hefner, USFWS
A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT
Scott Blevins, P.E., NCDOT
D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT
M. Randall Turner, NCDOT

NCDOT/P&E BRANCH
s
JAmEs B. HUNT JiL
GovERNox
Fax:[phone]
Apr 14 '97 1508 P.02
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRFrT P.O. JR-
BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
April 14 1997
N.C. Department of Environment, Hearth
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
ATTENTION; Mr. Eric Galamb, Environmental Specialist
SU13JECT: Proposed improvements. to U617, Including Replacing the Salmon Creek
Bridge in Bertie County; TIP No. R-2404C; State Project No. 6.019001T
The Department of Transportation will be widening the causeway through the
Salmon Creek floodplain and stage-constructing a replacement bridge to accommodate
four lanes of traffic across Salmon Creek.
In a recent phone conversation you enumerated three Division of Water Quality
concerns that must be addressed before a Section 401 decision can be made. These
concerns and the Department's responses are provided below;
How will long-term maintenance activities, i.e., ditch clean-out, impact the concrete
"ditch plugs" at each of the four surface water storage/distribution canals proposed
at Salmon Creek ?
Maintenance of ditches and canals is a routine activity undertaken by Division
Maintenance personnel. Sedimentation effects, storm debris and/or dense plant growth
can (and do) impede normal flows through ditches and canals. As a consequence of
flow restrictions, water backs up creating localized flooding. To alleviate this problem
the Department monitors potential sources of flow reotrictions and takes measures to
eliminate the problem(s). The Department also is engaged in preventitive measures
that result in ditch clean-out on a recurring schedule, a methodology which targets
drainage ditches for routine maintenance whether there are acute obstructions or not.
Where ditches are accessible to rubber-tire equipment, ditch maintenance often
involves the use of a standard back hoe. In other instances, where terrain is too steep,
or too wet, Cross-section of ditch Is large enough, etc., it may be feasible or practical to
use a tracked excavator, or a tracked back-hoo for ditch maintenance. Finally, in areas
that are generally inaccessible to equipment, or where equipment is impractical to use,
ditch maintenance is often accomplished by hand Work_
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Courier. 10-62-26
w «r
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Apr 14 '97 1509 P.03
.. j
Page 2
April 14, 1987
Mr. Galamb
Due to the existence of a saturated substrate adjacent to the proposed canals in
each quadrant and the fact that the canals wiH be built very close to the existing
causeway, it will not be feasible to operate heavy equipment adjacent to the canals for
clean-out purposes. However, the issue of accessibility may be a moot 'Point anyway,
because a similar canal system installed along the US 17 causeway-Roanoke River
wetlands immediately east of the Roanoke River in Berite County has never required
removal of sediment accumulation. Vegetation management may be the only potential
maintenance problem and this can be alleviated more practically with hand labor.
• The proposed 750 mm (z-W in) diameter cross-pipes that are to serve as
hydrological conduits between the canals located on the north and south sides of the
causeway are small enough so that blockage by sediment, debris and vegetation is
a real concern.
The Department agrees to utilize 1500 mm (-60 in) diameter cross-pipes in an
attempt to marginalize the potential maintenance burdens associated with pipe, clean-
out. Although this substitute pipe size grossly exaggerates the volumetric capacity
needed to redistribute excess surface water from one side of US 17 to the other, the
long-term maintenance concerns will be significantly reduced.
• The Wildlife Resources Commission has recommended that three box culverts (d,)
8.0 ft X 8.0 ft be installed in the causeway to facilitate movement of animals and
provide for cross drainage under the roadway. The DWq is equally concerned
about (1) providing adequate hydrological exchange between the two wetland
fragments at Salmon Creek, and (2) providing opportunities for the movement of
species which utilize the Salmon Creek wetlands.
In this regard, the Department's proposal to install a surface water storage and
distribution system in each of the four quadrants wilt go a lung way toward distributing
surface water to both wetland fragments. Having a canal along the entire wetland
boundary in each of the four quadrants will ensure that excess surface water will be
collected and made available for transport to the opposite side of the causeway via
cross pipes. In the absence of the canals, much of the runoff will flow directly into the
creek. Some of this excess water could be collected by other cross pipes (or box
culverts) for transport to the opposite side, but unless the water was directed into these
structures through grading, it is likely that a substantial portion of the water would still
flow directly to the creek channel. The Department's recommendation will ensure that
most of the water is captured and directed to the opposite side of the causeway.
Although the proposed bridge opening undoubtedly facilitates the movement of
many animals from habitats on one side of the highway to the other and vice versa, it is
reasonable to assume that additional openings could accommodate additional animals
who might not cross at the bridge opening. The Department agrees to install two 72"
pipe culverts in the causeway, one on either side of the proposed bridge. Final locations
and invert elevations of the 72" cross pipes will be determined through Consultation with
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission.
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH
Page 3
April 14, 1997
Mr. Oalamb
Fax:[phone] Apr 14 '97 15:09 P.04
The Department of Transportation has agreed to make these commitments in
the spirit of partnership with state and federal resource agencies and to demonstrate
how transportation improvements can be undertaken without causing irreparable harm
to the environment.
Please call M. Randall Tumor should you have any questions or comments.
Sinoerely,
H, Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
cc: Michael Bell, USACOE
David Cox, NCWRC
Ron Sechler, NMFS
Sara Winslow, NCDMF
John Hefner, USFWS
A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT
Scott Blevins, P.E., NCDOT
D. R. Conner, P.E,, NCDOT
M. Randall Tumor, NCDOT
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax : [phone] Apr 14 '97 15:08 P.01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT )K . DIVISION OF HIG14WAYS GARLAND B. GARRm )R.
GOVERNOR I'O_ Box 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611°5101 SECRETARY
PLANNINfi & EAWRONMENTAL ORANCH
FAX COVER S',bTEET
,Date: A'n-,7;f', 7 7
Number You Are Calling:
Please deliver the following pages to:
Name: ZLZC-, 47 Q L 2 n
Department and/or Firm
Address or Room Number:
This Yelecopy is being sent by:
Name: / ,l 0"n _..__ &
Phone Number: /. >. ) -
,Remarks:

Number of pages (Including Cover Sheet)^
IF YOUDO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES CLEARLY, CALL (919) 7333141 AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCHFAXIYUM8ER - [phone]
e•

8
' t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
April 11, 1997
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Mr. Bell:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201

RECEIVED
APR 15 1997
ENV'RCN1fNTAL Sc/ENce6
GARLAN D B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
Reference: Your March 25, 1997 letter, transmitting comment Letters from state and
federal review agencies in response to the Section 404 Permit Application
on TIP No. R-2404B&C, Widen US 17 in Bertie County
The Department of Transportation appreciates the opportunity to address
concerns raised by environmental review agencies regarding the Department's proposal
to improve a section of US 17 in Bertie County. Although the project is over 7 miles long
and will impact wetlands at 10 sites, agency comments and concerns are focused on
the proposed widening of the existing causeway, and construction of a new, 4-large
bridge at Salmon Creek. The following responses are being submitted.
The Department agrees with the environmental community that the Salmon
Creek wetland is a high quality system. As reported in its application to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the wetland at Salmon Creek rated the highest of all
wetlands likely to be impacted by the proposed widening of US 17. The qualitative index
value assigned to this wetland is 13 out of a possible maximum score of 15. Among
riverine wetlands, the range of possible scores in this rating system is 9-15, where
scores of 9-11 could be termed fair-to-good, scores of 11-13 good-to-very good, and
scores of 13-15 very good-to-excellent.
Comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service .....................
"...Based on this coordination and review, we believe that the wetland losses
associated with the fill approaches to the Salmon Creek Bride (sic) will be detrimental to
aquatic resources of national importance. Therefore, we feel that adequate mitigation
must be provided to offset these losses."
1. "... The Company Swamp Mitigation Bank (CSMB) is largely a preservation bank
and is located in an entirely different river basin from that in which the losses will occur.

Page 2
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
1.
These two factors are sufficient to rule out the CSMB as being a satisfactory site for
compensation for the riverine wetland losses associated with the Salmon Creek bridge
approaches."
Response from the Department............
The Department acknowledges that anticipated wetland losses at Salmon Creek
will occur within the Chowan River Basin, while the CSMB lies in the Roanoke River
Basin. However, it is important to note that the Chowan River-Roanoke River Basin
boundary is located only 2.7 miles west of the Salmon Creek crossing by US 17. In fact,
portions of the subject project lie within the Roanoke River Basin. Furthermore, the
Department feels that the technical distinction of providing compensatory mitigation
within the same river basin should be viewed as a desirable goal only in so far as it is
reasonable and practicable to do so. Unfortunately, it is not feasible, or practicable, to
strictly adhere to these guidelines in all instances. For example, the issue of site
availability, or non-availability, has stymied many of the Department's attempts to
acquire sites that would be more ideal. In this instance, the CSMB is a preservation
bank, containing several hundred undebited acres of high quality bottomland wetlands.
These wetlands are not unlike those found at Salmon Creek. In the last several years
the Department has committed unprecedented sums of public resources to the
identification, acquisition and development of mitigation sites throughout the state.
Several sites have been, or are being developed in the Pasquotank River Basin,
including the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site, the Ballance Farm Mitigation Site, the
Tucker Farm Mitigation Site, etc. Although the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site lies within
the Pasquotank River Basin, it has been routinely used to offset project impacts which
have occurred primarily within the Chowan River Basin (R-2208 and R-2512). The
compensatory mitigation proposed by the Department for the subject project would
result in utilizing the Dismal Swamp site to offset some of the project impacts (the lower
quality sites), while it made better ecological sense to offset the high quality riverine
impacts at a site with comparable value credits available. Even though out-of-basin
mitigation has been routinely approved by permitting agencies in the past, it is
reasonable to contend that state and federal resource agencies have come to
acknowledge that same-basin mitigation cannot always be achieved.
Comments from the Fish and Wildlife Service......
a... The Service recommends the application be denied unless a number of
Special Conditions are added to ensure that interjurisdictional migratory fish are
protected. The anadromous American shad (Alosa sa ip dissima) and catadromous
American eel (Anguilla rostrata) are among the fish species which occur in Salmon
Creek. These fish species must be able to safely and effectively pass through the road
crossing to complete their life history."
1. "No provisions for safe and effective fish passage are included in the proposed
activities, nor are provisions which would ensure that hydrological continuity is
maintained in the floodplain. Such issues are fundamental aspects of the ecological
integrity of this area, and cannot be fragmented or disrupted by the applicant."
r '
Page 3
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Response from the Department...
The proposed widening of the causeway and replacement of the existing bridge
with a wider bridge will not modify existing patterns of movement or migrations of fish
and other species. The existing hydraulic opening will not be altered in any way by the
proposal. The entire stream channel, NWL-to-NWL, and some overbank area will be
bridged. Furthermore, the new structure will have one less bent in the stream bed as
compared to the existing structure. Hydrological exchange between wetland fragments
on the north and south sides of US 17 will be enhanced by the proposal (see January
31, 1997 application to USACOE for Section 404 Permit: cover letter, page 8). A
system of storage canals, one in each quadrant, with cross-pipes connecting each pair
of canals, will ensure that excess runoff from either wetland fragment will be captured
before it sheet flows into Salmon Creek. A substantial portion of this water will be
vented through the causeway via cross-pipes so that any excess water collecting in any
quadrant will have an opportunity to equilibrate with the opposing wetland quadrant,
assuming that quadrant is hydrologically deficient.,
2. "Furthermore, it is not apparent to us that the CSMB is sufficiently "in-kind"
compared to the form, function, and structure of the wetlands which would be lost under
the proposal."
Responsefrom the Department...
Based upon community descriptions of the wetlands comprising the CSMB (Final
Report on the NCDOT Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, Bertie County, North Carolina,
1988), there is little question that portions of the CSMB are ecologically and functionally
similar to the community found at Salmon Creek. Furthermore, the referenced report
and the General Provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding confirm that wetlands
such as that found at Salmon Creek are precisely the type for which the CSMB was
developed (pages 7-8 and MOU General Provision 6).
3. "We are generally opposed to the use of debits from the CSMB until outstanding
issues regarding the management of that facility are resolved. The signatory agencies
are now about five years past the deadline for the requisite five year review of the bank
and its management."
Response from the Department.....
Any questions which relate to the management of the CSMB would be more
properly addressed to the interagency review team, chaired by the USFWS, and/or to
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the agency responsible for developing and
implementing a management plan (CSMB-MOU, General Provision 2). Until such time
as the chairman (designated as the USFWS) of the interagency review team assembles
the signatory agencies to review and critique the management plan and other issues of
common interest, the purposes for which the CSMB was created should continue
unabated.
Page 4
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
4. "In order to ensure that the safe and effective passage of anadromous and
riverine fish, other organisms, and hydrologic continuity, we recommend the following
Special Conditions:"
1. "The primary, and all overflow channels of Salmon Creek shall be spanned. Support pilings
shall be placed at or above the bankfull level, estimated at about the 1.67 year flood elevation."
Response from the Department.....
The Department is proposing to span the entire stream bed, including the
channel and some overbank area at Salmon Creek. End bents for the proposed
replacement structure will be built slightly outside the location of the existing end bents.
The two interior support bents are being located well outside the deepest part of the
channel, as compared to the existing structure, which has support pilings at mid-channel
and at two other stream channel locations. To span the entire channel completely, i.e.,
locate support piers only at or beyond top-of-bank, would increase the span length (+/-)
27 meters, which would result in increasing the roadway elevation approximately three
feet above the proposed elevation. This increasd in roadway elevation will result in an
increase in wetland encroachment (approximately 6-9 feet in each quadrant).
Furthermore, the single-span, girder style bridge would increase the construction costs
and construction time significantly.
2. "Flattened culverts shall be spaced under the roadway across the floodplain cross-section such
that the cumulative diameter of that particular culvert and all lower elevation culverts and fixed span bridges
shall meet or exceed the estimated volume and flow of water for a flood reaching that elevation.
Response from the Department.....
The design for the proposed crossing will provide adequate hydraulic
conveyance. The Department's proposal to provide hydrological connections under the
causeway, as components of a canal surface water storage and distribution system is
designed to address some of the sheet flow deficit alluded to above.
3. "Fixed span bridges and box culverts shall be modified to allow ambient light conditions to exist
throughout the structure."
Response from the Department.....
Orientation of bridge is dictated by roadway alignment. Since the bridge will be
positioned along an axis that runs almost due east and west, direct sunlight should
penetrate up to (+/-) 1/3 the distance under the bridge, except during mid-Summer
when the sun will be tracking nearly along the centerline of the roadway. However,
diffusion and refraction effects will result in more light distribution through the water
column for the relatively short distance (+/- 20 meters) crossed by the bridge.
4. All culverts and other structures shall be placed at grade, and no stream channel
modifications, including, but not limited to straightening or deepening, shall occur throughout the
floodplains.
Page 5
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Response from the Department.....
The Department has no plans to modify the channel of Salmon Creek. However,
the invert elevations of cross-pipes to be installed beneath the causeway at Salmon
Creek (see para 2, page 3 above) have yet to be determined. The elevations of their
respective inverts will be dictated by canal elevations.
5. "Effectiveness studies of the anadromous American shad (Alosa sapidissima) to safely and
effectively pass through the fixed span bridge (in all appropriate life stages) at Salmon Creek shall be
conducted in cooperation with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for two to three years after construction at
the applicant's expense. Any modifications to the structures necessary to ensure 95% efficiency (of
passage) shall be made within six months of such a determination by that agency."
Response from the Department.....
The Department feels that such a requirement is unjustified. The proposal under
scrutiny is not a "major construction project", but rather a widening of an existing
highway facility. The crossing of Salmon Creek.6as been designed to minimize impacts
to wetlands and to water quality. The Department will abide by the recommended
construction moratorium and will strictly adhere to "Best Management Practices" during
construction. The proposal will not diminish the movement of fish species up or down
Salmon Creek. While it may be argued that pipe, or box culverts inhibit the passage of
some species, there is little justification to argue that a spanning structure elevated (+/-)
5 meters above stream bed elevation might impede migratory activities of aquatic
species. The proposed design provides increased vertical clearance above the stream,
less support bent contact with the stream, thus in no way restricts the passage of fish
species.
5. "7n order to ensure that mitigation for unavoidable adverse impacts to Federal
jurisdictional wetlands replaces or restores a similar set of wetland forms, functions, and
structures, we recommend that:
The applicant shall mitigate for the loss of the subject cross-sectional riverine and floodplain
habitat complex by restoring and/or protecting a cross-section of a nearby river and floodplain, at nb less a
longitudinal dimension than 200 feet for restoration, 500 feet for protection, or some intermediate length for
a mixture of the two mitigation schemes."
Response from the Department.....
The Department does not concur with this request. The proposal will not result
in the modification or alteration of the stream channel unless the effect of shading on
the water column is to be viewed as a substantial factor, justifying compensatory
mitigation. Since the review community has uniformly held that bridging a stream is the
least damaging method, when compared to other hydraulic designs, there is no
justification for requiring compensatory mitigation.
Page 6
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Comments from the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries.....
1. "The Division requests a moratorium associated with the bridge construction
(instream and adjacent wetlands). The requested timeframe is 15 February through 30
June. This will ensure the environmental integrity of the area is protected during critical
times of usage by the previously mentioned species."
Response from the Department....
The Department agrees to the recommended moratorium on in-stream
construction at Salmon Creek. Should it become necessary, due to unforeseen
contingencies, to conduct construction activities in waters or wetlands during the
moratorium period, close coordination with the Division of Marine Fisheries will be
conducted in advance of the period in question.
2. "... The proposed mitigation by NCDOT appears to be adequate for the loss
and/or impacts."
Response from the Department.....
No response necessary.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the issues raised by various state
and federal review agencies. The Department is vitally interested in improving US 17 to
enhance travel efficiency and safety without causing unnecessary harm to the
environment. I can assure you that we will continue our efforts to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands and other important natural resources, and provide efficient means
of transportation. Bridging of the entire Salmon Creek wetland has been demonstrated
to be impracticable, but the Department has taken initiatives to improve hydrological
continuity at the crossing, and is willing to discuss sizing and positioning of cross-pipes
to further enhance the effectiveness of the hydrological innovation proposed. Please
call M. Randall Turner at [phone] should you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFVImrt
cc: David Cox, NCWRC
Eric Galamb, NCDWQ
John Hefner, USFWS `
Ron Sechler, NMFS
Sara Winslow, NCDMF

Page 7
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Terry Moore, NCDCM
D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT
M. Randall Turner, NCDOT

. ?.•.
STATE,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JP- DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
April 11, 1997
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Mr. Bell:

Reference: Your March 25, 1997 letter, transmitting comment Letters from state and
federal review agencies in response to the Section 404 Permit Application
on TIP No. R-2404B&C, Widen US 17 in Bertie County
The Department of Transportation appreciates the opportunity to address
concerns raised by environmental review agencies regarding the Department's proposal
to improve a section of US 17 in Bertie County. Although the project is over 7 miles long
and will impact wetlands at 10 sites, agency comments and concerns are focused on
the proposed widening of the existing causeway, and construction of a new, 4-lane
bridge at Salmon Creek. The following responses are being submitted.
The Department agrees with the environmental community that the Salmon
Creek wetland is a high quality system. As reported in its application to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the wetland at Salmon Creek rated the highest of all
wetlands likely to be impacted by the proposed widening of US 17. The qualitative index
value assigned to this wetland is 13 out of a possible maximum score of 15. Among
riverine wetlands, the range of possible scores in this rating system is 9-15, where
scores of 9-11 could be termed fair-to-good, scores of 11-13 good-to-very good, and
scores of 13-15 very good-to-excellent.
Comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service .....................
"...Based on this coordination and review, we believe that the wetland losses
associated with the fill approaches to the Salmon Creek Bride (sic) will be detrimental to
aquatic resources of national importance. Therefore, we feel that adequate mitigation
must be provided to offset these losses."
1. "... The Company Swamp Mitigation Bank (CSMB) is largely a preservation bank
and is located in an entirely different river basin from that in which the losses will occur.
e
It
Page 2
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
These two factors are sufficient to rule out the CSMB as being a satisfactory site for
compensation for the riverine wetland losses associated with the Salmon Creek bridge
approaches."
Response from the Department............
The Department acknowledges that anticipated wetland losses at Salmon Creek
will occur within the Chowan River Basin, while the CSMB lies in the Roanoke River
Basin. However, it is important to note that the Chowan River-Roanoke River Basin
boundary is located only 2.7 miles west of the Salmon Creek crossing by US 17. In fact,
portions of the subject project lie within the Roanoke River Basin. Furthermore, the
Department feels that the technical distinction of providing compensatory mitigation
within the same river basin should be viewed as a desirable goal only in so far as it is
reasonable and practicable to do so. Unfortunately, it is not feasible, or practicable, to
strictly adhere to these guidelines in all instances. For example, the issue of site
availability, or non-availability, has stymied many of the Department's attempts to
acquire sites that would be more ideal. In this in the CSMB is a preservation
bank, containing several hundred undebited acres of high quality bottomland wetlands.
These wetlands are not unlike those found at Salmon Creek. In the last several years
the Department has committed unprecedented sums of public resources to the
identification, acquisition and development of mitigation sites throughout the state.
Several sites have been, or are being developed in the Pasquotank River Basin,
including the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site, the Ballance Farm Mitigation Site, the
Tucker Farm Mitigation Site, etc. Although the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site lies within
the Pasquotank River Basin, it has been routinely used to offset project impacts which
have occurred primarily within the Chowan River Basin (R-2208 and R-2512). The
compensatory mitigation proposed by the Department for the subject project would
result in utilizing the Dismal Swamp site to offset some of the project impacts (the lower
quality sites), while it made better ecological sense to offset the high quality riverine
impacts at a site with comparable value credits available. Even though out-of-basin
mitigation has been routinely approved by permitting agencies in the past, it is
reasonable to contend that state and federal resource agencies have come to
acknowledge that same-basin mitigation cannot always be achieved.
Comments from the Fish and Wildlife Service......
"... The Service recommends the application be denied unless a number of
Special Conditions are added to ensure that interjurisdictional migratory fish are
protected. The anadromous American shad (Alosa sa idp issima) and catadromous
American eel (Anguilla rostrata) are among the fish species which occur in Salmon
Creek. These fish species must be able to safely and effectively pass through the road
crossing to complete their life history."
1. "No provisions for safe and effective fish passage are included in the proposed
activities, nor are provisions which would ensure that hydrological continuity is
maintained in the floodplain. Such issues are fundamental aspects of the ecological
integrity of this area, and cannot be fragmented or disrupted by the applicant."
y
Page 3
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Response from the Department...
The proposed widening of the causeway and replacement of the existing bridge
with a wider bridge will not modify existing patterns of movement or migrations of fish
and other species. The existing hydraulic opening will not be altered in any way by the
proposal. The entire stream channel, NWL-to-NWL, and some overbank area will be
bridged. Furthermore, the new structure will have one less bent in the stream bed as
compared to the existing structure. Hydrological exchange between wetland fragments
on the north and south sides of US 17 will be enhanced by the proposal (see January
31, 1997 application to USACOE for Section 404 Permit: cover letter, page 8). A
system of storage canals, one in each quadrant, with cross-pipes connecting each pair
of canals, will ensure that excess runoff from either wetland fragment will be captured
before it sheet flows into Salmon Creek. A substantial portion of this water will be
vented through the causeway via cross-pipes so that any excess water collecting in any
quadrant will have an opportunity to equilibrate with the opposing wetland quadrant,
assuming that quadrant is hydrologically deficient..
2. "Furthermore, it is not apparent to us that the CSMB is sufficiently in-kind"
compared to the form, function, and structure of the wetlands which would be lost under
the proposal."
Respbnse'from the Department...
Based upon community descriptions of the wetlands comprising the CSMB (Final
Report on the NCDOT Company Swamp Mitigation Bank, Bertie County, North Carolina,
1988), there is little question that portions of the CSMB are ecologically and functionally
similar to the community found at Salmon Creek. Furthermore, the referenced report
and the General Provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding confirm that wetlands
such as that found at Salmon Creek are precisely the type for which the CSMB was
developed (pages 7-8 and MOU General Provision 6).
3. "We are generally opposed to the use of debits from the CSMB until outstanding
issues regarding the management of that facility are resolved. The signatory agencies
are now about five years past the deadline for the requisite five year review of the bank
and its management."
Response from the Department.....
Any questions which relate to the management of the CSMB would be more
properly addressed to the interagency review team, chaired by the USFWS, and/or to
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the agency responsible for developing and
implementing a management plan (CSMB-MOU, General Provision 2). Until such time
as the chairman (designated as the USFWS) of the interagency review team assembles
the signatory agencies to review and critique the management plan and other issues of
common interest, the purposes for which the CSMB was created should continue
unabated.
Page 4
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
1.
4. "In order to ensure that the safe and effective passage of anadromous and
riverine fish, other organisms, and hydrologic continuity, we recommend the following
Special Conditions:"
1. "The primary, and all overflow channels of Salmon Creek shall be spanned. Support pilings
shall be placed at or above the bankfull level, estimated at about the 1.67 year flood elevation.
Response from the Department.....
The Department is proposing to span the entire stream bed, including the
channel and some overbank area at Salmon Creek. End bents for the proposed
replacement structure will be built slightly outside the location of the existing end bents.
The two interior support bents are being located well outside the deepest part of the
channel, as compared to the existing structure, which has support pilings at mid-channel
and at two other stream channel locations. To span the entire channel completely, i.e.,
locate support piers only at or beyond top-of-bank, would increase the span length (+/-)
27 meters, which would result in increasing the roadway elevation approximately three
feet above the proposed elevation. This increas6 in roadway elevation will result in an
increase in wetland encroachment (approximately 6-9 feet in each quadrant).
Furthermore, the single-span, girder style bridge would increase the construction costs
and construction time significantly.
2. Flattened culverts shall be spaced under the roadway across the floodplain cross-section such
that the cumulative diameter of that particular culvert and all lower elevation culverts and fixed span bridges
shall meet or exceed the estimated volume and flow of water for a flood reaching that elevation."
Response from the Department.....
The design for the proposed crossing will provide adequate hydraulic
conveyance. The Department's proposal to provide hydrological connections under the
causeway, as components of a canal surface water storage and distribution system is
designed to address some of the sheet flow deficit alluded to above.
3. Fixed span bridges and box culverts shall be modified to allow ambient light conditions to exist
throughout the structure."
Response from the Department.....
Orientation of bridge is dictated by roadway alignment. Since the bridge will be
positioned along an axis that runs almost due east and west, direct sunlight should
penetrate up to (+/-) 1/3 the distance under the bridge, except during mid-Summer
when the sun will be tracking nearly along the centerline of the roadway. However,
diffusion and refraction effects will result in more light distribution through the water
column for the relatively short distance (+/- 20 meters) crossed by the bridge.
4. All culverts and other structures shall be placed at grade, and no stream channel
modifications, including, but not limited to straightening or deepening, shall occur throughout the
floodplain.
Page 5
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
1.
Response from the Department.....
The Department has no plans to modify the channel of Salmon Creek. However,
the invert elevations of cross-pipes to be installed beneath the causeway at Salmon
Creek (see para 2, page 3 above) have yet to be determined. The elevations of their
respective inverts will be dictated by canal elevations.
5. "Effectiveness studies of the anadromous American shad (Alosa sapidissirna) to safely and
effectively pass through the fixed span bridge (in all appropriate life stages) at Salmon Creek shall be
conducted in cooperation with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service for two to three years after construction at
the applicant's expense. Any modifications to the structures necessary to ensure 95% efficiency (of
passage) shall be made within six months of such a determination by that agency."
Response from the Department.....
The Department feels that such a requirement is unjustified. The proposal under
scrutiny is not a "major construction project", but rather a widening of an existing
highway facility. The crossing of Salmon Creek.6as been designed to minimize impacts
to wetlands and to water quality. The Department will abide by the recommended
construction moratorium and will strictly adhere to "Best Management Practices" during
construction. The proposal will not diminish the movement of fish species up or down
Salmon Creek. While it may be argued that pipe, or box culverts inhibit the passage of
some species, there is little justification to argue that a spanning structure elevated (+/-)
5 meters above stream bed elevation might impede migratory activities of aquatic
species. The proposed design provides increased vertical clearance above the stream,
less support bent contact with the stream, thus in no way restricts the passage of fish
species.
5. "In order to ensure that mitigation for unavoidable adverse impacts to Federal
jurisdictional wetlands replaces or restores a similar set of wetland forms, functions, and
structures, we recommend that:
The applicant shall mitigate for the loss of the subject cross-sectional riverine and floodplain
habitat complex by restoring and/or protecting a cross-section of a nearby river and floodplain, at nd less a
longitudinal dimension than 200 feet for restoration, 500 feet for protection, or some intermediate length for
a mixture of the two mitigation schemes."
Response from the. Department.....
The Department does not concur with this request. The proposal will not result
in the modification or alteration of the stream channel unless the effect of shading on
the water column is to be viewed as a substantial factor, justifying compensatory
mitigation. Since the review community has uniformly held that bridging a stream is the
least damaging method, when compared to other hydraulic designs, there is no
justification for requiring compensatory mitigation.
Page 6
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
1.
Comments from the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries.....
1. "The Division requests a moratorium associated with the bridge construction
(instream and adjacent wetlands). The requested timeframe is 15 February through 30
June. This will ensure the environmental integrity of the area is protected during critical
times of usage by the previously mentioned species."
Response from the Department....
The Department agrees to the recommended moratorium on in-stream
construction at Salmon Creek. Should it become necessary, due to unforeseen
contingencies, to conduct construction activities in waters or wetlands during the
moratorium period, close coordination with the Division of Marine Fisheries will be
conducted in advance of the period in question.
2. "...The proposed mitigation by NCDOT appears to be adequate for the loss
and/or impacts." '
Response from the Department.....
No response necessary. 11 Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the issues raised by various state
and federal review agencies. The Department is vitally interested in improving US 17 to
enhance travel efficiency and safety without causing unnecessary harm to the
environment. I can assure you that we will continue our efforts to avoid and minimize
impacts to wetlands and other important natural resources, and provide efficient means
of transportation. Bridging of the entire Salmon Creek wetland has been demonstrated
to be impracticable, but the Department has taken initiatives to improve hydrological
continuity at the crossing, and is willing to discuss sizing and positioning of cross-pipes
to further enhance the effectiveness of the hydrological innovation proposed. Please
call M. Randall Turner at [phone] should you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
cc: David Cox, NCWRC
Eric Galamb, NCDWQ
John Hefner, USFWS
Ron Sechler, NMFS
Sara Winslow, NCDMF
Page 7
April 11, 1997
Mr. Bell
Terry Moore, NCDCM
D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT
M. Randall Turner, NCDOT

NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE
TEL:[phone] Apr 11'97 13:48 No.008 P.02
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission K' J,
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391
Charles R. FuRwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Parker, Jr., Inland "404" Coordinator
Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coordinator
1 labitat Conservation Prograr /?-
DATE: March 31, 1997
SUBJECT: U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action ID No.
199400838, review of application for North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) to fill approximately 19,86 acres of wetlands,
drain 3.17 acres of wetlands and to rill approximately 0.25 acres of open
waters to widen 7 miles of US 17 and replace the bridge over Salmon
Crock in Bertie County, North Carolina. TIP Nos. R-2404B and R-24040:.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
reviewed the information provided by the U.S. Army Carps of Engineers and performed a
site visit on March 26, 1997. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain
provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.) and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed project involves widening existing US 17 to a Four-lane, mediaii-
divided section horn SR 1503 to just west of the Chowan River. Compensatory wetland
mitigation proposed by NCDOT involves the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site and the
Company Swamp Mitigation Bank.
After visiting the site to assess the proposed pipe and ditch system, we are
concerned that the system as designed will require constant maintenance and will not
perform as expected. We feel that box culverts would function just as efficiently and
would not place the burden of maintenance on NCDOT in perpetuity. We prefer box
culverts because of greater benefits to wildlife and greater ability to maintain floodplain
integrity. Floodplains are very important in the life cycles of many local and anadromous
fish. species. Fish use floodplains for spawning and for feeding. The insects that fish rind
in the floodplains during flood events provide excellent forage and allow the fish to
rapidly gain weight.
We recommend two box culverts be located south of the existing bridge and one
box culvert be located north of the existing bridge- The flood plain along Salmon Creek
_, N'CWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Apr 11'97 13:49 No.008 P.03
Memorandum 2 March 31, 1996
is broader on the South; therefore, we feel that two culverts are needed. South of Salmon
Creek, culverts should be placed at approximately 700 feet and 350 feet from the existing
bridge. North of Salmon Creek, the culvert should be placed approximately 75 Feet from
the existing bridge. Culverts should be at least 8 feet wide and 8 feet-tall or as tali as the
roadway grade allows. The culverts should be placed at the elevation of the existing
ground, specifically not below ground surface.
Because bridge construction techniques are not specified in the permit application
for the Salmon Creek crossing, we may request an in-water work moratorium if
construction techniques will cause more than minimal turbidity.
We request that all wetland impacts resulting from borrow pits constructed as a
result of this project be included in the wetland impact totals and that compensatory
mitigation be provided for these impacts. Spoil material that results frorn tltc
construction of this project should not be placed in wetlands.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this permit application.
If we can be of-iny further assistance please call me at (919) $28-9886.
cc: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
Mikc Bell, U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers, Washington
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., G ove mor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
March 27, 1997
H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager, Planning & Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
#1 Wilmington Street
Raleigh, NC, 27611

E) E H N F=1
Re: 404/401 Application for Proposed Improvements to US 17 from SR 1503 to West of the Chowan
River, Bertie County; T.I.P. No. R-2404B & C; State Project No. 6.019001T; DEM ID. 97-0098
Dear Mr. Vick:
The Division of Water Quality is placing the referenced application on hold until wetland mitigation
issues and anadromous fisheries concerns at the Salmon Creek crossing are resolved. If you have any
questions, please contact me or Eric Galamb at [phone].
n
hn Dorney
cc: Mike Bell, COE, Washington
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Telephone [phone]
FAX # [phone]
An Equal opportunity Ammadve Action Employer 5Q56 recyclW 096 post consumer paper
I
FROM WASHINGTON 03.14.1997 12:39 P.02
, UNffCD STATES DEPANTMEINTiOF COMMERCE
t National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminiatmtiotn
Southeast Regional Office
9721 Executive Center Drive N
St. Petersburg, Florida 33702
March S, 1997
Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth
District Engineer, Wilmington Distriair???i.'T;'
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, Nortft Carolina 28402-1890
Dear Colonel Youngbluth:
In accordance with Part iv, Section 3(a) of the current Memorandum
Of Agreement between the Departments of Commerce and the Army, I an
notifying you of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
intent to consider referral of Department of the Army (DOA) permit
application 199400838 dated February 13, 1997. At issue is the
request by the North Carolina Department of Transportation to place
f ill material in waters and wetlands adjacent: to.. several
tributaries within the Chowan River Basin in Bertie County, North
Carolina, (TIP Nos. R-2404$ and R-2404C, State Project No.
6.019001T). This letter details reasons.- (1) why there may be
substantial and unacceptable adverse impacts to aquatic resources
of national importance; and (2) why issuance of the specified
permit must be conditioned or denied to protect these resources.
The proposed project consists of widening an existing seven-mile-
long, two-lane section of Us 17 to a four-land median-divided
highway from SR 1503 eastward to approximately 1,000 meters west of
the Chowan River. The improvements include the construction of a
new fixad-span bridge across Salmon Creek. The median width will
be 46 feet for the entire length of the project except through the
community of Midway where the proposed highway will transition from
a four-lane divided section to a five-lane curb and gutter section.
A f ive-lane shoulder section will be used through the wetland
portion of the Salmon Creek crossing.
Wetlands will be impacted at ten separate sites scattered
throughout the length of the project. Wetland loonies include
approximately 17.99 acres of non-riverine wetlands and 5.04 acres
of riverine wetlands. The riverine wetlands include 2.91 acres of
high quality wetlands that will be lost due to the construction of
the filled bridge approaches at Salmon Creek. The wetlands. in the
project area are vegetated with a variety of species including
sweet gum ( Ar wit lIM) , tulip poplar
Printed on Recycled Paper
a'awrd cod'
FROM WASHINGTON 03.14.1997 12:40 P.03
loblolly pine (mss taeda), bald cypress (Taxodbin
die _ir?h,no ) r
, sweet bay ( gj" ) , willow oak (Querc"a
Phe114A) , and fetterbush (1,y, app.). Nan-riverine wetlands
function to maintain water quality by slowing nonpoint source run-
off, trapping sediments and removing exoessive nutrients and
pollutants before they are discharged into downstream surface
waters. During periods of seasonal flooding, riverine wetlands
also function to maintain water quality by removing sediments,
nutrients, and pollutants.
Salmon creek, a tributary of the Chowan River, provides important
spawning and nursery habitat for anadromous fishery resources.
Species of economic importance that utilize the project area
ienglude -alewife (Alosa .nseudohar gus) , blgeback herring (812M
eikal") and hickory shad (Alp-4a m die gr") . These species are
identified in section 906(e)(1) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (PL 99-602) as spocies of "national soonomic
importance", Under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act of 1993, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission is developing management plans for these species which
include protection of managed species and their essential habitats.
Accordingly, we regard those fishery resources and their associated
habitat as aquatic resources of national importance.
Anadromous fishery resources are dependent on hardwood swamps for
annual pulses of detritus which form the basis of complex food webs
that support fish productivity in these ecological systems.x In
recent years landings of these commercially and recreationally
important species have declined and much of this decline is
attributed to declines in water quality and losses of habitat.3
The .Salmon creek wetlands impacted by the proposed work provide
essential water quality and habitat functions that are necessary
for the continued production of anadromous fishery resources
The National Marine Fisheries service has been involved with this
project.since its onset in 1994, including an on-site. inspection,
inter44ency.i9eetings, and the review -of an • Environmental Impact
..
'Wharton, C.H., W.M. Kitchens, E.C. Pendleton, and T.W. Sipe.
1982. The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast:
a community. profile. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Biol. sear. Prog.,
Washington, U.C. FWS/OSS-81/37.
2Meeter, D.A., R.J. zivingston, and G.C. Woodsum. 1979. Long
term climatological cycles and population changes in a river-
dominated estuarine system. pp. 315-338. In R.J. Livingston (ed.)
Ecological Processes in Coastal and Marine Systems. Plenum Press.
New York, New York.
3XPPQrlY, S.. P. and s. W. Ross. 1986. CharaCterization of the
North Carolina Pamlico-Albemarle Estuarine complex. NOAA, Technical
Memorandum NMFS-SBFC-175.
FROM WASHINGTON
03.14.1997 12:40 P.04
statement . Based on this coordination and review, we believe
that the wetland losses associated with the fill approaches to the
Salmon Creek Bride will be detrimental to aquatic resources of
national importance. Therefore, we feel that adequate mitigation
must be provided to offset these losses.
The mitigation plan outlined in the public notice is adequate to
offset losses of non-riverine wetlands. We do not agree however,.
that the proposal to debit the Company Swamp Mitigation Batik is
acceptable to compensate for losses of riverine wetlands adjacent
to Salmon Creek. The Company Swamp Mitigation Bank is largely a
preservation bank and is located in an entirely different river
basin from that in which the losses will occur. These two factors
are sufficient to rule out the Company Swamp Bank as being a
satisfactory siie for Compensation for the riverine wetland losses
associated with the Salmon creek bridge approaches.
In view of the above, we recommend that federal authorization for
this work not be issued. We will reconsider this recommendation at
such time that adequate mitigation for the wetland losses
associated with the bridge approaches to the new Salmon Creek
bridge is provided. At a minimum, adequate mitigation must provide
a 1:1 replacement ratio, in-kind and in the same river basin as
that of the losses. '
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can
be of further assistance in this matter, please advise.
Sincerely,
--Andrkas Mager r.
Assistant Re anal Director
Habitat Conservation Division
Cc! • FWS, ATLP,, GA
NS, R61eicjh, NC
EPA, ATLA, rA
NCDEHAR, Raleigh, NC
NCDEHNR, Morehead City, NC
SAF'MC, Charleston, SC
F/HP1 - Susan Stedman
F/SEd2
FROM WASHINGTON 03.14.1997 12:40 P.05
FISH AND WIL DUFF SERVICE
_ g?t?aott?
y Post Office box 33756
Raleigh. N6!eth C,-Ak4 27688.9726
Mara 14, IM
T Unites Stags Department of the Interior
Colonel Terry R. Yolungbluth - ? ~ ?-
Dis;Wct Engineer, Wilmington District
Lf.S. ,Army Corps of Engineers FAX TRAN
Post Office Box 1890
Wihnh gton, North Carolina, P
Attention; Michael Bell
Dear Colonel Xoungbludu
apflo++nt FoFUt 0 P-a°1
AL _ +ar?-'
S,"t't
T° Ar/vr7 b

be ero55ed via a fted span bridge; the r3ltdiau wid#h of the midway would be 46 fret.
118 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv'iae (Service) has reviewed Action I.D. No, 199400838. The
applicant, the North Carolina Department of Traupattation, has applied for a Section 404 (of the
CIean Watex Act) pernut to fill about 20 acres of Federat jurisdictional wetlands, drain anottscr 3
;lcres of wetlatWs, and fill a quarter acre of open water habimt {iwtuding Salmon Creek) i;u the
Gktvwan River basin. Tlp proposed aativsties are part of a prpg?am to wide U.S. l7 in Bcrtie
County, North Carolina, and ate identif vcl as T.I.P. No.s R -2404B anal C. Salmon Cry would
lVlitigation is proposed a# a ratio of 2:1, and is to be debited from the Company Swamp
Mitigation Bank at the Roanoke River National Wildlife Refuge.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Scat. 40I, as amGrtdGd;16 I.T.S.C. 661 at seq.) and the
'This is the report of the Service submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, pmvislons of the
P.ndangercd Species Act of 1973 (97 Slat. 584, as amended; lS YJ.S.C,1S31 et seq.).
shad (.llvra sapfd85sinta) and catadromotts Amcxican eel (Anguilla rastrasa} are among the fish
The Service recornruenci$ the application be denied Mess a number of special Conditions are
addod to ensure that irrterjurisdictivnal migratory fish arc protected. The anadtomous American
SpeCieS which gGGtu in. Salmon Creek. These fish species must be able to safely and et'FeCtively
pass t1Sau$h the load craoixtg to completC their life history.
No provisions for safe aud effective fish passage are incluctad in the proposed activities, nor are
or disrupted by the applicant.
provisions which would Cnsure that hydrologic eoRl3nuity is nnaintained in the fioodplaan. Such
issues are futRdawental a3p4cte of the eFOlegical integrity vftlris area, and cannot be frWented
PuAharmorc, Yt is net apparent to us that the Company Swamp Mitigation Sank is sufficiadtty
"in kind" compared to the form, fvrr+G#ion, and stxveture of the wetlands which would be last
FROM WASHINGTON
under tha prnpasal.
03.14.1997 12:41 P.06
W, ire generally opposed to the use of debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank until
on#standing in= regarding tha n)atutgement of that facility acre molved. The signatory
agencies are now about five years past the deadline for the regdwite five year Mview of the bmk
and its managernent.
T3, order to ensure the $do and effective passage of madromous and rivefte fish, other
organisms, and hydrologic contiuttity, we recommend rite following Speft Conditions:
1. The primary, and all overflow chmmels of Saftw Creek shall be spanned. Support
pilko sliall be placed at or above the baukMl level, estimated at about the 1.67 year
flood elevation.
2. Flattewd culverts sbaH be spaced under the roadway across the 1100414 W =55-
section such that the cumulative diameter of that patlicular culvert and all lower elevation
culverts and fixed span bridges shall meet or oxeeod the estimated volume and flow of
water for a flood reaching that elevation.
3. Fixed span bridges and box culverts shall be modified to allow ambiout light
conditions to exist throughout the structure.
4. All cuJvverts and other structures shall be placed at grade, and no stream channel
modifications, including, but not limited to straightening or deepenln$, shall occur
throughout the floodplain.
5. Effectiveness studies of the anadroxnous .Amwican shad (Alosa oapidissslma) to s ly
and effectively pass through Ibe fixed span bridge (in all apprnpriate NO stages) apt
Salmon Creek shall be conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
for two to three years aAa construction at the applicants expenwo, Any modiFcafions to
the sttuctures necessary to ensure 95% cfficionoy (of pamage) shaU be made within six
months of such a detezmiuation by that any
in order to ensure that mitigation fur un voidable adverse impacts to Federal jurisdictional
wetlands replaces or restwcs 3 similar act of wetland forms, functions, and strwtares, we
recommend that:
The applicant shall mitigate for the loss of the subject cross eetiOnal AM=* and
floodplai,R habitat complex by restoring and/or protecting a cross-section of a nearby river
ad floc dplaiu, at no less a longitudinal dimension than 200 feet for restomtavn, 500 feet
far protection, oar some;ntermediate length for a mixtare of the two mitigation schemes.
'Finally, we now that the failure to itacorporate these Special Conditions into anY ptsraait will have
irreversible and significant adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources. The above ftndiggs
f
,FROM WASHINGTON
03.14.1997 12:41 P.07
and recommendations constitute the report of the Service. 1a accordance With the procedural
requirements of the 1982 404(q) Memorandum of Agreement, Part lVXa), between Our
v4 ender„ we are advising you that the proposed work may result in substantial and unacceptable
impacts to aquatic resources of national concern.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the pXOPOSed activities. If YOU have any questions
or comments, please ca11 Kevir3 Moody of my star' at [phone] extension 19.
sincerely,
'Ie?- /7rmp
fil?John M. Hefter
Field Supervisor
dr. NCDCM, NMaxehead City, NC (Preston Pate)
NCDCM, Raleigh, NC 00bn Parker)
NCWRC, Raleigh, NC (David Cox)
EM Wetlands Regulatory Program, Atlanta, CYO, Momas Wclboru)
NMFS, Beaufort, NC (Larry Hardy)
IiWS/R4'KMOody:M03/12/97:919/856-4520 ext. 19:B:tfish
DEHNR Fax:[phone]
Sfdf .;-6f:.N: bdh: Ciprolirta
patrr? ai? if- ET) ui ro nma nt,
HeciNh ar cf l:.Ural Resources
D?vislon o! Coastal Management
James.B,; Hurit,.Jr., Governor
aonalianl- Howos, Secretary
:ttoger N.,Schector, Director
1 I WD! O'RAN
t l: T MUM.gan
Deborah Sawyer
FROM- David MoyelP
' DATE, 27 7February1997
Mar 12 °97 1052 P.10/11
A741 0
ID F_= HNF11
WASKiNCTON OFFIC1"
MAR 0 3 1997
A E K
`SUW. ECT: Application for CAMA Major Pemit and/or Dredge & FM Permit
North Carolina Department of Tramportatiop
Bridge No, 27 crossing Salmon Creek
Beale County, North Carolina
'A bed is an application for a CAMA Major and/or a Dredge & Fill permit which was received
y.me:lazz 2. Fetiruaxy 1997. I am consideriing this application complete, have acknowledged
:fedeipt, and-have1qun. processing.
I you.-have any.questions do not hesitate to contact me.

V
1424 CfiFQIna•Avent a. Wazhington, North CQdina 27889 Telephones919-946,6481 FAX [phone]
An Equai opportunity Affirmative Action 6npiover 60%recycled/10%post-consumer pcpar
i?
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
,?p,ZER Uh???
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers 't
Post Office Box 1890 k_
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
9? ®1
Action ID No. 199400838
PUBLIC NOTICE
February 13, 1997
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT),
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, Post Office Box 25201, Raleigh, Nort olina 27611-5201
has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO FIL 1 8 ACRES OF
SECTION 404 WETLANDS, DRAIN 3.17 ACRES OF SECTION 404 WETLANDS,
AND FILL 0.25 ACRES OF OPEN WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES ADJACENT
TO SALMON CREEK AND FOUR UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES WITHIN THE
CHOWAN RIVER BASIN. THE NCDOT PROPOSES TO WIDEN APPROXIMATELY
7 MILES OF U.S. 17, INCLUDING REPLACING THE BRIDGE OVER SALMON
CREEK, FROM S.R. 1503 EASTWARD TO APPROXIMATELY 1000 METERS WEST
OF THE CHOWAN RIVER, IN BERTIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, TIP NOS.
R-2404B AND R-2404C, STATE PROJECT NO. 6.019001T.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant
and from observations made during onsite inspections by a representative of the Corps
of Engineers. Plans submitted with the application show that the NCDOT proposes to
widen an existing two-lane section of US 17 to a four-lane, median-divided highway
from S.R. 1503 eastward to approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River.
The 7.0 miles of improvements include the construction of a new fixed-span, bridge
across Salmon Creek. The median width will be 46 feet for the entire length of highway
improvements except through the community of Midway where the proposed highway
will transition from a four-lane divided section to a five-lane curb and gutter section.
Additionally, a five-lane shoulder section will be used through the Salmon Creek crossing.
Wetland impacts will occur at 10 separate sites with open water impacts occurring
at the Salmon Creek crossing. Approximately 5.04 acres of forested riverine wetlands
will be filled by the proposed project and 17.99 acres of non-riverine wetlands. Wetlands
adjacent to Salmon Creek are of very high quality and total 2.91 of the 5.04 acres of
forested riverine acres to be destroyed.
f ,
-2-
NCDOT proposes to mitigate the wetland impacts by debiting wetland acres from
the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site (DSMS), currently under construction in Gates and
Perquimans Counties, and the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank (CSMB) in Bertie County.
NCDOT proposes to mitigate the wetland losses adjacent to Salmon Creek by debiting
29.10 acres from the CSMB (10:1 ratio). NCDOT proposes to mitigate the remaining
wetland losses from the DSMS at a 2:1 ratio to restore 4.26 acres of forested riverine
acres and 35.98 acres of forested non-riverine acres. -
The purpose of the work is to facilitate the completion of the NCDOT Interstate Corridor
Program between Norfolk, Virginia, and Raleigh, North Carolina. A site map is included
with this public notice. Copies of the application and plans of the proposed project are
available upon request at the following offices:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000
Telephone [phone], extension 23.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Telephone [phone]
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Telephone [phone]
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resource
Division of Water Quality
Mr. John Dorney
By Phone only: [phone]
The applicant has determined that the proposed work is consistent with the North
Carolina Coastal Zone Management Plan and has submitted this determination to the

-3-
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) for their review and
concurrence. This proposal shall be reviewed for the applicability of other actions by North
Carolina agencies such as:
a. The issuance of a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality NCDWQ).
b. The issuance of a permit to dredge and/or fill under North Carolina General Statute
113-229 by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM).
c. The issuance of a permit under the North Carolina Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA) by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM) or their
delegates.
d. The issuance of an easement to fill or otherwise occupy State-owned submerged
land under North Carolina General Statute 143-341(4), 146-6, 146-11, and 146-12 by the
North Carolina Department of Administration (NCDA) and the North Carolina Council of
State.
e. The approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Land Quality
Section, North Carolina Division of Land Resources (NCDLR), pursuant to the State
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (NC G.S. 113 A-50-66).
The requested Department of the Army (DA) permit will be denied if any required
State or local authorization and/or certification is denied. No DA permit will be issued until
a State coordinated viewpoint is received and reviewed by this agency. Recipients of this
notice are encouraged to furnish comments on factors of concern represented by the above
agencies directly to the respective agency, with a copy furnished to the Corps of Engineers.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period
specified in the notice,' that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests
for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National
Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties
listed as being eligible for inclusion,therein, and this worksite is not a registered property or
property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National
-4-
Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer,
and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown
archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work
under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed
activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the
public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on
the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in
each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision
whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to
occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That
decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including
the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and
flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy
needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property
ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied
if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the
Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence
and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District
Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and
local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider
and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be
considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or
deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts
on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and
the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
, I
-5-
Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the
need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed
activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will
not be made until the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) issues, denies, or
waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDWQ
considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and
307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serves
as application to the NCDWQ for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed
at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ), Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies
of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of
reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ), Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or
before March 3, 1997, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be
received in this office, Attention: Michael F. Bell, Washington Regulatory Field
Office, Post Office Box 1000, Washington, North Carolina 27889-1000, until 4:15 p.m.,
March 14, 1997, or telephone [phone], extension 26.
ID PROJECT
?EQ
R-251 2A
5lee+ /cj 30
1 tol d
t6-:5
y3;:Swn rid
da?
O
M
r
~ AcL
?S
a ?
X N
/ a
h
- vs??%s
APPPZX. S(.AL CT)
4
NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATCON
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTiE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24048
PROP03CO GRADING, PAVING ,CURO AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2 OF 30 NOVEMOER 1095
.SITE MAP
(No Sttes)
hL
Std. 6o+ 62.736_ - G'
-y4-NC4$ T M p
---=--- ( 'Sifes l -4
S
Sta. 5Z+ 62.250 "v
Sid 5?.tb3.3oo-G-.u9
S?te2
Site 3
s5+00
APPFZX. Sr-AL= ??++?
400 Ac0
soroo
v
00
5
1
&+O .r 00

Ma/one
NORTH CANOLINA OCPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPOItTAT/ON
DIVISION OFHIGHWAYS
BERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24048
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND t,TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF -o NOVEMSCR 1995
SITE MAP
(S(ies 5-7)
r
c
y<?tiE
STS y?ri
FV
90 too

w
a
S?+p?
?O.
-LITE 7
SALMON CREEK
>$xO
I 57A. -7Z +7 S.4/o3 -L- L.F.=
sTA -77-+ ZS.4el 3 -L-KEV LA.
70 +00
65 t00
•? p
5
2
3
2
SITE eol
APPRDX. SCALE (,)
.51TF-
400 2ao p. 4CO
r
TA. (,r)+L-
U.". SiATL Pg0j. (o.019001 T
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
UERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
5 11 E E T 30NOVEMBER 1595
_;L O f
GHOWAAI RIVER
N,\
t1
STA. 123t It. 2.D4 -L-REY. L.3. _
STA. S+xO.000 -L-REV. L.A.
1?-D{00
ll? tpp
l!O*po
loss 00
y O ?C
100
D
Ah
1
LV
p•i
P,
SITE !O
V
ITE
?AT G? Ll t?/ c
R?
SITE MAP
(SL f-es 8-/0)
STA. 10+-00.000 -L-REV.
ENO STA i E PROJ. (0.011-lODIT
-SITE
APPRDx. SGAL C•*+)
2.00 O 400
r M ,.
E W
Z
O N U')
¢
} WZ
F
-
Q
0

_ _
m

°

tL
O

O
CL
(f) O
Z
N O
Z
Q = =)

O
Q

(D
a

cr- LL
U Lu
z
F- O w F- Z O

OZ
w
rn w F-
Bch
3
O
? m o 3 0 0
F N,
LU > n OC to
LL J
U O

Z
?a ry
? +I
' r
Fr
r Er
C, •'a?
E'
a?j ^dE:

Y

r '.: ? E ~
® rtTUac
?a
E?
LL

E? E? ZiY

+N
301

e7l

.i -
E r
+ ! +
O
z
a
J
F'•
W
Z
J ?

rr ..

cli

w

I
I a r
?
Er... _
EE i
a
?
J
?
t ...
+v .
..
-
d c
O
q .a i

T_
??
ooo

O
' -
rIj

o Q °
O +
TI-lo rl PS?N + Lo. 1 NG. +
P
v
- .. .. .. .. ..
:A

-- -- --
¢t U
SECNrE E
O .. --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --ECnsr-- -- - --E--
BA5E LATERAL DITCH -
r
'
eo EG1N PtTC ^ _ i
]IC ?1C y EA 15'T N G. K/w 'K . • 1
-?

?---- 4N. TSTLIND _-V ?Y? .. - ... -
7000 U;•..
--------------_ ro ...
r- .. - ?
• ;
?
----- -6 ---------------?-•?- -`L ---------------- ---- -- -?-??- --?- ?-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
T50 RGP
- - - / r D?
1

F
,. -

`'1 Y l>
3EG.In1 D
ac iTLN L
0.6... EASE LATERAL D)TCH
©
?
Y
WILLIS A. 5AS5

PFOP. GZaDE
°
J
L- REV. +O.?-aA

N6 CaRAOE?
T
I
EA IS
NG AL.OnI(. -L- FZEV. ? ;9-
-
Q
lk-
A-

-7 50 P,C..°
-EDGE IAL-l LAN105

r?
_v
80
1 76+00 20 40 60 80 77+00 20
_
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
• - OIV:SION OF HIGHWAYS
OLRTIL COUNTY
10
2-0 O zp ?i .... 0 k' G.019001T R-24040
HORIZONTAL5CALE VFAT IC-'? L . 5CAI-E PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,

yt
src DRAINAGC ANO tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
DENOTES WS1IJ,1405 EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
C?J
? SCALE AS SHOWN
V cNOTL-S F.tLLIN WET LAN OS
SHEET _7_ OFO NOVEMBER 1995
DENOTE5 EXGAVAT10N lU_WLTL.AND5 (,Ev15ED
1 `I`t
JJ zsfl N
s
-1 HOMPSOnI 4- CO. INC. p
O
00 c)
L
.I •-E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- --E-- -?J?--E-- -- -- --E- - E- -- ?{
I yr ? R?PRnP? .„ / i T.S. GILUAM
CoNL.wAb1. 0.?,•?p S?c
O D.G. .., (iASE LATERAL OrMW b t\ 0.9 p (f Ff LAT
? ?v CDML.wALL/ * _
?. a1C yc ...- END Drr?T E.LW_ (?..
?s.xw
FvNYEL CURS c COMC CURB 5w
r ----------------- ------- - - O I?_ .,cam ,„ I C C k STtEL s c1URE
//? ?`--- - - d
7 T,
esr - ?? ------ -------`'rl-1 J T ' - '?JT cx+c aRS ptp ,ixa--
i
u `\; P:,e
T .
-Z ..
V yk
.;?.`?-??` ? 0.6? EASEl11T.OtTCtI
:cam ,
o\tl T•5. GILLIAM
0.(0- 5r- tmMAL 13
D ITC-1 GONG.
D' GL. WALL
JX t37 RIYRA{t'-- PstD 1 '• 1 z
O2 ?I t L L 1 5 A, PEA S 5 o rru-1 .• , ?•? ?`?
STO.75+ 47-L-ttLV. PROP. t)pla. --- - - PROP, C%RaD`. -
EX15TtNCxLtPACE NhDP SRG.C.LCV= 3.901
' y qqa?
I- F EXISTING GRCc.-1
- - - ZEV.
LNC•c a T I ; < CLA55 Ti R,RAP
ALCn1U -L- REV. `,? \ T- )- I r 1 ?' _ p
07 sz
750 Rt.P
MI-11-1 r0. d
\I MLl-1 4-0.12
-? EOCxE WETLAND5
rte- 1 i F, (o CDUc WE:-ILAMID-5
I I ? I .I i I ...
60 80, 7Q,+00:. .. 20 40 60 _ 80
NON TH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OIVIS 1ON OF HIGHWAYS
zo y a. UEIiTZE COUNTY
I.ioP IZONTAL 5C-ALE VLfiTIL4L 5CAL-! 6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER,
DENOTES WSyu."N05 DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. :S TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
0E.NOTE5 FILL IN WET LAN 05 SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Of 3 Q NOVEMBER 1995
DENOTES EXCAVATION 1N WETLANDS
1\>:VISED SAN.I 199

I. ? >rsruxD . r '

I ?= /
{
O
O N

0
+
D.io- BASC• LAT. r-
/ +
•

DITGH i
O
.. •
00

\
/ Ewsr, aovan E?SEUEHi
- -- -- --E-- O
- -- --E--+ - -- --
E? _ _ _ - -? E- •
W -44.00, a
0 I
4 00
CC
I? - -
O O
-a -?_ - nos_o-O- - - - -- _" --
___?-?:
1 O _
15.740 ? ---?- --j
? ' .
O ------- -- -------- ----------
- .....
US :7
r, -- - -- ----•??-?;-- `- --
-------__-__?_- -?

` t ? sus cn?c _ -_-
?
»f
V+
END
y 0.4..,, PASG La7. D rrGH
Tryv'D
X
4 _
2
0
EDb,E Wl:TLAN05
-(o L I . .. 1. I ... I .. .
79+00 20 40 60 80
20 10 0 Zo 4 0 4
f-ioP iz.ONTAL 5C-ALE VWNTIC.AL 5C.Al
yC L
DENOTES W ct LANOS
OE.NOTC5 FiLLIN WE"TLANOS
DaNOTE.5 EXGAVA-rIO1W IhJ WETLAND5
80+00 20 ' 40
NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPGRTATION
OIVISION.OF HIGHWAYS
UERTIE COUNTY
6.0170017 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURD AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND 'TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WCST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS .SHOWN
SHEET 9- OF a(2 NOVENOCi: 1995
-rte -------_.- '
f F '?
Nit-
? .
,:Ll'
r x 4,"AND `? .
i r GJ 1T? to
51
1 ,
PROP05ED &P%ADE
7 7.2 7
Ex15T ,cam ?un?r _L Rev.
NGrALONCx -L-REV.
3 ?
21,
u
Q
w
J
O
0
r
r
c
l

J-?
N
?d
sQ
z
_ 0 0
V /
-O
I
I

i,

_ N

o N

- o
a
1
r 1
to

/ h l

t ?
D
J ? Z I
O
1 ? - 0 i I _ O

I Z
X
I uJ I
I

'
I
? I.?

?• - N I I J
J
O I - N
_

s Z I

F O
t ?? >
Q
X
w
W
Z-
O n
a ? ? a
464-
3
g o g z
3 F 3 LL.
a a
Z
? £ o. n
u I ? s ? - p
u;
OCL
J
Ip I - <
'' } z
I Q.
.,1 0
1 _ CL
L \\V, ?a
? - U1
t ? g
r p? ? ; -'
J1 3 0 o
N
H
NORTH CAROLINA OEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF T14E CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 10 OF NOVEMBER 1905
R ?vtsEO sfl N t 9 9'?_
GAS>".? KIF AP AF--?-t
RFAa,1(-, -7
/ 1?z -
JcI
c 7L• a
x
% rS-LIND
x
rrrwrD xl
T, !5. G&ILLAM
1.0 m BASE LATERAL DITCH 1 m
} I 1 SPECIAL DITCH W/ ,J
*00.00 30.500 x CL A 55 "F3., -
(too.o7) - _ RIP RAP ANP .,.
.7n n -E-- -- -- -E-- - -- --E (1J ?r- - --E?00.0 - -- C

+70.0 26.J40
Yt _' 26.340 /// (O6 42')

FABQIG _ ,! t:
+•41.80 I 100.0
30.500 J0.500
E (100_07') - E wORO ^I (100.07•)
v vv ??
WELT
- -
- -- - - ---?- - _ -- - - - -_----_-_ - I- - - - --- - - - -- - _
---- -- - - - SPECIAL COLLAR-( I \-PROP. CI1nRORAIt' -
US 17 J.o Dr. I
.??- - -- - - - --'•--'-'Ua ?O REMOVE 375c Oy ---- I - -••-._ _, -
FALSE SJMP -? i -
400 J PROP. I \S\ v I --
CUARORAIL
MELr 375 RCPT
MELT -T' X _ , t ... Q ? I
/
rE VA I_ V "L IT 0-11, w/ • t? 1
1?1P FkAIR AN 0
LT CV_ FA&KIC.
C_LA55"PJ"RIP RAP
w/ FiL: E ?< i=?'bF?IG
75•GILLAM
O

5)TE 7
i / G . ?Nnan , ----
SPECIAL DITCH W/ '
Gt-A%, Yj"RI P RAP
AN0 FII.TGK FkvK,I
r)
O
(71
N
r
G LA`?S•i'/RIPKAP
W/ r ILTC K FA13FZ 1(,
1.2 m BASE TAIL DITCH
-L-
PI 91+ .617
p a -37'-50.1'
L
T 642
s 95.353
R s 436.4

Ll

I
I 4I.o0o
(iJjLLJ
.:l
t IN
LJ
I
J
1 ?
-L-REV
PI 91+70.262
AT 24'-37'-50.1
T5 128.464
Lc 89.954
Rc 400.000
Lz a 82.000
03 5-52'-22.1'
U a 54.697
V s 27.361
SF 08
R.O.-, 20.5
...............................................
PRELIMINARY PLANS
00 NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCIlC
o 10
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 2G.
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:I4Ga
yc DENOTES WSTLANDS -
OENOTGS FILL IN WETLANDS
••• DENOTES EXCAVATION M WEi LANDS '•5?jBat' ! / 3?
OENO-reS w>?T J-rkxos -YS-REV
C?[/1 PI - 4+37.513
DENOTES FILL tN W!:TL-aNDS ;rr or - 92.552 -03.2"
rr -
•y6 ?>,:
L - 177.809
-
. DENoTLS EXCAVATION 1N WETLANDS R 250.000
0 U
I / v v
/ SE - .04 6 C ?
rr \..
0 \\ \?? } 616R
?`? `O• \\\\ \??
``
02,
rr T. S. GILLAM, et of 5? \ L
\"?? ?? r I 00 201 PC. 41
rr?? 00 590 PC. 155 \
I 1 .'9
0.8 Dornor
O J.7 7VP 1
CD 0.7 DESP 0
?\;? ? / f.2 30,RDY 1
1.! T0P
+ ?? .•:
0.7 OILP O +00.0-YS-R \
TQ 18.000 \
1' (59.06') \
+80 0
O
fn I +76.00 _
0 0 11 Q PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
_Y5-REV PT 5.22.470 - r0%
- - --E-- -- r- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- - :i
ry? 1
U +76.oo ?I a _ r -E -- -- -' E f
15.240 -E-
Q (60.00') ii - - C .?-....-....?-....-.r.?.-...7 E
- - - 1 [nSt. •M - - - .- +78.04
C- -- _-___T - -- --- -- 750 RCPj .78.0'}
- u:aw _ - - C _ ° - - --- - - - -- _ -y.
?_• ---__-_-_ -__---_-___-_ _ - _ - -_14 _OL __LAR________ ___________ ________
?r
J.0 JST II 750 CG+C ---------._--------
?S 17
- _• --- -?is.s•o -L-REV.. FALSE SUMP Cl-8A •
..E D
N81 -56 -44.7
- -
? fv1?
n?n
+
L
T-

O

-I-REV POT 1 Ot+17.003 -
-Ya-RLV r0 233 -
-Y6-REV POT 1+00.000
W
W +70.0 .? W •_ ` Sd (+80.1 5Ct `
124.6Y)
6T)
(124
i .
f!I +67.4 .i,?.
I
Iw
V) 54.000
(tn.1r)
+7
. (156 86.35')
..? ? .
?1
:• LOm BASE TAIL DITCH
/ ;S• CLEAN OUT EXISTING TAIL DITCH
REMOVE SPOIL FROM WETLAND
80.000
(262.47') '/„•' +65.4
? 83.900
(275.26')
0 20 40
I: 1000
PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
C
T. S. GILLAM, et of
08 201 PC. 41
D8 590 PC. 155
?OODS

1
/37ldND N
,
JC 400
gpp ? 600
1200
5900 -L-REV 6100
14000
129 14800
1100(-)
,0
0
,oa

... ,
0000 1994 A0T
0000 2020 ADT
g,$
m1
o l,v
-cL.A55 5" P. IPRAP
w/ }?1L?rK F.Nev-1(i
125mm MONOLITHIC
CONCRETE ISLAND
PROP. SLOPE STAK
-Y6-RE
PI - 2+10.7=
4,T - 57'-O6'
T - 51.616
L s 149.49=
R - 150.000
SE - .08
EST _ TONS CL B RIP
EST - m= FILTER FAB
ShCeZ` /? ?? ?0
A3'd-1-40{-t<Jl d19 -:3 IN 1-7 H-71VW
,r, r l VII I I I' :? ?!1
,11 ? r ?? I o' I I III i, •? W
111 a L6r Zr 'w` . I 11 I III •' ? Z ?? Z
r I I 1 Q
w Io ?i illlw IQ- J :3
° ?I
41J ? J j
'?I 1 ?I U• I ? m ? I' ? O• .
' F " F j 1 1 '•? I l • i tY
r ?i t I i a i' I ;, = f
? v I 9O I I ?: /, ;?
g .. ..J r +'-- 1 r-?al I u , .J N' >{ ?p?
-13 OL 006 It
,,? ii .LL.caao ? ?''.__ r ic•sr. I a I ? .. •'I J ?? / /{',/
- d' 1N3 d01D 30 N0021_ ^ I i v I /
T
1?-Ir K
Z
pG'10 ?uIa: i e i '` I r.. :•I ?? :'f /?
L.J
L? {'\ l rl 6 l I r ->
J? O
in ?.?.` (=.7 l 1 v'lL* .\• .J'JI ,;rj/ YJ
l I ? L 7 LL,Ca11f1N \.CfR'(A•0NN N _ (:
. a; ?i z Z °O [•6s c? _.?xc< < = p O _j ( 4'99+ I :' ?1 ?Jn
< O rnZ of 1 1 - o )'r
c) IL
< o F.. < "' 1
K rye. < F O I
r LW O:
_ 17 1 . ?6' /' /' I
ca 0 CJ ?j _ W
E 07 0 p O I ^. w I ?? •..'... ... .. --?. , 1///Jl Q7 O 7.
or_
rh l? JI-l>' ?xo''aO. O(? .-J 8 1 .. , : ,i???r n..^.•?AL;..: Q :/CS p' `
S ?
n 3 o
1 _ N
N
CI WO NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
3 uJ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
g Z ? J
OERTIC COUNTY
W _J X U
3 U• W J 6.0190017 R-2404C
O
W U PF'OPOSEO GRADING. PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER,
FW
F F z
O O O z DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
?^ Z O EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
w u
O O O -
.S SCALE MS SHOWN
SHEET L? OF ;Q NOVEMSCR 1995
ry

g

p

+

I >
I
I
?
p .
I - O
I
I
? N

cc p

I o oQ

e Z
I Q I
o a
_ I z o

0
?
? 0

w I
(
- p
? N
i '

0. I
O p
Cc I p
a +
M

o`

w
I - 0 1-'

l ?
C
)
0
0

NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
_-I
p•? UERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVI14G ,CURB ANO GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND .'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET A OF 3-0 NGVEMUCR 1095
•oons © O
O
SITE r•J J.G. $ELL,H$I R`7 j PROP. SLOPE STARE UNE
r O
+00.0 +00.0
28.340
08
42) ? )
?
//
yc CL
._.
-L
.
(
E
- -E- --
.1

?
'..

- - - - - - - --------- -
C
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. __??:? ?'?•_'J??_?
*tTl.IND )iC ? ?
? " " "'. '? ?•?• • • • ?
i is rr'-? `'-'
- -•`'??"?-?• ?L
i .
Zi:
? O
- - - - - - -
i
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y
- -

O µ f
O
S81'- 6'-44.7"E --- Q

/
Z p Z

zz Oz/yZ/
?/
-
-

HEIRS
PROP. SLOPE STAKE UNE
0 Pesos? GRACE
ga?sSX? e -L- RFv -O.o-7.+%
NU ALONla -L-REV
I/0
12
I I I f I I -. I .i
104+00 20 40 60 80 105+00 20 40 60
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
xm=mezmvwEm OIV:SZON OF HIGHWAYS
ZO 10 O 2D 4 2 O DERTIE COUNTY
HOfUZDNTAL5CALE • vepmr- 1l- 5C.41-C-- 6.019001T R-2404C
? yG DENOTES W>=1lJh0405 PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURD AND GUTTER.
ORAINAGC AND .'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
® EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
DENOTES FILLIN WETLAN05
SCALE AS SHOWN
'•??.? • DENOTE5 EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS SHEET LfOFG NOVEMBER 1925

WOODS'
O CJ
J.G C'?ELL?4-tE?RS +00.0

l1

J
50* 7.
`
O
.9
+ 1450 RCP us 17 s.s ssr
?fl
0
v
til 10
L

LJ

J
1
U

Q

--

LL
_

1
•
V 1"

C\ 110
i

PROP. &i App -
?
-o n74 /
6
-L- REV.

A-

-2
4
-b
1 I I I .?. l I I -?
60 80 106+00 20 40 60 80 107+00
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMCN7 OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVZSZON OF HIGHWAY.
zo 10 O ZD '} 2 0 •4 DERTIE COUNTY
HOKIZONTAL-5C•ALE VEFlTICAL. 5UU.?
6.0190017 R-2404C
'K yt OENOT[5 WGTL1tN05
PROPOSED GRADING . PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND 'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CNOWAN RIVER.
DENOTE5 FILL IN WETLANDS
®
SCALE AS SHOWN
?-- ?-?
I'•": •;•i DENOTE5 EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
L?
SHEET 16 OF ,;-O NOVEMBER 1995
T E 9 ? (?DSao
? Cati[. VOME.4 EASEYENf `100.07•)

? . 26.40
? (86.42
~
4

:?? ???? ?? • ?-??.¢t-mil •?:T ?r•?.i- •4 T'f.? TT C
-

? I? •s0 ?'?-

I

GLASI ?'F?: ? ? ! L
3 }-1 ?1i?

?ILTE2 FAF•RIC. J
SITF to

:ic 00

r^)
V
1 N
O +
4

5
L
r 0

_ L-
?` J
J

1-
c
Z

PROP, GRAOC
e -L- REV O.G3ln`?o
--- ---- -r
----- ---- -
---?
?
??
l
-?.i?a?.oNrz -?.-
REV.

Q
-2-

_6 I l I I I ? I
0
107+00 20 40 60 80 108+00 20
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
2-0 10 0 ?p 4 2 O 4
' HORIZONTAL SCALE VERTICAL SCALE DERTIE COUNTY
Y Ag aL
,u CSC DENOTES WETLANDS 6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSCD GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,

DENOT F.tL
ES LI N WETLANDS
T-L?-i-•? DRAINAGE AND 4 ON U.S. 17 FROM

EAST Of N..C C. . 45 5 T TO O WE WC^^+ST T Of THE CHGWAN RIVER.
DENOTES EXCAVATION )N WETLANDS SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET , - 0 F NOVEISC1: 1095

? soots ..I.G, P?ELLJNEI?- ' x +
.tea- - ? ? ? ? 1?G y[ .CL''L? ?T r+T.??Y!'•? ? ? ?. ?
1l.Ia
If AIL U!'i
us 17 a.a esr
? - '
sea ?; c u.i -_. _ - R
_ y aI
E- -E- -E- -E- C
-E-
+00.0 y? Y x ?
38.000 :k
(124.67) ?
+00.0 O 70005
JC at.OCO
cls•.srt J.L. BELL, HEi RS
4
SITE
XA
_ _ YG JC J. _
rZMAND O n• r
Zk BOTTOM
=Y yc ?``? • o.r DrrP
GLaiS?'U ?0PkAt?w/ 141
Zk FII Tr_R FA?RtG ? - / GELIA SAWYER
+35.0-TZ- ]C 1
9.000 i
SPECIAL- DITO-t W/ (29.5 .
3 . 1.2rrt BASE TAIL DITCH CIEANWT
G1•A ?5'.>3., 1;1 P izo P A ^tD . ' yc
Ile Flr-l[KFAyglc--\ EST391 m? O.D.E. c
+80.0 sd
Uj
ul 131
(1
1
O
}
Q
gal
W 4?
.600
RCR
1
L? 1
1-
Q
x ?
® Y / © PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE r
J.G•!'?ELL? HEIRS ?/ GELIA SAIAIYER
? yc Y
NOfL 10 NTAL SL.ALE NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
??? yC DENOTES W>:TLAND5 OLRTIE COUNTY
® 6.0190 R-2404C
DENOTES FILL I N WETLANDS
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURD AND GUTTER,
(..? DRAINAGE AND tTRUCTURCS ON U.S. 17 FROM
I; - '•"1 DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN f:IVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN SHECT $ OF NOVE`OCR 1995
O SP?•-t IAL DITL1-l W//
- -
y
c
X
?D.sao
/ - - .!i • ,!.' do
(too.oT) ? 00
_ _ - -_ - - -
-
JC E - '?
-•+
'
0
I~'
v
90.
- 1- RS.
.n°V
+22
?-----.
?
•-
y? ? ?O.SCO yc
0.500
3• Y PROP.
(100.07')
rt00.07')
26
•
E
-E
'
'
?
) C
L:'ti?
(86.12
?J ?
J4, -
cf
-
'-
__

- - --- -- ---------- - -
600 RCP -
1 R£MO?E
*SO C.P.

L-REV

o?

T2= •PbT • 11;.75.33 - . .. •`, ..•: :. .

-E -E _ _?_ 1 E
-E- -E
?,Q PROPO56 D C? FA t7E
'O.n3?% A -1--REV. e ? -o. 112 io
---------?` ??-- ?tt(?pct-ONGc-L-REV.---- -
2-
SITE 9 _L P"D
? I I I _ ? I I I ?.
40 60 80 109+00 20 40 60 80
A
N6t EX15TING Di-rCH 6ED
PROPC5e0
PROP05tr0 Dt i&M f E0
SITE -72-
12100 I 610 J.. T ? 13100
-a ;m dry
t.
F- CHEM
-I
zo to ' 0 ZD 2 O
HORIZONTAL 5C.ALE VERTICAL 5CALE
yc OENOTES WETLANDS
it O
?- x J.L.6ELL.?NE?1ZJ rslux I
D O
? •1.2m BASE TAIL DITCH QQ
S Y ?`
•4-
(C) IpODS
J ?: •.?:.?'- .: •?:• • • ' ??'--;cam _?• ?ioE-? ?- ? x x _..1
. L Sul: yc 1
J v
?- ? ncruxD Q ? vooDS h--
ii y- x GELIA SAWYER
1 ?
Y
SITE q --TZ-
N G
-?- ?_ EX15TINCx 017GH 5ED
PROPOSED DITCH PED
4-
I?
1 O
IZ
I
13+00 20 40 60 80 14+00
zo to o zo a z o +
HOPl1LON"TAL 5C-ALE. VERTICAL 5CAI.-P-
?c DENOTES WBTL.AN05
DENOTES EX(-AVA"f ION )W W LTLAN D5
I .I I_
20 40 60
0 0
® o 0
J.G. [SELL HERS
g'19 RAP
+71.0
21. L .
C%, coons ?aa9o')
m
. rooas
rsrt
Q
RETAIN I
. 4!
I? !
txn , 1 O cucrrvarln
GEL)A 5AWF-K
]iG
_, i-
N C;
-c -
L PLO
Zo IO o ZO 4 2 O 4
HORIZONTAL 5C.ALE VERTICAL 5CA1.5
yc OENOTE5 1-4ETLAN05
DENOTE.5 EXGAVAMON 1N WETLANDS
BED
DTTCj? 8E?
PKOP05EID
i ( I ? I i ? I
60 80 15+00 20 .40 60 80 16+00

SITE IF
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DL'RTIC COUNTY
6:019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGC AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
511CET 21 0 F .30 NOVENLIC1: 1595

AOOOS ?k O x
0
c

+ITE GI:LIA SAWYER
+ +00,0
Jc 30.500 y" Y
(100.07•)
Rbt i•O?.f !ll?
; 1 1
-
`L
__ .. c __ ._ r. c
E--
Zia
?+-
STAKE LINE 26.3+0 •
JC S4 -
1
) 1

+
+
------
=
------------------
- ----==--------------
(
Q ; US 17 8.9 BSP . -
?
is . - - }
-
r

2
J

-E- E- -E

?k
7-
_00
0
©
1
y
.
k f FiLIA SAWYER ?ZOGo
I )
Y FOODS Y inn n
.
(131.51•)
- in PROP. (ARADt
-?. I12. i -?- REV.
?_ NG. Al-Ot?IC? - L.-REV

80 110+00 ZO 40

2.0 10 O ZO i 2 0 ¢
HORIZONTAL SCALE VERTICAL 5CAi.E
?A yc DENOTES WSTL AcK05
® DENOTES FILLIN WETLAN05
"•_'.--:• DENOTES EXCAVA?ION )N WETLANDS
? I
so so 111+00
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
UE14TIC COUNTY
6.019001T R-24090
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB ANO GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WCST OF.TIIL CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 24 OF .Q NOVEMOCR 1995
0
SITE 9
GI;LI ® N
Jc yc •
/ _c-- a- E_¦rsr.oa T.cR _asc rrv= --E'
a
cr-

IC`?l

REMOVE 375 canc375 RCP
is.
5
.?
4
--T --------------- -- -----------------------------
N

OS r7 8.9 BST ( -
Q IS^a r-...? S8I -$6 -44.7E r Z-GI-D -- Q

?1 -?- -

p
Jill
:?1 ??

? J

GEI.1A SAWYER
wci A55r 5" RIPPAP
/FiL7LP. FAf,•RIC
PROP CaRADIF-7? L- REV. +Q,61'7
L- NU ALONG- -1--RE Y.
(o
2-
_0
111+00 20 40 60 80 112+00 20 40
ZO 10 O zo 4 2 O 4
HORIZONTAL ` ALE - VERTICAL 6CAL-
y4
DEPtOTES W>:TLRMDS
DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN05
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WE-TLAN05
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF IIIGHWAYS
BERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
PHOPOSCO GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2j OF ?-o NOVCY.DCR 1295
110

Y

uJ - -
`L

? I.
Q : Sc
I

?3 - - --
(12_
I 0
-2-
-4
1
40
i i { 1
60 80 113+00 20
to O _ 4 2 O
H0R1L0r1TAL SCALE VERTICAL 5CALZ
Aw yc DENOTES WSTL4ND5
:je
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN05
DENOTE5 EXCAVATION )W WE.TLAND5
40 60 80
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OCRTIC COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB A-40 GUTTER,
ORAINAGC AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SIICET 24-0F NOVEMUCA 1975
I
-LINE EXIST. 0.6m BASE .n
DITCH W/CL B RIP RAP
rn to
SITE 9
? CL 8 RIP RAP ?•?"' ? r` ? p
?F
+OO. O
`(1314 •) ? + ' N +7-.693
?.6?aE,SA > (109.91)
U-J I -- Of = kE(,ELAOWYER c++ORo
I
-
E----- E --! --Ensrcoo.a - - - - - !2-?
30.600 2
US 17 tl.3 BST
450 RCP j ..? -
-77 77
n
REW(fF 450 CON( - . -c? .
L 2-CI ° -
E TTR DEPTH
lid - ?... - - -r.,s?• A?- ?-
t
?YEG AL , I At•1`? 'mac
• .' r:? . PAWAIC. L
•-E E _ ? y nrt.GVC 1
(1 20.0
+93.693 •? I 'IQ 38.000 +71.693
38.000 +20.0 (12,.67) 38.4.6
(1z4.67) 41.000 GEL1A SAWYER (1z4r)
n}2.51.1
PROV GRAVE N6L
+0.8'r °O f .11 °o
• pR:P,GrZ1DE Sf3L
NGc A1,-0WG -1-- REV.
? I .? I 11 1_ ?-
80 114+00 20 40 60 80 115+00
NORT14 CAROLINA OEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 31" HIGIIWAYS
w 10 O Y.D .? a 0
HOPIZONTAL5CrALE VW%.TIC.AL 5CALE DERTiE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24040
DENOTES WETLPcNDS
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
pT?T1 DRAINAGE AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN05 EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
'?_--_+ SCALC AS SHOWN
O>NOTES EXGAVA71oN IN W>:TLANDS
511EET !?5 OF ?G NGVCXDCR 1396

Q 3

w p
o
y ?
" I. ut v
a `rw
?n"
-? z w
• .. 1 - Q ?+J I• W W
_ . W
I I g? z z

j CL

?

a
3

4
j
I r d
CL ? G
V
u
y`
J
` .1
t11
is
o J
Z
J 1 `

? I c '
? ' -C r z

- ? Z J
O
I • c J

-Lo

C)
-d-.

3 Q NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1 1? DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Z
- cl) OCRTIE COUNTY

i 6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
I Qom, DRAINAGE ANOSTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF H.C. 45 TO VEST OF THE CIIOWAN RIVER.

O ?
Q i SCALC AS SHOWN
^ SHCET ^•r OF 30 NOVE%DCR 1995
J
UJ O

/. I W
786
.y// / J I
cc -
00+2
' ? t ? I% ?? a ? F y j• • jf. J
41
h; o? j. .?. ./ '..? s
Oy{ W N y I. '
' I Q •r' O ? /•. X
(L Z-
V) La
CL
/; ,• ?• v rya L tL ? • j :?T?
.I `Y c
/ J •? .! t a CC it ? ': '• %.?/ .?
w J v
1 V '\

I
I I1?

:r
;IS
?z I
C) I

Eut
•
} {II
? ??j?
1 11 461

L il
y UI
I
t I co
IItS- I + ++ I
I p 101•t00 1- I
II;?
1 I o aa
Q W I
a
e t ,
! € 1 I I
,•i
I !! \ I I 1
IJ
?i ? 11 v1 vn
. ii A y W v W
L Z
%-.
NORTH CARO't.INA OCPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
O yl OCRTIC COUNTY
J
6.019001T R-2404C
v PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
O < DRAINAGE AND tTRUCTURES ON U.5.. 17 FROM
t F CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
O ^l SCALE AS SHOWN
f (1 O_ SHEET OF 3G NOVEMSCR 1995
`J? o s'

0
- N
UI
? O
O
foil - f
te)
W
QO
d
0.
O
CL
0.
IAJ
1>
W
lQ
}
L
O
Q

+,
W
c?
o

1 - Do

>
- cD
?
1
D
I
0
- v-
? ? O
O - CV
o ;

o
o
_

1 CV

o
w - Co
Z

O
_ co
O

1L1

W
LC Z
Q

v O ul - 04
? N y
w

0
ul
O
O

?k I
Z .?
C ?

C

LN - O
W

0.
w
I L\

1
Q
N
t
N

V

-V?
`T

r.-

II
_
1 -N
I

O -1
N
C
. v1
OJ
Q
a r
Z
a
d
S

o
z 0
O

N 5
url
F'
Q
a 3
? w
3

o
z w
2 a
x
w ?-
-I
W
0
ul
a W
0
w
a
o
w
a W
b
w
p

NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OCRTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF TI/C CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
NOVE.:BCR 1095
SHEET 28 OF s_;

WETLAND-ADJACENT LANDOWNER'S
(R-2404 B & C)
PROJECT WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER(S) ADDRESS
R-2404 B Site 1 Vernon F. Lee 1431 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2797
M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N..Merry Hiil. NC 27951
Charles G. White 1504 US 47N. Merry Hill, NC 2795
John T. Evans 110 Cypress Rd.. Meng Hill. NC 27 957
Site 2 M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Gayle M. Bonds 1549 US 17N, Merry Hill. NC 2795-
Naomi P. Copeland 1548 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2795-7
M. H. Hughes 1606 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 2795;
Site 3 M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N, Merry Hill. NC 2795-
Howard P. Evans 1627 US 11 N. Merry Hill. NC 2..957
Mrs. W.H. Phelps 1614 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Wilma J. Evans 1630 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 2-957
Site 4 W. J. McClenny. Sr., et.al. 1637 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2795-
Helen J. Williams 1643 US 17N. Merv Hill. NC ?7957
8-2404 C Site 5 Weverhaeuser Co. P.C Box 1?91. New Sem. NC 28560
Willis A. Bass 1833 US 17N. Merri Hill. NC 27957
Jerre H. Cowand F.C. Box 215. Merry Hill. 111C 27957
Site 6 Willis A. Bass 1833 US 17N. Merry Hii1. NC 27957
Willis M. Bass 1909 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Thompson & Co. US 13N. Winascr, NC 27983
T.S. Gilliam. et.al: 205 Gars St.. Windsor. NC 27983
Site - T.S. Gilliam, et.al. 205 Gary St., `dVinasor. NC 2-983
Site 3 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. VVindscr. NC 27983
Site 9 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. bVirdscr, NC 27983
BlacK Rock Deli. Inc. ^235 US 17N. Memy Hill. NC 2 r 95 r
Black Rock Devei. L.P. 2_35 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC ^_795-
J. C. Bell. Heirs 324 US 13 Bypass. Windsor. NC 2-963
Cecelia Sawyer 404 King St.. Windsor, NC 27983
Site 10 T.S. Gilliam, et.al. =05 Gary St., Windsor. NC 27983
J. C. Bell. Heirs 324 US 13 Bypass. Windsor, NC 27983

Sheet- 29 of 30

SUMMARY SHEET
V/aters/Wetlands Impacts)
R-2404 B & C
IMPACTS (Acres) I FILL
PROJECT SITE # STATIONS FILL CUT DE CLEAR TOTAL (Cu Yds)
R-240413 1' 42-50 to 44+14, L&R i 0.69 - - 0.21 0.90 ` 3.003.6
2 49+66 to 50+27(1-&R) 0.16 - - O.C6 0.22 603.3
3 52+14 to 53+16(L) 0.09 - - 0.04 0.13 1
277.
4 55+17 to 55+2?(R) 0.007 - - 0.003 O.C 1 11.8
S
PROJECT TOTAL 0.95 - -
- 0.31 1.26 - 3,901.3-
_
R-21404 C 5 _
_
e.9+23 to 70+52{ LE R) 0.22 - - O.G9 0.31 5.639.9
6' 75-77 #0 79+ 0(R) 1.89 0.47 - 0.55 1 15. 7 ).,1
7' 329+33 to 90+C7(R) 0.4; - - 0.09 0.. 6.11" 3
8' 99+70 to 99+98i R) 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.03 0.0 43x.1
9' 102+53to114+30iR) 4.72 0.-6 1.99 1.70 14.17 12.218.0
10' 1+01 to 3+33 i Y61 1-32 0.0a 1.05 0.21 1 3 42 1.586.6
PROJECT TOTALS 6.74 7.19 3.17 2.67 21.77 , 41.367.44

COMBINED TOTALS
9.69
7.199
-3.17
2.93 _
23.045,255 S.,•
Note: °L" ..left) and "R" (right) equate to northside and southside, respectively; "CE" denotes
ditch ettect (see cover letter); ' denotes sites (impacts > 0.33 acre) for which permit drawings are
submitted: site 6 is the oniv site that is below headwaters
39 0? ---b
S
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
February 10, 1997..'
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199400838
970125
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:

j
Enclosed is the application of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) for Department of the Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to fill 19.86 acres of Section 404 wetlands and drain 3.17 acres of Section 404
wetlands and fill 0.25 acre of open waters of the United States adjacent to Salmon Creek and
four unnamed tributaries in the Chowan River Basin. NCDOT proposes to widen
approximately 7 miles of U.S. 17, including replacing the bridge over Salmon Creek, from
State Road 1503 eastward to approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River, Bertie
County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid
request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative
regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under
the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not
be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt
of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not
acted on the request, or asked for an extension of time, by April 7, 1997, the District
Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred.
-2-
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed
to me at the Washington Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,

V Michael F. Bell, P.W.S.
Regulatory Project Manager
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
DIVISION OF COASTAL. MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANTS NAME: N C Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge No. 27 in Bertie County on US 17 at the Salmon Creek
crossing near Merry Hill, North Carolina
Photo Index - 1995: N/A 1989: N/A 1984: N/A 1979: N/A
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,661,000 Y: 839,900
Merry Hill Quad. (lower right corner)
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA / D&F
4.
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit -02/20/97
Was Applicant Present - NO
PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 02/25/97
Office - Washington
5
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Bertie County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - 2 lane bridge
Planned - 5 lane bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
7
-91-- ? -
Ct;?? ,'t t
Coo_
[AREA]
FILLER OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands ±1,470 ft2 ±83,148 ft2 ±4,645 ft2
404 delineated shaded by bridge
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands ±5, 806 ft2
Creek bottom shaded by bridge
(C) Other High ground ±825 ft2 ±41,574 ft2
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±3.2 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: NO
(F) Water Classification: C-NSW Open: NO
8.
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace a ±33.5' wide by ±141.5' bridge with a
±70.8' wide by ± 147.6' bridge.
NC DOT Bridge #27
Bertie County
Project setting
The N. C. Department of Transportation (NC DOT) proposes to replace bridge #27 located
on US 17 over Salmon Creek near Midway, North Carolina. The bridge is bordered on the
downstream (east) side by wooded wetland vegetated with maple, gum, myrtle, cypress, shrubs and
various species of vines. Continuing landward of the wooded wetlands the site gradually rises in
elevation to change to uplands which were a mix of hardwoods and pines which have been logged
in the past month. Wetlands on the project site have been delineated as 404 wetlands by the NC
DOT and approved by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The wetland area gives way to upland
grasses as you move up the adjacent road shoulder.
The upstream (east) side of the bridge is bordered by 404 delineated wooded wetland
vegetated with maple, gum, myrtle, cypress, shrubs and various species of vines. Continuing
landward of the wooded wetlands the site gradually rises in elevation to change to uplands which
is vegetated with a mix of hardwoods and pines. The wetland area gives way to upland grasses as
you move up the adjacent road shoulder.
The downstream (west) side of the bridge is bordered by 404 delineated wooded wetland
vegetated with maple, gum, myrtle, cypress, shrubs and various species of vines. Continuing
landward of the wooded wetlands the site gradually rises in elevation to change to uplands which
are existing agriculture fields. The wetland area gives way to upland grasses as you move up the
adjacent road shoulder. A dirt road accesses the creek in this area and is used for boat launching and
retrieval. Adjacent to the access road is a dry fire hydrant used by the Midway Fire Department.
The upstream (west) side of the bridge is bordered by 404 delineated wooded wetland
vegetated with maple, gum, myrtle, cypress, shrubs and various species of vines. Continuing
landward of the wooded wetlands the site gradually rises in elevation to change to upland which is
a developed lot with a house and lawn grass. The wetland area gives way to upland grasses as you
move up the adjacent road shoulder.
The navigable water depth at the existing bridge is ±13'. Salmon Creek is ±82' wide at the
existing bridge crossing and 3 of the existing 5 bridge bents are in the creek proper with the center
bent in the middle of the navigable portion of the creek. Salmon Creek is classified as C-NSW by
the Environmental Management Commission and is not open to shell fishing at this location.
Project description
The NC DOT proposes to replace an existing ±33.5' wide by ±141.5' long two lane bridge
over Salmon Creek with an ±70.8' wide by ±147.6' long five lane bridge associated with the
widening of US 17. The existing bridge has three bents in Salmon Creek with the center bent in the
middle of the navigable portion of the creek. The width of the creek at the crossing is ±82' wide.
The proposed bridge will have two bents in the creek and the center portion will be left open with
NC DOT Bridge #27
Bertie County
Page Two
a navigable width of ±45'. The existing bridge has a navigation clearance of ±6.9' and the proposed
bridge will have a navigable vertical clearance of ±9.35'. The existing bridge has five bents and two
end bents while the proposed bridge has four bents and two end bents.
NCDOT proposes to fill ±83,148 ft2 of 404 delineated wooded wetlands adjacent the existing
roadbed to provide the needed width for the wider approach road. Six foot wide (top width) ditches
are proposed on both sides of the fill area in the 404 delineated wooded wetland to handle runoff
from the road bed. The ditches will end ±35' from the creek bank in an effort to reduce direct
discharge of runoff into Salmon Creek. The construction of the ditches will result in the excavation
of ±1,470 ft2 of 404 delineated wooded wetland. Approximately 41,574 ft2 of high ground will be
filled associated with the widening of the approach road. The existing dry hydrant and dirt road
access will be moved downstream adjacent to the new approach road. The existing aerial telephone
and cable television lines on the south side of US 17 are proposed to be moved to provide adequate
space for the wider approach road and bridge.
Anticipated impacts
Approximately 83,148 ft2 of 404 wooded wetland will be filled for the construction on the
wider approach road to the new bridge. The ditch construction will result in the excavation of
±1,470 ft2 of 404 delineated wooded wetland. Approximately 41,574 ft2 of high ground will be
filled associated with the wider approach road. The longer length of the new bridge will result in
the removal of ±825W of high ground and the reestablishment of the natural grade at this location.
The construction of the new bridge will result in the shading of ±4,645 ft2 of 404 delineated wooded
wetland and the shading of ±5,806 ft2 of creek bottom. Turbidity from the construction activities
will vary with construction technique, water depth, substrate, etc..
David W. Moye - 26 February 1997
Form DCM-SIP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
b. City, town, community or landmark
Merrv Hill
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State N.C
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone [phone]
c. Street address or secondary road number
US 17 ~
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X NO
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) Salmon Creek
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name H. Franklin Vick, P.E., lvigr.. ME Branch
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Address P.O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State N.C.
Zip 27611-5201 Day Phone [phone]
Fax (919)73' -9794
c. Project name (if any) Replacement of Bridge No.
27 over Salmon Creek: TIP No. R-2404C
NOTE. Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s).
and%r project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Construction of new concrete bridge. and a 5-lane
roadway to replace the existing bridge and 2-lane
facility. Work includes grading, excavation. bridge
construction and demolition.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? both
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed. please attach
additional pages. Purpose: Improvements to US 17
for increased traffic capacity, improvements to
safety, enhanced hurricane evacuation & enhanced
economic development: Use: Public Transportation:
Methods of Construction: Standard Highwav &
Bridge Construction
a. Countv Bertie
Form DC18i-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL Bridge: +/- 9.5 ft ( 2.9 m) above MHLV
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Dorovan Muckv Peat & Craven Fine Sandy Loam
e. Vegetation on tract Cypress-sum-mixed hardwood
bottomland forest
f. Man-made features now on tract
Existina concrete bridge and highway
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
X Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? Yes No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract'? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X -N0
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation. ff available) See Draivings
.m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff
from bridge and highway surfaces
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
AD A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus tivritten permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) dra«m to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by I V white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to
Form DCM-MP-1
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
•A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
,@A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name Willis A. Bass
Address 1833 US 17N
Merry Hill NC 27957
Name Thompson & Co
Address US 13N
Windsor, NC 27983
Name T.S. Gilliam. et al.
Address 205 Garv Street
Windsor. NC 27983
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, perminee, and issuing dates.
N!A
• A check for S250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
s A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policv Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 12th day of February 19 97
rint Name H. Franklin Vick- P.E.
Signatures
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
N DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Iviarina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Form DC1VI-IVIP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM MP-l. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) NIA
1. BRIDGES
a. Public X Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Steel reinforced concrete (cored slab)
c. Water bodv to be crossed by bridge
Salmon Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at 1v1LW or
NA,rL +/- 0-12.1 feet (0-3.65 m) at NILW
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 141.5 ft (43.15 m)
(2) Width of existing bridge 33.5 ft (10.2 m)
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 6.9 ft (2.11 m) at 1y1HW
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All
Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes X No
If Yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MI-1W or NWL
Cr. Length of proposed bridge 147.6 ft (45.0 m)
h. Width of proposed bridge 70.8 ft (21.6 m)
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
10.5ft(3.2m)
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
X Yes No
If yes, explain New bridge will have only two
Support bents in creek channel vs. three for
existing bridge: vertical clearance will be lar_eg r
with new bridge
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
9.35 ft (2.55 m)
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? X Yes INTO
If ves, explain Existing bridge has 3 bents in creek,
2 of which are near mid-channel: new bridge will
have only 2 bents in creek. both well away from
mid-channel
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
If yes, explain New end-bents are to be further
apart than at existing bridge. Therefore, a small
amount of fringe wetlands located between existing
and proposed end-bents will be spanned.
n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
X Yes No See attached
if yes, please provide record of their action.
Form DCNI-NIP-5
2. CULVERTS NIA
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the -%1HW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
NfHW or NIAI
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the NE-1W or NIN'L?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated +i-98ft (30m)
(2) Width of area to be excavated <15ft (4.9m)
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 34.5 cu vds
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If ves,
(1) Length of area to be excavated - 1-55ft(17m)
(2) Width of area to be excavated <15ft (4.9m)
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 17.3 cu yds
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
See Note 1 (attached)
Note 1.
(MP-5 item 3.d.)
Borrow and waste sites will be selected by the contractor, but must be approved
by the Department. Under most circumstances, the Department will not authorize the
use of any borrow or waste sites that require the placement of materials in, or the
excavation of materials from jurisdictional areas (wetlands, waters, estuarine shorelines,
etc.). In the rare instances where a candidate borrow/waste site is almost totally non-
jurisdictional, but access to the sites, for example, may result in a small; unavoidable
encroachment into a jurisdictional area, the Department will insure that application is
made to the appropriate jurisdictional agencies, Le, US Army Corps of Engineers,
Division of Coastal Management, Division of Water Quality, etc. In these rare cases;
the Department will insure that all avoidance and minimization opportunities are
explored during the site evaluation. If the Department determines that the combined
attributes of the site are substantial; and there is no practicable avoidance alternative,
the Department will then request that the jurisdictional agencies review the site, and if
appropriate, entertain an application for the incidental impact. If the impact is
determined to be permanent, the Department will provide compensatory mitigation in
accordance with the requirements of the permitting agency.
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
maintenance? Yes No any existing utility lines? X Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal If yes, explain in detail UG: Phone (copper), fiber-
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands? optic cable, Overhead: electric/TV cable
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
_N/THW or Nkkl? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
-Coastal Wetlands - S.AVs X Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled +/-1066ft(325m)
(2) Width of area to be filled ; /-78 ft (24 m)
(3) Purpose of fill approachwav fills for
additional travel lanes
Cr. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes I\To
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled +/-1066ft(325m)
(2) Width of area to be filled +/-39ft (12 m)
(3) Purpose of fill approachwav fills for
additional travel lanes
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached letter to COE
c. Will the proposed project require the construction
of any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or till material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? Standard NCDOT Best
Management Practices for Protection of Surface
Waters
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Cranes, backhoe, trucks. and other
standard bridge construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail Class 11 rip-rap will be
placed along both creek banks
H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
?jApplicant o roject Name
Signature
Februarv 12. 1997
Date
S? !
e.w STNg°
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GovERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
February 12, 1997
N. C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Washington District Office
43 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
ATTENTION: Mr. Terry Moore, District Manager
Dear Mr. Moore:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Errata Sheets for: CAMA Major Development Permit Application for the
Replacement of Bridge No. 27 over Salmon Creek as Part of the Proposed
Improvements to US 17 from SR 1503 to West of the Chowan River; Bertie
County; TIP No. R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001T
Enclosed you will find errata sheets for the CAMA Major Development Permit
application package that was mailed to you on January 31, 1997. The discrepancies,
described below, are being submitted at the request of Mr. David Moye of your staff:
Cover Letter & Application Forms
• Form MP-1: Item 4.1. should read "N/A" in lieu of "Yes"
• Form MP-1: Mr. Willis M. Bass, who was listed as an adjacent riparian landowner on page 3, should be
deleted. Mr. Bass' parcel is adjacent to the swamp, not the creek.
• Form MP-5: Item 1.m. should read "Yes" in lieu of "No" due to presence of small amount of wetlands
which lie between existing bridge end-bents and locations of proposed end-bents.
• Cover Letter: Cover letter should provide confirmation of right of way acquisitions for adjacent parcels
at Salmon Creek and its associated wetlands.
Figures
• Sheet 1: North arrow and figure notation is missing from Sheet 1.
• Attachment Figure: The map which accompanies the November 27, 1996 letter to Mike Bell, Corps
of Engineers, should be added to the application figures; outline of existing bridge should be added to
this drawing.
• Sheet 2: Date of Sheet 2 (site map) should be changed to reflect date of preparation.
• Sheet 6: Should depict area of upland excavation with a graphic highlight (stipling, cross-hatching).
• Sheet 6: Profile drawing of bridge (cross-section of creek) on Sheet 6 should be presented in a larger
drawing on a separate sheet.
• All Sheets: Where metric scale is used, scale bars on drawings should denote "meters".
• Sheet 8: Sheet 8 (cross-sections A, B and C) were inadvertently omitted from the application package.
Note: Due to incorporation of "Attachment Figure" and addition of additional sheet for
Bridge Profile, drawings will be comprised of 10 sheets; not 8, as originally submitted.
%P
Page 2
February 12, 1997
Mr. Moore
Right of way acquisitions have been completed for this project. The additional
right of way needed to construct the project as designed has been acquired through
"fee simple" purchases and/or separate easement agreements with the adjacent
property owners. Adjacent riparian property owners have received letters and
notification forms with attached project drawings depicting their parcels and the NCDOT
acquired right of way and/or easements.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] should you require any
additional information. It is important to reemphasize that this project is scheduled for
a June 1997 construction letting. Permits must be obtained on/before April 17, 1997 to
insure that prospective contractors are aware of permit conditions and stipulations prior
to submitting bids. If you or your staff become aware of issues which will require the
Department's attention please inform Mc Turner at your earliest convenience so that a
response/resolution can be addressed expeditously. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Sincerely;
-H. Franklin Vick, PE., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Enclosures
cc:
Mr. A. L. Hankins, RE., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. D. R. Conner. PRE., NCDOT, Division 1
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT P & E Branch-Division 1
.w STAT?°
w.?•m• .ice
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
January 31, 1997
N. C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Washington District Office
43 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
ATTENTION: Mr. Terry Moore, District Manager
Dear Mr. Moore:
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
SUBJECT. CAMA Major Development Permit Application for the Replacement of
Bridge No. 27 over Salmon Creek as Part of the Proposed Improvements
to US 17 from SR 1503 to West of the Chowan River, Bertie County; TIP
No. R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001 T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to improve
approximately 7.2 miles of US 17 in Bertie County from SR 1003 to approximately 1000
meters west of the Chowan River. These improvements include a new bridge at the
Salmon Creek crossing. The Department has divided the project into two sections (for
funding and construction management purposes), identified as R-2404 B (from SR
1503 to east of NC 45 at Midway) and R-2404 C (from east of NC 45 at Midway to
approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River). The Salmon Creek crossing is
included within the boundaries of R-2404 C.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) has previously determined that
Salmon Creek is a Public Trust Water Area of Environmental Concern (AEC). Since
the work proposed by the Department is defined under the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) as development, the attached permit application and associated letters to
adjacent riparian landowners is submitted for your review and consideration. Note that
the engineering drawings also address the associated Section 404 wetlands which lie
to the west and east of Salmon Creek. Impacts to these wetlands are being mitigated
in accordance with Department of the Army and Division of Water Quality requirements.
I have also attached a letter from the U.S. Coast Guard which confirms that a Coast
Guard permit is not required for the proposed bridge replacement. A check for
$250.00 and copies of postal return receipts (green cards) for the landowner
notifications are also enclosed, or are being sent under separate cover.

Page 2
January 31, 1997
Mr. Moore
The Department is aware of the Division of Marine Fisheries recommendation for
an in-stream construction moratorium at Salmon Creek. The Department fully intends
to comply with this environmental restriction. Additional efforts to minimize impacts to
wetlands, wildlife and water quality are presented in a letter from the Department to the
review agencies on November 27, 1996 (see enclosures).
It is requested that your biological report and public notice process be initiated
at the earliest opportunity since the anticipated construction letting for the project is
June 1997. If you have any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at
[phone]. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Since y
/I
H. ranklin Vick, RE., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFVImrt
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Mike Bell, USACOE, Washington
Mr. John Parker; NCDEHNR-DCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR-DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. John Hefner; USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
Ms. Sara Winslow, NCDEHNR-DMF, Elizabeth City
Mr. Kelly Barger, RE., NCDOT Program Development Branch
Mr. Tom Shearin; RE., NCDOT Roadway Design Unit
Mr. A. L. Hankins, RE., NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, RE., NCDOT Structure Design Unit
Mr. Don Morton, RE., NCDOT, Design Branch
Mr. D. R. Conner, RE., NCDOT, Division 1
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT P & E Branch-Division 1
BERTIE COUNTY, NC
PROJECT LOCATION

zm c
Gi
W U O
ms W?
m°
I - J t:
W
I I
' I
J li N
N =
V Z ~• U L) 41 .4
O O t: J
W \ W
v) 0 v)
?l m a co
x
E W
\,D
1! / a
cr -7>j
.9 a I a ?i
a: 41
X
LLl ?1 ? o ? a
41
cl)
?- - -, - W
?-
u _ W
c
i I co
o
•?332iJ NOWlVS . a •
w-- . - ---
m =
F U m
F
?J z J O
71 W
3: z
F W
`
U W
-N t: I O W
O ~ / N
Q
W 0 m
N 0 E
z co I a `°
F ? ? I a°-. Z -j {
w °K a
J
- Ld
41 ?a r L \
I LaU-
J
J
z L,
a o
s ' X
W -\I
a
m ?
\w--o

y3 =5?1y
da???rt

4
b?
3
APPRDX. SCALE C•++)
NORTH CAROLINA 0CPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24048
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN Rev. Jam 101
Figure 3 of 10
SITE MAP
SITE MAP
(Sttes S-'7)
tilgT
cy?NF
STS, 1?5,' 00
V
GO+oO
w
55+00

7$XO.
0
5TA. 7ZtZS.4/o3
5TA 7 Z + 25.4&3 -L-AEY L.A.
70+00
I r
65 too
Y4
MIDWAY 0;,-? X445
Qn
3
i
'-51TE 7
LMON Gt{E>:K
CAKiA 51T E
SITE
APPROX. SCALE C•*+)
.SITE
400 2.0o 0 400
'ATE PROD. (o.O1g001

NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND 'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
NOVEMBER.1995
Figure ?f a? 0 .
CHOWAN RIVER
G?
a?
STA. 12-S -t 11.204 -L-REV. L3. _
STA. S + 80.000 - L- REV. L.A.
l?-too
115+00
11p*00
i
a
10" f 00
V
I00.jL00
'Alb, ,
I
1°
Ok .
•L
o%
i
m
SITE. MAP
(s c t-es g - ?o?
STA. 101-00.000 -L-REV.
ENO 5TA i E PROJ. (0.01e-)0DIT
,SITE 9
?5TTE
?E
APPRDX. SCALE CR+?
1400 zoo o 400
!?A=GH L1?E STS _ -------
•?? } 00
CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REV NORTH
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
NOVEMBER 1995
Ft9uwe ? df /a .
o -
O O
TFIOrI PS?N + Go. i NG.
. -
to
y` =r
? O •' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. POMER EASEMENTE .. -- -- - --E-- -- -- .
? E
Y0,O'n5ASE LATERAL DITCH D
'o EC, I N D ITCH _ r
w r 3e Y E?c15TtNG R/w d[.
- ----- ------- ------ -
- -------- - -----------'-c=_ _-------"L ----- ------ ------
T50 RGP_ _-
-------------

--;T

/Y BE(.IKI D l re-m © O.b... 6A5E LATERAL DITU-i
? Y
WILLIES A. 5AS5

PROP. GZ.A7E
+ 0.2?t A 9?
L- REV.
- _L
Ex ISiINCA POE-
=
N6 A -
L.0r,I ?
pcpp
n
1 c
Co
-EDGE Wt: LMIDS

.v
80
I 76+00 20 40 60 80 77=00 2

NORTH CAHOLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
/Y1e'?+erS mefG'2j OIVISZON GF HIGHWAYS
ter. UERTIE COUNTY
20 10 O 7f> L O %r 6.0190017 R-2404C
HORIZDNTAL5CALE VFAT ICJLL 5CAL.E PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURD AND GUTTER.
.Y
yc
DF-N0TE5 WETLANDS DRAINAGE AND `'•TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCH.
®
DE!`lOTC-5 FILL IN WETLANDS SCALE as ;NOUN
NOVEMBER 1995
OENOTE5 EXCAVA-fIOtN•1N.WG-T.LAHDS Figure !?a ? fo 4?FVISEIC

THOMP50N tGO.ING. O

L1• co
.. •• .0..
?? _??w ____
-E-- - -E-- - .E?? ?-

L
,??[[
hic
D:fo w? I?SI: 7:{Y,TERgL DMI'U.1 ?,
alt
?
se

141 11
t
Z + LA•f•'V

h

4•• - D
a.lhMeAA6* MAL
b1•YC.a•4 ?
t:./ y?I?4i.i? fs?r ?AS?

w - RSV.

NCx At.ONL? rL FiEY.
d:

SK 6$ / //L'] ?f
--E 4
-E-- - T.S. (7LUAM
,v- R+PKnf?s 1
I LPf1?'nWAL4 G.feMb4sC•
LAI V
--..? CURB
! rczl
C A-S7EELISFRUCNRE r?:.?.
==

y ' ?'. ? riALL.
F ; p•1rf nITW
• O n.6rh SSASIS• JAM P
cs_.? N TS.Gti.LlAM
91 eltmlt?e 040
?w
r
V?

s
x
v .18+47
-L-RE/. F?RDf? GRAD.
i'FkDP BRO. ?L•I=v P %901
.rn_7aA9L 1wJI1?TIN l?ii?.LT.-._

-56 it R U- -at
7
?JrL?GsE. W?TLA!`1L?.'.?
60 8Q _ 7+00.;:. : 20 !FO Go.. 50 :
La4ld' E?cCHI/A1 tON
U
P
N0 S
M eyers mg?E,rS NORTN CAR04ZNA OEPTARTMKT Of YRANSPORTATi0N
oauAYs
i Oiviszan or nx
CERTIE COUNTY
$A 14 O
• FiOPIy dNTAL SGAi. zu a
VgATICAL .SCAiI
0.019001T R-t404C
PRS0 GRAOING• PAVING CURB RNO GUTTER,
oe-NQTE? L••1'?*nAmos pNAXNAFNAGE AND $TRUCYURES ON V.S. 17 FRON
EASY OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF TNk CNOWAN •RIVAR.
0 NOTF-5 FdL L IN WF_TI AN0. SCALE AS SHOWN
'• .?•f ? •?• NOVEMBER 1995
''"""' 7af
-
F(gure-
o RFWlS _b SAN M
)
I
i
i
1
S'
k. 3
Z N
O C 41
H U G1
r r L ¢
o ?¢z m
4 co 4 c E
N U _ •?
J ? Z ¢ O O
d W u
Cl m _ L Z N r
0 - ... r H W N `? ? r\
(? o?- r 4< ua o ?
V? W3 ar
1}LL--?4 ? < H H S v Z Qa
t?1 L ?
cc)
Y1 I + J ¢ o ?- z Cll
J `- uo O wu. u. t
H w O N< o
? ? ?? C ? S N H m O Z W
i 7 r H Y N 0. H r J
\ O N w ¢ = < U
'Z O ^..] t7 4 0 W N
(0
j - ? Imo. •.y? .
4- : a cr
Q., a u>1 ?= IS? O
fJ 3.11 o
?CO e? l n
? o
ob?
Ul J J
?J I/ J ?1 CC)
J z Z W
O
_ I
z o
<?J ? - LO o o
sl ?I ?I oI ?I ?I
? TC7J.UJD ? - h
1

E O
O ?
•
.• OaSC• LAT
DIo. ? A
N
3' 00
• __ __ _ _ _ - ElOIT. ROMtR CAI[4OVi
- -- -- -- -- -- --E-- O
- __ --E-_ + -
- -- -- --E CC - -- -E

uj
CC I O
Do
0
MST.
• v
J O _?
11240 ? _ •__•-_
- .--_? I
?

- - - - - - - - - ------------
- - - - -
- ------
- - - - - - - - - - - - -

US 17 d.9 J_ ?-
-
RY`I - -------------
.?1 ?w ----- ?OJL
- - ---------- •
O.4.- eAs e LAY. D 17GM / - , .
x
? TTZ?O
r S lT)< ?o
4 _
2
0
4
PROP05ED GPIAOE.
' X1.7 L2.7
cXi5T1,.rGz CxtCALr _?- REV. ?- i
i
L?
`, N&ALON6c -L-KE•V.
?- L I
79+00 20
EDGE WETLAN05
40 60 80
Meters MeterA
ZA 10 0 ZO 2 O
HOp lz.Cp ITAL. SC ALE. VFATICAL 5CAl
yc DENOTES W>:T LAN05
OF-NOTES F.1 LL 1N WETLAN05
DENOTE5 EXCAVATION'lW.LJE."TLAND5
80+OO . 20 40
NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
OIVISION.OF HIGHWAYS
OCRTIE COUNTY
6.012001T 9-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING .CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND 1TIIUCTURES ON U.S. 17 PROM
CAST Of N.C. 4S TO WEST OF THE CHGWAN RIVER.
SCALE AZ.SHOWN
NOVEMOCR IDD5
Fliole 9 o f ?? RF\,,6v - z- l
I
3 ? E.-
I
1
O
O
r
r
{
-2
_ U)
Q
z
_ o Q
?t1
-0
1 I
o
g I _ o
3 I ?
I
I X
I W
?? - N
A
S Z I

b

_ u1
0
w
CL
S '
p' - 1n
N
+
r

J
'

LL I
3 I _ o
' I
o
I

q
I
Y
N ?
I z
}
I
x

I
Ull

I
'
Y
I ? J

I - N
I

3
1 `-s r
aJ
X
V,
?1 - l? Q .9 n
U3
Cc Oi n
? a
p ? 0 3
Z z
g. o ? z
3 F 3
711 w 'A
ti I s _o ?1 I OL
s.
I ? C) I E ? U%
14
sf. ? N
14,
r s N s ?.
3 1 N ua1
A?Id C4 -id -H
NORTH CAROLINA OEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND +TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
NOVEMBER 1095
Flq 10 of LO REVlSZ O SAN 199
RECEIVED
FEB U 7199:7,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENMpNMEN7ALSCIE:RVG8
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 31, 1997
N. C. Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management Washington District Office 970098
43 Washington Square Mall
Washington; North Carolina 27889
ATTENTION: Mr. Terry Moore, District Manager
Dear Mr. Moore:
SUBJECT: CAMA Major Development Permit Application for the Replacement of
Bridge No. 27 over Salmon Creek as Part of the Proposed Improvements
to US 97 from SR 9503 to ?Uest of the Chowan River: Bettie County: TIP
No. R-2404 B & C. State Project No. 6.019001 T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to improve
approximately 7.2 miles of US 17 in Bert tie County from SR 1503 to approximately 1000
meters west of the Chowan River. These improvements include a new bridge at the
Salmon Creek crossing. The Department has divided the project into two sections (for
funding and construction management purposes), identified as R-2404 B (from SR
1503 to east of NC 45 at Midway) and R-21404 C (from east of NC 45 at Midway to
approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River). The Salmon Creek crossing is
included within the boundaries of R-2404 C.
The Division of Coastal Management (DCM) has previously determined that
Salmon Creek is a Public Trust Water Area of Environmental Concern (AEC). Since
the work proposed by the Department is defined under the Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA) as development, the attached permit application and associated letters to
adjacent riparian landowners is submitted for your review and consideration. Note that
the engineering drawings also address the associated Section 404 wetlands which lie
to the west and east of Salmon Creek. Impacts to these wetlands are being mitigated
in accordance with Department of the Army and Division of Water Quality requirements.
I have also attached a letter from the U.S. Coast Guard which confirms that a Coast
Guard permit is not required for the proposed bridge replacement. A check for
8250.00 and copies of postal return receipts (green cards) for the landowner
notifications are also enclosed: or are being sent under separate cover.
0
Page 2
January 31, 1997
Mr. Moore
The Department is av../are of the Division of Marine Fisheries recommendation for
an in-stream construction moratorium at Salmon Creek. The Department fully intends
to comply with this environmental restriction. Additional efforts to minimize impacts to
wetlands, wildlife and water quality are presented in a letter from the Department to the
review agencies on November 27, 1996 (see enclosures).
It is requested that your biological report and public notice process be initiated
at the earliest opportunity since the anticipated construction letting for the project is
June 1997. If you have any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at
[phone]. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Since Y,
`H. ranklin Vick, PE,, Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Mike Be?I. USACOE, Washington
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR-DCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR-DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Ncrthside
Mr. John Hefner; USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
Ms. Sara Winslow, NCDEHNR-DMF, Elizabeth City
Mr. Kelly Barger, RE., NCDOT. Program Development Branch
Mr. Tom Shearin, RE., NCDOT. Roadway Design Unit
Mr. A. L. Hankins. PE.. NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers; PE., NCDOT Structure Design Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE., NCDOT Design Branch
Mr. D. R. Conne RE., NCDOT Division 1
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT, P & E Branch-Division 1
Form DCNI-ZIP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
b. Clty, town, community or landmark:
Mern- Hill
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Department of Transportation
Address P.O. Box 25301
City Raleigh State N.C
Zip 27611-5_01 Dav Phone [phone]
c. Street address or secondary road number
US 17
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction" Yes 1 No
e.,% ' Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river.
creek, sound, bay) Salmon Creek
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Azent: 3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Name H. Frarlclin Fick. P.E.. Mg.. P&E Branch
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
Address P.O. Box =5_01 building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead- pier, and
excavation and%or tillinz_ activities.
City Raleigh State N.C. construction of new concrete brid-ae and a 5-lane
roadway to replace the existing bridge and 2-lane
facility. Work includes aadin=. excavation- bridge
Zip =7611-5201 Day Phone [phone] construction and demolition.
Fax [phone]
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work. or bothl both
c. Project name (if any) Repiacement of Bride "o.
27 over Salmon Creek: TII' No. R-2404C
,VOTE. Permit will be issued in name of landownerq!.
and,or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
c. Will the project be for public. private or commercial
use? public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Purpose: Improvements to US 17
for increased traffic cavaeity. imvrovements to
safety enhanced hurricane evacuation & enhanced
economic development. V se: Public Transportation:
Methods of Construction: Standard Hi_hwav &
Bridae Construction
a. County Bertie
Form DCNI-NIP-1
4. LAND A D '%VATER
CHARACTERISTICS
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
iA
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N, I I
c. Approximate elevation of tract above l ff-RV or
'N?Nl Bridge: ±!- p.5 ft (2.9 m) above \IHIV
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Dorovan Muckv Peat & Craven Fine Sandv Loam
e. Vei*etation on tract Cypress-gum-mixed hardwood
bottomland forest
f. Ilan-made features now on tract
Existing concrete bridae and h4zhwav
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial.,'commereial effluent. "wash
down" and residential discharaes.) Surface runoff
from brie and highway surfaces
o. Describe existing drinking water supple source.
N/A

5. ADDITIONAL IN FORMATION
g. What is the CA:%•IA Land Use Plan land In addition to the completed application form, the
classification of the site? IConsulr the local land use following items must be submitted:
plan.)
1 Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
'_\7;A
• a copy of the deed (with state application only;) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a cot)v of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to earn- out the project.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? 1 Yes -",-o
(attach zoning compliance certificate, ifapplicahle,i
Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? Yes 1 No
If yes, by whom?
L- Is the project located in a 'National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Re`ister listed or eligible property?
Yes 1 o
1. Are there wetlands on the site'? 1 Yes - 'No
Coastal (marsh) Other X
If ves. has a delineation "been conducted', Yes
r:tttach documentation. if (wrilable) See Draminss
• An accurate, dated work plat (inciuding plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1!_" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality- copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regardina that aaencVs use of larger
drawings.), A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide a,_eney personnel unfamiliar with the area to
Form DCNI-2\IP-1
the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
SA Stormwater Certification. if one is necessary
•A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landoNvners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been Drovided.
Name Willis -A- Bass
Address 1533 US 171

Name Merry Hill.'NC 27917
Willis %M. Bass
Address 1909 US 17N
-Merry Hill. NC 27957
Name Thomnson 3 Co
Address US 13'`

'Name
address RVindsor.l_C 7953
T.S. Gilliam. aal.
20i Gan' Street
IN"Indsor. N .,C 27953
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers. Dermittee. and issuing dates.
NA
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHIN'R) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance «-ith the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant. and do in fact.
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up mon'torir_g of the
project.
I further certih that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the 31st day of January . 19 97 .
Print Name H. Franklin Fick.
VSignature
Lan owner or.4uthorced.4een1
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
_ DCM N- P-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM IMP-3 Upland Development
DCM N•IP4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-3 Brides and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space proilded at the bottom of eac i Corm.
Form DCNI-INIP-5
BRIDGES ANA
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for C ALMA Major
Permit, Form M-1-N-IP-1. Be sure to complete all other
sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain) N. A
1. BRIDGES
a. Public 1 Private
b. Type of bride (construction material)
Steel reinforced concrete (cored slab)
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Salmon Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLZ V or
-WL 0-12.1 feet (0-3.68 m) at -NEW
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
1 Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge 141.5 ft (43.1 7, m)
(2) Width of existing bridge 33.5 ft (10.2 m )
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge 6 9 ft ( 2.11 ml at '_N,•11iW
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed':' (Explain) All
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)''
Yes X No
g. Length of proposed bridge 147.6 ft (45.0 m)
h. R%idth of proposed bridge 70. F ft (21.6 m)
i. 'Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
10.5ft(3.2m)
Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow''
% Yes No
If yes, explain New bridge INI have onh two
suuDDort bents in creel: channel vs. three for
existing bridge: vertical clearance will be larger
with new bridae
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
9.35 ft (2.85 m)
Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening' 1 Yes No
If yes, explain Existing bridge has 3 bents in creek
of which are near mid-channel: new bridge will
have only 3 bents in creek both well away from
mid-channel
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navizable waters? Yes N No
If ves, explain
If yes,
(1) Length of existing, culvert
Width of existing culvert n.
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the \ W.V or NANI
Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval''
1 Yes `,.o See Attached
If ves. please provide r ocord of their acti:,n.
Form DCM-_IP-5
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If ves,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(?} Width of existing bridge
i;3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all_ or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If res.
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Heir, n of the top of the existing culvert above
the -\,ffLM' or IKV?L
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
\'iH<V or %N'L
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes. explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential' Yes No
If yes, explain
a.

3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the !'MM or NAt'L7
Yes 1 No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
i") Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ S ad's 1 Other Wetlands
If yes.
(1) Length of area to be excavated = -98ft (30m)
(.) Width of area to be excavated <l5ft (4.9m)
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
vards 34.5 cu vds
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
X Yes No
If res.
(1) Length of area to be excavated -ft(17m)
(2) Width of area to be excavated <I5tt (4.9m)
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 17.3 cu yds
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any
excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area'?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
See Note 1 (attached)
Note 1.
(MP-5 item 3.d.)
Borrow and waste sites will be selected by the contractor, but must be approved
by the Department. Under most circumstances, the Department will not authorize the
use of any borrow or waste sites that require the placement of materials in, or the
excavation of materials from jurisdictional areas (wetlands, waters, estuarine shorelines,
etc.). In the rare instances where a candidate borrow/waste site is almost totally non-
jurisdictional, but access to the sites, for example, may result in a small; unavoidable
encroachment into a jurisdictional area, the Department will insure that application is
made to the appropriate jurisdictional agencies, i.e, US Army Corps of Engineers.
Division of Coastal Management, Division of Water Quality, etc. In these rare cases,
the Department will insure that all avoidance and minimization opportunities are
explored during the site evaluation. If the Department determines that the combined
attributes of the site are substantial, and there is no practicable avoidance alternative;
the Department will then request that the jurisdictional agencies review the site, and if
appropriate, entertain an application for the incidental impact. If the impact is
determined to be permanent, the Department will provide compensatory mitigation in
accordance with the requirements of the permitting agency.
Form DCM-Z•IP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
e.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the tII?t? or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
\ MW or N1VL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be tilled
2) Width of area to be tilled
(3) Purpose of fill
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
-Coastal Wetlands - S ad's 1 Other Wetlands
if yes,
(l) Length of area to be tilled 1066ft(325m)
(2) Width of area to be tilled -r!-78 ft (24 m)
(3) Purpose of fill gpproachwav fills for
additional travel lanes
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any till (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If ves.
(1) Length of area to be filled -,-1-1066ft(325m )
(2) Width of area to be filled -39ft (12 m)
(3) Purpose of fill gpproachwav fills for
additional travel lanes
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached letter to COE
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existingutility lines? 1 Yes No
If yes, explain in detail UG: Phone (copper), fiber-
oT)tic cable Overhead: electric%T`' cable
Will the proposed project require the
of any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If ves., explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
,If yes, complete Form DC".M-'IP-2
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled' Standard NCDOT Best
-Manaaement Practices for Protection of Surface
Waters
f. 1%hat type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Cranes, backhoe. trucks. and other
standard bridge construction equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site^ Yes X ?,:o
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
X Yes No
If ves, explain in detail Class II rip-ran will be
placed along both creek banks
H. FranklA 'ick. P. .
Ap roject .
;we-. cure
Januan 31. 1997
Date
construction
1:5 - 4w
BEG
BERTIE COUNTY, NC
PROJECT LOCATI O N
Sheef' ! 0? 9
RtS?
da
.? A
?a S
%,!t&l ?
a°
3

APPRDX. SCALE Cm?
NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTRCNT OF TRANSPORTAT-ION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24048
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURD AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AMC) t7RUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.L. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SITE MAP
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2 OF 6 NOVEMBER 1295
SITE MAP
(Sues 5-7)
it7,4 T
C
y<?tiE
STS y?x
V
9Dtoo
w
a
85+Op
'-51TE ?

SALMON CREEK
?$xp
0
5TA. 7 Z * 7 S. 41n5 - L- LP3. _
STA 72-+ Z.S.A(o3 -L-REV LA.
70 +00
J
fl
f
65+00
` 14L 45
4
MIDWAY
O?
U1''
Qn
3
f"
LAMA SITE
SITE ro
APPROX. SCALE. ?+++?
REM=
5 1 T E •400 :1-CO 0 4c;Q
A. (n 1) + (n?_-73r,) -L-
.(r.STATE PRO,). (0.019001
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIV15ION OF HIGHWAYS
GERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-24040
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND 'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF NOVEMBER 1995
_s \\\ GHDWAN RIVER
\
M
•
\
1\
ST/ A. 123 t 11.2D A - L_- REY. L.3- _
STA- 8+ SC.000 - L- REV. I -A.
I?-o " o0
115+00
/10*Oo
lQr ; 1.00
loo-".L,o i
?h v
a?
o-%
Q-
v?
m
Y SITE /O
?._._ 17 E

SITE MAP
(Saes S-/o)
STA. 10+-00.000 -L-REV.
END STATE PRDJ. (o.01c)ODIT
,SITE
APPRDX. SCALE
C
Mom
.400 =0 0 4co
MA7C
TA-?? t 00 L Rrti NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURD AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ,!,? OF ?, NOVEMSCH 1995
o °o

.
+ o. ING.
THOMP50N G
+
+
-

?.
?
$
p r

.. .. .. - - E e>CSr. Po+?A usCUCxrE - -
- -_- - --E-- -- -- -
0 -- E
?
-
E-- -- - ;" - --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- - - -- +
LAT ERA L DITCH .. r D
S
E
C b rn BA r
vo EGIN DIT y
r _
yl ?1C
Y EXI$?ING. FVw

_____

-- 750 RGP --?

1 . .
CiEG.InI D
Y 1T(? 1
© 0.6 .. DA5E LATERAL 1) 1TCJA
Y
?
WILLIS A.- 5A55

PROP. GRADE

-L-REV.
ING GRADF-
15
E
-
,
A
NG AL.ONIG L- Pr-v.
,1c MCI
Q -7 50 P,G.°
-E17GE 1..IETLAN105

?2.
?v
80
I 76+00 20 40 -60 80 77+.00 20
_
NORTH CAROLINA OCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
??L?;re d?-`-Yt
-""
Y OERTIE COUNTY

2.0 10 ??
O
1?
0 ?A "" G.0190d1T R-29?4C
HORIZDN'TALSLALF- VERTICAL 5CAL-- PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.

• ? yC
DErtOTE5 W1:T LA PI OS DRAINAGE AND .TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF T14E CHOWAN RIVCR.
..? _
DENOTES PILL IN WETLANDS
SCALE AS SHOWN $ItEET CC
.:7 OF IB NOVEMBER 1995
p>:NOTES EXCAVATION lq WETLANDS zs flN IC? ?1
W
J
0
r
r
W
z
J
1
V
Q
Z
r,TA.7B+ 4'7-L-KL-'/.
EX15?INL? &RADE PPo? SRG.5-Lr--V = 3•"O??
q"; EXISTING 'C?F[r.-'1
I
-4 EDGE WETLANDS
S 1T, (p
_G
PROP. C-vRA0E.
:,LAS'S Ti RRAv
P7top._
750 Rt:P
ED&E. W E't LAnIDS
ul
?S
S
r
L
J
1

60 80. 78+00 :. 20 40 60. 80
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OIV:SZ ON OF HIGHWAYS

rs v^
I--
,.
"
UEItTZE COUNTY
10 ZD
0 D 4
`
%,rir.AL SCJ?.?
vEj G.019t)?1T R-2404C
FIOfl1ZDNTAL SLALE PROPOSED GRADING, VAVING ,CURD AND GUTTER.
?[ dC
,L
?
OENOTE5 W.STLAN05 DRAINAGE AND t,7RUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM

EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHD:lAN RIVER.
DENOTES F.1 u.?N WET LA N05 SCALE AS SHOWN.
SHEET OF NOVEMBER 1995
DENOTES EXCAVATION D4 WETLAN05
R?-VtsEO SAN I -i

I /
i IL
I
' ? .. ? _ _ _ EAST. POWER CASEMENT - .. O - - ? ?• ? ? E •- .
J , Do J
1 - - -a -a-- - EEAST.R/W -O- - ?=- _ - - - ___:
O ?? -- -j
15':40
US 17 8.9 B?
----------- ----'C-- `---------------------------------
-----____-----------_. - ---`----- \ - -.
375 VC
t- .?1 •? -------------- Loll 3= 0.4 - C.45E LAT. D 17G1 i
5= 3'
PROP05ED G.RAOE
zz, i
Exjs-rl,lct C, KAL1; L_ REV.
NCxALON(s -L-REV.
-2- EDGE WLT LANOS
79+00 20 40 60 80
Z.0 10 O zo 0 fir
HORIZONTAL 5CALE VENT1Cat_ 5CA' E
yt OENOTE5 W1:71 LAK05
0 E.NOTE5 FILL IN WET LAN O-5
0SNOTE5 EXGAVA?ION* iN WETLAND$

80+00. 20 ' 40
NORTH CAROLI"A OEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
OIVISION.OF HIGHWAYS
UERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING .CURD AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS.SHOWNBB
SHEET OF ,F9, NGVEMDCR :995
I ?
7I u
o N
w _
,Q
? a
O - ? 1
r
r ?

t ? 1
?

Q ? ? I
g I _ 0 3 I _ o
3 I Q
I ? I o

I z
X '
x
u1

?.
a I
?
r
N
Q _
1 ? A

S Z ?

a
3
.r
.Q
x
x
w.
? ? L F
^ J-
o
N z
J'
z 3
3 S.
1 / o a
w
I i F o a
I ?
Gt ? I - w ? x a.
I 0
^ N:
_ u ,Vn
I 1 0
ks) CL
?d
\ O
?S
r
r lV
J\ 3 0 ? 0
N
i } i?
>
A?Id Ian C4 -a?-I
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET V- OF NOVEMBER 1995
V lSF.O SAN toll')
I
I
of
0
O
r
r
i
4
N
? d
+Z
_o O
-O
? I
r? _ o
i I Q
I
1 ?
x
I ?
h 1,a 1-
?• - N
S Z ?
I I 1 5.
1 3
9
N ? I CI
Ir x
w
S N
r ?
0 N 3
a ? ? ? m n
464-
a ?? o
? tw ?{
O y 7 ?1 / W u
I F` 1 ? O a
> I j I - v?
CC
I
z
I a
r I I .r?
r\
I\n
l; c
f - V1 ?I I a. l r...?
r N N
N'N
.ri 1- I 1_ ?T r 'o
L I N NORTH CAROLIt1A OCPTARTNCNT OF T:IANSPORTATION
DIVISION Of IIIGHUAYS
I DERTIE COUNTY .
r
I I J 6.019001T R-2404C
s
- N PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AN0 GUTTER.
DRAINAGE ANO +TRUCTUERES ON U.S. 17 FROP
CAST Of N.C. 4S TO U ST Of THE CNOUAtI RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHCET /_ OF ?j NOVEMBER 19^S
TA N1 1991
Commander reoerai tsuuoiny
U.S. Department Fifth Coast Guard District 431 Crawford Street
of Transportation Portsmoutty Y1bWf9J-5004
*Mi398-6222
Unified States
Coast Guard
Mr. M. Randall Turner, Environmental Officer
Planning & Environmental Branch - Division 1
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 1405
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27906-1405
Dear Mr. Turner:
16590
11 Aug 96
This is in response to your letter dated June 25, 1996, inquiring
as to whether a bridge permit will be required for the
construction of a new replacement bridge over Salmon Creek, mile
7.0, at Mill Landing, North Carolina.
Since the creek is not subject to tidal influence, or susceptible
to use by interstate or foreign commerce, it meets the criteria
set forth in Section 107 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of
1982. This section of the Act exempts such waterways from Coast
Guard bridge permit requirements. Therefore, a Coast Guard
bridge permit will not be required for the construction of the
bridge across Salmon Creek.
The fact that a Coast Guard permit is not required does not
relieve you of the responsibility for compliance with the
requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency who may
have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
Ms. Linda Gilliam, Bridge Management Specialist, at (757)
398-6227.
Sincerely,
ANN B. DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District

STATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIG11. N.C. 27611-5201
January 31, 1997
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6512 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Smith
Chief, Northern Section
Dear Mr. Smith:
970098
GARLAND B. GARRE IT J k-
SFCRerARI
SUBJECT: Section 404 Individual Permit Application for the Proposed Widening
of US 17 from SR 9503 to West of the Chowan River, Bertie County, TIP
No. R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001 T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is proposing to improve
approximately 7.2 miles of US 17 in Bertie County from SR 1503 to approximately 1000
meters west of the Chowan River. The department has divided the project into two
sections (for funding and construction management purposes), identified as R-2404B
(from SR 1503 to east of NC 45 at Midway) and R-2404C (from east of NC 45 at
Midway to approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River). However, a single
permit application is being submitted for both sections combined. The anticipated
construction let dates for these two sections are June 1997 (R-2404C) and June 1998
(R-2404B).
Immediately east of the subject project, improvements to US 17 from
approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River to US 17 Business, east of
Edenton (R-2512 A & B), were recently permitted by the Department of the Army
(Permit # 199400991) and are presently under construction. Improvements to US 17
from US 17 Business, east of Edenton, to the existing 4-lane section in Hertford (R-
2208A) are also under way (Permit # 199401492).
Purpose and Need
Legislative & Executive Mandates: In 1989 the North Carolina General Assembly
enacted the Highway Trust Fund which mandated that all of US 17 be upgraded to a
multi-lane transportation facility. US 17 is identified in Governor Hunt's Transportation
2001 plan as a "key economic development highway." The planned Improvements to
the US 17 corridor in Bertie County are consistent with and are directly related to North
Carolina's transportation objectives under the 1989 Highway Trust Fund Act and
0
Page 2
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
Transportation 2001. Since major segments of US 17 have already been widened, or
are presently under construction, the only unimproved portions in northeastern North
Carolina (from south of Williamston to the Virginia border) lie in Bertie County.
Completion of the subject projects (and the Windsor Bypass, scheduled for a "post-year"
letting) will result in a multi-lane continuum of US 17 through the region.
Major Intrastate Highwax US 17 is identified as an important transportation facility in
the intrastate system, functioning as the state's major north-south route east of 1-95.
The highway provides important linkage to major east-west routes, i.e., US 64, which
serve the coastal communities. Upon completion, the state-wide multi-lane upgrade of
the US 17 corridor will provide a modified expressway mode of surface travel from
South Carolina to Virginia, including an important direct link with the state port at
Wilmington.
Major Hurricane Evacuation Route: US 17 also serves as one of two primary hurricane
evacuation routes for coastal North Carolina. Currently, sections of US 17 in the study
area are below hurricane storm surge elevation and could be overtopped during major
storm events. Therefore, one of the purposes of the subject project is to improve
roadbed elevation and hydraulic capacity.
Safety & Efficiency Another important objective to be achieved in upgrading the existing
facility is to enhance safety and travel efficiency through design upgrades. The increase
in carrying capacity that will result from the addition of travel lanes will enhance traffic
safety by a reduction in congestion, and will result in less delays in the transport of
people, goods and services.
Economic Spin-off Economic development is an important potential derivative of the
proposed improvements to US 17. When completed, the multi-lane US 17 corridor will
provide a safe and efficient, multi-lane transportation corridor between South Carolina
and Virginia with direct access to the port in Wilmington. It is logical to assume that a
multi-lane US 17 will experience an increase in commercial traffic. US 17 also provides
an important link between North Carolina beaches and population centers located
inland. For this reason, the new multi-lane facility is likely to be used by increasing
numbers of travelers enroute to vacation destinations. The growth of tourism and the
enhanced capacity of the new highway system for moving goods and services efficiently
will undoubtedly spawn development along the route. Increases in tourism that are
projected in the foreseeable future will expose increasing numbers of leisure travelers to
historical, cultural, recreational and commercial points of interest along the route. These
tangible benefits to the economies of communities clustered along US 17 are particularly
important in a region characterized by economic underdevelopment.
NEPA Documentation
A State Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) study was initiated by
the department in early 1990 for the proposed 'improvements to US 17 from west of
Windsor to the Chowan River. This original study identified two reasonable & feasible
r
Page 3
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
build alternatives; an "improve existing", as well as a "new location" alternative, which
would bypass Windsor to the south. Based upon comments received on the SDEIS, it
was decided that additional study was needed to examine other (bypass) alternatives,
both north and south, including crossovers. This decision led to the initiation of a
Supplemental SDEIS study for the Windsor Bypass. With the exception of a new
location alternative at Midway, everything east of SR 1503 was presented in the SDEIS
as "improve existing". This portion of the project was determined to be independent of
any alternative that might be selected for the Windsor Bypass. Since the SDEIS
provided sufficient evidence and analyses for determining that the preparation of a Final
EIS would not be required for the project east of SR 1503, a FONSI was prepared and
was circulated on February 27, 1995.
Alternatives Analysis
• No-Build: While the No-Build concept would result in the least damage to the
environment, it could not accomplish the intended purposes and needs of the
project, which include the establishment of a multi-lane intrastate highway for
improved traffic capacity, enhanced hurricane evacuation capabilities and increased
economic potential for northeastern North Carolina. Accordingly, this alternative was
eliminated from further study.
Transportation System Management (TSM): This alternative, examined in the
SDEIS, evaluated low-cost attempts to maximize the efficiency of the existing
highway by examining the potential for upgrading intersections, improved
signalization and upgrading of parallel and/or circumferential routes. It was
determined that while TSM improvements at intersections in Windsor would result in
localized short-term traffic relief in the Windsor area, they would not meet the long-
range regional planning goals of US 17. TSM alternatives would not improve the
existing facility to the design standards reflective of an intrastate corridor, a principal
north-south route, or a major hurricane evacuation route.
• Multi-Modal Alternatives: Transportation concepts such as ride-sharing, satellite
parking, high occupancy vehicle lanes on existing roads and mass transit were
addressed, but since the proposed project is highly rural and such concepts have
been found to be effective only in urbanized areas with populations over 200,000,
this alternative was dismissed as being impracticable.
Bypass of Midway: Preliminary alternatives included a north and south bypass
route around Midway as the only "new location" routes to be studied east of SR
1503. Due to wetland and biotic community impacts, the southern bypass was
dropped from further consideration. The northern bypass of Midway and an improve
existing concept through Midway were retained as reasonable and feasible
alternatives in the SDEIS. Based upon a range of factors including relocatees,
wetlands, prime farmland, input from citizens during public hearings, and cost, the
Midway bypass concept has been dropped from further consideration.
Page 4
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
Recommended Alternative: The improve existing alternative, including widening
US 17 through Midway, was selected as the recommended alternative for R-
2404B & C. Widening of the existing facility was found to be the most practicable
alternative when contrasted with alternatives that included either of two bypass
alternatives at Midway (see above).
Table 1. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Resources by Recommended Alternative
AFFECTED RESOURCE ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
Recommended Alternative
Costs
Right of Way/Utility Relocation $2,278,000
Construction $15,300,000
Total $17,578,000
Relocatees
Residences 11
Businesses 5
Churches 0
Historic Properties (National Registry, or Candidates) 0
Hazardous Sites (Potential UST Sites) 3
Stream Crossings* 4
Wetlands (acres)**
Riverine 5.04
Non-riverine 17.99
Protected Species 0
Prime Farmland (acres) 34
Two perennial and two intermittent; - Values reflect impacts due to fill (9.69 acres), mechanized clearing
(2.98 acres) and cut (10.36 acres)
Preliminary Design
Beginning at SR 1503 (western terminus) and heading east. US 17 will be
widened from the existing two-lane roadway to a four-lane divided facility with a 46-foot
median, including four-foot paved shoulders outside and two-foot paved shoulders
inside. This four-lane divided section will continue to approximately one mile west of NC
45 at Midway where the improvements will transition from the four-lane divided section
to a five-lane curb and gutter section. A five-lane shoulder section will be used through
the Salmon Creek bottom. From east of the Salmon Creek bottom to the project's
eastern terminus (approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River) the design will
transition to a four-lane divided roadway with a 46-foot median.
Section 7 Issues
The only federally protected species listed for Bertie County by the Fish and
Wildlife Service is the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). The
only historic data available indicates that at least one colony occurred in Bertie County,
approximately 2 miles west of the western terminus of the project. This colony has been
Page 5
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
abandoned according to records at the Natural Heritage Program. All suitable habitat
(per Henry, 1989) within 0.5 mile of the proposed project were searched (on foot) to
determine if nesting-size trees are located in these areas. Although small parcels of
pine-dominated canopy with nesting-sized trees were located, subsequent searches
confirmed that the red-cockaded woodpecker is not present in the study area of R-2404
B & C, and will not be effected by the proposed improvements to US 17.
Historic Properties
As noted in Table 1, no National Register-listed, or candidates for National
Registry will be impacted by the proposed improvements to US 17 from SR 1503 to
approximately 1000 meters west of the Chowan River.
Impacts To Waters of the U.S.
Impacts to wetlands will occur at 10 sites and surface water impacts will occur at
4 of these same sites, 2 perennial (Sites 1 and 6) and 2 intermittent (Sites 3 and 7)
drainages. Impacts to wetlands will result from footprint fills, mechanized clearing in
wetlands, and as a result of grading and excavation for a roadside drainage ditch
(wetland sites 8, 9 and 10). Of the 10 wetland sites where impacts will occur, only site 6
is considered by consensus to be a "high quality" wetland. This site, the Salmon Creek
bottomland, is a relatively narrow (+/- 400 meter wide) surface water-driven system. At
present, based upon the distribution of standing water in the wetland on both sides of
the road, the existing causeway with an approximately 30 meter wide hydraulic opening
does not appear to be preventing hydrological exchange. Plans are to replace the
existing bridge with a wider structure to accommodate the additional three traffic lanes.
The hydraulic opening of the new structure will be larger than the existing opening.
Since the project is a widening, only minimal encroachment into wetlands will
occur at each of the 10 wetland sites. Overhead Utility lines are arrayed parallel to the
existing alignment throughout the project. A substantial portion of the wetland impacts
at each of the 10 sites will occur within the powerline right of way. Consequently, much
of the impacts will occur at sites which have been subjected to long term disturbances.
Effect of Grading/Excavation on Wetlands: As indicated, three wetland sites
will be impacted by grading and/or excavation (Sites 8, 9 and 10). The estimated
collateral impacts to adjacent wetlands from the grading at sites 8, 9 and 10 has been
estimated from previous work in Chowan and Perquimans Counties. The perimeter of
the zone of influence from the excavation, which is dependent to a large extent upon
hydraulic conductivity (permeability) of the soil, depth to water in proposed ditch, and
final invert elevation, was used to estimate an areal quantity to record as a presumptive
impact (see Table 2). Soils at wetland sites 9 and 10 are mapped as Leaf Loam.
Published hydraulic conductivity (permeability) values for Leaf Loam is in the range
0.06-2.0 inches per hour (measured to depths of 4-5 feet). Discussions with local NRCS
staff confirms that in order to replicate a similar ditch effect, ditch placement in Leaf
Loam soils would not have to be nearly as far apart as for either Roanoke Silt Loam or
Page 6
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
Portsmouth Loam series soils. These latter soil series were the soils involved in the
Roadside Ditch Impact Study (for the) US 17 Widening Hertford to Edenton (in) Chowan
and Perquimans Counties (Environmental Services, Inc., April 1995), and a related
supplemental study (Environmental Services, Inc., December 1996). Since there is
likely to be a less pronounced "ditch effect" from the proposed grading and excavation in
the Leaf Loam soils than was computed for Roanoke Silt Loam and Portsmouth Loam,
and based upon informal discussions with Mr. Dwayne Henson (NRCS), the Department
proposes a 50 foot lateral zone of influence as the "ditch effect" at wetland sites 8, 9 and
10. Based upon this recommendation, the calculated ditch effect impacts at each of the
three wetlands is 0. 13, 1.99 and 1.05 acres, respectively. This, of course is added to
the area of direct impact from the grading and excavation (See Table 2).
Table 2 provides a site-by-site inventory of wetlands to be impacted by the
project, including community types, relative quality and the type of impact (i.e., clearing,
filling or excavation).
Table 2. Waters of the U.S. Impacted by R-2404 B & C: Size, Community and Quality
Site Type of Impact (Acres) Community Quality Index
Fill Clear Cut +DE Total
1 0.69. 0.21 - - 0.90 PF01 (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
2 0.16 0.06 - - 0.22 PF04/01 (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
3 0.09 0.04 - - 0.13 PF01/04 (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
4 0.007 0.003 - - 0.01 PSS1 (R) FS 2-WQ 1-WH 1 = 4
SUBTOTAL (R-2404B) 1.26
NCOOT-112 ro ect: R=2 04B
}r NCDOT .Pro'ect R-2404G .. -'
5 0.22 0.09 - - 0.31 PF01/4 (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
6 1.89 0.55 0.47* - 2.91 PF01/06 (R) FS 4-WQ 4-WH 5 = 13
7 0.47 0.09 - - 0.56 PF04/01 (R) FS 3-WQ 3-WH 3 = 9
8 0.12 0.03 0.12 0.13 0.40 PF01/04 (NR) FS 1-WO 1-WH 1 = 3
9 4.72 1.70 5.76 1.99 14.17 PF04/01 (NR) FS 1-WQ 2-WH 3 = 6
10 1.32 0.21 0.84 1.05 3.42 PF04/01 (NR) FS 1-WQ 2-WH 1 = 4
SUBTOTAL (R-2404C) 21.77
TOTAL (R-2404 B & C) .0 ,
Note: Values given are in acre(s); "+DE" denotes "ditch effect; values given for clearing are based upon
Method III (10 feet beyond slope-stake line); PFO1, PF04 and PF06 denote Palustrine
Forested Broad-leaved Deciduous, Palustrine Forested Needle-leafed Evergreen, and Palustrine
Forested Deciduous; SS denotes scrub-shrub; R and NR denote Riverine and Non-Riverine,
respectively, Quality Index explained below; * impact for hydro-storage ditches at Salmon Creek
Quality Index: Each wetland was evaluated and was given a composite score based
upon its opportunity to perform each of the functional attributes and its presumed
effectiveness (based upon field and map assessments) in fulfilling each attribute.
Functional attributes selected are those which are widely viewed as the most important
among resource agencies (flood storage, water quality and wildlife habitat).
1. Flood Storage: Is wetland part of a larger system which is positioned in the
landscape to receive surface flows from the adjoining landscape or from overbank
flooding of adjacent streams and is wetland characterized by topographic depression
Page 7
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
? (score, FS 3-5, dependent upon size, positioning and topography of site) Or is
wetland located in an interstream flat, dependent upon ground water (and rainfall)
sources of hydrology ? (score, FS 1-3, dependent upon distance to closest stream
system, or inputs from adjacent agricultural lands).
2. Water Quality Mitigation: Is wetland positioned in the landscape to intercept surface
runoff from agricultural lands, highways or other development, and does it display
suitable topography and vegetation to hold and trap particles and retain toxins ?
(score, WQ 3-5, depending on positioning, shape and vegetation) Or, is wetland a
flat expanse without opportunity to receive and without topographic relief to hold
particles and toxins ? (score, WQ 1-3, depending upon the proximity to drainage
ditches from farms, etc.)
3. Wildlife Corridor/Habitat: Is wetland part of a larger, unbroken, riparian corridor
which provides opportunity for the movement of wildlife species ? (score, WH 3-5,
depending on how much fragmentation exists and the composition of the canopy
and understory) Or, is wetland part of a non-riparian system ? (score WH 1-3,
depending on whether community is fragmented and to what extent)
Mitigation
Based upon the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the
Army and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which was executed on February
6, 1990, a process of verification and accountability for impacts to wetlands has been
put in place. Essentially, the process demands that a proposal must be able to
demonstrate that all reasonable steps have been taken to avoid impacts to wetlands
(and waters) to the maximum extent practicable, and, where prospective impacts have
been demonstrated to be unavoidable, evidence that all reasonable steps have been
taken to minimize impacts to these wetlands (and waters) must be demonstrated; and,
where appropriate, compensation for the unavoidable loss of wetlands is required.
• Avoidance: Given that the proposed action is the widening of an existing highway
and that "improve existing" concepts usually result in much less impacts to natural
resources, and given that wetlands are positioned immediately adjacent to the
existing facility, it is fair to conclude that, short of a no-build alternative, the proposal
fulfills the avoidance requirement to the maximum extent practicable.
Minimization: Close scrutiny of the ten wetlands which will be impacted by the
project reveals that the size of the wetland is approximately the same on the north
and south sides of the alignment (See plan sheets previously provided). Discussions
during the interagency field review and during bi-monthly permit meetings
referenced a potential minimization opportunity on the north side of US 17 at Salmon
Creek. However, it turns out that the focus of these discussions may have
distracted the group from the fact that an upland is also located on the south side of
the roadway i.e., the area east and west of the small access road which lies on the
west side of the creek. This service road will be slightly relocated, but access will be
maintained because local fire departments use the area for filling pumper trucks at
the creek. The project's alignment will utilize approximately 0.3 acre of this upland
Page 8
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
site. Dimensionally, this area is only slightly smaller than the upland area located in
the northeast quadrant of the creek crossing. However, disregarding the upland site
in the southwest quadrant, the Department revealed that shifting the proposed
alignment at Salmon Creek from the south side to the north side would result in a net
savings to wetlands of only approximately 0.52 acres from fills, but the shift would
require the relocation of a major powerline easement. This would necessitate
mechanized clearing of approximately 1.2 acres of bottomland to accommodate the
relocated power line easement, resulting in a net loss of wetland functions. Another
concern raised by the agencies, particularly the Regulatory Branch, is that of
reestablishing hydrological exchanges in the wetland on either side of US 17. In
order to achieve a more balanced hydrological exchange between the two wetland
fragments, the Department has agreed to an innovative hydraulic approach that
would establish a full hydrological surcharge at the causeway-wetland interfaces
throughout the entire bottomland (see Figure). This design feature which employs
four storage ditches, one in each quadrant, would insure that hydrological
equilibrium is established on either side of US17 by connecting opposing ditches by
a cross pipe under the roadway.
The Department has further agreed to construct a shoulder section through the
Salmon Creek bottoms, and to limit median dimensions to 46 feet in the four-lane
divided sections of the project that pass through other wetlands. Furthermore, all fill
slopes in wetlands will be held to 2:1 unless guard rails are required and it can be
shown that a flatter fill slope, not requiring a guard rail, would result in lateral fill
encroachments similar to the 2:1 fill slope with guard rail.
Note: Please refer to the attached November 27, 1996 letter from the Department to
the Corps of Engineers for additional information regarding avoidance/minimization
explanations & commitments in response to specific agency concerns.
• Compensation: In spite of all efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and
waters, a total of 5.04 acres of riverine and 17.99 acres of nonriverine wetlands will
be impacted by the subject project. All wetland sites lie within the Chowan River
basin.
The department acknowledges its responsibility to provide suitable
compensatory mitigation and therefore makes the following mitigation proposal.
1. The anticipated impacts to all wetlands, except for the Salmon Creek wetland (Site
6), are to be mitigated at the Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site (DSMS). It is
recommended that a compensatory ratio of 2:1 be used in mitigating for the
expected losses of wetlands from the construction of R-2404 B & C. These impacts
(not including Salmon Creek, Site 6) total 2.13 acres (riverine) and 17.99 acres (non-
riverine). This ratio would result in a reduction of available mitigation acreage at the
DSMS of 4.26 acres (riverine) and 35.98 acres (non-riverine). If approved, the
revised mitigation acreage available at the DSMS, following mitigation for R-2404 B
& C, would be 38.71 acres (riverine) and 397.38 acres (non-riverine). Upon
Page 9
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
completion of the DSMS implementation, the Department will provide the Regulatory
Branch a platt, depicting metes and bounds of the portions of the DSMS designated
for the subject projects' mitigation.
2. Impacts to the Salmon Creek wetland should be mitigated at the Company Swamp
Mitigation Bank (CSMB). The high quality nature of this wetland would be more
appropriately debited at the CSMB, which is substantially comprised of similar
wetland systems. Since the CSMB is a preservation bank, the Department agrees
to a ratio of 10:1 for replacement of the Salmon Creek wetland losses. The 2.91
acres of losses that are anticipated at Salmon Creek would result in a debit at CSMB
of 29.10 acres. If approved, this action would result in a revised balance at the
CSMB of 30,464.86 habitat units (= 636.01 acres). This bank was established at a
substantial public expenditure as a cooperative effort among several state, federal
and private conservation agencies: the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, the (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service,
and the Nature Conservancy. The Department feels very strongly that it is entirely
appropriate to utilize this mitigation bank when impacts to high quality riverine
systems occur in or near the Roanoke River basin in northeastern North Carolina,
recent comments from the Fish. and Wildlife Service notwithstanding. Permits for
major highway improvement projects have been approved recently (R-2112B and R-
2512 B & C), each of which authorized mitigation for high quality wetlands at the
CSMB. Wetlands that were mitigated at the CSMB for two of these projects (R-2512
B & C) is also located in the Chowan River basin.
The department requests that this (these) project(s) be authorized by a Section
404 permit. A Department of the Army permit application (Eng Form 4345, dated Feb
94) and a set of drawings depicting wetland boundaries are provided as attachments.
The Department is concurrently applying to the Division of Coastal Management for a
CAMA Major Development Permit for the Salmon Creek crossing. Authorization from
the U.S. Coast Guard will not be required for the Salmon Creek bridge replacement
(See attached letter). Since a portion of this project (R-2404C) is scheduled for a June
1997 construction letting, the department respectfully requests that the public notice
process be initiated at the soonest possible opportunity.
If you have questions or comments, please call Mr. M. Randall Turner at (919)
482-7977.
Sincerel ,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Mike Bell, USACOE, Washington
Page 10
January 31, 1997
Mr. Smith
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR-DCM, Raleigh
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR-DWQ, Raleigh
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC, Northside
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS, Raleigh
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS, Beaufort
Ms. Sara Winslow, NCDEHNR-DMF, Elizabeth City
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., NCDOT, Program Development Branch
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., NCDOT, Roadway Design Unit
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. William J. Rogers, P.E., NCDOT, Structure Design Unit
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT, Design Branch
Mr. D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT, Division 1
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT, P & E Branch-Division 1
US.pepartment Commanaer reoerai buuaing
Fifth Coast Guard District 431 Crawford Street
of Transportation Portsmouft ?FJ-5004
SP9
United States Ft,of,? l' 1398-6222
Coast Guard
Mr. M. Randall Turner, Environmental Officer
Planning & Environmental Branch - Division 1
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 1405
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27906-1405
Dear Mr. Turner:
16590
11 Aug 96
This is in response to your letter dated June 25, 1996, inquiring
as to whether a bridge permit will be required for the
construction of a new replacement bridge over Salmon Creek, mile
7.0, at Mill Landing, North Carolina.
Since the creek is not subject to tidal influence, or susceptible
to use by interstate or foreign commerce, it meets the criteria
set forth in Section 107 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of
1982. This section of the Act exempts such waterways from Coast
Guard bridge permit requirements. Therefore, a Coast Guard
bridge permit will not be required for the construction of the
bridge across Salmon Creek.
The fact that a Coast Guard permit is not required does not
relieve you of the responsibility for compliance with the
requirements of any other Federal, State, or local agency who may
have jurisdiction over any aspect of the project.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
Ms. Linda Gilliam, Bridge Management Specialist, at (757)
398-6227.
Sincerely,

ANN B. DEATON
Chief, Bridge Administration Section
By direction of the Commander
Fifth Coast Guard District
'-y
StAre
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARR.E'TT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201 SECRETARY
November 27, 1996
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regu!atory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Subject: Responses to Agency Questions/Concerns for: Proposed Improvements
to US 17 from west of the Chowan River to SR 1504 in Bertie County; TIP No.
R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001T
Dear Mr. Bell:
A number of questions, comments and/or concerns were voiced by one or more
of the state and federal agency staff who attended the recent interagency field review of
the subject project. These issues have been examined by Departmental staff and the
following responses are being submitted for your consideration. Recall that the more
substantial issues such as (1) the possible relocation of bridge to the north side at
Salmon Creek, (2) curb and gutter section vs. should--r section at Salmon Creek, and
(3) bridging of entire Salmon Creek bottcmiand were examined at the last monthly
permit meeting for the Northern Section held in Raleigh on October 17 1996. The
Department is making a good faith effort to resolve any possible conflicts with
jurisdictional issues prior to submitting permit applications.
In this regard, it is very important that the Department receive your responses, if
any, to the contents of this letter, as soon as possible. The schedule for submitting the
permit application dictates that your feed-back be received NLT December 9, 199,6.
Your cooperation in this critical matter will be appreciated.
Agency Concerns/NCDOT Responses
Water Quality
1. In curb and...gutter sections, energy dissipators should be used at points of
discharge to mitigate against erosion in adjacent wetlands.
Response: Energy dlss/pators, In the form of stone placed at the outfall, will
be used at all outfalls In wetland auras throughout project
2. Can scupper discharge of water at Salmon Creek be eliminated in favor of
discharge intn basins cated east and/or west of bridge ?

Page 2
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
Response: No. Based upon the topography at the site, basins would have
to be Installed within the wetland boundaries. Furthermore, the costs and rick
to motorist safety associated with this off-site discharge methodology cannot
be fustifled by the resource classlf/catlon, given the fact that this option has
been traditionally reserved for only the most sensitive water resources. The
Best Usage Classification for Salmon Creek Is C NSW. While the Department
recognizes the Importance of this stream ecologically, Including Its role as
essential habitat for anadromous and resident fish populations, extraordinary
measures such as remote discharge of storm water from bridge surfaces must
be reserved for those best usage classification which are considered to be the
most sensitive watersheds, to., High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource
Waters, Primary Nursery Areas, certain Water Supply watersheds, etc. Failure
to discriminate among the classes of water resources when advocating
measures designed to provide appropriate water quality safeguards is to
disregard the rationale behind establishing stricter safeguards for higher
quality watersheds. The Department also recognizes that nutrient sensitive
watersheds require restrictions on nutrient inputs, but It Is only fair to
acknowledge that run-off from bridge surfaces cannot be compared to
agricultural run-off. The Department will take soil samples to determine plant
groundcover nutritional requirements to Insure that excess nitrates and
phosphates are not introduced to stream from surface runoff.
1. From the standpoint of water quality concerns, why can't a shoulder section be
used at Salmon Creek crossing, in lieu of curb and gutter section ?
Response: The Department agrees to modify the existing design,
which calls for a curb & gutter section through the Salmon Creek
community. At the request of the agencies, a shoulder section will be
built at Salmon Creek.
2. Where opportunity presents itself, stormwater should always be directed to adjacent
wetland rather than to live stream. Discharge points need to be corrected where
direct stream discharges can be avoided.
Response: Except for scupper discharges from the Salmon Creek
bridge, all drainage outfalls, where practical, will be discharged into
grassed ditches before reaching live streams. Furthermore, a change
from a curb & gutter to a shoulder section at Salmon Creek will also help
mitigate against pollutants entering stream system.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream ?
Response: Span lengths are dictated by structural and hydraulic
design constraints and are based substantially on total length of crossing
to be spanned.
Page 3
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
While it may be possible to engineer a two span-crossing at Salmon
Creek, the resulting costs, Including long-term maintenance liabilities,
should require substantlal Justification. Furthermore, a two-span crossing
would dictate that support bents be located near mid-channel. The
present three-span design calls for bent locations on either side of mid-
channel, well away from the deepest portion of the stream. Normally, this
arrangement Is most attractive to managers of such resources as
fisheries and public trust.
Fish and Wildlife
1. When old structure is removed can the unnecessary abutment fills 5e removed to
allow more horizontal distance for animal movements between new bridge
abutments and stream channel ?
- Response: Yes. Excess abutment fills will be removed to Insure that
adequate streamside space Is available for animal movements.
2. In-stream construction moratorium will be enforced between February 15 and
September 30 of any year at Salmon Creek.
Response: The Department acknowledges the validity of an in-stream
construction moratorium at Salmon Creek and fully Intends to comply with
Its restrictions.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream
channel?
Response: See response 3 under "Water Quality" above.
Avoidance/Minimization
1. Why can't bridge be shifted north at Salmon Creek to take advantage of upland in
northeast quadrant ?
Response: The proposed design (shoulder section, widen to south)
will result In the discharge of fills Into 1.9 acres of wetland at Salmon
Creek. A shift of the bridge to the north, taking full advantage of the
upland berm in the northeast quadrant would result In Impacts to 1.38
acres. In either Instance, a requirement to clear 10 feet beyond the
slope-stake line (clearing method 3) would result In an additional +/- 0.3
acre of Impacts. However, a shift of the bridge to the north side would
require that an existing powerllne be relocated northward. The relocated
powerline easement will result In 1.2 acres of impacts to Salmon Creek
bottomlands through mechanized clearing. Consequently, a net loss of
0.68 acre of wetland would result from the suggested shift of the bridge
Page 4
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
alignment and additional right of way would have to be purchased. Even
assuming that the shift could be achieved without a full utility corridor
realignment, say only half of the utility corridor would have to be moved,
their would still be a net loss of wetland functions.
2. If bridge is shifted north (at Salmon Creek), bridge length on east side of creek
should be extended to Station 79+37.84 to maximize avoidance/minimization efforts
on east side of Salmon Creek.
Response: See response above.
3. What is proposed median width of roadway ?
Response: The only median section within the project occurs east of
Salmon Creek and extends to eastern terminus of project. Median width
through all wetlands will be held to 14 meters (46 feet).
4. What clearing method will be used on project ?
Response: Clearing Method 3 will be needed on project to insure that
fill slopes and erosion control devices are properly maintained during life
of construction project.
5. Consideration must be given to spanning of entire Salmon Creek wetland. If not
practicable, consideration must be given to installation of cross-pipes throughout
causeway to facilitate hydrological exchange between north and south sides.
Response: As reported to you at the October 17 permit meeting In
Raleigh, the cost of bridging the entire wetland at Salmon Creek will
result in additional expenditures of $5.5 million 1 Since the total project
cost (as proposed) Is estimated to be $11.7 million, spanning the entire
wetland system would bring the total project cost to $17.2 million, or an
Increase of 47 % above projected costs. Obviously, the Department feels
that such expenditure Is Impracticable given the benefits to be derived, a
projected savings of f/- 1.5 acres of wetlands.
Since spanning the entire wetland Is presumably Impracticable (based
upon the Information provided above), the Department has considered
methods to restore hydrological continuity between the two sides of the
bottomland. Although Installing cross-pipes has been suggested, the
Department feels that this may not be the best way to achieve the
hydrological goal. Furthermore, maintenance problems associated with
keeping cross-pipes open over time and the added complication of
potential settling of the causeway, suggests that this method may be
Inherently unattractive.
'Note: Mitigation costs not added, plans are to recommend mitigation at existing mitigation site
Page 5
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
The Department Is willing to propose the Installation of a system of
open canals running parallel to the toe of the roadway fill on both sides of
the causeway. This open water canal system, would terminate short of
Salmon Creek; however the two canal segments on either side of the
creek would be connected via a single pipe culvert so that a hydrological
continuum would be maintained along the Interfaces of both sides of the
wetland (north and south). The Identical canal and pipe configuration
would be employed on the east and west sides of Salmon Creek. There
would be no other outlets. In other words, the system would dead-end at
or near the wetland-upland boundaries east and west of the creek. (See
attached drawing)
1. What type of fill slopes are being used in wetland areas ?
Response: As a general rule, 2:1 fill slopes are used In wetland areas.
However, when 2:1 fill slope would require guardrail for public safety,
flatter fill slopes (3:1, 4: 9, etc.) may result In equivalent wetland
encroachment because the guardrail section requires a wider shoulder
point-to-shoulder point dimension. In this project only 2.9 flll slopes, or
theirequ%valent will be used at wetland crossings.
Thank you fcr the time spent in the review of this project, both in the field and
during thoughtful consideration of the Department's attempts to be a full partner on
matters that relate to the environment. Please contact M. Randall Turner at (919) 482-
7977 if you need additional information or if you wish to discuss any issue further.
Si -r ,
Franklin Vick, P .E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFVImrt
Attachment
cc: Mr. Eric Galamb, DWO
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. David Moye, DCM
Mr. Ron'Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Howard Hall, FWS
Ms. Sara Winslow, DMF
Mr. Don Morton, RE., NCDOT
Mr. Marshall Clawson, RE., NCDOT
Mr. Davidian Byrd, NCDOT
Mr. W.D. Johnson, NCDOT
Mr. R.M. Girolami, RE-, NCDOT ,
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT

r om
n n vm
n
m x z x z
r
z ?
1 ? I

m
r rn
\ .. a
o z
? -0o ?
I *
> v g > -
0(A o
m r I
, co v

3
0
? N
m
co
a
in

I

LL
°

!L K- m

I
? m

O

I =
m
z m ) m
z
o r
r o
f?
p _? o

® C-)
? x
CD
= o
,f
m
.
? m ----- - _ - --?
_
SALMON CREED.

0
?
CJ v
co
x
i m
m-- - --
_ m _ - ?_ i co

m
m

o? ?

I

m
`
/ zo

? 2 ? I i I x
k IL ? ?0 1
o
o

ao
N
v
o I x
'' m LL
a f?
m

ran r
i °
? I
^' r

-+
r
r (
K- n 1
(\ °
m o
T i
(A
o °
N 1
1
r
a

r r
w
k--
o
/ o
v co
m
r,a v m
y m
x z x z
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 325)
ON1B APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of Information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of Information, including suggestions for reducing this burden. to Department of
Defense. Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports. 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204. Arlington, VA
22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your
form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413. Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit.
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can
a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FIL LED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8.. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is rot required)
H. Franklin Vick. P. E. M. Randall Turner. Division Environmental Officer
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
North Carolina Department of Transportation North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning a Environmental Branch 113 Airport Drive. Suite 130
PO Box 25201 P.O. Box 850
Raleigh. NC 27611-5201 ( Edenton. NC =7932
t
7 APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS 011AREA COC.E j 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS.:^1'AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence t919i -82-0563
b. Business 1919) 733-3141 b. Business (919; a8<-7977
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authori , M. RardailT er t a t in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
ion In su o this pe it pli t' n.
supplement. fo rpr
January 31, 1997
PLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PRCJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
R-2512: Proposed lrbidening of US 17 from SR 1503 to approximately 1000 mne!ers viest of Chowan ?fiver in Berta Caunt;.•
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (it applicable) ° 14. PRO,;---CT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Salmon Creek. unnamed tributaries (4); Chovian River Basin
N/A
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
3ertie North Carolina
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS. IF KNOWN (see instructions)
(See item 12)
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Proceed East of bVindsor on US 17 +i- 5.5 miles: Project A.',ignment Starts at SR 1503; Proceed Eastward i nrough Project Area to Eastern
Terminus Located approximately 1000 meters west of Chowan River (western terminus of R-25 12A)
ENG FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION CF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE (Proponent: CEC104-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project. including all features)
Proposed work involves construction of 4-1ane divided. 5-lane curb and gutter and 5-1ane shoulder sections of roadway at existing location" as
describea in cover letter new bridge across Salmon Creek and improvements at four box culvert cross!ngs will also occur
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see Instructions)
Proposed work is a Transportation Improvement Project undertaken to complete the multi-lane improvements to US 17. a major north-south
intrastate highway: subject improvements should provide increased capacity. improvements to highway safety. improve hurricane evacuation capabilities
and a potential for increase in economic development in northeastern North Carolina.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
r"i!.l will be d schareed into wetlands at 10 sites to accommodate roadway footprint.
21. Typets) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
All Fiiis m v,-tlands will be earn fill. derived from suitable uplar -, borrovv site:. Volurne of fii! in wetlands = + - 5.2°_°.' c yds.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
9.09 acres of wetlands will be f!Iled: 2 98 acres will `,e impacted by mec^an!zed clearing and 10 36 acres will be e-,tcavated or drained: Only
0.25 acre of surface -.waters w!!1 be impacted by oridge footings or box culvert extensionsiinsta!lavon
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete ? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE CCNIPLETED ':WORK
24. Adcresses of adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc.. Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please
attach a supplemental list).
See Attached List
25. List Other Certifications or Approvais,,Deniais Received from other Federal/State or Local Agencies for Work Described in -;'!'is ;"DDelic tion.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL` IDENTIFICATION NUN)B.R DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
None
'WouI'-1 Include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits _
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
/? ?anuar.: 31. 1997
January 31, 1997 Q'Y7
Z
DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section ".001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner, within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme. or disguises a material fact or makes any false. fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements, or entry, shall be fined not more than S10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
'U.S.GPO: 1994-520-373/82018
WETLAND-ADJACENT LANDOWNERS
(R-2404 B & C)
PROJECT WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER(S) ADDRESS
R-2404 B Site 1 Vernon F. Lee 1431 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 27957
M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N. Merry FIN. NC 27957
Charles G. White 1504 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 27957
John T. Evans 110 Cypress Rd.. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Site 2 M. R. Cobb. Sr.
Gavle M. Bonds
Naomi P. Copeland
M. H. Hughes
Site 3 M. R. Cobb. Sr.
Howard P. Evans
Mrs. W.H. Phelps
Wiima J. Evans
1617 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
1549 US 1', N, Merry Hill. NC 27957
1548 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 27957
1606 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
1617 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
1627 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2795 7
1514 US 4 17N. ;'Merry Hill. NC 27957
1630 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 7957
Site 4 W. J. McClenny. Sr.. et.at. 1637, US 17N. Merry Hill. N1C =7957
Helen J. Williams 1643 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
R-2404 C Site 5 Weyerhaeuser Co. P.C Box 1391. New Bern. NC 28560
Willis A. Bass 1803 US 17N. Merry Hiii. NC 27-057
Jerry H. Cowand P.O. Box 215. Merry H;11. ?1C 27957
Site 6 Willis A. Bass 182,3 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
WIBis M. Bass 1909 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Thompson & Co. US 13N, Windsor. NC 27983
T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Garr St., Windsor. NC 27983
S:te 7 T.S. Giiiiam. et-a/. 205 Gary St., 'indsor. NC 27983
Site 3 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. Windsor, NC 27983
Site 9 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. Windsor. ``!C 27933
Black Rock [Deli. Inc. -"-35 '.j--- 17d, Merry Hill. idC .,,Ci57
..... ,
Black Rock Devei. L.P. 2235 US 17N. Merry Hi!!. NC 2795-
J. C. Bell. Heirs 324 US 13 Bypass. Windsor, NC 27983
Cecelia Sawyer 404 King St.. Windsor. NC 2710-S3
Site 10 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. Windsor. NC 27983
J. C. Bell. Heirs 324 US 1 3 Bypass. Windsor. NC 2.7983
70
N
(J1
N
-0 co
Om
C?
n M
-i C7
O
C
0Z
O
W
O -i -
O z
Z n

m
z
0
-0
O
C-
m
C7
-1
21
0%1 iA
s
ss??wn?
dam
O
M
2a S
APPROX. SCALE (m)
Q'
NORTH CAN OLIf1A OCPTARTNENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VISION HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-24048
PROPOSED GRAOING. PAVING .CURD AND GUTTER.
ORAINAGE AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17
.SITE MAP
(No Sctes)
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2 OF 0- NOVENSCR 1095
Rev
- on

744, - L -
(Sifas ,- 4
APPROX. SLAL!-:- C-)

nG

NORTH CAROLINA aCPTARTRCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERT:E COUNTY
6.0190017 R-24048
PROPOSED GRADZNG, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF 30 NOVENOER 1295
SITE MAP
(S(ies 5-7)

ti1,4 T
C
STq ???
Cb ?<.
REV
90 too
> SITE 7
'c
S5+Op
5ALMON GREtK

I 5TA. -7Z+ ? S.4/n3 -L- LPG. =
STA Z + Z ,. sF?3 -L-FiEv L.A.
70+pp
65to0
M I AWAY
SITE 6
APPROX. 5LALr-
.SIT"L
400 200 0 4CO
r
J y
+ (n2.7' 6-) - L-
NORTH CAROLINA OEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
-Y4- nLG?S 6,0190017 R-24040
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER.
D:d DRAINAGE AND 'STRUCTURES ON U.S. 11 FROM
u lo 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
ino' EAST OF N.C
n°
z
3 SCALE AS SHOWN
?- SHEET iL OF .3_ NOVEMBER 1995
GHOWA&I RIVER
i+
•
1
1\
STA. 123+ 11.204 -L-RE`?. L•3. _
STA. S } SO.000 - L- REV. L.A.
??t00
t pO
1l py,Oo
10v 7.O
O
1QO?vo
Alb
aI
`w
o•
i
14f?
51TE !O
ITE
1"lq?-G? LIB`
ST?. q?too _L-
R
SITE MAP
5 t f-es S - !o)
STA. 10+-00.000 -L-REV.
ENO STATE PROJ. G-OiCIDDIT
.SITE 9
APPROX. SCALE C?*+)
DIEM IEEE=
.400 ^..00 0 400
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING .CURD AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO NEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF 30 NOVEMBER 1995
SUMMARY SHEET
(WaterslvVetlands Impacts"
R-2404 B & C

PROJECT SITE
STATIONS
FILL IMPACTS (Acres)
CUT DE I
CLEAR TOTAL FILL
(Cu Yds)
R-240413 1' 42+50 to 44+14( L&R) 0.69 - - 0.21 0.90 3,003.6
2 49+66 to 50+27(L&R) 0.16 - - 0.06 0.22 603.3
3 52+74 to 53+16(L) 0.09 - - 0.04 0. ; 3 21-7.1
4 55+17 to 55+22(R) 0.007 - - 0.003 0.01 11.8
S
PROJECT TOTAL 0.95 - - 0.31 1.26 3,901.3
R-2404 C 5 _
_
69+28 to 7C+52(L&R) 0.22 - - 0.09 0.31 5.639.5
6* 75-77 to 79+10(R) 1.89 0.47 - 0.55 x.91 15.372.3
c9+38 t0 90+07(R) 0.47 - - 0.09 0.56 6.11 ; .3
8* 99+70 to 99-93i R) 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.03 0.40 430.1
9* 102+53to 114+80(R) 4.72 5.76 1.99 1.70 14.1; 12.218.6
10* 1+01 to 3-3=• (Y61 1.22 0.84 1.05 0.21 3.42 1.580.6
PROJECT TOTALS 8.74 7.19 3.17 2.67 21;.77 41,367.4
_ COMBINED TOTALS 9.69 7.19 _3.17 2.98 23.03 45,268.?
Note: "L" (left) and "R" (right) equate to northside and southside, respectively; "4E" denotes
ditch effect (see cover letter); * denotes sites (impacts> 0.33 acre) for which permit drawings are
submitted; site 6 is the only site that is below headwaters

E1 t?

1

z
O LO
c
Q
L)
Q W

CL Cn
o LL
o °
U) C) Z N

Q
O LL
C7 w
X LL V z
1-O W F- zO
tL ? °o -I
o Z C
ub c ? p m rn 3C? o LL
7. ..a cn LL W V
G1`y ' ? :7 : aaaddd
C*i
El EE E r E ?-
E?
R roe
. •:?
._X
:.... W.....
77
N x
O
Z
Y
Z
J
J

O A
z e.' •

.. ? ?? .h. V V • tc.

r
?
_1 ? ?
S
4 yy113A . _
?
z
?? .f
,r

CIJ

.`
u •? W

1 I. ? V c ? _

fli

- - --_.Q .. O o
-rHo M PSDN -1' Go. I NC,. +
yc
^p to
O .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ec _ __E-- -_ --
. --E- sr. rox[tI casCU¢r+rE_- _ ? E
-- -- ---- -- -- --E-- -- -- -- -- --
_ E-- E -- r D
'Y0.lv,n5A5E LATERAL DITCH +
?O? N milt ? `Y >C ]IC - ?l' ?! 6J? ? ST ? N G W W ? 1 ?
----- - -------- -
----------- ?-- --.F - ------ - - - - - - - -4- ---- n- _-----E?
- - _ T50 RGP_
------------- - ---- -tau: -------

F
.. r5tl
? -
- -'
1 1 Y
\I
BEWKI D ITLH © L 0.6.. BASE 11aTERAL DITCH

WILL IS A..•t3!\SS
SI?-1: ?
yc .
PRoR GRRAiDE
d
y +0.2?°I Y
-L- REV.
5-1 ING GRADE.-)
EX 1
.
N& ALOrl(-- -L- REV.
. 'L'- - -? - - ? - -•Y -'Y - plc. - - yc- -
Pao?.
-ISO FUl
I
-EDGE WLTLANID5

80 76+00 20 .40 60 80 77-x00 20

( NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
7`R
YMIT-
i UENTIC COUNTY
-0
?A 10 ` D
?dtY
O ? ^
G.019001T R-2404C
HORIZONTALSCALE VPPIT ICAL 5CA1- PROPOSEU GRADING, PAVING CURB ANO GUTTER,

yc
DENOTES WETLAN05 DRAINAGC ANO +TRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
• _-
D Elul OTES F.i LL I N W ET LA N 0:5 SCALE AS SHOWN

SHEET -E- OF 3-0- NOVEMBER 1995
(--,}
' " -" LANDS
OENOTE5 EXCAVA-rION • I N- W -T ZSfl v N J >:19
Z SA
?
I .
' zl-
1 HOMPSDN INC., o p O CO J -E-- -- -- - E-- - --E-- - --E-- J / T. 3. GILLIAM 'Y
x RIPRnP? _r 0.I ? rise
GO1.1G. (
W4
LROTrC?
O D:C -. 13ASE LATERAL D17LH b EN
?NL.WALL/ hzo D rtLAT. w yt y END II mi-A •?-
tsaw r
:r •ltur/? cant CURB
FuuuEL _ 50• CUR ____ -_-_ -__ • o?l?- ? I C c u ST?EL S"TCTURE
51
T
---_----; ------ ------- t? _ - - - ----- =?-- w
----- J C:NC CUR9'75? t5.2?o
W
ISO
". LAT D T F --- I-
D Y WPLL
?- ??:\_? _ _ - - F•- c ,? END DITC,1I
5A P- LAT. D tTGH ,
0.(._pA5tLmORAL'7 O I l"I5 A• BASS
(61
Ex I57 I W(-t c?RAOE- -
2 A ?r\
v \
0•
-?
T.5.GILLIAM
L, CONC. ?\e
L LL
G 0 \ 1 - ]L
wa
DrfLi-1
STA.754.37-L-KL-V- PRop vza. ---- - PROP. CzRADE-
PRDP 5R'C,-CLEV= 3.901
o, EXISTING C'?FL-r.'-'\
3.1 1 •?
1 1
I
?-} 7 <C.LA55 S R?RAP
X50 RC.P
1 tit u,.i rn 9 A
ED&E- WL-rLANDS Ile
60 80. ..78-4.00

EOUE WETLAMC5
I .I
.20 40
p f.r i 3 .1<RY
1 IG"1t:OL':CJ - >+ ? I t17.:
Zo to O ;p 4 2 O k
FIORIZONTAL5CALE - VEPITIC.4L SCAM
OENOTE5 WSTLA1405
DENOTES F.ILLIN WETI:AN05
`. .:l OF-HOTE5 EXCAVA-riON 1W.WETLAND-5
I'
60 80
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIV:5I ON OF HIGHWAYS
UE14TIC COUNTY
6.019001-1 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
CRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THL CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 01 OF 3D NOVEMBER 1905
I
REVISED SA?J IRT)

CN
r 1fSTl.:XD r

n r
a
E

END
+
o
O +
a
D.(o..,13A5G LA-r- -i-
D7TCH v>
7. O N

-- -- -

--
E77ST. POWER EASEMENT E--
- --
-- -- -- -- -- j
-- -_E? --
-- - -E
uj
I
O
Do

DUST.
v
_ -? r
_I 0 ? --?--
I 40
-
O ---T --- -- -------- ---------- ?.-------%y?------- -- -
?!
a' US 77
.9 B. ---
-
--- -- ----<?r \ - - - - __------------ -----: Ig 373 CQVO
-"--
-------?
?f su --- -_ - ----So ----------
.. .. . v _ -?.- --z - - ! e- - '?. ? ??+. •ti l "te'n'`.' '+??
W
i
d C1
O.G.,+ Er+SC LAT. D 7-TGH
IrXIIA7D
x

CXIST77 6n cxp-Aoe-
4
-Z 1•
I-4
1 --
t
! 1(TTD
s ITS c0
f'ROP05ED &RAor-.
_?-
REN.
NCxALONCs -L-REV.
EDGAE WbTLAI405
79+00 20 40 60 80
2r0 1 O O ZD
HOR17-ONTAL. 5CALE VVTICAL. 5CA1.f--
yC ? aIG
? ? yc DENOTES W1:T??NDS
DENOTES FILL iN WET LAN 05
DI:NOTE5 EXGAVA?ION' IN_ W>-TLA ND5
80+00- 20 ' 40
NORTH CAROLINA UCPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
UERTiE COUNTY
6.012001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURO AND GUTTER.
ORAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CMOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS ,SHOWN
SHEET 10 OF `a.(2 NOVEMBER 1995
1 i
4
LL
Q
w
R
2
0
0
r
r

N
0- N A,\\\
_ +n
Q
Z
_o
W
-o
F I
o ?
3 Q
12
al ? - ?
I x
I
aI' - N
Q
J
s1 ? ? 1
S Z ?
ei '41 cl .9
T
_o
W
a
i
r
aL- - o

r I
i
3 ! - V1

O '
z I
?
I
3 ? _ o
' I
Io

I
V
N _ ?i1
? z

x
I

i I
I
I
r,
I

- N
I
ul-0 4 A H
I 'Q
Z
W
3
J
X
•Z
U3 ?.
? o
o w
z 3
O ? z
Im . ?
3 LL.
V11 / W
/ 0 0
I z
I `` f o. a
/ I c
c? = I °a.:
N
t- , p w
? z
1 ?Uo
CL l d?
1 ? o
K \\ - .lr? ._
F
J?1 3 ? ? a
I N H
?.01 ei 4 -I a ;? i ?? 61 C4 -4 <1
NORTH CAROLINA OEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DL'RTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WCST OF TH£ CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET I_ OF an NOVEMBER 1995
REVISED St?N_1991
G1-A5'5' t' KIYRAP AFFLA4
K)/ Fid--7 [fZFAL'KIr? -7
?cl
%
<X ?
Jc
O
0
Q7
CO
\

O
G.ILLAM
1.0 m BASE LATERAL DITCH
+70.0
k ;6.340

T wrY- -
"EL ?'
------------------------------------
r
4UU /
MELT F 1
C
0
za 1k
LAf-VAL. V ? 1j1TGY? W?
GLA5s 16' RIP FLAP AM D
1=11-TGKFA&K ICI
J.:
c 355"Pl"RIP RAP
W? FILI L"i? 1'A'VKl(
1.5. (?ILLAM
O
A a -50.1

+41.130
Z co
E ?
8.000
?'iz4.67)
SPECIAL DITCH W/
"

i

I +00.0
(/;
41.000
(t34.5t') LL;
RIVFAP
GLAD f?' (y
AND hILTCK FAv7ZtL
m

GLASS"a /RIP)lA? > GLA>; v"RIPp1P
W/FIt-TGKr??PKIC, LJ 1v(FIITL-K>At'?Y1C.
J
7.2 m BASE TAIL DITCH I
L-REV
-L-
PI 91+ 617
L >. 642
T 95.293
R - 436.4

PI > • 91+70.262
OT 24'-37'-50.1'
Ts 128.464
Lc f 89.954
Rc 400.000
Ls 82.000
00 5-52'-22.1'
U 54.697
V 27.361
SE .08
R.O.Q. 20.5
..............................................
PREUMINARY PLANS
00 NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCT.
..............................................
517E ?
o 10 20
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 26. L wuaf?
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:I4G0
'? yc OENOTE5 WBTLAN05 r
%sc
0ENOTE5 flu IN WG'TLAN05 I
OENOTE5 EXCAVATION 1N 6JE_TLAN05
i
:r
y
,TtTLIND r
?c - yc

f OII
-}- J:
? I +0001 l
SPECIAL OITCH W/
GLA55'(3"

O X1000.
07
1 ( ) ,
RIP RAP ANP .r
2
"
_
7 y? FI?:G
'I
FABRIC

-
E
- Ta["S[KetE-- J.
- ! ,- - --E a00.0 x +41.80 t to-OA
500
30
?/% 26.340
(86.42')
, 30.500
(100_07) .
CfrORD «I (IOO.ET?-
-
Jc
' [ E
T Ex E
?- 'L
-
_
0
; 00`0
_ MELT _ __ _ _
--------w.----- ---1'? -----? _-----_----
US 17 9.0 DT.
REMOVE 375 C^1104
I_ALSE SUMPS 1?-' I - -
CxSi. A!M ?
PROP.
CUARCRAIL
MELT 375 RCPT
4Lcf J It)
C
- - - - - - - c----- - -t----- ` I-
-- t?ha ! ? , :x
I rraum f,
I
Y:

DEt,IOTES WSTLANCS -Y5-REV
j PI - 4+37.513
/ DaNoTGS F.ILLIN WC-TLANDS oT - 40•-45'-03.<
T - 92.952
L - 177.809
()LTLANDS / R - 250.000
I•.?•.'-:•I DENOTES EXGAVA71oN 1N u V
v v
/ SE - .04 C ?
S T? S ti, \ ?s R.
gyp. .` ?
T. S. CILLAM, et al S
Do 201 PC. 41 S??' \\
?? .. /? "? 08 590 PC. 155 \\ ?6
0.8 DOTTOY ` ??\•. `c?,• \
3.7 O TOP \
O 0.7 DZZP
1.2 so
Q1 \., ; 4.2 TOP
C) 0.7 DE +00.0-Y5-R \
TO 18.000 \
Q ` (59.06') \
V) OT +80.0 \\ c
N +76.00 1 i O PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE 0 L \
(100.07 ?
LLJ o. _--- --r-- -- -- --E-- -- -- _ -- - -- - -- rp%
t.vO RE?SE?EMrE_- _E-- (100.47- ') ?__ __ _ Y5 REV PT 5122.470 \
Z EnS
_ _ -- r- - -- -- - -- - - I 1
-I
O _I + +7z.00 iI a-E- _R? _E_ ---E _
Q 1 (6000) - ?i - 0 +76.04 ?- -
- - E>aSf.rM - - _--- - _ 'L-- 1340
C ----------- r------- 750 RCP jj (6o.oo•) _ =) J
.u
_-
COLLAR _
__-- __-_
N'
nl US 17 ).0 3ST
of ---;;:• '??.
,o I
c1_ -----Evst.
N!
^L
M
O 0
Z
mi^
o?N
GLA55 ?r RIP}1AP
A 3y
-L-REV POT 101+17.003 =
-Y -.R: -5+ 1.23
-Y6-REV POT 1+00.000
-L-REV ? FALL ?'?P
N81--56'-44.1 E
--- -- . ,

r
f +70.0
'
LJ JC W
LL) (124.670 q
V7 +67.4 ,.
I
{
?
W 1Y)' `
(177

* 38.060 _ Y
f
? I
+7
56.800 y.
(186.35')
1.0m BASE TAIL DITCH
CLEAN OUT EXISTING TAIL DITCH
REMOVE SPOIL FROM WETLAND
+56.2
80.000 / y?
(267-4'r)' +65.4
? ? tl3.900 ??
(275.267
0 20 40
t I-
1:11000
._-
SLOPE STAKE LINE
LJ
T. S. GILLAM, et al
08 201 PC. 41
08 590 PC. 155
rooas
125mm MONOUTHIC . /
CONCRETE ISLAND --JJ
PROP. SLOPE STAN
-Y6-RE
pi - 2+10.72
pT - 57'-06'
T - 81.616
L - 149.49:
R - 150.000
SE - .08
EST _ TONS CL 8 RIP
EST _ m= FILTER FAB'
5i>ret- /3 v tiQ 30
$125
1

400
goo ? 600
1200
5900 -L-REV 6100
14000

0 t490o

?-)
0(
1000 too
o?
0000 1994 ADT 1
0000 2020 ACT
• 81g
n??--?-oo}poi dls ?Nn -+,-)ldw
.I
`I >A
.1 ?
-1 ?
. -I
-? =
J F °L
C2 Q
ll
I O Co
cl- J fo-
I 7
%
I j
1 u
7X
LL
z:j
•Is_
:?N y o ffl
s
e; CL
4xi
1 ../ ?.!
Ago
1
/ Or W
t/t < O 71
m
a
5 ?
n 3
z =
1
N ,? - NORTH CAROLINA DEPTAR7MENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Z 3 ul DIVISION OF 14IGHWAYS
J
Z > OERTIE COUNTY
1~11 J X U
3 1y W .1 6.019001T R-2404C
O
W W W V" PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURD AND GUTTER.
r0 p ~O Z DRAINAGE ANO STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
z z w o EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF T14E CHOWAN RIVER.
94
O O Q - d
?• SCALE NS SHOWN
O.- SHEET rOF ZQ NOVENBCH 1995

? / oI I
/ I I 1 II
1
;

o ?
I
f
? ? I
? I?? ' •
/
I
I
« L6t 'tt
w '" I ?
1
n /
- I 1
? ICI
1.?1 .
,
•
•
?
?
1
/n ? I I
?
I I .
,..
J ? W ?? I ° (I I
I
w i
•
I dO r ( 1 I IIi i
W v
C4
? (? ?1? ? FI f I i = i I? • I •

I ?'zZ'' .i
/ / aI1 90'7 i III
I rl '

II I r` 1
-
a7 oa -'- Oos'r[
1 ? I
. .

r ? CZL Jd?1199 80 / ? "? ?' I pj O1
I CT!
'
1N3 dOl3/?30 N?02i N d ___? 1? _ < I , w .
r
?,
?ryi ?WI?w? ? j...
.

?
?
to I
W
? ?
?
I I tl.
LM'pP•
Z
l
' \
I ?
N Li
I
•• `)
p N
N
.
7 LL.fAaT
4
?
rn v? z p cs sJ •?N.'?' .., o ? a i 1 ?• gg+ 1 '-" /f
0 1 o I ft; .
L W? Q ryA? J<F-4'OI r I
?
tl
1 '; /
!
I
v
1 j
`

R ;??p Xm?u
Z ?
? / > Flo a?Oi O

?

?

? ..

.

'.
? d z o

?
f
/ ^v Z
??
?
•
?.r .: •?
WOODS © O

!
{ 1 E C? J•G.BELL ?1-IEIR? j PROP. SLOPE STAKE UNE
O
..
.00.0 y? +00.0
28.34 ?' / i
- E- --
TN -E
:c
- -
'1 _
? /
. _ _ - '
• ?'+
': •:• •• •'
•
?
7iT.w1Y0 SG _ -• ?-: i _
? ..
`r?z:D
? c? •
?,.•"?
• O

O
--
-_ - - =- - _
---
- --L-REV -=- S81--56 -44.7-E
Q
-^
-
t ...
WD ,
W
US Z
z

t p
J.(..SEL.Lj HEIRS
PROP. SLOPE STAKE UNE
Q PROI? GTCAvs
REV ?` -0•07??0 ---- --
6
0
1 I I I
104+00 20 40 60 80
I I --- I
105+00 20 40 60
vwmmmg ITT nff!ffl
Z.O 1o o ?.D 2 0
' HORILONTAL5CALE Vvmr-AL SCALE•
sIG
? ? yc
DENOTES WgTLRN05
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN05
•.:?•? :;? OP-NOTE!, EXCAVATION )N WLTLAND5
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIE COUNTY
6.019001T R-.2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING ,CURB AND GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET L6 OF i0 NOVEMBER 1975
11.1
I
0
a
lL1
_L
J
V
c

YOODS J.G,BELL?HEIE2 - Yc
JC .y. .IC 00

?k yc _ -

13.i.
11;110 U?: yO' _ _ _
I ?
US 17 8.9 BST

112.
?
I

_E _-
c -E-
+00.0 y? ]VG
38.000
(12+.67) y?
+00.0 O FOODS ?
+1.000 Y ,,1,L. BELL. HEI R5
(13-.51') 1
PROP. CaRAD1=
- L-
• ?t?ICx ALONGc -L-REV.
A.
2
-2
-6 1. I 1 1
107+00 20 40 60
IL'.La ?•
2.0 10 O 20 A 2 0
HORIZONTAL SCALE VERTICAL 5CAIX--
if
? ,? Esc DENOTES W>:TLRN05
OENOT65 FILL IN WETL.AN05
DENOTES EXGAVATiON IN WE.TLAND5
w
1
0
c
Q
r
IJ?
?Llj
J
Q
80 108+00 20
NORTH CAROLINA OEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERTIC COUNTY
6.019001T R-24040
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURD AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET PS OF .Y? NOVEMBER 1295
S
I T?
1c ?/? C
i
? ? v XQ
_ yc ye 1. .1c ? ?
c
rzr7arrD ? ?
J
1
Q
Q
w
1
Q
J•L.5ELLi H1;195
:IC .x
?"°.91PRAP W/ y?
y` F11-Tf.R FAF.'RIG
+35.0-T2-
SPEGIAI- DITOA W/ (29 3)
GLA55"5 RtflRAFA>`1D .Sc
sc rlr-'I f-K FAT,RIL -"\
•r
/ r.a eo
?
rap
0.4 DL£P
C.1;L1A LAWYER
•; : ?:,• ? 1.2m BASE TAIL OfTCH CLEANWi
EST391 m3 O.O.E. :
yc O ' hl 5PELIAL- 01Tt-Pi W/
Q >ti GIAiJ"D" Rt?p.AVAND
+80.0 X yc C?. '?/ FI?rBR )%A>i21G.
30
500 D
_.
.
O
(100.07 ..
) .. .. .• .. -
't• - _

PROP.
' +80.0. y[ JC JC 30.300 yc •• 30.300
(100.0T)
100.07)
.. ..
26.340 _ EyC_
E
r (86.42') x C s+ . 7 1 C ? ?•'G
- r77 -7.
7

_..,.-. _.-.c -- -
---------------------------- -------
600 RCP

r
REMO
f
.P
.
30 C

-- - -- - -- -- '
i z-a
S81•-56'-4+.7'- -L-REV

-L=RSV' 1 x . :600:RGP•

-E -E- -E- _E
® Sr / 0 SIC
,? .].G•6ELL/HEIRS ?/ GELIA 5AWYER
Zo 10 0 ZD
HORIZONTAL 5C-ALE
IDENOTE5 WSTLA ADS
OENOTC5 FILL IN WETLAN05
O>:NOT65 EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
\-PROP. SLOPE STAKE 11NE zk
:11c ?jd
1i1
J
1
W
S
Q
y
u?
W
Z
1.
r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AMC GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Ip! OF 30 NOVEM3CR 1995
PROPOSE D C-- FADE
•D 03?l ??-- REV ? -O. 112 ?o
N1 (A A L-0 W GL- PZ\/
S
2-
SITE 9 P-1 D/
40 60 80 109+00 20 40 60 80
N6t EX15TING C))iC,N bED
? ramuv - .n?, i
pROpoSeD
pROP05ED D)-'0I PEED
S I T E --r 2-
12100 I ?o I 4L0 I 610 I ao 1 300
NORTH CAROLINA DCPTARTNCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OERT.IE COUNTY
?.O IO O ZD .+ 2 D 4 6.0190017 R-2404C
HOKILONTAL 5C.ALE VERTICAL 5CAI.-P-
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING ,CURD AND GUTTER.
-AA Q!`NOT'CS Il)?T LPcN05
]I[
r DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES
45 TO WCST
C
CAST OF N ON U.S.
OF THE 17 FROM
C1;OWAN RIVER.
.
.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2? OF 3Q NOVENOCR 1925
S.
cn
w
J
H
N G'?
ExIsrlNcx DITCH aEO?
-D.O(o y
PROPOSED DITCH eD
4
2
O
I.
N
f;-
O
I?
z
J
T.
v
Q
I
13+00 20 40 60 80 14+00 20 40 60
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ZO 10 O ZD Z D DENTIC COUNTY
H0KlZD7J"fAL5CALE - VERTICAL SCAL.>: 6.019001T R-:404C
SIC aiC PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURD AND GUTTER.
]6C DENOTES W?TLRNDS DRAINAGE AND $TRUCTURCS ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
•
DENOTES EXCAVATION )K WETLAN05
SCALE AS SHGWN
SHCET 2l 6 F 3v NOVCMDCH 1905
0 1 °
® + ?
J.G. BELL HEIRS !?2 / RIG fop
1 ' +710
G 21.
rods 6690
• 3=, RETAIN 1 250 1C
G 1 i- t E-
?? +71.0
L 1 • ?? 21.000 LT.
rOODS
cuyrrvarga
1 rrrr.AxD CEL1A 5AWER _
Q SITE 9 -I Z-
]C
8
t
- - - - - - - - - - - - _ ?EXISTIN(? DITCH 'BED
-0.0670
- --------?
PROP051:D UITC,N BED
i I I I I --- -: i I_ I
60 80 15+00 20 .40 60 80 16+00
.
SW IM NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
?
O:VI5I0N OF HIGHWAYS
K
20 10 O ZO 4 2 O
HOKILONTAL SCALE VERTICAL 5CALr-- UERTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
yc OENOTES WETLANDS
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURD AND GUTTER,
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST of N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVCR.
DENOTfi5 EXCAVATION 117 WETLANDS
SCALE AS 3I4OWN
SHEET 22 of 3-0 Novc :iu; 1S94
o ? -
® + Y
51TE
GELIA SAW`(EYR
-- _ - --
y?
-EEwst.voKx_•SE?Eer?__ -- - --E--
- -

?1 _G-_
?
?
or

W -
1

WXTLANn ti _ ... s 7 '' c
-------
c Q
Q - - -?-_
?.;. REMOVE 375 CONC 375 RCP
------ - --------
-
-------------
l N
- US 174.9 BS7
2 GI 0
56*- 44 7"E

r0l
Lij
L
? J

` c
I
GELIA SAWYER r
yC yc yc U A55 B„ R I P RA P
W/ FrLTL FABR IG

PROP. GRAD1- - L- REV +o.ot? °r
-
-t--REY.
NU At ONG
(o

t
t
2-

0
1
r
-Q.
t

111+00 20 40 60 80 112+00 20 40
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
r+O?' DIVISION OF IIIGHWAYS
l
W t0 O za 2 0 q'
H0P%1Z0r4TAL5C,ALE VEATICAL 6CALE RERTIE COUNTY

?'u DENOTES WSTLANDS G.0i900iT R-2404C

PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
GItnDING
•
DENOTES FILL IN WETLAN OS .
PROPOSED
DRAINAGE AND RS ON U.S. 1
EAST Of N.C. 45 TO O WC 3T OF THE CH 7 FROM
O Unn RZVL11.

• DENOTES EXCAVATION 1N WETLANDS SCALE AS SHOWN

SHEET ?? OF 3o i70

'J:MOCR 1095 t
c
-IL

x
SITE
©
+ CELI
5AWYER 0 0 00
r
PROP. SLOPE STAKE UNE
• .. .. .. _ .. .. `. ..--? - --E? -- - --E-- -- -E-- -+60.0 --E-- -- -- --
39'
3
0
/ 0 i 0.
)
(
1
i E-
-
, .. . .. - ?- - - - -C ----- S---------- ------
+60
0
RCP
375 CONC` .
26.340
REMOTE
O! _•?___ (86.42)-.-..._..
---------- -------------------------- - ------ ---------------
= i

-'m -L-REV

L
i

! Z/z
. .
:
FALSc .SUMP .

1
--?--- -----0--------------.---------j-------
' -
-
--
1
I
?
, --------
-
c
?k 0
\
CEl-IA 5AWYER sc Y
Sc L•PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
D Oily: L rF PRDA.ftRAD- N9 _
-0 L ----------- -?-- _-----?
WGq Al-0MG -t. 9zy ---T PR0P.GR DE 5BL-
(o
4-
2-
-2-
-4
40 60 ' ' 80 113+00 20
cam=
20 10 O zo 2 O
HORIZOrlTAL 5GALF- VENTICAL 5CAL-?
yc DENOTE5 WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND5
?::--:-=:? OF-NOTE5 EXCAVATION IN WLTLANDS
I
r?
W
?^1
LLB
J
1
v
i I
40 60 80
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
OEHTIE COUNTY
6.0190017 R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURO ANO GUTTER.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C.'45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
S 'L-LE AS SHOWN
S11CET 2S 0 F ;3-0 NOVCMUCR 1995
_UNE EXIST. 0.6m BASE n
rn DITCH W/CL B RIP RAP
CL B RIP RAP vo?p, + +
+ EAST. ?}
+00.0 ^
35 000 O f.' V +71.695
?ST
ti(114.8J•) ?'?'-E'?r? W (109.91")
r I .? -F. E?St. F O
W -- -= !1 -E-? Ul-IaSAwYE? O+aRo
-----_
C
Q '? - - - - - +71.695
+00.0 25.738
30.600 (84.44") ...- iso .. ..
V - - -rte-- 6 ?" -. ---_ _
'---?-- ------- J --.--_----._______ BST
us 17 B.9
i
450 RCPT
------------
Q1 REWOVE 450 CONC 2-CI - -
EXTRA DEPTH (1.55)•. ¦7w- ?-
7 77
uJ
SprrIAV p11L.1•1
-GLA%i (? }ZIP R/\1?RND "? A-
Q _ ??? ;?• ••'i rlL?r rAB?'L ?
f?• E E \+49.0 CHORO szrtwn t
+95.695 - 38.000 +71.695 :k
38.000 +2, (124.6 7-? (124.67.) (1?) .
(124.67 41.000 GEL1A 5AWfER
(1}4.31.1
pROP. C gAOE N 8 L
+0.87 °•
NGc At-OnIG -1-- REY•
4

o
_ '_ . I..
80 114+00 20 40 60 80 115+00
Z0 10 O E0 2 O
H0PiZ0NTAL6C"AEE VEPITir-AL 5CAL--
a1C
? ? yc pENOTES WtiTLPttiDS
OENOTE5 FILL IN WeTLaN05
?'.? •:•I OF-NOTE5 EXGAVAT10N 1N WE.TL.AND5
NORTH CAROLINA 0EPTARTMCNT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DCRTIC COUNTY
G.01900IT R-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTCH.
DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
CAST OF N.L. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHCET 26 0 F 9 NGVC••.UL'It 1995

I ?
I 2

' Z
. - -? ?

3 w
,
n ,
n
0

0 I -?n o ?: a cZ

:ti
41

N
o
x i
L
~ ;J y

1
~

_ -..? J w

C]
Z v,
tp 1
Q ` tll
?_ O J z

_? i1 L
0. >

W I
Q tL
3 J
l
tl
1 ?i
w

W Z
cr-
~
-?
?
t
i.l
3 Z

I o o

o
{
3 I
•??
O
I ?

G: I ( i
J ? I

r1.1A1
VJ 4-

0

NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OLVZSION OF HSGHWAYS
DERTIE COUNTY
G.019001T ft-2404C
PROPOSED GRADING, PAVING CURB AND GUTTER,
?i DRAINAGE AND STRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
EAST OF N.C. 46 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
W
H
SCALE AS SHOWN
?I SHEET I OF 3C NOVEMBER 1995
/* el /!? PRC 3+2? 186
.
{-I .•,..e _ } ? ? --' i? -„ ?/ `, ;ice ?? ? ? 1•: • ••. „. •!
CIL
/ , `ii a J I
Cc.
f /,,: :N
co,
' I >? / ?? •'i/ / ct u I • 00+£ 4,
0
? 1•
N r!
1'J
I_
r r
o
?1 ? az a
'ov

j ww Ix

, CL
V)

f A(

is
?.
"
'
?
x u7 3 / .
? i ..
'?=
• •
_ '
`" .y

f 'a + .1 ?
u ' N
1 i9ux
,
•
17 1 I ., f I ? .may /
\ ?'? x ?
tL

V .4
r
• ' •
y t R $ .. y
?i! ..? z'r Z 3

I ; w 1

i=

S ?z

v C: I
oN
I
oui I
1 .? 6-91+4 •. E W
31,
+ I it
1;1 f ii''
I I

o
R ? I

?I
L li I ° ?g I
O
I ;t %
I + ++ I
I
1 !i?•
lirti ?IOit00 p I

I;
I o a I
1
1': ?W
I >
w mix
i:V
L'; ?
1 ?i ?
I 1 I I
1
??i ? u1 v1 v7
F-
Z •?- Z
;Y 0 p d Q
NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTNHNT OF TRANSPORTATION
• DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
uJ OERTIE COUNTY
J
6.019001T R-24040
PROPOSED GRADING. PAVING CURB AND GUTTER.
O Q ORAINAGC AND tTRUCTURES ON U.S. 17 FROM
z EAST OF N.C. 45 TO WEST OF THE CHOWAN RIVER.
SCALE AIS SHOWN
o! _-
S SHEET 28 OF 3'0 MOVEXSER 1995

SGGT T13GW3AON C?7 d0 133115
NMONS S,V 31V75

'83AIH NVMOH3 3H1 AD 1S3M Ol Sb '7'N d0 lSV3
NONA LT S'n NO
• 53Un1onu.L; ONV 3OVNIVU0
'H311n0 ONV 9HAV ONIAVd 'ONIOVHO 03SOdONd - `?
3b0b2-`J LT0O6TO*9 - I
AlNR00 3I1N3fl
' CS
S).VMHOIH A0 NOIS/AIO
NOIlv1NOdSNVL 1 AD 1N 3N1NV1d30 V17I10HVI H1NON
I
QN-
W
.,.,
. _ V
? 7

•• o
v o 3 =:?E
o d
Z
z
z z

m
m
m
V N U U
r m
x
rt
j
p D r V1-

z

Z -I (n

`
z D
z
, N
1 O -
4
z z D
O
N N

1
P m

D ?
r oro

V
' ?c m
Cl

PN-
?
nv ?
o

k

0
0
rn
V
rn

p
w'q N ?
c?
p g
? p
<
v m

O
0
e
z
00 -
o
N
O
O
O
0
O
0
L4 rn
+-
0
o
M4
No - z
v
.th. -
0
0
T-
w
D
r
O
7
a
V1
T
p
0
0
rn

WETLAND-ADJACENT LANDOWNERS
(R-2404 B & C)
PROJECT WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER(S) ADDRESS
R-2404 B Site 1 Vernon F. Lee 1431 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N. Merry Hiil. NC 27957
Charles G. White 1504 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
John T. Evans 110 Cypress Rd.. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Site 2 M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2797
Gayle M. Bonds 1549 US 17N, Merry Hill. NC 2795-
Naomi P. Copeland 1548 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
M. H. Hughes 1606 US 17N, Merry Hill, NC 2795;
Site 3 M. R. Cobb. Sr. 1617 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Howard P. Evans 1627 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Mrs. W.H. Phelps 1614 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Wilma J. Evans 1630 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Site 4 W. J. McClenny. Sr.. et.al. 1637 US 17N. Merry Hill, NC 27957
Helen J. Williams 1643 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
R-2404 C Site 5 Weyerhaeuser Co. P.O Box 1391. Negri Bern. NC 28580
Willis A. Bass 1833 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 2797
Jerry H. Cowand P.O. Box 215. Merry Hill. dC 27957
Site 6 Willis A. Bass 1833 US 11 Merry Hill. NC 2795-
Willis M. Bass 1909 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Thompson & Co. US 13N. Winasor, NC 27983
T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. Windsor. NC 7983
Site 7 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St., Windsor. NC 27983
Site 8 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. bVindsor. NC 2-983
Site 9 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St.. Windsor, NC 27983
Black Rock Deli. Inc. 2235 US 17N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
Black Rock Devei. L.P. 22:.5 US 11 N. Merry Hill. NC 27957
J. C. Bell. Heirs 324 US 13 Bypass. Windsor, NC 27983
Cecelia Sawyer 404 King St., Windsor. NC 27933
Site 10 T.S. Gilliam. et.al. 205 Gary St., Windsor. NC 27983
J. C. Bell. Heirs 32.1 US 13 Bypass. Windsor, NC 27983
Sheet- 30 of 30
„-Z J
d aSfArjEa
RECEIVED
•? DEC 0 6 ,1996
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRON'tENTALSCIENCEs
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DMSION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
November 27, 1996
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Subject: Responses to Agency Questions/Concerns for: Proposed Improvements
to US 17 from west of the Chowan River to SR 1504 in Bertie County; TIP No.
R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001T
Dear Mr. Bell:
A number of questions, comments and/or concerns were voiced by one or more
of the sate and federal agency staff who, attended the recent interagency field review of
the subject project. These issues have been examined by Departmental staff and the
following responses are being submitted for your consideration. Recall that the more
substantial issues such as (1) the possible relocation of bridge to the north side at
Salmon Creek, (2) curb and gutter section vs. shoulder section at Salmon Creek, and
(3) bridging of entire Salmon Creek bottomland were examined at the last monthly
permit meeting for the Northern Section held in Raleigh on October 17, 1996. The
Department is making a good faith effort to resolve any possible conflicts with
jurisdictional issues prior to submitting permit applications.
In this regard, it is very important that the Department receive your responses, if
any, to the contents of this letter, as soon as possible. The schedule for submitting the
permit application dictates that your feed-back be received NLT December 9, 1996.
Your cooperation in this critical matter will be appreciated.
Agency Concerns/NCDOT Responses
Water Quality
1. In curb and.gutter sections, energy dissiipators should be used at points of
discharge to mitigate against erosion in adjacent wetlands.
Response: Energy dlsslpators, In the form of stone placed at the outfall, wlll
be used at all outfalls In wetland aroas throughout project.
2. Can scupper discharge of water at Salmon Creek be eliminated in favor of
discharge into basins located east and/or west of bridge`?,

4 .
Page 2
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
Response: No. Based upon the topography at the site, basins would have
to be Installed within the wetland boundaries Furthermore, the costs and risk
to motorist safety associated with this off-site discharge methodology cannot
be Justified by the resource classification, given the fact that this option has
been traditionally reserved for only the most sensitive water resources. The
Best Usage Classitlcatlon for Salmon Creek Is C NSW. While the Department
recognizes the Importance of this stream ecologically, Including Its role as
essential habltat for anadromous and resident fish populations, extraordinary
measures such as remote discharge of storm water from bridge surfaces must
be reserved for those best usage classification which are considered to be the
most sensitive watersheds, I. e., High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource
Waters, Primary Nursery Areas, certain Water Supply watersheds, etc. Failure
to discriminate among the classes of water resources when advocating
measures designed to provide appropriate water quality safeguards Is to
disregard the rationale behind establishing stricter safeguards for higher
quality watersheds The Department also recognizes that nutrient sensitive
watersheds require restrictions on nutrient Inputs, but It is only fair to
acknowledge that run-off from bridge surfaces cannot be compared to
agricultural run-off. The Department wli/ take soil samples to detennine plant
groundcover nutritional requirements to Insure that excess nitrates and
phosphates are not introduced to stream from surface runoff.
1. From the standpoint of water quality concerns, why can't a shoulder section be
used at Salmon Creek crossing, in lieu of curb and gutter section ?
Response: The Department agrees to modify the existing design,
which calls for a curb & gutter section through the Salmon Creek
community. At the request of the agencies, a shoulder section will be
built at Salmon Creek.
2. Where opportunity presents itself, stormwater should always be directed to adjacent
wetland rather than to live stream. Discharge points need to be corrected where
direct stream discharges can be avoided.
Response: Except for scupper discharges from the Salmon Creek
bridge, all drainage outfalls, where practical, will be discharged Into
grassed ditches before reaching live streams. Furthermore, a change
from a curb & gutter to a shoulder section at Salmon Creek will also help
mitigate against pollutants entering stream system.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream ?
Response: Span lengths are dictated by structural and hydraulic
design constraints and are based substantially on total length of crossing
to be spanned.
A L .
Page 3
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
While It may be possible to engineer a two span-crossing at Salmon
Creek, the resulting costs, Including long-term maintenance liabilities,
should require substantlal Justification. Furthermore, a two-span crossing
would dictate that support bents be located near mld-channel. The
present three-span design calls for bent locations on either side of mid-
channel, well away from the deepest portion of the stream. Normally, this
arrangement Is most attractive to managers of such resources as
fisheries and public trust.
Fish and Wildlife
1. When old structure is removed can the unnecessary abutment fil!s be removed to
allow more horizontal distance for animal movements between new bridge
abutments and stream channel ?
Response: Yes. Excess abutment fills will be removed to Insure that
adequate streamside space Is available for animal movements.
2. In-stream construction moratorium will be enforced between February 15 and
September 30 of any year at Salmon Creek.
Response: The Department acknowledges the validity of an In-stream
construction moratorium at Salmon Creek and fully intends to comply with
Its restrictions.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream
channel?
Response: See response 3 under "Water Quallty"above.
Avoidance/Minimization
1. Why can't bridge be shifted north at Salmon Creek to take advantage of upland in
northeast quadrant ?
Response: The proposed design (shoulder section, widen to south)
will result In the discharge of fills Into 1.9 acres of wetland at Salmon
Creek. A shift of the bridge to the north, taking full advantage of the
upland berm In the northeast quadrant would result In Impacts to 7.38
acres. In either Instance, a requirement to clear 10 feet beyond the
slope-stake line (clearing method 3) would result In an additional f/- 0.3
acre of Impacts. However, a shift of the bridge to the north side would
require that an existing poweNlne be relocated northward. The relocated
powerNne easement will result In 1.2 acres of Impacts to Salmon Creek
bottomlands through mechanized clearing. Consequently, a net loss of
0.68 acre of wetland would result from the suggested shift of the bridge

Page 4
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
alignment and additional right of way would have to be purchased. Even
assuming that the shift could be achieved without a full utility corridor
realignment, say only half of the utility corridor would have to be moved,
their would still be a net loss of wetland functions.
2. If bridge is shifted north (at Salmon Creek), bridge length on east side of creek
should be extended to Station 79+37.84 to maximize avoidance/minimization efforts
on east side of Salmon Creek.
Response: See response above.
3. What is proposed median width of roadway ?
Response: The only median section within the project occurs east of
Salmon Creek and extends to eastern terminus of project. Median width
through all wetlands wNl be held to 94 meters (46 feet).
4. What clearing method will be used on project ?
Response: Clearing Method 3 will be needed on project to insure that
fill slopes and erosion control devices are properly maintained during life
of construction project.
5. Consideration must be given to spanning of entire Salmon Creek wetland. If not
practicable, consideration must be given to installation of cross-pipes throughout
causeway to facilitate hydrological exchange between north and south sides.
Response: As reported to you at the October 97 permit meeting in
Raleigh, the cost of bridging the entire wetland at Salmon Creek will
result in additional expenditures of $5.5 million It Since the total project
cost (as proposed) is estimated to be $11.7 million, spanning the entire
wetland system would bring the total project cost to $97.2 million, or an
increase of 47 % above projected costs. Obviously, the Department feels
that such expenditure is Impracticable given the benefits to be derived, a
projected savings of f/- 9.5 acres of wetlands.
Since spanning the entire wetland is presumably Impracticable (based
upon the Information provided above), the Department has considered
methods to restore hydrological continuity between the two sides of the
bottomland. Although installing cross pipes has been suggested, the
Department feels that this may not be the best way to achieve the
hydrological goal. Furthermore, maintenance problems associated with
keeping cross-pipes open over time and the added complication of
potential settling of the causeway, suggests that this method may be
Inherently unattractive.
*Note: Mitigation costs not added; plans are to recommend mitigation at existing mitigation site
. . ?,
Page 5
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
The Department is willing to propose the Installation of a system of
open canals running parallel to the toe of the roadway fill on both sides of
the causeway. This open water canal system, would terminate short of
Salmon Creek; however the two canal segments on either side of the
creek would be connected via a single pipe culvert so that a hydrological
continuum would be maintained along the interfaces of both sides of the
wetland (north and south). The Identical canal and pipe configuration
would be employed on the east and west sides of Salmon Creek. There
would be no other outlets. In other words, the system would dead-end at
or near the wetland-upland boundaries east and west of the creek. (See
attached drawing)
1. What type of fill slopes are being used in wetland areas ?
Response: As a general rule, 2:1 fill slopes are used In wet/and areas.
However, when 2:1 fill slope would require guardrail for public safety,
flatter fill slopes (3:1, 4: 9, etc.) may result in equivalent wetland
encroachment because the guardrail section requires a wider shoulder
point-to-shoulder point dimension. In this project only 2.9 fill slopes, or
their equivalent will be used at wetland crossings.
Thank you for the time spent in the review of this project, both in the field and
during thoughtful consideration of the Department's attempts to be a full partner on
matters that relate to the environment. Please contact M. Randall Turner at (919) 482-
7977 if you need additional information or if you wish to discuss any issue further.
Si r,
Franklin Vick, PE., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFVlmrt
Attachment
cc: Mr. Eric Galamb, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. David Moye, DCM
Mr. Ron'Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Howard Hall, FWS
Ms. Sara Winslow, DMF
Mr. Don Morton, RE., NCDOT
Mr. Marshall Clawson, RE., NCDOT
Mr. Davidian Byrd, NCDOT
Mr. W.D. Johnson, NCDOT
Mr. R.M. Girolami, RE., NCDOT
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT
a??q
?a rNbM
`l
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
November 27, 1996
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-.1000
Subject: Responses to Agency Questions/Concerns for: Proposed Improvements
to US 17 from west of the Chowan River to SR 1504 in Bertie County, TIP No.
R-2404 B & C; State Project No. 6.019001 T
Dear Mr. Bell:
A number of questions, comments and/or concerns were voiced by one or more
of the sate and federal agency staff who attended the recent interagency field review of
the subject project. These issues have been examined by Departmental staff and the
following responses are being submitted for your consideration. Recall that the more
substantial issues such as (1) the possible relocation of bridge to the north side at
Salmon Creek, (2) curb and gutter section vs. shoulder section at Salmon Creek, and
(3) bridging of entire Salmon Creek bottomland were examined at the last monthly
permit meeting for the Northern Section held in Raleigh on October 17, 1996. The
Department is making a good faith effort to resolve any possible conflicts with
jurisdictional issues prior to submitting permit applications.
In this regard, it is very important that the Department receive your responses, if
any, to the contents of this letter, as soon as possible. The schedule for submitting the
permit application dictates that your feed-back be received NLT December 9, 1996.
Your cooperation in this critical matter will be appreciated.
Agency Concerns/NCDOT Responses
Water Quality
1. In curb and;gutter sections, energy dissipators should be used at points of
discharge to mitigate against erosion in adjacent wetlands.
Response: Eneigy dlsslpators, In the form of stone placed at the outfall, wlll
be used at all outfalls In wetland areas throughout protect.
2. Can scupper discharge of water at Salmon Creek be eliminated in favor of
discharge into basins located east and/or west of bridge ?,
14
Page 2
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
Response: No. Based upon the topography at the site, basins would have
to be Installed within the wetland boundaries Furthermore, the costs and risk
to motorist safety associated with this off-site discharge methodology cannot
be Justlfled by the resource classlflcatlon, given the fact that this option has
been traditionally reserved for only the most sensitive water resources The
Best Usage Classlflcation for Salmon Creek Is C NSW. While the Department
recognizes the Importance of this stream ecologically, including Its role as
essential habitat for anadromous and resident fish populations, extraordinary
measures such as remote discharge of storm water from badge surfaces must
be reserved for those best usage classiflcatlon which are considered to be the
most sensitive watersheds, to., High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource
Waters, Primary Nursery Areas, certain Water Supply watersheds, etc. Failure
to discriminate among the classes of water resources when advocating
measures designed to provide appropriate water quality safeguards Is to
disregard the rationale behind establishing stricter safeguards for higher
quality watersheds The Department also recognizes that nutrient sensitive
watersheds require restrictions on nutrient Inputs, but It is only fair to
acknowledge that run-off from bridge surfaces cannot be compared to
agricultural run-off. The Department will take soil samples to determine plant
groundcover nutritional requirements to Insure that excess nitrates and
phosphates are not introduced to stream from surface runoff.
1. From the standpoint of water quality concerns, why can't a shoulder section be
used at Salmon Creek crossing, in lieu of curb and gutter section ?
Response: The Department agrees to modify the existing design,
which calls for a curb & gutter section through the Salmon Creek
community. At the request of the agencies, a shoulder section will be
built at Salmon Creek.
2. Where opportunity presents itself, stormwater should always be directed to adjacent
wetland rather than to live stream. Discharge points need to be corrected where
direct stream discharges can be avoided.
Response: Except for scupper discharges from the Salmon Creek
bridge, all drainage outfalls, where practical, will be discharged into
grassed ditches before reaching live streams. Furthermore, a change
from a curb & gutter to a shoulder section at Salmon Creek will also help
mitigate against pollutants entering stream system.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream ?
Response: Span lengths are dictated by structural and hydraulic
design constraints and are based substantially on total length of crossing
to be spanned.
Page 3
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
While it may be possible to engineer a two span-crossing at Salmon
Creek, the resulting costs, Including long-term maintenance liabilities,
should require substantial Justification. Furthermore, a two-span crossing
would dictate that support bents be located near mid-channel. The
present three-span design calls for bent locations on either side of mid-
channel, well away from the deepest portion of the stream. Normally, this
arrangement Is most attractive to managers of such resources as
fisheries and public trust.
Fish and Wildlife
1. When old structure is removed can the unnecessary abutment fills be removed to
allow more horizontal distance for animal movements between new bridge
abutments and stream channel ?
Response: Yes. Excess abutment fills'will be removed to insure that
adequate streamside space is available for animal movements.
2. In-stream construction moratorium will be enforced between February 15 and
September 30 of any year at Salmon Creek.
Response: The Department acknowledges the validity of an in-stream
construction moratorium at Salmon Creek and fully intends to comply with
its restrictions.
3. Can bridge at Salmon Creek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans, or in the three span design can interior bents be kept out of the stream
channel?
Response: See response 3 under "Water Quality" above.
Avoidance/Minimization
1. Why can't bridge be shifted north at Salmon Creek to take advantage of upland in
northeast quadrant ?
Response: The proposed design (shoulder section, widen to south)
will result In the discharge of fills into 1.9 acres of wetland at Salmon
Creek. A shift of the bridge to the north, taking full advantage of the
upland berm In the northeast quadrant would result in Impacts to 1.38
acres. In either instance, a requirement to clear 10 feet beyond the
slope-stake line (clearing method 3) would result in an additional f/- 0.3
acre of impacts. However, a shift of the bridge to the north side would
require that an existing powerilne be relocated northward. The relocated
powerline easement will result In 1.2 acres of impacts to Salmon Creek
bottomlands through mechanized clearing. Consequently, a net loss of
0. 68 acre of wetland would result from the suggested shift of the bridge
Page 4
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
alignment and additional right of way would have to be purchased. Even
assuming that the shift could be achieved without a full utility corridor
realignment, say only half of the utility corridor would have to be moved,
their would still be a net loss of wetland functions.
2. If bridge is shifted north (at Salmon Creek), bridge length on east side of creek
should be extended to Station 79+37.84 to maximize avoidancelminimization efforts
on east side of Salmon Creek.
Response: See response above.
3. What is proposed median width of roadway ?
Response: The only median section within the project occurs east of
Salmon Creek and extends to eastern terminus of project. Median width
through all wetlands will be held to 94 meters (46 feet).
4. What clearing method will be used on project ?
Response: Clearing Method 3 will be needed on project to Insure that
fill slopes and erosion control devices are properly maintained during life
of construction project.
5. Consideration must be given to spanning of entire Salmon Creek wetland. If not
practicable, consideration must be given to installation of cross-pipes throughout
causeway to facilitate hydrological exchange between north and south sides.
Response: As reported to you at the October 97 perm/t meeting In
Raleigh, the cost of bridging the entire wetland at Salmon Creek will
result in additional expenditures of $5.5 million*. Since the total project
cost (as proposed) Is estimated to be $99.7 million, spanning the entire
wetland system would bring the total project cost to $97.2 million, or an
Increase of 47 % above projected costs. Obviously, the Department feels
that such expenditure Is Impracticable given the benefits to be derived, a
projected savings of f/- 9.5 acres of wetlands.
Since spanning the entire wetland Is presumably Impracticable (based
upon the Information provided above), the Department has considered
methods to restore hydrological continuity between the two sides of the
bottomland. Although Installing cross-pipes has been suggested, the
Department feels that this may not be the best way to achieve the
hydrological goal. Furthermore, maintenance problems associated with
keeping cross-pipes open over time and the added complication of
potential settling of the causeway, suggests that this method may be
Inherently unattractive.
*Note: Mitigation costs not added, plans are to recommend mitigation at existing mitigation site

Page 5
November 27, 1996
Mr. Bell
The Department is willing to propose the Installation of a system of
open canals running parallel to the toe of the roadway fill on both sides of
the causeway. This open water canal system, would terminate short of
Salmon Creek; however the two canal segments on either side of the
creek would be connected via a single pipe culvert so that a hydrological
continuum would be maintained along the interfaces of both sides of the
wetland (north and south). The Identical canal and pipe configuration
would be employed on the east and west sides of Salmon Creek. There
would be no other outlets. In other words, the system would dead-end at
or near the wetland-upland boundaries east and west of the creek. (See
attached drawing)
1. What type of fill slopes are being used in wetland areas ?
Response: As a general rule, 2:1 fill slopes are used In wetland areas.
However, when 2:1 fill slope would require guardrail for public safety,
flatter fill slopes (3:1, 4:1, etc.) may result in equivalent wetland
encroachment because the guardrall section requires a wider shoulder
point-to-shoulder point dimension. In this project only 2:1 flit slopes, or
their equivalent will be used at wetland crossings.
Thank you for the time spent in the review of this project, both in the field and
during thoughtful consideration of the Department's attempts to be a full partner on
matters that relate to the environment. Please contact M. Randall Turner at (919) 482-
7977 if you need additional information or if you wish to discuss any issue further.
Si r ,
Franklin Vick, RE., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/mrt
Attachment
cc: Mr. Eric Galamb, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, WRC
Mr. David Moye, DCM
Mr. Ron'Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Howard Hall, FWS
Ms. Sara Winslow, DMF
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT
Mr. Marshall Clawson, P.E., NCDOT
Mr. Davidian Byrd, NCDOT
Mr. W.D. Johnson, NCDOT
Mr. R.M. Girolami, P.E., NCDOT
Mr. M. Randall Turner, NCDOT
f * 09/18/96 12:18 €1001
5 '
STATL of NC)RTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOUAUON
JAMES B-IHuNT JR.
GovER.uov _
DTVl$10N aF HIGKWAYS
P.0- Rox US
Eli abeth City. NO 27906-1405
Phone, [phone]
F= [phone]
September 18, "1996
G.a Uu D B. GAxFm JR,
SE=AEtY
MEMORANDUM TO.Wr. Mike Bell, Corps or Engineers (Washington)
Uff.-Edi; Galamb, Division of Water Quality (Raleigh)
Mr David Cox, Wildlife Resources Commission (Northside)
Mr. Howard Mall, Fish and Wildlife SLtMee (Raleigh) -
Mr. Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service (Beaufort)
Ms. Sara Winslow, Division of Marine Fisheries (Elizabeth City)
Mr. Teiry Moore, Division of Coastal Management (Washington)
Mr Davidian Byrd, NGDOT Design Services Unit (Raleigh)
Ms.Gail Grimes, PE.,Planning & Environmental Branch (Raleigh)
Mr Roy Girolami, PE-; NQUOT structure Design Unit (Raleigh)
Mr_ Marshall Clawson, PE., NCDOT Hydraulics Unit (Raleigh)
Mr_ Randy Wise, NCDOT Roadside Environmental Unit (Raleigh)
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, Jr., P. E., NCDOT Division 1 (Ahoskie)
Mr_ J. R. Pope, P. F-, NCDQT division 4 (Ahoslae)
FROM: 4<1
M. Randall Tumer Division Environmental Cheer
Planning & Environmental Branch-Division 1
SUBJECT Minutes from Interagency Field Review of the Proposed Widening
of US 17 from East of SR 1 504 to West of Chowan R1ver= Bertle
County; TIP No. R-2404 B & G; state Project No_ 8.019001T
As a result of the field review of the subject project, which occurred on August
21, 19915, numerous questions and/or conoerns were raised by one or more of the
alteriding state and federal agencies. These issues are reiterated below.
This memo is being sent to attendees (and invitees who did not attend), in an
attempt to insure that issues reiterated below are accurate representations of the
questions/concems raised during the field review Should the information be in error
due to inaccuracy or ommission, please notify me limmediate_ly by phone or Tax
All attendees were provided with a copy of the plan sheets for the subject
project It is requested that, should additional quesfions or ooncems arise following a
period of study and review of these plan sheets, they should be communicated to me
within 10 days of receipt of this memo (on or before September 30, 1996). .

r 09/18/96 12:19 [a 002
w?
Page 2
September 18, 1996
Agency Questions/Concerns
ter C?ual!'iy
`• curie and gutter sections, why can't storm ter be discharged into dtt - #e?
ZzR.tff? into wetlands ?
+ Can scupper discharge of water at Salmon Creek be eliminated in favor of
discharge into basins located east andfor west 6f bridge ?
+ From the standpoint of water quality concerns, why can't a shoulder section be
used at Salmon Greek crossing, in lieu of curb and gutter section ?
Where opportunity presents itself, stormwater should always be directed to adjacent
wetland rather than to live stream. • Discharge oin ed where
direct stream discharges can be avoided. - S
LUUU' ree
Can bridge at Salmon Greek be built with two span '
spans to eliminate one tier of structures from the stream channel ?
Fish and ildiife 'Jig
+ When old structure is removed can the unnecessary abutment fills be removed to
allow more horizontal distance for animal movements between new bridge
abutments and stream channel ?
+ In-stream construction moratorium will be enforced between February 'l6 and
September 30 of arty year at Salmon Creek
Can bridge at Salmon Greek be built with two spans instead of the proposed three
spans to eliminate one tier of structures from the stream channel ?
Avoidance/Minlimftation
Why can't bridge be shifted north at Salmon Creek to take advantage of upland in
northeast quadrant ?
If bridge is shred north (at Salmon Creek), bridge length on east side of creek
should be extended to Station 79+37.84 to maximize avoidanceiminl=ation efforts
on east side of Salmon Creek
• At wetland site 3, why does alignment impact more wetland on south side than on
north side ? Wetland is higher quality on south side-
What is proposed median width of roadway ?
What clearing method will be used on project ?
Consideration must be given to spanning of entire Salmon Creek wetland- If not
practicable, consideration must be given to installation of cross-pipes throughout
causeway to facTltate hydrological exchange between north and south sides of
wetland-
What of fill slopes are being used in %vetland areas ?
Thank you for your prompt attention to the requests made in paragraphs
2 and 3 on 'page I.
cc: Mr H. Franklin Vlck, P. E., Planning & Environmental Branch
Mr. D. R Conner, P.E., Division (1) Engineer
07/23/96 12:55
host-ir Fax Note
7
671 oars 7XV-1e Wages
J ??yy
?
T. F.. • / V/S tiiqi?
CoJaePt Cb_
Phone Phone n
Faxa Rix DEP U IN,71 OF TPUNSPORTATION-

JAMES B- Horn= JP.
GOVEPNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
E#_O. Sox 1405
E -Mbeth t y, NC. 2791161405
Phorre: ($15) 331-4737
F= (Sig) 331.4739
July 23, 1996
a 001
GARLwD B_ CkRR= jR
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Milo: Boll; Carps of Engineers Washington)
Mr. i sic G212mb, Division of Environmenrai Management (Paieigh)
Mr C-2vid Cox Wildlife Resources Commission (Northside)
Messrs. Howard Hall & Kevin Moody: Fish and Wildrife Service (Raleigh)
Mr. Ro.I.Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service (Beaufort)
Ms. Sari Winslow, Division of Marine Fishsries (Elizabeth City)
Mr_ Ter Moore, Division of Coastal Management (Washing,.on)
Mr. Rlch'ard Watis, Division of Coastal Management (ETlzabeth City)
Mr. Davidlin Byrd, NGDOT Design Services Unit (Raleigh)
Mr. Sc= S!evins, NG©OT Design Services Unit Raleigh)
Me. Gail Grimes, RE., Planning & Environmental Branch (Raleigh)
Mr Roy Glrelaml; P .G., NCDOT Structure Deslon Unit (Raleigh)
Mr. Marshall Clawson, P.E., NCDOT Hydraulics Unit (Raleigh)
Mr. Randy Wise, NCDCT Roadside Environmental Unit (Raleigh)
Mr. G. E Lassiter, JL, F .F-, NQUOT Division 1 (Ahoskie)
Mr. J_ R_ Pope, RE., NCDOT Division 1 (Al czkie)
Mr_ T E Srite, NCDOT Dhftlon 1 (Elizabeth City)
Mr. John Wadsworth, FHWA (Raleigh)
FROM- M_ Randall Turner, Division Environmental OM, cer
Planning a Environmental Branch-Division 1
SUBJIrC`T: Interagency Feld Ravlevvs of: 1[1) Proposed widening o#'tJS-17 in Bettie
County from east of SR 15()4 to west of Chowaii River, R-24034 S & C;
(2) Proposed Elizabeth City By--pass from south of SR 1140 to US 17-
158 north of Elisabeth City, Pasquotank County, R-2615
The Meragency field reviews for the subject projects will be held on August 21-
22, 1096. The first meeting (R-241:348 & C) voll start at 10-:30 A, M. on August 21st at
the NOWRC Boat Ramp on the east sine of the Chowan River. 1 he Elizabeth City Sy-
-pass meating will begirt at 08.30 on August 22nd at the Holiday Inn paridng lot in
Elizabeth City_
urge everyone to and. It is essential that ail agency c oncems are
!denfified so that attempts can be made to addrem These concerns prior to Section 404
and LAMA permit application submittals.
cc: - H. Franklin Vick P _F_, NCDOT Planning & Fnvironmenial Branch
M
RIw PLPoJs
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1-B For Symbology
u?
,>or
mu
vw 1fA uv ?!. uu =`
ASKEWLLE
4"
NO PR(?JEC ?uv \ uu 4y
4ANDSOR BEGIN PROJECT
SKETCH MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF
STATE PROJECT 6.019001T
SHIPPING POINT: WINDSOR
LOCATION: US 17 FROM EAST OF NC 45
TO WEST OF *rHE CHOWAN RIVER
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, CURB AND GUTTER, STRUCTURE,
PAVING, THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
iy -Y5- STA. 4+00.000
`YS ?? p0 -Y5- STA. 4+46.239 LB _
`?'F ^X -YS-REV STA. 4+46.239 LA)
i o o c?
a SRO o 0 c
N go114 °o o 0 16A
0)
rJeJ.- X /?
IJ?
e (J
pa NN-
r
Ott ??.
0
i
00
N
I MIDWAY
i
y
i
i
to vn?? a?yo STA. 60+62.736 -L-
N 255,697.780
E 809,369.921
A nr.Al 17rn r.WMINATFSI
STATE OF i J_RTH CAROLINA
DIVISION 017 HIGHWAYS
PLAN AND PROM ILE OF PROPOSED
STATE HIGHWAY
BERTIE COUNTY
tVa . \ O
nz2
11
N :. 10 SSA
z ? END STRUCTURE
STA. 78+77.071 -L-REV
m _.
BEGIN STRUCTURE
STA. 78+19.071 -L-REV
STA. 72+25.463 -L- (LB)
STA. 72+25.463 -L-REV (LA)
ATE PROJECT 6.019001T
STA. 123+11.204 -L-REV (LB )=
STA. 84-80.000 -L-REV (LA)
00
0
cl
o
O
-F
L
P
18 JS ?T

e
-_
12
-L-REV 13 S
R?k, 14
HIGHWAY 15
-_ 16
17

STA. 10+00.000 -L-REV END STATE PROJECT 6.019001
N 256,278.083
E 815,556.693
(LOCALIZED COORDINATES)
NOTE: BEGINNING GRID COORDINATES ARE BASED ON GPS MON. R-2404-4
AS ESTABLISHED BY JOYNER, KEENY AND ASSOCIATES: N 253679.300 M
E 602605.972 M
METHOD OF CLEARING III THE BEARING AND GROUND DISTANCE FROM "R-2404-4" TO -L- STA. 10+00.000 (R-2404B)
(EXCEPT IN WETLANDS) IS S 83'-31'-45.46" E, 1263.963 M
COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 0.99996845
..........................................
PRELWINARY PLANS
:DO NOT US. FCR CONSTRUCTION;
:............ .............................. .
X71 1
DESIGN DATA
ADT (1994) = 6,100
ADT (2020) = 14,800
DHV = 10%
D = 60%
T = 17% (12% TTST
+ 5% DUALS)
V = 100 km/h RURAL
= 80 km/h URBAN
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY STATE PROJECT = 6.310 KM
LENGTH OF STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT = 0.058 KM
TOTAL LENGTH OF STATE PROJECT 6.019001T = 6.368 KM
Prepared In the Office of*
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
3717 NATIONAL DRIVE, SUITE 107
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
1095 I&MC STANDARDS SPBCLFICA27ON
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: 0 9'l 7 T.R._ REID-P.E..
- - axaracr krvdikm-
LEMNG DATE: JUNE 17-1997 D.L. KOONS _ _._-_
PRO1ECf DBSIGN BNGD'IR88
NCDOT CONTACT. MR. C.H_ CASEY, P .E. DRAPGN SBRVICSS - NNGnUARMG MORDIMiTOR
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER DIVISION O.P' HIUHT7AYn•
RICHARD SCARCE & ASSOCIATE§STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

iF SEAL rt
{ 6962 ? c

P.S. 1g..........
GP p•
as
ROADWAY DESIGN siera:rc6rgrr suimx_ ca _ __
6IOFFAT' & NICHOL, DEP.RRTMF,NT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERS Ap.. HEssi6v,,? . FEDERAL lFGHFAY ADMINISTRATION
f4 SEAL t
t 15869 j

P.B. T R ya

5IGNATUl1B. APPEOY m lox
mPavrotr emr-157Aime ma
-___
GRAPHIC SCALES
10 5 0 10 20
X11 X11 ?:
PLANS
10 5 0 10 20
II?III
PROFILR (ROMLONTAL)
1 0 2 4
311111 va?
PROPD:E (VEIMCAL)
ALL DIMENSIONS IN THESE
PLANS ARE IN METERS AND
/OR MILLIMETERS UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
6.019001 T
N C 1
_
i 1E Px01. NO f '01 NO
6 019001T IIYSC01YfI0N -
E
_
6.019003T R/W, UTILIT'
yhq-)"? "0
T, c ? ?j c
- ^?.,,.m".??.-..,?.:'h... _.. __...,??,..?,? ...«.?..._u..,».y,...,..s,,.aaxP?.rt..an«,w",?s«s?' '•'y?. sa ??-u- m?;. Win. m.??,yk?.??Ao;i?'
coN7?? I z II, a (? ?`?
1
8 it I11,I I W. H. SHUMAKER mI
0' 1 m If II' DB 416 PG. 304 -
m 1 111 Iy 0 I
?- - N
' 0
III 1 15FD
q it
I I II I 0000 -a?^'?
1 11 I?
1 s oo SOIL I
11 It
EIP
+61.646 N72'I8'4fi'E 63.622 -
-
II I
Z I Ill 58.944 EIP N73-06'51 -E
U 14.063
9.2 SO II I
OIj Iit
II 1 Q
+7u°I I Il; I
-2.B SOIt,_
`I 0 S
,a?l III ?o?
1 II
L ?N 1151 :• W 50?0 375 CONI 2O
00
It 0 00 +
39+65.0 CO
19.500
11 Ili ?o?j (63.98')
?? II III \0 +fi9.45fi-L?
/ II 111 ?' 15.179 'y
O
CARROLL G. MILLER
DB 503 PG. 683

4!1.234 -- --F ;
N7306'50'E Ion
? Zm
EIP
e
+
BEGIN PROJECT 6.019001T Nb
STA. 60+62.736 -L- 7
N 255,697.780
E 809,369.921
? -
2
O
WEYERHAEUSER CO., MIVTON #2
D8 616 PG. 322
J
SEE DITCH DETAIL 1 2
EST 30 TONS CLASS B RIP RAP a O
EST 40 m2 FILTER FABRIC ' O
+
+65.0
25.000
(82.02') +78.0
19.ooo
(62.34') O f (V
Go
+88
.? a +78.0 ITZ
?' I; \ (49'801 lye
(LOCALIZED COORDINATES o e Y1.
v ) 1 +65.? PDE +78.0
11 0 Ili l o l p l m o 15.240 w- -- 4 15.24(
II IIN It \ - q? -(sD.OD') (so.oc
/ Ilo -E- -E- - E ------yz- E 750 C&G - - E F
U '\ \ CI r r4'w .. .C .. n;n ^ '6r0 DR tit 8 + z n ti 15.2 X375 C°NC 450 RCP N CONC hz soN1REMauE 450 RCP CB
I, C
---- ..._ -'L-- 1
._.___.? ______._¢.r __L a
f N72'-37'-51.0"E
r, C14
M2 CUF'0 _.-. - r- f - 500 iUG REMOVE 375 CONC"' REMOVE =14 375 CONC
375 CONC _ _
1 _ 375 CONIC 375 RCP .
375 cawc $.q DR _
- - - - - CB, -- - 610 DR
BST s
-_-- -------- __ ^?° _
?/% ?_? Exlg a n I-Y - - 750 C&G --
(? I/•' +54.709-L- / / +62.7 F o"j-- - I I F
\ ?'\ X00\ III o/?\15,240 BST / SOIL w / 15.240 E-E- I _E -E -E --
Y T l a l
(50.00" Ixl v
_ 572'37'51'W_
62.789
0
FRANCES B. TAYLOR
OB 473 PC. 405
+88.8 a PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
8.000 N
(59.06') $1
?- E- -E
ICI ?- ?-
6.0 D
REMOVE 375 COPIC 3 750 RCP -.---
75 CONC

.NO
FROJ.REFERENCE .. SHEETNO. -
.
_
_
R 2404-6
:
z _ 4
R
I HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
? - - N
R
- E . ENGINEER
ARO`
1
C CARp4

hdjgMOFFATT &NICNO1
"
` °?
?
eti
o''kv
? c o4' EESS7p"•,?ky s

?
L
,
w,ow, " w ?
.aa
" rd
SEAL'} ij4
SEA
'
15869 ( 1 6982
t

CONSL_ REV.
R/W REV.

O
+

H

(n

I
,o
o?

f U
+87.0 1-
172 8) I; •I
1 <
+51s +67.0 r
,n +s
0 22.000 1).240
' .
?,'y?ti 22,

(72.18
) 1.19,00')
•, (7;
DEP
(TRd
E i +9
.
•
C13 (2.14) 15.
-• E ••- PDE F (5C

15-40 COLLAR N
US 17 B.9 BSB'

- 0
LO U
O
r

N
_-- ___________

5
-
O
.-

(0
=
,
COLL
375 CONIC
ARII
REMOVE 375 CONC _

0
6 CB 300 RCP
R
' CB EXTRA "
DEPTH CB
(2
11)
.
r z=vi .. Rq
Ex6
.. .N .. .. r. _ .
L 750 RI
E- -E
- _p -- F
?iP750 RC
Lc)
?
40 0 va +75 +90.0
S2 t c?? I up III °?/ \? 4 ._ / I 1 I o I + .
NI° 15.240 0
1,vc so° ?Ii v6?1 -- -f =1 I , I PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE 27.0G0 0
(5000)
?SVI II u ii' S°ty ?x- + I I 4 (50.007 23000
13O (50.C0') +89.8
II I // ?/ U2 +6.7 I I I (75.46') 23.00° ~
w
J II II?.? ??p'?? ? I N i> 21.000 1 I (75.46')
W
-- 83.617-Y4 (68'900 ROBERT E. PERRY, JR. EST - TONS`CL B RIP RAP .P +75.6
Isern au'a 10 m I g I I IW EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC 7 6
+83946 -Y4- De 655 Pc 922 (j54
(40') U)
--- of l •? _ B I I n 47.000 /
J o I DB 646 PG 567 N o 1.0 m BASE TAIL DITCH 54so
lOYllII I 12180 DB 645 PG 100 m SEE DITCH DETAIL 2 t
00
to I I? °°h (40'> G. F. PERRY, HEIRS 0
I I EST 65 m3 DDE-( +71.0 . o N
I° I? Mh ) CCNC U9 362 PG 319 "o N 1 01 I zi;
0
M 000
INI II If -m? °m o
?
I.
- - II III I o \ 0
-I ?1 N a ? ROBERT E. PERRY, SR. 0 tsvo ?
---- - ca -- C' 11 ll. o h tsro G. F. PERRY, HEIRS 0
Illu u DB 426 PG. 190 0
0 DB 382 PC 489
a 000
N?I? I?I? ji! a 1 a
00
tsF3 ? II II? °
I. 0 2sFO
?-•-? II II ?I z I
_I II III N6T1 '-EE ?? _'_9- ,07.E
0 8.282
a -- ?' 73.979-Y4-t0 COA
"
I Iu u ?o ? I?
0 a _
?II " IIi 2so n u
I ??ii '= II:I
lilt 0 ?J WIj
I III l I o
? I o
I Iii °i"I? ° ?
ROBERT E. PERRY, SR
DB 382 PG 484
32.810 _ L_F-
N72'37'50""
48,006 _
N72'37'5I E
I
48.010 _
N72'37'51"E IP
O (190.29
WILLIAM M. FREEMAN
DB 656 PG 776
_ 64,365 _
52.39'01'E
p; 53.000 0 1SBKq
I 0 (173.88'
I 00
6
HENRY D. EVANS
DB 699 Ire 987 0
1 , L-_? I (-f 63.634
................................
PRELIMINARY PLANS
:DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
:..................................................
FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 24.
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2
0 20 40
1:500
_,...,-,.,--•--- ?...,,a,.«? ? °"'".`_ ?-.=? i? ., uSliio4ti?w®wti4°'ec'*41??11?

REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
-- -R-2404C 5
RI HIGHWAY DESIGN S
HEN
_ ENGINEER G NEER
111 '
Q46(OFPATf&MCBOL
0?hy
''
2° F5sf0
?

I
?
n s
RTH CAR
J }4? SEAL a SEAL c
101. IO
e ? 15868 ?
?,
F (( 6962 ? ?
II
y1
°
E
'?
.NGINEE:
t :
r e
., C+
?INE
COJST. REV,
__.. "a'R. RE?,r'
nuu,,,p4 ; b N• 5°P0
anon
R/W REV.
I
EIP VIP J ~ x I
fi39',5 -- 83.857 _
EIPiI4- N7',7 6 ---Q-- N7}'16'09•E +;1r4 ECIM
i?'` . '48'E I v?' V S !
I W-ti?ti?''iirtiir ' O ..;ll
2
'X LT O
[i.] -. 0 I x p h
? - WEYERHAEUSER CO., MINTON #2
DB 616 PG. 322
tiI 3 +
s? REMOVE !k RESET 2000 ox
O &I ?\ (DO
A wh' CHAIN LINK FENCE & 3SBW- 8? }
sMnBUS \ JERRY D. SARY 12
C} " "
I£ p r'u:", ^ Q
WEYERHAEUSER CO., MINTON #2 r \ D3 673 PG 126
OB 616 Pc. 322 w DST \ p p EST 1.8 TONS CL B RIP RAP U)
p N O HENRY L. FREEMAN + m2 FILTER FABRIC X
s ' + DB 558 PG. 659 Lo EST 5.9 W
O 1
• + \'?1 ?I£. • Lc) I +92.0 (o +00.0 +40.0 + .D Z i
(o 8
1 00 J ?.
1 1 1 1 +92.0 21.500 21.500 21.500 D
[0 I f?1 1 ?_ ??. 70.54' (7
1SBKBUS 15.240 ( )
I 0 I - \ {50.( .. n I 1,, ._ 4r'4 4 fiX T OWER EASEM
P ENT OA _
+44 Ir 'E• +000- E-- -
+00.0 CONG. N°Z 16.000 se EC4NC - 1640 - 00 +BO.o -- - - 25.240 PROP. SLOPE STAKE
I - 15h1D a - _ _ .. E i, EASEMENT. ?- Q - E I a +80.5 200x450 ?fi 20.000 .500
721$, `x. fi J i (ABA LINE
21
22.000 ,,EXIST POWER - - - - r E
'
ue +16.9 _ --o 2(
20. 0 }-.,_ ._-E _!_yl
~ T 10x450 200.450 + .5 ? ;N 6`,.62 70.54) E p {5Q00E_
e'2 O I
( +40.0 00 N 82 .34 'p E "C,7+RB 6662) (59.06;!1 CURB CURB (: E ------- Ul-'---- _ • N'
19.00 (6 410 sl CI - v IT GR (59Aa') I- r EEISr
OR ai' -- E- --' p
19.000') ( •E -?- 1-_"- E ( E F
F _
- s? - - ?E.34 _-E -• - --E - 1 f R OVE- ' DI -31C C 1W RAIL ??
E
RCPCB
_Exu!IST__ _ -4.0 Rr 1375 R ?i. DR 150 cOt1 cUR 15.0 D _..- 5 -s cu 15.0 N
so `
---RW ORCP t
52 COLLAR 1 ri w=wc ?h ^ w w n r 1--- --
C6 - - 375 CONC 88 OR 69 CR O(l B r
/
US 17 88 BS
375 colvc 1= EXTRA pEPTH _REMDVE._,-., -_Z-_--
40 --
m -16d,)-.-_: -_; - - -
- --- -------- - ?- U E • ?----? - - RETA IIIm
N
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N72'-37'-51.0"E
I K US 17 8.9 BST
-.._ REMOVE L-. y ... -
15.240
- TEE T
600 RCP EE --- -- 7EE= -3 1 =-- --- 375 CONCi r 1:. COLLAR 450 RCP -
__ 5 X FtrDEPTH I EMOVE 5 1 ),c
-_ - -
RE?O.V?} - - 450 RCP J7s coN? M ? 450 RCP' CB (1.82 ? J7 n r REMOVE 375 CAN] ,,.,.-,?,,,•,,,?u.*,?/ti R - - - --
- - -_ yiy-.yr6 pu.!?.... AC.:+.+'.C?? r^v^ti_?.+h.4^t r^w`?r^L
450 RCP so i 450 RCP == DRI - - -
a7sicoNq- B I
f _
EI y
RCP 1300 RCP __. E _--¢'? fl - - -? -?- -' -F EI 1 -- -- E
00 RCP 6. R 1300 t
a r
. r.-... . - OE + I - + tp
TEE 6.0 DR I r30e? RCR ^ 13 _ _ _ .. 750 C&G P DI : I I . IE
6.0?R EP 1375 RCP -F - EP---- 7?1•DI mEiP I I E -- - E E
+95.0 G,9 +02.0.
EXIST R/?; I Cb ' eIP----DI I I E DI E 15.240 15.240
IF -7DI ° E E-; E--N- -- Ec45 to I ( ?? (50.00') (50.00') PROP.CS_OPE STAKE LINE I ; 20.000 6+00.0
') O
+
I ?I D5 u Ial q I ml" I a o NO WARP C&G TO ?T J PIN 61IN 0.2% GUTTER Z
E E 16/ IVµ'8.8 +23.8 15 h0 I Ipd' ` hI I I `? m
O 000 GRADE STA. 65+20 T Q ?Tfy::'6G+76 LT & T
Ig 5.za. E 300 RC 20.. DO (50.00) I I " Y Up I" I I I ! m `"I 20
I?(5o.D0' U '! sssz' I I I O. II I i 1 aIJ I I uv / DST (65
N +oz.o j I I w
1 •
1218,6 b I'.- 0 I m I IJ1 I 00
-. I ! RTR I I 1 1 2
(20.000 sz
a F? I ISBKO I 1SM1L0 20(65.0.62') I I y (n
I ?
sFO I
I ,.' a VN I L
C3 0
y° o I _ 0
, III I III I LIJ
Z ?G I.?. 0. I II I m Y .. II II IT, ISBKO } }a'•i-dh-r.^.ti,±?t? I li W
`°°° t L 0 9 0 I m- o I I !/ ..r,vI I III
LLI
W 0) I m 1 I i° 150 U)
1(0 v I I ° I _x
IIJJ?L
?Iu 0 :I I I.. °I I f "'s -? 14 I i i 11JI
u=i 0 1 I I s tiI" la I I 16
Bno - DEC f?? s ? N B TTIE R. DOMECQ
f ?lu.
COWAND
W ,6 o ; 9 s De 59 PG. 369 aIJ toi "I THOMAS D. 1 9
? t ?? p
0 `___I A I I q I PG. 1
462 sas PG. 689
6 n O BETTIE R. DOMECQ I I W J I I 7, DB DD
D6 519 PG. 369
DENNIS ? s m
O 4 I I ??° L1 {
? I I 8 R. BROOKS
f . CgCg ANS I 2 I I I r "Im i i ` pI
DB DB 566 628 PG PG 6591 62 I Is.w,?? f-1
D
599 PG`B7
I; l I y `?
32.873 250 CSf L 1;
.. JJ
a S77'C6'32'W T A 13 I I
I m u I I
LUDIE BROOKS I C. D. BYRUM I I
„ DB 503 PG 617 I I o DB 633 PG 399 I I I
C/0 DENNIS R. BROOKS I 15
GEORGE C. COWAND PRELIMINARY PLANS
I DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
40,476
UP UB 536 PG. :573
P 6760310"W -b I uIm :...................................
E"
I I I
..............
I I m I
I I I 1
39.180 -- EIP
N75'19'S0"E 0 20 40
FOR -L- PROFLE SEE SHEET 24.
I __ .1:500

NOTE: AFTER EXISTING CULVERT HAS BEEN CLEANED OF SEDIMENT,
?- IT SHOULD BE INSPECTED BY NCDOT PERSONNEL TO ASCERTAIN
- cr -nl0A1 INTCr,RITY AND SUITABILITY FOR RETENTION.
141 ?'Bx
c3?(, 4SO
6 H
?S\J.
W
S ;
-- '('
• L1 Ec?""
SOIL 1
F II
I
W I
Z
i
J
= II
U
- --
Q +00.0 f
18.000 o I
(59.06')+ y I 2000 CHL bE3SBW
2000 CHL & 3SBW _ GAIE
x 2sr. # x ;300 RCP /. 66.
DR
WOODS
REMOVE & RESET 2000
CHAIN LINK FENCES,
GATE & 3SBW
O
O
00
(01
E -- --
C)
WEYERHAEUSER CO., MINTON # 2
DD 6'6 I'G. 322
PROP. SL:)PE STAKE LINE

ItA
COhST._REV. rR. 8v0a`0 o,4Rp N, S
A 7 R/YI REV.----
?ll ` U lc?_ wv?
LT BK
5 a
o 4D---->-
ros9b609, 1 1 s 8K 0
60? s , I CDxr
N• +00.0 ! CONC
I OW (11155') 0 l\ 8°08 00000
p
? WNTLAND 0)
Fo r- CONC Oy +OO.D
o }10.0 l I }96.0 7.000
iY
X11 \ .. o.' 34.000 1 1 '` 2'3 26.000 . (88.58
1 .Om BASE LATERAL DITCH (111.55') I 1 (85.x-) .
SEE DITCH DETAIL 4 ;' ° IZI WILLIS A. BASS
p I \ \ +60.0 O p n +11. 1`I 0 DB 579 PG. 343 a
p \ 29.000 +80.0 +02.0 25.000°0 o I ° 1 U +91.0 91.0
+ (95.14' ) 29.000 82.02op, IrI 15.240 6.DOD
p I +40.0 \\` \(95.14') - (82 ) ME +15.0 o I i (50.00') (85.30'
II
82DO0zo)
zS.ooD
t !I
(82.07) I TD .. - --(- t-E-- ...- -- --E-- -- -- -- -
q. I +:2.0 +80.0
.0 E?"?=~ _16'54' 4 ('604 9000
') ' .W go.ID
.000
E? ------ 375 CSSN/ELBOWS +02.0 - ' 1200 ('-f:-- -- _E I'a
5.62
v -- F ,, - - - - - -?_? RLP I F C EXIST. R/W F LG
MELT -? `
_-CB PROP, GUARDRAIL CB B 37
15 S40 CB 450 c cM \-750 C&G-ra - - - - _ - - __-_-_ a_-
rc
ro '0 -----------
- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEE
450
US 17 9.9 BST
P7 15.2 r TEE _ 1,- - 0--- i -- - ff0 RE
--------- ------------- - -
REM
-- - T ... 450 CONC 450 RCP 48o c0ou0 CB 600 1
C8 ..
T-'5s'° 375 CONCr, T 375 RCP- i7sMC0DNt 5 aNC REMOVE 375 RCP
50' ! 0DR y .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Pvt. .. 0 &G 6119R OR
--- CB E60
6. `300 RCP 6.0 DR I 1 6. D - 6 - - - --? __ --------'- - ------ OP 6 ROE R, -ffL
sTr DIG I _300
I fqw -
F E- 1 --E-- ; E o E E-. tE E +409 I°C
+07.1 +09.0 0.000 20.(100 +73 35 2 0 RC
20.0 +09.0 I ?I 65.132' "
03.0 +(
1811 18.000 50
1 ) I ?I 1.240 o . n
(59.46j)G4/ +68.2 $ k 13, I : 1 300 RCP +I (59.06') (65.62')'+ 2a
40
: I I .00') +73.35 15.2
k 1s.coo PROP. SLOP: STAKE LINE 22.D a4 81 (5
Q i S F D // I l l h 1 (72.18) ° I • "I I I 25.000 o it 50.00') (71
Z (59.06' ti I n I h. I I. m I: 9 1 1 (82.02') 0 25 000 ( z. i BOP7
'j 1 S F 0 I I + I I (82.02 0.5 DEEP
C=31 w ! 1 1 1' 0o I I o0
F
I I/
LLJ
W 0 ! wl 1 1 _?O w ?_ p I`II 1 ow I w
08
In p -1? /1 t a o 1 w 3? Ia n to $ 0 1 SSK 0 wo
16 QW °?/ a o a v 1." 1 S F D 0 I O ° EST 30 TONS CL I
r
Q
H-
(n
W
Z
J
2
U
E-
Q
?-3 s cnuc oS40 REMOVEw DI a
---- - 0
SPECIAL COLLAR _ us 17 a BST JB
+ .9 0
17.2108 E RETAIN a
NU0 ------ - - - - - - - - - - --
SPECIAL +23sew JB
5JB 507E 95T ENO EL OWP GARDRAIL 15.:
240
J& \`n (50.00) O/r t, (50
bO<A? •?
y ±:11_J E a Z
0 ?a
00 27.000 \
' (88.58') W8TT"WD n ~
43') 40 ? \ +89.0 IW
PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
-
-- R-24040 - - 6
I
TR
? HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
.
?
? ENGINEER ENGINEER

?IIMOFFATT&NLCHOs ?off fss oM??tiy''..
-G"• — tea" a SEAL ? SEAL `
15869 8982
42.000 23 34.000 f i \3114 A3') _
F (111.55') (11156' j I ?k (n
kWILLIS A. BASS W
` DB 579 PG. 343 W
w +63.0. W
(193.5
59.000
0.6 BOTTOM
0.2 Weer
?. r.6 roP EST 4.5 TONS CL. B RIP RAP
s\'g EST 14.2 m2 FILTER FABRIC
+56.0 As a
(213 25)
WOODS
W - / 1 I 5 ° W J
THOMAS D. COWAND 0 a ' " C a EST 63.6 m2 FILTER F RIC
W
DB asz PG.1 1 9 sF D I? i 1qtI d n p 19 20 1 DEC 0
DB 62 PG. 689 1 I PY N - o ro 1 1 °tl DECK 1.0 BASE TAIL DITCH
649 ,
OQ I iw ^ a 0 0 m DEBORAH LASKY \J I of S DITCH DETAIL 3
I 1m1- ?$ O I' z o Ip WB 88E PG. 81 I I 0 T 100 m D.D.E.
I Ip I HTR 0 O ty
_j z
B 1171 0
I I a S
Ia1 0
II 0
1 PG. 227
l0 21 m RRY 3H. COWAND
DB 531 PG. 227
z°
d I 1/M L. E. BROWN JR. 5;
N I I L. E. BROWN, JR, I I 1/M ^?I p??
I I" DB 491 PC. 141
22 N?'
0 1`?I
l a I I? I I ?/c? ?` ;
z "Iv
101 I I i
I? I I I ..
1 I 1 FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 25.
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2
I I
.. ............................................: V a, 0
PRELIMINARY PLANS >s.
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
0 20 - 40
1:500,
_...,.. ?.. ..?,..,...w,u.?._,...wrw•rwu.m....ra ....n.wawi?+unx A_.?.IMIPM °LS"'.d"?ti"ud:u'?1i}?i

PFOJ. REFERENCE N0. _ SHEET
R -2404C 7 i
. - _ ??.TRI • HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
,
110FFA1TkNICHOL ?°?pfESSRO';kv:8 2? f lp4
?2y,% I.
=
e? N G I N
-EIGH. NO-
f a? SEAL\ aP SEAL`j
.8962 j
1 15969
"
1 \\ ? % CONST. REV. al•R. RE ,`
\ \ / / SILT BASIN NOTES: 1. REMOVE AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL FROM DISTURBED POND AND DAM i-
\ AREA. RESTORE TOPSOIL AFTER REMOVAL OF SILT BASIN.
\\ \\ / 2. EXCAVATE APPROX. 130 m3 BELOW ELEVATION 3.4 IN THE POND
\ \ / / O AREA FOR DAM CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL. RESTORE ORIGINAL
CONTOURS AFTER REMOVAL OF SILT BASIN.
CULTIVATED \\\ \\\ \ ill WILLIS A. BASS +14.0 CL. B RIP RAP
DB 579 PG. 343 TYPE A SILT BASIN 5.000r.
\\cA\ / J'246.06) 44
oA U ve Top 1 A
\ rV VA'4 / 1. ?.
\ \ \\ / / EST 4.5 TONS CL. B RIP RAP o.46TOP DEEP \ 1,\
p \ \ / EST 14.2 rte FILTER FABRIC 114A11 /'
O 1 A \ / / O 1Df +4640 \ . Q
+73.0 \ \ i'l
y0\i.
78. 000
p
6.000 \ \ \ TAIN / ..
11 o 17 +20.0 +89.0 7 (255y91',)
7(85.30') \ \ 4 CONC/
+00.0 +73.0 0 b
oQ
/-1.000 1 \? 0• 4--_ ROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE (18045') 6
00 CS ?? /C ep Z9
2.008Q i
0
86.58') E:t_ POWER EASENENi 7?72.1L E_ 900 W RISER / e . ??
-E-- -- -- --E-- -- ?7 - + g/ 8 5. 0?-E- too
?B5 02-- -- --E-- - +73.0
- --+25.463 PD5.800 / +89.0 +23.0 8000 151.84') E
97 '
59. 08.0006'0 159.06') E..nm--- f p
- f
_ ... '.' . k0 ?,?? ? 24 I
E- --E- --E- 0 +07.0 4
0 RCP 44) C)
\? 450 Y 2.000
- E oTTO r
Rw 1 _
wsi. D
------------ = = _-- E
- - - -- = - - _ _ ``` . /
60 10
_ Y
0 R 4 ?9 750 C&G - ?.9li1;''P E-.
5 WILLIS M. BASS 4
15.240 CB WO II ,. JB W/MH qao caN ` 653 PG. 95
a W P ' ` ?/? Sti?700 D8
- co -JoO'J u
50' _ - COVE _¢.'-_ , ,,`c- . _.. ` - -3-- -• ?___ __ 0`7///06 ,?
----- - - -
---'----------- -------- - b 16. N CJ d
-- ---------- 0 U
loo PVC 4s0 OVE +C;? 18 () © a
Is 1T 8.9 BST N72'-3T-51.0°E _L- of 7 t02 D
oO 71 (G4 u +2.8f------ a
:-7:1.a0 u,G REM203 ---
?ia 6---
5.24a r^ U/G 375 RCP N
I t+2461 EX. DEPTH
sott -- t Pv0+48?8\74 CHORDp- EZlsr. R/w - E- E --r375 RCP E _E- TEE E 5 RCP o GI
+00.i II J +07.463 E-•._ \
? 23.0 s.ODD PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE 5.240 +43.0 59.06') N? 50.00') 1 J5.40) +480
8 pD RC'A ?
.000 \ \ (50.00' ' 19.00 C ?_' \ e? 1 V
\ .
59.06') 0.000 D/TC
+07.463 IT
7(65.62) +70.0\ ?..:::: A \ w
(0 +43.0 (82.34 CB
t0 0.000 µ \ 1 19.000 ) +65.0 ' E • Ug C1
+ 23 65.62) \ \ (62.34' 1 5.240 ?. CB
I? \ 50.00') \ 9 . sp No Q•
Ln N O \ \ \`\??\ g
<V r + \ \ (50?DO) +70.0 ±06.162
F .RCp ?`. ?.
LIS A. BASS M \ \ 19.000 15.2,.0 N
N !n WIL n 1 ro \ 06.162 r,
r I- DB 579 PG.' 343 \ \ +65.0 (62.34') 150.00') 19.000 3j \ I'
U \ \ 19.00' (62.34')
N- W N 1'' \ (62.34) $ ON p s i .:
CUI TJVA.i'ED I K W \\ \\ ^ ' +29.000 FRq \\? \ \ s?ap`v. N
J J a \ \ 9.000 ? \?`? ° \ O' I
I I Va 1\ \\ - (J 162.34') e sIA
wooDs I \ ?,. \ CB 3jS °,w ro
1 \ ?/ '+88.162
15.24' C
. \ \ (50.00)
\ 1
? 1 1 cp
\ \
-L-REV CULTIVATED Q'
\ PI = 73+58.528 ^a A
PI - 73+ .726
p = -52'-59.7" 07 = 25'-52'-59.7" A
L = 430 Ts = 133.065
T 100. 7 Lc = 98.699 , LJ
R = 436.5 Rc = 400.000
Ls = 82.000 ?t
Bs = 5'-52'-22.1" v
U = 54.697 /
V = 27.361
SE = 0.06
R.O.= 27.3
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
...................................................
0. 20 40
FOR -L- AND -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 25. ?®m. ?--tea
1:500
r
_ _; ,. .<• .. _ _?.....:...??:.e„?,..?,?.??,?...?.?, -_? _. .:;?. Ire
1.
PROD. REFERENtME N0. SHEET NO.
'„ .. -- -
TRI R -2404C 6
HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS -
. rya ?
n N
N

O

O
N
O

A/1

p

-
w

?• cli
a N ?
a

N
a
w cv
/ o
N /
N W
0 ro
d ?
i o °
c? ENGINEER ENGINEER
?N"cARO(
%

SN SRO` II
?IHOPFdTf d NICHOL
'"• "°"" "°"" "fs3 y 3>
° SEAL a°D /?>''•
SEAL
(
1586 t 6982
9
1t
,,
,
`
OONST, REV. °'!;•R. i81?,o'° !qR0 N.
----------'--'- pnm,p` rnunur
A,/W FEV.
MARKED BEECH /,7 SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE
?? ? NFLATIr TO PROPOSED PAVEMENT ;
?• ? 1 ?A n I
1 CR ? CR ? ? ? qh0
I V
e
j i 24 1 THOMPSON & CO., INC. / ?eG
I f
!f f WILLIS M. BASS DB 599 PG. 437
1 , EST 0.9 TONS CL. B RIP PAP +
EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC u+? p
O f DB 653 Pc. 95 \ I 1w EST 0.9 CL. B RIP RAP / +
+I ?\ y ( EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC EST 0.9 TONS CL B RIP RAP
r ti ^ yc r
r- EST 0.9 CL. B RIP RAP \1
I EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC 4ph y" /
? I wN"a EST 4.2 m2 FILTER FABRIC
-?/ f` EST U.9 CL. B RIP RAP j=s
s? EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC
(n 1 SIF D O "??sT P WER EASE -- -- -- - .LS -E-- -- -- --E-- - -- --E° r- -
0 \•.
LtJ E - -6 E-- -.. .. ..
C --E-- --E-- -- -- -.j.E-- - - uEeTE-- -.r. -- 0 E-- -- -- --E -- -- --E-- E
--E -E - -- - - } mw.rv /T.S• GILLIAM, et al Z 00 O ---- '-? -t- - -- -- -- -- --
Z °oonaoo oo° o EST 0.9 CL. B RIP RAP h I( w , ! ,»a.j I 06 201 PG 41
t0 EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC (ti (\\uI r J
J \? r m + raw 08 590 PG 155
+ pr Y1?761////
PROP =
SLOPE STAKE L
.
V 1 " .. .. .. . .. .. .. !h.rE`>-r!! .. .. .. .. .. .. ^u??t_r!'tir^:.r!?uf! " . - - - - - - - - - -• - - - - 'u - - - v- - - - -' - - - -
l ?
RG 15.240
--- ------ _--,? -
..r?RO n GUARDRAIL - - - 1?? CO 5`\ F
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. - _==°? * moo= -
50240 \ yc 7dTLlND _ 'V 300 CS _ _ _ _ _ ?- - - - - 750-C&G 300 CS
---
-----cONC CUR CONC d
--- c00Wc w --- -- - ----
- •o ?
: sn.1 STAUCNRE
30 CS GRAD % 300 CS
400F ?S W ELBOWS vo LBO
Fl-
/ %!II
---- -- - -------°- --- - I MELT W]ELBOWS GRAU
F__---- US 17 8.9 DST I 6DR-,o;'-i^?---99.3-E _ % CBUS .eIDS N
I- CB CB - --------- --rr --CB - *a1YAfK1 - l\ D---;+960 -------------- / 6 NO c
+-r- 15.240 CON B°
15.240 500 U/ CB etsroT 0
------_-?.T--r.. __ - -R ?k IA
50 --- T =-
PC J+ \50.00' r//'?I ?XST. R • TftN N
S81'-29'-09.3"E
D
EXIST. ^/^ 1; • - - -
?? .,,r"''?" •-?--s--- ?----?---s--'?------?- --?----- R U AIL•? ?\ GCB
.. .. .. ?`
CB
- • .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .1 .. r.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ., .. `1' 77?R ii
B .. CB CB .. B• !
t-_____?\ \of\
375 RCP CB 450 RCP - - -- 0 CS WALBOWS
GRAU ffi W;RAU )m +30.0 , Al,
S
5450 CP 375 RCP 300 CS?W ELBOWS Sc 300 CS W EL \o. 50, c
\,MELT +75.0
--
------------°- , -- --------
/' ? 15.240 27.000 C 750 C&G 0 f (50.00' Yo ; jj, 96.0) o (50.00 8.00 0 F437u '--•--- --- F --?-- ---E -151?D? /?\\ \\ Ss 2 \' ` ?? I (88.58') F 550.9:)._----F 0)
F
S.'
r -E -? 15.240 15.240 15.240 15.240 15.240 T\
+35.0 _ ) O.p5E00' ?E _ 1.54.4) --- E_ +23.0 ` S E i h I E
?-" Ile Q 20.000 ±50.0 +68.5 E I +73.5 +96.0 +01.0 +38.0 +43.0 +75.0
Z (65.6225.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25000 PROP. SLOPE ST KE LINE lsaoo' \''?? saz74xn I k„ +75.o a o2D) Z
(62.02') (8202')/ (62.02') (82.02') ? (8202') (62.02') (82.02') +1 23.0 ) yc f.?' ° 27,000
I- EST 0.9 TON'S CL 8 RIP RAP 25.000 25.DOD - - E000 (fi6s6')
+96.0. EST 0.9 TON L. B RIP AP w
/ EST 3.3 n2 FILTER FABRIC (62.02') (62.02 a E-- W
W 1 h +30.0 ? EST 3.3 FILTER FABRIC =
V) +4 0.0 M2
EST 0.9 TONS CL. B RIP RAP
RIP RICAP (8202) ^ 39.000 + (Be69') 11 (11483)$ 1 . 26 U 70.5
EST EST 4.2 m2 FILTER FABRIC 23 EST 3.3 mON CL. BFA
d[
w S D (127.95') W
U) T 1.8 TONS CL B RIP RAP 2 FILTE
. 1 1 1 T.S. GILLIAM et al 01-1
m2 FILTER FABRIC
N EST 5.9 WILLIS A. BASS C.) DB 201 Pc 41
aN1` Q DB 590 PG 155

m

N C)

DRIVE S TA
7 7+60 RT.
+ Y .
E
4
1
1+00 +20 +40 +60 +80
OB 579 PG 343
D6 602 PG 37 EST 0.9 TONS CL. B RIP RAP
n? EST 3.3 m2 FILTER FABRIC
G? ? SEE DITCH DETAIL THIS SHEET
c

pn
PVI STA
= 1+60 0
R

It
w
L = =
0.000 m
+
K = .807 wo
n
--- ` "TS4.
o
0
W -1
iz, -1.10 X

VARIES 1.0 1.0 0.6
?•r
!i
NATURAL GROUND
3• DRIVE
I PgRIO 3.1
R
fs
r1
t DRIVE DITCH DES.
D
2+OD

. \ 1
DRIVE
PI = 1+20.832
A = 74'-30'-54"
L = 16.257
T = 9.508
R = 12.500
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 25.
DENOTES BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB
..................................... .
PRELIMINARY PLANS
:EO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION,
...................................................
0 20 40
1:500
__ J

o \pI? V
7g9M10p C¢E0.x"
aAti? /
LATERAL V DITCH PI - 80+ .935
SEE DITCH DETAIL 5 p -05'-25.5"
EST _ TONS CL B RIP RAP L 189
=
O EST _ m2 FILTER FABRIC T 97,1
} EST _ m3 D.D.E. :k- )1 1 R = 436.5
1Q co
_ WaTL9ND , _ 1
L2
J
Z --E ?
-L-REV
PI = 80+76.085
AT = 25'-05'-25.5"
Ts = 138.245
Lc = 121.060
Rc = 450.000
Ls = 76.000
Bs = 4'-50'-17.9"
U = 50.686

V = WOODS
25.351
SE = 0.06
R.O.= 25.3
PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
-- R-2404C- - 9
rD
•I fll HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
"9"1H 1CAR04'"'. R04
bdbgmo"LTT &NICHOL "=//)e,?t //":,?''., ,"'2oQ ¢ssi`0"''
{ SEAL SEAL Y
{
15869 6982
1 ? .
h
CONST. REV P
N.
R/W REV.
26
T. S. GILLIAM, et al
DB 201 PC. 41
DB 590 PG. 155
0.6 m BASE LATERAL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 7
EST _ TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST . m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST M3 D.D.E.-,
SPECIAL DITCH +75.1
SEE DITCH DETAIL 8 46.00
EST _ TONS CL B RIP RAP (lam
EST _ m2 FILTER FABRIC
SPECIAL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 6 v
+59.0 C
\ V ? ? ?• ?? ? 1 ? .. 26.30 II ?'
i °- 4 1 - Exlsr a0µ,?.R EnsEMEror ,. O + ,l O 7 (86.29') ••
J.
O c0 i N.. 1 .. .N /' w
m
.. ..
-C_oLLP
/ -
+++ d ©? `51? d 1 E
DRAIL- - ,E O U E' CURB FLARE l F Exst. a ? a _
?•. ..
F ,y SEE O - - ?
` ?xis\R ` -? E-- SHEET 2-1. RETAIN F.
-;y \ V 00 -- -- 5.240
ID 240 E-- --
so, o Us v? '?..._ ;? I C 6
.300 ? d 6 9 3 it
?• may-- I" ? {r'??? us ?'? ?
ay asr ?"?' '`?? _ ? _ PROP, SLOPE STAKE LINE i OCI
CB
S ,.. = .G
_._-..?-????-'"? '~ ?, H; ri 1s.2+o ?.•- y . r /
REMOVE PAVEMENT 750 C&G----
;6
' E ?// •?\ ?.'".?\"? CB®? `0--- F __ to00 U/0 REMOVE
---
-
.
,? \ E•?Si R ?\`?. •. 6.0 DR Y
- s
- 0
00
- -
- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
j \ 375 RCP =J75 `c _- -L- EV50Y u/c _---- 1 _ --------- 125mm CONC. ISLAND
+3784 -°-? - OHORD ?; •• - _- r_-_ '? - is F ?`\ i /°°°
'- --•------- _-
15.240 1 +81-.0. ?_ '• •
(50.00') yc / C \ 1 15.140 r
+37.84 ?? / .. .. .. .• :!?-"".,`v!`v^.";?"t'"•v!`"?` 750 C ?- - / +95.4 +10.9
27000 I\ (49.67') _ CHORD 18.600 20.000 \\F 1
TEMA D (88.58') \ ° ss li - ?? -6.0 OR 375 RCP
15.24L. - +13.84 MELT (61.02 (65.67) /?
(:50.00') ?.(so oo') +09.0 +14.0
+81.0 15.240 15.240 ° ./
j 28."000 (50.00') o (50.00')+34.9>1?1
0
O
00
Q
N
D.0
00
:?E V
r Q
i0' RAP;
t N
o ?
of
cO
z
) N
a
(91.86') / ---- E? - --_--- a15.240 Fl -0.6 m BASE LATERAL DITCH
?Y ?- PROP. UAG RDRAIL ?- _E, F~ /g (50.00') rv SEE DITCH DETAIL 7
I +86.0 -E- _E PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE +36.0 i EST 56 TONS CL. 8 RIP RAP
I/ s
/26.000 +60.0 47.000 EST _ m2 FILTER FABRIC
* (st.tls') War?WD `x\30.000 +09.0 +14.0 26 {15400') EST m3 D.D.E.
33.000 33.000
(108.27') (108.27') T. S. GILLAM, et al SPECIAL DITCH
zk ?k , EST 0.9 TONS CL. B RIP RAP DS 201 PG. 41 SEE DITCH DETAIL 8
/ EST 0.9 'TONS CL B RIP RAP EST 4.2 m2 FILTER FABRIC DB 590 PG. 155 EST _ TONS CL. B RIP RAP
° EST 4.2 m2 FILTER FABRIC \ EST _ m2 FILTER FABRIC -
WOODS
.................................................. .
PRELIMINARY PLANS
:DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
..................................................:
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 25. ?- i -
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2- 1:500

. PROd REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
._.
.. -
- - -R-2404C 10
__...
TR HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
" ENGINEER ENGINEER
.0 CAR ""I AR04
,,eeI[OFFA11'&
NICHOL
x s
1IY?
?fE?ia`•.ys?'•, 0
S2°? y???•
e x mm c[
w.uelox, rw cwoulw 4
SEAL KSEAL
15869 6982
?Q.
•
CONST. REV. - ??''?.?'R. tRC1?„°>° ?''.,RD N. Ns,.,
R/W REV. -
26
T. S. GILLAM, et al
DB 201 PG. 41
DB 590 PC. 155
0.6 m BASE LATERAL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 7
EST - TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST - m3 D.D.E.
WOODS SPECIAL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 8 ?? SPECIAL DITCH O
EST _ TONS CL. B RIP RAP SEE DITCH DETAIL 8 G
00 EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC +75.0 yD EST _ TONS CL. B RIP RAP +
+ 37.000 03 EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC OO WOODS ?
SPECIAL DITCH s (121.39')
M ,
00 O SEE DITCH DETAIL 9 37. 0 G O SEE SPECIAL DITCH DITCH DETAIL +
9 G
G EST - TONS CL B RIP RAP I:z
Q PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE ,+a. EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC (12.39'). EST _ TONS CL. A RIP RAP 00 -- -- -- -- -_ E-- ( j
. .,
h S . 0 R 0.5EMENTE
E5T•__ M2 FILTER FABRIC
-- -- - - - - '••rw':-- -- --E-- - -- --E-- -- -- -- -- -
Cn ._ .. .4 ?in+: E - - --1\- 00 E
--E- \ E- Z
- -
W -E Ex_?`RO1FPis;p_ -- --E --.--. - --E-- - - - - +63.0" PDE ` J
Z ` (8fi 2') ', - +18.0 U
J + .. .. 26.340 .. .. .. - ._ - - C)
= N F _ C (86.42') -------- ,.-__:--- Ezlsr. R/w
H EXIST. R N - - - „ „ - - - - -y:- ti ^,• - - - C - - - _ ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----
„
" RETAIN EXISTING DITCH 83+20 TO 84+60 F 1000 U/0 F F
-- ---- --------'-
' - - -------
F 15.a40 -__-_____-_._..-------------------------' 10o' u/G -- ---- _-- -- _ °--- -- _ - ------ _ -- -
-.--ro ______'C_- __- _ - co
5]' _ _ _ -
L _______________ ?? _ N
_
+ us 17 9,0 DST
• mN _
I RETAIN _ Ito - -- --------- _ - - - - ----- ' I'll
- o 750 C.P. - - - n .. .---
--
US 17 9.2 BST ? uX 15140
Lc 1
I
750
15.240 -L-REV RCP _ N -25'-z .z"E
I y_,Jn ?' T- I?. EKISi. R/W ?
o
+_ s 2-GI, EX DEPTH (2.97),-r+ 2-GI
..
..v1.`.5 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
UST. N
ft(W o? .. .. .. .. O N N N ? ? n
+ n --
?+ +
- -? DSO ?1 ''1 N
\ RCA 1 0
11 y
° O
0> 1 r' Z
--------------
C) ------ ------------- - C
C w ----------
Z ------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------------`- C W
C
W
W +00.0 \
W 38.000 \\ \ ` I I W
N (124'67) SPECIAL DITCH I t FOODS W
W SLOPE STAKE LINE SPECIAL DITCH SEE DITCH DETAIL 8 N
1n WOODS PROP, p`b EST _ TONS CL. B RIP RAP
SEE DITCH DETAIL 8 Xi, n EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST _ TONS CL. B RIP RAP 1( o,
EST _. m2 FILTER FABRIC \
?Y
EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
26 EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
T. S. GILLAM, et al
08 201 PG. 41
DB 590 PG. 155
PRELIMINARY PLANS
:00 NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
....... ............................................
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 26.
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:500

? y7
26 \\ C?
p T. S. GILLAM, et al f
`i. BASE LATERAL DITCH
p DB z01 PG. 41 SEE DITCH DETAIL 4
r OB 590 PG. 155 m3 D
D
E
EST
.
.
.
-
00 c
p
0.0
Q -I 500
F
00
00 00
EX15T POWER EASEM EN-TE -E
-- -- -- -'- -

-- --
+70.0

--
CL B RIP RAP APRON \ naTLAND 26,340 }
J
_
U 4

n
- Pi?OP. SLOPE STAKE LINE EST 3 TONS

2
EST m FILTER FABRIC (86.42') DE-V
Q EXIST. R/W
yEl
`
.. .. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - -

_----
_?

2-GI o FALSE
SUMP
•

RETAIN EXISTING DITCH THIS SIDE
'?
'
.+ ...,
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
?
F I5.
s aa
2 -
o' -'a -- -?...
, .
r:•----- - - - - - - - - - - ---------_-_-
, L1
MF.
---
i --
-- -
- PECIAL COLLAR-
PR;3 * _ S _
+
Ty RLN' 2-GI
ELBOWS
US 17 9.0 DST 375 RCPT I '.8 x 1'5"4CBC
15.240 2-GI-D N73'-25-25.2"E - -REV -?-
rALSE SUMP • w
EXIST. _?LW - .. .. . '.. .. .. - - - - - - -.• .. .. .. .!c.P'tr,!'O!?i7!?Q• :: .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
r 375 RCPT
MELT!
O
O
Z _
------1 _
- - - - --- - - ------ -
W
LIJ
1L?
.? F 1
ZAND
1 '

??- PROD. REFERENCE NO.
R -2 4 04C SHEET NO.
11
TRl( HIGHW
SIGN
g
HEN
LS
" EN
NEER G EE
"aRp4'''. ,d',?NCAR94
?11OFF17T&NICH01
"?CNNOa""`" I 'I s 4 }o ar "'
SEAL jESSto
SEAL }
15869 6982
# c
1
I
CONST^REV.---- ,,'?ROrN.
it
i
/V
i
?I WETLAND
IF
I'
I ' 1 +
I SPECIAL DITCH On
+00.00 SEE DITCH DETAIL
O ? 0 D7) - TONS . S RIP RAP Q
p - m2 TER FABRIC
LE
- ma .D.E. (n
(7Y
- r? - NA'i'L4N!/ - - EXIST. POWER EASEMENT
--E- __ - -- 'E - -- --{--E-- -- -- --E-- - - --E- Il.l

15-
31
--- -- =-- -
+.1500 RCP PROP.
? GUARDRAIL
MELT
.} N I
2.5 TOP
0.5 DEEP I
+41.80 +00.0 / Z
= 00
/-30.500 '0605.07')
+(100_07) cEORD j?1E _
R/W F-
?--
C Q
+00.0 < a
15.240
MEL (60.00')
-- - - - - - - - - - - -
US 19, 9.0 DST N
n
,240 REMOVE 375 CONC?1
d
FALSE SU M 2"?I
1 --+--- °
R/W - - - -
1° d
\o \ N
\ ri
375 RCP)
N a
450 C
1 \\? O
C - C _ -
?• CHORD ---___ _C W
+41,80 03 E Ltl
m
8.000 r +OO,D
SPECIAL DITCH 124'67) 41.000
/ SEE DITCH DETAIL 12 + (134.51')
?I EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP 0 W
+50.0/
000
8 L
+00,0 E --- '- -- +00.0 1
B.0 1*
67'
.
124.67') 38
000 PROP, SLOPE STAKE LINE )
124.
.
(124.67) LATERAL 'V DITCH
Ld
N +40.0
$g SEE DITCH DETAIL 10
-FST TONS CL B RIP RAP 1131•') EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC EST - m3 D.D.E.
2B EST -TONS CL. B RIP RAP ?
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
T. S. GILLAM, et al
DB 201 PG. 41
DB 590 PG. 155
Y° EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC rn
T EST - m3 D.D.E. 1n
EST 40 TONS CL I RIP RAP > EST - 'EONS CL. B RIP RAP
EST M2 FILTER FABRIC wd EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC

BASE TAIL DITCH
2 I
J
1.
m
SEE DITCH DETAIL it
(? EST 10 M3 D.D.E. - L-REV
I PI = 91+70.262
1; \ v ` AT = 24'-37'-50.1"
Ts = 128.464
-L- Lc = 89.954
- Rc = 400.000
?I - 91+ .617 Ls = 82.000 ..........
_ -3T-50.1" Bs 5'-52'-22.1" PRELIMINARY PLANS
_ s42 U = 54.697 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
T 95. V =
.
27.361 ..................................... ............
R = 436.4 SE = .08
/ R.O.= 20.5
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 26. I
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:500
"PR(U, REF REN(k N0. "°rSHEET' NO.
R.-2404C 12
F'IGHWI,Y DESIGN HYDRAUUCSM-?
ENCNEER ENGINEER ,
%
SEAL -? SEAL 11
CON57. RSV. ?°'"*yT•R? P,E??,a°° ` d ?`°+,;RD N. S?o'°,
R/N P.E'r. I
O
ch O
n

0)

?- I

[Yi:i( P^u?Yif @AS;iU!itt
.._?_.._. _,,. _... ....
E- i
.__. __. _._F_
- LyJ

z I
?d !,
=

(r
e
w ?
.
/
xin.
......._ ._....._ __.._.....? _.,_. _._ __-.._ C Q

15.24'3 N
_
' h
D,'. 9
Y
1 AIi ASP
--._._..... _.-
s a. O

n O?
O

N

C5
Z

? Ld
2LQ I
38.000 (n
(124.0=7')
U-1
+aD.O LLJ
41.000 (n
(134.51')
88 = 5'-52'-22.1"
U = 54.697
V = 27.361
SE = .06
R.O.= 20.5
................................... .
PRIEUMiHARY PLANS
:D0 NO USE. FOR CONSIRUC11ON
......... .........................:
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 26.
w6ia-m- W-
1:500

PROD. REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
'j` -- R-2404E-- -- 13--
' TRI HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
(
i ENGINEER ENGINEER
IP CAR
04 0. CAR
ol YN 04
4
?
h1[OFFAlTk iICHO1
?^:" romx "nwx o.y'':
c SEAL °2o
jfSSi0r
yy
€fa SEAL
_. 15869 ? [ 6962
_ •••
INf.;p
, ,I
MAO F ?b?••:
•
I,?
CONST. REV. y'IT R, RF,??,b°• '•nggD N. 5G?''P
R/W FEV.

i7
6 \ \ ?
I
! G .. c-
!! !/ T. S. GILLAM, at al
f
r D8 201 PG. 41 '
J ! DB 590 PG. 155
Ir
Ir
1!
fJ
f!
If

? °

! o
o r
! +
o f
r 0)
+
Lo 1 !
f r CULTIVATED O
O CULTIVATED 1 ! O Q

±y
l
J r
o o °
+ F-
V
U) r
!°J
+ + 00

W

W 19/
I O
--
E
-- -- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --E--
-- --E-- -- -- --E-- _- -- _-- __ __
-- -- - -E E
- PO
_ E-EXIST. -
WER EASEMENT E__
-- --
Z
Z
_E EXIST. P
_E --
OWER EASEMENTE -- -- -- --E-- -? ?- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- -'- .J
J r 1 PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE U
U r J / - - - EXIST. RA% Q
- - - - - - - -
- - - -
-
-
-
Q - -

--- EXIST. R/W

? - - -

- -.

-.- - _ --
-°`-----------------
C C

__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
_ _
G -
______ _____
lssw
375 RCP 1 o
o -
T
' 15.2+0 REMOVE 375 CONCH A
! 1000 U/G _
- o --
o
-----o - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----------- - - ° - - - - --
- - - -
-;
o Fo _------_-----
________________- -_--
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ .- - - - _ - -
-_--- --
1
__-___-_ _ e.
-_-..____ .- __
_
_______ t C
4
US 17 9 0 BST
US 17
r 9.0 0 BST
G + 450 RCP
----_. °
_- - ----
F----°---------
i.,.,1
+ S
..
-- -- ----
---

.
J
,
- - --

0
+ --
'
?
_-- - .? -------` -__-------
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _
} -

# .-_
.
H
75240 2-GI-D
'
SGO

?
s sw '
375 CO -L-REV • S81' 56'-44.7"E
I

- -
-.-.--.-------
- 7
-EXIST. RXW -----
-- ---

- -
R/W
EXIST
- - -
; I
?' N
' . ? I N
i ?
o + N
I
! ! + + 450 RCP -

J 1 375 RCP
v
d'
CV 450 RCP
-

-
---------
--------C
,

--------°-
-----
---------------
O
C -
----- ------ ----- i .. - - - - - - - -
-;?. EST TONS CL. I RIP RAP +oD.O
h
-
-- E
) E- -- --
- +DD.O PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC 38.000
67'
W
W
W -E- /
I
r 124.67) (124.
) =
v l 38.000 V
I
(n ! h !
1 (124.67)
W
W
W /!9! EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST
26 W
cn
U) -
/
J! fr T. S. GILLAM, at al
f r DB 201 PG. 41
P
1
J ! G.
55
CULTIVATED OB 590
rf
J J
II
I!
.................................................. .
PRELIMINARY PLANS
00 NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
:..................................................
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 27. k? -
1:500
-- i

,
\
\ 4)XLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
\ DB 663 PG. 543
clyOg& j zro
-- - PROJ. REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
_
R -2404C "-"-- - 14 -
I?TRI HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
- SN CAROz'"•,

N CARD4 '•'•
`1 •
.
"
&NICBOL ;°2o?•C'ESSrp i2°e,J('Essia.xy'•s
\ tai a ?} cgyp i/ ?/ (( .2> 6OFFATT E E R S
0 N Rlx N U •
SEAL f? 4 SEAL
z 6982
156
,
0 \ / % 8
I CDI V. •?''•qRD
., • 1 ?E ',•by
• \\ ??. \\\ I / . _.. 1ST. •,?R. f?t
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION YS RE
?\
i - PI - 5+3 .657 R?l1 R E J.
?J -Y5- STA. 4+00
ll \` \,.,a \ e [j _ -01'-23.0„
+00.0 PAV'T OBLITERATION ? L = .623
9.144vV T - 53. 5
R = 338.9
.h
t (30.00') \ ??Oo\ ?? ? iY
1. \ P \ ro Jp ?? 2a L /
\ OS?' ° Y
+67.2-130
\" \ f J. C. BELL, HEIRS -Y5-REV POC 5+11.657 =
D8 304 PG 212
1, \ \ ,°o°y X\ \\ Y\y \R?iy OB 304 PG 217 DRIVE POT 1+00.000
I? ` \ \ i" RETAIN EXISTING DITCH ? ? L A!
r'?••t `l' _
_.__. TLAND
1 _ +46.24 Wr
16000 N ?? - - -
t
_.. , , e'7 S bT` WETLAND
1 0, Q• f p' SCq?h' +92.045 8401 YS- i,EiP 19d _
(56.06') 1 V ` S 3 °,•` \ `s??' ? ?D 0 ` ? 19 ?ZEi 81'57' .45.557.
'30' E r-- 675- 1^ GIL
1A V'h BLACK ROCK DELI. INC. 6
DS 704 PG. 539 40\MA.DE 3-3(Or?m EAKS IN x
PC A PG.872 ?y
P CONC. U E3 F R DRAIN?GE BLACK ROOK u
T. S. GILLAM, et al \\ 1 \ R 25` A, C' De 201 Pc - - - - - - - - - - b DEVELOPMENTxL
. al 0 \ °s ? ' ' _1W TO ABAND NED OB 681 Pc 2 7 }
Q G \ .C \ \ ", CQ son x
I! N D8 590 PG. 155 1 of r\? ?Y 1
! -Y5-REV ?:' \ ?' ?• ° ft=5c - 425x450-CON CURB 4
0.8B07TOM sort J & `-PAVI? CI I?ERAl10N +
E
0 s.r TOP PI = .4+83.380 +30.4-Y5-REV
D k 1 h 1, ?\ \<\ \ 0 0l loo 0
0. 7 DrrPV?
\ ` l AT _ - 40-45'-03' / 18.000 ?, g _ /R o t I k O
37141 (59.06') 1 L , F -Y5- R-
p L2 BoTTom - T ( u, 1 0z oo v 1 \ < ?? Jip +6,.137 R coNC 1 =
3) 4.2 TOP L= 71.124 6 a s \ (0'O4 i X I DECK
0.7 DEEP O R 100.000 O 1 N \ ?.\?bNOn o k o
I\ ?, I 2SFBUS +11.6 I 0 2SF0 t
+76.00 \ + SE = 0.03 + R=toR=2\`\ \ ?o v 26 .3h0 X +
1 0+t5s 1 _Y (86.42')
Li 11s L /} o w
O 0.500 I si7 9I u T? x 000000 0 o Z_
30.500
7 PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE. _(100.07') at
_ Asp IP 000
(100.07) II - _ -- - --E-- -- -I-- - - o 9 4 +36987 - '+ J
(30 p Y!` _ BS7 1.l'1TL CONC
ExIST.PawEREASEMENrE E__ E__ _ __E-- -- -- --E-- -- -- --E-- rE E
- --E-- -- - ---- -- -- -- -- I? - - - _ ...125- mm MONOLITHIC I 02 +' Is-z+o/\ WARP SHLDR T01000 =
"ANOPY 1000 CONIC
CONCRETE ISLAND I N s $ GRADE TO Sa.aa'
s.oo ) ATTAIN 0.2 GUTTER U
_ it L 1 o N 0 00x450 CONC CU0B GRADE 102+65 TO aP 375 RCP Q
+7 i b - DRAIN
EXIST. R/w
! s
_2 -
- - 152ao -E- - "-E - -E- E p
_ - - - - - -
--.------- _.- __ 1 "n .•\I. Otl' T - i103+00 LT P-
Q EXIST. R/x' (60.00') I a R
- - - - - 600 RCP
? 3 ?
P SLOPE ST NE
F
----------a ------- +14.4
------- --
1 R b !1 \ R=25- - - -
5. 50! Go
15.9ao 750 RCP+' (60.00') _--a-=s,' --CUP9SY _ lPROP.
-- ------- --
- -_. ,o- ------- COLLA -
50' COLLAR 3o u/G-'°
- -- -- g
°'- - - .---.. __ __------- ---- _. Ta -,-- +ss.7si E- _ - n `-R-.S I HD-01 RO
...... . -
..-....... .-. ._ _._ ..... EP .. I-
----- _ _ - e 0 RETAIN --
n
5,2
R=25 Us 17 8.0 BST
-v '-•' - 600 COtJC....._.... p - ? - n
US 17 9.0 DST II750 CONC _ + _ II896-'n' + O L_ POT 102 1 + -- -. - o +_-1._ . 15 2401
__ --COLLAR - --
__
r
50a -GI-D ?1._n n ?..- .. .. -. ?!+,. u^•ir"r. :.COL -r ,'.a._ -1--1---{rn , nn nz,
0/0 1540
Q cc r
-L-IREV 750 RCP'. h .. .. .. .. r -
N81'-56'-44.7"E WErLavDy - - - - - °
' .: N . ". •:` 1FETLLY7 - ? . ? ._ - \ \ 1 \ -- a _L- :.
- - - - - EEiST. R/'p
-I. ro "! to c? a rn y. /. O N •- \ \ +65465^ E%I' N fir
n i 0.9 BOTTOM I WETLAND
I
N "F " a ro ; ro ?? rs0•' \ `\ \, (y.. • yo 1(soj n
N
. 3.4 TOP + + _.... .
n + / I 0.7 DEEP .. + - -
.::... +I4_113-L- WETLAND y '.\ \\ +433
_ ,• N 15240 `?' \ 00\\ ?, 6858 98
vVc---rn-r r , cc nn N
11 a I N E so) zisr63 ?c? (?y \\ \(zz.s0) - -rT o. ?6
o. I -L-REV POT 101+48,000 I / Y6-REV PC 1+31.439, fig5g `' °? \\ Y6 AP 6 8.61 f-
EST - TONS CL B RIP RAP Y5-REV POT 5+-73713 = I (zzso) !•\\ W
I EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC -Y6-REV POT 1+00.000 / ALSE SUMP r-
N) 1 --------- ------ -- ------
F2G-1?5-?-
\\ '?y. C ?Z
-------- - - - - - - - -------- ----- - - - - ----------------------- CONCRETE ISLLAI WIC- P TO C \; W ND U)
- - I ----
/ j 1 I ?- I
O D --
Z -- i' l 1 0 ?\
+90.0 PROP,,SLOPE
W +70.0 ' +80.1 ±B ODO.67'r \ it 1 I I 38.000 STAK LINEI \ cE
38000 j? w 38.000 :kv PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE ! 1 y (124.67') PAVT; PLy4 RAIU)N
(y
\,\ A i ?.yc 1 .c l \.
124.67) w (124.6.7 tt24) RR
'yhVy` % +40:0 -Y6-REV \ EST -TONS CL B
+67.4 IRrRA I I s
20.000
I I `r =O'
54-000 i I 26 (65.62') \ EST - mz FILTER FABRIC
W (177.ii') I WOODS t _ \ y R/W TO 6 IA?kLONED `k
U) .? T. S. GILLAM, et al \ \
DB zot Pc. 41 02 ? DENOTES R/W TO BE ABANDONED .EZD '.Ili 26 WETLAND -Y6-REV
I +76.9 DB 590 PG. 155
\ •i /
bb.IJUO (186.3 l ol
? (186.35') 1 ,. +80.0-Y8-REV (q T. S. GILLAM, et al w PI = 2+50.576
O ` DENOTES PAVEMENT OBLITERATION \?? 5)8 201 PG. 41 -4- AT = 87'-14'-55"
65.6 20.000 2' 1 I )El 590 PG. 155
t.Om BASE TAIL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 3 ( ) 1 .
Y6- YE- R = 1190347
j{ P CLEAN OUT EXISTING TAIL DITCH 400 600
25.000
F WETLAND ; - - SPECIAL 0.6m BASE TAIL DITCH L
Y REMOVE SPOIL FROM WETLAND 900 1200 --- _?-
SE = 0A7
SEE DITCH DETAIL _
±56 EST 70 m3 D.D.E. 5900 REMOVE SPOIL FROM WETLAND PI - 1+3 .190 P1 - 1+9 .198
.z L-REV_ ;too EST - m3 D.D.E. - / ' - _ - 2.25 = - -28.57 39 80.000 14000 14800 ' LL _ 95 3 L
(262.4T) = 04 PRELIMINARY PLANS
'r" +65.4 _ •
(275.26') 100 100 T n.9 T - 34. 4 IDO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
83.9900 WrrLAND 100(-) too(-) \
- FOR -L-REV D ILE SEES 27. R = 175.9 R? 653.5
, 3E
FOR -YS-R PR FILE SEE SH ET 30. i
FOR -Y6- SEE SH 30.
/ 0000 1994 ADT y FOR -
DODO 2020 ADT Y5-CE N PROIFILE SEE S E ET 29. D 20 40
?o ,.;1 \ • -Y -s
WETLAND FOR -Y5- R & -Y6-REV INTE SECTION DETAIL SEE SHEET 2- .
$' C3 FOR D TC ETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:500
IS ILI
81'57.52'

27
J. C. BELL, HEIRS
OB 304 PG 212
DB 304 PG 217
? PAOJ. REFERENCE N0. SHE__
_ _ --
ETRFC -- R-2404C----- __SHEET
-15 .?
HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
' ENGINEER ENGINEER
I 7t -?d'.•''6SSl?:?h'°; o;•?4'iS5"1'0••:y':
*?? iP?MOItA'ITkMCffOi; ? q .^. i _4 2rn
xoan c+r:ouw. '`k SEAL ' SEAL
t?G CIMi.Eo::F .%R'?hGiNE.F.e; • c'
4P•?o
COI, BT. REY_.._<•_ o T.R. R';10 .ph4RD N. SC,''
1 !„V lYe, t4"L?
R/W RaU
ZC
w p \
41 I'"7
?n?? o d 1 Ih
7
w
i - ?: ?0
wl WOODS
C 10 ° b P I exist O WOODS
.. .. .. O ?..rjn _D_
0 1Y DST f - .. ?t PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE j---
I O
Ers POWER EASEMENT ( u.i
(
J - -- -- - 5d ?%J'4:r`d'"rE±?=vim+?Y",:=?00.0 "`;;^o? - ??+, war .;,',,;,,;,,?.? ...,- w ??.,• f _
J p 26.30
m n l s b '? +0500 F
29 Nln I I PR.. .. ) 100.07) b T--•- ='=- ---E C . -?._ ...__.. E- _w __ . R/ .... ..-.I:. 8642. \?_..?
-- (86.42 ?- I-
existj
I +
_ C
ExISi._ R/W E E-
C -4,n.ff•c_t?G.iS?_
?,I sDST - ------ - °4n w? _--------- ___--- --- _._.- ---..,___ It _ Y Or t ?y Krr T
C 11dTLAND `l' `1' C YNTLAND ---_ _- '-" - -- '3 NETZ4N0 VC 1'' 1 SHE'TL1176 ??. ?' ('? '?? ?Y? C,S l1 ?I
S N
---- -------- ----
)I- 3-75 o N 1524
-- GR- - -- -f0 -- °-- _-- - -- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- _---- _----------__.___c -" -- ....._ --- -I
- - - ? ?REI,C rv
a -.-- { 4 uc
11 11 1,1 11T
r _
I
+450 RCP N M us - 17 8.9 DST -
w
---
-r--- -
-- - - -- -- ----
__ _ ----r-- - scp u, ., ? __? R?V • S81'- 6'-44.7 E ?
15.74 .•- ? ., .n ,-. _... _.. -._ .. ._ _. I _
r^. i T RSV CsE t.rM1U ?'.?..
is .` Ic7:•?`'?!+. c` as mr^ ^>.t`+=",,Lh-Z'=1`.:i s' _">="?±'u??,, WTL D""'.
-. r
y! ? N
_ ? ? -- ? - 114
'la5o rcr, r
Isoo RCP
EST TONS CL. 8 RIP RAP c0
?47'P1 EST M7 FILTER FABRIC
----------------------------------------- C ----------------- - - - - - - - - - - --------?----
- c O Lij
SEE SHEET NO. 21 JB?o 0 PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE: L t.5 TONS Cl.. 8 RIP x W
(t24sY) EST ___ m2 FILTER FABRIC U!
27 ?c y, :k W
[n
WOODS
-41

J. C. BELL, HEIRS
08 304 PG 212.
OB 304 PG 217
?k

Woans
? Y
.............. ................................... .
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
.....:
................... .........................
20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 27. S
1::100
PROJ. REFERENCE: ND_ SHEET NO.
\ -
_ S R-24(1 i? 16
HIGHWAY DE a I? hYORAWCS?
NATURAL GROUND ENGINEER i ENGINEER
CAR 4 1 t RD/
o
c SEAL i
? ? q `- a 'sate ? aoRZ .
/ / CONST. RFU 3 R RE1 qR0 p 5o
1.2m BASE TAIL DITCH DEJA11,_ ? Raw a V.„ __-
?
WETLAND '? `1' ^ ^
ti 7 CECELIA 9AWi,-C
/. h? / 2.9 TOEPN y 1t? DD 306 PC 217.
?p OB 304 PC 217
27 EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
WaTUxD ,? EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC +35.0-12- / yc
J. C. BELL, HEIRS 9.000
p / 08 304 Pc 212 SPECIAL DITCH (19.53' 1,2m BASE TAIL DITCH CPFANOUT c O
+ 1 DB 304 PG 217 SEE DITCH DETAIL 13' yc
-
r0 y. EST -TONS CL. B RIP RAP EST m ? D.D.E. Y +
SO: \ 1 EST - mz FILTER FABRIC
O yr EST - m3 DOE O r SPECIAL DITCH Cronus
Q O O yc 7 1? SEE DITCH DETAIL 13
+ + EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP ;1
f-
WOODS Z-` `l p 6 0. 0
?? (1-00.07,) N +80.0 EST - mz FILTER FABRIC 2. / r30,500
00
y'
p 30.500 \ EST m 3 DOE E%?
L (?{,` ?,r
-REV - 2\ {? ?. - - - .,T'?::>'tiu"?;?zw5:.`?'w+-k:,=4f -- 25.54C ., 2., •w• `,,,,rv, '?a• ,F? y. W
E
.. R AS' R - __ • - •. -_ __ - --_ .. --? ' -lE --? +22.1-L-REV r 0 +DO.D f n POW,," ?r
W m -- -- E -- - E _^? _ - E (100~D7-- ,
?r r w ? --- GT REV cry nay ?'. y? Z
J y w ti^ - +90.0 L ? PROP. SLOPE STAKE
yc 3 ?xLhNE
S?l
yn y' 0.500 'x /
+80.0 1 (100.07') 3 00.07'
s_
U - - ' --_---'- 26.340 -E - E )• •. ••"?'`. ti ... ?'"?,?,. „t"' ?, =`' U
x(86.42')
c - - - - - - - -
- -? - - - S - - --
?, yc ?" C .k,..'-"9a-•'3eD;d: •?.,,.''>'b?- .r ~< i v-c .T r,... •r? ?a
--- ------ -------_'?? --- I?.?- - - y, T Z (.I'll
----- --- ___?--- _---- _ _
15.2
- ro _
1000 U/C 50' ----_ ------._.-._ _. _. . __ ..._ _.c_ .. .._._
581* 56' "e 7LE- 500 RCP - - ... .. _. _.. + ._... _..._
REMOVE f US 3 n
C.P ,?„a, ,R-. z. -..' •... __
US 17 8.0 LIST 11-m-
r nl
----- --- 500 u;G ,5.24 -L-REV q
so,
iS1 ,? l
1 -. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ro y ex ?- a
-. y Y S
? IBTUND
t ° -
-L-REV POT 108+73.845 = 500 RCP{
-T2- POT 11+75.35
3
l y 1 Z
. yC ? ryma y `?'
W
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
-------- - ---------- --------- -- ---_ - S
Z 0--------- E - E -a EY E
-E- -E- --E- Lij
Ld E - --- -E- - -- - PE , r /
W +00.0
/ PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE W
2 3
1 , r
5L) WOODS - ,i2;?i f
(n yc
WOODS
/ CECEL.IA SAWYER (t1 boo ;
LLJ `W (i34 51')
1n J. C. BELL, HEIRS DB 304 Pc ztz "451
DB 304 PO 212 DB 304 PG 217
DB 304 PO 217
PIRE1.3MINARY PLANS
/ DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
:.................................................
/ FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 28. 0 20 40
/ FOR 1.2m BASE TAIL DITCH PROFILE SEE SHEET 16-A. - I i
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2 1:500

\ - I

? O
o - O
O
r? +
+
?
Q
I
M .
+

L 27 ' -
I
Z
J
? J
HEIRS
C
BELL
'?TLANO
C 1 .
,
.
DO 304 PG 212 2m BASE TAIL DITCH
1 WOODS
NETLAND WOODS y DO 304 PG 217 .
EST 43701 m7 D.D.E. I
C -4- Y ik -- -
E-
NE- - - TDE- -
T0?- y "1
.. ??4..r4r? >'4?1- 5.17 rJ CI ft
ail .. ? ?V .. _
72

REI
-1- -ODE- ---ME
'-_9D I

Y
? I
WOODS I 1
W-MAND
WarDexDI
CULTIVATED
I
Nk WOODS
? ? 30

CECELIA SAWYER
DO 304 PG 212
08 304 PG 217
NATURAL GROUND
1.2
1.2m BASE TAIL DITCH DETAIL
STA. 12+11 -T2- TO STA. 15+66 -T2--
NOTE: REMOVE SPOIL FROM WETLANDS.
XISTING DITCH B D
+ NOTE: PLAN VI W FOR HIS SECT ON OF _
6 - - PROFILE IS SHO N ON SHEET 16. -
4 ROPOSED DITCH ED _

PROJ! REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R-24C 4C 16-A
- T
T RI
DESIGN
HIGHN
HYDRAULICS
- tI
EN NE k ENGINEER
SN ARp?
?
0? s ?o11ATtxmCea?
? ? E p
; r° •''r°!e?`ss o ro9
wuwx
i+a TM cwcuH. a SEAL 4 SEAL s
jF
15869 6982
i

? ?N 6c
016
CONST. REV, o`
'• rR. P.f.t •, RD N. S
a
O R/W REV. n, .. ?

EST
EST __ TONS CL 8 RIP RAF' 1-
m2 FILTER FABRIC

21.0(.0(1010
21 LT.

E (68.90)
-

w
II
R r ..•?? ?i:r4JZiinvey..'Ziir4?-4J ti
950 PLASTIC,,
+71.0 _?_?- -T2-
I
r
? N39'
'
_
.
-50
2
-27
3"E
68.90
^
.
(
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIOI4:
:.................................................:
0 20 40
X10
1: 500

? t--- -- ---_ ? ? I I I ? --i
12+00 20 4 6 0 0 13-00
----
f
XISTING ITCH B D + - --
8
$ ---?-- j - - - -- - 1:100 VERTIC L
-0.06%' _ - - - a _ --.?
6
6--- - --Ell
l P OPOSEDI DITCH E
- -D
4 --?- - - - - ?- - 1:500 ORIzo TAL. _ 4
13+00 20 40 60 80 14+00 20 40 60 80 154 _00 20 40 60 80 16+00 20 40 --
PROI R,;FERENCE N0. SHEET N0. '
TR{ ? ?4o c 17
-L-REV a HIGHWAY DrSi N H19RAWCS
-L ENa:F`k?R ENGINEER
PI - 115 1.761 PI = 115+551.654 tN
- C?
p = 20'-45.5" AT = 29'-20'-45.5" ?gi t p,5 oo?,'fSSioyY'•.
YOFFAMNICHOL
Ts = 155.959 ??E " G " E E " le
L = 616 "". """,« -«.,a S 11 t ( a SEAL
- T 114. 8 Lc = 154.483
Rc = 450.000 tiDe 6982
R = 436.5 %
Ls = 76.000??;uoy:lr °?.
Bs = 4'-50'-17.9" r ; Wf P?,
U = 50.686 CONST. REV. •••• 'Om;C???w? °??,, ` .y qRp"N1'S u??A
V = 25.351 RN REV.
SE = .08
lk R.O.= 19.0
e S `' SEE DITCH DETAIL 14
CECELIA SAWYER 5Ct ?\ LINE EXIST. 0.6m BASE
D8 304 PG 212 DITCH W/CL 6 RIP RAP I
De Soa Pc 2n SEE DITCH DETAIL 13
O
\\, EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP O
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC c0 F
to
0/ r oKS c' •F r
k +00.0 a 6 U_ +71.6115 N
O?? \? 14.83') O tPSCVC?? ) (i09??') LrJ
-I- 5
04 PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE \ 6 t CNOf 0 J
POWEREA
+ - -- -- - .. .. .. .. --//-- --E-- -- - ---+-- -- --E-- - (0.6009,) -L-REV TS 113+95.695
J --E--' m --SEMENiE +60.0
Ek15i E _E --- --
j .. .. .. .. .. .Y_. / 10 3 E-CHORD C - Ek:S•T.'?
f- fi? .. .. ..•>,,,,, ?- - - - - - - - - . = - =? - - -._. -- .695
Q .. - - - --C-.-. - ?.- - 5.
kisT R - -- - - - -
00 0 9') C 1 N
-?' - / 863 40 -- +00.0
- 60.0 5 RCP
37 •..- ;
- a
U AID, !k
REMOVE 375 CONC ?8 1 (4.44')
0l? w - -- rc--. --E?•• IF.9 F-i?
F0-' -- -, 9 •f7 Y
I5.24 REMOVE 375 CONCT 375 RCP .42') --- -- - -------
s
-ro--. ---..-----_ - -_ ------------- - - - la
006 U50 ----w -
f0 h _--- .,
w-.'- -----_--...-------- _
i ------------------------------------- - - -
--r,---------- -a--__----..-- ?.
450 RCPT
-- US 17 8.9 BST 00 tj? z?
---- --- -` '----- - -- a 'r
E 50 C NC
-..r-- - --- ' ----
. -_-r
L-REV
500 u--15,24 - 881'-56'-44.7"E + 2-GI-D -. .. .. .. ,. •, .. x, r-e GI
EXTNA DEPTH 5 Er,si' ri1W ?
E:UST. R/W --WE77"D ---- ----- .ri ------- ----- •Y \ .+
450 RCP l 03
375 RCP
FALSE SUMP i'-
ilk O ? H^
----- C- --------.4.-------------2 -----------------•' i
-------------------
'
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHORD
- xar:lxD U1
C -Z •-•E E? +40:
:lk 38.000 +71.695 :L
-
w y5 PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE +95.695 (124.67) (8.00 '} J
W 2 EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP 36.001 +20.0
-r EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC (124.67) 41.000 SPECIAL DITCH
(134'51) SEE DITCH DETAIL 13
S Nc EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAPl
? ?, 30 Je EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
CECELIA SAWYER
D8 304 PG 212
D8 304 PG 217
Oi 1
PRELIMINARY PLANS i
:DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
0 20 ?.. 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 28. --
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2- 1:500
'- Pf'OJ. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R
?I -2404C 18
-L-REV HIGHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PI = 115+51.654 p agpl o`'?qd CaRO4
'Y = 29'-20'-45.5' +80.0 JYOFFATT&NIC80L `, ... S-lp'. ESSioky
-L_ Ts = 155.959 110.000 +92.0 bid A0 "" `a Si--AL T'i 44 SEAL ` }
PI - 115 1.761 Lc = 154.483 (360.89') ? '110.000' 15869 6982 ,
Q. • i Q t
-TOE (360.89) 4F S p
_ -20'-45.5" Rc = 450.000 01 NEE' o`.GiNS.:?s
L = .615 Ls = 76.000
T 114. fl Bs = 4'-50'-17.9" CONST. REV. R. K ?,.° gRO N S;P °`
.,..L-. nnnm? memo
I R/W REV.
°. R = 436.5 U = 50.686
V = 25.351 \
E El]ST. POWER EASETE _ _ _ - -- SE = .08
AlFN \ 1
-- E-- -- -- --E- -- - R.O.= 19.0 ??` \ w I
-E-- _ CULTIVATED
0 -SO-IL -----^
9. I
p --E - --------- w
_EEXISi. GOWER EASEIAEN rE -- _ _ A - --E \ \ 0.6m BASE TAIL DITCH
-
E - - -
--E- --E-- \
SEE DITCH DETAIL 15
E
- --E__ _ _ -- EST 380 m3 DDE
1` - --E-- -- 1 T --EI-
-..E-_ --E-- _ +85 111,1 +98.0 --E -- --E-- Ex15T rowcrt- EAS ' W NT _ 70.000 60.000 --E F- ENT - O
+ O --E (229.66') E - - O
(196.85) I +
.? YEE DITCH I I'
hV C CHORD Q CECELIA SAWYER 02.8 TOP .5 DEEP ?' EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP Eczlsr. Gowha ed; -`E-- -
O DB 304 PC 212 2 EAiENT '- - -
Q +sD.D 0 > 08 304 PO 217 I EST - m FILTER RABRIC -E Q
36.000 W O +85.0 III p
`\' F.y `-_ (178.11') + + 36.0001 1 O +05.0 +05.0
5
.11
CHORD +26.177 +02.177 116.11' i 'V'3160 0) (100.0]) w
R (o 1 ( ) CHORD ( ) PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE ) I w 30.500
-36.000 31i.DDO -L -REV ST 117+02.177 -- y
SPECIAL DITCH Z
n' so ` C 718.11' P+8.11' hl SEE DITCH DETAIL 13 X30.5 o J -600
EST TONS CL. B RIP RAP (100.07
) _
---
o s9 --- -------------- ---------------- ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EST m2 FILTER RABRIC E-- -E fU-
a?
F'
EXIST, _
/ ----------------------------- _- = - --- - -
4501 L +60.0 - '- -
C NC I 1 26.240 2 N?
\ s0. REMOVE 37 (86.09')
___________ ___ ___
__-__ __-____ __________________________.__--___?. _ lC ----------
229.8t- 99 BST
US f7 \ \ + 4550 0 CONC
? n I
\ ------------ _ _.-_ _ ONE 450 RCP - ---- ---- `h
?/. .. 2-GI N68'-4 '-29. 15
RED 8°E a ^ ?. s of
N N - _ L _ I
n + --- - - --- -- - - - - _ - - - 13
375
C -'---------
`SPECIAL DITCH i
SEE DITCH DETAIL 13
EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
EST m2 FILTER RABRIC
+26.177
38.000
(124.67')
p /jOj5 .
750 CS
wooo CS

a?OIL?/ w
'3
? N
od
+ r N

+ N
N
1450 RCP
/ FALSE SUTAP
CD
?` --------- -
---
-- -------
C ------- _ _ _
-"
CHORD `- --= E--- E-- ?
-- C - - _?-L-__- -"_--- ?
W
+50
0 +50.0 ` W
+02.177
000
38 .
38.000
'
+00.0 38,000
!124
67') =
(n
.
30 (124.67) -PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE (124.67
) 41.000
' .
(134.51
) W
CECELIA SAWYER N
D8 304 PO 212
OD 304 PC 217
CULTIVATED
.......................
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
:..................................................
0 20 40
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET hm=m=w___ -®p6
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2--. 1:500

0.6m BASE TAIL DITCFl\
SEE DITCH DETAIL 15 \
EST 480 m3 D.D.E.-?
\
\
\
30 TONS CL. B RIP 4 1
EST
p
O
CECELIA SAWYER -
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
+ - "E-- _
- -- DB 304 PG 212 CIAL DITCH
P
-
-E'- -- -
POWER EASE OB 304 PG 21 7 DITCH DETAIL 13
E
S
TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST
MENT
- E-- - -- -_E__ -
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC 4
Q
~ i
O
- "' _ -
--E-- -- --
--E-- -- -- --E O +40.0 ?
O
-- 35.000
1 00.07)
Z _EE--
%ISi POWER
PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
-
N +40.0

CJ
r -E
-
-- -E__

30.500
- +20.0
07
(100
_ --E-- -- -- --E-- -- - .
- 100.0')
E-
U

--E- -
-
E-
F-
Q
E-- --E- -E- -E- --E-- -E- --
c --
-
- EXIST- A/! - _ - - - - - - -
- - - _ __ C
= ---------??
?? ..?..??....

hqYOFFAIT , i NCHOI
caNSr. riisr+.?m"??
' rR01 I' . CNCE NO. II. ET NO.
a Ina,
S
d' D7
? '; Y
4
?
l SEAL 1 i
a SEAL ?

t t6sus r°
^' $
? sse2 a
•°'', ,r. R. kF14 a°°'a °°?y'°Ril N,°sC;,d.
+78.0 why
80.000 ^,-
(262.47')
.0 6 ,•
X00
.57') ` CD
l sB.DOe . c ' -'?J r)
(223.10'1 (7f,%,
i?? '•.\ (r N
app 1 all
O c REMOVE 7HEwVA: 617CN
S.5 SOIL SEE' DITCH DETAIL 'I, wl l
'I X600 -? ''SI TONS CL. B RIP RAP1°l E,J
u 48.000
(t00) ST rnE Fi ER FABRIC 1 { 6( Oaaai r a E 9Et _ -- - E- -
I)- p - --E-+600 EI •I - d -... Z
50.,00
d (10007) ?._E-- •_ } 1?? C Yi00 01,1. -. j_.E..-._..
E
r :2:
+60.0 3. .
- - I r ! S.zA
C -------- - 76 C w
- 0 500 =4
----- -
- 15.24 REMOVE soo CDNC cco c; c - L - -
50' looo 0/0
ro --------- - - - - - - - - - - -- _,..._._.

Ir
1
CO ?
O
Z
-
--•--------------------
d
8
750 RCP
AI O 42' C _ n
n n US 17 8.9 BST TtVO--Ta.A --
.375 CONC REMOVE
-. ---- ' -'- Soo a%C 2-GI • v 2-GI • • • a. ( _?_ I2_._.__.. _
-? -? -
-L IREV
I
N68'-42 29.8"E EX. DEPTH _ (1.88 \\ \ _,-....
------ --
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----
1
a 750 RCP

W
LtJ
+60.0
=
N 8.000
?12a.67)
Ld
LLI
(n
i3
---------------?--- ---------------------------------
E- -E- -E-
EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
30
CECELIA SAWYER
DB 304 PG 212
DS 304 PG 217
----------------
C
1-PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
F 1147 80')
SPECIAL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL 1/
EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP
EST - m2 FILTER FABRIC
EST - m3 D.D.E.
N
m •
"_-?.«...-.,mod w.,...._. - -„-._?......_.- ., _... ?„ , ...,."• .. ._.__. "?"='.`?"°' 1-
- - E F; -- +DD.O W
000 L4j
-- 124.67') _
?4\ v{00_D pLIJ
a1? 42.000V)
4iPECIAL. DITCH JJ, HEIRS
VA?\ SEE DITCH DETAIL 16 Ge sGa PC 217
1 1 E:ST ,- TONS CL B RIP RAP
\ 1 EST' - m2 FIL'IER FABRIC
\ \ EST - ms D.D.E.

t1,

FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 29.
FOR DITCH DETAILS SEE SHEET 2--
........... ......
......................PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONS
0 20 40
1:500

PROJ, REFERENCE N0. SHEET NO.
??? R-24040 20
HIG3 DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGI GINEER ENGINEER
ENGINEER
oa+``(?,1CAR0?/q, CARO"%•.,
YOFFd1TAITCH01 ' ?hEi?t,2?"', ; 0,,2y'•
III 'A ° 7?µ SERt. fit{ zz °? SEAL
5982
._,.,.-..m-...- '+•°`+a,, r.R. RE\Qtr`°' ggRD gGA?`c•
C04!:T. REV. R/W REV.
30 g ?`
?\\ \\ CECELIA SAWYER 0 ( "MABB
\ DB 304 PG 212 0 /
\ \ DB 304 PG 217 I?
\111 (? O \ 1 N
O o 11 11 0 p 0 +.... j ?I Y aSm wry
O + I t 0 O END PROJECT 6,019001T
+ 1 1 = -L al LA) EQUA o. STA. 10+00.000 -L-REV (LB) =STA. 10+00.000 -L- (SBL) (11 m LT)
- EQUALITY IF
- -
N 256,278.083 N 256,288.333
N
A. 123+ S x;.000
ST
E 815,556.693 = E 615,552.699
N 256,244.9596 258,244.7602 `? ryJ
Q E 815,4. t 7 E 8 ,#40, 893 (LOCALIZED CQRD.. R-2404C) (LCCALIZED COORD. R-2512A)
N -42'-29.8"E 4=t N68'-42'-32 0 Jr
(LOCALIZED COOf?DihATES) PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE DoDS F"' f s
` .. t .? .. tiar"Jr,i
E -- -- -- --E-- - - -- -- --,Y4,r^'
Z SEXIST. POWER EASEME?rE1_ E- -E-- -- -- -.-E-- -- -- - - -=E -.F - -E-- -- -- --
J t 1 +40.0
?r 4 r
_ " i t tt (86 09)
2 a z-v4 wy1
U t?1 C
sl ? t
Exlsr. R -E ----------------- -------------- - - - - --- - - ?sw --
- C °
---_-_---- 000
15.24 F
50' REMOVE 375 CO.
- 900 L%O
... --------
- IIS 17 8.9 BST 'rN.,
?. cow. ?n?;32-> v
/ r
__. r- 1... -.. r0 , ,,-._......._ - 3-CAB LE5 SUO U/C 5L0 L 1 ' c.. _ 375 r.. t .1^.i•?"' rn - ,e „ r!^-{ .
I . ^ REM aIC t o REMO C,?.-. ?., -L- REV ?' ?'CONC _ .., ,n, .n, .. .. .. .. .. .. u^. SG lr L ,v
-------------
50 375 375 ?• ---
0 t 1 - N68*-42'-32"E - - 1
-s-{ - ------- -
? 11
0 0 0 3\1 \\ \ 11 .
\
Q1 0 0\? \ 450 RCP TEMPORARY DRIVE CONNECTION) \
O f7 ?11 1 ? :? >t\
Z 1 - -
--:1 1 ------------
1 ---?
w C
10 = FD '? 1 +60.0 ?
0 5 i 1 36.000
(124.67')
W 0 .so 8-1:''?/ 1 t PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE
U) 1?' 1 1 STD BERM DITCH
1 I
II
J. C. BELL, HEIRS
9 1H DB 304 PG 217
1l i /
i
-L-REV (LB) EQUALITY INFO. = -L-REV LA EQUALITY INFO.
STA. 123+11.204 = STA. 8+80.000
N 256,234.710 = N 256,2,54.511
E 815,445.287 = E 815,444.883
N68'-42'-29.8"E = N68'-42'-32"IE
(LOCALIZED COORDINATES)
0 \t,
0 ' SFD j j.
J ?
/ / ? StStti
i
51 Jr
FOR -L-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 29.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION:
..... .................... ........................ :
0 20 40
1:500
01 jj tREFERENCE PROJECT R-2512A
n p _
II
N II
\ N\ W0009
\a \
ROODS
I
i
I
P
,.J
-Y6-
PI - 1+9 .198
pb
-Y6-REV
PI = 2+50.576
A = 87'-14'-55"
T = 119137

PROJ. REFERENCE N 0. SHEET NO.
R-2404C 21

- HIGHWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
,,•`"V,?GAROl''',,? HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
N CARO'o"""
A = 3-28.57 "? ..........
L - 04 ?lfOFtATTkNIG30L ,a°20+S Py'. ,a=o?f5sio ky'.,
T - 34. 4 auucn. omen cwax R s lad SEAL ` i ae SEAL t
R = 653.5 15669 J 1 6962 F
/J t'?NC f.E? r '?!Y;FHG EEC` off;
-I CONST. REV. rR ftEt`;o°,•' '•,,qRD N gcP•,
R/W REV.
NAo 7
SEti SNEE J. C. BEL , HEIRS
OB 3 PG. 212
?k DS 04 PG. 217
wsriAND R/W TO BE ABANDONED
O +86.5
_ PAV'T OBLITERATION 28.000
(91.86')
+83.9
(85fi2)
"i yr
-Y6-
PI = 4+21.309
A = 07'-33'-10.84"
L = 101.550
T = 50.849
R = 770.339
O
C,
M
FQ
Z
Z
/U
- -? tw.0 -Y6-
8.5B0
(28.15')
L = 190.347
R = 125.000 e sa \ f r
IFETLAND 1%'
SE 0.07 - -t _
\^ ?. .. ?\
' +21.786 yc ,
26 , :?? 22 g0:?
20.000
?Q ?k 65.62' _ `?` \ iv \f
^? ? 1 'F. GILLAM et al ? __ -_ i•,? -...?? ` ??.. `` ? \? ?
,
??Q I DS 201 PG. 41
??\\ (I 11 DB 590 PG. 155 C
PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE \ I
c? \ 6001 m
?\ I a Rpp \ ?? ?- ?NE f ` .-
^p? ? 1 e ? AI ll E
Q' 1 1 `l' E z O) +70.460
PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE 20.000 I I J CIV
(6:5.62')
-------.-.- -- Y \ EST - TONS CL. B RIP RAP N +49.9:ifi -Y6-
1 EST _ mr FILTER FABRIC N9' 7 O
+21.786 (65.62) 2
?6DS s°?) Y6-REV ° h +49.936 -Y6- [L(
0- 2 02)
+ (8
+21.766 Z
k 25.000 ?? PI = 3+86.098 I h
:R (82.02') A = 46'-24'-52" Q
trarLAND k T = 64.312 l?
L = 121.513 I 1 %
R = 150.000 1 a
9 Q? ?0 SE = 0.06 I 1
""LAND 1 2'7
? I
I J. C. BELL, HEIRS
• .k 26 DB 304 PG 217
I DS 590 PG 155
T. S. GILLAM, et al
D6 201 PG. 41 I
DB 590 PG. 155 .. ...... ..........................
PRELIMINARY PLANS
I :DO NOT USE FOF CONSTRUCTION':
....... ........................
DENOTES R/W TO BE ABANDONED
DENOTES PAVEMENT OBLITERATION
I 0 20 40
FOR -Y6-REV PROFILE SEE SHEET 30.E
I 1:500

-Y6- -Y6-
0
(0 PI = 6+20.585
I PI = 4+21.309 A = 08'-42'-52.64" -
r? p = 07'-33'-10.8" LT L = 92.758
L = 101.550
T = 50.849 T = 46.468
co R = 770.339 R = 609.852
W
J
Z
}U FOODS
?.C 1'I L :r ?I
27
d ,IHOJ, REFERENCE NO ~µ SHEET N0.
-
R 2404C -- 22
t --HKHWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
1. ENGINEER ENGINEER
jt1 CAROL CAROM
®'-?g1lOFFA9RUNICH01, ?o??E, 5j0 4, ° ?6S51p?yw?'c
'
a
? c
a ,? f SEAL SEAL
m
4
- y 156G9 G9B2

)
z?
LL
::311 H TR I C) J. C. BELL, HEIRS n
? ? 1 } '1- DO 304 PG 212
(Q -- t .;. ?
} I , I DO 304 Pc 217 .I, J ' CECE.t.IA, Ah 1. h
Lc)
D9 304 PG 212
I l y j _ [p - I: DO 304 PG 217
`s 85 FXIgT l o l I O
ti.FW y?
+ a oo m1i I_I\.1 DONSlRUCTIC)N
~ ?L7s coH - I I + -l6 --STA. l c80.000
Ins c - r
ws? v1 -Y6-REV POT 7+6C
-T4- PI 10 FOO
'
--
5'-19'_58.6"e ?
- v .
-= - -
.a
E%IST.Rj14 i!Zii"'ii'`-?' W"? E Lzzzz_ - --•--.----_-_ SR 1507 &1LCk4 RD 54RS _ - ? 4t N )V_,?,5
\ _.1 E-' -Ck1517 R 47
+72.010 / I 608
? 450 C.° W11 RCP }C 6.858
20.000 ELBOWS (22.50')
FOODS (65.62') E L \E r i +8(t__G
. i \ -_„ u ? ?-20.000
+72.010'- IT--
2.02') a (6562')
25.000 +74.117 f 4
(82850000 C
J (.82') +74.117 E E.-- E - -- -E- J, 1 0 00
25.000 / i.47? r I?t f 6ti
(82.02') - +47.3 / 25 000 ?I?T V t a - f O, 3?
PROP. SLOPE STAKE LINE 20.000 (202.} ; TA
+ss.-4 0.6m BASE DITCH (65.62') -466 , EST TONS CL. B RIP RAP - 20.000 t ? .wl l
i EST m2 FILTER FABRIC 250004 {65.67) NO Z3
(82.02') SEE SHEET `_EST IONS -fE t RIP RAP
EST rr12 FILTER f'ABRIC '
2'7 CULTIVATED
J. C. BELL, HEIRS
06 304 PG 217
D6 590 PG 155
CL -Y6- _ 5:0
-NATURAL GROUND
EXIST, PAV'T 8% `
I -)l /" i x
0:6 .....................
0.6m BASE. DITCH DETAIL PRELIMINARY PLANS
-Y6- STA. 3+70.46 TO STA. 7+55 RT. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
:..................................................
0 20 40
FOR -Y(i- PROFILE SEE SHEET 30. L sommomom-
1:

PROJ. REFERENCE NO . S'FET N0.
-.? -

-
----R-24046

- -
23
! - HIGHWAY DESIGN
1 fll HYDRAUE
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R
CAR
-'%k OZ
w i CAR
04
1 NOHELMNICHOL • ;p'. o',
11 ,
E f R 5 JQ
E N G N
o'a? G y

L.
E
nan, xaxrx aux.
a SEAL 2 SEA

15989
? 5
8902
Ova
?,, sPt,F +?,:
I?

27 O O
_- CONST. REV. I?'',.,TR. •AE1a„`°`?
a
u ?'eyARO tL S?,.S`,
n,nnu.
p 00 O + uw,
R/W REV.
+ ± J. C. BELL, HEIRS N n
O R- DB 304 PC 217
'- DB 590 PG 155

L?- CULTIVATED j CULTIVATED

W
7V +10.0
2.000
Z o \?.. (9.600
-T4-
-
PDE
rcm
-- ---- - -- -
-PDE-=- - -

PDE '
--- - - ----

-
-
U -i

_ _
-
;OIL ROAD
H-

--------- ---

_ _ - - -

l 2-::- 05 027W _ _ _
__
--
-- ---

_ _ _ _ 600 Rip ?? -
---
_- -
I?I
-PDE--11

-PDE-
?- -'- -PDE-
--
--
-POE- - -WOE-
???
+10.0
+00.0 w 14.000
'
15.000 (45.93
)
(49,21)
0.6m BASE TAI L DITCH
EST 2400 m3 D.D.E.
CULTIVATED
N
N
0
27
Z
w J. C. BELL, HEIRS
Ld DB 304 PG 217
= DB 590 PG 155
UJ
W
UI 1.2

FARM ROAD NATURAL GROUND
-
......................................
?DO NOT PRELIMINARY PLANS
777 ................................. ................. :
?

h -5
0,6m BASE DITCH DETAIL 0 20 40
s
I
STA. 10+15 -T4- TO STA. 13+08 -T4- .:a
1:500
NOTE: PLAN VIEW FOR THIS SECTION OF
PROFILE IS SHOWN ON SHEET 22. -

12

cq Lo

+
8
+ XISTING GROUN

-- -- --- - --- -- - -- -- - ?i EXIST. 6 0 CS
-0.207,

I
- ROPOSE DITCH GRADE
- - - - -- 61.- 1
--
1:100 VERTIC L
---
--

- - - -
-
, ?
, nn
n
n :500 ORIZO TAL
10+00 20 40 60 80 11+00 20 40 6u uu Iz-tuu . zu Ire _1
------- ------- ------------------ - ------- ------- ---------- ------------------- ------ --------- -------- ------
See Sheet I -A For Index of Sleets STATE OF NORTH PRELIMINARY PLANS *T?IRI_
SEE Sheet l-t3 For COnVenhOnOl Symbols .............
I

- - ` END
SR
R lRGI '
,
o
PROJECT
BEGINc
PROJECT
P

ti
S
?:0
S4 k 1969
!6p? _-c
y4,
PLANS ARE IN ME R. ANO
DIMENSION'S A't\<f D IPROFI LIE FOR PROPOSED /OR MILLIMETERS i?! ih, f
OTHERWISE HGTkt
S•?I,I,//??,\TJL A - /OR MIL..
JL d ????T'`?1y? HIGHWAY
ALL MERRY HILL' I
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION
OF STATE PROJECT 6,019001T
BERTIE COUNTY
LOCATION: US 17 /WIDEIVING FROM EAST OF SR 1503 TO EAST OF NC 45 -
6YATH
N.C 6fATB PRwP.CI' REPP N= n'a HET TOTA. 11
srxn mwxa Rsraa xa ecavnon
6.019001T PE
6.019004Y____
UTIL,
- ------ - ---------- --
NOTE:
THIS PROJECT WAS SURVEYED AND
DESIGNED USING THE METRIC F'ORWaI ',
BOTII ENGLISH AND METRIC DATA i,3
FURNISHED FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
INFORMATION
TYPE OF WORK GR,,41)ING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER, RAISED REFLEC17VF,"
PA'N:,A1ENT MARKERS AND LONG .FIFE' PAVEMENT . . NGS,
R It
AND BOX CULVERT EXTENSION
cs; ?
L-• REV STA. 52+62250 LB
---
` ny -L- STA. 52+62.300 LA
n+ +
V
+ BEGIN CONS'TRJCTfUIN._ d;
--
°o
?g6° X49 $ ?yoA -Y4 STA.2 Pi00(1
4 44- o G
+
4_ PT STA.12+93.198 LB =
-II.- REV. POT STA. 12+93.798 L
(3.0m LT)
BEGIN CONSTRUCT
-Y2- STA. 2+20.000
1.. o
44
•
I
TO K?lypspq 5 _U REV NOR7??
17
J :EN
o ` -Y3
-Y2- STA. 2+69.367 LB = o
oM -Y2- REV. STA. 2+69.367 LA
?. BEGIN STATE PROJECT 6.019001T a
-L- REV STA. 14+00.000 .. °y
N 253,783.658
E 805,128.299 s
(LOCALIZED COORDINATES)
1+75.000
-L- REV STA. 37+01.642 LB
-L- STA. 37+01.721 LA
i II
/ s
-z
END CONSTRUCTION j
-Y4- STA. 3+02.428
END STATE PHOJECI: UJ19L
-L- STA. 60+62.73&_
N 255,697.763
E 809,369.930
(LOCALIZED COORDU RTES)
"6L 10 DFNTON
? )
• • CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
DOT CONTACT: AIR. C.H. CASEY, P.E. - PROJECT ENGINEER, DESIGN SERVICES TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
J
:4
r
HYDRAULICS ?'NGIP.9s'Elt .I7IVISIOA' OF FIIGHYYA
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF

P.E. AP?°ROVED FOR

-- STATE OF 2VORT7i CAROLINA

re00
1995 STANDARD SPECfFiC,171ON CONTACT
Pa
RIGHT OF W
AY DATE HATFIELD
D
D
P
E SIGNATURE. P.E.
.
; _,
.
.
.
.
PROJECT ENGIAF
'F
R ROADWAY VE'SIG'!01 S'7AIE IDGTIWr3T ENGINEER -DESIGN
OIo`2B ^91o .
. 7
0N
AEPARTMF,NT OF TId.9NSPORTAT2
FEDERAL ffiCIPfvAY ADMIIdISTRATIOA'
LETTING DATE: D.H. FRIDGES. E.I.T.
06-16-98 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER

SIGNATURE: DTVISIO,N A11:N1NTSTItATC1R fl/1TE
-?? ? - ?? ? ? ?:\pro!ec1's\usli\tltle.d9n
G:\PROJiCTS\PLOi\TITLEPRf
06/25/?6
- P LIN1_I NARY PLANS -
Al.L EB,ST. DRWY PIPES ? , i I IT U;a FDA CONSTAUCi'ON ? ?-'?'
CO BE REMOVED UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
12865 91.3sY 30.685 60.844. T 9 I
7651501E EIP- - N6i16']O'E -"-?-?-- ? A6574'IO'E

r
L ©0 a r '• 21
i RAYMOND H. HUGHES ?LEROY BELL
25„ R DB 600 PC 307 : f PB 589 PC 0!

p o
N
w

S
N
'
SPECIAL DITCH GRADE LT
a
y

_ IT

TON R
STALLINGS
+60 !t {. REV)

5 ,
25 000 m
WILLIE W. WILLIAMS

DB 679 PG 725
DB 639 PG 249 SEE PROFILE

i
7 , 1

+00 (-L- REV)

25.000 m

_
AL
.
Z9 )
02 FT
82 MB 02 PC 43 - 1 82.02 FT.)

1 DB 634 PC 685
DB 587 PG 78
i'.,i? i•+W%4i/.4?kr` tiw.,.?:'rw,

?.,, ,
.
r
0
'tiiN'4' J'4. "' , h `I., y
l

., ?y

R ,

^ `

eauP Rrw1

r-S

AE LYE

siA
LOPE

a

EIP o ---T? -- ------ -

YS'C
PES

r-
M?^v. ,y?,, ..'*•.r :L- 7 +.t', ? LOW A ..,B, E EIP

I'
?, .tirr^.r^t5
P r.
r
- rv
PES
3
5'rC

•.
_• .,. _ _- ...,. -

- _?"?

EPSTRrrv

-_

Lam. _.
3
--

. o-
_
-?- T -- ?

` yi, :_? t._'s,?p •_.O r"tL•% ., tW' .? ;r .,? _•'.' ?.:% ?t?-,?.?iy -t;? ?i ?;"i

r \ .., _v J t4i''''?t 4.

`?'w 4j 'v? 4u"':. ,..?
uY - 1
624U '
( .? ...,.
' Su
CO'; rn ?
M \ S.o GONG 37s C :C .. _ . ._ 1 01 ...!.-
f R 1I -

0 0

Q
N IS

;.
_
_
a r rsce.c 3r5J-C ?.

0"\.,-•, t''o r •,.; rsr :..;: '. r•__ a, .- r PES '3 '5 s 6
PES 9 f
C soi
-
..

? , E
EIP PES

5T A/ry

__-__-_______________________
_____
___. _ _______ - __

-
_.._-
.

+60 (-L- REV)
`?
700 (-L- REV) o
CLAS
° +15 (-L- REV) 'F , EST
Wy
^ x
000 T RIP AP,
METRIC TNS
t''M FILTER FABRIC SL
+00 I-L- E:E V)
-
25.000 ffl OPE 5 kKE LWr
25.000 m
02 FTJ
82 _
5.C°70 m
16 q • 25.
m
02 FT:) 7
I (82
' . 82.02 F I.)
. 82.02 FT.)
1 ? rho, .
t
W y , I
RONNIE M.BRYANT
TYPICAL DB 644 PC 238 1?Y m I IB ! j S
DB 669 PG 373
L2 BASE DrrlQB N!, DB 641 PG 199 +95 h L REV) w GREG SARY S }

-NATURAL DB 645 PG 386 5E! OC() m i -° DB 631 PC 709 .?,
NATURAL
GROUND GROUND .•% r - -
190 c9 FT.) J p I - r N
o A >u i
i
r - ---

SPECIAL DRCfI U'ADE Rr?

SEE PRC(!IC_ _
- ----- -

`

7

1.2 m

MIN. D = .3 m
i
1
S
3 S:E i ' FOE
a, p p , , S

i
?oGE T
+10 (-L- ), REV7' µ: "x

ELDRIDGE H. BAKER
DB 615 PC OUT 1

L- REV STA 21+06 (Rt)

?I r1
M l 1?'
I III i
` _ -) i E ?, ? 1190.29

o c,
P5 N
21
IF f? _
LEE M.JOHNSON
r: ,}SO3 PC 36T
?} 1
RJJ.REFERENCE No SHEET No. TOTAL SHEETS
-R-24048 6 _ -
5-14'rE PROJ. No. F A PROj. Na. DES SIPTiON
I N N
V4 HENRY I). SPIVEY•
0P alr9 PC; 830
ROBBINS OB 603 PG 236
i._ 'J , w 8 '•?' [b 616 PG 43'5 r
?l
diROBERI E.RoisBIN
Q 4 GB 611PG 3s8 I r t +
_. -- I v ?. N
I ? C
r ? ?91151dp
?PFS
? ?y) I cc
PEI'
L?,I{
r r P r1 --_-[
_7 :i
I PES \(2 (/ \) /
S75 2L (28 ?75 R
3 .,.I
h?-
J ?; _ PES
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROP RIW
rr I
G: l
r:
5010 n x ff
' S. 1 t 1 _ CV 4 ? ?, f7
r 7 ? S4.
Q i fo ° 1 ? m ii
i WILLIAM A. PERRY I J ° o-
-? OB 570 PG 618 ?w
r
Z'i
r
I T__
77 L
i
T T
r L ;?
-}} I
I I i
00
r _I _T
l ._
7 T M1 - _
r F r - -!
?; _ - -
M r fi +, _ ??' Ff 14' C =G ?C 1 BURIE i_52r1 n DES
' I1
+ r+? ?? '? ? r ' ? I -. ? ? I, ? I ? I I ': 1?G 1 tFrtT r)- 'INT.. - 322 ?'?,` ( " ? 1 , 1 •; ? I Al ? B7R,'YD)' ?Y? _ Rt
DI CH OR D - =LT uT ?X00 LL G J2 "}5
? j rt L 13 31rR ? tr
. - HRA9 J - I -'={ - P- - DfT H (RAI C=111 µ f{
L & r
uTr"r t 80
.. . r r I
DIT H RA E T
T
T
(? gar t
l_ ?r; rR+I,rIT J=_ ?{":
1= r Ifs Ek #" _ _
-" r
Ot(6 4/ Tr IJ .{t}'G.32 1 /
0 0••'01 fBTN L- ri 1i - E (I?irl't?
n ur y
'+=?7 10 ?.-
L
I
PE IAL DI ICHi GRADE ECh L ITCf# G ADE R ?{ I r;
w r. ti .12.1 100
r
!
+ T
r : _ p,. N rn f Nl
-1 M
0
O
r. o 1, !
Mi i1F. E?!I -. r L
- -
+ -4 7 7 7
Ma L: - -
ii I 1 I" 5 IOm IT A?
14 HORIZONTAL SCALE
25m 5m
F_t?y?Q
r+? ?{ 11 it, f`4 t t L I 106??
VERTICAL SCALE _
A
W
N N
q:\GroleCfs\usl7\plan3.COn
G:\PROJECT5\PL0T\PLAN3.PRF
06/25/%
S6S'07'37'W
_, .. ., .,.n ._.....=•mrtiu0•i,rrrunllokwxtlwiW?ID1N/6 : +?r ' ;.
- _ 1
PROJ.REFERENCE No. SHEET No. TOTAL SHEETS
ALL EX1sT.DRWY PIPES I PRELIMINARY PLANS R-24048 7
. DESCRIPTION
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS DO. NOT USE. FOR CONSTRUCTION , STATE PROJ. No. F:A. PROJ. No
OT .• ....... ... ...•I
OTHERWISE NOTED I *T: 3
I
_ 91.544 EIP - / ..
V6513'40.E __________________
© 31
HENRY D. SPIVEY, HEIR
DB 599 PC B30 S 4 WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY
DB 628 PG 54T
?;• a / .? ?} 1-
DB 605 PC 236
Q +40 (-L- REV) uy / © P ROBERT E.HARRELL N { © (f ?'.
25.000 m N / N 08 648 PG 251 VIVIAN W. BALL I pB 637 PG
62.02 FT) A>? coe VIVIAN W. BALL' DB 646 PG 91
A0 10
IX' DB 646 PG 91
+00 (-L- REV) !. Q 'r SARROLL L. HURDLE
?' ?.
j'a t 5 +00 l L REV) SPECIAL DITCH GRADE LT 25.000 m
o k /? 25.00 SEE PROFILE (8202 FTC r. ; S I o &_c O
10
(
82.02 FT) SLOPE STAKE LINE k 0
O
b
Mac 1 1 4 1_1 f ,'..,. ,r 4r 4r-4w.;r'Hii Lir '+? •_ ?r 4?i' .?'.. - ?'4,. r, b,,.'.1'/ t. `A? -__ /R1
PROP-/W
_________ _
!i5i C _ 5 C----r...?--f- ?-. - f--rr-r-----r------`-•-----.,-.F?--tom PES
75 C
N 31 , PESO •- •- - *- •- • •-• •- EXIST R/W E? 35 - 36} N
PESr• •-•- 75
O EiP (?
C ,
?
00
'-
. tiles- 15.240 W :5 ?5 1 cw:c
n00 ?
w
--:REV -
9.0 da.
N 65-15' 27.6'
o -L_ m cn
a _-._ - - -
'7 7
r o
3i c
50'15 C 3 5 C 376
co::c N 32 0 33 -,4 -
E -
3D 5 R _ Q- •. r q r 3> C i_ r, S1111 ?n.
?_-
PE -
PES ?. • • eL J w -
1P--?-?- ?- .-`-?- _ - - -- - -------- ---------------------
00-L.
:.0 PES 75i C'----- --------- - ------ -_---?- -- - ?r FIR
---- a -
?? PROP TR AtlW 1 _ -
_ `--_ , ,? ?• '? 11 ? .EI,,?}?3Q3© h.
w c a.Cd RESET AND INSTALL i
o -E-E-E-E E ._._-E E E '1 FENCE ANO,GI,TE - +20 (-L- REV) -L
© :,. ©{? ;' ' n SPECfAl DITCH GRADE RT r'
h +23.712 (L REV) v._.
SEE PROFILE [ > V y 25.000 m 3
L r r .. , F (
25.000 m 82.08 FT.)
+16.671(-L- REV) SLOPE STAKE LINE ?
IY 182.02 FT.) s=c 25.000 m 3 iA +• BR ti'
' i o c ( 82.02 FT.)
+23.148 (-L- REV)
oy WANDA W. COLLINS fS I? 4
27,500 m +15.908 (L REV) +0D (-L- REV) k' f
?? e> ( 90.22 FT.) DB 596 PC 371 25.000 m
( 27.500 m MB 09 PC 65
A' 3
HENRY D. SPIVEY, HEIRS <,l 11 oao c,
d + DB 639 PG 160 90.22 FT.) ' l 42.08 FT.) ..
as W? L ? ,? f ? ..
m N ; o ELDRIDGE H. BAKER rJ ROANOKE ELECTRIC € HARLON D. CASTELLO
MEMBERSHIP E ' Q
a =.
DB 491PC CORP. ~ -B 555 PC 240
0T P DB 647 PG 580 D
?. - 109 A+L Q t
,
y
+. f
L?.
_-* - - -
--rl=?-
+,,
r
+ G - { rr 5I mi l t - ;; y 1 2 ,D 0
t : S At 6+ 4f a
„ , ? ..-L- --- __? L ._ .+• r ? r r -,?- _ r- ? - k` ? -- !?#+ -r
,
7 LELL
+-h-.: ,_ JXHijL' ._ ,_.{ TLL t#
aai 1 t ++H4+r+4 t PE-j'- LT: RT., 'LIT ...,?. - .+-?.1+, .'...
li?
V ( r -i `C k -. ,..? .. r , .. Lr L. 1... _. [ : 1.. -?._ +!-h Yt t1. fr+:r Ik: [" :L1 'I :: - -+' .. t •:_I
r
-.4 A---`I ;.` r--
T
Q..,.=rF`r: It
{f r-hf CL.
___,. :... ;._':.: _ .,;.?_ + , --?,,.r..+. ? rF +-I.::_..,..+ • 1.,..-.ll ?Ia-;1. ?..,,-.+-?.1 L+r -,C i... Li' -..'?' ?:... I, i. ? 1-_ .1 ? C1 I'4
_,...,. „?;--.. :; -.r, , .:-; ., '+ r- Li __ .- t1. .: ,::.,.4-a ., ?.?a ' "? .k. fr + 1?:<.L.._.?,_4. .__ 1:, - __r..: ?, ::j
T:
-_....:• -, ? ' <?__ __ r- _. ,_... - t+t, tu. _ .'..,.! _ ..;. :.:_. a ,.: -•- r r ., . 4 -, {+ .! _ L... ,.I,.... .. ..:, i.. ,.i.. ?:.,: .-L+ ,_Y L:.. _II.
.;. rl.r
- - - - .1
+
7:7 1
?-
0_. 1
_
N: t? -
0621 /
. .,,...•..+r,-'-+` -.++-r -r :, ::. -.. _- t. '; `r r.. ?' ? ? ? -. :_ :.,+ --_.. 1 r?rr
'-'tr.-r-_?,,'
-_...:.. -:. , r. ? 1.j. .. 'I? -
1 j•F { F 4 ?'r': `-: .,i L '-1T}i (r'?r- l[y?' _ LI. _ I+• r :1?, r!'` ?Z? Hi- t r _
-Y'F t,+?++ r,rl{ -4
- - #
+•= r'? ?lr ? _t-.._?_1+i
-
1 Ell
"t
?_ + :ET
-F'.r I't i a+a t.? W `r T+`Tt 't _. _
-RT _
- 1+s
77 T
k + TL L r
r T •r. . ' »-,-::., . - --+ ? ' - - ? .+i. - T - : ,,. ti.: h., L h Fes': «- - r '7+}, - Il-- P. P. ? rrl 4-1., lp
C,; ' o- ?F' $ u + U G P u 1.. n r :. n 1 ?. ..;.. a ?. p ;r[ xt..::v v v Ftt '+ f;ar{: tfk v4 <F+r sEih t. -i f ,: :,. st, t, +
rM. .. tr 1 .:.f. ;G _a._.. T+,. tr1' Fti G.. _. I tl!, ... U fi,. tl... tl tl,- : _.,,.• .- sYV h
... .,, .? r _- , - .I .. _ -.??' ,.. _.>T _.. ...- ';''?iJ r ', " A _._ .., •.I F 4 TI? i...?+t k. [ r 1,r I IL r:.r .}'r j::}r
. . +I T :fir ?' I.+?:. 4-. h- HDRIZONTAL SCALE
?qT -, r "_. --... _ .... _ _ 25m 5m
77,
..-- .. :. .? h
-1-IL; Hi
7-+. .1- -. ,, _ a, t J, rh
VERTICAL SCALE
1-
f rt
::jL L1?.
_s ..n. ? •.,_"' a -:: ?.... ? :
H. : 28
24 25 26 27
_ a:\projects\,s17\pIan4.ayn
G:\PROJECTS\PLOT\PLAN4.PRF
+' 0685/96
---------------------------------
- - - - - --- - - - - - - - -
1
CARROLL L. HURDLE
DB 637 PG 348
----- ---
--? PRELIMINARY PLANS
ALL EXIST. Dll PIPES R? Nor t sE Foe cordswucTION
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS ...............................
OTHERWISE NOTED
i
- PROD.REFCRENCE No. SHEET No. TOTAL_ LTS
_ R-24048 S -
STATE PROJ. No. F.A. PROD, No. DESC r ION _
x sE
r Y C N
00 . m 0 00 (-L- REV) m
N rn 25 000 m ??. jANIES A I FGGETT
a0 82.02 FT.) °o DB 673 N3 1F3
SPECIAL fVTCH GRADE LT I
ROBAH L. GRIGGS r SEE PROF/IE
DB 632 PG 879 ------'--- Cl `B' f21P RA'
+00 (-L- REV) l E ESi METRIC TORS
25.000 m tri W. I FABRIC
02 FT) SLOPE STAKE ueE_ EXI37 ?? --- -
(82 R IC rv/ (C
? 500E I_AR"
m 92 '
41
PROPN
-- ____________________.._ .._ .. I ..-____ -
_--__--w-__-_-__-_--
-a -a ,t--r-w-
- -a -r - - --' -i - -r - -.---r-s--?-«_.y J~ Y
PAS \n!f \ ?yW
S -
r
IP EXIST R/N ___
T^:.75,
-7
n r _. r. ?.r.. ;77
1
i ..--? •ir,y; ,.?? 4d'?y;'ti_a .?, y .:j/ vr' v'' •.r tir :- . _ _ - -- _ t?,b
C?'
6,
.000
REV
566 BI-
I
A L O 11 cl O
"-
pl 7? :7
1,375 CC;G -==-t,1h tO:J' ;_F 5:> C0:(c Sao 0'.C+.I. ,T ?2Z5- f : cl:,f:
40
T5 c 3g N 39 75 c zs c t5 c--_' -- --43 -- - - P S + _.. a?WA= 4 _ao?-
LI f w' -•--•-• PES 3 7 R
---- -•-•-•-?? Ezs. R/W ' s_ eC
PES , PES
C o_PES - - _.
L C ??
PES - r- ID
• .? PES 5si
?..... I ; c ( 5A 6' 4 { L11.11E 1111E LINE 4 ©y q5 ?L500 RC h
;WII.IAM W9 WILLIAMS 0 JII R?, IJP;Q 16 __._
i © I t DB GS2 PG 207...._
_19
0
oP 2LFTRIE) L. SPECIAL D1TCff GRADE R7
S3^;9 e '.._x. 25.000 -SEE PROP9LE ?o' r © 280001 Pf VI
f 82. ChAhFION INTERNATIONAL CORP. J
I 4 ° 1 625 PO 5;4 -
I
r v'J M8 Gr 1 65 L S;i , _... -JE
n.r r., h L I r.
I 1
.
_60o < -- Q ? 3 ? "" - u. Ao, F INTF.ftxrFC 1(nv h 11 5
Q,?
t ? 61x: "
w:.. 38 ROBAH L. GRIGGS, JR.
OB 580 PC 837
r" HARLON D.CASTELLOE
I-1
1 555 PG 40 -
I
I ;
LE _q7
_ Y
771
- _- w
$ r ti i_ --
- -_ -??
I
- -i - -__'
I
-:.ICI
13. 190.
-I I
I I I - ?.
r,.- _p1 r.-rr r+?- -,-r -1 ?. ?
II flU21C[I t. m,n DEEP.
u -_ - L N Is f.i- 41 . i- TT _14 TA 28 Q E 3 11+ ..: r L _7
-
j
uF,_ I' [Ai1 C1 0:55?I ?6.,?HII 111:) }iit p
, rr ? \ I I L .; r- -
_ _. N , L ++ r' .r - - ?EI 3 8681 - -
I ?
-4- 71L ( ,L 0 [05 L..:_: ,_ TJ:f1:9 68 .: ... ; :.,:_
T G +
- -
?L a
f77 ?- -- -- -
r. ___ - - T -
-- 7i j
-
-- r - - . ?. 7 - -
' I
L
j ?
?' - - --
T
7. _7 7
Tii.,-+
1
- y -
.., ..,: .__ ..,,,.?-.r :. _,,rr+l• +r , -t- ,-+? ? -r _?_. _? N:._..,_. ..__._.:' _. _.__-_ __ _ N - I ?_L'ICh CIFDE
r
I
T ..- _: 4FE
T_
{
Ej 'I,
ST EUME
1
:
--F
j
I
tr - -
- + - u
•.,. .. ?_?i-..I :. ?. I. r } ?. .. '-7T.....'.' _ +*:-1 ...:.+:r.. .. c.._.-`L $T
`? T _
$ ry
.,_ : '1F - I 41' _Y!' -I
i-Ir-`. -?
??., U1..
-41 Q•..
?:: ':.`5 ."•.. ?...-t ?,...-,F.U-cf _..:: p__... hl':..: h_.:-?F ?.`$T .- h-.'., 1(•. ... 7;-.,. st ..,,-: st._Z sk. ?:._.I?I?.1-cif-.-, $-_.... #., _..?J ? 7tt.: [:_>d'_---..17 ? i,' U I::? ? I h :•I I -- _ - ?----r_ • .?._.
lI ,
N HORIZOATAt SCALE
25m 0 5m
` _r .. ®R- . -c I r . T ? ...?I r-I_ I} H
i
TT -jT
L.VERTICAL SCAF
28 29 30 31 32
q:\R' 0jacts\us17\DiaM.cs-?
0:\PR0JECTS\PL0T\PLAII5.PRF
.''" _.-06/25/96_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - --
-- ? rrcua.rccrcrcc.rv?t rvo. ,r,«I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PRELIMINARY PLANS -', R 211046 9
De for use FoP coNSreucnON , -L-EXIST -L-REV - STATE PROJ. No. F.A. PROD. No. DESCRIPTION
TRI
------------------- PI S 35' 2589 P! Sta 3609194 --
A.3' 155'ILI) A- 3.02.0155'(LT) y
T -9 ! _. , T - 92.491 ---
L- 1 9 L- 184938 IP y
R • 34927 R 3492751 --
C • 1849(1 C • 184917 v ALL EXISTDRWY PIPES
RC e • RC TO BE REMOVED UNLESS
Os •!00 km/h Ds •100 km/h j OTHERWISE NOTED
to
N M 111 to M
F0 S M M M
F VERNON F. LEE
L- REV. PT STA. 32+08.881= 43 "? a
Y3 REV, STA. 0+96.898 JAMES A. LEGGETT N DS 549 PC 07 D8 673 PG 163 a DS 510 PC 50
-L- STA. 32+09.671= SPECIAL DITCH GRADES +16.704 O
-Y3- STA.1+00,000 +00 (-L- REV) m Nj > (L REV) O
BOTH LT.& R7. m 00 m
25.000 m SEE PROFILE 258
f +
I50mm MONO
GONG. ISLAM) 182.02 FT.) PROP R /W SLOPE STAKE LINE I 82.02 FT.) h: E_E_E_E-E
E
... .. fl .. _ _ _ _
_ 35 .
.v, L? 4J'4r 4Y,r _'?',ti?4i'L.r liir''i>r'w 'ai"ii?'4?'i?TV'' ?' 4,.: .;.r'..,v, ?'. 4?: 'ti,'4. v' W-4ir'4 - w'+: 4r'- '-,i.?
__--__ y-
. 15.2 { a
C 3 5 C ----------- - -• • • -. -.
.-. .-. .-.-. .- .-.-s- -?-•-? - •-•-• _
PES N - ._ - C F F ?'- 31 h a-+= \-1 -
?'•,..r%•tr' : 2.,.?,-rr.. EXIST R/W + --__ _--- } O
'-... u-•-?.rr."..':.,. ._ -_ .. --_>.,":+r.T?? r'^ r-.. +'.. EIP -'. ?"
0
is'''i 4ir 4-i. %'4i,- ar''vr r.,:JLr+'i?,'\ i+-ti 'i?" riJ 4r ",s D '-ii''':rr'Li?"'vj'tii+--? , '' S.@40 v? :.? 4,?'4;1 4Y 4J'tii'4?,v+ 4r'•_•+ ,? ,,it 4.r`4rT rvr'iw 4ir 4r '4,?' N _ .. ""
r f o ?? I o m
------------
L _REVa o u q. ESJ
m
..:... o. . -..-_ _.-_ .. _: ._... _....:... _ _ - ' - - _ - -
17 V65' IS' 21.6 E -' o C.9 n.
N 0 A?
FILL sis o sro o:c k.•. c a z
1.:c
. 600 a '0 G N 15250 31 O,C ? ..: -
53 i 54
4n.64rL ; c
-
F h r ., n. -
PES i5 G 51 C _ ,. r 1 EIP err-PES
49 ?, ?r 3 i
.240 5 52 .
f- ?- EXIST A/W 5 C E,P 55
qh EIP PIES 3 5 G
C ,?f
RCPES O - t - ? - L °. PES {i-r-. -. •-? ?-• -?`
LA y\ p PROP R/w PES o L. 8 U
6 0 45 1-L- I1EV) w o sLOPE sraKE LINE I I o c
ES 9 n°"? 25.000 m SPl:C1AL
safiar - DITCH GRADES 'y° E m" IQI ! ^W_. E { _E E E_ E E-E E
P BOTH LT.& RT. > o _ - 4 i I• !. { ELI COFIELD,JR G
(?82?02 SEE PROFILE y0ti^ w -.-_
S +16.104 pB 521PG 15
j , .194
9
v aal
I; CP V A f - 25.000 m /r 49
{ N»' 45 • , (.02 FT) d / t z'
S WEYERHAEUSER CO. REV)
1T.9s44rn SPECIAL DITCH GRADES 82
B 638 PC 80 E? 2 39 ` } 3 ELI COFIELD JR. +1U L
( 4?1 P
sao S? BOTH LT .& IDS R1, D&:541P? b ' 46 "u k j © W 30.000 m
wm (9842 FT) <
N m
LAN , SEE PROFILE' r CURT T IS OUTLAW JdME A. BELL
C ?' 45 EP N7o- 54?44'E WILLIE MOORE r m pe 'iT PC 93
>' ``d:•,,. DB 684 PC 923
42.954 E1P DB 525 PG 306 91187 .. k N 46.057
SEE SHEET 2C FOR ELI COFIELD JR. ea Nsso aeE t -` EIP N65roraeE N68`s8?56?E -
W ,; INTERSECTION DETAILS DB 521 PC s
1 Nw +82.992 (-L- REV)p fd WEYERNAEII:iER CO.
%
(82.02 DB 63e Pr, ea
O , m 25.000 m 7--
N I FT') ° SEE SHEET No. 18 FOR Y3 PROFILE
+ - 'T7 1. : _
, ' ?.'

TP

?
«

r :_..
_
t
a.-_

Tff

- RIP

{1

F?

f -

fr

x .

_
F F
?ff
_

i

:
ND-6'I

GH GR

DE rte.

-

r

i

-
..
. . ? + y

::

-
:CI

»

rT

yy
r
,+-{-:

? *. _.

_

_

FF

,-li.? L -'•

= 'bh

:+ .

7--
+ rf+ +1 r+
hr, '+--k
.,.....
.
.,a

#

NE

_
DI GH

R DE

T

z

-

J

t-

.

GI

D

TC
;

GAO
r
,i

+

±

U

_.

x
_-
. :i+
«,.
r
-
F;

TA

34

00
-
El .a3

2,

-
x;.

-
71
tl
'7: ?L a
+ I
tI
I+
i

777,
$, ft

to «+
_ r
_:
ST ..
. +8
EL 13
20
F : . . _
--
:
!+
= - I
t
;,

t

17. '' •- rr

t I C
-

i=?,-+?

+t
I

t to.

:..:,...

f•
t
=

.?

a .

?
!

_:.'r

Jam

*rl

4

!+

,iG
+t

r.
N
•r

±
i

:
s

r:.
.

.,,
;.
...,.

.,II
of
1,

;
+
_ -t (i
-
*
,
t
'
-
r,
-
-
,
:-
-
r
iM t- -1 tl F
,
77 T7

?
? :lL
?
?;TI
r?'
t'?
,
?;
,u

,.f
?
•?"
--
,;-
t. 4,
rte,
1 I'
d
Y it
J
•-t
_
a: ?
-:S r

:
t

f

-

Q'

a

o

H

>

:

a

f

y
m

'r'I-
_

' I
-
:.V,
TA
)+96
c
Y3 R
96
Lo. .

IR-

UR

ED-152

m--_DEE

P

_
_
.
-
'
' -
:Lj

m
T
=

?
mm
I ?:
' F=

711-
7-

T?
152
m: flE
P
t _
-
-•... II'.1 ?-,y Vii,,r
1 1[
`r

f .- :1 1-`t ',:: ? ,.t:.[ -
_

929 _.,., ..

. .:

_.
- r
H

,_
_

#

t

.

L T
+

ii
t

t`

4
0

L
Im 24

^It
. H

k

-

_ : -

rr t, s

BO
--T 1T

&. R

.,

t

-,.

q
-
__ .

T
#

rr

f 1, -
t

-

I

4-

'1#1

'
1

F

-

!

TI=

+ LIT
.

r

I

?

-

TR

t
- r ,r li-y

?

^

ro

..

"'1

(ht

.
- _

:{

k

r

i

?

::
A

I
u

'?

ln:

ul

...
N •

... .. }, :

t,1.: - ... rn-,.....,.
?
"?"? _..:._.y

en. ?, M .

_

Mme.:r .,:.

'7,= ,:.

1 -.

t,>_,. .:-_

'-- °^ . .:. ,+::

•,. +?. .}._:f::

.
?• ?,

,_

:.-,,._

,.. ,._: ... _.:.:.
-:?
- ._
--..
M..
.,_ ._
._.
.
-:
.
< . _.

-. ?
.... .
I_.. .._
I.:

.. ;.?

x r..

' Tqf?

b° k?: t

V :

h ,

t

h _

:
- ]
.R.

fir Q :_ Q s ., {
-4'-: u1t . ,
l
«1-
... .: ..+ .:...
?. ;:.
? :'?... _.,_ . .:_ : ..,... .". -.. '. .
-_ ...

T t. cF.:_.•
lp? s}_[ k:+ L. .?... .
-. .r ... ?. 7', err
t ;7 1 4 r:
, ?kG
?i
? . ,-
14
•+?
.+?
?r?
,+ r
Fr,
:•^r
Y„-.
I
tL:+ ,
.

r
t

y

1 _

3{

1 - - .77,T

r

T

? ?+?j

t

t

+

: I • .

1

i i
it
#

+

ORIZONTAL SCALE
: ,:..
- r „{ ,_ .
-
r
?F+ - - .. ::'

r
l
t

R :IL
S
E
1 : y Lrf1 ft .
{
i I
1
R µi
N-11
:::
#I+.

i 4

I

+,.-r CAL
VERTICAL

j
,. F
. 3 6
r
32
33
34
--_._-.,..----- ---------1_.-__--______.._....
0:\Profeot5\us,7\Olan6.d9n
0:\PROJECTS\PLOT\PLAN6.PRF
06/26/96 I
- • -- ---------------- PrRJ_REFERENCE No. SHEET No. TOTAL SHEETS
ALL EXIST. DRWV PIPES PRELIMINARY PLANS R- ?4046 10
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS , Go not nE FOR CONSTRUCTION; SPATE PROJ.No. F.A. PROD. No. DESCRIPTION
-L- EXIST -L- REV OTHERWISE NOTED ...............:.. .
' j -- -
?j TRI
--------------------
0
PI SI 5. 7.589 P1 Sta 36'09194 m - -
--
E' 3 0 155' (LT) E- 3' OZ 0155' (LT) VERNON F .LEE
T • 9 T • 92.491 DB 549 PG 07 1 3 \ \ :?" -
L • f 4938 L • 184938 DB 510 PG 50 ( „ ' r
R 3492751 R • 3492.751 g N . I f j : ' ' rl ,
84917 C 184917 +
e:RC e•RC r_ r ? a, 1
Lp Ds • 100 km/h Ds • 100 km,,h to o 4' ? \I CO M Q
M F M M +01.721(-L-) i 1 fn c p
SPECfAL DTCH GRADES 30:000 m a
98.42 FT.) S, 51 L
BOTH LT.& RT. 1 } co m
SEE PROFILE +60 (L) 2 r' I MICHAEL HOGGARD °x
> ^ " SPECIAL DITCH GRADES
°a
w 0-
d RT. r. 0 -J
+20.000 (-L- REV) 30.000 m BOTH LT.& DB 660 PG 687 's s
+01.121(-L) ( 98.42 FT.) +60 (-L-)
SEE PROFILE 3 f w r O
30.000 m 25.000 m 25.000 m +00 (L) `w w k' o O
98.42 FT.1 182.02 FT.)
i i 82.02 FT.) SLOPE staRE LINE 25.000 m o o }
m
E-E-E E-E-E-E-E-E-E E-E--E-E E E E-E-E-E-E-E-E-E r ?/ 58
62.02 FTJ
----------------- r
--_____ PAOP A/W
__ 7 ____ __ 1
W
-•-r-r--r--r-r--?'--a-a-?'--'--a--s -------?.-a--a-? J_ 1 n`"'t .'" i?4. ".r _ -
4 .9 ._59 T5I? 60 35Cw 611}J4C Q
t5?C
-• •-• - _ _
181
QEIP
a EXIST Ww _ _? _ E.!?- - --- PES PES PES
- 46.5 31 Q Gi? _? - ?-
t--r
r
+
L
/? 1
a? 240 t 51> IC S > 0 Sn L .0 2 - il4 :. O
p
1501 .- o.).•.- __ e J:ol.:- _ 4 -4
000
-al
_ .... ._.._ _ _ .,. Q
REV/ - 1 Lu
N 62* 13' 26.0' E
N
---- -- ----- ------
_ 0?' ill
s> ca c l s> cc L ao, su L L -
...._.. N L
T - E%151 R/
P 57
4 P c'' cox PES - - - - --
?_ /p\ /+
?.
-------------------------------------------------
G m o
Tp_ 175 FC - --- -- -
W \. ---- F_-E--
:. _ --"-E- E E +80 1-L-1 SLOPE STARE LINE +GG (L 1 I?
_ ____ E25.000 m 25.000 m W G
E _ E?--E h ESE E
E
_E_E E-5 E _E_ 182.02 FT.) 182.02 FT.)
Ln L; L } _ +01.721(-L-) 53 .
3 © 27.500 m
CHARLES G. WHITE
/ m
90.22 FT.)
5?
- w ELI COFIELD, HEIRS st 1 08 67IPG 794
-
49 DS 491 PIG 93 +90 (-L- Rev) PC A PG 600
- -? DB 667 PG 449
:LI COFIELD, JR. c 35.000 m
DS 521 PC 15 Y - ? 0 O3i (114.83 FT.)
x,46.057

4F4 lz7 r. ±--, .;.:

M
- HI
T
-
--
-
T -r "
l

:,.::.
.
?....
_--+
-....., ;'. .-.?
..
..

-?.
_ .,.,.:.. i+'r -•- r -r-I T„ + _ ?}. t *,
F?T'r L t
.

- -

EY-PI_S[_
a3a0.
6A-U_.. -_.. .
L
?
'L.
i L=
'
h
='
-
-
; ?
-
_
,

' *i .- Lam: _ <:r :• c _. ?
r
'
C ? -r ' . : 1' __ '
_t
1 .. , :
ND -
DI CH RA €
T Tl.. _
Tr -st
7t --
-- -- h
} _ :
:. r r r = . , z + - ©.0 n• , a i , t_..1. r._.
PE IAL' L (GR E - :r .kF-+

1 39 n
3
..:: :{x.

.
?:

ln-1
!+
IF

Tl.
.
.
,,.r
.I+
+
- ..,

''
,
F i 'T'k
.-I-
7
_.
. r.
+ -. '.
1. C u
r
. {?
,+•
I. L'. '
-„k
-
-
' -
-
t . rh f
rF-F
,_. . .,
F
IR E I
. ..I .
? :_
,

t

{'

?

T[ ry+

I

';_i -
SP
ECIAL AlT
7
S
-
- -
u
-
IL

7777, .-,. .14r r1i. .1.Y -
', r...

` :I

1 ?
Y

T

4 _:
- '.0, 358
- -- i- :
- + - -
_ _ ?. ...
T &
I
L,
RT.
L -H
IP BU ILD
152
m;-
DE P
L ' .I.

„

-

TT p
i-
Y

3

i

'

?
:. .„_ tl.l... .:.,
<
'

•
_

.

-f{?Haw
?

_:-

"

•

_
:

F

? F

kt.

k`r?, 'r4f-:

-

l?r

-

- ±

,

_ m

?

jt- 1 _ r;

L

? ?
?-

r
rl T

-

r
1;'- ,? Gr
- _-._-. ._. . -
ED ._ . .
,. _ ?
.i..
44h= r T

.'
.
-
`
f : i-I-
L

.IL.
.:,1
,r I
-r'-
L<
-' ?
.:J
:
r•' -._ _. -+
: LL..:'
r, _I r _.
F
7.
__
,_,, _
._
.-_- +
- _
,'L.' -
- _ .:L. rte--
.I-
.

'

'
-
-
•I _...
, ..._
-

,

N
NII.
, _
t"-l
?'. ,:... ..??
e

?, CO, .._ rv1: '?:?

t? S,,-
N': .•.?,. L
f.

_ 'J,j-F

•7 Q.1..:. .D? : OJ:.: ti_ -. C9... ,... N. n_j
11'.1 7?c
11. 11 :I

-, 7-I: NL:_,

. -.-

: M

l - .
?._- .
r -. ..{
_

.

M:

r

y
-
rv

I
v . :::v t
{ I ? ' .
t .:.
. . , b D

-, L
+• _ :. _r
,.4 ..
; .. ,
r
M

} + 'r

HORIZONTAL SCALE
:: f t
Y -
- t L .. .?.. _1
t.,-
' .? t' I. V ] _
:? F
- - :
}T _
LL.L ?Qu .1
1 1L . .:
4 ?
- _
:
rr {
:.
:

44 :- + F
71 .
,

1
,
+

1
L __
-r
j
t- 4
-T 7
-
7
VERTICAL SCALE

N ?. >_.
_

zo

3
0
36
-- q;\projects\us17\pIGn7.dgn
G:\PROJECTS\PLOT\PLAN7.PRF
06/25/96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

G ?E PROJ. REFERENCE SHEET No. T AL SHEE
----------------
PRELIMINARY PLANS ^ ALL EXIST.DRVIY PIPES R 24048 11
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS STAITE PROD. No. F.A. PRON. No. DE
Nor use FOR CONSTRUCTION. OTHERWISE NOTED / I - - - - -SCRIPTIOf
_.._ . - - ?.... •... • ....................I -
TRI ?-
?.
m l
VERNON F.LEE d
NING;
CE & GATE ARE
8' STONE NOTE: FEN
DD 510 PG 0 07 r,,?L/T,T
DB 510 PC 50 METRIC TONS FILTER FABRIC ` \ ® TO REMAIN IN-PLACE
I ,' COBB, SR.
D
F
- B28 PG 984 P
N CHANNEL BACKFILL 08;82 PC 144
08 ! 02 PG 46T
:> 04+° \ `---WETLAND'S ?r ''.? ^?•>' 5.5 cm SUITABLE mtl )iiic +g5 (-L-) CO.
+35 (-L-) 25.00m UTILITY
54 +40 1 L) +63 ML-) ( 8
-- 2.0FT.) +85 (L )
+00 (L) 25.0(70 m 33.000 m '' ! 333.000. 15.240 (108.27 FT.) r .27, on FT.)
(50.00 FT) Q
L STA. 43+43.7 ioE TO' -JOE +63 (-L-)
ROBERT J. HOGGARD 25.000 m D (82.02 FT.) (108'7
82.02 FT.) +40 (I; ) +35 l -L-) k,
20.000 m 2 (2.44x1.22) RCBC 25.000 m 25.000 m
DB 660 PC 689 a
( 82.02 FT.) i a a i i l 82?Q pFT ) ?
EXTRA +00 (-L-) 65 (.62 FTJ
DEPTH 20,000 m SLOPE STAKE LINE A PROP R/w - 8 ( L
d=1.156m 65.62 FT) TEE (600x600x3OO) _ r r 4 r
4
0 76
0
7 4 E
w --C- F .i"'.r -.mss 4 - ?4?'tii't,-? ?..r' 4f K, - ? J , - _- __ -
PAOP ft/W __----__-_ _
,, - ?' L -
?''?4.s?.? , ?,,• ,,., r 4 •,- w TO EXTRR Q
C L r ''?EZlsr A/w 63 )S `- 6 _ `?• r. F 1375 MELT
PES T2 F? 75
? q .. 64
LAND S
N
_ EIP ?-- N ' WETUwD ?? CAT-I WET d=1.116
N i •_-_ -. i
1 -
--- \ CB ?7 15.240 F C --: - CB .-- /OMMCoG .c.._a ?.. C F 9 vk.? coLWETLAND CB CB-?
_ .?,Jr,,,r ti,? S p
-r
o ...... ?g? .ri _
?s OC'0 y, ,1501 _ .__ __ ,...... _ _ .._. _.. _ .. _. _ _ _ .__ ..._ _ ,.. _ _
Z .7 ........ )S_ o :?rL6 N.'.?
B
;O l00 C ,... ... D D]S. `.u ..i00 ,..b
N D r, . N 62 13' 26.0' E 69 EE IGOOx6OOx300 69 D 357 " pEP7H N m
M m r _ CB 600 RC - - d=1:411m CB CB CB..:: ?$
•? p : C8 600 RC > I - C' 00 RC W
0; E 600 RC -? ;oo se
EXTRA
_- . : - ,o c cB 000 300 RC
eoe? '75C MM C;-6 MELT
bE T? r..
I 7 50 C H
'- 0 "__ 000 kY -- _. o d F7F2
t L acEn1n , : s m1 F -:<- f _ wFrwO
. CAT TS .J
- N /' ssaao ??-?6 _ F C_ PROP A/w C R F
N xlsr a/w DI , EXT RA
DEPTH EXTRA
74 7T DEPTH R g
PES??y? i ;E UAE. EXTRA w 68 T d=1.4IIm d=PTT
+00 1 L) 66? Q 68 r +40 (-L-) w
C 65 0. Q { CEPTH€j -
? ,t
0 U
- F 62 17.500 m R
_---------- d=I.381m Q : 17.500 m • w PaoP R111
R ---------------------------------------------------------
(57.42 FTJ 300 RC 157.42 FT.) +35 (-L-) -/ w +63 (-L-) +85 k"V
w PROP A/w
EXTRA
q © 25.000 m' I o 25.000
DEPTH +40 (-L-) 1 L
d=1 m 25 m
A u / (82.02 FT.)
+00 (L) Q CC3C ':.!©aC3 p ?: r ' .426m 25.000 m © 4 ` ??i ' •' 25..02 000 m FT.) CLASS 'B' RIP RAP (82.02 FT.)
2.02 FT
( 82.02 FT.) 82 C3 r EST.-METRIC TONS ioE "to
w/-SM FILTER FABRIC. .)
o?. , , r f (
+35 i-L-) % r +63 (-L-I
Nod ToE
SEE SHEET .2 Q r
37.000 m 31.000 m
FOR DETAILS 5 \°0 (12139 FT) FT.) t
© ?? ff
750mm CURB & X0'''7 ; WETLANDS ?d' 112139
© r
j COX
GUTTER FLARE CHARLES G. WHITE D
DB 671PG 794 TO'.',IL CHANNEL
C7\V
PC-A PG 600 ATION 80 cm 5
DITCH LINING a i E%
OB 66T PG 449 v 0 \ CLASS 'B' STONE 7
EST._32_METRIC TONS JOHN T. EVANS
12
42 M FILTER FABRIC. DB 6T2 PG 77
Y W/
, 1 4
y ?3
1
+
:?:..:? I .:-:.i1-1-rt --. i-1. L.'. 1=.17-?_ F,?:-T...; _' ?-. ? '. ? ? :..__... ?' '. _ _-. .i - .-:: _ _ - .. Ci $ _i- .? ?- '?`??I ...Ty« -• ? _..: ?'.
_ -J
?t 4 - _ - -
-+-- a--7+- -- ?. ._. -- - _ f
--
F'egeny
o's
r-
....t...,.._.? r -r Fr ,?,, '. _._ .. ..a -r?!?I"Li.? _,. :_.. I.?-r +-'-r+r _ "??LI W- L.?rti-.:d..' ..1_.u.'__?.-_... __.T.6 -•-J
.. ,.._.. ..,. .:... _.. .. _.« _._..... ..? _?.. :.ra.{ ... I I .'_..I-? ..:_. _:T _ ? 7 - r?+t?-?';?- '?:L eF ?l -:-L,.,-•? _.. MEF7 ._1=_ .. ::
, 1 ?' ,. 1 :: -r.:. - 1 I : 1_ .rr ?, ?._ i1jt:. +r ?,.:•: ;!: rr l r? ,, I+r,. re
-r t f` T -o'
..,. ,,,; .•f - jf. :: i:.f `# 1 r. 1 ... I I ?..E...:'?. ' ._ -.:T __^ :_ _ .. {,1+ {? . ?._ T . F r I r ? .+ `.,.?. .::. k ? _ + ?'.. +?.? _„ .,..: ..... _..,., _,._ -...: ..;L - t;'d. _.F{ ,.[ I
77.
Lc
-F
r :, r _,.f?tt___ ?....__. t, -.?• --:, __ ? . , ? I :.? ..-::?-fr.L-,!"?._ .._1xSrl i.,.{:?I.._h--+.L..,tr+ -t ?i:.?y ? _ _ - L._ - - .:.
--
:
Y
77...:: t. '-I
6.0 EXTEP,510 -
(IE100
,.II' t .....? .JI ; .. +;-.: - .., ,. ____•_? .... ., ? ., :''i _ -?4 ..,,-r ,+ LJ" 6?'C _r ? ',-FI- _ t<1?.;
? r$ .o
.L. :.:. _ , ..r:a. :rt-:--rl -: :, .' .._ .r--??:.,._ •?- _- ..... .... _:.. - _ - _i. J.1.. _?, '?` ?. v _?i ? r N.':: . 50;= 1'A?' I? .k,._.µ, . - - _ _ ?:. ?_ - - _
C ? C C
; J.
10
C
(y
HORIZONTAL SC 5T
r
25m 5m
r _
t_' VERTICN. SCALE _ c
T
44
42 . 43
-------------------- ---------------------------------------- -- --
-------
,, _
© ' 3 EIP 31.632 EP 31.699

M.R.COBB SR EIP - 210'
-•?---N6210'7B'E ^"•__" N62'30'53'E N61'S7'92'E
DB 410 PG 484
DB 382 PG 144
'
-

HOGGARD
DB 402 PG 467 ^" - a
w H.G. COBB JIM
DB 576 PG 617
-R COBS SR

I
-------------------
PRELIMINARY PLANS
100 NOT USE FOA CDNSTRUCTION ;.
I I
------------'-------
PROJ.REFERENCE No. SHEET No, TOTAL SHEETS
R 24046 12 _---
STATE PROJ. No. F.A. PROJ. No. DESCRIPTION
De 577 PG 186 r •,•. ; r ,I, m "o I I 1
N 8 410 PG 484 - RAY K • m G ? I - ?, EQ':c 'ALL EXIST. DRWY PIPES
f
F z Ds 4a PG 467 TER PIE M.R. COBB, $R.
DB 574 PG 574 p'I DB 410 PG 484 TO BE REMOVED UNLESS
:P
ERWISE NOTED
D8 382 PG
+70 (--L--) Q ` +13 1-L-) DB 402 PC 1467 r abC £ TH
s Q 9 C0,1 rt oo W
19.000 m o v i}
7 vQ ( n234 FTJ Q 162.34 FTJ
cn 4
+31.5(L)? m°
V
Q I ° I` c
o c co1.500 m 5
.20'.'000 (
ENCE & GATE ARE
5F TTO REMAIN IN-PLACE ` 57.42 FT.) mF
---- . T.) IdAGGLW, GASKINS 3tU +3 (-L-) 75D0 m OB'.93 PG 757 15,
S 1240 m 57.42 FT.) /('2214
31.5 (-L-)
I^ 3 b: C
(50.00 FT.) +28.5 -L-
UTILITY CO. L 1 4 O
+70 (-L-) 0 57,42 FT.) a P"a j
17 1 +317.
17,500 m +60 (-L-) 19.000 m 750mm P wS +00 (L) 00
` 57A2 FT.) ° o 93 5.240 m 62.34 F . 5.2 CURB & GUTTER d
ry n L7 M ,::r ,.
v 4 50.00 T.) 030 3 5.240 m
s a' (I 50.00 FT.)
\p ?.:. 4;,.. . , tir c..? 4.-4'.r w.r'';.n r . o `ti. :T +7 0 (-L-) .y : ?°. Q u a Q Q .,L;,75 Q Q Q 104 k , , -SLOPE STAKE LINE
) fflMmm"'uuu
98 PEE
4 ° `c 85 z 6.240 0 3 - -
E E E E
P E
81 E fiR-%-E W _ E E E 'E E E E E E E_E E _
----------------- - --- --------
E-E-E-E E--E-E-E-? E E 4- E!-E-E-E-^E- E-E EIP E?-E -E-E JI '1 EKISE R/n E E EE_ _ E___ E--------------- , _ _
-, c -
EIP 0 6 0 00 6 6 CB4 3?-
30 RIC 3 RC F
0 M
T C F 00)O RRC 5 0 EIP 6.0 DI 37 r 7 R
,'.., Iu co c all• n
6. --:
t p 6 0
RIC and 3i6 co c % :
CB s 5 co c. 37 o b. nnn
n., n -- r-;, --rco:c Srs co::c CB s'> o.:i s> LO L :.':. CBXTRAsi> o c Q C8 leo, EXTRA 0 _.
'DEPTH : c
o DEPTH:::_ U - _...101... 05 ::. 106
f ?. ?': :........ :.......... ...........-(R4')r, 90 9f d=1.456171
d 54m 94 L `?
rm? F CB
600 RC
EXTRA
DEPTH
d=1,401m
57
JOHN T.E11.,, ANS
DS 672 Pq 77
F
?C
of
80 db °
DEPTH
3(> yo 00 RC ;
. _ . __ .. r 600 RC CB I_L V> co ::c
300 RC `? CB
a ©92 95 6.0 4 96 6o...c EsI6TR/n !-- ---------- - ----------- ------------------
EIS
E??,E fi?-E--E EIP E-E-E-E-E E 01 E-E-P7 E 1 E-E ?--E
82 Q g3 ;P 88, f
In:?w ? Io
a +25(L) ql y p
15.240 m - r09v' i5 CLAREN?CE WHILE
1• (50.00 FT.) N , , f DS 668 PC 79
ER 9
c
y
TWINE ,
WALX86 PC G
I 17500 Lm :t at Q 686 r ?: > 0©c p
I Jtl d ©©© I 1S a
1 ( 1 5 1.42 FT)
+25 (L) alg 58 c E3 p ; is k`
20:000 m JAMES P. SIMON'S a 0
16.62 FTJ D@ 642 PG 456 4 4
4 B 0
7 1 1 H? I © p ?I Ir? - ?. ,I,
COA
N 62 13 26 0 E 99 103
91
6 ?
340
cc co.:c 450 RC - `, ;,CB 16oI e co.c 375 RCS- c,i:.c oo e
?s 10 1:
s; CB 6.0 6.0 F
0
-- --- - -E- '
E--IE-E-E-E-E E-E'Etp E-?F^-E -V? ESE E-E -E E-E-E-E--E-E-E- ErrT.r£-E-E-E- J
Q 00 EXTRA
EXTRA ?' EXTR QI r ! "' DEPTH 4 +00 I L I
° DEPTH m +00 (L ) ^ DEPTH i q c SLOPE STAKE LINE y4, d=1.185m ! a
a 3 15.240
mF TJ U
d=1.652m ' 15.240 m d=1 .613m s 0
r
(50.00 FT I t© ( 50.0
750mm t l t
! I Q I? CURB B GUTTER
n I r: f '-
ANDREW T. RUFFIN ©AROLYN L. WHITE' 4i DONOVAN BROWN i i MAGGIE W. GASKIMS {
I DB 669 PG 280 i OB 662 PG 362 w I. DB 653 PG 947,-y,r.,_ i i DB 382 PG 524
I 1 t I 1 '1.. ?, o f , ,..? '?' 4' 1 f S.
N
' I
/ `? •• ±\ } A I508 PG E73ND
DB
-I ;S31
Uo ti 1 i I I / ?
\
- - - :?., '-:.-u , •.'I [EI ...`I_ -?r -J.`.? rl :'.ice `If-:? -- I _ +r!. I? L _ .r_( ?i I r=:?

I-f

t I
111 E
I -

,
LT
,
I
`

44
` TT* _
V= 4-1T?1-4
- -` - _- - - a= t'
._.:-.+ 7_-r.;_I .,L+I r F--r SL 1.1,:
-__ • .?: :. ..... - .._ :? rh ?_ _. ._ . ?.: _?_:.._. u ' r•t r??, }rr T •`h - I it '1 :: t? _..._t J'?-111 j t. 1T + a?. r- _
I I-:µl,' JI14 u•-.1 ?F
.41
...,i.,_4. ?.T .-, .• .+....:+ - .: ?r , a,,.• _ .I :I 1. _._I I ::•., .F tt , girt t{1+i= ?-(
.___...: ::?: ..: :.-:. ,. .'+:-_ ' __:._ •, +'?'-,i,. 1? :44p. , .?. _ ? N 1-r :• ,_ _+tl:?' •.'.?1, ?C. _+? ? - gY ? ?". L :tl ..'?F+i r
:-_ ? ,_..- _ ..:? ., . _ . , .,,- w - r _ -1• - • _:,. ,. :.:_ __ - ,.-r?r T kFr l: hr - ,. .,-.. ,, • -t, ':_ h t
+ - .'4 .. ._._ - -_:. __.. _, -.,._u'-__ r- ,,. ? ?__. ,.:... .. _, + L.?,.,},?I r..N:_.?,. ... •?I .11 'T:t._t :.: , CT?Ta fi T1.11 •.1-..a ;_I -il_ 'nl. ?.- .-FI 1'--;-I-h-•
'. .. _?. _..., •: +:..... ..:- .._. :
h
I t-
fit
` -,__. ,r,, ?.? _ , .':- r .... --__ ? . -S +?+ ?i 1f f 74t.7,, t? ) `'-+• Y. -r-` 7T ''• '- 4 _ L; t; u,' 7:__ .
+tr1=. lr ? 1_ _
_:!:?I j: ,,. .-.; ..? ?. ,.+• t-. _LL+ I,-,1. 1
rh
r
1 _i_lri r+_?_.,....-4 _.:..<_,+I: :_.'_•i-:I Iw"-..:..--.-L_._.- __..._._: '_. _:.?E'.:._.. T _._:?. .,: .,.L-?17 ,- RL '1-'ut:. +tF?? ? +,.:a.?
Wt L Nary h--
__
k }}
_.. yr, _ f }L T?I .r(. h -
a m DEHP n -+ +
IP BURIED 152.
1 - µ I
+__ - - m (f? q2 - - _ t
?- r
r..aT„ ? ,:-_.. :...._.. ,,.: • .F'I ? r '.::_ ._ ... _.. .._. _.. ..._. ...._ --I-t;... nt?-y I ?h?I-y +• r t '?-I:.rt -.l '.?'...I i. ,. L :...
O p. s v, -
: . ,
67._ pt7
_+
- rnl
L_ .
rn _. ? : .. N. ,'-? ?• _?s ;?:.. .__ '` ._>T m F O_ ._ •?, 0? .1 "}-T ?e --. m ,.. •.. '-' _?. - - . ?'- -r tii --. O_ ?_,: o ?-::. 0 1 ?_:.
:oE,c
.1 - .. __.
rw1 T + y 51n Q to
..I + r 117 _ , I I I
AL SCALE
ORZA?
[? i::.:':::. I Na I .::v-,; l I :. .,„ . I i _ :'„ .: -r ,4t1 tl ::-:L''T-. ::i _ .. .., i..:.:.{.; .1. „ ICI -'.•'r' ll-L..rtFT1;- .+.,.t.' .. .... : ?...,.: . .., .:: :... J _ '? _ 1.+! ??I,. . ,?. r - :j. - '.'+ _? it ,-:.. r_ 1 ,.a ,1 L
+ 2,5m T
14 VERTICAL SCALE
i_T r1- .:. _. •- - -- ** :C _ ..: ?. -,.L- i.. r{- 7-- •+, : .. ;.. ". ., +I ?- i .. .,+r !1 j?+. f,a ?. .-=4 -`• -+,.. }._.
77 _3 4 48
47
45 46
G:\PROJECTS\PLOT\PLAN9.PRF
__07/01/96_--_,_ -
- -- -- --- - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.;???-. - _3-,-•1 ,. ,WSJ.. maS ?SL4A[RN

0 4 QQ
GD
v 69
MAOGIE W. GASKINS
DB 593 PG 757
{? Q f`•}
! 15
G
Coc.
E=E ' E E --E E E-
---- --- -----------
F /7.0C - 7.0c'
- j ALI- EX'.ST. DR WY PIPES ?V 7
-
OT UNLE55? % I' Ey
!TO BE REMOVED
IOTIiEP1VISE NOTED
32.203 EIS 6101
?- N61'75'07`E NN 350
p
p It
© r3 to
J
ABNER GASKINS GAYLE M. BUNK'.: m r
a
OB 613 PG 370 DB 628 PG 72,i
_00 (L-)
3 17.500 m
+
m 57.47 FT.)
s JO Ir fF 5.74L` 3 \ N
50.00 F IJ I--
..? 74 to
- C (l)
M.R.CO?B, R
it'
rr.
x o FT.) OB 414 PO 34
,NI
u. _ .. " DB 382 PG 14-1
J (-L-) LNTRA DB 402 PG 464
?40 m a oiH 6
? HAS
1.00 FT N
LOPE 'TAPE UN r
D 00 0??;,,, -
-.. ' R AGE. -E F
C0,'C
I 0
--E _02.E f E E-E-E-_' L r E.. ...
-E E-E
k' .--..-"____
--".'S.0 Q,?'?60'', Q Q Q 117 75 RC ,v£rta,•p ?_
EIP
43 { -._ _
?Y Tlf L1,13 CqO ._
?.m?_ __ fl0.o. a R.. 8 U I21 .A Iv .
36
} D 1 109 D 7 N 62° 13' 26 0 E ?3 n?? )TC +f I6 o? T (j9
.7- 7
?:: of M - - \ ?: p c 182Tr 1 9
.: i :.
mr 7 CE3 s n0 375 RC 375 RC > CB
C 112
F - - ----- t -
?o =-
---- --------
E-E-E- -EDP E E -E E E??E h E' E'"'E
EXTRA
+28.50 t-L-) 108 Q_.._QQDEPTH
15.240 m d 1182mk YI
( 50.00 FT.)
NAOMIP.COPELAND
i, DB 508 PG 73
sF
t,.
r
?V r
y ti?
_ I+
f
+ fa +

1r _T 1

" w1 y I+ t 5. A'.
is 00 V = EL :I

? 77-7

?
I
tll

r

t'

I

_

L-?

,,
b U h h - .0 L'1 R'
c o 0 0

t r
T ,r.' 4 r T 1

,E-E--E---
+40 (-L-) _ i
15.240 m
( 50.00 FT.)
+40 (-L-)_
17,500 m
( 57.42 FT.)
+40 (-L-)
20.000 m
(65 . 62 FT.
NOTE: SIGN TO
REMAIN IN-PLACE;
DO NOT DISTURB
7 375_Rj
anP niw l I --
40 STAKE LNE
`3 o f RAP
7 1IETRIC TONS
"_S11 FILTER FABRIC.
4 EXTRA-
DEPTH
d.-1.227m
IS. 3-/s RC
? i
+20 (l.?1
PROJ,REF'ERENCE No. SHEET No. TO'iA__SHffTS-
PRELI IIiNARY PLAINS - -- R-24018 L 13
r o0 N01 IISC FOI' C?N9TftUCY'ON "- 1_
STATE PRO No F A PROJ. No. DESCRIPTION
TRI1?f
- -- -
_j 51
€a
-L- REV
PIS r PI S o 51^43J93 A-10 f 0? 7) L10''P475.0?(RIJ o.
-+T)-
<1 ?tr (I )... ,??;'' I ! •iciRl Bs
Ir o00 L -15y r, Ls 80000 \ ti LSD
w.-'/ ( tl.)
5742 R C is •119596
1r
(.c - 7850 " I
2
+10
50.00 FTJ < s •100 h LT H3.zr9 Q
ST 266'%
+ i 48 I L _ , r e= CQ a c
(le ! , +03 4 2C Ds 80 km/h +82.250
1 I?®
Oat- t>l > Y?Y. 0) t'• L- R
C 5.c,2 FT) ( D ILS i - I- REV!- Q for l
\ Sr10 m
E- F - ( 57.+ r )
1 1 ?, I
20 I i ( I rz .Q C?' I e ' v-: A2 F
!'i Rix T Q I o Lfy
I ? _ t Q L;? 67 ss c 126 - -:
it
E
+. v
ref
-Q I(J I', 1 s 1RA ..,.r / ?k <_ J y oIp Jjt"
.?44m 1 t f kl
/? _
l5 RC --- CE _
I- nl l
6.9 Dl iq I n i I _L9501,1M CtG `, C
375
-- 3Y - -----'-- _ ? mj ?..
-E E
+54340 4- e -- E-. 8
15.240 m ?l l REV) +0301 -'E
E .E "-`E
Ii -
5000 FF) ?V .240 m P ,.V)
+20 (-L- (.,0.00 FT.) 4S('? Ir Q A_" E r?N
4)II v 57.42 `.J Q
20 OOO rn oc c 500 rn ?'' t ,4..340.648 0 Q
(65 a2yT1,: 57 n2 FT . RF.Y) q: 428
(-I- R0
fQ 00 _ 00 rn + d nl'f L REV)
"00 1 L 1 {7.42 F7.) :o a u .5(10 m
26.500 m (i7 42 F t.)
( 86.94 m FT) BLS U
9 ({ REV) Q ,' Q
75 ?? fY. _..Q_t iF I5.20 rn
©G3 L" E47.500 d, co50.00 FT.)
M, N. HUGHES s RI IvE 2.4m (-L- REV)
DD 502 PG 121 1 31 1 > V)
PL l 1050 w/ 47500 m w Q 0 U
V c, A6LE FILL ( 57.42 Fl) 1 SRS y 11. PHELPS
r UD 303 PG 524 I ^ 1 ,.>
e3^a DD 3071 PG 353 r .:
v
'h 6
? o ti'Y t .. - J -1
?_ r Y
1 , I I
7-17-7 7
I I _ T? ? I
r U e-6 i - -
_ ..,r.
IIt
6 r
r I I ? l Q Q t U Ll
r t¢ t0 _ kl
Y
4T4 fF'I
It T' _ ?. ?ll(tft'.?pP ITS 140y1 _ -' 1 -
u C 33
f
k _ -1 T? rh " EIJr?1<FI L lllggh ?01?
/ C, I I I ?? R r? I i ? 1
t 77
I
± t
{ jl __U
-_
r
L CC
J
' I I
._-
' - - = -
EE ?E_
1 I! -.:I r I. 3( R r•_I5 mm D ER f
-- -
_ I Y - -- I _ II 95m,.
V4 .I 117
.71- , E4 7
7TH
rt P ,1 ,Dln i _ R o
._ : r
J _
1..... (6.. 4_ d ..
.
m: ?p ?_.It,?, ?_ •.:-:... .m..:f....0. ? •;..14 :n ? I::- m - T - i - - - {_
_t t _„ L... hlcRlzoNr?! SCALE
r P !T t- 2.5m 0 5
t77 7 +1
_T 'fl, I
T- 7j. ,+r r' L_ _FF Ei - 1 l 'I
;t
7j1 VERTICAL SCALE
-l,.iy
Hl; i
4 Clr, u,I,ri- t1- t, I, II.
TI . -
a
-_.__. q:\projecis\usll\plan10.d9n
G:\PR0JECT6\PL0T\PLANI0.PRF
' 06r25i95
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_ ..... .... ... . . u.xMS,ad1?NxiulVYw:wmaLY I'mo' =x
mow7% *qlYi 4 . Jl?esiA. ?a_. 11
PROJ. REFERENCE No. SHEET No. TOTAL S.IEETS
L?A
M.R. COBB , JR
-DB 600 PG 292 _
tTG
s -L- EXIST
k Ir ..' CCC
PIS 51.4 192
ts •10.2' 5.OZ(RT)
j J
T • 79 q
• I n0 uD
R• 3138
C 158384 5 N o
7 ,, e • .04 r ? M
1C0 km/h
r Lo + +03 (-L-)
® F_ 22.500 m
vv) a (73.82 FTJ
M.R. COBB, SR.
+03 (-L-')
?.;
?.. ;' DB 410 PG 484 v)
OB 382 PG 144 L 18.500 m
DB 402 PG 467 r w ( 60,70 FT.)
D: D-
+20 ( LEV) +22.260(-L- REV))F +03 (-L-)
(60
s 18.500 m;' 115.240 m ' 5.240 m
70 IT 150.00 FT.) ( 50.00 FT.)
om E-E-,tE E E-E-E-E
HEP
L%I>T R/W 4 . 20
Ala (501 EXTRA C9 _y 375.
aDE=IP2T1H
6m
of -? s?' 130
rR
O9 © PRELIMINARY PLANS ^ R-24046 .14
P'FV ALL EXIST. DRWY PIPES 1 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION / -?
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS 1wrr STATE PROJ. No. F.A. PROD. No. DES_CRIP110N
47 OTHERWISE NOTED ALICE C. EVANS W.J. McCLENNY, SR. et.al {?
DB 337 PG 548 DB 651 PG 819 i?
DB 396. PG 596
PI Stc 51.4:3J93 'S V
A- 02,f 25.02' (RT) !4, o +68.095 (-L-) +68.095 (=L)
x 20.000 m
Bs • 2 37 18.82 © 22500 m
Ls • 80.000 , J ( 65.62 FT.) T382 FT. y
Ts • 19545 HOWARD P•EVANS +68.095 (-L 4r
•4ro'E
Lr, • 7(1.502 '- " • 15240 m +80 I L )' Q ... ` K 63 y",>s. ?? UTr"•?' .., '21-E
DB 330 PG 414 y Niwi Nn
r Rc • 8%3183
LT 53339 50.00 FT.) 22.500 m` 3657
JACK R. LAWRENCE >
( 1382 FT)
e' ?5' ;S Q '+80 +95 (-L) ...?1. L DB 685 PC 335 5+ •. 0. S3L ?.
D5 E0 do1/h Q ..
.:? t - N y; ' 0002 0 m . 2,500 m : r k07 (-L-) 20.000 m Q
+15 1-L-1r" Q wI? _,„ " u 3.82 FTJ ?13 22.500 m 65.62 T) Q Q
Q (;E6 :1
AJ 73.82 FT.
+80 I -) +95 (-L-I 1 )
- m
/(272,500 .82 FT.) 3+40 f )
r. .15 240•' m 20.000 m c +07 (-L-)
3
11 m°
p Q , /y C+ 50,00 FTJ (65.62 E.J) 20.000 m o ( 1 4P FT.) HELEN J. WILLIAMS JIV
+13 l L 1 pP? +95 (L;) c F 165.62 F TJ
OB 627 PG 859
\? I£ /7100 m $ r Q +07 (L) -E-76
5 42 FT) L WILL 91
L I +40 (-L) Cap 15.240 00 FT.I' 5.240 m o
13 1 ) Q s a )! 17.500 m 40 1 • cP 0 (50.00 FTJ
?o f .240 m p •- ?! - - N(57.42 FTJ EXTRA N 3s.ps } Q Q ?,"
n? 20.000 m! 8; DEPTH o szs3 b ?
50.0( FTJ p p © w 04.942 40 I-L-) 65.62 FT',) o . so.0gd
.lam o Q r' POE «"` y o E3 "?ppp4 Q
E o Q
p E F'LLO EX: SLOPE srdKELNL ? so6i, 5.240 m { POE _\E E
° 6ou RCRC 133 R: 137 E-E ATE E?E p
50.00 FT. E ° I0 -
W/flr; Wable ° 4--- K li-E-E E-E« -E-E ?.
-E
_ DwAL XIS %ra n {3
WALL EIP - EIu? E E-E E E-E E-E E-E-"E DIE E-E--E E
--'?F-?---- ---------y? 145`A IsMON 16.0 6.0 N
i -------- EX
0o RC ?x R/ - 143 6.ooG Rcf° R/w to
131 ?v 135 6.0 6. 6.0 on LT O VocMM G G _ -
- -
CB - > EXTRA 31 a:,c; 1 sr5 ce:cj ri5 c CB 300 RC' a ^ G co c / 40 ).n . o a y' e C ° w sIR co c B .°!ooa
=w. DEPTH 148 A t+: _ v
ea 3Z ... _.____. ..._.._ _._..____. 500 ',i:'C v, ! iA :A:L ?O? ,, 'r.:. to •Y'
° tl-L568m...... W
° - EXTRA N 72 37 510' E -- o co c
F EXTRA y
139 ° m .
1 a 49
N . ; 131 -' - pEPTH' DEPTH
d-1.196m CB - CB e > c'': ?.c' x-900 RC
d=.742
oa c, _ 0 42 6.0 CB F _C ` 900 RC C z
37 ?R60 E.0
t
F B Q ! . 20 ; ' -Q EXIST R/W
CBg 760 MM G4G 6 0 F C RC
n
CB . so b u DEPTH . ?0 d - ,r _ . _?-`-
6.0' •?'-?-k ... ,.'' - r?:r EX. A/W -E-E-E-g-E i-EE-E--E-- J
F EAIST A/W
--{C.?------ - ------- oN + w ?T +00 (-L-) 1 EXTRA
E-E-E , al EXTRA Q 151
-E--E-.-E E---E -E-E--E E-E-E E E r 136 «94038 E E o E--((??--'E-- E p 'QPaOP DEPTH 15.240 m 147 Q DEPTH
E
Q `27A +_22.260(L REV) +10 51.240 L m ) EW. +25 (L) 15173 +30TL I eoA4W 141 d=1.642m,-0 '.150.00 FT. B5 ?'i Q d=I.761m U
m o 15.240 m SLOPE STAKE LINE (49 781 q 15.240 m REMOVE 2.4m
50.00 FT }OD (L) q
o S 240 m (50.00 FT.) 50.00 FT.) 50.00 {'1.) PLUG 1350 RC CO c 17.500 m MAE T. WHITE ' Q
.) +80 (L) a aw
b 1 ° +25 l L 1 Im p 000 CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
m n w/FLOWABLE FILL (57.42 FT.) DB 6
20.000 'in 0 37* PG 403 C
-( 57.41 +B?l (.;I?B <,"N 20.000 m ;ST. _S--METRIC FILTER TONS FABRIC
- (L1 s 4 , ES
20.000 m WILMA EVANS - ) ?• PC-A PC 595 y G
157.41 FT.) E. • i
(65.62 FTJ 165.62 FT.) 22.500 m,, ck 2265.62 .500 DB 386 PG 57Z .f >} > ESTSS BMETRIC TOPIS a ' rcr , Q
(73.82 FT.) a. o D m +60 (L 1
+25 (-L-) fl/ ?M FILTERiFABRIC,'".
_ ©F P' T 1
22.500 30.000 m m Q AI 98.42 FT.1
K
MRS. W. H. PHELPS { c° >i o TYPICAL
Q I? 1
° 73 .82 FT.) 1..., QQ ;1 2+30 0 000L-) I ux?'V'Drr•Ce
M Q
M .' v --a fm PGO. P r 5u',• J NdTORA 5
DD 303 PC 52A w
111
81 4
Q . - ;,, I n° IJ 65.62 1.)
C n
Q
CLASS 'B RIPRAP.? ro ? v i
_, ... . Q - DB 303 - PG 353 EST. METRIC TONS C. EOYANS
84 2 L
%
w/M FILTER FjaBRIC. Q - 111 !..-.? DB 416 8
FILL SLOPE
K.,•
m s} aa Q
1,ti MICHAEL B. TAYLOR ?
In Q... .„:
DB 704 PG 91.. Q I - o
4:,.K \ } j^', Q LISTA 54+35 TON54+60 Rt

1 ly e r. s
4y --_
t
+ + a#
- t
t
? F . " {F` t? 3; ti Y? #o
1 p l g J lev I II'
-
+ ,
r 4 +
I
H
J

- -4 Y + 1 ' 1
it `..:.. I I .':+ -__ ,+ .-? ' ,_ t. . I ?
r , , ., ,y i I.. . I ' I' '•

t7 33 41%: : ' + _ . _ .
?
iln
- - - __ _C:,- - _?l
.-. _
+ _Y+ -
. _ i1.r1
,-
-_ _ +
- - '-
_ •}
-r: ?, 11...1:
`
.,'.
_` ?-.
r •: ;+?
'--i _: 1 -,.,y
- 'I., I:
,7 ?
.1 F' F'.F
# I_L I
?+? 1 r
,I

T'
,-W ? -. 1:_ >L ,•r, r+c+ + . .N. _T, F?H' T7. ,,- r

:4 :
00 ? - - ?
_
y -
. .

M
?? 77
t.. AC tO 10- tv•. t`;- N SIT N? .FT_ _L. I ..! D Q:1-: '.I: ,_I. •.'[ .:.1.:
.1 -1-.

7f T
E

-
I
r I
r
+++ 1
+ 4
+, :Y- +y .Y
r + r + I

T I
EN K

*
?

'r
S F
- -- FA

E n-H: _m
I 00. p}]
{ L r f i* rH H
J, t { I /
gy

10.0 h
-,
l
1
4LE
1-T
_4

I
f r Y " 4

+ t r:

IP, UR
ED+152
ma
EE T++ t it +:..,
y

I --, I i-7-4
L
,.
I:IIV
tlD•1
I:
v::
',.
tl'
'.:
?Llfi:
E'
-r?`-.
r+ r
-+...?1 N:i-
N
:..
N,L
?:.
If}.}_
N.L..
Ij.
4
_..
- u r

tt HOR IZONTAL SCALE

:* 2,5 1n Sm
?' » 7 '.. ._ : fit'}: i:_ ,. I}? .EF.i ? $:•$-' .tr?,.. ? VE RTICAL S CALE
56
f.NA0LEC15,PLOT\PLANII.FRF
06/25/96
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -- - - - - - -
- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- --- -- -- ---- ------- -
:- f -I
r
PROJ.REFERENCE No. SHEET No. TOTAL SHEETS
NOTE: EXIST. SIGNS TO REMAIN
86 IN-PLACE; DO NOT DISTURB
L'STA 571-00 RT,
HELEN J. WILLIAMS L STA 57+43 RT,
- DB 627 PG 859
-
WILL 91-E-75 L STA 56+20 RT
- -
EIP 63375 UP
3.6GI __ 11
88 1,172'3411E
a
T PRELIMINARY PLANS R 2 75 _
Do Nor usE FDR car+srRUCrION; STATE PROJ. N No. F.A. PROJ. No. " DESCRIPTION _
?, -Y4- STA.2+10.000 C 1
Ti'' l? BEGIN CONSTRUCTION w - -
------------------- n,o4 _
00
ALL EXIST. DRWY PIPES "' -
TO BE REMOVED UNLESS - us•9? ?' L
OTHERWISE NOTED s65ro+42w Q'
f f? 53 ° N y E% RrW CARROLL C. MILLER,
DB G 683,'
.. WoN'
•? CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
3
hJ tDA GH GROUP IN . ALAN C. HJGHe:S EST.-METRIC roHS c 503 P
0
77 W/ SM FILTER FABRIC. .-• .i4oza'1 2 t0
+30.001(-1-) +0.5 (-L) pp
'? DS 685 PG 512 [• : DB 712 PC 3 - x.91 252 L
D,....-.. ... ...f N19'92'49'W-A LO 1 00
0 m 9.000 m 8.259 3.5 (-L-) ©Q o 5 m 7h +59.30 (-L-) l9
PC-A PG b0 - -' to -- f2
O s 8 { 2 FTJ 69.057 16234 FT.) 5.240 m NI 47'0e'w o cqa arn Q C&25.000 m 90 {1TL )
727292W 63
2.211 68.195 ?? ©yON. \ , ~
a v n -. 1419'42'5011
150.00 FT.) EIP 4p4'09'W I e01.}45-Y4' I ( , (82.02 FT,)
? 8 THELMA DANIELS - ( _ 09o:-:E.IP 5 97e 12.,25 ? A 15.240 Er
'° ry!
o a DB 590 PC 634 + co 26 c,.001(-L-)' 91 N7wr42 E .. \2 gq 39.78'1 v.\ f 50.00 FT.)
3.5 ( L-) F1v 9s0
71 20.000 m EI FREDERICK C. JOHNSON, et al EDWARD OWENS m WOOD BEASLEY INC. F 15.2 fF so 90m RT. TURN O I 't
° 5 Q
l P 017.500 m
r 65.62 FT) .001 (-L-) DB 656 PG 152 - WILL 91-E•103 Zz : DB 554 PG 383 , •'.o
s. l ' I +26.001(-L-) ' 7.500 It1 0.5 (L) (57.42 FT.) • OB 330 PG 71 + y goo, TAPER r
17,500 m+3.5 I L) OB 330 FG 413 RR +80.60 (-L-) +, ,C 7.500 m :I 57.42 FT.) DB
2 FT I 330 PG 536
9.000 m , ;as7eo'1 r 040
( 57.42 FT.) ( 57.4 FT.)
©.: : C+l = i 1757.2 02 v°°y DEPTH 'r d 10
62.3 +
- FT b° d 1307m I .. ?? ?`
m 00 c «? +30.001(-L-)..
+26.001(L) ^?„ +0.5 (L) II z
R, i 172 ,
SLOPE 4
?, •. : : v- S1 AllE LINE l'm r ;,- 15.240 m ;i.?> +19.301-E•, ° 166 / '. ___ 68
+ .240
Q
5.240 m 150.00 : TJ 15 0. m 5.240 / m 00RC
E E \ -E r
v4 8 Q et 50.00 FT) PE 150 00 FT) o o so, 1' = ?-
4: .-.... E,; E.. E-?-E E-E-E-E E +
[ CC C
-----------
F E-E-- ii_ E E EX6i R/W J IP E-E-E-?L Er-E-?... EXIST AE/w
--------- 375 _?- - pr- 159 EIP6D0 CM Co,C 00 R LDI 163 ©>. 80
----- ---------
'. 1!? - _ r•
- ------ 6.0 9.3 ?: 9.0 11.8 E1P M
sz4o6 0 M' %T CM RA G RC
6.D C? a
- a a o .. . 'o _ o N DEPTH
CB
E N .1 0: o M o 0 0 !®
•-r _. .. EXTRA o
.....EXTRA-. .. .... _ r 650 ui
C8
.v °-- 158 DEPTH DEPTH 162 m .- EPTH ° 1 - N _4 -H91 IJJ
750mm
_tt ?°' d 53 tt 154J o. T: L- d 1.253m a -1 ° m_.-.°•.. W
152 / d 1.408m - _0mmm MONO SOmm MONO Ict CUEXTRA._15 I?0 %`; EXTRA N 72° 37' 51.0' E
D 167 0
m +(/?
> DEU7 m 160tv ISLAN C NC ISLAN'b
m DEPTH. -
+ +
-- d E94Gm.-900 RC 3.5 Co' C i C8 s o /. .-750 RC d 1 C0 9 .. ?„ 300 C' C8
_.- --:
s pn , v ? -. 71' p Cb
_ R C
300 RC o 5 257 - 6.0 ms G.T.D. Can CURB mm 6.0 6 0 w 750 m 0 ON a l
C x-900 RCC F S.Rw C8 -- 75c MM CMG -- 125 , E- E-E-E-E-E- -E 61 I?UE E- E-E _ E ONE-E-E }( 0 C&G,/ EF4T W 8 NC-. EC2
- =
EXIST R/W
EXIST ( ? 1' E E W E 0 E? E E
s- E. c
86 _ - y 5h h+° + -L BL(F,Q)
-E-E E-E-E-E--._E-E-E-E-E-E-E +99 (-_) + 64
MAE T. WHITE +20 (L-) 15.240 m Poe ° ?Om RT URN TAPER C6 e s e N Lr o?p ° 76 5 (.. ) .240 m =
(550:00 FT.) 9.93o e 4S C(, , 00 RC +
85 155 ? co ? ? ^ I
5.240 m +_26.50 (-L-) 50.00 FT.) - :c
50.00 FT.I m 5.2+ O :c +86 f L )15.240 m 500 0 I ati / 501 m 50.90FT )
SLOPE sra%E LINE 6? 40 m +99 (L 1 I L) 0 _ s.29o v T J 'h
00 FT) i ;
FT.1 17.500 m +05
99 l L) . ?F N 200mm x 450m s4. e9-LE 169 f'
DB_ G 433 +23.50 (L ) EXTRA ( 50,00 50
De 637 PG 403 DEPTH ! 157.42 FT) 20.000 m 15.240 m c?,:.• 83.613 (-L-) so
! 50.00 FT) 7 500 m / h CONIC CURB 4 +78 5 I
PCA PC 595 15.240 m +23.50 (L) d-2.012m! +26.50 l L 1 (65.62_F.LI „
FY,450 m L 1 m .Q?
50.00 FT.)1.450 _.. P ( 11 q2 FTa © Q 15 000 .._- Q X09 18 0 m ?.. G
613 r4 15.6 FF
(57.25 FT.! (57.25 FT.) 3 05 (-L-)., +93.83 (L 4 FT.)
+23.50 (L) a 89 +26 1.500 m 7 . W "N"01) +83.446 . 4) 59 06 F1..
l 51.42 F L) E I .000 m + .789 (-L) o {
;- w +0
° ANGELA T. TAY OR a 9.000 m
'NDITC79 1. 7 N +05 1 L I ! 542 FT.1
d .50 L ) 20.000 m c k 154900 T
TYPICAL 9(623.000 4 m FT.) ;I+ pB 689 PG 443 FTJ
CARROLL G. MILLER d 83.996 -74- 159.06 FT) . (62.3 ... 2 .428 (-Y4-) 94 (5 49.21 FIT.) BA 00 m
%N.usn.I N Q... oa (6562 FT.) ii Sj8 9 l F J u 90 T (L )
w
1 e J s m I U': ° o ° C0 (401
+00 .
1 9 i r 1. -- -- , "W000 @?ASLEY INC. a° z C p 3 02.428;1 4)
GROUND 18.000 m
NATURAL GROUND {; ©p 08 627 PG 623
STP59'43-W 98.020-Y+002. EIP ( 59.06 FT.)
?,y?2) ma 08.124 2.28 y .. + 0-fIF.-
"- 2489 51159'92'W EIP
44.8?
OP - --- N719712•Ee? G - EIP ±92 4 (-Y4-) +02.8(Y4) (4921FT•):
s7zree¢•w EIP .25 c'. 12.192 in SEE SHEET 2C FOR L STA. 59+24.414 = 12.192 m - =' G. F. PERR HEIRS
MIN. D = •3 m INTERSECTION DETAILS - -- (40.00 FT.) 5 j 1 °o ( 40.00- FT.) DB 362 P 319
Y4 STA 2+50 OOG U -
?N
02 136 SEE SHEET No 18 FOR Y4 PROFILE
Y4 STA 3+10 TO 3+30 Rt Y4_ STA. 3
d4
END CONSTRUCTION WILL IRLL 931 WILLIE F`PPERRY, HEIRS
_LL T
T : - r` -+ - - - - -- - +r _i _ + - PC -A g§ 595 N - +" 0Q -- . - S>
,
S7PS9.13•w _ .34. 10 + --
T- -- - _ -
_.I coA 7'z9'E 4
}- -1 Ty rlr _.
72.699-74-10 n N671 ..: .ij:. '.:__ ...-r I ..,. + _• ? -: ._ -,---' ? ? ..._ _ .. .?.:' __ .-r ..... _- h -`+?_+ __ .?. , ' I_ .78.927 ? 13.979-Y4 i0 C0A ? ?. u,.; } f_r.+?, -.- ;-
,,.:, :..__- _•. IT .':-l } LL' "-? }-i -:- -F ? _ ? '_ - '- -- I? 'l i- + r :`r- _._:.+'It l.- _ - f •(i _ 1,.
--:7.• Jay+Cr..- +I ?•r .:_ ,.(-?-,;$, I.r_'.+ ...?- ?' - - -
rT, MAE T. WHITE _
-
.-,. _?,.;.LI +, . LL k .1-?.ftc,.l ..; _? . {y_. 1,..rr, 4.1- T• ' - 'I' - i _.''+r _
DB 637 PG 403
PC-A PC 595
_rr; :.: [ _:: ...:.: I.I -:, '}- I 1 I :..k' ? n.l? .? -_?. - wrr, * '-r'- ?.? .:._ ? ,, _:._..? ~. .... - - tr II-r 1rr*-: 1 ? ?'TI I 1 r?`YEI .,.:_ -?,,•
759 24 41A - T
..._..,. -.:. 7., __•_ '-_-- : I - ? _ ? .':.? :.:..... ........y.. ,. 1H r.. ?, +., ??? tr+ -+? , `.:..._ .:- ?- - 'r1 :a . :.I ? rr ZI%_-+- . I'.. ?.; :, _..+._..
I r Iw, 'i -? + a I 50 00 -'1
a:
I- TH 7: :: ? ',F.? :, ..1.;- ..r, _.- 1... ,. -..: j,.- ; : ,:.L:_ - ' I I -, Ir. ,, Y . _•.?, I 1 ,',. a-
-
!" Z
.lo-: I,. t ., .. r ._ .I __.?.,. ': _. .,r,.r -• rr ,: ?: I ,?-..:._I- ;.. __: :,._..:. - ++?, H_. N- ?:Lm _ 11' 0.1 ?++_. I+ ,4r
I ? I • ++?$ -- - ? ? '--?-' , .-;br-, -„ ,. ,_: C_ ,T'.ttl.r,1. ..-+,:rl. _ + i >')00 -F/_ 135 6I ,.L,, .7 _I-t=?r:? ?,.+C' `";' ',.
.! _ :;'. .:...... '? ,. r ,;-__ ,- . ,--`-:?+ :?lu ' , ..-.:-.T7.,?-.- I„., r. „T.:_? -._ __•-_ ..._- - .OO - - : L-.,:? ? YFl - I-I?+ 1: :: _ . E +r! ? " '.: ? ? _,-
, +;a.. zL 1 4tL
,'...: ,, I I ..... $1 .-,-. , • I -c. ;.?? , r' --? - `?` ,-n+ . + ? .___ ..?' _. , , _.._:. ... :,.: ? _ ..i.. }}..r. + ..rte I .- I - T -. I ` ,i?r, r ].:. ?n -'}' ,-` I? Ni't
C
:
:. .,: ,- :_*. ., I; _.._ ..x( ,,_ .fir ,. •+ .._ I ?:. ?....._ --- - -'1 -_..:. w+, ^- „ ._ - -. ''' ':. ?.. _ Y -o:- 'f ?, >I t P _? •. M ?:.+i ,_ o ? ?; ?; ro :
. _a tq:_ . u cF;,+.+}. ... .., , 1 c0-r- LQ I c0.,-1_.; h ,;.:._ 1 •- N. , Ny?r; _ r,yk ?.. Ih'L. . rja :' . rh. : M rr}.,, a h} ??~M•+ _ _. r!}F+` . N=--: .. N _
lf h.: ,. If lq.. , :, C4:= ,t,:. ?.. .I., ?:. :'Q?r`f .? r .._ ?. Tj', F ,- _:., n. :: ":?i. '1-. .., rv';:: 6';.::ri:N'7".1-? ? :: 4'Sy .Mr'b:'F i1M1i'1:,-.: :. . h1 .• N'1- I ? r'_??. _? +• r ;,:. _;.;. ...: ,-+ ' -
,:., .,... ._ LCJ!: '?-CCh? 1? '' ?}:•_-:cV -+`'54 ,+.y MI?_ 5'1-,-?_P'1.. ..-M;.. a '.. - - - - -_ I
-7 '3
HORIZONTAL SCALE
q q::
25m 5
I '.^:? IrF - - '' -'+
yl-. r.
,.:; Fl+.+r I1- ,_ rn 1 +, I- ±' - - - ? y,.. VERTICAL SCAIE _
_ I;} -1., L irrrF _ .t K1.l i ? r
--, r - r I _ - , tTa
57 58 9 60
56 -- q:\Prolects\usI7\Dlc0p.dgn
-- G:\PR0JECTS\PL0T\PLAN12.PRF
07/01/96
w'
.....,.,?...w..,,.....uvs,.,w.iAo3,:wavn.,wlA.zeLCa?11?Yt __•"-•-YYdA'Y?(A6?NMEI w1®IY Amn'd1,wvl Y4YY ...r r. ,.?
f
1©p©'.CARROLL G. MILLER
s DB 503 PG, 683
to }
r'
--------------
?IP
PR
RE I.LIMINFlRY PIANS
?_ C? '-- a 1 7r5rw ?l)0 F FOR iRUCiION.
ao^ _ -R FE,REN_CE N- SHEE
7 R ?9043 - _LEE T N0' TOTAL SHEEI
Y 96
?° STATE PR?J. NN
-- -
RI
F PRO_J No. D. -PIE 1: AEuSEF, CO.. A!?NTOPJ $ ?. P I - '--
61E PC,, 322 FRANCES B.TAYLOR
o12 08 473 PG-405
h `' a r- --_----- -
P6 A€.L EXIST. ORWY PIPES
B: REMOVED
€ S''' R7 UNLES
-THEIIWISE NOTEDS
750mm °0 -
CURB & GUT7ER FT, S tD
?" ?U651?'1 (-,,-)
E%6T•EASEMENT
V
APER o E s7A e LINE -
SLOPE 7AJ m :4E)'ERW,EUSER C to
P K,OPa
- REMOVE EX. v ( ' '3 `T) 8 Cl
} 375 RC '- ' G. 322
T 174 +
L
N J _ ul.o 4, - 1
00
..7
`r '4r
375 AC --EXIST sT F/w IF,
?? a yr
i
15.aao - F .. s..,t
._
?_. 1507 r :Z,
460
-f E-- E
173 2
C
0
IS.P90 Ol L
'ISO MA4
C -? N J
_ ro
SLOPE STAKE LINE f--EI E'
75
CU
RID
G. F, BERT E
PER. PRY, ERRY
HEM SR.
D8 426 PG. 190 S
`
DB 382 PG 489 L
r
7 7-
_. F
2 DENI-ON
-+- y
r
` I 3 7, 5f p ------ -- L- - w
--- _- u
I
- ?CJ?E s'co
W o. fPY E ?W.
r f xTlI Rnr
+62.736 f-L-) LNCIE BROOKS
?I,F
15.240 m °?- STA 69+62.736 t so Pc 67
50.00 FT.) i C/I; n f ?l R. BROOKS ^ blNfS R BROOKS a
END STATE PROJECT 9001T Ec?N;?T?{.? I E
+62.736 N 255.697.780 ?<, Dn 66
18 I ( 659
8.000 (-L) DB b29 P? r lg R
1,000 m 909 069 92I t WILLIAM M. I'RfeMAN
159.05 FT.) DB GSr, 1'G 7715
fR7NS
c?
ROBERT E. PERRY JR I a O
r
BB 655 PG 922 ??-
DB 646 PG 567
DB 645 PG 10 ?3......,._ a I
Er' ,y ? ;0'31 - 1 3 H
l v
'I
i,
- I J
- I - -
--
F t r?, -T I
71
L_
..? -
,-- ?z
o? - - ? 1 ? I k I l- I I I ? I
1 fr 7_ i?:.
I I ? I
7t
r. -?.;a -. ?_ I.. ... ...
I
??'? ?, -- ? ? H•-- I ? ? II I ?: 11 I ,?_- ED?),,9 L _-
i
m T 1 - - -
71
rn r :. ? I I ? I I ? I 3 ?.-
- -
y
_-
~ 0 IOm
62 r,_..: ?4 I +-1 r: 25m p ?G SCALE
71
b3
VERTICAL SCALE
-""-"'^? G:\ ?..?j\P497\PLAW3.PRF
PROJ.REFERENCE No, SHEET No. TOTAL SHEETS
R-24048 17
STATE PROJ. No. F.A. PROJ. No. DESCRIPTION
-Y2- REV ? A >
a
3 -
- O •? y
JJ 9 r ! y"
pie',
PI Sla 3°40.000 ?G - -
A- 57'01' 5956' (L7)
T • 70533 O 0
L • 129.404 ti '00
1
C • 1240128 a 40 (-y2-
0 e?
e . RC q 4.144 m 5.9,
Ds • 80 km/h 0? 46.4C FT.) PRELIMINARY PLANS
. f +40 (-Y2-) DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A ? .
09 9.144 m P 59
?? ax (30.00 FT.)
??9 V E?/ 100?PJ 5/ ------------------
i7R ,?j" ' m,. .. '.;i?''::, :ir4i,,.,?',:.;r'tir-4;r+.';rzv%''i„ti;r ,r'?,;r+< r
65 ?.: ? 4., '^'h.^^. ?'a?'4r-4,r ':.i,.`%.Y-tir' u? ` "- .: ?4,, t?,r .."":.rr V"t.i+-ti.•r'iu'v'4 ?'tiJ tii'tij'"i:r .}'.J-,v'''.v%'4? 4,riv,':i.'? ?-4r 'nr' ,.: :_.
SPECIAL DITCH GRPOE
BOTH LTA RT. 9 '3s :, ?'.95sm
SEE PROFILE
SLOPE STAKE LINE
+10 (-Y2-)
I.
s
14144 m .46A0 p.
FT.)
' GC .f,, _: 5y! u%'.;. 4r' Y . •;? v,.' '.. .?''+? 4? 4r'Wr 4?.. +? 4r 4?4,4r+ 4.- 4.r 4 - ,% 4i,.4r 4J.'vr''.. -? r ,'v'4r 4?'.u, r 4? .
+40 -Y2-)
\j
9.144 m
9.144 m \ f a' 1 30.0
A 7
3 0 - .3, n9
1 0 F 8
30,00 FT.)
3
+20 1 Y2 1 REV ° a
?66 96 FT.) REMOVET
- ? -
O / r° O s 500 s C
REBECCA A.THOMPSON JESSE:RASCOE
DB 677 PG 258 / Ea +69.367 (-Y2-)
' 8.500 m DB 852 PC 129
+53.016 (-Y2- REV) V (57.42 FT.)
21065 m / A/3v.. 3 . r, -=III s cm!C
1 ) f r. o
69.11 FT.) SLOPE STAKE LINE
o
ADONED 144
O P :1_ ??, ^1C
3?? ee?e 07 Q I ?I?l, `,?5y` SPECIAL DITCH GRADE WEYERHAEUSER CO. EIP
635 ^' r
1 / f ; C1 I o M»s55g
BOTH LT.& R7.
SEE PROFILE DES 638 PC 801 ?•.?,
p 59 r>> , I / I / % , WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY ` I, 4,?,.??= '+.an.? ?. i•• '..`a1 1? ? ?,{?
CAPEHART TRACT SLOPE STAKE LINE 45
93.890 NI;S 26'E [gyp EIP EIP N69 / `, 3 r ELI COFIELD, JR.
7 79.324'Q O CUR Q - 3os SLOPE STAKE LINE
! +37.219 (-Y2-) REV I DB 521 PC 15
22.395 m No` I'
Y' i ( 73.47 FT.)
r' a 40 y? iK +57,092 (Y2) REV I :1 FI
a ' 2 0 27.953 m I t:
91.71 FT.) +20 l L REV)
i ?N? i\70 Q ?? +69.115 (-L- REV) Ir (O9022
?s 2 FT.)
I Y i 2 ?° n7saa\? T- 27.500 m
/WA a ? s
T ?l 1 ® E ` FTJ. I, : to
ICE SC „" v ELSE V. COLEMAN +70 l-L- REV) I JOSEPH A. BUNDY 4 o
E ?, s RONALD D.JACOBS
rr e 25.000 m °EIR DB 670 PG 580
c( J ISTA 82.02 FT.)
3+88
v'.:d 4? W. ?r '+'L,rti,. ,r 4?r?:_'. '^. ?... .. :} ..•`"='ti;;r .r ', .. -,+ ' 4.s. "'? f 4i. -.rti
.'' !"n . \7. t' .'!'`,.. n."., F^ 1 '? h r r' NS. ?,.."ni.r+ ?. ? '' 2`^.r+•^. ?3\s+1 ?,. +7"
`s '+?/ 4? 4r 4r' ? 1,r , .,. 4.? 4? ?4, s, Y y - ,? ',. 4J
---------------- ---- -----------
I s co.;e
1 L
p? I.
r
SEE SHEET 2C FOR
{ INTERSECTION DETAILS
s;
SEE SHEET No. 18 FOR -Y2- REV, PROFILE
I
i
i
I
p00 i
+60
A ` u, 15.000 m
(49.21 FT.)
p0
• +60 (Y3 ), ?;
Pp{ 5i
13" .0' (A•1+15.0
15.000 211F1'.) 5- CANS ??CIION
?

1 0> L, +75 (-Y3-)
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP.
DB 625 PD 634 0 15.000 m
49.21 FT.)
2

i
MB 04 PG 65
4

+75 (
Y 3-)

y +75 (-Y3-)
_
5.000 IT 9.144 m
( 30.00 FT.)
?
49.21FT.1 Yl? I
+75(Y3i ? i
9,144 'n

( 30.00 FT,I
"

I 4
4

f I
?
0 000
sj ?.
k S? A Z+5
1
1 ,t3. P05
9'.

IO,m ?
SEE SHEET 2C FOR
'j
gt
HORIZONTAL SCALE
INTERSECTION DETAILS O ' 5
u
p
gm
2
N 4 ?
µ
yy
?
S bOO
VERTICAL SCALE i

y} {. SEE. SHEET No. IS FOR -Y3- PROFILE
p;\pro lects\usinpbnl4,pg,
G;\PROJECTS`PLOT\PLAN19.PRP
06r25/96_

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, w7W;VA AN
Health and Natural Resources 1 • •
Division of Water Quality
James Hunt, Governor ID E H N F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 11, 1997
Mr. Franklin Vick
N.C. Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick,
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed US 17 Improvements from SR 1503 to West of the Chowan River
WQC Project #970098, COE #199400838
Berde County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3139 issued to N. C. Department of
Transportation dated September 11, 1997. This Certification replaces the one issued on April 25,
1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
4estoon'Howard0,Jr. P.E.
Attachments
970098.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Environmental Sciences Branch
Enviro. Sciences Branch. 4401 Reedv Creek Rd.. Raleiah. NC 27607 Teleohone 919-733-1786 FAX # [phone]
10, v 'V
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500 to N.C. Department of
Transportation resulting in fill of 19.86 acres, draining resulting in 11.49 acres of wetland impact
and filling 0.25 acres of open water in Bertie County pursuant to an application filed on the 13th
day of February and the 6th day of May, 1997 to 4 lane existing US 17 (TIP No. R-2404 B and
C).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters
of Salmon Creek and its unnamed tributaries in conjunction with the proposed development will
not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines.
Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable
portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application,
as described in the Public Notice or as modified below. If you change your project, you must
notify us and you may be required to submit a revised application. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow
the conditions listed below. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available
from the Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices) are
utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs) in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; and 10 NTUs in trout
waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed
and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the
project;
3. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a FONSI or
ROD is issued by the State Clearinghouse;
4. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
5. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation will be
required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities;
6. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the Corps of Engineers
requirements. DWQ shall be copied on the approved ratio, location, size and method of
mitigation (restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation) and annual reports for
the entire length of the monitoring period.
401 vo
7. On 17 April 1997, the COE and DOT agreed to modify the design at site 6 (sheets 8,9 and
10 of 30). DWQ shall accept the design that the COE agreed to. DWQ shall receive a
copy of the revised drawings for our file.
8. Based upon information provided in your correspondence of May 6, 1997, ditch effects
were erroneously calculated in your original permit application. Actual ditch depths of
up to 6.5 feet will drain an additional 8.32 acres of non-riverine rested wetlands. These
impacts will be mitigated through the restoration of 16.64 acres of forested no-riverine
wetlands at the DOT Dismal Swamp Mitigation Site located in Gates and Perquimans
Counties.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and
may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless
the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act
Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the l lth day of September, 1997
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
I
ston Howard, Jr. P.E.
WQC #3139