19960411 Ver 1_Complete File_19960517

SrATa
(?4
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
RECEIVED
MAY 0 1996
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE,
April 12, 1996
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
E D , 0771
APR 19 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ATTENTION: Mr. Bob Stroud, District Manager
c/o Mr. Jerry Parker, Field Representative
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Bladen/Pender Counties - Replacement of Bridge No. 67 over Black.
River on NC 11/53; T.I.P. No. B-2919; State Project No. 8.1270701
Reference the CAMA Major Permit application submitted March 14, 1996 for
this bridge replacement. We have received your request of March 22, 1996 for
additional information and offer the following responses:
1) Section 5 of form DCM-MP-1 has been revised to include the adjacent
property owner. This information is also included on page 7 of the
permit drawings.
2) Copies of the five deeds for the properties needed within the
project right-of-way are attached. Please note that the purchases
of two of the properties have been completed, while negotiations
for the remaining three properties are nearing completion. We
anticipate these deeds to be registered prior to the August 1996
let date for the project.
3) The certified mail return receipt (green card) from the adjacent
property owner will be forwarded to you as soon as we receive it.
In the meantime, please continue processing of the permit.
4) A copy of NCDOT's most recent.Sediment and Erosion Control Program
document is attached. Also included is a copy of our Best
Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters. These
measures are implemented in construction of all NCDOT projects.

e
April 12, 1996
Page 2

Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please
contact Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincer
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Archie Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P. E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. W. F. Rosser, P. E., Division 6 Engineer
Mr. Ernie Jahnke, DOA, Wilmington
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Project Management
Mr. John Smith, P. E., Structure Design
LU6
APR 1 9 1996
DIVISIOI*q OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
?l.4 vCv-'
t` 11
,JI °' •? ?G, mod' Ti,
r r? 'c{.,? ?cr'.
S2' ?, • 'C7 ?'
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached is
Sediment and
approved by
approval, the
administer a
jurisdiction
a "11L d
177 Arr ?'.
r
r
CIiIEF ENGNEFA PAEC0tlSTRtIP)D4
RE-COVED FILE ?C0,-1?
MAR 2 2 1991
FATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
March 22, 1991
Mr. D. W. Bailey, PE
Chief Engineer - Operations
William G. Marley, Jr., PE W6n
State Highway Administrator
".-VY ? -Tr AprxoprGib Acthtt
P 3 E `?- _ Prq _`re I?k r Y R--tv
A / V/_ Ye:r S;;lnn Wro
1•F: - Fvn m R Gply For
AUT_
DIVISION
WILLIAM G. MARLEY. JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
IVk ibl s
Poole ?/?tc O'Quinn
Dudeck Pren't _ Berton
Ke=m Ds.:. Shuller
Norwood _ ElliottNedwidek
elodlan Webb Springer
-w e}! Elmore _
Grimes_.._
Sediment and Erosion Control Program
a signed copy of the NCDOT Division of Highways
Erosion Control Program document that has been
the Sedimentation Control Commission. By this
Commission has delegated to NCDOT the authority to
sediment and erosion control program within the
of our department.
This new Program has been worked out successfully over many
months of consultation and coordination with the Commission and
DEHNR staff. Mr. Charles Gardner, Director of the Division of
Land Resources, has expressed appreciation to all NCDOT
personnel involved in this effort. He has singled out Berry
Jenkins and Bill Johnson for their special help and hard work.
Because of my own involvement in development of this-Program, I
know firsthand this special recognition-is well deserved. I join
Mr. Gardner in expressing my appreciation to these two men for a
job well done.
Delegation of authority to self -
must be well attended. Please make
is implemented and administered
department is in compliance with L
the Commission.
WGM/srj
regulate is a privilege that
certain that our new Program
effectively, such that our
aw and regulations issued by
cc: Secretary Thomas J. Harrelson
-- --Deputy-Secretary Jake-F. Alexander
Mr. J.-T. Peacock, Jr., PE
Mr. Jack Murdock
Mr. B. G. Jenkins, Jr., PE '
Mr. W. D. Johnson
Mr. Charles II. Gardner, PE

i?
{vAPR 19 1996
=? .? V I t?C:,?r' v F
COAS'1? MANAGEMENT
100014 nJ00

t
State of North Department of Environment, Health. and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James G. Martin. Governor
Wiliam W. Cobey. Jr.. Secretary
March 15, 1991
William G. Marley, Jr., P.E.
State Highway Administrator
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Marley:
Charles H. Gardner
Director

At1R?o1991 t
Ulk
OFFICC. OF ?
Y tut
?`yfflNA
Enclosed is a signed copy of the erosion and sediment control
Program delegation. The original will be placed with the minutes of the
November 1990 meeting of the Sedimentation Control Commission. The
Program delegation was effective on the date on which the dmmient was
signed. We look forward to working with the Division of Highways in
carrying out this program.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the
Department of Transportation personnel who have been involved in this
effort. However, there are two people whom I would like to single out
for all of their help and hard work. These two people are Mr. B.G.
Jenkins and Mr. W.D. Johnson.
and The Department of Transportation efforts in developing this program
I in controlling erosion and sedimentation are greatly appreciated.
any question please contact me. .
Sincerely,
H
R?7
Charles H. Gardner, P.G.
CHG/FMrljr/sl APR 191 1996
DIWSION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
P.O. Box 27687 0 Uelah. N.C_ 276tt_7AQ7 . T_.. -- -'a_ ----
i000r4 kdoo
I`
1101917;1
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PROG APR 19 1996
STATUTORY AUTHORITIES:
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Whereas North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) Section
113A-54(a) provides that the North Carolina Sedimentation Control
Commission (Commission) "shall in cooperation with the Secretary
of Transportation and other appropriate State and federal
agencies, develop, promulgate, publicize, and administer a
comprehensive State erosion and sedimentation control program";
and
Whereas G.S. 113A-54(d)(2) provides that the "Commission
shall assist and encourage other State agencies in developing
erosion and sedimentation control programs to be administered in
their jurisdictions, and to approve, approve as modified, or
disapprove such programs submitted pursuant to G.S. 113A-56 and
from time to time review such programs for compliance with
regulations issued by the Commission and for adequate
enforcement" ; and
Whereas G.S. 113A-56(b) provides that the "Commission may
delegate the jurisdiction conferred by G.S. 113A-56(a), in whole
or in part, to any other State agency that has submitted an
erosion control program to be administered by it, if such program
has been approved by the Commission as being in conformity with
the general State program"; and
Whereas the Commission intends to delegate to the Department
of Transportation, Division of Highways (Department of
Transportation), the authority to administer a sedimentation and
erosion control program within the Department of Transportation's
jurisdiction which consists of the responsibility for prepar-
ation, review, and approval prior to construction of erosion and
sediment control plans for all land-disturbing activities
associated with highway construction of one or more contiguous
acres; and
Whereas the Commission does not intend to delegate to the
Department of Transportation the responsibility for external
monitoring of the program and any necessary legal actions.
Therefore in accordance with the statutory requirements of
the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973, G.S. 113A-50 et
seq., as may be amended and pursuant to the statutory authority
in G.-S-143B.-348, as may be amended, - the -Department - of-- Trans-
portation ._submits the following sediment and erosion control
program to the Commission for approval and delegation.

IoQotq AJ00 CM "D
APR 19 1996
-2-
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF PROGRAM:
A. The Department of Transportation's
for Roads and Structures, as may be
the basic erosion and sedimentation
be implemented by the Department of
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Standard Specifications
amended, shall provide
control requirements to
Transportation.
B. The Department of Transportation will prepare, or have
prepared, erosion and sediment control plans consistent with
commission standards governing all land disturbing activity
it undertakes which uncovers one or more contiguous acres of
erodible surface.
C. Consistent with its plan requirements, the Department of
Transportation shall provide adequate rights of way or
easements to accommodate installation and maintenance of
appropriate sediment and erosion control measures.
D. The Department of Transportation will take all reasonable
measures to protect all public and private property from
siltation damage caused by any Departmental activity con-
sistent with its policies and procedures developed pursuant
to its statutory authorities and responsibilities. In the
event damage does occur, satisfactory restoration of the
property shall be made.
E. The Department of Transportation will utilize designs and
design criteria for application of its erosion and sediment
control program that are consistent with minimum standards
promulgated by the Sedimentation Control Commission.
F. The Department of Transportation will develop appropriate
training manuals, courses, etc., that will provide
sufficient technical and administrative guidance to its
employees or agents such that the objectives of the program
are * fulfilled.
G. Basic Objectives of Program
Erosion and sediment control plans prepared by and
for the Department of Transportation will address the
following control objectives:
1. Identification of Critical Areas - On-site areas
which are subject to severe erosion, and off-site
areas which are especially vulnerable to damage
from erosion and/or sedimentation, will be identified
and receive special attention.

• 1000+ - Ad00
DT7&
APR 19 1996
-3-
DIVISION OF
2. Limited Time of Exposure - All land-di ggl&? MANAGEMENT
activity is to be planned and conducted to limit
exposure to the shortest feasible time consistent
with good construction and maintenance practices.
3. Limit Exposed Areas - All land-disturbing activity
is to be planned and conducted to minimize the
size of the area to be exposed at any one time.
4. Control Surface Water - Surface water runoff
originating upgrade of exposed areas will, to the
extent practical, be controlled to reduce erosion
and sediment loss during the period of exposure.
5. Control Sedimentation - All land-disturbing activity
is to be planned and conducted so as to prevent off-
site sedimentation damage.
6. Manage Storm Water Runoff - When the increase in the
velocity of storm water runoff resulting from a land-
disturbing activity is sufficient to cause accelerated
erosion of the receiving watercourse, plans will
include measures to control the velocity.up to and
including the discharge point so as to control
accelerated erosion of the site and increased sedi-
mentation of the watercourse.
H. The Department of Transportation acknowledges its obligation
to implement its program consistent with the standards for
land-disturbing activities promulgated by the Sedimentation
Control Commission. Attached and incorporated herein by
reference is a copy of the Sedimentation Pollution Control
Act of 1973, as amended, and a copy of the implementing
Administrative rules codified at Title 15A of the N. C.
Administrative Code, Chapter 4, 15A NCAC, 4(a),'et seq., as
amended. In urgent conditions involving public safety,
flexibility in the application of sedimentation Control
Commission standards may be required and in those
situations, the Department of Transportation and the
Commission and their authorized representatives will
cooperate•in the best public interest.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF PROGRAM:
A. The administration of borrow sources obtained by the Depart-
ment of Transportation or its agents will be in accordance
with the-requirements of -_the- State Mining Act. -

-4-
B.
H?
APR 1Q 1996
DIVISIOi`V OF
waste areas furnished as a part of the Depa AHT,4fMANAGEMENT
Transportation's construction activities will have erosion
and sediment control planning and measures addressed as
part of the stabilization and maintenance plans developed
under the contract requirements.
C. Erosion and sediment control plans prepared by agents for
the Department of Transportation will be prepared consistent
with the Department of Transportation's program requirements
and the Department of Transportation will review such plans
to assure compliance before acceptance of them.
D. Erosion and sediment control plans and waste area stabili-
zation and maintenance plans prepared in the field divisions
will be prepared consistent with the Commission's standards
and with the objectives of this program. Routine review by
the staff of the Roadside Environmental Unit will be made to
assure that program objectives and requirements are
satisfied. Approximately 25% of the plans will be reviewed
on a quarterly basis to assure compliance with the program
delegation.
E. As part of its operational policies, the Department of
Transportation has issued to its field forces guidelines
entitled Modifications to Erosion Control Plans (Appendix 1)
that expressly limit field modifications to erosion.and
sediment control plans that can be made on the project level
without prior consultation or approval from a higher level
of management or the unit originating the design. These
guidelines are attached hereto and are incorporated herein
by reference. Any proposed significant amendments to the
guidelines for Modifications to Erosion Control Plans
(Appendix 1) will be submitted to the Sedimentation Control
Commission for approval, and the Commission will respond as
quickly as legally possible.
F. As part of its operational policies, the Department of
Transportation has issued to its field forces guidelines
entitled Sedimentation Inspection Process (Appendix 2) that
establish and control the inspection process. This
guideline will outline the various responsibilities and
accountabilities associated with the monitoring of the
program. These guidelines are attached hereto and are
incorporated herein by reference. Any proposed significant
amendments to the guidelines for.Sedimentation Inspection
Process (Appendix 2) will be submitted to the Sedimentation
Control Commission for approval, and the Commission will
respond as quickly as legally possible.

1000N -' Ad00 '
r
APR 1 4 1996
-5- DIVISIOiv OF
G. The Department of Transportation will furnish?0if TrequestedEMENT
by the Commission or its authorized staff, a copy of any
erosion control plans prepared under this program. The
Commission agrees to waive any fee charges, etc., associated
with the review of these plans and of the Department of
Transportation's program.
SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM:
The Department of Transportation will perform a self-
monitoring program (Appendix 3) for contract construction, force
account-construction, and routine maintenance activities to
insure compliance with program requirements and to evaluate and
rate levels of field implementation of the program. Any -'
proposed significant amendments to the self monitoring program
(Appendix 3) will be submitted to the Sedimentation Control
Commission for approval, and the Commission will respond as
quickly as legally possible.
PROGRAM REVIEW AND EVALUATION:
The Commission shall review and evaluate the Department of
Transportation's Sedimentation and Erosion Control Program at
least on an annual basis.
EXISTING UNCOVERED AREAS:
The Department of Transportation has implemented and will
continue a program that will, subject to the availability of
funds, provide corrective treatment to all existing uncovered
areas that exceed one contiguous acre and are experiencing
continued accelerated erosion. The treatment provided will
consist of the establishment of vegetative cover or other
protective measures, structures, or devices to control off-site
sedimentation. The program places priority on those areas that
are contributing to off-site damage.
MAINTENANCE:
During development of a site the Department of
Transportation shall install and maintain all temporary and
permanent erosion and sedimentation measures as required by the
plans, the rules, and the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
After Site development the Department of Transportation shall
_ __install -and/-or -maintain all --necessary and reasonable permanent
erosion and sedimentation control within highway right-of-way or
easements that the Department has secured for maintenance.
lOOON - AdOO
D 72_1 LT
APR 191996
DIVISIGiv OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL COMMISSION
The Department of Transportation will present an annual
report.to the Commission. The report shall include but not be
limited to the estimated number of acres of land-disturbing
activities monitored, the status of all training efforts, results
observed and planned emphasis areas for the next twelve months.
This report will be presented at the first scheduled Commission
meeting of each calendar year.
APPROVAL:
The North Carolina Sedimentation Control commission hereby
approves the program of erosion and sedimentation control
associated with highway construction submitted by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation as conforming to the
general state program as provided for in G.S. 113A-56(b) and
except for external monitoring and any necessary legal action
delegates the jurisdiction conferred on the Commission by G.S.
113A-56(a) to the Department of Transportation to carry out the
approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Program. The
responsibility for the external monitoring of the program, and
any necessary legal actions is not delegated to the Department
of Transportation but is -retained by the Commission.
-,`Approved for the Sedimentation Control Commission
ose h A. Phillips, h.D. , Chairman - February' 25, 1991
? Date

-4
i.

1000N - AdO3
ti
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
March 15, 1991
APPENDIX 1
?17173 H7T??
i'
APR 19 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY. JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR

MEMORANDUM TO:
Division Engineers
Mr. D. W. Bailey, P.E.
Chief Engineer
??.0 f99
Nrq?s? 6
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Modifications to Erosion Control Plans
Recently the N. C. Sedimentation Commission and the Land
Quality Section of the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources reviewed NCDOT's erosion and sedimentation
control program delegation. One of their-major concerns were
alterations of erosion control plans.-without consultation.And_/or
approval from the plan designers,.----Due to ;this>:concern r
condition ofrredelegation, NCDOT has agreed•to?preparejquidelines
for field' forces"?ifiat `limit -field '?modifications to erosion
sediment control plans that canbe made_on the project level
without consultation with the designers.`
With regard to these guidelines, below is a listof erosion
control devices which require consultation with the Roadside
Environmental Unit prior to being modified or altered in the
field.
1 • _T.YP_e "A!' Silt Basins - (Roadside.-Environmental Unit
will* .consult Hydraulics Un1t).=
2• Rip RaQ Sediment Dams
3. Temporary sediment Trans located at stream crossings or
drainage turnouts.
ock Si
R lt check Dams located at stream crossings or
drainage turnouts. -
`4
1000N - Ad00
. V
E D a U1 ? LYJ V 2 v'
APR 19 1996
-2- DIVIS)t. N OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
5. Culvert Construction se ence (Roadside Environmental
Unit will consult Hydraulics Unit)
6. Channel Changes - Temporary or Permanent (Roadside
Environmental unit will consult Hydraulics Unit)
It ip intended that the remainder of the items which may
appear on the erosion control plans be installed according to the
plans as applicable however modifications will be allowed on
these items without consultation to meet actual site conditions.
The Department has also made changes in plan preparation
procedures to offer more detailed and descriptive drawings of
temporary and permanent stabilization strategies. Additional
temporary erosion control plan sheets will be included that will
focus on the temporary erosion control measures and devices that
should be in place after clearing and before grubbing or major
grading begins. Specifications will be prepared that will
require the contractor to follow the sequence and measures:
identified on those plan sheets unless he requests a
modification to the construction sequence. If a modification of
the sequence is requested, appropriate revisions to the erosion
control plans must be proposed by the Contractor and if
acceptable, appropriate revisions will be. made to the temporary
measures shown- to.accommodate .the Changes.
.;;This will provide a
base working document (
. temporary:erosion '.control plans)
that 'can
be''utilized.or modified continuously until'-the regular erosion
control plans become applicable or until project stabilization
is achieved by vegetation.
Hopefully, the consultation required for the six specific
features will allow for exchanges of information that allow for
better plan design to. f it f ield conditions ° and better f ield '
implementation of the intended designs.
Dw6/vs

r s x
N
0
N
C)
0
V
0
O
O
r'r
n

O

O i

t
/
/
O
a
O
M
/
/

o O /
/
/
I
V /
V
/
/
/
/
/

I
.
060°L
_t
J t
t
t
t-
? N O 03 ?'o

W

V)

(
n W
Z
W >
Q W
1- W
s
(L
0
r?
V V
cr V) C7
Z = U
cr N
1 W M
Q
N m
O > w LL 4 (5 >
otS W ~ C) uZ ^ 2 O

v LL
O Z
a 0 1=
m
3
t
H
Z F:o N
'm \
? U)

N w
O °
(n V c
to = Q Q g d Z Q (O

V a O LU
Z v? ai
i

/

Q

Z
cr-
W
a Z

0
3 g

o?
u LLJ
o W
z zm
>- aN
as
?
(x Jo
z 0
W
(x JQ
4. J
I- tttt? z
z 3
- 3c:
Jw x0
X LL a7 W lL
W
W

D n
LL V

W L
-LU

_
C 'T C:D, C
N
Z
MAR 18 1996 Q cr
W
J Q O
DIVISION OF U
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

J =
J
r
J Q
t a z
t o ?°
t ?- o
t
t

a

N
. • Y
SUMMARY SHEET
SITE No. 1
Location: L7 Rev. Sta 13+60 to 15+45 Lt and RL
Volume of Fill in Wetlands Below Ordinary High Water. 2,350 cubic meters
Area of Fill in Wetlands Below Ordinary High Water. 0.267 Hectares (0.659 Acres)
Area of Existing Fill Removed for Wetlands Mitigation: 0.05 Hectares (0.123 Acres)
Headwaters: Below
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER
ROGER DALE WILLIAMSON
145 LONG ACRE ROAD
KELLY, NC 28448
PH: 910 285 5712
D ?rr-1 TM IE 7z
JN4
MAR 1 S 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
..,
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN /PENDER COUNTIES
8.1270701 (B-2919)
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
ON NC 11 / 53 OVER BLACK RIVER
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 7 (IF 7 .., .., .....
v 13kg" 2 z
z
s o' 0 O ~
V) L' L (n LU
PSC -A ? °z ? g < } W >
H W
M I. ? o
w ' d = O g
F I F- ? C7 U N w m
a• \', Z Q W W W
1 ?. X O F- O Z o 0 0
I
7y \C W Ir.. U. d O ? M Z
t O
CL W N m to N
C
/ W
n- U) 0 U3 ? m C
m 0 Z -i w
(L o <0 S
E Ile
#
`ice
E
h F /
T ,?•c
.fit IMNdnd pG/ W,
U-
Jffi?'i i <3ri Q ?i
a? ?? ? U J 4?CfCi ' . O W r?• '
I ? 0 ci a U 47
llv?i
W
•'=? 1 `1 m ct°? f I 722o
I I
I I I
MCA
` ?' ' I I I I
a
' o I I,Z? t 1 ?, ? ? uic
°? •'? _' • ter. i . ? ?'.'
J m i , n,
LL.
OW I l 1- a ?
2 m o ?j'
N
C) N
00 LLJ
Wca o z qg?
?I r Y
LL)
i 1' 1 `' I l a .?
W
MAR 18 1996 ° Ln
I
,!' I f ';: ,? DIVISION OF d °
'+ ' ?,,?? ;? _ j < <•?, , I COASTAL MANAGEMENT N
OZ??G nl I' I I O o
c\j
H?1 yw . 2
uu -r tt Ald
009'L l3 p
- O
7`
d
w
it
U.
E N

to L
?
E E
?
T
W
n
>1 al
7'0 NO
0~
Q O
2Rm
O
v
u-; in n w 2 +i TN OM w
u. u u a u J +
W tq O J Q
W W ;

W V W 2-oU- O ?
aWZ~w"'Q 0 z
Q Os-c:Z Z
V O
=
NS OvW2CLvx E
OL
T
i-
Da:?Oz?r.
z z Z OW WO Z
N

=7
L'i
NN V) V)VWWW

Q
X
0clmm
2 O
0
m0L
iMW
n
d
E
lw
N N
O ? C
in >
_+
0
aN
?p N O
> ti
N ? O
J W
O
O
Q
co
a
N
W
ix
-i
N
Q
J
w
N
2
-61- 3Nil HDIVW
\ II
O ?\ ? I
?Y I I
I
/ I 00,
?+ ?'I •aa 90'S
'il 91'?

P
C) M

O

W g
co N
P Q
1 d O
?
co
,
N
?- w
I ?.
ZOZ'8 /3 O N
(OpQ ") / v '

WZ? I < >
0 o a: N
a
2 a a '
O co
z I
O
LLI ;- '1
N I
N
O X
W
a
0
a
•ia oz's
•4l on
N p
??
A
Q N
n7 4. 11 .
-.-? ?.
nt. .... . ., --

J
a
a
z
O
O
M

z
O d F- ac .
F- Co cn Z LU
F" Q F- cr-
ui
z gx
d 2 o a U
co CD U N W S
Z 2 W ¢
emu, O CDj
Hp Lz o 00
LL LL c? cr-
OZ N 0°to
3
O •- 0
U-
0- cn W GO w' X C
o cn
pp az a
tr z UJ
v i
Z a U) U)
T
C
w H.
?(r
C? WQ W
Q
J
O
U O N
`
l
J
N U Q
O Z
H O
> o
2
v o
N 2
i 1?4
O
O D
+ MAR 18 1996
N
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
:
A
N , \\ A
J \
x W;
'`4` t
% .4 ? t_'t•t
Y,1 r l'\t
s r
oy
s
n? R t
h

z
O
1- cr
N _
~ fn W >
}
f, W } W 2 cr-
j
2 O °' QQ
Q Q Z cr N o m
V O =
N
U- 0 W W
CD >
Q Fp Z R oO
or
-
! OZ N m ?: N
?o . \

00
cli
U), Lli

13 Co LL,

U) :r
w LL
0
p a z
o in
Z
r''
U CC
a. O Q

U
w
Z v
i ?
d'
w
F-
Q Z
O
O F-
LLI
>
O
O>-
as Lj
cr in
JZ JO
JZ
F-0 Q
3=O O F-
W
J-J NK
u
LL. M W
N
D
s D Z(o)-gHvig
ED
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
. z.
000
?; tl
t . ?..
t?t\
I AL
y ?,,? g0
I?' tV ? Mpg
09+5L -L't-. 3Nn HoiLvw
00 I I
" I I

m ?
I II
N
Q O
II
°? w
U zW) O P
o i
. z
I
J
1n
Z x+
W Vf f
00 ° I
z
O
U
O> Q I
= O w I I
F-~
0: N
? , ?
?
X
I
z w W Q
I I
W H J J Z I N
Q
00 ? Z I
Q
z
II
l II
o I I

o ? II
o ,
65 900'L 13 ?- II
I
(09.) i d I I
o <i J?z it
C)
a
I
I I
`,
°
Z
° I
I
it

a X
w
II
II
A
I?
N ? o I 1
009'L 13 ?,
(09-) i d

'
08 + EL A311 -Lrl' 3Nn N7 I taw
O
Lr)
O
v
Z
_O ct
-f z _ L!J •
!- U) w >
1- } F- w
Q
d = O U U
z? "N g
?
Q= W u
WW
?LL ? r (7>
F- ) w o 13 p
O Z a_ CD Ir N m '` i 3
O Z r ? o
LLJ a ? ul rn
a a Z Q 4
U a 1= z
0 L i
Z L)
0
? ? V. P?? N
D avi?Zv V WS
(Y? W V, U.
J ?' C
MAR 18 1996 ° N ° V'
-j Zi
DIVISION OF N
° z
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Q N C
2
1
I
I
I,
I
?i I I
LL, co).
?° I
LL M I I
w
C) W
a ?z°c i
N ? to
L+j w `"
W
x
I

w I ? z
?-
a
I

? o c'
I
= o " <

Z W I = Z

I
° z
o
c =
O O
N O M
nc+cli
i
i
i
i
i
i
n
n
n
n
u
n
u
I., v IV
7w11-1 11l%1 vw
I
O
O I?
'I
. State of North Carolina
--Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
ffl1.9?FA
A&I 0
[D FE F10
June 8, 1996
Pender County
DEM Project # 960411
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Franklin Vick
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Dept. of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.66 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
replacing Bridge #67 at NC 11/53 crossing of the Black River, as you described in your application
dated 1 May 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number 3025.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section
401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-
1786.
Sincerely,
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
John Parker; DCM
1 ?Ia o n Ho rd, r. P. E.
96041Lltr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
May 1, 1996
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Proposed Project:
c? D`k?l
' IFIFMI
A 4 00
",D
ED F= F10
Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
John R. Parker
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
NC Dept of Transportation - Bridge #67 Replacement
NC Hwy 11/53 crossing of the Black River on the Pender/Bladen county line
Replacement of existing bridge #67
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by May 22, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Jerry
Parker at extension 254. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIG (? DATE ? S `?
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 0 Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
To: John Forney
Environmental Sciences Branch
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEWER: GREGSO
WQ SUPERVISOR: ADKINS
DATE: May 28, 1996
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKING
PERMIT YR: 96 PERMIT NO.: 960411 COUNTY: Pender
PROJECT NAME: NC DOT Bridge #67
PROJECT TYPE: Bridge PERMIT TYPE: CAMA
COE #: N/A DOT#: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: May 1, 1996
REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030620
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Black River
CLASS: CSw ORW STREAM INDEX #: 18-68-(11.5)
*OPEN OR CLOSED: N/A

WL IMPACT: Yes WL TYPE: BLH
`
WL REQUESTED: 0.66 WL ACR EST: Yrs ?'Fti I?9
T
WL SCORE: N/A q? 6
.MITIGATION: N/A MITIGATION TYPE: N/A
MITIGATION SIZE: N/A RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to replace the existing bridge on NC 11/53 over
the Black River.
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #3025
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WATER: N/A WETLAND: 28,749 sq. ft.
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? No
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIONS: That the project be done in such
a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the immediate construction area to exceed 25 NTU.
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM-Jerry Parker
John Parker
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NCDOT/Bridge No. 67 Replacement
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: NC Hwy. 11/53 crossing of the Black River, on the
Pender/Bladen county line.
Photo Index - 1989: None 1984: None
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,241,000 Y: 265,000
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 3-26-96
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 4/19/96
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender
Land Classification From LUP -
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - New bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 0.66 acres
Cypress/Gum Swamp
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other-
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 0.66 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C-Sw
Open: N/A

8. PROJECT SUMMARY: N.C.D.O.T. proposes to replace the existing bridge over the Black
River, on NC Hwy. 11/53, on the Pender/Bladen County line.
N.C.D.O.T./Bridge #67
Page 2

9. PROTECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is the existing bridge crossing of the Black River, on NC Hwy. 11/53 on the
Pender/Bladen County line with associated approaches. The applicant proposes to replace the existing
bridge and the associated approaches with a new bridge located 10 meters to the east of the existing
structure. The proposed relocation will fall within the footprint of an old bridge that was removed in
1947, when the existing bridge was constructed. The Black River constitutes the boundary between
Pender and Bladen counties. It is a tributary of the Cape Fear River and originates approximately 12
miles downstream of the project site. Within the river's floodplain, cypress\gum swamp wetlands and
low woodlands extend on the northern side of the bridge site. In the project area the south bank of the
river is highground. The new bridge will be approximately 450 ft long and 30 ft wide. Vertical
clearance of the bridge will remain at approximately 14 ft above ordinary high water with a horizontal
clearance of approximately 26 meters.
-1 '
The Black River has been classified as Inland Waters by the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries/N.C.
Wildlife Commission. The N.C. Division of Environmental Management classifies the river as C-Sw
waters. Black River has also been designated as Outstanding Resource Waters.
The relocation of the bridge and it's approaches will require the placement of 3078 cubic yards of fill
in 0.66 acres below normal high water and in cypress\gum swamp wetlands. The existing bridge will
handle traffic during construction of the new bridge, thereafter, the existing bridge and the fill from it's
approaches shall be removed with the intention of restoring that corridor to wetland elevation for the
purpose of mitigating some of the wetland loss from the construction of the new bridge. Approximately
0.123 acres will be restored to wetland elevation with the anticipation that natural succession will lead
to the re-establishment of cypress trees within the footprint of the mitigation area.
The cypress\gum forest adjacent to the project area contains some of the oldest trees in North America.
That fact was considered when the NCDOT selected the corridor for the new bridge. The proposed
alignment lies within the footprint of the original bridge removed in 1947, which means the trees that
will be removed will be relatively younger. As stated in the applicant's narrative, the Nature
Conservancy has Conservation Easements pending both upstream and downstream of the existing bridge.
The placement of the new bridge immediately downstream from the existing structure will not infringe
upon the easement areas. Also, in order to minimize the effects of construction on anadromous fish
utilizing the Black River for spawning, a construction moratorium on instream work will be observed
from April 1 through June 30. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters will be implemented throughout construction.
An overhead power line and two 4 inch PVC utility lines crossing the river attached to the west side
of the existing bridge will also be relocated by NCDOT Utilities.
The NCDOT investigated other possibilities which may have avoided or lessened wetland impacts, but
none were as cost effective as the proposed plan. It is the NCDOT's opinion that the submitted plan
is the most reasonable and prudent alternative.
N.C.D.O.T./Bridge #{67
Page Three
10. ANTICIPATED EMPACTS
The project would require the filling of 0.66 acres of cypress\gum swamp wetlands. However, 0.123
acres of wetlands are anticipated to be created due to the removal of the existing bridge and it's
approaches and the subsequent grading to wetland elevation. The proposed project would require the
removal of several trees located within the proposed corridor. Since the existing bridge will remain
open to traffic concurrent with construction of the new bridge, no temporary fill in wetlands will be
required. There also will be no change in stream or channel location. The project should not impact
navigation since the clearance of the proposed bridge and the existing bridge will remain the same.
Short term turbidity is to be expected during construction, but should not present any long term adverse
impacts if procedures outlined within the application are followed.
The proposed project appears to represent the most reasonable and prudent means of replacing an
inadequate bridge for the purpose of maintaining safe traffic operations. ., ,
Submitted by: Jerry Parker Date: 04/30/96 Office: Wilmington
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECMErARv
March 14, 1996
D ?CIH719
Division of Coastal Management MAR 18 1996
North Carolina Department of Environment, DIVISION OF
Health and Natural Resources COASTAL MANAGEMENT
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
ATTENTION: Mr. Bob Stroud
Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Bladen/Pender Counties - Replacement of Bridge No. 67 over Black
River on NC 11/53; T.I.P. No. B-2919; State Project No. 8.1270701
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace the
referenced structure on new location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge is to be located approximately.10.0 meters
(32.8 feet) to the east of the existing structure. It will be approximately
137.2 meters (450 feet) long and 9.2 meters (30.2 feet) wide. Navigation
will be accommodated with a vertical clearance of 4.2 meters (13.8 feet)
above ordinary high water and a horizontal clearance of 26.0 meters
(85.28 feet). Alignment changes will involve approximately 366 meters
(1200 feet) and 152 meters (500 feet) of roadway work on the south and north
approaches, respectively. The proposed relocation will fall within the
footprint of an old bridge that was removed in 1947, when the existing bridge
was constructed.
The relocation of the bridge and approaches will require permanent fill
in 0.267 hectare (0.659 acre) below ordinary high water in cypress/gum swamp
wetlands. No temporary fill in wetlands will be required, as no on-site
construcion detour will be necessary. The existing bridge will remain open
to traffic concurrent with construction of the new bridge. No stream
relocation or channel change will be involved. Please note that this
represents minimization at this location to the extent practicable. The new
structure will have 2:1 side slopes in wetland areas. NCDOT has investigated
the possibility of extending the length of the new bridge to avoid wetland
impacts. The linear configuration of the wetland impact area in relation to
the new bridge would require lenghtening the bridge by 190 meters
(623.2 feet) at a cost exceeding 1.03 million dollars. It is our opinion
g.t_*r*t4]*
March 14, 1996
Page 2
that this cost associated with such a structure does not constitute a
reasonable and prudent alternative to the proposed design.
In order to mitigate the wetland impacts, NCDOT proposes to remove the
approach fill to the existing structure following construction of the new
bridge. This will provide 0.05 hectare (0.123 acre) to be restored to
wetland elevation. It is anticipated that natural succession will lead to
there-establishment of cypress trees within the footprint of the mitigation
area. The footprint of the new bridge will be larger than the footprint of
the old bridge due to updated design standards. Thus, the new wetland fill
area exceeds the restorable area at the old bridge.
The cypress/gum swamp forest adjacent to the project area contains some
of the oldest trees in North America. This fact was taken into consideration
during the selection of a corridor for this new bridge. Since the proposed
alignment lies to the east within the footprint of the original bridge
removed in 1947, the trees to be removed to construct the new bridge are
relatively much younger than the ancient trees. The higher quality forests
on the west side of the existing bridge will not be directly affected. The
Nature 'Conservancy has Conservation Easements pending both upstream and
downstream of the existing bridge. The placement of the new bridge
immediately downstream from the existing structure ensures that the new
structure will not infringe upon the easement areas.
In order to minimize the effects of construction on anadramous fish
utilizing the Black River for spawning, a construction moratorium on instream
work will be observed from April 1 through June 30. NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be implemented throughout
construction. Due to the Outstanding Resource Water designation of the Black
River, High Quality Water Sedimentation Controls will also be implemented.
Two 0.1 meter (4 inch) PVC utility lines are attached to the west side
of the existing bridge. An overhead power line crosses the channel on the
west side of the structure. The relocation of these facilities will be
accomplished by NCDOT Utilities.
The scope of work for this project was documented in a Categorical
Exclusion approved by the Federal Highway Administration on August 26, 1994.
Copies of this document are available upon request. Application for a Major
CAMA Permit is hereby made. A set of permit drawings depicting the proposed
work is enclosed. By copy of this letter, a request for 401 Water Quality
Certification by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management is
hereby made. A check in the amount of $250.00 has been transmitted to the DCM
office in Raleigh to cover the CAMA processing fee. A copy of the check is
included herein. The adjacent property owner has been notified of this
permit request. Copies of the letter sent to this property owner and the
certified mail receipt are attached. A copy of the return receipt will be
forwarded as soon as possible.
2 D -7, Elul H V T M
1 B
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 14, 1996
Page 3
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please
contact Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Archie Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P. E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. W. F. Rosser, P. E., Division 6 Engineer
Mr. Ernie Jahnke, DOA, Wilmington
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Project Management
Mr. John Smith, P. E., Structure Design
9T'?"MOART11??8 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Form DCM-MP-1
C A
AILDIPLI ATIO
(To be completed by all applicants) MAR 1 8 1996
1. APPLICA'N'T
a. Landowner:
Name NC Department of Transportation
Address #1 Wilminqton Street
City Raleiqh State NC
Zip 27611 ' Day Phone[phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name H. Franklin Vick. P.E., Manaqer
Planninq & Environmental Branch
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
Bride No. 67
c. -P:ojz= name (if any) 9
• over the Black-River
N07F. _, Permit will be issued in name of lmidowner(s), and/or
Project name.
• .. _ .- . ifs '. . •r. '-- ..
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
Bladem/-Pender _
a. County
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
b. City, town, community or landmark
Atkinson
c. Street address or secondary road number
NC 11/53
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes XX No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) gi arV Ri Liar
H
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge on new location
(same location as older bridge removed
in 1947), s1on9 with approach improvements
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New work -
old bridge will be removed.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use; methods of
construction. and daily _ operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Bridge Na. ? 67 needs- to be
replaced due to deterioration of old
structure (18/100 sufficiency- rating).
Existing bridge will remain open to
traffic throughout construction, then
removed for-wetland-mitigation. P.rojectec
traffic 3300 vehicles per day for
2n15 rips-ion- year
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-1 TM
._ = MAR191996 =..._
- of; existing wastewater treatment facilities.
"gPASTAh MANAM.
4. ` LAND AND WATER .: _ :_.......:?A
CHARACTERISTICS
Two-lane travelwav
-a. Size of entire tract on -100=foot miaht=of-wav
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c., Approximate elevation of tract .above . MHW or
r NWL OTlaae` .l evati nn 97'fl6,(1 Q °FR fcct• \
- -NGVD _?- _.
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckal-ee Loam. Echaw loamy'-sand',
Johnston mucky loam. Centenary sand
e. Vegetation on tract ryp-ess-qum sw@m1g
and di s irb nmm mite
f. Man-made features now on tract
Old roadbed and hri ring tni irhrirn.gn
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
. .e.• 'l'.+.:[•O:_-..it ?M'r.+: v-'v*!?-'?• -f.f.?•.r •. .. va 4•..aw•. . ??/.vl:.sw.'.
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
"'wastewater; in`dustriallcomme'rcial" effluent; ° "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
.N/A_._ ...
Black River d®signsted nutstanriinn
Resource Water
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted: --
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
XX Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not zoned
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? XX Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cerWiftcate, if apPlictble)
J. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? XX Yes No
If yes, by whom? NCDOT - see CE
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does. it involve a National
Register listed g eligible property? _
Yes No _
l: . Are there wetlands on the site? XX Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other X-
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus.written permission
from the. owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 12" by I V white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule. 77.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate ' number of quality copies are provided by
applicant.- - (Contact the. U.S. Army Corps 'of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Name Roger Dale Williamson I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
Address 145 Long Acre Road; Kelly, NC 28448 grant permission to representatives of state and federal
Phone [phone] r agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
D I H7 on with evaluating information related to this
Name r,? pe t plication and follow-up monitoring of the
Address - 19 191ZJ*Uo
Phone
D I `J I S 1 0 N O qI further certify that the information provided in this
Name COASTAL MANAG1ion is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Address
Phone This is the lZ?? day of ' , 19 9/
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
Print Name H. Franklin Vic P.E.
r
Signature Landowner or Authorized Agent
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
* A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCiI•I-NIP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public XX' Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Asphnl+ mnd rnnrro+c
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Black River
PARR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge137.2 m (450 feet)
h. Width of proposed bridge 9.2 m (30.17 feet)
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
6.5 m (21.32 feet) ahnvP natural nrniinH
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes XX No
If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
NWL, 2.4 m (7.9 feet) 4.2 m (13.8 feet)
e. . Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
XX Yes No reducing or increasing the existing navigable
yes, g? Yes XX No
(1) Length of existing bridge135.2 m (443 feet) If yes, explain
_ . (2) Width of existing bridge - m (29 411)
(3) Navigation "- clearance underneath existing
. 4.2 m (13.8 feet)
bridge _
.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
.._; . -removed? (Explain)?lI of the existing . m. -Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
bridge. willl be removed, .along with ...:.. no navigable waters? .- .Yes _ XX No
o .. i ma era x - If yes, explain -'• M ,?

f Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?

%
_ Yes X° No
If yes, ; `-
y
<. ....
N contacted =the =-:•U S ast Guard
x y : (1) Length of existing culvert n.: Have M.you
z(2) -Width-of existing culvert
concerning their approval? -= "3•°L i?.
(3) ~Height of the top of the existing culvert above .. _ .yam XX ' :NQ Y-" a
the MHW or WvVL • -: If yes, please provide record of their action. "
Revised 03/95 : - _ . .• `
Form DCM-MP-S
5 TM Tg H.V
N/A J. TAI roposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS -
. ... ---- =- pole - - =Yes - - - No
A 1$ 19Y xplain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed DIVISION CJ -
MIM
L'MANAG
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert. (construction material, style)
d Will propoied culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
{4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h. ' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
3.. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a.... Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
.
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?.
yes. XX
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated -?
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. - Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
XX Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 1250 cubic meters
1638 cubit yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Project side slopes
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
see drawings
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
XX Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCINi-INiP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Wi 1 the proposed project rewire the relocation of
maintenance? XX Yes Hv? isting utility lines? Yes No
(S) Does the disposal area inclAd coas I xplain in detailTwo 0.1 m (4 inch) PVC
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or etlands? itv lines . attached to west side of
Yes XX No MAR 1 8 1996 ' stina bridqe will be relocated to .
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2) new ri ae .
above. DIVISION Q F
he ro osed project require the construction of
(? Does the disposal area include ?J ANACaEM any t mporary detour structures?
the MHW or NWL? XX Yes No Yes XX No
If yes, ive dimension if different from No. 2 If yes, explain in detail _
above.g2350 cubic meters
cubic yards
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in. -any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes XX No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill. (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs XXOther Wetlands
If yes, 0.267 Ha (0.659 Ac) permanent
(1) Length of area to be filled 195 m (640 feet)
(2) Width of area to be filled13-.7m_7 eet
(3) Purpose of fill Bridge structural support
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes XX No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site _,,
and erosion controlledl5tandard NCDOT Sediment
and erosion control measures, plus High.
quality Water Sedimentation Controls.
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? Backhoe and other heavy
highway r.nnstri irti nn pnjijpm!'nt
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes XX No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Ir d, above) to be placed on
highground? Yes _ No h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
If yes, require any shoreline stabilization?
Length of area to be filled XX Yes : No .-
'- r_ (2) Width of area to be filled If yes, explain in detail • 35m x l4? m 71 ?i '= A r ?r
= (3) Purpose of fill 147 : ft)- .fip - Tap'
Within footprint- of road. - ; :.. 225n v _. _ ?..
thi . maters (3f)7R Jr variic? -Y r
. ? below •MHW - - '?
z' NGao- 8r2? ; t^
s4. GENERI?L' j-'_ t or Project Name _ -s
EiKl
St?tui e _ yY-y- ? K s
M Will the proposed project involve any mitigation? -
1 - ?-.
`a
Yes
--
If yeses; a plain in detailRemo+ra1--o-T-f0•:f15_K6_ ?3-42 37atfi" Date
--bf exi.stinq fill-within footprint of existznq - - - -
bridqe followinq its removal
Revised 03/95 F

'' r n.w -s - ?wew •?y Se O N
t , s
t t , ' , Wass ' / r
w RE ji c wasae ? t f
g
. O
+? r r ?t /.; •. wee;
r 11 't ?% r?fsseeq ' 'is. f Asses ' ; ' • r
to .. wwef Career •?
r? E "Slow c3saft
t is + u canoe e Al + I
1 t few
#+ rest resw ^` t
r 7 1 t-. •+MAi1ls+Na t Q
Wooll,
- . , .
'
ar saw" Geeter NeMrr ' Mare 1. ` M11ee IF ,
geerq ty
t N Ee.wa w Ohl N Sw Gni 4? •2
C v 0 s U M U S
f Doa .fir.. 'i ':.,:•;:._?_. t _ 1.. ` ? f •' r '?
l1Mae.,
r er'e '
fK seew • ? , .
tid
I ?
o? ATKINSON s w 17 C ? K '
?
-Awl
! 11.171 49,
4-1
m lea, i • u 7
awes c?rra.rr
` - - ?' 134 -30, ?c PENDBR CO.
BL?DEN CO. MQJ ECT ,.?
MOOM CK.
NATIONAL
.. '.' IrJ .8ATTLE FI
(0 1B H V?
TTA
X0,1, i' R•`2.-• '? ?
r'l . Ij0 ` Vl,`, , J
MAR 18 1996
BEGIN `-` DIVISION OF
PROJECT COASTAL MANAGEMENT
vi*v
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN / PENDER COUNTIES
8.1270701 (B-2919)
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
ON NC 11/53 OVER BLACK RIVER
SHEET I OF T SCALE AS SHOWN JULY 12, 1994
&I, A
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT RECEIVED
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
MAY 1 71996
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NCDOT/Bridge No. 67 Replacement PPANCH
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: NC Hwy.11/53 crossing of the Black River, on the
Pender/Bladen county line.
Photo Index - 1989: None 1984: None
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,241,000 Y: 265,000 96 n Q 1 1
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 3-26-96 9 6 0 4 1
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 4/19/96
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Pender
Land Classification From LUP -
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - New bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7
HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DKEDUED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 0.66 acres
Cypress/Gum Swamp
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other-
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 0.66 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C-Sw
Open: N/A
8
PROJECT SUMMARY: N.C.D.O.T. proposes to replace the existing bridge over the Black
River, on NC Hwy. 11/53, on the Pender/Bladen County line.
V 1
s
N.C.D.O.T./Bridge #67
Page 2
9. PROTECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is the existing bridge crossing of the Black River, on NC Hwy. 11/53 on the
Pender/Bladen County line with associated approaches. The applicant proposes to replace the existing
bridge and the associated approaches with a new bridge located 10 meters to the east of the existing
structure. The proposed relocation will fall within the footprint of an old bridge that was removed in
1947, when the existing bridge was constructed. The Black River constitutes the boundary between
Pender and Bladen counties. It is a tributary of the Cape Fear River and originates approximately 12
miles downstream of the project site. Within the river's floodplain, cypress\gum swamp wetlands and
low woodlands extend on the northern side of the bridge site. In the project area the south bank of the
river is highground. The new bridge will be approximately 450 ft long and 30 ft wide. Vertical
clearance of the bridge will remain at approximately 14 ft above ordinary high water with a horizontal
clearance of approximately 26 meters.
The Black River has been classified as Inland Waters by the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries/N.C.
Wildlife Commission. The N.C. Division of Environmental Management classifies the river as C-Sw
waters. Black River has also been designated as Outstanding Resource Waters.
The relocation of the bridge and it's approaches will require the placement of 3078 cubic yards of fill
in 0.66 acres below normal high water and in cypress\gum swamp wetlands. The existing bridge will
handle traffic during construction of the new bridge, thereafter, the existing bridge and the fill from it's
approaches shall be removed with the intention of restoring that corridor to wetland elevation for the
purpose of mitigating some of the wetland loss from the construction of the new bridge. Approximately
0.123 acres will be restored to wetland elevation with the anticipation that natural succession will lead
to the re-establishment of cypress trees within the footprint of the mitigation area.
The cypress\gum forest adjacent to the project area contains some of the oldest trees in North America.
That fact was considered when the NCDOT selected the corridor for the new bridge. The proposed
alignment lies within the footprint of the original bridge removed in 1947, which means the trees that
will be removed will be relatively younger. As stated in the applicant's narrative, the Nature
Conservancy has Conservation Easements pending both upstream and downstream of the existing bridge.
The placement of the new bridge immediately downstream from the existing structure will not infringe
upon the easement areas. Also, in order to minimize the effects of construction on anadromous fish
utilizing the Black River for spawning, a construction moratorium on instream work will be observed
from April 1 through June 30. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters will be implemented throughout construction.
An overhead power line and two 4 inch PVC utility lines crossing the river attached to the west side
of the existing bridge will also be relocated by NCDOT Utilities.
The NCDOT investigated other possibilities which may have avoided or lessened wetland impacts, but
none were as cost effective as the proposed plan. It is the NCDOT's opinion that the submitted plan
is the most reasonable and prudent alternative.

N.C.D.O.T./Bridge #67
Page Three
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The project would require the filling of 0.66 acres of cypress\gum swamp wetlands. However, 0.123
acres of wetlands are anticipated to be created due to the removal of the existing bridge and it's
approaches and the subsequent grading to wetland elevation. The proposed project would require the
removal of several trees located within the proposed corridor. Since the existing bridge will remain
open to traffic concurrent with construction of the new bridge, no temporary fill in wetlands will be
required. There also will be no change in stream or channel location. The project should not impact
navigation since the clearance of the proposed bridge and the existing bridge will remain the same.
Short term turbidity is to be expected during construction, but should not present any long term adverse
impacts if procedures outlined within the application are followed.
The proposed project appears to represent the most reasonable and prudent means of replacing an
inadequate bridge for the purpose of maintaining safe traffic operations.
Submitted by: Jerry Parker Date: 04/30/96 Office: Wilmington
d„a SG1Tfv ^
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
March 14, 1996
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405-3845
ATTENTION: Mr. Bob Stroud
Dear Sir:
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SUBJECT: Bladen/Pender Counties - Replacement of Bridge No. 67 over Black
River on NC 11/53; T.I.P. No. B-2919; State Project No. 8.1270701
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace the
referenced structure on new location, along with associated approach
improvements. The new bridge is to be located approximately 10.0 meters
(32.8 feet) to the east of the existing structure. It will be approximately
137.2 meters (450 feet) long and 9.2 meters (30.2 feet) wide. Navigation
will be accommodated with a vertical clearance of 4.2 meters (13.8 feet)
above ordinary high water and a horizontal clearance of 26.0 meters
(85.28 feet). Alignment changes will involve approximately 366 meters
(1200 feet) and 152 meters (500 feet) of roadway work on the south and north
approaches, respectively. The proposed relocation will fall within the
footprint of an old bridge that was removed in 1947, when the existing bridge
was constructed.
The relocation of the bridge and approaches will require permanent fill
in 0.267 hectare (0.659 acre) below ordinary high water in cypress/gum swamp
wetlands. No temporary fill in wetlands will be required, as no on-site
construcion detour will be necessary. The existing bridge will remain open
to traffic concurrent with construction of the new bridge. No stream
relocation or channel change will be involved. Please note that this
represents minimization at this location to the extent practicable. The new
structure will have 2:1 side slopes in wetland areas. NCDOT has investigated
the possibility of extending the length of the new bridge to avoid wetland
impacts. The linear configuration of the wetland impact area in relation to
the new bridge would require lenghtening the bridge by 190 meters
(623.2 feet) at a cost exceeding 1.03 million dollars. It is our opinion
a

t '
March 14, 1996
Page 2
that this cost associated with such a structure does not constitute a
reasonable and prudent alternative to the proposed design.
In order to mitigate the wetland impacts, NCDOT proposes to remove the
approach fill to the existing structure following construction of the new
bridge. This will provide 0.05 hectare (0.123 acre) to be restored to
wetland elevation. It is anticipated that natural succession will lead to
the re-establishment of cypress trees within the footprint of the mitigation
area. The footprint of the new bridge will be larger than the footprint of
the old bridge due to updated design standards. Thus, the new wetland fill
area exceeds the restorable area at the old bridge.
The cypress/gum swamp forest adjacent to the project area contains some
of the oldest trees in North America. This fact was taken into consideration
during the selection of a corridor for this new bridge. Since the proposed
alignment lies to the east within the footprint of the original bridge
removed in 1947, the trees to be removed to construct the new bridge are
relatively much younger than the ancient trees. The higher quality forests
on the west side of the existing bridge will not be directly affected. The
Nature Conservancy has Conservation Easements pending both upstream and
downstream of the existing bridge. The placement of the new bridge
immediately downstream from the existing structure ensures that the new
structure will not infringe upon the easement areas.
In order to minimize the effects of construction on anadramous fish
utilizing the Black River for spawning, a construction moratorium on instream
work will be observed from April 1 through June 30. NCDOT's Best Management
Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be implemented throughout
construction. Due to the Outstanding Resource Water designation of the Black
River, High Quality Water Sedimentation Controls will also be implemented.
Two 0.1 meter (4 inch) PVC utility lines are attached to the west side
of the existing bridge. An overhead power line crosses the channel on the
west side of the structure. The relocation of these facilities will be
accomplished by NCDOT Utilities.
The scope of work for this project was documented in a Categorical
Exclusion approved by the Federal Highway Administration on August 26, 1994.
Copies of this document are available upon request. Application for a Major
CAMA Permit is hereby made. A set of permit drawings depicting the proposed
work is enclosed. By copy of this letter, a request for 401 Water Quality
Certification by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management is
hereby made. A check in the amount of $250.00 has been transmitted to the DCM
office in Raleigh to cover the CAMA processing fee. A copy of the check is
included herein. The adjacent property owner has been notified of this
permit request. Copies of the letter sent to this property owner and the
certified mail receipt are attached. A copy of the return receipt will be
forwarded as soon as possible.
E D I R 07- -3 ? V)
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
March 14, 1996
Page 3
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please
contact Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/tp
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Archie Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P. E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. W. F. Rosser, P. E., Division 6 Engineer
Mr. Ernie Jahnke, DOA, Wilmington
Mr. G. T. Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Project Management
Mr. John Smith, P. E., Structure Design
R D 0 (C IT H VIE
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

Form DCM-MP-1
A'P
PLICATIO 18 1996
(To be completed by all applicants) MAR
• DIVISION OF
OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
b. City, town, community or landmark
Atkinson
1. APPLICA'N'T
a. Landowner:
Name NC Department of Transportati-nn
Address
#1 Wilmington Street
City Raleiqh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone( 919) 733-3141
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
H. Franklin Vick. P.E.. Manaqer
Planninq & Environmental Branch
Address
City _
Zip Day Phone
Fax
State
Bride No. 67
c. ?_Prcj?= name (if any) 9
over the Black- River
N07E. Permit wilt be issued in name of lmsdowner(s), mid/or
c. Street address or secondary road number
NC 11/53
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes XX No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (d.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) -FU ark Pi var
3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing bridge on new location
(same location as older bridoe removed
in 1947)- along with anoroach improvements.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? New work -
old bridge will be removed.
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? Public
d. Give "a brief description of purpose, use; methods of
construction , and daily, operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages. Bridge.. Na. - 67 needs" to be
replaced due to deterioration of old
structure (18/100 sufficiency r"atinq).
Existing bridge will remain open to
traffic throughout construction, then
removed for wetland-mitigation. Projected
traffic 3300 vehicles per dav'for
215 d si on' year.
--
Revised 03195
Form DCM-MP-1
MAR -191996
---__- - -_ ----? _ T nivisll?t-O- ?.. . - .:-..
i'be existing wastewater treatment facilities.
NAMOL
MA '
z '
oTA>z
4. LAND AND WATER N? a
CHARACTERISTICS -
Two-lane travelwav
a. ° Size of entire tract -on 100-foot 'right=of-wav
N/A .
b. Size of individual lot(s)
c. Approximate elevation of tract above _ MHVJ or
.? _?_._ 11WL ?ri r1a ... -1 Pvati nn R? nm??14 FR ?fco+l :°-..
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee Loam. Echaw loamy'sand,
Johnston mucky loam, Centenarv sand
e. Vegetation on tract ry?<zz_•gum swamp
. and dis rb nmmunity
f. Man-made features now on tract
Old roadbed and hri ring tnt trbHoun
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
T
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
al/comme'rcial` effluent"; -? "wash
"wastewatei;° industri
down" and residential discharges.)
Surface runoff
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Black River dRsignated QutctanHinn
Resource Water
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (consult the local land use plan.)
Conservation Transitional
_ Developed Community
XX Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not zoned
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? XX Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cenificate, if applicable)
J. Has a professional archaeological assessment been
done for the tract? XX Yes No
If yes, by whom? NCDOT - see CE
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
_-...__ Historic., District or does. it involve a . National
Register listed g eligible property? _
Yes No _
1. - Are there wetlands on the site? XX Yes No
Coastal (marsh) Other XX-
If yes, has a delineation been conducted. Yes
(Aaach documentation, if available)
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted: --
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, pluswritten permission
from the. owner to carry out the project.
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an S 112" by 11' white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule. 7J.020' :1 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate-number of quality copies are provided by
applicant, (Contact the U.S. Army Corps 'of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Rericed 03/95
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
* A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
Name Roger Dale Williamson I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
Address 145 Long Acre Road: Kelly. NC 28448 grant permission to representatives of state and federal
Phone [phone] r agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
with evaluating information related to this
Name I pe t' plication and follow-up monitoring of the
Address
Phone J L r ' 19 19 ?6
D 1 V i S ! 0!N' 0 4 further certify that the information provided in this
Name COASTAL MANAG4?FrATi'on is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Address l???j Phone This is the day of .199
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
Print Name H. Franklin Vic P.E.
Signature ,
Landowner or Authorized Agent
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-NIP-5
?IgiDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public XX' Private
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Black River
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL, 2.4 m (7.9 feet)
e.
R D TR? (C Tg? HVT@?
B
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT-
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 137.2 m (450 feet)
h. Width of proposed bridge 9.2 m (30.17 feet)
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
6'5 m (21.32 feet) shnvP natural grrmnH
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes XX No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
4.2 m (13.8 feet)
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
yes, opening? Yes XX No
(1) Length of existing bridge135.2 m (443 feet) If yes, explain
(2) Width of existing bridge m (29 411)
(3) Navigation --clearance underneath existing
bridge 4.2 m (13.8 feet)
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be : -
removed? (Expplam)ATl of the existing- :. m. --Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands coritammg
,.:;.bridge will) be removed. - along with ...no navigable waters? Yes XX ..No
o . ?... ma erg :z . If yes; explain
,. y Yt . t{ 7s y'y3if. i
f Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)
r: Yes XX No

If yes,

1 of existing culvert - -
?•
O Len
?

Guard .
n - Have ou _v contacted =the U S '.. Coast
y
.
(2) ;Width of existing culvert ±=
concerning their approval?
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above _ yes XX : No
; ---'' s -_
_ . :. the MHW or N1,NL. - - - --:-If yes, please provide record of their action. _
Revised 03/95
Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
XX Yes No
Form DCM-MP-S
N/A J. : Will roposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS .
- ---- pote - -Yes - - No
111AR 18 19roy , xplain
a.
b.
Water body in which culvert is to be placed p I V I S 10 N U
L. MANAG -mT
Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert. (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an-'e'xisting bridge?
Yes No
If Yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert,
h. ' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
3. _ EXCAVATION AND FELL'-,.,.
a.. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?.
Yes. XX No .... _ - w
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. - Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: NO
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation?
XX Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 1250 cubic meters
1638 cubic yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
Project side slopes
.(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
see drawings
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
XX Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03195
'Form DC1N1-INiP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Wi 1 the proposed project require the relocation of
maintenance? XX Yes ?(0H?T istingutilitylines? Yes No
1
4 i
h) PVC
i
ilT
0
i
d
l
(5) Does the disposal area includ y coal wo
eta
.
m (
nc
I exp
n
n
a
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or o etlands? itv lines attached to west side of .
Yes XX No MAR 1 8 1996 stino bridqe will be relocated to .
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
5 I S I O N O new ri oe.
'
above. D 1
& e ro osed project require the construction of -
p
(6) Does the disposal area include afipM1 ANA any
temporary detour structures?
the MHW or NWL? XX Yes No Yes XX No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 If yes, explain in detail _
above. 2350 cubic meters
. cubic yards
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in.-any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes XX No
MHW or NWL? Yes XX No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
(2) Width of area to be filled and erosion controlled'3tandard NCDOT Sediment
(3) Purpose of fill and erosion control measures, plus High
quality Water Sedimentation Controls.
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert f. What type of construction equipment will be used
result in any fill .(other than excavated material (for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: dredge)? Backhoe and other heavy
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs XXOther Wetlands highway nnnstri m -inn p-Quipment
If yes, 0.267 Ha (0.659 Ac) permanent ?.
(1) Length of area to be filled 195 m (640 feet)
(2) Width of area to be filledl3. m feet) g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
(3) Purpose of fill Bridge structural support to project site? Yes XX No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental im acts
P
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Ir d, above) to be placed on
highground? Yes - No h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
If yes, require any shoreline stabilization?
(1) Length of area to be filled X Yes - No s
(2) Width of area to be filled If yes, explain in detail , 35m 'x X45 m "(?1 ? flffi ?c >
?(3) Purpose of fill ,.. , =-'147: Eft)- .rip 'Tao
- - Within -footprint- of road. 2350 b; meters (3mR r - i F '4 dA
?• below :MHW a. 7
.N'DOT gr2q?i. ;.
74
. GENERAL = itcaat or Project Name
r?
_{ . , ua ~•..h" ????. _ .. : 5' t .- ` ?°7`? '"
Signature 7.:, ?E,;
a ° Will the proposed project involve any mitigation? •-?
Yes No - - . -? _•
Date
If yes; explain.in detaURemovva1---o-f-Q-:f15-1#a= 3 --
if exi.stinq fill. within footprint of exist;inq
= bridge followinq its removal
Revised 03195

0
'0

i INN
N

' UutES y
_
! ?
y

,_?
/f

?•_?3j.
7
t . ) tAM ? ? • r y

+ X1,41
y 10111 n
7
RE Sa `a Aa11uff 1 y ..
nrf.., B A
1 .
{
it
Call
fwt
1111017
E ...
i ti w 11
was COW
"am Vf "low E N
E N E

Is clams
7
I ' 0 ~ thn? Pow
11 t
t
[ 1 i
+
11u
00941
V 1 r 1 t -? 1 /.N ) 7 .f110'/M o f 111X` coaw
08*4
G N t? ?
.. MIT 011.. Q,?11 l•AMtNfA ' MWfA u { w "1111. in11ww
, A
tlwe.•
w„ A
• i tti.w.d 10 3111111tr, L .
seat
f-10 U M U S / ti"'•, ?T may..
111 ° 4 ttf .
> 1
eiifnf11...
G J
I / IK f11gf 7
w
i ATgINSON? s w I c' K
i N ! •j? Ief11M11
L11b /` SnwtH .ji MAIL"
1
ao f u f
tl i` ; c?."rwft
134`30, ?G i , PEND$R CO. `w ....
BL EN CO. FIROJECT%
t ?•, NOOM CB.
NATIONAL
.°''"? ,=? BATTLE FIE
0,
MAR 18 1996
BEGIN DIVISION OF
-PROJECT COASTAL MANAGEMENT
` Y •
y / .0
or" `
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN /PENDER COUNTIES
8.1270701 (B-2919)
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
ON NC 11/53 OVER BLACK RIVER
SHEET 1 OF T SCALE AS SHOWN JULY 1Z 1994
Mg rcjJ
N l ??. CANE 'C1- R o?
W
BJ'dNbW Ib'1Sb'00
Z_
a ° JO NOISIAIG
r w ? '
966t 8 T MI
m ,R ? / 1 ?+ J ri 5
- r.
r ? f
0) MT
Pol.
O Q ` 1 a ..../ ?s#rx Gm?
D W /' • J J ' I • J
1??{/N?1 m FF
O $• //'? i 7 J /I Z II+11
in c
o??y li^ .i CD
'zp?
S ° A"` v
Eo C7 s ° ? ? ? <??,
z iJ? _ z
3 >' y
9R?7 O ? 'a
FS
/ rn
!i W o .?
z
??? r _ LJ Rol)
1?,?1v ? / A tt{

D O .v Z •p? i k! ?'?
m
4 m O
0 0 n
°
v r
X apt.
1N U) Z O < ml - f
?.

T
z cn
m
CO
m

o :,
Z
O
z w°° N Z0
o m

Ov
o M
z
O -? T, m
?' ox
m-
m m p -n cn r
r
:13 =Z mz z

C-) C' O
c
O gn rr'

r
m -ZI D vrr z

O
Cl)
<
A

a Z -? m

s
m• 's:
t.
E-
m s
j.
0
08+EL A38 -L-1- 3NIl HC1t?W 4
Z09'L l?
roa•? / d
0
W
Cr
U-
E to
A
U L E U L
tD
>%Cn
ti z
a
w0
a
m
v- ,w 0 to tan ri w 2 }1 02 N i
O=
11 . 11 11 11 11 -? +
W U5 O

W
O L O
O ,,o E F
-
a
cWU W ?a:_j0 U
Zm
a
-t+
?
=
t
n
w 0I-
a=??Zac? ?Q
?
a c
?
=
2QO?Z
V
Z
NU
a
(n CLE
D l>
2 N W(? U
0
? o:

Z
S
W?ti
ZZ Z O
N
N V) V) V) VV) V) w O R O
000mCD moU-.7w
v
11
a
a
to
w
Q
N
W
d ?
E
N N
in i
a £!
? a N
10 N O
ti
N Q ?
N ? O
? J W
N
9:
c? m
a '+8 0£'9
•?7 on
N w N
n7 It A".. ,---- -

rn
T 00 J \? x
D ti W c o
iQ V)
O
11 ?
1 / tr
W tp
ZOZ 8 / I ` l
(o d N
4
O c
. J ? i
0 0 cc N
0-a? 441
C7 0 I
Z
N N ` I
0 x
CL W
O
cr
cr
w

o° \ II
o ?\ I I
o
o ? \ I I
?'? I I

1 I
? I \I

i

4/-- ?01 '00,
0
z
0
J
Q
a
z
O
M

i
z
O E- rc
F-? c w> cl;
?Q W L? F- LLJ
O :?: n g v
ZCD U N S
Q = w ° [L
LL O w w
F-O Z o pp
LL IL a, a: cv) z
OZ ? N m'n 3 tiI
O.Z.(4 O? O
?- UJ CD Lu `- y O
a O U UL o g ° z a
O w
Z w
U a 0 Q w
Z N N
P ln'
i N p
(?
cr- Q?
c LJ
V ?- Vp F
W -
9
C? WQ u
J
O U Q
O L
tr
N
J

N U J
Q
O Z
F- O

>
. N

O
N
Q 2
? ??JN VTM
JN
0
+ MAR 18 1996
N
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
0$ Jr r??

1N3VG9VNVVV IV! SVO'_
JO NOiSIWO
?? 9661 8 T N
I?
ii
I
-n m
ox
?N
?
m Z
O
r
D
r
r
oz
N
?m
::j 00
0G
nm
4M
0
z
co _n
m r=
rr
O
? Z
O ?
?m
0_4
70Z
-<O
c5
D
m
-n-{ m
X
T =
I? Z
c
N
z m
O
Z -o
C-) O
m
? v
w
w ?
05
M m
w m
IN 0
?2 3:
m Z
--A

0
CO m
Z
N ?
v
C) _u
o m
v
m
`0 0
=° c
z
m
z
C7
? D
Z O
n
n
z
O
D
?D
Cn
z

m .?
o

v
N y

3

20

= N
00
m
N
O
-Zi o
n
r
N
D O
m s?
mm
m
Na ?
vW
\ %A
,a.

9
rn) yI
t` rrn
A y
,a
\ \ a
10
rte, i •• ,
.a \
R??
cU
R
2
0
f-
U
F-
N
Z
0
U
O
Z
W
u
05+5L -L'I-. 3Nn Holnw
-IT
I II
I L)
Y
U
m
O =
N Q
c? +
Z ? 4'f
to Q M
W N Ln
O> Q
w? N
P J J
O
w
F-
G
CD 0
=O I
Y- M
aW I
Z
o o ~ LV I
I Q
z II
1 O I II
II
?
? II

'
9Z0'L l? ?-
II
Y 109-J l d •\
I II
, OI JI Z
O' I
O O I
?. p a- O II
W
N O
Z
I
O

0 F- I
i l
Ir X

1 I(
it
I?
N ? o ?, I 1
Z09'L l 3 ?? :?
rob-J / d ° ?'? II 'I
N O tD Q..
08 + EL A3H -L1= win I47 I Hw
V
Z C)
O
- (n cQ W r
O? n o-, SU
0- z p •-
N V N W M
Z Q
c
W
f- o Z O _p CD >
p
LU r,
LL a. C ¢ co z
p z \ ? m\ p ~I
Z co Li = u.
> O N
w a
0Q g a.Z
p w ?-
V ate. O cai =
Z rn rn
D TM®R iEV?
MAR 18 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT

0

I I,
Z? I I
O O I I
_J U-
IL ct
O
I i
O O w w
a 0
LA?- M
I
Cif W N
w
? '

°
w z
I

Q
-r I
Z
°
_
0 = 0 o
O ; I J
?
v Z W
Q
0 o i Z

N O c o
4p Q
nC 4- Cl. -I'7- 3RII l Ll-% I MIAI

m ? 0
N W
W w

(Y? .. W

U
O °
N
W
J Q
(V Q O F-
U Z
c o
Q > N °
_
0
0
t0
N
O
N
z
0
0
0
0
Cr
n

O
o s
+
'
o O
ry ,
,

e ,
/

0
,
/
,
/

060°L
?
?

N
O
03
?.D l
t
t
t
r
.
.
1
I
1
z
o
W 1- cn c/) w >
J
u' v Q
F' Q L1J
-
w }
t- 1
gL) D
-,
a ?= o ^

14

L
(n C7
= L)
N CL
Lu m
ti L
LAN
o >w Q
LL W
0
C7 >
06W ~ Q Z O Q Q
J LL
oz d
? 0
c x M
m\ Z
3
tiI
Z n w co Lu ' azi O
H
Ln r
p Q V
Z
te y
= a
.
Z
V CL
O
Z m ai
Q
z
a
0
v z
z 0
I--
L.IJ U
W
cn

w
~
Q Z

3 ?

= >
7
c
? 0 \
= 0-
vi
L?
zm LA

¢Q
J Z N

J D

W ? J Z
lL J
3 O O H
Z3 ??
O
JJ
Nir
J W
LL. C13 X O
W Li
V TK(DIRI171K
MAR 1 8 1996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
rn
3 c
O
J
W
C] M
N
N
Z 11
Q?
J W
W Q
3 3
z?
J =
J
J Z
a
?- o
o?
?- O
}
a
SUMMARY SHEET
SITE No. 1
Location: L7 Rev. Sta 13+60 to 15+45 Lt and Rt.
Volume of Fill in Wetlands Below Ordinary High Water. 2,350 cubic meters
Area of Fill in Wetlands Below Ordinary High Water. 0.267 Hectares (0.659 Acres)
Area of Existing Fill Removed for Wetlands Mitigation: 0.05 Hectares (0.123 Acres)
Headwaters: Below
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNER
ROGER DALE WILLIAMSON
145 LONG ACRE ROAD
KELLY, NC 28448
PH: 910 285 5712
7-0 (rl TM
{
MAR 18 1996 i
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BLADEN /PENDER COUNTIES
8.1270701 (B-2919)
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
ON NC 11/53 OVER BLACK RIVER
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHFFT 7 nc 7 __ _?.