19930638 Ver 1_Complete File_19931102

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE

T `??
REF. NO OR R• _ G.
Bj?
O
FRO
1egq /
/? ACTION REF R
ROOM, BLDG.
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
?NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS )eFOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ;9"FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
..tea ? ???pd?
d w,. m. in, ",, 5 S
NOV 1993
?F WETLANDS GROUP
WATER 1 LITY SECTION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA r
DEPARTMENT OF TkkNSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT III
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
October 29, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for proposed improvements to
NC 87 from SR 1547 (Barker Road) to US 29 in
Reidsville; Alamance, Caswell and Rockingham Counties,
Federal Aid Project No. F-100-1(10); State Project
No. 8.1470501; TIP No. R72®50
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review procedure is to have an early "meeting
of the.minds" as to the scope of work that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for December 2, 1993 at 9:30 A. M. in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Michael L. Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, at 733-7842.
MLP/plr
I was C?
Attachment
wT
4?
Pk,?
"?Im ? t ,S ?, "'30'A COA ? J 2 +ea.S
sect FA?-
I CAI?6J
C A) SI?

( ?) S?i /? It- (°)

2 14
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date October 27, 1993
Revision Date
Project Development Stage
Programming
Planning X
Design
TIP # R-2560
Project # 8.1470501
F.A. Project # F-100-1(10) ?j
Division Seven I
Counties Alamance, Caswell, Rockingham
Route NC 87
Functional Classification Rural Minor Arterial
Length 30.7 kilometers (19.1 miles)
Purpose of Project: INCREASE CAPACITY AND SAFETY OF EXISTING_
NC 87 AND IMPROVE LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR CURRENT AND DESIGN YEAR
TRAFFIC.
Description of project (including specific limits) and major
elements of work: WIDEN NC 87 TO AN UNDIVIDED FIVE-LANE CURB
AND GUTTER SECTION FROM SR 1547 (BARKER ROAD) TO US 29
Type of environmental document to be prepared: EA AND FONSI
Environmental study schedule: EA JAN 95
FONSI DEC 95
Will there be special funding participation by municipality,
developers, or other? Yes No X
If yes, by whom and amount: ($) or M
How and when will this be paid?
4
Page 2
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Features of Proposed Facility
Type of Facility: MULTI-LANE
Type of Access Control: Full Partial None 1
Type of Roadway:.
Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 3
Typical Section of Roadway:
5-LANE CURB AND GUTTER (UNDIVIDED)
Traffic: Current 9.200 vpd Design Year 16,560 vpd
Design Standards Applicable: AASHTO
Design Speed: 50 MPH
Preliminary Resurfacing Design:
Preliminary Pavement Design:
Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies). . . . . . . . $ 8,200,000
Right of Way Cost (including rel., util.,
and acquisition). . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,075,000
Force Account Items. . . . . . . . . . . . $ _
Preliminary Engineering. . . . . . . . $
Prior Years Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80,000

Total Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ _12,355,000
TIP Cost Estimate:
Construction . . . . . . . . . ... . .
. $ 8,200,000
Right of Way . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . $ 4,075,000
Prior Years Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80,000
Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 125355,000
List any special features, such as railroad involvement, which
could affect cost or schedule of project:
Page 3
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
ITEMS REQUIRED ( )
COMMENTS
COST
Estimated Costs of Improvements:
Pavement
Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Base . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Milling & Recycling . . . . . . . . . . $
Turnouts (actually resurfacing) . . . . $
Shoulders: Paved. . . . . . . . . . . . $
Earth. . . . . . . . . . . . $
Earthwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Subsurface Items: . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Subgrade and Stabilization. . . . . . . . . $
Drainage (List any special items) . . . . . $
Sub-Drainage. . . . . . . . $
Structures: Width x Length
_ Bridge Rehabilitation x $
_ New Bridge x $
_ Widen Bridge x $
_ Remove Bridge x $
_ New Culverts: Size Length $
Fill Ht.
_ Culvert Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . $
_ Retaining Walls: Type Ave. Ht. $
Skew
_ Noise Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
_ Any Other Misc. Structures. . . . . . . $
Concrete Curb & Gutter. . . . . . . . . . . $
Concrete Sidewalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Guardrail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Fencing: W.W. and/or C.L. . . . $
Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Traffic Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Signing: New . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Upgrading. . . . . . . . . $
Traffic Signals: New . . . . . . . . . $
Revised . . . . . . . $
RR Signals: New . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Revised . . . . . . . . . . $
_ With or Without Arms. . . . $
If 3R: Drainage Safety Enhancement. . . $
_ Roadside Safety Enhancement. . . $
Realignment for Safety Upgrade $
Pavement Markings: Paint Thermo $
Markers
Delineators . $
Other (Misc. & mob, clear and grub) . . $
CONTRACT COST (Subtotal): $
Page 4
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Contingencies & Engineering . . . . . . . . . . $
PE Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $
Force Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Subtotal: $
Right of Way:
Will Contain within Exist Right of Way: Yes
Existing Right of Way Width:
New Right of Way Needed: Width Est. Cost $
Easements: Type Width Est. Cost $
Utilities: $
No
Right of Way Subtotal: $
Total Estimated Cost (Includes R/W): $
Prepared By:
Date:
The above scoping has been reviewed and approved* by:
INIT. DATE
Highway Design
Roadway
Structure
Design Services
Geotechnical
Hydraulics
Loc. & Surveys
Photogrammetry
Prel. Est. Engr.
Planning & Environ.
Right of Way
R/W Utilities
Traffic Engineering
Project Management
County Manager
City/Municipality
Others
Board of Tran. Member
Mgr. Program & Policy
Chief Engineer-Precons
Chief Engineer-Oper
Secondary Roads Off.
Construction Branch
Roadside Environmental
Maintenance Branch
Bridge Maintenance
Statewide Planning
Division Engineer
Bicycle Coordinator
Program Development
FHWA
Dept. of Cult. Res.
Dept. of EH & NR
INIT. DATE
Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division
Engineer for handling.
Comments or Remarks:
*If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping,
note your proposed revisions in Comments or Remarks Section and
initial and date after comments.

ALAMANCE-CASWELL-
R-OCKIi' GHAM COUNTIES
Ruffin q
r 2l Sl nevdl h' 4 10 Slate 2 7 a
Msyods 7 7 6?? 87 , t C A Vd L Ld
+ Lea.
0 2
K N Casville Yanceyvdl 4 7
fadiiono 1 2 + 2 29 158 ' a"s62
I 5 1 4 s M Wen 4 h Locust Hil
1 4 $
N 2 F
J 720 3 11c ReidsAle• 150 H,¢htowers
^ l 4 10 Milesville Fitch R;
1' 11 sb ro ,T2
Ie " 65 '1 vR 29 87 1 5 j 19 1
d I t 2 41 158 •,? • 5 sbur Matkins _ II 2 Prospec 4
? ? ,r••• I Hu7frnpfr
?, rrr• S Ras. d¢e 3 6
r
? ? ,•r•r - t Itamsha Po 62 10
,r••i ? Ie 49
87 1
.• l Glen n _ urlingtgn
?.'•?? ? ? Eton g e 70
•??• ? 1 a ? 1. aw R4v ^
(N
? ?4
19
?` ? M. raham? s s Ie
1
? l0 °
? n1o 8 54
€2
ALA MAN
,177 ,
' 1?,.•?•• END „o
1130 .4 1118
- " PROJECT
82' 4' 1114 -5
7' °. 144
eg u zeoe I .o - y n=o 110, V 7143 11 V7
76.7
?j 1131 .B 's
Milerrilla ,?
2593 2611 ta7 C2ferry _ IlOa r - `
\ 1,27 in, ' 1134 a o
2607 1-9, 1 12
"Ox
xsve r,." •!6C ??? 5 COSIIe / 2 e .b .1 1 a J?
x616 x006 ;1 5 3471 2611/ 1 2716 \ :.,y 121
V?1\ 0 1? 1' '?? ?COmo 11? Jo - 4; 1110
\ W 7606 t15 2012 \ It
' ..? 40 Y is Sly 2611
?. ty.'s I \ 13) 1.7.7-1
t 1 `\\ 2701 t9
2
262$
• ,boa? WIN. Omsburq '?'•• .) - \ /.9 1104y 1.LL
a 682 t. 2311 / C7 e113o
P 2619 10, 1107 1117, ' i 11_0 d n? ??yfl0 i
n O 261! 4 1 ? -- 1179_ ?r0 h ? V - Y, I.a
b _
\? .s ?fl 2_la _ lal Y?? ' ?"`? \1111 er 11 L?
n .7 tlm
{• ley m ?i -?- Slony'a>a.k 1
24 \J 1159 .9 • __I.2-+? STONY
'02474 143 2627 ?, :;? i'?•?t?_-.---_? 1 IN f , 1igQ 7.1 .7o- - .5 CR 1J1
4 247J z6?4 w. , 32 1 i, 4fo
1 L8 2626 ern _24Q2. 1 101 ' . t I b l 1 '14_0 L9.i MTK '•
'- 1.9 Motkin :.i 1=02 * ^ :?. UU12L
f
.O 1472 26702 . 1 \-) -- - -F•- -
?- o- 1 la '•a 1611 •J n fa .
S-• ]658 ¦. i Is6o, ?._1f?.'
27.,7 ti H a - - 1616
157e s „2686 - S : ?161s a
•6 2703 1.6 2701 2700 .0 2711 1.1 3 II _ X335 ;? t Ilse le,
a _ 7?03 ion 7 ISa: t. i!% Y
2706 ° x107 2701 y I Shilo $° 519 1340 Y,•` 1609 LAKE 'So
3L ?L ^
Oscedu ch_ S,onY 1027 BURLINGTON e
^91 6 t 2 09 x7w Cr
eek .2 RES.
' Ch. V.
r
`ti 73t x7 ' x70 o•? \q ( 1576 s \?r L` ! 160 1 1610 10"1 v ISM G
61 27]1 .4 7 `•? Gilli°ms Is76 In. 14a!1sec 1609
1,0 FAS
'J 1 e - ii;aa oY a ` ?fa7 t.1 - ;j,,' 7.pJ992
2y38 2725 2710 1 • a
•D n 2720. ' 4 lZ F 7576 S tse `. 9 7 'r star \?4 ' ,set ., ___ a- 1
7M y •2 27131 G ?- a 1385 .9 Union .2
726 ! 7771 7719 2705 .t 1 ?,p? l6 Ridge /
2727 1 x725 •I - J '? 'A 11371 C7 4 ` 'Yb 1760
V •Q S 7781 1.02717 1507 .'
?ISe9 , ?• .144.1
H Y'?
Jay
1 f , 7 na ' J .? ' AllomoOw a7 i ' .,? L,
.2 7 ' '.1. 1737
}} tE\1___ I 1
u t '-? : 277 i'-'- N 1. , Hq 14' I 1607 • _, ?i--
2733
L - APPIss 1-- .4 2715 1W
C
1---- a , 1.3
D s
1728 x271 ° Chp. 271$ 2?os s e Fu ` ' ,y1 5 ?'t.J , j Creek 1 se 7 1092 16Qe v 4 1 o\0 :,
2777 1.
ne b ''e .? .1 1607 ? 1?
}
1!
- I41
7
2731 T!. "' x276 .9
t.2 SL4? ,~?
___ __ n;.-• -
<.
? ? '-

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
61
1 s?pee TRANSPORTATION
2719 tft, --
,,,, ? r 2771 __-r-
.1 .4 2770
? °• '? "' ' 2734 -. }f!
o
..1 1

"
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
.a
v
1 '"
' g 2770 .9 \ i
,
TEt ,--- -•
"
:,. _ y .N
.
BEGIN BRANCH

, 1179 t' 2779 -
-
? 2771
A
•2767; 2737 "`-' 273;
N •
PROJECT
. 15
NC 87 - ALAMANCE, CASWELL &

0
770
'ti 0J 2719

t]A9 1.0 "

4 7 9
110 i
_ '- ROCKINGHAM COUNTIES
2234 i°- 2797 2771
-- 2
FROM SR 1547 (BARKER ROAD) TO
0
2915 2760
17_4q \ \? C!' _.'29
50A_ 1611 7 US 29 IN REIDSVILLE
R - 2560

3
1
a
•B
9
790 2791 ° t 271e 200,
1 11
7v
0
27.0
7 "
za1 ISr
7765
`74 2797: t Q

- ,
3P? ..y. ?? ;
e .9
f a .:.
ro",
e' GIFr

r
5 FIG. 1

k
'?STA
Inr
JAN 181994
.2sa&:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT III
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 13, 1994
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch `
SUBJECT: NC 87, From SR 1547 (Routh Road) to US 29 in Reidsville;
Alamance Caswell-Rockingham Counties, Federal Aid Project
No. F-100-1(10), State Project No. 8.1470501, TIP No.
R-2560
The Planning and Environmental Branch of the Division of Highways has
begun studying the proposed improvements to the highway segment described
above. The project is included in the 1994-2000 North Carolina Trans-
portation Improvement Program and is scheduled for right of way acquisition
in fiscal year 1997 and construction in fiscal year 1999.
The Transportation Improvement Program calls for widening the existing
two-lane section to a four-lane, median divided section. In areas where
residential and commercial impacts will be extensive, a five-lane section
may be utilized. The segment of NC 87 between SR 1558 (Old NC 87) and
SR 1002 (Altamahaw-Union Bridge Road) is a designated bike route, therefore
bike lanes will need to be accommodated in the design.
Transitioning will occur from a four-lane median divided section to a
five-lane section at the bridge over US 29 overpass. The bridge is wide
enough to accommodate a five-lane section, therefore it will be striped for
five lanes. The five-lane section will then be tapered to match the existing
cross section on NC 87, north of the bridge over US 29.
We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful
in evaluating potential environmental impacts of the project. If applicable,
please identify any permits or approvals which may be required by your
agency. Your comments will be used in the preparation of a federally funded
Environmental Assessment. This document will be prepared in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act. It is desirable that your agency
respond by March 7, 1994 so that your comments can be used in the preparation
of this document.
9
January 13, 1994
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact Michael
Paylor, Project Planning Engineer, of this Branch at [phone].
HFV/plr
Attachment
me _._a r• Ruffin 9 _, 1! y ? t
z St evil) 87 4 10 Stace 2 ?,
Mayoda 3 7 po t C A wF_
W L
2
0 3 K N Casvllle Ya ceyvitl 3 asb
ledi?°n W 1 Wen h? 29 158 6 62 I
1) I 8 4 s Locust Hit t 4 6
NS 2 Reidsville,
Q 3`C HlghtOwers FroI
1
It s to 2 I 1 4 to Milesville Fitch
86 Rmi
Q If B5 d JR 29 67 1 51 19 t 1
2 it
158 • 5 amsbur Matklns 11 t Prosgec t
?? , d? 1 _._ ._.?.???s?. _ _ f 4? , _ _ .. ?1iLL
411, ?._ ••? 5 Res. Union 4
1?LAMAilcE-CA$t ELL- X40. 0"0 •,• Itamaha fi2d10e4 3 =
R C' C K I N G H A M C-0-UNTIES • •?•?•••" 41e -?' I1oo Glen e^ 2 7
E
?• ? ,, :Eton urlingtgn
t' - 70 e o
•••* ? 8 1 1 aw Rtvj
41,44, (04
••• ? I 119
•••••?•• ? , my
? o a raham? S so le
54
•••••• ?' nlefa.?r? 8
•.•••..•A ALA MAN ,€a
1• 26o Q .,x 11] 1129 -- 1119 1.6.
S ? 1 J ?. _9 1130 1137 ?
e•••I , END ,' • Arland tv .a ,:? rr4•
1120 ' >,!<
PROJECT
2362• 1146 cP°? a "'? ' ? p 11.42
y 2608
x397 !O y 1133 ? ? 6 1r ?v 1163 111,7
r , 1 Y,4 f' .B lM'lesvilk •a V
2393 2611 1147 Cherry 1101 • 6
\ . N I 1148 GrOVe y 1134
2607 ^ Ili ) M I ` I133
9• 2398 l r e \b } I Castle \S 2 .6 .] , C - '? ' •n !.?
x617 360s '' 3471 2617 ' 1143 13 S cV •J
?? 26 3'1
<\7?? 8 1.33 ° I y Comp ?????o 17 to
3606
kv. - \ Springs _101, ]
7` ../ i`:t of 261a Ike At 1 - ll3],
/ I
'? zeoo 2j , ` 262s 1 - ¦ , 17a3 u a tl
11oa 19
•
2604'5 Williamsberq :• ? 9 ttos? Ittt
64 1. x61a 1139
h 2.1 3617 _ 9 11]6 F?
2619 O
C q I147 1140 1103 4
? \0C
~ \ r 2A14 2618 1179 1.8
?/ z6?7 141 1140 - ?°-` Ston "k 'k 13 1 a tm
4
y 242.;.1 7 7739 .9 • __l.i-:/ STONY
2629 '? ' HD ?a - 7.4 '? •" s CREEK III]
f 2674 2627 2626 '71100 'J MTN.
3471 % 1.6 F 2692 riot .net 1 MOO 11 ^ li o • s ?
"1r Matklns .? , ]J2 S
242_7 2624. n - ?--5?. ?.?? ?.?J?] V. •?34 1614 le 4' ? 7
• 4 I iJ 6
-1, -12623.2 x41 1 xb3e G 15 y li9d_ r f ~• 1611
HY ry / ?: 1 ? „1383 l," • !? l? N
3706 X73. .3 i•4, 1613 V O ?`
2703 1.6 2704 {I` 2711 3 '
e } I ? •a ` 1.2 tee
"J ? •.. 1613
/ - 290] 1377 ,? ? 7 1367' ') \. ,jr -y ?'
]!!! x7o3 , a "' lzo7- .? . ,y ?? Shilo 579 1580 2706 ,mot r',,. 16ov LAKE 4°
/ ;2947 C>Aeolo 2709 .3 2719 Ch. ;:q Stony 1611 BURLINGTON D 1763
, A ./ .8 . I 1591 .. \ 391 • -' Creek .2 RES. ?t
4tid
O 2708 o• -1 ,?,+ .1 ,1 ,,6,. 50 \1 3723 "3703 ' Y 2711 2ilx \q 't1 b 13]'6 6 8 t 1 Iml-ch.
J 1610 fr 312 1991
O 61 2731 ? 7 , .z. Gi^iams V 571 IS 4 At Isel 1
1,0 FAS 10 is74
v \ 'J Ch ,
2779 2723 s v x7-tee v ' 1.8 13 • o 18r`!p 1.1 ?'j;' ?c l,z 1
"D n 2720 , I "4 A R 1116 .3; b ? I 1584%f
2733 7 Y 22721 2713 G ?r •- - ?r .B 1383 .9 'V llni0n 2 - 1 -_
2726 ro ! ,719 2705
.B, R3 II .3 ' Ridge
!! ? b l32 Q
y 2727 2723 f p n j X71 Ism
761 _ 2717 '
e ? 5 ? 3-- •J 1.p- i is$' 1s9i 1587 . > J?1 t7se
2774
.2 1 775 716 'u• J Altama aw 87 -?!' 31I; 1K_4___>•?y/' IS I „ •f 1737
•J 277 :L t- 1., lseo HAW {-3-- +---+---'-- .4.. c ! .
-? 1667 1.2 Q -y •?
•J - App14ss rrls 4 t.3 SS
2728 C Chp. 2713 27os r .y'4 \?? 1 el LQQZ tto
x ? a 7 Creek "e a- ~ •'l3 j o 1734 ? b
2776 ti 6V '7 J56] I
' 1 6 449]3 ]!!9 22? 1. Y? .9 \.2 ?`J__-_._
1F8 2932 . _ _ - • ' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
2"s :7,9 37Z! 6t ?t. r _ ' 4 r 4 ssipee TRANSPORTATION
me a77o ,t .--'' .v DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
7 .4 93
.a PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
2 2770 , a BEGIN BRANCH
2179 3 n 1
2779 - a PROJECT
2 6 .p .\K • 1.3 NC 87 - ALAMANCE, CASWELL &
c° ' "" _ 3?4 "30 ROCKINGHAM COUNTIES
2719
70 2769 e x"0?o 2797 2772 J.2' w 7 !? 149R' '' n e"7 FROM SR 1547 (BARKER ROAD) TO
3788 • ?, "' II Cr. a', US 29 IN REIDSVILLE
925 .2 s B m ]47 4 y 2zs i.? 7 R - 2560
79 )96 \ 27se 2801 2746 7 -•,b ^ 4 4 1349 a 1 ? GS
ti
tLi.4 ]797: 2765 ?J .9 ?a
13 2799
14 ; ?..? to 27a log ,ous GtE FIG. 1
d.
1 S
09
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE 12-8-9-1
TO://f-_?i//•/ REF. NO. OR ROOM BLDG*
FROM: REF. NO.IOR_ROOM, BLDG.

ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WRN MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS rFOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
IC...

.Q?. nFr 1 31993
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF T)tANSPORTATI
JAMES B. HUNT, JR_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GovERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
December 8, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: Michael L. Paylor
Project Planning E
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for proposed improvements to
NC 87 from SR 1547 (Barker Road), to US 29 in Reidsville,
Alamance-Caswell-Rockingham Counties, Federal Aid Project
No. F-100-1(10); State Project No. 8.1470501; TIP No.
R-2560
A scoping meeting was held on December 2, 1993 in the Planning and
Environmental Conference Room. The purpose of the meeting was to determine
the scope of the project and determine recommendations concerning the
project. The following people were in attendance at the meeting:
Sid Autry
Stuart Bourne
David Cox
Eric Galamb
John Alford
Don Hurlbut
J. A. West
Don Sellers
Brian Williford
Abdul Ramani
Eileen Fuchs
Joseph Foutz
Michael L. Paylor
Location and Surveys
Traffic Control
Wildlife Resources Commission
DEM
Roadway - NCDOT
Roadway - NCDOT
Right-of-Way
Right-of-Way
Hydraulics
Hydraulics
Geotechnical
Planning and Environmental
Planning and Environmental
After opening the meeting with a brief description of the proposed
project including the current TIP schedule and funds available, the following
major points were discussed:
1. The cross section throughout the majority of the project will be a
four-lane divided highway, with a 14-meter (46-foot) median. In
areas where residential and commercial impacts will be extensive, a
five-lane curb and gutter facility will be utilized.
2. The bridge over the Mill Run Creek will be reconstructed as a box
culvert.
??4
? i.
December 8, 1993
Page 2
3. As a consideration to the proposed widening, the culvert over
Travis Creek may be extended.
4. It has been determined that Travis Creek and the Mill Run Creek
drain into High Quality Waters. Special erosion control measures
that may be required will be addressed in the environmental report.
In addition, the aforementioned creeks and the Haw River are
regulated floodways.
5. There are two dams located west of NC 87 on the Mill Run Creek and
the Haw River. These dams should be avoided if possible.
6. Coordination with Glen Raven Mills needs to occur to determine if
the firepond located next to NC 87 is still being used by the mill.
7. Because the segment of NC 87 between SR 1558 (Old NC 87) and
SR 1002 (Altamahaw-Union Bridge Road) is a designated bike route,
bike lanes need to be provided.
8. It has been determined that there are no problems with underground
storage tanks (UST's) along the project.
9. The bridge over US 29, at the northern terminus of the project, is
23.2 meters (76 feet) wide and will be striped for five-lanes.
This will ease the transition to four-lanes on NC 87 north of the
US 29 bridge.
10. Although the project will be done in stages, it is anticipated that
the Environmental Assessment will be done for the entire section.
11. SHPO listed one site along the project which is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places.
- Altamahaw Mill Office, just south of SR 1002
Although no other properties are listed on the National Register,
there are five other potentially historic properties and one
recorded archaeological site along the project. SHPO has stated
that it will provide a detailed report of these properties at a
later date.
MLP/wp
Ruffin 9 I( -
86
evlll (?• 25
1MeI ods z St 5 Y Dr 871 4 to Stace 2 1 C A W L 9
9
z
j C! 1 9 K N I Casville YaceYvill - 4 1 ; easy
ladison 2 * h2 A 158 Z r 5 S s
11 I 8 4 Wen Hit 4 6
1+$ 220 5 23 *Reidsville, 1 Fr,
H1Qhtowers
115 to 2 I t 4 - 10 Milesville Fitch
86 Ric
411, e 5 3.vR 29 81 t 5j t9 7
BI, ; d 1, 2 1 158 •wS - - 5 iismsbur - _ Matkln5 it 2 Prosoec 4
4 ?1u
` -00 l BurLnpb
J•.?.• 5 Rec. Ridat 3 4
ALAMAilCE-CASWELL- `. Itsmaha 6214
ROCKINGHAM COUNTIES •o`•<• je s7 49 '
0 `? Elon Glenn arhogtgo
0
)' - 70 ? C
a1V O
.••O• ` a 7 O` aM
4W#
.• N
••W^rt 8
••,411, ALAMAN
12
S .? 1• j 2609 1131129 f ' 1119 lb.
I 1 /?{ \ 8
END I 1127
11 , a „? ;'>
PROJECT 1120
a 542 y 114 s ?bc` a .A '3 p 1144
e0'Y. 9 1
y 260! Ilse. `y • S rT ?7
I ;0 7 ,-3 ? 1106 'v .lt 1145 1117
2587 1 13 .J .4 ' •s bLllssvill? .Q
7393 261, 1 1127 1104 • 4
\ . N se9>: 1 1148 Glm+ y. ,"34
1 i? J ~ , 1!22
?y Lenox y •? T • 1
398 ;• 9' 9 Castle \ 2 .6 .2 - .o <1
2643 2603 1 .?69! 2612 1 l US "•?!` 113] S Q "J
1
2604 162613 e• I \b ••? 1CampSW+w> , ??10t?o - q+o 110
1107 yfa
••/ w,tl L612 tots. 11
Tat ? ?? 7 I ` '3' c 1137 7111.
•? , !1 63.-0 ?i ' ?22 1 i4r* i 1133 0 ? 1704 19
l_.< 2eoa? W'Mannburq '?5? • 3 " N 1,oe / LLLL
2683 !• 2614 1179
2.1 3617
8 11 ?.?+
t? 2619 ?• ?D ?O .?
C ,103 y
2613, L42 7710
h \ p?` 2E4 1 r• 1139 .BTOnch V- wa"Y? 1.8
?. ?'? 111 Y
2617 1110 - 114 S--/--k E== 11.2 1192 .3 tloo
D 34Z? 1 •? /iD 1 1179 1139 .9 • STONY
? '- ?3- :627 ? • a '`?--. ,1,00 ? - 2 A .7 ~ - S CR133C 1111
4 3477 ? ,•g 2626 G? 3443 •1, J 11017.744 .]3 1 I 7144 o MTN. •s bh
.4 0 'P 1•y Mofkin".a /, 1t oe
fo 2 sjY! 1111.
2632 n
'?34 0 _.i-. ' _.__ -v_1 e7 u •1516 ?- i ?e a- -?p
5 2623.2 7614 2658 0. • 1 0 •? "?' 1546 r ?• ? 6 1 11 "J .f i
° Iss Y 1' t? ?? 4 166 ?
6 a aes ' a a? ~ 1b -?. 6 _5 161s u 4
270 1,6 2701 27, - L2 3 7
r 7708 •D ` IS 4 ?k 1388 1617
'2 2903 Isn ? % Ise7y- ?{; -y j
2884 2707 e• I ShilO t 579 D Y " f ` 160(OC'
2706 2707 2_01 y ,seo • LAKE
n Osceola 1 2709 'J 2719 SIOnY ten BURLINGT, 763
?=? • v I .1 \ ? ' Creek .2 RES.
ISC \? 2723 170 ' 0 `O 2711 2712 \Q ".1 b 1376 a 8 'e 1 I 1 (Sala' 1610 141 y, y 1001 `?0Y
1,0 FAS j 1222 ! •? J Gllioa t V 1a 1s?1 c I5 4! f 1387 1609
2724 2718 2725 ?0' 8 I 1.8 15 1553 r 8? 1 1492
•D 132 272 = 4 ,A a 1376 1 b Z I ,saa '?7/4 ' 1 5 .r; y.1` 1
J Y
hnq `' ', 8 1'143 .9 `? Un .2 3
2726 2721 2717 14
G y pidQe
0 ? 2719 nos .m. m 4 - .7 139( y --
.? 7727 2725 J 14441 113 1 I? ( ` 'Y b 1760 Y
4:• 5 7781
80 A - •3 1.02717 1389 • 15e7 y' at iWl 1758
1391 _
2774 .2 3 1 277 ?. Altoma ow s7 -•T!• 3; IEL_,--. Iwz ., •? 1737
.:i1 i 'u 11 Isar c
u 27 •J ??1? APPIes'2717 1. nu r 1580 HAW 1667 ,> r4 -'°-'3-1--?,-
J
o ?L2? 2774 ° Chp. L713 nos 1 .Q . r .>:•a 5 S? J ; 1587 ima o{Do n a b
Creek 136] 8 A'y 'LS -`\ ? 2 i
Tit _> I
t? -
2859 273S 1. 2735 .9 1•2 1733. 'f 1
r -- NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF i
_? F°'? ' - i--- r ; - ? TRANSPORTATION
? 2710 ? o
? ,,JOB 2778 •? f
41 _ Pe. ' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
'}7
"a 7 .4 2770 $r o -y -- •' 3131 .a 1?sas
"IlWryryryrr c; ?--a---?- • I PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
1A y--- -•2•J Y- .9 2770 6 •1 .B BEGIN p BRANCH
2 2 2737 2n9 \' = a \x`70 PROJECT e 13 NC 87 - ALAMANCE, CASWELL &
770q ~ 0 27 1- 1734 ROCKINGHAM COUNTIES
0 779 2772 .J. 7=9
221L 27.90 .9 666
u 1144 +. 1 ?j
2797 71 .Z ] FROM SR 1547 (BARKER ROAD) TO
.?' p .J II •a ?' ' US 291N REIDSVILLE
{ .2 .5 7 f 9 _ i0 0 504 "9' Z .e
n tl q 1549 1329
96 98 2 t 2801 L4 9 7 -}0= j71 R - 2560
79 t
2034 s 2797-, 3765 ; . J .9
9? A 62799 b .1 :0 1jt p0S '°
• •.,a - r
S G`E FIG. 1
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
6j
TO: REF. 11, OR ROOM, 11-11*
:
FROM: ///??/
i R.F. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
???
A @T I ON
[-I NOTE. AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN'TO ME - ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE. AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS
92:??,OR YOUR INFORMATION
? /
PLEASE ANSWER E] FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
RECEIVED
FEB 2 41995
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
BRANCH
,,yam' t?.??p
•?Qlwn ?'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
February 17, 1995
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th F1 r
FROM: Michael L. Paylor
Project Planning En i
SUBJECT: NC 87 from SR 1547 (Routh Road) to US 29 in Reidsville;
Alamance-Caswell-Rockingham Counties; Federal Aid Project
No. F-100-1(10); State Project No. 8.1470501; TIP No.
R-2560
A scoping meeting was held on January 26, 1995 at 2:00 P. M. in the
Planning and Environmental Conference Room (Room 470). The purpose of the
meeting was to discuss and determine the scope of the project and develop
recommendations concerning the project.
The following people were in attendance at the meeting:
Sid Autry Location and Surveys
John Alford Roadway Design
Don Hurlbut Roadway Design
Jerry Snead Hydraulics.
Felix Davila FHWA
Scott Walston Statewide Planning
Jerry Dudeck Statewide Planning
Betsy Cox Structure Design
Ray Moore Structure Design
Darin Wilder Program Development
Jack Matthews Photogrammetry
Clarence Coleman Planning and Environmental
Marc Hamel Planning and Environmental
Lubin V. Prevatt Planning and Environmental
Julie A. Hunkins Planning and Environmental
Michael L. Paylor Planning and Environmental
Following a brief description of the proposed project, including the
current TIP schedule, these major points were discussed:
1. Because the segment of NC 87 between SR 1558 (Old NC 87) and
SR 1002 (Altamahaw-Union Bridge Road) is a designated bike route,
bike lanes need to be provided along this portion of the project.
R10
?4
February 17, 1995
Page 2
The bike lanes would be 4.2 m (14-foot) outside lanes or 1.2 m
(4-foot) paved shoulders, depending on the recommended cross
section.
2. The Statewide Planning Branch (SPB) has coordinated with the
Rockingham County Planner, Patric Zimmer. According to the SPB,
Mr. Zimmer is in favor of multi-lane widening either on existing
location or construction on new location west of the existing
alignment. The SPB has also developed some preliminary
recommendations for improving NC 87 along the existing alignment
(see Figure 2). These recommendations were based on capacity
analyses that the SPB performed along the studied segment. If the
recommendations made by the SPB cannot be implemented, then the SPB
favors construction on new location.
3. The feasibility of widening SR 1504 (Elon-Ossipee Road) to a
multilane facility from SR 1558 (Old NC 87) to Elon College Bypass
or Cook Road instead of widening NC 87 from SR 1558 to SR 1547
(Routh Road) was discussed. It was agreed upon that widening along
SR 1504 would require additional study, but it is feasible. It was
determined that if widening along this route is to be studied,
close coordination with the project engineer(s) of U-2406 (Elon
College Bypass) and U-3110 (Cook Road) will be necessary because
SR 1504 intersects the terminals of both of these projects.
4. In the opinion of the meeting attendees, three separate projects
exist within the current project corridor. They are as follows:
- Multilane widening or construction improvements to the two
lane roadway from either SR 2594 at U-2418 (Reidsville
Southern Loop) or further south to NC 150;
- Multilane widening or construction improvements to the two
lane roadway from either SR 2584 at U-2418 (Reidsville
Southern Loop) or NC 150 in Rockingham County to SR 1558 (Old
NC 87) at Ossipee in Alamance County.
- Multilane widening of NC 87 in Alamance County from SR 1558 at
Ossipee southward to SR 1547 (Routh Road) or widening SR 1504,
with some new location, from SR 1558 southward to the proposed
intersection of Elon College Bypass and Shallowford Church
Road.
Some of the meeting attendees felt that further study needs to be
completed on the "middle section" (segment between SR 1558 and
NC 150) before decisions on selecting a typical section can be
made.
5. A discussion ensued as to whether improvements could be made to
"trouble spots" (i.e. poor horizontal and vertical alignment) along
the existing alignment. It was suggested that short segments of
new location improvements, where sharp curves exist, should remain
under consideration in the planning study. It was also noted that
February 17, 1995
Page 3
improvements to the existing route's vertical alignment may
necessitate total reconstruction of the roadway; this would be very
difficult to construct due to traffic maintenance considerations.
6. It was suggested that a meeting with Program Development, the SPB,
and the Planning and Environmental Branch may be necessary to
confirm the scope of the project.
7. If multilane widening is determined to be the course of action in
the area of SR 1002 (Altamahaw-Union Ridge Road), coordination with
Glen Raven Mills needs to occur to determine if the firepond
located next to NC 87 is still being used by the mill. A short
structure is located near the firepond. This structure is not on
the state system but would need to be improved/replaced under
multilane widening considerations.
8. SHPO has only conducted historic architecture studies for Alamance
County. Only one site along the project in Alamance County is
listed on the National Register of Historic Places: Altamahaw Mill
Office located just south of SR 1002 (Altamahaw-Ossipee Road).
MLP/wp
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date February 15, 1995
Revision Date 1-26-95
Project Development Stage
Programming
Planning X
Design
TIP # R-2560
Project # 8.1470501
F.A. Project # F-100-1(10
Division Seven
Counties Alamance, Caswell, and Rockingham
Route NC 87
Functional Classification RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL
Length 30.7 KILOMETERS (19.1 MILES)
Purpose of Project:
INCREASE CAPACITY AND SAFETY OF EXISING NC 87 AND IMPROVE LEVEL
OF SERVICE FOR CURRENT AND DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC
Description of project (including specific limits) and major
elements of work: WIDEN NC 87 TO A THREE-LANE SHOULDER SECTION
FROM SR 1547 (ROUTH RD.) TO VICINITY OF SR 1574 (HILLVIEW ROAD)
OR MULTILANE WIDENING OF SR 1504 (ELON-OSSIPEE RD.) FROM SR 1558
(OLD NC 87) TO PROPOSED ELON COLLEGE BYPASS; TWO-LANE UPGRADES
(IMPROVE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT AND ADD LEFT TURN
LANES WHERE WARRANTED) FROM VICINITY OF SR 1558 TO NC 150 IN
WILLIAMSBURG; WIDEN TO A FIVE-LANE SHOULDER SECTION FROM NC 150
TO US 29 IN REIDSVILLE.
Type of environmental document to be prepared:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FONSI
Environmental study schedule:
EA JJkN R5 FONSI DEC 95
Will there be special funding participation by municipality,
developers, or other? Yes No X
If yes, by whom and amount: ($) , or M
How and when will this be paid?
Page 2
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Features of Proposed_Facility
Type of Facility: MULTI-LANE
Type of Access Control: Full Partial None X
Type of Roadway:
Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 4
Typical Section of Roadway:
THREE-LANE SHOULDERS, TWO-LANE
Traffic: Current 12,500 vpd Design Year 28,500 vpd
% Trucks 6 % DHV 10
Design Standards Applicable: AASHTO 3R
Design Speed: 50 MPH
Preliminary Resurfacing Design:
Preliminary Pavement Design:
Current Cost Estimate:
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies). . . . . . . . . . . $NOT AVAILABLE
Way Cost (including rel., util.,
and acquisition). . . . . . . . . . $
Force Account Items. . . . . . . . . . . . $
Preliminary Engineering. . . . . . . . $
Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
TIP Cost Estimate:
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,280,000
Right of Way . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,075,000
Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12, 355, 000
(POST YEAR ROW AND CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 35,045,000)
List any special features, such as railroad involvement, which
could affect cost or schedule of project:
Page 3
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
ITEMS REQUIRED ( ) COMMENTS COST
Estimated Costs of Improvements:
X Pavement
X Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6, 400, 000
Base. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Milling & Recycling . . . . . . . . . . $
Turnouts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Shoulders: Paved. . . . . . . . . . . . $
Earth. . . . . . . . . . . . $
X Earthwork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8, 988, 000
Subsurface Items: . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
X Subgrade and Stabilization. . ... . . . $ 1, 151, 000
X Drainage (List any special items) $ 2, 243, 000
Sub-Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
X Structures: Width x Length
X Bridge Rehabilitation x $ 147, 000
X New Bridge x $ 1 ,387, 000
X Widen Bridge x $ 176, 000
X Remove Bridge 275' x 36' $ 43, 000
New Culverts: Size Length $
Fill Ht.
X Culvert Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 164, 000
Retaining Walls: Type Ave. Ht. $
Skew
Noise Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Any Other Misc. Structures. . . . . . . . $
Concrete Curb & Gutter. . . . . . . . . . . $
Concrete Sidewalk . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Guardrail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Fencing: W.W. and/or C.L. $
X Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 432 ,000
Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Lighting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ '
X Traffic Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 374,000
Signing: New. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Upgrading. . . . . . . . . . . $
X Traffic Signals: 3 New . . . . . . . . . $ 90 ,000
1 Revised . . . . . . . $ 30 ,000
RR Signals: New . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Revised . . . . . . . . . . $
With or Without Arms. . . . $
If 3R: Drainage Safety Enhancement. . . $
Roadside Safety Enhancement. $
Realignment for Safety Upgrade $
X Pavement Markings: Paint Thermo X $ 299 ,000
Markers
Delineators . . $
X Other . . $ 5 ,897 ,000
CONTRACT COST (Subtotal): $ 27,821,000
Page 4
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Contingencies & Engineering . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,175,000
PE Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Force Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Subtotal: $ 31,996,000
Right of Way:
Will Contain within Exist Right of Way: Yes
Existing Right of Way Width:
New Right of Way Needed: Width Est. Cost $
Easements: Type Width Est. Cost $
Utilities: $
No
Right of Way, Subtotal: $
Total Estimated Cost (Includes R/W): $
Prepared By: Date:
The above scoping has been reviewed and approved* by:
INIT. DATE
Highway Design
Roadway
Structure
Design Services
Geotechnical
Hydraulics
Loc. & Surveys
Photogrammetry
Prel. Est. Engr.
Planning & Environ.
Right of Way
R/W Utilities
Traffic Engineering
Project Management
County Manager
City/Municipality
Others
INIT. DATE
Board of Tran. Member
Mgr. Program & Policy
Chief Engineer-Precons
Chief Engineer-Oper
Secondary Roads Off.
Construction Branch
Roadside Environmental
Maintenance Branch
Bridge Maintenance
Statewide Planning
Division Engineer
Bicycle Coordinator
Program Development
FHWA
Dept. of Cult. Res.
Dept. of EH & NR
Scope Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division
Engineer for handling.
Comments or Remarks:
*If you are not in agreement with proposed project or scoping,
note your proposed revisions in Comments or Remarks Section and
initial and date after comments.
z St
yoda ein 87
3 ?
°? ' to state C A L Lt
a
I 0°
O
K
N i ? 7
CasNSle YanClYvlli - J
3 1
I
lads
. 7 3
on
I
7 Wen
8
h 7
e
158 'Locust Hit 6- 1 ,
7
S
VS 7 011Willf _ Fr(
220
1
1 3
Ht tower
4 It wlesvllle
filch
id
ftr 4 It
c% s o ? 5 ! y 87 I y, is
b-
.. ' e
w* a t I 158 S ' liamsour Matluns I 7 Prospee e
4 _ .,_hiLL
?

#410,
' Rurl/nul,
Res. Union
o t 1
ALAMANCE-CASWELL.- 4110? •,••' a Itamahs 019
ROCK_INGHAM COUNTIES •.?'''?`?
•' ? '
Glen uddgt
1
l
•
y,.•' 4%. g
a
o?ie8

0*0
411, 46.1 70
$10
ON
0,0 ? 19
,,•`, ? ?? , e Praha s s le
.•`

••`°• s
54
??A LA M A N

F I/ _ l' % 2 \ N tr i ilo \29 It ¦ 1111 1d
.••"'"_ ??K END
' - O PROJECT
1137, p , t.. ?o s aT s , U4,
'ts• spy. , I us - y , •5 '?' ' P
00000
Y o ? >:? 119! ,; 1142 11lL
3L
J 1 ?t?I,?a., v ., ?' ., • Mi.ail. •e
:.]__? 2611 1147 ?.•...•/ 1104
cro..
• R teo? 1 1103 1132 R ? -7 1• 1133
2598 tom' ° Lenox y .• /i ?•?•• [S
2"3 .??-- 3#0 . a 1J Z611 1 6s :: y. .,Camp
'3 • ?o ^ ' +°? 1 1
2426 261; I \e Sprvga f _Ls 1103
,?? ••r Z •?I fvjw 261 `.''- cots ry O n ? 1111
.? 26600 , 91 , ' R 262 , 13. ° j 1104
, tg
? •S`. 7 v l?0 11LL
WilGomsburq 9 - .{
2683 1. 6 11 1130
261 1
t ?y 2.1 3413 l t .3 ,1126 f.3
261p y D
o QI 1103
t^; o 1162 Ilw r •? I
x66a 6 1 ,. .Q 110 'B^s 0h? .'T'3 1.8
I6
?! 161 t l so - ?'"i? S_'Y"a_ E2: 11.2 LOQ .J 114s<
2217 a
•a- t i t .y , 1111 t-3 .9 • __1.i. ' STONY
t t i t
.5 CREEK
. Z 32.47; ev 2626 1 71144. J -J93 - 2.6 1 • - 1144. o
MTK
•oo y
1111 F t
.t ? 1.9 N1•fklm. <r I 2702 ^? ? ? ?.?- !? 14
0 _
2437 "26U 7..•;I 1535 ?_4_.+1 n1? -? 7
5 2623.2 "'. ; 2434. c { - e4 ti4 . 6 1 I I t
.a + y 3799. ! b - ? 2L-.S
3703 1A 06 I 7711 1.2 J
2708 .a 1 4 ;X4. 1 i
34S 1 ° ?>o? v I f ? Shit r \ 79 i5, LAKE
"93--67 Ouedo 709 'J .119g? y'?f Ch..:a - ?? • 510^Y sett BCRLIVGTON 9 t
\1 j., e. .i ( S ite Isar ?'? s Cry 2 RES.
O 1 l
250 O 2?1t L\,4 3! b7 ° .o s 1 1 ? Leto
t2 ,? t+ .1 1941
61 . .s e.7 T '1 Gillloms V 1$6 asg ;+ ~ S+ts°. : 397 !44P. y
1,0 FAS
Ch -
2728 X23 Ts. - 11 1.3 i?-43. • 6 t• ' ,?.
9 .>, .5 tsn • Bqp t _•J,' ;71'x' t .
ZM' ' ?' 6 .'R 1576 I E • 1336 7
3133 y .22m < e ?' - a 2533 UniOn 1 b
2726. 2779 X .2703 U-941. > T RidQ•
L 2727 725 J , ?1 571 !? ? ' y S44
7 1 t '
7360 33 .J b0 x717 1539 'sal .+r- °' 1591 t?t?.
2776
.2 ? 7 277 a 'i.Ailama ew ' 37 '?? :S1 t•_.---'. ... -r 1751
2733
J 2773 APPIda 12717 1. 2715 , 1 sd0 H? W 1667 i • 1.2 ;? Q ('J
2726. - (- - 2716 2705 t y.6 J' Sal 1Q02. 7 - 17
a _
° 2773 .a ` f J +.> _444. `0+ 1756
2TT7 a \ - y 7f Cf¢¢I[ 563 8 A -' 'lT ? 4•
m6 •a .1 >_ 1
. 7a 6 - ti 3492 7"4 = t. `! 2735 .; - 1.2 mot: ? !• ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTNIENT OF
3.7
??:? m Foy
---'? "' •
.2119 .11f 61 ? y _ • - 6 y •`?, yPQ' TRANSPORTATION
2773 'ss' i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
27za
2110 ,- 2771 PLANNING AND ENVIRON'YMNTAL
t' a =- rJ t?--6--0 2770 .y .e B?',CTly ' BRANCH
+ 2770 y277l 2737 ?.,
J 2119 5"'j 72
PROJECT . L5 NC 87
A . 27
FROM SR 1547 (ROUTH ROAD) •-
70 ~ u ?J / if04
"sl.- 2 80 3'7!9 7161 P ; 2739 I- a s a •6a2 -per TO US 291N REIDSVILLE
U 1197 J 2777 2 w ,
ALAMANCE - CASWELL - ROCKINGHAM COUNTIES
v -' 1.1 2736 ? 32 , . u 9 II .a 1 51 C i1-? 'J
2925 .2 .5 2710 9 _ ,0 so. .7 c R -2580
1.,?
'B m 2702 3L64 1549 1549 "
- L .7.
796 a 2116 2001
2" 165 ,y •?J ?` ,? .9 /`` _ - -
_ ,\7 •? 2799 ci: 0 mile 1/2 _:FIG. 1
269'. _
29 .2.5.79 vS ,? 2582. .9
2581 nr:rr444 1 5 8
2584.
2583 ?' `p7 ( 1.149
P 2 ^ ' 1.130 ? 1 1 •?,
2610 5
Q-
?j.6 I F b 1 15Q
??G? 'W 6 2 85 2609 ,' i 6 ly
'n 4g? 257i JAshland X. b
1 '9 3 2586. ''\ '9 `? I 1146.. :'W G°
_r 1 1148_
2582
l t' S
2635 / /O 1,131• .4
2608.
1147 Cherry ((-
\' p ??? 1148 Grove
2587 / 1• 261.1
j •r; 41
J y N a
2593
_2607 6 2 0
a I \ a P Len oxl? ?h 1 133
C4 Of
1 11A5 Camp
`263.1 2612
3 -
a" b Springs
2598 1103
X599 2605. 2631 err
2643 ® 2613. ! \
gee p 2606 1138 113_7_ i
87-
2 ,
)0 I ,_ fqn 61_3. 1. 2615 91.?? 1133
I V%
y ? .2 N A 2625. x 3
?-? .. 260 I,q 1139
,3
- 3 1 3 q W illiamsbvg .?. l% •e ?
lobb h 0?• 26U4 6t" 2614 2617 5 9 M ,1? TM
K
'1 \' 1
2.1 ?? y n 42 h
2683 c 1 11 _ 11AO N 6
`2660 <c? ? ? 1439
261 9
26.1 P4 d
aL 1141 1140
o I w ( /-? 2614. a ,r t 139 .9
LL
ri 1 ?Y / 2617
1 159
.711 2.4 a
1100 - i 161 `
00 1 .3
1101 1102 N .6
2673. ?\IG`
92629 '2675 2626 2692 .1. Matkins
A i.
2627
f •4 %, 2_674
(ebb
i2
2665• 0 4 2 - 2623 ,2 .3 2614` X658 ?!? o Q 1585
629 2627 2628 a CO
564
271_0 1.2 •?
Q •"' - 2706 2711 .9
9
. p 2903 1-577.' 5
2708 79 1580
1 _. r 5
.6 2 1.6 27Q4 Shilo <'? ,y
2728 7_0 3 _ Ch. . ; d r 1581 /
\
1. ?. 0,7 •-? 2707 27, 1- Sg
296 3
\ 2703 2706 3 271_ . r -
4 d 288a ?sce la 27Q9 , 5 ?A ` a Y
2847 ?8 1 ip p 1576 .6 ..
N 7 2_ 708 J2711 ?9 T b ?1 ? Y i 51' 1571 c!
'
.0 2712 '
2_723 2.705 Gilliams 1576 5
2? t 4 1 ? Gh 15a2
150 61 2733 2 ?. j .8 5 vi ' 1 1583 b
4 •? 1. `? 1576
1583
1.0 FAS.. 27,11 .4 8 1
S T i1t 2725 2 20 v 27 C' ` Y 3
272 a - C ? ?
1571
•9 ") 2763 2272k ??0 2705 N ,
?I
i
7 / 2719 !t 1589 155
2726.9 ,.-. 2717 3?? 3 !
2725 \ ?.0_.. _.. !1 _
2727 - cr 2781 .3 Altoma aw 87.
> t bb? f
5 a 'l HA W
2716 1560 ° 4
2880 277, r. .r ,
2775 a
4
2730 27.17 2715
27 F
-- hi 1 A$ ?
• 05. -+
1.oZ 4 2733: 2.763 Apples 2715 a 8 ?i a N. }007
Chp• C1.Qe): 1563_ ?y
,t
.2 2728 oD 2774 9J, ?? ?-1T•'E`' b -L /,
? ? Y O 1
O 2777 cp4
27,77 277 2735 ?,.
t ?- o s 35 1.2 1 _ q
b .? h I 271. .9 -? -
1 1 ? .2889 2734 293? ,1_ _ i14 1 Ossipee
i.w
2-856 2935 ?i ??r 1554 '?.
cy.
\^
? ` !o _ 61 1595
r/r tE`,y- o , -
2 ?1 2771 -1 2736 Y? ! 3 :M
?' p2778 U J " Soo _Z
.8 ,
5 LANE CURB AND GUTTER SECTION 8 ; q
L-12 4 LANE CURB AND GUTTER SECTION 2770 z? 2738 Wi 3 LANE CURB AND G 2737
UTTER SECTION .5 553N
=UPGRADED 2 LANE SECTION, WITH a ,3
HORIZ . /VERY • IMPROVEMENTS & 2767 27391ail- 1-- : 8 ' .107 .
2565 D ?- 1
TURNING LANES WHERE NEEDED r2739 ulsoo BEGIN 15s_?
v 276Y .3
S . ,y 2719 2 i.> IRO?ECT Cl • 9 U
r? 2770' 2772
..7 -
2_000 58 2780 2797
29 -. ?••' "_--- 'v? 68 1 . ! •$ q ` .46 •A Z0 1654 t 1$47
27 27 2740
290-1 a
NC 87. RECONmNDATIONS t? 2740 T549 1549
PRELIMINARY ,
2742 .6 'co 21
FROM SR 1547 (ROUTH ROAD) 2746 1 co 49
4 TO US 29 IN REIDSVILLE .X. .9
? r _ Oj5 0
1 ,??o a G1
ALAMANCE-CASWELL-ROCKINGRAM COUNTIES 2765 ., 3
1 .4 '0 T
2743 ?P ??? 87
R-2560 b 0 1500 q,
'reek ?r
q' 1550
NCDOT STATEWIDE PLANNING BRANCH 2983 2724 `'' ?? \~??? `
y 4 w ,?--- ?J 7 FAU
y i _ 8 `A 1500
g I "?
' Ip .4 29296 2764 . ?..; .1 ??
,y 2820--,101 9 ' 2819 ,Y? 10 2801 RA?(11',1 1 1502 = T
c 7 2927 .-i??• 29x5
?, `si: ' :9 :; ::('r_': •=\_::. G rsi}'!
X003 '3:r5
Fla.