HomeMy WebLinkAbout19920499 Ver al_Complete File_19920826*b-%
401 ISSUED
STATE or. NolrE1-1 CAR01.1 NA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IAMIl 13. 1111N1 Ili DIVISION 01 1-1101 (WAYS
GOVFRNO R P.O. WX 25201, RALLIGI I, N.C. 27(11-,52(11
----
June 9, 1993
District Engineer
Army Corps of Engineers
P. O. Box 1890 ?j`;
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 _
WETLANDS GROUT'
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch WATER UALITYSECTI.,"I
SAM I II IN I
SICRI IARY
Dear Sir:
Subject: Nash County, Intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose
Avenue and Tarrytown Mall entrance in Rocky Mount,
State Project No. 8.7332001, TIP No. W-2711.
The above referenced project was processed by the
Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion"
in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The Categorical
Exclusion document was signed by FHWA on August 4, 1992, and
approved by the Corps of Engineers on October 27, 1992. s
Therefore, the project was authorized by Nationwide Permit 23
in accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B-23).
Construction on this project has begun. However, the
contractor has requested that he be allowed to construct a
temporary construction accessway upstream of the existing
structure (see enclosed plan drawing). Because no mention of
this accessway was made in the CE document, it was felt that
this action is not presently permitted under NWP 23.
PP
of the creek to allow for normal water flow and aquatic
movement to take place.
The accessway is necessary because of the method being
used to construct the new bridge. Drilled pier construction
will be used to build the new piers. Drilled pier
construction requires that the drilling equipment be within
at least seven feet of the pier placement site. Therefore,
work can not be performed from the existing bridge. The
enclosed plan view drawing shows the general location of the
accessway in relation to the new bridge. The accessway will
be constructed with stone fill, which will be removed to an
upland location following project completion. An
a roximate 25 foot opening will be maintained in the middle
It is anticipated that the above ntioned afltivities
may be authorized under 404 Nationwid rmit 33 (Temporary
Construction Access and Dewatering). ?We erefore
requesting the.issuance of a nationwide permit authorizing
construction of this accessway. By copy of this letter, it
is also requested that the appropriate General Water Quality
Certification be issued by the N.C. Division of Environmental
Management.
By copy of this letter we are also requesting comments
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine
Fisheries Service regarding the presence of any federally
listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or
critical habitat, and from the State Historic Preservation
Office regarding the presence of any historic properties in
the area.
Information received from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, dated May 13, 1993, three federally protected species
occur in Nash County. The 1992 Categorical Exclusion document
stated that a review of the project area revealed no suitable
Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) habitat exists in
the project area. The document also stated that personal
communications with Mr. John Alderman (NC Wildlife Resources
Commission) revealed that suitable habitat for both the Tar
River Spiny Mussel (Eliptio steinstansana) and Dwarf Wedge
Mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) does not exist in the project
area due to the urbanized nature of the area.
Included for your information is a copy of the stream
crossing plan narrative and plan drawings, as well as a copy
of the 1986 CE document. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call Mr. Doug Huggett at 733-
9770.
Si cere
l
B J O__ inn, PE
Assistant Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM (7 copies)
Mr. Ken Jolly, COE-Raleigh
Ms. L. K. Gantt, USFWS
National Marine Fisheries Service-Beaufort, N.C.
State Historic Preservation Officer
Mr. A.L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. Jim Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
C.A. Gardner, PE, Division 4 Engineer
i.
DEM ID:
ACTION ID:
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #):
NWP 33
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E
Telephone (919) 251-4511
WATER QUALITY PLANNING
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
P.O. Boy 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
ATTN: MR..10HN DORNEY
Telephone (919) 733-5083
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation, ATM: Mr. B. J. O'Quinn, P.E.
2. Owners Address: P 0 Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611
3. Owners Phone Number (Home):
(Work): (919) 733-9770
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number:
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County:
Nash
Nearest Town or City: Rocky Mount
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): New bridge over Stony Greek on US 301 Bypass near
the intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose Avenue and Tarrytown Mall Entrance
6. Name of Closest Stream/River: Stony Creek
7. River Basin:
Tar
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [ ] NO [ x]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ x] NO [ ]
If yes, explain. W 23, issues October 27, 1992
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled: ITEM Fill = ± 0.02 acres
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: T ry = ± 0.02 acres
I
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): TeffPol ry ConstIlEtwn
Causeway
13. Purpose of proposed work: To construct taTa ary m traction accessway in order to place bridge piers.
14. State reasons why the applicant believes that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts. Work an not be carried out from existing bridge. Fill will be removed
following construction.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [x ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. By copy of
this letter
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ x] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS. By copy of
17. Additional information required by DEM: this letter
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. See enclosed sheet
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. WA
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. N/A
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. WA
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Forested and urban
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? N/A
V
Own 's gnature / Date
Nash County
.?,lµr
=!a Intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose Avenue
and Tarrytown Mall entrance in Rocky Mount.
State Project 8.7332001
Federal Aid Project HESF - 81 - 2(8) P t
Asa T.I.P. I.D. NO. W-2711 ,b
111 O o-o ?
'?a .'f P p „?+1 ..u vn.nc°w -elvD y,? y - .. - '-• - 'a.:.'?' fl 1 ..
CCL"Trf
t IUJ a .., CLUB rw %
'COLON
SNORT •-?/.,?
?4 OC V ?K \^V• 'S?.?/??Q4 , nR'rJ 110. ••°9 ..
%
•%c??: .`, _ Q ??, Rte
8f
P
ga 3 S ?• ? ?Ytt ?' +o nm. r° ? .
CID
SThw
i N.1J `rJ
WU _
cC 'o ; ro Z`` f ' ; . .. 7AR r 1
c R0. RD. ) _=r t ,•?. t}L
D, or
J "°• w T s. :/;;=0 * I ?,•7Y ..0 r PROPOSED P R n TRC_T •.?n..? •r . q .? .`_? :<
Top -zz
rc ,` q `T I-,. NIDDFN-SOUTHROUND 13=G . ,,t_:1,- LO s
?M•f LN,? RD "iii' _ .i .
s tr- 115?TQ,.TMPRGVy,T. _FT-TLiRN---'
?s R C
".M. ? 'r?.?. "` a I_et•- _ LiPGRADK ,TF2AF1)'?C!•'%,_::???:,
t ? :?? .• ? ? ?'7J SIGNILL.,TQ-.?_(IIT?$T11ND?12DS.:_?? {
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
r
d < , ? Jt dt, ?'L
J, WM 1 1 `? MTM ''? `?.a1`?j .•?'t t e_a _ ?ti
r r Gfi
RY
. •', • . •/ i - Jfnc?? w? .d'L!{ ;.° ` ? ?L ;' ? •? ' ? c r t s ";? ,?, ° t qh? ?^ ?? ? ? ? ? , ?
-' r•. ./ - ??`?•'t_ ? ??' 1 ? ??fSA7 L; ?Op ?."? °r ?T?- ???h?/k Fly ?r ` Stb• .S' -'a
5
4
I
O
m 1
J
f
i
4 Ib -r+ J
F N m u J
?? wz
? i ?U `s ''? (Y I W
?1 W N ?I
?\ NW
'=I port. ??
I w `.-
? +0'tb l3
I
J OI1l ?.
?I
v c 06 1.1
V
-
U
?I 3 ?6
'
? I
W
3
.
? ,o P
icCV"17
?I u
WI T ? iy I
J ?
W
w
~? I al
y
oc ti
CCCCCC c9
0.
r
R VC L
W J
^ Q I
?
V)I•
?H I
`3
9 ?• v
4?J
1 aL
!
d
'
1
i
J
y :OCb
13
h?y
v] ?1
?i t
\ I
MI -
7 - c ,ns
L
W
ff
r o
f J ' u t?1; 1'?
o
l•. f
y??n ?;2 u FI
? I
b
'sl
V
ni
J
r
i-
T
w?
d
?J
I
r.._ .y I
I I
I
I I ?
I
I
I
I I
J o w? r
v ? d A`
W
J
s u r.
'? n Q
i? a W :c
,lJ• ,y
.L 4
o. ? d
"+W I
J
r "
' r
2 J
r w
r n
a
v?
W al ? ?V3
N r ?
i z
a
S
31
d
l
s ?
d I- ?
Sts
? I ?
fi I
I !
Y
?/a '?/ F_ti
I I
I
F
+
I 'vs ti Y
Es
• t •?• S??'
. r y . p`
Y- I
1 ? N r
r
J ? a
V? I I l
?
f\ y 6 ? F?-
I > L5
L
ra
i
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
p
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
O
D ?
.l'1
I RALEIGH 27611-5201 I
SEP _ 3tyDl}/ISION`OF HIGHWAYS
i
August 26, 199 WEILAIMS G1WtLLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
HATER MALI HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
District Engineer
Army Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina
1128402
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch
i Dear Sir:
SUBJECT: Categorical Exclus?ion Approval for Federal Aid Project: Nash
County, Intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose Avenue and
Tarrytown Mall entrance in Rocky Mount, State Project 8.7332001,
Federal Aid Project HESF-81-2(8), T.I.P. I.D. No. W-2711
Attached for your information is a copy of the project planning report for
the subject project. The project is being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with
23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate requesting an
individual permit but propose to proceed under a Nationwide Permit in
accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B-23) issued November 22, 1991, by
the Corps of Engineers. The provisions of Section 330.4 and Appendix A (C)
of these regulations will be followed in the construction of the project.
We anticipate that a permit will be required from the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources for this project.
DOT will apply directly to NRCD for that permit when plans have been
developed.
If you have any questions or
733-3141.
LJW/plr
Attachment
cc: Mr. John
Mr. John
Mr. C. W.
Mr. J. T.
Mr. A. L.
Mr. C. A.
eed additional information, please call me at
Sincerely,
• X'I on
L. 4ard, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Parker, Permit Coordinator, w/report
Dorney, Environmental Management, w/report
Leggett, P. E.
Peacock, Jr., P. E.
Hankins, Jr., P. E.
Gardner, Jr., P. E.
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
t,
f
Nash County
Intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose
Avenue and Tarrytown Mall entrance
in Rocky Mount
State Project 8.7332001
Federal Aid Project HESF-81-2(8)
T.I.P. I.D. NO. W-2711
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
121 ` a...,
A E V .MI. T Lyn P. E.
t r ffic Engineer, NCDOT
DA / J. Ward, P.E., Ma ager
'01-Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
8O 2-
DATE Nichola . Graf, P.E.
?? Division Administrator, FHWA
'?
?
?..
?"ST? C
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN July 21 , 1992 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
SECRETARY STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
In Reply Refer To
File No. 4-89-44
State Project: 8.7332001, W-2711
Federal Project: HESF-81-2(8)
County: Nash
Description: US 301 and Stone Rose Avenue - Tarrytown Mall Entrance
in Rocky Mount
Memorandum
To: Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Environmental Branch
From: J. M. Lynch, P.E.
State Traffic Engineer 19?
Subject: Categorical Exclusion Report - Second Revision
Attached is a revised Categorical Exclusion Report for the above-
captioned project. This report reflects the second set of revisions to
the Environmental Effects part of the report as requested by FHWA.
This revised report is presented to you for your review and approval.
If you approve of the report, please forward it to the Federal Highway
Administration for their approval.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please let us know if
you need additional information.
JML/HMS : hs 1`1 ---
C?,
Attachment
cc: Mr. J. C. Richter, att.
Ms. Z. Smith, P.E., att.
Mr. C. A. Gardner, Jr., P.E
Mr. L. N. Stallings, P.E.
Mr. Bob Booker
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
I
PAGE Al
Nash County
Intersection of US 301 with Stone Rose Avenue
and Tarrytown Mall entrance in Rocky Mount.
State Project 8.7332001
Federal Aid Project HESF-81-2(8)
T.I.P. I.D. NO. W-2711
PROPOSED ACTION:
The US 301 southbound bridge No. 175 over Stony Creek is to be widened
twelve (12) feet to lengthen the US 301 southbound left turn lane at
Stone Rose Avenue. The existing traffic signal at US 301 with Stone Rose
Avenue and Tarrytown Mall is to be revised to comply with MUTCD standards
and back plates are to be installed on all through heads.
PURPOSE AND NEED:
Accidents are occurring because of the inadequate left turn lane on
southbound US 301. The length of this left turn lane is restricted by
the bridge on US 301 over Stony Creek.
Estimated costs are as follows:
Construction $237,000
Traffic Signal 10,000
Preliminary Engineering 20,000
Total $267,000
This project is being processed as a categorical exclusion (CE) under:
23 CFR 771.117(c)(8) or
23 CFR 771.117(d)(2) X
A
1?V
PAGE A2
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Proposed Improvement
Safety improvements for the subject project involve the
widening of US 301 southbound bridge No. 175 over Stony
Creek. The existing structure is 188 feet long with a clear
width of 28 feet. This bridge is to be widened 12 feet into
the median to lengthen the US 301 southbound left turn lane
at Stone Rose Avenue.
Information for this report is based on in-house
research of US Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, National
Wetland Inventory maps, county soil surveys published by the
US Soil Conservation Service and information derived from the
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NC Natural Heritage
Program. This was followed by a site visit January 29, 1992,
by NCDOT Environmental Biologist Janet Shipley.
PLANT COMMUNITIES
Less than 0.1 acre of a Mixed Herbaceous plant community
will be impacted by the subject project. Trumpet creeper
(Campsis radicans), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), broomsedge
(Andropogon virQinica), blackberry (Rubus sp.) and Japanese
honeysuckle are prevalent in this community. Scattered black
willows (Salix niara) occur at the waters edge.
WILDLIFE
Disturbed roadside communities and urban areas provide
shelter for opportunistic animal species, such as the Norway
rat (Rattus norvegicus), white-footed mouse (Peromyscus
leucopus leucopus), and house mouse (Mus musculus). These
rodents are common prey for red-tail hawks (Buteo
Jamaicensis). Other bird species observed in this urban
setting are the American robin (Turdus miaratorius),
mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), rock dove (Columba livia),
cardinal (Cardinal cardinalis), blue jay (Cyanocitta
cristata) and the European starling (Sturnus vulaaris).
Reptiles and amphibians likely to be found in the
project area include the southern toad (Bufo terrestris),
eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), eastern fence lizard
(Sceloporus undultus), ground skink (Scincella lateralis),
six-lined racerunner-(Cnemidophorus sexlineatus), southern
hognose snake (Heterodon simus) and copperhead (Agkistrodon
contortrix).
WILDLIFE IMPACTS
Aquatic species will be affected by the proposed bridge
PAGE A3
widening. Dredging, filling, pile-driving operations, slope
stabilization and land clearing are construction activities,
resulting in the direct.loss of benthic organisms and an
increase in silt load in aquatic and wetland environments.
Mobile benthic organisms are better able to avoid impacts,
and will have a faster recovery rate from siltation than
those species that are filter feeders and relatively
immobile. The removal of benthic organisms reduces the
potential food supply for vertebrate and other aquatic
organisms.
Siltation has many impacts on fish and benthos:
decreases the depth of light penetration, inhibiting plant
and algal growth; clogs the filtration apparatus of filter-
feeding benthos and the gills of fish; buries benthic
organisms on the bottom, cutting them off from a food
source; adversely modifies preferred benthic substrate and
fish habitat; and spoils downstream spawning beds for fish.
The use of stringent erosion control measures will minimize
the amount of siltation.
WATER RESOURCES
Subject project spans Stony Creek, a direct tributary of
the Tar River, located within the Tar-Pamlico River Basins.
Stony Creek has a "best usage" classification of C NSW as
designated by NC-DEHNR (1991). Class C designates waters
suitable for secondary recreation, aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife and agriculture. The
supplemental classification of NSW (Nutrient Sensitive
Waters) indicates waters needing additional nutrient
management (particularly fertilizer run-off) due to their
being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation.
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN)
addresses long term trends in water quality at fixed
monitoring sites by the sampling for selected benthic
macroinvertebrates. These organisms are sensitive to very
subtle changes in water quality. Good water quality is
associated with both high taxa richness values (the number of
different types of organisms) and the presence of many
intolerant forms. Water quality degradation gradually
eliminates the more sensitive species and leads to a
community structure quite different from that in an
unstressed stream. Specific data is not available for this
reach of Stony Creek. However, nearby sampling efforts in
the Tar River conducted in July 1990 received a Good-Fair
bioclassification.
PAGE A4
WATER RESOURCE IMPACTS
Impacts to water resources can have effects, both
spatially (distance from the initial disturbance) and
temporally (up the food chain). Impacts to water resources
include the following:
Increased sedimentation from construction and/or
erosion.
Increased concentration of toxic compounds from
highway runoff and/or toxic spill.
Alterations of water level due to interruptions or
additions to surficial and/or groundwater flow.
No waters classified as Public Mountain Trout Waters,
High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters or waters
designated as WS-1 or WS-11 will be impacted by the proposed
project.
Sedimentation and erosion control measures will be
strictly enforced during the construction stage of this
project. The use of sediment control devices such as
vegetated berms or filter basins will lessen the impacts from
non-point dischargers.
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
Stream crossings in the project area fall under the
broad category of "Waters of the United States" as defined in
33 CFR 328.3. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) has
jurisdiction over the discharge of dredged or fill material
into these waters as authorized by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. Wetlands are a subset of "Waters of the United
States" and thus fall under the same purview. In order for
areas to qualify as jurisdictional wetlands, they must meet
three criteria relative to vegetation, soils and hydrology
(Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 1987).
Based upon this methodology, no vegetated wetlands are
present within the project area.
PERMITS
In accordance with provisions of section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344), a permit will be required
from the COE for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into Stony Creek.
The subject project is classified as a Categorical
Exclusion, likely to be authorized by provisions of
Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5 (A) 23. This permit
authorizes any activities, work and discharges undertaken;
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed, in whole
J PAGE A5
or in part, by another federal agency and that the activity
is "categorically excluded" from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category of actions which
neither individually or'cumulatively have a significant
effect on the environment. However, final permit decisions
are left to the discretionary authority of the United States
COE.
A 401 Water Quality Certification administered through
the N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources will be required. This certificate is issued for
any activity which may result in a discharge into waters for
which a federal permit is required.
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered (PE) and
Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
Section .7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended.
Information received from the USFWS, dated December 10,
1991, reports several federally Endangered species known to
occur in Nash County (Table 1).
Table 1. FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Nash County
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME STATUS
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Elliptio steinstansana Tar River spiny mussel E
Alasmidonta heterodon Dwarf wedge mussel E
A brief description and habitat requirements for the
above listed species are summarized below.
- Red-cockaded Woodpecker (E)
The red-cockaded woodpecker has specific nesting and
foraging habitat requirements. Nesting habitat consists of
pine or pine-hardwood stands (50 percent or more pine) over
60 years of age. Available foraging habitat is defined as
pine and pine-hardwood stands (50 percent or more pine) over
30 years of age, contiguous to and within 0.5 miles of the
colony centroid. The 0.5 mile radius from the colony
.
'd PAGE A6
centroid represents the foraging range of clans and may
encompass areas outside of the project area. A review of the
project area in 1992 by an NCDOT Environmental Specialist
revealed no suitable habitat for the RCW exists in the
project area. The subject project will not impact the
species.
Tar River Spiny Mussel (E)
Historically, The Tar River Spiny Mussel probably ranged
throughout most of the Tar River drainage basin. By the mid-
1960s, its known range had been reduced to the main channel
of the Tar River from Spring Hope in Nash County to Falkland
in Pitt County.
The Tar River spiny mussel's preferred habitat includes
the following:
1. Relatively fast flowing, well oxygenated, circumneutral
pH water.
2. Relatively, silt-free, uncompacted, gravel/coarse sand
substrate.
3. Sites prone to significant swings in water velocity.
4. Habitat is usually found in shallow water areas.
Personal communication with John Alderman (NC Wildlife
Resources Commission, January 29, 1992), revealed that
suitable habitat for the Tar River spiny mussel does not
exist in the project area due to the urbanized nature of the
setting. The subject project will not impact the species.
Dwarf Wedge Mussel (E)
This small mussel currently inhabits the upper Tar River
in Granville County; Cedar and Crooked Creeks, Franklin
County; and Stony Creek, Nash County. It inhabits streams
down to two meters in size. The stream bottom can vary from
sand to pea-sized gravel. In larger streams, the dwarf wedge
mussel is usually found in pooled areas along logs. Personal
communication with John Alderman (NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, January 29, 1992), revealed that suitable habitat
for the dwarf wedge mussel does not exist in this particular
reach of Stony Creek due to the urbanized nature of the
setting. The subject project will not impact the species.
In addition, the following Candidate species may occur
in the area. Candidate species are species which are not
legally protected under the Endangered Species Act and are
not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7,
M
a
PAGE A7
until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened or
Endangered.
Yellow lance Elliptio lanceolate
Atlantic Pigtoe Alasmidonta heterodon
Diana fritillary butterfly Speyeria diana
Carolina trillium Trillium pusillum var. pusillum
These species are mentioned here for the purpose of
information, as they may be listed under a protected status
at a later date. Many of these species may have a state
protected status and will be discussed under State-Protected
species.
STATE-PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants or animals with state designations of Endangered
(E), Threatened (T) or Special Concern (SC) are granted
protection by the State Endangered Species Act and the NC
Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979, administered
and enforced by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission and the NC Department of Agriculture.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database
reports no state protected species within the immediate
project area. However, the USFWS provided information on
several Candidate (C) species that occur in Nash County that
may occur in the project corridor. The following state
designations for these species are provided in Table 2.
Table 2. STATE-PROTECTED SPECIES
Nash County
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME STATUS/RANK
Elliptio lanceolate Yellow lance T/S2
Fusconaia masoni Atlantic pigtoe T/S1
Trillium pusillum
var. pusillum Carolina trillium E/S1
NC Rank Designations: S1 = Critically imperiled in NC because
of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences), or because of
some factor making it especially vulnerable to extirpation
from NC; S2 = Imperiled in NC because of rarity (6 to 20
occurrences or few remaining individuals;
Suitable habitat requirements for these species is
N
Y
summarized below. No surveys
or suitable habitat.
Elliptio lanceolata (T)
Yellow lance
Habitat: Tar, Neuse and
Fall Line.
Fusconaia masoni (T)
Atlantic pigtoe
in lower Piedmont and
Fall Line).
Carolina Trillium
Habitat: ecotones between savannas and nonriverine wet
hardwood forests, over marl
PAGE A8
werelconducted for the species
I
i
Roanoke systems, mainly near the
Habitat: Most Atlantic drainages,
upper Coastal Plain (near
Trillium pusillum var. pusillum (E)
Historical/Archaeoloqical Evaluation
All construction will be within the existing median area
with no new right of way. According to NCDOT Archaeologist
Tom Padgett, the likelihood of the project encountering any
significant archaeological sites is infinitesimally low,
given the limited scope of the project and the extensive
modern disturbance in the project area. There are no sites
listed on the National Register of Historic Places within the
project vicinity. Therefore, no further archaeological
investigation for this project is recommended. The project
will not impact any historic structures. There are no
structures over fifty years old on or adjacent to the project
site.
Traffic Noise/Air 4uality
(SIP) does not contain any transportation control measures,
the conformity procedures of 23 CFR 770 do not apply to this
project.
The project is located within the Eastern Piedmont Air
Quality Control Region. The ambient air quality for Nash
County has been determined to be in!,compliance with the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Since this project
is located in an area where the State Implementation Plan
The project proposes to widen the US 301 southbound
bridge No. 175 over Stony Creek to ' lengthen the US 301
southbound turn lane at Stone Rose Avenue. The project will
not substantially increase traffic volumes along the facility
and no additional through travel lanes will be added. Hence,
the project's.impact on noise and air quality will be
insignificant.
w
d PAGE A9
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning
shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in
compliance with 15 NCAC'2D.0520. This evaluation completes
the assessment requirements in Title 23 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 772 (highway traffic noise) and
Part 770 (air quality) and no additional reports are
required.
On the basis of the above discussions, it is concluded
that no serious adverse environmental effects will result
from implementation of the project.
d
FORM N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION FOR OFFICE USE
TEB 76-01A DIV. OF HIGHWAYS - TRAFFIC ENG. BRANCH
6-4-76 HIGH ACCIDENT LOCATION - PROJECT REPORT I.D. NO. W-2711
REV.2-80 PROJECT NO. 8.7332001
TITLE SHEET PAGE 1
DIV.04 COUNTY NASH (IN/NEAR) CITY ROCKY MOUNT FED.AID SYS. FAP
LOCATION:
US 301 AND STONE ROSE AVENUE - TARRYTOWN MALL ENTRANCE IN ROCKY MOUNT
SAFETY PROGRAM NO. - YEAR -
CORRESPONDENCE
PRIORITY NO. - FILE NO. 4-89-44
BRIEF STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
ACCIDENTS OCCURRING BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE LEFT-TURN LANE ON SOUTHBOUND US 301
AT STONE ROSE AVENUE - TARRYTOWN MALL.
THE LENGTH OF THE US 301 SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE IS RESTRICTED BECAUSE OF
THE BRIDGE OVER STONY CREEK.
BRIEF STATEMENT OF PROPOSED TREATMENT:
WIDEN BRIDGE #175 OVER STONY CREEK TO LENGTHEN US 301 SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN
LANE AND THE UPGRADE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO MUTCD AND STATE STANDARDS AT
STONE ROSE AVENUE - TARRYTOWN MALL ENTRANCE.
WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY STATE, CITY, X STATE CONTRACT, OTHER
CONTRACT
RECOMMENDED FUNDING HAZARD ELIMINATION ESTIMATED COST $267,000
NET ANNUAL BENEFITS $ 89,669
MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED (YES/NO) YES
RIGHT-OF-WAY IS REQUIRED (YES /NO) NO
NO. PARCELS AFFECTED N/A
NO. RELOCATEES N/A
BENEFIT-COST RATIO 4.54 :1
INVESTIGATING PERSONNEL JFP/LNS DATE INVEST. 12-5-89
AREA TRAFFIC ENGINEERS APPROVAL L. N.(?Stallings DATE 1-25-90
APPROVAL-STATE TRAFFIC ENGINEER (MbL,( DATE ?-?- 9?
s
PAGE 1-B
SOURCE OF PROJECT
ANNUAL HIGH ACCIDENT LIST
ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE
PUBLIC REQUEST
HIGHWAY PATROL REQUEST
X DIV. OF HIGHWAYS REQUEST
MUNICIPAL REQUEST
OTHER-GIVE DETAILS BELOW:
CHECK LIST
X TITLE SHEET
X HISTORICAL SUMMARY
X TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
X LOCATION MAP
X PHOTOGRAPHS
COLLISION DIAGRAM
X ACCIDENT SUMMARIES
ACCIDENT REPORTS
X ACCIDENT CAUSAL FACTORS
X PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
ALTERNATE IMPROVEMENTS
INTERIM TREATMENT
CONDITION DIAGRAM
TREATMENT DIAGRAM
X COST ESTIMATES
X BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL DATA
SKID TEST RESULTS
OTHER:
REVISIONS & UPDATES
CHANGE DATE INITIALS
NOTE ATTACHED SEPARATE SHEETS WHEN NECESSARY
Q
PAGE 2
FORM TEB 76-018
CONDITION DATA AND
CONDITION DATA: CHECK IF SEPARATE SHEETS
CONDITION DIAGRAM, TURNING MOVEMENT
LOCATION MAP, SUMMARY OF PROPOSED I
DATA, PHOTOGRAPHS
MAJOR ROAD: 1990 ADT= 29,500 VPD ,
ACCIDENT DATA
ARE ATTACHED FOR THE FOLLOWING
COUNTS, HISTORICAL SUMMARY,
MPROVEMENTS, SIGNAL INVENTORY
2010 ADT= 45,000 VPD
STATEMENT OF EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS:
US 301 AT STONE ROSE AVENUE AND TARRYTOWN MALL IS A DIVIDED HIGHWAY WITH A 30
FOOT MEDIAN. BOTH THE NORTHBOUND AND THE SOUTHBOUND APPROACHES OF US 301 HAVE
ONE LEFT TURN LANE, TWO THRU LANES AND ONE RIGHT TURN LANE. THE EXISTING
BRIDGE ON US 301 BYPASS OVER STONY CREEK IS 188 FEET LONG AND 28 FEET WIDE.
THE LENGTH OF THE US 301 SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE IS RESTRICTED BY THE BRIDGE
OVER STONY CREEK.
STONE ROSE AVENUE HAS ONE RIGHT-TURN LANE AND ONE THRU-LEFT TURN LANE. THE
TARRYTOWN MALL APPROACH HAS ONE LEFT TURN LANE AND ONE THRU-RIGHT-TURN LANE.
THERE IS AN EXISTING 6-PHASE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHICH HAS PROJECTED LEFT-TURN
PHASES ON US 301 WITH THE STONE ROSE AVENUE APPROACH AND THE TARRYTOWN MALL
APPROACH EACH HAVING SEPARATE PHASES (SPLIT SIDE STREET).
THE SPEED LIMIT ON US 301 IS 45 MPH.
ACCIDENT DATA: CHECK IF SEPARATE SHEETS ARE ATTACHED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
COLLISION DIAGRAM, _X-ACCIDENT SUMMARIES, ACCIDENT REPORTS, SKID
TESTS.
TOTAL NO. OF ACCIDENT 44 FROM 1-1-86 TO 9-30-89 MONTHS 45 YEARS 3.75
DESCRIBE DIFFERENT IDENTIFIED PATTERNS AND THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS IN EACH:
PATTERN NO.
1.
2.
3.
PATTERN DESCRIPTION
NO. ACCIDENTS
REAR-END TYPE ACCIDENTS 33/75%
LEFT TURN TYPE ACCIDENTS 7/16%
RANDOM TYPE ACCIDENTS 4/9%
TOTAL 44/100%
--------------
--------------
a
PAGE 3
FORM TEB 76-01C
CAUSAL FACTORS AND POSSIBLE TREATMENT
CAUSAL FACTORS DESCRIBE CAUSAL FACTORS FOR EACH PATTERN AND LIST POSSIBLE
TREATMENTS.
PATTERN NO. CAUSAL FACTORS AND POSSIBLE TREATMENTS
1. REAR-END TYPE ACCIDENTS (33/73%)
REAR-END TYPE ACCIDENTS ARE PRIMARILY DUE TO
SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURNING VEHICLES STOPPING IN
THE THRU LANE BECAUSE OF THE SHORT SOUTHBOUND
LEFT TURN LANE.
2. LEFT TURN TYPE ACCIDENTS (7/16%)
LEFT TURN TYPE ACCIDENTS ARE OCCURRING WHEN LEFT
TURNING VEHICLES ARE TURNING LEFT ON THE YELLOW.
THE UPGRADE OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO MUTCD AND
STATE STANDARDS SHOULD REDUCE LEFT TURN TYPE
ACCIDENTS.
3. RANDOM TYPE ACCIDENTS (4/9%)
RANDOM TYPE ACCIDENTS WERE PRIMARILY RAN-OFF-
ROAD, RIGHT-TURN AND SIDESWIPE TYPE ACCIDENTS.
THE LENGTHENING OF THE SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE
AND THE UPGRADING OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO MUTCD
AND STATE STANDARDS SHOULD REDUCE THE RANDOM TYPE
ACCIDENTS.
M
0
FORM TEB 76-01D
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
PAGE 4
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CHECK IF SEPARATE SHEETS ARE ATTACHED FOR FOLLOWING:
ALTERNATE IMPROVEMENTS, INTERIM TREATMENTS,, PLANS, SKETCHES
DESCRIBE PROPOSED TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ALONG WITH ANY INTERIM TREATMENTS:
DESIGN SPEED = 45 MPH
1. WIDEN SOUTHBOUND BRIDGE #175 OVER STONY CREEK 12 FEET TO A TOTAL WIDTH OF
40 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE LENGTHENING OF THE EXISTING 90+ FOOT SOUTHBOUND
LEFT TURN LANE ON THE US 301 BYPASS APPROACH TO STONE ROSE AVENUE -
TARRYTOWN MALL ENTRANCE. THIS LEFT TURN LANE IS TO BE LENGTHENED TO A
TOTAL LENGTH OF 350+ FEET WITH A 180 FOOT TAPER.
2. UPGRADE THE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL TO MUTCD/STATE STANDARDS AND INSTALL
BACKPLATES ON ALL HEADS.
NOTE: CONSIDERATION WAS GIVEN TO MOVING THE EXISTING INTERSECTION OF US 301
WITH STONE ROSE AVE. - TARRYTOWN MALL 400+ FEET SOUTH TO THE SOUTHERN
ENTRANCE OF TARRYTOWN MALL. HOWEVER, A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THIS NEW
LOCATION WOULD SHORTEN THE ACCELERATION LANE OF THE SUNSET AVENUE
NORTHBOUND ON RAMP FROM 700+ FEET TO 300+ FEET. ALSO, STONE ROSE
AVENUE AT THIS POINT IS 8+ FEET LOWER THAN US 301.
DUE TO THE ABOVE REASONS, WIDENING THE STONY CREEK BRIDGE TO LENGTHEN
THE US 301 SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE IS RECOMMENDED.
THESE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE COORDINATED WITH MR. D. W. SPENCE, P.E.,
DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND BASED ON OUR FINAL FIELD INVESTIGATION OF
JANUARY 24, 1990 THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS OUTLINED ABOVE ARE THE MOST
PRACTICAL. SEE ATTACHED COPY OF LETTER FROM MR. D. W. SPENCE, P.E. TO
MR. C. A. GARDNER, JR., P.E., DATED JANUARY 25, 1990 FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION.
M BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS PAGE 5
LOCATION: US 301 at Stone Rose Avenue
DETAILED COST TYPE IMPROVEMENT Widen US 301 Bridge to lengthen left turn lane
--------------
ITEMS ------------------------------
LABOR MATERIAL EQUIP -------------
TOTAL --------------------
SERVICE ---------
CRF ----------------------------------------------
ANNUAL
COST
CONSTRUCTION $80,000 $120,000 $37,000 $237,000 30 0.0890 $21,093
TRAFFIC SIGNAL $2,000 $7,000 $1,000 $10,000 10 0.1490 $1,490
P. E. $18,000 $1,000 $1,000 $20,000 30 0.0890 $1,780
----------------- $---------TiT,-----------F-$H --000 ------------------------------------------ $24---,---
100, 000 $128,000 $39,000 $267,363
TOTALS
ESTIMATED INCREASE IN ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST = $1,000
ESTIMATED INCREASE IN ANNUAL UTILITY COST = $0
TOTAL ANNUAL COST $25,363
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT $267,000
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF ANNUAL ACCIDENT DECREASES
PATTERN NO $+- YEARS FATAL FATAL INJURY INJURY
ACC ACC ACC ACC ACC
PER YR PER YR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REAR-END 19 70 3.75 0 0.00 7 1.31
REAR-END 14
OTHER
LEFT-TURN 7
RANDOM 4
30 3.75 0 0.00
20 3.75 0 0.00
10 3.75 1 0.03
8 0.64
2 0.11
2 0.05
PDO POO TOTAL
ACC ACC DECREASES
PER YR
------------------------
------------------------
12 2.24 3.55
6 0.48 1.12
5 0.27 0.37
1 0.03 0.11
ANNUAL
BENEFITS
$32,667
$13,840
$2,960
$14,440
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS 44 1 0.03 ------------------------
19 -------------------------
2.11 24 -----------------------------
3.01 5.15 $63,907
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
FATALITIES PER YEAR REDUCED ------------------------
------------------------
$500,000 = -------------------------
-------------------------
$13,333 -----------------------------
------------------------------
INJURIES PER YEAR REDUCED $19,000 = $40,027
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY PER YEAR REDUCED $3,500 = $10,547
TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS $63,907
ADT INFLATION PRESENT ANNUAL
TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS FACTOR FACTOR WORTH BENEFITS
$63,907 1.8000 1.0000 1.0000 = $115,032
NET AVERAGE ANNUAL BENEFITS = AVERAGE ANNUAL BENEFITS - TOTAL ANNUAL COST = $89,669
BENEFIT-COST RATIO = AVERAGE ANNUAL BENEFITS / TOTAL ANNUAL COST = 4.54
? . y' ?'
ppp
• F. u 4?
N
h C
t ree '
?'
as
oun
y ?„ ,
,i
.
'Ng Intersection of. US 301 with Stone Rose Avenue •
and Tarrytown Mall entrance in Rocky Mount.
State Project 8.7332001 J
Federal Aid Project HESF - 81 - 2(8) P 1
mss T.I.P. I.D. NO. W-2711 JO -
.o
6 e
'
,.
U `.'-'°,OR. ::+?+•? f ?..- Vn,rcnw -RIND. Ill
- 4? Y f•
1 (1
_ fb. : •
? O<
9
-
N
' r: A '? •r-
COl117RY 111 SIEY
-115 1 A7 CLWa
°
-
?: - coLON
+ .?
ms`s'-. J
N , r
; ?
?r
p
'
R» ?
go
W ff
J ,. '?s,n.r "tt•• on'D ?e
fiy?r t, ??? y ? ?
-
•. .
'
jC
9
• .Yrr? •?
- ?• y
,+ ? ,c, j6
`yh ?
S7MSf
? -
I .. ?
Rd
_ •.xiJ :: Jr
.
_ -
WU
N u 8
,f--.t2
D
A %? :
w: D.
mo e f
i
t
?) z z
y l
RD
•?
M ?? -
? `? ? TAR
?°..
ERO
- pLY N
_ ?.i
•• ?
• •
? . '?' .?
R0. RD. -?r.
????? - '.' ----?-?? -?-
'???? fir'
61 cQRQPQ4Rn_ pHn TS?CT . ::. -;-
+
p Cr
(•?` R, t?E
TnPN
S
OUTHHQIIIsTZL BRTnr,F j,L
s Rq -
I.Z5, L17I7T-TURN
> r=te' • L HR.,AND=. tPrRA
1., ^ ?•,?•,? GIGNAL-._To-,U 7TCn-STA7M-J1Rn-cZ-; 1 ha
?1 Ci
r? 0J
L • "aL A .?v
-vp m
t ' o y
d F ^• ?
R9,;
c. f - - ivy
a *O. .;? .,?. ? ,,; ^
rc
? x t
_ ._ • '
I I TARRYTOWN MALL ENTRANCE
-?' ?- - .
\ ??`? ? ~ r -fir _....•r?-
STONE ROSE AVE. \
a
,n N
I I STONY CREEK
1. I N
I U)
LEGEND
PROPOSED WIDENING
? I 1 1 ?
4 ' O
H 1 I (n
. o jl}Ik ? a
` PROJECT 6.7332001 (W-2711)
US 301 AT STONE ROSE AVENUE
ROCKY MOUNT NASH COUNTY
eft t (NOT TO SCALE)
Itltl?l
• f
i
ICI' .
LOOKING SOUTH ON US 301
AT TARRYTOWN MALL ENTRANCE.
NOTE: SHORT LEFT-TURN LANE
1-23-90
LOOKING SOUTH ON
US 301 AT TARRYTOWN
MALL ENTRANCE.
NOTE: VEHICLE BLOCKING
SOUTHBOUND THRU LANE.
LOOKING NORTH ON
US 301 SOUTHBOUND
TOWARD BRIDGE.
J- 1r-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO October 27, 1992
Regulatory Branch
Action"ID. 199203451 and Nationwide Permit No. 23 (Approved Categorical
Exclusions)
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Division of Highways
ATTN: Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
Reference is made to your letter of August 26, 1992, concerning the
discharge of fill material into 0.1 acre of wetlands adjacent to Stony Creek
to effect widening of U.S. 301 at Stone Rose Avenue, Rocky Mount, Nash County,
North Carolina. In that letter you informed us that the project is being
processed as a "Categorical Exclusion" and that you intend to proceed under
Nationwide Permit authorization in accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appendix A
(B-23) issued November 23, 1991.
For the purposes of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Regulatory Program,
Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the
Federal Register on November 22, 1991, lists nationwide permits (NWP).
Authorization, pursuant to Section 10 of.the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities
undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed, in whole or
in part, by another Federal agency or department where that agency or
department has determined, pursuant to the CEQ Regulation for the Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, that the
activity, work or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which
neither individually nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment, and the Office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished
notice of the agency's or department's application for the categorical
exclusion and concurs with that determination.
We concur with your determination that the proposal can be processed as a
"Categorical Exclusion," and that the work is authorized by the above
NWP provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
conditions. This NWP does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any
required State or local approval. You should contact Mr. John Dorney of the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management at (919) 733-1786
regarding a State Water Quality certification.
A, M.
-2-
QuesEions or comments may be addressed to Mr. John Cameron, Raleigh Field
Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone (919) 876-8441.
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. John Parker
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
ok ih Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687