19920774 Ver al_Complete File_19920908

M SfAlF u?
???h va?tsst4 t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
August 25, 1992
District Engineer
Army Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch
Dear Sir:
77,
t??•?t?r?as cRO; .
ILI, ER pUALITY SE
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
Subject: US 221-NC 226, Replacement of Bridge No. 104 and the realignment
of NC 226 intersection with US 221, McDowell County, State
Project No. 8.1870702, Federal-Aid Project No. BRF-21-1(12), TIP
Project B-1277
Attached for your information is a copy of the project planning report for the
subject project. The project is being processed by the Federal Highway Adminis-
tration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b).
This project, located in one of the 25 western North Carolina Counties
designated as "Trout Counties', falls under the discretionary authority of
the Corps. In accordance with this policy, the North Carolina Department
of Transportation will obtain a letter of concurrence from the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission prior to requesting authorization to
construct the project under the CE Nationwide Permit.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at
733-3141.
Sincerely,
• . Xl OM
L. and
P. E., Manager
LJW/plr Planning and Environmental Branch
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Parker, Permit Coordinator, w/report
Mr. John Dorney, Environmental Management, w/report
Mr. C. W. Leggett, P. E.
Mr. J. T. Peacock, Jr., P. E.
Mr. A. L. Hankins, Jr., P. E.
Mr. R. E. Edmonds
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
US 221-NC 226
Replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the
Realignment of NC 226 Intersection with US 221
McDowell County
State Project 8.1870702
Federal Project BRF-21-1(12)
TIP Project Number B-1277
4'.?

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
And
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
APPROVED:
i ?L
ate L. . Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
z
Uate ich s L. ?ra
??ivision Administrator, FHWA
US 221-NC 226
Replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the
Realignment of NC 226 Intersection with US 221
McDowell County
State Project 8.1870702
Federal Project BRF-21-1(12)
TIP Project Number B-1277
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
June, 1992
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
06,14, A %?? k.
Ja es A. McInnis Jr.
r Project Planning Engineer
Linwood Stone
Project Planning Eng' ear, Uni He
H. r n lin Vick, P.E., ssistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HC
p`cVo •.
. 7754
•.• GI NE ,.
•., ,p ••......•
!? !l111?1 1j111
? zs?9z
US 221-NC 226
Replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the
Realignment of NC 226 Intersection with US 221
McDowell County
State Project 8.1870702
Federal Project BRF-21-1(12)
TIP Project Number B-1277
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject project consists of the replacement of Bridge No. 104
* over Armstrong Creek and the realignment of the intersection of NC 226
with US 221 in McDowell County. An adjacent project, TIP number R-2020,
proposes to widen existing US 221-NC 226 to five lanes from SR 1434 to the
southern limits of project B-1277. Design and construction of the new
structure and intersection will be coordinated with project R-2020.
The replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the realignment of the
intersection of NC 226 with US 221 were originally parts of the
state-funded project R-2020. Both the bridge replacement and the
intersection realignment were studied in the preparation of the State
Environmental Assessment (SEA) for project R-2020. Since the completion
of the SEA, it has been decided to replace Bridge Number 104 and realign
the intersection of NC 226 with US 221 under project B-1277. Federal
bridge replacement funds will be used to purchase right of way and
construct the bridge and widen the approaches to the bridge. State highway
trust fund money will be used to purchase right of way for and construct
the intersection.
Based on the planning and environmental studies, it is anticipated
this project (B-1277) will not have a significant impact on the existing
human or natural environment. This action is considered to be a
"categorical exclusion" as defined by the Federal Highway Administration's
environmental guidelines (23 CFR 771.117).
Project B-1277 is included in the North Carolina Department of
Transportation 1992-1998 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Right
of way acquisition is scheduled for federal fiscal year 1992 and
construction is scheduled for federal fiscal year 1993.
i
2
The estimated costs of project B-1277 are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Estimated Project Costs For B-1277
Replacement of Bridge Number 104:
Removal of Old Bridge $ 11,280
New Bridge (80 ft. x 147 ft.) 588,000
Roadway (pavement, earthwork, etc.) 423,208
?? Traffic Control (signing, etc.) 10,000
' Engineering and Contingencies (15%) 156,000
Other (erosion control, clearing, etc.) 211,512
Total Construction Cost $ 1,400,000
Right of Way Cost $ 615,000
Total Cost-Replacement of Bridge No. 104 $ 2,015,000
Realignment of NC 226 Intersection:
Removal of Existing Pavement $ 7,000
Roadway (pavement, earthwork, etc.) 298,500
Traffic Control (signing, etc.) 8,000
Engineering and Contingencies (15%) 77,000
Other (erosion control, clearing, etc.) 109,500
Total Construction Cost-Realignment
of NC 226 Intersection $ 500,000
Right of Way Cost $ 75,000
Total Cost - Realignment of NC 226 Intersection $ 615,000
Total Cost - Project B-1277 $ 2,630,000
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Structure
Bridge Number 104 was built in 1933. It is a reinforced concrete
deck girder bridge on reinforced concrete end abutments with the interior
bent on piles. It has a clear roadway width of 20 feet and a structure
length of 96 feet. The bridge has a sufficiency rating of 20.3, with an
estimated remaining life of 18 years.
1? Roadway
US 221-NC 226 is 20 feet wide with five feet of grassed shoulders on
both approaches to Bridge Number 104 and in the area of the US 221-NC 226
intersection. The bridge and intersection are located on a fairly flat,
tangent section of roadway.
US 221/NC 226 Intersection
The existing intersection of NC 226 with US 221 is located
approximately 400 feet north of Bridge Number 104. The intersection is
skewed approximately 30 degrees and channelized with a large, grassed
island.
Traffic Volumes
Current average daily traffic on the subject section of US 221-NC 226
is 9,400 vehicles per day (vpd).
Traffic volumes for US 221-NC 226 between SR 1556 and NC 226 were
estimated for the construction year 1993 and the design year 2013. In
1993 and 2013, 10,900 and 20,000 vpd, respectively, are expected to travel
the subject section of US 221-NC 226 (see Figure 4).
Accident Record
There were 20 accidents along US 221-NC 226 in the vicinity of Bridge
Number 104 and the intersection with NC 226 between December 1, 1989 and
November 30, 1991. No fatal accidents were reported during this period.
The total accident rate for the subject section of US 221-NC 226 for the
time period was 4.76 accidents per million vehicle miles (ACC/MVM).• This
rate is significantly higher than the 1988-1990 state-wide average of 1.83
ACC/MVM for rural US routes. The accident rate for the subject section of
US 221-NC 226 is also higher than the 2.21 ACC/MVM reported for the
segment of US 221-NC 226 from SR 1434 to NC 226 between January 1, 1986
and December 31, 1989 (see Figure 5).
Of the reported accidents; 9 were rear-end collisions, 3 involved
vehicles running off the road, 3 were angle accidents, 2 involved vehicles
hitting a fixed object (Bridge Number 104), and 3 were other types of
accidents (see Figure 6).
III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Bridge Number 104
Project B-1277 proposes to replace Bridge Number 104 with an 80 foot
wide, 147 foot long bridge. The new structure will be built in stages,
allowing traffic to be maintained on-site during construction. US 221-
NC 226 will be widened to five lanes within the limits of the proposed
project. The widening will be done asymmetrically (widening on the east
side) in the area of the bridge to allow for staged construction.
4
NC 226 Intersection
Also proposed is the realignment of the intersection of NC 226 with
US 221. The new alignment will create a four-leg intersection at the
present T-intersection of SR 1558 with US 221 (see Figure 2). Abandoned
portions of pavement will be removed.
Th
section
3 paved).
section
paved).
Roadway Cross-sections
proposed cross-section for US 221-NC 226 is a five-lane shoulder
with 60 feet of pavement and eight-foot shoulders (two-foot
The proposed cross-section for NC 226 is a two-lane shoulder
with 24 feet of pavement and eight-foot shoulders (two-foot
IV. PROJECT BENEFITS
Project B-1277 will replace an obsolete, narrow bridge with one able
to accommodate a five-lane cross-section. The present bridge is too
narrow, even for a two-lane roadway. Replacement of Bridge Number 104 will
reduce the potential for accidents caused by the bridge's narrow width,
such as vehicles crossing the centerline into the opposing traffic lane or
vehicles hitting the bridge railing.
The realignment of the intersection of NC 226 with US 221 will
improve safety at that intersection. Realigning the intersection will
improve sight distance by eliminating the excessive skew of the existing
intersection. Turning lanes will be provided, reducing the risk of
rear-end collisions caused by turning vehicles slowing down or stopping in
the travel lane.
This portion of US 221-NC 226 in the vicinity of Bridge number 104
and the intersection of NC 226 has an accident rate much higher than that
for other similar facilities, including adjoining sections of US 221-
NC.226. The proposed improvements will help to reduce this high accident
rate.
V. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Replacement with a Two-lane Structure
Replacement of Bridge Number 104 with a modern two-lane structure is
not considered prudent given the high traffic volumes and the fact the
adjacent section of US 221-NC 226 is being widened to five lanes under
project R-2020. The most logical point to transition back to two lanes
would be north of the structure at the intersection of NC 226 with US 221.
Postponement of Proposed Action
Postponement of the proposed action is not recommended. Bridge Number
104 and the subject intersection are both substandard. The accident rate
for the subject section of US 221-NC 226 is much higher than the
state-wide average for rural US routes.
"No-Build" Alternative
The "no-build" alternative is not considered feasible given the high
accident rate and the large traffic volume of the subject section of
US 221-NC 226. The replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the realignment of
the intersection of NC 226 with US 221 are necessary to reduce this high
accident rate and increase the traffic capacity along the existing
facility.
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Cultural Resources
The State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) was contacted
regarding possible impacts on archaeological sites or historic structures
in the project area. According to the SHPO, it is unlikely there are
archaeological sites or historic structures irf the area (see Appendix).
In order to insure compliance with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, the area of potential
effect (APE) was surveyed by NCDOT staff. The only property over fifty
years old found in the APE was Bridge Number 104 itself, built in 1933.
The bridge is one of 489 extant state-maintained pre-1940 reinforced
concrete deck girder bridges, and as such does not possess the
significance necessary for National Register listing. The SHPO was
informed of these findings, and verbal concurrence was obtained from the
SHPO.
Since there are no properties either listed in or eligible for the
National Register in the APE, no further compliance with Section 106 is
required.
No adverse impacts on section 4(f) resources are anticipated due to
the subject project.
Biological Impacts
Two upland plant communities will be impacted by proposed construc-
tion: disturbed grass-dominated and mesic upland hardwood communities.
Dominant species of the disturbed grass-dominated community include
broom straw (Andropogon sp.), sourwood (Oxydendron arboreum seedlings,
blackberry, short-leaf pine Pinus echniata seedlings, strawberry
6
Fra aria sp.) and the hairy cap moss (Polytrichum sp.). Approximately
10.3 acres of the disturbed grass-dominated community will be impacted by
the project.
Mesic upland hardwood communities are located adjacent to streams.
The predominant canopy species is tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipfera).
Other canopy species include sycamore Platanus occidentalis), red maple
Acer rubrum , southern red oak uercus rubra hybrid and short-leaf
pine. Understory and shrub layers, dense in some locations, contain
sourwood, silky dogwood Cornus amomum , flowering dogwood Cornus
florida , and several other species. Rose Rosa sp.), honeysuckle
Lonicera Japonica), and rumex Rumex sp.) are common ground cover plants.
Approximately one acre of the mesic upland hardwood community will be
impacted.
Both terrestrial and aquatic animal communities will be impacted by
the subject project. Mammals that are most likely to be impacted are
opossum, short-tailed shrew, eastern mole, eastern cottontail, eastern
chipmunk, gray squirrel, southern flying squirrel, white footed mouse,
raccoon, striped skunk, bobcat and white tailed deer. Reptiles such as
snapping turtle, snakes, lizards and amphibians will also be impacted.
Bird species which may be impacted include robins, blue jays, pileated
woodpeckers, warblers and thrushes.
Wetlands
Two types of wetland plant communities will be impacted by the
proposed project: the forested and the non-forested wetland communities.
Sycamore, river birch Betula ni ra and alder Alnus serrulata) are
common canopy species in the forested wetland areas.- Less than 0.1 acre
of forested wetland area will be impacted by construction.
The non-forested wetland areas contain cattail T ha sp.), juncus
Juncus sp.) and grasses. Less than 0.1 acre of non-forested wetland area
will be impacted by construction.
In summary, anticipated wetlands impacts are minor. Construction will
impact less than 0.2 acres of wetlands based on determinations made using
the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual". Minor wetland
impacts and surface water takings are most likely to fall under the Minor
Road Crossing Fill section of the Nationwide Permit Provisions of 33 CFR
330.5 (a) (23).
Water Quality
Two streams, Armstrong Creek and Hickory Bottom Branch, will be
impacted by the proposed project. Armstrong Creek is classified as WS-III
Tr by the Division of Environmental Management of the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, while Hickory
Bottom Branch is classified as WS III. WS III indicates a water supply
segment with no categorical restrictions on watershed development or
7
discharges; suitable for all Class C uses. Trout waters indicated by "Tr"
are suitable for trout propagation and maintenance of stocked trout.
Specific buffer zone requirements exist for development in "Tr" designated
waters. These requirements are stated in the Sedimentation Control
Guidelines (T15A.04B.0025).
No High Quality Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters or Waters
classified as WS I or WS II will be impacted by the proposed project.
Armstrong Creek and Hickory Bottom Branch are not Designated Public
Mountain Trout Waters, nor are they designated Wild and Scenic Rivers.
McDowell County is designated a "Trout County" by the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission. Any work performed near streams in a Trout
County requires the concurrence of the Wildlife Resources Commission.
This concurrence will be obtained during the permitting process.
Approximately 100 to 150 feet of channel change is proposed for
Hickory Bottom Branch. The channel change is proposed at the northern end
of the project, where Hickory Bottom Branch closely parallels US 221. It
will be necessary for NCDOT to consult with the appropriate natural
resource agencies in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 USC 661-667d).
Construction will adhere to strict erosion controls to prevent the
siltation of Armstrong Creek and Hickory Bottom Branch.
Approximately 1 mile downstream of the project on Armstrong Creek is
a stream intake for the American Thread Company. National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) dischargers are not located in the
study area or immediately upstream of the proposed project.
Threatened/Endangered Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) were consulted to determine if any
protected species are located in the study area.
Names of federally-protected species were obtained from an updated
list, dated March 16, 1992, from the USFWS. Two federally-protected
species are listed by the USFWS in McDowell County. The carolina northern
flying squirrel Glaucom s Sabrinus coloratus) is listed as endangered and
Mountain golden heather (Hudsonia Fontana is listed as threatened.
The carolina northern flying squirrel is found at high elevations in
the transition zone between coniferous and northern hardwood forests. The
project area is not located at a high elevation nor does it support
suitable habitat for the carolina northern flying squirrel; therefore, no
impacts to this endangered species are likely to occur.
Mountain golden heather is found on shrub balds. The study area does
not contain suitable habitat for this plant; therefore,.no impacts to this
threatened species are anticipated to occur.
8
Two state-protected species are listed by the NCNHP in McDowell
County. Oconee-bells Shortia galacifolia) is listed as endangered and
Gray's lily Lillium ra i is listed as threatened. No suitable habitat
for either of these species is located in the project area and no impacts
to these species are likely to occur.
Relocation Of Residences And Businesses
The proposed improvements will result in the relocation of one
residence. This residence is a frame dwelling located adjacent to the
Woodlawn Lumber Company, south of Armstrong Creek (See Figure 8).
The Division of Highways offers a Relocation Assistance Program to
help minimize the effects of displacement on families and businesses. The
Relocation Program will be conducted in accordance with the North Carolina
Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-17). The program is designed to provide
assistance to displaced persons in occupying a new place to live or in
which to do business. At least one relocation officer is assigned to each
highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will, at the time right of way is authorized,
determine the needs of displaced families, individuals, business concerns,
non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance
advisory services, moving cost compensation, replacement housing payments,
mortgage differential. and incidental cost payments. This assistance will
be provided without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national
origin. The relocation officer will contact the relocatee within ample
time prior to displacement to allow negotiations for and possession of
replacement housing which meets decent, safe and sanitary standards and is
adequate to accommodate the relocatee. Relocation of displaced persons
will be made in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public
utilities and commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement
housing offered will be within the financial means of the families and
individuals displaced. Replacement properties will be made available to
the displaced families and individuals in the same general area from which
they are being displaced and reasonably accessible to their places of
employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced
businesses, non-profit organizations and farm operations in locating and
moving to replacement property.
All tenant and owner-occupant displacees will receive an explanation
regarding all options available to them, such as (1) purchase of
replacement housing, (2) rental of replacement housing, either private or
public, or (3) relocating existing owner-occupant housing. The relocation
officer will also supply information concerning other State or Federal
F programs offering assistance to displaced persons and will provide other
advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships to displaced
persons in adjusting to a new location. Last resort housing will be
provided, if necessary, in accordance with North Carolina law.
The Moving and Replacement Housing Payments Program is designed to
(a) compensate the relocatee for the costs of moving from homes,
businesses and farm operations acquired for a highway project; (b) provide
incidental purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's
9
fees, prepayment penalty, appraisals, and other closing costs; and (c)
make payment for any increased interest expenses for replacement
dwellings. Reimbursement for replacement housing payments, increased
interest payments, and incidental purchase expenses may not exceed $22,500
combined total, unless last resort housing becomes necessary. Tenants may
receive a rental assistance payment not to exceed $5,250, unless last
resort housing becomes necessary.
Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies and
- their representatives to consider the impact of construction and land
acquisition projects on prime and important farmland soils. These soils
are defined by the US Soil Conservation Service (SCS). The SCS was
contacted regarding Important Farmland in the project area (see Appendix).
According to the SCS, the proposed widening, bridge replacement, and
relocation of NC 226 will convert approximately 9.0 acres of soils which
meet the criteria for prime farmland designation. The Form AD-1006,
Farmland Conversion Impact Rating, was completed to determine the
significance of the project's impact (see Figure 9). The relative value
of the prime farmland soils to be converted is high, with a rating of 81.8
on a 100 point scale. However, the complete site assessment indicates
that the proposed improvements will not threaten the viability of the
entire farm or farming activities throughout McDowell County. Therefore,
mitigation of the project's impact to prime farmland soils is not
required.
Flood Hazard Evaluation
McDowell County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Program. A complete flood study has been completed for Armstrong Creek
and the limits of the 100 year flood have been delineated (see Figure 7).
The proposed project will not have any significant adverse effect on the
floodplain.
Armstrong Creek has an average daily flow of 63.0 cubic feet per
second (cfs). Existing Bridge Number 104 over Armstrong Creek is 95 feet
long. The proposed replacement structure will be 147 feet long.
• The terrain in the vicinity of the project is rolling with natural
draws and streams located such that the proposed project can be drained
without difficulty. Ground water and existing drainage patterns along the
proposed roadway will not be significantly affected by project
construction. Siltation of adjacent areas and streams due to project
construction will be minimized by the use of standard erosion control
measures and devices.
10
Air Quality And Traffic Noise
The project is located in the Eastern Mountain Air Quality Control
Region. The ambient air quality for McDowell County has been determined
to be in compliance with the National Air Quality Standards. Since this
project is located in an area where the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
does not contain any transportation control measures, the conformity
procedures of 23 CFR 770 do not apply to this project.
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in
accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North
Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
The subject project will not substantially increase traffic volumes
along US 221-NC 226. Therefore, the impact of the project on noise levels
will be insignificant. Noise levels may increase during construction, but
the increase will be temporary.
This evaluation completes the assessment requirements of 23 CFR 772
(highway traffic noise) and 23 CFR 770 (air quality) and no additional
reports are required.
Underground Storage Tanks
Two sites with potential underground storage tank involvement have
been identified in the area of the subject project.
Woodlawn Lumber Company, located at the southern end of the subject
project, has two 10,000 gallon underground tanks containing diesel fuel.
These tanks are registered with OEM/GW, ID number 0-003114. The tanks
appear to be well outside the right of way limits.
Tony's Texaco, located at the existing intersection of NC 226 with
US 221, has two 10,000 and one 4,000 gallon gasoline tanks. A 1,000
gallon diesel fuel tank is located on the property as well. These tanks
are constructed of steel and all but one were installed in 1972. They are
registered with DEM/GW, ID number 0-014301. Depending on final design,'
this existing facility may be impacted by the project.
If underground storage tanks are impacted by the project, NCDOT will
determine the condition of the underground storage tanks and the adjacent
soil prior to right of way acquisition.
~ VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
The following federal, state, and local agencies were asked to offer
suggestions and provide environmental comments as part of the environ-
mental study. An asterisk indicates agencies from which written comments
applicable to the replacement of Bridge Number 104 and the realignment of
the NC 226 intersection were received (Written comments are included in
the Appendix).
11
Appalachian Regional Commission
*Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. Department of Agriculture (Forest Service)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Department of the Interior
Environmental Protection Agency
*U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Asheville
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Raleigh
U.S. Geological Survey
*U.S. Soil Conservation Service
*Tennessee Valley Authority
*State Clearinghouse
*N.C. Dept. of Cultural Resources
N.C. Dept. of Human Resources
N.C. Dept. of Public Instruction
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Isothermal Planning and Economic Development Commission
McDowell County
*City of Marion
VII. PERMITS AND APPROVALS
Estimated wetland impacts are less than one acre. The subject
project is a federally-funded categorical exclusion. The nationwide permit
provisions of 33 CFR 330.5 (a) 23 are likely to be applicable.
Because McDowell County is a designated "trout" county, a letter of
approval from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission will be
required before a Department of the Army permit can be issued.
State permits are administered through the Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification
will be required for any activity which may result in a discharge into
waters and for which a federal permit is required.
JAM/plr

10

N
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONRIENTAL
BRANCH
221 - NC 226 IMPROVEMENTS
MCDOWELL COUNTY
T. I. P. PROJECT B-1277
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1

1
I

Yl
4
•
40,
pr r
's
>4
Y
m h
}
?
r'

i
r
ar4
.' .II
L

v
0
N
W
W
U
O
Z
O
H
U)
Q>
wz
X00
W co U
N J
J
Lu C.)
?G Z
r O
N0
m V
Z
O
0
r
O
Z
W
U
_G
m
m
m
w
m
a
LL
ESTIMATED 1993/2013 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
US 221-NC 226 FROM SR 1556 TO NC 226
McDOWELL COUNTY
65 US 221 TTST-5%
119 -DUAL-4%
DHV-10%
62 8 2 6
NC 226 111 13.) k.:-3-
. 3 12 SR 1558
52 2
TTST-3% 93 4
DUAL-4%
DHV-10%
BRIDGE NO. 104
109
200
5 21
9 39
SR 1556
120 16 TTST-1 %
221 30 DUAL-3%
DHV-10%
US 221-NC 226
1993
2013 ADT IN HUNDREDS
FIGURE 4
ACCIDENT RATE SUMMARY
US 221-NC 226, MCDOWELL CO.
ACCIDENTS PER MILLION VEHICLE MILES
6
0
Total Fatal Nonfatal Night Wet
Noar NO 228 Intor. ® SR 1434 to NC 228 NC Avq. - US Routoo
FIGURE 5
ACCIDENT TYPE SUMMARY
US 221-NC 226, McDOWELL CO.
Percent Acoidonto
60
40
30 ____._._.._......_.-..............__.......
20 _?_---
5
10 --
0
Ran Off Rd Flxod ObJoot Roar. End Lt. Turn Anglo Othor
Near NC 226 Inter.
FIGURE 6
i M
/?.r / •a ?, .C
04
A
lp-
LLJ
n .
\: ?J ( Y y... ro
c O ?!
N IL
v 1.
383
to
co CO
O Q r .r zy -
LLI
O Y s; a'
N W
J W
J _ ?aF r t1
rv ?bj ,
Q
P Ljj
O d1 y(N v
c f Y
9 ,t 4Fr
x 8 0 m (? art '. Y t s6'el,;3
Ito
O r • / ? Si '? t ? ,, , t? !r'a r ??+f ? J `,:? t ?,??C17t??J?Y ,t'i? 1?ri,
cr Wx.. o ? ? Y ?d'??d
V t t t r "j > t t t i cr- U 'rte wA 4 err.y27t??Yfl?t;
^
,\??? l1 `4 , F tti r ^Yl r? k 1?: ?, GJ-71
3 g?. dY uitT42 ,-1 41
t{ ?j 4,J l4 } d }x YaC J ;, 1?T
W
T' , ;9 t ? S teat t?; o.
O
so N ,r ?S !} rtv rY°!Y 1 ]?
F '
w,t r,7. u'?zcY,?:?ik'ITk J, y",t k. ?4 Y? z z
a' i r 00
N N
t
sf n
?6 ti 11
j
\ b( ?? It
R E L- O C A T I ON Rap OR _F North Carolina Department of Transportation
X E.I.S. _ CORRIDOR _ DESIGN RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
PROJECT: 8.1870702 COUNTY McDowell Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
I.D. NO.: TIP B-1277 F.A. PROJECT: N/A _
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Improvements to US 221-2261 McDowell Count
?....._._. __.. _.._. _ = EST I MATED D I SPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
?..Tvpe of
Displacee Owners
Tenants Total Minor-
ities
0-15M 15-2511 25-35M 35-50M 50 U'
Individuals - - - - - - - - i
_....-._..___.___.____..___._?
Families 1
- 1
-
- - 1 - -
Businesses -?? ??- - - VALLE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLINGS AVAILABLE
Farms - - - - Owners Tenants For Sale For Rent
Non-Profit - - - - 0-20M - $ 0-150 - 0-20M 5 $ 0-150 2
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-4011 1 150-250 - 20-4011 10 150-250 8
YES NO EXPLAIN ALL. "YES" ANSWERS 40-70M - 250-400 -
___....__..____....__._.___.• .___ _ ____ 40-70M 35 250-4D0 10
_.__._...._ _ _.... _.__.___ .._.._....._.__...._._._............... ._....... h
- x __ _-_.
1. Will special relocation ._..?__ -
70-100 - 400-600 - 70-100 20 400-600 9
............ .. ._..-
x services be necessary
2. Will schools or churches be
100 UP Y _ 600 LIP
100 LP 12 - 6D0 UP _ 2
-_..__......_......_.........
--- ------- .?. affected by displacement
x 3. Will business services still TOTAL 1 - 82 31
be av a i l ab l e after p r o J e c t -__.___ __.. _.-_-_.• __.._..___.._.__ ----.._.....----__..._..._.__........_._.____.__ .______.____.._.._......._...._ ................
4. Will any business be dis- REMARKS (Respond by Number)
x placed. If so, indicate size
type, estimated number of 3. Will not be disrupted due to the protect.
employees, minorities, etc.
x S. Will relocation cause a 6. Local realtor, newspaper.
- housing shortage
x 6. Source for available hous- 8. As necessary in accordance with State Law.
- - ing (list)

x _
7. Will additional housing
- programs be needed
x 8. Should Last Resort Housing
(-•------- ---- be considered

? x 9. Are there large, disabled,
_- - elderly, etc. families
A14SWER TI-ESE ALSO FOR' DES I GN
10. Will public housing be
needed for project.
11. Is public housing avail-
able
12. Is it felt there will be ad-
equate DDS housing available
--- during relocation period
13. Will there be a problem of
housing within financial
- --- means
14. Are suitable business sites
- --- available (list source)
15. Number months estimated to
comp to RELOCATION
elocation Agent Date
Form 15.4 Revised 5/50
// av
FIGURE 8
Approved j Date
Original & 1 COPY: State Relocation Agent
2 Copy: Area Relocation rile.
U.S. Oeparcment of agncuiture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
(Oats at lino Evajuanon Requnt .. 3-?j ?G\?
PART 1 1770 he corno/etea by ='Cerol Ag"fl)
I Feaenj AgeneY Imrolvea ??].`??
Nam* Ct Project 3
Caunrv Ana star. m
Proootea uric Use •?` ?? ?'C?C?•?C.?
V I Oats Request Recrvaa 3v SG _ ?-5 - 4 ?--
PART II (fo be compered by SCS! 7
Yes No ImptsG IAvervq* Farts 5640
Does the site contain prime, unique, statewide or local important fatmiindt ,-n/ - -
()f no, Ise FPPA does nor a001Y - do not eOmplete addirronal parrs of this form). u a ?? L at r=.rtr+ ana As oehnw in raQ. _
Maio! Croo(s/ FarmaWe Una in Govt. lunsaaion r I PA
C or 1>.• I Oats LinC cva+u:nan RsLUm*a dv SCS
Name at Una Evaiuiuon System Urea tyan" at Loca Sim Aasssment SvsLSm
F- f7 f]
PART III (fo be completed by Federal Agenc/J
.,I :? ..< Tn Rw ('AnVert°_d Oirectly
a r-i -. Tn Re Converted Indirecdv
r• T.,r,l ilrrrr In Sits
PART IV lfo be completed by SCSI Land Evaluation Information
Ajternatrv• S.ce ann4
Sate C Site
SitO A I S't• d -
T,..-,j t- Primes And Unique F3rmland
a? Tnral Arses Statewide And Local Imoor'm Farmland
r• Oar -.manes Llf Farmland in Caunrr Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted I
0. Pemantage Of FarmUna In Gcvc. .,unsaicnan nth Sam• ar Higher Reiarive Value
PART V (fo be completed by SCS) Land Evaluation Criterion
o..,..,:.,.vii,?„ofFarmlandToBeCanverted(Sct/sofOW ICOPoinr.!
PART VI (To be completed by Federal AgencyJ `
cpiained in 7 CFR 658.5Ib)
i
i P,taximw

Paints
a an e?
rsrc
51t* AaessntML Crltaria lThKS cr

1 Area In Nonurban Use

2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use
3 Percent Of Situ Being Farmed
_
4. Protection Provided By Stata And Loeaf Govemment O
5. Distance From Urban Builtuo Area
6. Oismnea To Urban Suooort Services
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Comoared To Average
& Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland
4. Availability Of F3rm Suooort Servicxs
M On-F3rrn Investments c)
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Suooort Services

12 Comoatibiii Wlith Existing Agricultural Us0 \
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 16
PART V I I (fo be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) I 1Q?
Tow Sits Assessment (From Parr VI above Ora 1ota1 ( 160
sire J=eSSmenr)
TOTAL POINTS (focal of above 2linesl Zfid
Ct" Selected:
Oats! Of Seiection
n
.D ?
D ?
-` R
b\
\y of . 3
was A Local 5.t• Atsearnem Ussa(
Yes Q No Q
Re"on For Setecnon:
FIGURE 9
APPENDIX
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
4 WILMINGTON DISTRICT; CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
June 28, 1990
IN REPLY REFER TO
Planning Division
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:

z ?0
? ??'%? 'G• ? f990
'?'?F18RP?'.,.r
We have reviewed your letter of May 114, 1990, requesting information for
"US 221-NC 226 Between SR 114314 and NC 226 North of Marion, McDowell County,
R-2020, State Project #6.879001T" and offer the following comments.
This proposed project crosses Armstrong Creek where there is an identified
flood plain. The effects of the proposed project on the flood plain and
floodway should be evaluated and coordinated with the local government
(Ref. Panel 140 of 200, McDowell County Flood Insurance Rate Map dated
July 15, 1988).
Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 14014 of
the Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge
of excavated or fill material in waters of the United States or any adjacent
and/or isolated wetlands in conjunction with this project, including disposal
of construction debris. Department of the Army permit requirements will
depend on the final project design, area of waters and/or wetlands filled,
construction methods, etc. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands
should first be avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensation or
mitigation for unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed, including
the extent and location of any work within waters of the United States and
wetlands, our Regulatory Branch would appreciate the opportunity to review
these plans for a project-specific determination of Department of the Army
permit requirements. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. David
Baker, Regulatory Branch, at (7014) 259-0856.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of
further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
S n erely,
Lawrence W. Saunders
Chief, P1 ning Division

ENT 0, , Gt
TAKE
United States Department of the Interior F
rim
o FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AMM CA
-'?
ASHEVILLE FIELD OFFICE
100 OTIS STREET, ROOM 224 rte.
L3
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801 93
June 5, 1990 L
4??
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager, Planning and Research Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
Subject: Proposed improvements to US221-NC 226 between SR 1434 and NC 226
north of Marion, McDowell County, North Carolina (State Project
No. 6.879001T, TIP No. R-2020)
This responds to your letter of May 14, 1990 (received May 16, 1990),
requesting our comments on the subject proposal. These comments are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is particularly concerned about the
potential impacts the proposed action may have on endangered/threatened
species and on stream and wetland ecosystems within the project impact
area. Preference should be given to alternative alignments, stream
crossing structures, and construction techniques that avoid and/or minimize
encroachment and impacts to these resources.
The enclosed page identifies federally protected endangered (E) and
threatened (T). species that may occur in the area of influence of this
proposed action. The legal responsibilities of a Federal agency or their
designated non-Federal representative under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act, as amended, were detailed in material sent to you previously.
If you would like another copy of this material or if you have any
questions, please contact Mr. John Fridell at 704/259-0321 (FTS 672-0321).
The Service's review of any environmental document would be greatly
facilitated if the document contained the following information:
(1) A complete analysis and comparison of all available alternatives
including the no action alternative.
(2) A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within
existing and required additional rights-of-way and any areas,
such as borrow areas, which may be affected directly or
indirectly by the proposed improvements.
(3) Acreage and descriptions of branches, creeks, streams, rivers, or
wetlands which will be filled as a consequence of proposed
highway improvements. Wetlands affected by the proposed project
should be mapped in accordance with the Federal Manual for
(4) Linear feet of any water courses which will be relocated as a
consequence of the proposed improvements. -
(5) Acreage of upland habitats, by cover type, which will be
eliminated as a consequence of proposed highway improvements.
(6) Techniques which will'be employed for designing and constructing
any relocated stream channels or for creating replacement
wetlands.
(7) Description of all expected secondary and cumulative
environmental impacts associated with this proposed work.
(8) Mitigation measures which will be employed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated with
any of the proposed improvements.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and request that
you continue to keep us apprised on the progress of this project. In any
future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our log
number 4-2-90-061.
Sin erely,
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor
Enclosure
cc:
Section Manager, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Archdale
Building, 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27611
Mr. Charles Roe, Director, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
Mr. Rob Sutter, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Plant
Conservation Program, P.O. Box 27647, Raleigh, NC 27611
Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Box 26806,
Raleigh, NC 27611
Field Supervisor, FWS, P.O. Box 33726, Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
United States
f)? Department of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservation
Service
1
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.B.
Manager of Planning and Research Branch
N. C. Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone: [phone]
June 6, 1990
C? 'n
'r r
Re: US 221-NC 226 between SR 1434 and NC 226 North of Marion,
County, R-2020, State Project No. 6.879001T
Dear Mr. Ward:
s
This is in response to your request for Important Farmland Information for
this project. There is a small area of important farmland at junction
NC226 and US 2210 north end of the project area. The rest of the area does
not have important farmland. This is because of the steep to very steep
landscapes, cut and fill areas, and urban development along the project
area.
Sincerely,
Bobbye J. Jones
State Conservationist
cc: Kayla B. Hudson
U'
o The Sod Conservation Service
`J is an agency of the
Department of Agriculture
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ' ?n1?
NORRIs, TENNESSEE 37a2a
MAY 31 1990
• ?5
'rJUN 4199
Hr. L. J. Ward, P. E. ?
Manager of Planning and Research "•-
North Carolina Department
of Transportation '?SEARC? `,''
P.O.-Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Hr. Ward:
US 221-NC 226 BETWEEN SR 1434 and NC 226 NORTH OF MARION, HCDOWELL
COUNTY, R-2020, STATE PROJECT #6.819001T
This is response to your May 14 request for TVA's comments-on the states
proposal to widen the subject highway.
This project is located outside the Tennessee River drainage area and
TVA's power service area. Therefore, we have no comments.
Please let us know if we may be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Truitt if. Fore, Manager
Property Management and
Administration Department
Land Resources
An Equal Opportunity Employer
North Carolina
Department of Administration
James G. Martin, Govgmor James S. Lofton, Secretary
July 5, 1990
TO: L.J. Ward, N.C Dept. of Transportation
r.
FROM: Chrys Baggett, State Clearinghouse
RE: SCH #90-E-4220-0915; Scoping - US 221 Upgrade McDowell County
Attached are additional comments which were submitted following
our clearance letter on your:
Notification to Clearinghouse of Intent to Apply for
Assistance
x Environmental Review
Other
If you have questions regarding these comments, please contact me
at [phone].
CB/jt
Attachment
116 West Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-8003 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity ! Affirmative Action Employer
is t:3 ,? JUI'1 1990 ,
c
RECEIVED
.?..,... Sc n`-,,
DOA
j. ?
State of North Carolina kkk
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
. 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor Edythe M. McKinney
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Assistant Secretary for
Environmental Protection
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee il?-"''
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 90-0915 Scoping - US 221 Upgrade in McDowell County
North of Marion
DATE: June 25, 1990
The attached comments were submitted to this office after
the state's review period. The Department of Transportation is
requested to adequately address these comments.
bb: MM
attachment
N) Rus 27 os-, K116. 0i North C ondin., 27f.11 7t?87 Idephone ')I') 7? 3-a')ti 1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
June 19, 1990
MEMORANDUM
1980 .?= J1
Do ?'rFfCi. Cr?
TO: Melba McGee
FROM: Steve Tedder
SUBJECT: Project No. 90-090•
US 221 U Scoping Comments for Proposed
Pgrade in McDowell County North of Marion
The following DEM comments address potential impacts to water
quality and wetlands. er
Surface Water Quality
The extreme northern end of the
just north of Woodlawn, will cross Armstrong road improvements,
classified WS-III Tr. The classification meansethaththe is
is used as a water supply and is suitable for trout
NCDOT should strive to stream
project on Armstrong minimize the water quality impactsgoflthe
Construction impacts can be reduced through strict adherence
to required sediment control measures. This i
important in light of the trout classifications especially ce Loer
nonpoint source impacts associated with highway usencan berm
minimized by avoiding use of curb and
pollutants on the road surface and gutter, which traps
waters, and instead giving considera
pies to receiving
filter strips along the road shoulders.
tion toemaintaining vegetated
g
Wetlands
The brief project suinmar
whether any wetlands may be impacted. by NCDOT does not indicate
certification will be required if a Sectiont404 permit
required by the US Army Corps of Engineers. issuance of the certification will be assurances permit is
followed the Clean Water Act's A that site to
404(b)(1) lithat and NCDOT that has
mitigation, if necessary, is a guidelines and that
should clearly delineate the boundarieseandTn this regard, the EA
of the type(s) of wetlands, if an provide a de
y, the impacted by this project. It shouldabe notedathat sediment may be
control and wetland avoidance would not consitute Mitigation wetlands. ediment
for
We appreciate the opportunity to
project during the plannin provide comments on this
if you have any questions g phase. Please contact m,-
• (733-5083) • Alan Clark.
?..5 At,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 9 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Douglas G. Lewis
Director
MEMORANDUM Planning and Assessment

TO: Chrys Baggett
FROM: Melba McGee le
RE: 90-0915 Improving U.S. 221/NC 226 McDowell County
DATE: June 19, 1990
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
has reviewed the proposed scoping notice. Comments from our
divisions have been attached and should be adequately addressed
in the environmental document.
bb: mm
attachments

PO 1,,\ 271,87. P lcigh North Carulina 271dl i,N' 'Iclcphonc')N-733 i.?-,,
,r?.. ST. Tr 4
?4,My .n
IVY gwr,w.Y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor John N. Morris
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
June 7, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGeei?
FROM: John Sutherland/'
G
SUBJECT: 90-0915, Improving U.S. 221/NC 226 in McDowell County
We have the following comments on the above project:
1. At stream and wetland crossings, utilize bridges whenever
possible to minimize habitat losses and floodplain
encroachment.
2. Minimize the loss of timber and prime farmland.
3. Provide vegetation buffers when highway passes close to
residential areas.
4. Mitigate the loss of wetlands and forests.
5. Minimize the use of curb and gutter; maximize the use of
porous pavement and grass swales.
6. Involve local landowners in gathering data on impacts; be
flexible on location of alternatives adjust them to meet
local concerns.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh. North Carolina 27611.7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH Project Number
AND NATURAL RESOURCES 90 _
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Coun ye
Inter-Agency Project Review Response
r ' I 31",,,4P- 1134
Project Name l t y N (? ?(p 01 .?26 Type of Project
The following are our comments on the above referenced subject.
The applicant should be advised that plans and specifications for all water system improvements
must be approved by the Division of Environmental Health prior to the award of a contract or the -
Initiation of construction (as required by 10 NCAC IOD .0900 et. seq.). For information, contact
the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
Several water lines possibly are located in the path of an adjacent to the proposed project.
Due to a possible rupture during construction, the contractor should contact the appropriate water
system officials to specify a work schedule.
The proposed project will be constructed near water resources which are used for drinking. Precautions
should be taken to prevent contamination of the watershed and stream by oil or other harmful substances.
Additional information Is available by contacting the Public Water Supply Section at [phone].
Back flow preventors should be Installed on all incoming potable water IInes. Additional Information
is available by contacting the Public Water Supply Section at [phone].
This project will be classified as a community public water supply and must comply with state
and federal drinking water monitoring requirements. For more information the applicant should
contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
If this project is constructed as proposed, we will recommend closure of feet of adjacent
waters to the harvest of shellfish. For information regarding the shellfish sanitation program,
the applicant should contact the Shellfish Sanitation Branch [phone].
The applicant should be advised to contact the local health department regarding their requirements
for septic tank installations (as required under 10 NCAC l0A .1900 et. seq. and/or sanitary facilities
requirements for this project if applicable.) For Information concerning septic tank and other
on-site waste disposal methods, contact the On-site Sewage Branch at [phone].
V
The applicant should be advised that prior to the removal or demolition of dilapidated structures,
an extensive rodent control project may be necessary In order to prevent the migration of the
rodents to adjacent areas. For Information concerning rodent control, contact the local health
department or the Public Health Pest Management Section [phone].
The spoll disposal area(s) proposed for this project may produce a mosquito breeding problem.
For )nformalton concerning appropriate mosquito control measures, the applicant should contact
the Public Health Pest Management Section at [phone].
Reviewer Branc /Un t ?j Date
V.t ( ,?,-
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
FM208 06/13/90 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
t
116 WEST JONES STREET G'? v
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27611
r
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENT S_= GAL.
MAILED TO FROM t}. S
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MRS. CHRYS*.flAGGyT
L.J. WARD DIRECTOR
'" -
PLANNING E RESEARCH BRANCH ?r`?`'
N C STATE CL E AR?Q,U SE
HIGHWAY BLDG./INTER-OFFICE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0
SCOPING FOR COMMENTS ON IMPACT OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO
US 221-NC 226 BETWEEN SR 1434 AND NC 226 NORTH OF MARION -
(TIP R-2020)
SA I NO 90E 422 00915 PROGRAM TITLE - S COPI NG
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
( X) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone].
C.C. REGION C
I !? 1
J
.:? '?`? ?? r? 1411". ?'?< .t'??'}?' ??'} { ?. ?:.?'
t
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee, Planning
Dept. of Environment,
FROM: W. Don Baker, Program
Division of Boating a;
and Assessment
Health & Natural Resources
Manag
ad Inla isheries
DATE: May 29, 1990
SUBJECT: US 221-NC 226 Between SR 1434 and NC 226 North of
Marion, McDowell County. (90-0915)
These comments are provided in response to your request
of May 21, 1990, for information for input relating to fish
and wildlife concerns for the proposed subject project.
Wildlife Resources Commission review of the environmental
document would be greatly facilitated if it contained:
1. A description of fishery and wildlife resources,
including habitats, existing within, or impacted
by the project.
2. The quantity of wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds
and other fish or wildlife habitats to be graded,
,filled or otherwise disturbed.
3. Stream relocations, crossings or other proposed
construction activity that may impact them.
. 4. Acreage of upland habitat impacted by cover type.
5. Mitigation measures proposed to avoid, eliminate,
reduce, or compensate for fish and wildlife
habitat losses.
Thank you for the opportunity for input during the
pre-planning stage for this project. We will be happy to
assist in any manner feasible during all phases of the
project.
WDB/lp
M STA1Z O
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
November 8, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
William S. Price, Jr.
??a
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director

SUBJECT: US 221-NC.226 between SR 1434 and NC 226
north of Marion, R-2020, 6.879001T, McDowell
County, CH 90-E-4220-0915, GS 91-0035
We have reviewed your letter of October 12, 1990, and concur that there are
no National Register-listed properties in the area of potential effect and
further compliance with G.S. 121-12(a) is not necessary.
These comments are made in accord with G.S. 121-12(a) and Executive
Order XVI. If you have any questions regarding them, please contact Ms.
Renee Gledhill-Earley,.environmental review coordinator, at 733-4763.
WSP:slw
cc: B. Church

109 EastJones Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807

ST^rro
C7"r-Z71z,
C_,-)e6_
, bn
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
September 28, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation ,
i ,
FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Improvements to US 221-NC 226, R-2020,
McDowell County, CH 90-E-4220-0915,
ER 91-7342
Thank you for your letter of September 11, 1990, transmitting the
archaeological survey report by Thomas Padgett concerning the above
project.
During the course of the survey no archaeological sites were located
within the project area. Mr. Padgett has recommended that no further
archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this
project. We concur with this recommendation since this project will not
involve significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comments, please contact Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: T. Padgett
109 EastJones Street o Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
s.w STATE,,
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James G. Martin, Governor Division of Archives and History
Patric Dorsey, Secretary William S. Price, Jr., Director
June 15, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook, Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: US 221-NC 226 between SR 1434 and NC 226 north
of Marion, R-2020, 6.879001T, McDowell County
CH 90-E-4220-0915
We have received notification from the State Clearinghouse concerning
the-above project.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures
of historical or architectural importance located within the planning
area. However, since a comprehensive historical architectural inventory
of McDowell County has never been conducted, there may be structures of
which we are unaware located within the planning area.
We recommend that the Department of Transportation retain'a qualified
architectural historian to define and survey the area of potential
effect of this project. This consultant should coordinate the survey
with Martha Fullington of our Western Office in Asheville. Ms. Fullington
can be reached at 704/298-5024.
Portions of the proposed project area are considered to have a high
probability for the location of significant archaeological resources.
This is particularly true for the northern and of the project. We
recommend that a comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted prior
to the start of construction activities.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106,.codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
109 Easdones Street * Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
Page Two
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: State Clearinghouse
cd-wood Stone
Barbara Church

d

CITY OF MARION
P.O. Drawer 700
Marion, North Carolina 287S2
May 21, 1990
Mr. L. J. Ward, P.E.
Manager of Planning & Research
NC Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
OFFICE OF THE
MAYOR

r ?.

-? MAY 2 9 1990
DlVISIQN QF r?
=?? NfGt I44'AYS P ,
AESci?C-?GN ,.

SUBJECT: US 221-NC-226 Between SR 1434 and NC 226 North of
Marion, McDowell County, R-2020, State Project
#6.879001T
Dear Mr. Ward:
I am in receipt of your letter of May 14, 1990 concerning the
above referenced project.
I would like to take this means to let you know that I can
see no problems with the project at this time. I heartily
endorse the project and would like to see work begin as soon
as possible.

If I can be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
A. E erette Clark
Mao r ' -
AEC/lae