19890221 Ver al_Complete File_20100726

i"1K Dr:i Tr'i i::i
I" ,`1_; i::i j°j F:i ;'4'.:1 't I°; E::,
';;'
DiiTI::.
0700/89
ACTION j :I ND FILE l:;FC Aj°i(:i.:' 0 i P P;: WD ::> FORMAT ' t i)':°+" r`:' '!E::y:T C.`. :? 00656
i'l R i r t ENT ERED HIS DATA, RECORD S NO 00655 F RD RD DATA
F'Ri.1,J;; : 00 655 t" Rt.J& NC:;DC.lT -':f}UEtf"IAM CREEK ::BRDG COUNTY : !e:.,_. "i;UFORt r?: r , f:::(:l:

I
+. : ,:;•'.;
1
A.>.: IGNi::. .ii TO:
TYPI::. C.:E::RT:f:i° ECA IOi•! RECOMME ND DATI:::,`.:: Y`Y`jiMi:::'O
404 E'N: 401 RED: ISSUE: Y RECEIVED: 89062''1''
l.; i l z° A ONLY : GC: BRIDGE CON,'.-.'.' D E N Y : I: i' I 1 • :E r"L REPOR T:
Dt° ...:AMA `r• .::.t:.(. P ,ii,JI:: RE::Q : 1101..:D D: FINAL REPORT: 89000
RECEIVING
COMMENTS DURHAM CREEK CL ASS: S1:., BASIN:
:
SITE LOCA
TED
ON SR i955 IN BONN
ERTON COMMU
NITY
PROPOSAL TO R EPLACE THE EXISTIN G, SIMILAR BRIDGE
0 O-1 O
NO SIGNIF F WE
ICAN TLAND '',;1:::G:. tVtoL..Uid'i
T IMPACT,.-..' •'f::.E:.R? ON BRI D4;1::. APPRO ACHES WILL BE IMPAC TED
COPIES: Wr'iRO--C;I:::i! i'RAI.......N:l:l._L..S.._DCi"9
f
?r <
j,
' ir'

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Comments concern'Ing an application for State Federal CAMA Permit(s) from (`=

A. PERMIT:
This office cannot comment on this project until after the close of the Section
401 Certification Public Comments Period.
ZoS4. fice hasno objection to the issuance of the permit(s) for the proposed
pwith the following conditions:
That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increases in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction-
related discharge (increases of 25 NTU's or less are not considered
significant).
That the instream turbidity not be increased by more than 50 NTU's as a
result of the proposed activity after a reasonable opportunity for dilu-
tion and mixture.
That turbidity levels in shall not be increased
by more than 10 NTU's as a result of the proposed activity after a reason-
able opportunity for dilution and mixture.
B. CERTIFICATION STATUS:
Certification is not required
for this project.
Certification is required for
this project. Such action to
process the certification has
been initiated. Proposed
Certification will be acted on
or after
/ The proposed project is certified
under General Certification
A) No. 1179 issued on January 25, D) No. 1431 issued on October 16,
1977, for sewer line construction 1980, for boat ramp construction.
B) No. 1272 issued on November 10, E) No. 1664 issued on September 8,
1978, for bulkhead construction. 1983, for Rip-Rap Placement.

C) No. 1273 issued on November 10, No. 1665 issued on September 19,'
1978, for discharges of liquid 1983, for incidental bridge
effluent from diked upland disposal construct ion.
areas.

WATER QUALITY SECTION
DIVISI ON OF ENVIRONME NTAL MANAGEMENT

uTON OFFICE
JUN 2 71989
D.EM.
Memorandum
To: Jim Mulligan
From: David Gossett fDG---
Subj: Application for CAMA Major Permit and/or Dredge & Fill Permit
N.C. DOT - Durham Creek Bridge
Beaufort County
Date: 27 June 1989
Attached is an application for a CAMA Major and/or a Dredge & Fill Permit
which was recei-2d by me on 13 June 1989. I am considering this
application complete, have acknowledged receipt, and have begun processing.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Lat: 35" 211 35"
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long: 76 ° 511 07"
1. APPLICANT'S NAME N. C. DOT
2.' LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE Beaufort County, Bonnerton Community, -Bridge across
Durham Creek on SR 1955, no photo
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL X
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 6-14-89
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT No
CAMA X
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED 6-13-89
OFFICE Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Beaufort County
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Conservation
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP None
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE
COASTAL WETLANDS PUBLIC TRUST WATERS X
ESTUARINE WATERS OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC X PRIVATE COMMERCIAL
(E) TYPL OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING N/A
PLKNNED N/A
(F) TYPE OF STRUCTURES: EXISTING Bridge
PLANNED Bridge
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION N/A SOURCE
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
(A) VEGETATED WETLANDS
Typha Sp2. -
Scirpus spp.
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
(C) OTHER:
Open water
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED:
N/A
AREA
DREDGFT FILLED OTHER
+ 50 sq. t.
+ 1000 sq.ft.
+ 1050 sq.ft.
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge
across Durham Creek on SR 1955 with a-similar bridge.
Environmental settin
The proposed project site is in the Bonnerton Com=ity of Beaufort County at
the bridge across Durham Creek on SR 1955. Durham Creek is a tributary to the
Pamlico River, which averages + 7' in depth and is + 13.0' in depth in the
channel at the bridge crossing. The existing bridge is + 170' in length and
it averages + 5' above the normal water level, thus allowing navigation by small
vessels. The existing filled approaches to the bridge are mostly highground,
however, some narrow fringes of 'I pha spp. and.Scirpus spp. have volunteered
at the waters edge on the approaches.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing to replace the existing deteriorated bridge with a
new bridge. The new bridge will be 210' in length and will be constructed at
the same location as the existing bridge. The new bridge will average ± 7'
above the normal water level, therefore, no significant change in vessel
traffic will occur. Class II riprap will be placed beyond the normal water level
at both approach ends to secure the slopes.
Environmental impact
The project as proposed should have a minimal environmental impact. + 50 sq.ft.
of wetland vegetation (TV ha spp. and Scirpus sip.) which has volunteered on the
existing approaches will be filled. Also + 1000 sq.ft. of open water area will
be filled by the placement of riprap at the toe of the approaches for stabiliza-
tion. A total of + 60 cubic yards of riprap will be placed beyond the noruial
water level.
The bridge replacement will not significantly change upland development upstream
of the existing bridge, since no significant change in bridge elevation will
occur.
David L. Gossett - Washington Office - 27 June 1989
ticxpated development activities, including construc-
tion, excavation, filling, paving, land clearing, and
stormwater control. If the requested information is
.not relevant to your project, write NIA (not ap-
plicable). Items 14 and 8-9 must be completed for '
all projecm

a.
North Carolina Department .of Transportation b.
a. Name L. R. Goode, Ph.D., PE'
Address P. O. Box 25201. c.
City Ra e' ah State NC d.
Zip 27611 1Day phone [phone]
Landowner or -_ Authorized agent C.
b. Project name (if any) N/A
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give £
the owner's name and address. &
_ t
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1955 -
b. City, town, community, or*landn-ark
Bonnerton
C. County Beaufort
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? No
c. Name of body of water nearest project
Durham Creek
a. Describe all development activities you propose
(for e)ample, building a home, motel, marina,
bulkhead, or pier).
If you plan to build a marina, also complete
and attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex-
isting project, new work, or both?
New Work
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
Public
Size of entire tract N/A
Size of individual lot(s) N/A
Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
tional Geodetic Vertical Datum N/A
Soil-type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Road Fill
Vegetation on tract -.;urcessi ona l VPgPtat'i C
Around BridQe• Oren Water In Fill Area
Man-made features now on tract
Existing Bridae
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan CL-mifica-
tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation Y_ Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
How is the tract zoned by local govcrnmc:,t?
h.
i. How are adjacent waters classified? SC
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? No
If so, by whom?
Complete this section if the project inciudcs any
upland development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures proposed N/A
b. Numbs of lots or parcels N/A
c. Density (Give the number of residential units
and the units per acre.) N/A
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than
one acre of land, the Division of Land
Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
tation control plan at least 30 days before land
disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet
of mean high water to be covered by im-
permeable surfaces, such as pavement,
buildings, or rooftops.
Asphalt & Concrete
st.zfacts. -- -
h. If applicable, bas a stormwater management
plan been submitted to the Division of En-
vironmental Management? N/A
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal andlor waste
vmter treatment facilities. '
j. Have these facilities received state or local
approvaLi N/A
k. Describe existing treatment facilities. .
N/A
1. Describe Location and type of dislharges to
waters of the state (for example?, surf-act runoff,
sanitary wastewater, industriallcommercial
effluent, or "wash down"). Surface Runoff
M. Water supply source N/A
n. If the project is oceanfront development,
describe the steps that will be taken to main-
tain establi.:.-ied public beach accessviays or pro-
vide new access. N/A
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will
be the elevation above mean sea level of the
fast habitable floor? N/A
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava-
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads,
which are covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(MLW) or (NM)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW .
Upland fill
areas
c. Type of material N/A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marsh-
land, swamps, or other-wetlands? N/A
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards N A
f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area N/A
g. Location of spoil disposal area N/A
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? N/A
If not, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance?? N/A
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swampland,'or water areas? N/A
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean
high water? 'Yes
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 60 (_ v _
m. Type of fill material Rock F i 1 1
n. Source of fill material Quarizz
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? No. In Oven Water
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled See 6a
q. How will excavated or rill material be kept on
site and erosion controlled? Floating
Silt Fence, Silt Basins, Etc.
r. What type of construction equipment will be
used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
hydraulic dredge)? Standard Roadway
Construction Eauipment
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equip-
ment to the project site? If yes, explain
the steps that will be taken to lessen en-
vironmental impacts.
Alonq Existing Roads
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
or normal water level N/A
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
in feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed
below mean high water N/A
f. Type of fill material N/A
2
Length Width Dcpth
r
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
tide to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims tide, plus written permis-
sion from the ownez to carry out the project.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on 8 'A x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal
Resources Commission Rule 71.0203 for a detailed
description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard-
ind that agency's 'use of larger drawings.) A site or
location map is a part of plat requirements and it
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per-
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like.
A stormwater.management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and cbmplete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com-
ments on the proposed project to the Division of
Coastal' Management. The applicant must advise
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen-
ding a copy of the permit application to them by
registered or certified mail. This notification is re-
quired by G.S. 113-229(d).
Name See Attached Sheet
Address
for work on the project tract. Lnclude permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
went of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. If the
project involves the expenditure of public funds, at-
tach a statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
(N.C.GS. 113A-1 to 10).

Any permit issued in response to this application
will allow oily the development described in the
application. The project will be subject to condi-
tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
state and federal review agencies to enter on the
aforementioned lands in connection with
evaluating information related to this permit ap-
plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
This is the day of _
19'?)q .
X
Lan owner or ?kluthorized agent
Name Send the completed application materials to the
Address Division of Coastal Management Office nearest yo
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
Name map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
Address DCM office and addresses and phone number.
3
COUNTY LOCATION
w- cr." a
Itl1
' 1114 ?• IID1 LIM 9, 't•
1?.
fy r. t s? t
i If
V I I,g ti C-da 0.op.1
61' o
^ Itu
I II49
1114
H i•
1
I.? f 1 ..
ot? L1311? •?? ?4 f
?Sr.. c% ! 37
?? (f I I p1 .??. ?? •ti
1IN O ?
` J
t.t-ft CG..+?
WE 7I1t13
?..
Y'
11sr
.! wM+r
- i2
u IS^
wt'I 1124 .
SCALE
1 0 I 2 3 l MATS
0 os 11n11 j ;y
'i: Iff7 i (?•
R-dy
1-4h Ck
it • I
k f.s
ter` ? u
!tU ^"
11 ' ?' C
121 f g P ECT `?
b` SITE
7.6 It'7
f f ?? ISJ
`LIU Itil ???1!?!t , \•70? ?S
^ LE-! tY
!lam II>4 _
^ 'tll f
u>s ? +73
129
1..5 10 f•s `
S
,\ ,?f ••. 1411 l2L
LUf? ,nl
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
1
lilt
Lf u LO
1t11 ? o
LdoLa
-"r ,:11
1 ul
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2150401 B-2003
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ON
SR 1955 OVER DURHAM CREEK
SHEET 1 OF 3 JAN.1989
Jo
i 12!2 1[17
Itl•
?'Itlr rr!1 ltt ? Hitt1
.ere tti! .,
es ? r.l Ye 1
20
III ?D
i I cL
LL.
I
I ?I I
I I? I I
I I I
• i I I i
J 1`
LL.
j a W 1 ....?
? ?3c3 I I \.

I I

W I
I
U ? W i
I

I I
Q
CL I

15
A
LL F . .
o?
r?
?a
cr
w
J
J
ui
3
w
co
LD
Z
Ln
X
w
A
I I ?
I
I I
?? I I
\? I I
I I I
II
? II
I? l
li I
I ! I i??
i! I

Y C?
W
W
U
Q?
2
O
d
W
a 0
Z ?
¢ >
<
W
Q
Z .
W
Q..
O
Z
J
11..
V)
ww
G
W
0
LL
d
U)
U L)
Fw • °0
.o m
w
o r-
Z ?
3 J
• J J
o m J
Q J
uj.
= _' O
a w
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
cr- BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2150401 B-2003
J
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ON
w SR 1955 OVER DURHAM CREEK
3 SHEET Z OF 3 JAN. 1989

O in O
" 8 - 1 1 6 " )
J
J
LL
z_
c f)
X
W
!J "
i
C3j -
J
li
.Y
0
F-
T
:2I
F-
Q
W
-? _
--1. Y
co
W
co W
2m
O 2
a ~
Q
z
0
U
W
U)II

O
N
Of
Ll?
Q
:7 C
W
O
z
.J
L.L
U)
0
z
W
0
O
J
Q
D o
O
cr,
O
O
J
Q
F-
W
W i
J
Q
U
Cn
N.C. DEPT: OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2150401 B-2003
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ON
SR 1955 OVER DURHAM CREEK
SHEET 3 OF 3 JAN.1989

O
0-

0
-
t
' W

n? m

v?

qU Z
?
m g P U)
O 7. X
O ?No W

0
O
O _
T
Ln
0
h?
t
w
O
0
Q]
0
W
cn
O
n
O
n
q-
01
a_
U ,
I
I
I
I• ? I
J U)
m a
J
Z ? -w-
u~ - s
p
x LL,
O Z
n
o
a: x
n w
o
I i _0
II
J
L <
O v
N ?
G' (If
O w
j.
Q
u,
JUN 5 1989
COASTAL RES+ U:RCES COMLL
N_C. DEPT: OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BEAUFORT COUNTY
(PROJECT 8.2150401 B-2003
PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ON
OI SR 1555 OVER DURHAM CREEK
[SHEET- y OF y JAN. 1989
COov - f4cDOT