20030981 Ver 1_Complete File_20070831

? _0 W AF ?,? Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-I Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 5, 2004
Wake County
DWQ Project #: 03-0981
SECOND REVISED APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATE AND STREAM MITIGATION THROUGH THE NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Waterford-Stonewater Development
Durham-Green Level Road Thoroughfare project
Wake County
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact up to 765 linear feet
of streams (130 feet of perennial and 635 feet of intermittent channels) and 0.006 acres of isolated
wetlands for the purpose of constructing the Waterford-Stonewater development as you described in
your application dated August 6, 2003, revised on March 5, 2004 (received March 8, 2004) with a
revision dated April 7, 2004 and a final revision dated April 28, 2004. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404, which
may be viewed on our website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application
- except as modified below. If you -change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to
send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or impacts to perennial streams that
exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as
otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
E ;. .
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Steve
Mitchell at our Raleigh Regional Office at 571-4700.
Sincerely,
limek, P.E., ctor
Attachments
cc: Andrea Wade, Corps of Engineers Raleigh d Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Todd Preuninger; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary
Mohammed Mahjoub, NC Department of Transportation
John Holley, DLR Raleigh Regional Office
Scott Johnson, Waterford Development, Inc.
Don Sever; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Ross Massey; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Deborah Sawyer, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
3
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Q. Fax #:
Company: 5?' S Y? Date: ' S Log
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructi ns:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlmds
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen R Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: r? 1RJ Fax #: 6
Cornran : Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
0? W ATFq? Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?0 G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
q
j Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
p r Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 5, 2004
Wake County
DWQ Project #: 03-0981
SECOND REVISED APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATE AND STREAM MITIGATION THROUGH THE NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Waterford-Stonewater Development
Durham-Green Level Road Thoroughfare project
Wake County
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact up to 765 linear feet
of streams (130 feet of perennial and 635 feet of intermittent channels) and 0.006 acres of isolated
wetlands for the purpose of constructing the Waterford-Stonewater development as you described in
your application dated August 6, 2003, revised on March 5, 2004 (received March 8, 2004) with a
revision dated April 7, 2004 and a final revision dated April 28, 2004. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404, which
may be viewed on our website at httr)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This certification allows you to
use Nationwide Permit Number 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get
any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited
to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires
unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application
except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to
send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or impacts to perennial streams that
exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as
otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
S
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwettands
Conditions of Certification:
1. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of
completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
2. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, streams and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland,
water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands or streams approved for impact under this Certification. A sample deed notification
can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
3. The on-site stormwater management plan approved by the Town of Cary as transmitted to
DWQ in the October 20, 2003 letter from Donald Sever (Chas. H. Sells, Inc.) and any of its
subsequent modifications as long as those modifications are also approved by the Town of
Cary is hereby approved for this project with respect to providing on-site stormwater
management from this project.
4. Durham-Green Level Road shall be realigned to follow the general alignment shown on the
March 5, 2004 revised plan and as shown on the April 7, 2004 submittal. This alignment may
be modified slightly without additional written DWQ approval so long as no additional stream
or wetland impacts occur.
5. Since impacts to perennial channels have now been reduced to less than 150 linear feet with
the April 28, 2004 revision, compensatory stream mitigation will not be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality. By copy of this approval, the Division hereby notifies the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program of this change. However please be aware that the US
Army Corps of Engineers may still require compensatory mitigation for this project.
6. The isolated wetland impacts are deemed permitted in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .1300
since they are less than 1/10 acre.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above
conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
2
This letter completes the -review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Steve
Mitchell at our Raleigh Regional Office at 571-4700.
Sincerely,
Attachments v
cc: Andrea Wade, Corps of Engineers Raleigh d Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Todd Preuninger; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary
Mohammed Mahjoub, NC Department of Transportation
John Holley, DLR Raleigh Regional Office
Scott Johnson, Waterford Development, Inc.
Don Sever; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Ross Massey; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Deborah Sawyer, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
3
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Revised April 28, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
401 ISSUED
RE: Nationwide14, 401 Water Quality Certification, and Isolated Wetland Permit
Green Level-Durham Road Thoroughfare
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
S&EC Project #: 03-6412.W0, DWQ# 03-0981,
APR 2 S 2004
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney: WATER QUALITY SECTION
On behalf of Waterford Stonewater (property owner) and McFube, LLC (property
owner), we hereby request authorization from the USACE to use Nationwide Permit 14
for proposed impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the construction of
the proposed Green Level-Durham Road. We are also requesting written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that the project complies with the 401
Water Quality Certification/Conditions associated with Nationwide Permit 14. A Pre-
construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent
authorization form.
S&EC evaluated the area in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing for the presence of
wetlands in July 2001 and received a jurisdictional determination in June 2002 (AID:
200221059). Additionally, site meetings were conducted with Mr. Dave Penrose of the
NC-DWQ, and Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE, in order to determine the
perennial/important/significant start points. The attached map indicates the outcome of
these meetings.
The proposed Green Level Durham Road is a road shown on the Town of Cary
Thoroughfare Plan and is therefore believed by S&EC to constitute a separate and
complete project, independent of surrounding properties (see attached thoroughfare plan).
However, because the proposed thoroughfare is adjacent to the proposed Stonewater
project, the Town of Cary is requiring Stonewater LLC, (applicant and developer of
Stonewater) to build the road. The proposed project is located approximately at the
intersection of O'Kelly Chapel Road (SR 1628), Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and Green
Level-Durham Road (SR 1625). The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin.
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 5, 2004
S&EC Project #: 03-6412
Page 2 of 2
Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS
topographic quadrangle.
The applicant proposes approximately 765 linear feet of permanent impacts (130 If
of perennial channel + 6351f of intermittent channel). Isolated Wetland impacts
consist of approximately 0.006 acres of impacts. In the past, the USACE has generally
considered impacts due to thoroughfare projects separately (i.e. having independent
utility) from the adjacent development. All stormwater discharge points are located
outside of the Town of Cary buffers and although not required by the NC-DWQ (i.e.
Cape Fear) level spreaders will be installed in order to attain diffuse flow before the
water enters the buffers. The stormwater plan and calculations were included with the
attachments in our initial submittal.
After meeting with the USACE/DWQ and the Town of Cary, the applicant has re-aligned
the proposed road in order to minimize impacts. The revised alignment has been shifted
to the east and reduced perennial channel impacts by approximately 300 linear feet as
well as avoiding headwater wetlands. A copy of the revised alignment has been included
for your review.
Currently the USACE can require mitigation for wetland impacts that exceed 0.1 acres
and/or for any impacts to perennial stream channels. Approximately 188 linear feet of
perennial channel will be impacted by the proposed project. If mitigation is required we
are requesting payment into the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) for stream impacts
to perennial channels. A copy of our request is included with the attachments and EEP
acceptance has been granted.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project in non-buffered basins. Mitigation is
typically required for impacts to greater than 150 linear feet of channel per project. The
applicant proposes payment to the WRP for all impacts to perennial streams within the
project boundaries if required by the NC-DWQ. Because wetland impacts are below the
threshold required for mitigation (<1.0 acres) we do not believe the NC-DWQ will
require mitigation for impacts to wetlands.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Biologist/Project Manager
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Maps
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of re-aligning Green Level Durham Road in order to improve
an unsafe intersection and provide a major thoroughfare as part of the Town of Carv Growth
Plan Heavy equipment associated with road construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction to extend roads as part of approved
master plan for development in this area by the Town of Cary.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Jurisdictional Determination (AID#200221059)
Site Meeting _w/Mr Dave Penrose - perennial determination
Site Meeting with Ms Andrea Wade - significance determination
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated for thoroughfare --
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes approximately
765 linear feet of permanent impacts (130 if of perennial channel + 635 if of intermittent
Page 3 of 8
channel). Isolated Wetland impacts consist of approximately 0.006 acres of permanent
impacts In the past the USACE has generally considered impacts due to thoroughfare
projects separately (i.e. having independent utility) from the adjacent development.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
8 Fill 0.006 NA 600 ISOLATED
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htti)://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 5.77 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.006 ac.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 255 UT to Kit Creek 3' Intermittent
2 Culvert 230 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Intermittent
3 Culvert 150 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Intermittent
6 Culvert 56 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
7 Culvert 74 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 765 linear feet of
permanent impacts (1301f of perennial channel + 6351f of intermittent channel).
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
Page 4 of 8
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
t-.
Division of Water Quality
Coleen R Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
ontact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Fax #:
Company:, Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
R ?6- ?a3
d
J
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabaee Blvd., Ra1dgh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 9114-733-6893 (fax), ontp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlan
1
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen li. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
LQ?
Fax #:
Fax To: t?
Company: Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
72) Y
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
a
??F W A TF9?J Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?O P North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
v? r
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
April 15, 2004
Wake County
DWQ Project #: 03-0981
REVISED APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
AND STREAM MITIGATION THROUGH THE NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Waterford-Stonewater Development
Durham-Green Level Road Thoroughfare project
Wake County
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact up to 698 linear feet
of streams for the purpose of constructing the Waterford-Stonewater development as you described in
your application dated August 6, 2003, revised on March 5, 2004 (received March 8, 2004) with a final
revision dated April 7, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered
by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404, which may be viewed on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number
14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
Control, Coastal Stonmwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application
except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to
send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or impacts to perennial streams that
exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as
otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions of Certification:
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the
ARM-1
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
M10\'!1-2 1'704 /..L.... e\ n1n '721 4Qn2 /f of /l.re... //1.7.. o.,«- ,,..

r
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Steve
Mitchell at our Raleigh Regional Office at 571-4700.
Sincerely,
Attachments V
cc: Andrea Wade, Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Kevin Martin; Soil and Environmental Consultants
Todd Preuninger; Soil and Environmental Consultants,
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary
Mohammed Mahjoub, NC Department of Transportation
John Holley, DLR Raleigh Regional Office
Scott Johnson, Waterford Development, Inc.
Don Sever; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Ross Massey; Chas. H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Ron Ferrell, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Q
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE APR-15-2004 THU 06:46
NAME DWQ?-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE
PAGES
START TIME
ELAPSED TIME
MODE
RESULTS
: 98765823
: 5/5
: APR-15 06:45
: 00'54"
: ECM
: OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
e WAZ,
G
a
Division of Water Quallty
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands(401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Meiling Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raley, NC 27699-1650
ontact Information: Phone k: 919-733-1786
F. 7 919-733-6893
Fax To: - Fab #: ?' 76 - 8 a3
Y - (f
Company: d? ]Qc ?L_ 9 rte Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions: /
N. CD wm ofwm Q.,Iky.4 l Wmko sC fide-Vt
16:0 Mel 8mdwCmta. JW4b.NC V"-1650 (M :W rA?)
2$23 CMMne B". Ptltl{6.NC r1644RW (Ceram)
(919)7371786(pbmU.919.733-69 (fW.OIDP>?..oya+>??^r^°?"
Mlmee3 F. E?d6Y,Gwemm
wnBTm c. sw. (r.se<xy
Nrnb Ccalioa De9ummlatP viryopm(and N•?wti Arourme
K. W. P]tmck P.E..IM?me
cw.ma. swsnx D,.y>wmor
oiMam o3 w.? ?auy

SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE APR-15-2004 THU 06:44
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 5/5
START TIME : APR-15 06:42
ELAPSED TIME : 01'02"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
' Fach9el P. Ej51?)'•l3vnoat
xma3c.s.aery
4A
North CMU71 n"pv^°°i afUvhp?.x sa Nenml Rewxes
G AAaw. xsmx, ea, 0?1a
g., nlwl. Qw%?Y
? IL S.W.- D.P.7
owmrl
.? nnndw. m^walrs Q,,,cl.
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree 1101116vard, Suite 250
Ralel;h, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Addresa: 1650 Mail Service Center.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact laor den: Phone >R: 919-733-1786
Pax Ah 919-733-6893
c Fax #: - 7 1 to
tL
l
Fax To:
Company: o Date: Js dC
h
t:
c
over s
ee
.
Number of pages including
Notes or speciallnstructlons:

'????
a"X n. w

N. c nh:.co?
2321 FAR CMO?• wSCIwkO d.mwae.Q.+ser. W1 waYmo Catlacubo uwc.
R 229- 0w) Atld[esa)
2321 .. Rolm A0,.xC NC2196N6M-1260a
(919)T3}liC6fyhme1.919-17}68T fawJ.0?9//No?..r.??•Emc«ttl>nEf .
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Nationwide 14, 401 Water Quality Certification, and Isolated Wetland Permit
Green Level-Durham Road Thoroughfare
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 03-6412.W0, DWQ# 03-0981,
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
Revised April 7, 2004
01 2321 ttn: C Mr. Crabtree John Dorney
Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
A
APR 0 ? 2004
WATER QUACITYSISC
fl0,0
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that the project complies with the 401
construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent
On behalf of Waterford Stonewater (property owner) and McFube, LLC (property
owner), we hereby request authorization from the USACE to use Nationwide Permit 14
for proposed impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the construction of
the proposed Green Level-Durham Road. We are also requesting written concurrence
Water Quality Certification/Conditions associated with Nationwide Permit 14. A Pre-
authorization form.
S&EC evaluated the area in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing for the presence of
wetlands in July 2001 and received a jurisdictional determination in June 2002 (AID:
200221059). Additionally, site meetings were conducted with Mr. Dave Penrose of the
NC-DWQ, and Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE, in order to determine the
perennial/important/significant start points. The attached map indicates the outcome of
these meetings.
The proposed Green Level Durham Road is a road shown on the Town of Cary
Thoroughfare Plan and is therefore believed by S&EC to constitute a separate and
complete project, independent of surrounding properties (see attached thoroughfare plan).
However, because the proposed thoroughfare is adjacent to the proposed Stonewater
project, the Town of Cary is requiring Stonewater LLC, (applicant and developer of
Stonewater) to build the road. The proposed project is located approximately at the
intersection of O'Kelly Chapel Road (SR 1628), Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and Green
Level-Durham Road (SR 1625). The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin.
A) 720-9405
g:
Court, Suite C
28025
04) 720-9406
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 5, 2004
S&EC Project #: 03-6412
Page 2 of 2
Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS
topographic quadrangle.
The applicant proposes approximately 823 linear feet of permanent impacts (1881f of
perennial channel + 6351f of intermittent channel). Isolated Wetland impacts consist of
approximately 0.006 acres of impacts. In the past, the USACE has generally considered
impacts due to thoroughfare projects separately (i. e. having independent utility) from the
adjacent development. All stormwater discharge points are located outside of the Town
of Cary buffers and although not required by the NC-DWQ (i.e. Cape Fear) level
spreaders will be installed in order to attain diffuse flow before the water enters the
buffers. The stormwater plan and calculations were included with the attachments in our
initial submittal.
After meeting with the USACE/DWQ and the Town of Cary, the applicant has re-aligned
the proposed road in order to minimize impacts. The revised alignment has been shifted
to the east and reduced perennial channel impacts by approximately 300 linear feet as
well as avoiding headwater wetlands. A copy of the revised alignment has been included
for your review.
Currently the USACE can require mitigation for wetland impacts that exceed 0.1 acres
and/or for any impacts to perennial stream channels. Approximately 188 linear feet of
perennial channel will be impacted by the proposed project. If mitigation is required we
are requesting payment into the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) for stream impacts
to perennial channels. A copy of our request is included with the attachments and EEP
acceptance has been granted.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project in non-buffered basins. Mitigation is
typically required for impacts to greater than 150 linear feet of channel per project. The
applicant proposes payment to the WRP for all impacts to perennial streams within the
project boundaries if required by the NC-DWQ. Because wetland impacts are below the
threshold required for mitigation (<1.0 acres) we do not believe the NC-DWQ will
require mitigation for impacts to wetlands.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Biologist/Project Manager
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to tors project, piease enter °Not Appucame or IN/A .)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant InformationW,4t1;o-r4
Name: LLC (Attn: Bob Haverkamp)
Mailing Address: 3301 Woman's Club Drive Suite 104
Raleigh NC 27612
McFube LLC - Attn: Mr. Glenn Futrell
PO BOX 3006
Cary North Carolina 27519 -3006
Telephone Number: 919-785-1110 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Page 1 of 8
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Preuninger(a)SandEC.com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Green Level-Durham Road Thoroughfare
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA - Linear
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The proposed project is located at
the intersection of O'Kelly Chanel Road (SR 1628), Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and Green
Level-Durham. Road (SR 1625)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Kit Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mMs/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The adjacent property is relatively undeveloped and contains
wooded lots with some residential homes.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of re-aligning Green Level Durham Road in order to improve
an unsafe intersection and provide a major thoroughfare as part of the Town of Cary Growth
Plan HeaM equipment associated with road construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction to extend roads as part of approved
master plan for development in this area by the Town of Cary.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Jurisdictional Determination (AID#200221059)
Site Meeting w/Mr. Dave Penrose perennial determination
Site Meeting with Ms Andrea Wade - significance determination
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated for thoroughfare
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes approximately
823 linear feet of permanent impacts (188 if of perennial channel + 635 if of intermittent
Page 3 of 8
channel) Isolated Wetland imavacts consist of approximately 0.006 acres of permanent
impacts In the past the USACE has generally considered impacts due to thoroughfare
projects separately (i.e. having independent utility) from the adjacent development.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
8 Fill 0.006 NA 600 ISOLATED
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema_gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 5.77 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.006 ac.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 255 UT to Kit Creek 3' Intermittent
2 Culvert 230 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Intermittent
3 Culvert 150 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Perennial
6 Culvert 94 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
7 Culvert 94 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tgpozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 694 linear feet of
permanent impacts (481 if of perennial channel + 213 if of intermittent channel).
4. Individually, list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
Page 4 of 8
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts -should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed Green Level-Durham Road is a road shown on the Town of Cary Thoroughfare
Plan and is therefore believed by S&EC to constitute a separate and complete project,
independent of surrounding properties. Based on conversations with the Corps/DWQ and the
Town of Cary the alignment has been shifted to minimize impacts to the perennial channel.
Presently the intersection is considered unsafe due to the curvature of the road. The revised
alignment calls for a signalized intersection at ninet y?degree angles. The proposed alignment has
reduced perennial stream impacts by almost 300 linear feet.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 5 of 8
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htrnl.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
If required the applicant proposes payment to the EEP. A copy of their acceptance has been
included with the application.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hlW://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 481 linear feet has been approved
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 8
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (squImpact are feet) Multiplier
Required
Mitigation
1 NA 3 NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Gone 1 extends out 30 teet perpendicular in near banK or cnannei; tone L extenas an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
NA - The road is considered an independent project However, a stormwater management plan
was included for review in our initial application
Page 7 of 8
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA - application is for the construction of a roadway.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
X11V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
X/1
Applicant/Agent's Signature / [Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
Jun 19 03 09:36a Bob Haverkamp
919 785-1127 p.2
Soil & Envi roinmexntal Consultants, PA
11010 Ram kidp Road • R.'ddgh. Morin Carolina 27614 - Phones (919) 346-SM - F^.u: (919) 94&W7
ww.+.SandFC-coin
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks ?o Bq.??ed (a By The Current ?ndowner
Name: GVArel??c?2?7 STon??wRr?? LLB
Cf/o vu?9'? tom. Fo r?:Y Gk tiri; t?FM ?9V T 0C. , Lt-C
Address: 3341 woww"'s Cjv3 1 AIW-.2ofrr_ ?e ?c? l? eve z??rL.
Phone: q 1 1- 7.95-- 1110
Project Name/Description: S7o+urw,4Y?lZ?r1? ?4 8 f ?? ?+x ust;
Date: _ d u?.l J 4 ,3
The Department of the Army
US. Army Corps of Eagirmrs, Wilmington District ???
P.O. -Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 2$902
Attu &ZIM.
Field Office: ?.
Re. Wetlands Related Cansulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concem:
1, the current ro owner, hereby desigmte and authorize Sail & Environmental Consultants, PA to
art in my behalf as my agtnt hi the processing of permit applications, to fumkh upon request
supplemental imfoarmation in support of appUcatiions, etc, from this day forward. The day of
This notification sypQ-!modes any previous correspondence concerning the agent far this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liAbility and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
gover: meat officials to enter the property wbc n aeoompmded by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site otectlug prior to visiting the shp-
WA'fr R r*4>n.b dl?r<i?aol? rN'T N? 1 ?-G
C'Ro.14:aT M?t?R??r.•
SY.1-909P&T A. 94KMW?L4q11' 11E Md.
Print Property Owner's Name T Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. John Domey cc-- Mr- Walbt*_r Cole
NCDENR .- DWQ Soil & EOvirmummW Consultants, PA
2321 Crabhve %ulevard
Raleigh, NC 77604 ]*%*0gasttp0thturmdM
cb-dsrtte. se: _c. es>:> S?rc: Hcskocv otn c
2.16 Liff4jillip Court, Suitc C 3R17-F, Lnwndak Iki-ic 710 Boston Road
Comord. NC 28025 G.cr,.sboro. NC 2745$ Taylor V511c, HC 2mg1
Mac: [phone] PKw. (3367 540-8234 - rhonc [phone]
Nix: (70a) 720-406 rfix: (336) 54MR235 r-ix: [phone]
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Todd Preuninger
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
NCDENR
August 6, 2003
Subject: Project: Green Level Road (Town of Cary)
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by
the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by yowin a letter dated July 31, 2003 the stream restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
--^imt .,f m;t;Qar;n„ that the. NC'WRP will accent for this broiect is also indicated in this table.
Stream
(linear feet) Wetlands Riparian
(acres) Riparian Buffer
(ft2)
Impacts 485
Mitigation Maximum 970
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4,
1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Amanda Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
File
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
03/2_1/2004_ 04:17 919-781-4213 H@M DIVERSIFIED PAGE 02
?-? 10042
0 itawa Rad ' Rsip?
WW SONMOM
AGENT AUTHOMAMN FORM
AIT Bia+ks Tot Filled In'By The nt iandoma
[)i1 & 19tivironmental Consultants, PA
Norte -17614 • Pboad [phone] ' F*x; (914) $464467
AAMW. (4 t a Sa?IS
A- project Na ml Desorption:
vat: a I o
'yhe De mtri nt of the Army
U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers, Wgolingtoxt Dist *t
P.O. box 1890
W*ningtov, NC 28402
Attu'
ftla 01Ef?
lam: Wedmds ttedated Consulting wtd Fig
To Whom it may Concem,
L the current owmer; hereby designate and authorize Soil & Envimnatental Consultants. PA to
act in my beW as 1nq agent in t$e processing of permit applk-460116- M :furnish upon request
etc. from tabor day forward. Thar day of
supplemental inh?ranativn in support of 1Applications,
'T`his notification suWft des any previous correspondence emaer:*% the agent for this Project.
A&or,zadon, for liaboy artd pxofemdoaal coauteq reasons, is valid only for
N 0T?C& TWs a,
31tEC stiff. You should call SdcEC
govanm ig o ficids to enter the properly when accompanied by
to aura age >x sits meeting prior to visiting the site. r?'l C- ;,v ` L c - CY
Afc- ?K b •- t- L c- ?me*v% a yv\
G !?N tv ?u+r t Gtr- - M #LN A J tJZ - -
??y
Pruitt Property Owner's Nautie
cc: Mr. Jotm Dortwy
! NCDENR - DWQ
Propexty Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Todd Preurningm
Soil & gnvironmentaa Consultants, PA
23r4C 21 Crabtree B*UlevArd
s?rsaa?rn.SZ?a?a:
Cam aiq La-
t eptulttp? Cooa4, spite C 3817-8 LKWWAO Odvo Tx4larsv C. NC 0631
i Crceaasbom, NC 17455 (123) 63a-S11I0
Collotxd. NC 28M p}„=; (336) 5404234
p1 [phone] Pax: (336) 544.83-33 ! ": (an) 69S-Sno
[phone]
?Pb Naas: M C ULJZ. e_„o%
.Address:. 7p '? K -500 el ?.C, a S? Q
04412 1" = 200Figure 1- Location Ma
Project Date: P Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mgr.: JAB 7123101 01(elley Chapel Road Site 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.. Raleigh, NC 27614
McFube LLC [phone] - [phone]
Cary, Wake Co., NC Web Page: www.SandEC.Com
GREEN LEVEL, N. C.
SW/4 DURHAM SOUTH 15, QUADRANGLE
N3545-W7852.5/7.5
1973
PHOTOREVISED 1981
DMA 52551V SW-SERIES V842
Projed #: Scale:
01-6412 1" =1320' ure 2 - Wake Co
Fi

Projed
Mgr.: JAB
Date:
7123101 .
g
Soil Survey Map
OFtelley Chapel Road Site
McFube LLC

Cary, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
14 WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 35
v: ?rrr, ec is \:'?Pis r-rojecis\u.)4ii .-,.ant-whirr introsir icuirr\we(iana irnhncis?vvertancnrnptrc 5i:?marcnu4.aw<?, 4/n/ iuu4 t:.)i:ui r

0

H N
O ? y
w
o. ?
Stonewater Wetland
Impacts
Green Level to Durham Road.
Cary, NC.
Waterford Stonewater NC, LLC

iL!2? CHAS, H. SELLS, INC.
. , . .,
15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www,choshsells.com
v: \rrojects\?eus r-rojecis\U,?4I,: stone ziier inn-astructure\roaaway imp ro\errents\rlnal\culvert_Impacts,?:.awa, o/I0/LUU4 IU:UI:U4 /;

SX/ 1i WETLAND
f
N
N
33t00

N
I
I O N
N

) I
I j
I 1 ' ? 34 00 I A

35 00
Ir
3

I Z `? O
36:00
/
r-
r I r
3 D
z , o ?-
(D
M I 3
37 00 Q ?
? C) CD
3
O I /
I 38 00
\
O

1
V \
\
I
O /

0
r
D
W
00 -
z -P O
M (D
r N
TI _. 3
?-+
CD M -p
- o
IS M r+
_0 m
r
CD o
a 3 Q Q
3
?? x Z7
0 _
s? m
?- $ a D
O
D
D
© CHAS.H.SELLS,INC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSESION, REPRODUCTION OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION FROM CHAS H. SELLS, INC. IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

P
0

?
o

Stonewater
Thoroughfares
Green Level-Durham Road
Cary, NC.
ro
OPM
y
7yWz
zoo
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
Consulting Engineers, Surveyors _& Photogram.nietrists
15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.chashsells.com
s
g?
0
s
s
Cf
C
E
?r
m o
cn w ?I
S .
?pxW
000 ??N ?
K V
c ex••• •:?.w:anm?nw?nve,?+irrarwiatr"moenaraon?ea?arnreeaw?rwncnrweanau?wnrawK?wa?ev?.rrwris?
a
11mu
_ A
0
1tz
Rid IBC
I V; Z2
Z
g
r

M
1
L- ?R
"gCC

tz
P
Starve Iater PUD
Road ffmprovements
and Waterfine
Por waufad Soarw8w, u+c
not woaae9chbDAw 9" 104
Rdit%NC27612
J
to ? s* a r w rv s*8
r ^x
Ntq r $ r
m s , .
I?
o
z pig g 9.
D &
f s' $ g
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
15300 Weston Porkwog
Suitt 106
Cory, NC 27513
Tel:. [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www.choshselis.com
V:\Projects\Sells Projects\C34'2 Stonewater Infrastructure\Roadwa Impro,,ements\Final\CUL\ER--1.dwg, Layout', 4/6/2004 11:16:36 AM
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP 401 ISSUMU
APR 0 7 2004 Revised April 7, 2004
US Army Corps of Engineers Attn: Mr. John Dorney
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade WATER QUALITY SECTION 2321 Crabtree Blvd
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120 Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide14, 401 Water Quality Certification, and Isolated Wetland Permit
Green Level-Durham Road Thoroughfare
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 03-6412.W0, DWQ# 03-09811-
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of Waterford Stonewater (property owner) and McFube, LLC (property
owner), we hereby request authorization from the USA.CE to use Nationwide Permit 14
for proposed impacts to stream channels and wetlands associated with the construction of
the proposed Green Level-Durham Road. We are also requesting written concurrence
from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality that the project complies with the 401
Water Quality Certification/Conditions associated with Nationwide Permit 14. A Pre-
construction Notification Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent
authorization form.
S&EC evaluated the area in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing for the presence of
wetlands in July 2001 and received a jurisdictional determination in June 2002 (AID:
200221059). Additionally, site meetings were conducted with Mr. Dave Penrose of the
NC-DWQ, and Ms. Andrea Wade of the USACE, in order to determine the
perennial/important/significant start points. The attached map indicates the outcome of
these meetings.
The proposed Green Level Durham Road is a road shown on the Town of Cary
Thoroughfare Plan and is therefore believed by S&EC to constitute a separate and
complete project, independent of surrounding properties (see attached thoroughfare plan).
However, because the proposed thoroughfare is adjacent to the proposed Stonewater
project, the Town of Cary is requiring Stonewater LLC, (applicant and developer of
Stonewater) to build the road. The proposed project is located approximately at the
intersection of O'Kelly Chapel Road (SR 1628), Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and Green
Level-Durham Road (SR 1625). The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
April 5, 2004
S&EC Project #: 03-6412
Page 2 of 2
Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS
topographic quadrangle.
The applicant proposes approximately 823 linear feet of permanent impacts (1881f of
perennial channel + 6351f of intermittent channel). Isolated Wetland impacts consist of
approximately 0.006 acres of impacts. In the past, the USACE has generally considered
impacts due to thoroughfare projects separately (i.e. having independent utility) from the
adjacent development. All stormwater discharge points are located outside of the Town
of Cary buffers and although not required by the NC-DWQ (i.e. Cape Fear) level
spreaders will be installed in order to attain diffuse flow before the water enters the
buffers. The stormwater plan and calculations were included with the attachments in our
initial submittal.
After meeting with the USACE/DWQ and the Town of Cary, the applicant has re-aligned
the proposed road in order to minimize impacts. The revised alignment has been shifted
to the east and reduced perennial channel impacts by approximately 300 linear feet as
well as avoiding headwater wetlands. A copy of the revised alignment has been included
for your review.
Currently the USACE can require mitigation for wetland impacts that exceed 0.1 acres
and/or for any impacts to perennial stream channels. Approximately 188 linear feet of
perennial channel will be impacted by the proposed project. If mitigation is required we
are requesting payment into the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) for stream impacts
to perennial channels. A copy of our request is included with the attachments and EEP
acceptance has been granted.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires written concurrence for stream impacts of greater or
equal to 150 linear feet of stream length per project in non-buffered basins. Mitigation is
typically required for impacts to greater than 150 linear feet of channel per project. The
applicant proposes payment to the WRP for all impacts to perennial streams within the
project boundaries if required by the NC-DWQ. Because wetland impacts are below the
threshold required for mitigation (<1.0 acres) we do not believe the NC-DWQ will
require mitigation for impacts to wetlands.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Biologist/Project Manager
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant InformationWJ%.tr rJ 5.r4owewak%.e
Name: LLC (Attn: Bob Haverkamp)
Mailing Address: 3301 Woman's Club Drive Suite 104
Raleigh NC 27612
McFube LLC - Attn: Mr. Glenn Futrell
PO BOX 3006
Cary North Carolina 27519 -3006
Telephone Number: 919-785-1110 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the. Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Page 1 of 8
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Preunin er SandEC com
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Green Level-Durham Road Thoroughfare
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA - Linear
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The proposed project is located at
the intersection of O'Kelly Chanel Road (SR 1628), Alston Avenue (SR 1630) and Green
Level-Durham Road (SR 1625)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Kit Creek
8. River Basin: Cave Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The adjacent property is relatively undeveloped and contains
wooded lots with some residential homes.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of re-aligning, Green Level Durham Road in order to improve
an unsafe intersection and provide a major thoroughfare as part of the Town of Cary Growth
Plan. Heavy equipment associated with road construction will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Construction to extend roads as part of approved
master plan for development in this area by the Town of CM.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Jurisdictional Determination AID#200221059)
Site Meeting w/Mr. Dave Penrose - perennial determination
Site Meeting with Ms. Andrea Wade - significance determination
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated for thoroughfare.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes approximately
823 linear feet of permanent impacts (188 if of perennial channel + 635 if of intermittent
Page 3 of 8
channel) Isolated Wetland impacts consist of approximately 0.006 acres of permanent
impacts In the past, the USACE has generally considered impacts due to thoroughfare
projects separately (i.e. having independent utility) from the adjacent development.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
8 Fill 0.006 NA 600 ISOLATED
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mecnantzed clearing, grading, 1111,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htip://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 5.77 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.006 ac.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
1 Culvert 255 UT to Kit Creek 3' Intermittent
2 Culvert 230 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Intermittent
3 Culvert 150 UT to Kit Creek 3-5' Perennial
6 Culvert 94 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
7 Culvert 94 UT to Kit Creek 10-15 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mWquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 694 linear feet of
permanent impacts 481 if of perennial channel + 213 if of intermittent channel).
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
Page 4 of 8
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed Green Level-Durham Road is a road shown on the Town of Cary Thorou hg fare
Plan and is therefore believed by S&EC to constitute a separate and complete project,
independent of surrounding properties Based on conversations with the Corps/DWQ and the
Town of Cary, the alignment has been shifted to minimize impacts to the perennial channel.
Presently the intersection is considered unsafe due to the curvature of the road. The revised
alignment calls for a signalized intersection at ninet ??degre es. The proposed alignment has
reduced perennial stream impacts by almost 300 linear feet.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
Page 5 of 8
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
If required the applicant proposes payment to the EEP A copy of their acceptance has been
included with the application.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wm/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 481 linear feet has been approved
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 8
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No Z If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone*
I Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 NA 3 NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular trom near bank or channel; Gone /- extenas an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required; please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
NA - The road is considered an independent project However, a stormwater management plan
was included for review in our initial application
Page 7 of 8
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA - application is for the construction of a roadway.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
X1V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
yli
Applicant/Agent's Signature / [Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
Jun 19 o3 c9:36a Bob Haverkamp
919 785-1127 p.2
Environmental
Consultants, PA
IWnW (q'%346.5900 - Face: (919) x46-9467
WW .San&e-C=
AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To BeEal?ed In AXJ a Current Undowner
Phone: 9l4 7.75 )Ire
Project Name/Description: $ Td u w,4YelL ?u? ? 4 8 ?'c /ru x ?y usC ?u,.+w?t Wu 7?'
Date: _ d vile- 117. 2MS
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engines, Wilmington District
P.O. -Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: r.,f6(..?a - -
Field Office: Ra &AI "Wr I ..,,? .....
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current p owror, hpro!b designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental Womation in support of applications, etc, from this day forward. The day of
TM$ notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project,
NOTICE: This authozlzation, for Ba bility and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to center the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meting pritar to visiting the alte.
WA-rrtz r'I4>&U 014tfekol•^ri~?T Ne-j "C
?'RoJ?c.T tui•tnz?arfc-
gv ; rzo9 or-7 A. 64ya*x444w PC 6g?Ca
Print Property Owner's Name T Property Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. John Domey cc_ Mr- Walter Cole
NCDENR .- DWQ Sail & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 71604 bIX*ASt tAUthftzMdac
01-dali,.olft] qC'mos6aooffccr Hkkm Dffi=
2.16 t rlrldllip Court, Saitc C 3R 17.8 Lawntlak [hive 710 BostoA Ro-ld
concord. NC 28025 GreansAoro, NC 274S$ TaylorsvrHe, NC 28651
Phoov [phone] Phony: (33 +N 540-8234 - Phone [phone]
FAX: [phone] rax:. (336) SO.8275 Tax: [phone]
Name: WNArepForti9 sTnna?wfi'r?? L L C
ev'D v? ?,4 ?' ?R. t=-o R.RY ow v6v' 1. ?Ownf ?? 7' 00, L L a
address: _ 3361 Wowol"'S eLVti t74) T rr log i LK N ,X 7ti612-
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Todd Preuninger
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
jA?
?A
NCDENR
August 6, 2003
Subject: Project: Green Level Road (Town of Cary)
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is
willing to accept payment for stream impacts associated with the subject project. Please note that the decision by
the NCWRP to accept the mitigation requirements of this project does not assure that this payment will be
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality Wetlands/401 Unit. It is
the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCWRP for impacts
associated with this project is appropriate.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued
404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire.
Based on the information supplied by you.in a letter dated July 31, 2003 the stream restoration that is necessary to
satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements for this project is summarized in the following table. The
,,...,f , if;ant;nn that the NC'WRP will accent for this nroiect is also indicated in this table.
111QA1111U111 R111VU- va a ..»-? - --
Stream -- --- - - - -
Wetlands Riparian
Riparian Buffer
(linear feet) (acres) ft2)
Impacts 485
Mitigation Maximum 970
The stream mitigation will be provided as specified in the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404
Permit for impacts associated with the subject project in Cataloging Unit 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4,
1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Amanda Wade, USACOE-Raleigh
Steve Mitchell, DENR Regional Office-Raleigh
File
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone] Fax: [phone]
03/21/2004 _04:17 919-781-4213 H@M DIVERSIFIED PAGE 02
10002
0 Ram W*e Rad • RU S", N wwwomwec.OM
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All BW*s 19 _R Faw 1A By he nt T ande rem
A
Did. & ]Environmental Consultants, s 4?P7
Gtualo. r?
?i. Mauls! 1Nl G ?'"1:, t_.,t? . eras ????-1?
aa.Add><'eate: ? "gyp ZA ?C .304 G Garb., ? N.L a'?-S? Q - -
JLPrvjKt Name/ D 'M:
,Z ua*: °
The Departaumt of the Army
(D-S. Army Corps of Fa,gineers, W'Mington Oistr t
P.O. box 1890
Wiaatingtw, NC 2UM
Attu
P*1d Olfi!:
RQ: Waetlo nds !feared Consulting and Pandth+g
To Whom It May Concern:
!, ft cone nt 2t2RUIX owner, hereby designate and. authorize Soil & jnv"nmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of pewdt applications, to huabh upon secluest
day of
supplemental in omation in Support of applications, etc. hem this day forward. 't`he
`Phis notification sup@rsedes any previous correspondence conMY&% the' agent for this prarject
NOTICL Thin &UHM)r,"don, for liaMlity and pmfemional cogitesy reasons, is valid only for
goverametlt officials to enter the property rhea accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&6C
to arrange a site meeting ptio><to visiting the adh. /tit PwLti L C-
G I ?/V N T' ?f P e. GL - /?/t 61.N R If t1Z ?„ I.? ?' ?f '?f?1?L'? `?'??`?Y
1K -!5 y property Ownefs SrignaMM
PftA property Owner's Mum
cc: Mr. Todd fteuninger
cc Mr. Igim O Y Soil & BnvlronMntal Consultants, PA
t NC'DENR - DWQ
?? 27? vane
6zZcow Mow do
CMd1 Sbitas C 3917-?- la Ddva TWAOUVMC. NC: 22"1
Cxtconlboro, NC 27433 C Mc 2=5 Phone: [phone] Phase (128)) 635-5920
CWAQ(
3: (R23 054920
??ene: (7p4) 7z0-9? fax; (336) S4042-
F"., (M) 7t0-
Mgr.: J
#: Scale:
1" = 2000'
Figure 1- Location Map
Date.
7I23I01 OKelley Chapel Road Site
b
LLC
M
F
c
u
e
Cary, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
N3545-W7852.5/7-5
GREEN LEVEL, N. C.
SW/4 DURHAM SOUTH 15' QUADRANGLE
1973
PHOTOREVISED 1981
DMA 525$ IV SW-SERIES V842
Scale:
1- =1320'
Mgr.: JAB 7123101
Figure 2 - Wake Co.
Soil Survey Map
Ol(elley Chapel Road Site
McFube LLC
Cary, Wake Co., NC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
{919) 846-5900 - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 35
v:\r'r('?BC I F IR I-r cjec IA V1.141 1. orlftw(11 F( III I r(IS I r 11(: l tit (-\wellQn(i imf)(1cIS \vve IIQrmirriO(1c IR/.)M(1f cfIV4.(jw(j, 4/n/ /u1 A4 I:.)/: ll/ r
IF
]' z
n
0
ov

nt
3 n N
Q
t ?
S v
t?
CHAS.H.SELLSJNC. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED. ANY POSSEWON. REPRoDuenoN OR OTHER USE OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION FROM CHAS H. SELLS, INC.. IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED.

a

rn

v

C
y O ? ?d
5
o
r. ti N
? s
0 yyy
My w g
V y a
Stonewater Wetland
Impacts
Green Level to Durham Road.
Cary, NC.
Waterford Stonewater NC, LLC
I
n a
o
CJ1 rt

3
0
HE
d
Z?H
CHAS. H. S:E
PL
.PL -
LLS, INC.
M?Rlflffiilm --
'15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cory, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.chashsells.com
v: \rrojects\?)eus rrojects\UJ41L JLOne`woter InTI-aSUUCture\rocia Way imp rc.\emenis \r inch\cui vert_ImpacisG. aWa, J/ la/LUU4 1U:U1:U4 H

i
i
I
aq x
¦ 0
g rn+
I r $ 0
3 3 00 I
N
N
O m
I Z

I 3 4 00
I

I

F*
D '9+

rn

35 00 I M
V ! r
? r I
3
r ? rn /?
v I Z o
36 00 /
1 3
r
D 0 ?-
1
rn I 3

1
37
00
O cn
I n CD
3
O I /
38 00
\ /
0
3 0)

\
3 \
? D

?... _l

O
O
N
O ----

W
rn
N
U -
l rn
rn
Z
M r
71 3
rn
_
f C
rn
c
)
` Q
C
T
'Y

D

O
D

W
r
'111? 1-11"
lo?

W
00 -? -

N CD

- 1

M

Q
? ?
(D
3

0?
n 1.0

°a
.e W

Stonewater
Thoroughfares
Green Level-Durham Road
Cary, NC.
yap
2 t ?
zz?o
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.chashsells.com
i
g?
8
N
8
f
s?
? 3• o
s• i
11,0Y,
ROM
oO° ??N
PPP v
c a mAtim
?r

'A
gs 3C 3
R
R
20
z
3m
.• z
•?s a
II II
D TI e;
3 c
n
' w
3
D z
C'1
NYa
g
rm 1
g v
C? p
s

?r

z p

Stamewatem PUD
Road Emprovemeffits
and WaterUne
Ibr w.eataa leorrw.or,1S,C
9301 wonw?Cla6AM,8aNe lOt
Ra1N{h,NC27612
4r ? 9' M4 r! VN *?
mMHO a .'?-
W R
71
z : g
m ,.
7
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
IN I 111111M
15300 Weston Poikwoy
Suite 106
Cary, NC 27513
Tel:. [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www.choshsells.com
\':\Projects\Sells Projects\C34'2 Stonewater Infrastructure\Roadwa lm provements\Final\C 1.-JL\'EP--1.dwg, Layout2, 4/0/2004 11:16:36 AM

•?OI
?. VV n / 4:?qn InLwWci I-. a abicy, vV--vi
W William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
o Gy North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r- Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
C9 't
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 9, 2004
Wake County
DWQ Project #: 03-0981
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject Property: Waterford-Stonewater Development
Durham-Green Level Road Thoroughfare project
Wake County
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact up to 667 linear feet
of streams for the purpose of constructing the Waterford-Stonewater development. as you described in
your application dated August 6, 2003 and revised on March 5, 2004, (received March 8. ,g004). After
reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General,,,,Water Quality
Certification Number 3404, . which may, be viewed on our:-!website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands. This certification allows you to use Nationwide ermit Number.
14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any other federali state ar iocal
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion,
Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or. CAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application
except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to
send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If. total
wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre or impacts to perennial streams that
exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h) (6) and (7). This approval shall expire when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as
otherwise provided in the General Certification. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the
attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1p Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
b , Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: l Fax #:
Company: Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
X?4?6?-? 3?U?6 7
-1f?-

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Raleigh, NC 276042260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),,(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: °y?
Company:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #: 17,16 6-/) D'7?
Date:

4

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),,(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAR-9-2004 TUE 10:54
NAME DWQ--WETLANDS
TEL [phone]

PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 3/3
START TIME : MAR-09 10:53
ELAPSED TIME : 0013511
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
F A% Y
p
+
O? P? R..a h
a7laem o
.SmMy
N61diGmlm.3hpU10C9tofBrv'v.pIDml m4,y91W.1au99py1
SQ AIm W. Kffi k, Pa, Dilceta
~
?U < cd mN.Sw',. VT?1„ryD ?"

Diuiti..awacQeaab
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Addre ; 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Spite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Centex
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone & 919-733-1786
Fax [phone]
F. To:
?i^p l1 ?M S R. #:
?
/
I
Company: Date: D

Number of pages including cover sheet
Notes or special instructions:

N.C. DNldm of Q.Wy Ab) Wmadl Q tdeebm Ud,
1450MAHS d Cro ,R 04NCV699.16590491bb A64iew)
2124 CMbb.e Bbd1 RWA6?NC 2760F]= X..O )
N10)722-1M(pb..p, 919-9336893 fh4..fMgD>/?.?+I.I..sa+ .?

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
IF, Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
t Coleen H Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Q Fax #:
Fax To:
L I,-
Company: S K? Date:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
f,
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),_(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands

CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
I 1 1 / i ? / 11
CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
March 5, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
DWQ 03-0981, Wake County
Dear Mr. Dorney:

Q
S
-

co

c
7 o
-e
?
Z
PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT, P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P
SENIOR ASSOCIATES
PHILIPPE BOUSADER, P.E.
SCOTT W. DUNCAN, C.P.
NAOMI ISAACS
DAVID A. WEBBER, P.L.S.
ASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
Attached please find one copy of the revised alignment for Green Level -Durham Road.
The drawing is at 1 "=100' scale and shows the proposed alignment east of the stream
which was designated as Alternative C in your most recent letter.
The drawing shows the proposed improvements that will be constructed now. These
improvements include two multiuse trails and four lanes of pavement south of
Stonewater Glen Lane, and a single multiuse use trail and two lanes of pavement north
of this roadway. We are also showing the slope limits for this work.
The alignment shift rquires 982 lineal feet of roadway to be built on off-site private
property. Waterford Stonewater is presently in negotiations with this property owner to
acquire the right-of-way. Overall we are showing impacts to three sections of
intermittent streams and. two sections of perennial stream (at one location) along Green
Level to Durham Road, and impacts to the intermittent stream at Stonewater Glen Lane.
We would like to know if this alignment would be permitted by your office, given the
caveats that the owner can successfully negotiate the right-of-way and the NCDOT
would approve the alignment. If so, we don't see a need to meet on March 9, 2004, and
would respectfully request this meeting be cancelled.
Please call me to discuss any questions you may have on the above matter.
15300 Weston Parkway • Suite 106 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.chashsells.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER, M/F
AN
March 5, 2004
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,

Chas. H. Sells, Inc. A+=
d.?: D ?:kY
PA?

Donald A. Sever
P.E. r~ ?

N .xa

s
,
Project Manager

Enclosure: -? c
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater (w/attachment)
Todd Preuninger, S&EC (w/attachment)
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
Andrea Wade, USACOE (w/attachment)
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary (w/attachment)
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_03_05_04.doc\
imap://john.dorney %40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @ cros.ncmail.net:143/fe...
Subject: Re: [Fwd: John Dorney's Letter of February 18 and next meeting.]
From: Alan Klimek <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:12:33 -0500 1 ??\
To: John Dornw <roi?n?rntmxi ------- l i
wade <[e-mail]>
It would be nice to finally get something off the plate. Please feel free to talk to Kevin before and/or
after the meeting to see if that helps get this moving in the proper direction.
Alan
wrote:
another thought (stream of conciousness day). mr. haverkamp may be looking for some "flexibility"
if he moves the road to the east. if he moves the road, then there would be no stream mitigation
(andrea - please correct me if this is wrong). we (DWQ) have told him that the shopping center will
need to have stormwater management other than sand filters which cary approved. however we
(DWQ again) could not insist on this provision in this case (assuming he moves the road). this
flexibility could save him considerable time and expense (sand filters would not take the space that a
constructed wetland would take up). alan - you and i talked briefly about this a while ago. do you
want me to discuss this with kevin (maybe after the meeting is set up) to see if we can finish this one?
your thoughts please. thankx
Alan Klimek wrote:
As you can see below, Mr. Havekamp would like to set up a meeting to see if we can resolve
things. I talked to him today. He will be out of town next week. He claims he is in negotiation w/
the owners of the land on the east side and while they are cool to the idea (they find it hard to
believe he needs to move the road), he's trying to see what can be done. I couldn't get a feel for
what the outcome may be. He's suggested a meeting for Tuesday at 8:30 in the Archdale Bldg on
March 9. I could make that and have a few openings at other times that week even though it is an
EMC meeting. What are your possibilities for the weeks of March 8 and March 15?
Alan
------- Original Message --------
Subject:John Dorney's Letter of February 18 and next meeting.
Date:Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:16:58 -0500
From:"BHWDNC" <[e-mail]>
To:"Alan Klimek" <[e-mail]>
CC:"Scott Johnson" <[e-mail]>, "Ross Massey" <[e-mail]>,
"Todd Preuninger" <[e-mail]>, "Rick Stark \(work\) \(E-mail\)"
<[e-mail]>, "Tim Bailey" <[e-mail]
"Bill Coleman" <[e-mail]>
Alan,
I received John's letter regarding: Waterford - Stonewater Development, Remaining questions
regarding DWG's review, Wake County DWQ # 03-0981 by US -Mail on February 26th and a faxed
copy on February 18th. We are presently reviewing the letter and we will respond as quickly as
1 of 2 2/27/04 4:53 PM
imap://john.dorney %40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @ cros.ncmail.net:143/fe..
possible. I would propose that we set a meeting date to bring this issue to its final resolve.
I would like to suggest a meeting date of Tuesday March 9th at 8:30 AM in your office, if possible.
Thank you in advance for your help and cooperation.
Bob H.
2 of 2 2/27/04 4-`
WQC #3404
OR REPAIR CONDUCTED BY NCDOT OR OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES)
AND RIPARIAN AREA PROTECTION RULES (BUFFER RULES)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401,
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500 and 15A NCAC 2B .0200 for
the discharge of fill material to waters and adjacent wetland areas or to wetland areas that are not
a part of the surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the United States
(i.e., isolated wetlands) as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (14) of the Corps of
Engineers regulations (Nationwide Permit No. 14 and Regional General Permit 198200031) and
for the Riparian Area Protection Rules (Buffer Rules) in 15A NCAC 2B .0200. The category of
activities shall include any fill activity for road crossings and is limited to fill less than one-third
acre in tidal waters and less than one-half acre in non-tidal waters. This Certification replaces
Water Quality Certification Number 2177 issued on November 5, 1987, Water Quality Certification
Number 2666 issued on January 21, 1992, Water Quality Certification Number 2732 issued on
May 1, 1992, Water Quality Certification Number 3103 issued on February 11, 1997, Water
Quality Certification Number 3289 issued on June 1, 2000 and Water Quality Certification
Number 3375 issued March 18, 2002. This WQC is rescinded when the Corps of Engineers re-
authorizes Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Permit 198200031 or when deemed
appropriate by the Director of DWQ.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Enumerating and Reporting of Impacts:
Streams - Impacts to streams as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as length of the centerline of the normal flow channel. Permanent and/or
temporary stream impacts shall be enumerated on the entire project for all impacts
regardless of which 404 Nationwide Permits are used. Stream relocations and stream
bed and/or bank hardening are considered to be permanent stream impacts. Any
activity that results in a loss of use of stream functions including but not limited to
filling, relocating, flooding, dredging and complete shading shall be considered
stream impacts. Enumeration of impacts to streams shall include streams enclosed
by bottomless culverts, bottomless arches or other spanning structures when a 404
Permit is used anywhere in a project unless the entire structure (including
construction impacts) spans the entire bed and both banks of the stream, is only
used for a road, driveway or path crossing, and is not mitered to follow the stream
pattern. Impacts for dam footprints and flooding will count toward the threshold for
stream impacts, but flooding upstream of the dam will not (as long as no filling,
excavation, relocation or other modification of the existing stream dimension, pattern
or profile occurs) count towards mitigation requirements.
Wetlands - Impacts to wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall
be measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary wetland impacts shall be
enumerated on the entire project for all impacts regardless of which 404 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of wetland functions
including but not limited to filling, draining, and flooding shall be considered wetland
impacts. Enumeration of impacts to wetlands shall include activities that change the
hydrology of a wetland when a 404 Permit is used anywhere in a project.
WQC #3404
• Lakes and Ponds - Lake and Pond Impacts Enumeration- Impacts to waters other
than streams and wetlands as determined by the Division of Water Quality shall be
measured as area. Permanent and/or temporary water impacts shall be enumerated
on the entire project for all impacts proposed regardless of which 4Q4 Nationwide
Permits are used. Any activity that results in a loss of use of aquatic functions
including but not limited to filling and dredging shall be considered waters impacts;
2. Proposed fill or substantial modification of wetlands or waters (including streams) under
this General Certification requires application to and prior written concurrence from the
Division of Water Quality;
3. Application to and payment of a fee to DWQ is not required for construction of a driveway
to a single family lot as long as the driveway impacts less than 25 feet of stream channel
including any in-stream stabilization needed for the crossing;
4. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins (or
any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in effect at
the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification from DWQ in
accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0200. Activities listed as "exempt" from these rules do not
need to apply for written concurrence under this Certification. New development activities
located in the protected 50-foot wide riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not)
within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within
and constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be
located, designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect
water quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
5. Irrespective of other application thresholds in this General Certification, all impacts to
perennial waters and their associated buffers require written approval from DWQ since
such impacts are allowable as provided in 15A NCAC 2B. 0212 (WS-1), 213.0213 (WS-11),
2B .0214 (WS-III) and 2B .0215 (WS-IV). Only water dependent activities, public projects
and structures with diminimus increases in impervious surfaces will be allowed as outlined
in those rules. All other activities require a variance from the delegated local government
and/or the NC Environmental Management Commission before the 401 Water Quality
Certification can be processed. In addition, a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer for low
density development or a 100 foot wide vegetative buffer for high density development
must be maintained adjacent to all perennial waters except for allowances as provided
under the Water Supply Watershed Protection Rules. For the purposes of this condition,
perennial waters are defined as those shown as perennial waters on the most recent
USGS 1:24,000 topographic map or as otherwise determined by local government
studies;
6. Additional site-specific stormwater management requirements may be added to this
Certification at DWQ's discretion on a case by case basis for projects that have or are
anticipated to have impervious cover of greater than 30 percent. Site-specific stormwater
management shall be designed to remove 85% TSS according to the latest version of
DWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices manual at a minimum.
Additionally, in watersheds within one mile and draining to 303(d) listed waters, as well as
watersheds that are classified as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW), water supply waters
(WS), trout waters (Tr), high quality waters (HQW), and outstanding resource waters
(ORW), the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed according to latest version of the NC
DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the
stormwater management plan when a site-specific stormwater management plan is
required.
WQC #3404
Alternative designs may be requested by the applicant and will be reviewed on a case-by-
case basis by the Division of Water Quality.
Approval of stormwater management plans by the Division of Water Quality's other
existing state stormwater programs including appropriate local programs are sufficient to
satisfy this Condition as long as the stormwater management plans meet or exceed the
design requirements specified in this condition. This condition applies unless more
stringent requirements are in effect from other state water quality programs.
• Unless specified otherwise in the approval letter, the final, written stormwater
management plan shall be approved in writing by the Division of Water Quality's
Wetlands Unit before the impacts specified in this Certification occur.
• The facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire project, unless
otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality.
• Also, before any permanent building or other structure is occupied at the subject site,
the facilities (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be constructed and operational,
and the stormwater management plan (as approved by the Wetlands Unit) shall be
implemented.
• The structural stormwater practices as approved by the Wetlands Unit as well as
drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity.
• No changes to the structural stormwater practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
7. Compensatory stream mitigation shall be required at a 1:1 ratio for not only perennial but
also intermittent stream impacts that require application to DWQ in watersheds classified
as ORW, HQW, Tr, WS-I and WS-II unless the project is a linear, publicly-funded
transportation project, which has a 150-foot per-stream impact allowance;
8. In accordance with North Carolina General Statute Section 143-215.3D(e), any
application for a 401 Water Quality Certification must include the appropriate fee.
If a project also requires a CAMA Permit, one payment to both agencies shall be
submitted through the Division of Coastal Management and will be the higher of the two
fees;
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) compensatory mitigation may be required for
impacts to 150 linear feet or more of streams and/or one acre or more of wetlands. For
linear public transportation projects, impacts equal to or exceeding 150 feet per stream
may require mitigation. In addition, buffer mitigation may be required for any project with
Buffer Rules in effect at the time of application for buffer impacts resulting from activities
classified as "allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer
Rules or require a variance under the Buffer Rules. A determination of buffer, wetland
and stream mitigation requirements shall be made for any Certification for this Nationwide
Permit. The most current design and monitoring protocols from DWQ shall be followed
and written plans submitted for DWQ approval as required in those protocols. When
compensatory mitigation is required for a project, the mitigation plans must be approved
by DWQ in writing before the impacts approved by the Certification occur, unless
otherwise specified in the approval letter. The mitigation plan must be implemented and/or
constructed before any permanent building or structure on site is occupied. In the case
of public road projects, the mitigation plan must be implemented before the road is
opened to the travelling public. Projects may also be implemented once payment is made
to a private mitigation bank or other in-lieu fee program, as specified in the written
concurrence of 401 Certification for a project. Please note that if a stream relocation is
conducted as a stream restoration as defined in The Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina, April 2001, the restored length can be used as compensatory
mitigation for the impacts resulting from the relocation;
WQC #3404
10. For any project involving re-alignment of streams, a stream relocation plan must be
included with the 401 application for written DWQ approval. Relocated stream designs
should include the same dimensions, patterns and profiles as the existing channel, to the
maximum extent practical. The new channel should be constructed in the dry and water
shall not be turned into the new channel until the banks are stabilized. Vegetation used for
bank stabilization shall be limited to native woody species, and should include
establishment of a 30 foot wide wooded and an adjacent 20 foot wide vegetated buffer on
both sides of the relocated channel to the maximum extent practical. A transitional phase
incorporating coir fiber and seedling establishment is allowable. Also, rip-rap may be
allowed if it is necessary to maintain the physical integrity of the stream, but the applicant
must provide written justification and any calculations used to determine the extent of rip-
rap coverage requested. If suitable stream mitigation is not practical on-site, then stream
impact will need to be mitigated elsewhere;
11. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be
placed below the elevation of the streambed to allow low flow passage of water and
aquatic life unless it can be shown to DWQ that providing passage would be impractical.
Design and placement of culverts including open bottom or bottomless arch culverts and
other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that may result in aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of
wetlands or stream beds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained if requested to do so in writing by DWQ. Additionally, when roadways,
causeways or other fill projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or
wetlands, openings such as culverts or bridges must be provided to maintain the natural
hydrology of the system as well as prevent constriction of the floodway that may result in
aggradation, degradation or significant changes in hydrology of streams or wetlands;
12. That appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" whichever is
more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources (DLR) in the DENR
Regional or Central" Offices) shall be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management
Practices in order to assure compliance with the appropriate turbidity water quality
standard;
13. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands and waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored within two months after the Division of Land
Resources has released the project;
14. That additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects proposed under this
Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable water quality and effluent
standards;
15. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
freshwaters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
16. if an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
17. If this Certification is used to access building sites, all lots owned by the applicant must be
buildable without additional fill beyond that explicitly allowed under other General
WQC #3404
Certifications. For road construction purposes, this Certification shall only be utilized from
natural high ground to natural high ground;
18. When written concurrence is required, the applicant is required to use the most recent
version of the Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the
401 Certification has been completed;
19. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall expire
three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or on the same day as the
expiration date of the corresponding Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Permit
198200031, whichever is sooner.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific fill project
may result in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or
civil penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a
formal application for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity that
requires written concurrence under this certification, if it is determined that the project is likely to
have a significant adverse effect upon water quality or degrade the waters so that existing uses of
the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.,
Effective date: March 2003
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3404
w A r? Michael F. Easley, Governor
O RQ?. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 18, 2004
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
RE: Waterford - Stonewater Development
Remaining questions regarding DWQ's review
Wake County
DWQ # 03-0981
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
As we discussed in our meeting with the US Army Corps of Engineers (Ms. Jean
Manuele and Ms. Andrea Wade) and Mr. Alan Klimek on February 5, 2004, the Division of Water
Quality heereby requests additional information so we can make a decision with respect to the
401 Water Quality Certification for this project. Until we receive your response, this project will
remain on hold as incomplete. Staff from the US Army Corps of Engineers have reviewed this
letter and concur with the issues that need to be addressed. Please copy them as well as
appropriate DOT, DLR and Town of Cary staff on any response.
1. Stream and wetland occurrence south of O'Kelly Chapel Road - On the afternoon of
February 5, 2004, Mr. Ed Schwartzman and myself visited the property immediately
south of O'Kelly Chapel Road to determine if a stream channel was present. Based on
this site visit, I believe that there is a small isolated wetland (much less than 1/10 acre in
size) in the upper end of the drainageway No stream channel was present and there
was no evidence of surface flow through the upper part of the drainageway. A large
wetland and stream channel are present about 500 feet south of O'Kelly Chapel Road.
My conclusion is that a realigned Green Level Road would not impact any stream
channel on this property and would only impact a very small amount of isolated wetland
which would be deemed permitted under DWQ's Isolated Wetland rules (15A NCAC 2H
.01300). Therefore, there are no environmental constraints to realigning the road
westward as long as it does not impact the wetland present about 500 feet south of
O'Kelly Chapel Road.
II. Road alignment options. Four options to minimize stream impacts from this road are
discussed below (A, B1, B2; and C). All four options, would result in less stream impact
as described in the summary table below. Various design issues for each of these
alternatives are discussed below (see attached map for alternatives).
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 (919) M-7015 Customir
Service
1-877-623-6748
Design Wetland Intermittent Perennial Main Indirect Total
fill stream fill stream perennial stream direct
fill- Kit channel impact' stream
Creek fill impact
crossing
Original 0.084 213 feet 188 feet 440 feet Several 841
design (six acres hundred feet
lane road feet
Four lane road 0.084 213 120 410 Several 743
hundred feet
feet
Realignment of
road
Alternative A - 0.008 Zero 120 180 None 300
just west of feet
waterfal14, tie
into O'Kelly
Road west of
proposed
location
Alternative 131- 0.008 188 120 200 None 508
further west of feet
waterfall, tie into
proposed
alignment at
O'Kelly Chapel
Road
Alternative 132- Zero Zero 120 150 None .270
further west of feet
waterfall, tie into
O'Kelly Road
west of
proposed
location
Alternative C - Zero Zero 120 Zero Zero 120
east of waterfall
1 This is additional impact due to upstream headcutting and downstream instability due to increased stream energy.
2 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. The application states that the impact is 293 feet which is
not correct. Impact to this channel greater than 300 linear feet will require an Individual Permit from the Corps of
Engineers. This amount include the 290 feet of stream length to be culverted, 20 feet of additional riprap for energy
dissipation dissipation (which may be an underestimation depending on DLR's eventual review). 50 feet of upstream
realignment needed to prevent erosion of the road's fill slope and approximately 50 feet of channel hardening needed
into the main stem and two main tributaries to prevent headcutting.
3 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. This amount includes the 290 feet of stream length to be
culverted; 20 feet of additional riprap for energy dissipation (which may be an underestimation depending on DLR's
eventual review), 50 feet of upstream realignment needed to prevent erosion of the road's fill slope and
approximately 50 feet of channel hardening needed into the main stem and two main tributaries to prevent
headcutting.
4 Road is realigned so that the edge of the fill slope is at least 50 feet from the base of the waterfall so that the
crossing is perpendicular and on level terrain which addresses the issue of indirect stream impacts. This realignment
is offset from the proposed connection to O'Kelly Chapel Road in order to provide a safe road design. This design
incorporates a lower road elevation (275 feet rather than 285 feet).
5 This is an estimate based on the sketch plan for the road. It may be possible to reduce impacts below 150 feet
depending on the side slopes and possible retaining walls.
N 8
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Custornz
Service
1-877-623-674E
A. Move road alignment to the west of the stream valley. Impacts of this
alternative to streams would be limited to one crossing of the main creek.
Control points would be -1) The Kit Creek crossing and 2) a location with edge
of the construction corridor 50 feet downstream from the toe of the waterfall as
shown on your engineers plan (see attached map). This alignment would require
that the intersection with O'Kelly Chapel Road be moved about 40 feet to the
west in order to achieve a safe road alignment. The western intersection at the
shopping center may need to be reconfigured since it would likely be too close to
the relocated road to allow full access. This alignment would reduce the
contiguous size of the shopping center by about three acres (see discussion in
item III below) but would allow development of two additional commercial areas
between the relocated road and the stream valley. Therefore, there would appear
to be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this site.
The plans provided by your engineer at our meeting show that stream
impacts for this alternative would be about 280 feet. There are several design
changes at this location which would result in much lower stream impacts and still
result in a safe road. First, from our discussions with DOT staff, it is very unlikely
that a single 84 inch pipe would be approved as proposed by your engineer. If
this single large pipe is replaced with two 62 inch pipes (as proposed at the
waterfall location), then stream impacts could be reduced. In a related matter, the
use of two pipes would result in lowered velocities and therefore the downstream
riprap section which is planned for streambank stability would be more likely to be
approved by DLR. Secondly, if the final elevation of the road is 275 feet rather
than the 285 feet as proposed, then the impact to the channel (including a rip rap
dissipator) would be no more than 180 feet and could probably be less 150 feet if
two 62 inch pipes are used rather than one 84 inch pipe as discussed above.
The final elevation of 275 feet would result in a slope to the road of about 5%
north of the stream and 4.8% south of the stream. Again from our discussions
with DOT staff, we understand that this slope would likely be acceptable from a
safety viewpoint for this road. Our understanding that the primary reason for the
proposed 285 foot elevation at this crossing is to balance cut and fill on the
overall site. While balancing cut and fill is a worthwhile endeavor, it is not
sufficient reason to allow additional stream impact. As you know, if this alignment
impacts less than 150 feet of stream channel, then stream mitigation would not
be required by DWQ for this project.
Finally, this alignment would require a realignment of the part of Durham
Green Level Road immediately south of O'Kelly Chapel Road. However as
stated above in Item I based on my field visit, there are no environmental
constraints in this area as long as the realignment occurs less than 500 feet south
of O'Kelly - Chapel Road.
B.1 Move road alignment further to the west of the stream valley
(intersect O'Kelly Chapel Road at proposed location). Impacts of this
alternative to streams would be limited to one crossing of the main creek and one
crossing of the intermittent stream. Control points would be 1) The tangent
section about 250 feet north of O'Kelly Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek
crossing. This alignment would allow the road to be relocated well below the
location of the waterfall near the uppermost end of the larger wetland on the site.
This alignment would reduce the contiguous size of the shopping center but
would allow development of two additional commercial areas between the
relocated road and the stream valley. In addition, this alignment would reduce
the size of the apartment complex north of the shopping center. Again, there
would be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this sit
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customa
Service
1-877-623-6748
13.2. Move the road alignment further to the west of the stream valley
(intersect O'Kelly Chapel Road west of the proposed location). Impacts of
this alternative to streams would be limited to one crossing of the main stream.
Control points would be 1) a location about 40 feet west of the proposed location
of the road north of O'Kelly Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek Crossing. This
alignment would allow the road to be relocated far enough west to intersect the
main creek at a perpendicular angle just upslope of the wetlands on the property.
This alignment would reduce the contiguous size of the shopping center but
would allow development of two additional commercial areas between the
relocated road and the stream valley. In addition, this alignment would reduce
the size of the apartment complex north of the shopping center. Again there
would be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this site.
This alignment may not require stream mitigation for this project plan. Finally, this
alignment would require a realignment of the part of Durham Green Level Road
immediately south of O'Kelly Chapel Road. However, as stated above based on
my field visit, there are no environmental constraints in this area.
C. Move the road alignment to a location east of the stream valley.
Impacts of this alternative would be limited to an uppermost intermittent portion of
an intermittent tributary. Impacts to perennial channels would be avoided entirely.
Therefore compensatory stream mitigation would not be required by DWQ.. The
control points for this alignment would be 1) the tangent section about 250 feet
north of O'Kelly Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek crossing. This alignment
would allow the road to be relocated and entirely avoid impacts to any perennial
streams. The multi-family parcel to the east of the stream valley would be
reduced in size. The shopping center parcel, could be larger than presently
planned. We understand that this new road alignment would require cooperation
of the adjacent landowner whose land was included in the original Cary-approved
PUD.
III. Impacts of a relocated road on development of the commercial tract (Village
Center): At the meeting on February 5, you expressed a concern that any
reduction in the size of the Village Center would make it not viable commercially.
Clearly a relocated road to the east of the stream valley (Alternative C) would not
have this impact but the relocated road to the west of the stream valley
(Alternative B1 or 132) would impact areas shown on the PUD's site plan for
commercial development. According to your plan, the edge of the Village Center
occupies about a 23 acre parcel. Road relocations to the west would take about
three acres of the Village Center while leaving at least three additional acres of
commercially developable land east of the relocated road. From examination of
the topographic map and site plan, it is clear that a relocated road will require a
change in the conceptual site plan for this parcel. However, the few building
footprints that would be impacted by a relocated road could readily be built on the
east side of the relocated road with access to this road. In addition, examination
of the topographic map shows that the area east of the relocated road (between
the relocated road and the stream buffers) has about the same amount of relief
as other portions of the site. Based on this review and the review of the sketch
plan for the Village Center, we believe that the commercial buildings that would
be impacted by the relocated road could be readily relocated into this area.
Therefore, we believe that the Village Center would still be economically viable
with a relocated road.
In addition, we have examined all of the 401 Certifications issued for
shopping centers across the state for the last five years from our files
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Service

1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Custom
1-877-623-6748
(see attached table). These seventeen files show that the average size of a
shopping center is about 36 acres with a range in size from 7 acres to 55 acres.
Undoubtedly the size of a shopping center is affected by many factors including
environmental constraints, number and size of outparcels, and number of large,
free-standing stores. We believe that these data show that a viable shopping
center can be developed on a 20 acre tract since about 25% of the shopping
centers are 20 acres or less. In addition, a large number of outparcels could be
added to the area between the relocated road and the stream valley in addition to
the main shopping center. This area is included as the Village Center on Cary's
approved PUD - therefore the Town has already approved this area for
commercial use. These outparcels would also contribute significantly to the
economical viability of this project. Therefore we believe that an economically
viable shopping center with surrounding outparcels can be developed with a
relocated road.
IV. Stormwater management: In his response to our December 8, 2003 letter, your
engineer has proposed to rely on the Town of Cary's stormwater management
plan for this project. DWQ staff have reviewed the plan and agree that the plan
meets the condition of our respective General Certification 3404 except for the
Village Center site. The present stormwater management plan is to construct
sand filters for this area while General Certification 3404 for Nationwide Permit 14
states that in NSW watersheds, "...the Division shall require that extended
detention wetlands, bio-retention areas, and ponds followed by filter strips
(designed according to the latest NC DENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management plan..."
since these measures have been shown to be most effective at nutrient removal.
To date, your engineer has not redesigned the proposed stormwater
management plan to reflect the requirements of the General Certification. We
are willing to work with you and your engineer to modify the stormwater plans for
the Village Center in order to address the condition of General Certification 3404.
V. Erosive velocities from the culvert: Our review of your proposed road location
leads DWQ to the conclusion that a substantial amount of channel hardening
would be required due to the erosive velocities from the 60 inch pipes at a 7%
slope. At the meeting on February 5, your engineer stated that the 10 year storm
had a 21 fps velocity which would be addressed by the proposed stilling basin.
DWQ will have to rely on our colleagues in-the NC Division of Land Resources for
this assessment. Please provide engineering calculations to demonstrate that
the proposed pipe with the stilling basin and 20 foot riprap apron will result in non-
erosive velocities in the main channel. Again from our experience in working with
DLR and DOT staff on similar issues, we have serious doubts about whether this
stilling basin and reduced riprap apron can handle the velocities from this large
pipe at this steep slope. For instance, table 12-2 from the Surface Mining Manual
prepared by DLR does not show pipe sizes larger than 72 inches nor slopes
greater than 6%. However even a 72 inch pipe at a 1 % slope, would require a 72
foot length of riprap. We believe that a larger pipe at a much larger slope will
require a much greater amount of riprap and therefore much more stream impact.
In contrast, the relocated roads (Alternatives A, B1, B2 and C) would result in
pipe with much less slope and therefore less stream impact.
VI.
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Service
Reporting of length of stream impacts: As we discussed in our meeting, the
actual length of stream impact for all alternative has been unclear from the
original application to present. For instance, the original application requested
293 linear feet of stream impact on the channel in the center of the property
wh1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Custome5

1-877-623-67,'
our measurements from the plan revealed that 320 feet of stream were proposed to be
impacted. In addition, the original application showed a headwall in the stream channel
itself, but the application did not account for this impact. Similarly, at our recent meeting,
the narrower road at the waterfall was reported to impact 285 feet of stream although our
measurements show that 290 feet of stream would be culverted. From our
measurements, we believe that a length of 410 feet is more realistic. The 410 feet
includes 290 feet of stream length to be culverted, 20 feet of additional riprap for energy
dissipation dissipation (which may be an underestimation depending on DLR's eventual
review), 50 feet of upstream realignment needed to prevent erosion of the road's fill
slope and approximately 50 feet of channel hardening needed into the main stem and
two main tributaries to prevent headcutting. From our review of many DOT projects, the
realignment of about 100 feet of the channel immediately unslope of the fill slope would
be required in order to align this portion of the stream with the new culvert.
As you are aware, this amount of stream impact is well above the Corps of
Engineers threshold for an Individual Permit. Unless you can describe why these
calculations are in error, the DWQ will recommend that the Corps of Engineers retire
your application and publish a Public Notice for an Individual Permit for this project
including the road crossing.
In summary, DWQ staff believe that this analysis provides compelling reasons to relocate
the proposed alignment of Durham - Green Level Road to minimize impacts to the central,
perennial stream on the site. In addition, we believe that this analysis shows that this
realignment would have a minor impact on the viability of the proposed commercial development
(Town Center) on this site, most of which could be offset by the development and sale of out
parcels. Therefore, DWQ staff again suggest that the road be realigned and a revised
application be resubmitted to the Corps of Engineers and Division of Water Quality.As stated
above, this project will remain on hold as incomplete until we receive a response to this letter.
We look forward to working with you and your consultants to resolve these matters. Please
contact me at 919-733-9646 to discuss any of these matters or to schedule another meeting
regarding this project.
S
Cc
Scott Johnson, Waterford Develop t, Inc.
Don Sever; Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Ross Masey, Chas. H. Sells, Inc
Alan Klimek, DWQ
Jean Manuele, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
Andrea Wade, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
John Hennessy, DWQ
Kevin Martin, Soil and Environmental Consultants
Todd Prueninger, Soil and Environmental Consultants
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary
Matt Flint, Town of Cary
Mohammed Mahjoub, NC Department of Transportation - Special Studies Squad Leader
Shannon Macon, NC Department of Transportation
John Holley, DLR Raleigh Regional Office
A"'Mro
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Custom
Service
1-877-623-67
U/OYS?nSItSOyJ'MMM
90Z0-9L9-616 :XD-4
9£00-M-616 aal
£L9LZ ON 'bDO
90t Da!nS
ADM)IDd U0180M 00£91 -
'
r
'
'
`
IZIS
SVHD
S
H
DNI
o'n5x?.?asw?a.,b
-aH
""O'd lIIBWM 01 JOA71 warp
SJOWIR
PUMPOM Jallum-l u®ls
. ,®..,{'1D? ¦?1II'fT?4f1'?IOYI<?fiIIf[,/1?D.7/8Y0007? a?1?0 ? 1?1?„L?O,LM,Z,?.fH.IB?„P?IY„?BfY?

O
F-
W
Q Q

` X
W
d

. J
/ Ld

d
N W
Z
?
tL
V7 O
U)
Gl
r
w

M/d
Z
O
co
U
Z W
to
to
X
w
^t --

-? 7 ci I
w
J :
d
W
= {
lY
0
11
0

x

w I I ?
_
CDC
tY
d cp

J Z CU
LLI
> U
U)
X
W
d-
E ? r Q
J ?
LL. W J
W
oa
d
X =
W U

LL -
:2
cr) 00000
N
r*
, U)
T
tLi ? 10 r

0 0 0 0 0
00 O 1-
1 r N N

R
'C

d a v? 3 ?.
e
. 00 N V)
5
U! ? u
a>r EE

i Cl) coOO
Coo
O O O
= ,.?ooo
G 0 co ?

V+ ' o
c
rr d I I
i i

L I
I
0 .
:
R d)
a°ca
aQmmc? ?I

d'

(fl =
y:, r O
LLB
lO
!A
N
U 0 [2 U y N !? N V v? N y
Z
R U
N
U fSf
N 0)
i 0)
i N
i •
O N
i O
w O
i N
i L
Q N CO CU Q

• 0 Q ? Q a a .
O 0. - Q. a :3 C. Q. a p
? y 0 0 0 N O O O M O O O
7 U O r L
d O CU Lo N CO I` N
2 CO N M tf)
U i
W C1
- i
0 i
0 i
0 -
0 .
a i i i i i i i p
V C
O
-
C
C
C
C
U
C
C
C
C
U
C
C
C
Q
0
U C
V O
U N
U (U
U O)
?..?
•Q' 0
U 0)
0 U CD
0 U p
0
.2 ' O
?..? O
U O
U .C
N
_ 2-

. (D c. .9 .9 .9 .9 C co Q Q Q Q N .2- .2-

C
Q'
.
C
-_
-
O
r L
N ++ - fn N co N r U y y w r <n !n N
CL
O 'S'^ y
LL T C
U co
T N T T T (n T N r T (n T T T (n
.? U X .C X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
O
(n y O .. p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
T T T T T r r N T T T T N r T T T
.? T
o C! N It M Lo O Lo CO O
, Lo Lo T
' N M O ?t
' It I` CC)
cl _N It Lo N ?T M -
1 0 M It N M M It N M
N

d
O p
U
p

N
' CO CO N CD r CM 'q CO r LO N Ln N N C0 0
Idles N r N 0 ch M
l N
* N MF
. 00 N+
' d f- CA Oµ
. I?

/vc CO
00
LO
CO
CO
O
N
,
I
0
U
)
0
T
0
V
T
O
v
T
T
CO
0
y
0
T
0
? ? r O r r r r r r T
O O O M M N 0 0 0 m 0 m m m m
O O 0 0 0
2) 70

N =3
s a)
.0 C
ca
i C -0 i
3 O -0 ? Y V 0 0 •Y `10 Y O 0 - x - x
O
V C
D W
U W N
0 •?
0 > 0 03 0 •? Co co co co
0)
C
N
N
O
O CM
C
+•
C Q
Q
CU C
N L
U
? Q
Q Q
Q i
?
? U ?

c0 o

? Y 0 U
U O
a
?
?
0
?

N
cLS co 0) CD C U) U)
U
CO i 0) p '•y Cl)
co
Cl)
?
C-
Q -

Q
13)

NO p

U

0

0

O

O
V E Co cC
0 CS L = cc ? Q 0 E Q
co
N
?
co fn m
Y (n ,
C ?
a -
- O
U y
D
? O
L
?C O
U N O
70 cu = U
U N
O
p O
a Y C 0 U p fn

C1 0)
O M
N >
N C N
Q
p
_
O
t
(o o
0) y
0 as
y N
aC
CU C
0 =

0
0 Co
(n
O
0 tm
7
0
?
c
?
U co
N
cc
Z
cn
cA 0
? a)
2 0
Cn 0
u• >
>
FL _a)
(n
J
,LLLL CD
Z
0
00
r N CO d Lo CO I,- CO M O T N CO ',I- Lo CO I\
r T T T T T T T ^`
0
i5
CV
\ Q
imap://john.domey %40dwq.denr.ncmail. net @ cros.ncmail. net:143/fe...
Subject: [Fwd: John Dorney's Letter of February 18 and next meeting.]
From: Alan Klimek <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:46:22 -0500
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, andrea wade <[e-mail]>
As you can see below, Mr. Havekamp would like to set up a meeting to see if we can resolve things. I
talked to him today. He will be out of town next week. He claims he is in negotiation w/ the owners of
the land on the east side and while they are cool to the idea (they find it hard to believe he needs to move
the road), he's trying to see what can be done. I couldn't get a feel for what the outcome may be. He's
suggested a meeting for Tuesday at 8:30 in the Archdale Bldg on March 9. I could make that and have a
few openings at other times that week even though it is an EMC meeting. What are your possibilities for
the weeks of March 8 and March 15?
Alan
------- Original Message --------
Subject:John Dorney's Letter of February 18 and next meeting.
Date:Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:16:58 -0500
From:"BHWDNC" <[e-mail]>
To:"Alan Klimek" <[e-mail]>
CC:"Scott Johnson" <[e-mail]>, "Ross Massey" <[e-mail]>, "Todd
Preuninger" <[e-mail]>, "Rick Stark \(work\) \(E-mail\)"
<[e-mail]>, "Tim Bailey" <[e-mail]"Bill
Coleman" <[e-mail]>
Alan,
I received John's letter regarding: Waterford - Stonewater Development, Remaining questions regarding
DWG's review, Wake County DWO # 03-0981 by US -Mail on February 26th and a faxed copy on
February 18th. We are presently reviewing the letter and we will respond as quickly as possible. I would
propose that we set a meeting date to bring this issue to its final resolve.
I would like to suggest a meeting date of Tuesday March 9th at 8:30 AM in your office, if possible.
Thank you in advance for your help and cooperation.
Bob H.
2/27/04 11:03 AM

W A T? Michael F. Easley, Governor
O?O RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
`
r7 Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
r+ Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
February 18, 2004
Mr. Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
RE: Waterford - Stonewater Development
Remaining questions regarding DWQ's review
Wake County
DWQ # 03-0981
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
As we discussed in our meeting with the US Army Corps of Engineers (Ms. Jean
Manuele and Ms. Andrea Wade) and Mr. Alan Klimek on February 5, 2004, the Division of Water
Quality heereby requests additional information so we can make a decision with respect to the
401 Water Quality Certification for this project. Until we receive your response, this project will
remain on hold as incomplete. Staff from the US Army Corps of Engineers have reviewed this
letter and concur with the issues that need to be addressed. Please copy them as well as
appropriate DOT, DLR and Town of Cary staff on any response.
1. Stream and wetland occurrence south of O'Kelly Chapel Road - On the afternoon of
February 5, 2004, Mr. Ed Schwartzman and myself visited the property immediately
south of O'Kelly Chapel Road to determine if a stream channel was present. Based on
this site visit, I believe that there is a small isolated wetland (much less than 1/10 acre in
size) in the upper end of the drainageway No stream channel was present and there
was no evidence of surface flow through the upper part of the drainageway. A large
wetland and stream channel are present about 500 feet south of O'Kelly Chapel Road.
My conclusion is that a realigned Green Level Road would not impact any stream
channel on this property and would only impact a very small amount of isolated wetland
which would be deemed permitted under DWQ'S Isolated Wetland rules (15A NCAC 2H
.01300). Therefore, there are no environmental constraints to realigning the road
westward as long as it does not impact the wetland present about 500 feet south of
O'Kelly Chapel Road.
II. Road alignment options. Four options to minimize stream impacts from this road are
discussed below (A, B1, B2, and C). All four options would result in less stream impact
as described in the summary table below. Various design issues for each of these
alternatives are discussed below (see attached map for alternatives).
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
Service
Custon'T
1-877-623-6748
A. Move road alignment to the west of the stream valley. Impacts of this
alternative to streams would be limited to one crossing of the main creek.
Control points would be - 1) The Kit Creek crossing and 2) a location with edge
of the construction corridor 50 feet downstream from the toe of the waterfall as
shown on your engineers plan (see attached map). This alignment would require
that the intersection with O'Kelly Chapel Road be moved about 40 feet to the
west in order to achieve a safe road alignment. The western intersection at the
shopping center may need to be reconfigured since it would likely be too close to
the relocated road to allow full access. This alignment would reduce the
contiguous size of the shopping center by about three acres (see discussion in
item II I below) but would allow development of two additional commercial areas
between the relocated road and the stream valley. Therefore, there would appear
to be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this site.
The plans provided by your engineer at our meeting show that stream
impacts for this alternative would be about 280 feet. There are several design
changes at this location which would result in much lower stream impacts and still
result in a safe road. First, from our discussions with DOT staff, it is very unlikely
that a single 84 inch pipe would be approved as proposed by your engineer. If
this single large pipe is replaced with two 62 inch pipes (as proposed at the
waterfall location), then stream impacts could be reduced. In a related matter, the
use of two pipes would result in lowered velocities and therefore the downstream
riprap section which is planned for streambank stability would be more likely to be
approved by DLR. Secondly, if the final elevation of the road is 275 feet rather
than the 285 feet as proposed, then the impact to the channel (including a rip rap
dissipator) would be no more than 180 feet and could probably be less 150 feet if
two 62 inch pipes are used rather than one 84 inch pipe as discussed above.
The final elevation of 275 feet would result in a slope to the road of about 5%
north of the stream and 4.8% south of the stream. Again from our discussions
with DOT staff, we understand that this slope would- likely be acceptable from a
safety viewpoint for this road. Our understanding that the primary reason for the
proposed 285 foot elevation at this crossing is to balance cut and fill on the
overall site. While balancing cut and fill is a worthwhile endeavor, it is not
sufficient reason to allow additional stream impact. As you know, if this alignment
impacts less than 150 feet of stream channel, then stream mitigation would not
be required by DWO for this project.
Finally, this alignment would require a realignment of the part of Durham
Green Level Road immediately south of O'Kelly Chapel Road. However as
stated above in Item I based on my field visit, there are no environmental
constraints in this area as long as the realignment occurs less than 500 feet south
of O'Kelly - Chapel Road.
B.1 Move road alignment further to the west of the stream valley
(intersect O'Kelly Chapel Road at proposed location): Impacts of this
alternative to streams would be limited to one crossing of the main creek and one
crossing of the intermittent stream. Control points would be 1) The tangent
section about 250 feet north of O'Kelly Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek
crossing. This alignment would allow the road to be relocated well below the
location of the waterfall near the uppermost end of the larger wetland on the site.
This alignment would reduce the contiguous size of the shopping center but
would allow development of two additional commercial areas between the
relocated road and the stream valley. In-addition, this alignment would reduce
the size of the apartment complex north of the shopping center. Again, there
would be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this sit
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customer
Service
1-877-623-6748
(see attached table). These seventeen files show that the average size of a
shopping center is about 36 acres with a range in size from 7 acres to 55 acres.
Undoubtedly the size of a shopping center is affected by many factors including
environmental constraints, number and size of outparcels, and number of large,
free-standing stores. We believe that these data show that a viable shopping
center can be developed on a 20 acre tract since about 25% of the shopping
centers are 20 acres or less. In addition, a large number of outparcels could be
added to the area between the relocated road and the stream valley in addition to
the main shopping center. This area is included as the Village Center on Cary's
approved PUD - therefore the Town has already approved this area for
commercial use. These outparcels would also contribute significantly to the
economical viability of this project. Therefore we believe that an economically
viable shopping center with surrounding outparcels can be developed with a
relocated road.
IV. Stormwater management: In his response to our December 8, 2003 letter, your
engineer has proposed to rely on the Town of Cary's stormwater management
plan for this project. DWQ staff have reviewed the plan and agree that the plan
meets the condition of our respective General Certification 3404 except for the
Village Center site. The present stormwater management plan is to construct
sand filters for this area while General Certification 3404 for Nationwide Permit 14
states that in NSW watersheds, "...the Division shall require that extended
detention wetlands, bio-retention areas, and ponds followed by filter strips
(designed according to the latest NC DENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management plan..."
since these measures have been shown to be most effective at nutrient removal.
To date, your engineer has not redesigned the proposed stormwater
management plan to reflect the requirements of the General Certification. We
are willing to work with you and your engineer to modify the stormwater plans for
the Village Center in order to address the condition of General Certification 3404.
V. Erosive velocities from the culvert: Our review of your proposed road location
leads DWQ to the conclusion that a substantial amount of channel hardening
would be required due to the erosive velocities. from the 60 inch pipes at a 7%
slope. At the meeting on February 5, your engineer stated that the 10 year storm
had a 21 fps velocity which would be addressed by the proposed stilling basin.
DWQ will have to rely on our colleagues in the NC Division of Land Resources for
this assessment. Please provide engineering calculations to demonstrate that
the proposed pipe with the stilling basin and 20 foot riprap apron will result in non-
erosive velocities in the main channel. Again from our experience in working with
DLR and DOT staff on similar issues, we have serious doubts about whether this
stilling basin and reduced riprap apron can handle the velocities from this large
pipe at this steep slope. For instance, table 12-2 from the Surface Mining Manual
prepared by DLR does not show pipe sizes larger than 72 inches nor slopes
greater than 6%. However even a 72 inch pipe at a 1 % slope, would require a 72
foot length of riprap. We believe that a larger pipe at a much larger slope will
require a much greater amount of riprap and therefore much more stream impact.
In contrast, the relocated roads (Alternatives A, B1, B2 and C) would result in
pipe with much less slope and therefore less stream impact.
VI. Reporting of length of stream impacts: As we discussed in our meeting, the
actual length of stream impact for all alternative has been unclear from the
original application to present. For instance, the original application requested
293 linear feet of stream impact on the channel in the center of the property wh'
?F
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Custom
Service
1-877-623-6748

slalodug
PWPQA? JQ$VtAQU®$S
j ?o?a?rtyatzav?ro??cmfscv?mwcruaaaoa?asinIIOnwmmowloaA+unm?mmvan'm?emrtatroi
WOD'S!j2S4SDgD'MMM
90ZO-BL9-616 :XDJ
9£00-BL9-616 aal
£l9LZ ON"-(ADO
90l aa!nS
ADM -d -160M OO£9l
'
'
r
*
`
SVHD
IZMS
H
DNI
S

--r ® i
z L- ;

o i
J
>?
j
Q>
Q W
J
W
W = i
LLJ
I
th ?
? ? ? X f
W I I f

N U.. o JL
II-
-? J Z 0

W J LU
> C) Z
<E X
W
N W
LL 0 a
I 1 r p
U I W
0 ?W
p
? a a
r r w wv
__ ... ¢
LO

g 00000
M
..
..44
C\l
LO N
v 1` M
T
-
W
_ /0
'
L
o
--- 0 0 0 0 0
r 00 011-
;T

0
O
tD C d IQ=.^.
L i =

I-- V3 i? +y+ Q •+ r O.CO 00 O N 0
L O N 00 r
w
tZ d ,' N
E

£ >
o r. 0) ?
S x

*5 CO co co C) 0
co CD 0
cc cc a
V o00
E

t'1
'ooo

o
G e0 ?
O ??
V?
C
Mm; i

c 0
i
t
At CL
w
"F o
G] m

'z
e
0 03>-0 >M
o
(D 2
0
q Q
N Q.
rt (D
Q < (h
cD
7
° cn =
t =
y F A = 3
000 " CL
O W G
0?
OoCIDO (D
N 3 I
C O
(D

(D

(D to
?
M GO

am j -? N
0
0 (D O 0
C
] 00 W
00 b!
= -l' -0 <D
(D r; ? fD

? p1

N N - -D.-
-4
O O O
O
N
fD 0
-+ N Ln W -J 0
O O
O W
0
0
0
I
:n
nm
=x
_ f ?n ll,I
I rn I: I ?
0
L
?/i
? fT1
__,.L.__.,...._ x
LO
z
c

G
C
Z
O i

m
? K:
?;
r m
?U ,
m -
x
U)
r
z r
=
n zr
ra; e --1 D
M

D-

m
X
i n
C
M
\
tom,
D z 1a

n
?<
1
CJ M
r

D ;.
? ` ..

.41 f

t.7 TI
Z /?
N

T I ? S
I' m
i
fi a
x
D
D J
z ?
f)

Stonewater Wetland
Impacts
Green Level to IDintam it m&
Cary, NC.
W*da.d S.m.wmr Nr- IS.C
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cary, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.chashsells.com
i
W03'Sjl0SySDg0 WAkM
90Z0-9L9-616 :XD-4
9[00-9L9-616 :Ial
CISLZ ON XJDO
90l PIMS
d(DM„IDd uolsaM 00£Sl
*DNI `SrIZgS 'H 'SVHD
7nbx?+?osw??
-aN .k-3
T" M%MG 01 JOAn =;D
sJoisdlug
FRPO& 110316MOU®IS
1

tY
W
N Z
? z
ti 0
t!) in
U
CK:
W
i 0
z
0
IM
z T
X
P4 --

J J

W
J
1 Q
z
r
M \ W?
cj,

X
W
_

Q
JL
0 JL J
Qz -
0
J W z

X
W
>-
J
L,_ W J
Y W
OO
X =

tf" W U

C

a OED 1
LL
L I
IL.?
M00000
V I- M Lo C\I
R ^
d C w
..-
0
E
N
a
0 0 0 0 0
.-CO Of-
?t +- N N

eC

?• iced w
? d
a H 3 ? a
d s w

O
4) co C\I
N T
m
N n

E
ai x
a ?.0
co "
o o _=o E,

O o 0
° °
a °°o
0
ooo
E c Q v
o ++ L
cn cn o
C
Mm d
. j.
N
d 4-
,a Cc
$ E 0
0 2
ca O
n ammC\I
o
FEB.0512004 16:14 919 876 5823 USAGE RAL REG
1vO• ve r En c-em" IV. r•u 7?J?5CrHwr•i,VC r m- .7I G,VL mvuc
?ENR
_7 2
?q1
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
To: Andreawade
Company
Fax Number : 891871 3823
Phone Number :
From : Steve Boos
Fax Numbev : [phone]
Phone Number [phone] ext256
Time Seat ' Thursday, Feb 5, 2004 08:04AM
pages . 2
Andrea,
Attached is a copy of one of the methods to determine the
size of rip-rap energy dissipaters. There are other methods
to size energy dissipaters, but they usually give alone to
the same answers as this sheet. I also wanted to add that
there are other energy dissipation devices which can be used
at culvert outlets other than rip-rap energy dissipaters.
The other devices at culvert outlets are usually used when
the velocity coming out of the culvert exceeds the design
criteria far rip-rap energy dissipaters.
#2027 R.:)01/002
WI(orv-1 t-MbL. 1/C

FEB-5-2004 THU 16:05 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS P. 1
FES.0512004 16:14 919 876 5823 USACE RAL REG
08 t 05 F1:fB 05, 2004 TO RNOREAWAL E . FR STE?& EWE #2027 P.002/)02
r .. FKt. Crt

?y?yyy '?Fitlr .V?}d 167Ki :?1MJJ ?ed:M?6f?
.. .. ..
rktnpv ???ipttr
. ubk ice, ..
s
eil.M,tl?pCtt=$
. 4? +.,
t

..: Sit .. .. ,
' y :
Z
??
4:
9o-1:
lb b.. 7 :: t(! S t{I S 14
'

. ::X w

6a??

`?

24 ? t

aIAAS
k ? t
:..... , , : :•, 12. x d 3. I.
i fit.

'
::
• :
?? :.•.`..ls: '; :. •1,3.5 :'1?,5 '.'tt : i? ?'?
G
..
....
.
:
: W clans . :. `:Z) E3 1:

.... 24
.
....
::' `.x..: ::....16.3 3.. ' ` Z,..., za .
.
.

PAN : a. .
1a

:•

2 :.
-24

F 42

?.. ..,
. ...
.:
. , . v?'.a?1?
t's',
: Y'7 3• •
tea, s
.

4Y> 493
.. Vb a(ft) 20 •24.. sF

:.:'. 214

45

:....
... 2b 4. :.30

:..... '' ::. : Vii::<a.' . : :. . .. .. .:: fN'•(??. :: ' 6p?' :. : ' .: .: 7?:.' :. .:... .

. . ? gM Chas.. 112 ; : : ' : lf$
?;eltn#(!' ofmn0n.(k5" r W00 •?ti1 Aptgsk.(Ft} I}=tlai ?fxlesr cal siPnb i?):. S+?C151ss aF%ptvG
(?ecozx?meiigiatior?S ?nyy :?-,1?5??; as? rtt?ach ?of..?sad.a?.?,!?ce:liliv?w$.
« F4t.t E: #t?Xec4buauld:ba.u When $011 c ijaons wMan.t..
7?. E No1'ttxCamlira "ffmprtt. of F»vittinma t, Heal h. and. N#tttret RBSoWces. F-Ofvoay,3996
FE9-5-2004 THU 16:06 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ--WETLANDS P. 2

r
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: rAOpejC
FAW covra)
Company: ?
Fax #: /
Date: l
Notes or special mstructions:
2 iL c
e/, kv-fiL,
§?L :2&
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
f
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),,(http://h2c.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. HIimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To:
Company: rry?95;
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Fax #:
? -523
Date: '4
f'
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 276042260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),.(http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Fax #: ( 8
Company: Date: ??4) t k
Number of pages including cover sheet:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax),_(http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE FEB-18-2004 WED 17:11
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE
PAGES
START TIME
ELAPSED TIME
MODE
RESULTS
: 97851127
: 9/9
: FEB-18 17:09
: 01'58"
: ECM
: OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
`]ic!.ael f'. aYY:!'V. frrv-;,n
OF wQr?? V:ac..a ,. Ro•: it . ?rnrY.v]?
.? (?f Mmb::onWm Upnwei?r nfP.nvirnnirnrn :::ni n;nnrni:i_+nu.:?•.
Jie 7?:it; rrn n(Nnter :P•U:r?
.. aLLiWliez. i':S'-M1'Ctien;'t:rt
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Streel Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suitc 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-"? 660
MaG1tne Address: 1650 Mail Rer ice Center
Raleigh,.NC 27699-1650
Contact Informatlow Phone u: 919-733-M6
Pax S: 919-733-6893
Fax To: --- Q At 0"( ct ^/ a _ Tax it.. Company: Date:
Number of pages including cover %beet:
Notes or special instructions-
1c., c l? IUl,n?l !
? Coy m C ? 1M G -? cY.t ?? t?! r _
r
:f, C iA•.ilm of Wmr P-wh. 401 Wdb,AC &,UmUiL
26201 $eryw Cmrcr.R9 2450 Q•IPlllll$AMfrevl
nk'G.. c'kP'.VC VC.750]OOC2waa60ll.ocaEmr?
a?3! 0
(:219? ]]]IP. s iPT.mEL 919-'?.1l.A9a f'ru), Nttu/!Ll •a?. ga4,r..aJac+T??+b:
U-:.
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE FEB-18-2004 WED 17:14
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 8/8
START TIME : FEB-18 17:12
ELAPSED TIME : 01157"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
?O? W ATCRO `Mire. r? r
? ? nrp.wrc 0.an w.lillm!I:?ev h.`>uFyr
Dioirirn .>t R'nrrlV.Nil?.
O C e'n4.coA SuiFx. Lk.mrn?l`?,:?r.,,
February 18, 2004
Mr. Robert , Have(camp
Waterford Development
3302 Woman's Club Drive
Suite 104
Raleigh. NC 27612
RE: Waterford - Sioneweter Development
Remaining questions regarding DWQ's review
Wake County
DWQ # 03.09f)1
Dear Mr. Haverkamp.
As we discussed on our meeting with the US Army Corps of Engineers (Ms. Joan
Manuele and NN. Andrea Wade) and Mi. Alan Klimek on February 5, 2004. tho Division of Wale:
Quality heoreby requests additional information so we can slake a dccis,or with respect to the.
401 Water Quality Certification for this project. Until we receive your response, this, pmlp,,' will
remain on hold as incomplete. Staff from the US Army Corps of Engricers have reviewed this
letter and concur with the issues that need to be addressed. Please copy them as well as
appropriate DOT, DLn and Town of Cary staff on any response.
1. Stream and wetland occurrence south of O'Kelly Chapel Road - On the aftemoon of
February 5, 2004, Mr. Ed Schwartzman and myself visited the property immodialr-ly
south of O'Kelly Chapel Road to determine If a stream channel we. presnnt. Rased on
this site visit, 1 believe that there is a small isolated wulland frywch lass than li 10 arse m
size) in the upper end of the drainageway No stream channel was present and there
was no evidence of surface flow thrnurdh the upper part of the drainageway. A larye
wetland and stream channel are present about 500 feet south of O'Kelly Chapel Road.
My conclusion is that a realigned Green Level road would not impact any stream
channel on this property and would only impact a verysmall amount of isolated wetland
which would be deemed permitted under DWQ's Isolated Weiland rules (15A NCAC 2H
.01300). Therelom, there are no environmental constraints to realigning the road
wettwam As long as it does not impact the watiand present alwul 500 feet south of
O'Kelly Chapel Road.
11. Road alignment options. Four options to minimize stream impacts from this road are
discussed below (A. B1, R2, and C). All four option, would result in less stream impact
as described in the summary table below. Various design issues for eaoh of these
alternatives are discussed helow (see attached map for allematives).
N. C. ,M- Quin" 161-Mail srm'r 17m" Y.ak,E?NtrM C-1- 21t. le 1 V,--,J"015
Scr,rcc
WA

DATE FEB-18-2004 WED 17:18
NAME DWQ-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE
PAGES
START TIME
ELAPSED TIME
MODE
RESULTS
: 98469467
: 9/9
: FEB-18 17:15
: 02120"
: ECM
: OK
SENDING CONFIRMATION
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...
?pP YtAT?9
? -1
0
Division of Water Quality
Department of F,:nvironmental and Natural Resources
Nvetlands1401 Unit
Street Addrm: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Sww.. M
Raleigh. NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 MQ Sekvice Cmwv
Raleigh, NC 27699-1630
Contact Intonuatiou: Phone #: [phone]
Far #: 919.731-6993
Fax To: ? ria ?1 Fax #:
?/vw', l` fu a u l7i Dale: > -
Company:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions: _ ((]?
?>l i , ?C YtY CgrA C91.uv t"? ,
v. c. onaa„, oLwne<et.amr. am weu,aGr ceosanon Dolt.
IGGGMkd Soatrc C,mv. Wteipµ NC SlFC9-165U (Na?1;oR AdSrxS
2'.21 C+/Dtrm AIM. Rxk'Fp. N:_T.6M-?26G fl?utl0o/
(?)T,'IR3•IrRG 4,b..J, v14'r3:+av.9l l[u). (mq,frtuu ?a .wa.•c wtr.v.ftwnv
NGRL ^,moima Drynnmerv,d em•rnram ud Nerail Rrs?n,."c
w F.?,;,xk. Y.h., Jnr!•nx
Al.
(:,Tern X?.\n;A?.t;i. L:t4v;v
Df•.a irn, ,if W.•e.?j•,mi,?.

0 3
- V7 C7 V ?. V ID ? U1 A W N a. N N ? Q al
1
ati

n
S
r
o

-+
N
?
N
a0
(O
?
?
CO
A
0
Z u~
S
A O D O A A D D W m F. D

A N N N A N (a Z O 0O0 ?'' W V d
~ W N m O V p0 (Ji D O N ? (0
W
C
N

N
O
7
O
f It
ra,
?toc.uivenen?mexr?o.oaut ?m+mirnu?a0naian?noamawm0rnaioioo?no?aua ?+a maa m?mcrea®
Stonewater Wetland
Empacts

Grew Level to Mrham Road.
Cary, NC.

WAf d semewsbw NC, 13.C
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
15300 Weston Parkway
Suite 106
Cory, NC 27513
Tel: [phone]
Fox: 919-678-0206
www.chashsells.com

CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
TRANSMITTAL
15300 Weston Pkwy, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: John Dorney Date: 02-11-04
Company: NCDWQ Project Stonewater
Address: 2321 Crabtree Blvd CHS# 03412.002
Raleigh, NC 27604 Re:
FOR YOUR:
? Approval Q Use ? Information ? Review & Comment ? Record ? Distribution
WE TRANSMIT THE FOLLOWING:
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
12 100' scale topo of stonewater property

WETLkNDS 1401 GROUP
FEB 1 12004
ER QUALITY SECTION

REMARKS:
?'yl_ ?C, o?
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
07 4' 0. 0" W 0 8° 54' 0. 0" 07 ° 3' 0. O" W

_
? ? ??• ? rte,. • * - art-r?#?? ?t?
?;? ,? - _..

yam? ?4, i - ti* 411 M
M
2 F _

- ` ry? i ` k- w? by \ 4. 1
- - THbutarii V1 a Mall
Cr-
=4'Keffy
o

D JJ -? 10J" ?_ f r Y. jy
' &'POO
rai? 11 ,
IM o

M
etlAnd #2'?}?
A(
-
Level Rd
??b,

B .rte

CI-
o
f,I Ca (d ?icct l?1 ` ? ;; _
o
LO
U)
Cl)

371- LO
CO

.
E

1
8
w
0 8° 4' O.b0"IW I I I I I I I I 1 1 0+8-154' O.dO"'IN I I I I I I I I 1 1 0718-' 3' 0.60"IW I I I I
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
• 7° 5' olo°I VII I 1 78° 4' OjOQ" IWI I I I I I I I I I 1 1 97P°15 q-op vy I I I I I I I I
r rt rJ f ?,? ? -'F ? <?

LF?

. 7k JY -LO

ce)

? ?
t
E
I
_
erIl
'It

CO
butar 0o1fai rfall CO

fff rear. p?il? -Poo - {?

o {WetlAnd'#2 :
RJR( ?lr
I?
` I F
?eenLeval Rd= r,-
-

o

b
try-
Z -z

o
m
ra w.

TAY ? ? -- i
III
9 y

CO

8° W
I _
e I? Cl)
1111111 11 0*154' d.Obd 8 4 1 .0 " 1 1 1 1 I 7° 5' d.06'
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
° 54' 0. O" pI I I 07 ° 4' 0. 0"IW I I I I 10T8° 154' O,q0 f I I I I 10718° ?3 EP:0-:E, I I 1 0718° P3 OTO W I
N#

r
r
i 3
i
I
i
- y • f
i r
rl?t? ? o
i
,
+
?
-
•rs
6 C>

41
IS%

O Co

XJ,

i
Vol
`
__ _. ... " . ?. r?r
• ?_ ,. -? Z? ?, fir. O
S _ ?
q•?
r
,
,
f !i

CD-

O ip
p
N
LO
d- LO
_0
LO
,. LO
Co

-r??• ?r`N ? ? 1? _a
? • ms's, ? +
'
?

U) U)
80 W
,
lr U,
0 0" W 0 8° 4' 0. 0" W 148-154- O
. 0" Al 83' 0. 0" W
A- 3' 0. 0" W Cl
Copynght (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
• 078° 0. 0" W 0 8° 54' 0. 0" 078° 3' 0. o" W

T
f
,
?K
f,

00. _. ?•--__ - .. _.?_;,-r .? -? - '?',- t`+? ??? - O
c.f t r
LO
(Y) LO
Co

fv _ _

v . r? } - tF r- f t+ rn r 0
Cr)
I r-

f

co _ + f - -

r
?J
f
?
?

° J
J ?1 { 1??
I
F hV"" -
8
W f - -
l
-
o 8° 4' o. o" w I I I I I I I I 1 1 0+8°154' o.do" W I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o71s° ?3' o.bo'riw 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
NCDWO Stream Classification Form
Project Name: River Basin: County: Evaluator:
DWQ Project Number: Neatest Nanted Stream: Latitude: Signature:
Date: USGS QUAD:. Longitude: Location/Directions:
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a inau-!Wade ditch, then use of This form is not necessary.
Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the feature is a nian•niade ditch and not a tnodffied natural stream-this
rating system should not be used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per. Line)
I Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 1 .2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From Surrounding Terrain'?
0 '
1
2
3
3) e Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3
4) Is
Tt Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3
-
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Flooplain Present?
0
1
2
3
§) Is the Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3
7) Are Recent Alluvial Deposits Present? 0 1 2 3
8Z; Is There A Bankfull15ench Present? 0 1 2 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present?
(N0Tn. II'Bgd & Batik Caused By Ditching Agt 1 170 0
UT lLtilty Then Sror 1
e=0*) 2 3
10) Is A 211d Order Or Greater Channel (As Indi
On Topo Man AndlOr In Field) Present'? ctrted .
1.___Yes=3
No=O
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
IL Hydrology . Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1.) Is There A Groundwater.
Flow/Dischara6 Eresent? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Strew bed? 3 2 1 0'•
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed?.: 3' 2 1 0
3) Is Periphyton Present? 0 _ 1 2 3
41 Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
Secondary Field Indicators : (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geojnorpliology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Does Topography Indicate A.
Natural Drainage Way?
0
5
I
1.5
SECONDARY GEONIORPIIOLOGY INDICA'T'OR POINTS:
Absent
II. Hydrology
Weak
Moderate
Strong
_
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leatlitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
1
.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
Q Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since 0 .5
Last Known Rain? t*NOTE• If Ditrh btdirated lit #9 Above Skin 77ds Step _And #5 Below*) 1 1.5
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
Season)?
Conditions Or-In Growing 0. .5 1 1.5
_
ydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel
b) Are H (Or In Readcut)? Yes=1.5 No=0
-
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biology Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
t) Are Fish Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
2) Are Amphibians Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
3) Are AquaticTurtles Present? 0 .5 1 1.5
AN ArA r vavfish Pre-cent? O S 1 1.5 i
'w -a-D'ants In Streambed? SAV Mostly 0111. Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
`ce Of All Pianlx lit Slrcauubed 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
Ceps/ LN .??SS SAV 1'reeenl*).
QGY INDICATOR POIN'T'S:
°ritnary + Secondary), (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points 1 hV Stream Is At Least Interir

sd,??.. 1? e.Q
6 /v-)?
Iff -4911le

?-j / J?s
Gir C a-
?4'Kru?t?
_61h
a , V
A,r"f
?V-7?,
lwdtAe- 77L(5 ¢ AM A
1?7
ecomce- '?,^A? "'j- m- &VA (;(Wt
'-7y ' I?p * f L
Cra s?o-a c-(?so? Y4--
'Afa 3; Oa ?e I'D caj?-
'a [a, Ms & - Cbf -t- 7?)Wq.
QaA?b ? (PP1-/ ?W>on ylJ/ N?A? AlUV.ci.

64-
)-V? GOE
ow??04(
n ? L
A-yJ42W
??--
w?? % ?1 fps /o ? s1?
?L

s??le ?pp
- & "T
ca9l?-(!"05
yye
60L h -
3oa ?
?
36-D
4 tct
hko ? ?Cmo? c r aC M
U
^YI?IY?cA _
I

4o
IZ2
d?-
?-? ck,vw?neAuc ire
kff rod
C,?-? 1 ?SSsu?S
1
?' 0 'v _? mil/ • ? ?- .sV ?`
0
t.1
ow CZE)
vim
: evl- kl?ll?
aali
coe Ow.P Low,
I?fl^' Y?y-F W?
c l?? ?aT tC' c -w tIl1Z
CA -
74,-
? ??J(? 5 v"??ms =rSS-
?<? ? nag I?EI ? i? nos
z?
°733 96
kc
Kai
2sz r ?ct??e < V.S?C? ?`O? - 8-Ab %4q t
x3t
Cll-ia-s
Kc9cl676oo3S
?ev.?
a,?, ? i vh?l?- N G pw op
???-Sgt

1`x`9 76er=110
'114-?ss = r u-z>
qig 733-"7015 x 203
t t a 4 6St(90x [(
ST01
15' MATH
MULITUSE TRAIL GUARD RAIL
LOCATION VARIES
EXISTING
GROUN VAR. - 10 C1
SLOPE R 1
1.T =r
2' PRO FIBE T
(2' VR) RADE TO " 1
3' 3' El THIS LIN Jl
PROP CABLE 3? ? 6.5' 21
C2' COVER)
PROP. f AS
C4' COVER)
PROP. 24' FORCE MAIN
W COVER)
ROP. ELECTRIC 5.5' TOWN OF CARY
C4' COVER) UTIUTY EASEMENT
C
4
GREEN LEV-
FOUR-LAI
IEWATER
-?24'
4
TRADE
JOINT
1
21"
IRRENT CONSTRUCTION
-LANE MEDIAN DIVIDED
_DIAN WIDTH: MEDIAN SWALE 45'
_L TO DURHAM
GRADE TO
THIS LINE
ROAD
15' WITH
GUARD RAIL
PROP. 16' WATER
(4' COVER)
R/W
_ MULITUSE TRAIL
LOCATION VARIES
VAR.
TOWN ?F CARY
UTILITY
EASEMENT
IE DIVIDED MEDIAN, 102'-BB W/124' ROW
Y Al' i
t-V CHAS. H. SELTS, INC.
15300 Weston Pkwy, Suite 106, Cary, NC 27513
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TRANSMITTAL
To. John Dorney Date: 021W M
Company: NCDWQ Project: Stonwrater
Address: 2321 Crabtree Blvd
CHS Project #: 03412.003
Raleigh, NC Re:
FOR YOUR:
? Approval B Use ? Information ? Review & Comment ? Record ? Distribution
WE TRANSMIT THE FOLLOWING:
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
12 02/09104 Overall Corridor Green Level to Durham Rd
REMARKS:
Cc: file
WFiTLAN S 1401 GROUP ? K-3
FEB 0 9 2004 Donald A. Sever
ATE Q1A1I71' SECTIOfV
(Z?01'
S&EC Project No. 6412.W1 February 4, 2004
GENERAL STREAM ASSESSMENT
On January 8, 2004, we visited the O'Kelly Chapel Road site in Cary, NC, to observe the
condition of the existing stream channel in the vicinity of the proposed road crossing.
The purpose of our visit was to perform a general review of site conditions including
overall channel condition both upstream and downstream of the proposed crossing, the
existing rock outcrop within the active stream channel, local vegetation adjacent to the
stream channel, and observe the contributing watershed. While on site we walked the
local stream reach from a point roughly 500 feet upstream of the existing rock outcrop to
a point roughly 500 feet downstream.
At the time of our visit a significant portion of the northeastern side of the site had been
cleared, generally along the proposed road alignment. Clearing had stopped roughly 50
feet from a large rock outcrop within the active stream channel. No clearing appeared to
have occurred on the southwest side of the stream. The large rock outcropping serves as
a "waterfall" and drops the channel invert roughly 10 feet vertically into a small pool
(plunge pool) formed in the rock at the lower invert. A review of available topographic
data confirms this elevation difference dropping from an approximate elevation of 270.00
feet to and elevation of 260.00 feet.
The invert of the channel immediately upstream of the "waterfall" is controlled by
existing rock with a base width of 5 to 6 feet with no defined banks. However, within the
next roughly 50 feet of upstream channel a more typical stream cross-section is observed.
Typical upstream channel dimensions observed upstream of this point were 3 to 4 feet in
depth and 5 to 7 feet in top width. These numbers are approximate as no field
measurements were made. No defined floodplain was observed along the upstream
reach. Localized erosion was observed at various points along the upstream reach and no
evidence of over-bank flooding was observed. The channel itself while partially incised
appeared in generally good condition with a varying sinuosity and bed-form along it's
length, typical of what is commonly observed in Piedmont streams. Good ground cover
and hardwood vegetative cover (with little understory) exists along the upper reach.
The invert of the channel immediately downstream of the "waterfall" appears fairly stable
for a distance of roughly 50 feet downstream. This is likely due to the existence of rock
and large boulders in and near the channel banks. Below this point the channel is
noticeably incised. Observation would tell that the stream for the next 300 to 500 feet is
in the process of head-cutting (or down-cutting in and upstream direction) to find a more
stable grade. This is particularly noticeable along the western side of the stream where
this incision has created banks are overly steep and are in excess of 6 feet in height in
some locations. The channel width at this point as much as two to three times that
observed upstream of the "waterfall." As the channel continues downstream, it's depth
and width continues to decrease to a point where it's dimensions observed were 1 to 3
feet in depth and 2 to 4 feet in top width. Again, these numbers are approximate. Unlike
the upper reach, a floodplain appears to be accessible in the lower reach as the
topography transitions to a gentler gradient. This occurs at a distance of roughly 400 feet
Page 1 of 2
S&EC Project No. 6412.W1 February 4, 2004
downstream from the "waterfall." Localized erosion and deposition was also observed at
various points along the lower reach. At it's lower end (of the observed reach) the
channel transitions into an existing wetland and no defined channel was observed. Good
ground cover and hardwood vegetative cover (with little understory) exists (except where
recently cleared) along the lower reach.
The "waterfall" at the proposed crossing location currently serves as a significant grade
control measure on the site. Without it, it is likely the existing head-cut would have
continued a considerable distance further upstream. The placement of a culvert at a
similar location will likely serve as a grade control device assuming it is correctly tied to
both the upstream and downstream channel inverts. A variety of alternatives exist with
regard to installation as depicted on the attached sketch. Obviously each method has pros
and cons with regard to it's effect on the morphologic function of the stream. Regardless
of the installation method, Natural Channel Design methodologies could readily be
incorporated into the overall hydraulic design process.
The attached sketches reflect the Existing Site Conditions as well as three potential
Repair Options.
Page 2 of 2
a'
S

C_ J

?J
v_
t
Q
2

l )?
s
?w
c?
c?

CA
l-?
S }
_

CC

` 7

t

r of ? ;

c?
0
49
49
?yt
v
P
V
5
e
0

c?
,s
3
11 2
7
r °1
1 ? f
r
1
7
y .s
U a
01/30/2004 08:49 FAX
-? CORPS RALEIGH [a 001
Dull oc environmental Consultants, PA
11010 RaVcn Ridge 1Zoad - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - phone: (9I9) 846-5900 • Fax: [phone]
W?.sgtaEC.com
Transmittal
To:

We Transmit to you Herewith:
f!?-Arawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
i3---Correspondence
? As per your rcquest
%^Naa A ?*,. w.r..r. % ace' i.,. ; , Z

G *'ncw a??Q 'L
If enclosures are not as listed as above, lqndly no* us at Once. . V'"% a k°

By. .' `? MA4V . A C? r
'?4
6
A
T
`
C
CharoO ?y?.?
+
- p
??
.
,
cc;
236 LCPWI ip Court, Suite C
Concord
ITC 2$025
NC Greens x1to ()ff<eco
3817-E L.awndalc Drive 622k (3£fu
622 Coon Mountain Lanc
,
Phone.
Phone,
720-9405
5 Greensboro, NC 2745$ nylorsville, NC 28681

Phone: [phone]
(704) 720-940 Phone Fax: [phone] Fax; [phone]
Fax; (828) 6355820
Project. #: t-tt\ -- W a Date: 1 ?
Project Name.
File:
Under Separate Cover:
,br your information and files ? By mail
or comment or approval 0 By Courierr
? Returned for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted

Remarks:: - -C ?... Cam. %as- ?c.v`b??. o... ,?1 ?. 2. r
L. ..
e...STAip °
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
RA6E51VEL
JAN' _ G 2004
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONALEIGII REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
January 14, 2004 j j 6"Qej
Mr. Donald A. Sever, PE.
Chas. H. Sells, inc
15300 Weston Parkway Suit 106
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Reference: Town of Cary Bond Project
Stownwater Pud Roadway Improvements
Green Level-Durham Rd. (SR 1615)
North of O'Kelly Chapel Rd. (SR 1628)
CHS Project No. 03412.002
Wake County - Division 5
Dear Donald,
The Special Studies Squad of the Design Services Unit has reviewed the alternate
alignment for Green Level-Durham Rd. submitted to this office by Chas. H Sells on
January 9, 2004. This review is based on NCDOT current design criteria, standards, and
The 2001 "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (The Green Book).
Our Comments are as follows:
1) Need to check alignment, several curves are over lapping
2) Show bearings on alignment.
3) Roadway widths shown on plans do not measure correctly
4) Super elevation runoff length for curve at PI 13+17.72 and PI 17+56.50
needs lane adjustment factor for number of lanes. See page 171 & 172 of
"A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (The Green
Book).
5) Due to the grade on O'Kelly Chapel Rd. (-1.45%) super elevation on }4?5
-Green Level Durham Rd. must be rotated 7.5 increments (270') to obtain
DECEIVED
full super. This results in only having full super for a distance of 3'.
JAN 2004 Recommend either changing grade on O'Kelly Chapel Rd. or flatting
curve to lengthen distance of full super.
Chas„ H. Sells
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CENTURY CENTER COMPLEX
DESIGN SERVICES UNIT - ENTRANCE B2
1591 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.D01-l.DOT.STATE.NC.US 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27699-1591 RALEIGH NC
6) Can curves at PI station 17+56.50 and 25+21.15 be replaced with one
curve to eliminate tangent between curves?
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call Shannon Macon or
myself at 250-4128.
Sincerely,
Mohammed Mahj oub, EI
Special Studies Squad Leader
Design Services Unit
MEM/slm
Attachments
CC: Project File
00
sn ?" <
C. P
Ile -
M ti
J-j
i
' Ise 1 ?? '1 ?r• ?.. Cr h v. ; v o a I O 1•
1 a?
?? 'L°?+•-? ???? F _?h,. ? ??` ':?? ? ?»-Y'0. ?-ii ? ......... ...
t
r.3
rr,
'x7
\1 'I c
Stonewater PUD project
l
DWQ # 03-0981 ? Wake County I?IQeI?
February 4, 2004
FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY - NOT FOR DISTRIBTION
The following designs are options for road realignment for this project that are
permittable by DWQ and Corps of Engineers that also appear to meet DOT safety
considerations. All of these alternatives minimize stream impact on the site but all would
require modification of the project. The attached map shows the approximate location of
these realignments. All three of these alignments require a realignment of Alston
Avenue south of the project site which are similar to the realignment proposed by the
applicant.
1. Move road alignment to the west of the stream valley. Impacts to streams
would be limited to one crossing of the main creek.
A. Control points -1) The Kit Creek crossing and 2) a location with edge of
the construction corridor 50 feet downstream from the toe of the
waterfall. This alignment would require that the intersection with O'Kelly
Chapel Road be moved slightly to the west in order to achieve a safe road
alignment. The western intersection at the shopping center may need to be
reconfigured since it would likely be too close to the relocated road to allow
full access. This alignment would reduce the contiguous size of the shopping
center but would allow development of two additional commercial areas
between the relocated road and the stream valley. Therefore, there would
appear to be no net change in the amount of commercial development on this
site. This alignment may not require stream mitigation for this project. This
alignment would require a realignment of the part of Durham Green Level
Road immediately south of O'Kelly Chapel Road.
B. Control points -1) The tangent section about 250 feet north of O'Kelly
Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek crossing. This alignment would allow
the road to be relocated well below the location of the waterfall. This
alignment would reduce the contiguous size of the shopping center but would
allow development of two additional commercial areas between the relocated
road and the stream valley. In addition, this.alignment would reduce the size
of the apartment complex north of the shopping center. Again there would be
no net change in the amount of commercial development on this site. This
alignment may not require stream mitigation for this project.
11. C. Move the road alignment to a location east of the stream valley.
Impacts would be limited to an uppermost intermittent portion of a tributary.
Impacts to perennial channels would be avoided entirely. Therefore
compensatory stream mitigation would not be required by the Corps or DWQ.
The control points for this alignment would be 1) the tangent section about 250
feet north of O'Kelly Chapel Road and 2) the Kit Creek crossing. This alignment
would allow the road to be relocated and entirely avoid impacts to any perennial
streams. The multi-family parcel to the east of the stream valley would be
reduced in size. The shopping center parcel could be larger than presently
planned. This new road alignment would require cooperation of the adjacent
landowner whose land was included in the original Cary PUD.
??

\i:,c:

\i:,-c.
0k6
P
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 22, 2004
MEMO
TO: Alan Klimek
FROM: John Dorne
RE: DWQ staff summa f 2 rfor Stonewater, LLC project (Green Level
Durham Road)
DWQ # 03-0981; COE # 200320972
Wake County
Below please find a chronology of the permitting actions of the Division of Water Quality
and the US Army Corps of Engineers with respect to this project, a summary of the various
alternatives and their impacts and a listing of the issues that remain to be addressed before this
project can be permitted. I have consulted with Andrea Wade of the US Army Corps of
Engineers as well as John Hennessy and Danny Smith of DWQ in preparation of this memo.
A. Project Chronology
Corps and DWQ site visit with stream class January 8, 2003
Corps site pre-application visit with consultant June 19, 2003
Intermittent versus perennial streams
Relocation of road'
Application received by DWQ August 6, 2003
More information letter from DWQ August 18, 2003
Incomplete application letter from Corps August 26, 2003
Alternative location
Minimization and Avoidance
Response to DWQ more information letter October 9, 2003
Meeting with DWQ and applicant October 13, 2003
2 versus 4 lanes'
Relocation of road'
Stormwater management
Meeting with Corps and applicant October 16, 2003
Relocation of road'
Response to meetings from applicant October 20, 2003
Response to meeting from Town of Cary October 21, 2003
More information letter from DWQ December 8, 2003
Meeting with Corps and applicant December 8, 2003
6 versus 4 lanes
Relocation of Road
Site visit - Corps, DWQ, Cary, applicant December 15, 2003
Responses to site visit from applicant December 19, 2003
Letter from applicant to Bill Ross January 2, 2004
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
B. Summary of alternatives and impacts
1. Original application - Six lane road which crosses main channel at waterfall
site at oblique angle.
2. Revised application - Four lane road (same location and same angle of
crossing).
3. Realignment of road - locate main road crossing to a perpendicular alignment with
edge of fill slope at least 50 feet from the base of waterfall. This design would leave
two parcels (about 1.4 acres each) between the relocated road and the edge of the
protected buffer along the stream (Town of Cary buffer) that could be readily
developed into commercial or institutional sites and would leave about 20 acres for
the Village Center site. Finally it is the agency's understanding that the Town of Cary
and Department of Transportation have both reviewed and approved the road
realignment as meeting acceptable safety design standards.
Design Wetland
fill Intermittent
stream fill Perennial
stream fill Main
perennial
channel
fill Indirect
stream
impact2 Total
direct
stream
impact

Original
design 0.084
acres 213 feet 481 feet 320 feet Hundreds
of feet 694
feet

Four lane
road 0.084
acres 213 feet 431 feet 270 feet Hundreds
of feet 644
feet

Realignment
of roads 0.006
acres Zero 388 200 feet None 388
feet

A summary of the status of the main issues for this, project is as follows:
1. Road location: DWQ and Corps of Engineers staff have concluded that the road
can readily be relocated to minimize the impacts on the main channel. The applicant was told by
DWQ and Corps staff to redesign this crossing to be more perpendicular and at other alternative
locations on at least eight occasions over the past several months - namely,
1. at the June 19, 2003 site visit,
2. in DWQ first on-hold letter of August 18, 2003,
3. in the Corps on hold letter of August 26, 2003,
4. in DWQ's meeting with the applicant on October 13, 2003,
5. in the Corps meeting with the applicant on October 16, 2003,
6. in DWQ's second on-hold letter of December 8, 2003,
2 This is additional impact due to upstream headcutting and downstream instability due to increased stream energy.
3 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. The application states that the impact is 293 feet which is
not correct. Impact to this channel greater than 300 linear feet will require an Individual Permit from the Corps of
Engineers.
4 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. The application states that the impact on the main channel
would be reduced by 50 feet with a narrower road.
5 Road realigned so that the edge of the fill slope is at least 50 feet from the base of the waterfall so that the crossing
is perpendicular and on level terrain which removes the issue of indirect stream impacts.
6 This is an estimate based on the sketch plan for the road. It may be possible to reduce impacts below 150 feet
depending on the side slopes and possible retaining walls.
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
14L
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
7. in the meeting with the Corps and applicant on December 8, 2003
and finally
8. in the joint field meeting on December 15, 2003.
In addition, in the field meeting on December 15, 2003 both DWQ and the Corps
stated that if the road was relocated to the downstream site selected in the field, that both
agencies would issue their approvals immediately. To date, the applicant has not
redesigned the crossing.
11. Additional stream impacts: DWQ and the Corps have concluded that
construction of the road at the waterfall location will result in upstream headcutting and
downstream instability due to removal of the energy-dissipation benefit of the waterfall and the
increased velocity and energy of the stream which is proposed to be piped. The engineer for the
project apparently agrees since the applicant in his January 2 letter has stated that he could
develop engineering methods to address this impact. The exact design of these measures is
not clear but would undoubtedly result in additional stream impacts due to the installation of hard
structures in the stream channel. These impacts would increase the net amount of stream fill. If
the amount of stream fill exceeds 300 feet on the main channel, then the project would exceed
the maximum 300 feet of stream impact for a Nationwide permit from the Corps of Engineers.
The Corps then would have no other alternative than to require an Individual Permit for this
project. This would then result in the need for a Public Notice and additional permitting delays.
III. Stream mitigation: Stream mitigation of at least a 2:1 ratio would likely be
required by the Corps for impacts to the main channel if impacts exceed 150 feet. DWQ would
also require mitigation for the total impacts for the project to perennial streams if they exceed
150 linear feet. Both agencies have discussed the issue and agree not to require compensatory
stream mitigation for this project (other than preservation of the channels and associated
buffers) if the road is realigned as noted in the table above. This provision would save the
applicant a considerable amount of up-front money. For instance, W RP charges $200 per linear
foot for stream mitigation.
IV. Stormwater management: The applicant is requesting to rely on the Town of
Cary's stormwater management plan for this project. DWQ staff have reviewed the plan and
agree that the plan meets the condition of our respective General Certification 3404 except for
the Village Center site. The present stormwater management plan is to construct sand filters for
this area while General Certification 3404 for Nationwide Permit 14 states that in NSW
watersheds, "...the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by filter strips (designed according to the latest NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management
plan..."since these measures have been shown to be most effective at nutrient removal. To
date, the applicant has not redesigned the proposed stormwater management plan to reflect the
requirements of the General Certification. We are willing to work with the developer to modify
the stormwater plans for the Village Center to address the condition of General Certification
3404.
In summary, DWQ and Corps of Engineers staff believe that the applicant has had
numerous occasions over the past several months to revise the application to relocate the road
crossing but has refused to do so. The relocation of the road is a simple issue of minimization of
stream impact (both direct and indirect impact) that is clearly required by both DWQ and the
Corps rules. According to John Hennessy, DWQ staff that review DOT projects routinely require
DOT to meet these types of design constraints and DOT readily modifies their applications to
comply. Staff of both agencies would be willing to meet again with the applicant and consultants
to again discuss these issues if requested. However if the applicant would like a speedy
resolution of the issue so he can begin to develop the site, then the agencies suggest that the
road be relocated as repeatedly requested since June 2003.
Cc: Andrea Wade, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
File copy
D
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
NI A r? Michael F. Easley, Governor
10?O 9QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
> Division of Water Quality
G3 ? Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
January 22, 2004
MEMO
TO: Alan Klimek
FROM: John Dome
RE: DWQ staff summa f Wat rfor Stonewater, LLC project (Green Level
Durham Road)
DWQ # 03-0981; COE # 200320972
Wake County
Below please find a chronology of the permitting actions of the Division of Water Quality
and the US Army Corps of Engineers with respect to this project, a summary of the various
alternatives and their impacts and a listing of the issues that remain to be addressed before this
project can be permitted. I have consulted with Andrea Wade of the US Army Corps of
Engineers as well as John Hennessy and Danny Smith of DWQ in preparation of this memo.
A. Project Chronology
Corps and DWQ site visit with stream class January8, 2003
Corps site pre-application visit with consultant June 19, 2003
Intermittent versus perennial streams
Relocation of road'
Application received by DWQ August 6, 2003
More information letter from DWQ August 18, 2003
Incomplete application letter from Corps August 26, 2003
Alternative location
Minimization and Avoidance
Response to DWQ more information letter October 9, 2003
Meeting with DWQ and applicant October 13, 2003
2 versus 4 lanes'
Relocation of road'
Stormwater management
Meeting with Corps and applicant October 16, 2003
Relocation of road'
Response to meetings from applicant October 20, 2003
Response to meeting from Town of Cary October 21, 2003
More information letter from DWQ December 8, 2003
Meeting with Corps and applicant December 8, 2003
6 versus 4 lanes
Relocation of Road
Site visit - Corps, DWQ, Cary, applicant December 15, 2003
Responses to site visit from applicant December 19, 2003
Letter from applicant to Bill Ross January2, 2004
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
M
iZZ
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
B. Summary of alternatives and impacts
1. Original application - Six lane road which crosses main channel at waterfall
site at oblique angle.
2. Revised application - Four lane road (same location and same angle of
crossing).
3. Realignment of road - locate main road crossing to a perpendicular alignment with
edge of fill slope at least 50 feet from the base of waterfall. This design would leave
two parcels (about 1.4 acres each) between the relocated road and the edge of the
protected buffer along the stream (Town of Cary buffer) that could be readily
developed into commercial or institutional sites and would leave about 20 acres for
the Village Center site. Finally it is the agency's understanding that the Town of Cary
and Department of Transportation have both reviewed and approved the road
realignment as meeting acceptable safety design standards.
Design Wetland
fill Intermittent
stream fill Perennial
stream fill Main
perennial
channel
fill Indirect
stream
impact2 Total
direct
stream
impact

Original
design 0.084
acres 213 feet 481 feet 320 feet Hundreds
of feet 694
feet

Four lane
road 0.084
acres 213 feet 431 feet 270 feet Hundreds
of feet 644
feet

Realignment
of roads 0.006
acres Zero 388 200 feet None 388
feet

A summary of the status of the main issues for this project is as follows:
1. Road location: DWQ and Corps of Engineers staff have concluded that the road
can readily be relocated to minimize the impacts on the main channel. The applicant was told by
DWQ and Corps staff to redesign this crossing to be more perpendicular and at other alternative
locations on at least eight occasions over the past several months - namely,
1. at the June 19, 2003 site visit,
2. in DWQ first on-hold letter of August 18, 2003,
3. in the Corps on hold letter of August 26, 2003,
4. in DWQ's meeting with the applicant on October 13, 2003,
5. in the Corps meeting with the applicant on October 16, 2003,
6. in DWQ's second on-hold letter of December 8, 2003,
2 This is additional impact due to upstream headcutting and downstream instability due to increased stream energy.
3 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. The application states that the impact is 293 feet which is
not correct. Impact to this channel greater than 300 linear feet will require an Individual Permit from the Corps of
Engineers.
4 This is the actual impact measured from the site plan. The application states that the impact on the main channel
would be reduced by 50 feet with a narrower road.
5 Road realigned so that the edge of the fill slope is at least 50 feet from the base of the waterfall so that the crossing
is perpendicular and on level terrain which removes the issue of indirect stream impacts.
6 This is an estimate based on the sketch plan for the road. It may be possible to reduce impacts below 150 feet
depending on the side slopes and possible retaining walls. '_::
t hl
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

7. in the meeting with the Corps and applicant on December 8, 2003
and finally
8. in the joint field meeting on December 15, 2003.
In addition, in the field meeting on December 15, 2003 both DWQ and the Corps
stated that if the road was relocated to the downstream site selected in the field, that both
agencies would issue their approvals immediately. To date, the applicant has not
redesigned the crossing.
II. Additional stream impacts: DWQ and the Corps have concluded that
construction of the road at the waterfall location will result in upstream headcutting and
downstream instability due to removal of the energy-dissipation benefit of the waterfall and the
increased velocity and energy of the stream which is proposed to be piped. The engineer for the
project apparently agrees since the applicant in his January 2 letter has stated that he could
develop engineering methods to address this impact. The exact design of these measures is
not clear but would undoubtedly result in additional stream impacts due to the installation of hard
structures in the stream channel. These impacts would increase the net amount of stream fill. If
the amount of stream fill exceeds 300 feet on the main channel, then the project would exceed
the maximum 300 feet of stream impact for a Nationwide permit from the Corps of Engineers.
The Corps then would have no other alternative than to require an Individual Permit for this
project. This would then result in the need for a Public Notice and additional permitting delays.
III. Stream mitigation: Stream mitigation of at least a 2:1 ratio would likely be
required by the Corps for impacts to the main channel if impacts exceed 150 feet. DWQ would
also require mitigation for the total impacts for the project to perennial streams if they exceed
150 linear feet. Both agencies have discussed the issue and agree not to require compensatory
stream mitigation for this project (other than preservation of the channels and associated
buffers) if the road is realigned as noted in the table above. This provision would save the
applicant a considerable amount of up-front money. For instance, W RP charges $200 per linear
foot for stream mitigation.
IV. Stormwater management: The applicant is requesting to rely on the Town of
Cary's stormwater management plan for this project. DWQ staff have reviewed the plan and
agree that the plan meets the condition of our respective General Certification 3404 except for
the Village Center site. The present stormwater management plan is to construct sand filters for
this area while General Certification 3404 for Nationwide Permit 14 states that in NSW
watersheds, "...the Division shall require that extended detention wetlands, bio-retention areas,
and ponds followed by filter strips (designed according to the latest NC DENR Stormwater Best
Management Practices Manual) be constructed as part of the stormwater management
plan..."since these measures have been shown to be most effective at nutrient removal. To
date, the applicant has not redesigned the proposed stormwater management plan to reflect the
requirements of the General Certification. We are willing to work with the developer to modify
the stormwater plans for the Village Center to address the condition of General Certification
3404.
In summary, DWQ and Corps of Engineers staff believe that the applicant has had
numerous occasions over the past several months to revise the application to relocate the road
crossing but has refused to do so. The relocation of the road is a simple issue of minimization of
stream impact (both direct and indirect impact) that is clearly required by both DWQ and the
Corps rules. According to John Hennessy, DWQ staff that review DOT projects routinely require
DOT to meet these types of design constraints and DOT readily modifies their applications to
comply. Staff of both agencies would be willing to meet again with the applicant and consultants
to again discuss these issues if requested. However if the applicant would like a speedy
resolution of the issue so he can begin to develop the site, then the agencies suggest that the
road be relocated as repeatedly requested since June 2003.
Cc: Andrea Wade, Raleigh Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers
File copy
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone]
7El
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
R1?6ETVEL
r Mr..? puw ?•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA`
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONALEIGH REGULATOR' FIELD OFFICE
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
,GOVERNOR
SL•C'Rfi'fAiY
January 14, 2004
Mr. Donald A. Sever, PE.
Chas. H. Sells, inc
15300 Weston Parkway Suit 106
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Reference: Town of Cary Bond Project
Stownwater Pud Roadway Improvements
Green Level-Durham Rd. (SR 1615)
North of O'Kelly Chapel Rd. (SR 1628)
CHS Project No. 03412.002
Wake County - Division 5
Dear Donald,
The Special Studies Squad of the Design Services Unit has reviewed the alternate
alignment for Green Level-Durham Rd. submitted to this office by Chas. H Sells on
January 9, 2004. This review is based on NCDOT current design criteria, standards, and
The 2001 "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (The Green Book).
Our Comments are as follows:
1) Need to check alignment, several curves are over lapping
2) Show bearings on alignment.
3) Roadway widths shown on plans do not measure correctly
4) Super elevation runoff length for curve at PI 13+17.72 and PI 17+56.50
needs lane adjustment factor for number of lanes. See page 171 & 172 of
"A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" (The Green
Book).
do s ?%,s v?,ao. tis -??..?.? *ADA -k-,, ;V-,A . 1.1
5) Due to the grade on O'Kelly Chapel Rd. (-1.45%) super elevation on ,
RECEIVED
Green Level Durham Rd. must be rotated 7.5 increments (270') to obtain
full super. This results in only having full super for a distance of 3'.
JAN 2 -1 2004 Recommend either changing grade on O'Kelly Chapel Rd. or flatting
Chas. H, Sells curve to lengthen distance of full super.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CENTURY CENTER COMPLEX
DESIGN SERVICES UNIT ENTRANCE B2
1591 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWWDOH.DOT.STATE,NC.US 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27699-1591 RALEIGH NC

6) Can curves at PI station 174-56.50 and 25+21.15 be replaced with one
curve to eliminate tangent between curves?
If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call Shannon Macon or
myself at 250-4128.
Sincerely,
x '41 ?z
Mohammed Mahj oub, El
Special Studies Squad Leader
Design Services Unit
MEM/slm
Attachments
CC: Project File
...... ..w.. .. .. .. ... ...., ?...... ....
6-k
I k 4:??? 'tY 7; - f
y
r f
y..

Z',
f:, }
r,
1•: W
J .3
11 ..
t. ?
00
i. i
++?y??jj J
IIK
_ A 1? ? y hS_
?, Jy L'i ) }?
v. ? 1 `? ,n I nr ?' y ? ,
p ft
JIN
?? A by T?t ?? }
.. s
s
? A. f Rte,, r
r ' P Si D r 7? e?? 4t.
1 tt r C
??-a}?' ? .. . ? 1+11. `??t ? t ?"+c-? t ? ? 1.
r
? ,ITT
l1
4

l„J
a.. S.
aF5
Fk ??s
,7

CHAS. H. SELLS, INN
Consulting Engineers, Surveyors i Photogrammetrists
CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
October 20, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT, P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P
SENIOR ASSOCIATES.
PHILIPPE B6USADER, P.E.
SCOTT W, DUNCAN, C.P.
NAOMI ISAACS
DAVID A. WEBBER, P.L.S.
ASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
1b, (i Q 03-iZI
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
OCT 2 0 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
As discussed at our meeting on October 16, 2003, we are providing you with additional
information regarding our proposed alignment and storm water management for the site.
Enclosed are seven copies of the Drawing C3.0, which shows the storm water
management plan, a table listing the Total Nitrogen Export Calculations, and an
alternate alignment (Exhibit B - letter size and 24x36), and a copy of the survey map
with the alignments on it. We are also enclosing one copy of the Traffic Impact and
Access Study and Cary Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
The alternate alignment shifts the roadway 100' to the west to avoid the intermittent
stream. However, to maintain the minimum radius of curvature, a reverse curve is
needed approximately 700' south of the O'kelly - Green Level Roadway intersection.
This reverse curve impacts a stream on this property to the south. We looked at various
skew angles for this intersection, but all of them impacted either the stream to the south
or to the north. The soils map further shows the stream.
At the proposed stream crossing, the alignment was designed to make it a ninety
degree crossing as much as possible. However, again because of minimum curvature
and the skew of the stream, the impacts are fairly close to the original alignment. It is
pointed out that the new alignment north of the stream is completely outside the
Waterford Stonewater property, which is shown by a hatch pattern.
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss any
questions you may have on the above matter.

15300 Weston Parkway • Suite 106 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.chashsclls.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPWYER, M/F

October 20, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
[L,--
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Se11s Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_10_20_03.doc\

RIPARIAN
(ZONE I) BUFFER
CA A
ES

UFFER

30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
!ZONE 1)
\ Its I)RfAN bUFfCR
jf
WATERFORD STONEWATER LLC /
TRACT 2 11
45.743 ACRES`••,\
AR 1723, PG 5a
A PARr a
BM 1952, P6 67 j
P,N NQ 766.01-9398
ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
OUTSIDE WATERFORD P/L
RIPARIAN BIXlER
S 1)
RIPARIAN BUFFER
A&jfA
vs°t'p\
C
9L
0' TOWN
I
WATERFORD STONE WA TER

r--
U
PROPOSED ALIGNMENT

ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT

W?
DWELL Y CHAPEL RC
SR 1628 (60' R/V)
REVISED ACDOT R/V IMP
PR0..CCT Na 6.402172
.AND AREA J
8 ACRES ALTERNATE ALIG MENT
OUTSIDE WATER RP/L
ADDITIONAL STREAI IMPACTS
/ 0 200 400
SCALE 1'=400'
BUFFER
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
rq ALSTON AVENUE
SR 1630 (60' RIO
ACWT RIV MM
PRQ.ECT AG 6402152

I
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
SR 1625 (60' R/V)
wwr R/V NAP
PRa CCT AG 6402,52
,

o

J A . ??.
o . GREEN LEVEL TD DURHAM ROAD
SR 1625 !60' R/V)

EXHIBIT B AL TERNATE MINIMAL IMPACT ALIGNMENT WEST

PREPARED BY: CHAS H SELLS, INC.
OCTOBER 2003
Vol1\`O`0?
7-
\- S
I `
urlUtev -? F,
- - ---------1?
Stonewater PUD - Total Nitrogen Export Calculations
9/17/02
UENSI TN Export IU/Ac Coeff- L07 AREAS
;CELLANEOUS PARCELS
LOT TN BUFFER TN Export BUFFER TN P.P.M.O.S. TN Export P.P.M,O.S. T
P
Export AREA Coeff. Export AREA Cceff. R.O.W.• TN ort R.O.W. TN TOTAL TN TN LOADING RED. TN AFTER
145.39 Export 232.86 5 08 0.6 3.05 0 99 Cceff. Export EXPORT RATE METHOD 1 R RED. TN AFTER
3.19 0.6 1.91 c ?c 1.2 1.19 METHOD 2 RED. 2
% REDUCTION METHOD SYMBOLS
30% RB RIPARIAN BUFFER
25% D DETENTION POND
40% W WETLANDS
30% O OPEN CHANNEL
35% S SAND FILTERS
25% B BIORETENTION
20% V VEGETATED STRIPS W/ LEVEL SPREADER
NN OF CARY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DOES NOT SET A NITROGEN EXPORT LIMIT IN THE CAPE FEAR BASIN: INSTEAD REQUIRES NITROGEN TO BE REDUCED TO THE -MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE'. TO THIS END. STONEWATER IS PROPOSING
YEAR, AND INDIVIDUAL POD EXPORT LIMITS OF 3.0 LBS/ACRE/YEAR FOR RESIDENTIAL PODS AND THE TOWN PARK. AND 8.0 LBS/ACRE/YEAR FOR COMMERCIAL PODS (RESULTS IN PUD EXPORT OF 6.0 LBS/ACRE/YEAR).
rHOUT THE USE OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS. SINCE THE REDUCTION OF NITROGEN THROUGH RIPARIAN BUFFERS IS CONSIDERED IN SETTING A PUD EXPORT LIMIT OF 6.0 LBS/ACRE/YEAR.
ES ONLY, POD DESIGNERS RETAIN THE OPTION OF USE OF OTHER TYPES OF APPROVED BMP DEVICES TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED NITROGN EXPORT REDUCTION.
:ISTING POND IN SF-2 WILL BE APPROVED FOR RETRO-FIT FOR USE AS A BMP OR THE SF-2 POD WILL CONSTRUCT SEPARATE BMP. TO REDUCE THE NITROGEN EXPORT TO LIMITS SHOWN ABOVE. -
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
A
10/17/2003

i+
METHOD is SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENT

POD NAME TOTAL POD
AREA UNITS
SF1 49.15
132
0(
SF2
TOTAL .
69.96 163.OC
119.11 115.0U
METHOD 2: COMMERCIAL / MULTIFAMIL
SUMMARY
Total PUD Acreage 299.41 acres
Total Est TN Export 2600.45 lb/year
TN Loading Rate 8.69 lb/ac/year
TN AFTER RED. 5.44 lb/ac/year
NOTES:
1.THE STONEWATER PUD IS LOCATED IN THE CAPE FEAR BAS
TO USE A TOTAL PUD TARGET NITROGEN EXPORT OF 6.0 LES
ZTHE NITROGEN. REDUCTION CALCULATIONS WERE COMPLEI
3.THE BMP DEVICES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE P
CTHE CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT
SWNITROGEN-2nd submittal without buffers.xls. TN Export
P. P. M.O.S. - PERMANENTLY PROTECTED MANAGED OF
' R.O.W. IS APPROXIMATELY 75% IMPERVIOUS.
01/30/2004 08:49 FAX
auiu or r nvironmental
11010 Raven Midge Road - P4eigh, North Carolina 27,514 -
www SandEC.com
TrausmitW
To-

We Transmit to you Herewith:
' Drawings
[] Specif cations
? Brochures or photos
iR orrespondcnce
? As per your request
-.1., Itc.
t??+wti-••.• :,?..?,?, ?, aJ???-,r. ? Cr *tiasa~ ? or-Q. 'ti 33 .-a I ?rr^ ?'?. ?,....-
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By:
C-harlott,
2316 Lclfiitlip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax- [phone]
C" ast"U'a ° 'e???4't7
ot- ?tn' I,.e o?Cw rw„ai. ??
Grreensbnm office..
3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
4 CORPS RALEIGH 01001
Consultants, PA
Phone. [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Project tNkaw iz) Date: th-?
Project Name; SAQ.,
File:
Under Separate Cover;
. or your information and Ries ? By mail
or comment or approval ? By courier
? Returned for correction, resubmit ? By express
? Approved as noted
Fi CIMX Office:
1622 Coon Mountain Lane
7hylorsville, NC 28681
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]o
Remarks;«
? *P??'g? ?C.V 'r ors
imap://j ohn.dorney %40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @ cros. ncmail. net:143/fe...
Iof I
Subject: Re: stonewater/green level road - possible meeting
From: Alan Klimek <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:46 -0500
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
CC: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Coleen
Sullins <[e-mail]>
I've talked t Bob Haverk d he does want a meeting. I agreed to a premeeting Friday with just
him and I (perh this ?1 deflect the need for a bigger meeting but I doubt it). He had set up a meeting
for today at 4 that I told him would not work. He had invited the following:
Town of Cary - William Coleman, Town Manager
Tim Bailey, Director of Engineering
Jeff Ulma, Director of Planning
Chas H. Cells Engineering- Ross Massey
S&EC, Inc. - Kevin Martin
Todd Prunninger
Waterford Development NC, LLC - Bob Haverkamp
Scott Johnson
He also requested that Andrea be invited. Let me know times next week that you two (and others if
appropriate) could meet.
Alan
John Dorney wrote:
talked to alan klimek late friday. if a meeting is needed (not decided yet), then alan would like you
present as well. this coming week (january 26-30) is impossible for me. please let me know when you
could be available for meeting with the developer, consultants, alan and myself (coleen too?) during
the week of february 2 to 6 (probably a two hour meeting). would anyone else from the Corps need
to attend as well? please advise. thankx
alan - i'll let you know how her and my schedules coincide for that week. thankx
?bj
Qff\ el CO jJ" ~?
1/28/04 5:18 PM
9e?
z?7
AKe
?a"m X2r ?Sm obi ?.,?F'

etY7

s
r

A I
AR-D
E
NR
BILL ROSS JR.
SECRETARY
. IW ?-
??? , J .AVM
4"-el 040 444^zew-
r4o
a?
.4e 1*4-t
, . 1
44
• ?j`??° `_?. I'''mo
06RTH C OLINA DEPARTMENT
Waterforid Developnent NC,
January 2, 2004
Mr. William G. Ross, Jr.
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
SUBJECT: Waterford r
een Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
DWQ 03-0981, Wake County
LLC
Dear Mr. Ross:
This letter is in regards to our permit application for realigning Green Level -Durham
Road located in Cary, North Carolina. Our original permita,we as eicei a ett t stating that of
Water Quality on August 6, 2003. On August 18, 2 was
ince the project was placed on hold and additional
cor espondences wit Mr. John
received this on hold notification, we have had
DorneY to explain the reason for the roadway location
be done for the proposed roadway at a
variety of alternatives to show what can and can't Based on the most recent field visit meeting with Mr. Domey and our project manager
and consultants on December 15, 2003, what is being asked of us will cause my
loss. What is also
company a great hardship and a tremendous undue monetary
extremely frustrating to us that we have performed allanalysis t moment that they have asked, only
to have additional concerns being brought out at the last
our project. As part of our approved PUD for our 300
We offer the following summary
acre tract of land in Cary, the town stated that the Gree be even _ Roa D urham
as a oud is part of construed lane
their thoroughfare plan. The roadway was required 3,300
facility with the right-of-way width of 124' to allow fora future two lanes t to accommodate
actonal roadway to be of stream.constructed is approximately
mass transit or HOV lanes. The
feet, of which we would be impacting 694'

3301 Woman's Club Drive suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27612 919-785-1110 Fax: [phone]
,nuary 2, 2004
Ar. Ross
Division of Water,Quality
Page 2 of 3
The beginning and terminus point for the proposed realignment within our property was
based on tie-in points agreed upon by the Town of Cary and the NCDOT. Subsequently,
our consultant designed a roadway which minimized impacts to the stream by using
minimum NCDOT design criteria. DWQ staff was first concerned about us impacting 200
feet of intermittent stream, of which we showed it was impossible
stated that they will oAfter we
performed this analysis of alternatives, they
a roadway crossing at the "waterfall", a 12' vertical drop in the vicinity where the stream
changes from intermittent to a perennial stream. The drainage area for this "waterfall" is
56 acres, and because of the skew angle of the stream to the roadway alignment we
were impacting less than 300 feet of stream. crossin DWQ staff gave us direction that the only thing lirr?i would would bead be 50 feet fom
downstream of the "waterfall" where the construction this location
the base of the "waterfall". To meet minimum NCDOT design criteria, 3.5 acres of
requires us to lose a total of 2.9 acres of land in our proposed village center,
developable land for single family homes, plus additional engineering and construction
costs for the additional length of roadway.
Based on current land costs, the preferred DWQ alternative will impact us $1.3 million for
the village center, plus an additional $0.2 million for the single family home land, or $1.5
million in land costs alone. For the additional engineering, increased roadway
construction costs, additional financing costs associated with•delaying the project at least
six months to meet the town's PUD revision process, there is an additional $0.6 million in
costs. This brings the total cost impact to $2.1 million to avoid the "waterfall".
We have worked with the Town of Cary to reduce the 25width of 0 feet the thoroughfare
roposing twin y
a are proposing'
at our original location to lessen the stream impact to
60" diameter pipes at a 5% slope to handle the anticipated storm flows. The Corps of
Engineers seemed to be receptive for our proposed stream impact reduction. However,
DWQ staff gave us the impression that in their opinion we would not be able to design a
pipe outfall to minimize downstream erosion. This is contradictory to standards that
have been used to minimize erosion for decades.
It is our opinion that we have tried to meet the DWQ and COE's desire to minimize
stream impacts, but the most recent desire to avoid the "waterfall" is unrealistic. We
would appreciate your input as to how we can resolve this issue in the most expedious
manner.
1. 1
nuary 2, 2004
,Nlr. Ross
Division of Waters Quality
Page 3 of 3
Since ly,
?d
Robert Haverkamp
Waterford Development NC, LLC / Manager
Waterford Stonewater Project Manager

Attachments
DWQ December 8, 2003 On Hold Letter
Illustrative Master Plan w/ Revised Alignment
V:\Projects\Selis Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_12_31 03_ross.doc
12/18/2003 10:57 FAX
4 DWQ DORNEY U001/004
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] + Fax: [phone]
www.Sandl?C.oom
DAT ! --
TO: NAME:-7
COMPANY`-.
Project Number: (0""
CC.
FAX NUMBER:
FROM, SUBJECT:
The following items are being faxed. Number ofpages including transmittal sheet: `'A
For Your Comments/Approval
_ Per Our Conversation
y Tease Advise
Would Like To Discuss
HAND COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
For Your Information
Per Your Request
Please Call
_ Please Handle
Hand Delivery
No Hard Copy Sent
REMARKS-
bt4.
IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT AT [phone].
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, distribution or cop-Ting of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone xnad rentrn the faxed documents to us at the above address
via the United States Ponta) Service.
Greensboro QM--- Hickory Off cc:
ChAd tte e: 622 Coon Mountain Lane
236 LzPhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndalc Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Tiylorsville, NC: 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone- [phone] Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: (828)635-,5820
IFACSIM X SHEET"
FAX .NO (919)846-946r7
12/18/2003 10:58 FAX
4 DWQ DORNEY 1iD002/004
pagc 1. of 1
Preuninger
From: R, Scott Johnson, PE [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:59 AM
To: Todd Preuninger
Subject: Alternate alignments to GLD Road
Todd,
'lease forward this information to John Dorney with the exhibits of the alternate alignments for Green Level to
Durham (GLD) Road_ Also add any additional information you feel necessary. Thanks.
There are couple of important points to keep in mind while reviewing these alignments. First, we have submitted
both of these to NCDOT for their review and comment. We are requesting a written response (hopefully just an
email to move things along quickly) to get an idea if these alignments are acceptable from a safety and buildability
standpoint. We obviously don't want to move ahead with an alignment acceptable to DWQ only to find out that
DDT won't approve it. It should be noted that the alignment which crosses the stream approximately 300 feet
downstream of the waterfall (the location desired during the field meeting on 12-15-3) will most likely be denied by
DOT_ This is due to the intersection of Stonewater Glen Dr (the main eastlwest collector for the project) is in the
middle of the long horizontal curve of GLD Rd.
The second alignment crosses the stream approximately 130 feet downstream of the waterfall. The intersection
of Stonewater Glen Dr. and OLD Rd. is still in the long horizontal curve and the intersection of O'Keily Chapel Rd
and GLD Rd is a bit tight but the engineers think DOT may accept it.
Another point to keep in mind is that we are attempting to set up a meeting with the Cary Planning Department
and other town departments to determine if the re-alignment of GILD Rd, which will be different than the alignment
in our approved PUD plan, will require us to back through the PUD re-approval process. If it is determined we
need to revise our PUD document, this process could take 6 months to a year to complete which would throw our
project completion schedule into complete disarray.
While were checking on all of these other issues it will be important though to get some feedback from DWQ as
to their thoughts on these alignments. We obviously can't commit to either of these alignments at this time until
we get answers to the issues outlined above. However, -it's important to know. now if QWQ has strong feelings for
or against either of these alignments.
R- Scott Johnson, P.E.
Land Development Manager
Waterford Development NC, LLC
(0)910-785-1110 (M) 919-795-9285
12/18/03
12/18/2003 10:58 FAX
98• RVAR(AN BUFFER
42 P
W BUFFER
0-- _
t
4 DWq DORNEY [x]003/004
111AARIM NUFFER

mM R ?,
11 TRACT R
45.743 ACRES`-\
M
40

' ROADWAY OUTSIDE WATERF© :G? P/

aonc n

"P
WATERFORD STUNE WAT R L
r
i
,
r

RY BUFFER
TOWN O
t
I I
1
IATERFORD STON T LLC '
I i

NCAt1T REALIGNMENT
L) TL1 FRGPGSED 1540
d ' V I r
tr
' i AL S'TON AVENUE
J t t SR 16"g R1V)
e+
?
j
l O'KELL Y CHAPEL ROAD versa
?- + cr .a
/i -
t I
, SR 1628 (6r R/V)
i ¦,'r?
f
RIaECT

- _ GREEN BEVEL To DURHAM RQAD
_
lrars'2s (60' R/V>
s w ?e
i
PROP ED RELLOX, ATICIV -- = ??
u
I ? ?
r
J ?` Lev GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
1 SR 1623 CSr RIW
N
A y 'r

f?
goo
SEAL t 1'=400' I

;r PREPARE17 BY, CHAS H SELLS, INC.
i BCT17BER 2003
12/18/2003 10:58 FAX
M . r
,W RIPARIAN BUFFER
fo n
MWER

Pl .
t Pot
VATERFL7RD STL7NEWATER L-
DWQ DGRNEY 10004/004
RIPARIAN A(JrrER
45,743CACRES`-,
t
' RoADVAY OUTSIDE VATER'FDR&%
Q ?J
J1P?_
1{!!iA "R: 9A
r

,
1100!\R- - - --- lI --
l1
TOVN 0. t7Y BUFFER
_-- ------

it ,

I
t WATERFORD srDNEVATE c c
a
bt ?
i
i NCDL7T REALIGNMEW
TO PR17POSE11 1540
Li
4
U
I Ai,srnN AVE'
I SR C60' R/f

t
nCpr FN ?P
I
!1J$1 1 p KELL Y CHAPEL ROAD -
1
.?_ / ppp asi aweel?
"t _
+ SR 16M (W RSV)
te
LL _
?d?
J
?
I 1 /r
'?
I J? ..
ti? y GREEN L-E'VkL TO DURHAM ROAD

ado' Rfv?
Awag&s

Rr
A NCDOT RN IMP
/ ? ? PAO.XCT NR a1d•1SC
A
,
ACRES
A
PI?L1PfJ1S'ED RELD T ION P4 /?-
?
--_
?
GREEN LEVEL TV DURHAM RQAD
SR ZWS (w R/w)
N

em .w
n
SCALE 1'=400' f I PREPARED B )'f CHAS H SELLS IN(
AW
imap://john.dorney%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net @ cros.ncmail.net:143/fe...
Subject: FW: Stonewater East of falls
From: "Don Sever" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:38:02 -0500
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>
These alignment narrows the median to 2' and has a concrete retaining wall at the top of the falls. The 10'
walkway is not shown since the location might change to somewhere below the falls.
Don
iAiq Io 3
1 of 1 12/19/03 2:33 PM
? r, f
off;
37 RIPARIAN AFFER
czar D
( r? 00
?. 37 RIPARIAN 81FiER 00
t
EFFER
t
j11(? 45.7432ACRES o
AX i1N8a. P4 1?a
7rs a
1 p 1 Am IQ 7P6M-99m
`tlS: ?? i+D {rd
\` ` \?? \ f 1? ` -
ROADWAY OUTSIDE VATERFORD P/
c _ Y
.,.wry \? )'??
ew ?L'i ?f >
E_
VATERFORD STONEVA TER'
N
? P c
..?...
50' TOWN RY BUFFER '
f ATERF W STa"ATER LLC' s
t {
NCWT REALZGV49NT
JD PRQvOSED ISO
:
OMLY CHAPEL ROAD ? y ALSTdV AVEMX
RAO
SR mw d w R/V1
4 t
\ ~
04rn?\\\\,A \$-_.. l\a 4+? t `!.. J E/i/.,.??'/~? VNAy R)W
cf)
B RESJ i+ :®\ne It n ~r \ O MWNV&XM
? rn
r t. U
PROP ED RELD ATION _ 0
GREEN LEVEL TO BUW M ROAD
N ' WMW dWRAO U)
U
SCALES'=400 ,oo REVISED ALIGNMENT VEST OF FALLS o
1 PREPARED BY, CHAS H SELLS, INC.
/ $:,i DECEMBER 2003 >

A

133ND

A

VAProjects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Roodway Improvements\Final\greenlevel_impact_revcl.dwg, Model, 12/19
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
I / 1 / i ? / 11
CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
December 19, 2003

Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
DWQ 03-0981, Wake County
Dear Mr. Dorney:
)1b
1r1

Attached please find one copy of the revised alignme
The drawings include an overall at 1"=100', and the s
waterfall area. There is approximately 20' from the c
We have talked to the NCDOT and they have given
Please call me to discuss any questions you
Sincerely,
qt)as. H. Sells, Inc.
LDonald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC:

Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater (w/attachments)
Kevin Martin, S&EC (w/attachments)
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
Tim Bailey, Town of Cary (w/attachments)
V:V:\Projects\SeIIs Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspond ence\03412_DWQ_12_19_03.doc\
h

PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P
SENIOR ASSOCIATES
PHILIPPE BOUSADER, P.E.
SCOTT W. DUNCAN, C.P.
NAOMI ISAACS
DAVID A. WEBBER, P.L.S.
ASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
"FrZoi
GVgr?C 19 2003
?Q?ql/rYS?
?r/0/V
ht for Green Level -Durham Road.
Dcond is at 1 "=20' scale at the
Ivert to the base of the waterfall.
s their approval on this alignment.
e on the above mat er. -?-? o c?s?
W c?frn?
10?-
V
15300 Weston Parkway • Suite 106 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.chashsells.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER, M/F
Additionally, the Town of Cary has indicated that they will not invoke eminent domain
in order to re-locate the alignment as depicted by the NC-DWQ.
2. The plans indicate that you are proposing to construct a major new thoroughfare.
The proposed road is a 4-1ane thoroughfare that connects a 2-lane road at its
northern and southern termini. The following questions pertain to this design:
- The purpose and need for the enlarged road segment with respect to
traffic volume and flow is unclear with respect to Waterford Stonewater
LLC.
This issue was addressed in paragraphs 1-3 in our response dated 9/23/03 and by the
Town of Cary October 21, 2003. Please refer to these documents if you need
additional clarification.
- Also, the 10121103 letter from the Town of Cary is confusing since it
states that "Based on our modeling results portions of the Green Level
to Durham road are to be improved in the near term (2005) and mid
term (2015), then six lanes in long term (2025). " Please clarify which
time frame is relevant to this portion of the road. In this regard, DWQ
believes that the long term need for six lanes will require future
permitting since DWQ cannot permit impacts to streams that may not
be needed for over 20 years.
The Town of Cary has plans to construct Green Level to Durham Road to the south by
the end of the decade, while future development to the north of the Stonewater site will
dictate its schedule.
The Town of Cary requires a Traffic Impact Study to be performed by a developer for
every large project. As stated by Mr. Tim Bailey of the Town of Cary in his October 21,
2003 letter addressed to you, the Town had contracted Wilbur Smith Associates to
perform this study. Their findings are the Green Level to Durham Road needs to be four
lanes to provide adequate traffic capacity for the study period (2010 conditions).
Moreover, in order to reduce future impacts and costs, the proposed road alignment is
based on the assumption that additional lanes will be needed in the future and utilities have
been placed outside of the future right-of-way. If the four-lane section is constructed as
proposed by DWQ, any future improvements/widening will require that the infrastructure
(curb and gutter, walkways, fiber optics, etc.) be removed and placed outside of the edge-
of-pavement, as per. NCDOT requirements. This would be a considerable cost and
hardship for both the Town of Cary and the Taxpayers.
- Finally NC 55 is currently being widened......... One pertinent question
is whether the traffic models The Town of Cary is using have been
updated to reflect the current widening.
2
For the overall Comprehensive Traffic Plan, Wilbur Smith Associates also performed this
study. This company is one of the top traffic-engineering firms in the country. Their
analysis looked at all proposed improvements in the area, including the 1540 and NC 55
roadway projects in the traffic model. This model is quite comprehensive and allows for
the Town to properly plan all roadways in the corridor area.
In summary, we believe that DWQ will be able to issue a 401 certification for
either a two-lane or a four-lane road depending on when the modeling shows a
need for this segment. This road will need to minimize impacts.........
Based on our conversations with the town of Cary, the following is offered to minimize
the impacts at the stream crossing at Station 25+00. The roadway typical section at this
location will have an 18' wide median, with four lanes and curb and gutter on both sides
of the centerline. The multiuse trail on the east side will be removed from this project.
The trail on the west side will be moved to 4' from the back of curb. These changes allow
the reduction of the dual 60" pipe to 250'. The stream impacts are then lessened by
50'. These changes allow for your desire to minimize stream impacts as much as
possible, while providing the needed four lanes of pavement for the proposed
development.
3. It is our understanding that the Green Level project is proposed to be a
thoroughfare; however, the proposed expansion will also provide access to
adjacent properties. As such, our review indicates that a stormwater management
plan will be needed to address secondary and cumulative impacts for development
accelerated by the road. Therefore, please provide a plan a to stormwater
management...........
At present, all residual properties have access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue
and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could be developed/accessed without construction of this
thoroughfare. Therefore, the proposed improvements do not predicate any locations
for secondary impacts, and future development does not rely on additional impacts
to provide access to public roadways. As such, we do not believe that the NCDWQ
has the authority to require a stormwater management plan (i.e. the existing parcels
could be developed without impacts). However, as a courtesy we provided DWQ with
an overall stormwater plan and calculations in our correspondence dated 10/20/03. This
information should adequately address your concerns.
In closing, Waterford Stonewater, LLC.does not own the adjacent property, and therefore
the alternate alignment proposed by DWQ is not a practicable solution to reduce impacts.
However, in an attempt to avoid impacts, we contacted the adjacent property owner as
well as the Town of Cary and were unable to secure a right-of-way to the east of the
original alignment. In recent meetings with the Town of Cary we were able to
compromise on some issues (i.e. remove one of the trails) and have been able to reduce
the impacts by approximately 50 linear feet. Early in the planning process we explored the

3
use of arch culverts and bridges as an alternative to avoid impacts entirely. These
alternatives were either too costly or not feasible from an engineering standpoint. In fact,
initial figures showed approximately 550 feet of stream impact at the proposed perennial
stream crossing. We have reduced this impact to 250 feet.
We feel that every reasonable effort has been made in order to reduce impacts and we
have explored alternate alignments as per requests by NC-DWQ and the USACE.
However, these alignments do not meet NCDOT standards. Given constraints due to
property ownership, DOT standards, as well as the Town of Cary's desire to provide
pedestrian access, impacts are unavoidable, but have been minimized to the maximum
extent possible within the proposed Town of Cary alignment and within the property
boundaries of the Stonewater site. Because our application was submitted approximately
four months ago, we would appreciate a quick response to our request for the 401 water
quality certification.
Please call if you have any questions or require further explanation.
Sincerely,
jai- &Ux??twQ
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated December 8, 2003
2) Revised Typical Section
CC: Tim Bailey, Town of Cary
Bob Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Andrea Wade, COE
Don Sever, Chas H Sells
4
•DEC-8-2003 08:00 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 TO:98469467 P:2-14
aF VGA,
OCR DG Michael F. Easley
y Governor
r_- William G- Ross, Jr., Secretary
? Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Qugtlity
December 8, 2003
Registered Mail - Return Receipt Requested
Stonewater Waterford, LLC
Attn: Bob Haverkamp
3301 Woman's Club Drive, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Tim Bailey, P.E.
Director of Engineering
Town of Cary
318 North Academy Street
Cary NO 27513
RE: Additional information Request & on Hold Notification
Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
DWQ 03-0981
Wake County
Dear Mr. Haverkamp and Mr. Bailey:
On August 6, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of the
Waterford Stonewater, LLC's original application regarding the re-aligning of Green Level Durham
Road which would impact approximately 694 linear feet of stream channels in Wake County. On
October 20, 2003 and October 21, 2003 additional information was provided to DWQ. After review of
this information, we believe that your project should remain on hold. We will require you to address the
following items in order to allow processing of your project to continue pursuant to 15A NCAC 213 .0500.
1) DWQ believes that the proposed road can be realigned to the east of the proposed alignment in
order to entirely avoid impacts to the intermittent(perennial stream system in the center of the
property. Please see the enclosed sketch plan and provide an analysis of its praotioality, In this
regard, DWQ believes that a perpendicular crossing of the intermittent portion of this stream system
will likely be allowable in order to extend the road in the center of the development to connect the
Village Center to the relocated road (See sketch) plan. Finally this realignment of the Green Level-
Durham road should avoid the stream, thereby eliminating the need for compensatory stream
mitigation for this part of the project at a considerable cost savings to the applicant. In addition,
construction of this alternative should save considerable construction cost since it avoids the
extremely steep terrain lower in the stream valley.
2) The plans indicate that you are proposing to construct a major new thoroughfare. The proposed
road is a 4-lane thoroughfare that connects to a 2-lane road at its northern and southem termini.
The following questions pertain to this design.
* The purpose and need for the enlarged road segment with respect to traffic volume
and flow is unclear with respect to Waterford Stonewater LLC.
North Carolina Division of Water Quolity, 401 Wetlands Certification unit,
1650 Malt Service center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Locatlon)
819-733-1786 (phone), 91&733-8893 (fax), http:J/h2o.enr.state.nc.uafn*wetlaTxW
DEC-6-2003 08:00 FR0M:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 TO:98469467 P:3/4
Page 2 of 2
Stonewater Waterford, LLC
DWQ No. 03-0981
? Also, the October 21, 2003 letter from the Town of Cary is confusing since it states
that "Based on our modeling results portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, are to
be improved to four lanes near term (2005) and mid term (2015), then six lanes in long
term (2025)." Please clarify which timeframe is relevant to this portion of Green Level-
Durham Road. In this regard, DWQ believes that the long term need (2025) for six
lanes will require future permitting since DWQ cannot permit impacts to streams that
may not be needed for over 20 years.
? Finally NO 55 is currently being widened. Indeed the segment of NC 55 that is
nearest to this project (just a flew miles east of the site) is currently under construction.
DWQ has serious doubts whether a six lane widening of the Green Level to
Durham/Alston Avenue corridor w411 be needed given the current work on NC 55. One
pertinent question is whether the traffic models that the Town of Cary is using have
been updated to reflect the current widening project. Please clarify.
In summary, we believe that DWQ will be able to issue a 401 Certification for either a two-lane or
four-lane road depending on when the modeling shows a need in this segment. This road will need
to minimize impacts; therefore any future widening which impacts stream channels will require
additional permitting., Please be aware that issuing a Certification for impacts to streams for more
than a four lane road is very unlikely.
3) It Is our understanding that the Green Level project is proposed to be a thoroughfare; however, the
proposed expansion will also provide access to adjacent properties. As such, our review indicates
that a stormwater management plan will be needed to address cumulative and secondary impacts
for development that will be accelerated by this road. Therefore, please provide a plan to address
stormwater management from all parcels whose access is enhanced by this road (namely the
Village Center tract, the MF-3 tract and the MF-1A tract). We believe that this stormwater
management should address stormwater management for these entire tracts and thereby protect
downstream water quality. Since these are Nutrient Sensitive Waters, constructed wetlands or
similar measures that address nutrient removal will be needed probably above jurisdictional
channels or on their upper-most ends.
If you have any questions or would require any additional information please contact Danny
Smith at [phone] or John Domey at (919)-733-9646. This project will remain on hold as
incomplete in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will
begin when this information is received. If we do not hear from you by writing within three (3) weeks we
will as; umo you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
Sincerely yours,

cc:
Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office U
Andrea Wade, Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
Donald Sever - Chas H. Sells, Inc., 15300 Weston Parkway, Suite 106, Cary NC 275613
Todd Preuninger - S&EC 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh NO 27614
Central Files
File Copy
6EC-8-2003 08:01 FROM:DWQ-WETLANDS 9197336893 TO:98469467 P:4J4
?.
\ ' !1- aIPARlAh BuftCa
. r _
X.,
30' R/PMI.w PfFrER
t TRACT P ?•
:1 12. 45.743 ACRES'`-
! t . ,r. w.t[4n ter. \., a '
o64TE MW ALr vT
gursmr VArERFD?D P/L
_ +T,p
NATERFMD SnWEVAMR LLe ?! , • ` r y C)~?
! p.
t
vE
' 50' TVVN D RY BUrrCR
VA I-ERFORD STONE VA MR
U? .
V NCDFJT R£,4Llt"rNMENT
MUM M9 ?4l.IG 'NT TO PRDPOS£D 1540
VERMT£ ALIGNMENT
£i'KELL Y CHAPEL ALSTDN AVENUE
RD , e 1630 fbr R/vi
SR t628 Or R/A? s
, Icapr Rrv Kir
m wt Vv )w i c? MAesr w uaclr
GREEN LEM. T© DURHAM RDAD
µo AaCA - ^ :L - - SR 1625 ce(r R1W
ACRES AL rERNATE ALIGNMENTS
DUTSID6'
ATER ` P/L ? ? 4^?
ADAITM4L ST IMPACTS ?" J
4 . GREEN LEVEL TD DURHAM ROAD
J' `', ?`!} sa 1b25 X60• Q?n
LL?J -rT B ALTERNATLr MNINAL DFACT ALIWMENT• VEST
SCALE 1'=400'
PREPARE.0 PY-' CHAS H SELLS, INC.
GCTURER 8003

H AM
VET pUR
_Y-GREEN?E
23+45'26
p 4!5A' 31»
D=()3*06'06
T-24 .69,
-- 5' L
=T• 62• a

x

3
Ago g?
A' Y
vso"Ooo.>
0
q 66
BBVI - - I
1j1j1j1??
}
I
_ j
s 4
??AD °
I raorecrr. ox?z DALE 1]JIOiDT?
DRAWNBY: TH C`RECKM BY: DA
TIRE
SN
Q
O
0
M
O
O
N
N
N
a
O
ol
3
a
M
0
N
N
7
UI
N
O
C
Li
C
N
0
a
T
0
a
O
/
a
c
0
3
W
N
M
O
U
O
U)
N
(/)
U
0
/
f.
\N A7] Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0, Q? North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
C? rte. Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
y Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: C1 -P? Fax #:
Company: CJl I VL C. Date: Ztch L8?
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:

N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
V.
f
\I A 7` Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
p North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: rFax #: 76 - I
o
Company: I ?. Sw C64AW Date: 2-
Number of pages including cover sheet:
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-689? (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
r , ``
i•
Fax To:
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
?, - Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Company:
V 0 0
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
CU
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Fax #: W74-S823
Date: , 2 d
jA t
i
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
W
O('N9
GPPy ,,ATM C40
1871
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
03-091
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
October 21, 2003
SUBJECT: Green Level Durham Road Widening - Stonewater PUD
Dear Mr. Dorney:
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
OCT 2 2 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
I have been contacted by Mr. Donald A. Sever of Chas H Sells, Inc. regarding items that
you requested from the Town of Cary. Items included a letter from the Town of Cary that
provides the schedule for widening Green Level to Durham Road to 6 lanes and/or that states
four lanes are required at the present time in order to adequately ease traffic congestion, as well
as confirms the Town's requirements for sidewalks.
The Town of Cary hired Wilbur Smith Associates to perform a traffic impact studies for
the four large primary planned unit developments (PUD) including Stonewater PUD. These
studies state that the width of the roadway needs to be four lanes to provide adequate traffic
capacity for the study period (2010 conditions).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Roadway Element approved
in April 2001, also prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, further states the justification that this
roadway needs to be six lanes in the long term. This is a major thoroughfare on both Cary's plan
and CAMPO's plan. One of the primary reasons for the last two lanes will be to protect a HOV
corridor to support and promote transit in the area. Based on our modeling results portions of
the Green Level to Durham Road, from South Alston Avenue to Carpenter Fire Station Road,
are to be improved to four lanes near term (2005) and mid term (2015), then six lanes in long
term (2025).
In addition to the transportation planning studies, I believe the development trend in the
area will require the road widening to four lanes soon. Cary's N.W Area plan calls for
development with a maximum population approaching 40,000. Cary's has approved many
development plans in this area with short development schedules. As examples, Amberly PUD
was approved based on a 2010 build out schedule and Cary Park PUD has been developing
quickly. If the economy changes, vacant buildings in RTP could be filled quickly creating an
immediate market for housing in close proximity. Providing housing close to RTP is one of our
transportation goals to reduce trip length.
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org
John Dorney
October 21, 2003
Page 2
The need for six lanes would not be for many years, therefore on projects currently
under design the outside two lanes in each direction are planned using a wide median with
grass swales. When and if the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside.
Building outside lanes first has many community benefits. The extent of the roadway is
established allowing much better planning of facilities. Utilities, streetscape buffers, sidewalks
and abutting development can be placed at appropriate set back. Setting these outer edges
reduces the chance that widening beyond initial plans will occur in the future. Buildings are
placed closer making land prices difficult to justify for future widening. The extent of
environmental impacts can be assessed as a whole rather than incrementally. The streetscape
will be allowed to mature instead of constantly being disrupted. Because of these benefits we
have been pursuing widening to the outside first on Green Level to Durham Road where
existing buildings do not fall close to the road.
The Town of Cary has required sidewalks on both sides of thoroughfares since the
1980's. We have a system which is becoming more connected and receives high usage
especially for recreation activities. The Town has also identified this area as needing a 10'
wide multi-use trail on both sides of the Green Level to Durham Road with the adoption of
the N.W Area Land Use Plan. This policy is to encourage alternative transportation modes
to RTP, transit stops and the planned commercial areas thereby reducing dependence on
automobile usage.
Feel free to contact me at 469-4034 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
1--.11 ?I
Tim Bailey, P.E.
Director of Engineering
cc: Danny Smith, DWQ
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Donald A. Sever, ChasHSells
`'p? NO?RyQT?N??CU?RO`'ry9
?C
1871
October 21, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Green Level Durham Road Widening - Stonewater PUD
Dear Mr. Dorney:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
WETLANDS1401 GROUP
OCT 2 2 2003
WATER QUAUTYSEC710N
I have been contacted by Mr. Donald A. Sever of Chas H Sells, Inc. regarding items that
you requested from the Town of Cary. Items included a letter from the Town of Cary that
provides the schedule for widening Green Level to Durham Road to 6 lanes and/or that states
four lanes are required at the present time in order to adequately ease traffic congestion, as well
as confirms the Town's requirements for sidewalks.
The Town of Cary hired Wilbur Smith Associates to perform a traffic impact studies for
the four large primary planned unit developments (PUD) including Stonewater PUD. These
studies state that the width of the roadway heeds to be four lanes to provide adequate traffic
capacity for the study period (2010 conditions).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Roadway Element approved
in April 2001, also prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, further states the justification that this
roadway needs to be six lanes in the long term. This is a major thoroughfare on both Cary's plan
and CAMPO's plan. One of the primary reasons for the last two lanes will be to protect a HOV
corridor to support and promote transit in the area. Based on our modeling results portions of
the Green Level to Durham Road, from South Alston Avenue to Carpenter Fire Station Road,
are to be improved to four lanes near term (2005) and mid term (2015), then six lanes in long
term (2025).
In addition to the transportation planning studies, I believe the development trend in the
area will require the road widening to four lanes soon. Cary's NW Area plan calls for
development with a maximum population approaching 40,000. Cary's has approved many
development plans in this area with short development schedules. As examples, Amberly PUD
was approved based on a 2010 build out schedule and Cary Park PUD has been developing
quickly. If the economy changes, vacant buildings in RTP could be filled quickly creating an
immediate market for housing in close proximity. Providing housing close to RTP is one of our
transportation goals to reduce trip length.
TOWN Of CARY
318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org
John Dorney
October 21, 2003
Page 2
The need for six lanes would not be for many years, therefore on projects currently
under design the outside two lanes in each direction are planned using a wide median with
grass swales. When and if the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside.
Building outside lanes first has many community benefits. The extent of the roadway is
established allowing much better planning of facilities. Utilities, streetscape buffers, sidewalks
and abutting development can be placed at appropriate set back. Setting these outer edges
reduces the chance that widening beyond initial plans will occur in the future. Buildings are
placed closer making land prices difficult to justify for future widening. The extent of
environmental impacts can be assessed as a whole rather than incrementally. The streetscape
will be allowed to mature instead of constantly being disrupted. Because of these benefits we
have been pursuing widening to the outside first on Green Level to Durham Road where
existing buildings do not fall close to the road.
The Town of Cary has required sidewalks on both sides of thoroughfares since the
1980's. We have a system which is becoming more connected and receives high usage
especially for recreation activities. The Town has also identified this area as needing a 10'
wide multi-use trail on both sides of the Green Level to Durham Road with the adoption of
the N.W Area Land Use Plan. This policy is to encourage alternative transportation modes
to RTP, transit stops and the planned commercial areas thereby reducing dependence on
automobile usage.
Feel free to contact me at 469-4034 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Tim Bailey, P.E.
Director of Engineering
cc: Danny Smith, DWQ
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Donald A. Sever, ChasHSells
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
. www.SandEC.com
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
J-?
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
OCT Y 0 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsvillt, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3of3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projeats\SeIIs Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412 DWQ 9_23_03.doc\
'b
I
IS

30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
lz c
657,379 sq. fr.
4 . ?irr t - N` ..ss
15.09 acres
R,

PARIAN BUFFER
I
1 I 1?
? •??
•?1'•
••1
rzcax
n FLOOD PLAIN M IX AREA
XXX A ES 11 ?,
-? ..
?.._..
e
RES CNMMEL l „
I I \ a '30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRACT 2
45.743 ACRES `
me .i.AW IqX l IIi ® Sr. tmPC 3" '`•• '~) '`.
9= PC.
AREA zr u 15r• ` TRACT 2 R/V •\..
i 1.426 ACRES `•? a
Ak,AV ,L4rtaz'r tr 1, '?
1 `.9s??J+
J ALSTON AVENUE
II O ?2 SR 1630 ,'60' R/v)
N-wr R RAP
C PRaccr ma 6.4oa52
?@ I I » ,w,UnR ? 9
11 ? Rm N
TRACT ! Lx ,x ., Ior ??
195.288 ACRES
y?t f 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
' fZCNC ,)
TRACT 1
195288 ACRES
of ADDITIONAL STREAM & TLAND IMPACTS
FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME 4XISTING INTERSECTION
- ----------------- - -----
IS , HANNEL AREA B
i & 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
1 4071 ° "1 (ZONE 1)
?I - 1 ,.v ,MAnr3aer u I I
0, 1 Cx fx°AC, 16Y I \
rJ1 I "°' """ ' NCDOT REALIGNMENT
J 1 TO PROPOSED 1540
' _ 1 II
0 ALIGNMENT TO MEET /
1 j vn°ovascnnfaonn"0Va II
e EXISTING INTERSECTION
¢$' i LAIWO n. @A?
Way ALSTON AVENUE
II I, ?? - 1630 WV R/IA
I 2 Ae00T R- ,UP
LL CHAP LjAD,
I - / - PR°.,rcr fa s..o2,s2
R (60' 8 q. frmr,R I i i a re '
-J L._ sm•-., pll IIi ?'
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
-- -- lKMT /NP
B AREA J RIV
ti
ACRES PRO.CCr N4 641'152
1 /r
PROP ED REL OCA TION
I ?
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
N SR 1625 C60' Riw
/
i
° zoo 900 i EXHIBIT A - AL TERNA TE ALIGNMENT
/ SCALE 1'=400' i ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
OCT 1 0.2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsvill?, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of. Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection.. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412 DWQ_9_23 03.doc\
'N

1 .?

p? 30' UrfCR 657,379 sq. ft.
V 15.09 acres

RI
ABUFFER
Z
XX AA ESAREA k
A
?E$ \00' RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRAC T 2
45,743 ACRES`••1
w r r 11 m ls. NrtEO4 R •\.. -'1 .
L000 aLA,N Tarr ? I I /?A ?7 ?? , \.
&i"s?'b" .B+ l4 7%01-,V9V •"? IN
AA IN
2r Y H? 1 i TRACT 2 R/V \.
1.426 ACRES `• e'
Aa su-rce?'
1 `. sX J'J ALSTON AVENUE
I I p f2 SR 1630 160' R1W
1 PR NIP
PRD.ccr Na 6102152
? 1 1 arPUrrwv nsrca
• ? iI N
TRACT 1 T nvn zo>'• f I »?
195.288 ACRES r
I s
y? 50' RIPARIAN BUFFCR
1 rzrx »
11
I
TRACT I i `• `
195.288 ACRES
?r ADDITIONAL STREAM &LAND IMPACTS
------ = ------------- jai FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XISTING INTERSECTION
----------------------
cKeat I 1 HANNEL AREA D
i r 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
i 1 vEQ n°
1 _ (ZONE 1)
O' - 1 '+cH nrwK'"'r?xi i 1 -? I
V 1 ? '"°' ?""" NCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
ALIGNMENT TO MEET /
? a\EXISTING INTERSECTION 1
1-e r II r r i.
(7g ? uw
W3? _ ii r ALSTON AVENUE
ELL CHAP QAD 2 SR"Kw6n "'P RIO
SR (6v 8 AI N2 6102IQ
? mr O' $
cc _ !?}R-?'fl 17:1 ? ?' -•.-t._ 1? 1 1 air •x111 1p
• ?•??? I /
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
- -- ---- ----- » ;k f&5 tho' Rive
D AREA J ?••--.• ' T PROJECT N 6102!52
Amur RI w
ACRES
PROP FD RELOCATION y'
1 /
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
N / SR 1625 C60' RIW
/
i
0 e00 100 i EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
/ SCALE 1'=400' i ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS1401 GROUP
OCT Z 0 2003
WATER QUAUTYSEC77ON
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 TaylorsvilT, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_9_23_03.doc\
'b
la I

7
'
'
4 RIPARIM UFFER 657,379sq- ft.
? - '? 15.09 acres
° i ?

BUFFER
P- rt
`V i 1-? •
•`?•.?
..?'/?
'1
?
1) FLf1OXXX AA N ES AREA II
?,1 ..?
•\
?
?£S /
pLy?p- / I
1 1, '? ,?
'•??0' RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRACT 2 \
45.743 ACRES`-
?, m
u R' I m?m P6IG ? I \,-..
1 E
\
cmD PtNa 1a,x !i
\ 1K I= PG 67
?.. ? ` •\ .
1.6 S llb' A D `---1 yl t PDI I6 ZMOI-1991 \ •\
Ail IN
? 14
a i`114 ` i TRACT 2 R/V \.•
i 1.426 ACRES `•? @°
1
N IMACi 3 \ I,1 ••?
pµ(yN?i,.PAaIAN g!![R?r ? i' I I ? •\
D[09 Kit` '
li '?9/fd'
ALSTON AVENUE
SR 1690 (ho' R/V)
,0,S 'G w-wr Ri NAP
1 1 C PRoxcr AU 6102138
1 1 PN„Aw ,u<!ca
iI I A
TRACT 1
195.288 ACRES 1
?y Ac 90' RIPARIAN BUFFER r?
11 tZLO'.E I)
11 -
11 •
TRACT 1
195.288 ACRES
ADDITIONAL STREAM TLAND IMPACTS
---_-------------Ia" FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XIS TING INTERSECTION
-- --------- - --------------------
,? i I pypJ I HANNEL AREA D Il
I
i 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER ,l
.1 (ZONE 1)
011
<~.1 1 Sn avwoxPlca I
ENCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
C? _ wz
/
ALIGNMENT TO MEET
v?' EXISTING INTERSECTION
I
y? - ?` LDfAf N7L.I? 1 f j'
W3? - { ii r - ALSTON AVENUE
1 2 y I SR 1630 41W RSV)
S L C HA P l1 8 q. ! J l P w"r la 6.D is
Oil
11
11
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
- -- -- - _ - ,TRofd25 (60' RSV)
D AREA J R/ NAP
ACRES ?, » PROxcr ha 6402152
PROP ED REL OCA TION
j I j
I
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
N SR 1625 !60' R/VJ
/
i
o zaB co 4i EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
/ SCALE 1'=400' i ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax:. [phone]
www.SandEC.com
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS /401 GROUP
OCT 1 0 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
TaylorsvilT, NC 28681
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P. E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412 DWQ_9 23_03.doc\
'h
Id 1
l
i L" \ I
i 30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
`? rzaNr » ?t \.. 657,379 sq. ft.
15.09 acres
RIPARIAN BUFFER 1 I •`_'•?..?..?
ZME ))
FLOOD PLAIN M IX AREA 11 '•\
XXX A ES
ES GAEL 1I \ '\\V' RIPARIAN BUFFER
1 1 ?.
11
FER i TRACT 2 \ \'•?
45.743 ACRES'l-,
,mo nA,N aix 11 j aMr.? W r a •\••1 3
CC\ _ 11 IK J36CPG p 1. sZ \ •\
P.69P ?. ?' A D --1 4y 1 PD/ AG ]%01-Ai9I .? •l.\
1 `L
AREA rN
a u "`.'• ` i i TRACT 2 R/V
1.426 ACRES `•? a'
N IMKr 3 \ , •?
a Ri?I ;9,+r
ALSTON AVENUE
\ ` ;,? 1 `p X12 SR 1630 l60' RIW
mair NAP
? 1 g .h9(`i PRnrer An 6.4ozfst
1 ' RlawR,aR IIFfCR e
• ? iI ? to
TRACT 1 LR „p r I,)'• ???
195.288 ACRES r
l?[AL 30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
'I tZOK I)
TRACT 1 ?i
195.288 ACRES
g1: ADDITIONAL STREAM & TLAND IMPACTS
--- - -------------FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XISTING INTERSECTION
-----
--
---------------------
---------1 1 ill II
17. C , I l NANNEI AREA D
i KQa"? y a 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
1 A (ZONE 1)
,N•aL,
U I i ar RDMRWr[a 1
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
1 I
LWJ TD PROPOSED 1540
ALIGNMENT TO MEET
?' n'a II e EXISTING INTERSECTION
ALSTDN AVENUE RAV)
ELL CHAP L]AD 2 - - _ y sa w R ?
mOxtT N¢ sIR,Y
SR 8 w.wri
l !$? ' 1
.0
-, L--_ _ .'°mr` • .mr s++r-vyay " Ili ? ? q ? ? ,
_ s YY
?? _ _ GREEN,LES%EL TO
_ ?aots25 460' aiw DURHAM ROAD
D AREA J PRDXLT NR MP
4402152
ACRES
PROP ED REL OCA TION
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
N / SR 1623 C60' R/V)
o zoo wn , EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
/ SCALE 1'=400' i ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
1(Te I&" V J1,-) c .
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
OCT Y 0 2003
WAR
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 TaylorsvilT, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_9_23_03.doc\

t 30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
?a rzac
Bufrra
FLOOD PL A1N
M IX AREA
L000 PL,VXAC rRla'
L6?9P?#, r9," A O
2J Ki 6
N IMKI 3
?,T?J ST
LIAR &/rCR
TRACT 1
195.288 AC
TRACT 1
195.288 ACRES
.- 9
U
W
J
O
U
SR .16a !60'
c ow
vca,?,,
,MACr:
N DFKT?CBPT
1MK
Ul WKT 26d'
lXAf K1{AV
PROP ED REL OCA TION
N?
0 200 400
SCALE ]'=400'
1
657,379 sq. ft.
15.09 acres
0' RIPARIAN BL4'FER
TRACT 2 1. 1%
45.743 ACRES
m
i 5" ?..?
A PARr w
1111 1%4 P4 67 t•
ID'/Ma lE'601-f79I .?
AREA IN
TRACT 2 R/V
1.426 ACRES
? M
ALSTON AVENUE
0• R/V)
' ', 2`p ?y SR 1630 16RAP
j `. U' ACDOr R/V
V/ PRarcr Ra u4a2isz
9 90' RIPARIAN BUrrrR
ADDITIONAL STREAM & TLAND IMPACTS
'FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XISTING INTERSECTION
--
CHANNEL AREA D -------- 50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
(ZONE 1)
! NCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
ALIGNMENT TO MEET /
e EXISTING INTERSECTION
ALSTON AVENUE
- `1 I SR 1630 (60' R/V)
ACDOT RN RV
/ PROICr M 6102lY
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
0-.fis23 C60' R/V)
IWI RN MM
PRO.LCT Na 640M52
16REEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
/ SR 1625 C60' R/V)
EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
i s
AM" P0mLt
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS/401 GROUP
OCT 1 0 2003
W47 ER Q M W We r"
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: HickoEy Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsvill,, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P. E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412 DWQ_9_23_03.doc\

SR
30' RIPARIAN BUFFER ,
`4.,i rzaNE » ?*? _ •\• 657,379 sq- ft.
???? ••\ smtra? s'? w \ ?.. rtAr
_ - N* 15.09 acres
N BUFFER 11 •~'•?..?••J
FLOOD PLAIN N IX AREA 11 1'
.XXX A ES „
` ••?V- RIPARIAN BUFFER
1j m ` ?•.
Ij 1
'i TRACT 2
rt®A ' i 45.743 ACRES'--%
1
is" P& 5"
ftAN I- A PART Or
1 AREA IN
2l Y A17 TRACT 2 RIV \ a
1.426 ACRES `•? ?'
1
N BiAC1 3 \ , •?•
6p19 K ?IA I rtp •?
I, \'3e oP )ALSTON AVENUE
SR 1630 t60' R/V)
wwr R/ IMP
I ??? y PRaccr Na 6.4M W
I 1 R,PARIAx ovrrx ? 9
TRACT 1 rK „AAC, pr ??
195.288 ACRES
I ?
t 30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
' 4aK I)
195.288CACRES
Pi l
SIT ADDITIONAL STREAM TLAND IMPACTS
----- -------------- FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XISTING INTERSECTION
- ----- ---- - ---------
- 1 T p? , HANACL AREA B
I
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
pon Ac" (ZONE 1)
C.Aiw c1 1
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
J TO PROPOSED 1540
?I ALIGNMENT TO MEET /
' ` B'A° °R 11 i e EXISTING INTERSECTION
1I ?? t
Qgl ? trKwt ? w? i j i
Wei - { ii I ALSTON AVENUE
1 li I, 2 + SR I&V e&& RM
CHAP l?ADj, - PRa-Ler AQ 5102132
rR ? ?,•,? ?ii I a e
GREEN lEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
?- -'-- .-_._ c. -- - - - _ -_ -- _ --_ S'Rukt5 W' R/.)
EA J - T R/V!NP
'ES _ -.., PaO.CxCr Nn S4p2is2
PROP ED RELOCATION
//?\ GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
N ? r / SR 1625 4W RIW
lul i
400 i EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
SCALE 1'=400' i ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
DWQ Project # 03-0981
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believe will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 2003.
Sincerely,
J
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information - Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea Wade - USACE Raleigh
WEUNDS /401 GROUP
OCT 10 20

Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsvillp, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 10, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting
additional information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed
by the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part
of the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur
Smith Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes
in the long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty
years, therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 3
built in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could
be developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the
proposed improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and
future development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public
roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided.
This is being, provided on items 1 and 2.
October 10, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3 of 3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
Donald A. Sever, P. E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:V:\Projects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondenoe\03412 DWQ_9_23_03.doc\
30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
f ?^o ,mr n
r?~m.FFER FLDOB PLAIN MI/
?t=pp/PG.V/ ,4,r
P,6AP 31' A D
u ;T s
MArT 5
z9> 6f
??ppyy?? ??)) ,A4 srrr4
>4v?cr__MYA D
TRACT 1
195.288 AC
TRACT 1
195.288 ACRES
?rTrA,4
D6>, ,
,MArT
DPAr, 3AB2
CM 1MACi ,6l
JY 4IFA4?RIFfC4
,MKT I
,MKT lS0 5,`?
Gl IMACT 263'
osc°n'4?'an
6D1Y oaw
SR
D AREA J ------- 7--1- _ ?-
ACRES
PROP ED REL OCA TION
N?
/ / 0 200 400
i SCALE 1'=400'
1
657,379 sq. ft.
15.09 acres
0' RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRACT 2
45,743 ACRES"
sr. wumt .4
A PART 6
1961 0 67 t
ID/ M 711[M-9t99I
AREA IN
TRACT 2 R/V
1.426 ACRES
`9`rj11?A ALSTON AVENUE
- p ?y SR 1630 (60' RIV)
WDOT R/ NAP
N PMCCr M 6402152
rPA4nw arrr4 ? '9?
[ 30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
_,Zd ,)
ADDITIONAL STREAM TLAND IMPACTS
'FOR ALIGNMENT TO ME XIS TING INTERSECTION
?GHANAIEL AREA D 14p
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
(ZONE 1)
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
I TO PROPOSED 1540
ALIGNMENT TD MEET S
(,,,EXISTING INTERSECTION I
i
I sas&W eAw VENUE
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
;R'o1625 !60' R/V)
Aemt aiv Nw
PRD.9:LT N6 6402152
IG'REEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
SR 1625 W' R/V)
i
EXHIBIT A - ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
Soil & Environmental
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
www.SandEC.com
Consultants, PA
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
October 9, 2003
S&EC Project # 6412
Department of Environment and Natural Resources DWQ Project # 03-0981
Division of Water Quality
Attn: John Dorney
231 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Response to the Division of Water Quality's August 18, 2003 letter requesting further
information for the proposed Greenlevel to Durham Thoroughfare Road, Wake County, NC
Dear Mr. Dorney:
We received your August 18, 2003 letter requesting additional information and have prepared a
response that we believc will adequately address your concerns. We look forward to meeting with
you on October 13, 20Q3.
Sincerely,
Todd Preuninger
Attachments: 1) DWQ letter dated August 18, 2003
2) Response to request for more information Dated October 8, 2003
cc: Ms. Andrea. Wade - USACE Raleigh
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
. OCT 9 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickoa Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
I / I I I
CIVIL. STRUCTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
October 8, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT, P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P
SENIOR ASSOCIATES
PHILIPPE BOUSADER, P.E.
SCOTT W. DUNCAN, C.P.
NAOMI ISAACS
DAVID A. WEBBER, P.L.S.
ASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
This letter is in reference to your August 18, 2003 correspondence requesting additional
information for the Green Level - Durham Road.
Item number one questions why we are connecting a four lane roadway into a two lane
roadway at the northern and southern end. The Town of Cary has enacted an
"Adequate Public Facilities Planning and Development For Roads" ordinance which
states that the public facilities for roads will be available to accommodate new
development. The process is such that a traffic impact analysis is performed, and if
improvements are required, then the Town of Cary enters into a Developer's
Agreement.
The Developer's Agreement requires roadway improvements to provide capacity for
anticipated daily traffic volumes. Certain roadway improvements are to be completed by
the Developer while other improvements are to be done by the Town of Cary as part of
the Town's Capital Improvement Program.
A traffic impact study done by Wilbur Smith Associates of Columbia, SC stated that the
width of the this roadway was to be four lanes to provide near term traffic capacity.
Portions of the Green Level to Durham Road, from south Alston Avenue to Carpenter
Fire Station Road, are to be improved to four lane near term (2005) and mid term
(2015), then six lanes in long term (2025).
The Town of Cary's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, also prepared by Wilbur Smith
Associates, further states the justification that this roadway needs to be six lanes in the
long term to meet traffic capacity. This need would not be for another twenty years,
therefore the outside two lanes in each direction will be built with a swaled grass
median. When the roadway is widened to six lanes, the additional pavement will be built
in the median and curb and gutter will be installed on the inside. Therefore, future
impacts will be minimal.
15300 Weston Parkway • Suite 106 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.chashsells.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER, M/F
October 8, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2of3
Attached is an exhibit showing the proposed impacts if we connected into the existing
intersection at Green Level to Durham Road and Okelly Chapel Road. This location
would normally be required by the NCDOT. However, the existing intersection is a Y,
with a intersection skew angle of 60 degrees. The present day criteria for the maximum
skew angle is 75 degrees. Therefore, the NCDOT and the Town of Cary requires
improvements to the intersection to the more desired 90 degree intersection.
For Green Level Road to the south of O'Kelly Chapel Road, the road is fairly straight for
a long distance (over 1/2 mile). The horizontal curve can be eliminated to create a 90
degree intersection as proposed which eliminates this substandard intersection. This is
the agreed upon location of the intersection by the Town of Cary and NCDOT. If the
new roadway was designed to connect to the existing intersection, there would be an
additional 580' of stream and 1.2 acres of buffer impacts. In order to minimize impacts,
the intersection was moved to the west of its existing location.
The proposed thoroughfare is part of the Town of Cary Thoroughfare Plan, dated
September 8, 2003. As you are aware, this area is just west of the proposed 1-540
roadway, and the town has developed the appropriate thoroughfare system to properly
move vehicles from the proposed developments to 1-540 and NC-55. These roadways
will provide direct access to the RTP when all thoroughfares are completed.
Item No. 2 requires existing and proposed roadways to be labeled better. A revised
C1.0 is attached.
Item No. 3 states secondary and cumulative impacts analysis may be required since
access to adjacent properties is provided. At present, all residual properties have
access to existing public roads of Alston Avenue and O'Kelly Chapel Road and could be
developed/accessed without construction of this thoroughfare. Therefore, the proposed
improvements do not predicate any locations for secondary impacts, and future
development does not rely on additional impacts to provide access to public roadways.
Item No. 4 states the need for an environmental document is not clear. The proposed
thoroughfare is being built using private monies, no federal, state or local monies are
involved. This should preclude the need for any environmental document.
Item No. 5 requests a map of all tracts of land owned by the applicant be provided. This
is being provided on items 1 and 2.
October 8, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 3of3
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss
any questions you may have on the above matter.
Sincerely,
C as. H. S Ils, Inc.
PI)
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:VAProjects\SeIIs Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_9_23_03.doc\
30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
"ZONE D
RIPARIAN BUFFER
!ZONE U _
RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRACT 2
45,743 ACRES'
BF. NaEaD, -0..
BB ISM PG 504
A PART O
BN IM,, P&67
PIN Na 72&04-9492
BuffER
od
Wy
AND AREA J
3 ACRES
WATERFORD STONEWATER LLC
TWA TERFORD STONE VATER L L C
0
U
W
J
J
a
9
C
W BU'fER 9L
1
MM AM E
ADDITIONAL STREAM & \WL-TLAND IMPACTS
FOR ALIGNMENT TO MEET EXISTING INTERSECTION
50' TOWN OF CARY
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
ALIGNMENT TO MEET /
EXISTING INTERSECTION
14 ALSTON AVENUE
OWELL Y CHAPEL ROAD , , FrF SR 1630 (60' R/V)
SR 1628 (60' R/V) ACM
REVISED Riv Nw
SED ACDOT R/V NAP PRQ.EGr Na &402132
PRO,AECT A6 &402152 I I ?<^
I I
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
...... -- SR 1625 C60' R/V)
ACDDT RN RAP
PRaecr ra a+o2t52
PROPO ED REL OCA TION ' LA
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
/ N SR 1625 C60' R/V)
/ 400 EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL STREAM IMPACTS
0 200
SCALE 1'=400
PREPARED BY: CHAS H SELLS, INC,
OCTOBER 2003
WOO'SIIaS4SD43-MMM
9020-SL9-616 :xoj
9£0019-616 :lal
£19LZ ON 'A DO
901 al!nS
ADM>pDd UOISOM 00£S1

'DmI `SZrI3S 'H 'SVHD
8
J amma-a-M PAPMAs
P?2d =Wna 01 PAn QED
<6
q
g ?
o?
+?o?r?o?ma'aa'rtes,ro>ou?nm+mLweorvanwa?ma>•nmmo?owm,no?snu®mawvve>?erv?nvarnaerro® I
d
PL P?7 PE
? -r
1
LLJ C)
W ~?? ? ? . 1 h. ? d 3
!?La
u e L.t
}
A. 3
f
! f
X
Li
1 _
I ,
Lt.N
I' J LL
iC a ? Y La
L r v d
f J' n XC) TJ
C/]
I IC; ? w
A :d E } U c, II
Lr)
I-
r7 ??
l
V)
X
t
i
pam
3
I
1
1
l
!
I
d
N

m
O N O
O a N M n
0 O
N (O N
N (U n
R M sf O Z r A V
' O N E
V y Cl)

g
t Q ? VO" W Q Q ? ? N ¢ N •?-
? Z r N Z Z Z n

t
U

A W ? N N M V Vl f0 ? ? DD O
a c
C
G F
Michael F. Easley, Governor

William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
August 18, 2003
DWQ# 03-0981
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Au u L l Gi,: ..
Stonewater Waterford, LLC
Attn: Bob Haverkamp
3301 Woman's Club Drive, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED & ON HOLD NOTIFICATION
Stonewater Waterford, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
Dear Mr. Haverkamp:
On August 6, 2003 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of your application
regarding your plan to re-aligning Green Level Durham Road, impacting approximately 694 linear feet
stream in Wake County. Approval from DWQ is required to disturb these areas. Please provide 7
copies of the following information and refer to the DWQ # listed above in your reply. Please. show-
these on maps. of suitable scale (for instance 1" = 100 feet) so we can begin to determine your projects'
compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
1. The plans indicate that you are proposing to construct a major new thoroughfare. However, a
review of the proposed project raises the questions about purpose need of the project. The
proposed road is a 4-lane thoroughfare but it appears to connect to a 2-lane road at its northern
and southern terminus. Moreover, at the southern terminus, the proposed road appears to end
at an "off set" intersection. The purpose/need, of the enlarged road segment with respect to
traffic volume and flow is unclear. Please explain these matters in writing in your response.
2. It is unclear from the plans labeled the "Overall Wetlands Impact Maps (C1.0)", which road
segments are existing and which are not. Please provide a map that clearly details the existing
road footprints and the respective locations of the proposed roads.
3. The project is proposed to be a thoroughfare; however, it also provides access to adjacent
properties. As such, our review clearly indicates that a cumulative and secondary impacts
analysis maybe required. Please see DWQ's policy with respect to this issue on our website at
hqp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands.
4. Since the proposed road is part of the Cary Thoroughfare Plan is part of the public
infrastructure, the need for an environmental document is not clear. Accordingly, please
specifically address whether any public funding is being used in the planning or construction of
the proposed road.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Page 2 of 2
Stonewater Waterford, LLC
DWQ No. 03-0981
5) Please provide a map, of adequate scale, detailing all of the tracts of land that connect to the
proposed road expansions that are owed by applicant (Waterford Stonewater, LLC).
Please telephone Danny Smith at 919-733-9716 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0505(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this information is
received. If we do not hear from you by writing or by fax at [phone] within three (3) weeks we
will assume you no longer want to pursue the project and will consider it withdrawn.
ULnV
Water QualiJCe fi cation Program
JRD/ds
cc: Raleigh- DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office - Corps of Engineers
Kevin Martin - S&EC 110 10 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh NC 27614
Central Files
File Copy
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
1 1 1 I i? I 11
CIVIL. STRUCTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
October 20, 2003
a
Mr. John Dgrney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
SUBJECT: Waterford Stonewater, LLC
Green Level Durham Road
CHS PROJECT NO. 03412.002
Dear Mr. Dorney:
PRINCIPALS
STEVEN W. SMITH, P.E.
SUSAN K. FASNACHT, P.E.
MOSE D. BUONOCORE, P.E.
THOMAS NOVELLINO, C.P
SENIOR ASSOCIATES
PHILIPPE BOUSADER, P.E.
SCOTT W. DUNCAN, C.P.
NAOMIISAACS
DAVID A. WEBBER, P.L.S.
ASSOCIATES
C. ROSS MASSEY, P.E.
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
`DW0-11- () 3-0181
W 4l(-,- c3 V 7
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
OCT 2 0 2003
WATER QUALITY SECTION
As discussed at our meeting on October 16, 2003, we are providing you with additional
information regarding our proposed alignment and storm water management for the site.
Enclosed are seven copies of the Drawing C3.0, which shows the storm water
management plan, a table listing the Total Nitrogen Export Calculations, and an
alternate alignment (Exhibit B - letter size and 24x36), and a copy of the survey map
with the alignments on it. We are also enclosing one copy of the Traffic Impact and
Access Study and Cary Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
The alternate alignment shifts the roadway 100' to the west to avoid the intermittent
stream. However, to maintain the minimum radius of curvature, a reverse curve is
needed approximately 700' south of the O'kelly - Green Level Roadway intersection.
This reverse curve impacts a stream on this property to the south. We looked at various
skew angles for this intersection, but all of them impacted either the stream to the south
or to the north. The soils map further shows the stream.
At the proposed stream crossing, the alignment was designed to make it a ninety
degree crossing as much as possible. However, again because of minimum curvature
and the skew of the stream, the impacts are fairly close to the original alignment. It is
pointed out that the new alignment north of the stream is completely outside the
Waterford Stonewater property, which is shown by a hatch pattern.
This completes our responses to your letter at this time. Please call me to discuss any
questions you may have on the above matter.
15300 Weston Parkway ' Suite 106 • Cary, NC 27513 • Tel: [phone] ' Fax: [phone] ' www.chashsells.com
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER, M/F
October 20, 2003
Mr. Dorney
Division of Water Quality
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Chas. H. Sells, Inc.
N fL'-'
Donald A. Sever, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure:
CC: Robert Haverkamp, Waterford Stonewater
Scott Johnson, Waterford Stonewater
Kevin Martin, S&EC
Ross Massey, ChasHSells
V:VAProjects\Sells Projects\03412 Stonewater Infrastructure\Correspondence\03412_DWQ_10_20_03.doc\
,.N
30' RIPARIAN BUFFER
/(ZONC I)
L
RIPARIAN BUFFER
rZONC !l ?4r ;?-
E A
AREA D
UFFER
/
/Ilk
WATERFORD STONE WATER L L C
RIPARIAN BUFFER
TRACT 2 1. '1
45,743 ACRES'-••,\
AP. MtLCOD .5 `?..?
AA 1383, P So+
A PART D
a
Alb 1952, 67
PM Na 7AS.04 04-9398
ALTERNATE ALIGNMENT
OUTSIDE WATERFORD P/L
9 nof??f
',
?ARlAN IWIT l yL
TOWN OF{ a4RY BUFFER
5
WATERFORD STON
a,

f-
?
'
' PROPOSED ALIG
J
J
J
ALTERNATE ALIG
?c
Lj
KEL L Y CH
SR 1628 (
RCVISCD PRO.XCT N AND AREA J
9 ACRES ALTERNATE ALIG/?/MENT
OUTSIDE VA TER, P IL
ADDITIONAL STREAI IMPACTS
ZNIu
/ 0 200 / 400
i SCALE 1'=400'
NCDOT REALIGNMENT
TO PROPOSED 1540
?f
ALSTON AVENUE
SR 1630 C60' R/V)
ACDOT R/V MAP
PRaECT M0 6.402152
I
GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
SR 1625 (60' R/W)
,Z. ACDOT R/V MAP
y PRaXCT AG 6.402152
o ?
J c ??.
W % } GREEN LEVEL TO DURHAM ROAD
Q ' SR 1625 !60' R/V)
EXHIBIT B ALTERNATE MINIMAL IMPACT ALIGNMENT WEST
PREPARED BY, CHAS H SELLS, INC,
DC TOBER 2003
r
L r
7
w? l
\fi h V
'IA'A - y, 4rlij \\ \\
41
I'Y

W N
LL O
M
V
7 V
0
<
C
°Ni
r
N
Qt r r , <6 r
Z
F-
N
O
W=

K ru m m m 0 0 0 0 >
f
W
r
F
u, O
W
m
m
r
m
m
m ?i
o

rn Si
m

m
N

rn
o

v

n
,
a Q rn °; of c6 of ai °i ? co ao

O
W = 0 0 a u m m N m
W J .
f
0 ' ^ ?? O O
N N O N
N O O
N m
M
Z ri ei Mi wiri Yip
w r
'
O ?
F

l0
m m
Y11 ^ f0
in f?
oin O N
or O
m m
J1 n °m N°O "n
N om 4 9
Q p
IL m .- .- N M N

O? I F1

O M
mm m m
m? N m
N O N
6 Y n N f V r C m
M N N
0
°
xx
? W
d

Y
y N N N N NN N N N
W
Z U
F
N
O6.
r n
a w 4 4
0 W m
V *
0
J :
n I^
?
?
a 0 (
f O N f V n

F M N
? N? N
s Y O O
S O O m
m O 0 VI
N
? Y N O O O O O O N O ? C
w °
LL K
LL W
m

K
m m m m m m m m m
y
W U O o o Cl 0 0 0 0 0

F
W Q
°

1, J

00

00

00

m
?,
N
v

LL LL,
v
C o
0 0
0 o
e o .
? Q
m
M
Q 7
0
0 0 N N

N0?
V? O

MM
cM
? m N

<
W N N O

Ma
(V O

a0
N
x?
?.
a IL r O N u) N V w
d
? f
Y
a N N N N N N N N N
l U N N N N N N N N N
f

W
N M NN OHO N O '2
d N W N <Oi ?? ?(V m

0
• Wc
c C

O O

C O

O 0

O
0
m mm mm mn O
.
L^
y 0
Q 00 06 00 00
0
0
a
? rn N ??P _m ?n „

w

z
?'
a a?

l
- 1
i t O
F
J
W
K
a
D
W
5
J
W
U
f
f
Q
J
f
a
rc
w
U
0
O
2
2
W Z J
LZL) °a z z
m Z y Z W
Z Q O= F Z
¢ ~ Z U ILL ~
W
Q w W Z 0
LU 3: 0 N m
0
x 0 3 0 N co
e o ? ? a a
o N O o u? N
M N V M M N
W
a
a
z
W
w
¢ n J T
¢ °? O 7 A
oO
f ? a a a
CL v z e
W_e m o° "
? N N N
a ^
N
J
w
Z Q
W
S X a' o
K d ° p
as UZ??
N > ~ c
C/i
03 haw c1-
20 f o m J Q
a f=A 1° F
- FZ- FZ••
N
Z
0
a
O
tt
a
N_
w
W
F
a
z
O
N
Z
w .:
N ?
S W
H
O w
1- K
Q
w ?
m m
U o
H ro
U W W
O >
? m
z a
3z
0
?W
w j a N
? a w N
X ?
Q IN-U ?
? j ¢ O
m
1: w
O
rO Np m Z O x
w
W a O H w
J E j W
U
w K ? K K
O O O a =
z U w X F
W p Z Q
O w a O p
a
t O F
Z r ? Z O
u7
w m w W I
K U N 5-
m Q m
C,
p ° W
? W
w z O a
N ¢ Z j N
z O w F
Z a N V 7
viaNam
X W F- Z
W N O
LL W m U J
a IS- Z W J
a 3
U Z K d O
i a a m a
N
3 O = W h
O ? Z LL a
0 O
w a a
w OW Z a
?Q ? W N
z ? w OZ 7
~ ?
Z O
a {- LL w
w U 7 ? /-
a W _
O ro m O ?
Z W W P
w- 6 H Z Z
p t U F O O
w
F N Z a
Z r v,00
w O LL ' x O
z a
a m r a
w Z m
fL p a N
J
'0 x
3 a g z N
Q a'
? z ? °o p
a z
11 a z F- i a
Z < _o ° F
w N.
O L N W
2 Q W _
? r
NW
m-'a> x
z
? ? U ¢ O
O w N F
a K w ? ?
aJ3?J
S z p O Q
ougQ-
(a : > o
O F U m N
N 7 0 Z m
K j ww Q
w a m w 0
3 w > ~
w 0 0 w g
F
o 0 < a
N N N Z W U
W W, W W W
O O F
Z
rn
U
O
n
w
H
n
O
E
a
c
z
w
F -
z
3
N

Cvha r
- • ? Tt?et .?r¦ ,et/,'i`ii P/ten
R NSPClT TON
T
J yt 7 . yz z_-j ? ? ? r'rY"?fys
4 / `. S
rz'-
'?.? t ? ?,` _? -__ !?_. ? <.-?1 .mss.\.?r?---?__-r..?iJ-r_ ? - ???_,---- ? _ •------• -.

I JA
miff"
- ?,
CA Y---C C) L-Ali -
LU
aWN*%? CINEERS
Cam: E MIM PR ASR D BY 1 - ?-
Wilbur Smith Associates W I L E L1 R SMITH ASSO CIATE S
' - .8916 Sm th Azsa -
'an
Thoroughfare Element
Vision'
• Resurface streets
"C,ary -is closc> to everything, but it tak'cs so • ' Better public, transportation
long to get. anywhere" is an irony that was Reduced delays =',at ?unsignahzed
shared try a cifizcn„during telcplione surveys intersections a
coi ductedlin 1998. *Car s vision rs that°the •, Create spacc:forbrc}%cl sts
transportation system be -greatly in proved . Reroute outsiders around Cary rather tl1 ai ,,
through a major,constniction effort to widen through it ;
roadways;. synchronize traffic srg*tials; enhance . Prepare & Master Plan - `
intersections, and provide"ch 'ces. The vision `
includes'.managing , travel demand increase
i s
Goals

du`ou h, `?irip? reduction , prograinls- - aiitl 'better' _

?
coordination between land' use d&-clonient . `
The Citizen Advisory Committee accepted the
,
aria transportation improvements.-
following goals for Cary s transportation
a

'Cary's vision, adopted in th.c.Lund Use Plafi, system: i
? .
includes the following key obpectros retain a
' 'Improve safety, convemcnce
_ and
place, rave a more human scale'and
sense of ,
efficiency,
pedestp-in-orier ted. environinerit,- ? avoid step

• ontribuie to economic vitality ?
C
development along.arterials, focuscommercial • Establishsafe and convenrcnt`frcil`ties atleh
activity intoacthvity -centers, andto nici'.ease;
services for al(ernative
t7av
elImodes- I
connectivity. The C6mj) •ehehsh,e .
. t
Tj?anshortatiotr Plan embraces these visionary hiiprove -ent?irorunent (NC ranks third ii
ol?jectrves and a(ids t11e, following pr:ovrde°
the U.S. in arr•.polhrtron
re'at clloi'ees to travelers w-ho choose not to: • Ensure serwiceabl'e : operation of
drive, have a• bicycle friendlyY' conuntinify,
transportation facdrtres':
?

desr 7rr riino}at vc facilrtzes;-?ullcre nulovatiori Coordinate transport on «rth,laxf< s. P
g,
` ?``•? Coritnbuterto aitiactr??e `l?a ?
will create a more vAsua
comn?urrt5 friendly
roactrvelya?fund and _ •? Pioactr? ely?plan aor l?ikage`s?t'?; ';
Y?°? roadtivay contiinre A-
P
build needed facilities:` •. Icierihfy s rftrcient, ?tiinely ate 1
'fiiiidrng . _ 't
A telephone serve y of'Cary c tl2ens conducted
by ' h hidependent Oprnro.'ii 1 care, ?, c ' Each goal needs to,;be supported w ros s< , ;a
Cornnnu icatior s, hlc: 1n 199 producccl° the o`n6litM objectives, referr ck to?rr this Plan as - {
follolvin=rnsiglts The>third most mlportarit > Functional Requrreinents.
issue.facng Cary is iaflic;.trarhig gro?yth as y'
the most important and schools as: the second;; •' Build a coht*uuous. aid niter coiuiected ,
most rniportant- issue. If so - enlp,owered, 20 network of transportation fac lures
crcent of res ondents indicated -tlic would . 'Mope Leo ale - goods and erner{ enc `
p._ p y 1 1 g y.
seek improvements to traffic before tackling vehicles
other issues. Specific suggestions cited by Minimize peak period congestion
respondents included the following:
fl
t
{
Wilbur Smith Associate
Recommended New Major
Thoroughfares
• Carpenter Fire Station: New County
Line Thoroughfare - Morrisville
Carpenter (Upgrade from Minor)
• Dillard Drive: Walnut St - Jones
Franklin (Upgrade from Minor)
• Dillard Drive Ext: Jones Franklin - I-40
(Upgraded from Minor with new road
alignment and interchange)
• Green Level Church Rd: Lewter Shop
Rd/New Western Thoroughfare - Green
Level to Durham Rd (Upgraded from
Minor)
• Kildaire Farm Rd: Sunset Lake Rd - I-
540 Loop (new road alignment)
• Morrisville Parkway Ext.: Davis Drive -
NC 55 (Upgrade from Minor)
• Morrisville Parkway Ext: NC 55 - Green
Level to Durham Rd (new road
alignment)
• Old Reedy Creek Rd: I-40 - Weston
Parkway
• Town Hall Drive/Crabtree Crossing:
Morrisville Carpenter -. I-540 Loop
(Upgraded from Minor)
• New County Line Rd: Grandale
(Durham Co.) - Jenks Rd (new road
alignment)
• New Western Thoroughfare: Scott King
(Durham Co.) - US 64
Recommended New Minor
Thoroughfares
to Arthur Pierce Rd: Kildaire Farm Rd -
Holly Springs Rd
• Chatham St: Old Apex Rd - Old Apex
Rd (Downgrade from Major)
• Collins Rd: Jenks Carpenter Rd -
Leonard Christian Rd
• Jenks Carpenter Rd: High House Rd -
Holt Rd
• Holt Rd: Jenks Rd - Howell Rd
an
• Howell Rd: Holt Rd - Davis Drive
• High House Rd: Old Apex Rd - W.
Chatham St (Downgrade from Major)
• Leonard Christian Rd: Collins Rd -
Davis Drive
• Lochmere Drive: Cary Parkway - Lilly
Atkins Rd
• McCrimmon Parkway: I-540 Loop -
Green Level to Durham Rd (new road
alignment)
• Optimist Farm Rd: Sunset Lake Rd -
Bells Lake Rd
• Roberts Rd: Green Level Church Rd -
Jenks Rd
• Waldo Rood Blvd: Davis Drive - Cary
Parkway
• West Lake Rd: Ten Ten Rd. - Optimist
Farm
Removed Thoroughfares
• Piney Plains Rd: Walnut St - Dillard Dr
(Minor)
• Seabrook Ave: SE Maynard - Cary
Parkway (Major)
• Summerwinds Drive: Tryon Rd -
Sylvan Grove (Minor)
• Sylvan Grove: Summerwinds Drive -
Lochmere Drive (Minor)
While changes to the Thoroughfare Plan
must be formally adopted by the various
agencies, a change in designation does not
imply or require a change in physical
character of a street. For example,
designating an existing two-lane roadway as
a "major thoroughfare" does not imply it
must be widened to four lanes with
sidewalks. If traffic volumes are low, there
is no reason to widen the roadway. This
distinction is especially important in
downtown Cary, where wider roadways are
not wanted.
/in?? INEEItS -
¦/r1l1 rUNNE0.5
??rrlr ECONW]
Wilbur Smith Associates
Green Level to Durham Rd from South Alston Ave to Carpenter Fire Station Rd
N/A
Number
of
Typical Through Speed Thoroughfare
Year ADT Capacity Lanes Left Lanes/Median Limit Type
1998 N/A 9700 2 None 45 mph Major
2005 7500 9700 2 None 45 mph Major
2015 13900 24900 4 Yes 45 mph Major
2025 16700 38200 6 Yes 45 mph Major
Future Roadway Section
ADT = Average Daily Traffic Volume (vehicles per day) (N/A = Not Available)
Capacity = Maximum ADT
Number of Lanes = Draft Plan Recommendation for 2005, 2015, and 2025
Median: "None" - Indicates Double Yellow Line
a .... -rP- . •.r. v .. .. .-••r
Six-Lane Divided with Wide Outside Lanes
Notes: Additional ROW provided for potential HOV lanes; realignment with Alston Ave should be provided at
north end.
..?.:? ECONW1
Wilbur Smith Associates
Green Level to Durham Rd from Carpenter Fire Station Rd to Morrisville Pkwy Ext
N/A
Number
of
Typical Through Speed Thoroughfare
Year ADT Capacity Lanes Left Lanes/Median Limit Type
1998 590 9700 2 None 45 mph Major
2005 5100 9700 2 None 45 mpli Major
2015 8300 24900 4 Yes 45 mph Major
2025 9400 38200 6 Yes 45 mph Major
Future Roadway Section
Notes: Interchange should be provided with future Morrisville Parkway; additional ROW provided for potential
HOV lanes; realignment with Green :Level Church Rd southbound should be provided on the south
end.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic Volume (vehiclesper day) (N/A = Not Available)
Capacity = Maximum ADT
Number of Lanes = Draft Plan Recommendation for 2005, 2015, and 2025
Median: "None" - Indicates Double Yellow Line
.11111111111111111111
Six-Lane Divided With Wide Outside Lanes
?tl
I
0

Figure 6.8 F `
Thoroughfare
- Classifications
Freeway Crossings
Q Existing interchange
- Proposed Interchange
0 Proposed Grade Separation
Existing Grade Separation
Thoroughfares
®Minor
o ®New Minor
amomNajor
mNew Major

®
Collector
Outer Loop
Freeways
®Existing Freeway
- Existing Interchange
----- Future Interchange
--New Connectors
--- Streets
Railroad
Study Area
- p
0 1 2 Miles

i
Rielgh, NathCwhu
(919)7 5 5-05 6 3 WUL-tiv,h 11?
y
.4 dov
1 . .r
® r sr
TSt U? ema .?.
e
ar
4
.? Figure 6.9
!$• Recommended
j Thoroughfare Widths
October 2001
Freawaf trasmgs
aiww oeaee swa.,uon
R?ovosee oavrimnw
aa. sewaamn
Freane/s
? E.Yrw r?ee.a, f
mmouynraes
e. Yew:uneunanYeRwe
® s?.Reaa.m ra..a Y.man
m Yew 2lane ROaewen Party Yeah
® eeerr ilmernN LYNS-ipMYeman
elme UnahWeRase
? a e x vane YVamn
a=<.?YemY,
® s?n.Rnaa,rmRar.eY.mae
O s?.Ramwn unaa,aeee Y.maa
? Y.«srane .an?nasaaoa Y.aw )
i ®?eYr
Q om=rano Rgnmwa
cwmu.e:
j awry+a
fl
4
it

an HOV Lane is Recommended
on a North/South Route fo RTP
on or between these roads.
1\
1 r
? \t
r
120 ft of right-of-way shall be acquired I
or dedicated so that expansion is possible
if proven necessary by further study.

Three Options for Cary Parkway Extension East
1) Connect with the Proposed Gamer / Cary Parkway
2) Connect with Yates Mill Pond Road Only
3) Connect with Existing Gorman Street at Tryon Roa
it 4 X (r,
Rw-d by WIW Srmm M-19M
Ywa Ueigl NoO C-lim v
(919) 755-M
ar,mm3ma6 ?aum?
C j,?
? Comp?ha "
CARY. TY? ?' ? ¦ ? at/,din P/an
P- H E
p 6N
• -
---- _ 4 14 r>..
?L > t-c _
7s'.4,
.?
e }}S ih
r- y
>,/' G --
CARP -C? Cj?-1 `I ' .J P__L-Al?fi =} -
VOL-UM., B-
CINEERS
PIAMES
ECCNOM PR ? PA ?D BY ? ?
Wilbur Smith Associates W I L B U R SMITH ASS O C LATE S --- +
1
1
/rl??\ u
II??N euwFxe
ROW
\VI//
Wilbur Smith Associates
Town Council
Glen Lang, Mayor
Marla Dorrel
Jennifer Robinson
Nels Roseland
Harold Weinbrecht
Jack Smith
Jess Ward
Town Staff
Tim Bailey, P.E.; Engineering Director
Debbie Brooks; Meeting Agendas, Packets and Minutes
Consultants
Wilbur Smith Associates, Raleigh, North Carolina
The following citizens served diligently for more than 16 months, attending meetings
regularly and participating actively in the development of concepts described in the
Transportation Plan. While they may not all agree on all of the recommendations
contained in the Plan, one thing is for certain: they will never look at a roadway,
sidewalk, bikeway, or bus the same way again! The technical study team greatly
appreciates all the time, energy and insight offered by each of the dedicated citizens listed
below:
Citizen Advisory Committee
Darryl.Black, Chairman
Tim Brookie
David Cochran
David Farmer
Steve Fine
Joseph Hummer
Ray Martin
Ruth Merkle
Carolyn O'Neil
Gregory O'Neil
Linda Kaye Teal
Pamela Townsend
aw"
Acknowledgements
oul-i molla), elgnoa saMlpul - „auoN„ :uelpaw
SZOZ put? `560Z `50OZ ao} uol;epuawwoda?{ veld }}eaa = seue-l jo aagwnN
lay wnwlxeVq = ?(}loede0
(algelleny ION = y/N) (ftep aad salolyan) ownion 31}4eal AVG a6eaany = lab!
-pug q:pOu
le paplnoid eq plnogs any uo}sly ql!m }uawu6lieei 'sauel AOH lel;ua}od ao} paplnoid MO?j leuol}lppy :sa;oN
sour-1 ap!s;np ap!Ak gllm paplAI(I auurj-xIS
uoi;oeS AempeoM ainind
.iofeW i/d- gy SO), 9 00Z8£ OOL96 SZOZ
JofeW ifdui qt se), b 0061rZ 006£6 5602
iofew t/dw 9t, auoN Z 0016 009L 5002
iofeW ifdiu 94 auoN Z OOL6 `d/N 8666
edK Wwl1 uelpow/soue-1 118-1 saue-1 Alloedeo lay aeaA.
aaelgBnoaoyl peads gBnoayl leo!dA.L
10
aaquunN
V/N
pU uollels aai:j aa;uedaeo of any uojsjy yjnoS woal pil weyand o} 10na-1 uaaaE)
sappossd gaccuS ingfiAA.
IWON073 //I?\?
mammas\
SVNN%nd %us
57f33M9 \\\?//
i
i
7
AM
Wilbur smith Associate
Recommended New Major
Thoroughfares
• Carpenter Fire Station: New County
Line Thoroughfare - Morrisville
Carpenter (Upgrade from Minor)
• Dillard Drive: . Walnut St - Jones
Franklin (Upgrade from Minor)
• Dillard Drive Ext: Jones Franklin - I-40
(Upgraded from Minor with new road
alignment and interchange)
• Green Level Church Rd: Lewter Shop
Rd/New Western Thoroughfare - Green
Level to Durham Rd (Upgraded from
Minor)
• Kildaire Farm Rd: Sunset Lake Rd - I-
540 Loop (new road alignment)
• Morrisville Parkway Ext.: Davis Drive -
NC 55 (Upgrade from Minor)
• Morrisville Parkway Ext: NC 55 - Green
Level to Durham Rd (new road
alignment)
• Old Reedy Creek Rd: I-40 - Weston
Parkway
• Town Hall Drive/Crabtree Crossing:
Morrisville Carpenter -, I-540 Loop
(Upgraded from Minor)
• New County Line Rd: Grandale
(Durham Co.) - Jenks Rd (new road
alignment)
• New Western Thoroughfare: Scott King
(Durham Co.) - US 64
Recommended New Minor
Thoroughfares
• Arthur Pierce Rd: Kildaire Farm Rd -
Holly Springs Rd
• Chatham St: Old Apex Rd - Old Apex
Rd (Downgrade from Major)
• Collins Rd: Jenks Carpenter Rd -
Leonard Christian Rd
• Jenks Carpenter Rd: High House Rd -
Holt Rd
• Holt Rd: Jenks Rd - Howell Rd
an
• Howell Rd: Holt Rd - Davis Drive
• High House Rd: Old Apex Rd - W.
Chatham St (Downgrade from Major)
• Leonard Christian Rd: Collins Rd -
Davis Drive
• Lochmere Drive: Cary Parkway - Lilly
Atkins Rd
• McCrimmon Parkway: I-540 Loop -
Green Level to Durham Rd (new road
alignment)
• Optimist Farm Rd: Sunset Lake Rd -
Bells Lake Rd
• Roberts Rd: Green Level Church Rd -
Jenks Rd
• Waldo Rood Blvd: Davis Drive - Cary
Parkway
• West Lake Rd: Ten Ten Rd. - Optimist
Farm
Removed Thoroughfares
• Piney Plains Rd: Walnut St - Dillard Dr
(Minor)
• Seabrook Ave: SE Maynard - Cary
Parkway (Major)
• Summerwinds Drive: Tryon Rd -
Sylvan Grove (Minor)
• Sylvan Grove: Summerwinds Drive -
Lochmere Drive (Minor)
While changes to the Thoroughfare Plan
must be formally adopted by the various
agencies, a change in designation does not
imply or require a change in physical
character of a street. For example,.
designating an existing two-lane roadway as
a "major thoroughfare" does not imply it
must be widened to four lanes with
sidewalks. If traffic volumes are low, there
is no reason to widen the roadway. This
distinction is especially important in
downtown Cary, where wider roadways are
not wanted.

Wilbur Smith Assuaiates 3. .._.
Carrpr+ah?a va
T"ra fat/gin P/an
Jill
schedule for implementation of new facilities
and services.
How to Use the Transportation
Plan
The Transportation Plan is organized by mode
of transportation. Within each element or
chapter are the following:
• Vision,
• Goals and functional requirements to meet
the goals,
• Issues,
• Existing deficiencies,
• Future deficiencies, and
• Recommendations.
Recommendations are framed in terms of
near-term (2005), mid-term (2015) and long-
term (2025). The Comprehensive
Transportation Plan does not provide specific
locations for improvements. Instead it offers
a general guideline, for future interpretation
and analysis in conjunction with site or
corridor-specific design studies.
The Pedestrian Element shows the network
of walkways that will include sidewalks and
greenways, forming an interconnected system
that will allow citizens to choose to walk to
nearby destinations.
The Bicycle Element shows a network of on-
street bikeways together with the adopted
greenways plan. In 1998, the Cary Town
Council adopted a Parks, Greenways and
Bikeways Master Plan. The Comprehensive
Transportation Plan documents a few of the
adopted bikeways that are no longer
recommended and the reasons for
recommending deletion. There are many
more new bikeways to be added as
recommended in the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan.
The Transit Element shows how Cary can
begin to look to enhanced regional bus
service and future local and feeder bus
service within Cary. Demographics within
the study area are analyzed and areas within
the community that have the potential to
generate transit riders are highlighted. A
case is made for priority treatment for buses,
carpools and vanpools along heavily-
traveled commuter corridors into RTP.
The Thoroughfare Element shows the
network of major and minor roadways that
will improve traffic flow over existing
conditions and begin to meet some of the
anticipated future travel demand. The road
network shown shows the general location
and does not represent the actual alignment.
A more detailed design is required to
determine specific alignments at the time the
roadway is improved.
The traffic forecasts generated from the
Triangle Regional Model that are based on
the Long-Range Land Use Plans for all
Triangle communities produce travel
demand in several Cary corridors that would
outstrip the planned improvements. That is,
corridors such as Chapel Hill Road that have
approved bond measure money to provide a
consistent four-lane divided roadway
section would produce acceptable levels of
service for only a few years. By then, the
Model suggests that additional growth
would inundate Chapel Hill Road. Issues
like this are addressed in the Thoroughfare
Element.
How the Plan was Developed
Consultants, Wilbur Smith Associates,
working in close collaboration with Town
staff and a twelve-member Citizen Advisory
Committee, developed the Comprehensive

Wilbur Smith Asstxiates CQp,h _ VB
7kM hill
MINE FI---
Transportation Plan. Ample input was Additional public outreach efforts are
provided by citizens via: planned to coincide with the public release
• 16 monthly public meetings with a 12- of this report.
member Citizen Advisory Committee,
• the Town of Cary internet website created
for receiving public input,
• the broadcast of monthly Citizen Advisory
Committee meetings via Cable TV, and
• three community public open house
meetings held throughout the community.

1-1

I

a. r
. y
II//lam PL VNFAS S CCOVERY
hies va
Wilbur Smith Associates
7iw at/ n P/an
Via Goals commute corridors and to expedite the
The Citizen Advisory Committee endorsed movement of urban goods.
the following goals listed for Cary's • Safe and convenient bikeways and
transportation system. walkways, together with a service-
oriented transit system that provides,
• Create a safe, convenient, and efficient
multimodal transportation system.
• Enhance transportation's contribution to
the economic vitality of Cary.
• Provide safe and convenient facilities and
service for people who choose not to use
an automobile.
• Improve environmental quality.
• Ensure serviceable operation of existing
facilities and services.
• Coordinate transportation and land use
planning.
• Plan, design, and construct transportation
facilities that contribute to Cary's
attractive visual appearance.
• Proactively plan, in conjunction with
other agencies, to improve transportation
linkages to other parts of. the Triangle
region.
• Identify sufficient, timely, and equitable
financing mechanisms for transportation
services and improvements.
appropriate, convenient and reliable
service to the major activity centers in
all major transportation corridors.
• A transportation system that rewards
those who share rides, telecommute, use
transit, ride a bike and/or walk to work.
• A transportation system in which
maintenance is fully funded so as to
avoid unreliable service and deferred
The Citizen Advisory Committee further
defined each goal to consider how it relates
to what the user sees and experiences on their
journey. These are described below as
"functional requirements":
Functional Requirements
• A balanced transportation system that
employs a continuous network of
freeways, parkways, thoroughfares,
bikeways, walkways, and transit services
to move people, goods, and emergency
service providers as safely, conveniently,
and efficiently as possible.
• A transportation system that is designed
to minimize peak period congestion in
expenses.
• A transportation system that supports
orderly growth and counterpart land use
policies that enable the efficient
provision of transportation.
• Attractive landscaping of public spaces
such as medians and street landscaping
along major thoroughfares, gateways, or
entryways into Cary.
• A seamless, multimodal transportation
system for travel between Cary and other
Triangle locations.
• Policies and programs that accelerate
needed transportation improvements, but
do so in an equitable manner.
Wilbur Smith Associates ; '
f Try/ ?r r at?? n P/an
In 1999, the Citizen Advisory Committee
participated in a visioning exercise entitled
"If I Were King or Queen of Cary".
Responses to the "If I were King/Queen visioning exercise can be summarized in the puzzle
below where elements are interrelated.
Visions for Cary
Cab N Bike TTA
Bus

r

UP
Cor»" " ha va
Wilbr: Smith Associates p
Tim gat/onf P/an
kin Favorite Streets assumed in the Land Use Plan. Other
strategies in addition to the Capital
The Citizen Advisory Committee indicated a
few of their favorite streets in Cary, another
visioning exercise that accentuates the positive
in Cary. A sampling is as follows:
Improvement Program are needed.
Academy Street - {"my favorite street}
because of sidewalks on both sides of the
road, the Public Library, and the view of Cary
Elementary School."
High House Road - {"my favorite street}
because it has few traffic signals."
Kildaire Farm Road - {"my favorite street}
because it is conducive to walking, offers a
variety of land uses, but the traffic signals
need to be synchronized."
Cary Parkway - {"my favorite street}
because of the pastoral views and traffic
moves."
Lake Pine Road - {"my favorite street}
because of the scenery, the wide corridor, and
it is conducive to walking and cycling."
Themes
Several themes emerged from the 16 -month
study effort. These are listed below:
Balance and Travel Choice: Spread the
investment dollars around to all modes of
travel.
Resolve Existing Deficiencies: roadways that
are shaped like hourglasses, sidewalks that
don't connect, bikeways that aren't marked for
the appropriate level rider, and transit service
that doesn't serve enough of Cary.
Business as Usual Won't Work: future
forecasts indicate that the planned
improvements will not sustain acceptable
levels of service in the face of growth
Efficiency: find ways to interconnect modes
of travel, facilities and services so that Cary
can maximize the efficiency of each network
and operate as if it is one transportation
system.
Innovation: Cary is the Technology Town of
North Carolina. It has a high percentage of
PhD's and techno-savvy citizens. Where
they will preserve the character of the
community, innovative roadway
configurations should be considered. Some
of these are documented in this report.
Many others haven't even been conceived,
yet it is the desire of the Steering Committee
that full consideration be given to innovative
approaches.
Vision Statement
This Comprehensive Transportation Plan
embraces a vision of Cary's transportation
system as a community-friendly network of
roadways, bus routes, rapid transit trains,
bikeways, and walkways that are
interconnected with transfer points and
schedules that enable a traveler to
conveniently and safely use one or more
modes of travel to reach a destination.
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan
foresees a continued building process of new
and expanded transportation facilities
designed to minimize travel delays and
provide for reasonable travel within Cary
and the Triangle region. Where appropriate,
innovative approaches will be used to
minimize the impact of transportation
facilities on the community and maximize
the efficiency of travel.
f

?z

d•.EFO Coy a°? va
Wi16urSmithAsmciates
WJ,6jt n
Trm
r P/an
Another way to visualize Cary as a pedestrian-
friendly community is to apply the "Popsicle
Test". When every school-aged child living in
Cary can safely walk from their neighborhood
to go get a popsicle, then Cary will be a
pedestrian-friendly community
The fulfillment of this vision requires a "can-
do" attitude. The Town of Cary can build on
its current success and ensure that as it grows,
pedestrian and bicyclist issues will be given
appropriate consideration.
Goals
1. The Pedestrian Element addresses many of
the overall Comprehensive
Transportation Plan goals listed in
Chapter 2, including a safe, convenient,
and efficient multi-modal transportation
system,
2. safe and convenient facilities and service
for people who choose not to use an
automobile,
3. environmental improvements,
4. and to improve transportation linkages to
other parts of the Triangle.
Citizen involvement sessions revealed strong
interest for attractive, pedestrian and bicycle
friendly corridors. In response to the desire
for safe convenient travel ways that make all
points in Cary accessible to motorists,
pedestrians, and cyclists the Comprehensive
Transportation Plan encourages a higher
degree of connectivity for roadways,
sidewalks, and bikeways.
Issues
The Pedestrian Element is a key chapter of the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Good
coordination is necessary between pedestrian
elements and other elements of the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan,
specifically the Thoroughfare Element, to
ensure that appropriate consideration be
given to pedestrian improvements when
thoroughfare improvements are designed,
funded and constructed. Another key
objective is to minimize conflicts between
thoroughfare recommendations and good
pedestrian circulation.
Existing Deficiencies
The Four E's of walkability communities,
adapted from material presented by Steven
Goodridge on his website, consist of four
factors that affect the safety and walkability
of a community. These are education,
encouragement, engineering, and
enforcement.
Encouragement
While many people enjoy a quiet walk alone
to clear their head, the majority of
pedestrians prefer to be joined by others on
the sidewalk system to avoid that lonely
feeling that you're the only one who
understands the benefits of walking.
Programs to encourage and promote the
benefits of walking will contribute to the
success of the recommendations in the
Pedestrian Element.
Education
The safety of pedestrians, bicyclists and
motorists requires that all transportation
users know their responsibilities when
sharing the road, and understand the risks of
death or injury that their behavior may
cause.
Engineering
The design of a community's streets,
sidewalks, buildings, parking lots, and
public spaces determines what transportation

I_ r, a
th Cofnpreh wa
Wilbur Smith Associates
T?ntat/o- 'n P/an
Irr t ??.y
fir. ..-.. _ } _.
r? hiV.•nr
facilities are available, how safe they are, and
how people will choose to use them. Land-use
decisions also determine what destinations are
within walking distance.
Enforcement
How we drive, bike, and walk on our streets
affects public safety and shapes popular ideas
of acceptable behavior. Improving safety
requires that we communicate our
expectations of others and hold each other
accountable. Traffic laws are designed to
make our streets safer and to guarantee access
to all road users. Most traffic accidents are
caused when someone breaks the law and
behaves unsafely by speeding, running red
lights or stop signs, failing to yield, tailgating,
failing to reduce speed, driving while
impaired, or simply not paying attention.
Pedestrians can also cause accidents by
crossing against a signal or stepping into the
roadway where vehicles cannot stop in time.
Effective enforcement of traffic laws improves
compliance and safety.
Cary uses various ordinances and policies to
pave new sidewalks and bikeways. There are
three Town ordinances that promote bicycle
and pedestrian-friendly communities:
Connectivity Ordinance, Unified
Development Ordinance and Land Use Plan.
The Connectivity Ordinance requires that
developers provide more than one roadway
connection to a new development. The
current required connectivity index' is 1.2,
which under certain situations can be waived
by the Director of Development Services if it
is determined that it is unreasonable to be
required to provide such connections. In cases
Connectivity Index is calculated as "the number of
street links divided by the number of nodes
(intersections and cul-de-sacs)
where the connectivity requirement is
waived, a six-foot pedestrian trail must be
provided to link cul-de-sacs within a
residential development. The idea behind
connectivity is that it fosters improved
movement by pedestrians/cyclists and autos
between adjacent developments without
burdening the major street system.
The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO)
contains connectivity requirements for new
subdivision approval, but the updated UDO
seeks to put more emphasis on provisions
for a highly connected sidewalk and
bikeway network as an alternative to vehicle
transportation.
The Cary Land Use Plan provides strong
guidance for the development of Cary's
roads, sidewalks, and bikeways. The plan
describes where various types of future land
uses are to be located and also provides
guidance as to the appearance of the future
development.
Pedestrian facilities provide important
opportunities for short trips, thereby
reducing dependency on auto travel and
assisting in lessening roadway congestion.
Sidewalks are key elements in a diversified
transportation system that provides real
travel choices and does not solely rely on the
use of the automobile for all travel. In Cary,
there are sidewalks along many major
corridors to serve pedestrian transportation
and recreational needs.

orru? nnaarens .
Cornpr+aha ?va
Wilbur Smith Associates
T? N¦ mat/,on P/an

Pedestrian Accident History
Town of Cary Police Department records for
Total Pedestrian Accidents
7 1
6
° e 5
xv 4
rQ 3 -
2 2
0
0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50.60 60-70 70.60
Age Group
Figure 3.1 - Total Pedestrian Accidents
1998 show that there were 19 traffic accidents
that involved pedestrians (shown in Figures
3.1 and 3.2). Safety of pedestrians is the
cornerstone of this element of the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan since
people are less inclined to walk if they feel
unsafe. The Town has adopted policies and
standards to enhance safety and assure
sidewalk designs that minimize potential
conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.
Pedestrian Accidents
Pain-No
Fatal Apparent
Major Injuries 5% Injuries
21% 26%
Minor Broken
Bones/Other
Injuries
46%
Figure 3.2 - Pedestrian Accident Severity
Pedestrian Policies and Standards
Town of Cary policies related to sidewalks are
contained within several official Town
documents including the Municipal Code of
Ordinances and the Engineering Division
Standard Specifications and Details Manual.
Some of the policies contained in the
aforementioned documents are also shown on
the official Town of Cary web page.
The Municipal Code of Ordinances outlines
various requirements for sidewalks along
different classes of roadways in the Town in
accordance with the Standard Specifications
and Details Manual.
In Cary, sidewalks are required to be
constructed within a street right-of-way.
The Manual requires that sidewalks be
installed at the time of a roadway widening
or new roadway construction unless
otherwise approved by the Town Council.
The Manual also gives specific conditions
under which sidewalks are to be installed as
well as cases where sidewalks are not
required. Sidewalk guidelines outlined by
the Manual are as follows:
1. Sidewalk Both Sides of Street -
Thoroughfares, all collector streets, non-
residential cul-de-sacs.
2. Sidewalk One Side of Street -
Residential and non-residential local
streets not included in #1 above.
3. Conditional - On loop and residential
cul-de-sac streets: No sidewalk is
required unless either street is within a
one-half mile linear traverse of a
greenway, park,. shopping area, or the
street is within one and one-half (1-1/2)
mile linear traverse of a school, in which
case sidewalk on one side will be
required.
In addition to direction on where sidewalks
are required to be located, the Standard
Specifications and Details Manual also
gives guidelines for the layout and
installation of - sidewalks. Design
requirements outlined in the Manual specify
that the standard sidewalk width is five feet
with an adjacent planting strip of five feet
(shown in Figure 3.3). In cases where

i

.
Wilbur Smith Associates iW!160Y
/an
Tram P
either one or both of the above requirements
cannot be met, approval by the Town
Engineer is required.
Conformance with the federal Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1991 is also required when
sidewalks are installed. At a minimum,
wheelchair ramp (curb ramp) installation is
required where sidewalks and greenways
intersect any sections of curb and gutter.
The Cary Master Plan of Greenways is
another tool that can be utilized to specify
locations of asphalt paths and sidewalks
throughout the Town. In the Master Plan,
asphalt paths are required to be minimum of
12 feet from the back of the curb of an
adjacent roadway. The Master Plan also
outlines the limitation of asphalt paths as only
being permitted where there are a limited
number of access points and intersections
along a roadway. From experience, asphalt
paths do not function safely where there are
excessive number of driveways and
intersections along a roadway as it introduces
numerous points of conflict between
pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles.
Taking safety of pedestrians at signalized
intersections into consideration, the
Standard Specifications and Design Manual
requires that signal timing and phasing
include pedestrian phases to allow for safe
pedestrian crossing. Pedestrian signal heads
and push buttons should be installed. It is
also standard Town policy to install auditory
(noise making) crossing devices where
appropriate.
Intersection designs should be considerate of
pedestrian needs. Turn lanes should be
judiciously installed, since they lengthen the
roadway distance a pedestrian must travel.
At wider intersections, refuge islands should
be installed between opposing lanes of
traffic.
Future Deficiencies
An extensive network of sidewalks already
exists with plans in place to extend and
improve the network using a variety of
funding mechanisms, which include:
• Developer-funded,
• Town Annual Capital Improvement
Budget (CIB) funds,
• Cary general obligation bonds,
• State funds,
• Direct homeowner assessments.
Along thoroughfares, sidewalks are built as
roadways are widened. However, since
many roadways are improved in segments,
sidewalks are also built in segments. While
this practice may form bottlenecks for
traffic, it presents a serious safety concern
for pedestrians who must either turn around,
cross the roadway or walk in the roadway to
complete their trip. These gaps in the

Figure 3.3 - Typical Sidewalk Section
Showing 5ft Planting Strip and 5 ft
Sidewalk

Wilbur Smith Associates
Coipireha ` va
T? fatn P/an
¦ r s ifj.
sidewalk system must be closed before Cary
can rightly be considered a pedestrian-friendly
community.
Future deficiencies in the sidewalk network
will include numerous gaps where the
sidewalk ends and pedestrians are stranded,
with many choosing to walk in the roadway.
Recent practice in Cary has been to complete
the missing section of sidewalk at the time
that the adjacent property is developed, often
building it in conjunction with a widening of
the roadway as well. These future
deficiencies should be minimized through
systematic sidewalk gap closure construction
projects initiated by the Town of Cary.
Recommendations
The goal of the Pedestrian Element is to plan a
system of sidewalks and pathways to provide
adequate facilities for people to walk to
desired destinations within Cary. To
accomplish this goal, sidewalks will be
provided along both sides of all thoroughfares
and collector streets in Cary
The result is a planned network of greenways,
sidewalks, and pathways that will serve every
planned and existing activity center in Cary.
Recommendations are listed below and
described in the remainder of the Pedestrian
Element:
1. Establish Short Term Priorities.
2. Form pedestrian and bicycle advisory
committee.
3. Build sidewalks.
4. Provide a planting strip.
5. Initiate "Pathways to Progress" program.
6. Encourage pedestrian-oriented activity
centers.
Recommendation #1: Establish Short
Term Priorities
In response to a request for input, the
Citizen Advisory Committee and several
members of the public who attended
meetings or submitted e-mails offered the
following suggested actions for the Town of
Cary to initiate in the next one to two years
to improve conditions for pedestrians:
• Build sidewalks on both sides of North
Harrison Avenue, from the "Sam's"
shopping center and SAS campus all the
way south to Chatham Street in Town
Center.
• Build sidewalks on both sides of
Maynard Road, from Chapel Hill Road
to Reedy Creek Road.
• Build sidewalks on both sides of
Kildaire Farm Road, from Cary Parkway
to Academy Street.
• Build sidewalks on both sides of Cary
Parkway, from Holly Springs Road to
High House Road.
• Complete the sidewalks along Jenks-
Carpenter Road, from High House Road
to White Oak Park.
Recommendation #2: Form
Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory
Committee
An advisory committee should be formed to
help Town officials evaluate on-going
pedestrian improvements. With the recent
reorganization of Town staff, the
Transportation Planning section should have
primary liaison responsibility. The
committee could be a subcommittee of the
Planning Board and have responsibility for
bicycle issues as well.
Activities for the committee should include:
• Ranking and recommending projects to
the Cary Town Council for funding

Copr+a,i_a va
Wilbur Smith Associates
Tim on `at/, ; n P/an

• Encouraging programs that seek to
increase bicycle use and walking
• Encouraging increased enforcement of all
traffic laws including those that enhance
the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists
• Organizing volunteer efforts
• Receiving and reviewing public input
• Becoming educated on pedestrian and
bicycle issues in order to serve as a liaison
between technical staff and the general
public
Incomplete Sidewalk along a Cary
Street
Photo: David Farmer. Advisorv Committee
The committee would be divided into smaller
subcommittees to tackle specific individual
issues.
Recommendation #3: Build Sidewalks
The Town of Cary should continue efforts to
minimize the backlog of unbuilt sidewalks
along major and minor thoroughfares.
Maintain a backlog of not more than two years
of sidewalk construction projects. Exceptions
can be made for sidewalks that will be built as
part of a future roadway widening
improvement if that improvement is scheduled
within the ensuing three years. For roadway
widenings scheduled later than three years,
however, consideration should be given to
building the sidewalks sooner, given certain
existing conditions such as likelihood of
people using the sidewalk once it opens.
For sidewalks built prior to the roadway
widening, it is prudent to build the sidewalks
in their ultimate location to avoid ripping it
up later when the roadway is widened. This
requires additional right-of-way that may
not exist until the future when the roadway
is widened. Discretion on the part of the
Town Engineer should be exercised.
The Town of Cary should construct
sidewalks to close gaps, or sections without
sidewalk, left by spot development or spot
roadway widening projects. Missing
sections of sidewalk end up stranding
pedestrians, with many choosing to walk in
the roadway. Recent practice in Cary has
been to complete the missing section of
sidewalk at the time that the adjacent
property is developed; often building it in
conjunction with a widening of the roadway
as well.
It is recommended that the practice in Cary
be amended to accelerate construction of the
missing sections of sidewalk (close the gaps)
when the missing section represents 10
percent or less of the existing mileage of
available sidewalk. The 10 percent solution
would complete a 500-foot long missing
section of sidewalk if the project would
result in a one-mile long sidewalk when
completed; that is, the sum of existing
sidewalk on both sides of the gap exceeds
one mile in length. This guideline can be
superceded by the Town Engineer in special
conditions; such as an ADA request,
proximity to school, greenway, and/or a
park.
In February 1999, Cary voters approved a
major transportation improvement package
to accelerate roadway, intersection, and
sidewalk improvements. Sidewalks are

a?r Co . i'leha va
Wilbur Smith Associates ?l J
P ?K
Try at/ -'n P/an
included in each roadway project plus an
additional $1.2 million (out of $63.6 million
for the total transportation package). At $25 a
linear foot, sidewalks are somewhat
expensive. However, if you compare that with
over $200 per foot for a two-lane roadway or
with the societal costs of medical expense due
to an inactive lifestyle, it is not a high cost.
Recommendation #4: Provide a
Planting Strip
The five-foot planting strip design standard
should be continued, except where on-street
parking is permitted.
The Advisory Committee agreed that while a
wider separation between pedestrians and the
roadway is desirable, particularly on higher
speed roadways (45 mph and above), the
current five-foot wide grass buffer represents
a reasonable balance given the cost and impact
of additional right-of-way acquisition and is
enough to safely separate pedestrians from
traffic lanes. For roadways where on-street
parking is permitted, such as in the Town
Center Area and other activity centers, the
five-foot wide planting strip requirement
should be relaxed as per the Cary Design
Guidelines Manual. Since parked cars
provide a sufficient buffer between
pedestrians and moving traffic, the planting
strip area is better used for street trees and
additional pavement to serve pedestrian travel.
Recommendation #5: Initiate Pathways
to Progress Program
The Town of Cary should proactively initiate
a "Pathways to Progress" program to seek
support in Cary's neighborhoods for building
pedestrian and bicycle pathways that will
connect them with adjacent neighborhoods,
activity centers, shopping areas, parks,
greenways, and schools. Appropriate program
elements should be included that will mitigate

any negative impacts on properties adjoining
the pathway.
The Citizen Advisory Committee
contributed considerable insight and support
for better pathway connections in Cary.
Walkways and bicycle paths within and
between established developments as well as
new developments can greatly improve the
quality-of-life for everyone in Cary.
Imagine two cul-de-sac neighborhoods,
back-to-back, where people walk between
bushes to visit a friend in the adjacent
neighborhood. Why not pave an eight to
ten-foot wide asphalt path connecting the
two neighborhoods from one cul-de-sac to
another? Cars would be precluded by
installing metal or wooden posts at both
ends where the pathway adjoins the cul-de-
sac. Perhaps even a basketball hoop instead
of the post, as long as people can walk and
bicycle from the cul-de-sac to the pathway.
The pathway concept is also encouraged in
locations where residents of a neighborhood
can walk or bike to an adjacent activity
center, shopping area, park, greenway, or
school. Priorities should be set based on the
level of support received in the benefited
neighborhoods. However funding for these
improvements, particularly in the early years
of the program, should be provided by the
Town of Cary and/or through available
"Transportation Enhancement" type (State
or federal) grants.
Recommendation #6: Pedestrian
Oriented Activity Centers
A well planned roadway and pedestrian
circulation system for each activity center is
recommended, using the "edge road" and
on-street parking concepts.
J
k
iuu? nnaru ?` ? a
Copi'iah??ve
Wilbur Smith Associates
Tim ¦M ?? n P/an

Activity Centers are discussed extensively in
the Cary Growth Management (Land Use)
Plan. There are numerous future activity
centers located on the Growth Management
Plan map, with accompanying text
encouraging they be developed to favor the
pedestrian over the automobile. However,
there is concern that future activity centers are
mapped where two existing roadways
intersect. What occurs is commercial
development in two or more corners of the
intersection that have no relationship with
each other and are certainly not oriented to
pedestrians.
A new vision for future activity centers in
Cary embraces the location at an existing
intersection, however, the "through" traffic
would be carried around the activity center
(via an "edge road") rather than through it. To
attract support from business owners (they
prefer a front door. view of the traffic), good
access is needed between the "edge road" and
the heart of the activity center. Within activity
centers, on-street parking is encouraged, as a
buffer between pedestrians on sidewalks and
moving traffic. On-street parking is an
effective measure of supporting street front
retail businesses, particularly if travel speeds
are maintained at or below 35 mph.
Consideration should be given to roadway
cross-sections that provide for angled on-street
parking. Consideration should also be given
to well designed "pocket parking" lots that
would serve more than one business;
attractively designed to avoid a "sea of
parking" appearance.
Cost of Implementation
A typical cost to build sidewalks, excluding
right-of-way, is $25 per lineal foot for a five-
foot wide concrete sidewalk. For a typical
single-family homeowner in Cary, the cost of
building sidewalks in a neighborhood is
about $1,000 per household.
This compares with the $200 per lineal foot
to build a two-lane roadway, an increase of
nearly 10 times the cost of building a
sidewalk.
Conclusion
Walking is the most basic form of
transportation. Every trip we make, even by
car, begins and ends as a pedestrian. For
mass transit to be effective, patrons must be
able to walk between transit stops and
destinations of interest. Walking can be a
pleasant way to exercise, relax, and socially
interact with others in the community.
According to Cary resident Steven
Goodridge, "the safety and convenience of
pedestrian travel is an important factor in
our quality of life."
The Town of Cary is committed to creating
a more pedestrian-friendly environment by
building pedestrian enhancements wherever
possible. Even with continual
improvements being made for pedestrians as
roadways are improved, new developments
are completed, and stand alone projects are
completed there is still a distinct need to
have a plan for the system as a whole.
The Pedestrian Element focuses on
integrating the pedestrian into the
transportation system. The plan identifies
details that should be considered when
approving new developments and also when
designing new roadways. One example of
pedestrian planning in new roadway
construction is the provision for planting a
5-feet wide landscape strip. This area
allows for positive separation between
pedestrians and adjacent vehicles, increasing
pedestrian safety and comfort and thus
14
•? „ Cow t.-::.?i?.:y??h/ v?
Wilbur Smith Associates
Try `atl,.on P/an
¦ r `! /jig
increasing the attractiveness to walk rather
than drive.
r
The primary goal of the Pedestrian Element
is that pedestrians are a key part of planning
a transportation system. Planning for
pedestrians helps foster other modes of
transportation such as bicycle, bus and rail
transit as once a person gets off of a train or
bus they are then a pedestrian or cyclist and
should be accommodated. The full
development and implementation of the
Pedestrian Element is a first step in planning
improvements to Cary's transportation
system.

, a
Co?prehs , jva
Wilbur Smith Associates t J
7?w P/an
References
Website created by Cary resident Steven Goodridge:
http://sggoodri.home.mindspring.com/sidewalks/sidewalks.htm
The design of a community's streets, sidewalks, buildings, parking lots, and public spaces
determines what transportation facilities are available, how safe they are, and how people
will choose to use them. Land-use decisions also determine what destinations are within
walking distance. Links to the following websites are given on Steven Goodridge's site.
An Illustrated Guide to Good and Bad Walkway Designs in Cary - Pictures!
Effects of Buffers and Street Layout on Walkability - does this look like your
neighborhood?
Public Policies and Development Practices that Discourage Walking - how we got where
we are today
Traffic Calming Homepage - building slower, safer streets in Portland, Oregon
Roundabouts reduce fatalities by >95%, injuries by 50%, and accidents by 37%; boost
throughput 30%; great for peds too!
Walkable Communities, Inc. - provides consulting services for improving neighborhood
walkability
Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed-Use, Medium-Density
Environments is a study done at the University of Washington that challenges conventional
wisdom that suburbs do not need better pedestrian facilities because few people walk; it finds
that inadequate pedestrian facilities are a major factor in limiting real potential for pedestrian
activity compared to areas with better facilities. (Adobe Acrobat PDF file)
Pedestrian Facilities Guidebook: Incorporating Pedestrians into Washington's
Transportation System is the State of Washington's guide to pedestrian-friendly street and
site design. (Adobe Acrobat PDF file)
Cary Comprehensive Transportation Advisory Committee, which is currently looking at
pedestrian issues, will be constructing an information page on transportation concerns at
http://www.townofcary.org/traffic/trafficplan.htm (currently under construction)
Town of Cary Land Use Plan advocates anti-sprawl, neighborhood-centric North Carolina
Pedestrian Laws - Pedestrian rights and responsibilities according to NC statutes
North Carolina Motor Vehicle Laws Affecting Pedestrians - Do you know your
responsibilities as a driver?
Effects of Vehicle Speed on Pedestrian Fatality Rates - increasing speed by 10 mph
increases odds of fatality up to 900%
Mean Streets, an alarming report on pedestrian safety in the USA
Perils for Pedestrians details pedestrian safety issues.
Pedestrian Safety Roadshow - pedestrian safety program developed by the US DOT
The Transportation Action Network discusses neighborhood livability and transportation.
issues
i
1
Wilbur Smith Associates i
? _ Tyr `. q a ?on P/an
Architect James Howard Kunstler writes about the effects of sprawl development on
livability, community, and sense of place in Home from Nowhere, excerpts of which are
published at http://www3.theatlantic.com/issues/96sep/kunstler/kunstler.htm
Cary Police -Traffic Safety Team - Focus on drunk driving, seat-belt use, and crashes
related to speeding
Cary Crime Statistics including Traffic Stops and Citations (Adobe Acrobat File)
Police Powerless against Dangerous Driving in Parking Lots - Little or no enforcement on
commercial property
North Carolina Motor Vehicle Laws and Rules of the Road at the Cramerton Police
Department Web Site
NYC Traffic Violation Crackdown Produces Big Drop in Pedestrian and Cyclist Deaths
- 32% fewer peds killed in 1998
Pedestrian-Safety Sting Operation in Washington State
Other Links
The Town of Cary Web site is at http://www.townofcary.org/
g/
The Cary Citizens for Balanced Growth Web site is at http://www.carycbg.or

R'ilbus Smith Associates
Triangle Effective Bicycling, encompasses
the following elements:
• Education - educate motorists about
"sharing the road" with cyclists and
educate cyclists to ride predictably.
• Encouragement - municipalities such as
Moraga, California have successfully
sponsored programs to reward good
bicycling behavior with coupons for free
ice cream - distributed by Police
officers.
• Engineering - years of experience
analyzing accident reports and
evaluating human factors related to
transportation facilities qualify the Town
Engineer as a very important person
when it comes to Cycle Safety.
• Enforcement - Police should speak to all
cyclists, adults and children, when they
are observed violating traffic laws such
as riding the wrong way or not heeding
traffic signals. Likewise, Police should
cite all motorists who violate traffic laws
including failure to yield right-of-way to
bicyclists.
Attention to all 4 E's of Cycling will further
Cary in its quest to be a biker-friendly
community.
Existing Deficiencies
The existing network of bikeways is a good
starting point, however sections of some
major thoroughfares do not meet the State
standard width for wide outside lanes for
bikeways. This standard calls for outside
lanes to be 14-feet wide. Furthermore there
are numerous neighborhood and community
centers, local parks, shopping centers,
employment centers, and other similar
activity centers that are not connected to
an
major residential areas by the bikeway
system.
With regard to one of Cary's largest activity
centers, the Town Center Area, the
Transportation Advisory Committee raises
the issue or challenge to identify bikeways
for basic and advanced cyclists from all
directions within and across the Maynard
Road loop, destined for the Town Center
Area. Their belief is that the Town Center
should be an accessible destination for
cyclists of all skill levels.
Bicycle Safety
The following table is derived from data in
Bill Hunter's Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash
Types in the 1990's:
Basic Bicvcle - Automobile Collision Tvnes
Collision Type Percentage
Turning, Merging or Crossing
Paths TMCP 77.0%
Motorist Overtaking Vehicle
MOV 8.5%
Parallel Paths other than MOV 7.5%
Specific circumstances 7.0
These data indicate that turning, merging
and crossing-path type collisions, which
typically occur at intersections, is nearly an
order of magnitude more frequent than the
more commonly feared Motorist Overtaking
Vehicle (bicycle) type collision. Thus,
intersection safety should be a primary focus
of remedial bicycle facility investigations
and engineering.
Town of Cary Police Department's records
show an annual average of 19 traffic
accidents that involved bicycles from 1996
through 1998. Summaries by age of. the
bicyclist and severity of the injuries are
shown in the figures 4.1 and 4.2.

1

.
1Vilbur Smith Associates
Total Bicyclist Accidents
20
25
20
Za 10_
5 r
0`
0-10 10-20 2030 3040 40-60 50.60 60-70 70.60
Age Group
Figure 4.1 - Total Bicycle Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Major Injuries No Injury
12% 12%
Pain-No
Apparent
Minor Broken ; "'"`' Injuries
Bones/Other 28%
Injuries
48%
Figure 4.2 - Bicycle Accident Severity
Safety of bicyclists is the cornerstone of this
element of the Bicycle Element, just as in
the Pedestrian Element. Adherence to State
standards for the design and operation of
bikeways is highly recommended.
Although there have been no recent cyclist
fatalities in Cary, there has been a high
occurrence of significant injuries of cyclists
involved in accidents. Sixty percent of
cyclists involved in accidents in Cary were
reported to have had major injuries or
broken bones when involved in a crash.
Furthermore, crashes in other Triangle
communities have involved cyclist fatalities.
Given the age group that contributed the
largest percentage of accidents (10 to 20
years of age) it can be deduced that
increased education of adolescent and
teenage cyclists could lead to less severe and
less frequent accidents. The 10 to 20 year-
old group is made up of primarily
ran
recreational and youth cyclists who are not
always familiar with rules and regulations
that apply to safely operating a bicycle in
and around vehicular traffic. This is not to
say that motorists were not also at fault in
crashes with this age group.
An educational program or a required
supplement to the North Carolina Drivers
Handbook more clearly outlining a driver's
responsibility toward a cyclist is also
recommended. Often drivers are unaware
that cyclists are allowed to ride on a
roadway whether it is a designated bike
route or not. Cyclists however, are not
permitted to ride on access controlled
facilities such as a freeway.
Types of Bicyclists
Just like drivers, there are various classes of
experience when it comes to cyclists: basic
or new riders as well as advanced riders.
There are two readily recognized levels of
cyclists that exist within the riding public.
With each level of experience comes an
ability to negotiate comfortably, any number
of conditions that a cyclist may be faced
with while riding for recreation, running an
errand, or commuting to work. The two
general classifications of cyclists are basic
cyclists and advanced cyclists.
• Basic Cyclists - Basic bicyclists are
casual or new adult and teenage riders
less secure in their ability to ride in
traffic without special provisions. This
cyclist typically prefers bike paths or
bike lanes on collector or arterial streets
with less exposure to high traffic speeds
and volumes. A general estimate is that
80 percent of bicyclists are in this
category.
11
a

Wilbor Smith Associates
Advanced Cyclists - Advanced
bicyclists are experienced riders who can
operate in traffic safely and under more
typical thoroughfare conditions. This
cyclist generally prefers shared
roadways rather than bike lanes.
Although surveys show that this group
represents only about 20 percent of total
riders, surveys show that they ride about
80 percent of the bicycle miles traveled
yearly.
Children on bicycles do not fit either
classification. This group of cyclists
generally keeps to neighborhood streets and
greenways. When children venture out onto
busier roadways, they typically stay on
sidewalks or separate bike paths, where
possible. Cary has made efforts to
accommodate children and other cyclists
uncomfortable riding in traffic, by allowing
them to utilize sidewalks with the provision
that these cyclists yield to pedestrians on the
sidewalk.
Cyclists, not unlike drivers, gain experience
over time and miles of riding. As cyclists
ride and gain more experience operating in
traffic, often they move from being a basic
bicyclist to an advanced cyclist capable of
operating under more tenuous conditions.
Types of Bikeways
To accommodate all kinds of cyclists there
are a number of different types of facilities
that are employed, some of which readily
appeal to more experienced cyclists, while
others readily appeal to less experienced
cyclists. Bike paths, neighborhood
connectors, bike lanes, shared roadways, and
signed connections are among the most
common types of bike facilities found in
most communities.
'an
Bike Path - A bike path is physically
separated from motorized vehicular
traffic. Bike paths are often used for
recreational purposes, but can serve a
transportation function when part of a
comprehensive network of bikeways.
Generally bike paths are most appealing
to less experienced cyclists though they
are used by all classes of cyclists.
11
1
1

R'ilbur Smith Associate
• Neighborhood Connector - There are
many neighborhoods in Cary where
access is cut off from adjacent
neighborhoods, schools and shopping
centers by something as simple as a
dead-end street or a cul-de-sac. A
neighborhood connector is designed as a
10-feet wide asphalt path that links
adjacent areas for bicycle and pedestrian
travel only (shown in Figure 4.3). In
most cases it is necessary to install
bollards in spaced intervals at both ends
of a neighborhood connector, to prevent
unauthorized vehicles from using them
as cut-throughs. There are situations
however where it is not possible to
construct a path 10 feet in width, in
which case less width is acceptable with
the provision that cyclists dismount and
walk along the path.
RESIOENnO
DEVELOPMENT
CUL DE SAC
i

R-NEIGHBORHOOD l
CONNECTOR o
PEDESTRIAN
AND
BIKE i RESDIENTUL
J
I
ONLY " DEVELOPMENT
.
RESIDENTOL CDL DE SAC
DEVELOPMENT
Figure 4.3
Neighborhood Connector
an
• Striped Bike Lane - A bike lane is a
portion of a roadway designated by
striping, signing, and pavement
markings for the preferential or
exclusive use of bicyclists. Bike lanes
are especially effective for basic
bicyclists on collector or multi-lane
minor thoroughfares with relatively low
traffic volumes, few commercial
driveways, and few complicated
intersections. Typically bike lanes are a
minimum of 4 feet in width, not
including adjacent curb and gutter.
On roadways with higher speeds and/or
higher traffic volumes it is often desirable to
increase the width of the striped bike lane
proportionally to the conditions that prevail.
Often in addition to a white line, bike lanes
are delineated by a diamond stenciled
marking or "BIKE ONLY" marking painted
at regular intervals on the pavement or signs
designating the route as "Bike Only".

Bike Lane Striped along a Thoroughfare

i
Nilbur Smith Associates
Striped bicycle lanes can be confusing at
intersections, to the extent they encourage
bicyclists to remain to the right at
intersections, regardless of their intended
destination. Traffic law requires drivers to
move into the lane position closest to their
destination before turning. A bicycle lane
striped to the stop line of an intersection
clearly encourages bicyclists to stay right
and motorists to stay left, rather than
merging before turning. As bicycle lane
proponents began to recognize the reality of
the problem of motorists turning across
bicycle lanes and colliding with straight-
through bicyclists, they proposed that lanes
be dashed before intersections, indicating
that drivers on either side of the line may
merge. Although dashing may reduce the
problem, the existence of any dividing line
at an intersection discourages proper
merging maneuvers. Drivers are used to
merging into a lane, not straddling a lane
line (the dashed bicycle lane)."
In Carrboro, at the intersection of North
Greensboro Street and Estes Drive
Extension, the bike lane stripe is terminated
well before the intersection with a sign
warning motorists of merging cyclists.
Terminating the stripe well before the
intersection gives cyclists an opportunity to
position themselves correctly for the
intersection.
an
• Shared Roadway with Wide Outside
Lane - A wide outside lane refers to the
through lane closest to the curb that
should be a minimum of 14 feet wide to
safely accommodate
both motor vehicles Cary
and bicyclists. The 14
feet of lane width does
not include the width
of the curb and gutter, Bike Route
as this is not a suitable
area to travel due to collection of debris,
drainage structures, and proximity to the
curb itself. Wide outside lanes are
effective on collectors and thoroughfares
and are effective for and preferred by
advanced bicyclists.
• Signed Connection - Signed
connections are typically found on
residential streets having low traffic
speeds and volumes. Appropriate
directional and/or informational signs
typically designate bike routes. Signed
connections often provide connections to
other bikeways that otherwise could not
be provided.

Wide Outside Lane along High House
Road

1

R'ilbor Smifh Associates
Bicycle Policies and Standards
The Town of Cary considers bicycle traffic
an important mode of transportation. The
Standard Specifications and Details Manual
takes into account bicycles when designing
thoroughfares and collector streets. The
Town is currently undergoing a process to
update this standard to reflect recent changes
to bicycle-friendly facility design by
incorporating 14-feet wide outside lanes as
the standard instead of 13-feet wide.
The Bicycle Element has been prepared after
thorough review of the North Carolina
Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design
Guidelines, published by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation in 1994. It
relies heavily on local, state, and federal
research conducted in the past two decades
and includes _valuable insight based on
engineering studies, thorough consideration
of accident experience involving bicyclists,
and extensive public input from bicyclists,
motorists and the general public.
Existing Bikeways
Cary already has a good head start in
bikeway planning and implementation, as
can be seen from ordinances already in place
in the Town to promote and encourage the
design of bikeways. Between the standard
for constructing new multi-lane roadways
with 14-feet wide outside lanes and a
planning effort completed for the
Greenways Master Plan, Cary has a start at
planning for additional bikeways.
Presently, there are no designated bike lanes
in Cary and only a handful of other facilities
actually completed within the Town. There
are four multi-lane roadways that have wide
(13- feet wide) outside lanes and "Share the
Road" signs through various sections
including:
• High House Road
• Cary Parkway
• Maynard Road
• Walnut Street
an
It is cautioned however, that roadways with
13-feet outside lanes DO NOT meet State
minimum standards for bikeways and that
posting "Share the Road" signs on
inadequate facilities does not alone make
them suitable for cyclists.
North Carolina Bicycling Highways
In North Carolina there are designated
bicycling highways to provide for long
distance cycling throughout the State. In
some cases these bicycling highways
connect to a nationwide system of
designated bike routes. Generally, bicycling
highways are routed in either the north/south
or east/west direction. Wherever possible
they are routed mostly on low volume
roadways that are well maintained where
possible. Of the many bicycling highways
in the state the Carolina Connection, the
Mountains to Sea Route, and the Cape Fear
Run pass through Cary at its outer
boundaries.
The Carolina Connection is a route that runs
north/south from South Carolina to Virginia
passing through the East Piedmont and
Southwestern Sandhills Region. This route
is a part of the US Bike Route 1 that runs
along the Eastern Seaboard from Florida to
Maine.
'u

U
Wilbur Smith Asswiatts
As this route passes
through Cary it utilizes
sections of Davis Drive,
Morrisville Carpenter
Road, and Aviation
Parkway.
The Mountains to Sea Route runs in a
predominantly east/west direction from
Murphy in the Mountains to Manteo on the
Outer Banks. The Mountains to Sea Route
uses Highway 751 and Green Level West
Road as it enters Cary from the west, turning
briefly northward onto Davis Drive and then
eastward again on Morrisville Carpenter
Road, leaving Cary on Aviation Parkway.
The Cape Fear Run is a predominantly
north/south route that approximately
x•xz 3
F:'•p
parallels Interstate 40 from
the Triangle., Region to
Wilmington. This route
uses Ten Ten Road as it
passes south of Cary and
terminates in downtown
Apex where it intersects
the Carolina Connection.
Existing and Future Greenways
Greenways, though they serve a slice of the
cycling public with adequate facilities, are in
most cases for recreation purposes for
pedestrians and bicycles.
The Cary Town Council adopted the Parks,
Greenways and Bikeways Master Plan in
1998. Existing and future parks and
greenways are shown in Figure 4.4. The
reason for this report to mention greenways
is that they are part of an integral
pedestrian/bicycle system and providing
connections between bicycle/pedestrian
an
transportation facilities and recreation
facilities is important in creating that
system.
Some of the Parks, Greenways and
Bikeways Master Plan bikeway
recommendations do not meet State
standards for safety and those are therefore
not included in this Bicycle Element. The
primary issues with these routes are
inadequate lane widths (13 feet compared
with the minimum 14 feet) and/or rough
(non-navigable) shoulders. The following
table shows bikeways shown as existing in
the adopted Parks, Greenways & Bikeways
Master Plan that were found to not meet
minimum State standards.
Existing Bikeways not Meeting State of North
Carolina Minimum Standards-for Bikeways
Road Name Reason
Cary Parkway Narrow Lanes, High
Volumes
Davis Drive Narrow Lanes, High
Volumes
Northeast Maynard Narrow Lanes
Road 13feet Outside Lane
Southwest Maynard Narrow Lanes
Road
Tryon Road Narrow Lanes, High
Volumes
Ten Ten Road Narrow Lanes, Rough
Shoulder Pavement
Holly Springs Road Narrow Lanes, High
Volumes
Walnut Street Narrow Lanes
(13feet Outside Lane

i
1
1
i
1
1
r
1~
1

Figure 4.4
Cary
Adopted Bikeways
and Greenways
Adopted Bikeways N
Existing W+
E
- Proposed
Adopted Greenways S
Existing
Proposed
Streets
Lakes
Study Area
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 Miles
- T
I
??`r
M
1
LL
? Pmpamd by ffibur Smdh Assocbtes
f? 1 Raleigh, North Carchna
?S [phone] Wilbur Smith Associates

f
-.?
Nilbus Smith Awes Co . Pr-190th
. rxw at/on P/arn
Recommendations
The goal of the Bicycle Element is to plan a
system of bikeways to provide adequate
facilities for cyclists to reach desired
destinations within and outside of Cary. The
main focus of providing facilities was to
create an interconnected network that would
both allow for the needs of the commuting
cyclist as well as the needs of the casual or
recreational cyclist.
The result of the planning process is a
planned network of bikeways that will serve
every planned and existing activity center in
Town. The system of bikeways includes
striped bike lanes, wide outside lanes
(shared lanes), bike paths, neighborhood
connectors, and signed bike routes.
Before recommendations for bicycle related
improvements were made, a number of
cyclist specific issues were placed before
Town Staff and the Citizen Advisory
Committee. The issues and corresponding
recommendations were discussed and
recommendations were formulated.
Recommendation #1: Short Term
Priorities
In response to a. request for input, the
Advisory Committee and several members
of the public who attended meetings or
submitted e-mails offered the following
suggested actions for the Town of Cary to
initiate in the next one to two years to
improve bicycle transportation:
• Widen Davis Drive with 14-foot wide
outside lanes.
• Widen NC 55 with an appropriate
bikeway for advanced cyclists.
• Widen High House Road, from Cary
Parkway to NC 55 with 14-foot wide
outside lanes.
• Build Louis Stephens Road, from High
House Road to South Alston Avenue
with 14-foot wide outside lanes.
• Build a greenway or striped bike lane
connecting Bond Park with Brookgreen
Drive/Lake Pine Drive neighborhoods
via Chatham Street and suitable collector
streets.
• Improve bicycle connections between
Lake Crabtree County Park, Weston area
businesses, and nearby high- and
medium-density residential
neighborhoods.
• Build a greenway or off-road asphalt
bike path along Cary Parkway, from
Holly Springs Road to High House
Road. Build a barrier-separated bike
path in the median of Cary Parkway
through a reconstructed interchange with
Highway 1/64.
• Build a greenway or off-road asphalt
bike path in the Kildaire Farm Road
corridor, from Ten Ten Road to
Academy Street. Install bike racks in
convenient locations around the Town
Center area (downtown).
• Build a greenway or off-road asphalt
bike path along High House Road to
improve access to Bond Park.
Recommendation #2: Form Advisory
Committee
To maintain on-going community input, The
Town of Cary should consider the creation
of an advisory committee. With the recent
reorganization of transportation functions in
the Town, The Transportation Planning
section should be responsible for soliciting
this on-going input. One potential avenue
would be through a bike and walk
subcommittee of the Planning Board.

t

J
Nilbur Smith Associates
Recommendation #3: Proactively
Plan Non-Motorized Pathway
Connections
The Town of Cary should proactively
facilitate the planning, construction and
maintenance of bicycle- and pedestrian-only
(non-motorized) pathway connections
between existing subdivisions, Planned Unit
Developments and adjacent developed areas.
These are not intended for use by traffic.
Instead, these are to better connect
established neighborhoods with pathways to
adjacent neighborhoods, greenways,
shopping areas, schools, and parks. This
function should be added to the mission of
the Pathway and Bikeway Advisory
Committee.
The Connectivity Ordinance addresses
future developments to improve accessibility
to adjacent uses by a pedestrian trail that can
also be used by bicyclists. However, since
many developments were established before
the Connectivity Ordinance was adopted,
there should be a process to identify
"missing links" in the current system to
improve pedestrian and bicycle accessibility.
The Pathway and Bikeway Advisory
Committee should address these issues.
Representatives from the Wake County
School Board, Planned Unit Developments,
shopping centers and other local attractions
could be consulted in the process to locate
missing links. Particularly in the beginning
of the program, the Town of Cary should
provide funding for the planning, design,
construction and maintenance of these new
facilities. Applications for federal
Department of Transportation and possibly
Department of Energy grants should be
pursued.
an
The Citizen Advisory Committee was
unanimous in their agreement for the Town
of Cary to proactively facilitate the process
of investigating opportunities to link
neighborhoods together with pedestrian and
bicycle "neighborhood connectors".
Initially, the connectors should be provided
based upon neighborhood requests and
avoid neighborhoods opposed to providing
the connections.
Recommendation #4: Amend
Roadway Design Standard
The Town of Cary should amend the
Roadway Design Standard to change the 13-
foot wide requirement for outside roadway
lanes to 14-foot to . better accommodate
bicycles.
In practice, the Town is currently
incorporating a 14-feet wide requirement
where feasible in roadway designs.
Formalizing this requirement by changing
the standard would ensure that all new
multi-lane roadways not yet designed would
be bicycle-friendly for intermediate and
advanced bicyclists.
Recommendation #5: Create a
Bicycle Suitability Route Map
The Town of Cary should produce a bicycle
suitability route map.
As Cary adds to its greenway and bikeway
system, route maps indicating how to get to
major attractions by bike will be needed.
Either a town-wide map or smaller
individual route maps can be produced. The
maps should be available on the world wide
web, in all government centers, as well as at
schools, parks, recreational areas, offices,
retail establishments, and in bike shops.

Nilbus Smith Associates
The map should display the suitability of the
roadway, based on the roadway character
and traffic volume. The suitability index
takes into account pavement width,
pavement conditions, roadway speed and
other related factors. The Pathway and
Bikeway Advisory Committee could solicit
volunteers from local bicycle groups to work
with the Town Engineer to collect and
compile the needed information. U.S. DOT
"transportation enhancement" funds can be
used to produce the maps.
Recommendation #6: Adopt Bicycle
Parking Standards
The Town of Cary should consider adopting
appropriate bicycle parking requirements as
new developments are approved to ensure
the provision of adequate bicycle parking.
There are currently no bicycle parking
requirements, although this issue is under
review by the Town as part of its update of
the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
The Citizen Advisory Committee supports,
in concept, the adoption of bicycle parking
requirements for new developments. The
specific requirements should be appropriate
based on expected levels of need relative to
what other jurisdictions require and be
supported by the community.
Without convenient, secure bicycle parking,
the effectiveness of bikeways will be
diminished. The guidelines presented in
Table 4.1 were developed based on League
of American Bicyclists recommendations
and experience in other cities.
Short-term bicycle parking is meant to
accommodate customers, visitors and others
expected to depart within two hours. High-
security racks that permit locking of the
bicycle frame and one wheel with a u-type
an
bicycle lock, such as the inverted "U" rail
rack and the ribbon rack, are preferred.
Long-term bicycle parking is meant to
accommodate employees, students,
commuters and others parking for two hours
or more. Racks or bicycle lockers can be
used to satisfy long-term needs. Typical
costs are $60 per bike parking space for
short-term (racks) and $800 per bike for
long-term (lockers).
After discussions with Town Staff and the
Citizen Advisory Committee it was
determined that the guidelines given by the
League of American Bicyclists provide for
more than enough parking for particular land
uses. Both Town Staff and the Steering
Committee expressed interest in amending
development requirements with bicycle
parking requirements, but not requiring as
many spaces as recommended by the
League.

Wilbur Smith Ac _W-

'an
Table 4.1
Potential Bicycle Parking Guidelines
Land Use Bicycle Parking Space Examples
Office Building with 100,000 sq.ft.
generally accommodates 400 employees
Office 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. of floor space (400 auto parking spaces). Requirement
would provide 20 bike spaces (roughly 3 or
4 bike racks).
Sit-down restaurant in a stand-alone building
Restaurants 1 per 1,000 sq. ft, of floor space with 7,000 sq. ft. of floor space generally
accommodates 200 seats. Bicycle parking
would be 7 spaces.
Major Entertainment Raleigh's Entertainment and Sports Arena has
Event 1 per 100 seats over 21,000 seats. Parking for 210 bicycles
should be added.(30 racks).
An industrial building with 100,000 sq.ft. of
Industrial 1 per 15,000 sq. ft. of floor area floor space would provide 7 bike parking spaces
(1 rack).
A medical center with 100,000 sq.ft. of floor
Medical Center 1 per 20,000 sq. ft. of floor area space would provide 5 bike parking spaces (1
rack).
School
- Elementary, Middle, 2 per classroom, 0 grade and
High School above
Parking Garage and 1 per 50 auto spaces provided A 300-space parking garage should include six
Park-and-Ride Lot bike-parking spaces (1 rack).
For the future Triangle Transit Authority in the
Town Center Area, 200 parking spaces are
Rail Station 1 per 20 auto parking spaces planned. 10 bike-parking spaces are
recommended, one rack plus several bike
lockers.
Reference: League of American Bicyclists. Note that Cary's Citizen Advisory Committee believes
that the initial requirements for bicycle parking spaces should be less than the generic
recommendations made by the League of American Bicyclists.
t

`1

'?
NiIbu Smith Associates
Recommendation #7: Construct
Physical Improvements
To allow for immediate bikeway system
improvements as well as to coordinate
bikeways with future long-term roadway
improvements, the Bikeway Element has
several exceptions that are noted. As
illustrated in Figure 4.5, bikeway
improvements are possible with already
scheduled roadway improvement projects
funded through Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP), Capital Improvement
Budget (CIB), and bond projects.
As a result of changes that will take place
due to roadway thoroughfare plan
improvements, an enhanced system of
bikeways will be created. Bikeways that
will be added as a result of thoroughfare
improvements include sections of the
following corridors:
• Arthur Pierce Road
• Collins Road
• East Durham Road
• Green Level Church Road
• Green Level to Durham Road
• Green Level West Road
• Holly Springs Road
• Jenks-Carpenter Road
• Kildaire Farm Road
• Leonard Christian Road
• Morrisville Carpenter Road
• Old Reedy Creek Road
• Optimist Farm Road
• Penny Road
• Pierce Olive Road
• Reedy Creek Road
• South Alston Avenue
• Ten Ten Road
• Tryon Road
• West Lake Road
Also, as a result of necessary roadway
improvements to accommodate future traffic
firn
growth, sections of the following corridors
will be able to be upgraded from facilities
with narrower 13-feet wide shared outside
lanes to facilities with 14-feet wide outside
lanes.
• Cary Parkway
• High House Road
• Kildaire Farm Road
• Maynard Road
• Walnut Street
• Weston Parkway
With the recommended Bikeway Element,
every planned activity center in Cary will be
accessible by bicycle. The recommended
new Advisory Committee should work to
implement the recommendations and also
should seek different types of bikeways to
accommodate different skill levels.
Striped Bike Lanes
The plan calls for over eight miles of striped
bike lanes throughout the town. Because
striped bikeways often give cyclists a false
sense of security,
roadways that will be
designated as striped
bikeways were
carefully selected
based on having wide LANE
pavement, carrying AHEAD
traffic volume that can
be accommodated
within the design capacity for that roadway,
low to moderately low traffic speeds, and a
limited number of commercial driveways.
Roadways recommended to have 4-feet
wide striped bike lanes in selected sections
(5-feet wide if adjacent to on-street parking
lanes) include:
• Farmington Woods Drive
• Hampton Valley Rd
• Sudbury Drive
• Northwoods Drive
11

??w
Wil6o? Smith Associates
• Two Creeks Road
• East Dynasty Road
• West Dynasty Road
• Lake Pine Drive
• Seabrook Avenue
• Sloan Drive Extension
• Westhaven Extension
• New Hope Church Road
In addition to adding a white line to each of
these roadways it will be necessary to use
appropriate signage and pavement markings
to ensure that facilities are safe and
unimpeded. Street trees will not be affected.
Signs used to mark exclusive bike lanes are
similar to the one pictured on the previous
page. Additional pavement markings for
bike lanes often include "BIKE ONLY"
stenciled on the pavement at regular
intervals.
Shared Roadway with Wide Outside
Lanes
In the Bikeway Element there are numerous
roadways designated as shared outside lane
bikeways. Sections of existing roads such as
Maynard Road, High House Road, and Cary
Parkway already
have 13-feet wide
outside lanes.
Although these
roadways do have
s, an extra foot of
Travel La width in the
outermost lane, 13-
14 R feet wide lanes do
not meet state
standards for a shared outside lane facility.
As roadways are widened in the future,
rather than constructing 12-feet wide outer
lanes, 14-feet wide outer lanes should be
constructed to allow for a shared roadway.
Appendix E lists roadways that will have
Qn
shared wide outside lane facilities in the
future.
Interchange Improvements
Bicycling along thoroughfares in the vicinity
of a freeway interchange is a particularly
challenging and potentially dangerous
exercise, due to the high volume of turning
traffic and complicated traffic signal phasing
schemes. Alternatives to bicycling through
interchange areas, such as bikeways on
parallel (non-interchange) bridges and
innovative bikeway facilities should be
investigated. One such innovation is the use
of a very wide bridge over US 1/64 within
the Walnut Street interchange: bicyclists
along Walnut Street could cross Buck Jones
Road at the traffic signal before detouring
onto the shoulder of the "Crossroads
Shopping Center" ramp, and then traversing
through the secondary street system to rejoin
Walnut Street at either the Meeting Street or
Dillard Drive signalized intersections.
Although this increases the distance traveled
by bicyclists, it has the potential to enhance
the safety of cyclists in this busy area.
For future interchanges along the Western
Wake Expressway, better interchange
designs that incorporate bikeways (along the
thoroughfare and the freeway) are
recommended. Examples from other cities
include the bikeway parallel to a northern
Virginia freeway where bicycle-only loop
ramps are provided for cyclists
interchanging between the thoroughfare and
the bikeway parallel to the freeway.
Another example is the median bikeway in
Palo Alto, California where a barrier-
separated bikeway is constructed in the
median of the thoroughfare as it crosses over
the freeway. Openings for bicyclists -are
provided only at the end points, within
crosswalks at a signalized intersection.

f
??w
Wilbur Smith Associates
Neighborhood Signed Connections
Neighborhood signed connections
planned for collector streets that have 1
traffic volumes. By installing signs
collector streets that already connect
sn
the ability to travel efficiently between
are neighborhoods without having to backtrack
ow to an arterial street and take a circuitous
on
with
other streets will provide a degree of
connectivity within the bikeway system that
could not otherwise be provided.
Neighborhood signed connections will not
result in any change other than to post green
signs displaying the image of a bicycle and
the words "Bike Route".
The primary purpose of signing connections
is to allow for greater cyclist awareness of
streets other than thoroughfares. For signed
connections to be effective, appropriate
signage must be used both along the routes
and at intersections. Signs that reference
commonly known destinations at bikeway
ends are useful in enhancing wayfinding for
this type of bikeway.
A complete listing of all signed bike routes
can be found in Appendix E as well as in
Figure 4.5.
Inter-Neighborhood Connectors
The primary purpose of this facility type is
to provide non-vehicular linkages where it is
not possible or not feasible to construct a
full street.
The following five inter neighborhood
connectors were identified in the Plan.
• Academy to East Boundary Street connector
• Normandy Street to West Chatham Street
connector
• Lion's Park to Cary High School connector
• Greenwood Circle connector
• Kingston Ridge to Seabrook Ave Connector
Each of these connectors links
neighborhoods that are not connected by the
existing street system. By providing these
connections, pedestrians and cyclists have
route to a nearby destination.
One of the responsibilities of the enhanced
Pathways and Bikeways Advisory
Committee could be to actively search for
more non-motorized pathway connections
between disconnected land uses and
neighborhoods that would be useful to
connect.
Other Improvements
Other suggested improvements for the
bikeway plan include re-routing two North
Carolina Bicycling Highways, the
Mountains to Sea Route and the Carolina
Connection, as they pass in the vicinity of
Cary as well as maintaining a bicycle
crossing on Green Hope School Road at the
CSX Railroad.
The Mountains to Sea route currently
utilizes Davis Drive to travel north/south
between High House Road and Morrisville-
Carpenter Road. It is recommended to re-
route the section of the Mountains to Sea
Route that currently utilizes Davis Drive to
Carpenter-Upchurch Road in the future.
Carpenter-Upchurch Road offers several
advantages over Davis Drive for cyclists
including better pavement quality, lower
traffic volumes, greater lane width, and
lower prevailing traffic speeds which would
improve the cycling quality of this link of
the Mountains to Sea Route.

r
v Morrisville
"z I
RDU Airport
w.meaa nark
Lain C.W.

!1 4 f
D ?
0

Figure 4.5
`" Cary
Bicycle Plan
Bikeways
Existing
-Future
Greenways N
Existing
w
-Proposed E
Airports s
- Streets
Lakes
0 Parks
Study Area
O Inter Neighborhood
Connectors
1 2 Miles
Raleigh

Y rr
?V-,
II
- ¦
zl
R.* Ranh Ca,dn ®,• ` •\
[phone] Uilb..

Nilbuc Smith Associates
The Carolina Connection also uses sections
of Davis Drive to travel through Cary from
Apex to Northwest Raleigh. To improve
safety, it is recommended that the Carolina
Connection be rerouted along Leonard
Christian Road, Jenks-Carpenter Road, and
Carpenter-Upchurch Road instead of its
current routing along Davis Drive. The
recommended route would provide a safer
facility due to lower traffic volumes and
speeds, better overall pavement quality, and
wider travel lanes.
Figure 4.6 on the following page illustrates
the recommended routing change of The
Mountains to Sea and Carolina Connection
routes.
an
now closed to all types of vehicles as a
result of CSX Transportation Company
attempting to improve the safety of at-grade
crossings in its rail corridor.
It is recommended to re-open this crossing
to bicycles only. The section of the railroad
that the road passes over is straight with
good sight distance in both directions.
Providing this bicycle-only crossing would
greatly enhance mobility between areas west
and east of Davis Drive. Without this
crossing, cyclists reaching the east end of
Green Hope School Road are forced to ride
on NC 55 in either the north or south
direction in order to cross over the railroad.
SCF=FO

Green Hope School Road Looking
East at Closed Railroad Crossing
As shown in Figure 4.7, Green Hope School
Road is currently part of a heavily used
recreational cycling route that passes
between Cary and rural western Wake
County. Cary area cycling clubs and teams
rely on this roadway to avoid driving from
Cary to rural staging areas. Until recently
there was a railroad crossing open to all
vehicles on Green Hope School Road, in the
vicinity of Davis Drive and Carpenter
Upchurch Road. The railroad crossing is

Figure 4.7 - Green Hope School Road
Railroad Crossing

55 M°RRi Morrisville
s
0 v •
r n
m
c
DNS
T - TED
c? C OL " ?.. N
70

d R O
E

55
Cary
? H1G??
\\\\ \ HOUSE
CAR NEC N
REC UT G
C LLINS RD
rem ur?- 7.e .?
is Figure 4.6
North Carolina
Bicycling Highways
NC Bicycling Highways
®Carolina Connection
? Mountains to Sea Route
am moCarolina Re-Route
. mCarolina Connection and Mountains to Sea Re-Route
Streets
Lakes
Study Area
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 Miles
T1 11 11
R
J
1
IlburWhAssaciates
RaIdO.HatthCardm
[phone] 1Yiihia Smith Associates
1

Nilbur Smith Associates
Recommendation #8: Sensitize
Traffic Signal Detectors for Bicycles
Detectors for traffic-actuated signals should
be sensitive to bicycles and should be
located in the bicyclist's expected path,
including left-turn lanes. The preferred
options are depicted in Section 4 of the
NCDOT Bicycle Facilities Planning and
Design Guidelines.
Where programmed visibility signal heads
are used, they should be checked to ensure
that they are visible to bicyclists that may be
positioned near the right edge of the
roadway.
Additionally, signal timing at intersections
should take into account bicycle travel. In
particularly, sufficient yellow time should be
provided to allow a bicyclist to clear the
intersection.
Recommendation #9: Remediate Rail
Crossing Improvements
For bicyclists, there are two challenges
associated with railroad at-grade crossings.
First, if the tracks cross the roadway at less
than 45 degrees, a bicyclist's front wheel
may be diverted by the rail or trapped in the
flangeway, causing loss of steering control.
Second, a rough crossing may cause wheel
damage or may cause a bicyclist to crash. It
is recommended that each at-grade rail
crossing in Cary be inventoried, evaluated
from a bicycle safety perspective, and a
program for remediation recommended to
Town Council. Section 4 of the NCDOT
Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design
Guidelines should be referenced in the
development of remedial measures.
an
Methods of Implementation
Implementation of planned bikeways can
occur through one or both of the following
mechanisms:
• As part of future roadway
improvements, such as, new road
construction or road widening; or
• As independent projects, by retrofitting
the existing roadway.
The greatest difference between retrofit
projects and roadway improvement projects
is clearly cost and time. Often retrofit
projects just require restriping a roadway to
provide a wide outside lane or posting signs
to designate a neighborhood route whereas
roadway improvement projects often require
physical changes to existing roadway
sections.
Cost of Implementation
• Thoroughfares - Most bikeways will be
built as wide outside lanes on
thoroughfares, constructed in
conjunction with a thoroughfare-
widening project. Accordingly, the
marginal cost of building 14-feet wide
lanes instead of the standard 12-feet
wide lanes is an additional $ 111,000 per
mile of thoroughfare. This includes the
additional cost of pavement and right-of-
way. To rebuild the roadway simply to
add two feet of pavement on both sides
for bicyclists would cost $ 325,000 per
mile. This includes curb-and-gutter
demolition and reconstruction,
mobilization of work crews, relocation
of utilities plus the additional cost of
pavement and right-of-way.
• Drainage Grates - while grates are a
necessary feature for avoiding
stormwater ponding on roadways, they
have a significant impact on the safety of

..
R'ilbur Smith Associates
bicyclists. Alternative inlet designs can
create more usable roadway width
within the same right-of-way. Bicycle-
friendly drainage grates cost no more
than standard drainage grates.
• Bike Parking - Just as automobile
parking is considered as a critical
element in the transportation system, so
is bicycle parking. Bicycle parking
facilities fall into three categories:
Class I. bicycle locker or fenced-in area
that completely protects the bicycle from
vandalism and weather., Cost is typically
$800 per storage unit, based upon the
number of units.
f
Class I Bike Locker.
Class II: bicycle-friendly bike rack to
which the frame and at least one wheel
can be secured with a user-provided
padlock and cable. Cost is typically
$275 for a five-bike rack.
'W7
Detail showing types of grates to be used aocording to
water flow..
Type 'G" 7-Type 'E" -"F"
s•.n nnr secs
Water flow -Y Sag < Water flow
908 mm
-?i (35.75 En)
B
A A ,
E^
M n '
E rn
r
OIJI?Jl?1UUUl0
B ` Section 13B
type E Grate
Section AA
P
E rn r?t Type F
?%? AIM7 8. Grate
P '
I 908 mm
(35.75 in)
Section AA
q
p
JE
Type. G
908 mm Grate
(35.75 in)
Section AA
Bicycle Friendly Drainage Grates,
Approved by NCDOT, Shown
According to Direction of Water Flow
Class 11 "S" Shaped Rack
1

?8
Nilbus Smith Associates
Class M. old-fashioned bicycle rack that
secures only one wheel. Not
recommended except in a secure fenced-in
area. Cost is typically $350 for a five-
bike rack.
Class III Bike Rack
• Rubberized railroad crossings -
The cost of installing rubberized crossing
material at railroad crossings is typically
$25,000 per lane.
Traffic signal detectors/ markings -
The cost of sensitizing traffic signal
detectors and remarking the lanes to show
where bicyclists should sit in order to
trigger the detector should be included in
the Traffic Signal System Feasibility Study
currently underway by the Town of Cary.
Advisory Committee - Town staff
liaison resources for a new committee
may exceed available staff resources. The
role of the Pathways and Bikeways
Advisory Committee should be expanded
as an alternate to forming a new
committee. The functions, however, are
split between two different Town
departments; Parks and Recreation
Department oversees greenways while the
Engineering Department oversees
sidewalks and bikeways that are within
the roadway right-of-way.
'sn
• Inter-Neighborhood Connectors - the
typical length of an inter-neighborhood
connector path is estimated to be 300 feet.
At a recommended width of 10 feet, the
cost is estimated to be $11,500 assuming a
modest purchase of easement rights from
adjacent homeowners.
Best Practices
With stronger policies and a set plan to
guide future developments, the Town of
Cary can build on its bicycle and pedestrian
friendliness. As a point of reference, the
best practices that some recognized bicycle-
friendly and pedestrian-friendly cities are
taking are highlighted below.
• A bike station in Long Beach, California
provides free valet bike parking, bicycle
repairs and tune-ups, a restroom and
changing area, and coffee-bar and patio
seating in addition to other amenities at a
major transit station.
• Bike racks on buses in San Jose, Phoenix
and other locations that have increased
both bicycling and transit usage.
• Walking and bicycling maps and guides
all over the world.
• Exclusive pedestrian interval signal
phases that reduce conflicts between
pedestrians and turning traffic in San
Francisco and New York.
• A separate, parallel bike path along a
freeway corridor in northern Virginia
that includes bicycle-only loop ramps to
interchange between the main path and
local streets above.
• A barrier-separated bike path within the
median of a major thoroughfare
traversing through a freeway interchange
in Palo Alto, California. The bike path
end points occur in the crosswalk of
pedestrian-actuated traffic signalized
intersections at either end of the
E
1

1
Wilbur Smith Associates

interchange (next maj or intersection
rather than the ramp terminals). The
only interchange configuration where
this concept works is a full (loop ramps
in all four-quadrants) cloverleaf
interchange.
A "bicycle boulevard" in Palo Alto,
California where a local residential
collector street linking the downtown
business district with outlying
neighborhoods is restricted to local
traffic only and bicycles. Landscaped
half-street barriers are constructed at key
locations to reinforce the "local traffic
only" requirement.
Boston Bike Week, a seven-day bicycle
Spring extravaganza that includes
educational, recreational, competitive,
lobbying, and culinary events. Tours are
provided of transportation facilities that
are under- construction; for example,
showing how the mega-Central
Artery/Tunnel project will be bicycle-
friendly.
Portland, Oregon "bicycle facility
improvement program" using the world
wide web to solicit suggestions intended
to enhance bicycle safety and encourage
bicycling through low-cost small-scale
improvements suggested by concerned
bicyclists; such as, pavement
maintenance and sweeping, hazard
removal, bike rack installation,
rubberized rail crossings, and grate
replacements.
Conclusion
The Town of Cary is continually working
toward creating a more pedestrian-friendly
and bicycle-friendly community by building
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Even with
facilities built as roadways are improved,
new developments are completed, and stand-
alone projects are completed there is a need
Srn
for a system plan. The Bicycle Element of
the Comprehensive Transportation Plan
provides such a system plan.
The Bicycle Element addresses where and
how bicycles are to be handled in specific
locations throughout the town as well as
reviewing and recommending changes to
relevant standards and ordinances.
The Town has already taken the initiative to
update the roadway design standard for
outside lane widths on multilane roadways
from 13 feet to a more bicycle-friendly 14
feet. In addition they are taking a hard look
at their development ordinances and other
standard specifications that may affect
bicycle transportation.
Striped bike lanes, shared outside lanes,
neighborhood connectors, signed
neighborhood connections, and bike paths
can all be found in the Bicycle Element
among other bicycle critical issues. Just as
High House Road and the newly completed
section of Cary Parkway have shared outside
lanes, the plan also shows Kildaire Farm
Road and NC 55 as well as other roadways
having similar shared lane treatments in the
future.
Striped bike lanes are planned for sections
of Lake Pine Road and Two Creeks Road to
name a few. To increase neighborhood
connectivity without using roadways,
neighborhood connectors are suggested for
numerous areas throughout Cary, including
in North Academy Street neighborhood and
near Cary High School. The recommended
Pathways and Bikeways Advisory
Committee would supplement the Bicycle
Element recommendations by identifying
more pedestrian and bicycle facilities and
pathways to complete the network.

WIP
Wilbur Smith Associates
Bicycles are a key part of our diversified
transportation. system. Full implementation
of the Bicycle Element of the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan is a
first step in growing Cary into a biker-
friendly community.
References
1. Incorporating Bicycle and Pedestrian
Elements into Transportation Plans, North
Carolina Department of Transportation,
' Statewide Planning Branch, September,
1998
2. Bicycling and Walking in North Carolina, A
Long-Range Transportation Plan, North
Carolina Department of Transportation,
Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation, November, 1996
3. North Carolina Bicycle Facilities Planning
and Design Guidelines, North Carolina
Department of Transportation, Office of
Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation,
January, 1994
4. Improving Conditions for Bicycling and
Walking, A Best Practices Report, Federal
Highway Administration, January 1998
5. Crash Statistics Database; Town of Cary
Police Department, May 1999.
1
aj?

Wilbur Smith Associates loci I
T??atl, n P/ten
all
• Operate all day fixed-route service, demand-response is
• Serve the Senior Center customized based upon the origins and
destinations of the riders. Finally, the
Many of these goals overlap with those of the Center for Volunteer Care Giving provides a
Citizen Advisory Committee. limited transportation service using
volunteer drivers.
The TTA has the following goals for transit
service within Cary:
Each of these services is described in more
detail in this chapter.
• Connect Cary with the Triangle
region
• Increase coverage within the
Research Triangle Park (RTP)
• Provide connection to North Carolina
State University (NCSU)
• Satisfy service requests
• Be high quality
• Allow for quick implementation
• Establish ridership in advance of the
rail service
These goals also overlap with the goals of the
Citizen Advisory Committee.
Existing Public Transportation
Services
The Town of Cary has public transportation
services available from several providers.
TTA provides one "fixed-route" bus service,
the "Gold" Route, which connects Cary with
Raleigh and the Research Triangle Park
(RTP). Fixed-route bus service is where the
bus follows a designated route on a
designated schedule. Buses do not deviate
from their route to pick up or discharge
passengers.
The Town of Cary licenses 13 taxi
companies. AMTRAK provides daily train
service connecting Cary with Charlotte and
Raleigh, and other cities. The Wake County
Coordinated Transportation Service provides
demand-responsive service for client
agencies in Cary and Wake County. Unlike a
Triangle Transit Authority (TTA)
The TTA operates one bus route within
Cary. The Gold Route connects Cary with
downtown Raleigh and RTP. Figure 5.1
shows the GoldAoute and the area served
within one-quarter mile of the bus route.
The quarter-mile distance is a five-minute
walk and represents the maximum distance
the average rider is willing to walk. This
route operates Monday through Friday from
approximately 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM and
3:30 PM to 7:00 PM every 30 minutes. No
midday service is provided.
The Gold Route is an express route. The
route is targeted to longer distance trips, few
stops are provided along the route, and no
midday or weekend service is provided.
The fare is $1.00 to Raleigh and $1.50 to
RTP. Riders 65 years and older and
handicapped riders pay half-price. Children
ride free. Discounted ticketbooks are
available at the CCB South Hills location
and the Cary Town Hall.
A ride check was conducted on the Gold
Route within Cary during December 1999.
This check showed ridership in Cary of 152
boardings and 146 alightings in both
directions, up from 96 boardings and 92
alightings from a similar check in 1996.
Ridership has grown 59 percent in three
years.

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A
1
1
1
1
1
1'.
1;
1
1
1

t

VA
Will ur Smith Associnta Cv ?\ 1 79
Tim n? Gat/on P/an
No service is provided in Cary that targets
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
population. Under the ADA, complementary
paratransit service must be offered to
individuals meeting the requirements of the
act if local bus service is provided. The TTA
is not required to provide this service since as
an "express" route, the Gold Route is
technically a "commuter bus route" as
defined by the Act.
If the TTA expands service to provide more
frequent stops, midday service, or weekend
service, the routes with this service would be
considered local routes and would require the
provision of paratransit service under the
ADA. The most common way to meet the
requirements of the ADA is to provide a
demand-response service similar to taxi
service. To use a demand-response service, a
rider must call in advance to make a
reservation, and the vehicle is scheduled to
pick up the rider, typically on the next service
day. This service is offered in Raleigh under
the name ART (Accessible Raleigh Transit)
and Durham under the name ACCESS.
Taxicabs
Taxicabs operating within the Town of Cary
are required to obtain a permit from the Chief
of Police. Thirteen taxicab companies are
licensed to operate. Table 5.1 lists the
companies and number of permits.
Table 5.1
Town of Cary Taxicab Companies
Company Phone Permits
Air Time Taxi 785-9812 1
Carolina Cab 233-9533 3
Cary Cab 481-2206 1
Cheetah Cab 467-4989 1
Choice Cab 680-3116 2
Classic Taxi 833-3990 3
Corporate Taxi 272-8156 1
Express Taxi 233-6798 17
HAPPS Taxi 380-1414 5
Midway Cab 873-9298 1
Silver Cab 272-2515 1
Standard Reservation 233-0733 1
USA Taxi 875-0515 2
TOTAL - 39
At least some of the taxicabs companies
offer 24-hour service. Fares are regulated
by Town ordinance. The basic fare is $1.35
for the first one-sixth (1/6) mile, and $0.25
for each additional one-sixth mile ($1.50 per
mile). Additional charges may apply for
luggage and waiting time. Some companies
advertise a lower rate for certain groups,
such as students. At the time of this report,
these fares are the same as the fares charged
by Raleigh taxicabs. Raleigh City Council,
however, approved in March 2000 a fare
increase effective July 1. The new rates are
$1.70 for the first 1/6 mile and $2.00 per
mile thereafter.
AMTRAK Service
AMTRAK provides four daily trips through
Cary. This service is provided on the
"Piedmont" and the "Carolinian" routes.
The Silver Star passes through Cary en route
to Southern Pines. This train does not stop,
however, since it uses the CSX tracks on the
south side of the depot rather than the
NCRR tracks that serve the station on the
north side of the depot. Cary has held
discussion in the past with AMTRAK to

r
Wilbur Smith Associates C, r6M7 ,?'ireha VB
Tra ' atI n P/an
him Y f?
have a stop added, but AMTRAK has Table 5.3 shows the ridership breakdown on
deferred doing so. the two routes serving Cary.
The Piedmont provides round-trip service
between Raleigh and Charlotte while the
Carolinian provides round-trip service
between Charlotte and New York. Table 5.2
lists the times for the trains at the Cary depot.
Southbound trips on both services are
destined to Charlotte, and northbound trips
are destined to Raleigh on the Piedmont, or
New York, NY on the Carolinian.
Table 5.2
AMTRAK Schedule
Di
i Piedmont
rect
on Train 73 Train 74
Southbound 7:18 AM -
Northbound - 8:55 PM
Carolinian
Direction Train 79 Train 80
Southbound 4:36 PM -
Northbound - 11:33 AM
Within North Carolina, fares from Cary range
from $3.00 to Raleigh or Durham to $18.00
to Charlotte each way. Discounts are
available for children, seniors, and military
personnel as well as other discounts.
Based upon counts available from the North
Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT), ridership on the Carolinian and
Piedmont has risen significantly since 1997.
For the 12 months ending June 30, 1999,
boardings and alightings combined on the
two routes increased 205 percent from 6,552
in 1997 to 19,994 in 1999. Average daily
ridership increased from 18 boardings and
alightings to 55 boardings and alightings.
Cary's growth rate of 205 percent in the past
two years is almost nine times the 23 percent
growth rate in North Carolina ridership. No
other station grew at a faster pace than Cary.
Table 5.3
FY 1999 Annual AMTRAK Ridership in Cary
Piedmont Carol inian
Direction Otis Offs Otis Offs
Southbound 4,996 49 1,796 2,556
Northbound 39 6,112 2,689 1,757
Total 5,035 6,161 4,485 4,313
Source: NCDOT counts, Jul 1998 - June 1999
Cary is the ninth busiest train station in
North Carolina, and the most active
unstaffed station. Cary is more active than
High Point, which has an attendant on duty
during train arrivals and departures.
Wake Coordinated Transportation
Service (WCTS)
The Wake Coordinated Transportation
Service (WCTS) provides transportation
service to clients of member agencies.
These agencies include Head Start,
Department of Social Services, Department
of Mental Health, dialysis clinics, and
nutritional sites for seniors. WCTS
contracts with Laidlaw Transit Services for
the operation of the service. Laidlaw has a
fleet of 43 accessible vehicles, of which a
maximum of 35 are typically in service.
Service is provided from 6:00 AM to 8:00
PM Monday through Friday.
The service is a demand-responsive, door-
to-door service. The sponsoring agencies
call in trip requests by at least the day prior
to the trip request. Riders are scheduled by
the contractor and are picked up and
dropped off at the door. This arrangement
results in the riders being assisted to -and
from the vehicle as opposed to a "curb-to-
curb" arrangement whereby the rider must
reach the vehicle on their own. The

t

WHI&
Wilbur Smith Assceiatca Cv ?+I Ia jV8
Tim at/.on P/an
expenses of the trip are billed to the Table 5.4
sponsoring agencies. Medicare funds pay for Gold Route Ridership in Cary
most trips. No fares are accepted on board
the vehicles.
According to the NCDOT 1998 Operating
Statistics Summary, the Wake Coordinated
Transportation Service carried 165,189 riders
from July 1997 to June 1998. At an
estimated 255 operating days per year, 650
passenger trips per day were made. Laidlaw
estimates that this number has increased to
700-750 per day, of which 10-15 are trips in
Cary.
Center for Volunteer Care Giving
The Center for Volunteer Care Giving is a
non-profit, interfaith organization providing
services to the elderly and persons with
disabilities. Among the services offered is
transportation service. Volunteers using their
personal vehicles provide the transportation.
No provision exists for users in wheelchairs.
Clients are asked to schedule their trips a
week in advance. No fare is charged to use
the service.
Evaluation of the TTA Gold Route
As the main public transportation service in
Cary, the express Gold Route was evaluated
in depth. A ridecheck was made on this route
on Wednesday, December 1. Three trips that
were missed on Wednesday were checked on
Thursday, December 2. The results of this
check provide a complete picture of ridership
and operating characteristics within Cary.
Total Ridership
Table 5.4 provides a summary of the
ridership on the Gold Route. Complete trip-
by-trip counts are given in Appendix D.
AM Peak PM Peak Total Daily
Direction
Ons
Offs
Ons
Offs
Ons
Offs
Eastbound 53 9 53 48 106 57
Westbound 36 44 10 45 46 89
Total
Dail 89 53 63 93 152 146
Source: December 1999 Ride Check
Compared with the ride check taken in the
Fall of 1996, ridership has increased 59
percent in the ensuing three years. In 1996,
total daily boardings in Cary were 96 and
total daily alightings were 92.
Overall, ridership on the Gold Route and the
typical TTA route is low compared with
neighboring systems. In 1998, according to
the National Transit Database, TTA's routes
averaged 9.8 passengers/hour compared
with 28.3 for Raleigh, 30.0 for Durham, and
32.1 for Chapel Hill. Nationally, the
average system of the same size as TTA had
21.5 passengers/hour. Passengers per hour
measures how many boardings occur for
every service hour. A service hour is the
number of hours of service provided, for
example if two buses are each in service for
10 hours, then 20 services hours are
provided. TTA's numbers are low due to
the express nature of the service and the
newness of the system.
Ridership by Market
Five potential markets exist for riders on this
route. These markets are: Cary residents
traveling from Cary to downtown Raleigh;
Raleigh residents traveling from Raleigh to
Cary; Cary residents traveling from Cary to
RTP; RTP area residents traveling to Cary;
and Cary residents making internal trips.
While these markets are somewhat
simplified, for example Cary residents going

t
t

Wilbur Smith Auocie?la ?P:•.: l.. _ty` l1, j;9
r,, 03 Tips at/.on P/ten
to RTP can transfer to another route to reach increase. The Raleigh to Cary market was
Chapel Hill, these are the five basic markets also up, from a combined ridership of 62 to
served by the Gold Route. Table 5.5 shows a combined ridership of 87, a 40 percent
the ridership levels for these markets. increase. The other markets were also up,
but not as dramatically.
Table 5.5
Gold Route Markets by Ridership
Market AM PM Total
Ca residents to Raleigh 49 40 89
Raleigh residents to Ca 44 43 87
Cary residents to RTP 36 38 74
RTP area residents to Cary 5 5 10
Internal Ca trips 4 15 19
Source: December 1999 Ride Check
As can be seen, the major market for Cary is
for riders originating in Cary and traveling to
Raleigh. In the morning, 49 riders made this
trip and 40 riders returned in the evening.
The remaining nine riders must have found
an alternate way back. The second largest
market is from Raleigh to Cary. Forty-four
riders made this trip in the morning and 43
riders returned to Raleigh in the evening.
Ridership from Cary to RTP is the third
largest market. In the morning, 36 riders
traveled from Cary to RTP, while in the
evening 38 riders made the return trip. The
lowest market is riders from RTP to Cary. In
the morning, five riders traveled to Cary and
five riders returned to RTP in the evening.
Internal usage of the route is low. Only 19
riders used the route solely within Cary -
four riders in the morning and 15 riders in the
evening. This low internal usage reflects the
commuter nature of this route.
Compared with the 1996 check, the Cary to
Raleigh market had the most growth. In
1996 this market consisted of 18 morning
riders to Raleigh and 15 evening riders from
Raleigh. In 1999, these 33 combined riders
had increased to 89 riders, a 170 percent
Ridership by Location
The most active stops are Maynard @ Cary
Towne Center and Waverly Place. Other
active stops are at other designated
timepoints: Cary Depot and Kilmayne &
Fountain Brook (Kroger Center). South
Hills Mall and Harrison Plaza, the remaining
timepoints are not very active. In 1996,
South Hills Mall was the most active stop
because at the time it was the last stop
before the route entered the freeway. As a
result of the route changes, the activity
appears to have shifted to Cary Towne
Center. Table 5.6 shows the major stop
location activity. Intermediate stops
between those listed had little activity.
Table 5.6
Major Gold Route Stops
South bound Northbound
Stop Ons Offs Ons Offs
Ca Towne Center 21 7 2 26
South Hills Mall 7 4 4 4
Waverly Place 16 7 12 19
Kroger Center 8 8 7 5
Ca Depot 8 9 4 3
Harrison Plaza 8 0 1 3
Source: December 1999 Ride Check
Parking is available to varying degrees at
each of these stops. The most convenient
parking is at South Hills Mall, Waverly
Place, Kroger Center, and Cary Depot. Of
these locations, Waverly Place is most
heavily used, with up to 10 cars parked at
the stop on average. TTA parking is
discouraged at Cary Towne Center by the
Mall management and by the businesses
located on the opposite side of Maynard.

C 4P
Imo
Zvi ^ tell Y_ ''
Wilbur Smith Aaoaiotcs -- Cv t p/]??V9
71,w P/an
`mot ? n
log
Table 5.9 block group to the average demographics for
Gold Route On-Time Performance Cary as a whole. The individual indexes for
h h d

Morning Evenin
Category NB SB NB
Earl 14% 2% 14% 0%
Late 0% 41% 60% 76%
On-rime 86% 56% 26% 24%
Source: December 1999 Ride Check
eac c aractenstic were Somme across
each block group to arrive at a composite
score. The composite scores were ranked to
identify those block groups with the greatest
potential for transit ridership.
A complete analysis of the on-time
performance is given in the appendix. The
large percentage of the late trips appears to
be the result of insufficient running time
within Cary, as well as the severe impact of
RTP traffic on I-40. The RTP traffic impact
is most acute northbound in the morning and
southbound in the evening. Once the bus is
delayed, there is insufficient recovery time in
the schedule to allow the bus to make up for
lost time. The early trips are partially the
result of the drivers' efforts on the first trips
to compensate for the delays experienced on
the later trips. By arriving early on the first
trip, for example, the driver has more time to
compensate for traffic delays on the second
trip.
Unmet Need Analysis
The 1990 Census demographic information
was examined to identify areas of Cary that
have a high potential for transit ridership.
Seven characteristics were calculated for
each block group in Cary.
• Population density
• Minority population
1 High-occupancy households
• Household income
• Households with no automobile
• Senior population
• Population with a workforce disability
An index was developed for each
characteristic that compared the individual
A final quality control check was made for
those block groups that were identified as
having a high transit potential. Since the
demographic analysis was limited to 1990
Census data, which was nine years old, field
checks were made to verify whether the
demographics of an area had changed.
Figure 5.2 shows the resulting area of Cary
that was confirmed to have demographic
characteristics that support transit use. The
potential high-demand area is triangular
shaped, centered over downtown. The
triangle is bounded on the south by Cary
Parkway, on the east by Maynard and I-40
and on the west by the CSX railroad.
Within this triangle is the area of Cary with
the greatest population density, greatest
number of minority persons, highest
concentration of large households and
households with low-income and no
automobiles, and the largest number of
elderly and persons with disabilities.
Also shown in Figure 5.2 are major transit
origins and destinations. The types of land
use included in the figure are:
• Apartment complexes with more than
250 units
• Hospitals
• Office buildings with more than 100,000
square feet
• Public buildings, such as libraries

s
t
}
t
i
i
¦

-\ F
wETI,
r- J

Figure 5.2
f Areas with High
Transit Potential
* 100,000 sq. ft. and over Businesses
- Streets
Attractors / Generators in Cary
Highest Transit Need Areas
Study Area
0 0.75 1.5 Miles

~U
r ?-
Prepared by Our Smith Assocems
Raleigh. North Carolina ?=1-
[phone] Wilbur smith ?
t

r
Diu ..wau •' •.
Wilbur Smith Auociates vct " 10 V8
11 'Tia VA M mat/,?n P/an
• Retail centers with more than 100,000 from the Citizen Advisory Committee,
square feet Senior Task Force, TTA, and Town staff.
• Social service locations WSA has taken the information provided by
• Subsidized housing each of these groups to develop an overall
transit plan. Considering the diverse nature
Figure 5.3 compares the high transit
potential area with the quarter-mile service
area of the existing TTA Gold Route. As
shown, the Gold Route does as good a job
covering the high-demand area as a single
route can be expected to do. However, large
areas remain beyond a quarter-mile walk of
the route.
Recommended Transit
of the groups involved in the planning
exercise, the recommended plan represents a
compromise.
Improvements
Cary is already slated for transit
improvements by the Triangle Transit
Authority (TTA). TTA will be implementing
commuter rail service connecting Cary with
Raleigh, Research Triangle Park (RTP) and
Durham. This service is projected to begin
service in 2007. Prior to that time, TTA is
scheduled to make bus service
improvements.
TTA's planned service improvements are
designed to fulfill TTA's role as the regional
service provider. These improvements
increase the alternatives available for Cary
residents destined to other areas, primarily
for the peak work commute. The changes do
not, necessarily, meet the internal needs of
Cary.
The following sections describe changes that
are recommended to improve the quality and
convenience of transit service within Cary.
These changes are offered as
recommendations to TTA as they refine their
regional service plans, and as
recommendations to the Town of Cary to
increase the level of transit service beyond
those planned by TTA. The
recommendations have been developed by
Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) using input
The changes are recommended to be
implemented through a phased approach
divided into four time periods: immediate
term, which describes changes that should
be implemented within the one-year
horizon; short-term improvements through
2005; mid-term improvements through
2015; and long-term improvements through
2025.
Immediate-Term Improvements
In recognition of the diverse needs of Cary,
the recommended transit system is
composed of two elements:
Fixed-route regional service
Demand-responsive local service
In addition to these two elements, the Senior
Task Force developed specific
recommendations for their constituents.
Their recommendations are discussed
separately.
Fixed -route Services
Fixed-route services are aimed at the
regional traveler - primarily those going to
or traveling from the RTP, North Carolina
State University (NCSU), and downtown
Raleigh. Fixed-routes are the services
designed to carry the most riders. As such,
they will use larger vehicles and travel on
major streets. These routes appeal to riders
who want the flexibility of multiple trip
times, and who can walk or drive to a bus
stop. Three fixed routes are recommended
for the immediate term. These routes are
shown in Figure 5.4.

1
1
1
L
1
1
1
1
1
i
t,
I
i
1
1
Figure 5.3
Existing Service
Coverage
100,000 sq. ft. and over Businesses
ammmExisting TTA Cary Route
-Streets
® Attractors / Generators in Cary
0 1/4 Mile Walk Zone to TTA Gold Line
oM Highest Transit Need Areas
® Airport
Study Area
0 0.75 1.5 Miles
iiiiii
N V
L,
W- EI
Prepared by Mbur Smith Assocktes c??u
Rakgh, North Carolina rev
[phone] 0583 Wilbur Smith Associates

I

.\ P F
Wilbas Smith Associatcs `- _
Tia ¦r at/, ? n P/an
One route is a modified version of the 3. Downtown is established as a transit
existing Gold Route. This modified route focal point, reinforcing its role as a
operates north/south along Harrison and
Kildaire Farms through the middle of Cary.
On the north, the route serves businesses
along Weston Parkway, and travels along NC
54 and Morrisville-Carpenter to Davis Drive.
The route follows Davis Drive into RTP,
increasing bus coverage of RTP. On the
south, the route follows Tryon, Piney Plains,
and Dillard to Crossroads. From Crossroads,
the route travels to NCSU and downtown
Raleigh.
future rail station for TTA.
The second route operates east/west through
downtown Cary along High House and
Chatham. On the west, the route follows
Cary Parkway, NC 54, and Aviation Parkway
to I-40 and in to RTP. On the east, the route
follows SE Maynard, and Walnut to
Crossroads. From Crossroads, the route
follows I-40 into downtown Raleigh. This
route is shown in blue.
The third route operates along NC 55 from
the Food Lion at US 64 & Lake Pine through
downtown Apex to RTP. This route is shown
in gray.
Each route is recommended for an initial
peak frequency of 30 minutes, the same as
the existing TTA service. No midday service
is initially recommended. As the routes
mature, midday service will be warranted on
the gold and blue routes since they serve
multiple destinations within Cary.
The fixed-route service offers several
advantages to Cary.
1. Most major transit locations in Cary
are served (apartments, retail, office,
governmental).
2. Service coverage of the high-demand
area is increased.
4. Three intersecting points are
provided between the two major
Cary routes - downtown,
Crossroads, and Morrisville.
5. Service is provided for travelers to
RTP from Apex thereby providing
an alternative for commuters going
through Cary.
6. Additional coverage is provided
within RTP.
7. Direct service is provided between
Cary and NCSU.
Similarly, these recommendations are
advantageous to TTA by covering the major
regional destinations within Cary, and by
connecting Cary with regional destinations
in other areas.
Demand-responsive Service
One of the limitations of fixed-route services
is that it is confined to a designated route.
For patrons who live within walking
distance, or those who have access to a park
& ride facility, this limitation is not
significant. For other patrons, however,
fixed-route services can be inconvenient to
use.
To address these shortcomings, the
recommended immediate-term system calls
for the establishment of a demand-
responsive service inside of Cary Parkway.
This service area is shown in Figure 5.5.

N
iEl
PUFPOR
Prepared by Mhur Smith Associates'
""
0 0.75 1.5 Miles Raloigh. North Carolina
(919)7550583 «I6urSmith AssociZ'

reha va
CornP
Wilbur Smith
Tra ?'? atlas Plan
Unlike fixed-route services, which follow a facilities, such as Western Wake Hospital
defined route on a prescribed schedule, will not require a transfer. All other travel
demand-responsive services have no set route outside of the zone will require a transfer to
or schedule. Vehicles travel throughout a one of TTA's fixed-routes.
defined area based upon the requested pick-
up and drop-off locations and times. Riders Service will be provided inside of the zone
must call in advance to make a reservation, Monday through Friday from 6:00 AM to
and the closest vehicle is dispatched at the 7:00 PM for the general public.
appropriate time, similar to a taxicab service.
Demand-responsive services usually use
smaller vehicles, which give them greater
flexibility to travel on smaller neighborhood
streets. Raleigh offers a similar service under
the name "cat connector." The service is
available to anyone wishing to travel within a
defined "zone" with no limitation on
eligibility.
Demand-responsive service is appealing to
riders who can schedule their trips in
advance. Seniors, persons with disabilities,
and other patrons who have difficulty
walking are best served by demand-
responsive service since it comes to their
door and does not require a walk out to a
stop.
The recommended service for Cary
establishes the zone inside of Cary Parkway.
Cary Parkway was selected as the zonal
boundary for four reasons:
• The high-demand area is all located
inside Cary Parkway
• Land-use within the area is a mix of
high-density and low-density
residential uses and commercial uses
• The area is large enough to provide a
fair test of the potential demand
• Cary Parkway is an easily identifiable
landmark
Riders traveling within this zone will have a
one-seat ride. Travel to nearby medical
As experience is gained with the ridership
demand, the zonal boundaries can and
should be extended to cover a larger area.
Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
Paratransit Service
The Transportation Task Force for Cary
Senior Citizens and Citizens with
Disabilities has conducted a parallel effort
with the work of the Citizen Advisory
Committee. The Senior Task Force looked
specifically at transit options for their
constituents. The recommendations of the
Senior Task Force have been included in
this document to provide a complete
overview of transit services being
considered for Cary.
The target audience for the paratransit
service is Cary residents who are 55 years
old or older, or those residents who have a
disability that limits their ability to freely
travel regardless of age. The latter category
includes residents who meet the statutory
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
definition, but also includes other
individuals on a case-by-case basis who may
have difficulty traveling. The service would
be open to visitors while they are within
Cary. All riders will need to be pre-
qualified and will be issued an ID.
The area to be served by the paratransit
service is the entire town limits of Cary.
Medical related trips outside of Cary and job
related trips for the disabled would be

The service to be offered is a demand-
responsive service, which does not follow a
fixed route or schedule. The service will be a
"door-to-door" service where the driver will
accompany the rider from the door of their
origin to the door of their destination upon
request. The driver will not, however,
provide assistance beyond the threshold.
Riders in need of this assistance will be
covered by the Center for Volunteer Care
Giving, discussed in a later section. Trips
must be scheduled the day before, following
the guidelines of the ADA. Smaller vehicles
will be used on the service to permit greater
flexibility in reaching locations where a large
bus cannot physically operate.
Wilbur Smith Associates Co/areh VB
T? '" aat/, ? n P/an
_ dl¦ :r _;yji
provided anywhere within the Triangle By contracting the service, instead of
counties. Service will be provided between implementing its own service, the Town
6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through controls some of its risk. If demand is lower
Saturday. than the projected level, the Town has
avoided purchasing unnecessary equipment
and hiring too many personnel. If demand is
higher than expected, a private contractor
with widespread operations should be able
to more easily add resources to the service.
Fares for the service are recommended to be
set at $1.00 for trips within Cary and $2.00
for trips that leave the town limits. These
fares are in line with those charged by TTA.
In keeping with the need to schedule trips in
advance, riders will need to purchase tickets
in advance. Ticketbooks should be widely
available throughout the town to minimize
the hardship in obtaining a ticket.
The demand-responsive service, both
seniors/disabled and general public, can be
contracted out to a private transportation
provider. This service does not travel beyond
the Cary town limits and TTA will not be
funding the service. This situation makes it
attractive for the Town to contract out the
service to the lowest cost, responsible transit
provider. Any contractor must comply with
the high quality of service standards the
Town insists upon.

Once the Town gains experience with a
private contractor and the actual levels of
demand, the Town can consider operating
the service "in-house."
Transportation Director
Along with the recommended service, the
Senior Task Force recommended the
establishment of a Town staff position to
serve as overall coordinator of the program.
The Senior Task Force felt this position
should be at the Director level, or other
similar high level to give the position the
authority necessary to carry out the
implementation and monitoring of the new
service.
The position of a transportation director
complements the general public
recommendations as well. The position
would be responsible for monitoring this
service, coordinating with TTA as their bus
and rail plans progress, and overseeing the
marketing and financing of the services.
The specific organizational location and
reporting relationship of this position will
need to be established by the Town staff.
Potential locations, based upon practices of
other cities, could be within the Parks,
Recreation and Cultural Resources, Public
Works, or Planning Departments.
More detailed information on the Senior
Task Forces recommendations were

Wilbur Smith Associatcs
presented to the July
Committee meeting.

Co,?preha !va
:? at/on P/an
Tim
13, 2000 Operations constituency cannot provide the time
required to escort riders at their destination,
or to help prepare riders at the start of their
Relation to General Public Transit journey.
The Senior Task Force's recommendations
overlap with the Transportation Advisory
Committee's recommendations in the area
located inside of Cary Parkway. Both groups
envision a demand-responsive service
operating throughout this zone.
At the time this document is being written, it
is anticipated that the seniors and persons
with disabilities service will be implemented
first, with a demand-responsive service
covering the entire town limits. The general
public, however, will not be allowed to
initially use the service.
Once the demand for the seniors and persons
with disability service has been established,
the general public will be able to use the
same vehicles inside of Cary Parkway. This
approach is recommended to lessen the
potential for the general public demand to
overwhelm the demand for seniors and
persons with disabilities. Such an
incremental approach will help balance the
supply of service with the demand for the
service.
Center for Volunteer Care Giving
In addition to the demand-responsive service,
the Senior Task Force recommended the
continuation of Town funding for the Center
for Volunteer Care Giving. This organization
provides a different, more personalized
service than the one envisioned for the
demand-responsive element.
The Center for Volunteer Care Giving can
provide the escort service that some residents
need to travel, primarily for those who cannot
afford their own attendant. A demand-
responsive service aimed at a broader
Marketing
One key element of a successful transit
system is the development of a marketing
strategy for the service. Just as any
consumer product agency would not
implement a new product without
marketing, transit service changes should
not be implemented without a marketing
program.
At a minimum, a successful marketing
program should cover the following
elements:
• Initial publicity of the new services
• Clear statement of the benefits and
how to use
• Easy availability of information and
fare items
• Repetitive exposure to publicity so
that information is available at the
time the rider is ready to try the
service
The marketing program should develop a
clear, concise message and theme for the
service that conveys a fun and easy to use
image. Publicity to the service should use
all available resources including:
• Cable television
• Town website
• Water bill inserts (BUD)
• Brochures at major locations
• Partnerships with major retail and
service locations
Transit information and fare items, such as
ticketbooks and monthly passes should be
widely available. Currently TTA passes are

V
Wilbo, Smith As
m?eY
'T3? a ? '1at jo. 'n P/an
only available at the CCB South Hills branch Crossroads Plaza. Instead the bus will travel
and Town Hall, neither of which are open at along Maynard to Cary Towne Center to
the times most convenient to riders who work South Hills Mall and then to downtown
outside of Cary. At a minimum, the fare Raleigh. The revised "Gold" route is shown
items should be offered at all Town facilities, in blue.
such as the community center and senior
center, and information should be available at
the library and post offices.
Ideally, all CCB branches should sell the fare
items. Such an approach increases the
geographic coverage of the town. Several
CCB branches are located in grocery stores
and maintain later evening and weekend
hours. Another approach- is to develop
partnerships with one or more of the grocery
stores in town to carry transit information and
sell fare items at the customer service booth.
The wider availability will increase the
likelihood of a successful service launch.
TTA Planned Changes
During the Immediate Term, TTA has plans
for an expansion of bus service. One set of
changes is planned for the fall, with a second
round of changes occurring in Winter
2000/2001. These expansion plans were
developed by TTA independently of the
routes recommended in this report. TTA has
elected to proceed with their plans. The
discussion below describes TTA's changes.
TTA is planning to redesign the Gold Route
and add two new routes. All routes operate
every 30 minutes during peak hours. Figure
5.6 shows TTA's planned improvements to
bus service compared with the high-demand
areas and major destinations within Cary.
The Gold Route will be redesigned to provide
service to the businesses on Aviation
Parkway and Weston Parkway en route to
RTP. The route to downtown Raleigh will be
streamlined to travel more directly by
eliminating the service to Tryon and
One new route will provide service along
Davis Drive between RTP and High House
Road. At High House, the route switches to
Cary Parkway to Lake Pines Drive to US 64.
At this point the route takes over the existing
Gold Route service along Tryon and to
Crossroads Plaza. This route will serve
NCSU. The connection between Cary and
NCSU satisfies one of the major service
requests received by TTA. This route is
shown in green.
The second new route operates on NC 55
between RTP and downtown Apex. From
Apex, the route travels northeast to the
intersection of Lake Pines and US 64. At
this location the route connects with the new
route along Davis Drive, providing options
for Apex residents to reach destinations
along Davis Drive, NCSU, or downtown
Raleigh. This route, shown in gray, will be
implemented in January 2001, due to
construction around the new Environmental
Protection Agency building in RTP. This
route is the same route as the gray route
shown in the recommended plan.
The expansion offers several advantages to
Cary. The fast growing areas on the western
side of town gain bus service for the first
time. More service is offered to RTP, the
largest employment center in the Triangle.
Businesses along Weston Parkway and
Aviation Parkway gain service, including
several businesses, such as Austin Foods,
that employ lower income workers. Service
is provided along southwest Cary Parkway,
where TTA has received requests for direct
service to RTP. Finally, a connection is

r
r
t
i
r
r
S
P /-.¦
1 l

?tn
rim

Figure 5.6
TTA Planned
Short-Term
Improvements
* 100.000 sq. ft. and Over Businesses
=Blue Line
??Brown Line
awmaGreen Line
-Streets
® Aftradors / Generators in Cary
Q 114 Mile Walk Zone for Blue Line
114 Mile Walk Zone for Brawn Line
[ 114 Mile Walk Zone for Green Line
Hghest Transit Need Areas
® Airport
Study Area -
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 Miles
r 1' ?
iPrepared by Mbur Smith Associates fl
i I Rabgh, North CalvGna
[phone] Wilbu,SnaithAss.iates
NNNtuNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN{,~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
O 7 = O QC i Cp 0 ~`O~ Olrl ~y2 N~obQVqtnAlU,fNvpb~Vq(7i#wN.adbg44444444NNNNNNNNNN-~~-.~...,.,NNNNNNNNNNNNN~~~~........,,,,,,,,,,,~ ~ ~ 0 ~ p~0 QC ~ Z N~2i1'I~~C LO •c 0Y O VgUd4N-.ObOO q 0 OgqOo p pp m 0 ~ J J C fl ~ ~ u; D O ~ ~r+l !!1 V Ud4N Obq Vgtnd4N..Ob~V0~UQ4N ~Ob~VgU~4N~Ob~uV Oqi V~idWN~<
ID 0~.,~~,0^0 NYn~1~tD0~ ~Z {~~1~ OVi ovi OVr DVigOViggpV,pV,ggpVjq~~~~~vVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ,n bq~ggq~q~gOVVVVVVVVVVqqVqqq gggqUu',UUUUUUUUw?v i,aaaaaaaW~ ^ S~' Ob VqU C+ ~ObgVqlnaWN~ObapVgU~4N~Ob4VgUaWN-.ObtbVgUAWN~ObWWWWG44WWNN~vNrobNNNN~W 44WWNNN ~ q VgUw WNW NNNNNNN~~~~~~.. `
~'J Ob Ob ~Q(~jA C~C ~n(~ AC ddpdp..App4444444444q~4444((,,~~((Q,,,'~{{g,,~~lq.,((,q~,g{,~gqqq Aq* qqq ggqq ggOViqqOqOViqOViq OVi OVi OViAggOVi OVi OVigNOVi CViq OVigQOViVOViNVVVVVVVVVVVVVV` ~ ~ 0 J J "'J ~ ~p~~2y~ Cn AVNN~bN(Uiib~OA~q~VV Vglb Dp (pq tD'GObb00~~.d, 1,djNdd ddA##d d ddd ddA aAaddd gggqq ggqqq~qq 4gCbodA `V, NNN44WC,f~4~4NNN444444G4 ~~II ~uUP~nsldnua a:.i~{~ d +`f p;n0,..4.~ OD^0 n0 2A ~C ArnVVW..dcotnbgNrvVOgwWVOCn~4V,qaU#g4aV.•dUVbONNdN44~bbbO~..d aA (n * {4444i! Ob4VgUwWN~ObU WN~ObgvgUa WN..ObgVgUwWN~Obq VgUAWN~ < VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ~ O~ggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ggqqqqt*qqqqqlrqf>+qqqgggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq0.aggqqqq qqq aaaa{,#a as a aawa a #*awawAaawaaaaAWw4wWwWWW4WWWWWWWWWWWWW wawwwawwVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
QOH~• 2222 X12 y0 ~ CubV4ddNNOpO dONdbb v~4;~-.OUO OIAN(v ofdN~UA~-.b a ..ppg VV)QddgV~V)~. I,fUVVU4p~(1p ~ .l) qb bf004~ d(,~ 4, OCOb N VUaApq O 0 00 OILN~~#pp4~4b 4Ulb~woNibb V#~~b~b 00dOgbgq(,iv#V V!oNW VO..UVv..N~Ug4tnbUdUbVq C 0 10 J'0 V1p hl 2~ypn1~A 2 A~ Nd41p (L ,gg40bbbqdV Cpq~t0bU~4d4dbW4~ 'O V11041f.,,~~`4bw4~( aaaaA#W~WWW4~WNNN~4 GWWWWNNNNN.••...OObbbg4WggqVVVVqqqUqqU ~'a0'rfgOf ar ~r Oi O~O,gggqO~qor v~O. Vrggo~qV~qgO~O~tT O~ fWANbU~OOUbVq#W~ OgWq•.NN.. W....pgaUW gaNtba w U a 1. w ~ ~yJ . WW~AUO~U o V WboavwWO 4 w io~SS BOOS ~ \ C/ Aa!o~?1 fE V!OQIb(nVb,orVC~b-.V4a~btr-.gO~WVUO4lD4Qb#ObU-. ceV6~w(~~wwaw~tba~d O~bgO~ ~ ~~O~OOUaAUUVVVVVV V ~~TH
J ~ J fD Win. L1 D bVq`.v .{p~ VOb4~VU4V{,~~ VdNVV" bdgdU~ VOVO~Agi00fA~0VaGTCgnNNOU VOtDN-.bgb0~ ~ v' C (nCl/700 O V4UUq Od4gNbb4bU0 gU4N0000Agdq#q#b NbNNfvoOpobW`.V`.q Ubd(bdNbNUN Vb ~ to fOV Cp0 p ~ fiI if 2 ~1 ONaV4gbU~.g4dbUOqb0U4 ~vbb Vdd ~NNb~.44WNNb~. tp4~U00004b0~ opv ggOgaUC Vigb-.NNVNV OH 00 22 i 2n1 4~4gVOq~~44-.gOaVVdUU~ 4 4ptV+VOUi#b0U1UvV4WV4Ut4ii0~#g40brfldgabVOg4Wm~UgVUlqiOb4qU~adb4gpNq(,~ 11OW WbvbONOV~#O~UN~ tnghpQ ^tNgVbON{{,,~~N4~ b Oq~.b4W!JU U-. U U {u~ NNAUw%U A(„1~-.OtLOtDq Obb~ VV A,7,~ UVO N~bgtiibG,gNVaaOW 4 b4W aWWOUNao•.q V O q 4NNQ~ NUwNW4agm K~~.. Cp ~i gOgabb~gbVqWq~G (D `~AVt11b4tn ~vUV~gmgO-.a u~vw!va!OOVUgbWWbU!~vOw-.qqV Ab VG V~vNUUO F , cUgb-.NNVNV?qtp b# ObN~vt~.. NONaNV ObgiOl~vW..Obb VbaggOOWObq#gbUOgq WbvaWbNUtN4Nqu~vUN0oO~~O4Ub~A ~ ~.n L,_-r
4~ i7 ~ ~2f~00A 2\ q4q~ U ON40adU0U4U d vugbwfy4N~("p~a NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N Vg4galn-.UgdNbN~O~vVfEgq4fV 3 J ^ 0 al Ymg r'1 00000000000000000006!.0000000 NNNNNNN p 0 H ~ O nn2 n n0 NNNN4444444G44444441.,. 00000000 OOOOOOOOOUOOOOONNNNNNNNN NNyf~ rr~~~qiNly~rr~~yyrr~~NNN U?ab4q Nq W bWW q qb ~iWAw VVVOgbUVNgq~OV VNObNb4tnNWVWWOb Va~bU-.UNabUU gtOnUgOgVVVbUUU-.WW~~,q.,wgOUVtbggq VlLNwO°' a VUO,bw Fyn p#, VOUq~~NaONOb~ wtDvggp ab-.W Vggaab4b##VpVO~ V UUNOAggAqbNUNbV^1bg WO,ANONN~VbmObba ~ A N"0`VVggq~1WOQNvVi~0~Ogq#Wd VgNaUv~gg6U~V VaVbq-.ObbggNQqtnNO4q~#aNggNNtLUWNOwt~~~q44UU VOgWU
QA 0) q'O'~b" 000000 00 ..r444444 4444444 44444 444444444ENtiNNtiNN~~000~00060600000000000C fop ~ 00 N 2 2p~~ Cif) UC Vggq~.~ov~~ ~ 000000~0000000~00 NNNN pp OOb'O ttV,,)bbq qq t~~~7VV VVgggUUUUVif~pU.Ad v0000000q bbbbbbbbb bbbbbbblNDbbb~NNNNNNNNN4 O NWb gWVbw(,1N~q VOgOOUN~ W gVUtDVWOgUQaW~VNWONwONOq-. ObU V~Ww Ub(LVVONOw~.NNbvwv~.-. tngOWawA-.WWONNUUbUONbgVVavOVVANln t.1N.. OVNbNOObmNVUNUgVUUbN~gvb VO bNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN W0gb~4gqOaaqWWb..p..OONOU~uOV DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOUODOOO0DDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ~ NNNNNNNNNWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWtyWWWWwWwG4WWWWwwWwWWW' NNNNNNNNIVNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN °i ,
C 0 ~ Q d`,0 2 dn~ ~f`IY 26 ~a Ob4a~4,oNi Novi Q,l4.Ow0°p~g4jVbVdNbb4bbgfli "000vv 5~{~'~^444NN•.-...Ogppbbbbbggqq bbbbbbbbb 0 ~ p ~VO~ C)~ V.n*.•V#!V-.ONON~.~ ~6VNN 40~fbdbdp VUOgUNOODUN.. OVU~~q~lUnUggVVVlbg40o V7 tL V)bb D 02 f00#q OIDOVbUfNVNNIbfbV NU ~~'fNb VV~1n400, fV fp d O.V q~Vfip NUUObNU $k ~k O 'n0~ I U4NNVtn fnUWbVVVdA(Ab8 fp ~4gQ(nUdggON~.444qv Of (nbVbO UgbUVbVUNb V V` obbbbbbbbbpO OOOOOO00OOOOOt'OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOO NNNN ,i^~ vgUgq'OgbbbpppO~~~~NNWyt,~Ww OooOOOOWWWWW~~~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN r 000000 2 NUUObNUVOUVbaba4~A aw##l^w aUUUUUggUVVVVWtb4W4qWWbbbb OOO~~ Co CbWlA4tD CUUIb CCq Cb (AWID fAgC~gqqtAq NJNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN p V~NUVVtrbb WwU4(pNggN wgbNNWWq Vqb NWVbN IbW UQ ~~b V07 oUi tJOi oOi ~'OnOO UOO-.~~ gggqUqqqUqqUqqUVVVVVVVV S.R 7625 ,
~f 0 q N40q (b04UVtp~UU V lb VfnV~b4~.bU 2 4bdf-0 Vq~Naq VN~d~.gNgUb~ gN~tn4NbdppfOVrOt.0U04~b~b~ M n J Cry,n; r 4~ 02~n 2 44tD0 bvNV`~Vdt/i ~a44 ~'+OUVdtnb 4gbbUVilVglDbbObVqOpNatnOV4qq4q~NbVG~b44UtnuvbbbN qbd j 0 J J•~ 0 I O D C~ AjM bbgvUOgiV#UglbUq# t'+~S+bGONpuq qbU gAd44VgUbqbq VgOGOga4bAgi4b V p c~..Nb., VN{~OgV4d4q 4V#-.V,~7~ VVVOOVVVbtnNC,`V(,~vNCL4~UV{~4N~gbb .~V(nV~b4~bUggbNU4bq',o4Oq~0Uwa~a VbW!v~-. cnO4q~NWNUgq ii. V ~ 4 NNNWWWWNNN~~~OOOWWwwwAwAa A . Rl~ AOWONWVbgbb~O Ai#A1o. w'OV(N~A OpV •"gOWO~VgVOb4V•••.. OOr~A0i4Ntb •.a Wqb~ V bOAV tTbwUUA bv+~VwObry c,,'v'vW www-~~NA•~Urwi A'OUV gg4'+JNWOWWa V'O~b•.OQqq~~#oo# O UWUgb Ogq•.A~. V(n (A O~U V(,rAlbVw UNtnW4~. UlwVOVW ~!vwU^~b~~ c~. !AOUObOf• c
b ~A fL `.d4UbVfEVONV)-.d4VO44-, ~~11 gAgOq""'q"4U00 `400'OVdILUgNILVUNVW~V4fb40bNN v(,fU V7~aN U QO y 0 p n. V ~(rlv nAjOrC~~ tn 4i~~NgUAdUbalbNU4d~blgv~vNv N~q•.d44gggUVppqbq4qb V gaANvqq ~ 00 ~f~ y fpq dOgO4V4Vaab40dgUOqN VOVaV~U#O4.b~"lnUgOVdbdb.ft0 IE wy q DV n O~ V~dq~bNN-. -.NdV V1{~~WN-. qVq~gW#U bb bbgabgb4q VgpOg4lnObNqWUqq(gr~.W.~t0,rO~gNO-.bgOO4[o ivgO agwVOWw VIVO-.O -.b vl+t'NW ~aNVUgaAgbbWaO a 4 q~, VN+.ggO.,g-.AON~ OgWV4~aU-.NWao, NNOb~ ~A Vb~UVawq-.at,r. ~ . N q#4V VbU~.gNVNaq 4 q WOU4baO+NOA~ tnwO~OObN wU l v""U V~vA UgOVwbab~glnNNq 4NWNaNNq~ N aauvgvgvatiti~bq$OWqqUUO~ap gW~bNUgWqat~pqq WNUWwNq~ga cn ~gOV~OU+.UUtibwtkVU~Va in
Om~~'p J iA r i rt bNN-. A OO OOUVa-. O'o~UNO~P~b rv'vOU~, U.T ~q" N VNNWV bb~+ g4UObNUga6OOfUNUNOOU VOV~v'OO~~ggU N4UbOWgIbN VUbUVaWVbWAUW-aw ~ g qW*qOO u~.bq~.gq..UUggNVNWqW4V4VNOabaOaU N4Nln~0NgbVtnUbabU CogOlw tv r, wO VWNq~aNgUNaWWNA ~OWabbUWggVqaOqOatqnO~QOONO4qVaA-.vtw4N
~ o J o ~ q"' r n1 Y o~ WUUUQIp -.A VbO ~ N ~ ~ a ~
v ~m,~~, ~ *y o+ < c o ym~am~uuuuatnqi,:,uu~~a~oNOVdduuqudtndduadud 1 ~ . a P' ~ ~ z z UUUdUUgUgUU#AUddd4UUU UUU4dadUddUUgUq 4 rn ~ #UaaUUgUgU(n#UUU#U#qU##U#Uq(nUaaVONOggVVUUaagUGUUUUvqqVqV NNWNNNNNNNNWNNNWaWWWWw
o ~ gip,' ~ -f~ o~~in An nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn~,nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . ~0\,f)~J'~`. ~ ~ OY~ D~~ ~O ~ y~ ~y~L i2 nnnnnnnnnnnn~nn~nno~noo~~ . o n ~ ~.4 ,,2 ~ c ~~~~~2~~~~~x ~ 1~ ~ y~ nnnnnnonnnn~n H . Y n ~ ~ F~2~;~ ipiAA2pAy1~ y~ y~y~ nn le Y 2 2222222222 :~~~~~2~~z222?r 2AyS A2yy~~ p2 . ~ v WNNNNWaWWWWwWN ~nonnnn~nnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
_.0 C ~ 22222_ Z2~22~22~~2 y~y y~y~y~ ~y 27r2 y ~ ~ Y ~I 2222222 ~~~~~~22~ }y~~}}~~y}~~ ]&SS to J ~ rrrr r ^~"1'~^~^~^fr1~ 22222222222 ~~222~222~22 A r rrrrrrrrr .r'1~1^Ir`t~i~lr`I 222222222222 ~ 2~~~~~~22 y~y~,~y o ~ 0 4 . A A! 0 ~ D'C ~ ^rrrrrrr"1^I^~^I^r^r^lr'1 ~ir+1~1 22222222222222 22222 `na4~ y ~ p Z ~~~~~n~~f~,nn~f~n~n~np~~~n~~ N~. b~ ~{1 ~ y i~ ~ C~ oo rrrrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr 222Z2~2c2`22222 ;~~~~~~~~~~~~~y ##~y~~~~ y~ ~ ~ nnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn~~nnnnn 0 2222 ~2~~~~ ~2~~~_222222~2 ~~L LS~Y~3~ 2T?2 ~N :~2c2c2.,22 ~2~222~~2~~}~ y y 22222222222 -222 2222222222 ~ S5
X A ~ ~ ~ T ~ O't~D ~ 2~ A rr~rrrrrrr~~i~rr~ #Add Add#d .dd#dddddAA ~ntr9r'l~hr+rn.grl 22222<. 22222222222 2 ~22~22222222 ~rrrrr r'1 ~1 r'1~ ~ 2 2222222222 22 ~~~~~~2~~~2~~ AApy r. rrrrr"arrrrr~ M~~~ ~"!^~"~^"'~"~~"~^ir',",~^, 2222 2222222222 2~2222cL2 rrrr~rrrrr-~ rrrrrrrrrrrr~•r~rrrrrr~rM•n~rr~r~r ~M~M~~f'~~r'1^rm^xl~2i~r2',r2'I~t2+t~rt2jr2jh2jr2jr2.rr2,~r2+rr2.~~~~~~~~~r2,~ rrrrrrrrrrrrr-r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~r
b qj J ~ '(~~y ,,rl' : ~0~ O ~O ~$bmVmUdw~v4NNNNNNNNr„ pS # 4444444444 *Ad Addddd Ad ##~~,#p~# J'~ a ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~AYy Obq VgUA4N -'~bgVgUd4fN~Ob~VO,~#~00 bbbbbbbbbb4lb (b~ 444444444444444444 m. ~p s ~ in N 6bOpVgUd4N-. ~~~~~~VVVVVVVVV q 444 i44WWW4WWW4tWU~WWlytytyLf44(~t,,W#WWWWt~wWWwtt4v~WW44WW4WWWW4WW444W444WWWWWWWWW4W
ObW VgUd4N~ObfDVgU;.4N•.V qq ggqqqqqU ~ 2~ ~ vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv Obgvgad4y.,Ob p ~ ~•J ~ r~I ~ ~ ,,a ~ ~2~~~f2Y~2 2A ggqqqqqqqqqq VVVVVVVV l 2 ggqqqqqqq VVVVVVVVVV VVVV VVVVVVVVVVV VVVVVVV tOSDy ~s ~i^ +4•{` O Ar~ ~2 r,10 NN~NNNNNNNN NNNNgggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq p VVVVVVVVV '4vANwlgx'V~ObIb VOUi U'UWN~O~apVOAiN#wN~Ob4vgUw(W,fb4pb~NNNNNNNN-.~~..........,,..OOOOOOOOOWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN r VgUaWN•.ObgVOIUaWNv OcDq VgUAwN-.ObNbVq(bii#tbf ibvbOb Q~ogiU~4N~pb~VgU#4ti vOb~Va,Ua4
Y ~Q.O p ~ ~'I C C 4-• OOOOOObbbbrnb000oNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN VVVVVVVVVVVVV' 4V VUNbgVU4 O~ q ggqqqqqqf-0gggqD~qqqqqqacrqqqqqqqqfAqgqqaqq' ~?R D Y ~r/f<.,~ q1°' ~ yU~py 2 Or .,o,ti~W~N bti~bg44gb~4UV~bNU 44NNN~-.-.NN444444d NNbNbNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNi V, 4 04444NNNNNNN~~~~.... ..'vNfuNNNN4444daaAU~ 0 1`CfS f,E "ren+e+s~i~~', ~ n~0 O A q~v4d4rn..-. !o lnU V!V OO~a`Og40 Vb4100~O.U.VVb OgUUd 'VVVVVVVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVV VVV VV VVVVVVVV VV VVVVVVV VVVVVVVV VV VVV VVVVVVVVV VVVVV VVVVVVV ggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqO~'+lggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqOiOaqqqqqqqqOfU1T NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNA. n1NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNr~NNNNNNNNNWWt„wwWWWWWWWWw vvV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVv
i r't O V440gOgVAd 4~toAv.. !OOOtno,bOW4rnA°jW~.f~..4!04~ ~ b 2 0 d4d Ag4NdloObd{{.. p VOUtnb4~ 4NbtfN fDdb 14i 01g40!V b#W+aUgVm Nq 0 A MC 0 C ~Ly A 2'~ OqV V(ViiN400iUONib"4dA Ob4VlL -.440v pVo't'fdggq4N dgg0 bd~d`. 4rv0gV$44~. }1 ~.r ~O ^7 VV4-. Ubq d4f0 pp t~ UNb OOoIbdN44V~abgNq'v V~V4V40pa4~ J ~0 J•~ pY~ 1 gVUUCD440Vd(y ,N,b VgpV Vb4ti~l~gga N~bOf40q VlbVb(U,f~UNao#NbUVNCtlN4glAgVVV((,,~~gq VNUq~. 044UN4• NWWwWaawaUUUU UggqqVV~VVVV+V VVUWOO OOtbUggUVVVVqWqVV VgWgqqq WgWbbbb O0oOO~-. ....NN ggqatr Oiggqa ggqaaO~qqqqqqqqUUUO m$NgVODUb4Wa V~gv4gVpp NUaUf~Vgq-.vwUUtrWOOmggbOOOgb'OOv 'vtilrWA4dawUWWwWww(rwWwwWwaAaaAAA V. (.i4~.}1.,CO!~7..!OOr!vV VO~IAUiaOpbUl.fOr(n rnq~b m!J IbgUN(.rwbO;a(A4V#V~tnOO#WVUAq V!v ..UOf !vb~NUbrn VWbOO UUURr c~vVVVVtb b-.~NNNrvNN WWUUUgbOWglUNaq~vUONUVqbbwVWtDwvrOAUV'oNUU:nNVv~rvNVWUvq AWw-.
4 fE C 0 0 C 't CRr i 2~ 004'0b4gdgq UUUOUVUdbbgf gO4q"NdN VNb40 b4q-. „00 U4NU-.N 4Ugb1AUN~ `d"dUV V404b0~i ~ aP ryy ~ ~0 ~r t0~.04q`.g4NV^~VUbgb~.bfo..NV~4~qq V~n440V4N4VOb gNq~.O UONdVa4Uq gg4VUUVAbOONIaW~NNN v"V4b0 qA-.4• 4NN04 gNgqN40vUV bUgO A(brig#gOVlgfUO4ib <p#tbf4Ubb44Naq.. ONUOA VU~~f4NAI wUV V4OUbO~~ bNUO..OOHfn40~4fUO0fNgWaVVU..bO4+N~OVg VUNW..WAObNggAtn b.. U..WWVWti..UU bOUtAOa aOCO4alrgag4V~UAa!v to `b4VgOi 1.1 (nAOUtb th VWbO qA-. UbWgagWq VbgUbUNNOU-.OgWbUq-.blrgrp .,q f.1NwOVaoNgNUOq V~~NmgN4WwO VUNtbi~Nq~~ W~Wv V borggqoQiVti4~obrU0aO4tnvV`o-.UVUU#~UvOWO AW'b
Vd4gb4aagbv N ~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN gg4~NNVNObqbOq44-.gvUUm NNt J OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO p0000NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN S UOAVU bl,lgOgU,.VVVVVb-.WgNgAbtnNVUVWUOo~qWqNw WbNgaq VOiVgO~OUga Nq agOO~ wagbv ~ OWNwgU VWW~-a W'~~tDbWbwp tpgpgqb W..b VN~gq-.VggUq(n .,VWW~tpON~. VOVAObaWNVwNOb-. o~tbUOO~NA Vq#NU~+ccJi tw.iUb Ugbtiwb A,v ~ W f**tngUWgwNNqNOVO~~q~V ~VbO~-.OgObgNwOAVWOWV~qQ~.-,WVOONVqwbWVWAbtiOwi,o,W~gN~tipq,#NObigaUUti tTOAaaObVOAbOwVVVVQrWU0i0UC W~tAVUUmONNbUVUgV Vtb~VtvVgb4f~vO~UWabgqVaNw VONbq VtbbgagbUqb~UUab W UANN q p n
Q bbbbbbbbbbmNNNNNNNNNN~~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN0000000000000000000~00NNNNNNNNNNNNN~ V Vggqqqqqqcfbbbbbbbbbbv`bbb'ab'Obbbbbbbbbbb bbbfp bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb 000000000000Of pq~,ObbVVgUgUUqqqqOjqqqqqrnqqq NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNfVNti^~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNf . '"N~NtA~bpWN~~~VOaUUUq V' VVVVgggVVVVVVV VVILW WOp lp rp ~p ~pbbfpbbbbbbV)bbbbbbbb'0 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNgGOmbwaugWo,..pggttAOtitT OiUNt.1V+0AO+bbgAViW 00000000000000000000000000~10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~,rvNNNNNNNNNNNNN'
v VgbOONObgqO~Ovv4d bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb4 4NAO~O .q..a044VECAba Vb"4Vgb00~-.NN~dUgVVgqqqqqVVqU#titi4NbbV)bggqqqbt U44NgdOV4U{#.dGU4Nd dq0 444urn!o ~UAO.,d Vd~Ob VOgd qO#l.vN4q?4lnb~, )gON~~r„#~Ng VWbbOI V)"V dlD4bOW4l~ pp ~+4q VONOV#OObbgOf#l,,b dlLbip qd bC7dAi, ll~tpvfpj V4, U!O V VOOrgfAgbtnv Vq.,OVbV V40UV OVfnq VO~gfy fpd ~ b4UdggwqOln4 v NgNV U~gb`.bgNdllbb40b4q (un ~ NgvgOUqUtD ivNNNv~ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbinbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbfobbbbbbbbbbb OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~ bbbbgggqqbqqqqqqqqqqqqqptVVl»VVgggtAVtO l~ggl~bbbbbbbbbbqlDgggVVVVVVVVVVmo,rno,ggUUUUawaaaNNNNNbNNN':U~, rv !vNNN NNNNNN'vNN 2 OOOWVgbbODUUggp,tnVUqaN~~bbt~VgO~OObONWgb-.WgVbbVgW~.bqWN bVgV aUWNNbvWNN~Vw~ObblLgabbrObb bbbbt)b'obbbb UQgtpg4tp t>,Ugp Irn
AgUObNOgNfbNgUNNOUN4q{{,, "Nd OdgtANbtng4WqVVN NIb40"b VA~4N04(dii#gdUb VgU4U Vb..U Odq NOg4 vtnd b NNUUdNd U400bb~.gV~(DV4alrojUUua, t~j~fW,i+.r,~u#Nvd 4V{, NUVp~VOVU~N-. Uggd VOUg44lA4.+4Q~- 4 dU4NV UbgUUg4ad4Utncf..fLNOq4d NU-.400b ObgNNb(wbUNU40~cpA pOq V4VdgtbbOgbqq Vda4b#V ONVb~ggtvii44qU000 4w VNVW~(n!o-.VNO!~tngbOVA~.4b(nU~!h!o U!a~-NbvNVO, .,q.,OaO.. QQ aWWwwwWNNNro N-.-.OObb'obNg4 v4ltW ,IIN OUq(nq~vNNN Viii wWW Nb NaUgUgr`VWww WwA~.w p WW~~~":"V VbVOO~~v NbVmmw-bgva~WVWaVNONV~OVVVO 4vtnwWbwUlw iVbq~vNUNgbgU'OOqqObN UaWOOO0UNU0pq~o, bb4aNVV~NNg OW~WgOa VOO Natb Vi U,'b VOwa OOgUNq~-.A(~q.. c~tnv~~n,~c., c.,matn t~-.~bti b Wq VVNaNOOUVUwgNWWVN#WWV~V~OOb W4q VbgfpOVq~
V d4Vp4d 44V4QgbNq~b4Vgdb VbUNb VNVOOv U lwD Ob4AbOrvNbddUVNNOV4Cn VVgiN lbii4 qV bbggOAN~gbO UO-~V'O'OgNOaUWOggNOp(7i"OW'O~.UW~{{baUVaaOOgbaQC~AOOObggqVqAbq W~.OOgq NUV'O~UOUbNUAgWbN-, OV~bgUbtDNOg VGO^f#orONVggwgOVU~~.q ggU4WgUlqql~~OtDVV(l~~aWW VgAN~VUbONVWOOUV~q-.OwUVNOVggbbUOOb~~gAAW4bNUNUqNwUAb ANOgo,wNtbNVUw4~rrwq VQ~UNWUavUN~WgtbNWOrO VN bbggOAN~qbOViU~#NVb#q#~Wt4pAb Wa~'Nb UUq NfoV~alpW wAa OW UU~.bg VUgA vt~IJ VWNW gQb-. (,i ty ..WOtbO~o~fo oiAgOV v~wO(T VtO R
UUOrUUbONWgOb VOO~Aga Ual~NaUNO-.NNW'OAbNWUOiWO~ O VWV~gOWgVabNWWq,.gNlpwgUUVVbbl,lbwObaOti~dVtU'oOO~UwbUrvt0Ogwa0UfTgbqUWNwO4wU4bU#-.W(bgWNbtn ^ZI VW~OOgVvAbgAagNvbaim-.a..WObUANVbbU~bUUO4UW0 O
NNNN444d4NNa4444dNN4a444NNN
• - NA~N4dNdU(n~!44G4Nf.f4NdN+.NUf4NNNdNfN44444 nnnQnnnnnnnnOnnnnnOnnnnnnnn 444UdNddN4N ~4WUwNAaNWNWCraUNgUUgv4qqNNwbNWNqNWNNWwUqNNaWWaNNgUaWNNWaaInUUbvbOOVgaUVqUUaww
' ii~ii~~ii~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ noon nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnf 2 ~~2~z~~z~~zr 2A p2 ,nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 2222222222 <~Z22~ ~ y~ y~ y~y~ zC O r~n~~m~~~~~ 2222222222222 ~ r . Innnnnnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnnnnnnnonnnonnnnnonnnnnnnnnnonnnnnnn ................."auwgmUWgqqa wa www ~
rrrrrr ^I^r~^I~~ 222 ~~~2 ~ rrrrrrrr ^I~^r^I^I^1^t"1 22222 2~~2~~~2~22~ ,L': rrrrrrrrr"f "1 "1~ 2222222222 ~~--~~~22~~~ rrrr r'Inlr+rr~r+~ 22222222222 r rrrr r~rrrrr~r~rrrr~rrr~nrrrf'rlr~~rnrrrrrrnrrn~~r t~~~~~~~~~~~~ y~ nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 2 ~F~~F~~~~~~~ 2r }~y~y T ~ y 2 2 nn non 1222222222 ~a ~~~~~~~~z~222 ?p A2 2y y~ ~ ~ ~y y~y~ ~ 22222222222222 ..2 ~~~~~~L~2~2~~~2~ A y n
~~~r~mn~n~r,,n~r,~n~~m 22 2222222222222222 ~~2~22ti _~2~~2~~ A ~~~~n,~~r,,r,rmrln~rl~lmr,,mr~~~r1~~ 22222222222222222222 2 ~2~2~~22~~2~2 ~rrrrrrnrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrn~r~~~~~m~r'1 r'1 ~1 r't i'l r'1 ~'111~~1M~, 2r-22222222222222222222 ~22 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrnrnnnni~~rnrrrrrnrrrrrr~nr~~rn 22 222
ggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqU Add4 44444444NNNNNNNNNN-.~~..., .,~.,0pp0000000 WUUUUUUUUUUu((~~ z
N"Ob~VgUA4N~Obq VgUd4N`.Obq VgUd4N~.ObcVVgUd .bbbbbbbbblb lb W ~~ff55nn;, Q,~,~fnUUUUUU UUUUU c 4N OV,gVgUd4N~OVlq~q~j~~~`"O~~V~VVVVVVggggq~qq~q~cccnnnntVnfUcun, tn ~ttnnutnaCn tuoU cntuntnUu
vVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV V Ud4N~ObgVqtga4N~Ob(avalnAGnui`ob~~#d ~##W(~ G ggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq VVVVVVVV VgU~WNvObWV dAdasd#ddddddddddda#Adwwaddad4444444 VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV iwA t#nAa#4fu(~Gf W(qf (,f~~~~y ~jNNNNNN ~n~U(IigUUUUUUUUUUqu U AAa AAa awaa Q JgU~G1NvObg VgUAWNv "oppOO OOONpbbb pa4pawaaaaaaaaa
4AA44444NNN4444444NNNN gggqtqcq,Cq,ggqqqOiqqU'qqqqqqqqqqoo,~pp,~qqqqqqq,~gqgq9q~pq~ p~q~qq~ q bgUgq#dOV)V)bNNNNNNvU#((,,,~NVUd4-.OgbbNU~fbb~4UgN VUA44444NNNNNNNNNNddddUf Uf C,f 4'4'tr444GtHWW NGi (1144 VVVV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV~V ~WVVOb Vb44!v a1 (nUdd~v#N~.q VVggir lnUUdatpg A{,ddd4-.v., dd#UUUggqqqplqqg44qUUddp#, pd~ggq,q q q ggqqqp,p~p,q p~ ObW VgUAWN OblbVOrUw WN~Ob1AVgl7iAWN~6 bbbbb'OblD l~~~~~W(b(bNVVVVVVVVVVagOai Oaigggaaaawwawaaa a aAAaaaa bg VgUa WN~ObtDVgUaWN~ObOOVgUAWN..ObgVgUwWti~~h~VOUiUAWrUV~ObtDAgUaAA JV VgVp~gqVppV,,pVp~~ppV~~qVq~~VpVp~~VqVqqqV~~V VVgqV~~gVq~~VVVVVVqVVqV~VVVVVV VVV VV VV VVgV pV~VgV~VVVVVVV VVVV VVV V VVV V VVV V VVV V VV VV V wN v+
U#V!v4qtrq-...~,wq~gNUgOObOt,Ub4bb0V)V)fbgU-.b4v((~~4G ~a V)4V V~UgV q ~ V~ ~~444{4,41.i444G4c,~444t.f t,f f,f fyl,f f,~4(,f UVV4dUbNVUggq Opp l,fVNNggNb4 Vgb~bNUgV44-. NVdgN AbUN4~V!vd•. V(n lnbq(1~, ~ $ V ( qN(p 40UN~`.p aAaddad A444444.A ddd NlbkgOV~gq OgN..gvdbVNOgOU•.V~bd.. Vq, V# !~4!VUVgW4tnN W44Vid40Vd.. ~ UUVq+.40b VggVbO 4Uq Ng4bdvgbOb4NqqqU~ 4Nga44tnd aN~va f+bf-0444tn4Nnpva~~' V~!~4tnVVbV~tngvVtndO iGtgrWW41tyW4flgnW4giW4G444(a4G(gn4Wggww~~``~1,1W######AaAa##4WWW4WWtq,~W4gggqO~qqO~Uqqo,rno, O~gggqqqO~o~o,qq WWWWWW Awa wApppp CA (pggqVV~q4bbOOOOO~~NNNWwUUaaw WWt,1N VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVv 1'OVggVb~WUq~UUaU,~ # NNN.W.ytrWWWWOOOOObbbb~~~~~~~VVVVV~~~~~NNNtitititititiNNNtiNNtitit~v'ti
bb~NAbtbg4Nfodl~dbUO~UUU4d1Vj~V#Oq,NVbUgIA ..v$ ~4q#VtD4V]~Nb4gNNOUtObU V~b V.4. ~O ~ONOb WlyU 40 OOfdb VOA Vgagb OgNOq-.bUbVWv N UC4 bbOq~ly ppO~ VgbVVV#~N~b~.gbbgv#4Nq~A b4V44..4`V.~UUVbgVAU•.4N4gv4V~0p"044V~V(OnN44~4gq~ubd q VAb~V~bbbgOU04 vb NoNiV V4d4lN,fqu N-.O p.. q..Ub4UNNUIbOV)vU+ 4gdbN40U4dUb~0..bqq„,,V)VA?N4gOgU-.4..g4VgOgqVVVUqVUqOvN gNbb4~ pp *V q q dNNVgbb~.VOg4pp~g4vq 6 OO VbWUtbWV`~U'('yy~fV~NNVWW<oUVba OIn N'OVUabgNVgOr4bglbVUNOq VUW~v tbUWO4gUUw~-.gb VgUawN~-.0 r. 'NaVVtna VO~OVU q., .,b., rZOb#wVWgaOblAVOO!UOInNNbUgbOWV~uUaWwVq-• VV VVV Vqq UtTUUUUUUAAAwwWww >bbq #(qNq#., N~~v~wtw !v~UUrny>Uy!o C)4UO,a.. vaw b'ovw4n~bgUObWWU fUNNglbObVU+ gNgW'bb~pGVVaW qtr Ab+WVN#wONglA44AOvp~~ypp1.W aCbwbVW#q{,,aO bbmAUagUgwgU..' bOUaawU-.fT~.-.f,1t,~-.~o~.Ot,~AVCD!v!vbb~-.O!v
# 4`.O dgbVbdO~GVbgq040~UfGbbOV~tp Qgfv~v~N4bgppOq 4d~.Uq g4gp NrvA+N naNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN41NNN4pNNNNN 4v 4NgNV#UVVgggOvV) b~.b..gVbdq-.Divlv~q( gV44q U JUOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC pp bfNVq 6)"V V~gbq-.b4ddgty Nr~NNNNN4444444444p4pGp444444G4444444cc,,,~44444444 ~NNNNN1aNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN41NNNgpNNNNNNNNNNNNNUbNNgvvv w4dNq~U-. q.,rcvppq pV,OgWR ..gWvq~N#NpajWbUON#O(W8..t~OOUNVvtOji~~'~Vq-.NANgaAppbgtDOUtDUNNUNUgaV-. NU#q-.OV0w4 '$cnww"q~WWgWgNq ggWVqvb Vq ~DNWgbO-.VvWNq~'ggOVfntn~w b brvbfbVbOOUA-.V VAWVUA-. gUtitiV VwUb~nUQAO~OUVO~v VVVC' wvNONV#Nv GbNVNSNg WWw WOra N<Dbggqqt~bbO~Uqw UUww UwwwbNbaw~q~.j ON~~Orn a(V,~VN~OO b'v Ub i bq-.bWaag WbOO OvNW##WWagtn l~~OgWONgOOVgWV~ObNq VUpWWO~~QN~~OGUb~ivVU~~~gbabO4b~'AbpV,baagN°rUV~NaV4c~~w..NUU~w(DaNwbO
bbbbbbbOUONfO.flO.f44fO.idd£UOi(Oii lOii UtOn (0n U0i VOi (Oii 00100000 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOODO000 bggbbbb d~A£ C,4,44444NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN O~+4d U(CUgN NUV VCLNUf000~dUq Vgap„~'~ OOOO~Op 00000-. bbbbbbbbbbgCpfOl~fDbbbbbbb 0000000000000000000 ggVVVVV bbbbb0~v {~1~ bbggq~p(~~p(y(~ m(~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 'q"U"q~NV~Oggbq~OUtpWN4#aA-. fb tti ~WVOgbUWVgwgb VNVNWNI.UONWa~.ggUVaa4wgrp pub AtUOa-.-.NNaAWA ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN1~ NNNNNNrr,,,,NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNgWaawWWNOV~~gq~bOUtDUOUwVbaboOOON~AAO
OUO•. vr04WU !OWUO#UNVg4U4Ugq..4.. bb~.NCrggOdV04 agg4t~qqbbVp l~roV roV gObi 0V0~~V#~UNNvv~00bbb V(b OpW~~t0~0p 111ggqfqblDWtDg4t04qOp4W(pgqfL V ~~~v 444 V"d q..maN~ 4$qd U-.V40bq VgNV VbtgiiggUUUUGUUUUUUUUUUU 4VUdd4VNV4g4Nd#vbdVN4VgV VOV44q VUNOq(EUVgVIVV,q~VOb!v.VUC,vdU~gOdNVNUV„tb pqq{~ to U`.bUNg4b-.WVVV~Abq..O U.. qV gOgq.. gNpb4VUVObdb bq`. VUbfLVbgOpVdA(bObOV~~. V!c A4tngQOdibabbfbWVU1.Uq ~0000000000000000006000000t50000000000000000000000000000000000000 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNbN ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~,NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNtiNtiNNNNN b'vvNNNNNNNNNN g4tDgqq gggqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqu~bqqqqqqqqtDqtOq~bbbb'obbb'O'ob'ObbbbbbbbbbbbbobbbbbbrpOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO UUUUUU~tnUUUUgggqqqqqqqqqO~,~,gggUUqqqqqUU NWWWWWW#AawaA NNN'vN'vNNN'viv'vNNNNNNr.~tiytitiNNNNNNNNNN
Vp,ggb-.Uq-.bWgdVWUAgUNq#dg0~i tiiOUbV~~~Nmgd NCD V)O~~NVNd~Aq V.. y..NV~OtDN~. ~Oq(bb(OU~ tOgNV41(f U~ 'AUNV7UN-.dbOdgUg04gOOd4UVdOObqtL Wpb VOq~OON pp~~ II,,~~UUq#.I~V~4dgqN~.q..q..U4~~mm~d~pp~,UgUVOAA~Odgd4~p U., ,,vv. . VAVVNOOgNVUq~Uagff„dU4UggNOd40Nq4bV4VbOqUdOUO"dbOgbUO(UdfDNd##NV....4 ggbVbON4bU~.d VOt~d4N(~pn VO~bNgUl;gOgVb# OgrOVbppgdi gbNV~q 4N~NObfoVNOO~tb4NNUb#044p~440VvVq~4UNoUi#a~b#bAb vV4baN~Vgdd dwU~i VOObggVUl.UqVbOWAa ga ONNUVgviaWgNVfoNUwa~ U UUUU ggqp,q p, b`ab'a'a b'obbbbbbbbb'obbbb b'Obbbbbbbbb ab~~~N:'~~"~NA~'gOOW~!vUg41b-.#1,1t>,?UNOr IvUV~Vq~~NNb-~. jai ~(pggvWq VgbOOw `IVVVVVVVVVg VU'~~~~.vV V2aglbggt~(~rh tpror~Upp UtyUggq~yVV ~OlbabggVwOawUq~ V~NNNaCD~-.NAAUVgVbOb~UUVbtOb-~NWUUgU'rUUaAUbbb VVN~bq
~qd N40-.N4NtDaab4gV VCpgd•.NVbgfpd VdNOAV VaV)VO4V AVfk Vbb#gNON#d 4~ON~N00(nVdO Ovd Vfbb~. 4 qU da Oq"gb NqV#4b-.~ NVU4NUObtLgb4U41o~NNOgi AUiV~p~4q~ VU-.d~ UV ((~~GfAWO+aNN-.ggNNa-.b V~DV~W ~g OOgq VO-~abbaNQiUNWA~.#g gOaUVa VCeba Ol,~ (D b~gOV OOq O4UUWW.Na V~O1WgNgwb ONgabONq•. V$q~UfOggUbbvOrONq..N ib (,1WggbWqqAObVOqq•.~ OU..U V VN?.N~7vb vbo~OOV~V~IL tnUb a„Wq I,, pp~~ UV UVNVWNgw~.babgw WglENbblD Wa vOiUUNAUUq Uqb VbWq_ Vb?qAU WU"vbbwo~vOtiV VWOiUWb V wa wAUgUgb~.q4 bw gVbgOVWOWUb VOgaUNOUNaNVagV VOWgbbgNVUbqaOwvNWUAWwUqqUqN~bv Vtn-.wNUbgV4WNWNlpbNNgUUAqVbo,bWbVw-.w ww aw NlvUvgUgNtbUAtV~bal,trwN~qW-.qU
NUgNOUV4d NNgbggNtDNq4q~q VN4 VUVUOUb00##vW w WUU gUUIngWUg4~apOOUqqOOaaV VOgWWaq~NgNAUO~NaAOjV4V V~G~O9bigaOa4tNn(vU~pw,vti~ON#N#~VaU~vUUau O~N4N0~a0UUOUVUb-'OOvI~A U~U'oOOaa VWUW~N VUCpOUb~gNt,1N-mb~OOUNbWNOq'og VbWO~q-. V p b _ _VW OVaOq•.#g VUWV~ANawWO,..bAW~mOaglVnbGgV~tia'UO ~UbVb~tD tnObb bCpWUOiOdr'W~q
NNNN
f`!NNNNNNN4NN4NNNNN~ n nn N4NNWbNNNNNNN aq g4ugqqUAaaaUliiq VUagvoobvbUUUa
~ ~ ~nn 2nnnnn?nn Wont 2x22 2~~ Z~~~~2 } nnnnnn Ann nn aWNgNWNNwNNagWVqUUqNUw44NWNaaNaWNN nn n nn2Qnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.. ? ~ t 1~ nano....
~rrr~ 22222Z22222Z22 2222 ~~r~~nrv~r~~r~~~~nr~-rr~--ter, ~ ~~~~?T ~ ~~~~~~x~~~~ y~~~~~~~~~i~ 2 S2 ??Snnnnn 2222222222222 ti (D~ r,i r:~ 2 222 2~L2z2..22t 7 ~ ~ A2:~AS y~ ~'r'r?~~~nr~-r~~r~i'r^r ~n 22 22222222222 L -2~~~~22222222- Y ~ rrr Z ~ nM 22222.;2:2.`?2222 --22~~2~2722L~222
r r n~^f^f^r^f"f^1","~~^1r1~ r i n 22222222222'1::22 ? c2~2~22 ~ f., r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrn~r~.~nrr~~~rO.n~rr'l~rrrr~~nr~~~`~~r~i-'~~~~~r2` 1 ~~iri~z~r~r2ir r2i~~m~~~ rrrrrr r.-~
1 R Val Nyr.~~~ rrrrrr rr~rr rnrnmoo~ ,
I r "~li'~ ~r,,p~
O ^f~ 1 ~a' w 1~ ~ Ntib' ~rV,`~~ 0 ~ ~v(nN ~~~vr rvA
ti~i~z S)5.3g , 4 >3 , O (n
ilk A; , 7 \ Y ~Q~na n WHO ~r „~r.
gAioo `~~Fr n v ~l n rf r~ 2;~~~Nr~~ n2n ~ s> p
~~N ~ro ~ ~ro2 ti1A\~. ~
01 N ~ ~7 TAN \ N'~ o U ~r ClN£ \~?'04~ n~pnQ ~ ~ u~`~~;a~ ~ ~ ~N~~~ ~D~yy~
MB£R \ 8)4.9 - R7 7- 8. PC~ y~~OU p. y R7 ~ ~ @ I n,n
(Y pU \2 ° w \ ~ w,~ ~r V r,i~a Arr Tr,~~'~ /Yyr.w. r~ G`~O r, ~
~ MAp ti VI 2 36, ° o a ~ ~ a~UL~ ~
3 ww w~ JS NW W p' S' • O ~
m ~fn f u~ # ..m ~ ~ C ~ \ t?~'' Ob~rn
~ N-- J ~ V i p,0 Jp i o ~ ~ z~. ~ ~
• ~ ' \1 r1 ~ z z ^ rr, ~ o~,o n~
.~o~ .~o~ ~ MA ~ ~ ~N 02'01'28' E 6g7.8, 9 ' ~
I MATCH LINE TO AMB R - - = - E LY PUD WETLAND MAP
I ti
Gr ~ i'i'o ~ $ s~, sa
Nom'
moa bN w # N O ~A ~ F
2 Z ~ ,oi _ ,A " ' 8 p ~
2 a m ~ g m ~ a
~ ~ A I ~ ~ °o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
u~, ~
~ ~ v D N N -r.
~ ~ ~ L 1 ~
1 L I I 2 ~ ~~~;i~
N o ~ ~ ~ r L7 L6 \ ~ R/w co ~ ~ ~ N I y L5 o i A ~~'^~n r~r
~ ~ t. I p ~ ~ ~"~~~U 2 `~~y~0 O ~
Q ~ I o N U22 o~.~a~ ~ ~ ti~ Z~rnn^~i W ~ O
o , ~ ~-.--R/w 2 chi ~ ~ t o oym°~y ti~~~,~
~ 1212 g$ \ ~ ~ Z iN n p ~ti~oro
r .g'a~N ~ ~1 ~rn° ; z~ f~ ~e° g n a ~ 0 1 V~ ~ m ~~o~~~,
Jp 'l, o~ f~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 4v a a ~ ~ wro V i °'u A~na~ n
~o ; 4a ~N n a~ I
ti , fo a o-o ~ N ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ 02 ,W 1O(y N N U~y~
e~ c ~ rn ,B m m~ Q ,N O~~r~~ NA O\)
e~ O 0 O i m o 2 0 ~ p C.f ~ U sift. W
~ I O ~ = i v o ~ 1 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~i~. ~
a;' 0 U b~~; z VV ~ nti~ X02 mti~ O roar 2°A '~o~ t^
a ~ titi~w~ co 2 I (',~j (li O1• y r'1 O ~ oilbn o~~ z~~ ~2 p~+i~ Z ~ o~~
u; O ~ 0 4i ~ a~Oc~~ I N N A „ n~ r,~2 p w ,
m I ~ r; I ~ ~ rA~ oA L7 N ~ 0 w~ ~ ~ ~ n~ #o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
vJ broV .A X07 ~ F ~
ti ~ ~ y~ ^~~2
!D O ~;o
~ ~ qo~^ d 7~, ~ ~ W ~ N o ~ U ~ U O 1
~ Aga ~ Aa N~ p ~ ~ .O a U a 'il ~ Up
. ~ + V N U ~ N IO U/ \v' N U U U C~ / U y ~ ~
L__ . U U ~jN O N J A G U U ,f~
y$ v r'LO L0~ LNE a ~ u A [9 ~ 1
N rb ~ o~ ~ 2
Nib vrv u ~n N J l6L£ J ~ ~ ~ ~ .D D N ~ ~yJ ~ a NN M 90 L l.6
~ b m ~jOkO OZ ~
O m N N T mN O Q ' + <W ~ ZOIA ~ O ~ ; mm yA o2C~ Q 2 ~ u ~ ~ I p el N u ~
D D A p ti a 2 u o ~
Q n ~ ~ ~ 0 0 r '1 ~ r r r b u >C b ~I ~ r . . r Q~~n "~1~. ~ ro ~ VUyOOn cn OO Vr r y ` bb b Wr ~ ~ ~ J N I I ra . ~
t0 b°j a SON ~o o~~O•.~ g a o ~,N~ O O o~ o~ O ~ (n ~ 2 n~ $ o U V m W O u 2 J ~ . ti ? 2~
Q Q Q Q V ~ r r ~~0~~ ~ O G1 N ~O ~A ~v V o W v 1~ ~1 a n orb b ~ I o ~n0 m a a
as as ~ L189 w~, oa 2~ a as a aaaa~ r ~ by ~Ay a .~~Z
nn nn ~ r~o~ ~ n n n n n n n n ~ N r 1188 ~ C C ti n ~ ~
O a o m S ~ o r Bl y C y u~ ~ \ ~ W J 110 ? ~'o ~2 ~ v u u I p
+ v + Z Dp J N Li = N ~
~ u u u ~ ~ '.o vJ ~ Qt A ~ S 4 = ? ~ V C O N ~ ~D ~ a ~ ~ ~ J
~U w I~ u y ~ ~ 2 k 2 ~ s U o U W N A 01 u ° a v ? ~
~ P ~ R P o n = ~ 9n g C w ~ ~ P o ~ m ~ ~ o m ~ ~ A~ = z v m° v ~ ~ ?m$~ \ ~ ~ 4 I N xt 4 O lD ~ 2 o J 4 O
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N O v$ No N ' ~ O N ~n c~0
o O ~~1 N~ A O ~rV~ .O U 2 v y u oa O u ~ N m \I ~ ~ V a ~ m V I`~ IV U i'1 71 r'1 r ~ N 4' ~ O I
~ + u v~Wfi ~N ~ V 02~) `O' u ~ ~,,~p~0 N~ V Z V O ~ ~ tb A O W CJ ~ 2 r tO^ w N ~ ~ a ~ NO P O ~ 1. U ~,n VI • P 'V
- - ~ W N Npp v V 2 ~ 2 A N O ~ v o.RN n0 rn !'I rn. ~ o rnrn
O ~ ~ to ~ ~ ~ a ti„d~ ~W 1C ~1 n~ ~ ~ R, o r ~`1D ~ ~r
I U ~ r A „I rV 1] ti..UO r ~ n~ 02. cnr z 2~ N A J O t0 U Zi -r NON m ~v r
o u ~ ~ ~ S m W ~ (1 \ ~ \ b N V
~ ~ v~2 2 I ~ . ~ I ~ u L ~ O(J N ~M V~ m o ~ o a ~ ~
C A` r~ r N~ ~ alp t~ u ~ u ~m ~ I „ ~ ~ , m
'V W ~ v~ ~ ~(f ~ N UN a U + O o.,io ~ y ~p O y ~OOOOr1J~n~ 1 , ~o m- T ~ T~ SIN ~ oa m
0 2 ~ I U N co~r_,. S L229 ~ f o 2 ~1 r r ~ .r, .r. ro ' ` 4 4 Ri ~ ~ N N N N N i'".,
2`O°~ off" y •a2~n Wei tn~R^~~r~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ $ f I o?~~ U 4 C.i r--y D ~I SIC O ~ ~'1 lD O~ O C I - ~ Ili.. - r p ~cn~A ~r(a 2 r`~ O~ yO ,uOZ I O ~O~n~ ~ 'Pik, 0~' rn % £8ll ~ si'~n'~'~.~ ~S~ti N ~r r r: ~ 8~ ~ to _ 12 ~ s W i W N _ / ,
~ Cp^~ ~t~0 Op1~1v 2~ 1~1 ~[~O[ p1~202 ~ v ~ Nab r~ a ti r 0 2 2 O (b I ~ o ~ ~ 1~ ~ r'1 11 O ~ j'' r `r ~ 1r v N r i . ~ ~ t s i N 1?' C (i i~, ~ wa W 6l LB l7 Lg .~`'R W
~COR° p~0 N~1t1 ~C ~~p~A ~ 'P~, ~ Z9ll ti ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 2 0 = o yZ ~c, ~ u _ a p w~ 5 E ~ r~ w rn ~l~~il gln t116u,9 a 35.Ig~~ ~ s ~ ~ yl~t .>,,Yl ~5lll L121L 22' , --__R
~~~n° I I i~ D''2 1>C= nl'1 CZ~ ~>Jp01) 0 ~ ! l G ~ N u ~1 t s O ~ [ p y 191 ~ i # N o~ { v ~ v C2 ~p o ~ ~ l'1 ~ ~ ~ , L21 b r
Or~,~~ ~ U 1J n U 'CZ ~ r O ~0~1 ~ ~ / ~ all . Lw~' `f! v2
°a Nti~O I z~! I yr ~ ~,~n y~C ~ ' ~ uW~°i 'u~.q~ P v7 0~~ N~o cn w~ Q'00 w'~O ~I 1~ ~s ZI ~ z~,r 6L~1 , ZZ u~,w"'- 8 ~ ~ aA a ; p~ < o o ~ ~ N m F 1 l ~ W W ,D O 4 fy t0
° cD~~ ~bi , r ~ O ~ , ~ voi., ~vl GCn v 9tU `ti N T ~.ui'~ n a , I a i oozy ~ ~ ~a~ D 1 a ~ N +v'' nA D ~ b ~ 2 O ht ~ nl I ~ !'1 W ~J r~ r ~ ~ ~ $ gL~ ~ 2t ~ ~ M3N ' ~ ~ ~E ~C~1 r u f ~ Z ~ o
p~ 2 ~ Or O r ~ ~0 M j1° r' ~ c n ' U 2 C ~ r~ m ~ < ~ 3NI fTl 1nb~ 1J~ ~~y O 2 "n~~ r~ ~ N m~~ mC~ ~ ~4 ~ w 1 ~ ~ I r~ O2 r~~2 (8 ~ i a L LO ~ , ~ ~ 1~. u r"wI v 4 /'0$ ~ rnNy ~
Z q ~°c~ ww~ ~oob'~1 0 "~2~ ~ 10 ~a~ 202 ~ ~1~C40 ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0~ SUN
r20 wv~, ~rvl'1 11x2 ~2 ~ O ~ 2 ~ L~ ~ .L t ~ ~ rl r~~ a~ ~ b~ Ord O~ ~ ~ p~2 9 M g0g 200 ~'O~ v. C!o ~ ~ s~ ! ~ F D ~ 2 F N
m ~V~ ~ ~ 2 Oy ~y O O o v0 ~ 'C ~ 2i' ~ 22~ `w ~ y A •j~~ 7R tiO W O bfy ~ ~ ~ w / ~ • ~
~2~" ~ b~ n U1J11 ~ O ~1 C Ap wo0 \O 44 O• ~A ohs O ti ~ 0 ~ ~ rn~^~ ~ ~ ~ ~-•2 O R ~ p~v ~O ~ ~ 76 1 ~ p ~ N vJ ~ r v 2 2 lJ1 ~ cn
~ a ~ !rl n1 w r 'l~ ' ~ ,Owi A v 0 l~ O o ~1 rV rOZ ~ ~b O1)~ yRl ~ r Opt I ~O y4 O '1 (b C ~ v mq m~~ p ~O ~ wp L215 ~op~~A~
~~o ~ ' w I p z a 2 <s o ,1 w ~ tt~~~rZr ~ 22~ {a C Oyn ~~I S ~ i'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VP 2 Oils O ~2ti nt b ~O n~ 2 ~ ~ 2y I ~ < I ~ my 22~ $ Alb ~ no 7 , p ~ o~J 1 ~ ~ ~ F aN~ m.,2 66p v AVn On 2 A~ a7 o ^
O 2 1'1 y~ 1 O ~ al n1 2 ~ O ~ 7 2t r ~ 0 •~6 ~I~ h 2 tD `g p~' ~ ~ ~ L216 ~
m ~ w = ~ ~ ~o o ~ ~ tL ro~NO n0i n~ C ~ - rn o a ~ ~ ~ 't ~ , 0 ~ ~ A p f0fnn 2 ti 7a
'w w o ~ 20 ~ ~ p I ~1. = b V~ 172 21 ~V O t P2¢ ~ ~ ~A n6 t, vtir
2 o ~ ~ O 2 ll ~ p` ~ o G OL g ~ nn A ~ ~2 ~p $ o n ~ J e ~0~ a
`y l21) u o
p 0 ~ L169 ~ o, w pp nN ,2 tse87 ~u ~oZ$ ~ ~ az~ I 2~ w a~$ 2 o; l An ~ ~!N n E oyi a~ ~ 0 'J O
N ' L168 ~ m g'~ 6 < iP 1 U < s O b~i'\g6 B ~ Qo*t ~ ' 02 o N c r ~ 0 m o N ~ ~ X60 9V o aa='° . PNU N ~n vA~ao
0~ 86 p~ O ao- ~ N ~L~ ~~Ati
n ~ ~ L 161 r ~ ~ N ' 1 '4.~' ~6 O ~ ~ ~t$ r r ~ N W "L 9~ 1 2 ~ ~ r r ~ ~ tr o ~~1 a ~ ~ 2 ~ m ~ ..'oe a J ~ ~ n O. t ~ ~ 1 A ~ • 2 ?t J u a'~ ~4 pG'L S U RI „ ~ ~ '~J l gb ti o D tip ,L~,G ~ ~ a ~ c, 2 i
C ~ ~ o X166 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 4~ 4~1 r 2 ~ r ~ £l S41 ~ v$ N C v~yroi _ ~ ,ti~~ ~ rr„ ,^am''D
a~ ~ ~ 01rnN~ £ 3 0191.9 L g~ N NA• O1 ~ 3 • ~,~t~~~
Z a ~ SL 64 6Cl u 1J ~ ^ 9l1 ~ l1l iw p~0~~ ',p4~s;r V,ro AVI ;;~;1,, , ~I~~ Rl, 1 ~ ~ fir'
~ ~ ~ A v ~ ~ ~ Z 91.90 S Z4 _ ~ r~~a $ N ~ ~ ~ C1 ~ A 49'64£ 3 •0.. $ ? ~ ~ ~ m b~~U~ ~N~ ~A t r,~ ?
2~ ~ 0 N V 9 Sol 44 I £4l ~ r ~ ~ np yo ~ r~0 20a ~ ~ 2 y T' 2. ~ m rov A a a~ a ~ODq N~o ~N NI; 5 0 ~ o,~ y, ~
Z 2 ~ i-~ O~ ~ ~g~" NJ ~ onN oa w `0 g0 ,per r ~
~ rn~ ~ ~ ~0~ n U A O A (N ~ ~ ~ ~r N a4 u •ti 'Op t vJZ
n~ ^ m s O ti ~ ~ ` a ton 0 O G V+,'', _ t1i I~ oho ~ lZ G~ o
O ti ~ j~~b ~ ~ 'C n : ~ ,o ~ O • in o s ~ a~
I-~ ~l v^~ til.'i .n ~ J ~ N a n~ uo ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ O r= Q v~r1 p . n ~a t2 rn ~ ~NA "N o A ~ I M N ` T
' ~I ~ ~ \OZ a N v _o ='N 2 ri 4
' ~ O rn~Ofa 'o
C ~ a ~ ~ o ~ 2 O ~ o Q~ O w O ti N I p T 716.81' e s ~ x
= O U 0 O 9 yy ~ ~ ~ ` 6666 ~ ~oo 4 ~~5 00'08 46 W 1800.26 1DA3.45'
~C ~ ~ i o
y H ~ ~ ~ n~~+~ ~ tJ n ? 2 ~ ? n~~`~1 ~ 1
_ rq s ~~`•c~ 9 O y 2 ~ c,
C ~ ~ ~4 6
~ 064068 ~ 168 ? '^~t~.'v
~ ~ ~ ~Od 9 , r , ,
F y ~ w ~ o`~ Z C1 ° ~ ~ 0 O v ? f) O V . ~ M„'
O um
a. ~ u o 112!1 n I r r gi ~ n O ~ ti II ~ r c„~;i, ; 1
n, 2 m m K+JJ~j U ~ ONa V) ^ 'V ~ a ? _Yu~' • ~J a 00 , A p
C ~ ~ V A N
Z ~ ~ - d ~ 1, 0 2 2 I~ , x
~1 ~ N1 ~ S ~ ~r1'w + 4 0 ~ ? yilq ` J 0 U c, ~ w
_J V W • U . lV~~ III II~ GS, Q ~-U ~ W- I
i 1 a ~n 1p L Zi I ~ 4 S F ?7~4' N1Nr^N OJL+`J J N
~ ~j! ~ o 0 ~i' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ `D U ~
m \ O ~ N .N O~
o p
mu,, N Vz ~ ~ ~
P a 1 a oooooo~ J~+N • JC Of GIAwN~.~
w J N ~.s
X41
Ott 04 a+ ~ ;o~ i~"~ ~N.. ~ Z'C ~ ~ NNc"noon, 'u
y~ O v~tioWrnO 1~ ~ ~ ~ UiO~iUir\i(>ir rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~rrr bbbbbbbb~tbGRfWWNtri 00 (AV V V V V V'~ ~ rrrrrrrrrr rr rrrrr VO1U,AwN~ObWVp,(nAwN••ObOIVO,UA 1vVVO,vtgOfO,O,plp~p~plGG~(AGGUUrrrrrrrrrrrrr~rrrrrrrr r r!~ \
Cry ~ I SS ~g01~.bQn ' O wIV~ObC~VpJCO{.wN-. ulu,AA.pAAAAAAAwwwwwwwwww~~~G~~,G~NG~,~~~~~~~~~~rrrrrrrrr2 ObWVA(nAwNvObCOV~(>1AwN~Ob(~Vpx(n{~wN~OblDVrnxG+.wN~ObCbVO~UAwN~O ~'1
~ 'J ~ ~ ~ w U(ntill~eU~ 222222~n~n~nv,cn~n222222222~n~nv,cnv,cn b~VrnNawN~ wwN~aa,cocacacacncac~wc~wmwceoo~mcowco~omca~wco2~cncn~~cnN~~y~cn~~'222222v,cnv,~n~ncn~cn~ncnv,~,~,v,c~t~cncny~nc~c~v~
~ ~ ~ ~v1vN~b4~ wOyyNWlnwN~vwb~owwwN~tiwG~mA~;~„~,~yybrnbC„yw~ObOwOOAODICO ~,~~1VfVIIIViVIVIVIVI~VJV1~If~VIf~V1(~2(~l~ ~~V VO10jOjpjGO'Oip'v~~~~~~ovvooooeoooo~~-. n, UawO-:wawNN~aaUN~N~Nw#+:np~~ tNNO01NN~a0,VVCbWGb., VNtiwwwwwwwwwwNNNN~~•~.~..00000000(nGIQ 'vVNUN~~A~oubb~~GO~~a~cnrnc,~„tiu,bbbbcnaao,vrnNwcnwbvctu,Ab ~ wyowyyowrnc~b~oamaoyarvoeyo,arvcoo,wo~rvwaaNro
I O ti ~ 0000 I ~ UI y ~ ~ ~~.v0~0~ v ~h~ ~N ON UUUrO fSw(.id-:~a(1jd O0A~p ^j p(nO~AUiw~Al,i Gi ~j (,~U.p '(wArv40U4iUil.iAUiUi-: a ON~~UUIOtbWAA NO~Uiww~tiU0000UU0A"A'+'VOUAUUUA 4,NAOAbwOAbwCb N 4~iU~"U'00+.(.;(,; r~jA,; ~~i~~Ui Gi Ui 'f+'C.i 'A Gi ~jO^i (.i brnNbUOANNVNbNO~AwV, CbUwb (L NwOA?.A~j G~-:~
N v I R y Boa ~ I~,, c t t t e t x t x t x x QoVOwb~AOwbb UAAOwwwNAA ti`x0^i 1V ~:d V ObOAVC~Cbwbd.0 x t t t x t x x OWaON-.OQfnO,NV OO~i00UU-.OACnUAdw-•.p(nwU w'~' ""J x t x t x x t t e t e t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t~OV~VVVAO,O(bUb~~~NWA,. wwNANO~~iiO~i(li t~j Ui l~j (rip.: (N l~j t~j Ui Ui ^i FFF'~"~^~'~^~^,~11i1~ t t t t t t t t t t x t x bwAANrnwm~AWVU1`.wOONbi.~WwCbOO,VO~Cb~op~.ppJpw~
O O w o F. ~ av~acnw ~ "~I ~ w o ~ „Z omrnNCn F F F F F F g F F F$ z F F? F x x t t t t t t t t t t x x x t t t t t t t t t t t t t x t t t x t x t x x e2 FFFFFFEFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF~M~~~~,~mM~~^~~~~,~~MM~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~v,~vJM~,~mFFFFntFFo
b ~ owbo,~oins I ~ n ~ ~ row~Nrvb~ (nUAAN~GtnObap,"wN....N N N v,.VGOUNOO!ObOU 'AAJOAtOAAi^•wUw~Ati"., ,AUGGGAd`blV (n ,q AVlAIJr (nAAUA NA(nUOUI InAUUA(nU A-+ O
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ wN tnbb!obbb!oOVNGlncno,vNV!v0000!ob!o wUGGU##tn(n~n(n(na(natn.p[nUGGAA OIVO(A~.A~.V~,#AN(n V+.NGIVVi tb (L ~•A~V r VO~D!UOb00~0!o fab(b U~v00000!000!o00!ObO0000bc000b00~0 G~+UdwO(,~G~l UCD'•ln(•iOCbUwA~AUNp~•.~v0(rOOV(bOOiUaV~ti~NNNO~b~VpObi(VtI~AtVnOOV~VbwOU40~O~vCbcJ~c000'OU,V~N~ is O!00!000OOb~00~ObNW(.i0~
~ Ofvbd(~yp O~#tntnb" Cn0 lno~W~pVOVwIAVwO~l00~abwObNObrvb~.V0000bOpNppNbUVNO2 C I`rrr-rrI~rt~1~f~ wVUNwwbO, 'JVAgNNW(b `.WwU1 Ox U, 0>A(~ 2
Z ~ WNV~bO~ w~v~'Ub~V01~iVNi UNN~,>NNNwNNryrrrr rr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr wwwwNNNNNN~vNNN~v~iNN~iNNN.•.•-•.•.•~~ rrrrrrrrrr ~ wN~•Ob(bVq(nAwNNN~~~~~~~~bbbbbm(b(bp,@C~Q~~~~VVVVVVVVVVrnmp,p,~,p,p~p~~~~~u" ~~~v~~~~rrrr"rrrrrrvrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r ~I
O j ~ ~ • N"Ob~VQ, UI ~nwN AwN~ObQIV~rUAwN~OxOroVrnaAwN~ (1,U(71UUIUUAAAAAAAlaAd vv-.vvvv ~~rrrrr obwvmUAwN.,Obo,Vrncn++wN.,obwvrncnAwN~ wwwwc~wwwwwNNroNNNNNNN~~~~.,.,.,.,.,.,""" ~~rr2 ObCOVUUAwN.xObWVrn,(nawN~OIO OO VO, to +twN ~O ~~~OOi (Oi,A WN ~ObobO~
~ ww~oNVa~ y22~n22222 O ~ ti b.. ..a n22cn2222222tnv,vlyyy2hv1y22222222cncnyv,2v,~v,yyyv~y~y,~~,~~ Fj
' c ~ w~aaaw~ boaNg~,.~.. ~ ~ u,rooroob .YY ..Y ro u~G-~oowo ~NONg~,..... 2222tnc>tcnv~ycnv~cncncncnc>tHV~tncncnycnyv,yv,cncncnv,cnv,tnincnv,cncncncnhcntncn W ~u+~woaoo~cbo,~o~ctc~ro~c~q,roatacn~c~VVrnrnamcnarnmvmoaoo~~,c~aoooo '2222222 ^Owy-:OO4i0~~^'~`'V~VA~OfnILNw~ow'vtiwU~Ar~ybo~bw w~OJ00wW+. 0000~~-+Nti 2222222222
:C ~ v n y 40oCD4brvb(b~. v ~ i a.. Vi iv 4i .:~i~i0 w#OON~wwNNNNNA~NNwA:O-: y `~rn`bwNObAQ, G~~b~ NwwwwWwww(.~wN~vNv-.~~.~~0000000000000000~.~„~~N 22222222 ~OOCDwNNb(b~pdVwlrlOaNwwOwtbv~•bt~O~A~GONUOb~q.wggVONCGxJ(#il(O,~bV~Cna~oO,v.p"'{'wU~v("(n'A"NOO(nwAUOObb~GAOyANO~Dyo,ANbolwOvNwAa NrvNwwwwwwww •btUiiO~"v~iniO~A (~(.iniO~i.:(w~i~Vi~iUi~:(,iUGUO+:4i^i^iti~:UiUiUi~A d4i~i N U,O,blb4i.ADO,JVbUO#rvVNbNOOi~(G.xoUiOWU"A••_• w~v~OworncplvarnyboNayOamlbbbCbrn
I ~ ~ 222222 ;ems°vN..oo~.~ + r r r r r VN~oo.nNN,Q OUAUU(f,ANwOAAA x t x x t t t t t t t ~ ~~wO,UVCDvwbO(AwbAOwbUAONAAO A w ONW~^i~pNla•.00N J^'bVO,~"rnbOAVOp(bwbA ++~++AOwNAUCnUA(n0`~~A~.#OU ID t t r t t t ~ ONv04UO~~~ OOU(n-.p.p(riUiA OwwOAtowlbCpVAObO,v G0000 t t. t t x x x x t x t VrnO,VW~D~AO~OWUbNNNA-. w"AUi(.iUiGil.i~i+~nip-: `:t:O~iU~i(Ii~VUip`~li^i~i GVbw(n(brnwAO~Nb~ ~ t x t t t t t t t t t t t x x bwANgwp,ACbVU~.wOON'"~ACp Cbw400,V0i OOb(hAN NW~OUi ~i Ui ~i Ui ~ipA~: FFF "'F"~F ^~FF ~1~'1 ~i ~l hl~f~h11~11'l t~ x x t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t x x x t x t x AO,b (b 01V~041w~LWia cpNON#~ww UiwUA P
~ ~ N ~ 000000 ~ O mwcntin,v;~ n~cndwwn,o FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT~FFF"~~'i^~~t~,~1~r+~n~r~n~n~n~n,r,~rx~~~ x x x x~ x x t x t x t t x t x t x t x t x t x x x t x x x~w xG ;G#0jw2
b~rowom~ 'vGU wp+lL01w~ ~7~~~~~I'1~n1 ^i f+l ^~h1 nl R1~~~R1 x t t tO FFFT~,^,~~,FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF.TFFF.TF ,wUA~pxQpl(yVv4,w~•NAwIU~bAiV.NgU.AObAAAU,UA A
I~ o0i~N40g0 Oo,a?";A~bto01 r r r r r r~ VOOOOUOUioiO.AOiI 1qA. .p lb tp0 N0~0(xJv ObO~., qG•. 1p0 bOb00 [bV~~.GA eA1.A~AbN(>I (TiUGIUUUUUw A`~AAOAUaad.pp ~~aa O J~0"~OiO~AOI~p~•.0^1-.b(n Nd•. OVOigV(L!D~D~DO~•~VGx!v!vN~.OWAb~obObO!o~nbWCb,N~4OAa~t,#obb00(nUrUUGUUUUl1,UUUlN(tfUU(nUwAfadA
is~i~~~ ~1"OfOff >OOU~N"~1010bOVU(nVwV~VVO~'gbVOrvb~O OOibWbxOAlv.xpNcDtppp.pVbUrv ia-. OOOO~~~..x.... AAAAAAdAA~..p ~ VV~pwOU,W~vQt,Jmla'c1~If10ydOO~iUbfq~~ ~UGtip,~.,c~p~Gtn~vta(NNOInAW.,tvo,OCbwIrOUtiaCL OOOrnO~ob~ntp(b~bWtb~o~o,obwbAdAaAaaCn(nUlti J ~JVV Om~vOQ,~vAUOA00 VwCbOwgOIV,{tVOAAgAtnO ~ ~blLCblb(bb!oOp~.D
w"Vb~Vwm~a ~I~nlnU(hO~,mNw ONNAVON~(~,O.,o,AA 2 v nn,~~Nrn~~~~himm~,ac c . , vVwvro~ A w ~ n~~ nv~~ ,{nl~~l~`I`Il~fll
-
_..~..,s.,,,..,.,....r._._

1 ~
~ ~ ~1
r i
1
~I
i
i, ~ Off' i i
r
i I ~ / / I
i 1
' ~ I 1 ~ / i ~ i
~ 1 ~ ~ / ' I ~
~ j 1 I ,i i ~ ~ I i
/ ~ ! ~
i I t ~ ~ i l ~ s ~
/ ~ ~ 1 l ~ ~ ~ ~ f I ~ l i I
/ r i I i - ~ o i ~ i I
~ / i r ~ 9 o v
~ - ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ \ o ~
i / ~ j / i ~
~ i ~ ~ I
i ~ / ~ ~ l I ~ ~i l i ~ \ I
r i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ .1; \ ~ I
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ i j\
! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ \ ~
! J I' i ~ / / ~ ~ O 1 ~ 1 ' \ \ \ ~ \ - ~~J
~ ~ i / ~ i ~ ~ i ~ 1 / ~ / i ~ ~ I ~ .
i / i ~ j; `i j ~ ~
1 1 } 1 / i IM AST \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t. i / i~ % /
~ ~ % I ~ ~ / ~ J
~ ~ / ~ ~
~ ~ / ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i
l ~ ~ ~ !
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1

y ~
~ j
~ ~v
j 1 I I I
~ A ~ ~ ~ ~V i - _ ~ - ~
V ~ \ \ ~ t ~
' ~ ~ ~ C IT goo / ~ - - ~ \
~ ~
~ ~ ~ \
~ ~ ~ A
~-1 ~ ` ~ J ~ i ~ ~ ~s liter i ( ~ - l ~
~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i
1 t~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f j ~ \
1 ~ ~ ~ - ~ } ' 1 ` ' _ ~ I
~ 1 t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ \ i ! \ ~ ~ ~ ~
,1,, ~ , 1 ~ 1 ~
I ~ ~ i ~ \ \
, ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ ; ~
\ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ c___~ ~ ~ 'Tip, l~ ~ Ir / ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ C~
J I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 f i I , ~ ~ ~I
I r J ~ f t ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ % ~ i ~ ~ ~ e
/ ~ 1
i i ~ \ / - i /
i ~ / ~
~ ~ ~ i
J ~ / ~ i ~ ~ i ~ I 1 ~ , i ~ ~ ( ~
~ ~
~ ~ r ~ ~ i / i i
~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ i { i ~ ~
~ ~ ~
/ / ~ ~
~ ! ~ ~ ~
` , ; I I ~ / ~ I ~ .I r ~ / f i ~ i~ ~ i
~ / ~ i 0 ~ / ~ i I ~ ~ 1? i / i i ~ ~ i
/ i I
/ - ~ ! , , ` I ~ i / ~ ~ ~ ~ I / j- _
~ r i ~ ~ .0 i ~
~ i` 1 ~ \ ~ i 0 ~ ~
, / l ~ i i ~ O ~ i
~ C 1 i I/
i ~ ~ ~ l l l 1 _ J ~ i / ~ I ..y
~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ' i _ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ /
i / ~ j i ,
` i - ' ~ ~ ~ t i - ~
_J ~ r----~- i -
i ~ ~
/ ~
v I ~ / ~
~~i II I / i ' ~ I 1 /
'i ~ ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i -
~ -
~ ~ I I - / ~ ~ - - i ~
~ i / , i ~ ~ i ' ' ~ ~ j i l' ~E~.,,
~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I 1 ~ i I ii ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~
~ 1 l 1 ! i r I ~ I ~ 1 r
~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ i i
~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
I ~ ~ ~ i ~ C~l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ r ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ / ~
i ' i ~
r' ~ i , m
1 i ~ % ~ i i ~ f ~ / i u~
- ~ ~ ~ i i ~ , ~ /
/ 1 0 l
Il

Wd 90~95~Z b00Z~6~~ 'I~'I'uyV '6MPZlb4'~low~\sauawanoad~ul .4oMpoo~{~a~na~na~so~~u~ ~aaoMauoa, ZltiS~O\s~~a(o~~l SIIaS~,l~aioa~j~-
~ ~ ~ V 1 ' ~
• Z • ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ Q ~ ~N v
:W
ro ~ Q ~ V ~v t0 ~~~A ~ , ~ ~1\ ~
O N ;V ~ /~2 i ~ \ J ~ ~ \ \
~ ;I ~ ~ 1 \ ~I ~ ~ ~ 1 Z 8 / ~ ,
Z g0• I~ Z ~ ~ ~ 1
~ \ ~
s a~ v~A N o W 51 ~ ~ 1,
r W ~ ,o~ ~ U 1 Q~ ~ V Z ~ . ko ~
~ ~ / o°° W 112 ~ o0 1 \
~ ~ Q~ '0 ; V 6
W ~ , a ~ 2Z ~ ~ Q ~ 1N ~ V A ~ ~
~ Q 3 ~ 3142 ~1 ~o j ~
W „ / 9 I \ o , h 116.6 ; 1
r 1 1
~ ~n ~ /(1 i °'"av3H''b ~~~i ~ ,.i, ~ ~ .J ( r 1 r 0 ~
~ _ , 1 ~~a 1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ T~
~ r ~ ~n ~ ~ / ~ tea,. ~-.il---.--~.-- ~
,a i r~~ ~ a r ~ ~
r 1 / / r ~ ~ 1 - ~ ~ ~ t ~ ` ~ l _ i I i ~ f/ / a
- Z , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ { ~ ~ _ ~ ~ J f~ -
~ - ~ / ~ ~ V i ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~l ~ i ~ ~ ~i; ~ , _ ~ ~ t ~ ~ s^ i d~ ` ; : ' i ~ : ~ t_ ~ 1 J ~ 1 \l ~ i ~ \ ~ ~ , i I ~ ~ ~,_~~1
,1,, ~ , ~ , ~ : ~ , J l f ~ , , ~ J A7~.6 A ~ ~ Z
t , ~ \ V ~ ~ ~ I ~ l~,.... . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i , ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f
.l ~ - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ _~r~... ~ r A ~ ~
. - i i I_L ~ , ~ 1 , ~ > ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1 i,
~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ("r--\ ~ , ~ .;-,,y- ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~I
~r,- ~ ~ ~ i 1 I ~ ~ a I ~ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ i ~
'S~ ~ R1 i ~ i ~ 2 t i ~ ~ r ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ J i ~s ~ _ ; ; ~ 4 , ~ _ ' ~ ~ , I
, A ~ ~ ; ~ ) ~I r ~ \ ~ , \ ~ i \ ~ . \ ~ \ \i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ I i i~~, iii _ \r-" ~bt ~ ~ t ! 14
~ > > v ~ ~ \ A ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 'ti~_ -mar/ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ o A , , ~ , ~ ~ / ~ 1. , F / i ,I , / ~ - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
~ ~ . 1~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ A_ ~ v i / ~ ~ lt, ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~I I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f ~ , . i d . I p ~ ~ ~ .,.A ~ \ v ~ y/~, / o ~ 00'StF / ~ I A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ , A. , ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i V ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ S
~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ V r----'~ rya _ ~ /`i-`\ ~ A ~ f ~ ~ i ~ / ~ i i ~ \ , i ~ /ig / ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ w
_ , ~ I ~ ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q v, ~ ~ /i V ~ ,
~ ~ ~ f 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ . \ ~ \ l,~ - - _ , , / r ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ co o p , . ~ , l
• , A ~ ~ ~ i l S U N Q O ~ ~ i,~ Zp v-p ~ I ~ QaO~ N O ~I~ ~
~ \ a. , ~ : ~ ~ ~ , V r ~ t, ~ ~I v
A ~ ~ ~ ~ \ .---~-~--i W ~"~Q ~ ~ d ,i \ li~~ ( ~ N ow 3 ~ i
~ ~ ~ A ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ V ( i Q ~ i i
~ `---i ~ 1 ~ ~ !y ~ to 1 a ~ ~ o ~ ~
~ - - ~ ~ i p \ ~ / ~ A ~ ~ ~ 6 . V Q
~ ~ ~ir Q 1 ~ . l E l ~,_.1- V~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ Q~ ~
A ~ \ _ / r ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ i J l ~ ~ ` i i I
ti ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ - . ~ a / ~ ) ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ J ~ v AA ~ J ~ U ~ ~ ' I J ~ ~i ~i.l ~
t ~ ~ V i, ~ ~ ~J ~ ~ l\ I f ~ ~ ~ l I,,
~ t / ~ ~ l \
y / ~ 1 i , ;
i 1 ~ v
Q \ r' Z ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ . S / ~ -
Q ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ / ,
~ ~i1 ~ ~ ~ 1 / ~ / l
o ~ / ~ ~ 'I / / ~i i
o Q rrr ~ rr / '1 ~ ^ / r jd~~ ~
O I \ ~
~ Imo. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~l~ i'.,, ~ ~
. l ,o~+, ~,o,~~ ~ iii" ~ ~ ,
: Z ~ U ~ ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~
~Z~ Q~ ~ l
/ Q I ~ o, r T ~ ~ °~r ~ ~ ~ '1j, ~
/ ~ ' ~ ~N ~ ~ ~ ~ i ai ~ ~ I
~
~ r ~ n J... Q ~
bOJ~ ~ 0 ~3~

\ / / ~ ~ ( ~ _ I / / / r r +
I I ~v ~ I I ~ v v / / / , v v v, , v 1 vv v vv v I I / Ir / / I / / / / . v v ~ ~ j , \ ~ ~ ! ~ , 1 I I ~I ; I ~ III ' V 1 III ~ I I I 1 .,I ~ ~ ~ /
I ~ / ~ `C v/ ~ i I 1 S y / / / ~ V 1 1 / l 1 I r / J l 1 1 1 1 1 1 A\ v v ' ` ~ _ f I / I / ~ I I 1 ~ / ~ / \ \ i 1 / / / / 1 / / / l / / / 1 I J 1 I I \ / I I i N Cn
~ V i J ~ f / _ 11 / / ~ j y 1 f / / ~ O j / v 1 1 / / / / / / / /J / ,r / ~ I I I l ~~O 1 r / 11 ~ ~ / V A ~ ~ / / / V I / / / / / / , / / i' r / / / I I ) 1 I l / _ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ / / ~ / , 1 / / / / / , / / / / , / / / / v A-. / / IIII I I I~ ~ I I v J I III ( 1 11 1 A J l I J/ i t II 1 111 11 i
/ / / ~ / / / / { i I i l I / ~ _ y'' ~i ! I I 1111 I ~ II I 11 \ ~ N l
~ / ~ ~ / + to I J / / / A l 1 f / i - / , ~ ~ r ~ / / / i / • / /IIII 11111 111 1 A\ 1 W~~..1 \ 1 ~ ~ ~
' ' / I I II 1111 \ V AA\ \v A v N I N ~ ~ ' / / / / 1 ~ ~ '
~ ; - / ~ I / / / 1 l 11 VA V A ` ip ~ '
v I / , ~ - , I III v 1.; - .,v . , , ~ - - - _ \ 1 I I I 1/ 111A.~~ v v I - \ 1 ~ 1 1 V A AVA t 11 \a ~v v 1
v- V / ~ / / ~V A V ` ~ / I j I 1 ~vA ~ V VA\111 r,~„_ ~ ~`v \ 1 I \ v 1 A \ \ j I ~ V v \ vv A V 1 \V A ~ 1 V A \ ~ I 1v vv vv I ~ ~
. v/(l / / / I I f ! AV ~ ( \ \V A?~ , VAA? ~ ~ - "v~VAV AAA., ~///i ~ 1 A\ v A 1 / ~ V I
~ + \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ r. \ \ 1 vv A 1 1 v 1 1 1 1 A VA \ A \ V 1 ~ \ \ \ 1 1 I 1 \ \ \
\ / ( / / / ! III j / ~ \ ` / / \ \ \ \ _ \ \ ~ \ - v \ v I 1 v 1 I ~ Z \ \ ~ \ \ I 1 \ \ ~ \ \ Z ' \ \ \ \ , ~ ~ 1 t I I III 1 \ \ \ 1 1 I
/ r ~ \ v \ \ V / V A\ V A 1 1 I 1 \ 1 \ ~v v v v 1 1 I I I V A v~ v 1 1 1 v 1 Q~ vv v v vv v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A V v vv A 1 1 11 v v ~ `v
\ 1 I 11 \ \ 1 vV vv \1 I i l l 1 1 1V A V A\ v\ 1 1 1 1 ( I A v TN
\ i l 1 1 1 1 1 1\ 111 I ~ I I \I ~ j ' I~ ` \ 1 'I
~ v vv A I I I I 11 II II 1 1 11 1 V AI 1 ~ 1 1 j l 1 1 \ vv v ) I I t i t ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 J I f l 1 1 ` v ~ / / 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 v
\ \I 1 !i / % ! I I I I i I II i l( 1 7 1 1 1 ~v ~v \ 1 I / / / I I l l I l l I j I I 1 v \
1 1 i l( i /l ~ I I I I I 1 1 1 / l/ I j I( 1 \ \ I I j / / ; j I I i I/ / / 1 1 1 N 1 1 N
- ~ ___y_ _ A 1 I to 1 / / / 1 ~ v ~ • v I ( I / \ 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I l 1 1 / j 1 I \ \ ~ I / ~ Cn
I1_ _ J W ~ ! III ~ /I , / - / ~ ~ 1 { \ \ I I I I ~ / / i 11, / / / _ / / _ 1 I I 1 I I I ( ~ j l r 1 1 1 II ~ I 1 1 l/ / j /1 ~ U 11 ( d
I ~ I ~ ~ I I I j l 1 l l j II 1 1 l l l/ / / ( i 1 I I / .I~'r~
r / / 1 / ) I I (I f l I / _ - / / j III / l / ; \ ~ ! v vv
\ ~ ' ' / 1 / l I ( III 1 I I I 1 / / ~ _ ~ / III I / 1 , ~ l / ~ vv ! O / I ! ~ ~ v ( 1 / j 1 J r l l l I I / r/ I I J .
/ l l I l I r l 1 t l r~ _ l l l1 / l I ~ / ~ ~l l IIII 1111 II I - / / ; ~ , ° \
I 1 I II I I I I \ ; J I i , ~ / / ! I I I ~ _ ~ 1
` \ t I ~ I I \ \ \ t I l I ! _ \Z 1 / ~ / 1 I p,\\ IIII I / i l ~v ~ } 1, ~ ~ I V A v i v A 1 ~ r ;~v A v v v? I , , 1 1 V ! I I I f/ j--,__ / /
~ I \v 1V t I I l l V 1 v \ \ v v V A ~ / vv - `vim / / 1 / / A tv~ !1 I I I I I I / ' ~ / ( I ` vV `v v V I~ I! V A A\ V v v v A / v _ L / ~ r-~____,.' / I/ i t fvv~ 1 1 4 IIII 1 1 / III { I I 1 ( / - / I 1 / 1 / / r' / / 1 / l l I 1 I 1 1 / I / - ~i j I r i',/ / r/ _ v ~ V 1
v. A V V Av A ``v 1 Il I I \V A A \ v A A V A V r -^v v? A\ ~v,~~ l /1 / r l A - I 111 11 IIII} ( ' / I
\ \ } \ \ II I I \ \ \ O \ \ \O \ 1 \ ~ ~ 1 1 1 / / \ \ j I 1 1 1 I \ \ ll 1 ~ vv A I l y \V f ~ ~ li vv v A v vv V A V A \ l ~ v vv vv ~ \ 1 ~ ~ , ( \ I vv I I 5 1 Al 1 \ lV / - ^ / / / / / r I \
~y v A 1 I I 1 11 I ~ \ 1 1~ A A A V A V v vv vvv W 1 A ! I I r \ I I l \ 1 11 I ^~-.°--.`S- `J / I I 1 1 11 1 / / / r /mar ter-` \ \ \ \ f 1 \ ~ I 1 \ III / / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ , 1
v v v I v t ~ ~ II / I i ~ 1\ V A l\ v\_ v~ ~ ~ I\ V A ~ / I V I ~ V A l ~ A v A 1 I 1 1 } \ V A\" \ v ? / ~ v v v v y l I } v v 1 1 von ~v . v 1 1 J 1 I I I
\ vv ~ ` v v ~ I I I / / v I } v 1 ` v vv ~ v v , ~v - vvv ~ r l 1 1 1 1 III } 1 I ~ \ \ \ 1~ ~ ~ / / / I I / / I } ~ \ 1 \ \ I ~ /I \I \ \\1 \ / 11 I 1 11 I } }I} \ t lr~` _ 1 - \
v v V A A i a / I / / / / I ~ V A AI I /-vA AEI ~vv ~I,Q~'~r,,,(~ ( 1 VA v ~ I ~ I I I ~ II 11 \ 1 1 1 11\1( r I/l I / P'~ / 11 / \ \ \ 1\ `
~ ~ V v vV vv v v } ~ / l / / 1 \ v 1 I II 1 I I \1 1 I / / / / / / / i I I 1 1 v V vv ~ _ vr'`~ ~ r l VA A\ ~ / I I I 1 I1 1 1A VA \~^-i \ 1A ~ r-r 1 1 1 / / r' I I l v A V ~ V v v ~ v V v vv A 111\ ~ r// 11 r / r - v/ ! / / / /rr ~~00 \ \ \ \ \ \ \
I ~ ~ 1 1 r / / I 1 f \ / ? - -_QS vQ.- / - \ / I I I III 1 ~ I \ \.y I G li I / i ~ / ! 1 } l / / \ \ \ \ \ - / / ~ / I I III \ \ \ I ,a I 1, I ~ I I / / / / / } 1 I r~ ?
^ 1 I I ! I I I / / / / / r / I I 1 I \ ~U'''~ ~G1 / 1 11 \ \ \ / / _ /I 1 I 1 \ A ~ l \ \ - ' I ) I ~ I i II ~ / / / I I III vv _rt r'' n I V A A \ 1 i / , - / 1 I 1 l S V A
/ / I I ~ v ' - ,-c r III ~ ~ / J / I I I } I r / , I I I 1 \ 1 \h~ 1 1 1 1 / i--- / , li / / / , I / v ~ v v v
N--' I / I 1 _ _ i i % I ~ / I ter' ' ter' .r ~ j' O / l i I i^- v~ ` _ _ - ~j------_- / ~ / III 1 1 - l f rl 1 I (I IIII I I 1 III / y / 'r,/~,/!! / / / r' ~\O \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ l l l i I I / / l l - l / ' / / - A v v v v v v ~ V A
, + / I I / l /i ,r r/ r~ r , ~ r/ / i I ~ ~ - ' ~ / / I I / 1 ~ ~ / f I I / 1( `11
+ i I 1 I l l ( ~ / r'~ - r l r _ ~ ' _ _ / / ! I 1 r _ / _ , / l I ( III + / ! / ! 111 / / ~ti / / I / / / / / , / ~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \
` ~ / / I I i I I ! I (I 1 ( J / _ ~ _W / I ~ I \v~ / l / :l IIII { + ~ / , j 111 J ! , ~ i I l ( I l ~ l ~ " ~ ~ ~ O vv v \ A \ ~ ~ vv vV v A vv v 1 1 ~l
1 ~ I I 1 1 I t i V / r / i' rr ~ - _ TJ'-..__ A rr I I I /"vim l / / / l I rll 1 - _ ~ - ~ - - _ % / Iji! 11 1 I I i I I I ll l / / ~ ~ ~ \ 1 V A \ vv vv v ~v ~ vv v A \ vv v 1 / / I I / ~ / / / / / r'r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
• ~ ~ ~ / / / J I I I I/ I~ / -,vim I} I I f l! 1 / j l / vV 1 1 1 1 \ v v vv ~ vv `v v\ v V vv 1 1 1 f/ ~~-v ' v ~~'vt 1 1 I I I I I 1 / l / l r'~ ~ vV A I I l ~1 V \V A v A AV v AV ~ A AV A \ V .I 1
/ j / / v I J / / / / I I t 1 ~ / ) I v~ \ \ ~ A A A 1 I ~ ( i v 1 1 I I I ( t / / _ v 1 1 1\- v 1
/ \i 1/ 11 ~ l l\ 1 1 I I J i / / / ~ A i l 1 1 i i A ~v v ~v v v, 1 1 1 1 I I I / / / \ 1 \ I i / / / ,i//i/ I jll / v~ v\ 1 1 I ( 1 I / / l / v I l 1 v 1 v` v 1 1 1; .i /1 ~ ~ /
\ I ~ ~ _ ~ \ \ NO 12'3~0O l2-`37,E 1 1 / !'r r i \ \ ! f \ i t / \
v~ ~v 111111 I / ~ \ 1 1 '1 i I I / / j / \V I I I I A I ~ ~i / / i ~ ~ - 'i'ce ~v~vv111 I / / - ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 I I I / /l / ~ O V 1 1 j 1 11 ~ ~ ter. s ~}_.~r-vJ_._.--s--- -1---~- - -
y~ i ~ I I I ~ A ~ AI ` I A - ~ O 1 V A\ \V A\V AV A ~A A\ ? ` ~ ,r'' / / / / / ii
1 I / I V A i ~,r / / / ~ / i' ¦
.v v v ~n 1 f a v V I j I / ~ v I I i / / I I I v v / / / 1, v I I ~ ~ I o> I I i 1 / / \ 1 I / ) ' 1 I I ) ) 1 r y v 0> / / / , ,9~a~ v v \ IiI { / v,,,- J i I I I { I / / - - _ ~ ) J I I / -s-? / /
/ / l \ \ \ i'- / / 1 / r ~ i ~ ,1 I t`\ 11 I I I I ! r I f ~ , / ~ - / / / / W / / ( I \ \ . ~ . -J / / f 1 / / r . S, 'r-- vv v A\ V III 1 ! `v l i I I I / / / r ,-"i _ ``v i I I I l r' / I ~ v I I / / I I I 1 r / / ~ ~ - v 1 / / I 1922159 E /
r~ i'~-~` A V ~ t v--~-/ I I f I I / / / ~k ~ ''i ~ f / I I~ ~ j ~ l / 1 l /l ! ~21' / ~ I
(CYO v v V A I 1 1 l I I I V / ,r 1 1 1 1// l / 1 / ~ I/ ~ I Q ~ V A 1 1 1 ! I I I A ~ r / r'r ~ / l l ( / ~ / / / / / / / . b N /
j i I ~ `v A I l l 1 1 r~ _ r' ! / / / / ' , ~ - I rr / ~ / , r,. r' /mar \ \ \ ~ I I I I J 1 \ / r`-^" ~ / r.r rr/ / % l / / / % / / , j ~ x
r ~ V v 1 A / / / ~ / ~ /
~ / 1 \ ? / / / / / ~ \ \ \ ~GJ i'-'_..-.-- r/ r~ ~ ~ I ! - Ili / _-„!r - \ I 1 } / 1 / / /r ,/W Wes. \ J / \ \ ~ / I / r r'r~ ~ vv AV I I I I ~ I / ~ / I 1 _ ,I r / l/ / ~ / i ~ \ \ \ 1 I j I , /r r/ / /mar, _ ! / / / I I ~ ~ ~ ~ / / i / / i
C i, V ~v V A ~ i V I l ( \ } 1 v ~ 1 / l / : i-' ~i' I I O ~ \ v/~ r~ - \ . A ~ I J / / r / I l r / i AO /
\ \ I \ \ \ - ~ _r / f ~ / / / _ \ / - ~ / r \ I / ~ ! 1 `1`~ _ ~ \ v I / l //J `\~r / ' / ~ r'/ I 1 / 1\ \ 1 11\\ l ( r-' ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ARLIH
~ ~ I\1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Z 1 ~ ~ \A11! II 1 / / - 1 I I I / J r' -
y v v A I l v ~ 1 _ I r v v ~ 1 / v I ~1 V A V 1 1 1 1 \ v, l__- - j 1 I l _ ' 1 1 1 1 I r / / ~ v '~v ~ / 1\ 1 v A 1 A I I I I I I I I v ) I I l -.v ~ v~/' - \ A V I I ! / ' - ~ / 1 r \ ? / / / \ 1 1 1 / .V ` v ~ v - V A 1 I I 1 f 0~ 1 1 I J I I ) v__ v ` r'-- r / / / / _ Ar 11 I / ``v v 1 1 \ } ; I I 1 / , / r/-
to' 1 1/ l I I `V v~ v v _ A\ ~ I f I I A l / /Jr I l l L~ I Is'/'`-~ \ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I/ % / ~ / \ \ ~ \v / / / / ! /
\ \ \ \ I I 11 f \ ~ 1 I I / / / / / / .r''~ ~ 1 \ \ I I I 1 1 I } ( I / /
1 \ \ 1 ti~ 1 l l{ 1 ~ ~ I I I / i ~ I I l l//~i / o ~ ~ \ ( I I 1 f l J 1 1 I I I f / / ! \ \ \ \ I 1 l \ _ t f / \ / / , \ 1 ~ _ 1 I I I I I I ! I I 1 I I / / ~ v 1 l t I -.-v
` \ \ - \ a 1 1 1 1 1 1\ \ \ ? I I / , ~ 1 1 I( r / / / i ~vl - ? \ 1 I I III( I I I I I r / / \ - ~ A V Av 1 1 1 V t V , ~ v ~ ~ - v I I I / A 1 1 f l~/~. / / /v - A \ 1 I (1 L.i ~ I I I I I / / ~ ~ 1..\ ~ ~i i/ / / l \ I\\\~ 1 r 1 ~ Its\_,.._ . J \ \ / I (
~ _ vv \V A 1~ ~ 1 y 1 1 ~v v / I i / / / V A 1 1 I / / ~ / - ~ \ 1 I 1 / I I I I / /
- \ \ \ \ \~4 I 1 \ 0 \ ~ N 1 / / 1 \ ~ 1 V v Y \ I I 1 \ \ \ O V 1 ! / //Ji//'--., \ 1 I I I ~ / / / ,~1~r I ?v ` \ l I I II / 1 I ! ~ / / \ ` \ ~ \ \ ~r \ \ 1 I / / / / \ l I I l I / / ~ l! \ _ \ \ \ 1 I 1 1 I I I / /
- \ V A t v v A \ v v~o V v vv ~ 1 1( I`_-'~, j/ 1V I! 1 1 ~ ~ / /r N-~ V 1 /I ?v vv A l 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l r( v \ \ A A \ V A A A v I / A A 1 1 / / O- 11 A V A 1 I I r te/ i^~ l! I / \ I ~ v v V 1 1 \ A I -~'1 I 1 / / I l / / \ / / r \ \ \ \ ~ v ~
_ vy A 1 1 A •I A \~V ` v vv vV ~ `v A 1 t 1 ?v AA114 I / \ v V V 11 ( I I I ' ~ i l1 / ! l l % I / r \ / / / / / \ \ \ ~
1 v ~ I v/ ~ v / J I / / / 11 /I ! / ~ ~ ! L -~,(rl~~_ (b ~ W
\ 1 I \ \ / \ ,Pry ~ I I I I / / /
I 1 } 1 I I I I ~ AA? v ? vV A V A A? A,__.' / v Av v / r vI ? I I 1 1 I I I I I , , / / / / /Cnl ,,r /1 rr \ \
I I} I AV A I l t I w V ~ yV v v v A \ W \ v \ i / v vv ~ v 1 I I l 1 1 I 11~/ / / O/
I I i 1 \ y 1 I ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ O ` 1 r'~ \ / ''Tn1 \ 1 I I S 1 1 I } / / ~ / r' I I 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 ' A 1~V A A A V v 1 / v? - O V A \ I 1~ 1 I / / 1 1 / \ / j 1 , x err !1 i'r/ W '
I \ / ~ / / ,r N N \ ~ ,W
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A A I )A AV A .p V A\ \ / ~ ` - } 1 1 1 v~~?vvv 1,/ , / J 1
! / / / \ / 1 / / / / /
/ / I J - ~ ~
V A \ V A } ~ \ V V / / ~ / 6/ / / I /
t~, I , / - w y /i'r / ~ V I l / ~ ~ ~N
1 \ \ \ \ I \ \ I \ ~ \ \ \ '------"'mil ~ I - O " \ \ I r 1 \ \ / / / , %
I / I ~ II / d /
I / r \I l \ \ I 1\`I F \y \ \ ~ \ \ I I L,-_ 1 I \I Il/' % r'/ I ( I 11 %
I 1 v ~ A l I J l /i \ ~ J ~ I I / ~.---''-~V 1\ I ~ / Ij ~l , ' ~
1 I II t / / I l 1 I ` v ` ~i vv A Al 1 A I 1 11 I 1 1 1'/ ' \ 'i'/ G~i / W 1 \ I I j/ /
r 1 / . / / / v / V A / ~ / \ W + , ! l / % ' d . 1 ~ ' _~P_--"'~J 1 \I \ I 1 j ~ I 11 1 I % / , A r/, / p
~ 1 I r / / ~ •/J.J.r,l I ~ i/ ~ _n~'i 1 I I I I I/ I I I / / / / / /
i / I / / 1~.~, / / 1 II ~ ~'I '`O* v r,>r~7 I I I I I I A ~ I ! ? . / / i'~ l Ir /1 ~ I ~ / I ~ ~ A ~ I x ~ j I I I ~ t A\ I 1 I / ~ ' / ~ , 4z / - , r - ,
i ( I f l Il / ( Yw'' I l ~~`~y `v x ~ , ~ ~ ! I I I I 1 1 I I f /J / - ter'' / r a ,fir /
% I I I ! / / / / 2 I / ~ 'rr - T`... Gl I I I I I I I I ~ ~ / % ~ ,r' I ~ I / / ! 1 / / ~ (rl y (jJi~ I I l I 1 J I / , / ~ ~r (iv ~ r' ter-' t+v ter'
/ II / / I / / / ! I / ~ \ 1 O _ ~ / ! l j l % l fir' / r / / I~ I ~r
l / 1 f I ; / ~ II 1 r "5~~i';, •~"'~."'h"\'t.a`-'i I - N-_ / l i'/~/ ''.i /i'~ ,/r' . / / I / it I /r\ / / ~ \ ( \ k / ~ / r / / ' ? / ~i J/ / r o
I ! r 1 r,~ ~ 1 ? - W - ' / / '~'~l ---fig' , 1 I I 1 ~ / w v I _ _ _ ~ w / / / / / / ti6 y -~,r , ;r- 6 q~
- ~ I I I I I r I / / ~ ~ /f r.,;,,-' V A I I ~W"-a _ \ 1~`~~`"'4~t J---- - \ l % i '/li/'~~ ''/',i~~ /,',r- ~ , _~i
( i I I I O / II / / ~ ! I 1 '~`~w.~„ 1 I /1 ,,,~~I ~ I ° _a__-.. l I /J ~ /i// ~ : I I I I 11 I r Il ~ I j O ~ ( I / ~~~r,. ~`v 11 I / ~ i ~ ~s~-
I I I I f I f ( ll , 1 I ~ r. - - .L_ \ 1 I I / 1 t I / I I I I I I r I I / 6 6- J
1 I I I ! '1 11 I J ~ - / _ v) I I f l l A 1 1 1 I/ 1 I I 'f \ - I 1 \ 1 v? / I I } I ~ 1 I ~ I j ~ v~ ' _ ~ xrs^~"'~`'~a''- _ j ~ -_;r~` - I I I \ V 1 \ I 1 _
~
V 1 1 I 1 11 r' to j f'-- - ,r~a'^'e` / v v A 1 / ,p ? 1 l 1 V 1 1 ~ >a~ / . p 6 .
1 f s I I 1~ • ~ / v1 I I I / / 'w v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
v V` / 1 J l l l Do - I / A I 1 1 1 1 I I I \ v + } I III V / / ~ ,r' _ ~d?--/,'_'~ I A } \ V A , I I I 0~~ 0 ~ ~ ~J
+
' 's~ ~1l ~s ~ . ~
v / / l f , / /J l ~ ~ V l ~ / ' _ A A \ \ V vv v ti sos ° z 9o,a~ ~ l O 1/
f
1 / ~ ~ ~ I~~/! / / I A Iv ~ \\v~~ A i ~ ~ V / ~z~r ~
/ / / ~ t N / 4 / J w~ \ ~ ~ ~
/ i ~ ~l ~ ~ x / ~ v_ ~ A \ _ . ~ ~ s~
11 tip. ~ ~a
~ .,J o°' _ ~
~ , . ~
~ ~
.~f' "S9 ~Zx9 V A ~ w~ ~ ~ o ti~
~o
~ ,
\ tR215A. ~ M:•k. i~.4. w..N .~_.._.1.1~...-~~~.. _ r..__
its\0341 ~tonewofe~ Irfra ructure\Ro I 12. dm 4 A v~ h V \3 4 el, 21111200 8~ 22 . 9 h1 . -

i / 1 ~ i ~
I I f I I / I 1 IV 1 I ~ j / ~-v A Av 1 I C I / r } ~ A V v i I / - i , 1 vv / tl f l vv ~ \ ~'1 I j I i! ~ j l~ i v, A 1vvA v v V A v
~ l ~ f ( / 1 \ \ ~ I 1 + ~ / ' / i ' v V 1 i ) 1 1 iA ~ _ , \ ~ \ / / ~ / / / 1 I I I I I 1 I f0.. `I `I ~V t v \ ~ I ~ ' ~ I i I I I I II I I i ;I ~ N (Ti
' :1~'. ~ I ~ t I - / I ~ ~ ~ / V i. ~ / / / l I / / / / I / / l I I 1 l i A A \ ni ~ II ~ ~ ~I / , A 1 \ ~ / / ! / O i //-vv 1 1 / / / / / / / ~ 1 f/rr fr ~ ~ l f I I I 1 1 1 1 Al vI vv / / v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I i i1 `O ~ ~
/ t A l \ \ / 1 / ~ 1 1 I / / / r' / / / ' r/ /rr ~r r ' / i / l 1 i ~ / `1 / / / / / W \ I 1 / / / / / r i' r ~//r r' r r' / r I / f l 1 1 1 A 1-`~ IIII I V I I III 1 \ ~ 1 1 1 I ~ J i l ~ I I I l III 111 II ~'~1
rr 0 ! ~ i ~ / ~ ~ ~ 1 \ / / / / / .P / / r r /r r r / r r / r / / / / I / / / / / ! t i IIII it ~ N ? / 1 11 \
! lJ I / ~ I~ / ~ / 1 \ \ ~ / l ~ i I ~ / f/ % / / //rrr' rr r f/ / r' / rr rf / / / \ ' ! / \ \ / / / / r r r / r r r r / r r / / / ~ ~ A / i 1 r ~ 1 / / / I I \ ( / \ ~ \ \ / / I l I l ~ I I / /r rf/ / r rrr rrrir rr r r rrr / 1 ~ l GI>~ I I l / / ~ ~ A ~ v / l / I i / /r / / rrr r r r ~r / / / i ~ l ~ ~ / / \ ~ V A / ' l l I l rrr rrr rr r~.~ ~ / / / r / / r ' / / / ' ~ / / I 1111 11 \ \ ~ ~ '
r ~ I / 1 \ / / 1 / i l / i rrr rrr rr r, - r r'~ r - i 1 I / 1, r /~r r r r'~~--- r / f r rte". ' / r'~~ _ / / / I I L 1111 1 N 1 cn / -__•i/ / I 111111 11111 ~1\ \v N I v.,~ N ~ ~ - - ' I ! } 111 11 \ \ \ ~ I ~ ~ ~
1 Ii I ~ ly- ~ V A •V A. V v~-,."// l l I ~ 1 / / /I ~ ~ 'r rr / ~ r ~ ,ir..-^ r / / rr-_~._-.-~ _
~ J ; r ~ ! ~ 1 A ~v v v ~ v / / ~ l / / l / , ~ i'/'r r r f.,~ ~vl- ~_.-''ter / / k / J / / / / 1 1111 Av vv ~
/ / ~ ~ 1 / I I / / / 111 ~ \ }
/ ! ~ ~ ~ i / \ / / i J i \ \ ~ 1~\\\ \ 1~\ / //rrr r.~.- ~ ~ l ! 11 / r ~ i / i \ \ \ / I \ \ \ ~ \ , 1\ \ \ / _ I \ \ \ ~ \ / ~ v 1\ 1 \ V 1 1 1 / I 1 \ 1
I / ~ v \ ~ v / / 1 V A Vv ~ A A\ v v v ~ - / r ~ / ( 1, / v ~ v v ~ A \ / r / _ \ \ \ ~ i 111\ \\\t ~ \ \ l ~ ~
~ f ! I ~iI / / ~ ~W \ \ rf r/ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ~r''~ r/ - ~ ~ ~ ~ % ( II~ V ~f b+(h ~V A v A tom' v ~ V v\\V A v VA A\v\ \V AA ~,.r~rrrr'r~ `w vv vv A 1 v ~ \I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1AvA.~~v ~ A\ 1 f ~ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 ~ \ \ f ~ Z
~ / I i i ~ G \ v / _ vv A A AV A VA V A~ v A AV A / r ` vv v V 't l l l l I l l V v v 1 1 \ I
_ 1 I I / ~ \ v ~ i v v v A V A V\ V v ~ V v A / rrr i~ V v 1 1 1 1 1 V A 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\ 1 1 \ 1 Q r v v vv v ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 V A vv 1~\ I I \ v~ ~ V A
/ \ 1 11 1 \ I ~ 1 vv v v1 \I 1 1 1 1 11 11 Il 1 V 1v vv v\ } 1 ~ 1 I I A N
` I I ' "v v v ~ i I / ~ / I } 1 V v v v _ v v v v rrr v r= V vv 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 \ v v 1 111 I II I I 11 v I I I I i i II 1 1 1 1 v vI 1 1 I I i 1 11 1 1 A r a
- ~'`vv v ~ I I r ~ I 1 1 i II ~ I I I II ll I III 111 `v
/ A 4 \ 1 W / / / / \ ~ ~ v\ v V ~ v ~ ~ \ _ / / Y~ 1 / / J / I V v v v v ~~v ~v ~ l % i i l l l i t I i i j l l l 1 1 I 1 1 `v vv \ } I/ / / / I I I I I I J I r /l I i 1 1 1 \ \
a - / ~ - - / \ \ - W - - / / ! I r / / r / J \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 / _ _ y v 1 1 I I/ / l 1 f l l l I I I l 1 1 I i l! 1 \ 1 ~ 1 I I ~ I l i / / /f ~ ~ I I l f l / ll l I I ~ I 1 cn
I / \ 1 I ~ ! I cn \ vI 11 I I I~ 1 / - ~ l l l~ X 1 1 1 ~ l/ / j /l ~ it I v, 1V p
i _ ~ - I I I j I I f 1 / l! I ll I l l / / 1 r v
/ i r / r r! \ r' i / r' I I I / I I _ r / / I i i / I ! I l / .I~ I I 1 1 01 ! I I l l l/ I f 11/ f ! 1// ~v ` v
r / / / / / _
1 ' ` \ ~ ' / /l I 1 / 7 I I l IIII 1 ' - ~ / l ! i I I / l / ` v~ ' / / I l / ~ 1 I ~ I l Ili /j ~ / ll lI I 1
/ / , - / / / IIII I' , , c - - : / / / / / ~ I / \ 1 - / / I / / / /
I / _ / \ 1 / ~ r - \ / I r/ ~ - !rte \ l r l _ / / ,r - < - _ _ " 1 / / / r / / / 1 1 1 1 I / / it N / / ~ _ ~ v
I \ ~ r ~ v v I - I rY
I I V t ' i / l l/ / / III 1 / / / ~ / % / ' ~ - - \ "l1 lIl / / I I ~
r i 1 I~ A V A t I / vZ v / / ~ 1 I I I I I I rr I i .!d /
1. v 1 I I I I I ~ A\ vv ~V v v v Ay i ~ / `vvv vvv ~ vV / T / l % / / A\ P~ v I I I I II 1 i I r \ ~ ! ~ \ I II I I \ \ \ \ \ \ i \ \ ~ / L i i / j 1 (l I I I I l I I I _ \ / i 1 I i I I 1 J /I J~ / 1 ''j / / / v v `v w 1 1~ !
v v A \ i II I I A V A\ v v A V A A r v v ~n v / / / r 1 1 lv~v I I ill / ' ~v v v .v t II I I V A v~ vv b y v~ v W v I _v ` v~~ / _ I I t v vv I I I l l l I - _ --..i / I I 111\1 \ \ l ~ r / / / ~ ~i~i i~ I I
\ l 11 I V \ 1 A V A rr v \ V `I n r/ J A 1 ti \V 11 1 V A \ VA I--- v j I 1 } III III 1 \ 1 1 A V A V A A A r `vv v . v vv Gl ~ r W \ 1V A} i I I i A 1 1 1 1 A ~ 1 A l/ , , \ \ III / ~ , , , • 1 1 1
v v v I \ ~ I / ~ I I ~ 1 1 i\ V A" V 1 ,-v v ~ r ~ \ V A ~ / / I V 1 V 1 1 I i I^~ ~ 'v ` } v ~v v v I I I I I\ 1 1} V v v v v v v 1' V v\~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ v v v~ C"__--______---' i ll l / 11 1 v A V I i I _ I \ 1 t ~ J I I i III I / / / / / ' \ \ \ \ ` \ 1 \ ` \ I 1 I \ / ~ 1 1 ! I I I / / / ~ r r / / / / \ \ \ \ ~ \ 1 \ \ \ \ O
\ \ \ ~ ~ I 1 ~ / 1 i I I I 11 \ \ \ \ \ ~ _ \ ~ ` ~ - \ \ \ \ ~1``-- _-r ( 1 1 1 1 r _ _ / 1 I 1 1 ~ \ \ I ~ / / I I I 1 \ \ 1 \ ~ \ I \ \a'~ v` \ I \ \ \1 t, - / I 1 I 1 L 1 v. ~V ~ \ \ I / ~ I I ~ / I i 1 v v °~`v A .r. ~ ~ ~ / 1 A V1 V I V I I I I i I II 1 ( , 1 111 1 1 r` ~ j / l l ///Ill I I ! l / \ \ \ \ ` \ \
V v A V A ~ 1 ° / 1 i / 1 1} I /vvv\ v ~ V vvv I I VAv vV~ I r-- ~ I I I I t i t \ll y A ~ ~ ~ / / / I I ~ V v v v r~ ~ / VA AV / ~ / i I iI 1 1A IA 1 V 1 11 / / / / / - I I I / ~ - \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ ~I I ~ / / / ~ / I I } 1 1 1 \ \ ~ r vt3_ ,-_r/ / \ / _ I I I I 1 1 11 \
- ~ vvvv 1 1 ~ ~ !I / ~ / / 11 } 1 1 t vA / A .v v~ - / V A 1~ v ~ ~ / ~ - / I I I I 1 1 1A + i ~ r ~ / l \ v - _ A . _ I ~ ~ j I y II I I 'I II '1 / / / / / / r/ 1 1 II } t \ Av v~ vvv - ~ ~~-~-bW - ~_..r/ 1 1 A A 1\ 1 ~v / / _ / / I } 1\ 1 ~ ~ 1
- ~ , , , ~ I i , ~I ; ~ rrr , . r I I , ; A r.• , , , , V ; , , 1 I , 1 1 1
s' - _ / ? i ~ Il / II ~ ~I ~ i ~ / / rr rr° r / I l I ~ A~ ~`v, ~ ~ / I } 1 I } ~ vV v~ 1 / /r-~ ~ I I I I I _ v. 1 v . I/ 1 1 _ - ' - i / l (I i I IJ r r/, ~ " r ~ r/ 'r 'r~--._'' ~ I I I ~ V / A 1 { 1 ~ ~ ,-r Il - ----'s 11 ~ I i ! r ~ i ! / ! I r' -rrr/ / rrr' r'" % ' / f I I I h\ / / i I / / I I I { I 1 111\ / / / / / / / / / ~'`.O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \
- / ~ / i ~ / - - . _ _ _ / r' ter'/r Y p i ! I i <4-~----_____ ~ j III I ``~~,-l 1 - r/ 1 I I I / 1 1 IIII I / / I 1 - I ~ / / / , / \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ / 1 ! I I I III/ 1 / J ! I I / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \
r - r' i / / / I / / / / ' / I h ~ _ _„r/ ~ I i I i ~v I l ~rJ l I i I j / I I'll { / A I I / / / / /i'- ~ , , / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/ / d j _ i 1 / ( ! I j I / r/ it / r.- - - / / I i / \ / I - l 1 r/ / / / ~'i / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / l 1 / ! III '~ti / / ~ I / / / / % / ' / ~ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `l' 1. it 1 / l , t I f 1 I / / / / / ~ / / \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ ' 1
/ ~ I i 1 I i ( ~ / r _ / 1 __..W ~w rr ~ / / I I I vv / / ..___._.-.._-...-~r / / i I ) ~ i l I l l j / / "rrr' r r.~-'~¦ ' ~ - - v_. - rr/ I I I l-V rr l! / / / /l - / l l 1 r l ~ I / / / / ~ O \ \ t \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ 1
y ' I I l ' 1 / i I i I ( rr \ / r / r .r- - - ~ r r I ~ ..'r l ~ / / - II i f / ~ A A V V vv ( f' \ - - ~,~~~___i/r r /1 i I rr 1 err / / ~ ` / ~ { 1111 I I //'.-.v.`'~ I I I I I/ f !l l / / j ~ i ~ \ 1 1 1 \ \v A \ vv vv v ~v ~ vv vV v Av Vvv v I / / / 1 I , v / / / / _ v A \ V~ ~ v A 1
i I I / r- / /Il III / / v~I I I I I I I I l / / v A A S 1 A v\ V vv v v v v\ v v v I / 1/ /~_v ~'"-`~v 'vJ 1 1 I I I I 1 ! l / / / ~ _ vv A I i l 'i \ 1\ v `V vv v v A A V A } v .I 1
1 - 1 I I I I i V ~ A V ~ ~ v v ~ - ~ ~ \ ~ r ~ i I rr / _ _ / / 1 / / / I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ t } \ A I - i /i I I I I/~ v~ 11 I I I I 1 I l I l / - v\ I 1 1 1 1 1 A v ` `v v` 1 1 1 '1 I ' i 1
35/~ I I I ~ ~ ~ \ -rr ~L /l l / J'rr ~r r%//i /i//i/ ~ r'". I l (1 / v~ v 1 1 1 I I 1 ! 1 / l ' ` 1 I 1 1 Av 1 V ` v 1 ) ,%r:~ % / l ~I ~ ~
i/,~~ ,a,A 11 / ~ 11 } 1 I I / / / / 1 A I 1 1 v v A 1 / / /r --`~r,._ v vv III f 11 1 1 ( I I / / 1 I 1 I A / / / / ~ , < ~
l / ~ I V \ \ \ Av V v A ~ A ~ \ V A ~ A V _V I l 11 V A A \ \ \ Wvv vv vv vv ~v v vV AV A't AA \V• AV BO.O~r ~~.J~.3rr / l G / / '~r~
\ \ I ~ \ l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r" / / / / I ~~~\\111 I i I / I I / / / / / l / / , ,-~i.~ y \
\ / ~ I ~ \ \ r - r' i \ - \ 2 \ I / I / / / / / ~ - - -
v I I ~ i I m \ I i l % / r V 1 / / 1 ! I ) I 1 P \ v Of " ~ / / / / r . ~ x ~ V I / / rr' l / ~ / i / l ) l \ V A 'A r' / / / / / ~ ` rr / r~~r'~ -c35`a' \ \ \ 1 I i / ~ 1 f I I I I /i / / / / ~ - ~ 1 / J I I -a... / / CC\ \ \ \ I I / I I I I / / / / ~ y-''S ,-'J I I I 1 / l
~ L ~l ~ I i I I' ! I i I / / /Yr r _ ~ / ~ / / / /rW /l % / l I \ VA "V rr / / r'~? rl) / /r~ ¦f r' ~i ~ I ~ ~ / t / / / / /ti _ r/ / / / r / / / I 1 1 1 v vvO UI rr / ~ r I / / ,,r rr r, \ \ 1 I I I r 1 I I III / t, / \ } l N9?2 59 E , (
i ~ ~ ~ ( I 1 / ~ i / ! f ~ / / / / / ~r rr r / J / --_Y. .SfS' f/ / / .r--'-''~ II / r r'' r I v ,y ~.1_ ~ . ~ ~ I ~ r ~ / i I - - - r / / r s r / A A _ r' / / / ( ( r / rr i''~ ~ ! J l I I I I ~ / I / i ~'-`v v V A I y / I I I / / / ~ %'i I ~ 7 1 ~ 1 / / / 1 / / / l ~2 i / ~ v A \ l I I I I I / / / / .r _ / I / l l / / / / /l J ,N I
/ 0 -.S~ i \ / r r - ~ I r/ r t / / ~ v / _ / ' r (0~'' v v AV A 1 1 / I I 1 1 / ~ - 1 l / ) / l / / / l l 1 / ~ /N 1 ~i O / v V A 1 I I 1 ` / I ( I A ~ r / i~ / l l I / 1 { / l / / / l / . '4 /
rJ II 1 , - r' t~~ ~ 1~ ~ '11 / / I _ + _ i r ' / / / / / Y'~ r r ? -v ' I l / ~ y..r r r ij I \ _v, A~ I / I i I ~ ~ i r--~r - rr _ r / / / / '/r r' yr _ _ r l/ I / rr - rr / rr ~ \ \ ~ I 1\ i / l I / ~
f ~
i ~ V ( I / I V A \vvv r ~ / / ~ r' - r ~A / I 1 / / fr /r rr ~ vv v \ I / / I / / I ~V wv` /r ~ ~Y r I ~•i'~`v~ / ~ A~ J r~ vV 11 / / l ~ -ter / rr r,
! i \ \ / / i ~ \ \ \ r ~W r' _ - ~ r r / l / \ 1 r I J r' / r r ~ ~1 V / J / b ) vv v'" 'ir' ~ ~r9 1/l / / _ v 1 11 / rr / r
~ ~ v ~\~VA I ~ I / / (/~j~~'~ / it I A A\ .CR .•---'r rr// f ~ I - r.~ ti\ / r' - _ A AVAIL / ' \v v v r it i I I I V t ~ 1 ~ - - I rr / / r' >~i'' I i ~ ~ \ v/ / r A \ (I / r/ / , ~ ~ \ \ 1 / / / , ~i ..~i ~ f I I I/ / / / a+Fy WW1 / / ~ ~ A ~ v v / / / / / , ' r' f / l /mar , _ ~ / / / ~nGV hR r~~
v ~ / S ~\V iII\~I~ v v ~ A v v v _l- i irr' '~v d 1 / / V1 r'~~ vv 1 A i I / / /r - ~ I V A \ `v A VA\vvv ~r ~ ~aZ4~ t Al 1 / V, . A l Ii / / / / i"~ vV A A ( I / / / 'i/ 1 1 ~ I 1 1 11111 \ ( r-' i RIP • i
~ 11~A ~ I ~ v v v v v v v ov vvv v vv ~ Z A Vv\IIII / - \v y.A 1 III f / / / r 1- \ 1 ~ V A V A 1 1 V A V A v ~ I ,r- r.. I A / I i - 1 11 1 I / / /
v ~ v 1, ~ ~ V y ~ A I ~ 1 t A v v •.A---_`% -r \ I i / - / '`v A 1 1 i I i / / / ~ A . ~ I } 1 I L v ~ \ ~ 1 it// / .v wV~/ - - v A 1 I I / / ' r'
y V A A ,1 I 0 1 I I I I I I 1// / r AV i ~ A I I i / / / / A v 1~ 1 ~ I i I 00 1 I l f ` v v rte-' -~I 1/ 1/ / / / A/ 1 Vl v A 1 A 1 ~ I i / / vv vv ~V ~ I I k ' I i I / / ~ ! vv A AV r r.-' ---~y/ I l / f/ r' ,v A 1 ~ rf'-- V 1 I S \I I l I ~ / ff ; i / / / / W \ \ / l / / ii' - ~ \ / 1 \ ~
_ A I I 1 l.~ r 1 I ! / - _ \ v I I , I / I _ A 1 / 1 / / ~ / ~ i /rr l I I I I I I I ! / /
I f J! `V - ~ 1 1 I// r/ r r ~ / r .r._ ..v 1 i I I I I I I 1 1 11 / / . v A\ VA` 1 1 1 } \ I l I/-~ v--- - i 1/ / ~ - 1 1 1 l ~ fr O I _ ~ \ I I i I/! I I I I f I/
~ \ ~ \v V`, y } 1 I v _v l / it ) /I! r' r / r ` ~i _ I I I 1 I I I I / A ~ - _ \ i, \ \ V I 1 A 11 1 I 1V~ 1v / v~ - 1 ! 11~/ ~ vV I I ! ~r mar/ j ~ ter' A I 1 v 1 IV I I I I ~ I f~-_.J I I I I I I i/
.v A ~ \Iv 1 1 1 1 \ ~ \ ~ ~ i 1 / - ~ t f IIA/r' / r''~' rv ~ v \ I ~ I I I I~r / I 11 I I i J
vv A A v A 1 A i ~ ~ v \ ~ v f / A l I I / / / `v ~ i /r"~____--~ v V A I I l l/ 1 I I I I / _ 1 \ / 1 1 / / ~ \ I / o ~ 1~C v 1 / ~ A / / \v v V 1 t/ _ 1 f
_ _ v 1 A v r 1 ! I I \ \ V ~v O 1 1// r////r V A 1 V/ r/ / ~ V _v v \ 1 1 1 I iI f/ ~ I I I I / v v ~ v I A ~i~~V v v v V i 1.,~/ I I 11 ~ „ram 1/ I Q vv A I I I I I r'^ l i I ''v A t V A~ V A v V A v I I ~,/r/ / 1 1 l I I i / / N.~ 1J A \ 1 A I I 1 / 1 1 1
v, ~ 1 I I A I \ A l vv \ V ` \ I V r; r ,r - vv V 1 A I I/ / A A V \ A I I I I 1_ i j l 1/ \ \ \ ^1
/ ~ \ ~
1 l 1 A i Q AA \ v \ v A A A 1 / r - V A A I! ~ / l \ i \ ~ ~ ~ V v \ 1 v / r' \ v / / / / / I I ~ / _ / / /
v ~ A ! 1 A 'VA VA \ v A A I I \ / \ Vv~- / r,--- r A / ~v } I I ill / ~ r/ l / / 1V I 1 A I \V A v vv `v I I v v / vV A v - / ,1 ~..'~vv/---. \ 1 \ j (i I I I I Ir/~ / r ~ / j / 1 ~ 1 1 I V A V V A / r' r' V V / \ I / / r / / ~ / /
~ i! i 1 I i I I I .1 vv v v\ \ V A Av A~-.' / r/~ v A\ vv ~ /r / r I v I I 1 1 I I I I / / rr / I I V 11 1 A v ,v I W V A v / r v v rr r' ~ vV 1 I I l I I I Imo/ / ~rr / ~ ~ / / fed /CJt / ~ \ ' Z
I 1 I \ I 1 1 I w \ \ \ \ \ / / rte., \ ~ / _r~l _ - I 1 I I / / / / I I I ~ 1 f V V v v \ V~ V vV 1- / rr v v / '"`.Trl ~~v \ 1 I 1 1 1 1 l A / / r'~~ _ r % / / / \
I I I ~ ~ A \ ~A \ v \ A \ v V - / / A vv r`/ r'~r (d----- \ \V I 1 I 1 1 I I ~ i r I .I I I 1 ~ 11 A i \ V'~) A A V A v V / / vv v - O A \ I I \ 11 f 1 1 - ~r/ ' ///j / i 1 : J i/~ (p to
1 1 1 1 \1 A 1 1 1V A 1~ A ~\V A A \ rr 1 I I \ I ((v/ 1 /f~ r'~~ r.~ / I / N ti W i 1 \ \ ~ / /
I i 1 A V~ V A A ^v ~ O A 1 rr vv 1 i A 1 \ }1 I r r r' ~ / V A V ~ \ ~ ~V V A V V ~ % - . ~ ~v V 1 \ 1 f / ~ I \ 4//r rr rr/ r/ / ' / / / l / ~ " v 1 ' ~ 1 ~ I ~1 / t
~ _ \ \ 1 \ I / / I 1 / / rr / 1 `i A v \v AV 1 V ~ V V V V Av rr/ /rte A \ \ V I l / / I / / r / - ~ ~ rr / /
/ ) /
t\ \ V vV v\ V A) A ~ V V A \V A /i , v A A\ \A I /r ~ ~ j / ~ ,r' rte' mar/ I i \ \ \ l 1 R. \ \ \ \ \ \ I !I// V I~ \ I\ / 'rJ 'rte / / / I ~ W i L/ /
/i' 1 ~ 11 I /
\ v \ V 1 I A w\~ 1, ~ \ V V rrr / ``v ~ vV A I (I r' v I `r / / r i / / I ~ I / I / I I I /
\ ~ / r \ / I I \ V A~ ~ I ,l ~ V A v / ~V A\ \ I I 1 1 I Irr ~ / rrr /r ~v I II ~ 1 O / ' ! /
f l v v / ,r ,v \ v • 1 / / / ' / ~ \ I J ~ / ~ 1 I f / ! /
1 I i ! / / 1 \ / I I I I \ ,r rrr r~~ - - \ \ \ \ \ 1 I l ~ rr j / /
'I I i ~ / J i l I i ! ~ r rr \ AV V A\ \ \ } I I A A~fr rr I r~// W I! 1 / / j i 1 I a r'' r v A V A A A 1 1 11} r / ~ / /f W W 1 A I I I / ~ / / CN V \ ~ If l I/
~ M r ( I l / ~ / I ) J~ \ r.----___ --°-4--'~~ .~--Lr (N \ I I I 11 I / I S 7 } i % ~ /r / r/ / My / / / 04
~ ~ i 1 / / / ' r I I I ~ ,a-~ ~ W ~ / r--N 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 I / / / / < rr ~ I / 1 j' I S/ A_--' ~ v I I I I I I A I I/ ,,r .r . / r ~r r , / , ti z~ - - ~ ~z /
l ~ l % l , I r~ .x-a "
J / i l ~ /~'~i., I ~ ` y"f ~ ~ ~ x ~ 1~_-- I j I 1 I \1 A 1 I i / % r' rr 1 I 1 ! / 1 ~ W I I t / r r'~ / ~f. / i~ W// ~i
! ~ ~ ! I l / / ii l ~ l ~ W / I i ~ I i I i vr- / r % ~/r rr" 'G1 ice' / /
l / 1 I I / i ( V Q _ / 11 / / l ~ r r ` - z
~ i / V~ r ~ ter", ~ -~"'4:,~. _ / N- r/ / ( r r/ / v.."` r r / / / /'rrr l I / r r fSJ i I O II ~,a- .r,.mv~ ~ '1wt, A _ l i C ~ rr / / / / / o
I ~ ! i ~ I Y ~ !l ! ~ ~ `„¦,`-p,r \ 1 v:,~.,v:.\ 1V ~ r ~v_~~-.'.~' ¦ rrr r / ~ ~ r~i'-' r ` - ~ ~
I I I i ~ ~ r I rrr \ ~ "ti:q J _ 1 l / r / / . i ~ I iI 1 / i / I i 1 , .,r~ '"~:;,~~a, ~ I I / '"n• „~r I I D-_ .r.--- err /r'r _ 1 ( / q ~
I I I O r l Ii fI I, O r l / j / / / .._.._._n----- I l ! ~''r 'rr''-' ~Sa I I I I I I 11 i I ~ ~ l ' / _ - -ti_ _ - vv I I I / / / 1 ' r"~~ ' ~ '~o - ~ J
I _ r r.~=' _ / I I I I I I I 'I /I JI i t / r ~ ' 4;;•~' ~-~''~._._---,--r'te'--"~ ~ v I I I f( 11 1~ I I / 6 , 11
1 1 I I I ~ 1 I I I 1 V 1 A ~ ! i I I ~ I l ~ ~ ~ v _ / ¦,,,,b,.;,,~x' _ - % ~ w ~ _ } 1\ Ii I 1 v A \ 1 A\ 1 Al - \1 ,11~ ,
,y- 1 i A \ I ' lF=zv k r - "an ~di ~ - r~ 1=--..- ~ 'v I / v i 1 v 1 1 1 1 ~1 ~ 5
I I 1 A A ~ i ~ r' ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - - = . ,p.~.~ / / / v 1 / v 1 I 1 I I I V 1 1 ~ / I I A 1 i ; ~ Ct - ~ -r'/ r -'f t / .'ri' / / \V 1 I / ~ I W / ~V A 1 1 1 A I i 1 I ~ >a / . p 6 .
~ A', / I I Al I f I ~ l ( " _i ~ r r .`r'.-/// /i~\ I 1 I 1 1 x ~ ( \ }1 I 1 11 11 ~ v/ i V I t i ~ 0 ~ .n.e.;. - I r / - -r'r. / A } 1 I A I I I • ~ 0~• 0~~
l 1 x0 i ,-Ci / ~ ,r W / 1 I 1 t I i I ~ \ ~ ( I I li 'i 1 ~A / "~.~-`g'"~. 1 ~ r- ~ ~ (at-~ .rr r•-~ l \1 1} Ii 1 V AV i 1 I ~ ~ _ - ( I I ~ j ~ ;~.""`Y' ' Ul d' . - / ~ i\ ~ r r,~ .r.. ~ Q~ r A \ \ 1 \ V 1 1 0
~ n i ~V I I I I I ~l / i ~f~'' D -c / k~~y' ~ \ \V A\ \ V A\ vv w Jl 'ti L6 6
V "d / I l / 1f aryl! r'~ i % f r'~//r ~ /',~'rr, - ___.__.~r'w\ \ \ A\ ?v Av vv v V ~ l rI / ~ r A\ \ V A
~ / / \ \ / i /i l~ I I /~,c2~ iV l / / r' \ V A V A ~ 60S ~ . Z O,Z~~ y 0 a9 r
I l / 41 ~ ~ll~-li/ i{ Ii / ~ r~~~'~/ % /r ~ N
z, ' a ~r ~ .
l / ~~I it r I N / l ,A \ i
I. ~id ~ i r , . 1 ~ ¦ / ~ P/r1
~v K r/
0 "1 0 I E,
1~44 /0000
;roh w~ 5 o
~0
Sore o'.e ~c'.~re\Ro ue T h \ \z4'2.dw el, 2111120 8:2249 AV
, a

vV. ~ ~ V v WV 6b ~ZZ'~E ~OZ~II~~ '~,a~ ~~~Zi7~~l -As~4 a>t~~~w~~~. o~~a~ a,u~ aa;oMa?c;~~ ~1b~0 sl~afc~~ ~ a~ ;~afc,~v
~ ~ ~ ~~i~
r \ \ ~ / / '
, ~ ~1/ ~
• , v , ~ p ~a _ _ -
0~ ~ ~ ~Z~ ~ f ~ / /
h~ a 5 ~'h
~ a~ ~ \ f ~ ~`a.~ ~ i~ ; k ~ y ~ ~ ,
~J E
FF6 ~ ~ ~ 2QU4 .pp g~ h \ v w ~ : ~ i /
pp~~ 1~ , / z I / /
l~'J 1 ~ ,
°E 2~ \ \ u~ I
~I~^`V ~ ~ !
V / M 1 '1206. ~2p. ! \ \ \ \ \ i'/ / l l l i'/ l i ~ 1 f 1
Sp9 \ ~ ~ 97' ~ / \
49' 1 ! ~ 1
f~ Illy I , 0 , I i I 1 A 1 } 1 { 1V ~ ~ r''~,~'~,~''' _ `,i / ~ J +;~w' ~ .;;~,'i ;y~r"' 0 J i~ I 1 ~ I A ~ ~ !v} 1
1 t .p~ ~ 1 1 1 } 1 1 \ \ / / I t / , / s,'
I 1 \ ~9 0 \ r 1 \ 1
\ I \ \ \ \ 1 ) \ I 1 ~ 1 1 1 11 ~ / I -~i , r.`'~ _ - - +,.^.cs_7-~' i _ / lV ( it I I I I I I
_--~Y' w I/ i l ~ A , O 1 I' U I I 11 I i I f
c / I ' 'r„--, i~ ~ ~_•,.O.r--... 1 , / I / ~"U'E.~ / I ~ l ~`r`~„ ,r,,,•^+. ^ 1 ~ I I ~ r d I I I I i----° , I lv I I ,0.'r" ..,E 1 I l I l~ I I ! I / I
' / i r. / / / / - /J~
/,1 . / r / / / / _ iJ ~ 1 1 r / / / / / 29 \ ,A ~ ( / ~v, / I l` 1 r l
~ , / l / 1 I /i - / ~ / / / / - / i ~'w'w,;, I I ~ I / / I , / I
J - ~In- ~ / I r / I / / r O v / ~ / l ~ I I y 1 1 1 / ~ - A r f l / / / I 1 ~ 1
, - j l l ~ I 11 1~ ~ M ~ - i 1 ~F 1 1 l I l f ~ I
. ~ ~,,/''~_,.%,r'~ rte,' /i ~ rr rr I I y y 1 1 I I I I ~ ~ K r ~ rk l / l/ I~ I !
/ / / / I ~ 1 I ~ ~ / ! Il
' 1 ~ . / / i'rr / / f / I n ! / / r/ " / / / / / 1 i I I ~ 1 I i I A 1 N--' ~ rn ~ - ~ I I. . ~ / / 1 I / ~
.
~p I J t~ I l ~ ///r / r/ ' 1
J ! I } ~ / ~l / / ' ' 1
/ 1 / J ~ / 1
1 ~ v \ / ~ A l 1 ~v
/ 1 vim,,, 111 A v ~ v V A v ~ M,v A 1 v \ v v V 1 I "III v V~ ~'v p- v V A 11 v A 1v A vv v v~ ` V }
' / / / 1 / , ~ A Av \`~~1/l I vV A vV A ~ ~ vV A V A vII A AI A Av v A it / 1 V V v ~ i ~ \ 1 ~ V 1
% yam' / ! l A A \ - - ~ \ \ S~' p to V A A\ vV A A ~ \ ~ _ / ! I V 1 V - _ / A 1~ v A A \ \ 1
/ y l\ ! l l l V V AV v~ / \ V A \ ~ 1 ~ \ V A ~v \ \ V 1 1
I / r~ , I 1 / / „r r / \ t \ \ I v , A O ~ V A ~ A V I l i
/ I
/ 1 / l l \ 1 i ~ _ ~ / \ \ \ ~ \ } 1 I
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~1--'~' , / A ~ ~ / v v p V 1 vvv v \ ~ r l 11 j A AV I} I} }
^y y I I I y \ ~ J~~ / \ ~ ~ / \ \ 1 \ \ I I t I i } } 1 I I I ( I I 1 1 I 1 v ~ 'V vv A v~ A V A V 1 v v v vAV I 1 I \ V} I 1
_ _ / .'tv r''~ ~ / / / / I I I I I I v I ~ v v v ~ ~ v V A v v v v vv / I I V ' ~ i 1 l l I l l\ I 1 v`-' v v ~ ~ \ 1 v v v ~ ~ I A I v v y A v
III I 1 7 1 1 1 v v A v / ~ - \ I l v v v A v A \ y\ 1 A I y I ! I 1 1 A ~ / / / ^vv V A v _r/ / ~v 1 1 1 Av v v v vv AA ~ II 1V 1 1 ; A v..
~W \ (V % / / / / / / ' III I I pp \ \ ,y / i / / 11 11 / / J I ~ I I 1 III I 1 1 1 \ / / / / A A \ \ / 1 f V 1 v ~ v v A~ ~ V A } 1 ~ I I i t i 1 V / A ~ / _ A V 1\ ~~~"V I } V A v V v A\ r~v~, A I V A l 1 ~ I -
tl, ~ ' ' \ \ \ \ ~ ~ _ ~ I J 1 I I I 1 \ v \ 1 1 l1 "ZV / 1 l l 1 j ) I I v v A ~~v v V A V A V A} v A.
y t \ v I 1 Jt~ / / / 4 1 1 1 \ l l \ O A v 1 1 1 v v 1 v
I v v r . r v v v / 1 r ~ ~ 1. v v v
I! I v v v v / / I I I I / 1 1 v ---v I l i 1 11 vv~~`_~ v\Vv1 J lI l i _ ~ / / I I I I I I I /'I I I } 1 1 1 A\ v/ 1 1 I ~ I I I / / ~ / 1 1 1 I I I/ 1 1 1 I I I I I A V A\ ~ ^ / i/ i/ f ~ I V ~ ~ /n l I ~ ` _ A v~. A A AV 1\ \ ~1 A - v~ w I - 1 ~
/ -------ter,-/ I I j i/1 J ~ / /r r' % lJ I I I I I ( J / J I I ~ I 1\ / / / - ~ \ ~ / ! I I I 1 ~ I i
I O ( I ~i ( I ~ //j/' ~i /i-~~vv ~ ~ / J I I I ll 1 1 1/ I j I I1 \v,
/ i
1 / \ / ~ I _,~~r-,--- lam. \\\Y ( / ( t j I Op0 I I 1 ~ ~ \ , \ \ \ v / 111 \ ~ / / ( • - ` ` Ql v l I I I I I I I V A v ~ \ ~ / ~ v ~ V
\ \ \ ,ter , / , l r l / \ \ \ i / / / 1 I I \ 1 t \ ~ v I v__r ~ / / l f ~ v / / I 1 1 \ / v~~_ / III ;.:~/___•'"-1 y ~ I~j ~ v A~ A \ } l \ y I A V r \ 1 'v A_d v y "v
\ III ll\ _ 2_ \ \ , \ I \11 ~ \ \
/ \ / / ~ / l I v r ~ \ \
Opl N011Y / / r' / 1 l J / / r' / / / / / 1 J \ \ . / / r , J ¦ \
_ ~ ...'i /A / ~i' /,-gyp ~..a \~AA ( 4'~ i l / ~ / / ~ ~ ~ AV y I
/ q / ~ / % / / / / / _ ' % 1 I I 1 / / I 1 ' i I I I ~ \ \ ~ r I / J Il I I 1 / / / / / /'r ~ / / / I ~ / \ l / I I I ~ \ \ / ~ / / III
, l / / / I / / / 'ter / ~ / I I I \ \ \ / / r ~ / / J I 1
/ / / / ?r / " ~ / J / / ~ l / _ l \ \ / / ~ / / / / 1 / / l l J / / / / / \ I I I % I I I t \ r'' O ' / J J /r
/ N " / 1 / / / / / / / 1 I / / / ,r /I~O~'3 ~ 1 1 I I I / r 1 I t I \ \ \ \ /,,r r' / I 1 l_,,/ / ~ /
/ . / ~ / / / / / ~ / ~ / , ~ i I i I ~ I / , I IIII \ ,99(S / J , / / ~ / .ln ~ vv 1 I\ I l j / i h~ ~ % / ~s// ~ ~ I f I! I ~ ~ i ~ i I ~ \ V
I / \ 7~''`~~/ / `T / / / I I I 1 / J III 1 \ \ \ \ / I I' / / / ` 1 j .3„65j~~~ t / l I I ' I l\ ----i'~-' / i~r2 ~ J I ~ I I I J / / IIII \ \ rr'fr / ~ / / / ~ v v I ! ! t l / 11 / I ~ / / ~ i I i A ~ i I ~ x ~ ~v 4 i
l / --f- / I I ~ ~ ~ ~ r \ , ~ /////rr ~ / J I I I I ) 1 _ III I AV v Av r r / / / / / , ~ v i1 1 \ \ 1 I / I I / A v
i I 2 v v v v v v I / o v ~ ~ ~v 1 ~ I I / ~-r~ , ~ \ \ \ \ \ I ~
~1 / ~ £'9'l -'x'0'09 ~ ~ ~ ~ y v ~ I I 1 /
r\ \ - -1-- , r' , / ~ / ) l ! 1 J r / / / I 1 1 1 I 1 ? / I 111 ~ ~w''~ ~ ~ . T~i~
- \ ~ ~ > , / ~1 I 1 I 1 l I tr)`- / / / ( I I 1 \ ~ ~ / J 11 _ /x.f-'~ / 1 / ~ .a.. , y r I v v v I , / / 1 J J I I I} I I `v _ , rr 11~ v:' r~/%' _ J 1/ r ~ r
i ~ /''/,•/i' ' ~ } ~ 1 \ 1 11 I 1\ % 1 ~ t 1 f I I } 1 \ \ r--~„ JJJ J I -r• l l V 1 / / I } 1 } ` ~ - l 1 / / / r'' 1J I/ / ' / 1 ~ ( J I I { f V v Av A l 1 1 1 1 I V ~ / / / J J J I I \ `v l J l J I\ / / J _ 1 1 1/ ! l / i v -rte.-.,~ ~ ~ w~ ~ 1' I 1
1 I I I 1 1 v v. ~ v v ` V 1 1 I v _ / / / J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v J I / l /I / ! f ~ t v~ v V 1 1 1 / l 1 / _ J 1 1 - ~ I i
I v. A V v v V~ v v vv A~ v v v v 1 1 1 `v / / / I J v~-- I 1 1 l 1 1 V v vv v ~ \ V 1 1 1 1 A _ / / / J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v `vim-'~ I I I j _ I l l f \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 } I 1 ` - ~ ' ' J I I f IIII \ \ / / / I Il ! I I
1 \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / r / I ( I IIII / ~ / I I IIIJ / / /r J / _ I I i v v A V v v v v ~ v \ 1 A \ r / / f l/ l I l l y / 1 1 JJ 1 1 / l l / _ v_J I I
~ 1 v } A V Av \v V ~ \v, vv vV vv A ~ 1 A ~ Av O ' / ~ / / / ! I I ,.v ~ / r / J IJJJJ J' 1 l ' J / r~~ w I \ ' _ _
h \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ . r / / / / JJ / / _ ,
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / ' / / / ~ / I ' J JJJ I 1 J I 1 / J l - ~ I " - I III r
\ V A\ vv vv vv vv A vv vvvv v\ vv vv ~`v ` _ _ / /'•-'~----~~~r'rr J 1 % / 1Ji~ I I I J I IJ J - ~ ) i' A ~ A I I v. ~ I f ! itV ~ ~ / / / 1 I it / i / - I I I / /
\ \ \ \ ~ \ \ ` \ \ \ O`\ - - ,r / ~ r /,¦j / / r / / / / / Ill 1 I I I J / - - / I ` ~ y /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ Nom, rY \ _ / / ! / / / / . / 1 I I I / / / ~ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ / / / / / / ~ 1 I 1 ~ / 1\ \V A A 1 1 ~ V AV I 1 I I I /i / / /i / I~ I~ ( I 1 lV I / / _ v v V 1 1 / ~ ~ _ v / Vvv ' I 1 A 1 I 1/ ~ / / / / ~ II/~ V 1 l vvv-.., /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ / / , / ~ `---/~/mar , r / r / I / r l } I f I - / , / ~J \ \ \ \ y / ~ 4-wry - \ \ / 1 I 1 I ~ / / / / / i li I } y I I 11.
\ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ \ 0p ` ~ % ! l J I , / / / I J lj ~ _1_~~ 1 11 I I I I f r vvv / ~ ~ v ~ / 1 1 1 1 / / / ~ } A v v v \ \ I \ I i \ \ \
v I ` v v v v V A v vN~'~ `v v v ~ r l •J /'mar / l/ I1 1 1 I I I f _ \ \ \ \ \ \ / 1 ~ / i / / / 1 / 1/ l / I 1 1 1 It I i I I \ 1 1 / A ~ i.~ ~ ~ v o f \ A 1 1 I 1 I I / / ~ 11 ~ A ~ A v
1/ - 1vv A A I ~l`I~ v !A 1 VA \ 1 i l ~ \ / I I I I v 1 v V v y v ! _ _ \ V A \ ~ v_~ ~ \ 1 V } l I } I } I I V A ~ ~
O , \ \ \ \ \ \ / , / , , / I I II I I I l ~ - 1 / - \ \ \ 1 \ N` \ \ \ , / / / / / I / 1111 1 1 1 I I ! 1 / / - ~ V A 1 / ~ ~I'. `v A Av A A \ 1 V A 1 V I 1 / 11 1 1 v I \ A vv \ I/ ! l ~ 1 I 1~..~ ~ . ~ v~ . A\ \ A 1 1 ~ I~ ~ f 1~ l I v ~ \ A ~ v \ v ~ \ L \ v A V 1 ~ I I t 1 t l 1 1
} J \ \ \ ~ r r' / / / / ' } \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 I /Q t \ \ } 1 l I 1 r \ I 1 j / / ~ \ A V A 1 \
v l l! ! 1 1 / Qc `V ~ _ / A\ Q\ v v O v ,v v V A I I II l vv A v v `v v ' v V 1 l / I ~ Qv ~ ) v \ v v~ v v v V v I I U 1 v v v
I 1 I ` /'r' ~.r,r /,r % / / -f'r" 1 \ \ \ 1 I r ~ ~ 1 1 } 1 1 I \ l / \ ` ~ - \ / '~'r'~''~ / / I / / J / J I \ 111 I I I / -`_r IIII I I I J/-__-,_~~~ \ I I
\ ~ \ \ - r / /r / 1 ~ / l I1 I I 1 \ J 1 Av v / / 1 1 P,t" / J IIII I 1 1 / / 1 1 I I I J A d \ ! 1 \ ~_1 \ i I 1
I \ \ ~D \ ~ ' ,i ,rrr.- " O , I I i f 'O /i/ /l f J 11 / - J 1 I I i I _ I ~ ~ \
` 'J ~ ~ / / / ~ ~ _ _ _ I / I ~ -
r r l / I I -
~ / 1 Il 1 1 ! 1! ~ ~ l / _ - it ~ I I ! j I O ! if JJJ I ! % ~ / j _ - _
v v v / 1 ~ l 1 l l / I J / / / v l J J J J l _ - t i~ III / I J / / I ~ v v -`v ~ ~ I J 1 / 1 l l J 1 1 1 I I I / I t i i / i
vv ~ / l J J I I J J J/ / l J I 1 1 I O J I I / I I v ~ , ~ I' / / l l I J 1 I J 1/-- I I J I I I I I I I 1 I ' r'
z vV ``v 1 ~ % l I J 1 1 J IJ j I/ - ~ l f ~ } I I I Av A I 1 % / / / % I/ \ l III _ / {
\ } l I ~ I J / l I 1 J 1 1 I I I I j l l I 11 1 vv A Av A 1 N N I 1 J J J I I I / r r / J I \ V v A \ \ \ ~ A / ~ / / ~ - / 1 / ~ ~
N 1 I I i / J J J I I I I I I J / 1 ! I l \ \ \ Q 1 \v 1 ~ 11 / / J J I I I I I / I I 1 I Av A vv v ~ / ~t I i A 1 / / / / / A ~ i / ~ \ N. \
. \vv vv ~ I I I I J I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I IJ J / / 1 } ---.'vv ~ vv -`vv v `v_ 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I / / Av `v vv v A~ \ ~
vv 1 1 I I I I l l l~ I} I l l I I I I I 1 I f v ,--v `v vv v~~ , O \ . J \ \ } 1 I I I 11\\ 1 1\ 1 I I I I I I t \ _ \ / / I /
~v v A } 1 1 1 } v V v / A~ ~ -
/ j ~~`~v~`
v ~ A I I V A A \ i A ~ \ \ ~ V / ' 1 / / I vv ~ vvv vv v v `v~ \ / ~ vv vv v v tiny ~ / I v ~ I I / ~ ~ ^ \ ~ . `v v v v ~ v v Avv`. ~ vv vv / ~.v v A vv ~ / / ll~ ~ I 1 / ~ / ~ i \
\ \ \ ~ 1 1 \ - / 1 \\1 I \ \ \ //I\ \ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~AA~ v~ ~ \ \ l ( / A A A \ i / I I I / / / / ~ \ / V
cr- 1 \ \ /r f 1 1 ; I l
-~~l'1 ~l fig .-~~~"r ~iif/ %//l / / / I / i ~ ? A \ ~ ~ I ~ ! i i r i
N 111 1 I I/ _ i r' l / `r ti. V ~ A\ V11 11 II11 ~ I I J ! /r//// / / / /~r// rrr/r/ ~ •'r~// /.,~r/
cc L-L:
V 1 1 I f l l / / / / ~r l l l l I I / / / / /r / / / / L-W
~ ~ 1 1 1 1 II II 1 1 1 / A ~ 1\ 1 1 1 1 I f j / / l j ~ 1 I I ! I I _ / / / v v V 1 I /

I I I 1/ ~ I ~ ~ I i i,
i r { i I 1V I V A ~ I / / / . 1 A ~ i % I A ~ / / / 1 I ~ / i 'V A A'VA ~ ~ ~ ~ f i
~ + 1 rr A A AV ~V I l ! I 1 ~ / ~ 1 ~ I I V A\ V ~VA i I 1 ~ _ ~ A v / ~ AA I ~ / I i / 1 f I / ~ ~ I 1 ~ ,A , , I. I yn
- I ~ I, ,-r 1 i / I t I / ~ A ~ 1 ~ / l 1 I / / ~ / l j I V Iv 1 ? 1 i ~ i ~ A / ~ f ~ / A I I / l 1 / / / I / ~ 1 / A ~ v vv II IIII 11.1 r J 1 1 1 1 A ~ I I I I I I I ~v ~ / ,l I l) I I vI vv ~ ; v I i l j l l l I I 1 1 ~ N U
. Cl i~ I ~ ~ --I~ ~ ~i ~ / / ~ ~ ~ / ~ I V ~ A / / Q v A 11 / / j f / / / j /r/ j I y ! / _ 1~ ~ t i ~ ~ ~ / / / / 1 / / / / r / r s r ! / / \ / / / / / r r r / / / / / l l l i t v A-~ / IIII I! I I I A ~ D
. ~ ~ ~ / ~ I I ~ i i .I i \ 'ti I. ~V / I / / / (N 1 / / r / / r/ /,/r /.i / r/ / i ( ~ / / IJ - r \ 1 l e ~ / / / / / .p I I / / / ~ r , , ~i/r/.r rr I i \ / l I l / / , , ir` / ! I J 1 I i / 1 1 1 1 11 1 II 11 1 1 1 I ~V ~ r' / / / ~ / / / l I 1 1
1 1~ 1 f~ ~ ~ / I/ ( 0'i I I / / r / r' /rrr rrii r / r i' % / / i I III 1111 II 1 11 V I / r / / ~ ~ I 1111 ll ~V n /
t I it ~ ~ i ~ I I / ~ 1 O V A 0 / / ! ~ / I ~ l /r r r r/r r / / ~ / ~ r / - / , / , ' , / / i 1 111 l1 1 \ \ \ 1 ! y ~ !n / t..~ / / r I 1111 11\ \ \ N \ G,1 cn
/ , - - vI j , I Ill 1111 \ V Al V A\ v N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ / ,i/~ / ~ I ! ? \ ` \ \ ~ \ i / I / / / ` i % , ` = _ _ 1, i' r ~ ~ _ C__
\ j l / 1 ~ v , \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 / \ 1 1A~'Q ~ A I ~
y ~ ~ l /i i \ v / / I 1 11 y'v.: - v v `~``v ~ ---,vim v [
, / I / \ ~ v / I l V ~ V A~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ ~J I ~ f l ~Ij / v V A l / J v ~v vv tiv v AVv~ ~ v v v ~ w AVAA...-r / / \ \ I 1 \
/ \ \ I
/ ! [ li / v v v _ v v vvv v v v ~ ~ ~ v v / ~ = - - \ / v A 1 1 V A ~ ~ Z v V~ r v v v~ V A 1 1 1 v v A\
r/ I ~ i ~v / I I 1 A A \ A V /ri fr `v A~,/ / vv ~ A A 1 1 11 11 1 1 1\ \V A vv v 1 1 11 1 1 A ~ 1
~ v~ v A 1 I I 111 V A V A I I l l A
~y 9 AV 1 V ~ / x / ( 1 \ A V A A i `v A~ _ vv A l I I I II I I 1 1 1 \ \1 A l i j ~ I I i t 11 w ' \
, v vv - '`vv A I I I j I I ~ ~ 1 1 1 I 1 1!! 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ v ~v v i I / / I f l l I I I I I I i ~ ~
r S / , A I / / A v - / ~ `v 1t 1 ~ I j ll I I I I I I I I / ~ I% i t 1 vv v\
y ; ` ~ r" v \ I I I/ i I I I 1 1 1! l/ i I j ~ 1 \ 1 vv 1 I I l I h/ , ~ l l l l I l l! l l /l J l I N I 1 \ N
i II ~ / / / v ~ I v - ~ ~ I i c - . , / ~ - / _ - / / ~ I I I I ~~v v 1 i t I l i , l l l l 1 1 1! l l/ I/ ~ (n I/ 1 V to I I j / r te 1 1 1 ! f! l l/ l l ~ I \
- / I I ! I 1 -.a I I 1 I l l I 1 I I I! l / / ~ 1 1 V 1V / I i ~ OI III I l / , ' / ! ! / 1 / l l / / .l~ Y v
_ _ / I I I ~ j I ~ I ! I I ! l ! I I ll 1 f 1 / / / . /'~v ~v
_ ~ ~ I l l I II IlI1 ~ - / ! I/I/ lll/ ,,Y ~ % ~ ~ v ~ vv / ! I ! 7 IIII 1 / / / / ! / / / ~ V ~ ~ v ~ l J I I!{ I Ol j l l 11// l l I l I l I/~ J ~ 1 - ~ `vim A
` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i O ~ \ r / / / / - / l / i 1~ I f l l 1 I I r ~ i //i /Ill l ~`~v -
r _ ! / ~ j _ ' _ r ~ ~ ~ ~ I III I ~ i r' ~ J`,.- \ ~ /l ( 1 _._.r/ / / ~ , - l l i l l i 1 I 1 1 1 { i _ = l / l l y ~ , ~ ~ - / 1 1 - /
, l I ? I I! i t ~ 1 ( / / ' _ ~v ~ ~ I I / / I 1 / / / ~ ~
T / I 1 I \ ~ I ! \ I i I \ I I I I/ _ ,,,I ~ y~ ~ ~ / % r,.____ / I I I I I i ( /
I ~ I I v A t ~ v ~ / 1 I I v. ' ~ V A I! I I I ~ \ vv ~v v v v v A ~v v~ vv I / / l / I I''vv 1 1 1 1 1 1~ i I / . VV
'v I it `v ~ v / v ~ / / r \ rv v 1 i I ~~v ~v ~ v v ~ i{ I I ~V vv~` v v `v ~ v ,v ~r' v ~V ~ v ~ n V ,L / r-- _ ~ i ( !l I I v~ I I 1 II I I I I 1 / , l ~ l II 1 j i - / l I I ~ p / . v~ p~ A V 1 l - / / i I / - / I / ~ v ~ v I l / I III / _.!d / / / / / / l' \ ~ \ O I
A ~ v~ 1 I I I ~ \ \ v ~ A V v v v / - r ~ ~ fv~ I I / 1 1 v \ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ / _ I / !t \ I ~I III r IIII A 11 ~ I III1 I 1 ~/,i,/,/~ v. vI \ l IIII / I 111 \ 1 l 1 ,~i / / I ' / / \1 1 ~ l
`V A A \ i ~ \ V U V A O \ 1 v ~ ~ / I r^--- , I v v I 1 11 1 I ~ I 1 V 1 lI I } v A v v V A A I v v ~v. r I l ! l I I v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j, i I , III 1 4 v 1 v vv y v v v v I I \ V ~y s v v ' I r i yv I I I v 1 v vv
I I f I ~ ICI C Il. ) v 1 1 v A v V v \ v A w~ v w vv ---tin ~ A V Iv 1-___~_---------- I 1 1 ,.v v- I I 1 V 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 I 1 I 1 \ \ \ •~1 ~ J,', /lam - \ i / I t 1 1 11 1 \ \I I / I 1 1 t 11 1 / / / \ \ \ I ! / \
1 vV I ~ I I I I 1 1 A I V A~ v, vv ~%I' t,r' 1 A I I I I v I 1 1\ v v A A \ \ I I ~ I i t I I 1 1 1 V AV , \ 1/ vv v~ O ~ j\ V A ~ 1 / I V j I V 1 1 I I I i t I I / / / ~i i A \ V ~ 1 1 A 1
v t v ~ _ v tl ~ I 1 V ~I ,A1A v ~ A v v r~~ / l I I ~ A Ati 1~ 1 I I I { ) I i} V r~ \ by A v~{.~ v~ ~ r V A l 1 1 I I `v v \ 1 I ~ i I i \ ~ ~ v vv ~o v v ~ I \ \ i 1 1 1 I } 1 1 I Il 1 1 I , ~ 1~ /~Il 1 I I ! / - v v vv ~ vV 1 \ Av v`~ O
v v ~V ~ V A ~ i a / r' i / / / ( t \ 1. ` ~ A AEI \ v vv vv ~ ~ l \ V1 V .r__-_- - / 1 I 1 I I ~ v v V I A ~ I r , / / / / 1 , I v V v ~ v v I A VA v ~ / I J I 1 I ~ 11 1111 1 11 ( ~ - / / /l/j 1 J// I l I ~ ~ \ \ ' \
`v, ~V , v a I ~ / / / / I l l t ( / v \\,,l vv v `'v N-E'S Z / I Iv vV` _i I I l l / 1 ~'v ~~v; I 'I I A I{I i / / / ( II 11 A \ \ /v ~ v v~ - , - / l \ ~\~V ~ _ ~I ~ I
I I i I / ~ \ v A - ~ ~ 1 I I 1 1 1 V1 ~ / ! / / / I ! / / / / ' -~•v ~ ~ "~\N~~ V A v v A v., v v v 1 y v J I I ~ i 1 1 11 111,\\ i / /l f r / • I / / / ~ - ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ ~
- - JI ) l ~ I I II ~ ~ r'' / r /r rr I I I 1 I A A-~^- v ~ V A A A\ V w / / ~ - ~ / 1 _ , i i / l l l I ~r/ / / r ~ ? r / 1 ( ~ i A ~ - I V A ~ ~ l / r l ~ I I II / I I l / / / r / / , / / / / / \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ 11 ~ ! / v v v v v 1 A
_ ~ - _
= / ( ~ ~ it I / , ; ~ _ - / I I ~ • I 1 I I I / - r O / I I _ _ _ I I _ _ / / (n~ I / ~ I ,/rr- r~ , , I I - - ~ , III r '
. - _ ~ ~ _ ~ r
' I / / i~
/ I j ! / I I I l j \ , r~ _ ; - rte/ / I I I \ -r r r/ ! r'` ~ _ _ / / /Il 1 / I ! ! f / ! ~ l / / ~ A ~ \ V v 1 ~ / , /!Ir 1 1j ~ J I I I I I l / l / / O \ ~ ` \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ 1
~ ~ / _ Ix I I1 ~ ! I 1 \ \ - - / I I ter' ~ r,.____ . ~ ~ I \ ~ / ri i I / / IIII 11 I / / / ~ A~ 1 ~ 1 v v v v v v~ v l 1 / / /III I / / \ \ l I I I ! I f f / / - _ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ I
f ~ / / I/// v 1 1 I I I I I I ! l / l `v t I I I 1\ v v ~ v vv ~ A v V v v , I 1
I \ / / / 1 I / / / \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 I \ i I
',,/Ji I f I/ 1 1 1 1 I I ( I / / / / \ j 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ 1 I 1 .~i%./~ \ 11 l! / v -J v 1 1 1 I I I / l / v A I 1 1 V 1 1 1 v v v v 1 1 I i I I /
/ I I I 1 v V v ~ v ~ v ~r~'` ~ \ v ~v V / . "i i ~ A~ I / 1 1 1 I ! f / / , 1 1 I I A A V A A f / ~ ~r~.. / i/ / ~ _ - i"~'`. \ ~ 11 I / \ 1 1 1 ! ! / / / / -~rl \ 1 1 ' ~ 1 I \ / / / r/ i < c-.- G`
/ ~"v A 1 v ~ (al v v v v \ r I ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ 80.0-'1.53 / / l ~ ,
1 I \ \ \ \ / / / / V f I v A \ r / 1 / - "1 _ / / III v ~ s t / ~ v I / i 1 \ \ ~v \ ? - ~ / / /
U I i 1 \ p / r" ~ v ~ ( ~ ~ I CA \ ' I 1 ~ V I I I / /J I I I 1 V 'I A~, \ ~ ~ / % % j % ~ --r/ r'
_ ~ \ IIII / I I I ! I i I / ; / / , ~ Wit- r__ _ 11 1 1 I - r_--_
I I _ ~ O r v ~ / / ~ ~ 6 ~ I I / / I I I I I I , .-1'' / ,'r ~ \ 1 I ~,2rJr9 E /
~J C.+ ~ / i 1 / / r A / / 1
- I / 11 I l ( 1 I /j'-- ~ ~ -_r ~ / / / / r'/ y~ "7!' M `v I I / I r /i / v v l f / l I \ / ~ ~ ,,y ~ ~ / / / I / / / / / / 1 / / to
I ~ A i I 1/ / I I I - ri ..w ~ rr/~ ' / / / ~.T - ~ ~ _.r--- _ ~ (J / ~ / r ter'
f ! / ! ! ~ l \ \ ~ / / rte' ; f r . .L'"''~ ,r ~ ` I ( l / / V ~.l \ ~ ( !l / / / I Vv.vvv ~ r" /r / / / ~"`~,u ~r L i1 ~ / I I I / / ~ / ,r"
\ l 1 / / / ~ \ \ \ rte. ~ r - / f- ! - r / r"`~'.'~'~- \ 1 1 / ~ ..r , ~ v ~ 1 I , 1 / _ _ ~ / / /
~ _ _ / ~ ~ / / . v v I I I / / / l / / I I , l / / / , a
1 ~ i A v - r / ~ A / ' - - I I / ,-r I ~ A v A ~ _ ~ v r r i I/ / _ V I / , ~ v v l l / / ~ 1 / I - - / / 1 /
A ~ - ~ 111 1 A ~ ~V ~ V 0 ~V 'w~\ ~ w~~\ 1 I l ..~A1 ``v V A A I I / / ` ~ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ t` ZZ ~ 1 I / Its 1 I 1 1 / v v A C V 1 , v V~ 1 I\ I V v vI v~ \~w ~ ~ 1~ A I Ill I I! _ - A~/ - \.I 1 1 1 1 I / /
~ v 1. ~i \ A , ,V I ~ ~ 1 v ~ V I /1 ~ V¦1 I / / ~v , ~ ~ ~ v ~ I la I i . , ;1,~N Iv ' , ' I,,; / ' -~,ti - . v~ , I 1 1 I , I /
I ~'V A A I I I I OQ j I! l l; i ~ y v ~ _ ,r-- j / V A l v S l l V I { I !
_ \ V ~ s I I 1 I I ! / , > f _ I I { / /rr-'~.. _ 1 / / li~ /.i •--'V 1 jr ~ ~•.V 1 I I I I~. I I I I / I / / i Gl V A Av / l l / /i i i 1 v ~ . .~j ! I I / / / \ \ \ ~ / 1 / ~ , , J ,C~a / , r / ~ \ 1 \ ~ ~
\ \ Vv I I I I /I ' \ - - l I t i _ 1 / / ./~~i~' ~ ~ I I/ \ I I I I I I I I I / 1 I I i I~---v - L~ / ~ ~ ~v V I l I ! 1 / / \ I / / / / / p / r /
v ~`v 1 \ 1 y~,~ 1 1 i l 1 1 I/ v 1 / ~ I//! r' t/ A I 1 t l I I I _ _ v v v , , _ ~ I l / , I / , , 1 _ v I ! III I a ,v v I ~ I 1 v ? v - _v / j l / / I ( r; , , ~ v / - I I I I I ! ! ~ J ( I I I
_ ~ A ~ v \ 1 i 1 v A v l I / I III ~r A/ l J I I I I v v v ~ a t , ~ ~ 1 v . \ 1 I I , / I / / ~ `'/v _ v I 1 I I I I I ,-'-1 I I I y I A~ ~ I l1 ~ I ~ vv , 1 / ~ , ~'-..,v 1 1~ I f r/ /r ~ 1 1 I / V A 1 1 1 I I I I? ~~rl I l I
- \ \ 1 I 1 ~ ~ \ ~ \ / ~ \ 1 I I / ~ I 1 I I 1 I r/" I 1 I
A v ~Av 11 V v v A O \ f~/ r \ 1 1 1 I~/ , / ..\y / v 1 A i l l I l-/ - r/ I - _ ~V ~ ` ~ ~ v ~ Al \ v v Z ~v v w v I I?/ A 1 1 I ! ! ~ ~ I l!-~ _ v v 1 I I j I / _~ti.. i
V Av I' ~ A \ \ ~V A A. ~ v\ ~ 1 1 i Iv. ~r j iV l I 1 1 l / r/ F r~~~ All/11/I v AV 1 I I ~ j !I r" 1 I _ ~ ~ vA v ~ w ~'v 1 I r _ AA V A/ / / I v v V I 1 j / J 1
_ \ I ~ ~ Al 'V A V ~ V A 1 11 ~V A A A I / r' / / \ V V A I I I I / /~-,.~--ter ` , / f If if / / \ i'~ / 'rJ- • v
/ J ! / / i V A 1 V~ ~A v vv vv ~ v A I i ~ , A \ A \ v~-/ / % / - / I / 1 1 I I 1 I 1 / r`_-____'. \ 1 l 1 \ I ;S. ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ t \ , r , \ \ / / / / I 1 1 l I I I I I i / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ v IV
v V 1 v v i \ i vA ~v v v v 1 1 ~ _ r / v v vvv-_' / V i/ 1 \ I I I I III r--------'~ \ \
I i ~ i I I I / \ ~jv v vv `v \v 1 A~ \v v i / \ v v ~ / r/ `I I__w I f 1 1 J 1 I 111../~ / III II 1 I I I .t V v v vv ~ ~ I .V vv \ - / / ~v A\ vv _ vI Av 1 i 1 I I I I III \ I'1~
1 1 ~ ~ i v v v W\ ~ ~ / v v v f' v I I \ I l / I i l l I ! , I I ~ „v t~ A v vw v V 1V O A Av r/-.. ~ vv vv - r'/ A 1 I I Il II I I I Imo/ /
~ I I I ~ 1 t l '1 ~ \ V ~ V A A vv A / v~ vv ~ - ' v V 11 II I 1 1 l I II /
I I ~ I A A\ \I \ ~ A A AV A ~ ?vv ~ ~ r~r d A AV A I \ II ~ j I 11 / I 1 1 ~ I ~ v v v V / ~ _ _ 1 1 1 \ I (t / 1 / r~~
\ ~ ~ v v 1 1 /i m J / / / 1 , Cn
I V ~ A\ \ V A AV A \ Ij~ A \ V 1 V A r/ / - A \ 1 \V I I I I A /r ' i' ~ II A ~ ~ A ~V A AV v A 1~, \ V A V A~ - _ - ~~v \V A \ V I l % 11 / / ~ r' I
\ \ 1 \ ~ A \ A V ~ A 1 A \ _ ~ A V A \ 1 ~ l / ~ - \ l / % ~ rr
t/ / , / 1 c/ / I ! / - v Q1
V 1' ~ \ \ _ i t V 'v \ v\ II I A\ M\~ v \ \V A vv ~ _ ~ vV A AV I j j ~~r 1 A I / / ~ /r- r r / / \ I / / o~
~l 1 I 1 \ I / A S I A iI P,A' ~1 A AV _ ~ ~ V A I I ("i^ A V I ~ / / / r--"~ r/ ' ~ _ / l \ \ T 1 { ~ F ~ \ \ \ _ _ \ \ \ 1 I I \ 1 I I / / / / ~ l- I
l I II ~ I l ~ \1 I 1_\ r' - \I 1 I i----\ 1\ l 1 1i''_/ ~ I ~ \ I / I
/ 1 I I / l / I I I ~ \ I /i' \1 j ! / ! / ' / / - 1 I 1~ 1 I
l { j / i i / I j ~ ~~ti v v v vv vv vv vv vI I i l l rr' / / ' ~v 1 I f / l ~
~ 1 \ / v A I V 1 1 I l l- , / r 1 I f. , Cw 1\ 1 I /I
~ I ~ / / 1 ~ / ~ I I I l 1 / / i I 1 1 / / j .I ' r.~_ ~ ~ I 1 I I I ! 1 t / / / / / / / i j " v r/I % l %
I i / j !i I `'t~ ~ ''_N i 1 1 I I I 1 ~ J l i i r// ; l I l . / / l ~ ~ i ~ ~~1 I I I I 1 I 1 I ~r / / r
/ ~ I I I ~ / / 1 a~ ~ I / a x ~ x ~ " ~ I I I I I I l I / , r'
I ~ y
~ / i i,r W~ / /
r J
~ f / I `r i i `tee A \ I _ _ r / / / / r j I j 1~ / i ~ I M \ ti'~\r*\ 1 ~•g., ~,~V A~ _ LN\_--" r' / ///~~i~
l f I f 7 ~ W~, t W / I i f ' 6 z s 6
1 ) I i ~ a 1 ~ / / ) / r / "tire I ( ~ , ter.' ~ - 'G
I i ~ '
I I I I ~ ~I r 1 1 A -L~` ~ ~.:r'v __--r'~'..~--~ v I I I (l I V 1 I I ~ - I i i, i t 1 ~ / 1, ~ \ 1 ~ I I ....J
_ v ~I YiZ_ t. _ ~:0..1~--- -~~,r, - - \1 11 1 A\ \V A\ I AV AI I I I I ~ 1 , ~ ~ _t-- ~ l i" ~ ~~„«k~~^-m'`'t j v~ v\ 1 ~ vvv 1 I t II \I A \ 1 II I ~
/ 1\1 1 1 111 w \ 11 \ ' ~ S
v~. ~V / I i i I I r; i ~ ~ ~ _ ~ -vC"''/k:~~~,ac,~ .,____.-~C- ~ ter' / vv A I / / W r-- l 1 1 I I I V 1 \ v\ v; I I 1 i ( ! 1 ~i ~ 00 / .~.n°.`~'~" ~ , ~ ~ ~ r~' /~vV 1 1 I 1 I ~ 1 11 t 1 11 l1 i I I a ~p 6 ,
\ ~ ; I J l tix ~.i ~ " ~,r ' ' GI / 1 1 I I I I I r " i ~ _ / v _v I I ( I/ ~ _~f___~.,...>k__ J a/'Y/'. ~ - (,tJ~ , r /•-7 11 A l I V A\ IV I ~ I I I ~0
l f P r; V 1 1 v I v 1 III 1~IY/ /.i~~~;. boy="~ 1 Y~< /fix` - _ V \v v 1 \ v vv v I 1 ~ 0~ 0
~ i i. /i / A ~ \ \ V A / i ~ ~
~s~ ,ts ~
~ 'ice l r ~ x / / v I / j Al / ~I ~`~W l ~ / / /V ~V v/ CA --v~ A A ~ ~ sos ~ .QZ „90~t ~
j - / ~ t ' ~N ~l 1~
~~6~ iv ! I \v i /e • ~ ~I / z'~
v
oo ~
i/ / ~%S9 x9 6 \ C o
r
41 o ti
i
\ \ 112 7# 8.22.9 th1 v
d \
a

I 1 ~I / ~ ~ / / I Iv / / 1 A l ~ 1 / i ~ l ~ V A~ ~ ~ vA I ~ i i i ~ ' 'y `1 I 1 1 ~ / ! I v v A , _ 1 ,1 I \ \ \ ~ III n I I ; I ',I ~~y ~
~ / i ~ l 1 ~ • / ' / ! , 1 v ~ \ / / - '\lll I I ~o I I I I 1 v r v Ill i~ I, ,i v ~ v it I
i I / r ~ i I ~ v ~ % / / p / / A A I / / / ~ / ~ / / / / /i r / / I ( 1 1 1 1 / I I I I II h u l l ~ /
V 1 ~ / w I / ~ ~ A / / / / / 1 I I / I / r/ / / / / / r/ / / / r'i rr / l / / ...i- / /rr / I III ' 1 11 1 11 \ d'
/ 1 i ' A / r i/ ~ i Cn~ I ~1 r / / /,r l / ~ i' , I / / V A \ / l ~ / ~ I I / / / / i / i r.ir it r/ / / r/ / / e / / ~ ~ v' - / ! 1 I I !iII V1 1A i n to • r / / - I I1 11 \
1 / r I ! / l / / J / / ~ / / r ~ / / / ~ / _ / '/i' / ` „ _ i/ / I I ~ 1111 lVA1 \ \ N 1 ~+J ~
~ t r' 1 I' I ! I I \ \ O \ l ~ r ! 1 / / ~ / " r ''ir' ~i i 'i' / rj ' / r•-.•I r /
V ~ ' / ~ 1 ~v v ~ v vv. / { I 111 V - ~ ` . - ,v / / ~
/,///rr..---, ~ `'~V 1 V I \ \ 1 A V} \ \''_-J J I~ \ \V A I N i / / / A 1 \ 1 \ \ f t ~ V A v A\ \ 1 v v A i
v ~ ' i / lr j i / ~ l / v. I i I\ 1 ~~v~ A\VAAv ~ w~~ "~.~AVAA~~,r~//'~ \ / / \ \ / ///s t A \ \ A ~ t \ A A ~ "
i v ~ \\V `v ~ i v V`~ v Av v v V w V A v~~ / / l / I / A ~V A ~ \ / ~ ~ V 1 ~ ~ / f I/ v..--~ AV / v v vv vV A A\ A\ \V v - \V A Av.-r~j/ i \\-'r' e s' - \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 \ \ \ 1\\\ l V \ \ \ I / r \ 1 \ ~ 1 \ \ \ ~ / V / v A 1 1 1 1 1 v.,~ A\ l / ~ Z
v 'v y ~ / 1 / i I Ali I ~ ~ ~O v, v ~ vv. / / vA v v A A v Vv v vvvv_r//'/ \vr r j' A A ~ 1 t i l l 1 1 \ V~ \ V 1 1 \ 1 ~ A\
v_..rr/ r'~ v v vv v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. A A V v } j t A\ v. ~ 1
~r~ vv vv vv v\ ~ l 11 I l 1 l 1 \V vv vv 1 tl i I II A ~ rv .v vv A 1 i t 11 1 1 1 1 \ V vv v\ 1 1 1 1 11 A ``v
' ~ v v 1 1 I I I I 1 1 }t v v v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v vv r~
~ r/ I "I ~ V A / / / I ! ~ \V ~ \ ~V A V A \ v I' i 1 1 1 1 tl vI I t v i l e IIII v t V _ v _ I i a ~ I r i I I I I 1 v ~~vv~ vV / / l f I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 l I j l I t ~v
----__-v A 1 / / f I I 1 i l l l 1 1 1 1 1 11 vv v\ .v A \1 I ~ r/~ / 1 1 1 I I I I J 11 t l / l j I I j ~ 1 V 1 ~~vv vv 1 1 1 1 If i j I I I I I I i! ! j 1 1 1 1 rv I At ~ ~
\ / y V ~ V 1 'I W / / l / j A vA vv v A v I I / r r / ! i I I ( ( (n I '
_ / / I / % / / V ~V 1 v \V A I I 1 1 1 1 , r 1! 1 1 1 1 ! r fl l/ l l I ~ I/ \ \ O v 1 1 1 r l i ~r r ! l i I I 1 1 / f / f 1 U 1 1 v \ .
.p / - ~ l r _ _ - / ~ / / \ ~ I x I ~1 r / / / I I I \ I / / / I I I I I / r' / I 1 1 1 r l/ / ! ~ ~ v I I I I I I If ;///r 11 1 1 1 1 1 J 1// / ~ r~ " \v
- _ - . v _ - I I I ~C1 II( l/// - I 1 1~1 / ~v ~
r - \ 1 I I I IIII l/ r / !l /I ~ 1 ~ / v 1 ( I I l t f/ - / i 1 l 1 ~ l 1 / "
v i _ - r _ _ \ / ! ~ I j ~ I r! ~l I I I f 1 ((/J•" ---._.~'_'"r / j~ 11 l I 1 r I ! ``~v ~
_ , / / ,1 i / / , / ~ v
I I i / / / / ~ v v ~ / / / /
I O ~ III I / / ~ ter' ~ - ~ r/ O / 1 I r~_ l 11 I / . ~ _ ~ i
v I I i it i 1 I~ / / ~ - _,_v vv A / / / / 1 I I { I / / / / ~ / / 1 1 I _ - ri / / / e / . ~ \ fix" I
V ~ i I i ',v I 1 1 V ~v v V ~ ~ I I ''v ~ vv ~ v ~ / / ! 1 V v IIII 11 / / e/ 11 l ( f/ 1 I I Q I " ~ ~ ~ ~ \ I r r/ % I ! I I ~ ~ / j /i - / 1 I /e 1 i / / " " v vv V 1 1 1 r I i i _-t~a J Z ~ ~ 1
l j 1 i 1 y vv vv v v v vv ~-~v v~ v~ , / 1 / I l I I v 1 1 1 I f i l _ I I _ A... / I I 111 \ I/ ,~i l I r'/' i i / v v A I
~ ` v v v A v ! ~ / / ~ ~ _ _ / ~ lam. I 1 1 I v f ti y v l I II I I V A \ v v v v v A r/ v~ v v~ n ~ ' / / _ ! J 1 v• 1 I I I ~ v v y v i II I I v A\ v v A ~ _ v I / i v vv I 1 I l I l I 1 I ( _ I I 1 1 ~ \ 1 \ r"'s / ~ / rr r /r rr r/ - \ \
v t . y \ ~ A v v v v v v v v ~'1.'~ ~ / / I r•--~..-~""` / i / I i v I I 1 1 \ \ ~ t \ \ lV f I I ~ 1 1 A A A1t\ //er / r' ,w vv vv _ ~~vv v\ \ I / it \
\ ' I~ A ! ~ ~ IJ v A \v v A A\ } 1 vv vv ~y ~ / / A} I I_--__ I I I A v 1 1 I A V A I/ 1 1 t 11 1 ` ~ ~ I 1 I I 1 I I I / / , / / _ - \ \ \ \ _ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ O
I 1 I ! I I t \ \ \ \ \ \ r ~ ~ ~ y` LI'' I \ \ ) / / I I 1 1 ` \ \ I I 1 ~ \ \ 1 I ( 1 1 ICI ~ II } 1 ' Ii \ I 1 1 l \ \ _ / \ \1 ~ ~ r ~ \ \ \ _ , / ! 1 / \ \ 1 t t A AV1 11 I~ v~~ ~ 1 1 1 1 / J ! I I I I I / / ~ / / - v v vv ~ `~1 V t\ vv vv v`~ } t \I 1A 11 1 ~ ~i / l l l JJ 1 I /i' I ! l / / A\ \V v ` \ V A V vv ~v \
v v i I I I v I ~I / ~ / 11 1 ~v ~v vv v I v V \ v I I I I / I 11 I ~I I A A \ V A A ~ V IV{ •v - A v vV y r _ ~ / {1 I I I I I} 11 , A v I I / V A _ v `lN ~ I 1 Vl / S l 1 11 / 1~ / / I ~ A v A v v A 1 I I 111 1 - / / I ~ e' I ( / ( / \ \ \ \ ~ \ ~ \ \
v v v I _ I I 1 v, ~ ~ y v v_ I I I v\ ~ I I v v v J r0~~ I y` J i 11
v ~ vV ~ \ V A I. i a / I 11 i /J / 1 1 \ ~ I /~v V vv ~ ~ ~~Z I I VA\\\\ - ~ I ( I 111 ~~V A ~ ~ i / / ! 1 I i / \ ~ v v r~~ ~ / I \ \ / I I i i \ 1 I / I \\J v ~ v _ AV I
v 'y A \ A. A 1 1 ~ / / r I I I I 1 l~ \ \ v~ ~ ~ v ~ / VA _ / r- - I I I I \ \ \ ! 1
_ , / ~1AvA I V ~ I ~ II / i ~ / i I I I l I v V" _ "~Gl I V A V ~ / ~ / l I ~ ~ I A I ' I ~ 1 ~I ~I / i' / / ri I I 1 i \ ~ ~ ~ I 1 V A 1 V `v~~ ~ / / ~ _~i/ / I 1 ~Y / / / r / / . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
~ J ~ I 1 l I 1 I , Il / /f ' /i ! III vv ~ / j I 1 I 1 ~A _ ! / f„~~ / j I / I II I ~I ~ I
/ ~ ~ _ ~ / ; / / I I I / r' r /r r ,,r / I ~ ~ 1 I I I I v,, I / ~ / l _ ~ / r ~ /i I I ~ ' ~ ~ / /r~ rr r'r'~ r / I i ~ ___.r'~r / I I I I I A~ J I I / 11 } i l / / l I - l ~i ~ v\\ v v v v v v v 1 v 1 I III III / I I I I r / / / ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \
~ r _ - / r' ~ _ i / I / _ r i l r r r ~ r-•' f
r ~ i ~ / / ! O _ ~ / / _ -i / I 1 I q ,@ tip / / v / / ~ / / / / / / v v v y v v v `r 1 1 I f l °r I t 1 I I e'~ • ~ v A v v v v v 1 1 \
/ - / , / ~ I / ~ r / r ~ J / III l I - ~ / _ /f i' _ . .i ~ - / l 1.1 IIJI 1 / //r v~ r / / ~ / / ,e ~ O v A ~ A \ \ V ?v A A A V ~ \ 1 `v 1 ~ - l•l / / l' / IIII ! l ~ ~ / / O v 1 . A v v v v v ` v v ~ v v
i j / l l 1lIJ I ( r' / ,v IIII I l I l / / / r~r A ~ A ~ A A v v v v ~v vv v v Av ~ v v I
~ 1111 1 1 ~-.v~~ I (I 1 1 1! ! / / r _ v v t 1 1 A v v V \ v~ v w vv ~ w V v\ S ~ ,,_,r / /IIII I I / , e'_~vv~, f 11 11 II ~ I ~ I l / ~ / ! ~"vv 1 ' i ~ I v1 vv v vv v vv v ~ v v \ vt vv . / l / f / / I I \ v v I I - _ / ~ l I ~ / / .-'-~~v 'vl I I ( / / % v A 1 V A V ` ~ vvv vv. v ~ V A i } v i I
r v I I I i \ \ ? \ \ ~ \ ~,1!i \ r--- r.~ I { I ~rl, / 1 / ~ ~ I I II l _ - , \ A A _ / 1 J 111 v 1 4 I I I I 1 I I / / \ i t i t t o v v ~v v v 1 1/{ i I l
/ 1/ 1 I / ~ 1 1 A 1 I I I 1 l I / / vv } II 1 ~ \ } V Av `v vt } ) /I ~1 I ~ / I _ 1
/ ~ ~ III i v ,,,v ~A ~ ~ v ~ _ v v~ ; v NO 12'3A300 t2~~7,F ! { - ~ / a ~ ~ ~ v v ~ r - i.-~w ~irr III{I I / --J \ } 1 1 I ! I / / / ~.1 \ 1 I r I ( I ~ ~ ~ C` ",1 1""_-~ v~ , _ _ x,;,,11 I / /r ~ \ i i 1 I I / / / / \ 1 r / ! ~ / / ~ _~-fi=r`
v v t A v 1 J I I \ vV A A I A v \ v vv ~ v V 'C V V \ ¦ A v - -V~.~~%~1.53rr / l ~ / /
1 ~ ! I r / / / , / / .yam' \ I ! I ! I I ! / / / ~ ~ t- / - \ \ } 1 I ? I
~ ~ ~ th II I I I \ \ I }I ~ I ~ \I \ 1 I / I I 1 V A \ V A ~ w ~~'ti... / / / ~ i/ /~~r. N ~ / i J A V 1 v ~ / ~ \ \ \ \ 1 I 1 I I I / / r' / \ /ice ! - - ~ ''\~11 1 \ I / / 1 f_~.sr
ii i 'ii/ ~-c3~ Fv v \ V IIII I v / ( I I I I I I / / ,1-- `vv ~ 1 / / 1 ~2~ Jr9 E / ~ . /rr /ri \ 1 I I I 1 \~~_l/ I ( I I II I / L~~'/ / \ 1 i ~ l l l ~ J 1
1 i / ~ yr 5.1 ~ v 1 1 1 1 I / .v / i I I I I / , / ( r / / / , / / I ' 6 V ~ , I l J l I I I 1 I / i~ ~ I ! ~ lI I l l/ % /1 / l l ! 12 ~~p ,N I
4 ~ ' \ ~ ``~K` ~til_-L~ J I I I i / / ~ / ~ I~~ r' / ~ /f /ir / / ' l \ ~ _ / l fr' I I l / / r r/ N .r / r'~ / ~V A V A I ~ 1 / I I ! I V ~ / / ~r ~ / /r l l / / / / / / / ! l 1 z r' /r ~ A AVAA~l 1 I 1 / 1 I ( \ ~ r/ / r~ q( p~ rr ~ l l J / / l / l / / l / N /l
/VS r S- f 9
( S V -'~~at ~ I dfA', / ! / J ~ r' r/ r / / / / / ti's / fa ~ I / / y"^~ / / ' \ O 'y l I l r I l ! 1 _J,// i_~____ _.r r ~r / / / ~ ~ ~7 r - _ 1 I / / ~ ~ r ~ .r r' r~'z J Av A A\ I I I I I ti_ . 1 / J/ / r' r•~ / , / ~ ~ / / / / ~ /
r' //fiJ G) v~ AV I 1 ~ I rl ) j ~ / / / I I I 1 i/ / ~ / ~ \ \ / I r'-~ / / ' / / /
/ / i ~ 5 v. ~1 ~ 1 / / ~ / i } vAv~ ~ //r.- _ r1 l \ \1 / r'te'' \ II V{/ I / ~ , r _
AA I ! / r / / ,'0 / 1 I A ~ CR i / i / ! / r ~ - ~ l 1A I / / v ~v v , I ( I l I ( t t ~rr' - A / / r' r^! i' r~ II / ~ ~ -vAv/ /rr \V I I I % / / r ~ \ \ 1 / / r' / / / r~ 1' r 1 t 1 i'l ~ r / RIP, •
~ ~I, ~ A v I ,1 \ V A v A A ~"v v , _ ~ ~,(i~ I!,' / r / / - - ---v b v A I I J / / ~ I\ v I ~ 1 . v A C- / -v ~ .W~!'---_ r i ~ 1 OVA / / ~ A 1 1 1 / I~\ 1 I \ 1 \ \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ui - i I \ / I III F /
A ~ y v _v •o I - ~ I / ~ \ I I v v ,vv l} ~1 V A 1 1 I I } ~ i 1 A \ ' ~ V _ 1 III// / r. _ v 1 1 1 I 1 I l /
`,.v ~ / v \ + v } ~ I I I I I I I I I 1 -y,~ ~v ~ _ I / / 1/ h-_., I\VI / ~w vv 1 ~ V Al . I I I
v A r A I J I I I/ r/ 1 n4'/ ~ V v V r' _ l ! r 1 ~ / _ I I I~' 11 I I I
I{/ 1~~~ / ma r ~ I I/ r~ ~ V I I I I I I I I I I/ \ \ Q ! I _ 1 l I f I I i / \ ~ ~ / / / i / ( ~ I \ I v / 1/ ~ v / / f
v v V v ~ 10 I I i ~ 1 l r// r t/ / \ J / 1 1 1 i f v A ~ `i.. ~ ~ A v 1 1 I I 1; v._----..___ I 1 I / / ~ J l / / ~ O ~ \ I I I ! / / ~ I I I I I I ~ ~ I I f ~ / - _ i I C I i I /
\ \ 1 1~ 1 y~ ~ I I\ I 1 W/ I/ 1/ I l/ r 1 I 1 I III 11 I J ' \ \ i \ \ ~ \ \ \ I 1 / ~ \ I i / ~ / ' ~ ~ vr,- \ \ II t I 1 Imo. ~ ~ 1 I I I I \ _ \ \ l / / I / r / r \ _ \ I 1
\ - _ \ } \ 1 \ p \ 1 l \ .Q \ 1 / / / \ \ I I { / - v / ~ \ \ \ 1 I I I / I I I I 1 1 I I I I % - _ I \vvv ~~A wvv iV I ~ { I / 1 I I / / - / ~ \ ~ \ I \ \
V I v v \ 1 1} I I ~ v N 1 1 //i /r,,- \ / / ~ 1/ 1 / v \ I I I I I i- ~ f I `~.v A ~v } 1 1 i Av ~~Q v O i f \ 1 ~ I j I / - "/Ill-~ ~ v vV A I I i I I~ / i 1 I / I I / / ~ , / AW ~ ~ v v~ A v v (q
_ A A r I A \ v A / . I i ~ / / i~~ ~ 111 ~ v \ I ! / / / { 1 t \ \ ~ \ ~ ~ _ / / \ / / I 1 I / - r/ { 1
_ \ \ A } 1 yv v A ~ ~ A v v I I ~'r vAA 1 A I ~ a :"11 { v\ v V A V I I I ` l l _ ~ V v ~ V v V I \ / / ~ t 1 \ / / / A ~ ( I I ~ / / /
- ~ ~v. \ V A Av A 1'ti ~V1 A ~v A v `v V I l ~/r' ? v A } I / A ~ A V A I I A_ / / A ~ \ I I I AV A A V ~V A \ r' / / \ VA 1 J l ! - __r I / \ 1 I I I I I / / / 1 , A A 'v ,Aa }V A v V A 1 ~ ~ A_; / / \ 1A1 / / / i~ 1 / 4 \ I I 7 1 I ~ / / /
I ~ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ I l / / \ \ - i / / / / /rte I I / V~ I \ i A\t A V A \V A V I A v / r/ V A A A / ~ / V I~ 1 l I i I ( I I /r_-_____ ~
~v t A A I 1V I . ~ AV ~v , 1 I \ v U- / vA~._.-/ / ~-'"~v /"-~v 1 I \ ( 1 I I i ~ it - ~ / / / / r \ / / / GI / N / \
1 I ~ 1 1 I \~t v v ~v I `V A `v /f v v v ' ~ / Av1 v 1 I \ I I I I I I - / v i l 1 ~ \ I I I Acv A v v V A v r' / ~v vv vv / v~ 1 1 1 l I I I I I //r 1 1 , I } I l I A \ V v vv " v vV 1~ A v /r ~v v r i~ A l I I l l l I I I ~
I I \ ~ ~ A V v v t V A \ / i / v v / / \ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / / I ~ w l \ \ \ O \ / \ r \ / / e ! r W,
/ I l / / r N ~ W \ ~W ~
1 1 1 1 V A A 1 A\ V A v V A v~---- / v _ 'r I l 1 I(~ v 1/ / ~ 1 A V A ~ VA~ v V / ~ ~ I ~ A t vim. v v I// / / 1 I Li'/' I ~ \ Cn - / / , / r\ )
i A l V A v \ V AA O \ ~ \ \ ~r A A l \ I 1 I \I \V r~ / / /i /~i~ /r/ I ~ .
t r r - -r ~ //r- ~r r / I /ri (Q r r
' / 1 / .y i / L / / r I I Qf ~N
/ 1 I / / / / / i t '
r / - 1 ( /
Je ~e 1 I I / 1 (
~ I r \i ~ / I { ` vV V A \ 1 \1 I I 1 II 1'/ / ~ ~i 1
1 i A _ v V A 1 r - / / t i e' G~+ \V A I ! I l / I I/ f r p / i' v /1 i ( ~ ti~
i ~ / _ / _r t I I / 1 1 / / / / / ~ I ! r , ! ~ ~ ~ U ~ \ I II ii I 1 / i I I j /i j f/ / / / /
~ ~ / ~ / 1 ~ I I A ~ ~ ~ -N 1 I I I 1 I I ! i / / / ~ /r. I ~ / / / t~ I i/ A ~ _ I I I I ~ A I I { rte' /.P/ / - /
/ r / /rr~ l',r r•' J„~' ,r r r
/ i / \ x ~ ~ W I I l / / j I I I / ! / l ~ ~ y ~ l i/ v~.v ''v, `r..r,• CN I ~ ~ I I ) /I \i-~ ~ ~ r / r''r ~r / % ter`- rr'' ~ / / i V~" / wr ~
/
r o _ / i I ! l ( / r /~I ~ z1 •~r,~ ~`R-ti,.ti-.. I ~i_-...--_- ~tp- rr/t/ r' / / / / ' r / r'' - ~ O~ / / _ r,- - ,r/,/ 6 5
r / l I i / ~ /1111 I/ ~A ti:~., I A `M / r' ' / / / / / ( CIJ i I ~ 1 i l J ~ ~ a I ~aN q;., A 1 ~ r r r / / / / / /r / / rrr
l 1 / ~ % CA\ M \ I rte, ~ ~ / ~ i /r// / / r'''l
I ~ 1 1 I { li I ~ x \ ~ I / / f 'V^~ i / _ A\ I I I /J / { f ~~r/i ( ( / ~ _ - ~ A I I I / I T ~ / / L / 1 ( I I ' / ..r' ~ ' f
J I II I I I 7 i~~ ({I I li I 1 i/ i ~ ~.~.a,"~J . ~ \ I ( i I I (1 \ \ ` I \ t I /
/ I I I I I yI II h'/ ` \ ~v ' ~.~y~F~L~'J4 I I I I II I\ \ \ \ \ \ r / ` O / I I\ I ~ _ ~ ~vi~~ ~ ,-ti" O,_.. = ~ ~ \ II I I II 1 \ \ I } \ \ \ \ \ V r
- - \ W v ~ I I A 1 ! b+ ~ _ I ` i~ ~~`;'~=-~"s k / ~ ~ ~l I v~ ~ I I A 1 1 1 } I I \ v ~ - ~ - , - ~ ~ ~ - ~5._.,. / / / / v ! 1 V ~ I 1 \ l 1 \ tit ~ ~J / 1v11 v ~0 6
1 t I ` , } 11 d , , - ,G Q`~"~_----,.-~~- mar/ / \ I / O if w f/~- } \ 1 ~ I I ~ I 1 I ~0 0~~
~V II I I l I II I , I ~ ~ ~ ,-.--C ~.~e,~n~'a",~~~ / ~r ~ / '~v V I I / ~ N / V III I }v ~ 1 / I I, I ~ l Y -,i _ ~._~wh;!~~,,.1•- /r . ~ / A I ~ I I V I I I I I\ V I I I I ~ t 1 V I I I , 0
v! I 1 I r ~ x00 i ~f r/~ - rr r/ 1 V A I \ V A i 1 I I I { ~ ~ ~ sup-~- 1 ` , (~.a..' 1 v \ ! ~ ~ l 1 titi ~ ~jA 1. 5~~: - / rr"~ V A A I \ V A ~ i j ~ I , .-.^~'J`--tom.,.,' ~~~I~ ` n ~ ~ \ v 1 1 v v v / 1 ~
_ \ ,~6 6 0 ~o
r ~ \ \ \ \ \ / / l % /rrr~y .m~r~~ /r / I \ . r T I ~ , Av A V A V v Av L \ ~ .6pS ,~Z M9p~zl
, ~~.1 1M 6 / l a / / l ~ / / v v ~I
z, ~ /
~
i r~ ~
Cti W j o0 0
~o
~ k' e GS a ~ ~ \M b~
~r`~ C~ c ee Ro ` 5ve i - 34'~2,dv 2 "~20 g.2~:49 Apo

1' I I ( I / ~ r I I i 1 ~ V / / / 1 ~ ~ t f / ~ I I V 1 / / / ,_v A v ` 1 f i/ / j r / l V ~.vv v i 1 \
\ / ~ l ~ ~ i / -v / 1 / / ! \ I I ~ J/ / r ~ / I I ; 1 1 / i \ \ v / / / / I I \ v / ' III r i~ t ~1vv Iul II1,,1 ~v ~ / j
y' v ~ 1/ I I~ i ~ 1 / _ I t 1 t - v ~,r / / r ~ / v 1 1 1 / I I I/ l / J A I I} 1 v v vv v ~v i I i ~ 1 / / / I ~ t ~ l l 1 / l I l / / / 1 I J I I i 1 1 1 1 v v v~ ! v/ ! I IIII I .t ~ N to J 1 1 I\ 1 v l / i/-' v i I I I I I I I V 1 `O ~
V A ,v O r ! / ~ I ~ ~ / ~ V 1 V 1 V ~ / / /l / 1 } i/ / / !/i'ii' / ~ / ) 1
r - r; r I I I i i I I I I 1 11 \ ~ N j
+ i i \ ~ l / / / ! I I / r / 1 \ 1 A ~ / / / / / / I 1 I / / / i / ! ~ / ' i ! / / ! / / i / / / } ~ ' / /III 11 I 1 i t v 1 w.~~,. 1 \ ~ ~
1 ~ % ~ ~ 1 I I 1 l( ~ ~ I l ! ~ V A\ v\ \V / / ~ 1 /l l 1 / / ~lir,// r,/ ~ c/ i' ~i .r_ / /i / ' f 11111 111\1\ \ \ \ N 1 ~Ny ~ -i ~ - --.'i' ~ / C 1 11111 l V AA \\11 ~ I v~ N ~ ~ .
1 / ( 1 V A A / / 1 x / / :~i i i / i _ ~ / - ~ . ~vI / / 1 111 1 V 1~A V 1 ~ !`1 I cn ~ ~ / \ ~ t >C
y ~v v v~ v~I l1 / / i/ / i I ! i/ \ 1 V v v / i I ( 1 1111 v vow v `~.,v ~ ~`v.// /
/ / ~ v A t 1 \ \ l \ \A\~__.' 1 I~ \ V Av \ N
V ~V ~`~vJ ~ r / / / / I I I / \ V A A ~v 1 J \ V ~`v vA AVAAV~ vvv vvv v~ ~ 1AA ` v 1\ 1v 1v \V 1 ~ 1 1A \ ~ i 1v vv A I ~ / to / _ ~ t V ~ 5 ~ 1 / v V I /
\ \ ` .l 1, 1 / / / 111 l l / / \.(.1 \ \ \ _ i / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ _ \ \ \ /
~ v v ~I / / ~ \ v V ~ ~v ~ V A V A ~ ~ v V / / / \ 1 \ ~ 11 1 1 t 1 \ it / - \ \ 1 \ \ 1 t \ \ \ D Z - vv vv ~ vv v~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1v v-~?l~'jv vv v1 v v 1 Z;
/ I t 1 I t v v 1 ~ - ~v v 1 1 1 1 1 1 v v v A v v, t v 1 4 `v
- v v vv v 111t v v` `v 1 t1 I I v v v t 1 1 , v I ~l / vv v A A 1 1 1 1 I t1 11 1 V Av vv v\ 1 t 1 I I y v _ N
v v ~ f / / I 1 / v v / / / .p 1 1 1 ~ V v v~ v~,~ v~ vv v / -,v vv v\ \l ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 V Al \ v 1 t X 1 1 1 I( \t ~ ~ p I A l I 1 ~
\ \ I I I I I I lttt 1 1 111 1 1 r. - '~~v ` ! ! I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( I I I ( 1 1 i t v .,v m
\ ` / I I I I III I l r 1 1 1 I I \ A \V l i i ~ 1 1 1 1 I I V II l i l t I' I 1 1 ~v vv
v 1 1 I I r % I l I I I I I I// l/ I J ~ ,J I 1 \ 1 ~
~ / V / A. / .i A V A V 1 } \ \ I I r' / / l I Ill 1 1 / 1 r l N I i A 1 N \ 1 1 f I/ 1 1 1 IIr 1 1// I r N / \
_ _ ~ x r III / 1 / / / / / / / 1 \ ~ I I } ~ G+ I J 111 / ~ / r /'l- / 1 / / _ / } I I \ i i \I 1 1 1 I~ 1/ f l 1 i~ ~ I r r / r! / j ! ~ It ! \ 11 q
I I ( ~ I III l / r 1 j 1 (I 1 / / / / . I I f / / ! / / .I _ I I I I g I 1 I l f r l/ J l 1 r' ! I// / ~v
\ / \ / /
/ J 1 I I1 )III i,~ ~ ~ / rlf J/ .'1~,~ 1 , _ ` v~ vv 1 q / _ ~ / 1 / / , ~ \ i I _ ' ~i ~ l l ! lr 11 ~ 11 I I ~ I I ! r ~ ~ % /l l l I llr ( I ~ ~`v ~ ~ -
- } I O 111 ( / / / / i ~ \ _ I 11 l r i - ~
/ - ~ _ / _ _ I 1 j ~ I III I I / f/ 1~~ O / ~ .-__''J / I I l I 1 / /r_~ ~ / / / r / 1 1 1 I V 1 i1 N / / ~ ~ v
\ I j I I I 11 } I \ \ i I 1 / - /l / - / l 1 I I f 1 I I i Jam/ / / ~ / / ~LL~' / 1 1 1 / / I.P / / / / ~ ~ \ \
` , 1' I I 1 ) I } \ ~ \ i I i \Z / L / / ~ / 1 / 1 I I I I J ! /
v v I S ~ ~ I v A V A V \ . v v 1 / 1 v / 1 1 11 / / / vv ` , V 1 / I III - _-!~a ! , , , / ~ v v ,
v v t `vvv vv V i fl l l v v v v v v vvv vv vv , ~v~ v n vv ,L / / / 1! ~ i 1vv. 1 1 1 I i l i /_,__v., \ \ I
_ i ~
y ~ .v A } 1 y \ ~ I ~ ~ II v \ } A A V A V A \ V 1 v v v ~I (n ~ ; n / ~ I I i l v 1 1 1 1 V A \ V i
v v. vv vv I I i 1 1 I f it y \ l 1 i \ \ .v v vv v~ ~ v V A 1 / A 1 l 1~~ I I v v A 1 v 1 I t ~ I / I 1 1 A V A A" v v _ O~ / A A / 1 v_ / ~ 1 1 1
\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I I I i ,-'c' / ) t I t \ \ \ / 1 1 1 y ~ ~ ! \ \ c ~ / I 1 \ \ 1 \ 1 } } v v A~ v V I I I / / 1 } 11 1 A\ 1 A ~ 1 A! _ v ~v v v v v 1 1 1 I i} 11 1 1 ~ \ V A V A ~ 1 I ( } 1 \ 1 v aF, v~ I A l / 1 I 1 I r. 1 1 t ~ 1 1 ) / / v v v v ~ v _ v
y vv v vV A v A} I 1 / I 1 } V 1 A \ 1 l\ vv .w~ vv \l A AVA V~-..____ / i 1 1 1 1 1 ll 1 1 1 I 1 111 11 ( / 1~~~/ / / ) I J l / / _ ~v v ~ - ~ v v v `V vv v A 1 t 1 1 / / ~ / i - I ~ / ? v v y ~ ~ v v ~ A v v
v A v vv v v A A A\ 1 1° ~~l 1 1 i / 1/ 1 1 1}~ / ! ~v V `v A `v N Z- I }v A i I I I} 11 VI r ~ `v v v v A 1 1 / / / / / 1 1 I \ ~ v v v v ~I / / v vv / - J I I II i VA
1 II / / ) \ / \ ~ / \ ~ ~ / I I I 11111 11A1~\ ~ l,:. i _`_'i I % / vv vv ~ .~0~ vvv V yv vv ~ v vy vv. A
/ i ! l i I ~ I / / , / / / 1 ~ I 1 v ..-,--n j \ t /v / ~ i i 1 I 1 _ l l I I ~ !i / / ~i I l 1 1 ~ v~ ~ \ / I I ~ 1 I( \v A f 1/ / 1 1 1 1 / I I ~
- / / / I I I III / / . ~ -t,d I I I ~ / s / I 11 I } 1 \ / / I I 1 1 / / / / I ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ! I ~ - / I III h\ I / ~ / I I - - - / / / I ~ / / ! . O / 1 I ~ _ - / / III f / I I 1 / ~i - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / ) I I I I / / f ! / //i / _ / / _ ~ v v v v v A ~
i / I I / l / . f.. - i I I 1~\ - - ~r III / % ! / / 11 _ _ / I ! ! ! ( I III/ ~ ' I I ~ / ,P 1 - J l \ \ ~ \ \ \ 1 1 \ L1 \
! J l / I / / ( ~ y/ / /mar-- ~ / I A ~ "r ~ % 1 11 f / l - r ' / 1 1 1 fl l ~ I I / - v 'v v~ v v v v v v v A v v - / / / III / / ti I / r l / / / , ' A '~.GI ~ A ~ A V~ V A Av A A t 1
r I I 1 J 1 I I } { I / _ ' ~ _._W ~ ~ III I v ~ ! / / / ' I' 1 I 1 I I i 1 1 I 1 1 /i/ \ J /i /ir-,. i' ' _ - - ~T~~.~.__ //i /i i { J.'\\ l 1 % % / / rllJ r _ , ,vv J I I r r / ~~v ~ v v v v v v ~ ` v ~ v \ v I ~
~ / / 111 I i l , ~ IIII I ! ! / `~v \ 1 V A v v v~ v v vv ~ v v v v / Ilfl I I / J -vvv v I l l l I I I I ~ l+, l 1. / , _ ~ A 1 A t ~ A\\ V v v w v A~ v AV A\ I~ I I I I ` v~~ 1 1 1 I I I I I / r / , 'v v V I l l I 1 v\\ v A v v v\ v \ v~ l
~ 11/ rv I .F v v1 1 1 I I I I ! / /l` ~ l vV A 1 1 1 t v\ 1V A v \v vv v vv A A\ vV A 1 . i 1 / I/ v I / 1 1 1 V ~ v v~ V 1 } i I I ` - ~ / t l _ ~ l 1 \ t I f ! 1 / / \ \ I l 1 \ 1 1 \ \ \ ` 1 f I I V
~ r q I ~ I it • _ 'd. ~ ! I - / ' v t I !lam ~ ~„~1 I I 1{ ( I / / _ v I \ 1 A~ v v I t , 1/ ~ r / , . 1 I I I
\ I i~ / / I I ~ I \ \ \ O`er.. " ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ NO ' ~ ~ u ! l ' / ' _ / / ~j~ ,-a.\ 11~I / 11 \ \ 1 ! f 1 I / l 1 t 1 1 t \ \ \ \ ) / ~~,.i-,- r 1
i, \ III , \ r 1 I 1 / / -.t~ 1 ! 1 t ~ / / ~ ~ - -
/ / i \ \ \ 1 \ \ _ \ \ \ ~ ~ \ l \ \ \ d ~ r / / / \.111 I I / ~ 1 1 ~ 1 / / / q \ I ! / ~ ~..-fi=j"`"
. A, `.v• i / W 1 1 1 1 A ~ 1 A I A O / A A A\ V A\~ A Av ..~i / / / _ ~~v. v }I III I ~ ~ ~,.1 I ~ I I I Il / / / /I i i /i' /_.,'i'~"%'~ 'r- -~.'~t--''r r' "'`i-____._
~ v IIII / 1 I I I I J J / / / ~ / v ~ ~'i - \ v v V v t
~1~ } v I I ~ ~ i rn \ I I / / / / V I l l l J 1 1 1 v~ \ v v ~ " - i / / / / \ \ \ \ i I I ( 1 ! i I ( I I / wt,.a~s=., , / r~ / .-r''/- \ 1 f 1 X02„? 59 E / r
\ I I ~ ~ ~ I / 1 ~ l / 1 f I ' / j / / O/ / J J \ 5D' / / / ! ~---r, II /
/ , ~ I I 1 I / , I l Z ~ Av I
1 1 1 1 / f / ! / / / / / / / ~ S-- ,r / / / O ~ ~ AI (r! 1 A A \ S 1 ? IA i 1 / / J ~ l l / / / / / / / / / ,~,r~" /i ~~'j, i /r - ~ ._i ~i ~w l l / / - q - i' v V AA I I I ~ / I I I 1 V ~ - / QN' / / l l ( / l / / / J / l / v rr~ l
\r 1 ~ O { ~ V ~ ~I l 1 1 / / l" / / / / / - v.~ ~ ~v r l1 I / /
t I v A~ ~ ' ( i I ! 1 1 V A vv vv / _ ' / / '1jL j'a~,~ ~A / ~ ~ 1111 / / ~ i / r
l r' I l ~ ` 1 ~ l / 1 I \ ~ _ i' .f / / 1. _ _ \ ? }lJ Jr-' 1 / / l~ / i' ' i A A\ J V / / / / .b A Vv ``V-+ ~ J 1/~~~ 1 ! /_-y _V 1 11 / i' / / / / - V v \ I I ~ / 1 / f I ( / - - / /
I ~ V vv A\v I I 1 ) ! i ~ f ~ l I v 0.~ / __r~ ~p~'/' ~ ° 1 / / _ _v \ 1VA 1 / I / /
v v ~ '~v ~ 11\ I v v v v v\ v cv vvv` v vv ~ - Z 1 Vvv1~ I I 1 \v / _ \.A 1 I I i i / / / /
/ - _ / / / - - / / ~ ! \ \ vv \A V
~ \ v v / 1 ~ ~ } A 1 1 I I I vv Z(J \ ~ I 1111/ / -~v v~/ - \ t I I / / / \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ I I 0 1 I I I 1 I I ~ ~r_' - 1 / / / ! \ } 1~~ \ \ 1 1 I 1 / ' /
\ \ ` \ I Ot 1 1 f 11 { \ I I \ 1 / ~ / , ` ! 1 1 I i I 1 ! i } 1 I I { ! 1 \ \ \ J l / / / / _ O / / ~ / vCv
v v v v vv ~ ~ v 1 1 1 I 1 It 1 1 / , I l ! / / ~ ~ \ 1 I I ( 1 / ~ } 1 } I 1 1 ! / ( \ / / A / / l I ~^v l 1 ~ ~ / 11 I! r I ( /
`v v v v. ~ ~ \ \ \ V ~ y 1 } t v v,• -v / / 1 1 l / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ L l I / C 1 I I I I I \ \ _ \ \ I } 1 1 \ l \ ~ - i 1 1 / / / 1 / ?i / ~ \ / t 1 i III _I I I I i / I I I r / ~ I ~ ~ ! I I
\ ~ \ \ 1 1 } \ ~t ~ ~ I 1 / / / - I I) / /i / ~ \ \ \ I I III 1..'''~~ i } 1 I j 1 i A A A 1~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~v ~v J I! 1/ ~ /i / V 1 1 I I/ / v / ^ vv A V} 1 1 1 J / ,1 1 I I ) ~ v V A A V A 1 1 7. v A ~ \ V - A I l i / / rJ(r^~._... v A I i / I I)
` \ 1 A Vv9 \ 1 } 1 V 0 v N \ / / / / l / V / / ! 11 ! v v \ I I ~ / ~ I I ~ ~ 1i r\ \ \ } I / , I / / / .ice 1 l I \ I I 1 I / / I 1
~ - v V\ 1 V A~ V 1 v v V v vv v f l,, / 1 1 1 1 l/ / / N~ 1l } II v v V 1 1 1 t / l l J \ \ ~
` 1 1. A 1 \ v 1 vv v V ` \ 1 11 - vv A A A 1 I/ / 1 v V A V I I I I y_ / / i 1 / / / ~ / / / / / v.. p
\ \ v v v \ 1 A J/ l I 1 / 1 ~ Gi
\ 1 1\ } \ 1~ I `\1 \ \1 11 l 1\ \ ~ / \i° \ 11 \ 1 I I ~ I I i / / ~ / / / / - / N v~ vv v~ ~ / / , - / - O \ Rl
v V i f v v v v A v / . / 1 I i i / \ 1 t I V A i ~V A v v~ v 1 1 v~ ~ _ A A v_/ / ~rvv/__vv A I \ i J l I I 11../~ / 1\ V 1 V 1 1 1 Av A v v A V A A v / _v v A ~ A 1 I 1 I I I ~ /
I I I i 1 1 I i I I vV v vv vv A V 1 V vv vv v v~ / v~ 1 I 1 1 I I I I I//'- / i 1 ~ / / fed (j~ j ' ~ ' Z / / / \ \
i l i l A\ A 11 I I w V ~~1 ~V v v v A V A \ ~ / v vv _ v 1 I i I ~ / /
I l l l 1 A~ 1 1 1 1 . A }A \ v vV A A \ v } - / .v v~ (d---- \ V 1 1 l 1 1 I 1 Imo/ ~ i 1 1 1 l V A } 1 V A ~ V~ A ~ A A A / vv ~ _ 1 } 1 A I f fv / 1 / ~ /
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V A I I A \ ~ V Av 1 / ~ _ - - } 1 A 1 v~ `Vvvv I// / - / I N
11 1 1 1 1V A A Av `AA1} A ~ A 1\ ~ ~ - ~`v \V 1 t\ 1 1 11 ~ 1 V ?/i/ ~ / / /i 1 / ~ ~ _ / / I
\ ~ \ \ \ 1 y__ s _ - \ 1 I 1 \ ~ ~ \ / / - _ \ 1 \ / ~ I / i / 1 I .
1 \ ~ \ \ _ I 1 / 1 V \ V 1 ~ ~ A / _ \ 1 V / / ' ' - ti- / , ; I I w y
I / I I I / , / _ i f /
1 1 i 7 ~v I ~ 11 1 O /
I 1 1 1 A I - - v v v v ~v V 1 1 / i'/ I t r / I/ / t I 1 / / I
I I( / ~ ~ / I I I
1 i/ (a V A ~ l! J l / ~ / I ! ! J Z
1 I I t ;..__..a r~ ~ r ~ l i 1 / I / i' l • l,I i ~ - / .r-- W ip / rev 1 1 I i I I 1 I I / i/ , ~ / i r V / ) / /
~ 4 x 1 I % j~''~~,~, l l 1 Ij I 41 A ` V W`~ I I 11 I I 1 A I 1 / / /:•A j' zti ' / / / - -
/ l / 1 / ~ x ~ ~ / I i I / -4- s ° ~ , l i 1 / / 1 / I 1 ~'r. ~ _ 7..,, W / I I I I ) I I \i- / / % / 't"'
'r,~ ~ " / I l J f l l f 1 Ci 1 I I 1 r-~ ~ ~ 1 p - - _ / 1 ~ / 1 / 1 - ~,4Jf ~ / -
~ ~y ! / ! i I 1 / ;I O' i / \ ,y ~ y ~ "x:~.ltM 1`------_- h _ / I f t ` ~ / - ~ I , .6
- _ , ` - ~ ti s
y ~ - - I ! 1 ~ ~ _oo-- / - . 6 ti - ~ ~ 4~
`y ! 11 I 1 / ! - 1 r,.r~ '"G^,..,`~:+ / / rn"i. i I I"'Tl., o- I / l l / / ~ i ( I I I I O f 1 I / II i O / / 11 / ' / ~r 1 1 / / 1 ' ' ~ q ~ . ~
I I I / / . i 1 ~ / r ~ ~ \ / '~.i I I I 1 I ~ I l ll 1111 A ~ ! 1 _~~*~=5..,~____ - vv I I I ///1 ( I ~ r/ . J J a- ,
I I I I I 1 'r n / I ; ~ , - ~=:r~-~'~- 11 r r v 1 v I ,I \1 \
vvv \1\ ~
4 \ I 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1( ~ - s-;__ _ ia'..~'-~''_,~.~,t^'"'°'~"'°~,1 / \ 1 \ } 1 I, t \ \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ v 1 M I 1 1 ~ 1 d!/ ~ ~~--r _ _ - R - r / v v I / .p, _ ~ \ 1 ~ } 1 1 V 1 \
V~ / I i 1 I I i i . '..fir-'~~„6 i 1 v A 1 / O W 1 1 1} 1 i I I ~ A 1 I 1 I I ' 1~ x ~~r'-``~ r~ sue"'" ~ ~ / / ~ A 1 I J N l 1 1 i V 1 I I~ I i . -r~-..r/ ~ rM~~ - / ~v } 1 I } l x / \ t l l i O. , . ¦ 6
I i V 1 11 I l Do ~ I i rte' , W / A } 1 I } A I I } I I\ 0 o~r o ~
l X r ~ 4
\ ~ ...,J I AV I I 1 ! i. l / i' ~ ~ t0;±" J t / / AS`V' ~ \V A\ \ V vv ~ ~ '6~ L6 ill
ii v 1 ~i / ~ V l / ,.i V A \ \ \ ~ ,60S ~ a~
z o, ~ ~0 "9
V
~ / A , / ,I ~y / 1 / / A 1 v Av A i ti~ ~ ~ ~ • ~o
.
ti ..J
0
w CD w~ C ~o
W
\`'~jee~sV~e ~ Poiecs\u3412 Stanewcter cre Ro bYe h 3412.dw el
A6 1 , 2/11/20~ 8:22.49 AM r...... _ _ .....~..r......,~.--.~ ~ ,,.,,,rte,

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
} ~ 1 ! / ~ / / \ / / ! / / I I I V A \ ( IIIi
f 1 t / / / ( 1 I I 1 v / 1 I l \ / / / / / / ~ ~ V A \ v ~ , r / / / / / 1 I I 1 ~ / / ~ t l v / / / / / I 1 I I 1 I / / / 1 / / / / ~ / I \ \ \ \ \ ~ , / / / / ~ I I i I N ~1 " \ ~ \ / cam. / / ! III ! Cn t` ~ \ _ / 1 % 1 11 I
i ~ ~ ~ ( I I 1 / / / I I I A V / I / / ~ 1 A\ / / / / ~ / I I A V A ~ I^ i / 1 ~ / ~ \ \ I I ~ I ! i ~ / ~ l \ 1V A / / / / / //-vv V v l f / / / ~ 1 II V A\ \ vA\v\v t vA v v v V A ' ~ I , / , / \ I II 1j 1111 1 J v?_// 0 O
- ! I I / / Il _ 1 / / I I 1 \ / J ! I / \ \ \-1 i l I / l / I I I j 1~ j I l ; / / I I 1 11 \ i 1 ! / / A~ l / J 1 1 / ~ ~ ~ A \ I " I \ / 1 1' II 1 1 111 I, I I 'D I w 3
\ I 1 1 J I ~ / I 1 t 1 ~ / / ~ % _ 11 I I I l / Jl ~ 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 \ vv\V A v / / / , III I1 I I III ~ \ (Si D ti I / / / r V I I I 11 11 ~ 1 1 1 I \ 1\ / I I III I I t ~ ~
/ ( I I l ~ / / ~ / 1111 Ilil il~ \ ~ • / / f 1 1 1 I . / J I I I I I ti 11 11''±+ v ~ ~
1 / ~ i ( ~ I / - 1 1 ~ / / / / 1 I / / / / / / / / ~ / ' / / l / l l I ~ I/ / / 1 \ \ V / / l / / W \ I I / / / / ~ / / ' / / l l f l ~ l it l 11i1 1111 tl~ ~ n ' , / / / / ? / / i I I ~ 4 t 1 V ~ ~ ~ J , ~ , 1 I 1 1 ! 111 III \Z - ~ ~ N /
' ~ ~ / / / / : I i / 1 1 \ \ A / i / J ~A l / / / / / / j / ~ i//// / ~ J % / / 1 ~ l / A A A v / / / / I ~ / / / / / ~ b S ~ ~ / / / / / ~I / ~ i / V~ w / ( 1 / l ~ / v A \ V v v / / i l to ' / / , , - - / r (I 1 I I 1 111 11 1 v ~ 'v \ a ~ ~ ~
~ / 1 J I / A \ V A l ( / / / / / / / / i 1 f I ~ ~ I / / A V A ~~V / / l l ~ ~ / / iii / i / / ~ ~ i/ / /
~1 / / / ~ l 7 I / 1 V A v / l / 1 / / / i~ i' ~ f / I 1 \ \ \ / l / ~ i ~ .rte - ~ /
/ v l / / / I I I I ~ A \ V A V / 1 J / ~ / '/-'s'i'p 1~.,.,,-•w\ -
v . ~ / ~ ~ / ~ / / v v A ~v - / I 1 i V v~ ~ ~ v v Vv v ~ - - - VAA
~'v I l / ~ I \W v ~ v v v x v _ - \ / ~ ? \ \ 1 1 \ - - \ \ 1 v v / r ~.v v 1 v 1 1 1~ 1 11 v vv v,_ v\ v v 1 ~ ~
. A ~ ) ~ i / Ili I l w~ v vv / / vv v v v v tZ ~ ' -~v vv A A ' / /
\ / I/ \ / / \ \ \ ~ \ / vAv ~ ~ v vv v \ ~ ~ 1 l f l 1 \ v ` ? vv 1 1 \ v v v v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v v v 1 \ . v?~ ~ v v v ~ 1 V v~ v v 1+ 1 t ~ ~ v
v vv / ~ v v A ~ 1 I 1 1 1 1 A V` ?v v 1 ~1 1 ` v~ A T
/ / \ ~ ~ \ \ ~ 1 / i ! 1 \ ~ vv ,v `v v 1 1 I 1i 1 1 t 1 1 A\ \V v V 1 i 11 I~ II 1 Al a ~ ~'~I \ \
v~ vv A i i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V A 1 1 I I I 1 1 V vv t ~ - '~'v V ) t i I 1 I{ 11 l 1 I i l l ( I I 1 v ~
/ I ~`V A / / ~ A v V Av - - ? V / / / I I I I I V I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 ~ V
^ A \ ~ I/ % f l I I I i 1 1 1 1 /l l l 1 I I 1 ?v vv v v 1 I I f' / / / l 1 I I I l/ I / / I l I 1 v 1 v \ I I l l ~ I I I i t f l I 1 l 1 N i ~ \ N
_ y ~ / _ / ~`g---_ i ~ ~ ~ I II 1 / ~ ~ / / A \ v - _ _ / ~ - ~ ~ / ' J~ I vv 1 1 1 ~ 1,,' - / lI 1(i I Illf / i,/l r , ~ i; 1 ~ C v 1 , i / / 1' Illy / / ~ If vv v
~ ,
I 1 I I j-'I III I//'/j~_~__ / i l! 1!! l l l 1/ j 1 . ? 1 I I fpi it i t l1/ / 1 f llfl III / I I I/ I l l 1 1 l l l / I 11 i f I I//// v___,--~
I~ S I / / / J I III i 1 1! / l 1 1 I f ! ~ ~ l I ~ / _ / I !l / \ ` ~
• ~ ~ - ~ J _f' _ _ ~1 / I 1 f O li _ ~ 1, 1/l ~ ~l ' ~ A ~ ~ ~ / / 1 ~ I I I I 1 i (1 _ ~ i / / / / l 1 it I ! ~ ~
j / l j 1 ' r ~ I ~ I 111 i - i l / / / 1 1 ~ r- - - ~ / 1 ! ! _ / ~ / / ~ A
I /
~ / ~ ~ / /~i 1 1 1 \i\1 l / / / ice'/ / / ~ \ ~ ~
/ / / ~ / ~KL- I I / / v / / / ~ \
J I I I i I I V Av vv 1 1 1 f -,v v vv j / ~ 1 P~q.~~ I I I I l - I t / _ - / l ! l I III / , 1 , / / ~ /f ~O ~ \ ~ ~
t I I I / I I ) l / ~
- V \ A VA ~ ~V A V A V A V A \ ~ A A ~ / / / / I Vv I 1 1 ~ \ \ I ! \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ / ~ ~ ~ \ / / / i / J l \ I I 1 III 1 I
\ ~ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \O \ \ \ ~ \ / 1 1 I ~ _ 1 I 1 \ 1 1 1 1 - ~ I I 1 1 1 \ \ V V1 / / ` ~v V I l / -h
1 1 li } 1 t \ . v v ~ ~ / W V ! I 11 ~ 1 ~ , 1 \ \ 1 I ~ _ / r I I 1 V A ! 1 I W / / ! % ~ ,w ,i i" ~'~~?V A V ~ A A \ V A 1
'•v v I + ~ 1 ~ / , I , v 1 1 , v ~ v v v m vv A I ` , ` r- / , / I `v ' ' 1 ~ 111 ~ vv 1\ ~ 1\ I\ I I I / 1 l 11 1 1 1 11 \ AI ~v` ~ O / 1V A A\ - _ / 1 ! ~ 1 l t ~ / / / ~
v ~ v ~ I / / I 1 I i ~ 1 1 v v~ _v vv v v~ ( \ - 1~1 _ I I I I I I 1 1 t 5 I1 I 1 1 ~ 1 / / / / / / / i / f / l / ~ A v ~ . V A vv v -v A
vv \V A V 1 A 1 ~ I /I 111 1 1 / ?r v V v v DI I A I I l l 1 1 1 I 1111 1 1 f / ~ / - i t 1 1 ~ , v v v V v v v ? v A p
\ 1 1 I / / / / / / 1 I \ ~ \ \ - 1 / - 1 I I I 1 I I II 111 1 \ 1\\ 1 ~~~r _ . ~ / rl, / ~ / ll / \ \ ".,w' \ \ \ 1 \ Ul
-v~ vV A I j l l i /1 I 1 1 1 1 vlQ / A •`v / ~ ~ / I I I I I / / ~ / 1 1 1 1 . ~ \ v - _ 1 / / / I j I I I I 1 1 11 ~ ~ ~ j / ~ / l /~j / ~ \ ti-_~ ~ ~ A ~V A ? A V A \ V
` / I 1 1 \ r / ~ / / / _ J J / ~ ~ - _ v ? V A A v A v v V A \
- ~ / i III I / / i I i - \ \ ~ 3 I ( ~ ~ ~ J r - / , I 1 1 \ 1 1 \V / , /~V / , / / / / / ,l f l / / ~~N`. ? vv~ V A A v ` v ? A v v
/ j / Sl / l / ' ~J I ~ 1~` - _ / I I / J 1 _ r t A _
- / ' ~ _ / 1 I I 1 I / 1 1 1 1 / / l / , A ~ \ ~ A I \ \ \ \
' ~ , A - - / j l 1/ Illl(I 1 ~ ~ 1 I I l 1 / l / / / % ~ O ~ ` ~ \ v ` ~ A vv vv ~ vvv ?v vv vv 1 It v
/ l l 1! l / ~v IIIi ! 1 / / / / p v V \ v v ? ~ v ? , / / It ' ~ J 1 / ~ ~ A ~ \ V v v ~ v v \ V v / / / Ill I ~ ~ 1 I t I 1 ! / / / / , ~ A 1 \ v A ~ v v v ` v f ~
/ I / I ~ 111 1 ! ( I / ! ~V I \ v ?v v v 'v1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 I l / l V I 1 1 1 V A\ v V vv A vv A v vv A v I ~t
- / - / l y. I 1 1 / \ I 1 1 r l ~ \ ~ I I 1 1 \ \ ` \ \ ? \ \ \ \ 1 I ~ - _
/ / / 1/ 1 ,J'A`I, p I I f 1 I / / l 2~'--~ \ 1 1 1 \ ~ \ ~ /'i' 1 1 I I 1 I / l ~ 1~1~ 1 1 \ -L- -t-''r
Ill / v ~ 1\ ~ r I f I / / - v V I 1 1 A _ _ -
r ~ I I ~ ~y - - C / v V~ 1 / - f ~~1 ' \ : ~ '
J / / ~ ~ ~ v ~I 1 1 / / ~x - _ / ~ r - \ r
~ / v 1 M, ~ v ~ ~v v / / / - yvv V v I 1 J I ~ _ I 1 V D~1N~ ,VAA / ~ / - / v _v , I I ~ v ~ ~ / v 1 Vr~nµo ~ Vv / I / / / _ _ _
~ ~ m 1 J ~ / / ~ , I I A t \ ~v v / / / / / ~ f 1 I `ll I / / / ~ ~~t ~r: I ~ A / / / / nn ~ I m 1 \ ~ I v\ v 0v / / , i,r ~ n a i , \ it 1 I ) I /
' ~ I ! / / / l is / / 1 I 1 • 0\ ~ - / / / / j / /
- , i _ ~ _ _ _ , ~ _~i I I *'C
1 l ~ t ~ / / 'r. i ~ - , I i v v I VIII / 1 / - > ~ i l / ~ yam" / ~ ~ A~ ~ A i ~ _ ' 1 1+ 1 / / I • T/~l l ) 1 / / / / / ! / / ~ ,CVO (A i
v v~_ ~ i t 1 / l J I 1 ~ v ~ - ` ~ ~ ~ / t'~ ~ "(7;8,x,_ -.,v - ~ I I I A v- ! ~ I 1 l / l 1 / A V A ~ ~.lv ~ - / _ ~ i' \ V I I I ~ ~ ' / / / / / 1 ~ "
\ 1 - { / \ ~ I / _
\ ~ l r ) i v ~ v V ~ ~ I \ 'V A ,V A v AVA\ v'~ i / ~ - ~ 1 w -l ~ ~ J i ~l 1 \ ~ \ _ /
p ~~v 1 I f A N - ~ 1 1 I `v ~ v ~ti_ ~J \ 1 1 I I I I I I f l i J ~v -`;~~-v iv • !~C 1 1~ / _ 1 4 1 1 1 1
1 / \ l if l / i,'rr.~' .~i--~ l`_-.... ,I I \
'v A ` ' M ~ ~ I I J t l / / A V ; / / f- - _ I I / L.~ / ~ V - v I I I i J \ ~ ry - 1 ~ I ~ I I I i l1 1 - - _ 111 I 1 / / ~ 1 I I III 1 I I I I
\ ~v r w 1A 1 i I i I ~ J/ r- 1 /'~-r I I J 1 1 1 1 v v v ,`4` r ~ 7 I I 1 1 1 I l~/~` - - I l ~ I J// I ~ V I 111 ( I I I I
v , a v v v s 1 v 1 v 1 1 c I// ~v ! t J/ ~ ~ 1~ - 1 I 1 i I I I v ` y-_' vAv VA c 1 1 1 1 1 1 v 11 I / / I I l v~/ v 1 i I I J I J ( I I I I
~ a 1 \1\ ® ~ 1 1 ~ \ ~ I 1 / r 1 I I / ~ \ 1 1 I { ! I I /r _ ! I I -----~i- \ \ 1 \ 1 `I \ \ 1 I / / / 1 1 1 / / /'IV -1 J I - \ 1 I I I f I I I 1 I i I I I 1 / - _ ,I l (1 1 1 / i I 1 r- ~
~ a, < \ \ 1 \ ` 0'~ N 1 J l 1 ` \ 1 I (\1 / / r-r \ 1., r \ 1 l I I I~/ - 1 I I
A ~ i 1 Z~ v Av ~'v O 1 / / I I L ~ ' 1 I 1 - v 1 II I ~ i r--~ ` l ! . _ 'V ~I i \ v 1 v ~ v v 1 I f 1 ~ ~ 1 I I t ~ / ~ ~ / llry v t I J I t I / / / 1 ~ Lam..- ! / / / ~ ~ I ~ \ \ ~ ~ ? \ ~~~,v"~\ N 0
~ \ V AVA V A A I / / _ A A 1 A ~ ~ / ~ A 1 , I / C , A V l v A 1 1 \ A 1 -r~ I ~ I /~~id /
O _ \ I 1 l \ \ \ \ ~ \ 1 I \ r mob,/ ~ /1~ r+ I / ! I / / /
V 1 ,l A A \ y~~ A A V v \ S I / ` 111 x / / ~ N_ 1 / 1 \ l I I / / - / v 1 V A ~1 A A i ~ VA V A\ \v A 1 1 1 A / A\ \ V A-".~j' /a / V 1~/-/' \ 1 1 I ~I J 1 ~ ~ / ~--r-r--' / / / / / / / \r' a / / ~ N ~ \ \ \ ~ ~i N Q
W ~ \ \ \ / " -11 I \ rv li
W ) 1 l 1 I I I \VAVA A ~ A Av A 1 W V A A ~ / ` v A~ H / vr'_'~ v 1 I I I/ / ~ 1 t I t 1 ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ / i/ \ w a / _ _ \ 1 I l 1 I I f'T I /
II I 1 V 1 1 \ 1 ''1 1 1\ \ \ ~ \ O \ \ / / ~ j / ~ 1 I I 1 l 1 / I I ',Q 1 1 \ ~,1 A \ V A \ 1 I J ~ v / ~ V 1 l I\ I ~ I/ / r+ 1 1 1 1 \ ~ 11 ~ ~VI A\ v\ \V A V A\ ~ AV A / vvv ~ OD \ V AI 1 1 I 1 / ~ / / / ~ / ,r, / /
1 1 ~ 1 V A V A V ~ , ~ - / v Q I I \ I f f / ~ i ~ ,I c \ -
j ~ 1 1 1 1 A A *~AAA , 1 'v v\ A l ~ ' v 1 I \ A 1 1 1 / rt~~"-'~~~
1 b ~ l A ` vv ~1v' A A ~ ,A 1 1 v~ _ -`v vv 1 1v v I I l l A v ~ v v v ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ _ b
, / 1 - 1 - - 3 ~
/ / / Z D - N I
\ \ \ 1 \,1\ - - I I/1% {/SIC/ / / / 7~ \ \ - - \ ~
\ \ A \ 1 _ / ~ I I 1 f ~ ~ n W
/ I / N~~~
X1311 . t I \ V 1V 1 V A v ~ - - ~v vv I 1v Irv vv 1v ' 1 / / / , \ I / 1 / y Q ~ \ 1 ~ / / / O ~
I \ \ ' \ \ \ \ I I I I / / 'V - / / I
I 1 ) J / / i ~ Il AV \ V ~ - i \I 1V A\ I I II I 1 I ~ ~ ~i'~~I ~ / /
I 1 , ~ i~ / 1 /I v - --_----p-'~ W l l l I I l l I l l / ~ / / / ' / ' ~ ~ ! 1 1 / A j I r / f / ~ ~ / / y ~l ~ / / / W ~ . . ~
f J i~/ I_ 1/ l ~ I v v ~ - / N Cn 1 I I I I/ 1 I l / / / / J I / / _ _l J 1 I 'I v.r W ~n ~._rv I I III I i / / / / / / i ~ I I I ~ / i , I / ~ / / - ! ~I A\ \ ~ ~r ~ / W ~ {i I I I I I A I 1 1 ' 1 /
/ / - . , / / ~ ~
/ ,
t,?/' ~i
/ ' ' - .6
/ / ~ / ~ 6 /i / -
/ ice/ f' / , ~i
I I I O 1 I I 11 O . A l 1 i~ J / _ ~ 11/ / /
I II I I I J/ J I I v v l t - I~ vvv 1 I ~ I/ II t ! ~ I I 1 1 V A 1 _r ~ V I 1 I I r~ J { 1 1 1 1 'r 6 .
I i I I I l + l I v A -k- 1 - a p ~ A I I I I I I\ 1\ 1 ~ v I I I \ ~ ~ Q W ~._k. ~i r'~ _ 1 ~ a 1 11 III \ \ \ \ 1 1
1 1 1 ~t / ~ V 1 .,V ) I I ~ A } .I 1, ! ~ / ~ ~ / 1 / ~v~~v -v\ 1 ti ~ W vv 11 I I 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 \I 1 1 AC 1 ' •
I I I 1 4 \ 1 1 ~ ~ '4~ •IW 1 1 I ti0 0
\ It / I I I I I ~ /I ~ l._~l '1\ 1 I I I v J N i i l I 1 v v v, i , vv I i ~ , r ~'I i,, _ / ; v I II II i ~ 1 ~ i I I, i l I I + ~0/ \
V `V I 1 I i 1 / ~ ~ \V / _ , ~ ~ Cd / I I I I I a V l I ` I I 1 0` 0
4 / I I / i~ r/ 9'~ ~ \ V A\ 1 Av \v v l I ~
L6'64
c
p2ti .90`°~ , v
u C4 Tri ti
:*tb l I j i 1 { ~O y
y ply
i w°/ C
r1l 11 Iv 1v 1.