20031152 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20070831

OF wATF9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j r Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
°`---'? Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 18, 2004
Town of Cary
Attn: Joseph Godfrey (Park Planner)
111 James Jackson Ave., Suite 201
Cary, NC 27513
Subject Property: Glenkirk Greenway, Glenkirk Subdivision, Cary, NC
Coles Branch [03-04-02, 27-33-3, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
DWQ Project No. 03-1152
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Godfrey:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 60 feet of perennial streams and 15,000 square feet (ft2) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose
of installing the proposed greenway trail at the subject property, as described within your application dated January 28,
2004 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 28, 2004. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by the General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404).
The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian
buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control
and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with
all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated
with the project.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind - No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands,
waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 2
March 18, 2004
All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and erosion control measures
shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and
erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade
restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
4. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
5. Diffuse Flow - An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as
diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-concentrate
before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 26 .0233 (5). If this is not possible it may be
necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional
approval from this Office.
6. Construction Plans - Any final construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and
plans approved by the DWQ under this authorization letter and certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
/Alan W. Klimek, ?PE..
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC3404
Cc: Todd Preuninger, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 031152
Date: March 18, 2004
bz
-w o?p? W ATF?QG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
N r Alan W. Klimek, P.P., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To:
Company:
" IKX? ??clh.
S i Ec'
Number of pages including cover sheet: S
Fax #: 0 q 6 --?y6?
Date: 2115104
Notes or special instructions:
,AMA
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httpl/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
w WA Michael F. Easley, Governor
?QF TFRQ
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
\Q North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
> r. _{ Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 18, 2004
DWQ Project No. 03-1152
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
Town of Cary
Attn: Joseph Godfrey (Park Planner)
111 James Jackson Ave., Suite 201
Cary, NC 27513
Subject Property: Glenkirk Greenway, Glenkirk Subdivision, Cary, NC
Coles Branch [03-04-02, 27-33-3, C NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Godfrey:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 60 feet of perennial streams and 15,000 square feet (ftz) of, protected riparian buffers for the purpose
of installing the proposed greenway trail at the subject property, as described within your application dated January 28,
2004 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 28, 2004. After reviewing your application,
we have decided that the impacts are covered by the General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404).
The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian
buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control
and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
Erosion & Sediment Control Practices - Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with
all specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated
with the project.
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind - No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands,
waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notice Application.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Town of Cary
. Page 2 of 2
March 18, 2004
All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards,
statutes, or rules occur.
3. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters - Sediment and erosion control measures
shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and
erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade
restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
4. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
5. Diffuse Flow - An additional condition is that all constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed as
diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-concentrate
before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A NCAC 26 .0233 (5). If this is not possible it may be
necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove nitrogen. This may require additional
approval from this Office.
6. Construction Plans - Any final construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and
plans approved by the DWQ under this authorization letter and certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 26 .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
%Alan W. Klimek, P.E.,
NC DWQ, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC3404
Cc: Todd Preuninger, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 031152
Date: March 18, 2004
bz
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Glenkirk Greenway
Project Number 03 1152
Recvd From APP
Received Date 9115103 Recvd By Region
Project Type greenway
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ?i*ft-aType Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. TiF i r+iHi=i??
14 Stream P-77@ N ? 27-33-3 ? NS?'V 30,402. ? 145.00 F__
NBR Buffers O Y O N F__ F_ F-F--30,402. 0.46 F- r-F__
F_ P-770 N F__F_F__F__F_F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
1)The greenway starts off of Olde Weatherstone Way and immediately crosses a perennial channel,
then within 150' connects to a cul-de-sac to the east and and then another 150' connects to a
cul-de-sac to the west which crosses an intermittent channel. This is not needed, one of these
cr__ossings needs to go. or even a compromise would be bridging.
2)lmpact Al-there is no reason why a 10' path needs 75 linear feet of impact, minimizel
3)lmpact A2-move out of zone 2
4)Impact R2-move out of zone 2- except where the constructed wetland is, that is ok, Put along the
berm. Age, there is no need for 70 linear feet of impacts for a 10'
greenway path, minimize. And just above the property line that separates Glenkirk S/D and Preston
Apartments, move out of zone 2.
5)lmpact Q1-fill is needed in zone 1, lots of topographic change here and constraints of apartments
building. Area just north of the proposed fill, needs to be moved as far out of zone 2 as osp sible,
agajn, lots of topographic change here.
/\I.Y ....L rNA ...?..IJ ..--- -- L_ -_..- L_ _..L-- --.1 _l ____ a L- M-L-
cc: Regional Office '
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Glenkirk Greenway
Project Number 03 1152
County Wake
Regional Contact: Deborah Edwards
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
February 10, 2004
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

Date;
L

Triage Check List
Project Name:
DWQ#:
County:
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
RRO . Steve Mitchell
From:
?' WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919)'7 3 / qK
file attached is being forwarded to your for r-youar evaluation.
Please call if you need as listance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimi=ion/avoidanca issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
?. Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available an d viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
comnencs: - - l ??n acQ??s
01<
°v Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
JAN 2 Ir' 2004
Revised January 28,12pPAJ QUALI7YSECTION
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
Raleigh Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Ste. 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 14, 401-Water Quality Certification & Buffer Compliance
Proposed Glenkirk Greenway .
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 01-6599.Wo
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of the Town of Cary, we hereby request authorization from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) to use Nationwide Permit 14 and its associated 401-Water Quality
Certification for the subject project to cover permanent impacts to jurisdictional stream
channels. In addition we are also requesting concurrence that the project complies with
the Neuse Buffer Rules. The proposed project consists of the construction of an asphalt
greenway that begins in the central portion of Glenkirk Subdivision and continues in a
northerly direction until reaching the northern property boundary of Preston Reserve
Subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the trail on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
S&EC conducted a wetland delineation and received a jurisdictional determination from
the USACE in October, 2002 (AID#:2003320144) for the Rood Property (Glenkirk).
Buffer impacts include 2,822 SF of impervious surface (i.e. asphalt trail) in Zone 1 of the
buffer, 8,808 SF of grading to Zone 1 of the buffer, and 3,370 SF of impervious surface
in Zone 2 of the buffer. Channel impacts consist of 60 linear feet of perennial channel.
Proposed impacts are summarized in the attached PCN form and illustrated on the
attached impact maps.
Whenever possible, the greenway has been routed outside of the riparian buffer and
avoided any impacts to wetlands. However, due to development within close proximity
of the trail, an existing aviation fuel line, and steep topography, impacts are unavoidable.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
January 28, 2004
S&EC Project #: 01-6599.W0
Page 2 of 2
Based on a site meeting with the NC-DWQ, the alignment has been altered to reduce
impacts as per comments from Ms. Debbie Edwards.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation
may be required to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when the discharge
causes the loss of greater than 0.10 acre of wetlands or the loss of any perennial channel
length. The applicant requested a wetland evaluation prior to the greenway development
in order to avoid impacts to jurisdictional features to the maximum extent practicable.
Bridges will also be used to decrease the amount of permanent stream impacts. Because
the applicant avoided and minimized impacts to waters of the US to the maximum extent
practicable as described above and the proposed impacts, 60 feet of perennial channel,
are unavoidable in order to provide trail access to adjacent neighborhoods, S&EC does
not believe compensatory mitigation should be required by the USACE.
The NCDWQ's current policy requires compensatory mitigation when the proposed
impacts exceed 150 linear feet per tributary of perennial stream channel per project or
greater than 1 acre of wetland impacts acre of wetlands. Because the proposed stream
channel and wetland impacts do not exceed these thresholds (i.e. 60 linear feet of
perennial channel) and because the crossings are at nearly perpendicular angles, S&EC
does not believe that compensatory mitigation should be required by the NCD`'VQ.
According to the Neuse Buffer Rules, greenway trails are an allowable activity within the
buffer requiring prior approval. Therefore, we do not believe buffer mitigation should be
required.
Please call me at [phone] if you require any additional information or have any
questions.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA

Todd Preuninger
Biologist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) Notification Form
USGS Location Map (Figure 1)
Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
([f any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Jose]h Godfrey Park Planner Town of Cary
Mailing Address: 111 James Jackson Ave.. Suite 201
Cal y, 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:Preuninger a sandec com
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Glenkirk Greenway
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The proposed project consists of
the construction of an asphalt greenway that begins in the central portion of Glenkirk
Subdivision and continues in a northerly direction until reaching, the northern property
boundary of Preston Reserve Subdivision.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 0754.15-54-8289
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Coles Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.us/adniin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Land use in the surrounding area is mixed including both
commercial use and subdivisions.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of installation of a paved reenway trail for public transportation
and recreation Standard heavy equipment necessary for grading wand paving will be used for
this proiect.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
provide a reg enway trail that can be used for recreation and exercise and will link the
surrounding communities.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Permits were obtained for the Glenkirk Subdivision USACOE AID4 200320144/793
Authorization of Nationwide Permit 12 &14. DWQ Project 403-0120 Approval of 401.
However, the proposed project is a Town of Cary Greenway Trail and is not affiliated with the
existing subdivisions
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The construction will impact 60 feet
of perennial channel and 70 feet of intermittent channel. Buffer impacts include 2,822 SF of
Page 3 of 8
impervious surface (i.e. asphalt trail) in Zone 1 of the buffer, 8 8,808 SF of grading to Zone 1
of the buffer, and 3,370 SF of impervious surface in Zone 2 of the buffer.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
indicate on ma acres (es/no linear feet)
NA NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized ctearmg, grading,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.feina.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma (linear feet) Before Impact (please s ecify)
Impact A 1 Culvert 60 UT to Coles Branch 3-5 Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.uov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., WWw.top07pne.coin,
www.mapquestcom, etc.).
*** Temporary Impa u verts will be removed following construction an k-crossings-`riiBc-via-a-bridg
O Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 75
channel and 70lineal'-f to ermrtten channel.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 4 of 8
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Whenever possible the greenway has been routed outside of the riparian buffer and avoided any
impacts to wetlands. Based on comments from the NC-DWQ, the initial alip'nment has been
altered to avoid impacts to a stream channel and zone 2 of the riparian buffer.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
Page 5 of 8
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.litm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the applicant avoided and minimized impacts to waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable as described above and the proposed impacts, 60 linear feet of
channel are unavoidable in order to provide trail access to adjacent neighborhoods, S&EC
does not believe compensatory mitigation should be required by the USACE. If required, the
applicant proposes payment to the WRP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at llttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htni. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Page 6 of 8
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No E] If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Impact Zone 1
(Impervious) Zone 1 (grading)
(SF) Zone 2
(Impervious) Required
Mitigation
Al 607 3,443 373 SF NA
BI 7 12 1342 NA
CI NA 1,863 1,287 NA
D1 2,208 3,490 368 SF NA
Total 2,822 (0.065 ac) 8,808 (0.20 ac) 3,370 (0.077 ac) NA
• Lone 1 extends out 3U feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Please note - The trail is located within an existing sewer easement in order to minimize impacts to the
remaining vegetation (Impact D).
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
NA
Page 7 of 8
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
/ January 28, 2004
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
WITHERS t: RAs/ENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
January 19, 2004
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR-DWQ
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
RE: Glenkirk Greenway
W&R Project No. 203112.0
Dear Ms. Karoly:
We are responding on behalf of the Town of Cary, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources
Department concerning your correspondence dated November 10, 2003 concerning the proposed
Glenkirk Greenway. Your letter was written subsequent to a site visit between Ms. Debbie
Edwards of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, myself and Todd Preuninger with Soil &
Environmental Consultants (S&EC). One (1) set of revised construction drawings and revised
impact maps have been given to S&EC for submittal to your office along with a revised permit
application.
Our written responses to your review comments are as follows:
1) The Town of Cary has agreed to eliminate the greenway stub that was located between
lots 30 and 31 and tying to the main greenway at approximately station 16+00. The
deletion of this spur trail will eliminate the channel impact, the Zone 1 impact and most
of the Zone 2 impact associated with impact B1.
2) We have slightly revised the alignment and increased the grade of the trail to better
minimize the channel and riparian buffer impacts previously requested. Please note that
we have completely eliminated the spur trail as discussed in our response to comment #1
above.
3) The greenway has been relocated to eliminate the previous impact A2 in Zone 2 of the
buffer.
4) The greenway trail has been relocated to eliminate Zone 2 impacts except at the
constructed wetland as requested. Again, the spur trail has been eliminated, which also
eliminates 70 linear feet of stream impacts. We have also relocated the trail at the
property line to eliminate Zone 2 impacts as requested.
5) The trail has been located as close to the apartment building as possible while also
considering the existing slope of the fill slope. This entire area is cleared and grassed and
therefore existing forestation will not be disturbed. We are also using retaining walls to
protect the integrity of the existing apartment building and minimizing the area of
disturbance where possible.
iii MacKenan Drive i Cary, North Carolina 27511 1 let: 919.469.3340 1 fax: [phone]oo8 i www.withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 2
January 19, 2004
6) As discussed with Debbie Edwards on a site visit and noted in your letter, we are
proposing location of the greenway in the outer 10' of the existing cleared sanitary sewer
easement. This will significantly reduce the amount of forestation requiring removal and
also minimize grading.
We trust that these revisions will allow for the 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rule approval to
be issued.
Please advise if you require additional information or would like to discuss any of this information
further. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
WITH R RAVEN EL, INC.
Ji Canfield, PE
JEC/trk
Attachments
cc: Joseph Godfrey, Park Planner - Town of Cary
Justin Patsey -John Wieland Homes
Todd Preuninger- Soil & Environmental Consultants
K:\03\03-110\03112\Proj\011904. ck.d oc

I
I_
I
I ?
l?
i
I
ICI ? ?`?
I?
I_
1
I
' z>a
W
12 JANUARY 2004
N
S

't a4
1
1
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 °=150'
150 0 150 300 450
lrl.J LS ME & QQV FE: M E L
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
E
GLENKIRK GREENWAY
OVERALL NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP
WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TYPE IMPACT AREA/LENG
CHANNEL 60LF
ZONE 1 IMPERVIOUS 2,822 SF
ZONE 1 NRB 8,808 SF
ZONE 2 IMPERVIOUS 3,370 SF
NOTE: NRB REFERS TO NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
N/F
PRESTON RESERVE LIU90 PARTNERSHIP
1
CH
?j
Ile'\1 l A\\ `\ ` 1 `4 1 ? ,' ' 1 i + (' -'? ?;1 11 L `\\ •'` ?:\•\ - ,,?
0,1
I I : ? ? \ I c ? t ? \ \ \ ? ?•\ \ .• \ / \ .• \ _? - - - e fir-- ?- _ -`' '
/ t \ I 1 < \ \?___ 1 /
eX,
%
vv,
\\I !\ ' \\ V\ A\i \
?.?
/:'/ \ 1 \ I v t ?ir I t / \ \ \ \
ZONE 11
I,X
1 r
f M1/ v v `` `??L v
, --60 LF=CHANNEL11 ,?!1 P Cf'}
07-SF-
PERU U
; SEZONE 111 IMPACT-r' \1 ??\\\ ;??\
i / -373-SF=ZORR ?MIOw
- - ---------- ---
l -a I (lo, ,\, 1 ! ! r?;.rr rrr j I-`\\1\ Jr 1 Jr?i----?'`-\??„
r1 r r /" --- •
N Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Map for Area Location
W E GRAPHIC SCALE
12 JANUARY 2004 S 50 0 50 100
& "t " o o GLENKI RK GREENWAY
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP A
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 lei: 919-469.9740 fax: [phone] www.wltherva.eneLCon, WE COUNTY CARY NORTH! CAROLINA
i
????-•? _r ? Yom' •& ?.''?? ? ? './rr r r r? ,''"' i''.rr'.
\ , irr ?? y l `? ? ?" ? //?/ / /?, rr' it /rr/s J'? ?',•i
1111 r? !i r'P -? tiff - ? \ "• / , / / / " / ? i r ? /
/1 111 I I C id/' 1 .-??-^ ?? \ ?• / / / / / ? / r '/ rr ? r?'/
/ I jl i p11 t(I-./? ,• -?\ \?`;? ?fflk C
(tl lt?(tl\?<<? ,, \ \\ r r
\ \\\ ?? ` ?? 1\\ \` \\\. \,`? I t
i,;`; ?1 S ?IE?111?' Must ?I Y
tt t?\\\\ I 1 1 tt 1 1 I I\ t I\, i
?tttt 1 tt \,\\. \\\??7 11 ?t '1-;' It It 1, t t I 1 I 11 1 tItI t.•t I I I ( l \.I I\•I
ttt 1 ?\\\ \\\? \ \?,< tt ttt-_ / ,:. t1t, ttt i ? tt t' I t t _?I i 1 i t ?.t`t \I
?t1? +4\ \\, \\\\\ ` ,ttt?? ?. ,\ t t
it l k 't, t t t "1 t 1 ?. 1 I , , t/1<_<t 't? , ?.
I \ \ ??` \ ,\ \\ v\ \ , \._ ., \!\ 1 t, t , t it t t t 1 `' , I I \ / ?; 5 `\,\ tt t
\\ X
d ? 1 t ttt \ \ , t ? ? I \??\ \ t t\ , tt ` \\ t ?it'w.t 4•?? \ \ \ \ \ t'", ? 1\ \?.
\ ?\ 1
t I t I l ?\ ` t lS \ \ \• \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ -tzl\
i t \ \?\ 1 \ I h 1\ t t t t \ S.:J\ \ \\ \?`x \ \ ?
1 \ \\\ \ \ ` \\\?\ \Ilh \ ` Ilil1t t\, t L\? \ \ \ \
lot,
It 1,4-
Xl?
r rr j?? \\ ` `\`? \?\ \ \ \ \`, \ \ 1, , y? \ t , t t. , \ C \ t I I ,
N Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Map for Area Location
W E GRAPHIC SCALE
1 "=60'
12 JANUARY 2004 S 60 0 60 120 180
HMO l HERS & ° A VEN ELF,
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
i I 1 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone]& ... woh-a-0 cn,,
GLENKIRK GREENWAY
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP B
WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH 'CAROLINA
I I l? j 1 rf
(II 1 1 1 , ? ?? ! f'? I
111 l i fffl / I
11 \` I 1 ? I
t I
?v v \ vti i Vj,4t
\ I t
1 fj / C,---
r , 1 il_rr--?-•?r
7I(?
I? lrl?r? ?? f(
IN V
rrl
I ,
\\\;?\ x\`111\\\1 ? \ `? ?; , . ?I
till
(u f( ?
? II ,I
1y u?titn(
rl tl`l\`?? =.

r
IMPACI
1,863S
1,287 Si
N Note; See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Mop For Area Location
W -'I ? E GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=50'
1 F7711 177-11
12 JANUARY 2004 S 50 0 50 100
GLENKIRK GREENWAY
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS ]FNEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP C
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: 919.469•3700 lax: 919.467-6008 www.wah-ra<enel.com - - WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA

1 \ I 1+ G j? ?J' Ji
2,208 SHONE1 IMPERVIOUS
,'?` ?? t ', + ? ;? ''?,?r, - 3,490 SHOD CT
' t?•`, ' 1 i { 1 1 t r 368 SHO 2 Imi
1 1 t 1 ?, i"?-- -1 ?•',
lilt I 1 t 1
iii iili nl?l fit' I?? t(r r rrrrrr / '?
iii viii •, ,i' I?t? ' r } tart !rile
Iltlliti / , 1111 if ?iit ili?'
tll ,Ili <? rrr ' ' J /IJI
?? it i \` !,'?•'f r' ? ?? ? r%Y,!//?/r???
tt,tt 1 Nl?/ i r; ,r,,,rrrr /
? t 1. ti u• r t( rrr rrr
tl r, rr O 1 i?
/it
ii f r
+ t, r
?;r { tlltlt It,t ``vr
til
fit I it it Ilk
Ilk
If I,
1 ! ! 1rrr rrrl ;
t
N Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Mop For Area Location
W ?I E GRAPHIC SCALE
1 "= 50'
?7- E?7--
12 JANUARY 2004 S 50 0 50 100
M/ O Tt H CG M S & o o M E M G L GLENKI RK GREENWAY
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS ][NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP D
111 Mac Kenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 2 7511 1 el: 919-469-3340 fax: [phone] with-raven l- WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA -
p?O? W AT ?RQG
> DWG? y
November 10, 2003
U-hXe eabafms County
DWQ Project No. 03-1152
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Joseph Godfrey
Park Planner, Town of Cary
111 James Jackson Ave., Suite 201
Cary, NC, 27513
Dear Mr. Godfrey:
On September 15, 2003, the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application for a 401 Water
Quality Certification for 145 linear feet of stream fill and 0.46 acre of Neuse Buffer impacts associated with the
construction of the proposed Glenkirk Greenway in Wake County. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0506, a site
evaluation has been conducted by Ms. Debbie Edwards of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, and this file has also been
reviewed by Mr. Bob Zarzecki of the DWQ Central Office. Based on this review, we have determined that significant uses
could be removed or degraded by this project. Insufficient evidence is provided in your application to conclude that your
project must be built as planned. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made, we will move toward denial of
the 401 Certification and Neuse Buffer Rules Approval as required in 15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and 15A NCAC 2B.0233.
Specifically, please investigate the following so that we may further review your application for avoidance and
minimization of impacts as required in 15A NCAC 2H .0506(b) and 15A NCAC 2B.0233:
1) The greenway starts off of Olde Weatherstone Way and immediately crosses a perennial channel, then within 150'
connects to a cul-de-sac to the east and then within another 150' connects to a cul-de-sac to the west which
crosses an intermittent channel. This is not needed, one of these crossings should be eliminated, or another
alternative would be bridging.
2) Impact A: It appears you are requesting placement of a 10' path within 75 linear feet of impact. Please reduce and
minimize the scale of impact to match the need, or explain the design constraints associated with this crossing.
3) Impact A2 should be moved out of Zone 2 of the Buffer.
4) Impact B2 should be moved out of Zone 2 of the Buffer, except where the constructed wetland is located. Again,
there is not sufficient justification or explanation for 70 linear feet of impacts for a 10' greenway path. This crossing
must be minimized as discussed in Item 2 above. Furthermore, the pathway just above the property line that
separates Glenkirk S/D and Preston Apartments must be moved out of Zone 2.
5) Impact Cl: The proposed fill in Zone 1 of the Buffer has been justified due to topographic and design constraints
associated with the apartment building. However, the area just north of the proposed fill needs to be moved as far
out of Zone 2 of the Buffer as possible. Constraints related to topographic change must be illustrated if the fill area
cannot be moved entirely out of Zone 2 of the Buffer.
6) Impact D1: We propose re-location of the existing sewer easement to the outer part of Zone 1 of the Buffer.
Otherwise, the topography would require a much wider corridor within Zone 2 and it would be difficult to move it out
of Zone 2 entirely due to site topography.
Until the information requested in this letter is provided, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers
place this project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete information (15A
NCAC 2H .0507(h)).
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Debbie Edwards in our Raleigh Regional Office
at 919-571-4700 or Cyndi Karoly in our Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Sincerely,
) John Dorney
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
VXT.
Mr. Joseph Godfrey
November 10, 2003
JRD/cbk
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Debbie Edwards, Raleigh DWO Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Todd Preuninger
031152
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Regional Contact: Deborah Edwards
WQ Supervisor: Ken?Schttster
Facility Name Glenkirk Greenway
Project Number 03 1152
Recvd From APP
Date:
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Received Date 9115103 Recvd By Region
Project Type greenway
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ( -??_>> IriIcie
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. SuPP• Basin Req.
??i-?. tfl?;t ? f
Req.
14 Stream O Y O N F__ 27-33-3 F _c NSNV 30,402. F__ 145.00 F_- F-
N_Biz Buffers FT _0N F- ???30,402. 0.46
??DY ON ????Ir-F_f _ F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
)Thy. greenway starts off of Olde Weatherstone Way and immediately crosses a perennial channel.
then within 150' connects to a cul-de-sac to the east and and then another 150' connects to a
cul-de-sac to the west which crosses an intermittent channel. This is not needed, one of these
cr__ossings needs to go or even a compromise would be bridging.
_2,)lmpact Al-there is no reason why a 10' path needs 75 linear feet of impact, minimize!
3)lmpact A2-move out of zone 2
4)lmpact 132-move out of zone 2, except where the constructed wetland is, that is ok rout along the
berm. Again, there is no need for 70 linear feet of impacts for a 10'
ar nway path- minimize. And just above the propery line that separates Glenkirk S/D and Preston
Apartments- move out of zone 2.
5)lmpact G1-fill is needed in zone 1 Jots of topographic change here and constraints of apartments
building, Area just north of the proposed fall. needs to be moved as far out of zone 2 as possible-
again, lots of topographic change here.
n\1.--.-..a M4 ......I.J .-... ...... a. .--?..? L. ...a... .-..1 .2 _..-. 4 ...:. a:.--. ??...?.. .....--..-a n.-.1.. a. M- -
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Glenkirk Greenway County Wake
Project Number 03 1152 Regional Contact:
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
Deborah Edwards
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
03-1152
loft
Subject: 03-1152
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:15:14 -0500
From: Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
I went out to the Glenkirk Greenway today and wanted to share comments
on project. This project will need to be put on hold because they are
going to have to change their greenway plan through alot of the
subdivision/apartments. Moving from south to north,
1)The greenway starts off of Olde Weatherstone Way and immediately
crosses a perennial channel, then within 150, connects to a cul-de-sac
to the east and and then another 150' connects to a cul-de-sac to the
west which crosses an intermittent channel. This is not needed, one of
these crossings needs to go, or even a compromise would be bridging.
2)Impact Al-there is no reason why a 10, path needs 75 linear feet of
impact, minimize!
3)Impact A2-move out of zone 2
4)Impact B2-move out of zone 2, except where the constructed wetland is,
that is ok, put along the berm. Again, there is no need for 70 linear
feet of impacts for a 10,
greenway path, minimize. And just above the property line that
separates Glenkirk S/D and Preston Apartments, move out of zone 2.
5)Impact C1-fill is needed in zone 1, lots of topographic change here
and constraints of apartments building. Area just north of the proposed
fill, needs to be moved as far out of zone 2 as possible, again, lots of
topographic change here.
6)Impact D1-would propose to move to outer part of zone 1, existing
sewer easement. Spoke to Bob about and he agrees. Otherwise, the
topography would make them cut a much wider corridor within zone 2 and
it would be very hard to move it up out of zone 2 b/c of topography.
Any questions, feel free to call me!
Debbie
I
11/10103 10:19 AM
Re: Glenkirk Greenway, Wake Co, 03-1152
Subject: Re: Glenkirk Greenway, Wake Co, 03-1152
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:52:42 -0500
From: Debbie Edwards <[e-mail]>
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
Steve had the file, he has reviewed the package and I believe the only
question is "why" the greenway needs to be in zone 2. I have scheduled
a site visit with Todd P. for friday, that is the earliest we can meet.
I will be reviewing the proposed greenway trail and the justification
for it. I will send you an email with my findings on friday when I
return.
Thanks
Debbie
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
>Hey guys - this one's on the tardy list, so I'm officially nagging now.
>This one's due next Thursday - right in the middle of the Veteran's
>Day/Annual Meeting next week. Please advise whether it's ok to issue or
>not. Gracie.
\ I ICI 63 y??O?IPS
O'n
12
5
1 of 1 11/3/03 4:06 PM
Triage Check List
Date: q-19.03
To:
DWQ#: o3-11sl
From:
Project Name: Ue" Ic:' k CYe? ^ w ?
? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
? MRO Alan Johnson
RRO Steve Mitchell
3aG
County: ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919) q39-11-47f,
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination-and-distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
,inimization/avoidance issues
?uffer Rule (I?feuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Z ck;\a1?4?,
Comments: sec 5.1e- yt,4-a k c 't--0
Y1a..h ?{nw?.1 52v2rc?? S?OrM?.v.?e.r c CneJ^_w ,g6 rw?r? k^2
I, I V
?QC? ?I C'.Cr'{!?' C..?-.???rn..? ?a?' ?'1?27A C?iS ?vLlr ? ?...fa G1C??Vt??t,_ -
T?r U V
A 2 h r n r?1? r *L' b ¢r- r ?kM
O The Stu?.hc,n,itr clew cep near 10? 5Z Gn Nlc.n (? wa5
03012o c.-? c, n13MP Co^slyo,tc-8 Ljca?kc'A Cpocke_b c.??'Kch ?. -CHc?jre
5`+?v?\c1 w be ?•
T?
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.coni
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Andrea Wade
Raleigh Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Ste. 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
'RR12SX81401 GFOUP
S Fa P 1 5 2003
September 15, 2003 Ol'-TEUGUA ITYSEGHON
NC-Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Ste. 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 14, 401-Water Quality Certification & Buffer Compliance
Proposed Glenkirk Greenway
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 01-6599.Wo
Dear Ms. Wade and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of the Town of Cary, we hereby request authorization from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) to use Nationwide Permit 14 and its associated 401-Water Quality
Certification for the subject project to cover permanent impacts to jurisdictional stream
channels. In addition we are also requesting concurrence that the project complies with
the Neuse Buffer Rules. The proposed project consists of the construction of an asphalt
greenway that begins in the central portion of Glenkirk Subdivision and continues in a
northerly direction until reaching the northern property boundary of Preston Reserve
Subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the trail on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
S&EC conducted a wetland delineation and received a jurisdictional determination from
the USACE in October, 2002 (AID#:2003320144) for the Rood Property (Glenkirk).
Buffer impacts include 1,155 SF of impervious surface (i.e. asphalt trail) in Zone 1 of the
buffer, 9,108 SF of grading to Zone 1 of the buffer, and 9730 SF of impervious surface in
Zone 2 of the buffer. Channel impacts consist of 70 linear feet and 75 linear feet of
intermittent channel and perennial channel, respectively. Proposed impacts are
summarized in the attached PCN form and illustrated on the attached impact maps.
Whenever possible, the greenway has been routed outside of the riparian buffer and
avoided any impacts to wetlands. However, due to development within close proximity
of the trail, an existing aviation fuel line, and steep topography impacts are unavoidable.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndalc Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
September 15, 2003
S&EC Project #: 01-6599.W0
Page 2 of 2
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Compensatory mitigation
may be required to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when the discharge
causes the loss of greater than 0.10 acre of wetlands or the loss of any perennial channel
length. The applicant requested a wetland evaluation prior to the greemvay development
in order to avoid impacts to jurisdictional features to the maximum extent practicable.
Bridges will also be used to decrease the amount of permanent stream impacts. Because
the applicant avoided and minimized impacts to waters of the US to the maximum extent
practicable as described above and the proposed impacts, 75 feet of perennial channel and
70 feet of intermittent channel, are unavoidable in order to provide trail access to adjacent
neighborhoods, S&EC does not believe compensatory mitigation should be required by
the USACE.
The NCDWQ's current policy requires compensatory mitigation when the proposed
impacts exceed 150 linear feet per tributary of perennial stream channel per project or
greater than 1 acre of wetland impacts acre of wetlands. Because the proposed stream
channel and wetland impacts do not exceed these thresholds (i.e. 75 linear feet of
perennial channel) and because the crossings are at nearly perpendicular angles, S&EC
does not believe that compensatory mitigation should be required by the NCDWQ.
According to the Neuse Buffer Rules, greenway trails are an allowable activity within the
buffer requiring prior approval. Therefore, we do not believe buffer mitigation should be
required.
Please call me at [phone] if you require any additional information or have any
questions.
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
lam/ v?-??
Todd Preuninger
Biologist
Attachments:
Pre-construction (111CN) Notification Form
USGS Location Map (Figure 1)
Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Agent Authorization Form
Impact Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACC Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Joseph Godfrey, Park Planner, Town of Cary
Mailing Address: 111 James Jackson Ave., Suite 201
Cary NC 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Todd Preuninger
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: Preuningernsandec com
Pagel of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Glenkirk Greenway
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The proposed project consists of
the construction of an asphalt reg enway that begins in the central portion of Glenkirk
Subdivision and continues in a northerly direction until reaching the northern property
boundary of Preston Reserve Subdivision.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 0754.15-54-8289
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Coles Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/adniin/jnaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Land use in the surrounding area is mixed including both
commercial use and subdivisions.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project consists of installation of a paved greenway trail for public transportation
and recreation Standard heavy equipment necessary for rg ading and paving will be used for
this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed project is to
provide a greenway trail that can be used for recreation and exercise and will link the
surrounding communities.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Permits were obtained for the Glenkirk Subdivision USACOE AID# 200320144/793
Authorization of Nationwide Permit 12 &14. DWQ Project #03-0120 Approval of 401.
However, the proposed project is a Town of Cary Greenway Trail and is not affiliated with the
existin.g subdivisions
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The construction will impact 75 feet
of perennial channel and 70 feet of intermittent channel Buffer impacts include 1 155 SF of
Page 3 of 8
impervious surface (i.e. asphalt trail) in Zone 1 of the buffer, 9,108 SF of grading to Zone 1
of the buffer, and 9,730 SF of impervious surface in Zone 2 of the buffer.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (es/no) (linear feet)
NA NA NA NA NA NA
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains arc identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://w-,vw.tcma.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: NA
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please secif )
Impact Al Culvert 75 UT to Coles Branch 3-5 Perennial
Impact B I Culvert 70 UT to Coles Branch 4-5 Intermittent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.e,ov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.cum,
'www.mapquest.crnn, etc.).
*** Temporary Impacts - Culverts will be removed following construction and creek crossings will be via a bridge
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 75 linear feet of perennial
channel and 70 linear feet of intermittent channel.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) (if applicable) bay, ocean, etc.)
NA NA NA NA NA
• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
Page 4 of 8
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Whenever possible the red enway has been routed outside of the riparian buffer and avoided any
impacts to wetlands. However, due to development within close proximity to the trail and the
fact that easement has already been recorded impacts are unavoidable. However, due to
development within close proximity of the trail, an existing aviation fuel line, and steep
topography impacts are unavoidable.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 5 of 8
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwet]ands/stringide.litin1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the applicant avoided and minimized impacts to waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable as described above and the proposed impacts, 75 linear feet of
perennial channel and 70 linear feet of intermittent channel, are unavoidable in order to
provide trail access to adjacent neighborhoods S&EC does not believe compensatory
mitigation should be required by the USACE. If required, the applicant proposes payment to
the WRP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://112o.enr.state.11c.us/wrp/index.litni. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 8
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
NA
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and snap all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Impact Zone I
(Impervious) Zone 1 (grading)
(SF) Zone 2
(Impervious) Required
Mitigation
Al 600 SF 3950 419 SF NA
A2 NA NA 103 SF NA
Bl 555 SF 3065 4241 SF NA
CI NA 2093 2019 SF NA
D1 NA NA 2948 SF NA
Total 1,155 (0.027 ac) 9,108 (0.21 ac) 9,730 (0.22 ac) NA
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Lone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Page 7 of 8
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
_-
NA
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
September 15, 2003
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
_ --
- - II

"
41 c Aq
-Tei
V?j tc

I '7 II O r?
1
?
II0 ?-

pp ,?,Q
A
0 -??? -ice
/
'? l
16'

?

%
g %

? .?_

2000 1000 0 2000
wi?
NORTH CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10'
PROJECT NO.: CONTOUR NTERVAL 5HEEr TII
G599.WO - is FIGURE I -VICINITY MAP
PROJECT MGR.'
TP/JB U5G5 7.5 MIN. QUAD.
DRAWN BY: CARY, NC PROJECT NAME:
LGT GLENKIRK GREEPJWAY
TOWN OF CARY
SEPTEMBER 2003 WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROUNA
CARY, NC
1993
N1MA 52551V SE-SERIES V842
1 & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Ww .SandLC.com
/•' IJ f ?.H r ?.r'I? •?? r _..~ fr Fkt`r j-
41 l r/ yr ?Il?,t { *+1 r ,, ti `. esCtC rfr GtC i'+ -r: CCE3 rGF ?},
rF'fJ It trri f ? ?y +GZ '1? \ ? r s: ±e?? t ? rt t t ? ? rt t? ?S t ,i t I7r, r •`517
4r"rr'?1r ti?^C tji hy\7?,:y i1.? Mytfl? _ ?N:`, r .,t .t`di k,.y'ri ti ,'.t?'i
Y_ ~ f r
Vt ? 1 r q ? M ?k, ti ? 1 ?1YD ti r't: ?i q ,? f ? r? < ? ti r(9)
f T, xrr`i`? v,?v\?r_ D 11Hv? r ?t? 9 r/ s y y } i J`3.-f? rdU hl ,1?.
f{tiAT.7 '? x? ?. ry 4aL r ., r u ., ,?, ekF { ? T YS• y a 1, h 3 ? -~'?
?.7 rtry .h-. •?i?ft tr ? it s ; '??T ??,,jt? ? ? fy1G r? ? yt .ice S1f'i qd .11. r t,( y??? i•.r-
?i. ?,t a 'K r R r ? ? T k t? CstC 4 L!{? b 17 V .. ?r ?. r _
?.P nT1a
(, 'a1. ry,.; r Stir .T. M
iii, t r!?t t? f ?t w,w a? .i} ,?ks T r ` ?kF } I j N'r
r •' 1 ? •.1. , w v a _ x t?f , ? f Y r,l ?:l(, q? a. ,?d. t3iC ? 1 +?r
?W8 ' 1 Cj0 dr?tp its _
ryp'.r rr r -•r
t x- H ,( r 1Y5E.}..a'? ?i•7 :.? j?^ } t1. . (- t y V,,, 0 ' icr ?'r
l" t f ? y
11 X., t .{ t;tit ?
rt t/r! .,r/? r4? : . •"t( ?` J :?y k:F~
f^ 1.
9 1 tt' S r ?.?µ4., f gylt +t-- l \'` ; ,r?-q 4 p t' G? t e .CI fr :'`re5
t ?4?+ } ?' f'?}t 7N 1 E ?` j i w r T Ail
??1..! 4} t xf.; •n r?,r r r y! r,? '.:.
+ f r ? Yid C2. 4k N '"S?rM?Ctd'+? ? t, •r 1? ,' 1 A, ? ?? t J r
( r s? tirSCt ?i? s- o ? ?it ? :+. W h r r a :.-
s ,4" nw y l ?? ty %rr ` "Ck?dl i (?? CP 2 ' 1 .r y, 'ksr f'r ;J? # ±.
t. k }? r ? .r st' l `w _. +' 'y-.M f??RJ r f ?, s d > y=Cr CJ+. r 7 Y
TM:
r'"n ??.b I G ,t r' r ? "S ,.MyC2 } ? f r'S r. ? +¢?r?? r it J•n. -'ar v '°? 7, ( tt ? ,:,} .'F {J, ?? ? .
t r, ? i , r ? 1 ? ?r a r . ? P '?
4r t1'a?.,, 4 ., u fi Ly; 1 T r 1 :. .+•a J} r y l ? + 1 i It r r: rr )' '4 r a anA
r rl?.?:., er w •.?- t r T ft ?] 1 Yt ''-? "G fir,
' ??• r r •! n YDr t - "°A Ti .,/ J i 3 -,.s 1, r
f t ? k,r J C ???, o :i ? f •. ti ? /,,. :: fi?zT t x; r?"' .? 1 a{: ;??
f f , t r• k? a r- `.? ? a? f ST '+ v 1'}-. W ,c. r ?.i:o
ey t4G?' rl t JJf C: i' -?. S f r f"... rj r I? #?+ 1} J a }i.\ Iz? P ?f r k?. f) ff A •,1.?A ?;
•S?t TT""i. „? /lr? fit/-^, F:.i ?l ~ ? -
SA???tl
I N'
r n r i } ry It r J ? { a `r'?n`?y"?1d.,cn ,r,,. r} ,?
r ' !r t ,Y ?t t ? ._. P '? l ? \ ! : 1t?V rC'e 'I's
r :•t,.kr `i> . i4 ^ r rrt t ';UE
+ u u• (r GP I a tt r } tLT
0R 2
cJ - t ? ... r>! ! r,??JYp• ^ '•,•? r ?r'•? r.?. ' ?? '. q ?r,rV r? V tit ,'•t:,i/ er ? r?t, ,,•, ? i" ?}?t ?._r??'L,'G'
t i fr rY. ,':1XII <r .+•L"???r' ,..j. '? ? f ? rr•"!`p ?vlf. S ? -\? ) r e1??2"§+.
t T _' v i• { h?f W`y.?:r t ] I. yC'U y n.. f r it tp Y .-,} r a 'L raA r?
y yv t ?~ ' 'to-- f - r .. y t.: ' ? Jr'G "°sy,'. ?..• ? 0 " j. • r"!" 1
! /??zt.r n i rr tkr .t J t'y}/ ..Vr1R:1:2 tt 4?`??(?r? •a.:[,
42
a t s'? + e , u b..K ?+. j 6 ..a ?-' y'?`?j?* +•. -.1 s, 1.? ar'Sf?r ' rr,(i r1" ?r ., ?"r?.
A?fA t }?x , t 1 >tiZ• } 1 -i/ a „r 'c vL,.\ . /r ' ,/ r , (t?
? (Y??? ? r? ?, r tt.t? y xl rs7yt A? ? r?? :+ (u n c } n "t?>1 `_ ? 1? i„ t /?L -fzi
t ??• a - ,;? ? ? :? r -r, `5..?. r ---•-y s: ? •r-:• 3'7)1 "? { l.?P ? .?rt)?? ?,>*A':
Y ?ra x,..r•v.r ? CYr } C?1 5 dtl? rr r• jtf/ \ tt ?, p e w.?
?lr } -, r lt'?g,( Nf6 ... ?r R41I?R? ditr ,.. •''r* y????,? ; Cff? r .fir t ,r ?, ?- t £1' ? y,,. y7 ?' +4? l'
ft }t , t><?.s y 1 f?v r. at r r ++, u r -..-?'tr'?.' * / ca ?k, h,. r
it Y. r ,I 1~ r r t. i;l Fr ?v1 r+ J •Ni r rr ?,'r? w,,,+yr kYf,•
4? V•,y'`. ? :.zerl f T2 t .y• t +'rr'?: rrf? ? ,.1 S?YS ?^ tr , \"?f?° r? y r4 '. .+y
rV1YG{ it af?K? a 'tt,:? d 3' 1 ` .. q#(r? r}?`Srt,t' r -ir ?' '`? r4? k? 4?.tYif 't n? f? ?.yt '}t,r /tip T a... TC'
a t ?,` t1y,+?t5 }i ??Y o ' k• , •r tr7 y ?` y \r`-'t 4 h("; w , .i t " - Slk{? .-rJ"t y7
f ' r2fv ?r, 31r rt+' I MkD ti Ir t? kfi ?i• i,?p? ^lf?t (y "? ,+l! E?L?4 1T321 p,?'.
r' 11
vr' +S t ,.a 'r ,r71r t`1 t FQt ', tk ..r +H/?, Y i?. •• ,•, ..iGC?2. - aY
' r• r5.
gf ? r :? rth•'° "4Mt'rtr' ? ,alf??.4 r}f itL.r,t ? ? y ?^ t? ?q..„iu ,["? u ?' tro t?i?r }7 rt ?Il'.
. .J}Y ',. jw( rt y? iwy?' +r. qy"»? FirE ?:kf ((?C4 ')rf ?? 1^.'t yif A-
7`. ?'.?' ?b;`<ri r}'. ?t ar?is?3<- <, PGa. ??$, F'l +q `rYN a•f't
? ?, •.e ix MyB r rG{ i??l? y t F ?. F? ? (J._ I f? yr?J? fV; t.
•t-- ..' o- a}Y} .F, ;t??.? !` .rai, ", rV 'f{t F*t 'S.L{rt M1 t ?,v 1^?t ??.r ?J'Y•r?'t??t
' w^, r ?MYC LY t?f.. Nr4 1j p•3?`r! y!t;at?t? m r;
.+2 , ?, ,.4 .t. I 'r{ti!".r.l c -.,Y? .F{r?`• ? s,. { %/ n?m ^:\?••. s
1320 GGO 0 1320
NORTH

PKDJCCT NO.:
65931410 CONTOUR INTERVAL 5r=TTITLC:

PRD,ECT a NA FIGURE 2 - 501L5 MAP
TP
6 u5:
5 7
5 VN
GLAD
/J
` .
.
.
,
EKaECT
Soil a Environmental Consultants, PA
N pY,
Z?RAA
Gr CARY, NC GLENKIRK GREENWAY -
N
h C
li
27614
0 H
Rid
d
l
i
h
R
R
--TOWN OF GARY aro
na
aven
ge
oa
•
a
e
g
,
ort
1101
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
SEPTEMBER 2003 WAKE COUNTY, WORTH CARC'LINA www.SandMcons
nur, 26 03 01:2:•-•;7 CARY PRCR 919 469 4344 P.1
P11
Soli. & Environmental Consultants, PA
:?.?.
r.. r
4r 11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North C¢rolinn 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name:
Address: _7,r1Y1E-S ???,v \l?t1Uc U177020/ A)K Z 7?/3
l `
Phone:
Projer_t Nam.:'. `? -sci-ipticn: ??viKl ? ?iZC`?.•wA-j? --
Dat-: ....L
The Departr:^ -rr;`: )f the Array
U.S. Army Carr::.; of Engmeers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1899)
Wilmin,-ton; N. 28402
Attn: _
Field office-
Re- Wctlanes ? _-.ted Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It Concem, :
1, the cogent ?erty owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf . s my ager.:t in the processing of perrxuit applications, to :6arnisb upon request
st3plement l i - E-;rmation in support of applications, etc, from this day forward. The 25 -?W day of
L'
This notificatierz supeesedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: Ttkzs itbori u don, for liability and professional courtesy seasons, is valid only for
government coif'. ials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to a range a si p: oaeetnn Pnor to visiting the szte.
Print Property C. +ner's Name p Owner's i tuz/?
cc: Mr. jo[ it E_ mey cc: Mr. Todd Preunlnge,
NCDEN.;c DIVA Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
2321 Crab! r f?a Boulevard
Raleigl-i, r V* 2760
Charlotly
rcn .- _ Gr_ c?Stabora Of6^ S{ o v Office:
236 LcPhi1(ip Court, sui::: C 3817-B ):.awndale.Drivc 622 Ccan A4ountain Lenc
Concord, NC 28025 Grccnsbom, NC 27455 ToylcrsviUc. NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] P1:enc [phone]
Pax: [phone] Fax: [phone] Fix: [phone]
AA
ti
01
z
- -----------
?,
48
IMPACT A2
I •..1 3 SF-ZONE 2 PERVIOU:' >
ter, ? -7
Z9E 2
l \
ZONE1 46
-75 LF-CNANNEHMPtiC v`
I \ 600 SHONE I IMPERVIQU
,950 SHONE 1 NRB IMPACT
419 SF-ZQRf 2-IMP-lIIO
N Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Mop For Area Location
?I I GRAPHIC SCALE
14 AUGUST 2003 S 50 0 50 100 150
F, F-
???HF?FS & o o ???EL. GLENKIRK GREENWAY
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP A
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
?,",K-o D-e City, North Carol-" 27511 lei 919 4693340 a. 919 467 W08 »»» » m ,,,,.e ,ei WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA
r
i
MIS C OBI
0 LF:-C11 I L IMPACT
55ONE 1IMPER 1O[ s".
,065 SHORE 11 ELI PACT
4241 S 140 MPE VIOUS
,= 53
I! x
./? \51
i.
N Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Mop For Area Location
W E GRAPHIC SCALE
14 AUGUST 2003 S 60 0 60 120 180
o o M C N C- [- GLENKIRK GREENWAY
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP B
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKe,- D-e easy. N.,,th C-W,a 27511 lei: 919.469.37ao fav 919 867-6008 n..w..„ahenu.veo0rvn WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA
U ? LL ? 01
IMPACI?
2,093 SFEx FRB IM CT
9.019 RF-III E?7iINPERVI S
N
W E
14 AUGUST 2003 S
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=50'
50 0 50 100 150
GLENKI RK GREENWAY
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP C
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS i SURVEYORS
Itl nlacKe-D-e Cary, No,m earoina 27511 1e1. 9946947)40 - 91940,7 .(4in8 WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA
Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Map For Area Location
a-
N
N
\ c0
+I
\ N{
o /
N IMPACT 01
11. 1 / 2,948 SHONE 2 IMPERVIOUS
N
W
14 AUGUST 2003 S
Note: See Overall Neuse Riparian Buffer Impact Mop For Area Location
GRAPHIC SCALE
1"=50'
50 0 50 100 150
o o V C- H C- (- GLENKIRK GREENWAY
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP D
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
I II Mac Ke-n Dive Cary, Nooh Car 1-17$11 lei 9194697340 f- 919-.467 U-K)8 ..».. -d -1 cum WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA

MAP D
exf 9
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
IMPACT TYPE IMPACT AREA/LENGTH
CHANNEL 145 LF
ZONE 1 IMPERVIOUS 1,155 SF
ZONE 1 NRB 9,108 SF
ZONE 2 IMPERVIOUS 9,730 SF
NOTE: NRB REFERS TO NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER

,l
11 "
r
I>
:I
1

I ?(??. " J';1 "I
E "FI
_-'? t t t a?
1 1 l ?
U V ? ? LnJ ? Lr? t:?J ? tr?Q? l? 11 ?1 L? L?
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 lei: 919-469-3340 fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
GLENKIRK GREENWAY
OVERALL NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT MAP
WAKE COUNTY CARY NORTH CAROLINA
\ N
PRESTON RESERVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
PIN, 0754.14-44-6873
03 8132 PG 2068
MAP C
\ f
MAP B`
J
it \
GLENKIRK SUBDIVISION
v 7 ,
s
,
IMAPA
14 AUGUST 2003
SUIL & tNV1KUNf 1tN IAL UUNSULIAN I*, FA
NC Division of Water Quality
Tran H Invoice Type Date Reference
621 091503 Invoice 09/15/03 uSC O,rUO
r, i? '11
'NETU-SIDS 1401 Cl1 cUR
S P-1 [ 5 2003
f 1,
NATERQUALUSECTION
016258
Check Number: 16256
Date: 09/15/03 Check Amt: $200.00
Balance Discount Pay Amount
$0.00 $0.00 $200.00
~ _ _ - -
- i. ,rej"'fi.c 'A rs'1 ~s: 7 ti s 4 ,idi6+a e'"- „ en ,.yj~ ~C$~?fr:W ~ s.,t35`1dta. B~..4q~~',:.~ a t-, .,..Ix, ,~L.~, , tasp7a lt., ~ .~1 A YA, ~ 4 f~..474A~~'.AP~.~'} . , {ic7dk.nb.. J ~'4&~ 5..3'~61ea . >iE' ":gr, x.1'.v~.a'k°to:8~'4w~°"~23T.N;~+~s:`.:m,.~T 4,.'as`~'.SI~'diut. ~ , ~ ' ~'G'ikG:: a'd'~G"... ~3F~~+r1ki",iaK•.:.::1~ ~i S~A*€'~iM1'7~11 ...oaa,aa ; zaz~ ~"A~-.. ~>Oppra •cti:~.Otq - °k- '~ifi~~'+~'&:,+i~?. `Ye"`F°1F'-.~ "a ..7 .45':., ~ng3g~'. .p. _±fi5.o'isBC~
I
i
I
i
~ \ \ 1 ~ ~ 1
1 ~ ~ ~ , i 5 ~ -1 ~
i , i ~ ,
~ ,
. I ~ ~ } ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I~ V _ ~ v, _ _ ~
R • ~ ~ ~ FI,IC R~~1P
-
I ~ F CE TYP, I SLT ) V ~
\ o ~l
~o ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i
/ i
1 i
~ ~ ~
a
~ ~
~ ~ ~ A REMOVABLE BOLLARD (DETAIL D)
I
~ ~ ' i, o i
~ ~ ~ ~ I' ~ ~ /
~ \,A ~ ~ ~ o.~~~
1 ~ ro ~ - o -
/J i \ r i. l f ~ / O'' ~ r-- ~1
! i I 1 l ~ ~ ~i
/ ' ; 1
' i ~ ~ ~ 0000000 n o
l ~ 0 0 0 0 ' I I. 1 0 0 4 e ' ~ i 9 ~ ~ °o o°o ~ ~ , i ~ o',, ~ 0,° ~N CARp 'o°
k ~ , \ 03 SP 075 0• ~ SSA y
\ E 9, 0 e
~ i ~ - ~ APPROVED : Q~ ~ o e e e . .
~ i ~ , - ~ TOWN OF CARY e g e
A roved b Date e~°°e a
PP Y 9 °,NG I t~,°° ~ Plannln Date "o~ °00eee°°° F~~'0°
50 0 50 100 9 °o° $ oo° En ineering Date oo,° C °°oo 9 0 ° o o°°
SCALE: 1 " = 50' ~ 4
I
i i i
.i -_r__ -j.-_.. - L_
~ i - _ -
- -___-__-_I-.__--_ - _ _ _ - 1 -
- -t - _ 400
-
~ i - -
_ - - - -
i -
1 I - 395 - ----------t-----
~ _
_ -
- - - ~ i-- - - - r-- - - - _ ~ -
i _ i 390
i ~
~ ~ i --i-- _ _ _
- r _
_ -t- - _ _ _ - - j - -
i I _ _ _ 385
- i _ - - _ _L-_--
_ - ---t - - - _ - , -----I-- ~ i ~ ~
- ---1-- -
- i - _ _ ; _ _ 380
--fi--
1-- i t--- - - _ _ ~
~ - _ _ _i---- - - _ _ _ _ - ----r - _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ i ,
i _ _I ~ ~ I - I - --r---- - -
. - _ - _ ----1- ~ - - - - - - - j--- - - _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 375
1 - ~ ~ i
_ _ _ ~ -j- - _ _ - --f-- - - - - - - - - i i -
_ _ I _t__ - - i ~ ~------I- _ - - - i I I
~ ~ • - - - i 1 ~ _ _ _ - - --r ~ 370
~ _ j a ~ ~
~ -
a ' i i I I ~ I I -
~ I i i i t - _ - - - I - -i _ - ~ a - - -
- ~ 1 ~ t.
- - ~ --__-1-_ _ _ - _ - _ --f -1- - - - - - - - ~ I - _ - - - - - ~ 365 ~ i ~ ~
n ~ i E _ - --I--- - - -
_ ---F---- - - r---- - -i-- ~ ~
I- _ i.- - - - _ ~ - - - - - - -
~ ~ - - - ~ _ f _ - --j - _ _ - - - - -i- - , - -
- _ . ;n - _ _ - - ~ ( i ~ _ - --r----- r - 360
i _ -
- ------1- ~ ' ~ - ~ - ---t---T--- - - - - - - - ~I i L--- - --4- - - - - - - , I
~ - --I-_ _._a. + -r- ~ _ - - - - - ~ _ C - -_r--- - - - I
' ~ I ~ - - - - _ _ - -f ---f - _ . 7----F _ _ _ _ - - _ - { - _ - -f i ~ i ~ ~ i
_ _ t ~ f i 1 \ 355 1
r ~ I ~
- - --T---- - - -f - - - _ - _ _ - - ----fi- - i fi
~ I _._._t-_ _ i ~ - - - - - - - - - _ a---
- - - _ _ _ r-- _ - - - - - --h---- _ - - - f i ~ i
:f _ _ f- _ -----r- ~ ~ i i
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
Designer Scale
No. Revision Date g 1"=5' Vert. :'ER 1C: 1Si REVIEW 06/02/03 PMO W&R 1"=50'Horz. Sheet No.
P LP - Drawn By Date LP "NO REVIEW 07/03/03 pMO Drawn By Date
i0C FINAL APPROVAL 08/11/03 PMO PMO 05/05/03 GLENKIRK GREENWAY G002 PLAN & PROFILE 1 3
- - --PPRO Q REV'e W 01 /12/04 PM0 Checked By Job No. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS .I
i - - - - JEC J_ 203112-- 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com

i. r- ra. . if Wf01R'S"f, XYin'+ 5 ~ •:a: .,w n < *t t. W'-,. Y. 4 ^t:;• G~7 r.~i:> _4b.%~S,X'~.?^ - i. ..tw' 2~aF ,,.~.$~.~'.fi~ k.} _"3G :&'G~_ . ;t ;.4~ pYC_'.!.~.. . F'- i ..s~!'f.W,. w .s. .Q:'.r.9 .(e' w4. 15. ~°.Q'~9G dM.'S~6R~d+Y.+So.~R. .7R~ p'~dN@~ff:#r.N6'.`S3dr 7 8t1 x b°Cx7r .C.. a ki.]fd E ,en. .4~.„ +A1E]i.S'x.~7K•wPt ~Si~.':&•+TV51D:, ~2.t)X 'h+~.. .u2Z*?rMR16MSC~ekT. e>wA:wfe. r„~~s~su:: m.iR, ~.;Ja9:~Y7ts0.EVF - «rw~ .sas.;.. .tF „zi5-.^ F , .~;.:rx lR.a:• :r-a. •«e s..,W4. + :~;2&r, a~rt~,'"':7t~ ~u.fi'ati ,~gi7Et~Bau s c~!IY,..
I--.-.- _ _
I _ (88-60PL) _ ~ LLNCP aPTl~s ~ RB 6• MAN. SEEDBED PREPARATION
I6 ~6 E ~ ( 8~_80PL ) ® 6~ DENCH 3/16' x 6' SD. v/GSSIL V SHERCaNDSCR. _ ? D• DEN~M Sr L, PLAiE NYLON IOCKNUT - ~e° I VARIABLE a5 OWECIED BY THE ENGINEER 1) Chisel compacted areas and spread topsoil 3 inches deep over adverse
f - ~ - f--i - -C~ 1U' 6" ..LEAR - 4' 0' CLEAR SLAi OPTIONS soil conditions, if available.
i PRpVIDE STEEL LATCH- END CAP STANDARD WUUD ? 'CEDAR' RECYCLED PLASTIC MIN. 11-, 1 cA. 2) Rip the entire area fo 6 inches depth. / INRaMEDIATE 3) Remove all loose rock, roots and other obstructions leaving surfaces
WITH RINGS FOR KEY WELDED D' x I Non.) s LACK BOLLARD (SEE PROFILED scars ? 'GREY' RECYCLED PLASTIC ~ GRL, ur"e v~~s' WRES reasonably smooth and uniform. ~
L(,P i[1P - CAP TpP SEPARATE DETAIL) ~ sEE scar oPnons) _ ®'REDUODD' RECYCLED PLASTIC 3/e• x r ~ STL. BAR PL i WELllE[ ~ 4 X C x 1( GA STEEL-,~ WELDED ~ ? 'GREEN' RECYCLED PLASTIC Ln PLgsrlc 41L FEN F -L 4) Apply agricultural lime, fertilizer, and superphosphate uniformly ~ LINER IN TALL 10 C D and mix with soil (see below*).
T 'N ~ UBI G 1 - ? OTHER Ij _ _ - -i- 1/~' K I 1/~' 5 N praDE 5) Continue tillage until Dwell-pulverized, firm, reasonably uniform
S.STL. LAG SCR. POUND STEEL- ~ a/s• x ~ yr 37 /6 seedbed is prepared 4 fo 6 inches deep. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ 6) Seed a freshly prepared seedbed and cover seed lightly with seeding
Srl BAR D/ ~;~r, srHLnuLE I 12 yg„ sr Q" (I-I IS LIVER 5' 3/e• x r ssn 3/16 N I k' sn, BAa equipment or cultfpack offer seeding.
I .S - r•' Pi_'S i ~ 3'-4' BiN. SKI. H0. 3' S0. M 1/.' 2' % 1' (NDx + SLAi$ - LAG W/ VASHER V. STL. TUBE + SEE SIAi OPTION ) 7) Mulch immediately after seeding and anchor mulch. 8) Inspect all seeded areas and make necessary repairs or reseedings
' j- / 2 X ~ X II GA. STEEL TUBING a/s• x , vz~ ssn. Iy ,i I1/ „ CAP SCR. V/ LOCKNUr 2 7/B' 0.0. z 7/B• D° FRONT VIEW within the planting season, if possible. If stand should be over
l6 X16 STL. PIPE 8 1 'I 'r $TL. PIPE 8 %'b 60% damaged, reestablish following anginal lime, fertilizer and
- ~ 8 yq" (88-60PL) GALV Prof I , -3000 PSI, CONC. r ~ TRAIL SURFACE (88-80PL) ` seeding rotes. srEELPOSr 9) Consult Conservation Inspector on maintenance treatment and
G'nvP) - Ti%'• i FOALING trm) swwRT I2° NDTES "°YEN w1flE fAealc ferfilizotion after ermannenf cover is established. SLAT pPtIONS SILT FENa FABMC p
_ U AlL STL MEMBERS CUATED W/ ZINC RICH ~ l _ _ -N57 WASHED STONE arP+ ~°o"r~sl NDTES RICH ? 'CEDAR' RECYCLED PLASTIC LYESTER ~ * Apply: Agricultural Limestone - 2 Tons/Acre (3 Ton per Acre on cloy soils)
I L) AlL STL MEMBERS CUAIE? W/ 21 NC RICH EPOxr THEN FIM SHE? w/ BLACK POLYESTER COMPACTED SUBGRapE IrrP>, USE TYPICAL CONCRETE EPD%Y TNEN FINISNED w/ DLAeK PaLYESTER PownER OonnNG. ? 'GREEN RECYCLED PLASTIC ~ FaL ROPE Fertilizer - 1,000 lbs./acre - 10-10-10 wl n • Fp7 REPAIR Qf $Ili ? 'GREY' RECYCLED PLASTIC NDffL z FENCE fgauRES, usE
`1`'rrr~ ~ " 95% STD, PRpCTOR FOOTING DETAIL FOR ' POWDER COATING. 2.) DuMar PRU?UCT OR EQUIVALENT. i ~j' 6 s-- THESE PASTS 2a• ,a) NRsTwASNEOSioNE Superphosphate - 5001bs./acre - 20% ® 'REDWOOD' RECYCLE? PLASTIC -USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA y°• ~ FOq ANCHOR WHEN SILT MUlafl - 2 Tans/Acre - small grain Straw
I IIrP) 2J DuMar PRDDUCT OR EQUIVALENT. ..a ' 3a' 24" DuMar vrE FuRnlsnwcs SERIES p 40-32PL D-32PL ? DiNER DOES NOi EMCEED I/a ACRE AND NEVER IN n •.p ~ GRADE FENCE IS PROICCTING AaEAS DF coNCENmA¢D now calm eaSN. AnChar - Asphalt EmUI$lan ~ 300 gal. OCre
STEEL. RUUND PIPE, ANCHOR POSTS - 4 X 2 X ll GA. ~0 LX~PA STRUNG. TUBING. ALSO PROVIDE ONE PGST ?uMor: slrE roemswmcs PRDDUCT p 88 SERIES PL CAROLINA RECREATIONAL PRUDUCTS, INC. i, INC. b 6' WN. COVER AVER SHIFT •
t' TO ANCHOR GATE ARM WHEN GATE P.0 BUx 2924z 78,5 l~D„ 5.563 D, GREENSBORp, Nf, 27429 IS OPEN CAROLINA RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC. L336) 288-9083 I-800-542-3887 P.0- BOx 29242 REw90N5 " 887 DATE DESCRIPTION oaecr~EO arEnaxEER • ~
i t2' m GREENSBORO, NC 27429 12° O [phone] 1-B00-542-3887 1°/B6 ~,E A°DIlIOtR 5,5.5. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I 10/68 DELPLN.WEW NOTE $.VIfW MHD
METAL GATE: BACK ELEVATION ICJ No>E AoanoN WA I VI W 1) Obtain Grading Permit, aJ96 REWSE FENCE FABRC GMA
FA LNG TOW STR ETlP RKING LOTffRAIL HEAD C ARDS E A ( ) STD. No. Instal! all erosion control measures os shown. _ 3) Obtain Certificate of Compliance through on-site
STANDARD BENCH TRASH REC A L STANDARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE a.o1 inspeatian by TaWn Erasion Cantral Engineer. 4) Proceed with grading. I
i 5~ Clean sedlmenf basins when half full. ~
6) Seed and mulch denuded area within 30 days alter finished grades ore established ~
ANCHOR POST 7,_c. 7j Maintain soil erosion control measures until
GATE permonenf ground cover is established.
ANCHOR FOST- 3' SQ. x I/4' W. STEEL TUBE PoRTIGN ro BE REMOV~O 8) Request final approval by Town Erosion Control 'I PORTION TO BE REMOVED ANO REPLACED Engineer. I A 1-1/2" DEEP CUT WITHIN THREE (3J WORKING DAYS
0 TRAIL DULLARD ' 1/a X I t/a' THUMB SCR in FLARE PAVED It/16• (3 PLACES ) sHAU aE MADE 9) Remove soil erosion control measures and stabilize PERPENDICULAR To these areas.
ADDITIONAL BULLARDS- SURFACE 12 GA. STL - BACK OF CURB AND 1-1/2" DEEP SCORE I THEN PARALLEL WITH
AS SHOWN I GUTTER LINE
CJ _ 45• STL DOME ? U COVER W/
HINGED ODOR TRAIL SURFACE -
1 ADDITIONAL BOLLARDS O.H544 t-I 2" DEEP SCORE / SEEDING SCHEDULE
TO STREET / ° i ~I TRAIL HEAD/ 2.13604,
PARKING GATE POST 4'-'" 1.53790 LUT - 6'-0' _ SHOULDERS, SIDE DITCHES, SLOPES (max. 3: 1)
DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE
3'-T I a.. Au 15 -Nov 1 Tall Fescue 300 Ibs/acre :o. • ~ Nog 1 -Mar 1 Tall Fescue & Abruzzi Rye 300 Ibs/acre
I PLAN VIEW 2~-6" r I e 0 oc - 3 0 bs 1 ~i6 Mor 1 Apr 15 Toll Fescue /
NTS eurTER uNE 45' a BREAK Apr 15 -June 30 Hulled Common Bermudagross 25 Ibs/acre July 15 -Aug 15 Toll Fescue and 35 Ibs/acre STEP ONE STEP TWO Browntop Millet
NDTES' CONCRETE SLAB NorE: or Sorghum-Sudan Hybrids - I
U AI_L METAL SHALL BE GALVANIZED, THEN PRIMED AND PAINTED WITH TWO COATS EE BENJAMIN MOORE HUNTER GREEN METAL ENAMEL. CURB AND CUTTER SECTION SHALL SLOPES (3: 1 to 2: 1)
ALL JOINTS SHAi_L BE WELDED SOLID. ASPHALT TRAIL DuMor: srtE FIRNISHInas SERIES % 47-30 47-30 BE REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRIVEWAY WIDTH APPROVED BY THE TOWN. Mar 1 - JUne 1 Se/iCea LeSpedeZa ~5Carlfied) 50 Ibs/acre
I 3? CONTRACTUR SHALL PRpVIDE SHUP DRAWING TO TOWN OF ANCHOR LATCH ASSEMBLY pN ARM CAROLINA RECREATIDNAL PRUDUCTS, INC. I AND ANCHOR POSTS. NOTE P.a. Box ~92a 74 INC REVISIONS IF PERPENDICULAR CUT IS WITHIN 12' FROM A JOINT, THEN and DATE DESCRIPTION THE PARALLEL CUT SHALL BE MADE TO THAT JOINT. Mar 1 - Apr 15 ADD T011 FESCUe 120 lbS/acre
a; 3' DIAMETER REFLECTORS W[TH GALVANIZED METAL BACKS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE GREENSBORO, C 2 29 STREET/TRAILHEAD SIDE OF THE GATE, pN ALL PASTS AND IN CENTER OF GATE ARM. 4' CONCRETE SLAB 3000 PSI, FINE BROOM FINISH, (336> 2B8-9De3 I-eoD-sae-3887 I (TYPJ PERPENDICULAR TO DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. 887 and Mar 1 -June 30 ADD Weeping Lovegrass 10 Ibs/acre
I r - _ or STD. No. Mar 1 -June 30 ADD Hulled Common Bermudagross 25 Ibs/acre ~
I STANDARD METHOD OF REMOVING EXISTING CURB
METAL GATE & TRAIL BOLLARDS CONCRETE SLAB FOR TRAIL BENCH DOME COVER N 3.12 June 1 -Sep 1 Toll Fescue and 120 ibs/acre FDR A DRIVEWAY APRON INSTALLATIO erawntap Millet 35 Ibs/acre
I SIGN iACE RAISED 2° BORDER STEEL DOMETOP WELDEDTO 4'-0' CLEAR (TYP.) or Sorghum-Sudan Hybrids 30 Ibs/acre 9awAlN U• Sro A °+reoa6 °"M'"6,~P ~~,~I Sep 1 -Mar 1 Sericea Lespedezo 70 Ibs/acre
bf i T h REVEA'" RAISED BACKGRUUNC, TOP OF BOLLARD 5' CLEAR WHEN CENTER 1" BEVEL (d 45° (TYP.) nD>£ rD coxTRacrat: I coniRACraR. LO B - 6 0~ I P"- I
AN G ROU1 E D LETTERS - - l 6' LONG 4" DIA. STEEL PIPE POST ISREMOVABLE -cREEnwar iRA~L cues c ~ ~ ~ 6x8 POST TYP. WITH 8' DIMENSION -au DoncRErE swan eE BOLLARD -GNEENWgY iRAll CURB CUTS 70 BE 8' w Vn01N. JPOJ,Oa,~l ~s~~~')- v.ll L Unh Ulled-Un Scarf fled) 5~N5,° and Tafl escue 120 Ibs/acre -ALL concRETE sHAU eE JDDD Ps.l. BACx of SIDFwALK DROP r^ ~ Nav 1 -Mar 1 ADD Abruzzi Rye 25 Ibs/acre
L ~ 9NG FORWARD I 'I 7 ~ ` ~ - 5' O' 7 -ELEV. -s' uwus ELEV..) -ELEV. -O" MINUS ELEV. "A- EQUALS I INCH. 3• ' ~ SECTION B-8 Consult Erosion Control Engineer or Soil Conservation Service for additional I
LOCKING EYE, WELDED TO pRlvEwar er DtrIERS 51DEwaLK EYE 80LT ON BACK & PIPE BOLLARD FRONT OF BOLLARD - S[GN FACE _ _ ,DPa information concerning other alternatives for vegetation of denuded areas. ° uY^^~^ , ~ ~ aRB The obove.vegetafion rates ore those which do well under focal conditions; j
? lia' HIGI+ COLESBRANCH 6X8 POST (WITH (MIN. 3-V2' WIDTH) LOCKING EYE, WELDED TO ~M~ h r In rote combinotionsare ossible. of e seed q p
'LzT OREENWAY 6' DIMENSION GROUND INSERT v CONC. TRAIL FACING TO SIDE)-~ 6"x6"POST, S.Y.P. ~ APRON w/5' MIN. AIL 7,~',yO /6' MIN. ASPHALT TRAIL °F~S vARA6LE1oRx6t GGTI[R Temporary - Reseed aCCOrding f0 OptlmUm SeaSan f0I deSlred permonenf
1Y4. H,SH rowNOFCUIr PRESSURE TREATED THICKNESS ~'-lC' TEX' - S' S"DIA GROUND INSERT, FOR GROUND CONTACT. 5.5' $ * tDEnCEfD17:1(133Q SECTION A-A i vegqetation, Do not allow temporary cover to grow over 12 Inches in height s' ,z° be7ore mowing, otherwise fescue may be shaded out. 5.5' B A Nom . IgILTgN n 9NE a eoTN
+ FINISHED GRADE 3FT.LENGTH B i I I ~ g~ \ / EI°ANWCN JOxi ME RENRN EahxD DUTBDF ,T6 V SIDEWALK
- TRAIL PAVING FINISHED GRADE +a.Ex ,D.6x ISOMETRIC VIEW
' COMPACTED - I -I 1/2" E%PANSION--~ RISE e"v......... vvev.v. 4Z" RADIUS o f 250G PSi CUdC, T- INT _ JO al "••~•S` EWAFbIb1 Janr
F OL71 !l YP) ~ SUBGRADE BENEATH - _ vvvv'o°::.ae'. K o voo,9wvo evo":"oao'v _ CONCRETE FOOTINGS, (TYP.) _ _ DRIVEWAY A _ - _ - - APRON S' W A WwA1.9• A B lFy~. 5~ ZOt AE INAT A 'I~ - AND NOTE I
N57 WASHED - - pp I _II N - COMPACTED I I I I BACKFILL I/2 TED I 2• C~ANSION ,qmr / 6 O.D' S.6' 7.3' 6.5'•' i
I Sll]NE (TYP.) I II~"II = ExPAN f- 1'-5 - ~ N - EXPANSION JOINTS JOINT 4 EXISTING CURD AND GVTTER E%I$TING - EXPANSION s zD 7e ze s.D JOINT 5 2.5 8.3 SI l6 SDEw0.rc 5 30 6.8 6.3 4./
-r - _ I FRONT ELEVATION 1 ~ SIDE SECTION II LI I T PAVEMENT c CONCRETE SIDEWALK w/ s' a.D' 9.6' B6 1B' 6" MINIMUM THICKNESS 5 a. T 7 1 xor LESS MAN I~~Sf
- I I D 1= ~ TYPICAL - - - - nog: N.' TYPICAL SECTION s s.a ID.B B.D J.I r FULL Nxai N.T.S. 6-K-(Af9.) anee[TWCEM u,E,;A.
COMPACTED SUBGRADE PLAN VIEW r~l~ N ~ S CONCRETE FOOTING • ~ T cuRB sMau aE uRERED ro L FINISH EWSH Wllw SIDEWALK. B =DISTANCE FRpA FRONT EDGE OF yDEWaLN rWls PDRnm DF RAMP RAMPS IEAED TO i0 BACK POMT OF 11:1 (&JJ%J ROPE. L~sWA'~uc w4itt F wa K. IRED oR Au , SIDE L • A WA RE tmTE a 8 LN dF SIDE Il( DROP W (SEF )
T 3000 PSI 30 DAYS (TYP.) N..5. REMOVABLE 80LLARD: C~ U SIGN SHALL BE IDCNTICAL ON BOTH SIDES. z. BEaNNNC Raoms swat nor ENatoaOw aN SIDEWALK ROPES. sEE Ixgi A !HAIL NOT ENCROACH ON " BACK OF $IDEwgIK DROP REWIRED f01t SIDEwA1K AND NpTE I IE$ BASED ON A PROJECTION ROPES 0.01.
ALIGN POST 8 SLEEVE SO EYES ARE aOdacENi PROPERnes easEO a4 a PRO.~cnoN ~i MA1EKiALS CEDAR OR REDWOOD. LOCATEDA78ACKANDFRONTOFPOST, REMOVABLE BOLLARD: FD(ED80LLARD TYP.: oEn+EPROPERrruNEFRaurwERIGwTOrwa INE iRpA THE RIGHT OF WAY PLAN VIEW ,
NOT STICKING OUT INTO TRAVEL WAY. TYPICAL WHERE SHOWN NOTE: BOLLARD SH LL BE INSTALLED ON ro >NE cuRa uwE 3) COLORS ]7CRAN "ARTIST'S CANVAS' FOR SIGN FACE BACKGROUND & DURUN 'HOLIDAY GREEN' FOR ALL OTHER BOTH SIDES OF GATE TO CLOSEST TREE, 3. 9DEwaLK sECnoN swan nor eE REOUIREO aLc REN$ION$ STREETS WHICH aRE NOi PLANNED FOR SIOEWAL 91AL1 NOi BE REWIRED ALONG NOi PLANNED FOR SIDEWALK. REVISIONS
EXPOSED SURFACES, INCLUDING LETTERS, BORDER OF S[GN FACE (OUTSIDE OF REVEAL), AND POSTS, SEE NOTES RE. SERVICE GATE FOR REMOVABLE80LLARDASPROVIDEDBY CREEK OR OTHER OBSTRUCTION. DATE DE$CRIPnON 4, rHEraw+ISNOrRESCOnsISLEFOR~+ICLESn GATE DESCRIPTION ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH NC STATE BUILDING AND HANDICAPPED ACCES$IBIUTY CODE VOL. 1C. IESPONSIBLE FOR VEHICLES THAI S/ID/01 WIDER RAMP 'MD1H
4> A~~LY pNE CUA I pF PRIMER AND TWp FINISH COATS. BOLLARD FABRICATION AND FINISHES. CALPIPE MANUFACTURING, LOS ANGELES, Iz/es ExP. .mr. aootD oou DRac p1E ro cRaoE oP oRlKwar. THE DRwEW ( BOLLARD COLOR: SAFETY YELLOW CA (1-800.225.7473) OR APPROVED EQUAL. +vee xoTE aoolTwN RwD PRwatELr MalNraiNEO. I +D/ee noTE aoanOn cVa E OF DRIVEWAY, iNE DRIVEWAY IS TED. SHEET 1 OF 1
I n STD. No.
LE BOLLARD N REMOVAB WAY Slu SMALL GARY GREEN L R NWAY TRAIL APRON G EE D STANDARD WHEELCHAIR RAMP RON 3.1~ R
STRIPES ARE PAINTED WHITE UN 2a I THE WALKING SURFACE SHALL BE AIP RESISTANT.
I EXISTING PAVEMENT ---2d SIDE SLOPES. CUT AND FILL SLOPES ANA~W tff1ECTABLF WARNING DOMES SMALL COVER iNE FULL Nip TN AND DEPTH OF THE RAMP BOOR ~R11" INE DEIFCiABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONSIST Of RA15C0 TRUNCATED DOMES WITH A DIAMETER
SHALL TIE INTO EXISTING SLOPES TO 2° BITUMINOUS CUNCRETE I-2 SURFACE CREATE AN EVEN TRANSITION. COURSE 117~p ~~~A xawn wrWA OF NOMINAL O9', A HEIGHT OF D.1' AND CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING OF NOAHNAL 1.35'. THE RAMP MAY BE YELLOW IN CaOR OR ANY COLOR WTN a 70% CONiRASi RADO.
-mN LnW 2 CROSSWALK YAOHIS ANO CONFIWRABON VARY. MUST CONFORM 10 1RPiFIC DESIGN $TArv0AR05. '~-4 wort 3 NOR1H CAROLINA GENERN STATUTE IJ6-u.1a REWIRES THgi ALL STREET CURBS BANG CONSTRUCIEO DR
RAT A MOUNT SIGN TO POST TO NCDOT - 6' AGGE G E B SE SIGN , AECONSWUCTED FOR MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES, TRAFFIC OPEPARWA REPNRS, CORRECDON$ OF UTILITIES D ~ OR ALTERED FCR ANY REASON AFTER $CPTEMBEP 1, 1973 SHAG PROYx1E MNEELCNMR RAMPS FOR ME ~
COURSE SPECS. ALL HARDWARE TD BE STOP I GALVANIZED AND FIlEO TO PREVENT OI u ~ A PHYSICALLY NANpLAPPEO Ai ALL MTERSECTIONS wHE0.E BOiN WAB AND GUTTER An0 9DEwalKS AaE 1 ~A ~,w FRONDED AND Ai OTHER PgN1S U PEOESTAIAN FLOW. IN ADDIROn SECPON 216 OF h1E ID7J FEDERAL up InGNWAY SAFETY ACT REWIRES PROmSON OF CURB RANP$ ON ANY WAB CON5IRUCTIpv AFTER JULY t, 1976 WXEIHER A SIDEWALK IS PROPOSED INIRAiLY OR I
THEFT/ REMOVAL. IS PLANNED FON a fUNRE DATE. YAUWt DIE AMERICANS WITH OISABILIRES AC7 (ADAJ aF 1990 EniENO$ TO MO`nWN.$ WIM pSaBNRES.
- - - I SHOULDER - 8 0 SHOULDER ra,n COMPREHENSIVE pWl RGN7$ PROIECRWS SIMILAR TO THOSE FRONDED TO PERSONS On 1HE BASS CF °I'•~'WW~^ RACG SE1C NADONAL ORIpR AND RELN,TON UNDER 1HE pNl RIp7TS ACi 6 1961. THESE CURB RAMPS 5 -O„ HAVE BEEN DESCNED r0 COMPLY WITH RILE III OF R+E aD0. BECOMING EFFECNVE DN JANUARY 26, 1992 4a Anc • to n
I 10'-~" 4'x 4' POST 5' ~ ~ ASPHALT TRAIL/ GREENWAY 4 wHEEICHAR RAMPS SMALL BE PRONGED AT LWANONS AS SxOwN ON THE PLAnS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENONEEfl, WHEELCHAIR RAMPS SHALL ~ LOCATED AS INDICATED IN THESE DETAILS; HOWEVER, ME I
2% MAX CROSS SLOPE SIDE VIEW DFTAII SHDWW.G TYPICAL LOCATION OF WHEELCHAIR LOCARW MAY BC ADJUSTED AS OIRECRD BY THE CNGINEER WHERE EMISRNG UGHI POLES, FlRE HTDRAxiS, I RAMPS PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND STOP LINES SHau eiEP Aao BEr~ENPixi aiuvs AT Au Loanaus, Nor LESS rxaN 2 F[er or rvu N[ICnr Lune
3'-0° 2" 2" 5 NO SLOPE ON THE WHEELCHAIR RAMP SHALL EKCEEO I'/I' (11~i) IN REU110NSHIP TO CRAOE OF THE STREET.
ii - I' 6 IN ND C45E SMALL THE W107M OF THE WHEELCHAIR RAMP fiE LF55 THAN 4O' (3'-4') HOWEVER, WDM MAY E%CEED b'
"-11 ~ I D- T I T N- I I I I- I I _ - I I I I I- _ _ _ ~ - I'- - - 1'- ~ 7 USE CLa55 "B- CONGiETE W1M a SIDEWALK FlmSH IN ORDER i0 WTMN A POUGN NON-5X10 TYPE SURFACE. aaTWw (SEE SHEET I FOA SURFACE DESIGN)
' GEOTEXTILE FABRIC i i [AmW¢ ^vaM^.MOIa 8 A I/1' EMPANSION JOINT vALI BE AEWIPED NNERE THE CONCRETE VMEELCHAIR RAMP JpNS ME CURB. I
1' CGMPACTED SUBGRADE i i / / F, I ABC .XTEN ION 9 OR INSIDE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK LINES SNAIL BE SEi NO aOSER m iNE INIERSEC110N THAN w0UL0 BE ESIABLISHEO BY BISECDNC 7HE INTERSECTION RaOn. (SEE NOTE IA)
CLEAN BACKFILL ~~-0" - - 'f- 'f 2'-0' 2500 PSI CONC ~ ~ _ O n YwWU q(F~ qrW( 10 THE CURB CUT ANO iNE PEOESTMAN CROSSWALK LINES SHAH BE COOROINPIFD SO TNAi THE BEGINNING a ( THE WNEEICHAIR RAMP KILL FALL MIHIN 1NF PEDE9IRINN CROSSWALK LINES. j
(SEED OR MULCH PER SPEC) ~ VARIES FOOTING, (TYP.) r Rr ue - 4a art A ~ - mr ur n ME wNIMUM WtDiN OF THE PEDESTMan CROSSwaIK SHALL BE 6 FEET. a CROSSWALK WOTH OF 1U FEET a Ivnw 4MIWU4 ~ OR GREATER IS OE9RaBLE.
NOTES k57 WASHED CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPERLY RE-ALIGN STOP BARS AND OTHER PAVEMENT MARKERS AS STONE, (TYP.) 12 51OP LINES, NORMALLY PEPPENDIDJLAR IO illE LINE LINES, SHALL BE UAO 'WHERE li IS IMPpi1ANi i0 DETAIL SHOWING TYPICAL LOCATION OF WHEELCHAIR RAMPS woICATF THE Pour BEHIND WHICH vEHlaes ARE REOwLEO To srOP IN LoMPUaNa IWTH A TRafnc
- N A Y T N TA WA K P R NCDOT REPRESENTATIVES ECESS R O 1 S LL CROSS L E PEDESTRIAN GROSSWALK$ AND STOP LINE FOR TEE INTERSECTIONS SIGNAL, sraa vcN w OTHFA LEGAL REWIR[MENT. AN uNUwAL ApPROAa SKEW MAr REWIRE THE TR.aaMExr I Cf THE STOP LINE TO BE PARALLEL TO iNE INIERSECIING ROADWAY,
" NO1E5 COMPACTED 4' ~ 1 CR[]SS SLEPE DIRECTION VARIES. SEE LAYOUT FLANS FCR D[RECTIpN OF SLOPE, CROSSWALK STRIPES SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT STANDARDS, SUBGRADE I -0 f ,D 4 REVISIONS IJ PARKING SHAH BE ELIMINATED A MINIMUM Of 10 FEET BACK OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK, DATE DESCRIPTION ~ PROPOSED WHEELCHAIR RAMP
C~NTRACT~R 1S RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ALL SLOPES DISTURBED BY 1-1 - GEN. flEV. i0 WMPLY W ADA IA ALL PAKMENI MARKINGS SHAH BE IN ACCOWANCE WITH 111E IA1E51 EpRW OF 1HE MANUAL OT UNIFORM D DJ / PROPOSED OR FUTURE SIOEwAI TRAFFIC cWma DEYiCES (MUTCO) PUBLISMEO BY 1HE fEDEAAL HIGHWAY AgAINISIRAROn AND inE NatiH CARWNA SUPPLEMENT TO INE MUTCD.
C~NSTRUCIiON CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY LONG L[FE MARKING MATERIALS ONLY. it - - - SHEET 2 Of 1 i STD. No.
" WALK 8 0 ASPHALT TRAIL CROSS TRAIL SIGN. STQP °°°OOOOOOOODOOOpv IP STANDARD WHEELCHAIR RAMP
I - 3.16 °e°° •~N ~ARQ °00° I ®0 ~ p0evo°°e° 0° 03-SP-075 e° o ti
° O e °o APPROVED °
r o E o TOWN OF GARY a e ~
e o: ° °~p o° Approved by Date " ~
°°•:~G I NF.. I Plannln -Date °°p F °°•°..°•°°°F~~'°°° g °°00 $ C A~ a°°e I
Engineering Oote ?p° f
°D De Deooe
I iy v~
i i
N0. g Designer Scale Revision Date
I PER TOC 1ST REVIEW 06/02/03 PMO W&R AS NOTED
PFR TOE 2ND REVIEW _ 07/03/03 PMO Drawn By Date F- WlTwgrRS R"EN-E--L--7 F, Sheet No.
T'X, F~NAE APPROVAL 08/11/03 PMO PMO 04/09/03 GLENKIRK GREENWAY DETAI LS ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
4 r F WE REVIEW 01 /12/04 PMO Checked By Job No. 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 2711 tel. [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersraveneLcom
JAB 203112

vYv, ,-s,. - ~ Alm+~iF' , . +t ~ . - - _ .i"3$r4.t f~9.:Lkksa'-~vh~+.'.eWY~wS4`e`;~'t:,FL~°.: ~~Y.+9T,~S~.' fv;w .u..: . ' P'3`aR,^")
~ ~ ' ~ ~ i
~ ; CiJ q , i , 1 , ~ ~ 1 I II 1
~1 ~ ~ \ ; ~ i it `i ' /r~ i ~ ~
1, i r`' ai ~ ~
a / i
s ~ ~ ~ lV , , ; ~ 1 ~ _ ~ . i t;
- i ~ \ ~ ~ i --r ~ X a ~ w~ ~7, J ~ 1 1 I
- - , ~ ~
1 ~
- ~ - / J - / r 1, ~ - ~ ~ _ - ~
- ~ ~ - . _ o 1 _ i
,-r. ~ ~ ~ ~'t~ i i ~ ~
J _ _ ~ - r~- - i i i ~ I ! i ~ _ - / ~ ~
, ~ _ _ ~ aF. - - -
_ ^ ,v
r - / i j ~ / i ~ ~ ~ -
~ \ ~ 5 ! \ j ~ ~ ~ - ~ A . , ~ - ~ .
_ - - - - , • . ~ ZONE 2 ~ _ . , ~ ~ - - - ~ l
- ~ . ~ ~ _ _ • ZONE _ ~ ~ ~ ~ T • SILT FENCE (TYP,) ~A` D` ~ ~ i
~f~ ~ FES ~ ~
- _ - _ , ~ , ~ _ ~ - FES 41 ` _ _ - - ~ _
~ ~ / JB 31 =351.41 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~j-- / ~ ~t- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ioo ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~PA 51 - - .$~,r ~ , A
~ ~ , _ / ~ ~ I ~ ~~0~ ~oo ~
~ ~ _ A - - SILT FENC (TYP, ~ ~ ~ ~ FES i E ~ R TAINING WALL i~~~ ~ ~ • - i ~ \
% c~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ W 356. /4; ~I - / \ ~ \
~ _ ~ ~ . o ~ _ - 1 ~ . . 'r' ~ N~ E
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i' ' ~ -
%F.ES 10 i 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - 1` 1
~ ~ - - ~ r~ ~ / - • ~ ~ / tl~ }
i~
• . ~ --L,,~ ~ i; i -370 ~3 Q i~;~ri I ~ .i I i / 1~ ~I ~ .
I~ / \ -
I I ~ I i ~ ~ i \ / I
/ ~ ~ - - ~ ) ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~

s _ _ i goo ~ _ ~ / - ~ , ~ ~ A CROSSWALK (DETAIL N) i
a o ~ , ~ ~ F IX? ~ SAP ARMDR~'-, ~ ~ I r ; I I ; ~ ~
o~,,, , GREENWA Y SIGN DETAIL L B ( )
j W~ ~f ABR ~~I~IJDEf~LINER i , / ~ ;1 ~ 1 ~ J j eoaaoeo°oooaeao j
~ ~ ~ .k" i 11 t 1 / / ~ ! ~ 1 o°~°°~N ~qR oaaoo ~ C METAL GATE (DETAIL C) R , ao i
~ ~ ~ ~ - 1---385---- ~ ~ ~ s. . 03-SP-075 ss •°ti
~ r. ~ 1 1 ~ APPROVED ~ 9 ~ D CURB CUTS (DETAIL M) ~ ° °
` ~ ~ / , ~ ~ 1 X1„1 1 1 Q \ 1 1. ! ~ ~ ~ ° TOWN OF CARY ~ ° i ° °
1 ° ° ° ° ° . %v, o 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - X90. - - . -A E STOP SIGN (DETAIL K) Approved by_ Date •,F ~,~;°°~o; I PIE°,°
1 ~ ~ ~ Planning. _ Date - •,aeFS ••o°.••~F~°°°°
~ ~ % En Ineerln Date °oao E, CP eo° TRASH RECEPTACLE DETAIL J 9 g °aaeea a o°° F ( )
~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ • < ~ ~ fqv
j = i\ 1 ~ ' i / ~ 50 0 50 100 (i PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN
A ~ ~ , r I PER NCDOT MUTCD STANDARDS
- ~ / ~ A ~ I ~ ~ ,,r r . n ~c i ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ) - SCALE, 1 - 50
P I STA = 11+ 0 , - - _ i
l _ _ - - - ---1---- - - ---r--_ . - _ PVI ELEV = 38 ,33 _ ---F-- I
o ~ ' A. D. _ - 2.0 i - - - -
- _ I L L = HIG POI T ELE = 3 4,12 - -r- - - - - _ _ - - rt
_ ~ t ~ I K = 0.00 1 1 _ _ - _ - -i- - ----I-_.___ 390 o~ L - ~-2+ HI6 POIN STA 13+34,25 ~ ; ~ - -rt - t-
_ + Vl S A = 1 +40,~ 1 380
_ ~ = PVI E EV. _ 374,8 ~ - I -
. I mm I , _A.D 3:00 I ~ - - - - - - -~--r- _
r '
•Q ____r I ~ I I I i 375
385 _ _ • 3
- ~ ~ o o I ~
~ - ~ 0 1
. - , _ , T - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - 370
M > M -i '
W ~ ~ _ _ i
-(J i ' m N J ~ t - --a-- _
- - e--- - _ VI ST = 21+87,7 i _ -r---- - - - _ _ ~
~ I I W i ~ ' I ~ VI EL V = 51.30 - - - ~ aD. _ - ,o0 365
I ~ r ~ • ~ _ 375 ,Q W - - _ - .
- _ i- _ _ - - - I --a_~ - ~ - - _ 1 _ _ I . -
i ~ 5.00- VC__ I i ~ - - - - - _ ~ ~ I I - - _ _ _ E _ _
_ - ---i-- - _ r--- --1. - _ : o I
' N - - - ~ _ - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - -p- - _ _ - ti ~ - _ r - ~ --i- - - - - - _ - - -
~ O i ~ i - ~ , 360 :
~ ~ p ~ N ~ \ ~1 i N ~ N ~ I - - - I - - - - _ - - - ---r - ~ - ~ ~ N O _ir, i i ~ _
t. --~1 - - - - _ - - ~ w + ~ 1 - i i ~ ~ - -
I -r- - 1 7~i I QQ W ~ O ~ O N cp 00 Oi a0 lil I - fi- - - - - ~ M , . . - - ..r- - _ _ - - _ ~ -a `o -f9- _ . i8- - ~ - ~ U ~ N ~ - ~ - -1-- - - - ~ -
I ,,,,i ~ U > _ lp ~ M OQ ~ M ~ V > - ~ m
365 - _ - L _ - - ~ - - _ ~ . CO W W r~ W w - - _ W _ - - _ _ _ - - 1 - - - PVI STA 25+ 6,013 5
~ ~ ~ ~ - - > I ( PVI, ELEV = 33 .30
- - I _ I - ~ U ~ , ~ ~ U _ u . ~ ) I _ _ ~ ~ W _ _ _ m > C6 ~ ~ ~ .0.=-4,5
- _ _ _ ---t- i---- ' ~ ~ - li ~ _ iy _ _ __.-I__-_.- K - 11,11
~ I - t
- - - - - - - - - - -1--- 360 ~ _ ; - --o,oo----- - - - - i o ~ _ _ - - - 350
i ~ - ~ ` ~ ~ M i i I
- _ - -_i r- ~ - + ~ - a ~ ~
- - - ~ Ir_-I ~ ~ i r~ I s
~ - ~ ~ i . ~
355 - - _ - -----i-~ - - - N ~ 345
w - ' ~ 'r'
- I - - > - _
- ~ _ _ - - - -t- - - - I------i- - - - - - - ~ ~ - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - -_5 w j w
r I fi I - I-- 340
350 Q Q - ii
_ I - I _
_ - $s i ~
. _ - - y _ °
_ - -I - - - - - - ~ - - _ - 33
345 -
, 1 , I - i - - I _ .---i - - - _ i -
f ~ f - _ - - - - -
I ~ I t - - -T t - - I
- - r -__--i------ - - - - - -
I I 1 ( , ~ - I I I I I I
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 .00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00
NO,~ Revision Date Designer Scale 1"_5' Vert, PER TOC 1ST REVIEW 06/02/03 PMO W&R 1 50'Horz. Sheet No.
PER TOC ND REVIEW 07/03/03 PMO Drawn BY Date WITHERS R"ENEL
3 j TCC FINAL APPROVAL 08/11/03 PMO GAS PMO 05 05/03 GLENKIRK GREENWAY G001 G001 PLAN & PROFILE
4 1N;Q REVIEW 01 /12/04 PMO Checked By Job No. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
203112 - - - - - I - - --L- I JEC 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersraveneI.com

.~'i5N~1. `r. ~•~'+'~t.4L,1k~JSl~" e!S:AE ~t•~Sr ut,. 'r„RS'RA"~..'.~r"T<Y ~.`1'19R~'~"x.~G4911.~°SIi~L'3,:E9"'.1C~'F~:L4 b4tT.:^.F".:a 5"A7~Y'.',p1^'934 4+'s,F~'~-tF"SFi _ .~5~y, ~~7iSk... ~p,:¢"P` 'i7k'A$M;t+t'~,~ +«a~r~nnr~~ ~r~°~ws~~~asc .cm un• r~asa7+r ~so-~~; s w_ ~ ~x~ts~vcfr-"+:x~ . ' u ~+ws;ans~a aa~e+r~,
L119&. ftitnR16? r• ~FAr~~~`7rt,~~~~'S `k7'.~~k,",.r;~ywyYN.`~S4Q+Y#W&~nrv~~:}"'9yIRC+FYI^9.u9'+7^iI
+ ~ ~ r L . NOTES C~ (t) ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN OF CARP
' .yam i , . ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ANO DETAILS REVISED APRIL 8, 2001.
(2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE TO AV010 DISTURBING ~
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL DURING THE GREENWAY CONSTRUCTION. ALL GREENWAY STREAM CROSSINGS AND DISTURBANCES SHALL BE
PROTECTED WITH 22" CLASS 1 RIP-RAP WITH FABRIC UNDERLINER. ~
- _ , (3) ALL MANHOLES & CLEANOUTS REQUIRING ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE
_ ~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE TOWN OF CARY STANDARDS.
1 _ - 1 \ _ '1 ~ _ - - (4) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
/ ~ \ / _ ~ - - - DURING THE LIFE OF THE PROJECL
I ~ , 1 I . 1 1 ~ (5) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DIVERSION DITCHES AS NECESSARY i0 - - - ~ ENSURE ALL SEDIMENT IS DIRECTED INTO EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
r 1 \ 1 ~ ~ \ ~
I ~ l ~ A I ' ~ r ~ END PROD CT ~ ~ ~ ~ , (6) CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR ~ ~ ~ TO CONSTRUCTION. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLANS I
I ~ t E ti ~ ~ IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION BUT CAN BE CONSIDERED ~ ~ ~ ONLY AS APPROXIMATE.
I~ I II' 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ % / ~ ' ~ I TIN MANN AT THE TOWN OF CARY
I 1 I 11 Ii / ~ (7) BENCHMARK IS RIM OF EX5 G OLE ~`C~~, ~ ~ ~ SEWER INTERCEPTOR. ELEV. IS 380.67 I
I ~I ICI 11 y~ ' ~ N AREA = 1.0 ACRES / ~ ~ ~ (8) DE UDED I
II I i~ 1 / ~ ~
I l l s ~ 'I 1 I ~ ~ (9) TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION FROM SURVEY BY KENNETH CLOSE, INC. AVEN L. ANO WITHERS & R E
I ~ I I ~ , ' • ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ (10) CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE GRADING OPERATION IS CONDUCTED W A
~ 1 1 1 I I ~ J I , ~ ~ MANNER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW ANY SEDIMENT INTO CREEKS.
I ~ I~ ~ 1 - - ~ ~ 1 11 ~ ~ ~ 11 STORM WATER DISCHARGES INTO COLES BRANCH. O
I I Q l i i 1 / 1 i ~ P F AIN AT D ON THIS PROJECT - 1 I N T ANY FEMA MAP ED LOOD PL LOC E \ (2) THERE S 0
I I 11 ~~1 ! ~ \ \ PER FIRM MAP 3718300294 E, DATED MARCH 3, 1992. \ \ \
I I 1~ 1 1 I !I 1 1 N F I 1 6, \ I I 7 1 l N ~ V (13) A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION. ~ / \
I ~ ~ PRESTON RESERVE LIMITED f I - / :RVE LIMI1'EO PARTNERSHIP ~ v (14) PERMANENT GROUND COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED EITHER IN 15 WORKING C \ \ pAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SNORTER, PER TOWN OF CARP
~ ~ '1 ~ PIN# 0754.14-44-6 / \ ` RE UIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. x754.14-44-6873 ~ \ Q
/ I ~ DB 8132 PG 206 / ~ \ \ PR T TI N FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR 15 TREE 0 EC 0 8132 PG 2068 ~ \ ~ ( ) / ~ \
I ~ p TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT. FENCING SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED \ \ ADJACENT TO AREAS WITHOUT WOODED VEGETATION. ALSO REFER TO
1 ' ~ ~ ~ \ \ PHASE I PLANS FOR GLENKIRK FOR FENCING LOCATION. ~ ~ \ \
j 1 1 / ~ / ~ 11 - ' ~ I ( I lUBMOU$E POOL 1 1 ~ \ ` (16 ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT ~ ~ ~ \ )GROUND COVER WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS,
I I SEE OEiAII ` ` - t 1 1 A WHICHEVER IS SHORTER. / \
I I 1` 11 - - ~ I 1 1 I / ~ ~ \ \ (17) GREENWAY SHALL BE CONTAINED IN ZO' EASEMENT CENTERED GN THE 8' TRAIL. \ \ OFFSITE EASEMENT ON PRESTON RESERVE SITE SHALL BE RECORDED PRIOR
I ~ 11 _ J / ~ \ \ \ TO CONSTRUCTION.
I l j I 1t i \ V ~ i PR SS TO ENSURE THAT ~ \ (18) GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL MONITOR GRADNG OCE I \ \ THE SUBGRADE CONFORMS TO THE TOWN OF CARP STANDARDS,
I II I I li i i 1 I II 1 1 / \ (19) CENTERLINE OF TRAIL TO BE STAKED 50 FEET ON CENTER- CONTRACTOR
I I 1 { I 1 1 i I 1 ' \ \ \ TO OBTAIN FINAL APPROVAL FROM PRCR PRIOR TO PAVING TRAIL. \ \ j
I I ~ ~ 1~ ~ 1 I I 1 , I I j i t t 1 \ \ (20) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TWO BENCHES WITH CONCRETE PADS PER "DETAIL I" V ~ ON SHEET 4. BENCHES TO BE LOCATED BY PRCR AFTER TRAIL IS wSTALLED.
I ' / / I i 11 1 M 1 II 1 ` I I . ' / \ \ \ (21) GREENWAY EASEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED AT WAKE COUNTY REGISTER
i ~ ~ 1 1 / I i / \ OF DEEDS.
l i 1 I I / I I~ 1 I , . \ I I... i / ~ ~ (22) ALL METAL GATES AND METAL BOLLARDS SHALL BE PRIMED, THEN PAINTED ~ ~ WITH iW0 COATS OF BENJAMIN MOORE HUNTER GREEN METAL ENAMEL.
I I; . , I ~ , 1 ~ / ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ v I ~ ~ \ ~
I , , ~ / ~ SITE DATA
I II , 1 Y ~ ~I I I 1 1 i ~ 1 / I ,
I ,1 / / I ~ ~ 1F OF GREEEN~NAY 1,835 LF ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ 1, ~ / / ~ ~ DENUDED AREA 1.00 ACRES I \ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~
3 I / ~ ~ / I
~ ~ /
e I ' I ~ I~ 1, ~ / / a I STORM DRAINAGE SUMMARY
I 'i l ` v ` .r /i t~ I I I - ~ / Aetual
I ~ ~ I I / I { / / Inlet No. Pipe Pipe Pipe Pipe Upper Lower From To 'Top Diameter Length Slope Discharge Material Invert Ele Invert Elev
i Q V ~ I ~ U ' ~ t / / ~ \ ~ I \ Elev D L S 010
~I 11 ~ _ a I ~ i I ~ / Pn1 Iftl l%) (cis)
4 I I 1 1` \ ` / 1 ~ / 1 I FE 1 FE 10 N A 48 60 3.00 55.0 CMP 367.00 365.20 I S1 S 1 ,
I (l 1 1 / ~ I 11 1 / 54
I ~ , 1 , / / ~ ` I I ~ 1 A ~ ~ ~ I + , , ~ / \ FES 21 FES 20 NIA 18 30 5,00 1.0 CMP 356.00 354.50 ~ I _ I
JB 31 FES 30 362.00 15 30 1.67 5.0 RCP 346.00 345.50
~I / FE841 FES 40 NIA 18 20 10.00 1,6 CMP 350.50 348.50
I % II ~ 11 / ~ r ~
i I 1 / ~ ~ ~ I ` l i I 1 ~ 1 t / 52 ~ PA 51 PA 50 NIA (42x29 20 1.00 19.0 CSP 338.40 338.20
~,I I NOTES; I • ALL CONSTRUCTION SMALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH CURRENT TOWN OF CARP i
/ i 11 / / 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ END PROJE ~ ; 55 I 1 - _ . I I I ~ 1 ~ / / 1 ~ , ~ 1 ~ , , - I ~ ~ STANDARD 9PECIFK:ATK)NS AND DETAILS.
~ + r _ I II ~ ~ 1 / A ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I - • FES DESIGNATES FLARED END SECTKIN, JB DESIGNATES JUNCTION BOX. • PA DESIGNATES CSP PIPE ARCH. PIPE ARCHES SHALL HAVE MRERED ENDS.
1 / ~ I 1 1 ~ . - • ALL PIPE IS ALUMINIZED CMP UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE,
~ 1 / \ \ i. - I / _ / v 51 ' , • SURVEYOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY INVERTS.
C ~ 1 1 / 1 . 1 I 0 \ LD f- / , ~ 1 C ~ 1 \ / 1 i ~ / I n / / 1 "
I ~ qT ~ A ) ~ v ~ 5s i' ~ ~ . \ /
T c / ~ ~ \ I i / ~ ~NF \ , ~ \ \ \ / 50 \ / ~ ~ OISSIPATOR DESIGN
v i, ~~l I \ / v v ~L 1 i , APRON OUTLET D. STREAM RIP RAP SIZE
~ ~ \ ~ / / 1 / \ \ \ ~ ~ \ ,.1 v \ / ~ 1 / V~ \ ~ / , PIPE DIA V10 LENGTH WIDTH WIDTH THICKNESS RIP RAP d50 ' OUTLET!! CLA33 (INCHES) (FTISEC)
1 A` 1 v / 1 v v v ~ 57 -1 \ , I / \ r ~ \ , \ ~ ~ (FEET) (FEET) (FEET) (INCHES) (INCHES)
v / v v. J v 1 13 6 BANK•BANK 22 FES 10 48 10.2 32 - FES 2D 18 2.4 6 4,5 10.5 9 A 3
I \ / ~ / / \ 1 ~ I ~ \ i I \ \ \ I ~ I ~ \ FES 30 15 1.1 7.5 4 1 . 2 ~
/ 1 31 ~ I ~ \ / ~ I I ~ 58 FES 40 18 6.3 9 4,5 13,5 22 8 6 ~I 58
' / 1 1 I I ~ I ~ ~ PA 50 (42x29) 5.1 15 6 15 22 B 6 ALL DISSIPATORS SHALL HAVE FABRIC UNDERLINERS.
~ / 1 1 I I i \ + / ~ I I i I
~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 _ I I , ' / 1 ~ ~ I , I : / , n.
/ ~ I ` ~ 48 ~ 0 1 S i 32 I I I I 1 II 59 -
,i ~ I ~ I 1 1 ~ I ~ ' ~ , c ~
~ I 47 V A / 1 ~ I ~ ~ iii in. ~ 1 + I \ 'i
' ' ~ ~ 1 ~ I P V`. A i ~ i 1 _ I I ~ ` 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~
' 1 ~ I I I i I ~ [ ~ , ~ 46 ~ ~ r~ i II
I I I I i 1 1 ~ I I i / Ji ~ ! 1 1 t 33 I ~ _ 6t)
' ~ ~ 1 ~ I I ~ ~ ~ 1 1 / - I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I I / \ ~
~ ; ~ I ~ ' i' \ 1 1 - I I I ~ ~ ~ 45 ~ ~ 45 ~ + _ \
1 ' 1~ 1 , +l
' ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~I ~ ~ " + / ~ 1.~ .11
- ~ 1 I - . ~ 61 ~ , ~
A 1 i I ~ I + ~ _ I ~ ~1 -
' 38 I + - ; ~ 65 I
1 I 1 ~ I - ~ ;1 64 ,,I
~ ~ _ I z ~~~i' i I ~ l i~ ~ , 1 , 1 ~
, ~ / 1 I ; 37 ~ I I I v _ i . - 62 i I i ~ ~ + ~ '1 '
~ ~ / 1 1 \ L~ 1 / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ / i 1 1~ 1~ I 43 ~ ~I 43 I ~ , , - ~ " - - +
~ 3 29 ~ ~ r 1 1 - - - ` '
i ~ - ~ 1 I ~ _J l ~ ' / 1 11, _ _._J i _
1 1 I i
- ~ i _ _ _ _ 1, 1 I , , / 4 I------~ _ - ~ ~ 1 I 1 , a r__- _ + y J I
i < ~ ~ IN~ i --7 ,fi~ , I I BEG p~ r ~ ~ 4z °i' i 42 1 I ~ I~ " ; I I r J'
~ i ~ zl 1 ~ ~ i' ~ I ~ 1 23 1 ~ ~ ; I ; ' / - 69 ~I
/ ~ 35 /I1 ~ / l i ~ , ~ i l ~ 68 I 1 +
i - 1 1 11 I i ~ 67 ',I'~ I I I 't ~ L 1 - 000000000000000 ~
i fir, 24 % I ~ 1 ~ ~I 1 ~ \ ~
26 20 1 1 1 j ~ ~ A v
_ 6 ~ 1 1,/, i - - APPROVED ; Q~'
LaadscaQe Arr6itecture~ > 25 _ ~ , , 40 ~ / ? / _ ~ I _ 1 ~ I o ° a e - o s ° o
Land. Planning ~ , i - - - ~ _ Eavunnmental Design ~ c _ _ _ - - - _ _ 1 1 1 - ~ ~ - TOWN OF CARY e ° ; _ ~ ~ o
_ ~ is 1 Too o Too Zoo Approved by _ Dote- °°y°°°,c~'yCl~ °o ~Oo, i
805 lone fhnklin Roed / ~ , 1 \ 1` l ~ ~ ~ / ~ 41 I ® Naleig6, NorlG farolina 2M06 i ~ 1 1 ~ ~ +'v ; ~ ~ Plannln Date ~ g s PaF
(818 851-715D lex (81A) 851-7517 ~ _ _ _ - 1 1 • I - , _ ~ Engineering Date E. C ' 1 - 100 0 00 SCALE. °P~ °9°
.~~NNI I~~M~ ~ ~\\IN.I~I~\ ~ 7lJ 58 5N A~rnue /1 _ _ i ~ . ~ . ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 Y RWVVlr11YY3 111V- Delray Beach, Florida ,13189 ~I +Yl~
- (561) 226-a59 lax. (561) m-7599
- - Revi-sion- Date By Designer scab rN- -
70C ISM REVIEW 06/02/03 PMO W&R 1"=100' Sheet No. I
TOC 2NREVIEW 07/03/03 PMO Drawn By Date WITHERS R"ENEL
PPVA08/11/03 PMO GAS PMO 05 05 03 GLENKIRK GREENWAY SITE PLAN ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
RF JF W - - 1 14 PMO Checked By lob No. 0/2/0 I 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel. [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
_ JEC 203112 PL - - --J--- wm~lll

_ ~ v ti
,,,.,x„ e, , ~ a ~ , , - - _ } ~ ~
~ I ~ •
NT6
p y P yq
GP v 9 AF `SQ ~d y9'~i ~
~ ~ F yi( ~ ~~s (RO
02 '
pLDE srrE
WEATHERSTONE WAY } I j
I I
I ~ I ~ I ~
OLDE j ~4 f~,
4fs WEATHERSTONE i 'r ~
r WAY ~
o ~ ~ T.....

Z . \1 , , 'ti.
Q I , 1~•'~,
I ~ ~ ~ i I
Z ~ i I .l J r,
I .~~L ~ ~ { _ j ~ / ~ ~
i ~ ; HIpH HpUSE ~ i~
RD. j, ~ i11 t,.
I ~ ~ ~ I a / ~ tl ~ ~
I ~ I ~ i ' j ~ ~
II S ~
~ , ~ ' j~ . ~ SHT1 SITE PLAN
; ti~ v
o C; / 1 / HT 2 R IL LA & P 01 0
r
t i ~ r, ~ HT 3 S PR FIL
PLAN & 002 ~ .
® ~ ti ~ , DETAI L HT 4
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION EXISTING ~ ,
~ ~ ~
~ ~ n ~ t i ~
2 CONTOUR INTERVAL I ~ 4~ ! ' 6 ~
' I ~ ,~v ~ ® p , p
10 CONTOUR INTERVAL ~ i' ~r~ ~ 1
PROPERTY LINE ; j ~ i`
ti :w.. +~1' V ' i ~ ,
ROADWAY CENTERLINE ~ ~ ; o ,v. . ~i' 1 ~
RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS ~ , " o,, ~~~-l~_____:.--. ,
© o ® 1 ` 1 1 © 1
LINE - o ~ EASEMENT o , . 1 ~1 ~ ® ..y - 1 ~
CURB&GUTTER "o ® e _ _ -
© © , '~1 /
SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES - - -0- - - o ® ~ ® ® © ® 0 "1 r / 41, ~ l ~ \
o I - STORM SEWER FACILITIES = - ~ - = i ® , ~ l - 03-SP-075
WATERLINE o ~ © , : - ' o 0 0 - .i°`~ APPROVED
FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY ~ ~ 1,.:;,,;;%~ o _ - - . ~ , ; , ` TOWN OF CARY
o © - ~ ~ ; ; ~ i Approved by Date
FENCING STRUC U _ - , ~ Planning Date
r . _ ~ ~ , ~ E...==-=----.~ - - 1 , ~ WOODSLINE N/A ,I ~ ~ i j Engineering Date.
. ~ i ~i ~ i~
WATERWAYS NIA ~ i ~ ~ ' i i
' it SILT FENCING NIA " " " " " i
i
I,andsca a Architecture
P
Land Plannin g
Environmental Desi n 101-A UAIL FIELDS COURT
MORRISVILLE N.C.27560
~ 905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, Norfh Carolina z7sos ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I S U TEL [phone] ~ I SURVEYORS
(919J 851-715o fax. (919J 851-7547 FAX [phone]
~ 111 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] fax: 919 277 S.E 5 Avenue ~40 fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com
~ ' Delray Beach, Florida 33483 ATTN: JUSTIN PATSEY
(561J 276-0453 iax. [phone] 4
1 PER TOC 1ST REVIEW 06/02/03 JPMO
2 PER TOC 2ND REVIEW 07/03/03 3 TOC FINAL APPROVAL 08/11/03 4 DWQ REVIEW 01/12/04